Strange “Coincidences” Dealing with the COVID/Vaccine Narrative

Things that make you go, “hmmm….”

I have covered conspiratorial subjects on this site before. Of course, some are not just merely “conspiracy theories”, like the mainstream media and big tech platforms would have you believe, but are actually based on FACTS and REALITY.

The term “conspiracy theory” has largely been used and abused in order to attempt to mock and deride any counter opinion to the official narrative. However, for the sake of entertaining some interesting correlations, whether they are just merely coincidences or perhaps have some deeper meaning after all, I have selected a few compelling incidences that have happened throughout the years that shine a curious light onto the events going on today.

While these may not have any bearing as to the circumstances that are occurring right now, it is also possible that some might – and as the saying goes (whether it is an accurate translation of Aristotle or not): “It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.”

So without further ado, here are some interesting things to contemplate, that may leave one scratching their head and say, “Hm… that IS strange.”

1. ???? – Origins / Etymology: “In other words…”

When one digs deep into word meanings and their origins, it’s incredibly interesting (and rather eerie, sometimes) seeing where the word developed from and it’s current usage today.

Let’s take ‘pharmacy’, for example.

pharmacy: “late 14c., farmacie, “a medicine that rids the body of an excess of humors (except blood);” also “treatment with medicine; theory of treatment with medicine,” from Old French farmacie “a purgative” (13c.) and directly from Medieval Latin pharmacia, from Greek pharmakeia “a healing or harmful medicine, a healing or poisonous herb; a drug, poisonous potion; magic (potion), dye, raw material for physical or chemical processing.”

This is from pharmakeus (fem. pharmakis) “a preparer of drugs, a poisoner, a sorcerer” from pharmakon “a drug, a poison, philter, charm, spell, enchantment.” Beekes writes that the original meaning cannot be clearly established, and “The word is clearly Pre-Greek.” The ph- was restored 16c. in French, 17c. in English (see ph).”

https://www.etymonline.com/word/pharmacy

Hm… it started out promising, but some keywords that stuck out to me gave me quite the shock, and never realized that there were rather COMPLETELY DIFFERENT definitions for the same word. “Poisonous potion”? “Poisoner”? “Sorcerer”? “Harmful medicine”? …

Then, again taking the medical profession into account, is a symbol that is often used to represent the medical industry – especially in the US military field:

However, there is a lot of confusion and debate when it comes to this symbol – known as the Caduceus – especially when comparing it to the Rod of Asclepius, which is also used as a medical symbol and is represented with a rod/stick with a single snake (contested – some scholars believe it depicts a worm or parasite) wrapped around it.

The history of these two designs go way back to Greek Mythology, and perhaps even further than that, with some believing that the Rod of Asclepius is the true symbol of healing, and the Caduceus is a misrepresentation of the health/medical field. Instead, it is a symbol of Hermes/Mercury, who was commonly known as the god of commerce, god of thieves, and the herald of the gods, amongst many other meanings – some benign and helpful, and others that are more darker in nature.

I do want to mention that it cannot be lost on us how this symbol is used widely in the United States military/medical field, and that caduceus literally means “herald”, which if we are looking at the etymology of this word, gives us the following information:

caduceus: “in ancient Greece or Rome, “herald’s staff,” 1590s, from Latin caduceus, alteration of Doric Greek karykeion “herald’s staff,” from kēryx (genitive kērykos) “a herald,” probably a Pre-Greek word. Token of a peaceful embassy; originally an olive branch. Later especially the wand carried by Mercury, messenger of the gods, usually represented with two serpents twined round it and wings. Related: Caducean.

The caduceus is a symbol of peace and prosperity, and in modern times figures as a symbol of commerce, Mercury being the god of commerce. The rod represents power; the serpents represent wisdom; and the two wings, diligence and activity. [Century Dictionary]”

https://www.etymonline.com/word/caduceus

herald: “messenger, envoy,” late 13c. (in Anglo-Latin); c. 1200 as a surname, from Anglo-French heraud, Old French heraut, hiraut (12c.), from Frankish *hariwald “commander of an army” or a similar Germanic source, from Proto-Germanic *harja “army” (from PIE root *koro- “war;” see harry) + *waldaz “to command, rule” (see wield). The form fits, but the sense evolution is difficult to explain, unless it is in reference to the chief officer of a tournament, who introduced knights and made decisions on rules (which was one of the early senses, often as heraud of armes, though not the earliest in English).”

https://www.etymonline.com/word/herald

To make things even more interesting, when looking up “commerce medicine list”, found the following site:

Source: [ https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/07/2020-27754/commerce-control-list-clarifications-to-the-scope-of-export-control-classification-number-1c991-to ]

which has some information on what to classify “vaccines” as. I am not a data analyst. But when you combine vaccines in a control list, with the terms “chemical / biological weapons” and “anti-terrorism” and “weapons of mass destruction” [anti-terrorism and weapons of mass destruction are mentioned in a separate section of the document], well – it doesn’t exactly give me a warm and fuzzy feeling like the government and health industries are trying to get us to believe.

While anything in the hands of corrupt individuals can twist something that is supposed to be beneficial to mankind into a harmful weapon of destruction – the labeling and control of vaccines under this heading is rather alarming. While I agree that it is necessary to put restrictions and controls in place for this very reason, the fact that it is acknowledged that vaccines can very well be determined as a chemical/biological weapon should not be lost on others.

I have not thoroughly researched this document since there are a plethora of technical terms and viruses listed that I am unfamiliar with, but thought it was rather fitting and interesting enough to include on this list.

2. January 1981 – Eyes of Darkness mentions a bioweapon that comes from Wuhan

The title of this section is not technically correct. As others have pointed out, the first edition of the book “Eyes of Darkness”, published in 1981, mentions Gorki-400 (Russia) as the origins of a deadly virus/bioweapon from a research center.

However, a few years later, some sources state that Koontz was allegedly approached by his editors who asked him to change Gorki to something else – purportedly to not create waves with the Russians at the time. But whether it was solely Koontz’s decision to change the name to Wuhan-400, or whether it was suggested to him by other influences, only he and his editors would know for sure. And this is if it was Dean Koontz’s decision in the first place. There are some speculations that the publisher/editor changed it of their own accord. It is also possible that for a more thorough novel, authors employ some research and use real life accounts to make the story more engaging, which is what may have given Koontz the idea to use the Wuhan lab, which was created in 1956.

The below tweet shows an excerpt from page 333 of a paperback copy of the Eyes of Darkness book (the year that this specific publication came out seems to be from 2008 – although many people still state the original publication date of 1981).

Source: twitter | Manish Tewari

While it is incredibly uncanny that the book mentions Wuhan-400, a biological weapon created in a lab in China – combined with the current events of the coronavirus being suspected of being a man-made virus from a gain-of-functions attempt from the Wuhan Institute of Virology – there are differences that many fact-checkers are fond of pointing out to derail the similarities that garnered attention in the first place.

The mortality rate, for one – indicating that the virus in the book has a 100% mortality rate – even though even that is not technically correct since “Danny” survives… compared to that of the COVID-19, which has a reported range of .002 to 6% mortality rate – depending on one’s age and health condition.

Even if the book is not indicative of predictive programming, the strange specific terms that are so widely prevalent in today’s time caused quite a stir when it was first mentioned in social media, and is still shocking people who first learn of this “coincidental” connection.

For added overall summaries of the book, which doesn’t bode well right after all of the chemical/biological weapons talk in the previous section:

“As the cat gets out of the bag, Christina and Elliot come to know that, it is actually a Government Research Project laboratory for “chemical warfare”, established to develop biological and chemical weapons, to be used against the enemy countries.

They become aware of the fact that all the young Boy Scouts’ death was staged and, in reality, they were captured to be used in the experiments who unfortunately died, save for Danny. All their biological weapons failed to kill him. Meanwhile, he gained powers to talk to his mother, at the same time killing the main researchers in his final bid to escape.”Dean Koontz the eyes of darkness plot

***

“After storming the facility and arriving the correct room, the truth was uncovered. Danny was a victim of an accident: of viral proportions. As it turns out, this secret installation was actually a centre of biological weaponry. Danny and his expedition team accidentally came across and were infected by a Chinese-constructed virus with the name “Wuhan-400”. It had a 100% mortality rate. But Danny survived.

Danny was in a room next door, looking completely starved. He had a bunch of electrodes over his head. The scientist explained he was only the survivor of the virus and they extracted the antibodies responsible for saving him. After that, he was useless. Danny was constantly infected and reinfected to see how long he would last.

During this time, he developed an increased size of his parietal lope, which Evan and Stryker surmised must be the factor allowing him to practice his psychic-telekinetic abilities. They decide to hide this information from the scientist to prevent any potential studies of a such a kind in the future.

They eventually escape the facility after Danny uses his psychic abilities to take down the enemy helicopter.”The Eyes of Darkness — A Dean Koontz Book Review

***

It especially isn’t very reassuring considering all of the real life terrible experiments that the governments have conducted on their own people…

1 Measles Vaccine Experiment


Experiments involving the measles vaccine were conducted from 1990 to 1991 by the Centers for Disease Control. The doctors wanted to know if they could use it to replace natural antibodies in babies. To test this, doctors injected thousands of babies in the Third World with the drug. The vaccine eventually led to several immune problems in the babies and caused many deaths, although the exact number is unknown.

Knowing the drug had this effect, the government still tested on African American and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles. They injected more than 1,500 babies in the United States with the experimental drug. However, the study came to an end when it was discovered that African children were dying at an alarming rate up to three years after receiving the vaccinations.

The CDC later admitted that the parents were unaware that their children were being injected with an experimental drug that had not yet been verified by the Federal Drug Administration.[10]

Source: Top 10 U.S. Government Experiments Done on Its Own Citizens

3. February 2011 – “Year of the Vaccines”

In 2011, Bill Gates sat down with Sanjay Gupta and discussed vaccines and vaccine hesitancy.

Chillingly, knowing what we know now about the incessant push to get everyone on the planet vaccinated this year, Sanjay seems to repeat a quote made by Mr. Gates himself as he states the following – again, keep in mind that this interview was conducted in 2011:

Sanjay Gupta: “10 billion dollars over the next ten years to make it the year of the vaccines… what, what does that mean exactly?

Bill Gates: “Well, over this decade, uh, we believe unbelievable progress can be made, both inventing new vaccines and making sure they get out to all the children who need them. Uh, we can cut the number of children who die every year from about 9 million to half of that uh, if we have success on it. The benefits are in terms of reducing sickness, reducing the population growth; it really allows a society a chance to take care of itself, uh, once you’ve made the intervention.

I often see Bill Gates’ apologists and “fact-checkers” try to justify and defend Mr. Gates’ words by saying that he doesn’t mean what we think he means… however, considering all of the shady practices he’s been involved in, including some of the unsavory company that he has been connected with, I’d say that there’s a fine line between “entertaining an idea” and just plain common sense…

On a personal note, once you see the “duper’s delight” that Mr. Gates just can’t conceal himself from revealing, you can’t unsee it.

4. January 2017 – Anthony Fauci predicts “surprise” outbreak

On January 10, 2017, during a Keynote Address, Anthony Fauci shares his… “expertise”, on what the upcoming administration will face as far as infectious diseases go:

“The idea that we are now a few days away from a new administration, I obviously prompted the really extraordinarily, very enjoyable – and I have, I’m really pleased I had the opportunity to listen to the panel, both of Amy and Ron, as well as Bill, and Dr. Jafari. Which really, I think, set the stage for so many of the things that we are going to be dealing with over the coming years.

Given, as you heard from the introduction, that I have been around for awhile and have had the opportunity and the privilege and the pleasure of serving in 5 administrations, I thought I would bring that perspective to the topic today is the issue of pandemic preparedness.

And if there’s one message that I want to leave with you today, based on my experience, and you’ll see that in a moment, is that there is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration, in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease, and we have certainly a large burden of that, but also there will be a surprise outbreak.

And I hope by the end of my relatively short presentation you’ll understand why history, the history of the last 32 years that I’ve been the director of NIAID, will tell the next administration that there’s NO DOUBT in anyone’s mind that they will be faced with the challenges that their predecessors were faced with.”
– Anthony Fauci

How he’s so confident on this matter is anyone’s guess, although those who “vouch for Fauci” are convinced it’s just because he’s such a knowledgeable, intelligent human being.

Those who have known him in the past, however, have quite some different things to say about him…

“Those guys have got an agenda. Which is not, what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to – and they smugly – like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”
PCR inventor Kary Mullis on “Dr” Fauci

While “Dr. Fauci” was mistaken and/or flip-flopped on a lot of topics related to this “pandemic”, in which he predicted would happen years in advance – yet still fumbled the response on – he was right about one thing: there was a “surprise outbreak”… planned or otherwise…

5. January 2019 – Flu shots for everyone

This is quite possibly one of the cringiest things I’ve seen in a long time. And incredibly fake, as actors and actresses are adept at being (not intending to be harsh – but it is their job to pretend to be other people…).

Sandra Oh and Andy Samberg, in what seems to be an obvious bit to cater to the pharma overlords, announces excitedly (maybe a little too excitedly) that it’s time for everyone to get flu shots! Just what I’ve always looked forward to whenever I attend an awards ceremony.

Source: youtube | RandomCooking&ENTClips | Golden Globes FLU Shot Skit

Andy Samberg: “At this point of the show, the host would do something fun and spontaneous to show how we’re all just ordinary people, like ordering pizza for everyone.”

Sandra Oh: “But since we already got food at the Globes, we thought we’d mix it up and try something new. So roll up your sleeves, Hollywood, because you’re all getting – “

Both Andy Samberg and Sandra Oh: “Flu shots!”

Cue marching “healthcare workers” holding needles up while approaching various Hollywood stars. In the background, Oh and Samberg are embarrassingly chanting “Shots, shots, shots, shots, shots!” to the tune of LMFAO’s Shots. But not to fear, because Sandra reassures the audience that “these nurses are all licensed professionals straight from the Rite Aid in Echo Park.”

Then Mr. Samberg, in a speech I’m sure he wrote all by himself, states: “And look, if you’re an anti-vaxxer, just put a napkin over your head and we’ll skip you.”

And because the shots were seemingly freely administered (with no informed consent or anything) – and that it “costs 50 grand”, Samberg and Oh ends this atrocity great Samaritan act on human kind with a “you’re welcome!”. Such caring individuals.

However, it was of course later on found to be fake. 🙁

“5:45 P.M. The mood was muted and the syringes were fake. I ran into the main ballroom area to ask Linda Cardellini if the flu shot administered during the ceremony as part of a bit was, well, actually a flu shot. Interrupting her chat with her Green Book co-star Mahershala Ali, she assured that it was fake. Apparently, performers weren’t asked ahead of time, either. At least Willem Dafoe’s people said he wasn’t. —N.S.”
The Golden Globes 2019: What You Didn’t See on TV

So they lied? And here I thought they were being honest when they said getting flu shots was “fun and spontaneous”.

6. March 2019 – Project Runway: Kovid mask

In March 2019, Project Runway aired an episode which featured Kovid Kapoor, an Indian designer, which showed the model he was partnered with donning a face mask to match his outfit.

Many people brought this back into attention in 2020, when news of COVID first broke out, and the widely insistent push to urge everyone to wear face masks.

Tiktok user @joanschumachermartin shared the following video:

@joanschumachermartin

When project runway has a designer named Kovid who makes a look with a mask…. in 2019…##foryourpage ##fyp

♬ original sound – Joan Schumacher-Mart

Offered two links in case one gets taken down. (Please let me know if both links no longer work and I will replace it.)

Some things I can honestly say may just be a crazy coincidence. This, however, hits extremely close to home.

7. 2019-2021 Coin Collection

2019
Polio vaccine is highlighted for the U.S. $1 coin

2020
Prints for fruit bat coins were introduced in early January 2020

2021
Tuskegee is focused on for the Alabama 2021 coin

I realize some of this could be selection bias and just pure simple coincidence, but when combined with the suspicious timing of the last few years, I wouldn’t take any bets.

While the 2021 coin is highlighting Tuskegee Airmen specifically, it does tend to remind one of the Tuskegee Syphilis abuse that occurred from 1932-1972 – yet devastated for far longer than that.

As for the fruit bat coins, it’s interesting how the WHO declared the first case of coronavirus on December 31st, 2019, while the bat coins were announced in early January 2020. At around the same time, bats were first mentioned as a possible source of the coronavirus outbreak.

8. October 2019 – Event 201: Conveniently timed meeting of what would happen during an infectious outbreak.

Event 201, ironically occuring around 2-3 months before the first known case of coronavirus, was a simulation exercise created to show what would purportedly happen during a coronavirus pandemic.

It highlighted economic crises, social crises, health crises, “misinformation”, and so on.

Some speakers and attendees during the conference included:

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security: Anita Cicero / Dr. Caitlin Rivers / Tom Inglesby
Johnson and Johnson: Adrian Thomas
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: Christopher Elias
UN Foundation: Sofia Borges
The UPS Foundation: Eduardo Martinez
Former US Deputy National Security Advisor: Avril Haines
–  ANZ Bank Group: Jane Halton
China CDC: George Gao
US CDC: Stephen Redd
Henry Schein: Brad Connett
Formerly World Bank Group: Tim Evans
Lufthansa Group Airlines: Martin Knuchel
Marriott International: Latoya Abbott
NBCUniversal: Hasti Taghi
Edelman: Matthew Harrington
Monetary Authority of Singapore: Lavan Thiru

This list was comprised just from the 11 minute video of the highlights that the Johns Hopkins Centers for Health Security made available at the following archive: https://archive.org/details/og-event201/Event+201+Pandemic+Exercise_+Segment+1%2C+Intro+and+Medical+Countermeasures+(MCM)+Discussion+(1080p_30fps_H264-128kbit_AAC).mp4

The 11 minute video ended with labeling the contributors of this “pandemic exercise” event:

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
World Economic Forum
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

I might end up doing a whole post on this interesting event in a completely separate article, because the videos in this archive alone have a combined total of over 3.5 hours, and have incredibly pertinent, and even more disturbing, correlations to the events happening today. (Almost as if it was all PLANNED… and not just for altruistic “pandemic preparedness”…)

9. November 2019 – Netflix series Explained, airs episode called “The Next Pandemic”

“If you’re not worried about a looming global pandemic, you probably should be. Are we prepared for an outbreak? Bill Gates and other experts weigh in.”

Featuring two of our favorite sponsors of the vaccines: Bill Gates and Peter Daszak.

Hm… I have not personally seen this episode (I canceled Netflix a while ago) but according to reviews and research history, it seems that the genius Bill Gates accurately predicts the situation we find ourselves only a short 2-3 months later. Fascinating.

Actually, if determining how long the production of this episode took, who knows when it was actually taped. But when also considering the interesting timing of when the episode first aired, with the alleged timing of the “very first coronavirus case” – with some people claiming that it might have come out as early as September of 2019 – is too strange to ignore.

Combine that with the suspicious connections between Daszak/EcoHealth Alliance/Wuhan/Fauci/NIAID/NIH/Lancet etc., there seems to be an obvious paper trail, conflicts of interest, and cahoots going on within several agencies/industries that all point to a gain-of-funds gain-of-functions agenda, with the same key players over and over and over again.

And while Mr. Gates has been a huge advocate of vaccines and tweets about it all the time, there is still a sense of uncanny foreshadowing considering his past history with vaccines and the harm that they have caused in several countries, and the tweet he sent a few days before 2020:

BillGates
What’s next for our foundation? I’m particularly excited about what the next year could mean for one of the best buys in global health: vaccines.

Mm hm… Of course you are, Bill. Of course you are.

10. November 2019 & January 2020 – Kobe / COVID connections

There are some suspicious events surrounding Mr. Kobe Bryant and his name being mentioned in conspiracy circles, with some alluding to deep, rabbit hole theories, such as tptsb using Kobe as a sacrifice to fully present the coronavirus onto the rest of the world, and/or a pharmaceutical company’s feud with him in order to use his moniker “Black Mamba” for one of their dietary products, in which Kobe alleged was using illegal substances to begin with…

Kobe Bryant Accused Big Pharma Company Of Using Illegal Substances In Black Mamba Lawsuit Weeks Before His Death

So this legal battle aside, which compellingly enough, also insinuates pharma companies of malfeasance, the focus of this section aims at Kobe’s name being tied to something much more revealing. 

I am not sure where the original source came from, although a youtuber leaves a comment that White Board Gematria was the first to notice this, but the youtube video below shows Kobe’s name being translated from English to Hebrew. (The google translation has since been changed to no longer indicate this.)

Source: youtube | KOS 137 | COVID = KOBE (prod. Eskry)

And as the video shows as well, Mr. Bryant was buried in Corona del Mar – which is another interesting coincidence. On top of that, another youtube user points out that Mr. Bryant also has a crown tattoo on his arm.

Then there’s the article that came out on January 27, 2020, featuring Kobe Bryant’s death on the front page, with a smaller article to the side of it, titled: Rush is on to develop vaccine for coronavirus. At the time, there were purportedly 5 illnesses in the US due to the coronavirus, and widespread recognition and alarm of the disease did not even truly begin until late February.

And if it ended there, it wouldn’t be so bad. But no. There’s more, actually. From another video that KOS 137 has on their channel, it mentions the 2019 book that Kobe Bryant created with Ivy Claire, called “Epoca: The Tree of Ecrof”. In that video, along with other conspiracy material that I won’t get into, is a reference made to the Kabbalah’s Tree of Life.

Keep this tree in mind, because there’s an interesting correlation coming up in the next section.

For another “fun” coincidence, there are two main characters involved in Epoca: The Tree of Ecrof. Rovi and Pretia. Currently, there are some issues involving Japan and suspected contaminated vials of the Moderna vaccine. The manufacturer where the Moderna vaccines are filled is called Rovi, a pharmaceutical company based in Spain, where an investigation is being held for the contamination issue. Additionally, another “fun fact”, you can spell Pretia with the word “pharmaceutical”. While yes, the Spanish spelling of pharmaceuticals is ‘farmaceuticos’, the organization has their own English counterpart on Linkedin titled ROVI Pharmaceutical Company.

Lastly, there’s this rather chilling video, that while it doesn’t really have anything to do with the coronavirus specifically, it does have eerie connotations to the duality of the Tree of Life/Tree of Death (good/evil dichotomy – light/dark musings) that Kobe seems to be alluding to in his book.

11. November 2020 – More “fun” with translations / and other strange “coincidences”

I wasn’t sure whether to put this near the beginning of this list, since the alleged publication date of the “2020” book ranges from the late 1980’s to mid 1990’s (depending on various sources), but since I didn’t find out about this interesting tidbit of data until just recently, I decided to put the date of the article that I found this information in. Plus it fits in rather well right after the Kobe/COVID translation fiasco.

Raul Diego posted an article on mintpressnews.com titled: Predictive Programming? Israeli Publishers Have Been Writing About a COVID-Like Pandemic for Years which focuses on some incredibly coincidental, if not deliberately intentional, events that have happened throughout the years, that also sheds a strange spotlight onto some well-known conspiratorial figures.

1st off: A subject that I’ve already covered on number 8 of this post, Raul Diego references the Netflix series “Explained”. Which is bad enough since it again puts Bill Gates on this list. But then we come to the 2nd topic:

2nd: Another interesting “coincidence”: a book titled “2020” was allegedly written over 20 years ago by Chamutal Shabtai, detailing eerie similarities between the virus written in the book, and the events (whether exaggerated or not) we find ourselves in today [2020-current]. The book was published by an Israeli company named Keter Press.

3rd: Which brings me to the next point. Keter Press, translated from English to Hebrew, means “Corona Press”. Now tying this back to the Kabbalah’s “Tree of Life”, which bears an incredible resemblance to Kobe Bryant’s book, the very top of the tree is labeled Keter.

While it’s not improbable that an Israeli company would use the term Keter/Crown to name their own press industry, the probability of it doing that, while also publishing a book titled “2020” that is all about a virus going on – which we now find ourselves in with an illness labeled specifically for its corona-like appearance, is a little hard to swallow…

I took the liberty of providing a short video showing this, since the Kobe/covid translations ended up being changed shortly after it was shown.

A bonus that I added, “corona”, at least in English – automatically translates to “coronavirus” in Hebrew – which I wasn’t exactly expecting…

4th: Pairing that up with this next section, Raul Deigo provides even more interesting connections between Keter Press and its history:

“Keter Press began as an Israeli-government program called The Israel Program for Scientific Translations in 1959 and was dedicated to translating and publishing scientific and technical manuscripts from Russian into English for the National Science Foundation in the United States, which is the technical counterpart of the National Institutes of Health.”Predictive Programming? Israeli Publishers Have Been Writing About a COVID-Like Pandemic for Years

Hm…

5th: [From the same article] “In 1987, the same year 2020 was written as a movie script, Keter became a public company. Two years later British tycoon and spymaster Robert Maxwell – father of Ghislaine Maxwell ­– acquired control of the publishing house after Maxwell Communication Corporation bought Macmillian, which then owned Keter. The publishing house was passed on to an Israeli investment concern called Arledan after Maxwell’s death in 1991, which owned it until 2016.”

And who’s currently undergoing trials for child/sex-trafficking crimes? Ghislaine Maxwell. And I’m not sure if I have to mention, but this brings up convicted sex-offender and misconduct/blackmail-extraordinaire Jeffrey Epstein into this mix.

In a similar vein, who is currently trying to shake off allegations of a possible friendship and/or business venture connected with Jeffrey Epstein? Again, our very own “philanthropist”, Bill Gates, who is very much tied up in the current corona/COVID/vaccine scheme.

Sure this could be just random conglomerates coming together as large businesses usually do, with no nefarious conspiracy behind it… but… when considering all options and the misconduct they’ve engaged in, being willfully blind is what enables these organizations to keep getting away with their criminal practices to begin with.

Credit for most of this section goes to Raul Diego for all of this information.

BONUS: May / August 2020 – Corona Crop Circle Conspiracy

For a true conspiracy, let’s take a look at the strange crop circle that appeared in May of 2020, with a bizarrely shaped “crop circle” that looks EXACTLY like a coronavirus/spike protein would.

It is obvious that whatever the case is, it goes without saying that we can safely rule out fungi, as a possible contributor; at least to THIS crop circle. And maybe rule out “overactive hedgehogs”, like some people apparently speculate…

Crop Circles Explained

So the question is, who made this crop circle, and for what purpose? Was it to try and help scientists figure out this illness or possibly alert us to the spike protein that would be found in the vaccines – which is causing untold numbers of harm in people? Maybe a hoax that fools people into looking at something completely unrelated to keep them preoccupied and looking the wrong way?

Was it someone boasting of what they were doing to the population? Gloating of pulling off a mastermind villainous attack through this biological weapon?

Alien visitors trying to give us hints as to what this whole coronavirus/vaccine agenda is all about?

Overactive hedgehogs just having a good old time in the field, that just so happened to make an uncanny resemblance to a spike protein? 😛

And how would one carry this crop circle out? Lasers, perhaps; maybe coming from a satellite? Drones programmed to map out a particular picture in the crops? Some kind of radiation that has already been patterned out to make a perfect image on a field? Just hours and hours of physical man-labor; for the funzies?

Another crop circle that was created, this time in August 2020, shows a chemical composition that someone identified as 2,4,dimethyl-3-isopropylpentane, according to the same site: Was There A Coronavirus Crop Circle Laid Down On May 28, 2020?

Does this crop circle have anything to do with the coronavirus one? Are they completely unrelated?

And again, one has to ask, who is making these, and for what reason? If they’re alien beings, perhaps they’re better off just making a radio broadcast telling us exactly what it means, because at this point, all of these cryptic symbols are confusing people even more and no one has a clue what is going on. (except those creating these crop designs, of course…)

And one more crop circle that I just learned about is the following, also created in August 2020, which is suspiciously built around a single tree in the middle of a field (or the tree was specifically placed there – and if so, again, for what reason?) and ~2 miles away from the coronavirus crop circle.

Is this another allusion to the tree of life? What does the 4 circles around it represent? Does this have no bearing on this at all, and is just a fun prank that someone engaged in? Or is there some esoteric meaning behind it to decipher?

There are many more events that have shed a shady light onto the “coronavirus pandemic” and the vaccine narrative, and these listed were just a small few.

While some could be completely coincidental – yet incredibly bizarre – some of the others tend to feature the same people over and over again in what cannot be described as mere coincidence. While there are those who work to defend these people/institutions for just being alert and aware to the possibilities of a new strain of coronavirus, and who are just “genuinely looking after the well-being of humankind”, a look into their history would suggest otherwise. It is dark, and foreboding, and the only ones who benefit are those already at the top.

I think collectively, we need to get out of this mindset of labeling EVERYTHING as a “conspiracy theory”, and take a really good, long look at the deception and collusion going on behind the scenes. Maybe then we can finally admit that some “conspiracies” aren’t so fake and ridiculous after all.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by 12222786 from Pixabay

Our Grave Concerns About the Handling of the COVID Pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK

Open letter from several healthcare professions to the UK government/administrators.

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

Mr Boris Johnson, Prime Minister

Ms Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister for Scotland

Mr Mark Drakeford, First Minister for Wales

Mr Paul Givan, First Minister for Northern Ireland

Mr Sajid Javid, Health Secretary

Dr Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer

Dr Patrick Vallance, Chief Scientific Officer

 

22 August 2021

Dear Sirs and Madam,

Our grave concerns about the handling of the COVID pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK.

We write as concerned doctors, nurses, and other allied healthcare professionals with no vested interest in doing so. To the contrary, we face personal risk in relation to our employment for doing so and / or the risk of being personally “smeared” by those who inevitably will not like us speaking out.

We are taking the step of writing this public letter because it has become apparent to us that:

  • The  Government (by which we mean the UK government and three devolved governments/administrations and associated government advisors and agencies such as the CMOs, CSA, SAGE, MHRA, JCVI, Public Health services, Ofcom etc, hereinafter “you” or the “Government”) have based the handling of the COVID pandemic on flawed assumptions.
  • These have been pointed out to you by numerous individuals and organisations.
  • You have failed to engage in dialogue and show no signs of doing so. You have removed from people fundamental rights and altered the fabric of society with little debate in Parliament. No minister responsible for policy has ever appeared in a proper debate with anyone with opposing views on any mainstream media channel.
  • Despite being aware of alternative medical and scientific viewpoints you have failed to ensure an open and full discussion of the pros and cons of alternative ways of managing the pandemic.
  • The pandemic response policies implemented have caused massive, permanent and unnecessary harm to our nation, and must never be repeated.
  • Only by revealing the complete lack of widespread approval among healthcare professionals of your policies will a wider debate be demanded by the public.

In relation to the above, we wish to draw attention to the following points. Supporting references can be provided upon request.

  1. No attempt to measure the harms of lockdown policies

The evidence of disastrous effects of lockdowns on the physical and mental health of the population is there for all to see. The harms are massive, widespread, and long lasting. In particular, the psychological impact on a generation of developing children could be lifelong.

It is for this reason that lockdown policies were never part of any pandemic preparedness plans prior to 2020. In fact, they were expressly not recommended in WHO documents, even for severe respiratory viral pathogens and for that matter neither were border closures, face coverings, and testing of asymptomatic individuals. There has been such an inexplicable absence of consideration of the harms caused by lockdown policy it is difficult to avoid the suspicion that this is willful avoidance.

The introduction of such policies was never accompanied by any sort of risk/benefit analysis. As bad as that is, it is even worse that after the event when plenty of data became available by which the harms could be measured, only perfunctory attention to this aspect of pandemic planning has been afforded. Eminent professionals have repeatedly called for discourse on these health impacts in press-conferences but have been universally ignored.

What is so odd, is that the policies being pursued before mid-March 2020 (self-isolation of the ill and protection of the vulnerable, while otherwise society continued close to normality) were balanced, sensible and reflected the approach established by consensus prior to 2020. No cogent reason was given then for the abrupt change of direction from mid-March 2020 and strikingly none has been put forward at any time since.

  1. Institutional nature of COVID

It was actually clear early on from Italian data that COVID (the disease – as opposed to SARS-Cov-2 infection or exposure) was largely a disease of institutions. Care home residents comprised around half of all deaths, despite making up less than 1% of the population. Hospital infections are the major driver of transmission rates as was the case for both SARS1 and MERS. Transmission was associated with hospital contact in up to 40% of cases in the first wave in Spring 2020 and in 64% in winter 2020/2021.

Severe illness among healthy people below 70 years old did occur (as seen with flu pandemics) but was extremely rare.

Despite this, no early, aggressive and targeted measures were taken to protect care homes; to the contrary, patients were discharged without testing to homes where staff had inadequate PPE, training and information. Many unnecessary deaths were caused as a result.

Preparations for this coming winter, including ensuring sufficient capacity and preventative measures such as ventilation solutions, have not been prioritised.

  1. The exaggerated nature of the threat

Policy appears to have been directed at systematic exaggeration of the number of deaths which can be attributed to COVID. Testing was designed to find every possible ‘case’ rather than focusing on clinically diagnosed infections and the resulting exaggerated case numbers fed through to the death data with large numbers of people dying ‘with COVID’ and not ‘of COVID’ where the disease was the underlying cause of death.

The policy of publishing a daily death figure meant the figure was based entirely on the PCR test result with no input from treating clinicians. By including all deaths within a time period after a positive test, incidental deaths, with but not due to COVID, were not excluded thereby exaggerating the nature of the threat.

Moreover, in headlines reporting the number of deaths, a categorisation by age was not included. The average age of a COVID-labelled death is 81 for men and 84 for women, higher than the average life expectancy when these people were born. This is a highly relevant fact in assessing the societal impact of the pandemic. Death in old age is a natural phenomenon. It cannot be said that a disease primarily affecting the elderly is the same as one which affects all ages, and yet the government’s messaging appears designed to make the public think that everyone is at equal risk.

Doctors were asked to complete death certificates in the knowledge that the deceased’s death had already been recorded as a COVID death by the Government. Since it would be virtually impossible to find evidence categorically ruling out COVID as a contributory factor to death, once recorded as a “COVID death” by the government, it was inevitable that it would be included as a cause on the death certificate. Diagnosing the cause of death is always difficult and the reduction in post mortems will have inevitably resulted in increased inaccuracy. The fact that deaths due to non-COVID causes actually moved into a substantial deficit (compared to average) as COVID-labelled deaths rose (and this was reversed as COVID-labelled deaths fell) is striking evidence of over-attribution of deaths to COVID.

The overall all-cause mortality rate from 2015-2019 was unusually low and yet these figures have been used to compare to 2020 and 2021 mortality figures which has made the increased mortality appear unprecedented. Comparisons with data from earlier years would have demonstrated that the 2020 mortality rate was exceeded in every year prior to 2003 and is unexceptional as a result.

Even now COVID cases and deaths continue to be added to the existing total without proper rigour such that overall totals grow ever larger and exaggerate the threat. No effort has been made to count totals in each winter season separately which is standard practice for every other disease.

You have continued to adopt high-frequency advertising through publishing and broadcast media outlets to add to the impact of “fear messaging”. The cost of this has not been widely published, but government procurement websites reveal it to be immense – hundreds of millions of pounds.

The media and government rhetoric is now moving onto the idea that “Long Covid” is going to cause major morbidity in all age groups including children, without having a discussion of the normality of postviral fatigue which lasts upwards of 6 months. This adds to the public fear of the disease, encouraging vaccination amongst those who are highly unlikely to suffer any adverse effects from COVID.

  1. Active suppression of discussion of early treatment using protocols being successfully deployed elsewhere.

The harm caused by COVID and our response to it should have meant that advances in prophylaxis and therapeutics for COVID were embraced. However, evidence on successful treatments has been ignored or even actively suppressed. For example, a study in Oxford published in February 2021 demonstrated that inhaled Budesonide could reduce hospitalisations by 90% in low risk patients and a publication in April 2021 showed that recovery was faster for high risk patients too. However, this important intervention has not been promoted.

Dr. Tess Lawrie, of the Evidence Based Medical Consultancy in Bath, presented a thorough analysis of the prophylactic and therapeutic benefits of Ivermectin to the government in January 2021. More than 24 randomised trials with 3,400 people have demonstrated a 79-91% reduction in infections and a 27-81% reduction in deaths with Ivermectin.

Many doctors are understandably cautious about possible over-interpretation of the available data for the drugs mentioned above and other treatments, although it is to be noted that no such caution seems to have been applied in relation to the treatment of data around the government’s interventions (eg the effectiveness of lockdowns or masks) when used in support of the government’s agenda.

Whatever one’s view on the merits of these repurposed drugs, it is totally unacceptable that doctors who have attempted to merely open discussion about the potential benefits of early treatments for COVID have been heavily and inexplicably censored. Knowing that early treatments which could reduce the risk of requiring hospitalisation might be available would alter the entire view held by many professionals and lay people alike about the threat posed by COVID, and therefore the risk / benefit ratio for vaccination, especially in younger groups.

  1. Inappropriate and unethical use of behavioural science to generate unwarranted fear.

Propagation of a deliberate fear narrative (confirmed through publicly accessible government documentation) has been disproportionate, harmful and counterproductive. We request that it should cease forthwith.

To give just one example, the government’s face covering policies seem to have been driven by behavioural psychology advice in relation to generating a level of fear necessary for compliance with other policies. Those policies do not appear to have been driven by reason of infection control, because there is no robust evidence showing that wearing a face covering (particularly cloth or standard surgical masks) is effective against transmission of airborne respiratory pathogens such as SARS-Cov-2. Several high profile institutions and individuals are aware of this and have advocated against face coverings during this pandemic only inexplicably to reverse their advice on the basis of no scientific justification of which we are aware. On the other hand there is plenty of evidence suggesting that mask wearing can cause multiple harms, both physical and mental. This has been particularly distressing for the nation’s school children who have been encouraged by government policy and their schools to wear masks for long periods at school.

Finally, the use of face coverings is highly symbolic and thus counterproductive in making people feel safe. Prolonged wearing risks becoming an ingrained safety behaviour, actually preventing people from getting back to normal because they erroneously attribute their safety to the act of mask wearing rather than to the remote risk, for the vast majority of healthy people under 70 years old, of catching the virus and becoming seriously unwell with COVID.

  1. Misunderstanding of the ubiquitous nature of mutations of newly emergent viruses.

The mutation of any novel virus into newer strains – especially when under selection pressure from abnormal restrictions on mixing and vaccination – is normal, unavoidable and not something to be concerned about. Hundreds of thousands of mutations of the original Wuhan strain have already been identified. Chasing down every new emergent variant is counterproductive, harmful and totally unnecessary and there is no convincing evidence that any newly identified variant is any more deadly than the original strain.

Mutant strains appear simultaneously in different countries (by way of ‘convergent evolution’) and the closing of national borders in attempts to prevent variants travelling from one country to another serves no significant infection control purpose and should be abandoned.

  1. Misunderstanding of asymptomatic spread and its use to promote public compliance with restrictions.

It is well-established that asymptomatic spread has never been a major driver of a respiratory disease pandemic and we object to your constant messaging implying this, which should cease forthwith. Never before have we perverted the centuries-old practice of isolating the ill by instead isolating the healthy. Repeated mandates to healthy, asymptomatic people to self-isolate, especially school children, serves no useful purpose and has only contributed to the widespread harms of such policies. In the vast majority of cases healthy people are healthy and cannot transmit the virus and only sick people with symptoms should be isolated.

The government’s claim that one in three people could have the virus has been shown to be mutually inconsistent with the ONS data on prevalence of disease in society, and the sole effect of this messaging appears to have been to generate fear and promote compliance with government restrictions. The government’s messaging to ‘act as if you have the virus’ has also been unnecessarily fear-inducing given that healthy people are extremely unlikely to transmit the virus to others.

The PCR test, widely used to determine the existence of ‘cases’, is now indisputably acknowledged to be unable reliably to detect infectiousness. The test cannot discriminate between those in whom the presence of fragments of genetic material partially matching the virus is either incidental (perhaps because of past infection), or is representative of active infection, or is indicative of infectiousness. Yet, it has been used almost universally without qualification or clinical diagnosis to justify lockdown policies and to quarantine millions of people needlessly at enormous cost to health and well-being and to the country’s economy.

Countries that have removed community restrictions have seen no negative consequences which can be attributed to the easing. Empirical data from many countries demonstrates that the rise and fall in infections is seasonal and not due to restrictions or face coverings. The reason for reduced impact of each successive wave is that: (1) most people have some level of immunity either through prior immunity or immunity acquired through exposure; (2) as is usual with emergent new viruses, mutation of the virus towards strains causing milder disease appears to have occurred. Vaccination may also contribute to this although its durability and level of protection against variants is unclear. 

The government appears to be talking of “learning to live with COVID” while apparently practicing by stealth a “zero COVID” strategy which is futile and ultimately net-harmful.

  1. Mass testing of healthy children

Repeated testing of children to find asymptomatic cases who are unlikely to spread virus, and treating them like some sort of biohazard is harmful, serves no public health purpose and must stop.

During Easter term, an amount equivalent to the cost of building one District General Hospital was spent weekly on testing schoolchildren to find a few thousand positive ‘cases’, none of which was serious as far as we are aware.

Lockdowns are in fact a far greater contributor to child health problems, with record levels of mental illness and soaring levels of non-COVID infections being seen, which some experts consider to be a result of distancing resulting in deconditioning of the immune system.

  1. Vaccination of the entire adult population should never have been a prerequisite for ending restrictions.

Based merely on early “promising” vaccine data, it is clear that the Government decided in summer 2020 to pursue a policy of viral suppression within the entire population until vaccination was available (which was initially stated to be for the vulnerable only, then later changed – without proper debate or rigorous analysis – to the entire adult population).

This decision was taken despite massive harms consequent to continued lockdowns which were either known to you or ought to have been ascertained so as to be considered in the decision making process.

Moreover, a number of principles of good medical practice and previously unimpeachable ethical standards have been breached in relation to the vaccination campaign, meaning that in most cases, whether the consent obtained can be truly regarded as “fully informed” must be in serious doubt:

  • The use of coercion supported by an unprecedented media campaign to persuade the public to be vaccinated, including threats of discrimination, either supported by the law or encouraged socially, for example in co-operation with social media platforms and dating apps.
  • The omission of information permitting individuals to make a fully informed choice, especially in relation to the experimental nature of the vaccine agents, extremely low background COVID risk for most people, known occurrence of short-term side-effects and unknown long-term effects.

Finally, we note that the Government is seriously considering the possibility that these vaccines – which have no associated long-term safety data – could be administered to children on the basis that this might provide some degree of protection to adults. We find that notion an appalling and unethical inversion of the long-accepted duty falling on adults to protect children.

  1. Over-reliance on modeling while ignoring real-world data

Throughout the pandemic, decisions seem to have been taken utilising unvalidated models produced by groups who have what can only be described as a woeful track record, massively overestimating the impact of several previous pandemics.

The decision-making teams appear to have very little clinical input and, as far as is ascertainable, no clinical immunology expertise.

Moreover, the assumptions underlying the modeling have never been adjusted to take into account real-world observations in the UK and other countries.

It is an astonishing admission that, when asked whether collateral harms had been considered by SAGE, the answer given was that it was not in their remit – they were simply asked to minimise COVID impact. That might be forgivable if some other advisory group was constantly studying the harms side of the ledger, yet this seems not to have been the case.

Conclusions

The UK’s approach to COVID has palpably failed. In the apparent desire to protect one vulnerable group – the elderly – the implemented policies have caused widespread collateral and disproportionate harm to many other vulnerable groups, especially children. Moreover your policies have failed in any event to prevent the UK from notching up one of the highest reported death rates from COVID in the world.

Now, despite very high vaccination rates and the currently very low COVID death and hospitalisation rates, policy continues to be aimed at maintaining a population handicapped by extreme fear with restrictions on everyday life prolonging and deepening the policy-derived harms. To give just one example, NHS waiting lists now stand at 5.1m officially, with – according to the previous Health Secretary – a likely further 7m who will require treatment not yet presented. This is unacceptable and must be addressed urgently.

In short, there needs to be a sea change within the Government which must now pay proper attention to those esteemed experts outside its inner circle who are sounding these alarms. As those involved with healthcare, we are committed to our oath to “first do no harm”, and we can no longer stand by in silence observing policies which have imposed a series of supposed “cures” which are in fact far worse than the disease they are supposed to address.

The signatories of this letter call on you, in Government, without further delay to widen the debate over policy, consult openly with groups of scientists, doctors, psychologists and others who share crucial, scientifically-valid and evidence-based alternative views and to do everything in your power to return the country as rapidly as possible to normality with the minimum of further damage to society.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Jonathan Engler, MB ChB LLB (Hons) DipPharmMed

Professor John A Fairclough, BM BS B Med Sci FRCS FFSEM,  Consultant Surgeon, ran vaccination program for a Polio Outbreak, Past President BOSTA, for Orthopaedic Surgeons, Faculty member FFSEM

Mr Tony Hinton, MB ChB, FRCS, FRCS(Oto), Consultant Surgeon

Dr Renee Hoenderkamp, BSc (Hons) MBBS MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr Ros Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician

Mr Malcolm Loudon, MB ChB MD FRCSEd FRCS (Gen Surg) MIHM VR

Dr Geoffrey Maidment, MBBS, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician

Dr Alan Mordue, MB ChB, FFPH (ret), Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine

Mr Colin Natali, BSc(Hons), MBBS FRCS FRCS(Orth), Consultant Spine Surgeon

Dr Helen Westwood, MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner

Click here for the complete list of signatories and if you wish to add your name to the letter.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image: Prime Minister Boris Johnson during a press conference on 16 March, with Chief Medical Officer Prof Chris Witty and Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance. Picture by Andrew Parsons

CDC, FDA Prepare Mass Distribution of a Merck/Sanofi Six-in-One Vaccine for Kids, Turning Blind Eye to Safety Signals

Egregious oversteps endangering children’s lives.

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

The FDA approved Vaxelis in late 2018, but only now is the shot being readied for widespread distribution — in Europe, where infants have been given six-in-one vaccines for years (including Vaxelis since 2016), the vaccines have been associated with reports of sudden infant death.

Since the mid-1980s, the number of childhood shots on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine schedule has more than quadrupled. When parents express reluctance about turning their little ones into perpetual pin cushions, drug makers and doctors have a ready answer — combination vaccines that “simplify” the schedule by decreasing the number of injections administered.

This month marks the U.S. launch of the Merck/Sanofi joint-venture vaccine, Vaxelis, a six-in-one (hexavalent) combination vaccine that contains diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP) components as well as components said to protect against polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and hepatitis B.

Public health officials optimistically believe that bundling all of these components into one shot will help close noncompliance loopholes and increase the likelihood that children will complete “all recommended vaccinations.”

Though Vaxelis is the nation’s first hexavalent injection, it joins other four- or five-in-one vaccines already on the CDC schedule. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Vaxelis in late 2018 — as a three-dose series for 2-, 4- and 6-month-old infants — but it is only now, two-and-a-half years later, that the shot is being readied for widespread distribution.

Warning signs were ignored

There are numerous warning signs that potent all-in-one vaccines are too much for immature immune systems to handle. Concerning safety signals have emerged not just for hexavalent but also pentavalent (five-in-one) vaccines.

In Europe, where infants have been given hexavalent vaccines for some years (including Vaxelis since 2016), the formulations have produced many troubling reports of sudden infant death.

Absurdly, none of the clinical studies assessing Vaxelis safety and efficacy conducted fair comparisons against an inert placebo. Instead, in the two U.S. clinical trials for Vaxelis, not only did investigators compare infants receiving Vaxelis to babies who received Sanofi’s five-in-one Pentacel — but babies in both groups also received rotavirus and pneumococcal vaccines at the same time!

In this context, the CDC’s sales pitch to the public — and its claims that side effects are “usually mild” — cannot be considered credible.

Here are some of the other facts missing from the CDC’s communications:

  • In the two U.S. trials six infants died (slide #27) in the Vaxelis group (some after receiving just one dose); one infant also died in the “control” group that received five-in-one vaccines.
  • All six Vaxelis recipients died within six weeks of vaccination. This timing matches other published accounts of infant deaths “clustering” following hexavalent vaccination.
  • The reported causes of death for the infants who received Vaxelis included asphyxia, sepsis, fluid in the brain and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). These outcomes correspond to the types of adverse events reported following hexavalent vaccination in Europe.
  • Package inserts for other vaccines on the CDC schedule list similar causes of death, suggesting these fatal Vaxelis outcomes are plausibly associated with vaccination.
  • In the clinical trials, the rate of fever was notably higher in Vaxelis recipients even when compared to children receiving five-in-one vaccines (47% vs. 34%).

Juicing vaccine sales

In the no-liability context enjoyed by vaccine makers in the U.S., combination vaccines are already quite popular. In fact, market watchers and health economists praise the jumbo shots as being a catalyst for positive industry trends and a “key to commercial success.”

 

Thus, financial analysts expect Vaxelis to “garner significant patient share following its [U.S.] launch” — predicting that it will account for almost a third of U.S. DTaP vaccinations by 2028 — or $841 million in annual sales.

These predictions represent good news for Merck and Sanofi, two of the “big four” pharma giants that dominate the childhood vaccine market in the United States. Merck is already doing a booming vaccine business, recently reporting annual sales growth of 14.8% for its pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumovax 23) and 5.4% for its human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil-9.

However, Merck also faces proliferating Gardasil-related lawsuits — including legal actions alleging that the company knew about and ignored life-changing adverse events from the get-go, many of which (when not fatal) have involved autoimmunity and chronic pain. In fact, before the advent of emergency use COVID vaccines (responsible for an alarming escalation of vaccine-related adverse events), Gardasil had had “more side effects reported than all other vaccines combined.”

Sanofi, too, is embroiled in thousands of lawsuits worldwide — notably for its disastrous and sometimes fatal dengue vaccine. As with Merck, this has not dampened overall vaccine sales growth, which continues its strong upward trajectory, likely to be further strengthened by the U.S. Vaxelis rollout.

Although Sanofi has not been a front-runner in the COVID vaccine race, the company is currently running clinical trials for messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines for both COVID and seasonal influenza.

Aluminum secrecy and grandfathered ingredients

Merck’s proprietary, “super-powered” aluminum adjuvant — amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS) — which is believed to play a significant role in Gardasil’s risk profile, is also present in Vaxelis.

After Merck developed AAHS, it began to “preferentially” feature AAHS in its vaccines even though, as Danish scientists outlined last year, the company appears to have disregarded procedures ordinarily required for approval of new adjuvants.

According to the Danes, at the time AAHS appeared, it represented a “new type of aluminium adjuvant with excipients that [had] not been used earlier in [European Medicines Agency] authorised vaccines.” It should have been — but apparently was not — tested against an inert placebo. For this and other reasons, the Danish scientists question the ethical underpinnings of the Gardasil clinical trials.

In noting that Merck also “seems to have prevented independent studies of AAHS,” the Danes repeated a critique aired by world-famous aluminum expert Christopher Exley in 2018. In an extensive discussion of different aluminum-based adjuvants and their immunological mechanisms of action, Exley and co-authors emphasized the importance of studying aluminum adjuvants one by one, as each is “chemically and biologically dissimilar with concomitantly potentially distinct roles in vaccine-related adverse events.”

Concerningly, the Vaxelis liquid suspension is adjuvanted onto not just AAHS, but also another aluminum adjuvant — aluminum phosphate). The package insert disingenuously shorthands the combination of adjuvants as “aluminum salts.”

How this double whammy of aluminum (319 micrograms per vaccine dose) interacts with the vaccine’s six antigens, or Vaxelis’s numerous other ingredients, or the heavy aluminum load in other childhood vaccines is largely unknown.

According to the Vaxelis package insert, the vaccine also includes: polysorbate 80 (an ingredient flagged for its propensity to induce hypersensitivity reactions); glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde (problematic chemicals deemed necessary to inactivate pertussis toxin); bovine serum albumin (often harvested from bovine fetuses when female cows are found to be pregnant at slaughter); three different antibiotics (neomycin, streptomycin and polymyxin B); ammonium thiocyanate (also a rust inhibitor, weedkiller and defoliant); and yeast protein (associated, notably in hepatitis B vaccines, with autoimmune reactions).

Regulatory loopholes allow manufacturers to “grandfather” ingredients into new vaccines if the components are already present in other licensed vaccines — regardless of how inadequate the original safety testing may have been.

Thus, Merck and Sanofi perceived no need to test Vaxelis for DNA-damaging or cancer-causing effects, and conducted no studies of the ingredients’ pharmokinetics (i.e., how the substances move “into, through, and out of the body”).

The main cautionary note sounded in the meager Vaxelis patient information sheet is to not give Vaxelis to children if they are “allergic to any of the ingredients.”

For thee and thee … but not for me?

The CDC seems to be particularly interested in ensuring that poor and non-white children get Vaxelis. The agency began laying the groundwork to offer Vaxelis through the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program — the agency’s vaccine program for the poor — over two years ago, in March 2019.

In September of that year, the CDC followed up with an affirmative vote. Public health departments have been promoting Vaxelis to participating VFC providers since early June 2021.

At its September 2019 meeting, CDC outlined another topic deemed important for discussion in the near future — raising the issue of whether Vaxelis should be “preferentially recommended” for the American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) pediatric population.

The tenuous rationale, according to the meeting notes, was because, “in the pre-vaccine era” (more than 35 years ago), “Hib disease occurred at a younger age among the AI/AN population compared to the general population.”

Wave of the future?

Judging from its website, the CDC perceives combination vaccines to be the wave of the future, and has signaled its strong endorsement of Vaxelis by incorporating the new vaccine into its 2021 vaccine schedule.

As if exposure to six antigens were not enough, FDA and CDC also say it is okay for healthcare providers to administer the six-in-one shot at the same time as other vaccines.

These agencies’ characterization of the Vaxelis safety profile as “acceptable” indicates they have either not done their due diligence, or are willing to accept a high level of collateral damage in exchange for the “convenience” of six-in-one shots.

However, as the “overwhelmed by guilt” parents of COVID-vaccine-injured teens are increasingly finding out, convenience is poor consolation for life-changing or life-threatening adverse outcomes.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image is from CHD

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

BOMBSHELL: Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds [Full Transcript] - " - it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it's a way for them to know who's vaccinated because their blood will glow."
Studies PROVE That Live Parasites and Parasite Proteins Are Being Used/Tested in Vaccines | Are Parasites the Cause of ALL Illnesses? - At least 650,000 - 800,000 CHILDREN have been injected with a malaria vaccine to test its efficacy.
Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates - Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.
The War on COVID-19: Man’s Final Conquest of Nature. The Great Reset Requires “Merging Humans with the Machine” - "Man's conquest of nature, if the dreams of some scientific planners are realized, means the rule of a few hundreds of men over billions upon billions of men."
Taking a Look Back at the 2012 Olympics London Closing Ceremony: Does it Hold Secrets to What’s Going on in the World? - The world has been blind-sided for centuries, while underhanded organizations operate behind the curtain.
VMAT2 “God Gene” Has Been Studied Extensively Throughout the Years – And is Being Used in CRISPR Studies/Vaccines - According to studies, scientists can manipulate and "tightly experimentally tune" our level of spirituality.