What is Bill Gates’ Motive?

And why does he seem to smile and smirk all the time?

It’s strange that the main person pushing for the vaccine and contact tracing is also one of the hugest supporters of population reduction and genetic manipulation.

Even stranger, are the people that will refuse to believe that Bill Gates has said anything of the sort, or been involved in anything of the sort, and will maintain to this day that he is just trying to help “save the world”.

So I am not going to inundate anyone with fancy words of my own. I will just point you to words and actions of Bill Gates himself and those of his institutions and partners, and let him do the talking for me.

As you’re watching the video, which helps to paint a broader picture of Mr. Bill Gates other than just reading his words, keep in mind the term “duper’s delight”, and see if this might apply to anything we’re being told.

Duping delight is a particular micro expression a person will display that betrays a sense of enjoyment they are getting out of controlling and deceiving another person. It is a very important expression to watch out for in catching dishonesty in a person. In fact it is a form of body language pretty much exclusively reserved for pathological character types such as psychopaths.

The phrase was coined by the psychologist and body language expert Dr Paul Ekman and was defined by him as “the pleasure we get over having someone else in our control and being able to manipulate them”.

Duping delight most often manifests as a grin or a smirk which will flash across a person’s face, and is usually completely inappropriate to the situation or the topic that is being spoken about. The psychopath is either about to lie, or is lying to someone and they are believing it, and the smirk is a leaked expression of pleasure that they are getting away with it. – psychopathsinlife.com

Click to watch video (bitchute.com)

(Picture is from Bill Gates from his presentation youtube.com | wwwAAASorg | )

Original videos can be found at the following links: (unless they get deleted due to youtube’s always-changing definition of their “policies”. Please let me know if this happens and I will try and fix it.)

1.  00:00 – 00:32 | Bill and Melinda Gates assure you of a second wave that will “get your attention” | Exigent News |
2.  00:33 – 01:52 | Bill Gates: We Could See Early Results From Coronavirus Vaccine Trials This Summer | The Late Show with Stephen Colbert |
3.  01:53 – 05:15 | Bill Gates on Fighting Coronavirus | The Daily Social Distancing Show | The Daily Show with Trevor Noah |
4.  05:15 –  05:37 | Bill, Melinda Gates advocate GMOs to a Brussels audience | EURACTIV |
5.  05:37 – 06:29 | “These vaccines are unlikely to “completely sterilize” a population. Professor Sir John Bell, SAGE! | Steve Willis | (John Bell – leads the development of Oxford’s health research strategies and chairs the Gates Foundation’s scientific advisory committee)
6.  06:29 – 08:17 | Innovating to zero! | Bill Gates | TED |
7.  08:17 – 09:13 | Bill Gates on Overpopulation and Global Poverty | The Borgen Project |
8.  09:13 – 09:47 | Year Of The Vaccine (Bill Gates) | POPS Maroon |
9.  09:47 – 12:50 | Gene editing can now change an entire species — forever | Jennifer Kahn | TED |
10. 12:51 – 16:29 | Bill Gates: How Gene Editing, AI Can Benefit World’s Poorest | wwwAAASorg |

11. 16:29 – 16:58 | How to spot a liar | Pamela Meyer | TED |
12. 16:59 – 17:26 | Bill Gates on US reopening: We didn’t get away with it like we thought | CNN |

Transcripts of the video segments 1-10 can be found below:

1. Is this a threat? A promise?

“In fact, the testing could’ve been ramped up, uh, very quickly. And a few countries that have almost avoided the epidemic entirely, like, Taiwan, New Zealand, Australia, you know, they took their experience and actually prepared and so they moved a lot faster. Uh, so we, you know, will have to prepare for the next one. That, you know, I’d say, is, uh… will get attention this time.” – Bill Gates

2. Bunkering down

Stephen Colbert: “You tried to warn us about this pandemic, um, and we didn’t listen. What’s the next thing you’re warning us about that’s gonna happen 5 years from now that we’re not listening to at the present.”

Bill Gates: “Well, I didn’t want to be right. What I wanted to do is, uh-

SC: “I understand. I’m not saying you won. Everybody loses. Nobody wins with this. And I’m not saying that you’re, that you’re, this is not an endzone dance.”

BG: (laughs)

SC: “I’m just saying, what else are we not listening to that we need to take action on now.”

BG: “Well, the, the idea being a bioterrorist attack is kind of the nightmare scenario because they’re a pathogen with a high death rate would be – now the good news is, I’m not trying to depress you, it’s tough enough right now-

SC: “Too late! Too late.”

BG: “That most of the work we’re going to do to be ready for pandemic 2, I, I call this pandemic 1, most of what we’ll do to be ready for that are also the things we need to do, uh, to minimize the threat of, of bioterrorism.

SC: “Well, um, Mr. Gates, thank you so much for being here. Thanks so much for the efforts you and your organization are doing to try and find the cure for this. And uh… we’ll see you again. Stay safe.

BG: “All right. Great talk.

SC: “Give our best to everybody else in the bunker.

BG: “Thank you.” (laughs)

3. Vaccinating the whole world

But the ultimate solution, the only thing that really lets us go back completely to normal, and feel good about sitting in stadiums with lots of other people, is to create a vaccine and not just take care of our country, but take that vaccine out to the global population and, um, so we have vast immunity, and this thing no matter what, isn’t going to spread in large numbers.” – Bill Gates

Again sadly, the richer countries that do contain the epidemic will not allow people from those countries (poorer countries) to come in, you know, unless they are quarantined or tested or-or proved they’re immune. Uh, and so this is gonna stop people going across borders very dramatically these next few years till we get to that full vaccination.

Within the United States is different because we’re not gonna partition the country. Uh, and so therefore we are all in it together. We can’t do what we’re gonna do with foreign nationals, which is reduce the numbers a lot and have very strict screening there. We’re not gonna have at every state border, you know, some complex quarantine center.

Uh, and- so the whole country needs- even when you have small numbers, because those can exponentiate  to big numbers so quickly. You know, the doubling time is like three days when you’re still behaving uh, in the pre-epidemic way.

Uh, so you know, each country, uh, you know, has to get the entire populace, even some who- who, uh, initially resisted, maybe for very good reasons, because the economic effect on them, uh, is- is strong.”

So this is powerful medicine. But if you take a big dose of it earlier, you, you don’t have to take it for nearly as long.” – Bill Gates

Bill Gates: “We’ll have a lot of unusual measures until we get the world vaccinated. You know, 7 billion people- that’s a tall order. But it is, it is where we need to get to uh… uh despite a lot of things in between now and then- to minimize the damage.”

Trevor Noah: “You predicted this pandemic almost to a T, and maybe it was because we were dealing with other things at the time we didn’t really pay that much attention. Is there anything else you want to warn us about now that we should-

BG: (laughs)

TN: “that we should be looking forward to. Is there anything else that keeps you up at night?

BG: “Well, this is a naturally caused epidemic. And as bad as it is, it looks- if you have reasonable treatment, to have a one percent fatality. There could be epidemics that are worse than that, including, uh, ones that aren’t naturally caused that are a form of bioterrorism. But I do- one thing that I feel good about it, this is such a big, uh, change to the world, that this time it won’t be like ebola, which was just there in West Africa or Central Africa. This time, the 10’s of billions to have the diagnostic standing by, the vaccine manufacturing standing by- this time we will, uh, get ready for the next epidemic.”

4. Gleefully injecting GMO’s in little kid’s arms…

You know, is there something to worry about with medicines that is might, some of them have side effects- do we need safety testing? I mean, and we’re taking things that are, you know, genetically modified organisms and we’re injecting them in little kid’s arms- we just shoot ’em right into the vein.

So, yeah… I think maybe we should have a safety system where we, you know, do trials and test things out.” – Bill Gates

5. Sterilizing the Population

John Bell: “And don’t forget, there, these vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilize a population. They’re very likely to have an effect which works in a percentage, say, 60 or 70 percent. We’ll have to look quite carefully, and the regulators will have to look quite carefully to make sure that it’s done what we need it to do before it gets approved. So there will be a delay between the outcome of the trial and the decision whether it can be approved as a vaccine. Uh, and of course anything that happens-

Jon Snow: “Professor Sir John Bell…

John Bell: “Yeah?

Jon Snow: (pauses) “I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to cut you right off like that-

John Bell: “Can I just say that anything that happens to undermine the legitimacy of the regulators to make independent decisions is, in my view, profoundly unhelpful.

Jon Snow: (long pause) “Professor Sir John Bell, thank you very much indeed for joining us.”

6. Innovating to Zero

And the answer is, until we get near to zero, the temperature will continue to rise. And so that’s a big challenge. It’s very different than saying, “We’re a twelve-foot high truck trying to get under a ten-foot bridge, and we can just sort of squeeze under.” This is something that has to get to zero.

Now, we put out a lot of carbon dioxide every year- over 26 billion tons. For each American, it’s about 20 tons. For people in poor countries, it’s less than one ton. It’s an average of about 5 tons for everyone on the planet. And somehow we have to make changes that will bring that down to zero.

It’s been constantly going up. It’s only various economic changes that have even flattened it at all, so we have to go from rapidly rising to falling, and falling all the way to zero.

Bill Gates Innovate to Zero Equation
Bill Gates presented this infograph/equation to show how we would need to get the carbon dioxide emissions down to zero. "People" takes a role in part of the equation. Bill Gates | TED2010

This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication. So you’ve got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero, and that’s going to be based on the number of people, the services each person is using on average, the energy on average, for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy.

So let’s look at each one of these, and see how we can get this down to zero. Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero. That’s back from high school algebra. But let’s take a look.

First we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion.

Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.” – Bill Gates

7. What is “health care” and “reproductive health”?

When our foundation first started up, it was focused on reproductive health. That was the main thing we did because I thought, you know, population growth in poor countries is the biggest problem they face. You’ve got to help mothers who want to limit family size have the tools and education to do that. Now that’s the only thing that really counts.

Well, then, I came across articles that showed that the key thing you can do to reduce population growth is actually improve health. And that sounds paradoxical. You think, ok, better health means more kids, not less kids.

Well in fact, what parents are doing is they’re trying to have two kids survive to adulthood to take care of them. And so the more disease-burden there is, the more kids they have to have, have that high probability. So there’s a perfect correlation that as you improve health, within half a generation, the population growth rate goes down.” – Bill Gates

health care:

“All three components that Gates mentioned can involve direct forms of population control. “Reproductive health” is a euphemism for contraception and abortion. By now “health care” includes an increasingly wide scope for euthanasia, including in Canada. Contraceptive (or more literally, abortive) vaccines also exist, meaning that the use of vaccinations for more direct population control is at least a possibility.”

Gates, WHO, and Abortion Vaccines (fcpp.org)

8. Year of the Vaccines – 2021 (interview was with Sanjay Gupta on 2011)

Sanjay Gupta: “10 billion dollars over the next ten years to make it the year of the vaccines… what, what does that mean exactly?

Bill Gates: “Well, over this decade, uh, we believe unbelievable progress can be made both inventing new vaccines and making sure they get out to all the children who need them. Uh, we can cut the number of children who die every year from about 9 million to half of that uh, if we have success on it. The benefits are in terms or reducing sickness, reducing the population growth, it really allows us society, a chance to take care of itself, uh, once you’ve made the intervention.

9. Dangers of gene-editing

They engineered two mosquitos to carry the anti-malaria gene and also this new tool, a gene drive, which I’ll explain in a minute. Finally, they set it up so that any mosquitos that had inherited the anti-malaria gene wouldn’t have the usual white eyes, but would instead have red eyes. That was pretty much just for convenience, so they could tell at a glance which was which.

So they took their two anti-malarial, red-eyed mosquitos and put them in a box with 30 ordinary white-eyed ones, and let them breed.

In 2 generations, those had produced 3,800 grandchildren.

That is not the surprising part.

This is the surprising part: given that you started with just 2 red-eyed mosquitos and 30 white-eyed ones, you’d expect mostly white-eyed descendants. Instead, when James opened the box, all 3,800 mosquitos had red-eyes.

When I asked Ethan Bier about this moment, he became so excited that he was literally shouting into the phone. That’s because getting only red-eyed mosquitos violates a rule that is the absolute cornerstone of biology, Mendelian genetics.

I’ll keep this quick but Mendelian genetics says when a male and a female mate, their baby inherits half of its DNA from each parent. So if our original mosquitos was “aa” and our new mosquito is “aB”, where “B” is the anti-malarial gene, the babies should come out in 4 permutations: “aa”, “aB”, “aa”, “Ba”. Instead, with the new gene drive, they all came out “aB”. Biologically, that shouldn’t even be possible.

So what happened?

The first thing that happened was the arrival of a gene-editing tool known as CRISPR in 2012. Many of you have probably heard about CRISPR so I’ll just say briefly that CRISPR is a tool that allows researchers to edit genes very precisely, and easily and quickly.

It does this by harnessing a mechanism that already existed in bacteria. Basically there’s a protein that acts like a scissors and cuts the DNA, and there’s an RNA molecule that directs the scissors to any point on the genome you want.

The result is basically a word processor for genes. You can take an entire gene out, put one in, or even edit just a single letter within a gene. And you can do it in nearly any species.” – Jennifer Kahn

Say you want to get rid of an invasive species, like get Asian carp out of the Great Lakes. All you have to do is release a gene drive that makes the fish produce only male offspring. In a few generations, there’ll be no females left, no more carp. In theory, this means we could restore hundreds of native species that have been pushed to the brink.

Ok, that’s the good news. This is the bad news:

Gene drives are so effective that even an accidental release could change an entire species, and often very quickly.” – Jennifer Kahn

The last worrisome thing, is that the technology to do this, to genetically engineer an organism and include a gene drive, is something that basically any lab in the world can do. An undergraduate can do it. A talented highschooler with some equipment can do it.” – Jennifer Kahn

10. Bill Gates excited about certain new technologies

And therefore, we’re not taking the best of science, uh, in creating something that can have, uh, its potential impact. And so, a, you know, a redirection either of the market signals or the role of governments and philanthropy or scientists themselves against this broader goal, would help us make, uh, far greater progress, even more than we have today.

We have an opportunity with the advance of tools like artificial intelligence in gene-based editing technologies to build this new generation of health solutions. Uh, so that they are available to everyone on the planet. And I’m very excited about this.” – Bill Gates

Even so, the machine learning tools that we have today, uh, are going to be applied in a broad range of domains, including modeling disease, uh, finding drugs for disease, understanding biological systems, uh, and so it is a very exciting time.

The capacity to execute those AI models is, is doubling more than once a year. So we’re going up even faster than so-called Moore’s Law by building these very, uh, uh, special purpose things to execute both the creation of deep learning models and the execution of those, those models.

And so applying those in a broad way and really understanding whether they’re applicable, that data revolution is here today and it’s suffusing itself through many many problems, including these health problems that are, are so critical.

We also have recent breakthroughs like the gene-editing technologies including CRISPR, uh, and so we should be able to use that, uh, for very low cost point-of-care precision diagnostics, um, we should be able to use that for therapeutics and we should gain understandings of how to do, uh, vaccines, even vaccines that the turnaround time, instead of being the typical, uh, three or four years- literally at some point we’d be able to create in months. And we want to use these tools, not just for orphan diseases or not just for diseases in rich countries but also for the diseases that predominantly afflict, uh, people in countries where most of humanity lives in, the, the middle-income and the low-income countries.

In terms of genetics I’m sure we’ve all ready the history uh, you know going back to when, you know, people didn’t know, Pauline didn’t know, where is that information encoded? And you know Crick Watson and Franklin laid the foundation for modern genetics by understanding how, uh, DNA encoded that information and it’s only 15 years ago that the human genome project gave us, uh, the basic blueprint and let us now identify sequences that are associated with different diseases.

It was 8 years ago that CRISPR came along and it continues to evolve in some pretty fantastic ways and including the accuracy of the editing. Today, over 89 percent of genetic variants that we know are associated with human disease can be corrected, that is, if you get in to the cells of interest, uh, you can, uh, make those corrections.” – Bill Gates

eugenics: the practice or advocacy of controlled selective breeding of human populations (as by sterilization) to improve the population’s genetic composition – merriam-webster.com

Introduction to Eugenics:
Eugenics is a movement that is aimed at improving the genetic composition of the human race. Historically, eugenicists advocated selective breeding to achieve these goals. Today we have technologies that make it possible to more directly alter the genetic composition of an individual. However, people differ in their views on how to best (and ethically) use this technology. – knowgenetics.org

Other useful links that also help tie in between Bill Gates’ history into eugenics and his partnership with Planned Parenthood: (which was born out of an agenda to exterminate the “Negro population” – according to the founder, Margaret Sanger)

BILL GATES AND EUGENICS: THE WORLD NEEDS FEWER PEOPLE

The Gates Family, Eugenics and COVID-19

Margaret Sanger: “We Want to Exterminate the Negro Population.” Her Wish is Coming True

Bill Gates, Monsanto, and Eugenics

Melinda Gates: ‘Black People, Indigenous People’ Should Get Coronavirus Vaccine First

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

WORLD PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY! Stop Big Pharma’s DNA “Vaccine” Experiment! - “Mass Vaccination will Breed Dangerous Variants & Destroy Our Immunity” — Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD
Dr. Peter McCullough / John Leake – Full Interview [Transcript] - Renowned doctor exposes worldwide covid treatment suppression and corruption of the medical and governmental agencies.
Anthony Fauci’s Wife: Christine Grady – Hidden Face of the Vaccine Trials? - What is Christine Grady's role in the vaccine agenda?
REPOST: Proof that the Pandemic Was Planned With a Purpose - Many connections involving complicit huge name individuals and organizations.
FLASHBACK | COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci - A look into Anthony Fauci's involvement into medical/health corruption.
David Goldberg’s FINAL WORDS: Project Pogo and Project Zyphr | Full Transcript - Extermination effort and implementation of a world government.
“America’s Pastor” Billy Graham Exposed - Exposing Graham's ties to freemasonry and their agendas.

MORE Suspicious Activity Surrounding Covid

And the faulty tests used.

Expanding on the first post I made in relation to this one: Suspicious Activity Surrounding Covid and the Vaccine, I am just going to get straight to the point. (Because if I state what I really want to, I will just end up on a long, frustrated rant.) So, without further ado, here you go:

1. CDC sent out TAINTED TESTS

Yes, folks, in case you didn’t know, at the very start of this whole “pandemic”, the CDC sent out batches of tests that were already tainted/cross-contaminated with SOMEthing that created a “false positive”. (and who’s to say that they’re still not contaminated?…Let’s just hope that the labs that all these tests were sent out to remain dutiful in their testing of these batches…)

What could do that, you may ask?

Well, who knows? Not me. I’m not a scientist, molecular biologist, medical researcher, etc. But what I can give you, is my best, educated guess. What could the test possibly be tainted with to present a positive result of “covid” on a covid test?

Well… maybe covid? Just throwing that out there.

Here are some articles and the time/date that it was allegedly created to follow the history of this development:

Coronavirus Test Kits Sent to States Are Flawed, C.D.C. Says (original: February 12, 2020 | Updated on February 16, 2020)
Ontario received 100,000 contaminated, unusable swabs for COVID-19 tests (April 10, 2020)
Contamination at CDC lab delayed rollout of coronavirus tests (April 18, 2020)

Fact-Checking?

Of course, some “fact-check” articles will refute that the virus itself had anything to do with the faulty test (although the main issue is that the test was tainted to begin with – but certain articles will specifically hand-pick certain articles to debunk, since, I suspect, it helps their narrative…), as website Politifact targets a Facebook meme that states “Covid-19 test HAS the virus “…the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sent states tainted lab kits in early February that were themselves seeded with the virus, federal officials have confirmed.” ” – archive.fo

They will say something along the lines of, “Oh, it’s not for sure known that it was tainted with covid, specifically. It was never proven. It was just a different chemical reagent and/or due to a faulty lab set-up that attributed to the false positive.”

But these tests didn’t and couldn’t contain the live virus, as live virus isn’t used in test production in the first place. Meanwhile, the tests were early in their development and never made it to the stage of being used for patient testing.

politifact.com (July 8, 2020)

Hm. I’m glad they cleared that up for me. Thank goodness for sites like politifact that will tell me how they fact check and debunk articles. It seems like they just assume that the tests couldn’t have been tainted with the virus itself simply by saying that “the live virus isn’t used in test production in the first place”. Seems good enough for me! …

Flu Does not Exist Anymore…

And even if these swabs weren’t already infected with coronavirus and instead was a different reagent like officials are claiming, then this would still be a very suspicious event surrounding what is becoming a turning point in history. The sudden absence and non-focus on the flu, which is normally a regular occurrence that happens every year, is now all but obsolete. Instead, we have the coronavirus, which presents symptoms almost identical to the flu. And the amount of “positive” cases, (due in part – or completely all of it – to faulty tests, as it is still occurring to this day) is unreliable and suspected to be highly exaggerated – as is stated from actual numerous medical health doctors.

Ask the Experts (covid-19 vaccine)

Not to mention the attempt of a FDA official to address the CDC’s apparent ineptitude:

In late February, after an FDA official visited the CDC’s lab complex in Atlanta, he advised the CDC to discontinue manufacturing the kits, the regulatory agency said. In response, the CDC turned to an outside contractor to manufacture the remaining kits it had intended to make for public health labs.

washingtonpost.com (April 18, 2020)

So much for “The FDA is the gold standard of regulators” that Bill Gates has touted earlier this year, if even the CDC is not adhering to these “regulations”. Of course, since Bill Gates has made this statement, he has, in recent months, retracted it…

And think all of these accounts were one-offs and that fully fixed batches were sent out the next time around?

Well, guess again.

Spain is sending back faulty coronavirus tests to China that were supposed to be replacements for the first faulty batch (April 22, 2020)

Which brings me to:

2. More Faulty Tests from Many Different Sources

I’m not sure how many people know by now about Elon Musk’s test results from the antigen covid test, in which he allegedly tested 4 times in one day, half showing a positive result, the other half negative:

Elon Musk tests positive, AND negative

Mr. Musk is not the only one.

Others have stepped forward to announce their strange occurrences with the covid tests and results. Not to mention the many people who were trying to alert people to their experience that they did not even submit the test, and received a letter back or a call saying that they tested positive for covid. Including a woman who died in February and allegedly got tested in June.

Some reasons have been attributed to clerical errors, or testing of those who have donated their body to science in conjunction with missteps in regulations, misinformation, etc. No one (in authority) wants to flat out admit that these people are honestly just telling the truth and relating their experiences about this strange dilemma occurring all over the world.

It’s easy for “authority” figures to dismiss claims coming from “normal” citizens.

But when there’s a prominent figure making these claims, one who allegedly has inside knowledge about certain business industries and has millions of followers, subscribers, etc., the refutations of multiple “news outlets” are harder to take hold.

Another celebrity claims that the conflicting results she received came from each side of her nostril:

Erykah Badu Says She Tested ‘Positive’ for COVID-19 in Her Left Nostril and ‘Negative’ in Right (November 14, 2020)

A third test revealed a negative. Which, obviously, begs the questions… if she took yet another test, would that come back negative again, or a positive? Did they duplicate the test results from each side of her nostril? Would that have made any effect on the outcome of the results? I suppose it’s too late to know now. Although I would think a real scientist and medical health professional would want to know the answer to all these questions and why these tests are presenting with such unreliable information in the first place.

Animals and Inanimate Objects Testing Positive for Covid

And it’d be one thing if all these tests had some semblance of normalcy in its testing processes… Yet, perhaps because I am not a scientist and am not familiar with how molecular biology works in conjunction with reagents and viruses and all those fancy scientific doodads and such, that it boggles my mind how even different types of substances can test positive for covid. Such as the pawpaw fruit, goat and engine oil that the Tanzanian president sent in for testing to, ironically, test the test results.

Pawpaw, bird, goat, engine oil test positive for coronavirus (May 8, 2020)

Some have accused him of not taking the situation seriously, but no. He was doing what any wise person in his position should do to protect the integrity and honesty of the test themselves before submitting it to the rest of his country. It would have been interesting if he also sent in tests that were merely opened, and then sent in as if it had already taken a sample, to see what the results would have been.

Coca-Cola Tests Positive for Covid (live in front of other officials)

There is also a test recently performed by FPO General Secretary Michael Schnedlitz in which he demonstrated live, in front of several peers, a can of cola testing positive for covid.

Watch: Austrian MP Tests Cola for Covid-19 – Yields Positive Result (December 11, 2020)

So with all of these different accounts of multiple different tests ranging from things like engine oil, to fruit and carbonated drinks, to different types of animals, bringing back an alleged positive covid result, it should not be lost on others how many different ways the number of cases can skyrocket with the apparent either faulty results in these tests, and/or the hyper-sensitivity of them, or even the possibility that they are still cross-contaminated.

And, again in theory-like fashion, if one were to surmise that there is an agenda to boost the number of positive cases of this disease, one easy way to do this would be to simply dip a whole bunch of swabs in coke and let the positive results roll in.

Hypothetically, of course.

3. Creator of the PCR tests Refutes its Reliability to Determine if You a Have a Virus

Now, that brings us to the PCR test itself that several different authorities state is THE test to determine a positive result of covid (or just about anything, according to the PCR test creator).

From: NOT the Creator of the PCR test
Hence, the rapid tests are not as accurate and reliable as the gold-standard RT-PCR tests. As we explained in a previous column, tests are assessed based on their sensitivity and specificity. The more sensitive and specific a test is, the more accurate and reliable it is.
COVID-19 rapid tests, gold-standard tests—expert clarifies misinformation (April 7, 2020)
(Jessica) Watson claims in all seriousness that, “pragmatically” COVID-19 diagnosis itself, remarkably including PCR testing itself, “may be the best available ‘gold standard’.”
COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless (June 27, 2020)

According to the Indiana State Health Department the “gold standard COVID-19 test” is a nasopharyngeal PCR test.

Which is the gold standard of COVID-19 tests? (October 17, 2020)

Stating that the antigen test is only done in emergency cases, he (Dr. Bhattacharya) said that he is not a fan of antigen tests and ultimately it is the RT-PCR test which is the gold standard and gives a confirmed result.
RT-PCR: The gold standard for COVID-19 testing (December 10, 2020)

These are just a tiny amount of officials who have declared the PCR test as being the ‘gold-standard’. There are many more.

From: The Creator (Kary Mullis) of the PCR test

However, as we can see in the below video from the creator himself, he states what the PCR can and does do, and by the sounds of it, it doesn’t seem like even the creator himself would suggest this test as a means to accurately detect a viral infection. In fact, he’s basically stating the exact opposite, that to use this test to detect a virus would be fundamentally flawed, because the test could detect anything out of anyone if you “amplify” it enough.

Kary Mullis Explains the PCR Test (youtube.com) | Eduardo Corrochio

Some highlights from this 3 and a half minute long video, are the following quotes:

“If they can find this virus (talking about HIV, specifically in this video) in you at all, the PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody, it starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else.”

Kary Mullis Explains the PCR Test (youtube.com)

“If you can amplify one single molecule, up to something you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of in your body.”
Kary Mullis Explains the PCR Test (youtube.com)
“It allows you to take a very miniscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it in meetings and stuff like it is important.”

Kary Mullis Explains the PCR Test (youtube.com)

“PCR … it’s just a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something. …it doesn’t tell you that you’re sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that.”

Kary Mullis Explains the PCR Test (youtube.com)

All of this information is from just one video. A very short clip of it, I might add.

Kary Mullis’s Opinion of Anthony Fauci
 And in another twist, we have this added bonus on Kary Mullis’s feeling on Anthony Fauci:
Kary Mullis on Fauci (youtube.com) | Dag Gano
“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything, really, about anything and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you could take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there, you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine, he should not be in a position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on at the bottom. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to and they smugly, like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”
Transcript courtesy of Dan Gano (youtube.com)

Now, even with the suspicions about Anthony Fauci and his ties to certain figures and their agenda, it is still interesting to note that even Fauci admits to the PCR test being basically fruitless to determine an accurate covid result, at least according to the FDA guidelines.

“As reported by Jon Rappaport, during a July 16, 2020, “This Week in Virology” podcast, Anthony Fauci made a point of saying that the industry-standard PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run using the threshold standards recommended by the FDA”
Anthony Fauci Admits Chances Of Getting Accurate Results From COVID PCR Tests Are ‘Miniscule’ (November 11, 2020)

Of course, Anthony Fauci’s admission about the PCR test being possibly useless if using the FDA guideline could trace back to a suspicion that Kary Mullis’s testimonies might get released and Fauci wanted to protect himself and cover his bases that he already knew that the PCR test could be an inaccurate source of true positive results. But was it covered widely on mainstream media?

Nope.

The below link is another article that describes the inaccuracies of the PCR tests and the outrageous efforts of unlawful governmental control over quarantining tourists suspected of having covid (and the subsequent silence from the MSM) :


Kary Mullis, creator of the widely mis-used PCR test, died on August 7, 2019 of “pneumonia”.

And then, a little over 2 months later, on October 18, 2019, Event 201 was held by several high-profile figures to simulate a wide-spread pandemic exercise to demonstrate how a virus of such magnitude would effect global and economic situations.

“The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.”centerforhealthsecurity.org

“It (PCR) allows you to take a very miniscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it in meetings and stuff like it is important.”

– Kary Mullis (creator of the PCR test that is being used to determine covid results)

I’m a huge proponent for people doing their own research. Please don’t just take my word for anything, or that of any others. Use critical thinking and discernment on top of looking at things with an open mind and keep researching and looking. Put the pieces together and maybe you’ll see a bigger picture starting to form.

Stay informed, and spread awareness. It may seem like an uphill battle but I believe we have more perseverance than we realize. Stay strong.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

WORLD PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY! Stop Big Pharma’s DNA “Vaccine” Experiment! - “Mass Vaccination will Breed Dangerous Variants & Destroy Our Immunity” — Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD
Dr. Peter McCullough / John Leake – Full Interview [Transcript] - Renowned doctor exposes worldwide covid treatment suppression and corruption of the medical and governmental agencies.
Anthony Fauci’s Wife: Christine Grady – Hidden Face of the Vaccine Trials? - What is Christine Grady's role in the vaccine agenda?
REPOST: Proof that the Pandemic Was Planned With a Purpose - Many connections involving complicit huge name individuals and organizations.
FLASHBACK | COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci - A look into Anthony Fauci's involvement into medical/health corruption.
David Goldberg’s FINAL WORDS: Project Pogo and Project Zyphr | Full Transcript - Extermination effort and implementation of a world government.
“America’s Pastor” Billy Graham Exposed - Exposing Graham's ties to freemasonry and their agendas.