Military Project Called the BEAST (for Battle Engagement and Tracking Targets) Has a Smiley Face Emoticon at the End of the Acronym

Psychological manipulation? Passive aggressiveness? Psychopathic expression?

Can someone tell me why a military project named the BEAST – which stands for “Battle Engagement And Simulation Tracking” or “Battle Engagement Area Simulator/Tracker”, has a smiley face emoticon at the end of the acronym?

Even as far back as 2005/2006 – where this page was captured on the webarchive for the first time, has that rather ominous smiley face emoji next to it.

So… what is the reason for this? Did the person who entered this in the website just think, “Wow! “Battle engagment and simulation tracking”? That sounds amazing! So amazing, that I feel the need to express my excitement and joy at this prospect by adding in a smiley face so others can share in my joy!”

Was this an actual legitimate entry, from the initiators of this certain project? Did the data entry person add it in out of sarcasm/distaste?

I don’t know. But the fact that it’s there, seems a bit foreboding and EXTREMELY out of place. Since I’ve been on the topic of A.I., perhaps the computer program read this particular line and felt the need to add it in itself. (That’s, of course, a sardonic assertion, with no hint of seriousness, but in light of the technological advancements and interest in “unlocking the true potential of A.I.”, I wouldn’t doubt it.)

Now, to get into the nitty gritty of this “BEAST” project, what does it entail?

Well… that’s where I came across an even deeper rabbit hole of sorts.

BEAST project started by DARPA

Firstly, according to a researchgate (pdf) publication about the BEAST program, written in October 1990:

“The present report is intended as a major progress report of a project started originally under DARPA/ISTO sponsorship and now continuing under direct SDIO support.”

[ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235102816_Battle_Engagement_Area_SimulatorTracker ] (page 6)

It’s main goals are the following:

The project’s purposes are to successfully apply parallel and supercomputer technology to the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO) battle management tracking problems, and to develop software and algorithms appropriate for new, highly parallel supercomputer architectures.

The preliminary implementation of BEAST performs five “operations”:

      1. Model conflict scenarios (ground truth) consisting of tens of thousands of targets, decoys, sensors, weapon satellites, and other objects in orbit or on ballistic trajectories,
      2. Simulate in a single system the sampling of ground truth by many loosely coupled sensors to produce contact reports from all sensors in a parallel fashion,
      3. Construct and maintain in real time the necessary composite data structures containing reports from multiple sensors and tracks as the sensor reports are generated,
      4. Process and analyze the data, producing projections of tracks tagged with estimated target identities and generating new track automatically,
      5. Model interactions and decisions by battle management analysis systems using these parallel data bases constructed in MLG form.

The last item in the list includes many important aspects of the SDIO battle management problem which the BEAST project is only treating in a cursory way. These parts are evaluating tactical threats to defensive sensors, communication and weapon platform satellites, weapons allocation against detected targets, kill assessments, strategic assessment, and target discrimination.

Source: [ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235102816_Battle_Engagement_Area_SimulatorTracker ] (pages 2&3)

Oops. Don’t forget to add the ” :- ) “. That’s what ties it all together.

MARCC – Multiple Automated Readout Computer Chip

Now if it ended there, that would be bad enough. But no. There’s more.

After looking up more information about this BEAST project, it led me to this interesting inquiry that was allegedly asked on January 3rd, 2000. Granted it came from a website labeled “rumormillnews” so take that as you will, but the fact that there is indeed a program called BEAST with the same acronym that is mentioned on the rumormillnews is intriguing enough.

However, after reading the contents, it mentioned a couple of other interesting leads to go down.

Source: [ https://web.archive.org/web/20211213214340/https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/942 ] “Project Tessera/MARCC”

“To Whom It May Concern:

I would like to place this into the “the mix” and see if anyone has additional info on this project.

The military super computer (BEAST – Battle Engagement Arena Simulation and Tracking) are to be used along with a tracking chip called Multiple Automated Readout Computer Chip (MARCC).

This has been done under the code name: Project Tessera. Tessera is Latin for-a-tag that is worn by a slave to mark ownership. The tag is also used to maintain the master’s accounts at the market place while the slave conducts business on behalf of his master.

It has been reported that G.I.’s are now currently tagged/implanted with the MARCC chip. The current plans are to expand this tagging/implanting to the general population (the greater arena of slaves). This would effectively strip away all that remains of human freedoms.

Anyone with personal knowledge or factual evidence regarding the above mentioned project, is requested to kindly step forward – elaborate and enlighten us.

T J Hines”

So yes. It references a “MARCC”, in addition to the BEAST. But surely there’s no way the MARCC is legitimate as well, right?

Although there is a slight difference in the acronym (chip vs. card, for example), the concept remains the same. “Multi-Automated Reader Card” – under the Government & Military filter.

And for additional reference, while there are not many websites at all that mentions this particular MARC(C), I did manage to find the following:

Multi-Technology Automated Reader Card

Agency: Department of Defense

Pilot Project Description:

The Department of Defense (DOD) is testing a smartcard as a multi-functional, cross-service utility card that will be carried by each military service member. The DOD has functional requirements for both a card that is a portable, updatable medium, and a static medium card that can be used as a key to a variety of databases. The Multi-Technology Automated Reader Card (MARC) card is being tested to determine if it can satisfactorily fulfill both these requirements for a number of different personnel related services.

So it would seem as if the MARC(C) that is mentioned in conjunction with the BEAST system/technology both originate from the DOD/DARPA institutions. And they have been heavily invested in implanting everyone with a microchip (under the false guise of medical/health reasons).

DARPA uses mainstream media to flaunt implantable microchip “to stop coronavirus in its tracks”

Considering that the same company who has been making worldwide surveillance technologies and weapons of mass destruction also wants to implant everyone with a tracking biochip, I’d say that people would have to be VERY careful before believing that this is for altruistic/philanthropic reasons.

But what about the “Project Tessara” that’s mentioned in the “rumormillnews” website? Again, 21 years ago in the year 2000, if the post is legitimate and accurate.

Well, yes. There’s information on that as well. Although again, very little.

Project Tessera

Tessera Inc. is a real company, at least according to an actual government website. An archived version can be found here.

Now, what are their agendas and/or products?

Well let’s see…

Pixel Abstraction Software and Test Platform Development for Advanced Seeker Image Processing:

“Tessera Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation are currently developing an advanced systolic array missile seeker system for massively parallel resolution of IR images for end-game targeting.”

Miniature Command and Data Handling Sub-System for Nanosatellites

“The goal of the Tessera’s Phase II work proposed here is to demonstrate the effectiveness of advanced packaging technology for miniaturizing a nanosatellite C&DH sub-system.”

Producibility of Higher Density Avionics

“Increasing the density of seeker focal plane processing elements is critical to achieving multi-color, fine grained end-game target resolution and LADAR processing capabilities for missile interceptor…”

Development of a Versatile Reconfigurable Computing Platform for Surveillance and Seeker Applications

“Typical surveillance and seeker information processing platforms today use general-purpose computer architectures or custom, application specific architectures to execute signal-processing algorithms…”

This was just a small list/section of the entirety of their webpage. So comparing the agendas and manufacturing processes of TESSERA Inc.’s products, they certainly do match pretty closely with the BEAST technology mentioned at the beginning of this post.

And as we can see in the blue tabs of the above image, the organizations involved in such projects include The Department of Defense (DoD), Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Missile Defense Agency (MDA).

By the way, in Italian, tessera means “card”. (MARC – Multi-Technology Automated Reader Card…?)

Now, I wish I could say that was all I found.

But sadly, no. No it was not.

This next reveal, takes us back to an extremely dark implication, and involves one of the biggest conspiracies of our time.

The Tessera Project (Short Film 2007)

While researching more information on the Tessera project, I came across a rather disturbing video.

The video was uploaded to youtube in 2007, in two parts, by ChrisRyan156. These are the only two videos he has uploaded to youtube.

In the first part, available here: [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7GCFWQttxE ], the description is as follows:

“This is one of my Dad’s videos that I found in his desk drawer, It’s an informative video and it’s scary stuff, what they are doing to all of us. I’ll try to get more, i know of other hiding places. Again, don’t tell anyone, I don’t want him to get in trouble, please.” ChrisRyan156

The second video, available here: [WARNING: GRAPHIC IMAGERY] CIA TAPES NOT DESTROYED has an even longer description:

“Hey Guys, Christopher Ryan here, The other day I was watching the news and saw just like everyone else, that the CIA had destroyed interrogation tapes. My dad won’t admit it, but he works for the CIA, I think. I remembered him talking to my mom, and he mentioned something about the tapes. The next day I went into his home office and found it in a locked drawer. They made a video out of if it, to teach the millitary how to do this kind of stuff, it’s called the tessera project. This was so Crazy, I just had to share with all of you, so i decided to put it on youtube. Don’t tell anyone, I don’t want my dad to get in trouble.” – ChrisRyan156

Of course, posting a suspicious video to youtube is the last thing you want to do if you don’t want people to tell others. So it seems as if this is just a marketing ploy to promote their film/video.

Indeed, since it is also listed in IMDB, with a different synopsis, but with the same name:

“The Tessera Project is an informative video produced by the Smith and Mitchell Corporation commissioned by the Department of Defense to shed light on the Enhanced Interrogation Techniques used domestically during the War on Terror that proceeded 9/11.” — Christopher Ryan

Now, if we take this synopsis as fact, then again we have the Department of Defense coming up. And it mentions 9/11 as the reason that the Tessera Project was enacted. (Of course, 9/11 is one of the largest controversies of our time since there is a lot of evidence pointing to the fact that this was an inside job, and from our own government, no less. – But that is a different extensive rabbit hole altogether.)

HOWEVER, if this video is true and it really was commissioned by the DoD, that does not explain why Project Tessera was mentioned in 2000, on the rumormillnews website. Assuming that the emails were not tampered with and the dates are legitimate, then Project Tessera was first mentioned OVER A YEAR before Sept. 11, 2001. The Project Tessera film leads us to believe that the project was initiated in order to stop future terrorists because of the attacks that happened in New York City, 2001. But again, if the date on the email is accurate, TJ Hines mentioned this project in January 2000.

There are also large implications that physically and psychologically torturing suspects is justifiable in order to “extract information” from them. As we can see in the video, because the briefcase that the suspect was allegedly holding contained a bomb, the DoD (and/or the filmmaker) is using that as an excuse that “Enhanced Interrogation Techniques” is necessary to “get what they want”.

It is a very disturbing and Machiavellian prospect all around.

And because I like to read text in order to really focus on the scope of these things, I have offered the full transcript of the video in question as well for the readers to take in. Please keep in mind that I am not sure of the legitimacy of the video and if it really was commissioned by the DoD as an “Informative Video”, or if it is simply a short film mockumentary.

But considering the deceptive and manipulative tactics of these government agencies, and their agendas at using psychological operations and wanting everyone to believe a lie (CIA), I have not jumped to any conclusions. Only to say that their involvements in multiple different projects are NOT for the benefit of humankind, but instead a means to defend their own institutions and agendas.

Narrator: “On October 18, 2012, at 4:36p.m., the Earth as we know it will be home to 7 billion people. More than half of them, will hate Americans. And will threaten the very thing we cherish most: freedom.

The Big Apple, District, the Windy City, the Emerald City, and the City of Angels.

As far as the American people are concerned, these 5 cities are highly vulnerable targets for an eminent terrorist attack. Much like they assume our job is to prevent those attacks from ever happening.

Hello. I’m Scott L. Campbell, and on behalf of the Tessera Project, I wish to congratulate you on dedicating your life to the neoteric American century. I’m here tonight for one purpose only. To disclose highly classified information about our young program. Remember this, when they can’t do it, they turn to us.”

“As you know, we are in the 21st century leading a global war. Our commander has strategically deployed over 1 million soldiers around the globe. And as we forge ahead in our occupations of Afghanistan, and Iraq, the public MUST continue to think that our intelligence reports are accurate. That Iran is extremely close to constructing a weapon of mass destruction.

If someone wanting to topple our empire stands in the way of bigger plans, we must stop them. As a result, we have chosen to preemptively begin Operation Condor within the next couple of weeks.

You see, in late August 2001, the project for the neoteric American century, gathered at a small ranch in Texas for an emergency session. Topic at hand, with an unquestionable war in the future, how do we protect the homeland when most of our soldiers are overseas?

The answer is, the Tessera Project. Where we watch, we read, we listen, and we stop.”

[scene shifts to camera crew moving offset – agent moves the narrator to a different set nearby to continue the presentation – starts with panning across the camera crew/agents]

“As we all know, American support these days is at an all time low. This is based on studies done within the last 6 years. But don’t lose hope just yet. A positive change is in our future. Big plans are in the works to get this country back to living in a daze.

I’m talking about another catastrophic event on U.S. soil, blamed on our enemies. The population will become increasingly paranoid. Fearing their lives are in danger, and having no one else to turn to, they will turn to us, their leaders, and our policy. It’s proven to work.”

“The main reason the Tessera Project was created, was to keep a watchful eye on the people that pose a threat living in the United States. In order to do this, rights unwillingly have to be given up.

At our disposal, are different ways to help in building a case against an ordinary citizen.

The man seen here [shows a hostage tied up in a dark room] has been labeled Citizen 1348B. All citizens of this great country have numbers.

This citizen, has written several letters to the editor of The New York Times and The Washington Post, speaking out against our current administration.

If you notice his demeanor, you will be able to spot that he’s hiding something. Through state of the art technology, we were able to track where he went at all times. I’m happy to report that Los Angeles and other major cities are very close to having cameras on every street corner.

Incriminating the suspect when he has done nothing wrong may be a difficult task at first. But not if you know where to look.”

[shows scenes of agents looking through Citizen 1348B’s trash and monitoring his calls]

“Never before in history, has a single government agency been granted so much leeway in terms of what they can and cannot do. Having to answer to no one, the commander, George Walker Bush, on October 17th, signed into law the United States Military Commission Act of 2006.

Under this provision, habeas corpus went out the window. Because of this, we were able to immediately pull Citizen 1348B off the street. We did not give him a trial, and he never received the chance to contact someone on the outside world.”

Narrator: “Once the enemy is in custody, many possibilities are available in order to get what you want out of the suspect.

Enhanced Interrogation Techniques are a necessity in the process of acquiring what you want from the enemy.

Here at the Tessera Project, you are taught to refrain from force, at the point just before the detainee sustains any serious mental and physical trauma.”

[shows graphic imagery of a suspect detained and tortured]

“Moments later, they begin the search for intel.”

[more graphic and dramatic abuse happening to the suspect]

“One of the most powerful techniques used in today’s interrogation rooms is waterboarding. Which causes a severe gag reflex, as water is continuously poured over 1348B’s face.”

[graphic language and abuse interrogation continues, including electrical torture]

“When administered, electric shock can be controlled with exact precision, cause great pain.”

[agents seem to be leading the suspect to confess through physical/psychological torture]

“The catastrophic, Pearl Harboresque events of 9/11 changed everything for us, and the American people.”

[shows briefcase containing a bomb]

“We are on the offense, in a fight for world domination, and globalization. We are the ones in control. And you are either with us, or with the terrorists.

I assure you that this program has saved many lives; and disrupted hundreds of plots to overthrow the government. In order to uncover false claims. You will be the ones to be judged throughout history. Don’t forget. You are doing this, not for me, but for the future of America.

Join me next time, where I will take you deep inside the Tessera Project.

I’m Scott L. Campbell, and on behalf of the Tessera Project, good luck.”

Now, who could have imagined that all of this information came from a simple, innocuous (unsettling) smiley face emoji at the end of a project (named BEAST, for one…) that is used for tracking/surveilling and battling designated targets?

And then, of course, we have to ask ourselves – who do they determine as their “targets”?

Justice Dept. threatens to sic FBI on parents as domestic terrorists
Biden Admin Now Including Anti-Vaxxers in Sweeping Expansion of ‘Domestic Terrorism’
‘Domestic Terrorism’ Bill Could Target Pro-Life Christians, Almost ‘Half Of The Country’: Tulsi Gabbard
Homeland Security Terror Alert Cites Vaccine Skeptics, Lockdown Opponents, & Election Questioners as “Significant Threats”
Since New DHS Alert, You’re a Potential Terrorist if You Oppose White House Lies

:- )

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by InspiredImages from Pixabay

Revolver Exclusive: The Big Pharma “Shell Game” Tricking Our Military Into Mandatory Vaccinations

Commander Jay Furman alerting of deception and malfeasance within the government and pharmaceutical companies.

Reposted from Revolver and Commander Jay Furman
Original article written on September 25, 2021 (reprinted with permission)

Last month, Revolver exclusively published a paper by Navy CDR J.H. Furman, warning that the mandatory COVID-19 vaccination of the entire Navy could constitute a national security threat.

Now, Furman has produced another paper, describing what he calls a “shell game” by which other U.S. government agencies, and several pharmaceutical companies are tricking the Navy into embracing mandatory vaccination, at great risk to the United States.

 

His paper is reproduced below.

The views and opinions expressed in this paper do not in any way represent the United States Navy or the Department of Defense.

 

CDR Jay Furman, USN

At the turning point of the Spanish American War, a single American officer volunteered to hand carry a critical message through impossible enemy lines to a fateful ally named General Garcia, forever changing the course of that war and our country. Today, one million COVID-19 non-vaccinated brave military messengers would deliver a, no less, existential dispatch: the U.S. Military is being misled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Center for Disease Control (CDC), and the Pfizer and BioNTech drug companies, resulting in the current mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies. While some media outlets reflexively cheer on the deadly shell game, is our military leadership prematurely mandating a vaccine that their personnel cannot, or should not, legally receive? Could that decision prove to be more detrimental to military readiness than the disease itself, thereby posing a greater threat to U.S. national security?

 

On August 23, 2021, news broke that Pfizer had obtained an FDA license for its COVD-19 vaccine. The contrived FDA announcement:

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine [BioNTech’s COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA, not Pfizer]. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine [Pfizer’s non-FDA licensed vaccine], and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee) [only available in markets outside U.S.], for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older (emphasis added).

 

The agency charged with the public’s health in pharmaceutical matters issued two related official letters confounding the announcement, above. Reconciling those letters and the ensuing policy is tedious, leaving the truth one-layer too deep for most media outlets. Unfortunately, the resulting confusion appears more goal than incidental. Bottom-line, the FDA did not license a COVID-19 vaccine physically available to consumers in the U.S.

In their first letter, the FDA issued the only COVID-19 vaccination license for COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA (Comirnaty) owned by German company BioNTech (not Pfizer). It is not produced for a U.S.-licensed label anywhere in the FDA’s jurisdiction. In their second letter, the FDA re-issued the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (not a FDA license). The letter officially designates Comirnaty as the licensed name for COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA. This EUA explicitly states that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine “[…] has not been approved or licensed by the FDA, but has been authorized by emergency use [EUA] by the FDA […]” (emphasis added). It goes on to assert that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) formulations are the same and thereby can be clinically substitutable. The FDA notes the abundant supply of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and the non-availability of Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) in the U.S. market. They then explicitly re-affirm that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is, in fact, experimental and only covered by the EUA, not FDA licensed.

 

FDA License Letter:

 

EUA Re-issue Letter Excerpts:

Confused yet? The CDC did not help matters, either. On Monday, August 31, 2021, their Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) released an inaccurate statement. The committee’s public announcement unanimously endorsed the FDA license for the “Pfizer-BioNTech licensed vaccine.” They misstated the vaccine name and license holder, never mentioning the actual owner of the FDA license, BioNTech, conflating legal ownership of Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) as Pfizer’s. They neglected to mention it is not available in the U.S. and therefore not possible for consumers here to receive. Those inaccuracies further aided the public misperception that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is FDA licensed. Concurrently, two high-level career FDA officials resigned at the time of the CDC ACIP board announcement, citing frustration with overreach into FDA affairs by other parts of the Executive Branch.

 

The Pfizer company issued a “forward-looking” press release, that was also easily misinterpreted. Perhaps they were hoping the mundane went unnoticed, as the pharmaceutical giant intermingled complex terms and concepts: Pfizer, BioNTech, Comirnaty, COVID-19, mRNA, EUA, authorized, approved, licensed, manufacturer, legal owner, national markets, and etc. The corporate relationship between Pfizer and BioNTech is no less convoluted. The joint venture and vaccine names, also similar, only add to the confusion. All of which potentially prevented a clear understanding of important legal and regulatory nuances, and allowed a fearful U.S. public to believe an available vaccine was now regulatorily licensed for their safety and legal recourse, when in reality, it was not. In brief:

  • BioNTech is the marketing arm of the two company enterprise in the U.S., Europe, and UK.
  • Pfizer produced Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) for BioNTech, while both submitted supporting material for the license.
    BioNTech, alone, received an FDA license for Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA).
  • Both Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) were covered, in-part, by the re-issued EUA.
  • Both Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA may be available in other countries. Yet, Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is not available anywhere under FDA jurisdiction.
  • If and when this occurs, Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) will be “[…] manufactured, filled, labeled, and packaged at Pfizer.”
  • Both Pfizer produced vaccines are, at times, marketed as Comirnaty outside the U.S. While only COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is officially recognized as Comirnaty in this country.

Recent U.S. military vaccine mandates look to be a direct result of the manufactured confusion. August 24, 2021 DoD guidance stated that the Department “[…] will only use COVID-19 vaccines that receive full licensure from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) […]” (emphasis added). A fully FDA licensed COVID-19 vaccine is not available to U.S. service members. They are simply not able to legally comply with the DoD mandate.

By administrative and regulatory law, it appears that all public and private institutions are not allowed to mandate EUA medical products. In 21 U.S. Code 360bb-3-Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies for unapproved products (b)(2)(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), it says that recipients have “[…] the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” In the FDA’s own policy guidelines it is written that recipients “[…] have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product […].” Under U.S. Code 335(i)(4) and related regulations, “the informed consent process typically requires human subjects to agree to the receipt… upon a disclosure that the product in question is not yet FDA approved and that the receipt of such product is voluntary.” Informed consent is required to administer EUA vaccines with few exceptions.

 

The newly mandated Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is legally defined as an EUA and therefore cannot be mandated in the military unless informed consent is waived by a presidential waiver and, according to U.S. Code Section 1107a of Title 10 and DoDI 6200.02, only after meeting specific criteria. Two of these criteria apparently preclude its issuance in this case: 1) “[…] specified military operation presents a substantial risk that military personnel may be subject to a chemical, biological, nuclear, or other exposure likely to produce death or serious or life-threatening injury or illness […]” and; 2) “[…] no available satisfactory alternative therapeutic or preventive treatment in relation to the intended use of the investigational new drug.” In the first, a waiver of informed consent is limited to the support of a specific military operation. For the second, monoclonal antibody therapy is an FDA-authorized alternative COVID-19 treatment.

It does not matter that the FDA stated in their re-issued EUA, their website, or Fact Sheet that the vaccines are similarly formulated and can be clinically interchangeable. The simple fact is that the administration of an EUA vaccine, by law, requires informed consent. It is therefore illegal to mandate any of the three U.S. available COVID-19 vaccines that are not officially licensed. As the Department did not receive an informed consent waiver from the President to mandate the Pfizer-BioNTech CV-19 Vaccine, and the FDA licensed Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is not yet available in the U.S., it remains uncertain how the military can continue to incorrectly mandate COVID-19 vaccination.

Consequently, the Services’ mandatory vaccination orders are impossible to lawfully execute according to Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 90. U.S. military officers take an oath to the Constitution, and not to those appointed over them in the event orders are unlawful (enlisted service members swear allegiance to both). An officer may find themselves duty bound to refuse an unlawfully mandated vaccination in support and defense of the law of the land, on the behalf of their troops.

 

Meanwhile in other countries, Pfizer has not provided any COVID-19 vaccines without explicit (and extreme) indemnity contracts in place. They are requiring not only protection from all future product harm civil lawsuits, but also protection from Pfizer’s “[…] fraud, gross negligence, mismanagement, failure to follow good manufacturing processes… or malice […].” The company is requiring some countries to fund foreign bank accounts, take out insurance, and put up sovereign assets such as their Embassies or military bases, according to global health law lecturer Mark Eccleston-Turner of the University of England and statnews.com.

The aforementioned regulatory charade may be a U.S. version of Pfizer’s COVID-19 global indemnity project. Unfortunately, the company has a history of misbranding “with the intent to defraud or mislead.” In a landmark DOJ case they were found guilty of a felony, and fined $2.3 billion (the largest such fine ever) for fraudulent marketing. Interestingly, the FDA receives almost half of its current funding from industry in the form of “regulatory fees,” a clear conflict of interest which should be strongly questioned.

If the vaccine is actually safe and effective, then why all this confusion? Why did they only license “Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA),” exclusively available outside of this country? Why did they not license the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” the only label available in the U.S. Why does Pfizer not just import the approved label? Why are they so keen on some form of almost total indemnity everywhere their vaccines are available? Why are we told they are interchangeable, but their license and EUA are legally not? If what is in the vial is the same, then why the legal labyrinth? And what exactly was the cross-agency overreach into FDA licensing processes and why is there no formal Congressional inquiry?

 

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) is asking questions. He recently wrote a letter to the FDA requesting “why they did not grant full licensure for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that is already in use and available in the U.S., and how the agency will ensure that those being vaccinated under mandates will receive the FDA-approved version […].” Those concerned about our nation’s defense should consider asking their Congressmen and Senators to do the same.

The complex web of words, business structures, international legal agreements, and unforthright regulation may not collectively protect U.S. citizens. Rather, they enable a slight-of-hand scheme that increases global market-share, reduces expenses, and lowers potential legal exposure. All the while, this product (with no long-term studies and declining efficacy) is pushed on the consumer—at all costs—regardless of the potential harm. If the confusion were removed as it should be, informed citizens, their elected officials, and public servants would not stand for this carnival-like side show.

Nine months into the vaccination campaign, available evidence to-date does not look good for existing U.S. vaccines. The original “wild” version of SAR-CoV-2 is virtually dead and the increasingly immune variants dominate. Delta is highly contagious, but much less dangerous to the general population. The largest real-world analysis study, examining 700,000 records in Israel’s official health database, found that the COVID-19 vaccinated are 13 times more likely to be infected and 27 times more likely to demonstrate serious symptoms than those with recovered natural immunity. The Combined Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which tracks post-vaccination events for possible patterns, has through August recorded more than 600,000 events, including 81,000 serious or life-threatening events and about 13,000 deaths.

In contrast, as of 12 August, the COVID-19 mortality rate in the military was .001%, or 29 deaths in the almost 2.2 million-strong and exceptionally healthy U.S. service member population. Recent studies, meanwhile, indicate that teen boys and young men (the military’s dominant demographic) are more likely to suffer heart problems from vaccination than they are to be hospitalized from COVID-19 itself. It is not difficult at all to imagine that in a force as young and healthy as the military, universal vaccination could cause more harm than the disease itself.

We all, citizen, elected official and military, want to protect the Force, but the extent of national harm that could result from doing so in this way, with wrong or incomplete information, is staggering to contemplate. Industry, regulators, and media must be immediately cross-examined. We literally only get one shot at this, as these vaccines are irreversible experimental gene therapies. I have previously suggested a Department-wide safety pause to conduct further study, so as to not prematurely commit the entire U.S. fighting force to one permanent experimental group. Given all of the cross-agency confusion, Congressional inquiry may be necessary. A bipartisan body could better investigate the misperceptions informing national security decisions.

Until more is reliably known, DoD can still maintain a control group with almost half of the 2.2 million uniformed population still deciding not to vaccinate. We could easily commence prevention and treatment therapies like I-MASK+ currently used in nations around the world with great efficacy.

It would be a national calamity to “rush to failure” en masse with the entire U.S. troop strength, using vaccines that may be more harmful than the disease itself to this specific population entrusted with our nation’s defense. The pervasive misperception that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is FDA licensed, thereby justifying mandatory vaccination policy, is a logical syllogism based on a false premise and, therefore, invalid. The FDA, CDC, Pfizer, BioNTech and the media must reveal what is under all of the “shells” for the sake of this Republic.

Many U.S. military service members are carrying these messages to Garcia in the strongest terms possible, by tendering resignations. I am aware of many seasoned officers and enlisted who have done so, or done the effective equivalent (early retirement or non-reenlistment). This mandatory vaccination decision may, in the end, squander billions in training and readiness. The sudden loss of even a fraction of the one million non-vaccinated force could expose critical capabilities at scale. The talent capable of separating, at this time, have completed all service obligations, are fully trained and highly experienced, constituting the best of our warfighter expertise and lethality. Many others are declining to visit the military recruiter’s office for the first time. The already difficult task of recruiting for our all-volunteer force may become nearly impossible with a mandatory vaccination policy.

The most tragic are those already in the Service who have a remaining obligation (contracts or enlistments) and cannot choose to leave for risk of legal or financial ruin. Continue down this path, and our military will almost certainly suffer a heretofore-unseen morale deficit, further reducing overall fighting capability. If we run off or demoralize fully half of our armed force, then the defense of this nation will be significantly crippled.

And for what? To protect 0.001% of those in service? We would wreck our military, just after wrecking our economy, at the worst possible time, when U.S. soft power and perceived hard power are arguably at their lowest levels in half a century. This unnecessary vaccine mandate comes at a moment when strategic competitors are demonstrably more capable, more aggressive, and more able to project their will against U.S. interests than ever before.

If the mandatory COVID-19 vaccine policy is truly a military readiness initiative, then the reality is it will cause a far graver impact to our national defense posture than this disease. America’s foes do not care the reason why our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guard or Guardians are not on duty to prevent attack. Mandatory vaccination’s enterprise-level damage to recruiting, retention, and trust and confidence within the ranks could make us all more vulnerable than COVID-19 ever could alone. It has been said that this great nation can only be conquered from within. If the military self-inflicts a strategic sized wound (by persecuting half the troops), then it is possible we could gift this nation’s enemies our own mortal blow.

To review, the FDA licensed vaccine is not available to consumers in the U.S. and even DoD cannot mandate any emergency vaccine without a specifically conditional, presidential waiver of a service member’s informed consent. To do otherwise is unlawful. The way I see it, service members have three choices: 1) choose to receive the EUA shot; 2) submit a religious and/or medical waiver, or; 3) refuse the EUA shot, as only a fully licensed vaccine labeled Comirnaty, not available at your U.S. clinic, can be mandated at present.

As we do best, service members are helping service members. More information can be found at COVID-19 educational information hub: thecontrolgroup.us

Commander Furman is a career United States naval officer, naval aviator and foreign area officer with extensive experience advising senior military, diplomatic and international organization’s leadership. The Commander has spent years serving throughout Africa, Asia, Europe and the Middle East at sea, ashore and airborne. He holds a Master of Arts in Security Studies from the Naval Postgraduate School.

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS:
Thank you to Commander J.H. Furman and The Revolver for bringing these incredibly important issues to our attention. The amount of deception and manipulation that these “medical/health agencies”, government/politicians and pharmaceutical companies have employed to vaccinate everyone cannot in common sense terms be deemed as a beneficial goal and/or for health reasons. There is something else at work here.

Thank you again to Commander J.H. Furman and everyone else speaking up during these perilous times. Your bravery and integrity in coming forward is greatly appreciated and much needed to bring this awareness to the population.

God bless.

Dr. Michael Yeadon (Former Pfizer Chief Scientist) Warns Pregnant Women of the Dangers of Taking The Experimental COVID Vaccine

Study on women showed “vaccine induced autoimmune attack, on their own placenta.”

Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former Chief Scientist and VP of the Allergy and Respiratory Unit of Pfizer, has been very outspoken in his assessment of these “vaccines”, and has called this agenda out several times for being deliberate crimes against humanity. The following video below is an explanation and warning to people – specifically for women who are pregnant or who are of child-bearing potential, to avoid these dangerous injections.

Source: bitchute | WHAT IS TRUTH?/WAS IST WAHRHEIT? |
3 THINGS WOMEN SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE COVID JAB – DR. MICHAEL YEADON

The following text is transcribed from the above video with some embellishment added for emphasis. All words are from Dr. Michael Yeadon.

“You’re being lied to. I’m being lied to. We’re not being treated like adults. And the authorities are not giving us full information about the, the risks of these products. And so I’m going to try and do a non-science presentation, um, because I really want to speak to you who are probably not scientists. You’ll be a lay audience. So I’m going to do my best.

So, uh, three things to tell you about my concerns about the impact of these vaccines in reproductive health, fertility and pregnancy.

The first thing, is so obvious, that you’ll agree with me when I tell you. And that’s, we never, EVER, give experimental medicines to pregnant women. Why do we not do that? Well, you’ll probably will have heard of the word ‘thalidomide’. 60 years ago, through, I think an ignorant failure of medicines regulation, we were more exposed to a new product for morning sickness called thalidomide. And it led to at least 10,000 birth malformations. And we didn’t know at the time, that the studies they were doing at the time simply wouldn’t pick out thalidomide as the actual toxin in the womb.

And I think it also taught us that babies are not safe and protected inside the uterus, which is what we used to think. But in fact, there are a miracle of minute development, critical stages, especially in the early stages, where if they interfered with biochemicals or something else, it can change the course of development to that child irreparably.

So that’s the thing to tell you. You never ever give, really inadequately tested medicines, medicinal products, to a pregnant woman. And that’s exactly what is happening. Our government is urging pregnant women, and women of child-bearing age, to get vaccinated. And they’re telling them they’re safe. And that’s a lie. Because those studies have simply not been done.

So reproductive toxicology has not been undertaken with any of these products. Certainly not a full battery of tests that you would want. So here we are, dosing potentially hundreds of millions of women of child-bearing potential, with products which are untested in terms of impacts on fertilization and development of a baby. That’s bad enough, because what that tells me is that there’s recklessness; no one cares. The authorities do not care what happens. But it’s much worse than that. And remember, I’m a toxicologist as well as a research scientist.

Two things to tell you.

The first only came to light because of a Freedom of Information request made by somebody to the Japanese medicines regulator. So the Japanese medicines regulator had required Pfizer to do a study where they looked at how the vaccine distributed around the body, in this case of a rat, over time. It’s a distribution pharmacokinetic study. And they were not required in America or Europe, because that’s not what you do with vaccines. Another – for another day. But the Japanese regulators required it.

Now I’ve seen a copy of that report, and I’m entirely able to read and interpret it. And to my horror, what we find is the vaccine doesn’t just distribute around the body and then wash out again. Which is what you hope. It concentrates in ovaries of rats. And it concentrates, at least, twenty-fold over the concentration in other background tissues like muscles.

Um, what’s it doing there? Well I don’t know. You don’t want this product in your ovaries. It’s simply not necessary to induce immunity to have a vaccine in your ovaries. And, as it’s concentrating in the ovaries, getting higher concentrations over time, they have not even defined what the maximum levels are or when that occurs.

So, so now we’ve got a second problem; that the vaccine, at least in rats, distributes in the ovaries. And I’ll tell you, a general rule of thumb in toxicology, is if you don’t have any data to counter contradict what you’ve learned, that’s the assumption you make for humans. So my assumption at the moment, is that’s what’s happening to every female who’s been given these vaccines. These vaccines are concentrating in her ovaries.

That’s very worrying. So we don’t know what that will do, but it cannot be benign. And it could be seriously harmful. Because the vaccines will then express the coronavirus spike protein and we know that there are unwanted biologies from that spike proteins. That’s the second one.

I’ve got another one now, and it’s even worse! Because it’s actually, this time an experiment in humans. In females.

I wrote with a German doctor 8 months ago, a petition to the European Medicines Agency. And amongst several concerns we had, one was that the spike protein is faintly similar, not very strongly, but faintly similar to an essential protein in your placenta. Something that’s absolutely required for both fertilization and formation and maintenance of the placenta. So you can’t get pregnant and have a successful pregnancy if this protein is damaged in any way. And we noticed that the coronavirus spike protein is similar. Similar enough that I would worry.

And I wanted them to do some experiments, hopefully to rule out the possibility that when you vaccinate the person, who then makes spike proteins, and they develop an immune response against this spike protein; my worry was that there would be an echo. You know. A faint signal that would potentially bind this similar protein in the placenta. And the studies just came out a few weeks ago and it says, exactly, what I was worried about.

15 women were given Pfizer vaccines, they drew blood samples every few days, and they measured antibodies against the spike protein; which took several weeks to appear. They also measured antibodies against the placenta. And they found within the first 1-4 days an increase of two and a half to three times – a 300% increase, in the antibodies against their own placenta. In the first 4 days. Um, so, I’m sorry to say this, but that is a vaccine induced autoimmune attack, on their own placenta.

And I think you can only expect that that is happening in every woman of child-bearing potential, is generating antibodies against this critical protein required for fertilization and successful pregnancy. Now, what the effect will be we can’t be certain. Again it can’t be benign. I don’t know whether it’s enough to cause first trimester losses. But I would think it would, because I’ve looked at the literature, and women who are unfortunate enough to have what are called autoimmune diseases, tend to have a higher rate of first trimester losses. And what this vaccine’s done is induced an autoimmune response.

So, I’m here to warn you that if you are of child-bearing potential, or younger – so, not at menopause, I would strongly recommend you do not accept these vaccines. Thank you.”

Thank you to Dr. Michael Yeadon for bringing this awareness and research to the forefront and warning people of the potential dangers to this COVID vaccine.

I also want to point out that most vaccine trials take 10-15 years, if not more, to determine safety and efficacy. Yet with the COVID vaccine, it was developed in 2 MONTHS since word of the outbreak hit (some sources are claiming it is because of the wonderful advancements being made in tech and the “stupendous foresight of the NIH” to predict a similar outbreak would happen… if that’s what you would like to believe…) and the clinical trials started soon after. With emergency authorized use only, NOT APPROVED, 9 months later.

With this in mind, even if it becomes “approved” – in which this little caveat has caused more drama and confusion than what was necessary – are we going to still continue to trust the FDA, the CDC, NIH, NIAID on these incredibly unnecessary vaccines, when we can now see the results of this rushed mRNA/spike protein experiment? Not to mention, there are treatment regiments available that are KNOWN to treat this illness, in which the EUA would not be required since under their own regulations they state:

“Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.”https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained

Doctors have proven, IN COURT, that Ivermectin, an already approved medicine, works and nutraceutical bundles are beneficial in treating these respiratory syndromes. Yet they are being SUPPRESSED by the very health agencies that are promoting vaccines every where we turn, even though the vaccines are not approved and are causing thousands upon thousands of side effects and deaths.

Please do your research and use critical thinking and discernment. Doctors like Michael Yeadon get nothing from trying to save your life and help you (except censorship and ridicule from the mainstream media and big tech platforms) and shows genuine concern for our well-being. While pharmaceutical companies have gained BILLIONS from pushing these experimental vaccines onto the population.

Thank you again to all of the sincere doctors/scientists/healthcare workers/researchers who are bringing all of this information to light.