Tal Zaks, Former Chief Scientist at Moderna, Speaks of Nanomedicine, Personalized Vaccines and Genetic Engineering in 2017

Scientist quote/unquote: “hacking the software of life.”

Tal Zaks, former Chief Medical Officer at Moderna (currently partnering with Orbimed) – gives us another look at their terminology of “hacking the software of life”, i.e. – changing/modifying our genes.

Piggybacking off of Klaus Schwab’s statements that gene-editing changes YOU, not to mention Craig Venter’s (of the Human Genome Project) admission that:

“It’s pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in the cell, and the cell instantly starts reading that new software, starts making a whole different set of proteins. And within a short while, all the characteristics of the first species disappear. And a new species emerges from this software that controls that cell going forward.”

Craig Venter of the NIH and Human Genome: Creating Synthetic Life | ” – trying to design what we want biology to do”

– it is clear that, by definition, “rewriting the genetic code” changes what it means to be human – or changes whatever species is being modified. Craig Venter himself says that a “new species emerges from this software”.

So while these doctors and scientists try to sugarcoat these ill-conceived endeavors (even if they were born of good intentions initially… “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”), the attempts at genetically changing our DNA have grave consequences; not only on the physical-molecular level, but on the conscious-soul level as well.

Here, Tal Zaks, in a Tedx Talk from November 2017, specifically mentions vaccines (a total of 17 times in a 10 minute presentation) to administer this genetic-changing software. In addition, he also alludes to collecting DNA in order to make “personalized vaccines”. An endeavor that DARPA is also invested in:

DNA Script Partners with Moderna to Develop On-Demand Vaccines and Therapeutics for DARPA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., and PARIS | April 27, 2021

[ https://www.dnascript.com/press-releases/dna-script-partners-with-moderna-to-develop-on-demand-vaccines-and-therapeutics-for-darpa/ ]

“Rewriting the Genetic Code” – Tal Zaks (2017)

Source: odysee | @RedPillman | Rewriting the Genetic Code

Full transcript below. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Tal Zaks: “So I started my professional life about thirty years ago as a nurse and the pediatric intensive care unit.

And I remember this one infant, let’s call him Jonathan, who came in really really ill. Seemed to have a rare genetic defect, but in those days, gene diagnosis was still in its infancy so we couldn’t really figure out what’s wrong with him.

And in the years since, as I’ve trained as a physician scientist, we’ve been living in this phenomenal digital and scientific revolution. And I’m here today to tell you that we’re actually hacking the software of life. And that it’s changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease.

So here’s all the biology you need to know in 30 seconds. Our body is made out of organs, our organs are made out of cells, and in every cell there’s this thing called “messenger RNA” or mRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA, our genes, to the protein, which is really the stuff we’re all made of.

This is the critical information that determines what a cell will actually do. And so we think of it like an operating system. And it’s not just in every cell of our body. It’s actually in every cell of every organism of life. It’s the same thing.

And so, if you could actually change that, which we call the software of life, you could introduce a line of code, or change a line of code, it turns out that has profound implications for everything from the flu, to cancer. And I’m going to demonstrate that with three short examples.

Let’s start with the flu. So many of us get a vaccine. What is a vaccine? It is an injection in our arm where we get bits and pieces of the virus; the protein, and that teaches our immune system to recognize the virus and so when we get infected we’re not sick.

Now imagine if instead of giving the protein, we would give the instructions on how to make the protein. How the body can make its own vaccine. That’s an mRNA vaccine.

And here’s what it looks like from the cell.”

Image Source: Tal Zaks / Tedx Talks

“So the traditional approach has protein floating around your cells. An mRNA vaccine approach has the cells themselves in your own body making the vaccine.

What’s more alarming: a stranger prowling the neighborhood, or somebody who’s just broke into your ground-floor, and tripped the alarm?

That’s what happens with an mRNA vaccine. You’re tripped the alarm wire and now the cell is dialing 9-1-1. It’s calling the police at the same time as it’s making the protein and saying, ‘that’s the bad guy’.

That’s how an mRNA works. And for the last several years we’ve shown this actually works in a whole multitude of animal models. Earlier this year we published the first actual study in people. And it actually works in people.

We took a group of volunteers and injected them with a messenger RNA vaccine against a variant of flu/influenza. And all of these volunteers got the immune response we were hoping to see. The side-effect profile was pretty benign, what you would see with any normal type vaccine.

So we’ve proven the principle, this actually can work. It works in people and now we’re going to be developing a whole slew of vaccines against diseases for which we don’t have one. So that’s infectious disease.

Now for the second example, let’s talk for a minute about cancer. Horrible disease. Cancer has affected the lives of many of us and will affect the lives of many more of us as we age.

The problem with cancer at the cellular level is that the DNA is screwed up. You’ve got these mutation on this screwed up DNA, leads up to screwed up information that makes screwed up protein. And so the cell loses control.

Now, how do you figure out what is actually screwed up? Well, you got to figure out the whole sequence, right?

It took us decades and billions of dollars to sequence the human genome, and we’ve done that. We achieved that in 2003. And now we’re less than 15 years later, and it takes us a week. And we can do it for every patient. So now we can go and figure out what exactly is screwed up in a patient, and we can use that information to make a vaccine.

We take that information, say a patient with lung cancer, and we take it – we take the biopsy, we figure out the sequence, we figure out their immune system, we – and that all becomes information. It goes up in the cloud into a bioinformatic algorithm and then automatically makes a vaccine that we administer into their normal tissue; into the muscle to try and wake up their immune system.

Now the challenge, of course, is that every person’s cancer is different. Mutation happened by random chance. And so to do this you have to make it personalized.

So this is me, but if every patient is different, what we’re going to have to do is make a personalized cancer vaccine for every patient. And that’s exactly what we’ve started to do. Every patient gets a vaccine that’s based on the sequence and their own tumor.

So when we started to do this a couple years ago, my CEO stopped by one evening and said, “Tal, I get the idea but is this going to work?” And I said, “Look, Stefan. I don’t know, but we’ve got all the pieces to try and answer the question so we should try.”

And today I can tell you that I still don’t know if it’s going to work. But I know we’re able to actually run the experiment. Earlier this week the first patient was treated with a personalized cancer vaccine we made just for her.

So in the months and years to come we will know the answer of whether we can actually wake the immune system against somebody’s cancer with a personalized cancer vaccine so stay tuned.

I’m gonna finish with a third example of something called “methylmalonic acidemia” or MMA for short. Now the name doesn’t matter. Okay? This is just a disease that is caused by an enzyme that’s critical for metabolism. And children are born and they lack this one crucial gene. And so their body is not able really to fight infection properly or anytime they have any sort of stress, their body goes into crisis. They have one gene that’s gone awry and it causes a really significant disease.

If you look at what happens over time, for these children, about 1/3 of them don’t make it to the age of 10. You see here the survival curve whether the gene is completely lost or whether there’s just an aberration in it, the survival is impaired.

And, what do we do? Well there’s not much you can do because the missing protein is actually missing inside their cells. So what do we do? Well, here’s what we do. We take out their liver and we transplant the liver from a donor that is healthy and normal into these kids.

Think about it. They’re missing one critical piece of information and what we do is transplant an entire organ. Well, it fixes the problem, but what if there’s a better way? What if we could fix the missing information?

So based on innovations, nanomedicine, a new class of invention that Bob Langer across the river at MIT in Cambridge has been inventing, we’re now able to package this information and messenger RNA with a goal of giving it as an infusion, and then having it go to the liver to replace that missing information.

Is this going to work? Well we know the biology works. So together with the National Institutes of Health, we’ve studied this in a mouse model and this mouse has been engineered to have the exact same problem that the kids have. They’re lacking the one – the same gene. And you can see in the red line what happens to these mice when they’re born. Pretty much immediately they die. They cannot cope with stress. But if you inject messenger RNA that codes for the one missing protein that replaces that information, these mice, all of them survive, as you can see in the green line. And if you look at them they not only survive, they’re actually growing, they’re gaining weight, they look like they’re healthy littermates.

We’re hoping to start the clinical trial in the near future and the idea is the same thing here. If you think about what it is we’re trying to do, we’ve taken information and our understanding of that information and how that information is transmitted in a cell, and we’ve taken our understanding of medicine and how to make drugs and we’re fusing the two. We think of it as information therapy.

I started by telling you about Jonathan and 30 years ago, and I was a nurse in the intensive care unit, I worked two night shifts, and Jonathan came in when he was about 12 months old and very quickly became dependent on a ventilator. And for the next 15 months or so, every time I came into the unit he was my patient to care for. You know, bathe, feed, treat, play with – he couldn’t talk, he was on a ventilator, but he was very much alive and you could tell – you could play with him, his eyes would – would follow me. After a while he would recognize me. Until one day I came into the unit for my shift and he was no longer there. He had died because of an infection in between shifts.

Imagine a world where we cannot just diagnose, but we can actually use the information to create vaccines to wake up the immune system to something like cancer and to fix the missing information for children with diseases like Jonathan, so that they can leave the ICU and live a healthy life.

Thank you.”

What is “nanomedicine”?

“Nanomedicine is defined as the medical application of nanotechnology. Nanomedicine can include a wide range of applications, including biosensors, tissue engineering, diagnostic devices, and many others. In the Center for Nanomedicine at Johns Hopkins, we focus on harnessing nanotechnology to more effectively diagnose, treat, and prevent various diseases.”

[ https://cnm-hopkins.org/what-is-nanomedicine/ ]

Interestingly, but not surprisingly, Johns Hopkins was the organization that the WEF (World Economic Forum / Klaus Schwab – famous for the “Great Reset” agenda) chose to moderate the EVENT 201 Plandemic Pandemic exercise, with the help of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation…

And while, of course, Mr. Zaks ends his speech high-lighting the beneficial aspects of a “gene-editing vaccine” and reminds the audience that it is to “cure cancer” or any other number of diseases, we must be alert to alternative motives and the implications of what could arise from such technological tampering of the human genome, not to mention a collection of the population’s DNA in a database – to control and alter at their discretion.

Now aside from those chilling prospects, is it worth it to forever alter a human being, and what it means to be human, by injecting them with genetic changing software? What possibilities might arise from such an endeavor? Are we SURE that they have our best interest in mind? (that is a rhetorical question, by the way… because of course they don’t) If they can change us as a species, then it follows suit that it can change our emotions, our thoughts, even our very purpose.

There are some things in life which should not be meddled with. “Life” itself, is definitely one of them.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Youtube To Get Rid of Dislike Button – As an “Experiment”

More media manipulation.

If it wasn’t obvious before how much youtube manipulates viewers’ opinions, maybe this will finally shed some light on the matter.

Not only do we have facebook, who has admitted outright that it was experimenting on its users:

Facebook manipulated users’ moods in secret experiment

(Keep in mind, this experiment was allegedly done in 2012, with word coming out in 2014 about the results. Imagine what they have been doing since then…)

but we also have other big tech conglomerates engaging in mass experimentation with its users in order to steer public opinion.

Youtube to hide the dislike count is only one of them.

I made this post: Youtube Trigger Words, a couple of weeks ago, and it explains how there are certain suspicious words that will initiate an information panel to “guide” the viewers to additional information (that supposedly come from a third party – but that youtube obviously recommends. Again – in order to manipulate viewers’ opinions…)

And these words are of a highly controversial, and conspiratorial nature. It brings to mind why youtube would go to such measures to implement this system on such a small amount of very specific trigger words. Could they be working with organizations that are attempting to “debunk” certain theories and speculations? …You be the judge. (And then the question becomes ‘why’? If these subjects and theories are so ridiculous and outlandish, why spend so much time and effort into ‘debunking’ these topics? It seems as if more and more people are starting to believe it, and it damages certain organizations’ reputations and credibility. That would be a very good reason to target and manipulate people who aren’t onboard with the official narrative.)

And now, with the experiment of removing the dislike count (oh, but don’t worry. You can still press the “dislike” button, according to the youtube spokesperson, but you just can’t see it. Only the creators of the video can see the results.) it is only another agenda in order to sway public opinion. And/or a way to suppress people’s opinions. And it is unclear at this moment, if the “like” results will be hidden as well. If not, then obviously only the LIKE results will be shown, while the DISLIKE results will be seen with NO dislikes. But it couldn’t possibly be an effort to skew the public’s opinion on what’s good content and what’s not… right?

Let’s take the speculation of the current US presidency results, for example.

Youtube has already been caught removing some of the dislikes from The White House channel. These screenshots were taken from reclaimthenet.org: YouTube scrubs thousands of dislikes from Joe Biden videos on official White House channel where you can see many more examples.

Let’s say that youtube is initiating this “experiment” because of the incredible amounts of dislikes that The White House youtube channel has been receiving due to the 2020 presidency.

Is it a targeted dislike campaign, like youtube is suggesting? Or is it simply people expressing their sincere dislike of being fooled and manipulated into believing that Joe Biden actually won the presidency fair and square? And even if he did win the election fairly, people are allowed to express their disappointment of the current president’s handling, are they not? And if they disagree with the president’s statements, then they are allowed to have their own opinions and thoughts on the matter, are they not?

Or is everyone expected to just fall in line with what many see as an egregious over-step on the voters’ rights and who most suspect of election fraud? (…Which, by the way, “U.S. Elections” just so happens to be a “trigger word” on youtube that initiates an information bar on certain videos.)

And what gives youtube the right to alter the like/dislike algorithm to begin with? Sure, it’s their platform, but then they can’t say that they’re not attempting a deliberately targeting “like campaign” to counter the “dislike campaign”. Or to even apply to any video they want. Again, just like with facebook’s experimentation on their users, it might just boil down to manipulating and steering people’s moods, opinions, and thought patterns. Which is exactly the goal.

I do want to make this clear, I am not for Trump or Biden. I think most politicians are corrupt. But taking away the people’s voice – because not only is youtube taking away the dislike counter on some videos “as an experiment”, but there is of course the option to disable comments as well. Even though each content creator has their own option to do so, to disable comments on a widely used platform geared to present important information to the public by the government, but then take away the public’s ability to express their own opinions and disagreements, is completely against the democracy that the government was supposedly built upon. (And they call themselves democrats?)

We are not living in a democratic society. Or even a republican one. Everything that you are witnessing is the result of an ARISTOCRACY – and we have most likely been living in one for most of our lives.

And for other controversial circumstances that could have added to youtube’s decision to remove the DISLIKE counter, is the entire coronavirus situation and the debate surrounding the efficacy of the vaccine and mask mandates (along with other several different issues), and the general disagreement to the Klaus Schwab, World Economics Forum’s “great reset” proposal.

Both of these topics have been heavily opposed with many people expressing their distrust and suspicions regarding these institutions.

Of course with so many shady practices and everyone in each other’s back pockets,

YouTube CEO Says They’ll Censor Content Not In Line With World Health Org
The World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization are launching an emergency coronavirus task force of 200 business leaders — including execs from Alphabet and KPMG
A timeline of the great reset agenda: from foundation to Event 201 and the pandemic of 2020

these big industries are obviously trying to protect each other, and what better way to do this than to silence dissent and make it appear as if no one is against these agendas?

As we can see from just these three links, we have youtube partnering with WHO, which youtube’s own CEO Susan Wojcicki has explicity stated that “anything that would go against World Health Organization [WHO] recommendations would be a violation of our policy” and would therefore be classified as “misinformation”.

And then from there, we can see a whole camaraderie between the biggest establishments running the current covid situation at the moment.

The WHO, partnering with not only youtube but also the WEF, who has partnered with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who have partnered with Anthony Fauci’s NIAID, and so on and so forth. All of which are highly involved in pushing this vaccine mandate/”new normal”/great reset dictatorship scheme, and trying to get everyone to follow along.

This is no accident, and no mere coincidence. Everything has a purpose and a meaning.

Because George Carlin said it best (rest his soul) and it is still very relevant, here is a transcript of part of his infamous Big Club speech (emphasis added – and strong language ahead) :

“The real owners, the big, wealthy business interests control things and make all the important decisions – forget the politicians – the politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice.

You don’t. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls – they got the judges in their back pockets and they own all the big media companies so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear.

They got you by the balls! They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying, lobbying to get what they want!

Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. But I’ll tell you what they don’t want.

They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests.

That’s right.

They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly they’re getting f***ed by a system that threw them overboard thirty f***ing years ago. They don’t want that.

You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly sh**tier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours to reduce benefits, the end of overtime, the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it and now they’re coming for your Social Security money. They want your f***ing retirement money. They want it back. So they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They’ll get it. They’ll get it all from you sooner or later, ’cause they own this f***ing place.

It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it!

You and I, are not in the “big club”.

By the way, it’s the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe – all day long, beating you over the head in their media, telling you what to believe, what to think, and what to buy. (both literally, and figuratively…)

The table is tilted, folks.The game is rigged. And nobody seems to notice, and nobody seems to care. Good, honest, hard-working people – white-collor, blue-collar, doesn’t matter what color shirt you have on – good, honest, hard-working people continue – these are people of modest means – continue to elect these rich c**k-s**kers who don’t give a f*** about them. They don’t give a f*** about you. They don’t give a f*** about you! They don’t care about you, at all! At all! At all!

…(small excerpt taken out due to content)…

The owners of this country know the truth. It’s called the American dream… because you have to be asleep to believe it.” – George Carlin

The key point to all of this is to be self-aware. Think critically, think for yourself, and stop letting all of these corrupt agencies/big tech media corporations think for us.

Like what you like, not because of what other people say or how the supposed majority thinks and feels, but because you are confident enough in yourself to know who you are and what your own individual personal likes and dislikes are. As long as it’s not hurting anyone, you should feel complete within your own self to not care what other people think and instead stick to the truth of what you like and your own opinions, and not so easily cave into societal pressure or demand.

This is the goal of big tech and businesses. They push their agenda on the population to get as many people on board as they possibly can, and if that doesn’t work, then they skewer and manipulate the public opinion to coerce others either through fake popularity, and through bots and shills – which are a very real media manipulation tactic.

Maybe we can better learn to support and socialize with one another in real life and still be able to expose injustices and ridiculous propaganda, since these companies are deadset in taking away our capability to do this online. And help each other to learn to build our awareness in order to realize when we’re ultimately being taken for a ride.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by mohamed Hassan from Pixabay (with some slight alterations).

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”

A Fundamental Requirement of a Memorable Super Bowl Performer

Is apparently to have an alter ego. (Illuminati symbolism is a plus.)

Since the concept of dissociation/split-personality and mind control has been at the forefront of my thoughts, and the possible strange connection it seems to have on the politicians and celebrities we see in abundance all over the media (both in the past and in today’s society) – I felt compelled to delve a little deeper into this phenomena and see if we can tie in a very popular sports event to the growing rise of questionable content people are being exposed to because of it.

So as a curious researcher, I wanted to take the 11 most memorable super bowl halftime performances, as proclaimed by cnbc writer Sarah Witten, and see if I can make any connections to how many of these artists have (or had) an alter ego, and if there were any strange behavior or allusions that these celebrities may have displayed that would give away some kind of mental and/or physical disturbances.

Let’s begin, shall we?

DISCLAIMER: This post is not meant to debase, defame, or debunk anyone’s persona or reputation. It is only meant to be an objective look into the commonalities that an outside observer would see when comparing these celebrities and their famous lifestyle as an artist and their performances (whether it be a personal performance and/or a stage one).

1. (1993) Michael Jackson

Michael Jackson Super Bowl 1993 Performance HD
Starts off with a relatively nice (aside from occasionally touching his… nether regions – classic Michael Jackson) and crowd-pleasing performance, along with some choreographed dancers, and ends with the “Heal the World” song and the sweet images of children in the audience as well as real children unifying on the stage. Then we have a globe depicting the whole world and the song’s message in itself.

(There’s so much more I can say about this performance, but that would take me into political territory, and I don’t want to derail the topic of this post…)

Alter ego? – YES

Houston Hawkins (claimed by Boy George)
Dave Dave (suspected)

(Some theorize that these alternate personalities were created to protect his identity.)

We all know about the accusations of child molestation and the many surgeries he’s been under, but something that not many people may know about Michael Jackson, is his interest in art – showing what appears to be a haunting look into his mind and what could be depicting duality and dissociation. Although “art” could just be a way to express oneself and may have no deeper meaning, it may also give an insight into one’s mind and what is lurking underneath.

2. (2002) U2

U2 – Superbowl Half-Time Show 2002
U2 pays a tribute to the 9/11 victims, listing the names behind them on a huge screen; no doubt touching the heartstrings of many Americans. Not only that, but he also opens up his jacket at the end of the performance to reveal the American flag on the inside. Again, I do not want to get into the politics of it all, so will just leave it at that…

Alter ego? – YES

Mr. Macphisto – “Mr. MacPhisto is a stage character created by Bono for the Zoo TV tour as it wound through Europe in 1993. The name refers to Mephisto (sometimes written as Mephistopheles), a demon in German literature, who works for Lucifer.

Unusual Behavior?:

Besides his performance as Mr. Macphisto? (no offense, although I’m not going to lie, I love his gold outfit…) And besides his connections with all of our “favorite” people? Like: Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, the WEF, etc.?

You can also check out the subliminal messages that the band (whether they were aware of it or not) played in the background during the concert in 2011 Glastonbury at the same link as above. Or check out the video below and see for yourself.

Not unusual behavior per se, but a proclaimed life-changing experience that made him address a “brush with mortality.”

Below quotes from The Sun:

“I was on the receiving end of a shock to the system myself, a shock that left me clinging on to my own life like a raft,” he writes.

“It’s an arresting experience. I was arrested.”

He describes “facing a wall with my hands up over my head . . . the force screaming at me not to move.”

“I won’t dwell on it,” he adds. “I don’t want to name it. In a reality TV world of minor/major melodrama, I can spare everyone that.”

3. (2004) Janet Jackson

Janet Jackson Super Bowl XXXVIII Halftime Show (2004)
While there were many cameos during this performance, including P. Diddy, Nelly and Kid Rock, it was Janet Jackson’s wardrobe malfunction at the end that inevitably stole the show. We started off with a sexualized dance choreography, then went into the rock performance of, well, Kid Rock. Then finally the finale where Justin Timberlake tears off a part of the costume that Janet Jackson was wearing, revealing one side of her chest.

Alter ego? – YES

To put it bluntly, she allegedly has two alter egos (at least…), one named Damita Jo and the other Strawberry. Apparently they are so hyper-sexual that some of the records they produced are banned in some countries.
With that being said, research at your own risk.

15 Times Ms. Jackson Was Real Nasty

(So from what I understand, Janet Jackson is sexual. But her alter ego, Damita Jo, is even more sexual. But the question is, is she sexual enough? The answer is no. And so another alter ego is made, who’s even more sexual-er than the other two personalities.)

Unusual Behavior?:

Not including the need to produce two different alter egos to justify the highly controversial actions and freedom to express oneself with extremely explicit lyrics and strutting their stuff, there is also the questionable choice of (ahem) decoration that Janet Jackson adorned herself with that just so happened to be exposed to the super bowl viewers.

Was this deliberate? Or an honest accident that has no bearing on any symbolic meaning and that Janet Jackson just thought was a nice, kinky addition to her bodily enhancement?

Iraq: the Star of Ishtar

There are many theories as to what the symbol that Janet Jackson was… wearing, means. The above link is just one of them that some speculate it could represent.
Other than that Janet Jackson just liked the design.

4. (2005) Paul McCartney

Paul McCartney Live At NFL Super Bowl XXXIX Halftime Show
What is undoubtedly a much calmer and low-key performance compared to the previous years, we see Paul McCartney (supposedly…) and some members of his band play a few sets of songs for the audience. Fireworks and some light shows accompany them which is, to be honest, a nice reprieve from the overly gratuitous onslaught from the previous year’s version.

Although Percy Thrillington was basically a made-up invention by Paul and his wife, Linda, and not so much an alter ego, the fact that he tried to build this character and gain a sort of mysterious fame through him is quite telling.

The Fireman is more of a collab between Paul McCartney and the producer/bassist known as Youth.

Unusual Behavior?:

Well, considering that this Paul McCartney may, in fact, not be Paul McCartney at all, and instead is who some people claim to be William Shears Campbell, then I’d say that the unusual behavior award goes to Billy Shears, who has apparently kept up his appearance as Paul McCartney all these years. (Although if this is true, obviously some people didn’t buy into it.)

Of course, another theory is that the old Paul really is dead, and it’s the new, alter ego of Paul taking over. Since he seems to enjoy playing as different personas…

Then there’s tons of theories that The Beatles were tied into the CIA, doubles, mind control, drug propaganda, on top of so much more different suspicions:

Beatles Mind Control (Part 1) Paul is Dead Conspiracy

I want to take the opportunity here to remind everyone to do their own research on these matters. I do not claim that everything that these websites are saying is true. There is so much misinformation, conspiracies, theories, speculations, etc. and coverups involved, that it is hard to dig for the truth. Please take everything in with an open and discerning mind, and not automatically believe everything at face value.

5. (2007) Prince

Let’s Watch Prince’s Super Bowl Halftime Show, The Best We’ve Ever Seen
I don’t title these videos, so I wouldn’t exactly label it “the best we’ve ever seen”, nevertheless, I’m sure it was a fun performance for the audience (however, I have been desensitized to the glitz and glamour of celebrities due to their connections with what I’ve seen as the corrupt entertainment industry, and so have a hard time getting excited from any of these shows…) With that being said, the perseverance that these performers showed (complete with dancers and a huge, dedicated band) staying through a downpour and playing rather spectacularly in it, was a delight to see.

Alter ego? – YES

Several of them.

The Purple One told Oprah that he had “another person” inside of him, sex undetermined, and created music as different characters or under different aliases.” – The List: Prince’s alter egos and aliases

Here are 6 things you probably didn’t know about Prince

They’re right. I didn’t know about any of those things. I don’t make it a point to know about celebrities lives. But now knowing those things, and some other things I’ve uncovered while researching, gives me a deeper insight into this man’s life and the struggles he must have endured. Both from what life throws at us, and at the hands of other people. And also what he himself has dabbled with. Whether willingly or not.

Unusual Behavior?:

Of course throughout this post, “unusual” is subjective. What may be just a fun hobby for someone, could be something strange and unusual for someone else. While it’s not kind to ridicule or make fun of someone with different interests, we also have to be aware that sometimes these “interests” may be a detrimental side effect from trauma, mental and/or physical abuse, etc., or perhaps have a hidden agenda on its own to manipulate the public on how to think. (Whether it actually came from him or his handler(s).)

“One day Prince’s head producer approached Monson and Lizz Luce to say Prince needed a symbol. She didn’t say why—Monson and Luce assumed it would decorate an album cover—but said he wanted the icon to fuse the astrologically inspired Mars-male and Venus-female symbols, and he wanted it soon.”The Fascinating Origin Story of Prince’s Iconic Symbol

Prince and the Illuminati Blood Sacrifice Conspiracy

The above site seeks to expose some theoretical connections between Prince and the Illuminati.
Yes. We all know it’s a “conspiracy”, but Prince himself is known for being a conspiracy theorist as well.

Prince Talks About The Illuminati & Chemtrails

And as we all know, there’s nothing more “unusual” and “bizarre” than someone being a conspiracy theorist, as the msm and social media giants love to remind us every single day.

Perhaps Prince trying to expose a corrupt government agenda is what got him killed off, as some people speculate.

8 Super Creepy Aspects Of Prince’s Death That Almost No One Ever Talks About

6. (2009) Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band

Bruce Springsteen – Superbowl Halftime Show HD 2009 XLIII NFL
Possibly known as THE Most American singer in the states (although some people will disagree with that label…), I took extra care to watch out for unity and “meeting in the middle”, as Bruce Springsteen urged in his 2021 super bowl jeep ad (which ironically got removed after he was allegedly caught with, at least one, DWI…). Needless to say, I didn’t really see so much “unity” at this super bowl performance, as I saw what, to me, appeared to be a highly propagated concert with a concerted effort to highlight black people. And although Clarence Clemons was part of the E Street Band and the only black person playing directly at this venue, we didn’t even get to see him at the end, with the camera panning out but unable to capture him, who seemed to be at the far left end of the video.
Shame. Wasted opportunity.

Alter ego? – Debatable

The Boss – Is this an opinion piece? Or based on fact? I’m not sure. And I’ve already wasted 13:40 seconds of my life watching the whole 2009 super bowl performance, and, to be quite frank, don’t feel like spending even more time digging any deeper onto this story. That’s my opinion, at least.

Bad Scooter – Some people have proposed the theory that Bruce Springsteen is Bad Scooter, the character in his songs, mostly to try to dissect the lyrics in relation to Bruce Springsteen’s life. And of course, the initials of both of the names. B.S. (kind of funny, in hindsight)

This video attempts to make the connection of Bruce Springsteen to the characters that he mentions in his song. Which actually isn’t that unusual. It’s something I’m sure many artists do and what I’d do myself if I were writing a book or a song, movie script, etc.

Unusual Behavior?:

I’ve already derailed a bit on to the political zone, which I kept trying not to, and now here’s another zone I probably shouldn’t approach but will.

First off, I am not saying that being a Catholic is unusual behavior. But I will say that, unfortunately, there seems to be a slight connection between people of a catholic background, and what can be termed as a difficult lifestyle. And I have not even tried to look at the political or religious views of the previous super bowl performers on this list. But after seeing some statements from Bruce Springsteen about his religious upbringing, compelled me to open up this subject.

[Much of my music is a result of] being completely brainwashed by Catholicism in my formative years. It’s given me a very active spiritual life – and made it very difficult for me sexually!

Once a Catholic, always a Catholic.

Source: The Hollowverse | Bruce Springsteen

I’m not exactly sure what Mr. Springsteen means by these quotes, but it’s not the first time that a catholic background has been blamed on a complicated view of the world.

7. (2013) Beyonce

Beyonce – Super Bowl 2013 Halftime Show
Now, I am honestly trying to look at these with as much impartiality as I can, although I let loose a little on a couple of the previous ones, so I am going to try my best to be unbiased.
Again, I can see “unity” alive and well as I see nothing but female performers on this stage. As if making a statement that men are not welcome here. Or that they are pandering to the male population and making it hyper-sexual to appeal to them. Or both! (or neither, but how realistic is that?…)

Alter ego? – YES

Sasha Fierce – Even if you’re not into the celebrity gossip or stay up to date in their worldly affairs, the word of her alter ego probably crossed your ears or eyes at some point. If not, then there’s no better time to look into it, if you’re interested.

And then, of course, there’s the idea that Sasha Fierce is actually a demon, possessing Beyonce.

And I remember, right before I performed, I raised my hands up, and, it was kind of the first time I, I felt something else come into me.

Stunning.

Although to be honest, I look worse than this when I’m angry. Does it mean “demonic possession”? Not necessarily.

Unusual Behavior?:

This video shows Beyonce rocking back and forth in a steady rhythm in the company of Jay-Z. Her heavy-lidded eyes seems to indicate that she is either dazed, tired… drugged, maybe? Some people have pointed out that the rocking motion may be a means to self-soothe due to stress and/or anxiety.

What do you think? Stress? Psychological issues? Mind control?

8. (2015) Katy Perry

Katy Perry Super Bowl Halftime Show 2015 Live | FULL Performance | NFL Super Bowl XLIX
(Oooh, I love ads as soon as I’m about to watch a concert. And all of a sudden I have a sudden urge for a Pepsi.)
What may seem like an innocuous concert may in fact be rife with symbolism. I can’t get into all of them here or in any of the other performances – since it is not something I have studied in depth, but there are better outlets that can break it down extensively. (TheVigilantCitizen and IlluminatiWatcher) They go into it in a very detailed manner, and although I do believe in some of the shady going ons of the “elite” and their use of symbols, I also think maybe in some cases it may be reaching.

Alter ego? – YES

Katy Perry – Confused? Her real name is Katheryn Hudson, and her stage name, Katy Perry, is actually her alter ego.

Kathy Beth Terry – Seems more like a character played on a music video than an actual alter ego personality. But what do I know?

“A lot of people are living in fear from something that happened in their childhood, or some form of PTSD they picked up along the way, and I created this wonderful character called Katy Perry that I very much am, and can step into all the time, but I created that character out of protection,’ she told The Observer.”
Katy Perry created her character for ‘protection’ because she was too scared to be herself

Unusual Behavior?:

Yes, she faints on stage, maybe from exhaustion? But some people have pointed out that she fainted at pretty much the same point at a different concert, and that it was part of the performance so she can get a costume change. … I don’t know about you, but that’s a really strange reason to fake faint on stage. Was it all an act? Or just a coverup?

Katy Perry Mind Control Session (Disguised as a Therapy Session)

Unfortunately, the video for this session is not available. I have been trying to find it and will update this post if/when I do. I have noticed that plenty of websites have this same video mysteriously disappeared from their site. If you come across the video and know where it’s available or where I can find more information, please let me know.

An alleged quote from the video from Page Six (where the video is also missing):

“The therapy session eventually ended with Perry picking a card out of the therapist’s ‘angel bowl’ “to see what the angels tell her”.

And after Perry draws out the word “freedom” she absolutely loses it, bursting into tears.”

9. (2016) Coldplay

Coldplay’s FULL Pepsi Super Bowl 50 Halftime Show feat. Beyoncé & Bruno Mars! | NFL
Now I have to admit, back in my early days of not really paying attention to symbolism, lyric meanings, the music industry in general, I have been guilty of liking some of Coldplay’s songs. But now, I don’t know if it’s because my metaphorical eyes are open, but I’m seeing “symbols” everywhere, even in this relative harmless show. And yes, I can see how people would enjoy the different artists, bands coming together and having a standoff, but then coming together at the end. It seemed like a fun show, even if I don’t agree with some of these artists’ views.

Alter ego? – YES

The Nappies – Honestly, I’m sorry to subject my readers to some of this content, because I’m usually about exposing hypocrisy and getting the truth out to the public, so again I’d like to warn you to please click the link above at your own risk. (Or don’t click on it at all.)

I wonder if some of these “alter egos” is just a kind of fantasy escape from their everyday, normal personas, and that they actually do want to dissociate from, say, a personality like The Nappies, for example, (which honestly just looks like ridiculous, goofy (if not immature) frivolity from a group of guys), so that they don’t have to tie in these “freedom of expressions” with their traditional selves.

Unusual Behavior?:

Well, besides all the “illuminati” symbols they seem to display all over their work, same as pretty much every single artist on this list, there is also the suspicious circumstance that when I get close to revealing what seems to be real controversial subjects regarding this band, it has been deleted. Now we know that censorship is not anything new, but for some of this material to be really difficult to track down, is pretty bizarre.

There were a few websites with some links/videos missing to what they were referencing, but the link below delves into the nitty gritty of what Coldplay and some of their work might mean. This seems to be an effort on the part of the writer to give their opinion on the band and some of the symbolism that was used and their meaning. I am not taking it as fact, but just as an objective look.

Coldplay: Illuminati Magicians of Super Bowl 50

10. (2017) Lady Gaga

Lady Gaga’s FULL Pepsi Zero Sugar Super Bowl LI Halftime Show | NFL
With a rather acrobatic start to the performance by Lady Gaga, I can only imagine how much time and effort went into some of these shows. It’s definitely not to take away from the stamina and practice all of the dancers have to pull shows like this off. Including the other performances, of course. And when you take into some testimonies from mind control victims, or those under hypnosis, they tend to be able to endure a lot more physical duress than the average, ordinary person. Just thought I’d throw that out there. Even Beyonce herself said in an interview that there are just some things that Sasha Fierce can do that she herself cannot.

Alter ego? – YES

Jo Calderone – “Just a guy”, according to this short interview with him; not a singer, or an actor, but could be a comedian.

A more detailed look into the identity of “Jo Calderone”:

Unusual Behavior?:

There’s actually quite a bit. From her very slowly getting into a vehicle:

(Is this just a publicity stunt?)

To her cheekily showing who her allegiance is for:

And then her strange behavior of covering her eye right after the host says, “Good Lord.”

(Which seems pretty on par with the whole Al Roker / Holy Ghost debacle.)

And let’s not forget Lady Gaga’s close relationship to Marina Abramovic, which is huge news in itself thanks to the “spirit cooking” wikileaks fiasco.

Lady Gaga snuggles up to performance artist Marina Abramovic on haystack at Hamptons benefit

11. (2020) Shakira and Jennifer Lopez

OMG, not fair. I have to do both of them? (This one’s going to be short, because I’m burnt out.)

Shakira & J. Lo’s FULL Pepsi Super Bowl LIV Halftime Show
I am trying not to be mean here, so I will just say we have more singing, and more dancing.

(By the way, did you know, “Back then, the Roman government kept the Roman people pacified by offering them free food and rousing entertainment in the Roman Colosseum. Now, “bread and circuses” applies to any civic or governmental entity — or any situation, really — in which the masses willingly accept short-term solutions to ease their discontent.” – What does ‘bread and circuses’ mean?)

… Where’s my free food?

Alter ego? – YES and YES

Shakira:
She Wolf

Jennifer Lopez:
– J. Lo (now deceased)
– Lola

Not much more to say here. To break it down, yes, they both have an alter ego. Just like all the others on this list.

And yes, they both made “illuminati” references in their work and style.

 

Unusual Behavior?:

Because I’m honestly getting to the end of my sanity, and yes, we all display unusual behaviors here and there (some more than others and who seem to be tied to some kind of nefarious agenda), here are some symbolism from both Shakira and Jennifer Lopez that are shown throughout their videos/performances, etc.

Not so fun fact: Not even half way through this list, I had a huge headache and wanted to throw my hands up in the air and declare that ‘yes, they all have an “alter ego” ‘, because apparently it’s a prerequisite of becoming a super-duper-uber mega star. But, I pushed on and finished the list legitimately. Sort of.

Now whether these people are/were really suffering from an alter ego or dissociation program of sorts, only the ones involved would know. It could be simply that these are aliases or nicknames, meant to give the performers more fame and fodder. Or side projects to tackle something new and different.

But the similarities of each performer to the ties of some kind of hidden cabal is quite glaring and hard to ignore. Each one has connections to certain parties and organizations and is surrounded by so much symbolism. I know some people just excuse this away by saying that it’s just an “artistic expression” and it doesn’t mean anything… but when you combine the bigger picture compared to the individuals behind the scenes involved, and then you dig even deeper into what all these symbols mean, plus the testimony of others trying to get their voices heard about this agenda, a strange (ancient) plot can be seen.

And let’s not forget. MK Ultra and mind control is a REAL program, stated by the CIA themselves. It is heartbreaking that these individuals are being manipulated and controlled against their will. And far be it for me to suggest that a worldwide dominance is aimed for by tptsb.

THE MEDIA IS THE ANTICHRIST

From U2’s 2011 Glastonbury performance – after a slew of quickly flashed (sometimes awful) words displayed on the screen (starts @ 4:22).

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”