Propaganda in the Media

When I was younger, I used to think that all the people that claimed that violence on t.v., movies, music, etc. made on impression on us, were ridiculous.

I ardently believed that people were conscious enough to come to their own decisions and thought patterns, and ridiculed those that speculated otherwise.

Perhaps that was me jumping on the bandwagon of mocking the alleged “conspiracy theorists”. Calling them crazy and uninformed.

Well, who's laughing now?

(Well, I suppose it’s no laughing matter, but at least I’ve finally come to the realization that I was wrong.)

Before I delve in, what do you think? Are you here on this page because you believe the same thing? Or are you here because you think it’s a ridiculous concept like I once did?

Disclaimer: This website promotes love, kindness and compassion. However, in order to strive towards that, we must also expose the negativity surrounding us on a day to day basis. This post delves into some dark material that we should be aware of in order to guide us towards a better future.

- Crystal

Expanding Awareness Relations

If you’ve read my previous posts: How do we Find the Truth? and When News Media Lies, you already know about the levels of deception and manipulation that these “sources” have propagated to the population. (With the help of the CIA, I might add.)

So is it that much of a stretch to contemplate on this idea?

If that’s not enough of a reason, I will be addressing other points that might provide a little more insight into this kind of “mind control” programming.

Welcome to the 2nd part of this series “Does Media Affect Our Thoughts” – “Propaganda in the Media”.

You can read the first part here:

Violence in Entertainment pt. 1 -

From everything such as t.v., movies, music, video games... watching violent movies, shows, playing violent video games, or listening to hate-filled music has inspired some horrible crimes.

I think a lot of us would like to say, “Pfft. Yeah right. I’m in control of my own thoughts, thank you very much.”

But are we just kidding ourselves? Do we just have too much pride and ego to admit that the media might play, at least in some small part, a role in how we think?

It’s a little frightening when we look at the people around us, and realize that most of us have absolutely no clue what’s going on. (And, I should add, a lot of these people are incredibly intelligent, book-smart, knowledgeable people.) They still rely on the news and refuse to believe that there’s anything untoward happening as far as agenda and propaganda go.

They ignore the signs that the news media has repeatedly lied, twisted, manipulated, suppressed, staged, and edited crucial information. In their mind, anything the news media was caught doing was simply a mistake, a “misunderstanding”, an “editing gaffe”.

Um... no.

They have been caught, repeatedly, pushing for specific agendas, deliberately splicing their videos to paint their subject in an unflattering light (or a flattering light – depending on who they want to endorse…) and completely fabricating/staging news stories to exploit the emotions and thoughts of the viewers.

I have already addressed some of these examples in When News Media Lies, but here are a few others that might leave a sour (but much needed) impression on your mind (it’s a bitter wake-up call, no pun intended):

False Flags

Most of us by now have probably heard about this “conspiracy theory” that’s not a conspiracy theory at all. The government/CIA/officials have admitted to partaking in these covert operations. It is no secret anymore, and those that still try to debunk it are either paid to do so, to sow even more confusion and misinformation in our midst, or are just as sadly misinformed and set in their beliefs as a lot of people still are. They will refuse to believe that such a thing is possible.

With the amount of whistleblowers and truth-outers that have tried to expose these operations, it has become increasingly more obvious how untrustworthy a lot of news media and government officials really are.

There will always be excuses, reasons, justifications for carrying out heinous acts of terrorism and framing a specific country or organization, but when is enough enough and when do we finally admit that those that are initiating the false flags “for the better good” are actually the malefactors?

Another interesting question: when did all of this deception start? How long has this misdirection and smoke-screening been going on for? What else has the general population fallen victim to as far as manipulation and exploitation?

This video was created in the 1986, talking about the US and CIA involvement in the Nicaraguan Revolution.

The below is a snippet from a very detailed account into this complex entanglement:

Then CIA Director William Casey was in charge of the propaganda system that was meant to influence the media, the congress and the American people in favor of Reagan’s policies:

The American people thus were spared the chapter’s troubling finding: that the Reagan administration had built a domestic covert propaganda apparatus managed by a CIA propaganda and disinformation specialist working out of the National Security Council.

“One of the CIA’s most senior covert action operators was sent to the NSC in 1983 by CIA Director [William] Casey where he participated in the creation of an inter-agency public diplomacy mechanism that included the use of seasoned intelligence specialists,” the chapter’s conclusion stated.

“This public/private network set out to accomplish what a covert CIA operation in a foreign country might attempt to sway the media, the Congress, and American public opinion in the direction of the Reagan administration’s policies”

According to Parry, the Reagan administration launched a “clandestine propaganda operation” that involved a system of inter-agency committees whose mission was to work with both private groups and individuals to raise funds, organize lobbying campaigns and to initiate a propaganda campaign to manipulate public opinion and U.S. government officials in their favor”

Another excerpt from this article:

This is what the CIA called it, Operation Red Christmas, and by that they meant bloody. They meant the red of fire and of the blood caused by gunfire, not the red of fireworks in celebration of Navidad. Red Christmas was the opening salvo of the US-organized and -financed Contra war to Oust the Sandinistas. Not many people knew about it at the time, and little of the reportage and history then or since identify Red Christmas as the beginning of the Contra war. I know only because I was there. It was reported at the time that the US government spent $2.5 billion a year on media for domestic consumption. Against all propaganda to the contrary, my own word was a whisper, the testimony of an eyewitness. From then on, I would try to magnify the whisper.

– Source and a very in depth look into this operation can be found here: globalresearch.ca

This is just one of many accused false flags that the government has had a hand in. Others (with a witting or unwitting media coverage) that have been speculated upon and some that have been proven true are the following:

1931 – Manchurian Incident: Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria.
1953 – CIA hired Iranians to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.
1955 – Turkish government carried out a bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.
1962 – The American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba.
1998 – An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.
2001 – 9/11 terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers. Speculations and accusations still abound, with researchers, engineers, and architects (among other specialists) debating the authenticity of the official news narrative.
2007 – Quebec police admitted that thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers.
2011 – Egyptian politicians admitted that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.
2020 – Covid-19 crisis. There are many speculations and theories about who or what is responsible for this “outbreak”. Nature? Man-made? Deliberate? Non-existant? If it’s man-made, then most likely only those at the “top” know for sure.
1932-Current – Antifa: allegedly created in 1932 during Nazi Germany, “Antifaschistische Aktion”, this faction is still alive and well; with some accusing this organization of being paid to sow choas and confusions during protests. Some even speculate that certain people are being paid to act as Antifa to smear the group’s actions.

The information in blue text can be found here: globalresearch.ca – Highly recommend checking out this site. Has a lot more information. But again, as with everything, please don’t just take one source’s account with anything. Investigating and researching several sources is the key to finding the truth.

Crisis Actors

No false flag operation could be complete without a few crisis actors to go with it. How else is the public going to know just how deeply affected we should be, and what agenda we should be pushing?

Gun control is a popular propaganda. As you can see in this video:

Transcript: “My name is Susan Orfanos, my son was Tel Orfanos. We lost him last night at the Borderline shooting. My son was in Las Vegas with a lot of his friends and he came home. He didn’t come home last night and I don’t want prayers, I don’t want thoughts, I want gun control and I hope to God nobody else sends me any more prayers! I want gun control. No. More. Guns! Thank you.” – Susan Orfanos

And in this one:

Transcript starting @ 3:40-4:00: “This is a club that nobody wants to be in. And, please, can we do something with the assault weapons? So that we could stop this club from getting any new members?” – Christine Lienonen

Now, I’m not sure if this was scripted by the news station for Christine Leinonen to read, or if she wrote it herself.

…And, if I’m to be honest, I’m also not too entirely sure on a couple of other names that were involved, notably that of a doctor Matthew Lube, Angel Colon – not intending to highlight their names… per se, just think it’s ironic.

Perhaps the news media just couldn’t help themselves to choose these certain people to run a story about. Kind of makes you wonder why. I also think it’s highly suspicious that there are SO many videos that were removed from youtube due to this shooting. …I should correct myself. They deleted a lot of videos that would shed a different light than the story being pushed. Too many suspicious activities, in fact, that to cover it all would require a whole new article in and of itself.

Some websites that have covered this topic more in depth can be found here and here. I apologize in advance if some of the videos on these sites are unavailable. (Youtube “policies”, and all.)

Lots of profanity in the below video…

Woman in the video has allegedly been identified as Rebecca Goyette – art teacher? (if you think the profanity in this video is bad, you might not want to check out her “art” – it is most certainly… subjective, to put it mildly.)

Paid to cause commotion? Wanted her 15 minutes of fame? Passionately believes the ideology she’s raving about? Maybe even a combination of the above?

More crisis actors?

David Hogg – Father is an alleged retired FBI agent and his mother worked for CNN?
Patience Carter – Revealed to be a Fox News 29 Intern. She just wants to make money, according to the link.
Victoria Adriana Munoz – Are these all the same women? The first three definitely seem to be, but not positive on the last one. The other ladies aren’t named, although with a little digging I’m sure we can find it. (or at least, find the alleged name(s)).

Disclaimer: If these are real people who have legitimately experienced these horrors, then my deepest apologies. (And heartfelt thoughts and prayers – no mocking intended.)

One can never be too sure that what they’re seeing is real vs. lie, which is the point of the C.I.A. agenda: “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” – C.I.A. director William Casey (1981)

Smear Campaigns and Frameups

If false flags and crisis actors weren’t enough, we also have to deal with the collaboration between certain government factions and the news media in order to “smear” people’s reputation to make them appear “crazy”, or “suicidal” (…perhaps), or “uneducated”, or any other negative connotation you can think of.

William Binney is a former intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency. In the below video he is seen stating the underhanded tactics that the NSA used against Joseph Nacchio back in 2001.

Joseph Nacchio was the CEO of Qwest Communications back in 1997-2002. Because he refused to cooperate with an illegal raid by the NSA to give up information on his customers, he was framed and sent to jail for 5 years.

Interestingly, the same thing happened to Judy Mikovitz, who allegedly uncovered a link between deadly illnesses that were administered through vaccines to 25 million Americans.

Most of the videos alluding to this documentary have been taken off of youtube or “shadowbanned”; except, of course, the videos defaming or ridiculing the subject matter. The Plandemic Documentary can be found here.

Sadly, with the onslaught of misinformation and collusion between several factors to “debunk” and “tarnish” the reputations of those who oppose the main narrative, a lot of people are lost and confused as to what to believe. And because most of these “smear campaigns” attack all at once and repeat it, over and over again – we, the people, none the wiser, end up believing it. After all, we were brought up to go to the news for updated, “accurate” information to the events going on around us. In other words, we were trained to trust the media. And even if, in the beginning, this was the honest idea, it has since been infiltrated and corrupted.

There are many more insiders and whistleblowers that have worked on getting the word out. Most notably that of some former CIA operatives who have been spreading the word since as early as the 1970’s… if not sooner.

Political Endorsement/Defamation

Hm… interesting that they’re using the same people from these horrible tragedies to push a political agenda. I mean, after all, they’ve already gained the sympathy of the public. (At least, those that haven’t been awoken to the suspicious material that has been presented to us.) What better way to try and sway the votes? (The whole “political party system” is another shady story, but that will have to wait for a later day…)

In hindsight, perhaps using “crisis actors”, if that’s what they are, to push a political agenda is small fry.

After all, we also have large, influential media corporations that seem to push for their own views as well. The official narrative is that they are doing this to “protect the public from misinformation”, but I would highly suspect that the actual reason is COMPLETELY opposite.

- Twitter – Twitter Just Made Ideological Defamation Its Official Corporate Policy
- Google – Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam
- Facebook – Facebook Insider Leaks Docs; Explains “Deboosting,” “Troll Report,” & Political Targeting in Video Interview
- Youtube – And, I think all of us already know about the countless videos and accounts that youtube has been banning, for who knows what reason(s)… (I think a lot of us already know what that is.)

Then, of course, we have the news media themselves of pushing certain political affiliations:

FOX - Fox News Lobotomizes Its ‘Brain Room,’ Cuts Fact-Based Journalism - One of the highlights from this article is this little tidbit:

"Separately, Brain Room staffers were let go, this person said, “because they help fuel journalism and fact-based reporting and Porter and Stefanie are not interested in facts. They are obsessed with pitching ‘on-brand’ stories that include Blue Lives Matter, anything antifa-related, anyone who has suffered during BLM protests that can put the protestors in a negative light, anything that threatens Christianity, and anyone who is a Trump supporter who has somehow been wronged.”

CNN - CNN’s bias is now beyond laughable

CNN & ABC - Fauci Troubling Political Ties Exposed After He ‘Signals’ Jim Acosta At Presser

Thankfully, according to this article, research shows that a lot of people aren’t swayed by celebrities’ political opinions. Sometimes, even, they might have the opposite effect.

Either way, once we can gain a good handle on our own decision making abilities, that will benefit us in coming to well-reasoned, educated choices; and then the media will no longer have such a hold on our mind.

For those already “awake” or are waking up, please spread and share the word.

Sadly, propaganda in the media is all around us; some stories even completely fabricated. It has become clearer that a lot of the media, whether it be social, news, advertisements…, are witting accomplices in enforcing some of these agendas.

Why? What is their purpose? They wouldn’t be just staging various traumatic events for the simple reason as views, would they? And why glamorize all the violence, division, hate?

As more and more people are finding out, perhaps there is a much darker, deeper purpose for keeping the public in this state of mind.

Another critical question we must ask: Who owns all this media?

In part 3 I will be addressing media addiction, and in part 4 we take a look at media experiments.
(Starring “us”, the public.)

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.