Walensky and Fauci Fumble in Their Responses to the Senate Committee, with Rand Paul’s Call for Fauci to Resign – But is the Senate Culpable as Well?

Rand to Fauci: “You won’t admit that it’s dangerous, and for that lack of judgement, I think it’s time that you resign.”

This post is not meant to convey whether or not there is an existence of a “deadly virus” or not. But it is to point out the suspicious nature of experiments that the NIH has funded/endorsed in regards to gain-of-function research, and also to show the indirect and dishonest responses from two individuals who have been spear-heading the shady “coronavirus/vaccine” situation.

The spotlight is on CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, and NIH/NIAID Infectious Disease “expert” Anthony Fauci.

Now, I want to first preface by saying that I am withholding judgement on the legitimacy of Senate hearings to begin with. While I would love to believe that there are indeed good politicians in high places that can make real change in ousting corruption in big establishments, many are speculating that psyops have been put in place to prolong certain narratives while keeping people’s hopes alive that something will be done about it. And of course we can’t ignore the possibility that even if there are those who are trying to make a real positive change, they may be set against a huge criminal organization who will stop at nothing in order to drive their own agenda forward.

Case in point: Walensky, the FDA, Pfizer, etc. have already gone ahead with their atrocious approval of these dangerous COVID “vaccines” on children, in which this agenda should never have gone on so far to begin with since there is ample evidence that the vaccines have nothing to do with our health and are definitely NOT “safe and effective”.

So to continue witnessing this farce without arrests being made casts a dubious look into the justice system as it is. Not only do Fauci, Bourla, Gelman, Daszak, Walensky, Gates, their agencies, as well as complicit governmental bodies, including Joe Biden, etc. have immense crimes to answer for, but the whole legal/legislative systems seems to be right behind them if this is allowed to continue further.

(This is, of course, under the assumptions that the whole of the legal/legislative structure isn’t already completely corrupted/broken to begin with…)

With that being said, I would still like to point out the following two Senators that are at least calling out Walensky and Fauci for their complicity in keeping this ruse going. Senators Rand Paul and Bill Cassidy certainly seem as if they are trying to get to the bottom of these narratives. But could they be merely actors on a stage? Keeping us happily engaged in believing that the “good guys” are making progress? Or are they genuinely one of the few brave souls standing up to deceit and subterfuge?

I will say this: while Anthony Fauci is a known liar, how good is his acting? He certainly looks shaken up as Rand Paul questions him…

Senator Rand Paul@58:24: “Fauci, I don’t expect you today to admit that you approved of NIH funding for gain-of-function research at Wuhan. But your repeated denials have worn thin and the majority of Americans, frankly, don’t believe you.

Even the NIH now admits that EcoHealth Alliance did perform experiments in Wuhan that created viruses not found in nature that actually did gain in lethality.

The facts are clear. The NIH did fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan despite your protestations. You can deny it all you want, but even the Chinese authors of the paper, in their paper, admit that viruses not found in nature were created, and yes they gained in infectivity.

Your persistent denials though are not simply a stain on your reputation, but are clear and present danger to the country, and to the world. As Professor Kevin Esvelt of MIT has written, “Gain of function research looks like a gamble that civilization can’t afford to risk.” And yet here we are again, with you steadfast in your denials. Why does it matter? Because gain-of-function research with laboratory created viruses not found in nature, could cause a pandemic even worse the next time.

We’re suffering today from one that has a mortality of approximately 1%, they’re experimenting with viruses that have mortalities of between 15 and 50%. Yes, our civilization could be at risk from one of these viruses.

Experiments that combine unknown viruses with known pandemic causing viruses are incredibly risky. Experiments that combine unknown viruses with coronaviruses that have as much as 50% mortality could endanger civilization as we know it.

And here you sit. Unwilling to accept any responsibility for the current pandemic, and unwilling to take any steps to prevent gain-of-function research from possibly unleashing an even more deadly virus.

You mislead the public by saying that the published viruses could not be COVID. Well exactly no one is alleging that. No one is alleging that the published viruses by the Chinese are COVID. What we are saying is that this was risky type of research; gain-of-function research. It was risky to share this with the Chinese, and that COVID may have been created from a not yet revealed virus. We don’t anticipate the Chinese are going to reveal the virus if it came from their lab.

You know that, but you continue to mislead. You continue to support NIH money going to Wuhan. You continue to say you trust the Chinese scientist. You appear to have learned nothing from this pandemic.

Will you today finally take some responsibility for funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan?”

Anthony Fauci: “Senator, with all due respect, I disagree with so many of the things that you’ve said.

Gain – first of all, gain-of-function is a very nebulous term. We have spent, not us, but outside bodies, a considerable amount of effort to give a more precise definition to the type of research that is of concern that might lead to a dangerous situation.

You are aware of that. That is called P3CO.”

Senator Rand Paul: “We’re aware that you deleted “gain-of-function” from the NIH website.”

Anthony Fauci: “Well I can get back to that a moment, if we have time. But let’s get back to the operating framework and guide rails of which we operate under. And you have ignored them. The guidelines are very very clear, that you have to be dealing with a pathogen that clearly is shown and very likely to be highly transmissible in an uncontrollable way in humans and to have a high degree of morbidity and mortality, and that you do experiments to enhance that. Hence the word EPPP: Enhanced Pathogens of Potential Pandemic.”

Senator Rand Paul: “So when EcoHealth Alliance took the virus SHC-014 and combined it with WIV-1 and caused a recombinant virus that doesn’t exist in nature, and it made mice sicker, mice that had humanized cells, you’re saying that that’s not gain-of-function research?”

Anthony Fauci: “According to the framework and guidelines of – “

Senator Rand Paul: “So what you’re doing is defining away gain-of-function. You’re simply saying it doesn’t exist because you changed the definition on the NIH website. This is terrible and you’re – you’re completely trying to escape the idea that we should do something about trying to prevent a pandemic from leaking from a lab.

There’s – the preponderance of evidence now points towards this coming from the lab, and what you’ve done is change the definition on your website to try to cover your ass, basically. That’s what you’ve done. You’ve changed the website to try to have a new definition that doesn’t include the risky research that’s going on.

Until you admit that it’s risky, we’re not going to get anywhere. You have to admit that this research was risky. The NIH has now rebuked them. Your own agency has rebuked them.

But the thing is, you’re still unwilling to admit that they gained in function when they say that they became sicker. They gained in lethality; it’s a new virus. That’s not gain-of-function?”

Anthony Fauci: “According to the definition that is currently operable… you know – Senator, let’s make it clear for the people who are listening.

The current definition was done over a 2-3 year period by outside bodies, including the NSABB, two conferences by the National Academy of Science, Engineering and Medicine, on December 2014, March 2016. We commissioned external risk benefit assessment, and then on January of 2017, the office of science and technology policy of the White House issued the current policy.

I have not changed any definition.”

Senator Rand Paul: “And coincidentally, coincidentally the definition appeared on the same day the NIH said that, yes, there was a gain of function in Wuhan, the same day the definition appeared – the new definition, to try to define a way what’s going on in Wuhan.

Until you accept it, until you accept responsibility, we’re not going to get anywhere close to trying to prevent another lab leak of this dangerous sort of experiment. You won’t admit that it’s dangerous, and for that lack of judgement, I think it’s time that you resign.”

Chairman Murray: “Thank you Senator Paul. And I would like, um, to give the time to Dr. Fauci.”

Anthony Fauci: “Yeah, well, there were so many things that are egregious misrepresentation here, uh, Madame Chair, that I don’t think I’d be able to refute all of them, but just a couple of them, for the listens to here for – 

You has said that I’m unwilling to take any responsibility for the current pandemic. I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. The current pandemic. Okay?

Number two, you said the overwhelming amount of evidence indicates that’s a lab leak; I believe most card-carrying viral phylogenists and molecular virologists would disagree with you, that is much more likely, even though we leave open all possibilities, it’s much more likely that this was a natural occurrence.

Third, you say we continue – “

Senator Rand Paul: “We’ve tested 80,000 animals and no animals have been found with COVID.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, the time is for Dr. Fauci to respond.”

Anthony Fauci: “And third, you made a statement just a moment ago that’s completely incorrect. Where you say we continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Senator Rand Paul: “You approved it in August of last year…”

Anthony Fauci: “No no, your statements say, quote, I wrote it down as you were writing, “You continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology – “

Senator Rand Paul: “Your committee a month ago says you still trust the Chinese scientist and you still support the research over there. You said it a month ago in the committee.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, I have allowed Dr. Fauci to respond. You’ve had your time and I’m going to give him one more minute.”

Senator Rand Paul: “If he’s going to be dishonest he ought to be challenged.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, we will allow Dr. Fauci to respond after you’ve given accusations like that. Dr. Fauci.”

Anthony Fauci: “Well I don’t have any more to say except to say that as usual, and I’ve – I have a great deal of respect for this body of the Senate and it makes me very uncomfortable to have to say something, but he is egregiously incorrect in what he says. Thank you.”

Senator Rand Paul: “History will figure that out on its own.”

While Rand Paul seems to be on the right side of history, the complete negligence and willful ignorance on the part of the Senate committee as a whole to not continuously address the many, MANY adverse events of the COVID vaccines which have harmed MILLIONS of people, according to VAERS, and who instead continue to humor the narrative that the vaccine is the end all be all, is, quite frankly, ludicrous and criminal in and of itself. While they may allude to the information about the adverse events, no steps have been taken to fully investigate and analyze the hundreds of thousands of ACTUAL DATA provided.

There is enough substantial evidence declaring that the COVID vaccines are NOT safe nor effective, yet the ruse continues to go on.

Not to mention the push now to mass vaccinate millions of children, who were never at high risk from “COVID” to begin with… it is obvious that the vaccine effort should have been halted A LONG TIME AGO.

Keep in mind that it is common knowledge that the adverse events are under-reported by a factor of only 1-10% being reported for non-serious side effects, and a speculative estimation of 10-50% being reported for serious events.

There is also the suspicious account of the FDA presentation that flashed for a brief split-second showing a list of the “possible” side effects from the COVID vaccines to be on the lookout for:

Screenshot from: [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XTiL9rUpkg ] U.S. Food and Drug Administration@2:33:40

So to continue to ignore these facts and people’s plights from the devastating effects of the vaccines and prolonging this “pandemic” and the vaccine narrative is either complete obliviousness, to put it nicely, or downright complicity.

Again, this is not to speak of everyone in the Senate individually (unless it is in fact true…), but to point out the incredibly inane decisions of those ultimately in charge of these committees and giving their final verdict which has enabled these atrocious crimes against humanity to continue.

It is my opinion that a call for Anthony Fauci to resign does not do the damage that he has caused throughout the years (including his organizations: NIH/NIAID) justice, but instead efforts to make arrests of those initiating these crimes should be pursued as well.

Moving on to the second portion (from the same hearing), we see Rochelle Walensky responding to Senator Bill Cassidy’s inquiries to address natural immunity versus vaccine-induced immunity, and also her refusal to answer uncertainty in how many CDC employees are vaccinated.

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Dr. Walensky, couple things: as I walked in, I came in late, one of you – either you or Dr. Fauci – were saying that the reason that we’re not saying that natural immunity is protective as is a vaccine, even though there’s recent publication showing that 6-8 months out, 92% of those with natural immunity have T cells, B cells and antibodies that would be considered adequate to protect, and indeed B cell continues to climb, that we don’t have data.

Now in your response to Mr. Casey, you just mentioned that CDC has access to tens of thousands of EHRs [electronic health records]. And I’ve been told that HHS or CDC has access to patient identifiable data, as to who test positive. So I do that as a prologue.

If we don’t know that natural immunity confers protection against future infection, is because we’ve decided not to look. Because I’ve learned that there is a cohort of people that we know have been previously infected, we’ve got the bench research showing that the triad of antibodies, T cells and B cells are there, and that 92% of them are still there at 6 months out, so why don’t we – why have we not done the research showing that natural immunity confers protection against recurrent infection?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Yeah, thank you so much for allowing me to clarify this point, because I understand, I understand the question.

Um, first of all, let me just reiterate that our current stand after reviewing 96 papers in the scientific brief on this issue is that everyone who’s been previously infected should be vaccinated.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But that’s not my question.”

Rochelle Walensky: “Right, agreed. So, so – and part of the challenge here is as you know the infection induced immunity and the biases associated with retrospectively looking at the data. Several of those papers that we reviewed for that brief have demonstrated that the kind of disease that you had at the time you had it matters.

Um, did you have disease a year and a half ago? Did you have – were you an older person? Were you – ?”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “May I stop you for a second?

We could do this prospectively, because you know who is actually, apparently I’m told, you’ve got patient identifiable data, and you would be able to say, okay, 6 months ago we’re going to start everybody infected within the last 6 months, and be able to follow their EHR, prospectively, to see this.

I mean, theoretically, CDC has the ability to do this right now.”

Rochelle Walensky: “Yet that too would have its own biases. So one of the things that we have demonstrated in the scientific brief is that asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic people, who might not present to their providers, might present to an urgent care clinic who might not be recorded in their own EHR, likely have less robust protection than those who’ve been severely affected.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But that could be established prospectively if using the data that you have. And you could even say, if you had symptomatic infection, you don’t need to be vaccinated, we would consider you immune, you don’t have to be subjected to the mandate, but – “

Rochelle Walensky: “If we had data – if we had data that demonstrated a correlation of protection, Dr. Fauci already mentioned data that they’re working on to look at correlates of protection, not just in antibodies, but as you noted in T cell function as well. So if we were able to document a correlate of protection we absolutely could prospectively follow – “

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But this paper that I’m reading from NIH, speaks that there is durable memory of the virus up to 8 months after infection in 95% of the people who recovered, including B cells, which continue to climb, and T cells and antibodies.

And I’m also saying you could do it clinically, because we have data that’s patient identifiable, that we could go back and look and see if they were exposed. They could be in a hot spot like Louisiana, where you know they’re being exposed, and then you would see. Not just by lab data, but empirically.

I can tell you, the American people intuitively understand this, and they feel a little bit like we’re being willfully blind to it.

I have limited time, let me just ask you something else. What percent of CDC employees are vaccinated?”

Rochelle Walensky: “We’re actively encouraging vaccination in all of our employees and doing a lot of education and outreach in order to get our agency fully vaccinated.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “And the – but the percent?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have that for you today.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “I’m told that 75… some north of 75% of CDC employees at headquarters are still working remotely. Is that correct?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Um, we are following regulations through HHS and the federal government.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “No, that’s not my question. I apologize to be rude, but – but I’m asking a very straightforward question.

I’ve been told that north of 75% of employees at CDC headquarters are working remotely. Is that correct?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Senator, I don’t actually know the number off the top of my head. So I’d have to – “

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “When you look down the hallway, are there empty desks? Are over 50% of the desk empty?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Senator, I don’t have the numbers off the top of my head. What I will tell you is that we’re working closely within HHS and the administration to follow the governmental rules for return to the workplace.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “There was a recent GAO report that shows, it was released in the last 2 weeks, that there’s been no coordinated response in the federal government to get people back into work.

Now if there’s any agency that – since we have teachers in Fulton county are back at work, that the caseload of COVID in Fulton county is about 88, at its peak it was 606, if what I’ve been told by someone who frankly kind of knows, that people in laboratories are not showing up, I have no clue how people, how laboratory workers who presumably are vaccinated, wearing PPE, would consider themselves eligible to stay at home.

I say this because, I just want to echo – we’ve got to lead by example in the federal government. If our public health agencies don’t have enough confidence in the immunization and the PPE to go back to work, fighting infectious diseases, there’s going to be a lot of undermining of a willingness to further fund public health.”

Rochelle Walensky: “We absolutely have our central labs back at work, conducting their essential research towards this response, and um, we are following the regulations and providing technical assistance and technical support to the federal government for return to work policies.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Uh, one more thing, I had – Angus King and I had sent a letter dated February the 25th, asking about genomic surveillance. We’ve still not received a response. You reference it in your earlier remarks. Both Senator King and I would appreciate a response.”

Rochelle Walensky: “We’ll get back to you. Thank you very much.”

I can sum up Walensky’s testimony in 5 short dialogues; paraphrasing, of course:

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Do you have data showing that natural immunity may offer better protection than vaccine immunity; and if not, then why?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

(By the way, I want to interject here by saying that Senator Bill Cassidy is absolutely correct when he posits that the reason that they “don’t have the data” is because they deliberately did not look for it. I also want to add the shady practice of the pharmaceutical companies breaking protocol and completely getting rid of the control group after only a few weeks into the COVID vaccine trial…)

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “What percentage of CDC employees are vaccinated?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Are around 75% of CDC employees still working remotely from home?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “When you go into the CDC headquarters, how much percentage of desks have no workers there?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Bill Cassidy: “Senator King and I asked you about “genomic sequence” back in February but have not received a response yet. We would appreciate a response.”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time… but we’ll get back to you.”

This is the Director of the CDC, ladies and gentlemen. This is who is in charge of an organization that we are supposed to entrust our lives to in order to help get us through a “deadly pandemic”.

When she cannot say, in all honesty, that 100% of her CDC employees – who presumably have complete trust in the vaccines that she kept reiterating is the most important thing needed for our health – is fully vaccinated, while at the same time preaching that young children most definitely should get it, is EXTREMELY suspect and I am amazed at the continual indulgence of these hearings to not call out this hypocrisy for what it is. (Save for a small handful of Senators, that is.)

But at least we know that Rochelle Walensky hasn’t lied about how many of her employees have been vaccinated… yet.

Lastly, during the committee hearing, there were other Senators posing additional queries as to the questionable responses and suspicious nature of those testifying and their habits of skirting away from certain questions, which I want to mention here as well.

Senators Marshall, Burr and Moran (of the additional 3 testimonies that I watched, there may have been more with similar interests) have also raised legitimate concerns over the vaccines, mandates and debates about natural immunity versus vaccine efficacy – and was also met with a jumble of non-answers mixed with endless endorsements of the COVID vaccines.

Honestly, if I, an average American citizen, can see through their facade, then surely well-educated and seemingly experienced individuals in detecting deceit and malpractice would be able to determine the illegitimacy of these corrupt establishments and their cohorts as well.

So again I have to wonder at the incredibly unnecessary perpetuation of these fraudulent activities, instead of finally taking appropriate steps to shut down this criminal conspiracy.

To those Senators and other researchers who are genuinely seeking the truth and attempting to uncover the treasons, misconduct, and egregious scandal that has corrupted our governmental body and health/medical industries, my sincere gratitude and respect to you for standing strong and having enough integrity to stand up against these depravities.

God bless.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Edward Lich from Pixabay

Jerm Warfare Interview with Dr. Zelenko: “These “vaccines”, which I call ‘poison death shots’ “

“The only reason you’d vaccinate your child is if you believe in child sacrifice.”

Dr. Zelenko, the doctor who created a treatment protocol for COVID, sits down with Jerm Warfare to discuss COVID, the dangers of the vaccines, and the worldwide suppression and agendas that are occurring around us.

The below video of the interview has been transcribed in full, with some embellishment added for emphasis.

Intro message from Dr. Zelenko: “Hi, my name is Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, I’m the original owner of the Zelenko protocol, which is a pre-hospital treatment for COVID-19.

What I believe is going on: that the enemies of humanity have weaponized fear and anxiety in order to effectuate a change in your life to mold society into the direction that they believe to be correct. And that involves taking away our freedom, and anxiety is a tool to which they enslave us.

So I’m here just to give you a simple message: that COVID-19 is highly treatable. There are treatment approaches as well as prevention – preventive, prophylactic approaches, and there’s no need to be afraid. There’s plenty of information available and even over the counter options without prescriptions that can save your life. You really don’t have any reason to be afraid once you have the right information. The information will set your mind and your soul free. And you don’t have to live with paralyzing anxiety.”

Jerm Warfare @1:54: “My name is Jerm. This is Jerm Warfare, the battle of ideas. That was the face and the voice of Dr. Vladimir Zelenko who is joining me right now on the other side.

It’s a great pleasure, Dr. Zelenko. Thank you for being here.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Thank you so much for having me.”

Jerm Warfare: “You posted a video saying that your cancer has returned.”

” – worst global crime in the history of humanity.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @2:18: “Yeah, I have a very rare – actually the rarest form of cancer there is. And there’s around 10 cases a year in the world. Always found at autopsy. And I was diagnosed with it three and half years ago during an emergency surgery, where they thought that I had a blood clot and turned out to be a tumor that killed my right lung in the pulmonary artery. I had that resected and I went through very difficult chemo which I had to design myself, cause there was no treatment available.

And that was good for two years, and then it came back last summer. Had another open heart surgery and had my heart valves replaced because of the tumor. And then just last week I found out it came back again, again in the pulmonary artery. And so now we’re putting together a plan to deal with this, but the game is not over. I’m very hopeful and optimistic about the future. Both mine and that of the world.

I really believe that my heart is still beating because of the prayers and the positive energy of so many decent people around the world. It’s what happened last time. I had millions of people praying. And so statistically, naturally I shouldn’t really be talking to you. I should be under the ground. And yet God has spared me for now, and I ended up, just a few years after having this type of cancer diagnosed, being the tip of the spear of the worst global crime in the history of humanity. And so part of the reason I was spared is becoming… revealed to me, I would say. But God’s ways are very mysterious, so.”

Jerm Warfare: “If you get through, which I’m hoping you will, you can call it the Zelenko Miracle.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Well, listen, it’s already a miracle, every second of my life. And your life is a miracle. And those are things that we don’t necessarily focus on or appreciate, until our lives are threatened.

See the address between life and death is something very familiar to me. And so when someone lives in that state of being, you realize that: I want to say Happy Birthday to you. And not because – I don’t really think it’s your biological birthday, but what it is, is that every second of existence is a recreation; creation ex nihilo, something from nothing. God is making us in the present tense. And so since we’re being made every nano-second, that implies a few things. That He knows about us, He cares about us, He wants us to be. And if He wants us to be then you’re never alone. If you’re never alone there’s no room for anxiety.”

Government’s protocol: ‘Send them home and give them tylenol’
Meanwhile, patients were getting sicker and eventually put on ventilators – in which 80% DIED.

Jerm Warfare @5:08: “This – let’s go back 18 months or so. Life was somewhat normal, and then suddenly this weird thing happened.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “So I didn’t choose COVID, it chose me. What I mean by that is that I was practicing family medicine in upstate New York, in a small community of 35,000 people that live within a square mile. Very high population density. And when COVID arrived, it spread to everyone. Immediately. And I found my practice, my little practice of – we used to see 50 patients a day – inundated with over 250 patients. And there was no treatment at that time.

The government was telling us, “Send people home. Give them tylenol. When they get sicker, send them to the hospital. They’ll end up on a respirator.” And 80% were dying… on the ventilator. So that didn’t seem like a good idea to me. So, just like 3 years before, I had to develop my own cancer treatment, because nothing existed. I figured, well, why not innovate and find something to help my patients. These are people that I care about; these are people that I’ve cared about for 2 decades.

And so, I actually prayed; at 2 o’clock in the morning. I couldn’t sleep – You know, when people look at you and say, “Doctor, please help us.” And they – and you care about them, and then you have nothing to offer them. It’s a terrible feeling.

It’s, it’s – so, I just was studying what other countries have been doing. And something made sense to me. That in South Korea they were using hydroxychloroquine and zinc. And France, in Marseille, France, they were using hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin. And I understood the mechanism of action of these drugs and I said, you know, why don’t we just combine the three of them, modify the dosing and see what happens? Why not? This is battlefield medicine. You know? This is World War 3, the whole world is fighting the same virus, there’s no studies, there’s nothing that I could rely upon. So what do you do? You innovate.

They say necessity is the mother of all innovation. I had a necessity. I had to take care of my patients. I’m an outpatient doctor. Meaning pre-hospital doctor. My job is to keep people out of the hospital. That’s what I’ve always done, 20 years, in every other aspect of medicine. So why would I allow my patients to go home and just get sicker? It didn’t make sense.”

Dr. Zelenko develops a treatment protocol for COVID

@7:38: “So, since I understood the virology, I understood that this virus is an RNA virus that uses certain pathway for viral replication, and I found out that zinc inhibits that process, so zinc was the bullet. And I said, okay. But there was a problem with zinc. It didn’t get into the cell. Due to biochemical reasons. And so it was having like a bullet without a gun. So I needed a gun.

And it turned out that hydroxychloroquine is a zinc delivery system. So zinc ionophore; it lets zinc go from outside the cell to inside the cell. And by doing that we were able to inhibit the RNA dependent RNA polymerase; it’s just an enzyme, but all the COVID strains were using to… to use to make copies of themselves. And I shut down viral replication. So in other words, zinc was able to get to the right place at the right time, and stop the virus from making copies of itself. So that was the mechanism of action.

It was theoretical, but I deployed it. I also didn’t treat everyone. I treated the high-risk patients. And the way I found out who was high-risk, I just called the ICU near me, and I asked the doctor there, who is dying? And they said to me, “well, the old people and the people with chronic illnesses.” I said, “How about the younger people?” They said, “We’re not seeing them in ICU.” So right away I knew that this virus doesn’t kill equally.

So, I didn’t have any resources. Half my staff was sick, the outpatient service was like ‘blood-draw’, and radiology were closed. The hospitals were at near capacity. So I was like walking through my office; it was like a bomb went off. A mass casualty event – people all over. And so I had to triage. I had to make decisions; who to, who would get my attention. And who was low-risk enough that I can send them home. So I basically sent home everyone who wasn’t dying and it was young. And left the older patients; all those that had chronic medical problems.”

Treatment needs to be started IMMEDIATELY – against government “recommendations”

@9:46: “And I started treating them immediately. I didn’t wait for the results of tests. The tests took a week to get back. If I would wait a week, by the time the test result came back, the patient was dead. So instead of – I did the test, but I wouldn’t wait to treat – I used my head and said, “well, you know, the whole community has COVID, there’s no flu, they have all the symptoms, they’ve been exposed, this person has COVID.” Until proven otherwise. And I would treat them immediately. Within the first few days of the onset of symptoms.

From the moment I did that, people stopped going to the hospital and dying. So initially I didn’t believe it. I thought it was a fluke or – I couldn’t believe – But after 50 patients or so, I realized that I… stumbled across, or God gave a gift, of something that is a potential answer to a global problem that has no treatment.”

“Look, COVID is two diseases. There’s the viral infection phase, which is… lasts around 5 days/6 days. And then the immune reaction, your body’s immune system goes on overdrive and it’s the body’s immune reaction that kills the person. It destroys the lungs and causes blood clots. But the immune reaction does not start until a week – 6-7 days into the illness. So the key is to destroy the virus before then, so that the immune reaction, so the monster doesn’t wake up. We have a latent monster inside us – the immune system, in this particular case, and it’s ready to destroy the person. And it takes around a week to wake up. So if we could treat this infection within the first few days, it never wakes up. No problem. Patients get better.”

Media and NIH against the use of hydroxychloroquine – not interested in the treatment of COVID

Jerm Warfare @11:35: “Now, the elephant in the room is the amount of negative press, as you are well aware, surrounding hydroxychloroquine. I mean, Donald Trump, he spoke very highly of it. And funnily enough he took your treatment, didn’t he? As well as a bunch of people in the White House.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Yeah, I ended up treating most of them. What happened was that I made a video addressed to the president, telling – I felt like a front line soldier that found an important enemy map. I needed to get it to the five-star general immediately. Didn’t have time to go through the chain of command.

So I made a video and it was addressed to the president, and the next day his chief of staff, Mark Meadows, calls me on my cell phone. I’m not making – I wouldn’t believe it unless it happened to me. But that’s what happened. And then I told him what I was doing; they were interested. Two days later the commissioner of the FDA is calling me on my cell phone, in Wuhan.

@12:32: And then the – because no one knew what to do. Don’t you understand that at that time, I wasn’t saying that my treatment is the best treatment. I was saying it’s the only treatment! So, so people were looking for solutions. And so then he referred me to the NIH, which was a deadend. They weren’t interested.

And then Rudy Giuliani called me. And I ended up doing a podcast with Rudy; became my good friend. And millions of people saw it. And from that podcast my life has never been the same again. Um, so that’s how people got to know me. And I’ve ended up advising governments and hospital systems and thousands of other physicians.

Um, so I also sent a letter to the president after a few hundred patients summarizing my experience and making my recommendations. And I didn’t know if the president got it or not. Until there was a news conference where President Trump announces to the world that he’s taking hydroxychloroquine. And he says, “Yeah, I got a letter from a, your upstate New York doctor.” And he was telling me this and this and this. I couldn’t believe it. – [Jerm Warfare: “How did you feel?”] – it’s the president of the United States. So, that was pretty cool. And so, that’s how I got involved.

“COVID-19 is an artificially made bioweapon”

@13:50: But, to understand the essence of the problem, we need to understand the essence of the problem. And everything else will make sense. So if I would’ve told you 18 months ago that COVID-19 is an artificially made bioweapon, I would immediately be labeled a conspiracy theorist. [Jerm Warfare: “Yes.”] Now, even the liberal media admits that this is an artificially made bioweapon. It’s a conspiracy, it’s just not a theory. It’s a conspiracy to commit mass murder and genocide.

And to tell you to what degree of resolution we know things – so for example, I can tell you like this, in 1999, that the Ralph Baric, Baric, in the University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill, modified a surface protein on a bat coronavirus, and made it be able to infect human beings. And he has a patent number associated with that modification.

And then it became, this type of research became illegal in America. It was outsourced by Fauci and the NIH, to Wuhan! And then in 2005 or so, they were able to augment the lethality of this virus, so that it, it can destroy human lungs and cause blood clots. And we know the patent number is associated with those changes.

So no one’s denying that this is an artificially made bioweapon. So, okay. So now you have to understand why is there such opposition to the treatment of it in the pre-hospital setting. Cause what is the real desire goal of this bioweapon. It’s not to kill everyone. It’s to scare everyone. And if you studied psychological warfare, which I have, if you use fear – prolonged fear – and isolation: lockdown, what you do is you psychologically destroy the person. Most people will be compensated.

And then you dangle a false promise: the vaccine, and because you’re living in such chronic pain, and fear, you will gravitate – not intellectually – towards something that, anything, that will alleviate that emotional pain that you’re in. Now, that explains why people get so belligerent if you challenge them. Because if you challenge someone’s narrative, that they bought into, what you’re really doing is bringing them back into that anxiety state, and they, it causes so much pain they can’t stand it. So you can’t reason with them. It’s not a – it’s a super rational transformation of – it’s a way of enslaving people.

Denying the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin – because THEY WORK

@16:31: Now, the problem with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, for example, is that they work! And since they work, what that means is that it could reduce the amount of anxiety and fear in the world, which is contrary to the whole point of the bioweapon. It’s a weapon against the bioweapon.

So, you have to ask yourself, why was this released? Why was this bioweapon made? Why is there such a effort – sorry – why is there such a global coordinated attempt to maintain global fear? And there’s an answer.

Um, in 2015 – by the way, I have a disclaimer. I want no one to believe me. Please do not believe anything that I’m saying. But, you can take that information that I am giving you, and I’m giving you very specific information, and go do your due diligence. Do your research. Don’t make the same mistake that you did with the governments, with me. Don’t buy into my narrative. But at least listen. And then, go and look into it, do your research, your due diligence, your – use your brain. And then come to a conclusion. And whatever that conclusion is, it’s yours. But the point is, hear the other side.

Bill Gates and the eugenics agenda

@17:51: So anyway, so with that disclaimer, I’m going to say that in 2015, you can google, ‘Bill Gates, Ted lecture’. So this sociopath – [Jerm Warfare: “I saw it. I saw it.”] So this sociopath calls for the reduction of the world population, because of global warming. Okay. So first of all, what kind of human being, uh, feels entitled to decide how many people should live on the planet or not? So that’s someone who doesn’t believe in the divine nature of humanity. That’s someone believes that in eugenics, or survival of the fittest, or the godless version of our lives.

But anyway, I have a good joke for you, by the way.

A child goes to his mother and says, “Where did we come from?” So the mother says, “Well, we’re made in the image of God.” And then the child goes to the father and says, “Where did we come from?” And the father says, “We evolved from monkeys.” So the child’s confused. So he goes back to the mother and looks for an explanation. So the mother says, “That’s not a contradiction. That’s my side of the family, and that’s his side of the family.” [Jerm Warfare laughs]

So Bill Gates belongs on that, group of people, belong to the monkey side of humanity. Whereas most humanity belongs to the – the wind made in the image of God department. Now, since they think they’re the biggest monkey, they think they’re on top of the food chain. That they can do whatever they want with us.

So here – I’m going to ask you a question. The same sociopath – I’m picking on him, but he’s just representative of a mentality – in last year said that 7 billion people need to vaccinated. So one simple question. Why would I take a vaccine, supported and funded by someone – for my health, a vaccine for my health – supported by someone who wants to reduce the world population? [Jerm Warfare: “It makes no sense.”]

Risk versus benefit analysis: medical necessity / efficacy / safety

@19:57: Okay, so, if I evaluate any treatment, any vaccine, anything I do to someone, I do a risk versus benefit analysis. If what I’m going to do may be risky, but does the benefit outweigh the risk? Otherwise, why would I do it? So, to understand if something is beneficial, you need to assess three things.

Whether you need it: medical necessity. You know a surgeon who operates on everyone is not a surgeon. He’s a butcher. He’s not using medical judgement. Just because someone came to your office doesn’t mean you have to cut him. There has to be a need for it, a reason for it. And the real surgeons know when not to cut. A real doctor knows when not to do something. So necessity.

Does it work? Efficacy. That’ll be useful, right? If I’m going to do something to someone, it better work.

And is it safe?

Though, if you analyze these vaccines from that perspective, and I can do that for you, I don’t know how much time we have, but – [Jerm Warfare: “No, please. I’ve got all the time.”] All right, so let’s look at medical necessity.

Without a vaccine: healthy children have a 99.998% survival rate /
“For every one child that dies from COVID-19 naturally, a hundred will die from the vaccine.”

@21:05: 18 and under, healthy children, have a 99.998% survival rate, according to the CDC, with no treatment from COVID. Why would I immunize a group, a demographic, that has a near 100% chance of recovery with NO treatment, with an experimental substance of questionable efficacy and known danger? The answer is I wouldn’t. Unless, I believe in child sacrifice. Doctor, Dr. Michael – “

Jerm Warfare: “Yeah. Exactly right. But – sorry, sorry, sorry – doctor, the media keeps pushing out a different story. So the questions is, who do you believe?”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Well, you can look at the CDC and see the survival rate of COVID-19. Um, as a matter of fact, I mean I can look at the day outside right now and say it’s night. That doesn’t mean it’s true. So the media is a tool of the fear. Maintaining the fear. So, getting back to my point, which was that – yeah, the young demographic has a 100% survival, essentially, so why would I do something that would threaten that demographic?

If you look at Dr. Michael Yeadon, who was the head of Pfizer, vice president of Pfizer[Jerm Warfare: “Yeah, he was on my podcast also.”] So, you know what he says? The guy is a world expert on vaccine development. And he did his statistical analysis, and he said the following, and he said this to me directly, because I’m friends with him and I called him up, and he said “For every one child that dies from COVID-19 naturally, a hundred will die from the vaccine.” 

Jerm Warfare: “That is not something I want to hear, doc.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Well it’s not about what you want to hear or don’t want to hear, it’s about the truth. I don’t want to hear it either but it’s not going to help the children that are going to be sacrificed. 

Let me ask you a question. What’s the difference if I take a child, let’s say a five year old, and cut its throat, or throw this child off a cliff, or into a volcano or whatever, or inject them with something that they don’t need because they’re going to get better anyway, and it has a 100 to 1 kill ratio? [Jerm Warfare: “Yeah, no… this, um – “]

Without a vaccine: healthy 18-45 year olds have a 99.95% survival rate /
WITH TREATMENT (not vaccine), it’s near 100% survival rate

@23:26: So, okay, I’m gonna finish. Now, if we look at 18 to 45, many healthy adults, so the survival benefit there is according to the CDC, is 99.95%. With treatment, it’s near a 100%. So the same question. Why would I vaccinate a demographic of healthy adults, with something that, against the virus, that they’re gonna get better from, and with something that may kill them? It just doesn’t make sense.

And just yesterday, it was published, multiple studies, that proved what we all knew anyway, that natural immunity is multiple – many many times better than vaccine induced immunity. Which means, anyone who had COVID already and has antibodies have superior antibodies. So why would I inject in them a liquid that makes inferior antibodies and puts them at risk? There’s no medical – just – there’s no medical necessity there.

Okay. Now let’s get to the problematic group. The high risk group, 45 and over, or those that have medical problems, have a death rate, globally, of 7.5%. That’s unacceptable. That is… a huge number of dead people. However, if you treat them, properly, all the data, all the clinical trials or the peer reviewed studies, they’re dozens of them that have corroborated my initial observations. Which I had published in a peer-reviewed international journal, that if you treat people properly, you reduce the death rate and hospitalization rate by 85%.

So, just to explain what that actually means, at a 600,000 dead Americans, we could’ve prevented 510,000 from going to the hospital. So I can reduce that death rate from 7.5% to around 1%. So now comes a good question. If we have something that with treatment, has a 1% death rate, in a sub – in a small demographic of high risk patients, perhaps it’s better to vaccinate than let them get sick. We have to – we have – it’s a good idea – thought. It’s a question. I’m not denying it.
 

By the way, if there were good, effective and safe COVID-19 vaccines, I would recommend them. I’m not against the vaccines, I’m against being stupid. And, so let’s look if these vaccines have – if they work!

Booster shots suggested even though the initial vaccines
DON’T WORK

@26:07: The three most vaccinated countries in the world: Israel, Gibraltar, and in the Indian Ocean there’s an island nation called Seychelles, they all have more than 80% vaccination rates. All the countries are experiencing massive outbreaks of delta variant.

The CDC director, I think her name – Walensky or whatever he name is, said two days ago that it seems according to the Israeli data, anyone who was vaccinated early, has a higher risk to end up in the hospital, in the ICU, and therefore you should take another shot. [Jerm Warfare: “Why?”]

I’ll tell you why in a minute. But, so, so it doesn’t work. Apparently.

And now let’s look at the safety concerns, which is really – could keep us busy for the next hour. Let’s divide safety concerns over time. Because they vary over time. So there’s the first time period would be, let’s say from the moment of injection to 3 months. It’ll be the acute period. Then there’s the subacute period from 3 months to 3 years. And then there’s the long-term, more than 3 years. And I want to break it up in this way because it’s important to understand the mechanisms of action.

The – I’m sorry, my kids are calling me. Um, from the moment of injection until 3 months, people are dying from blood clots. And we know exactly why. The Salk Institute from San Diego published a paper, a landmark paper a few months ago explaining the mechanism. From the moment you’re injected, your entire body becomes a spike factory. Producing a viral spike protein.”

Jerm Warfare: “Sorry, before you go on, can you just explain what that means? Cause we keep hearing about that.”

The “vaccine”/”poison death shots” cause dangerous spike proteins to produce in our body – leading to blood clots

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @28:16: “Well, um, how do vaccines work? How – usually I would give you a piece of a virus, let’s say the flu virus. So, I’ll take a piece of it, not the whole living thing, although sometimes we do use living tenuated viruses, but in most cases – or polio – that’s a better example. I take a dead polio virus and I inject it into you. Your immune system recognizes that it doesn’t belong there. It mounts an immune response generating antibodies and now if you ever come into contact with real polio, all your soldiers are ready to pounce, and destroy it and you don’t get sick.

That’s how a normal, traditional vaccine would work. These quote/unquote vaccines, which I call ‘poison death shots’, they’re completely different. They don’t inject a piece of virus. At all. They inject a code, a formula, that converts your body into a factory that produces part of the virus. And a very specific part of the virus.

See the virus, coronavirus, is basically a ball with thorns. And it has these little spikes. Let’s call it the male organ. And in order to be able to get into the cell, it needs to attach to the receptor on the cell, which is the female organ. So the spike itself goes and finds its mate, and that allows the virus then to get into the cell. So, the spike is what actually gets the virus inside the cell.

So what we’re doing is giving you a code in the form of mRNA, which is the code. Your body’s cellular metabolism, your body’s own processes, are hijacked to manufacture all these little spikes. Not the whole virus, by the way. Just these little spikes. Trillions, hundreds of trillions of them, and it turns out that they migrate and end up in your blood vessels. Lining the endothelium, which is the inner skin. The inner lining of the blood vessel.

And it’s supposed to be smooth, obviously. Cause you have high rate of flow of blood cells, you don’t want them – [Jerm Warfare: “Yes, I understand.”] – you don’t want them to bump into stuff and break. In fact, all of a sudden you just coated lined wallpaper, inner lining of every vessel in your body with thorns. Little spikes. [Jerm Warfare: “Okay, yes.”] And then the blood cells get damaged. And when they get damaged, they leak stuff. That sets off a reaction in the body to cause blood clots.

So, the main cause of death in the first 3 months is blood clots in the form of heart attacks and strokes, or anywhere else. It could be kidneys, lungs, could be in your mesentery, your gut. So that’s what we’ve seen. And 40% of the deaths are happening within the first 3 days of injection.

How many people have to die from the COVID vaccines before we finally say, ENOUGH?

@31:45: Now, what’s the threshold of death? When do we say, you know, it’s too risky? It’s too much? In 1976 we had the swine flu vaccine. Um, it killed 26 people. The entire vaccine program was canceled.

According to the United States government already, this is according to the government, there’s 13,000 dead. According to the whistleblower, from the CDC, that wrote an affidavit, the number’s 45,000.

That’s not enough? I’m telling you, in 2009 there was a study on the system used for reporting. Called VAERS. That only 1% of events are actually reported. Now, I can make an argument, that maybe rashes are reported much less than death. Agreed. I’m not gonna deny that.

So what is the number? No one really took the time to figure it out. But, okay, it’s not 1%. So I’ll be very generous to VAERS. I’ll give ’em a 20% reporting rate. And that’s being generous. So what that means is that the number of deaths being reported, you have to multiply it by a factor of 5. [Jerm Warfare: “So over 200,000.] I think so.

And there are two other problems with this system. Which is that known reports are being scrubbed off the server. We have evidence of this. We have screenshots of reports that were there a few months ago that no longer exist. We can’t get ’em. And also I have colleagues that are trying to file reports. They lost patients, and the system won’t let them. It’s rejecting their reports, on technicalities.

So, there’s an obvious – and Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin is actually doing an investigation to see to what degree their suppression and obstruction and flow of true side effect information. So, that’s a lot of death already.

Issues of myocarditis and miscarriages – and no long-term assessment of the COVID vaccines

@33:55: The other problem is inflammation of the hearts. Called myocarditis. It damages the hearts it seems of young men. And the other problem is miscarriages in the first trimester in women that have been vaccinated is a much increased rate of losing their babies.

So that’s pretty bad. Remember, this is something that doesn’t work and you don’t need it. And then, let’s go to the longer term consequences. Well, it’s clear that the number of autoimmune diseases and cancers is going up. And there’s enough data concern/smoke, to require further inquiries to see if these mRNA vaccines are actually causing it. Remember, it went from laboratory to human use in less than a year. When on average it takes 10 years to vet a vaccine. So it’s not like we have long-term studies. So you need to know what’s going to be in a few years.

So there’s a concern already of autoimmune diseases and cancer – so that’s going to effect lifespan, and there’s also a real concern – there’s a leaked study from Pfizer that wasn’t supposed to get out. But someone leaked it from Japan. Where it showed the, when you inject it here [Dr. Zelenko points to his arm] where the vaccine actually ends up. And the largest amount ends up in the ovaries. So the question is, what is the long-term consequences on fertility? That has not been vet – that has not been ruled out. That has not been checked or assessed.

” – this vaccine program is the biggest threat to humanity in the history of humanity.”

@35:32: Okay. Now, but that’s – everything I just said is nothing compared to what I’m about to tell you. Between 3 months and 3 years, is a period where the world experts, the top minds in medicine and science, are SCREAMING, “Stop! You’re going to cause a genocide.”

So, for example. Remember, don’t believe me. Dr. Luc Montagnier, he happened to win the Nobel Prize – [Jerm Warfare: “For HIV.”] – for finding HIV. Yes. Pretty big boy. I wouldn’t say he’s the… he said like this. He’s never seen anything like this, and this vaccine program is the biggest threat to humanity in the history of humanity.

Okay. Then, Dr. Dolores Cahill, a top […] from Ireland, came out saying that within 2 years, she believes 90% of the people who got vaccinated will be dead.

Now, – [Jerm Warfare: “Wait! Two years?] – Yeah. So maybe she’s wrong. Maybe it’s 3 years. Or 4 years. And maybe it’s not 90%, what if it’s 5%? Not enough? So she’s raising a concern – hold on, and then Dr. Robert Malone invented the mRNA vaccine technology. It’s telling people, “Don’t take it. It’s too dangerous. The government is lying to you.”

And the, Dr. Michael Yeadon that I mentioned is saying the same exact thing.

Immune system, activated by the vaccine/virus, is attacking our own body –
Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE)

@37:15: What is the concern? And why are people going nuts about this? So, here’s the reason. In the 1960’s, an RSV vaccine was made, given to children, it killed children. No one understood why until they figured out that the children developed antibodies to RSV. And then when they were exposed to RSV, there was a – the immune system blew up and it was the immune system that killed the child. [Jerm Warfare: “What? The immune system?”]

It’s the child’s immune system that killed the child. It was an overreaction. That’s called antibody dependent enhancement. It’s not from the actual vaccine. What happens – listen again. They got the vaccine, they developed antibodies. Now you have these supposedly protective antibodies, then the RSV virus came, touched – came into contact with these antibodies and there was an explosion in unhealthy immune reaction.

Not every part of your immune system is good for you. You heard of autoimmune diseases? Lupus? Rheumatoid arthritis? That’s your body’s immune system attacking your body. That’s unhealthy. So it’s not always that your immune system is good for you.

So, in this particular case, the antibodies that were produced by the vaccine triggered a reaction, once coming into contact with the virus that killed the children.

So in 1970’s, there was something called the dengue fever virus vaccine, same thing happened. They would give it to people/adults; they died. It was the same exact mechanism of death called antibody dependent enhancement.

In all the attempts to make coronavirus vaccines, in the animal models, all of them manifested this reaction. And killed a large percentage of the animals that – in other words, the animals were vaccinated: mice, ferrets, and they produce antibodies, and then they’re purposefully infected with the virus that they’re immunized against. They’re challenged, to see if it works. And a large percentage of these animals died. Again, it’s called antibody dependent enhancement.

So here’s the question. Wouldn’t it be a good idea to rule that out by human beings, before you deploy a vaccine to 7 billion people?”

Jerm Warfare: “It sounds like an absolutely terrible idea. So, why – “

Leading experts warn of the many side effects of the vaccines –
and world suppression of the truth

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @40:13: “That’s exactly what happened. Said – there’s 2 billion people already in the United States, there’s been a deployment of a substance that has the potential to kill the organism that it was given to. And that potential has not been excluded. And there’s a historical precedent for these things to happen. And it’s being done to people that don’t need the vaccine. And it doesn’t even work.

So, I’m going to make it very simple. Um, this vaccine is being deployed not for medical reasons. At all.

So I already told you, look, the causes, blood clots, inflammation of hearts, miscarriages, increased rates of cancer potentially, increased rates of autoimmune diseases, potential infertility, and the potential of this autoimmune death process, that it’s not me saying it! I am nobody. There are world experts in the fields; you mean, the guy who invented the vaccine – that’s not enough for you? Or the guy who ran Pfizer? Or the guy who won the Nobel Prize for finding HIV? That’s not enough?

These people – so what would be the normal rational thing to do? Would be, well, take a step back, let’s test these more to see if they’re safe. Forget about – you don’t need it, but still. So, do you see what’s going on here?

There is the suppression of life-saving medications, there’s the suppression of knowledge of life-saving treatments. Anyone who dares to say against the accepted narrative that the media is pumping, is deplatformed. It could be the world expert who made the mRNA vaccine who says something against the policy of the government is immediately deplatformed from every social media site. Why is that? And then, the actual side effects of these vaccines are being artificially suppressed, so that we don’t know the truth. And no one really needs this vaccine. Because I explained to you – though… what’s going on here?”

Jerm Warfare: “I mean, Dr. Lee Merritt has said very much the same thing.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Yep, and Dr. Peter McCullough.

A need to reflect on our own values and freedom into the future

Jerm Warfare @42:47: “Yes. He also says the same thing. So, how – how do you, how do you respond, doc? What do you do, in a situation now when you’re hearing about the mandatory vaccines that are coming? And by the way, it’s not just in the United States. Our own government is now talking about making these vaccines mandatory.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Define mandatory. In other words, they’re going to come down and hold you down, and put a needle in your arm?”

Jerm Warfare: “I don’t think that – to that degree, but I think you won’t be able to get employment, you won’t be able to go into shops, etc., etc.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “I wouldn’t worry about it; I’ll tell you why. Because there’ll be so many dead people, rotting corpses in the streets, that the worse it’ll get, it will look like a kindergarten, and you’ll have plenty of job openings.”

Jerm Warfare: [laughs] “I’ve never heard that. That is such a dark joke, but it’s so true.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Look, I am not ready to sacrifice having a future for a few conveniences in the present. [Jerm Warfare: “Sure.”] I’d rather sacrifice the present, so that I have a future. And people have really messed up values. “All right. I can’t fly in a plane, so I’ll take the vaccine.” or, you know, “I’ll lose my job.” or, “I won’t be able to go to school.” And I look at these people and I say, well, you are making decisions on – that will potentially affect your lifespan and you’re doing it so willingly and blind – why? And so people are so gullible; it’s so easy to manipulate humanity.”

We’re in a life and death situation: not with the virus, but with the vaccine

Jerm Warfare @44:36: “Is it, is it literally a life and death kind of scenario? In your view.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Absolutely, yes. We’re at World War 3. And you know, if the Germans were bombing over your head, you wouldn’t be asking that question. But the bombs that are being sent at us are invisible. And sugar-coated. And, I mean, there’s already hundreds of thousands of deaths from the vaccine. How much more death do you need to see before you say enough?”

Jerm Warfare: “Well they’ll say – they’ll respond and say yes, but it’s not because of the vaccine. It’s because of other things.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Well they can say whatever they want. It’s just not consistent with truth. Not consistent with the data. And we know that COVID-19 is exceptionally treated.

It’s true that if there’s a fire and I don’t put it out, it’s going to burn the house down. So you’ve set a lot of fires, artificially. You go around and you set fires around the neighborhood and then you tell people, don’t put it out. Then the neighborhood burns down. Okay? That’s true. But doesn’t mean you have to put gasoline on the fire either. So, my answer to you is, don’t worry about the virus. Be prepared to deal with it. They’re over the counter options. And you’ll be fine. And don’t buy into the false – “

Assessing the difference between DNA and mRNA vaccines –
and the issues with “shedding”

Jerm Warfare @45:54: “Emma has got a question. She wants to know what your thoughts on the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. Because as far as I’m aware it’s not mRNA.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Yeah, it’s worse. It’s a DNA vaccine. In other words, the way it works is, mRNA is limited to the cytoplasm of a cell. To the – let’s call it your living room. It gets into your living room and it uses your television and it makes copies using the equipment that’s in your living room. And those proteins that are made are what are potentially killing you.

The Johnson and Johnson is a DNA vaccine. And that gets into your bed where you are, lying there, in your pajamas, and goes right into your core, into your essence, and makes – messes with your DNA, and then becomes mRNA and – in other words, it’s deeper penetrating. It’s much worse. It’s like having someone – difference of this: someone in your living room and someone in your bed. Johnson and Johnson gets into – into you, real deep.

Now in Texas they have a flag, ‘don’t tread on me’. So I made a meme, ‘don’t shed on me.’ But uh, I don’t like shedding, but it’s not really a major problem for most people. Because what shedding is, is in the first 3 months after you get vaccinated, you’re actually shedding the spikes. And it comes through your breath, droplets, it comes through your skin, comes through other bodily fluids.

Now most people, it may mess up their periods, it may make you feel not so well, but it’s not an enough of a dose to cause real problems. Except in 2 categories of people. Someone who has a blood-clotting predisposition. There are conditions where people are more prone to blood clots. That could trigger blood clots. Because that’s what the main concern is, in the first few months.

And then, miscarriages. It seems to cause miscarriages in, you know, pregnant women. So, if – or women that want to get pregnant; it messes with their ability to get pregnant. So, but it’s a short-lived problem. So it’s not – it’s a problem, but it’s not a problem worth over emphasizing, because there’s much bigger problems.”

Jerm Warfare: “She says, yeah, especially around pregnant women.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Yeah, so that – that’s a good question. Um, you don’t know who’s vaccinated, and again, if it’s more than 3 months they’re no longer radioactive. You know? But you don’t really know when and what – so, that becomes a hard question. So… pregnant women have to be a little bit more isolated, in my opinion, if they want to protect their pregnancies. But the majority of people should not isolate themselves because of shedding.

Inspiration and advice: ‘Stay away from bad, do good, and live’

@49:04: Whenever I need inspiration, I look back into bigger minds than me. And in the Psalms of David, King David writes the following, a very good prescription: ‘stay away from bad, do good, and live’. So that’s the prescription. So let’s break that up.

‘Stay away from bad’. Do not give into the fear, do not isolate yourself. Do not take a poison death shot. And if you did already, don’t do it again. Don’t harm yourself. Do no harm. Don’t destroy yourself psychologically, emotionally, and physically.

‘Do good’ means, that if you’re in the high risk category group, meaning anyone over the age of 45, or anyone with medical problems, or in my opinion anyone who got the vaccine, you should take prophylactics; it’s preventive therapy. And preventive therapy doesn’t mean to take another shot and make more bombs. Preventive therapy means that to prevent the detonation of those bombs that already exist by using antiviral drugs – um, and you can find them on my website: vladimirzelenkomd.com.

I have protocols with dosing and everything for prescription and for over the counter options. So people could have them in their hands. But they – and the idea is to protect yourself in advance so that you, if you do come into contact with the detonator, another virus, you don’t die. And if you do get sick, God forbid, you have to start treating day one. In other words, you don’t want the monster to wake up. And then you’ll live.”

Spirituality and the sanctity of life –
Godliness vs. godlessness

Jerm Warfare @51:03: “It seems like this is way more than a medical war that grew in. It seems like it’s a psychological war, isn’t it? Religious war, spiritual war, I don’t know what, but it’s certainly more – “

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “It’s a war against God. There are two systems of thought, that can’t co-exist anymore. There’s a system that is based on God centered consciousness. Which means like this, just follow the logic. If God makes you, that means your life, your life has sanctity. If your life has sanctity, that means you have human rights. If you have human rights, then it’s not in the realm of another human being to decide how long you should live and how many of us should be on the planet. That’s God’s department.

There’s another system, which is completely godless. It’s based on Darwin’s theories and Galton who developed eugenics. You know they were – he was a nephew of Charles Darwin. And their system is the survival of the fittest system. In other words, they believe that there’s a hierarchy of humanity, to be based on genetics or other factors, and it’s the strongest, on top of the food chain, that will dictate what happens to everyone else.

Now, this sounds like a fairy tale except that it killed 200,000,000 people 80 years ago. Because invariably it deteriorates into 3 categories of human beings. The super-human, the human and the sub-human. So the Nazis, the Aryans, believed that they were descendants of Aryan gods. And therefore felt entitled that they could enslave and murder anyone they wanted, and wage global war.

And the humans were the Anglo-Saxons, the Europeans that were meant to be enslaved and serve the super-humans. And the sub-humans that I belong to, the Jews, the slobs, the gypsies, handicapped, and political people that oppose them politically, they’re the sub-humans that needed to be thrown into gas chambers and then the ovens and vaporized into dust.

So, and this is not a fairytale. This is history. Recent history. So that mentality did not go away. That mentality went dormant for a bit, and now it’s woken up, but it’s not anti-semitic, actually. What it is, is something else.

On top of the super-human is these, what they perceive themselves as evolved higher level of consciousness people that think that they know better for what the rest of us need, and therefore can make policies that will control how many of us live, and how long we live. In reality, these are not evolved people. These are devolved pagans. These are sociopaths, these are wannabe deities, these are just the biblical historical replay of maniacs that are denying the existence of God and believe in their own immortality.

People who are dictating the rest of the world keep themselves hidden

@54:17: And what – so let’s – who are they? Um, honestly speaking, 70% of all corporate wealth in the world is owned by 150 people. So I would suspect it’s some – some people in that group. And because they control media, politics, academia, and one of their policies – what do they want?

The real people who are doing this are too smart to be in the news. It’s not Fauci, it’s not even Soros or Gates, or Schwab. Because the people that are really doing it are really really smart. And they hide themselves like layers of proxies, to do their bidding. And ‘why would I sacrifice myself – I’m too smart for that’.

But if you look at the World Economic Forum, which is a good example of despotic thinking – tyrannical thinking – and they crafted a 2030 UN plan. It’s already being implemented. And, you know, Hitler wrote Mein Kampf, and wrote it many years before he took control. He laid out his plans. These people are not even hiding their agenda. So what is their agenda? Go look at the 2030 World Economic Forum plan, and you’ll see – [Jerm Warfare: “You’ll own nothing.”] – and you’ll be happy, yeah.

What kind of sociopath, what kind of human being feels that they can decide whether you own property or not? Possessions or not? What else do they say? Um, you won’t eat meat except on special occasions. [Jerm Warfare: “And insects, also.”] All right. I didn’t hear that one. They – you won’t use fossil fuels. America will no longer be a super-power. A few European countries will run the world. There’ll be a billion refugees. So, what you have are – this guy, Schwab, said in 2016, it’s on an interview in French, that within 10 years, by 2026, everyone will have a digital tag and identifier in them.

Jerm Warfare: [jokes] “You are really ruining my Friday evening, doc.”

Test on humanity – on our decisions

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @56:58: “You know, that’s good. Because reality – you need a reality check. And the next people that are willing to stand their ground and sacrifice even their own lives so that humanity’s – the soul of humanity is… remains. Because that’s, it’s an attack on the core of what is means to be a human being. And the core of our souls, and the core of our relationship with Creator.

And ultimately I think there’s a divine test, here. Which is, no one’s making you take this. You’re choosing to do it. There’s no such thing ‘you were forced’. Because, you could be pressured, you could be coerced, but you still have the ability to say ‘no’.

And if you put your trust – if I was God, I would be asking this following question: “I know you’re scared and the world is crazy. But who are you going to put your trust in? Me, who makes you? You’re going to ask me to fill the… your anxiety space? Are you going to ask me for protection? Because I’ll do it. Or are you going to go around to false gods, despotic governments, sociopathic oligarchs, and the golden calf of this vaccine? Because if you are going to do that, then let them protect you. Let’s see how that’s going to work out for you.”

Reflecting on the future – God conscious living vs. immorality

Jerm Warfare @58:20: “In front of you, doc, there is a crystal ball. What do you see?”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “I see a glorious future. I see a… we’re in the cusp of a redemptive process. Where there’s going to be – people are going to self select into… God conscious living, versus idolatry.

And then I believe what the prophets say. Not me. That the spirit of inequity will be removed from the Earth. God will take out His big broom, clean out the garbage, and then the world will be filled with the knowledge and glory of God.

I think, I think that God has had enough of people who, for example, if these despots had their way, a 30 year old man who thinks he’s a woman would be sharing a bathroom with my 4 year old daughter. [Jerm Warfare: “It’s unreal.”]

So this type of erosion – you know, in the Bible it says that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed. The Talmud asks why. So one suggestion is because of immorality. The answer’s no. The whole world was immoral. What was so special about them that they were singled out? You know what the answer is? That they codified it into law. It became the law of the land. Immorality became codified as the norm.

[Jerm Warfare: “That’s what’s happening now.”] You think? What do you think I”m telling you this? So I think that we’re in a glorious journey that there’s going to be a transformation. It’s going to be bumpy. Be some turbulence. But at the end, the world will be cleaned up, just like the flood. And we’ll be left with, with people that want to live a God centered moral life.

I’m not afraid of dying. It’s not my department. You know? How I’m going to die, how long I’m going to live, no one knows. And it’s ultimately in God’s hands and He could do whatever He wants.

What I’m afraid of is living. In other words, am I living to my fullest potential? When I have to stand before the King of Kings, and give an accounting – he’s not going to ask me why I wasn’t like you. He’s going to ask me, “Why weren’t you like you could’ve been?” Me. Zev Zelenko. “Why didn’t you reach the potential that I had for you?”

And, so, I want to use my thoughts, of check and control, my speech, and my actions of check and control, and my time. I want to use that in a way that makes the world cleaner and better and healthier, and more Godly, and beautiful. I think that’s a worthy, worthy of my time and efforts. And that’s what I focus on, and that’s what I try to do. And that’s why I’m talking to you.

Jerm Warfare: “I’ve been waiting for 30 minutes to say what I’m about to say, but you are making medicine great again.

Thank you so much for your time. It’s been a great pleasure.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “God bless you. Thank you.” 

Jerm Warfare: “You too. Thank you, man.

My name is Jerm, this is Jerm Warfare, the battle of ideas.”

Thank you so much to Jerm Warfare and Dr. Vladimir Zelenko for this interview. Your efforts to spread awareness and the truth is extremely important especially in these suppressed times, where going against the narrative is ridiculed and censored.

And a special thank you to Dr. Zelenko and other doctors/healthcare providers who made the decision to help treat the people who needed it. Your compassion and integrity speaks volumes of your character and is the role model that people need to get through these uncertain times.

Lastly, a huge thank you to everyone for reading and spreading these messages. God bless.

Featured image by HeungSoon from Pixabay

Navy Commander Warns of “National Security Threat” from Mandatory Vaccination of U.S. Military Personnel

“Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination – A National Security Threat”

Reblogged from globalresearch.ca
by Revolver and Commander Jay Furman on August 15, 2021

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

An officer with the U.S. Navy is warning of a full-blown “national security threat” if the military moves ahead with its planned universal COVID-19 vaccination mandate, in a paper obtained exclusively by Revolver News.

In a memorandum released on Monday, Biden Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin announced his intention to require a COVID-19 vaccination for all service members by mid-September, or immediately should any COVID vaccines clear FDA approval (the vaccines are currently only authorized for emergency use). Servicemen who refuse to submit to the vaccine will potentially face court martials, prison time, and even less-than-honorable discharge from the service.

If that plan goes ahead, though, CDR J.H. Furman warns the results could conceivably be catastrophic.

“The forced vaccination of all military personnel with the present COVID-19 vaccines may compromise U.S. national security due to the unknown extent of serious vaccine complications,” writes Furman. “Further study is needed before committing the Total Force to one irreversible experimental group. Initial reports leave more concern for the COVID-19 vaccinations than the virus itself for the (at present) exceptionally healthy military population.”

Furman is a career United States naval officer, naval aviator, and foreign area officer with extensive experience advising senior military, diplomatic, and international organization leadership. The commander has spent years serving throughout Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East at sea, ashore and airborne. He also holds a Master of Arts in Security Studies from the Naval Postgraduate School.

Furman’s paper is not long, weighing in at just two and a half pages plus an equally long list of citations. But he nevertheless hits all the key points for why imposing COVID-19 vaccines on the entire general populace is driven by hysteria, not real concern for saving lives or stamping out the virus.

Furman’s key points are:

  • The average member of the U.S. military is young and in excellent physical fitness, two categories that are nearly immune to the dangers of COVID. So far, only 24 people out of 2.2 million military personnel have died of COVID-19, a rate of less than one per 91,000.
  • There is reason to believe severe or even fatal side-effects from existing COVID-19 vaccines are more common than reported, and could even prove deadlier to otherwise-healthy servicemen than COVID-19.
  • There is also the outlier possibility that mRNA vaccines (the kind used by the Moderna and Pfizer shots) may have unanticipated negative effects on the immune systems of recipients.
  • Currently, the U.S. military has proven completely capable of weathering COVID-19 without any loss of effectiveness, so forcibly making the entire service a test case for a novel type of vaccine is a pointless risk.

We invite readers to read CDR Furman’s entire paper below

***

We thank Revolver News for having brought this article to our attention.

***

Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination – A National Security Threat

CDR Jay Furman, USN*

The forced vaccination of all military personnel with the present COVID-19 vaccines may compromise U.S. national security due to the unknown extent of serious vaccine complications. Further study is needed before committing the Total Force to one irreversible experimental group. Recent reports leave more concern for the COVID-19 vaccinations than the virus itself for the (at present) exceptionally healthy military population, which is not appreciably impacted by the virus without vaccination.

First, SARS-CoV-2 is unlike any other virus. We have yet to completely understand the virology and it is rapidly mutating. Second, the COVID-19 vaccines are all experimental. The world is simultaneously learning about this new technology amongst the largest vaccine rollout in human history. The data on both the virus and vaccines are new and not yet scientifically reliable. Basic assumptions are changing with unprecedented levels of breakthrough cases in the vaccinated population. The U.S. military service member is extremely healthy compared to the general population and is not succumbing to the virus at any significant level, even without the vaccination. According to the CDC, “COVID overall has a 99.74% survival rate. Among young people, that number is even higher. For people aged 18 to 29, the survival rate is 99.97%.” As of August 12, 2021, only 29 (or 0.001%) of the 2.2 mil military population had expired from COVID-19.

To date, the vaccine is more seriously injuring this unique population than the virus itself. A Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) study finds 23 U.S. service members experienced post-vaccination moderate to severe myocarditis who were otherwise healthy and non-symptomatic. There have been many other COVID-19 vaccine harm or death outcomes documented in the U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). In fact, COVID-19 vaccine adverse events comprise a full one-third (over 500,000) of the three-decade total for all VAERS reports. Plus, the VAERS system is underreporting COVID-19 vaccine deaths by a factor of five, according to a whistleblower who is described in their court filing as a “[…] subject matter expertise in the healthcare data analytics field, and has access to Medicare and Medicaid data maintain by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).” They attested that the 9,048 reported COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths in VAERS is more like 45,000, after reconciling the various databases.

The UK government agency Public Health England recently published a report showing that, “people who received the COVID-19 shot are more than three times as likely to die than those who have not received the vaccine.” Early signs in Israel indicate the same. Officials there recently reported that at least 85% of all severe and new COVID-19 hospitalizations are prior vaccinated individuals. The inventor of m-RNA technology, Dr. Robert Malone, recently disclosed that “[…] new data indicates that people who have taken the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are at greater risk of getting Covid than someone who is not vaccinated.” The Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca vaccines also demonstrate significant problems as compared to the negligible military COVID-19 mortality rates. In the European Union (EU), more than 22,000 vaccination-associated deaths are now documented in the EU drug adverse events database. Which caused Doctors for COVID Ethics (an international doctors group from over 30 countries) to conclude on July 9, 2021 “[…] the benefits of vaccination are highly doubtful. In contrast, the harm the vaccines do is very well substantiated […]” Vaccine-enhanced herd immunity is in question. On August 3, Iceland’s Chief Epidemiologist announced that their 95% nation-wide full vaccination rate, “[…] has not led to the herd immunity that experts hoped for. In the past two to three weeks, the Delta variant has outstripped all others in Iceland and it has become clear that vaccinated people can easily contract it as well as spread it to others,”

There is precedence for vaccine failure in respiratory viruses as noted in the journal Nature Microbiology last September, “Data from the study of SARS-CoV and other respiratory viruses suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could exacerbate COVID-19 through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), resulting in failed vaccine trials.” Evidence suggests ADE could cause viral interference and along with other (influenza) vaccines alter our immune systems non-specifically to increase susceptibility to other infections. The mRNA vaccines may redirect our cells away from suppressing latent immunity issues from previous infections (e.g., chicken pox). Consider along with what Dr. Malone describes as an “entire population [that] has been trained via a universal vaccination strategy to have the same basic immune response, then once a viral escape mutant is selected, it will rapidly spread through the entire population – whether vaccinated or not.” It could mean massive problems ahead for the global COVID-19 vaccinated as they encounter variations and even simple viruses like the flu, in combination.

Natural immunity already possessed by the military population recovered from COVID-19 is effective against all known variants and also likely durable over time, according to Dr. Peter A. McCullough, who is regarded as one of the most credentialed experts on COVID-19 in the U.S.This past January, the journal Nature published that greater than 95% of COVID-19 recovered people have “[…] durable memories of the virus […]” There is precedence here, as well, with SARS-CoV-1 demonstrating 17 years of natural immunity. A Cleveland Clinic study concluded, “Individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination […]” Another recent Israeli study questions “[…] the need to vaccinate previously-infected individuals […]” after comparing re-infection rates for the vaccinated and recovered segments of the country’s national health database.” Dr. McCullough strongly asserts that the current vaccination programs have become dangerous and should be shut down immediately – that mass vaccination programs in the middle of a pandemic actually causes the variations, making the entire vaccinated population vulnerable to those same variants.

Currently, about 50% of all active and reserve service members have yet to receive a COVID-19 shot of any type. Based on recent reporting data supported by published research findings, this paper argues that instead of lumping two very large unknowns (COVID-19 virology & vaccine efficacy) into one experimental group — possibly threating U.S. military personnel combat readiness — the DOD should maintain the “unvaccinated-half” as a force protection CONTROL GROUP, thus guarantying a viable fighting force. Similar safeguards should also be considered for the civilian DOD population to support the Warfighter, regardless of the long-term vaccine verdict.

Given the COVID-19 mortality in the military, the U.S. can presently maintain the nation’s defensive manning levels, in all critical fields. Pressing forward against these extremely large unknowns by mandating COVID-19 vaccines could potentially threaten basic military deployment assumptions, to say nothing of the long-term destruction to morale and recruiting. If it is true that the military is, in fact, essential to national survival thereby justifying massive budgets and sweeping measures to protect the Force, then deciding to gamble the entirety of those vital forces on what little is certain, is reckless at best. To do so given such low demonstrated serious outcomes in the unvaccinated Force could prove fratricidal. With a better than 99.74% COVID-19 recovery rate in the military population, the singular act of stopping the present vaccination drive, thus preserving a force protection CONTROL GROUP, could prove existentially critical to the country. Immediately, cease and desist all coerced COVID-19 vaccination initiatives for service members and civilians (except for any remaining co-morbidity groups). Moreover, the force protection CONTROL GROUP should commence harmless alternative and preventative protocols like I-MASK+ currently used in nations around the world with great efficacy. According to the American Journal of Therapeuticsin their May-June 2021 issue “Multiple, large ‘natural experiments’ occurred in regions that initiated ‘Ivermectin distribution’ campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.”

Bottom line, the known science does not justify committing the entire U.S. troop strength to one singular experimental group. Given the many unknowns and what we have come to learn most recently, mandatory COVID-19 vaccination may not only be rash, but perhaps become life-threatening to the nation vis-à-vis those dedicated to her defense, against very well-known strategic competitors. Simply, COVID-19 forced-inoculation could prove to be a grave national security threat at a time when the nation can least afford it. We must immediately pause and reevaluate the U.S. defensive strategic assessment of COVID-19 vaccinations for the entire Department. There is absolutely no imperative of ‘benefits outweighing the risks’ to continue with mandating the COVID-19 vaccines to the military population who do not self-elect. Doing so could potentially trigger manning shortfalls brought on by resignations and lost enlistments from this all-volunteer armed force. At this time, there is more than enough justification for a COVID-19 vaccination safety standdown to reconsider how the decision to mass vaccinate will critically impact overall mission effectiveness.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Commander Jay Furman is a career United States naval officer, naval aviator and foreign area officer with extensive experience advising senior military, diplomatic, and international organization leadership. The Commander has spent years serving throughout Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East at sea, ashore, and airborne. He holds a Master of Arts in Security Studies from the Naval Postgraduate School.

Sources

1. Moss, William. “Q&a: How Many Covid-19 Variants like Delta Are Possible?” Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center, 15 July 2021, coronavirus.jhu.edu/vaccines/q-n-a/how-many-covid-19-variants-like-delta-are-possible.

2. Crawford, Nigel, Adele Harris, and Georgina Lewis. “Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED).” The Melbourne Vaccine Education Centre (MVEC). The Melbourne Vaccine Education Centre (MVEC), February 22, 2021. https://mvec.mcri.edu.au/references/vaccine-associated-enhanced-disease-vaed/.

3. Robertson, Sally. “Research Suggests Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Reprograms Innate Immune Responses.” News, May 13, 2021. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210510/Research-suggests-Pfizer-BioNTech-COVID-19-vaccine-reprograms-innate-immune-responses.aspx.

4. Kekatos, Mary. “Israel Saus PFIZER’S COVID-19 Vaccine IS ‘Significantly Less’ Effective against the Indian ‘Delta’.” Daily Mail Online. Associated Newspapers, July 17, 2021. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9796589/Israel-saus-Pfizers-COVID-19-vaccine-significantly-effective-against-Indian-Delta.html.

5. Captaindaretofly. “VAERS Whistleblower: ‘45,000 Dead From Covid-19 Vaccines within 3 Days OF Vaccination’, Sparks Lawsuit against Federal Government.” Daily Expose, July 20, 2021. https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/19/vaers-whistleblower-45000-dead-from-covid-19-vaccines-within-3-days-sparks-lawsuit-against-federal-government/

6. Simpson, Robert. “Research Reveals Vaccinated People More Vulnerable to Delta Variant than Unvaccinated.” The Simpson Post, June 25, 2021. https://thesimpsonpost.wordpress.com/2021/06/25/research-reveals-vaccinated-people-more-vulnerable-to-delta-variant-than-unvaccinated/.

7. Public Health England. “COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report Published.” GOV.UK. Public Health England. Accessed August 8, 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/covid-19-vaccine-surveillance-report-published

8. Department of Health and Social Care, PHE Genomics Cell, PHE Outbreak Surveillance Team, PHE Epidemiology Cell, PHE Contact Tracing Data Team, PHE Health Protection Data Science Team, PHE International Cell, et al., 17 SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England §. Technical Brief (2021).

9.  Lieber, Dov. “Delta Variant Outbreak in Israel Infects Some Vaccinated Adults.” The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company, June 25, 2021. https://www.wsj.com/articles/vaccinated-people-account-for-half-of-new-covid-19-delta-cases-in-israeli-outbreak-11624624326.

10. “Provisional Covid-19 Deaths by Sex and Age.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed August 10, 2021. https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Provisional-COVID-19-Deaths-by-Sex-and-Age/9bhg-hcku/data.

11. FLCCC. “Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) Prevention & Treatment Protocols for COVID-19.” FLCCC, n.d

12. Kime, Patricia. “Army Officer Is 29TH US Service Member to Die FROM COVID-19.” Military.com, August 12, 2021. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/08/12/army-officer-29th-us-service-member-die-covid-19.html.

13. Kime, Patricia. “DoD Confirms: Rare Heart Inflammation Cases Linked To COVID-19 Vaccines.” Military.com, June 30, 2021. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/06/30/dod-confirms-rare-heart-inflammation-cases-linked-covid-19-vaccines.html.

14. Montgomery, MD, Jay. “Myocarditis Following Immunization With Mrna COVID-19 Vaccines in Members of the US Military.” JAMA Cardiology. JAMA Network, June 29, 2021. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2781601.

15. Kime, Patricia. “DoD Confirms: Rare Heart Inflammation Cases Linked To COVID-19 Vaccines.” Military.com, June 30, 2021. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/06/30/dod-confirms-rare-heart-inflammation-cases-linked-covid-19-vaccines.html.

16. Team, Children’s Health Defense, and Children’s Health Defense Team. “We’ve Never Seen Vaccine Injuries on This Scale – Why Are Regulatory Agencies Hiding Covid Vaccine Safety Signals?” Children’s Health Defense, August 12, 2021. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccine-injuries-regulatory-agencies-hiding-covid-safety-data/.

17. Rickards, James. “The Battle of the Censors.” Daily Reckoning. Daily Reckoning, July 28, 2021. https://dailyreckoning.com/the-battle-of-the-censors/

18.  Simpson, Robert. “Research Reveals Vaccinated People More Vulnerable to Delta Variant than Unvaccinated.” The Simpson Post, June 25, 2021. https://thesimpsonpost.wordpress.com/2021/06/25/research-reveals-vaccinated-people-more-vulnerable-to-delta-variant-than-unvaccinated/.

19. Lieber, Dov. “Delta Variant Outbreak in Israel Infects Some Vaccinated Adults.” The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company, June 25, 2021. https://www.wsj.com/articles/vaccinated-people-account-for-half-of-new-covid-19-delta-cases-in-israeli-outbreak-11624624326.

20.  “Israel, Widely VACCINATED, Suffers Another Covid-19 Surge.” The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company, August 12, 2021. https://www.wsj.com/articles/israel-80-vaccinated-suffers-another-covid-19-surge-11628769603.

21.Conradson, Julian. “Leading Israeli Health Official: VACCINATED Account for 95% of Severe and 85-90% of New Covid Hospitalizations. VACCINE Effectiveness Is ‘Really Fading’ (VIDEO).” The Gateway Pundit. The Gateway Pundit, August 9, 2021. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/please-add-video-leading-israeli-health-official-vaccinated-account-95-severe-85-90-new-covid-hospitalizations-vaccine-effectiveness-really-fading-video/.

22.  Delaney, Patrick. “Inventor of MRNA VACCINE: Jabs Not Justified for Young, Data for Informed CONSENT LACKING.” LifeSite, July 30, 2021. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/inventor-of-mrna-vaccine-jabs-not-justified-for-young-data-for-informed-consent-lacking/.

23. de Jesús, Erin Garcia. “How Antibodies May Cause Rare Blood Clots after Some COVID-19 VACCINES.” Science News, July 6, 2021. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid-vaccine-antibodies-cause-blood-clots-side-effect.

24. Miller, Sara G. “Johnson & Johnson Vaccine Linked to 28 Cases of Blood Clots, CDC Reports.” NBCNews.com. NBCUniversal News Group, May 12, 2021. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/johnson-johnson-vaccine-linked-28-cases-blood-clots-cdc-reports-n1267128.

25. Kime, Patricia. “Army Officer Is 29TH US Service Member to Die FROM COVID-19.” Military.com, August 12, 2021. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/08/12/army-officer-29th-us-service-member-die-covid-19.html.

26. “About.” Doctors for COVID Ethics, June 11, 2021. https://doctors4covidethics.org/about/.

27. Peckford, Brian. “Letter to Physicians: Four New Scientific Discoveries Regarding the Safety and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines.” peckford42, July 17, 2021. https://peckford42.wordpress.com/2021/07/17/letter-to-physicians-four-new-scientific-discoveries-regarding-the-safety-and-efficacy-of-covid-19-vaccines/.

28. Ćirić, Jelena. “COVID-19 in Iceland: Vaccination Has Not Led to Herd Immunity, Says CHIEF EPIDEMIOLOGIST.” Iceland Review, August 3, 2021. https://www.icelandreview.com/society/covid-19-in-iceland-vaccination-has-not-led-to-herd-immunity-says-chief- epidemiologist/.

29. Lee WS, Wheatley AK, Kent SJ, DeKosky BJ. Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS CoV-2 vaccines and therapies. Nat Microbiol. 2020 Oct;5(10):1185-1191. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00789-5. Epub 2020 Sep 9. PMID: 32908214. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32908214/

30. Cunningham, Allan S. “Tamiflu & Influenza Vaccines: More Harm than Good?” The BMJ, August 3, 2021. https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m626/rr.

31. Lin X, Lin F, Liang T, Ducatez MF, Zanin M, Wong SS. Antibody Responsiveness to Influenza: What Drives It? Viruses. 2021 Jul 19;13(7):1400. doi: 10.3390/v13071400. PMCID: PMC8310379. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310379/

32. Malone, Robert, and Peter Navarro. “Vaccine Inventor Questions MANDATORY SHOT Push, Biden’s Covid-19 Strategy.” The Washington Times. The Washington Times, August 5, 2021. https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/5/biden-teams-misguided-and deadly-covid-19-vaccine-/

33. Rumble. Accessed August 15, 2021. https://rumble.com/vk8cpw-top-american-doctor-covid-shots-are-obsolete-dangerous-must-be-shut-down.html.

34.  Le Bert, Nina et al. “SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls.” Nature vol. 584,7821 (2020): 457-462. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2550-z

35. Patel, Neel V. “Covid-19 Immunity LIKELY Lasts for Years.” MIT Technology Review. MIT Technology Review, January 6, 2021. https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/01/06/1015822/covid-19-immunity-likely-lasts-for-years/.

36. Shrestha, Nabin K., Patrick C. Burke, Amy S. Nowacki, Paul Terpeluk, and Steven M. Gordon. “Necessity of Covid-19 Vaccination in Previously Infected Individuals.” medRxiv. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, January 1, 2021. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.01.21258176v2.

37. Goldberg, Yair, Micha Mandel, Yonatan Woodbridge, Ronen Fluss, Ilya Novikov, Rami Yaari, Arnona Ziv, Laurence Freedman, and Amit Huppert. “Protection of Previous Sars-Cov-2 Infection Is Similar to That OF Bnt162b2 VACCINE Protection: A Three-Month Nationwide Experience from Israel.” medRxiv. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, January 1, 2021. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.20.21255670v1.

38. Rumble. Accessed August 15, 2021. https://rumble.com/vk8cpw-top-american-doctor-covid-shots-are-obsolete-dangerous-must-be-shut-down.html.

39. “Mortality Analyses.” Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. Accessed August 8, 2021. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality.

40. Bhargava, Hansa D. “Coronavirus Recovery: Rate, Time, and Outlook.” WebMD. WebMD, August 7, 2020. https://www.webmd.com/lung/covid-recovery-overview#1.

41.  Military Benefits. “Coronavirus Cases in the US Military.” MilitaryBenefits.info, March 19, 2021. https://militarybenefits.info/coronavirus-cases-military/.

42. Kime, Patricia. “Army Officer Is 29TH US Service Member to Die FROM COVID-19.” Military.com, August 12, 2021. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/08/12/army-officer-29th-us-service-member-die-covid-19.html.

43. “I-MASK+ Protocol: FLCCC: Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance.” FLCCC | Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, August 11, 2021. https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-plus-protocol/.

44. Hope, Justus R. “Ivermectin Obliterates 97 Percent of Delhi Cases.” The Desert Review, June 7, 2021. https://www.thedesertreview.com/news/national/ivermectin-obliterates-97-percent-of-delhi-cases/article_6a3be6b2-c31f-11eb-836d-2722d2325a08.html.

45. “Ivermectin.” National Institutes of Health. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed August 8, 2021. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/.

46. Bryant, Andrew, Theresa A. Lawrie, Therese Dowswell, Edmund J. Fordham, Scott Mitchell, Sarah R. Hill, and Tony C. Tham. “Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines.” American Journal of Therapeutics 28, no. 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1097/mjt.0000000000001402.

47. Ahmed, Sabeena, Mohammad Mahbubul Karim, Allen G. Ross, Mohammad Sharif Hossain, John D. Clemens, Mariya Kibtiya Sumiya, Ching Swe Phru, et al. “A Five-Day Course of IVERMECTIN for the Treatment of COVID-19 May Reduce the Duration of Illness.” International Journal of Infectious Diseases 103 (2021): 214–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.191.

48. Kory P, Meduri GU, Varon J, Iglesias J, Marik PE. Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19. Am J Ther. 2021 Apr 22;28(3):e299–318. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001377. PMCID: PMC8088823. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/

Featured image is from Revolver

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS:
Thank you to Commander J.H. Furman for being the voice of reason during these perilous times and for expressing his concerns. He brings up several incredibly important points, all based on facts, that show the detrimental consequences of vaccinating everyone – military and citizens alike.
Thank you for being brave enough to speak up about these unnecessary vaccine mandates, especially in this current environment when any form of vaccine hesitancy is met with scorn, censorship, and in some cases, hostility.

Your efforts are greatly appreciated.