After addressing the insane amount of lies that NASA has built their enterprise upon (Exposing NASA’s Many Lies) I felt it necessary to also address the subject of the dome / firmament that many people claim is surrounding the Earth.
Of course, these claims are heatedly disputed, though not as much as the “flat Earth” theory – although some people tie both of these topics into the same category.
Obviously, if there is a dome around Earth, then it would automatically counter most of the findings from NASA. We wouldn’t have been able to go to the moon (unless, of course, the moon is within Earth’s firmament somehow) and all of their fantastic satellite voyages to Mars are nothing more than a Hollywood production.
There are uncanny correlations between the Mars terrain that their multi-BILLION dollar space rover allegedly photographed – to those of the terrain on Earth (Devon Island, off the coast of Canada, to be exact – where NASA has admitted to having a base there to “practice” on the rocky terrain – similar to that of how they used Mauna Kea, Hawaii, which eerily resembles the Apollo space landings) – while also strangely accidentally photographing on Mars what seems to be wildlife (lizard, squirrel, rabbit…) and items normally found on Earth – (coffin, war helmet, etc.)
How are they able to find so many creatures and items from Earth on Mars?
BECAUSE THEY’VE NEVER BEEN TO MARS!!!!
Everything is filmed on EARTH.
Why is this such an important point in the dome / firmament theory?
Because if we’ve never even left the Earth’s atmosphere, or our own “orbit”, the questions then become why, and why would we have been lied to about it all these years?
A theory I propose is that all these billions of dollars that are given to NASA, is not only to keep the “space exploration” alive for the public’s belief in their industry – (and disbelief in the Bible) but it may also be used to try and break this dome.
By faking the space exploration around Earth, it gives people more belief in science and perhaps the ever-expanding universe – while also making Earth seem inconsequential and insignificant in light of our humanity/consciousness, and also contradicts the Bible.
People may scoff and laugh, but I think this is a HUGE part of the deception that NASA and their cohorts are trying to pull over the population.
I’m going to take you back to Genesis. Back to the flood that covered the whole Earth.
7 Thus God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so.
8 And God called the firmament Heaven. So the evening and the morning were the second day.
15 and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth”; and it was so.
16 Then God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He made the stars also.
17 God set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth,
How far exactly is the sun from Earth? 93 million miles, according to NASA?
Are these clips just really clever cgi edited videos? Could it simply be a trick of the light/reflection/refraction of some kind? A government experiment with holograms? What are we really seeing here?
UPDATE (June 22, 2021): Once again, youtube deletes another channel – I have left the original links up for reference. Here is the same video but from the odysee platform:
Notice that in Genesis 1:17, it states that God put the lights (sun, moon, stars) IN the firmament.
Not above. Not below. IN. If this is true, how could we see the sun, moon and the stars unless the firmament was clear – like a crystal, perhaps?
But what does firmament mean? Let’s take a look:
n. The vault or expanse of the heavens; the sky.
n. Foundation; support; basis.
n. The sky or heavens; the vault of heaven, viewed as something solid and abiding; the region of the air.
(Here are some more examples, implying that some of these definitions are obsolete… I wonder why…)
noun obsolete: Fixed foundation; established basis.
noun (Old Astron.): The orb of the fixed stars; the most remote of the celestial spheres.
noun: The field or sphere of an interest or activity.
noun archaic: In the geocentric Ptolemaic system, the eighth sphere, which carried the fixed stars.
noun: the apparent surface of the imaginary sphere on which celestial bodies appear to be projected
It’s really funny how throughout several centuries, “firmament” had always meant some form of the above definitions, yet now they are trying to say that firmament was a mistranslation – and the word in the original texts actually means “expanse”. Of course, only those with a scholarly (and honest) education in etymology and Hebrew would be able to discern better. And we should be aware that the act of changing definitions by tptsb is not new, as they will try it at their whim in order to fit their agenda. (case in point: WHO Deletes Naturally Acquired Immunity from Its Website)
Then there are other different translations between all of the Bibles themselves. Some of the different terminology that has been used instead of “firmament” and “expanse” are “sky”, “dome”, “vapor”, “horizon”, “heavens”, “canopy”, “vault” (just wait until you see what vault means…), etc. You can see why there would be so much debate and discussion on this topic.
Now getting back to the flood, some people have proposed that the image above of the “Milky Way Galaxy” is actually a tear in the firmament that God allowed to release the waters to flood the Earth. Here’s a couple of interesting verses that lends credence to this theory:
Here is an interesting video of what looks like a tear in the sky. Is this someone pulling a prank on the viewers? Is it some kind of weird natural phenomena not normally seen? Is it a spiritual phenomena? Is it an encounter with aliens?
A user left a comment detailing what he purportedly saw:
But perhaps that’s not enough to tie all these theories together.
No worries. I’ve got more.
Government Research / Testing
It’s no secret that the government(s) have been engaged in studies, research, even experiments with this planet and the living beings on it. One that I’d like to focus on involves the government’s interest in Antarctica, and outer space. Why do the two go hand in hand?
Well, let’s take a look at the timeline below.
(1946 – 1947) – Feb 19, 1947 – Operation Highjump was formed to investigate Antarctica. It is my belief that Admiral Richard E. Byrd Jr. was not given the full scope of the mission – as the government had kept the true reason a secret. This link: Operation High Jump: “The Untold UFO War in Antarctica” and the “Hollow Earth Theory” – ADMIRAL RICHARD E. BYRD, reports a diary entry allegedly by Richard Byrd speaking of the mission and the fascinating encounter he met there.
(1958) – On July 29, 1958, Eisenhower signed the National Aeronautics and Space Act, establishing NASA – historically as a response to the space war against Russia.
(1958 – 1962) – Transfer of JPL (“Jet Propulsion Laboratory” founded by Jack Parsons, who was heavily involved in the occult and Crowley’s “Do what thou wilt” religion – The Occult Roots of NASA and the Ongoing Fraud) to the newly created NASA organization. (Funny how NASA was basically built upon a man of “science” who was obsessed with the occult. But “trust the science”, right?)
(1959) – Antarctic Treaty, (Dec. 1, 1959), agreement signed by 12 nations, in which the Antarctic continent was made a demilitarized zone to be preserved for scientific research. – britannica.com
(1962) – Operation Fishbowl was a series of high altitude nuclear tests in 1962 that were carried out by the United States as a part of the larger Operation Dominic nuclear test program. The Operation Fishbowl nuclear tests were originally planned to be completed during the first half of 1962 with three tests named Bluegill, Starfish and Urraca.
(1969) – July 20, 1969, The first Apollo moon landing allegedly happened. (and more staged footages/pictures from NASA ever since…)
(1997) – Fake photos from NASA continue – this time from the Mars rover landing (still ongoing).
(1998) – On May 12, 2017, a mystery facebook user made a detailed post with his own anecdotal experience on Mcmurdo station (United States Antarctic Research station) and a researcher showing him what they call “sky ice”.
For some other interesting pictures/references to the spoken account of the facebook user’s experience:
Alternative video source:
To read the experience personally, this video shows clips of the facebook post itself:
(2018) – A team of scientists/researchers bore a drill on the Ross Ice Shelf and made these discoveries: “As was recently highlighted by a piece over on National Geographic, the underside of the Ross Ice Shelf isn’t currently melting.
The presence of a basal layer of flat ice crystals suggests that the seawater there – at least, in the spots they drilled – is actually freezing into place instead.” – Researchers Drilling Into Antarctica’s Ross Ice Shelf Make A Genuinely Surprising Discovery
This is just the tip of the iceberg. (Ha! See what I did there?)
Now a lot of people have speculated that the nuclear testing that the government has been carrying out was in fact to see how far the firmament reaches, and if their own nuclear power could break the dome. The creation of NASA, in my theory, was to keep up the illusion of space, while the world leaders investigated what, exactly, is space – and how to get there. Is NASA the modern day “Tower of Babel”?
Then there’s another theory that I came across, more of an insight really, that perhaps since the space team couldn’t break out of the dome/force field, or what have you, that the Antarctica research (drilling down into the snow/ice) could be an attempt to see how far deep the dome/firmament goes into the ground, and if it’s possible to dig underneath it. Even if the scientists/researchers may not be aware that this could be a possible motive by tptsb.
And the strange findings in Antarctica raises questions about what Admiral Byrd allegedly encountered, and why we – the general public – has heard very little about this.
Why keep it a secret? The message that Admiral Byrd received was a significantly benign one. Are these all just psychological tricks and the military didn’t trust the information that Mr. Byrd received? Did the people that he encountered truly have a peaceful countenance and wished nothing but goodwill for this planet? …With that being said, weren’t THEY on the planet, as well? If so, where exactly is the location and why are they so much more technologically advanced than we are?
Could Mr. Byrd himself have been participating in a psyop of some sort to mislead the public?
Too many questions arise when looking at all this research. And as theories abound, the purpose of Antarctica (and the firmament/dome) seems to serve as an ice wall to keep us contained. (Like a “fishbowl”, perhaps?)
As a whole, it seems as if humanity has lost sight of what really matters. Now most of our focus is on entertainment, our eyes glued to the screen – whether it’s television, video games, the computer, smartphone, etc. We have fallen into the trap of being distracted and looking at the wrong agenda.
Corporate establishments: “Look to these stars,”
” – instead of these stars.”
Corrupt organizations: “Trust NASA the science,”
“ – but not this:”
Bottom line, while I may not know the exact “science” or truth of our existence or reality, here are the things that I DO KNOW:
– You can’t trust man.
– You can’t trust NASA (and many more corrupt organizations).
– You CAN keep searching for the truth; and when you do – you may “see” things you’ve never even thought possible before.
– The world is full of mysteries, and we’re not even close to scratching the surface of what it all means.
– Love is the answer.
These are the things that I KNOW.
As for everything else, the important thing is to keep seeking, keep searching, and keep the faith. While many may think the world is a cesspool of sin and corruption, there are an ever-growing number of people waking up to the truth.
One last word of caution…
Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.
Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.