Is This Post Legitimately Detailing a Global Government Plan Using COVID as the Catalyst? | If So, It May be Related to a Previous Genocide Experiment

“THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government.”

A post was created on a forum describing a “billionaire elite” detailing the COVID scam and the actual purpose of unleashing this narrative upon the world.

Whether it was a LARP, a legitimate disclosure, or a disinfo campaign… there are uncanny parallels to what is going on currently and what was presented in the post. Granted, the post was created in August of 2021, so they may have simply combined multiple so-called “conspiracy theories” together to present a somewhat coherent anecdote.

However, the concepts documented below are admittedly awfully close to several plans/projects/programs etc. that have been admitted throughout the years by several individuals and organizations in high places, in order to implement a One World Order.

This is not a secret. And it is not a conspiracy theory.

While the post below has been floating around the internet for a few months, I think it is prudent to bring it up again, to remind us of the possibility of this being a true account, and what may be to come:

“I will not tell you who, or why. Let’s just say I spent days with this person and they have a bolthole in NZ. It’s the first time I’ve ever ‘hung out’ with a known, high net worth individual (billions). It was a chance encounter after doing some work for them in Queenstown. Dinner, drinks were had, and discussions took place. I was invited to hang at their place for the weekend. I am posting this now after processing it.

They were loose lipped and open with me but did say if mention these things, that ‘we never met’. But laughed and said no one would believe it anyway, so ‘have fun’, just keep their identity out of it.

They said we have nothing to worry about here, so in-spite of what they told me, he told me to consider myself one of the luckiest humans alive to be in NZ right now.

They asked if I took the vax, and were relieved when I said no. They said kiwis would get the antidote anyway but some will not make it to that point. After all, someone had to run things here ‘for them’.

Initially asked what they thought the ‘end game’ was for all this covid stuff, They asked me what I thought it was, with great interest, but I wasn’t close.

They basically said this..

-a plan was devised many years ago, and for many years that is all it was, a plan. They had to wait many years for the technologies available to make the plan viable. And to recruit the appropriate individuals.

-This is definitely about a new global government being put in place (details will continue)

-This new global government is already in place operating for years in complete secrecy, waiting on the sidelines, moving the chess pieces.

-The new government required some of the top minds on the planet, almost all of them came on board of their own free will and with a full belief in the cause of a new world government. In their view they are brute force saving humanity at all costs. I was told those who refused were dealt with, but in most cases, they would bring the person to the wider group and through discussions, they were convinced and became committed to the cause. Most times, these ‘minds’ were applying for fake jobs and going through psych evaluations etc as a first step.

-This plan is ongoing and the most complex global chain of events ever put into motion.

THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government. How they are doing this is pure genius and pure evil.

To achieve this plan, my chance encounter asked how would I do it? How would you turn every citizen of every country against their own government? I really have no idea. So they laid out the basics for me.

-There must be a global engineered ‘sickness’
-There must be mass fear, panic and paranoia
-Leaders, Scientists and Media must converge on consensus of a treatment
-that treatment would be essentially handed to them without them even realizing it
-Initially, there can only be few ‘sanctioned’ treatments, all other treatments must be deemed ‘dangerous, unsafe and banned’
-Leaders, Scientists and Media are manipulated, to believe this treatment’ is the only option, the only way to keep you and your family safe.
-Leaders, Scientists and Media in a sense, give you their word that this treatment is safe and effective

-Children were also targeted to inflict maximum pain and anger when it goes bad.

I found this part interesting. Our leaders, scientists and media are NOT complicit in this plan or actually part of this plan in any way. NONE of them, not even Fauci. They are mere fodder to these elites, serving a purpose then will be “discarded” or “‘fed to the angry” ! They have been played.

-The few outliers who question the ‘treatment’ are discredited in a variety of ways and censored
-Sanctioned ‘treatments’ are biologics/poison that takes 2-3 years to be fully realized.
-mRNA was the advanced technology they were waiting for.
-Public messaging ensures people beg for the ‘treatment’ and line up for it.

We could say, the plan is well underway at this point and so far hugely successful. The mRNA uptake has been huge and the people all believe the ‘treatment’ is the only way back to normality.

I was told it has exceeded their wildest expectations!

WHAT NEXT?

This is where the final plan executes.

The tables turn on the vaccine narrative. I was told in time the vaccine will increase infection and increase death. That billions will die, and the people will be enraged and burn their governments to the ground. Their leaders, scientists and media will be torched, hunted and hung in the streets. BOTH sides will burn their governments to the ground. The pro-vax side, completely betrayed and dying will rage.. the non-vax side will rage for what their gov allowed to happen.

I was also told when this happens think “Mad Max” for a while, but think of NZ “Elysium”. There are a few designated zones like AZ, but due to geography and infrastructure NZ is known as Zone 1. Once the masses are free of government and all those who ‘betrayed’ them, and they have suffered enough. This is when the new global government will emerge as the great saviour. It will be an ‘”easy sell” I am told.

This was my brain dump. I probably left out quite a bit. They waxed on about this but somewhat ignored direct questions.

They said they liked me and want me around when the dust settles, that I was hugely useful to them.

I dunno, part of me just thinks they were f’ing with me. I do feel better about being where I am right now.”

– sk1nnybob

So if this post is legitimate (or even if it isn’t – since it is still eerily accurate and talked about throughout many years), all of us need to realize the steps that are being taken, and especially the slow leak that is happening now that the “vaccines” – the “savior treatment”, the “holy grail mRNA technology” that they were allegedly waiting for (which I have no reason to doubt) has caused more detriment and damage than the “virus” itself.

Once this is fully realized by the public – if they can snap out of their cognitive dissonance enough to believe the actual leak that the vaccines do, in fact, cause excessive injury and death – then a full on rebellious outbreak is expected.

People will be rightly angry, and as many have already concluded, people like Fauci, Gates, Tedros, Walensky, Bourla, Trudeau, Johnson, Macron, Biden, etc., etc., etc. will be sought after to seek retribution on. And yes, I agree that everyone who was involved in perpetrating these crimes against humanity should be held accountable and tried for their crimes.

I do want to briefly highlight the opinion of the above poster, who stated: “Our leaders, scientists and media are NOT complicit in this plan or actually part of this plan in any way. NONE of them, not even Fauci. They are mere fodder to these elites, serving a purpose then will be “discarded” or “‘fed to the angry” ! They have been played.”

 I, personally, do not agree with the first portion of their comment. I do agree with the second portion, however.

In some capacity, many of the people who have been put front and center of this scam, know full well what they are doing. This is my assessment, based on all of the research, documents, collaborations, event planning, etc. that has gone on throughout the years by the governments and other institutions; involving the likes of the WEF, WHO, UN, NHS, NIH, Johns Hopkins University, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Soros, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Pfizer, Moderna, etc., etc.

There are MANY players, and many are pawns, whether they realize it or not. And yes, they will be sacrificed by the very own groups they endorse if it serves their purpose.

However, this post is ultimately not about that.

This post is how to best move forward with the “plans” that they (tptsb – the powers that shouldn’t be) have dictated upon the world. Obviously, the best way forward for us, is to do the exact opposite of what they want us to do. So… what do they want us to do, exactly?

“THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government.”

“There must be mass fear, panic and paranoia”

” – the people will be enraged and burn their governments to the ground. Their leaders, scientists and media will be torched, hunted and hung in the streets. BOTH sides will burn their governments to the ground. The pro-vax side, completely betrayed and dying will rage.. the non-vax side will rage”

I want everyone to pay specific attention to the word “rage” here.

Now I want readers to direct their attention to these statements:

“The new government required some of the top minds on the planet – “

“Most times, these ‘minds’ were applying for fake jobs and going through psych evaluations etc as a first step.”

This is important if we are to consider what may be the inevitable “PLAN” that these “global elitists” want to execute upon the world.

With that being said, there are eerie correlations between what was stated from this billionaire admission, to a tragic event that happened in 1994 – Operation Crimson Mist.

Some of the details follow…

Operation Crimson Mist, Electronic Slaughter in Rwanda

(Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.)

Willing to Commit Mass Murder

Though officially tagged an “experiment”, none of those present had any doubt that this was merely a cosmetic cover for the gruesome operational work ahead. Each member had been carefully vetted and then vetted again by US Intelligence to ensure they had the “right stuff”, and were philosophically committed to two objectives.

First was the evolving need to control or eliminate political dissent by remote means in the run up to the 21st Century, and second was the need to stem or reverse massive population increases across the world, which threatened to overwhelm existing natural resources, especially water and food. Intrinsically this required a willingness to commit mass murder, and everyone present had passed this critical test with flying colors.

Operation Crimson Mist, Electronic Slaughter in Rwanda

Hm… depopulation agenda… Yes, that is a big goal of self-described philanthropists… This also describes a recruitment process to filter out those who would not be instrumental in their plans.

Moving on:

Urged on by corrupt officialdom, Hutu tribesmen started marching on Tutsi tribesmen and threw a few rocks at them. Innocent enough at the outset, although with a few nasty machete cuts here and there. But then the C-130 Hercules made a carefully-calculated pass directly over the advancing Hutu, and they suddenly went berserk. Eyes glazed, the mood of the Hutu crowd went from simple anger to uncontrollable rage, and within minutes, hundreds of assorted Tutsi body parts were flying through the air.

Operation Crimson Mist, Electronic Slaughter in Rwanda

Creating Electronic Rage

“What the Hercules crew had just achieved has been an open secret since the late fifties, when researchers accidentally discovered that there is a precise “control” brain wave for literally everything we do, and for everything we feel. The problem back then was that each of these control brain waves [rage, fear, panic, lethargy, vomiting and so on] had to be transmitted with an accuracy taken out to three decimal places, or they simply did not work at all. But as the years rolled by, and with the advent of transistors and microprocessors, the operational application of precise control brain waves became practical reality.”

Operation Crimson Mist, Electronic Slaughter in Rwanda

“What the C-130 crew were actually engaged in was “electromagnetically augmenting” a pre-existing state. Remember that the agents and security service personnel first had to point the Hutu tribesmen in the direction of the Tutsi, induce reasonable anger, and make sure they were appropriately armed. Only then could the C-130 go to work with the precise control brain wave of “rage”, augmenting and thus upgrading crowd behavior from that of angry demonstrators to uncontrollable genocidal maniacs. Although not “classic”, this was and is unquestionably mind control, for the simple reason that external means were being used to force an irresistible change in behavior.”

Operation Crimson Mist, Electronic Slaughter in Rwanda

It certainly does seem like this type of technology and capability has been tested for many years until its refining moments, which has all been culminating until this very point in time. One has to wonder if the 5G antennas that have gone up all around the world will lend a significant hand in flipping on this specific brain wave electronic frequency to induce as much panic and “rage” as they possibly can to get people to turn on one another and their governments.

Not to mention the suspicious contents of the vaccines that many people took, which is being revealed to contain nanoparticles, micro-routers, sensors, etc.

So, if this is the master plan of these “elites”, how would we counter that?

Well, like I mentioned earlier, it would be to do the exact opposite of what they want us to do.

Number 1, no violence. These global dictators are banking on us turning on each other and the government and basically tearing our own civilization down. They WANT this to happen. Meanwhile, while people are acting out their aggression on each other, they are hiding in their bunkers and watching everything unfold.

Number 2, do not cave in to fear, panic and paranoia. This is exactly what they want you to do. This will exacerbate the violence and the rage and people will be trapped in their own hysterical outbursts. “Order out of chaos” – or so “they” are hoping.

Number 3, be acutely aware of your own emotions, feelings and thoughts. Keep your mind in check. I fully believe that they will be initiating all kinds of manipulation tactics to get us to react violently/impulsively; whether it’s through psychological operations, brain wave frequencies, mass psychosis, etc. Strengthen yourself mentally, physically, emotionally and spiritually.

Number 4, do not, under any circumstance, accept the New World Order government. Do not accept their world passport. Do not accept their social credit system. Do not sign any contracts. Do not accept their “olive branch”, no matter how tempting it may look. And I do believe it will be tempting. (Think NESARA/GESARA…)

Number 5, and most importantly, LEARN TO LOVE ONE ANOTHER. This is the greatest commandment that Jesus Christ gave to us. There is a reason for that. By loving one another, we would not want to commit atrocities, violence, rage, hatred, etc. on each other. Therefore, by default, the “bad guys” automatically lose. Even if they were to wipe us out anyway, our consciousness will live on and we will be in God’s good graces.

The reason why the luciferians, freemasons, global “elites”, etc. HATE Jesus Christ, is because He is LITERALLY the Way, the Truth and the Life. He has shown us that the way to defeat this evil, is to be loving. That’s it. He has never condoned violence (one can debate His anger at the temple courts in John 2 – although one can attribute this to controlled, righteous indignation), and in fact, He has asked us to take up our cross and to follow Him. How many of us are actually doing that?

“And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength.’ This is the first commandment. And the second, like it, is this:You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.”Mark 12:30-31

“For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.”1 Timothy 1:7

“There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear, because fear involves torment. But he who fears has not been made perfect in love. 1 John 4:18

 “But I say to you who hear: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you,  bless those who curse you, and pray for those who spitefully use you.”Luke 6:27-28

“Then Jesus told his disciples, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul?Matthew 16:24-26

While we should most definitely not give in to these global dictates and attempts at building a One World Order – though, honestly, if the Biblical prophecies are true (and I believe they are…) we may not have a choice, we can do the next best thing and resist this tyrannical takeover in any way we can – though not by becoming a rage-filled, violent, vengeance-seeking rebellion, but instead, doing the exact opposite – leave the society/world as we know it, make a name for ourselves by forming our own communities and/or free living in the country, and step out of this corrupt system while we can.

There may be inclinations from many to defend our world/our society from this onslaught, but I think this way of thinking is missing the point. “The world” was never ours to begin with. At least not yet. Right now, it belongs to…

Jesus answered and said, “This voice did not come because of Me, but for your sake. Now is the judgment of this world; now the ruler of this world will be cast out.John 12:30-31

We know that we are of God, and the whole world lies under the sway of the wicked one.1 John 5:19

In my opinion, we need to prepare ourselves for the world when Jesus Christ reigns, and not to continue to defend a system that was implemented by satan to begin with.

The Heritage of the Righteous and the Calamity of the Wicked

A Psalm of David.

37 Do not fret because of evildoers,
Nor be envious of the workers of iniquity.
For they shall soon be cut down like the grass,
And wither as the green herb.

Trust in the Lord, and do good;
Dwell in the land, and feed on His faithfulness.
Delight yourself also in the Lord,
And He shall give you the desires of your heart.

Commit your way to the Lord,
Trust also in Him,
And He shall bring it to pass.
He shall bring forth your righteousness as the light,
And your justice as the noonday.

Rest in the Lord, and wait patiently for Him;
Do not fret because of him who prospers in his way,
Because of the man who brings wicked schemes to pass.
Cease from anger, and forsake wrath;
Do not fret—it only causes harm.

For evildoers shall be cut off;
But those who wait on the Lord,
They shall inherit the earth.
10 For yet a little while and the wicked shall be no more;
Indeed, you will look carefully for his place,
But it shall be no more.
11 But the meek shall inherit the earth,
And shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace.

12 The wicked plots against the just,
And gnashes at him with his teeth.
13 The Lord laughs at him,
For He sees that his day is coming.
14 The wicked have drawn the sword
And have bent their bow,
To cast down the poor and needy,
To slay those who are of upright conduct.
15 Their sword shall enter their own heart,
And their bows shall be broken.

16 A little that a righteous man has
Is better than the riches of many wicked.
17 For the arms of the wicked shall be broken,
But the Lord upholds the righteous.

18 The Lord knows the days of the upright,
And their inheritance shall be forever.
19 They shall not be ashamed in the evil time,
And in the days of famine they shall be satisfied.
20 But the wicked shall perish;
And the enemies of the Lord,
Like the splendor of the meadows, shall vanish.
Into smoke they shall vanish away.

21 The wicked borrows and does not repay,
But the righteous shows mercy and gives.
22 For those blessed by Him shall inherit the earth,
But those cursed by Him shall be cut off.

23 The steps of a good man are ordered by the Lord,
And He delights in his way.
24 Though he fall, he shall not be utterly cast down;
For the Lord upholds him with His hand.

25 I have been young, and now am old;
Yet I have not seen the righteous forsaken,
Nor his descendants begging bread.
26 He is ever merciful, and lends;
And his descendants are blessed.

27 Depart from evil, and do good;
And dwell forevermore.
28 For the Lord loves justice,
And does not forsake His saints;
They are preserved forever,
But the descendants of the wicked shall be cut off.
29 The righteous shall inherit the land,
And dwell in it forever.

30 The mouth of the righteous speaks wisdom,
And his tongue talks of justice.
31 The law of his God is in his heart;
None of his steps shall slide.

32 The wicked watches the righteous,
And seeks to slay him.
33 The Lord will not leave him in his hand,
Nor condemn him when he is judged.

34 Wait on the Lord,
And keep His way,
And He shall exalt you to inherit the land;
When the wicked are cut off, you shall see it.
35 I have seen the wicked in great power,
And spreading himself like a native green tree.
36 Yet he passed away, and behold, he was no more;
Indeed I sought him, but he could not be found.

37 Mark the blameless man, and observe the upright;
For the future of that man is peace.
38 But the transgressors shall be destroyed together;
The future of the wicked shall be cut off.

39 But the salvation of the righteous is from the Lord;
He is their strength in the time of trouble.
40 And the Lord shall help them and deliver them;
He shall deliver them from the wicked,
And save them,
Because they trust in Him.

Much love, and many blessings.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Walensky and Fauci Fumble in Their Responses to the Senate Committee, with Rand Paul’s Call for Fauci to Resign – But is the Senate Culpable as Well?

Rand to Fauci: “You won’t admit that it’s dangerous, and for that lack of judgement, I think it’s time that you resign.”

This post is not meant to convey whether or not there is an existence of a “deadly virus” or not. But it is to point out the suspicious nature of experiments that the NIH has funded/endorsed in regards to gain-of-function research, and also to show the indirect and dishonest responses from two individuals who have been spear-heading the shady “coronavirus/vaccine” situation.

The spotlight is on CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, and NIH/NIAID Infectious Disease “expert” Anthony Fauci.

Now, I want to first preface by saying that I am withholding judgement on the legitimacy of Senate hearings to begin with. While I would love to believe that there are indeed good politicians in high places that can make real change in ousting corruption in big establishments, many are speculating that psyops have been put in place to prolong certain narratives while keeping people’s hopes alive that something will be done about it. And of course we can’t ignore the possibility that even if there are those who are trying to make a real positive change, they may be set against a huge criminal organization who will stop at nothing in order to drive their own agenda forward.

Case in point: Walensky, the FDA, Pfizer, etc. have already gone ahead with their atrocious approval of these dangerous COVID “vaccines” on children, in which this agenda should never have gone on so far to begin with since there is ample evidence that the vaccines have nothing to do with our health and are definitely NOT “safe and effective”.

So to continue witnessing this farce without arrests being made casts a dubious look into the justice system as it is. Not only do Fauci, Bourla, Gelman, Daszak, Walensky, Gates, their agencies, as well as complicit governmental bodies, including Joe Biden, etc. have immense crimes to answer for, but the whole legal/legislative systems seems to be right behind them if this is allowed to continue further.

(This is, of course, under the assumptions that the whole of the legal/legislative structure isn’t already completely corrupted/broken to begin with…)

With that being said, I would still like to point out the following two Senators that are at least calling out Walensky and Fauci for their complicity in keeping this ruse going. Senators Rand Paul and Bill Cassidy certainly seem as if they are trying to get to the bottom of these narratives. But could they be merely actors on a stage? Keeping us happily engaged in believing that the “good guys” are making progress? Or are they genuinely one of the few brave souls standing up to deceit and subterfuge?

I will say this: while Anthony Fauci is a known liar, how good is his acting? He certainly looks shaken up as Rand Paul questions him…

Senator Rand Paul@58:24: “Fauci, I don’t expect you today to admit that you approved of NIH funding for gain-of-function research at Wuhan. But your repeated denials have worn thin and the majority of Americans, frankly, don’t believe you.

Even the NIH now admits that EcoHealth Alliance did perform experiments in Wuhan that created viruses not found in nature that actually did gain in lethality.

The facts are clear. The NIH did fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan despite your protestations. You can deny it all you want, but even the Chinese authors of the paper, in their paper, admit that viruses not found in nature were created, and yes they gained in infectivity.

Your persistent denials though are not simply a stain on your reputation, but are clear and present danger to the country, and to the world. As Professor Kevin Esvelt of MIT has written, “Gain of function research looks like a gamble that civilization can’t afford to risk.” And yet here we are again, with you steadfast in your denials. Why does it matter? Because gain-of-function research with laboratory created viruses not found in nature, could cause a pandemic even worse the next time.

We’re suffering today from one that has a mortality of approximately 1%, they’re experimenting with viruses that have mortalities of between 15 and 50%. Yes, our civilization could be at risk from one of these viruses.

Experiments that combine unknown viruses with known pandemic causing viruses are incredibly risky. Experiments that combine unknown viruses with coronaviruses that have as much as 50% mortality could endanger civilization as we know it.

And here you sit. Unwilling to accept any responsibility for the current pandemic, and unwilling to take any steps to prevent gain-of-function research from possibly unleashing an even more deadly virus.

You mislead the public by saying that the published viruses could not be COVID. Well exactly no one is alleging that. No one is alleging that the published viruses by the Chinese are COVID. What we are saying is that this was risky type of research; gain-of-function research. It was risky to share this with the Chinese, and that COVID may have been created from a not yet revealed virus. We don’t anticipate the Chinese are going to reveal the virus if it came from their lab.

You know that, but you continue to mislead. You continue to support NIH money going to Wuhan. You continue to say you trust the Chinese scientist. You appear to have learned nothing from this pandemic.

Will you today finally take some responsibility for funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan?”

Anthony Fauci: “Senator, with all due respect, I disagree with so many of the things that you’ve said.

Gain – first of all, gain-of-function is a very nebulous term. We have spent, not us, but outside bodies, a considerable amount of effort to give a more precise definition to the type of research that is of concern that might lead to a dangerous situation.

You are aware of that. That is called P3CO.”

Senator Rand Paul: “We’re aware that you deleted “gain-of-function” from the NIH website.”

Anthony Fauci: “Well I can get back to that a moment, if we have time. But let’s get back to the operating framework and guide rails of which we operate under. And you have ignored them. The guidelines are very very clear, that you have to be dealing with a pathogen that clearly is shown and very likely to be highly transmissible in an uncontrollable way in humans and to have a high degree of morbidity and mortality, and that you do experiments to enhance that. Hence the word EPPP: Enhanced Pathogens of Potential Pandemic.”

Senator Rand Paul: “So when EcoHealth Alliance took the virus SHC-014 and combined it with WIV-1 and caused a recombinant virus that doesn’t exist in nature, and it made mice sicker, mice that had humanized cells, you’re saying that that’s not gain-of-function research?”

Anthony Fauci: “According to the framework and guidelines of – “

Senator Rand Paul: “So what you’re doing is defining away gain-of-function. You’re simply saying it doesn’t exist because you changed the definition on the NIH website. This is terrible and you’re – you’re completely trying to escape the idea that we should do something about trying to prevent a pandemic from leaking from a lab.

There’s – the preponderance of evidence now points towards this coming from the lab, and what you’ve done is change the definition on your website to try to cover your ass, basically. That’s what you’ve done. You’ve changed the website to try to have a new definition that doesn’t include the risky research that’s going on.

Until you admit that it’s risky, we’re not going to get anywhere. You have to admit that this research was risky. The NIH has now rebuked them. Your own agency has rebuked them.

But the thing is, you’re still unwilling to admit that they gained in function when they say that they became sicker. They gained in lethality; it’s a new virus. That’s not gain-of-function?”

Anthony Fauci: “According to the definition that is currently operable… you know – Senator, let’s make it clear for the people who are listening.

The current definition was done over a 2-3 year period by outside bodies, including the NSABB, two conferences by the National Academy of Science, Engineering and Medicine, on December 2014, March 2016. We commissioned external risk benefit assessment, and then on January of 2017, the office of science and technology policy of the White House issued the current policy.

I have not changed any definition.”

Senator Rand Paul: “And coincidentally, coincidentally the definition appeared on the same day the NIH said that, yes, there was a gain of function in Wuhan, the same day the definition appeared – the new definition, to try to define a way what’s going on in Wuhan.

Until you accept it, until you accept responsibility, we’re not going to get anywhere close to trying to prevent another lab leak of this dangerous sort of experiment. You won’t admit that it’s dangerous, and for that lack of judgement, I think it’s time that you resign.”

Chairman Murray: “Thank you Senator Paul. And I would like, um, to give the time to Dr. Fauci.”

Anthony Fauci: “Yeah, well, there were so many things that are egregious misrepresentation here, uh, Madame Chair, that I don’t think I’d be able to refute all of them, but just a couple of them, for the listens to here for – 

You has said that I’m unwilling to take any responsibility for the current pandemic. I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. The current pandemic. Okay?

Number two, you said the overwhelming amount of evidence indicates that’s a lab leak; I believe most card-carrying viral phylogenists and molecular virologists would disagree with you, that is much more likely, even though we leave open all possibilities, it’s much more likely that this was a natural occurrence.

Third, you say we continue – “

Senator Rand Paul: “We’ve tested 80,000 animals and no animals have been found with COVID.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, the time is for Dr. Fauci to respond.”

Anthony Fauci: “And third, you made a statement just a moment ago that’s completely incorrect. Where you say we continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Senator Rand Paul: “You approved it in August of last year…”

Anthony Fauci: “No no, your statements say, quote, I wrote it down as you were writing, “You continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology – “

Senator Rand Paul: “Your committee a month ago says you still trust the Chinese scientist and you still support the research over there. You said it a month ago in the committee.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, I have allowed Dr. Fauci to respond. You’ve had your time and I’m going to give him one more minute.”

Senator Rand Paul: “If he’s going to be dishonest he ought to be challenged.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, we will allow Dr. Fauci to respond after you’ve given accusations like that. Dr. Fauci.”

Anthony Fauci: “Well I don’t have any more to say except to say that as usual, and I’ve – I have a great deal of respect for this body of the Senate and it makes me very uncomfortable to have to say something, but he is egregiously incorrect in what he says. Thank you.”

Senator Rand Paul: “History will figure that out on its own.”

While Rand Paul seems to be on the right side of history, the complete negligence and willful ignorance on the part of the Senate committee as a whole to not continuously address the many, MANY adverse events of the COVID vaccines which have harmed MILLIONS of people, according to VAERS, and who instead continue to humor the narrative that the vaccine is the end all be all, is, quite frankly, ludicrous and criminal in and of itself. While they may allude to the information about the adverse events, no steps have been taken to fully investigate and analyze the hundreds of thousands of ACTUAL DATA provided.

There is enough substantial evidence declaring that the COVID vaccines are NOT safe nor effective, yet the ruse continues to go on.

Not to mention the push now to mass vaccinate millions of children, who were never at high risk from “COVID” to begin with… it is obvious that the vaccine effort should have been halted A LONG TIME AGO.

Keep in mind that it is common knowledge that the adverse events are under-reported by a factor of only 1-10% being reported for non-serious side effects, and a speculative estimation of 10-50% being reported for serious events.

There is also the suspicious account of the FDA presentation that flashed for a brief split-second showing a list of the “possible” side effects from the COVID vaccines to be on the lookout for:

Screenshot from: [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XTiL9rUpkg ] U.S. Food and Drug Administration@2:33:40

So to continue to ignore these facts and people’s plights from the devastating effects of the vaccines and prolonging this “pandemic” and the vaccine narrative is either complete obliviousness, to put it nicely, or downright complicity.

Again, this is not to speak of everyone in the Senate individually (unless it is in fact true…), but to point out the incredibly inane decisions of those ultimately in charge of these committees and giving their final verdict which has enabled these atrocious crimes against humanity to continue.

It is my opinion that a call for Anthony Fauci to resign does not do the damage that he has caused throughout the years (including his organizations: NIH/NIAID) justice, but instead efforts to make arrests of those initiating these crimes should be pursued as well.

Moving on to the second portion (from the same hearing), we see Rochelle Walensky responding to Senator Bill Cassidy’s inquiries to address natural immunity versus vaccine-induced immunity, and also her refusal to answer uncertainty in how many CDC employees are vaccinated.

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Dr. Walensky, couple things: as I walked in, I came in late, one of you – either you or Dr. Fauci – were saying that the reason that we’re not saying that natural immunity is protective as is a vaccine, even though there’s recent publication showing that 6-8 months out, 92% of those with natural immunity have T cells, B cells and antibodies that would be considered adequate to protect, and indeed B cell continues to climb, that we don’t have data.

Now in your response to Mr. Casey, you just mentioned that CDC has access to tens of thousands of EHRs [electronic health records]. And I’ve been told that HHS or CDC has access to patient identifiable data, as to who test positive. So I do that as a prologue.

If we don’t know that natural immunity confers protection against future infection, is because we’ve decided not to look. Because I’ve learned that there is a cohort of people that we know have been previously infected, we’ve got the bench research showing that the triad of antibodies, T cells and B cells are there, and that 92% of them are still there at 6 months out, so why don’t we – why have we not done the research showing that natural immunity confers protection against recurrent infection?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Yeah, thank you so much for allowing me to clarify this point, because I understand, I understand the question.

Um, first of all, let me just reiterate that our current stand after reviewing 96 papers in the scientific brief on this issue is that everyone who’s been previously infected should be vaccinated.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But that’s not my question.”

Rochelle Walensky: “Right, agreed. So, so – and part of the challenge here is as you know the infection induced immunity and the biases associated with retrospectively looking at the data. Several of those papers that we reviewed for that brief have demonstrated that the kind of disease that you had at the time you had it matters.

Um, did you have disease a year and a half ago? Did you have – were you an older person? Were you – ?”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “May I stop you for a second?

We could do this prospectively, because you know who is actually, apparently I’m told, you’ve got patient identifiable data, and you would be able to say, okay, 6 months ago we’re going to start everybody infected within the last 6 months, and be able to follow their EHR, prospectively, to see this.

I mean, theoretically, CDC has the ability to do this right now.”

Rochelle Walensky: “Yet that too would have its own biases. So one of the things that we have demonstrated in the scientific brief is that asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic people, who might not present to their providers, might present to an urgent care clinic who might not be recorded in their own EHR, likely have less robust protection than those who’ve been severely affected.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But that could be established prospectively if using the data that you have. And you could even say, if you had symptomatic infection, you don’t need to be vaccinated, we would consider you immune, you don’t have to be subjected to the mandate, but – “

Rochelle Walensky: “If we had data – if we had data that demonstrated a correlation of protection, Dr. Fauci already mentioned data that they’re working on to look at correlates of protection, not just in antibodies, but as you noted in T cell function as well. So if we were able to document a correlate of protection we absolutely could prospectively follow – “

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But this paper that I’m reading from NIH, speaks that there is durable memory of the virus up to 8 months after infection in 95% of the people who recovered, including B cells, which continue to climb, and T cells and antibodies.

And I’m also saying you could do it clinically, because we have data that’s patient identifiable, that we could go back and look and see if they were exposed. They could be in a hot spot like Louisiana, where you know they’re being exposed, and then you would see. Not just by lab data, but empirically.

I can tell you, the American people intuitively understand this, and they feel a little bit like we’re being willfully blind to it.

I have limited time, let me just ask you something else. What percent of CDC employees are vaccinated?”

Rochelle Walensky: “We’re actively encouraging vaccination in all of our employees and doing a lot of education and outreach in order to get our agency fully vaccinated.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “And the – but the percent?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have that for you today.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “I’m told that 75… some north of 75% of CDC employees at headquarters are still working remotely. Is that correct?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Um, we are following regulations through HHS and the federal government.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “No, that’s not my question. I apologize to be rude, but – but I’m asking a very straightforward question.

I’ve been told that north of 75% of employees at CDC headquarters are working remotely. Is that correct?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Senator, I don’t actually know the number off the top of my head. So I’d have to – “

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “When you look down the hallway, are there empty desks? Are over 50% of the desk empty?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Senator, I don’t have the numbers off the top of my head. What I will tell you is that we’re working closely within HHS and the administration to follow the governmental rules for return to the workplace.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “There was a recent GAO report that shows, it was released in the last 2 weeks, that there’s been no coordinated response in the federal government to get people back into work.

Now if there’s any agency that – since we have teachers in Fulton county are back at work, that the caseload of COVID in Fulton county is about 88, at its peak it was 606, if what I’ve been told by someone who frankly kind of knows, that people in laboratories are not showing up, I have no clue how people, how laboratory workers who presumably are vaccinated, wearing PPE, would consider themselves eligible to stay at home.

I say this because, I just want to echo – we’ve got to lead by example in the federal government. If our public health agencies don’t have enough confidence in the immunization and the PPE to go back to work, fighting infectious diseases, there’s going to be a lot of undermining of a willingness to further fund public health.”

Rochelle Walensky: “We absolutely have our central labs back at work, conducting their essential research towards this response, and um, we are following the regulations and providing technical assistance and technical support to the federal government for return to work policies.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Uh, one more thing, I had – Angus King and I had sent a letter dated February the 25th, asking about genomic surveillance. We’ve still not received a response. You reference it in your earlier remarks. Both Senator King and I would appreciate a response.”

Rochelle Walensky: “We’ll get back to you. Thank you very much.”

I can sum up Walensky’s testimony in 5 short dialogues; paraphrasing, of course:

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Do you have data showing that natural immunity may offer better protection than vaccine immunity; and if not, then why?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

(By the way, I want to interject here by saying that Senator Bill Cassidy is absolutely correct when he posits that the reason that they “don’t have the data” is because they deliberately did not look for it. I also want to add the shady practice of the pharmaceutical companies breaking protocol and completely getting rid of the control group after only a few weeks into the COVID vaccine trial…)

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “What percentage of CDC employees are vaccinated?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Are around 75% of CDC employees still working remotely from home?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “When you go into the CDC headquarters, how much percentage of desks have no workers there?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Bill Cassidy: “Senator King and I asked you about “genomic sequence” back in February but have not received a response yet. We would appreciate a response.”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time… but we’ll get back to you.”

This is the Director of the CDC, ladies and gentlemen. This is who is in charge of an organization that we are supposed to entrust our lives to in order to help get us through a “deadly pandemic”.

When she cannot say, in all honesty, that 100% of her CDC employees – who presumably have complete trust in the vaccines that she kept reiterating is the most important thing needed for our health – is fully vaccinated, while at the same time preaching that young children most definitely should get it, is EXTREMELY suspect and I am amazed at the continual indulgence of these hearings to not call out this hypocrisy for what it is. (Save for a small handful of Senators, that is.)

But at least we know that Rochelle Walensky hasn’t lied about how many of her employees have been vaccinated… yet.

Lastly, during the committee hearing, there were other Senators posing additional queries as to the questionable responses and suspicious nature of those testifying and their habits of skirting away from certain questions, which I want to mention here as well.

Senators Marshall, Burr and Moran (of the additional 3 testimonies that I watched, there may have been more with similar interests) have also raised legitimate concerns over the vaccines, mandates and debates about natural immunity versus vaccine efficacy – and was also met with a jumble of non-answers mixed with endless endorsements of the COVID vaccines.

Honestly, if I, an average American citizen, can see through their facade, then surely well-educated and seemingly experienced individuals in detecting deceit and malpractice would be able to determine the illegitimacy of these corrupt establishments and their cohorts as well.

So again I have to wonder at the incredibly unnecessary perpetuation of these fraudulent activities, instead of finally taking appropriate steps to shut down this criminal conspiracy.

To those Senators and other researchers who are genuinely seeking the truth and attempting to uncover the treasons, misconduct, and egregious scandal that has corrupted our governmental body and health/medical industries, my sincere gratitude and respect to you for standing strong and having enough integrity to stand up against these depravities.

God bless.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Edward Lich from Pixabay

BOMBSHELL: Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds [Full Transcript]

” – it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it’s a way for them to know who’s vaccinated because their blood will glow.”

As well as offering informational articles on this website, I also provide written transcripts for those who prefer to read texts to these incredibly important interviews and insights.

The video below is of a Pfizer employee who exposed emails detailing the secretive nature of keeping news about aborted fetal cells being used in the vaccines/vaccine development away from public knowledge. She also reveals the SM-102 lipid that is used for vaccines is actually referred to as “luciferase” – these ingredients which are, of course, being hushed about in the mainstream media and which may be part of the “trade secrets” that Bill Gates does not disclose is in the vaccines.

Are the reasons for patent protection only? Or because they know that it would cause an uproar in the communities if the population realized that aborted fetal cell lines were used in the vaccines and/or the testing of it, and that “luciferase” is a real enzyme being used in this process as well? If it was about our health and for altruistic purposes, and “free”, then what would be the problem in dispensing the FULL ingredient list for the whole world to know and be able to reproduce for their own countries?

The answers become obvious for those with eyes to see and ears to hear. And when one realizes the corrupt nature of these companies and organizations, the fact that these vaccines are not for our health becomes clearer and clearer.

Thank you to Melissa Strickler for bringing this to our attention. The full transcript of the interview between her and Jim Hale from LifeSite News is below. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Jim Hale: “Hello LifeSite friends. Jim Hale with you. And we have today a very important woman for you to meet. In fact, this may be one of the most important developments that we have seen in the last year and a half, throughout the COVID ordeal, and the vaccine battles; all the misinformation that we’ve heard from big pharma, from the government, from the media.

Well, a young lady in Kansas has stepped forward. She was a Pfizer employee for ten years. And recently she went to Project Veritas exposing some of the emails that came right from Pfizer executives and Pfizer employees who were talking about how to talk to the public about the Pfizer vaccine, which is derived from aborted fetal stem cells. And we have her with us right now; her name is Melissa Strickler.

Melissa, thank you so much for joining us today, here on LifeSite. You are a very courageous young woman and I – I just wanted to ask you about that, Melissa. What was it that compelled you to want to come forward?”

Melissa Strickler: “Well, honestly, I mean, I stumbled across the information by accident, but I would rather say a miracle. ‘Cause I’m not computer smart. And when I found the information I thought, you know, the Lord wanted me to show it to my family to convince them not to get it and things like that. Then I found out by presenting them with this, they had been lying to me and already got it. Well, maybe not lying, but not telling me.

And so then I was like, well why did I find this information? Then what am I supposed to do? And I told a couple of friends who had previously worked at Pfizer what I found and they referred me to Project Veritas. And I prayed about it, quite a bit, to decide what to do, and it’s like God just kept giving me the right verses. Kind of pointing me down the path of what to do and Project Veritas reached out to me almost instantly after getting a hold of them, which I took as a sign to go with them.

And they also had a whistleblower shortly before me named Jody who – she whistleblew against her hospital and she said she fears God and not man. You know, what they can do to us. And so I was like, if I feel that way, why aren’t I doing anything about it? And I just – it’s important information for the world to know, especially because so many people were getting denied their religious exemptions under false things.

Jim Hale: “Right. And that’s what this is all about, Melissa. Because, what – what Pfizer’s messaging has been, it is, is being very evasive about the truth about this vaccine being derived from, you know, aborted babies. Is what’s going on here, right?”

Melissa Strickler: “Well they’re just simply being deceitful. I mean, they could end the “conspiracy theories”, they could correct the fact-checkers on social media and they remain silent because they know if they do say, ‘yeah, we did use fetal cell lines in the development of this’, they KNOW that they’re not able to deny the religious exemptions. And so I think that’s what it’s about.

I don’t – I mean, it’s wrong to, in my opinion, to benefit from an abortion. Just my opinion; I don’t think God would want us, you know, doing those things. But it’s even more than that. I mean, it goes so deeper than that as to public deceit and they’re trying to get it to children. It’s just… ridiculous.”

Jim Hale: “Well, let’s, let’s, let’s talk about some of these emails that you exposed. Starting with Vanessa Gelman, who is the Pfizer Senior Director of Worldwide Research. And this is what she had to say:

“From the perspective of corporate affairs, we want to avoid having the information on fetal cells floating out there… The risk of communicating this right now outweighs any potential benefit we could see, particularly with general members of the public who may take this information and use it in ways we may not want out there.”

Wow.

What was your reaction when you saw this?”

Melissa Strickler: “Well these were the first things I had stumbled upon in the database, and it made me sick to my stomach because I’m like, “If they’re going to lie about something like this, what else?” Because I had been in contact with the company, you know, asking questions – ’cause I’d hear a “conspiracy theory” and I’d email them and they’d shut it down.

I never asked about the fetal cell lines just because, I don’t know, it never stumbled across my lap to ask that, I guess. But I did ask about other things, and I knew they were being deceitful in their answers and that just kind of led me down the rabbit hole of, why?

Jim Hale: “Yes, and then Gelman went on to say in another email, “We’ve been trying as much as possible to not mention the fetal cell lines…”

And let’s talk about this gentleman, Philip Dormitzer, Pfizer Chief Scientific Officer. Now these, these aren’t a bunch of underlings we’re talking about. These are important people at Pfizer here. And he talks about, tell us first of all, he mentions, HEK293T – what does that mean, Melissa?”

Melissa Strickler: “Well it’s actually like one of the things, if the public knew, they definitely would care. They’re human embryonic kidney cells. So in the 70’s there was an aborted fetus from an unknown origin, and they noticed that its cells are never stop replicating, unlike normal cells, which, you know, die. 

And so they just saw – their claim is they saw a cost-benefit that, why keep, you know, having to get these fetuses and all of these things, when we can use these immortal cell lines that never die. And what they use them for is to see how the vaccine or what they’re working on will affect our cells. Some things do include those cells; I’m not a hundred percent sure if they’re in this final vaccine or not. But how can we trust them if they say they aren’t? So, they’re basically cancerous cells from an aborted fetus that they use to test.

Jim Hale: “That, that’s fascinating. It’s so helpful to learn this, ’cause there’s so much confusion out there. 

Melissa, what, what was your job at Pfizer? And how long did you work there?”

Melissa Strickler: “So, I started working there when it was called Hospira, a little over 9 – over 9 years ago; it’s not quite been 10 years. But I started working there as a pack assistant and I was on the production line where we’d just get the product, label it, ship – pack it, and send it out. MQ started – MQ is a Manufacturing Quality. They’re the ones who see the whole process of the manufacturing process and they noticed, you know, I had an eye for finding things and I didn’t make a lot of mistakes. Things like that. And so they offered me a job as a promotion, considered out there. And so I took it.

Loved the job. I love it, I had the best boss, he’s a God fearing man, he was great. I had some, actually I do believe because of that position is why I became a Christian, because I worked with Christians who ultimately helped, you know, plant seeds.

So, but what our job was, was we have to know everyone’s job in the plant on papers. So we get like electronic training documents we have to read and sign off on, and sometimes we have to do physical training to make sure we know the task. But we see the entire operation from fill, to light testing, to packaging.

And I, specifically, my job is to like, really make sure protocols are being followed, to make sure paperwork’s all in order, and my favorite part of the job is inspecting the product. Which is when you’re just checking for defects, looking to see if there’s little bits of metal, or glass, or cracks, or any sterilization issues that could cause harm to the customer. So I’m the final inspection of the product, sometimes. You know. Things like that.”

Jim Hale: “Right. So, you were a trusted employee of Pfizer, so, you know, when you saw this email from Dormitzer, I just want to read this, where he talks about the HEK293T cells, and he says, the use for IVE assay. What does that mean?”

Melissa Strickler: “I think it means ‘in vitro’. There’s like ‘in vivo’ and ‘in vitro’. In vitro is like in a human sample, and in vivo is like a test tube.”

[ EDITOR’S NOTE FOR CLARIFICATION ]: The difference between in vivo/in vitro:

“The term in vivo refers to a type of experiment that is carried out within a whole, living organism, such as a plant or animal.. In vivo means “within the living” in Latin, which aptly fits its modern definition.. Overview. In vivo refers to a specific type of experimentation that involves living animals.”

“In vitro is pretty much the exact opposite. Instead of complex, living organisms, in vitro experiments refer to techniques that use biological components such as cells or biological molecules and are carried out outside of a living organism, whether that be in a test tube, culture dish, or so on.”

biologydictionary.net

Jim Hale: “Right. And this is very important, what he goes on to say here. Especially for Catholics. He says, “they’re ultimately derived from an aborted fetus”. So there you go, right there. Okay. That, that’s – “

Melissa Strickler: “But they say, “Oh! But they’ve replicated so many times that it’s like not the same thing.”

Jim Hale: “Right, right. That, you know, yeah, so somehow there’s enough distance that you shouldn’t have to worry about it. But, and he says, “On the other hand, the Vatican doctrinal committee has confirmed that they consider it acceptable for pro-life believers to be immunized.”

And what’s stunning about this, Melissa, is that it shows you how much they understand about, you know, what the push-back on this is going to be. So they have their talking points all squared away to deal with, with Catholics, and you know, by extension other Christians as well. So, you know, if the Vatican says it’s okay, then, then we’re good with this, and all we have to do is polish our message.”

Melissa Strickler: “Yeah, but is the Vatican saying it’s okay because they’re not getting the facts? Like are they okay because they don’t understand? And even though I’m not Catholic, I understand that Catholics follow the pope. They, they follow what they deem, you know, like – but Christians don’t answer to the pope. And I think that’s where their disconnect is, in the, in these emails, is they think because the pope says that it’s okay, that all religious people should be okay with it.”

Jim Hale: “Well, right. And we had one judge in New York trying to say, “Well, look, sorry. You don’t get to this religious exemption because pope Francis says it’s okay.” So that, that’s all part of their attempt to just whitewash the whole thing, for sure. Thankfully though, the federal judge in New York has issued a preliminary injunction that upholds the religious exemption for medical records in the state of New York. So that is a major battle won.”

Melissa Strickler: “That’s great, but I still, like – it still concerns me. Like one of my friends just text me yesterday that hers is getting denied. You know? Like – and that’s in Kansas! That’s in the Bible belt.”

Jim Hale: “Yeah. Well, well, Melissa, that’s why what you have done is so vital. This is just so important that you have exposed Pfizer’s real agenda, here. And I want to ask you a little bit more about that, Melissa. Just, you know, you said you had plenty of Christian friends, many of those who helped lead you to Christ. So I take it you’ve had a conversion, somewhat recently in your life?”

Melissa Strickler: “I was born again on January 19th, 2019 at 6:44p.m.”

Jim Hale: “I love it! That, that is just wonderful. And you’re recently married, too?”

Melissa Strickler: “Yes. I just got married. Um, my legal name, like I haven’t gotten to change all my documents yet. My legal name is Melissa [MacIntey(sp?)] now, but Melissa Strickler is my maiden name and it’s still in the process of getting changed. So…”

Jim Hale: “Well Melissa, I know that you’ve put your name out there, and I want to encourage all of those who are watching this interview right now to go on to the link that we’re going to put below on the Project Veritas page, just to see those initial interviews you did with James O’Keefe.

And I also want to let our viewers know that we are going to step up now to try to help you, Melissa, because you got a phone call, that was really creepy! I gotta say. That, that’s on the Project Veritas website and we’re going to, we’re going to go ahead and play that right now, just so our viewers can hear the call you got from the – this man in security from Pfizer. Let’s listen to that right now:”

Clip insert:

“My name is K.J. Wigglesworth. I’m from the corporate office Pfizer security in New York City. I’d like to pass a message on to you from Ian MacKellar, who’s the VP and site leader at the McPherson plant for Pfizer vaccines.

We’ve been advised to let you know that you are not, under any circumstances, to return to work. Your termination is being processed at the current time. If you have any questions, contact Mr. MacKellar at the McPherson plant and I’m sure that he will explain the reasons why.”

Jim Hale: “Melissa, when did you get that phone call?”

Melissa Strickler: “I got it on this past Saturday. Forgive me, I don’t know the days. They’ve all kind of blurred together.”

Jim Hale: “And have you heard anything else after that?”

Melissa Strickler: “I did get a letter – um, some people were thinking that maybe I was scammed and it wasn’t a real call from my job. I knew it was, but, just to lay that to rest, I did get a confirmation letter in the mail letting me know that my job protection ends on the 19th of this month from my leave.”

Jim Hale: “So you’ve been terminated?”

Melissa Strickler: “Basically. I mean they haven’t fired me. I’m sure I’m still going to get pay checks for about two weeks, um, but… yeah, as soon as they can, they don’t want me coming back there.”

Jim Hale: “Yeah, well, 2 weeks of paychecks for 10 years of work is not all that great. So that’s where I was mentioning – I know you weren’t that familiar with LifeSite, before we got in touch with you, but I want to just say, Melissa, that you and your husband are now part of the LifeSite family. Because I would say 95% of all the people who are watching this right now are Christians. And they really want to help right now.

When they see people like you, and they see David, you know, grabbing his slingshot to go after Goliath, and that – that’s what Pfizer really is right now. I mean, the power companies like Pfizer has right now, is unprecedented really in human history. They’re outside the law.”

Melissa Strickler: “They’re trying to act like a government of their own. And I don’t like it.”

Jim Hale: “They – absolutely. So, thank you SO much for what you have done. And, as I said, you’re part of the LifeSite family now. You’re about to find out what LifeSite News is all about, because we are starting up a life funder for you. And we want to put that address on the screen right now, so we can help you. You know, you get another paycheck or two from Pfizer but that’s where we come in, Melissa. So we want to encourage all those out there who really want to do something, to contribute as little or as much as you can to help Melissa now, who is out of a job, newly married – “

Melissa Strickler: “I’ll probably never get to work for a company that has anything to hide, ever again.”

Jim Hale: “Well that’s right, and we also know, Melissa, that this is a spiritual battle. You have taken up your cross, and you’re going to be attacked. They are going to come after you with everything they can to try to discredit you, to try to say you’re a religious wacko and all that kind of stuff. But, but you know what? We love it when they call us religious wackos and right-wing fringe people – “

Melissa Strickler: “What an honor to suffer as Christ. Christ was laughed out of his hometown. I mean, what an honor, right?”

Jim Hale: “Amen to that. You know, it really, it’s an honor when they try to smear us in that way. And I think it’s also important to point out, Melissa, that you’re not like an “anti-vax” person, obviously.”

Melissa Strickler: “I really wasn’t. But you know, I’ve been saying to a lot of my friends that, you know, I’m not really political. I have, you know, my preferences, but I’m not one way or another but I’ve been saying for like the last year that if anything good came from Donald Trump, it was that people started paying attention to politics. And if anything good comes out of this COVID vaccine, it’s that people started looking into what’s going into their bodies.”

Jim Hale: “Well, and that’s, that’s what this is all about. Never before in the history of mankind have we been in a situation where we have not just the government, the federal government, but now we have corporate America, the whole education system, all the “elites” in the world are telling us, forcing us, saying that, you know, if you want to feed your family you have to inject something into your body. And thanks to you we know now, for a fact, that Pfizer has been concealing the truth about their vaccine, that is now “FDA approved”, unbelievably. The fastest approval process.

Melissa Strickler: “All that means is it’s approved to be given to people, it does not mean the FDA said it’s safe.”

Jim Hale: “Well, right. We know – we just interviewed Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccines, and he, he described the approval process for the Pfizer vaccine as being totally corrupt.”

Melissa Strickler: “It’s misleading and it’s just another thing. It’s just another thing. And then of course instead of people questioning things, they don’t want to cause a mess, and so they just do it. Do what they’re told. They, they get misled and it’s really sad, because I can tell you, there’s far more about this vaccine that people need to know. And it should be coming out, more and more. This is a slow leak. But it will eventually flood Pfizer.”

Jim Hale: “Well, tell us more about that. What else do you think we need to know, Melissa?”

Melissa Strickler: “The vaccine glows. At least Pfizer’s does. And the only components that I know that can do that are SM-102, which is called luciferase, and graphene oxide. And they claim both of those aren’t in there.”

Jim Hale: “Wow, so when you say it glows, tell us what you mean when you say it glows.”

Melissa Strickler: “Well, it looks like someone took a blue glow stick, cracked it open and poured it in the vial. But it only glows if there’s light, and if it’s around a dark surrounding. Like a dark background, or a dark table.

I have pictures of those – “

Jim Hale: “So you’re saying that this, that graphene is, is in the Pfizer vaccine?”

Melissa Strickler: “I would believe luciferase has a little bit more weight, that I think is in there. The graphene oxide I also have reason to believe is in there, but I can’t prove that one as well.”

Jim Hale: “Explain this ‘luciferase’, because, of course we’re talking about Lucifer, here.”

Melissa Strickler: “Well, what it is, is it’s a glowing chemical; it’s found in lightning bugs, plants and fish. It’s a kind of an organic matter, and it’s – it glows. And depending on the certain type of chemical compound it is, it’ll either glow a green, like a lightning bug, or it can glow blue. In this case the vaccine is blue when it glows. But when it’s in front of a white background, it’s clear.

It’s, it’s very odd, considering I’ve looked at hundreds of thousands of units and never once have seen anything do that. Or not even close. Usually it looks like water.”

Jim Hale: “Melissa, what, what are you saying here?”

Melissa Strickler: “I am saying, like, I thought all this stuff was “conspiracy theories”. And then I watched a doctor say that they use codes, in their, their stuff. You know? And I took notes of those codes, and I found out SM-102 is luciferase and when I messaged them, my company, I emailed them and I said, “Hey, is luciferase in the vaccine?” And they responded with, the vaccine is – err – “the luciferase is in the testing of the vaccine, but won’t be included in the final vaccine”.

But the way I see this, is this whole thing is experimental. We haven’t even seen the comirnaty – I don’t even know how to say it – we have not even seen those labels getting put on the vials on that plant yet. So as far as I know, everyone is still receiving that emergency use authorization, and it’s experimental – it is a test – it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it’s a way for them to know who’s vaccinated because their blood will glow. Their cells.

Jim Hale: “Wow. And, this is absolutely stunning. I have never heard this before, Melissa. And how dangerous is this?”

Melissa Strickler: “It is toxic to people, in certain doses. Yeah. I don’t know a whole lot about that, but I do know it is toxic in certain doses.”

Jim Hale: “What do you know about, we know that there’s a lot more vaccine injuries and vaccine deaths then the CDC is putting out there, what do you know about the higher ups at Pfizer and how they are dealing with that reality?”

Melissa Strickler: “I haven’t really heard a whole lot. Um, one thing I’ll say, like, I’ve never met Albert Bourla, who’s the CEO. I’ve emailed him a couple times, but I’ve never actually spoken directly to him because when I get answers, after emailing Albert Bourla, they’re from, you know, Pfizer answer services or whatever.

But the people like in those emails, I had never heard of. I did verify they were employees, you know, things like that, but other than that I didn’t know that – how high up they were until Project Veritas did their research. Which threw me for a rollercoaster, cause I had no idea that it went up that high.

I will say, like, Pfizer, I kind of call them the abusive rich husband. You know? They give you excellent benefits, excellent pay, and the jobs are fairly easier, and temperature-controlled building. You, you know, you don’t have to buy fancy clothes, you change into scrubs there, you know, it’s a good job. It’s just, you know, they don’t exactly treat you the best in the sense of they don’t all seem to value all their employees equally. We get a lot of virtue-signaling emails, I would say weekly. They named Albert Bourla a “father of the year”. You know? Things like that.

And I just, this whole – since the pandemic began – like I had no problems almost all up until the pandemic began. And even then I was still excited to be helping contribute with this process. And so were a lot of my coworkers. We were all excited. And then when the process actually came to our plant, a lot of people experienced vaccine regret, and a lot of people refused to get it. In fact, I would say over half of the employees were willing to walk out over this, and Pfizer knows that.”

Jim Hale: “Melissa, this is really bombshell information, here. Just describing the culture at Pfizer. I mean, this sounds like pure evil. This, I mean – “

Melissa Strickler: “We’ve known it – yeah, we’ve known it for about a year and a half and I just kept praying. I was like, “Lord, you know that I can’t quit. You’re going to have to have me fired. Like, why am I here? I don’t want to be helping this.” You know? And one day I was praying, and I was wanting to walk out. I was like, I can’t handle it any more and I just got the impression I needed to wait. And two weeks later I found all this. So…”

Jim Hale: “But you know what? You have spoken the truth; the truth shall set you free. So you, you are free now. You have – ”

Melissa Strickler: “I’ve got nothing to hide.”

Jim Hale: “Well thank you for that. You are a, a courageous young lady and, you know, I want to ask all of our viewers right now to pray for you. Pray for you, and your husband, may God continue to grant you courage and sustain you through all of this, because I know after this interview we just did today, they’re really going to be coming after you, Melissa.”

Melissa Strickler:Well I also did an interview with Candace Owens that just aired last night, where I go into a lot of detail with the FDA and the glowing. You’ll have to subscribe to dailywire to view that right now, but I think they are wanting to get it on youtube. So once that’s available…”

Jim Hale: “Well, we’re obviously, we’re not going to be able to put this interview on youtube, but it’s going to be on rumble, it’s going to be on banned, it’s going to be on gab, it’s going to be on telegram, it’s going to be everywhere that we can get this out. Because, honestly, Melissa, this is one of the most important – this is some of the most important information, I think, that has been revealed yet.”

Melissa Strickler: “There – it’s endless. Endless deceit. Endless. I don’t think they’ve been honest about a single thing about this vaccine other than it’s experimental. And it’s an mRNA. Which they also don’t mention that that’s CRISPR technology.

Jim Hale: “And you know what? It’s deadly. It’s deadly! Melissa. I just interviewed a man from McAllen, Texas. What a sweet man. He was a single father of one son. This 15 year old boy took the Pfizer vaccine, 4 days later he collapsed and died. Myocarditis. It was, it was – “

Melissa Strickler:But you’ll be fact-checked as false and misleading information cause you’re a danger to the society. Pfizer could put an end to all of that. They could. They could speak up, issue a statement and say, hey, like, these people aren’t conspiracy theorists. But they don’t. Because they don’t want people to know.

Jim Hale: “Well, that, that’s one question I have, Melissa, is that when is the American public going to start listening? To take – you know, their blinders off? It’s almost as if people have been hypnotized. They’ve gone out, they’ve gotten their shots, they’ve gotten their boosters, and they are willfully ignorant, right now. If they are not listening to what you are saying, you know, may God have pity and mercy on us all. Because now we know. Now we know the truth.”

Melissa Strickler: “They’re exchanging the truth for a lie, for comfort. You know? People want to hold on to their lives so bad, they’re going to lose them no matter what.”

Jim Hale: “Well, it’s like Alexander [S] Easton says, “they have the will to disbelieve the horrible”. And I think George Orwell said, you know, he called it ‘the desire not to know, when you live in a totalitarian regime’. You know. It’s like a weird psychology that happens. And you know, I just pray that people like you are helping to awaken us all from this terrible slumber.”

Melissa Strickler: “Awake, oh sleeper. Rise from the dead. Cause it’s, it’s a big deal. Like, it breaks my heart, cause they may be Jesus loving people, but they don’t know their Bibles. Because if they did, they would be very well aware of what’s happening right now. History always repeats itself.

People are sitting there – I’m the generation who still learned about the holocaust and everything. And I remember being horrified thinking, how did we ever let that happen to a religious group of people who did nothing? You know? Well, I think now we’re finding out who would’ve whistleblown on Anne Frank and who would’ve whistleblown on the Nazis. You know? I think we’re kind of finding that out.”

Jim Hale: “That’s such a good point, Melissa. We are living through pages of history right now. Just like you said. When we all look back and we judge the German people and we say, you know, how in the world did they buy all that propaganda… these were intelligent people. Well, you know, we’re going to be judged too. This generation is going to be judged for one of the greatest scams in the history –

Melissa Strickler:Worldwide! People keep forgetting, they’re like, oh this has happened. Stuff like plagues have happened before and I’m like, yes, but we haven’t had mass deception on a global scale, mass abortion on a global scale, mass everything on a global scale, literally trying to get this to kids.

And if anybody knows anything about Genesis 6, God really cares about the human genes. The human genome. That we’re made in the image of God, and this vaccine uses CRISPR/Cas9 technology, which edits your DNA and edits your genes. And that’s something else that they’re not very upfront about it. [Jim Hale: “Tell us more about that.”]

Well it says, you know, God sent the flood cause of the wickedness of man, but it goes up if you say, you know, it was the nephilim, in the land, those days, is why God brought the flood. And they were… mixed races; they, they altered their human image of God and it says Noah was perfect in his genetics. Essentially is what it says, and he loved God and that to me is my biggest red flag. Like I don’t want to mess with any of my DNA if I have a say in it. You know? And even in Revelation – “

Jim Hale: “So this vaccine does alter our DNA?”

Melissa Strickler: “Yeah. It does! And they were so open about that, just 3 years ago. But then as soon as it’s in a vaccine they’re like, “Oh no. It doesn’t do that.” But they boasted all about it for years until it was in a vaccine.”

Jim Hale: “Well, Melissa Strickler, this has been the most mind-blowing interview I think I have ever done. And I hope you will come back to talk more about not only your ordeal, but just to try to educate us more; tell us more – Is there anything else you feel like that, that you need to tell us right now?”

Melissa Strickler: “Yes. While the use of the fetal cell lines is wrong, I believe, there’s so much more on the Bible that’s against all of this; even if fetal cell lines don’t corrupt, like to serve your Holy Spirit and your conscience, there’s still Revelation 18, where it says the whole world was deceived by sorcery, witchcraft and magic spells, and the root of that word, the root word in the Greek is ‘pharmakeia’. And it’s where we get our word ‘pharmacy’. And if that doesn’t raise a red flag for every Bible loving person out there, I don’t know what will. Honestly. Because we’ve been so convinced things are one way, and then I’ve done just this deep study in the fact that Revelation mentions pharmaceuticals being involved is very alarming to me.”

Jim Hale: “Melissa, Melissa Strickler… Well, you know what? You know what else Revelation mentions, Melissa? Is that Jesus wins, right?”

Melissa Strickler: “Yes He does. Even if it’s not now, in this life, He will ultimately. And that doesn’t – He wins.”

Jim Hale:Amen.

Well, may God protect you, may God continue to, you know, the Holy Spirit just, you know, fill you with strength and grace and courage to keep doing what you’re doing, Melissa. We can’t thank you enough, on just behalf of our viewers, our LifeSite staff, and everyone that is watching this interview right now, thank you so much, and please be assured that we will be praying for you. I’m getting ready to go to mass in just a few minutes here, and I’m going to be praying for you and your husband before the alter.”

Melissa Strickler: “Thank you so much. I need that so much right now. Please pray that, you know, God is with me, because I need Him. I need Him in this. And sometimes it feels a little dry on my end. So… “

Jim Hale: “Right. Melissa Strickler, thank you. God bless you, sister.”

Melissa Strickler: “Thank you.”

Proof that ‘luciferase’ is being used for vaccines:

“The combination of cutting-edge techniques in molecular biology, animal research and imaging technologies, provides researchers the unique opportunity to use this tool for influenza research, including the study of virus-host interactions and dynamics of viral infections. Importantly, the feasibility to genetically alter the viral genome to express two foreign genes from different viral segments opens up opportunities to use this approach for: (i) the development of novel IAV vaccines, (ii) the generation of recombinant IAVs that can be used as vaccine vectors for the treatment of other human pathogen infections.”

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31475986/ ] “A Luciferase-fluorescent Reporter Influenza Virus for Live Imaging and Quantification of Viral Infection”

FURTHER proof that ‘luciferase’ is being used in vaccines:

And while Melissa Strickler alleges that Pfizer, specifically, uses the SM-102 lipid nanoparticle, here is an admission from an “infectious disease expert” discussing the same lipid in the Moderna vaccine:

Question: Does the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine contain SM-102? Is it true that SM-102 is not approved for use in humans?

Answer from infectious diseases expert James Lawler, MD: Yes, the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine does contain SM-102.”

[ https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/sm-102-moderna-vaccine ] “You asked, we answered: Is it safe for SM-102 to be in the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine?”

While the same article goes on to say that “it’s safe” – at this point, with all of the deception, lies and manipulation techniques that these establishments have pulled in order to get everyone vaccinated, it is getting clearer and clearer that we cannot trust these mainstream health/medical organizations.

Note from Expanding Awareness Relations:

I honestly cannot say this enough, thank you SO much to EVERYONE speaking out against this nefarious agenda. A HUGE thank you to Melissa Strickler, LifeSite and the others who are courageously standing up against the establishment and warning others about the dangers of what’s going on. Your integrity and bravery are incredibly appreciated.

Stay strong, resist the mark/vaccine. (Not sure if they’re one and the same, but DO NOT take any chances! DO NOT take the “world passport”, the vaccine, and/or the “mark”. Stay human. Do not get genetically modified.)

God bless.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Get an Earful

The 5G Roll Out: EMF Radiation, Devastating Health Impacts, Social and Economic Implications. Crimes Against Humanity? - What are the real effects of 5G radiation? & "Why is 5G Important for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?"
Is This Post Legitimately Detailing a Global Government Plan Using COVID as the Catalyst? | If So, It May be Related to a Previous Genocide Experiment - "THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government."
The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability” - "The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection."
Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
Sofia Smallstorm Warned of DNA Genetic Altering and the Transhumanist Agenda Back in 2011 - "- self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself."
Dr. Ricardo Delgado of La Quinta Columna Connects the “Vaccine” Graphene Oxide Nanotechnology to the Great Reset/Transhumanism Agenda - Graphene oxide can map our brain, and "collect information such as memories, local thoughts, sensations, emotions, or feelings."