Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates

Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.

Somewhat of a disclaimer: I put “may” in the title of this post to deflect direct allegations that “may” end up turning out to be false. Of course, in the world we find ourselves in, where money, power and hidden motives rule, it seems the same key players are involved, over and over again. I’d say that is no coincidence and holds incredible importance when addressing the strange situations that are occurring around us.

I also focus on the names given above because they are the most prominent figure-heads of the “health initiative” and have high-ranking positions who may also just happened to have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. Again, coincidence? I’m inclined not to think so.

Why is bringing up connections of Jeffrey Epstein to the NIH and the Human Genome Project so important?

Well, other than the obvious reasons (convicted serial pedophile and blackmail extraordinaire – along with Ghislaine Maxwell, currently under trial) are the incredibly suspicious interests that Epstein has divulged and perhaps invested in to further his goals.

Take the following, for consideration:

“- He hoped to seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women / Epstein told scientists and businessmen about his ambitions to use his New Mexico ranch as a base where women would be inseminated with his sperm and would give birth to his babies

– longstanding fascination with what has become known as transhumanism: the science of improving the human population through technologies like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence

– Epstein discussed the financier’s interest in cryonics, an unproven science in which people’s bodies are frozen to be brought back to life in the future. Mr. Epstein told this person that he wanted his head and penis to be frozen.

– Epstein said he was fascinated with how certain traits were passed on, and how that could result in superior humans.”

Original source: Jeffrey Epstein Hoped to Seed Human Race With His DNA
Alternative source found here: [ https://storageunit.home.blog/2020/02/17/jeffrey-epstein-hoped-to-seed-human-race-with-his-dna-at-zorro-ranch/ ]

Some studies that Jeffrey Epstein supported and sponsored are the following:

(all 4 published wholly or in part by Martin A. Nowak – “Professor of Mathematics and of Biology at Harvard University. He works on the mathematical description of evolutionary processes, including the evolution of cooperation and human language, as well as the dynamics of virus infections and human cancer” [ https://oeb.harvard.edu/people/martin-nowak ])

2006[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279745/ ] “Five rules for the evolution of cooperation”

“Support from the John Templeton Foundation and the NSF/NIH joint program in mathematical biology (NIH grant 1R01GM078986-01) is gratefully acknowledged. The Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University is sponsored by Jeffrey Epstein.”

2007[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2387227/ ] “Breaking the symmetry between interaction and replacement in evolutionary dynamics on graphs”

“Support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (H.O.), the John Templeton Foundation and the NSF/NIH joint program in mathematical biology (NIH grant 1R01GM078986-01) (M.A.N.) and FCT-Portugal (J.M.P.) is gratefully acknowledged. The Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University is sponsored by Jeffrey Epstein.”

2008[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567469/ ] “Prevolutionary dynamics and the origin of evolution”

“This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (H.O.), the National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health joint program in mathematical biology (NIH Grant R01GM078986), and J. Epstein.”

2010[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842638/ ] “Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of direct reciprocity”

“This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation, the National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health Joint Program in Mathematical Biology (National Institutes of Health grant R01GM078986) and J. Epstein.”

Of course, the studies mentioned above are all tied into one particular grant, by the NIH, no less. And again, as a reminder, who is the head (soon to be former) of the NIH? Mr. Francis Collins (who is also known for his leadership position of the Human Genome Project), who is to step down from the NIH role at the end of the year, but yet continue his research at his lab.

And that of course ties into with Anthony Fauci as a close colleague and friend of Francis Collins, and as most of us know about Fauci, is the lead of the Coronavirus Task Force and director of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases – a branch within the NIH) – and I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention Mrs. Christine Grady, wife of Anthony Fauci and also Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.

But that also brings up a Mr. Eric Lander, well known for his work on the Human Genome Project, who has met Jeffrey Epstein at least twice, according to records. Does this necessarily mean that Eric Lander was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and all of the allegations and crimes he has been engaged in? Of course not. But it does set a suspicious light in regards to Jeffrey Epstein’s close relationships to other scientific researchers, who many have alleged to have known about Epstein’s interests and various fundings into these projects, not to mention his sordid history. It would appear that Jeffrey Epstein was quite a prolific (no pun intended) character in the scientific and medical community.

And it would make sense that someone with money, plus a sinister desire to populate the world with his offspring, would attempt to get close to those who could further his goals. So for multiple scientists and researchers to have a passing acquaintance with Jeffrey Epstein would not be unheard of. However, this points a very specific light on those who do seem to entertain Mr. Epstein’s ideals.

And now with Mr. Eric Lander, selected by Joe Biden as the head of the Science and Technology division,

Jeffrey Epstein (left), Eric Lander (right)

it makes one wonder, to what degree would money be a motivational factor, even if ideologies differ? Would some scientists care? There would not only be excessive financial compensation, but it may also satiate a scientific curiosity of a “what if” scenario.

Then of course we have to mention Bill Gates, who isn’t necessarily a scientist or medical researcher, but who has “philanthropic” ventures into transhumanism, synthetic meat, genetically modifying products and human beings, as it is, despite what “fact-checkers” try to refute.

“Gene editing in animals or even humans raises more complicated questions of safety and ethics. In 2014, the World Health Organization issued guidelines for testing genetically modified mosquitoes, including standards for efficacy, biosafety, bioethics, and public participation. In 2016, the National Academy of Sciences built on the WHO’s guidelines with recommendations for responsible conduct in gene-drive research on animals. (The Gates Foundation co-funded this work with the National Institutes of Health, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.)”

[ https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-04-10/gene-editing-good?linkId=50322894 ] “Gene Editing for Good | How CRISPR Could Transform Global Development” by Bill Gates

“Gene editing in animals or even humans raises more complicated questions of safety and ethics.”

…Well, it’s a good thing Bill Gates is such good friends with Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci, both of whom work in the NIH and have leadership roles; including Fauci’s wife, head of Bioethics at the NIH. Very useful and convenient, I’m sure.

And who, by several accounts, has met with Jeffrey Epstein not once, not twice, but NUMEROUS times.

“In fact, beginning in 2011, Mr. Gates met with Mr. Epstein on numerous occasions — including at least three times at Mr. Epstein’s palatial Manhattan townhouse, and at least once staying late into the night, according to interviews with more than a dozen people familiar with the relationship, as well as documents reviewed by The New York Times.”

Bill Gates (left), Francis Collins (middle), Anthony Fauci (right) – Source: nih.gov

Now, of course we can’t claim “guilty by association”, right? But what about when the individuals/institutions listed above have direct funding and sponsorships from Jeffrey Epstein and sit on the Board of Directors of these very organizations? Can they claim plausible deniability?

“Even though Epstein did not donate to PED or Harvard after 2007, he played an “indirect but significant role” in facilitating a grant from the John Templeton Foundation to PED in 2015.”

Epstein, Martin Nowak, Eric Lander, MIT and a very sinister genome project tied to the Covid test

“Epstein had suggested at one point that the John Templeton Foundation could match any donations dollar for dollar. Unfortunately for Ito and Epstein, a spokesperson for the Foundation could find no record of Epstein’s plan, and provided no funding, according to Farrow.”

MIT’s Media Lab Director Resigns From NYT Company Board After Pocketing Millions In ‘Anonymous’ Epstein Donations

Although these two statements seem to contradict each other, and the fact that Jeffrey Epstein is mentioned as a sponsor on Martin A. Nowak’s published studies (unless we are to conclude that Mr. Nowak is lying about his sponsorships; though in light of multiple various sources agreeing that this was a huge interest of Epstein, and with proof of various meetings with those in higher positions, the supposition that Mr. Nowak is lying is highly unlikely), we can’t ignore the fact that anonymous donors and facilitators were likely happening, especially when groups/foundations involved knew what kind of detrimental publicity would arise from a known connection with this infamous criminal.

Continuing on with the John Templeton Foundation, who named Francis Collins as the recipient of the 2020 Templeton Award, and who was involved in the very studies that Jeffrey Epstein sponsored and funded, according to the ncbi/pubmed articles listed above (of which were also supported by a NIH grant, I should add) also sponsors BioLogos, a “Christian” outlet founded by Francis Collins who is eager to combine science and religion together. Make no mistake, the material exposed on the BioLogos site is meant to lead Christians astray; with many articles a propaganda piece to influence and convince Christians that getting the vaccine is for the betterment of humankind.

But again, this still raises the issue that even if Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci aren’t directly involved with Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Gates is, and seems to be a very significant one at that. With such financial sway and investments, including funding and sponsorships of numerous organizations, largely of which consist of pharmaceutical companies that just so happen to be insisting that everyone on the planet needs to take these mRNA/DNA “vaccines” – and when researching their possible involvement in CRISPR technology as well – this sets a very alarming precedence on who’s really in charge of our health system.

So again, why is it such a concern that the heads of the National Institutes of Health, and the heads of the Human Genome Projects, and prominent scientists/researchers, and professors at acclaimed universities, and billionaire philanthropists who have a vested interest in CRISPR/gene editing technology, have such business (and perhaps personal) ties and gains related to a man who wanted to populate the world with his seed and went so far as developing a “breeding ranch” and funded studies devoted to human evolution?

The answer speaks for itself, honestly.

Now, with all of Epstein’s connections and influence, not to mention all of his funding of numerous projects, are we to really believe that those involved with his projects have the best interest of humankind at heart? The same people, mind you, who are directly involved with pushing a “COVID vaccine” on the WHOLE WORLD?

And are we to really believe that the Director of the NIH, Francis Collins, and Eric Lander, a very prominent figure in the scientific community, including at Harvard and MIT:

“An influential geneticist, molecular biologist, and mathematician, Dr. Lander has won many awards and recognitions for his work in mapping and discovering the human genome. Among other former positions, Dr. Lander was a leader in the international Human Genome Project (1990-2003) and served as co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) for President Barack Obama (2009-2017). He was a professor of biology at MIT, professor of systems biology at Harvard Medical School, and President and Founding Director of the Board Institute at MIT and Harvard before going on leave in 2021 to serve at the White House.”

[ https://chinaus-icas.org/biden-administration-international-affairs-personnel-tracker/biden-personnel-tracker-climate-health-and-technology/eric-lander-presidential-science-advisor-director-of-the-ostp/ ]

had NO idea about Jeffrey Epstein’s involvement in these studies, supported by the very same institutions they oversee? This either speaks to their complicity, or their ineptitude in directing these organizations. Is this an unfair assessment? Does it instead speak of the inherent flaws (or perhaps strengths, depending on who’s looking at it) of compartmentalization and the excessive ways it can get out of control without proper supervision? But this would ultimately ignore the very real dilemma of bribery, coercion, threats and blackmail – of which Mr. Jeffrey Epstein seems to have been adept in and the center of in various circles.

With credentials such as boasting of sponsoring scientific giants, some of which have won the Nobel Prize:

“The Foundation has also had the priviledge of sponsoring many prominent scientists including Gerald Edelman, Murray Gell-Mann, Eric Lander, George Church, Stephen Hawking, Kip Thorne, Marvin Minsky, Lawrence Krauss, Lee Smolin and Gregory Benford and Nobel laureates, Gerard ‘t Hooft, David Gross and Frank Wilczek.” – Web archive: Jeffrey Epstein Ideas Forum

we have to ask ourselves, why would Jeffrey Epstein lie about Eric Lander, out of everyone? Are we sure he embellished his sponsorships, as multiple articles claim? Or is perhaps the person who has been chosen as President Joe Biden’s top Science Advisor and Director of OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy) denying such claims in order to preserve his own reputation? In the same sense, wouldn’t a person selected for such a prestigious title undergo a stringent selective process, including investigations of past connections and potential involvement in secret programs?

That is, of course, if the presidential/government committees aren’t involved in it themselves…

One last note: am I saying that Jeffrey Epstein was the mastermind behind these nefarious ideas? No. I think there were individuals above him who were directing where these studies and blackmailing efforts were going and who keep themselves largely hidden from the public eye; and who, in my opinion, may have supplied Epstein’s budget. There may also have been connections with certain alphabet agencies involved in these schemes, although these suspicions remain to be substantiated.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Does the PCR Test Affect the Pineal Gland? Humans and “Transhumans”. Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger - "- vaccinating has nothing to do with protecting human health, but all to do with subjugating humanity to a bioweapon"
BOMBSHELL: Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds [Full Transcript] - " - it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it's a way for them to know who's vaccinated because their blood will glow."
Studies PROVE That Live Parasites and Parasite Proteins Are Being Used/Tested in Vaccines | Are Parasites the Cause of ALL Illnesses? - At least 650,000 - 800,000 CHILDREN have been injected with a malaria vaccine to test its efficacy.
Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates - Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.
The War on COVID-19: Man’s Final Conquest of Nature. The Great Reset Requires “Merging Humans with the Machine” - "Man's conquest of nature, if the dreams of some scientific planners are realized, means the rule of a few hundreds of men over billions upon billions of men."
Taking a Look Back at the 2012 Olympics London Closing Ceremony: Does it Hold Secrets to What’s Going on in the World? - The world has been blind-sided for centuries, while underhanded organizations operate behind the curtain.

Pfizer-BioNTech/COMIRNATY Vaccine Is Still Under “STUDY” Runs to be Completed at Different Intervals Between 2022-2026

” – known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis”

In addition to the many debates and conflicts surrounding the “approval” of the Pfizer/BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine, there is interesting information to glean from the documents involved surrounding this controversy.

The below documents, some from the FDA’s own website, sheds further light into what seems to be a product still in its experimental/study phase. Some of the revelations are chilling, and doesn’t quite give the reassurance that an “approved” drug of this magnitude is more beneficial to us than what it is purported to be saving us from.

Screenshot of the FDA NEWS RELEASE: FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine
taken on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine ]
Content current as of August 23, 2021

Selected quotes in gray text boxes are from the above document:

“Specifically, in the FDA’s review for approval, the agency analyzed effectiveness data from approximately 20,000 vaccine and 20,000 placebo recipients ages 16 and older who did not have evidence of the COVID-19 virus infection within a week of receiving the second dose. The safety of Comirnaty was evaluated in approximately 22,000 people who received the vaccine and 22,000 people who received a placebo 16 years of age and older.

Based on results from the clinical trial, the vaccine was 91% effective in preventing COVID-19 disease.

More than half of the clinical trial participants were followed for safety outcomes for at least four months after the second dose. Overall, approximately 12,000 recipients have been followed for at least 6 months.

The most commonly reported side effects by those clinical trial participants who received Comirnaty were pain, redness and swelling at the injection site, fatigue, headache, muscle or joint pain, chills, and fever. The vaccine is effective in preventing COVID-19 and potentially serious outcomes including hospitalization and death.”

There are a couple of notes to take away from this document. In the above quote, it doesn’t quite specify how long the clinical trial lasted. Only that more than half of the clinical trial participants were followed for safety outcomes for 4 months after the second dose. It also states that 12,000 of the recipients were followed for at least 6 months.

Both of these numbers (4 and 6) are incredibly low quantities when taking into account pregnant women who are at the beginning of their pregnancy. The length of the clinical trial does not take into account the full 9 months needed to determine a healthy pregnancy, nor does it allow for any time to safely assess the development of the baby once born.

The data in this document also does not include differences between those of the placebo group compared to that of the “vaccine” group. In addition, if we are to only take the 12,000 participants into account, which from the wording of the document seems to allude that these are the recipients of the vaccine, that would still leave 10,000 participants unaccounted for. Just from the amount of vaccine recipients (22,000), this is 45% of their study that the data does not reflect. If we are to include the 22,000 of the participants who received the placebo, the data that was not tracked would rise to 72%.

There is also the challenge of how they determined that the vaccine actually prevented COVID. Were these recipients exposed to someone with COVID or were deliberately inoculated with the disease to see if they would get infected? Many people, myself included, have gone on for more than a year without developing COVID, or at least “COVID symptoms”. Since this data only involved a 4-6 month trial period, how many of us (vaccinated, placebo, or otherwise) can say that we have not contracted COVID during this time-frame either? Is this implying that unless you’re vaccinated, you will most likely get COVID every 4-6 months?

Another consideration to take into account are the many testimonies from well-respected and renowned doctors/scientists/virologists who are adamant in their assessment that these vaccines are unnecessary and instead further harms the immune system rather than help it.

In the same regard, those who are unvaccinated will obviously then not contract any of the possible side effects that are listed in this document as well as the many adverse events that are reported to VAERS. Which leaves one to wonder if the benefits really outweigh the risks of the COVID vaccines.

There is also the slight alteration on a different page of the FDA website that gives further clarification as to the efficacy of the COVID vaccines – which does not reflect that of what many people are influenced to believe:

Under the heading:

Q: What safety information did FDA evaluate to authorize the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for emergency use and approve Comirnaty?

Screenshot of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
taken on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions ]
Content Current as of August 23, 2021

UPDATE on September 6, 2021: Since the FDA website decided to remove this particular section from their FAQ (as of 9/1/2021), here is a screenshot taken from the web archive showing its existence:

“While the vaccine may not prevent infection, symptoms or transmission of the virus from person to person – “

This seems to be the heart of the matter, and although it continues with, “it is effective in preventing hospitalization and death.” it is in direct conflict with what we were led to believe this whole time. Most of the mainstream media, big tech platforms, health agencies, etc. have insisted that vaccines are needed to stop transmission of the virus and to protect those around us. However, this one simple statement defies everything that people were coerced into believing.

And with the last part of the sentence concluding that it prevents hospitalization and death, which even that is debatable when looking at the scope of the situation, it leaves one to wonder why this would not be an option for people to decide to take that risk on their own account. When comparing data of young individuals as well and their extremely low risk of hospitalization and death in the COVID setting, there ARE acknowledged threats when they are injected with the vaccine.

“Additionally, the FDA conducted a rigorous evaluation of the post-authorization safety surveillance data pertaining to myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and has determined that the data demonstrate increased risks, particularly within the seven days following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age compared to females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had resolution of symptoms. However, some individuals required intensive care support. Information is not yet available about potential long-term health outcomes. The Comirnaty Prescribing Information includes a warning about these risks.”

The FDA is also acknowledging that there are higher risks involved with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and myocarditis and pericarditis, especially in males aged 12-17, and up to age 40.

“Information is not yet available about potential long-term health outcomes.”

“In addition, the FDA is requiring the company to conduct postmarketing studies to further assess the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with Comirnaty. These studies will include an evaluation of long-term outcomes among individuals who develop myocarditis following vaccination with Comirnaty. In addition, although not FDA requirements, the company has committed to additional post-marketing safety studies, including conducting a pregnancy registry study to evaluate pregnancy and infant outcomes after receipt of Comirnaty during pregnancy.”

The document is also stating that the possibility of myocarditis and pericarditis is an accepted issue and will continue to be monitored after the marketing of the Comirnaty vaccine.

And in a rather blunt admission, FDA states on their own website that Comirnaty is not required to evaluate pregnancy and infant outcomes after receipt of Comirnaty during pregnancy. This would explain why the initial trial run was only monitored for 4-6 months. An outline in the BLA (Biologics License Approval) also states that Comirnaty will conduct studies on this group as we see in a later section.

BLA documents state Comirnaty vaccine studies to be conducted for the next several years

Screenshot taken from from the FDA BLA Approval on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
Document dated August 23, 2021

Text below is page 5 of the FDA BLA Approval document

Your deferred pediatric studies required under section 505B(a) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) are required postmarketing studies. The status of
these postmarketing studies must be reported according to 21 CFR 601.28 and section
505B(a)(4)(C) of the FDCA. In addition, section 506B of the FDCA and 21 CFR 601.70
require you to report annually on the status of any postmarketing commitments or
required studies or clinical trials.

Label your annual report as an “Annual Status Report of Postmarketing Study
Requirement/Commitments”
and submit it to the FDA each year within 60 calendar
days of the anniversary date of this letter until all Requirements and Commitments
subject to the reporting requirements under section 506B of the FDCA are released or
fulfilled. These required studies are listed below:

1. Deferred pediatric Study C4591001 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in children 12 years through 15 years of age.

Final Protocol Submission: October 7, 2020

Study Completion: May 31, 2023

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2023

2. Deferred pediatric Study C4591007 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in infants and children 6 months to <12 years of age.

Final Protocol Submission: February 8, 2021

Study Completion: November 30, 2023

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024

3. Deferred pediatric Study C4591023 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in infants <6 months of age.

Final Protocol Submission: January 31, 2022

Study Completion: July 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2024

Submit the protocols to your IND 19736, with a cross-reference letter to this BLA STN
BL 125742 explaining that these protocols were submitted to the IND. Please refer to
the PMR sequential number for each study/clinical trial and the submission number as
shown in this letter.

Submit final study reports to this BLA STN BL 125742. In order for your PREA PMRs to
be considered fulfilled, you must submit and receive approval of an efficacy or a labeling supplement. For administrative purposes, all submissions related to these required
pediatric postmarketing studies must be clearly designated as:

• Required Pediatric Assessment(s)

As the document states, the completion study of Comirnaty postmarketing (after approval) is not due until May 31, 2023 / Novermber 20, 2023 / July 31, 2024 respective of older to lower age groups. There is also another important acronym to consider, which is the IND, which stands for Investigational New Drug.

With this knowledge in hand, it’s important to note that the clinical trial run was monitored for 4-6 months after the second dose on around 55% of the recipients, while the actual “approved” drug still in its investigational/study stages is set to be monitored for 2-3 years. This is a sizeable difference in the amount of time to determine safety and efficacy, especially when considering the many events already reported to VAERS. And according to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions page from the FDA website:

Screenshot taken from the FDA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions ]
Content current as of August 23, 2021

Q: Are vaccine providers required to report side effects?
A: Providers administering Comirnaty or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine must report to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and to Pfizer the following information associated with the vaccine of which they become aware:
  • Vaccine administration errors whether or not associated with an adverse event
  • Serious adverse events (irrespective of attribution to vaccination)
  • Cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome
  • Cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death

Acknowledged myocarditis and pericarditis issues being studied on children

” – known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis”

Screenshot taken from from the FDA BLA Approval on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
Document dated August 23, 2021

Text in the gray box below are from pages 6-8 of the FDA BLA Approval documents
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]

We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events
reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known
serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of
subclinical myocarditis.

Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under
section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks.

Therefore, based on appropriate scientific data, we have determined that you are
required to conduct the following studies:

4. Study C4591009, entitled “A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of
the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in the United States,” to evaluate
the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of
COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: August 31, 2021

Monitoring Report Submission: October 31, 2022

Interim Report Submission: October 31, 2023

Study Completion: June 30, 2025

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2025

5. Study C4591021, entitled “Post Conditional Approval Active Surveillance Study
Among Individuals in Europe Receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine,” to evaluate the occurrence of myocarditis
and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: August 11, 2021

Progress Report Submission: September 30, 2021

Interim Report 1 Submission: March 31, 2022

Interim Report 2 Submission: September 30, 2022

Interim Report 3 Submission: March 31, 2023

Interim Report 4 Submission: September 30, 2023

Interim Report 5 Submission: March 31, 2024

Study Completion: March 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024

6. Study C4591021 substudy to describe the natural history of myocarditis and
pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: January 31, 2022

Study Completion: March 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024

7. Study C4591036, a prospective cohort study with at least 5 years of follow-up for
potential long-term sequelae of myocarditis after vaccination (in collaboration
with Pediatric Heart Network).

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021

Study Completion: December 31, 2026

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2027

8. Study C4591007 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical
myocarditis following administration of the second dose of COMIRNATY in a
subset of participants 5 through 15 years of age.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this assessment according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: September 30, 2021

Study Completion: November 30, 2023

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024

9. Study C4591031 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical
myocarditis following administration of a third dose of COMIRNATY in a subset of
participants 16 to 30 years of age.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021

Study Completion: June 30, 2022

Final Report Submission: December 31, 2022

It is interesting that the timing to be considered for approval of these vaccines was only a 4-6 month timeframe, however, known dangers/risks, identified as “serious”, are still allowed to be approved and to be studied for 2+ years.

The document also recognizes that myocarditis and pericarditis is enough of a concern to happen after administration of the Comirnaty vaccine, since it mentions several studies just for this specific adverse event, and to continue to assess these reports.

In addition to all of the substudies to be conducted, there is a study to be initiated on a select group of participants to administer a third dose of the Comirnaty vaccine.

All of this information leads credence to the fact that even though the Comirnaty vaccine has “officially been approved” by the FDA, it is still in the investigational stages and being experimented upon on the public. And it goes without saying, but if myocarditis and pericarditis (on top of other reported side effects) are serious risks especially in children (“The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age.”), then for this known risk to be offered to infants/toddlers defies any ethically moral boundaries and is in direct violations of the Nuremberg Code.

The next section also provides further evidence that there have been NO studies in the safety/efficacy of the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine on pregnant women.

Pregnancy/Births were not studied during the initial Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty trial runs

Another snippet from the FDA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions website page, states the following:

Screenshot taken from the FDA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions ]
Content current as of August 23, 2021

Q: Can pregnant or breastfeeding women receive the Comirnaty or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine?

A: While there have been no specific studies in these groups, there is no contraindication to receipt of the vaccine for pregnant or breastfeeding women. Pregnant or breastfeeding women should discuss potential benefits and risks of vaccination with their healthcare provider.

The acknowledgement above seems to indicate that the FDA and Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty company have side-stepped this particular group in their vaccine studies, and have left it up to the healthcare provider to determine whether or not to administer this vaccine to pregnant women or women who are breastfeeding. This alone should be enough of a statement that there is no sufficient/professional data to analyze if the Comirnaty is safe during pregnancies/breastfeeding stages.

And if one were to consider the VAERS reporting system, in which the Pfizer-BioNTech company is required to report to, there have been numerous conditions of miscarriages/stillbirths/complications during pregnancy after administration of the COVID vaccine. While it is difficult to determine if these complications were a direct result of the vaccine, it is up to the scientific/healthcare community to investigate these cases in a thorough, unbiased and uninfluenced manner.

Another extremely alarming section of the FDA BLA Approval documents shows the following trial to be monitored in pregnant women:

Screenshot taken from from the FDA BLA Approval on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
Document dated August 23, 2021

Text in the gray box below are from pages 9-10 of the FDA BLA Approval documents
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
POSTMARKETING COMMITMENTS SUBJECT TO REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
UNDER SECTION 506B

We acknowledge your written commitments as described in your letter of August 21, 2021 as outlined below:

10. Study C4591022, entitled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Exposure during
Pregnancy: A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of Pregnancy and
Infant Outcomes in the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists
(OTIS)/MotherToBaby Pregnancy Registry.”

Final Protocol Submission: July 1, 2021

Study Completion: June 30, 2025

Final Report Submission: December 31, 2025

There are a couple of key takeaways in this section that are of incredible importance. One major term to focus on is the word “NON-INTERVENTIONAL“.

According to What is a Non Interventional Study?, “In general, a non interventional study (NIS) (also called a non interventional trial) is where a patient takes regular medicine, prescribed according to the label. In an NIS, the researcher sets out to exert as little influence as possible on the patient’s condition while studying a medicine’s “…effectiveness, safety and tolerability under real life conditions” (Mishra & Vora, 2010).”

The article also reiterates multiple times that “non-interventional” studies are observational studies – the researchers are not to interfere with the dosages in any way but to prescribe them exactly as listed on the label. It also seems to imply that even if severe side effects show up, they are to still carry through with the “medicinal product” in that patient as prescribed. Another insinuation that one can make is that in order to not interfere with the study, it is not recommended to prescribe treatments that may help alleviate potential side effects. The term “tolerability” is implying to keep the patient going through the side effects in order to continue to study the long-term effects of the investigational new drug.

However, with the inclusion of “real life conditions”, it doesn’t indicate whether the patient can seek out physicians to investigate what is causing the side effects in their system and engage in therapeutic treatments to alleviate these effects. If a study is to be conducted in real life conditions, then it is to be expected that patients will seek treatments on their own while the researcher is only required to observe the patient to see how the alternative treatments interact with the drug/symptoms.

The same article goes on to state that the UK/EU have different definitions of what “non-interventional” means. “Aronson (2004) states… “the term ‘non-interventional’ in the Directive doesn’t mean non-interventional (i.e. non-interference) at all; it refers to an intervention with a licensed medicinal product.”

There is controversy and conflicts in this statement as another article, Interventional or Non-Interventional? Analyzing the Differences Between Clinical Studies Using Medicines in the European Union points out:

“Although defined in DIR 2001/20/EC, non-interventional studies are outside its scope. Due to the lack of harmonized regulation, some studies designed to be non‑interventional may be considered clinical trials by EU authorities. The two blinded studies described in Table 4 (see PDF) were considered clinical trials in the EU for planning on collection of data to support the marketing authorization application of experimental IMPs, despite no IMP being given and normal clinical practice being kept during the study period. Sponsors are thus advised to consult with authorities when planning studies under these conditions and/or whenever the objectives or design may raise questions.”

Further in the article, it states the following, which again, is not reassuring considering the policies/guidelines/mandates that authorities have been engaging in in order to mandate these investigational new drugs (COVID vaccines) onto the public:

“There is no centralized submission procedure for non-interventional studies with the exception of non-interventional PASSs, imposed as an obligation by an EU competent authority.{9} Because non-interventional studies do not have harmonized legislation, some Member States require submissions to regulatory authorities, while others do not. It is therefore important that sponsors are familiar with the regulatory framework of target EU Member States, and that they consult with local competent authorities and ethics committees (ECs) when justified.”

It’s sad to have to point this out, but the quote does specify “competent” authorities. And even the inclusion of “ethics committees” is not comforting seeing as how one of the leading figures in ethics study is Christine Grady, Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, and wife of Anthony Fauci – Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Chief Medical Advisor to the president, and who is also a large spokesperson for the experimental injections.

The other takeaway from section 10 of the FDA BLA documents is the term “TERATOLOGY“.

Definition of teratology
: the study of malformations or serious deviations from the normal type in developing organisms
merriam-webster/teratology

Teratology, branch of the biological sciences dealing with the causes, development, description, and classification of congenital malformations in plants and animals and with the experimental production, in some instances, of these malformations. Congenital malformations arise from interruption in the early development of the organism. Malformations in human infants, for example, may occur because the infant’s genotype contains mutant genes or includes an abnormal number of chromosomes; they also may occur if early in pregnancy the mother has had German measles (rubella), has taken some injurious drug, or has been exposed to an injurious dosage of radiation. Experimental studies suggest similar types of factors can cause malformations in animals and plants.”
britannica/teratology

Now when you combine the terms “non-interventional” and “teratology” together, it is suggesting that the ongoing studies (that were not conducted to begin with even in a clinical trial setting, as per the FDA’s own response) on pregnant women with Comirnaty and on the developing baby, will be monitored with as little intervention as possible and is mostly to be observed for malformations/genetic defects/miscarriages/etc.

In other words, safety and efficacy were never studied in this particular group, and neither was it studied in infants. It has also not been studied for long-term analysis, as the 4-6 month trial runs proves. The current “approval” it is undergoing now is an authorized experiment on the human population that is posing incredibly unnecessary risks when considering the many effective treatments that are already available to combat respiratory illnesses. And the insistent assertiveness to push this “investigational new drug” onto babies/children who are at extremely low risk for this illness is a disastrous decision from those in an “authoritative” position and should be investigated for malfeasance and misconduct.

This is also not the first time that government agencies/health industries/etc. have conducted experiments on the public.

The Tuskegee/Syphilis experiment was initiated onto a selection of African American men between 1932-1972. The study was only stopped (allegedly) after a publication was released on Associated Press in 1972 about the immorally unethical experiments being conducted on this group:

“Of about 600 Alabama black men who originally took part in the study, 200 or so were allowed to suffer the disease and its side effects without treatment, even after penicillin was discovered as a cure for syphilis. Treatment then probably could have saved or helped many of the experiment participants, PHS officials say.”AP WAS THERE: Black men untreated in Tuskegee Syphilis Study

This study seems to echo the sentiments we see going on with the coronavirus situation, in which only one type of drug is being promoted (the COVID vaccines) while suppression of other treatments that have been proven to work (such as Ivermectin) has been denounced by the very same government/health/medical fields that have conducted these experimental studies.

A study that involved the CDC/FDA’s approval, this time on Black and Latino babies, was conducted in the early 1990’s and involved the measles vaccine:

“1990: CDC Inoculated Black and Latino Babies with an Unlicensed Measles Vaccine
A covert clinical trial by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Kaiser Permanente inoculated Black and Latino babies with an experimental measles vaccine without informing parents the vaccine was experimental. More than 1500 six-month old black and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles are given the deadly “experimental” measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States; a vaccine that had been tested in African and Mexican babies resulting in high death rates. The parents were never informed and they never gave their consent. The CDC harmed babies, violated federal law, and trampled on parental rights with impunity.”
1990 FDA Issued a Waiver From Consent; Covert CDC Experimental Vaccine Test on Black / Latino Babies

It’s interesting that the measles vaccine experiment identifies Kaiser Permanente specifically, because as we see in another section of the FDA BLA Approval for Comirnaty, it seems as if Kaiser Permanente makes another appearance in the role of human experimentation:

Text in the gray box below is from page 10 of the FDA BLA Approval documents
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]

13. Study C4591014, entitled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 BNT162b2 Vaccine
Effectiveness Study – Kaiser Permanente Southern California.”

Final Protocol Submission: March 22, 2021

Study Completion: December 31, 2022

Final Report Submission: June 30, 2023

It would seem that the approval by the FDA of these IND drugs (Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine) is a way for the government/health agencies to skirt away from liability by stating that since the vaccines are no longer “experimental” by their definition, and that they are FDA “approved”, it is no longer required to gain informed consent of these drugs. In addition, as to the technicality of their terms and protocols, there are a multitude of ways to interpret their “informed consent” rules, which officials can then bend or define in any way that best reflects the use of their study/drug.

[ https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/informed-consent#exceptions ]

Also keeping in mind how long it was determined before the “health agencies” granted approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine – (4-6 months) – it would be conclusive to state that the vaccines have NOT sufficiently been studied in young children or pregnant women (or even the rest of the age groups because of the short amount of time the clinical trial study was conducted in), and the subsequent approval of this vaccine is to continue this research on the population who is exceedingly being pressured into taking this investigational new drug.

There is also the matter of the many adverse events that have been reported since the inoculation of these injections, that have largely gone unheeded within the health/medical institutions that are endorsing this drug. Other than the widely acknowledged myocarditis and pericarditis, most common in young males, which is still being studied and allowed to persist onto the public.

So again, taking into account the collusion of the government/health/medical/research fields to conduct experiments on the public, it would be necessary to reflect upon these agencies for additional breaches upon human rights, consent, and ethical behavior.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Ahmad Ardity from Pixabay

Strange “Coincidences” Dealing with the COVID/Vaccine Narrative

Things that make you go, “hmmm….”

I have covered conspiratorial subjects on this site before. Of course, some are not just merely “conspiracy theories”, like the mainstream media and big tech platforms would have you believe, but are actually based on FACTS and REALITY.

The term “conspiracy theory” has largely been used and abused in order to attempt to mock and deride any counter opinion to the official narrative. However, for the sake of entertaining some interesting correlations, whether they are just merely coincidences or perhaps have some deeper meaning after all, I have selected a few compelling incidences that have happened throughout the years that shine a curious light onto the events going on today.

While these may not have any bearing as to the circumstances that are occurring right now, it is also possible that some might – and as the saying goes (whether it is an accurate translation of Aristotle or not): “It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.”

So without further ado, here are some interesting things to contemplate, that may leave one scratching their head and say, “Hm… that IS strange.”

1. ???? – Origins / Etymology: “In other words…”

When one digs deep into word meanings and their origins, it’s incredibly interesting (and rather eerie, sometimes) seeing where the word developed from and it’s current usage today.

Let’s take ‘pharmacy’, for example.

pharmacy: “late 14c., farmacie, “a medicine that rids the body of an excess of humors (except blood);” also “treatment with medicine; theory of treatment with medicine,” from Old French farmacie “a purgative” (13c.) and directly from Medieval Latin pharmacia, from Greek pharmakeia “a healing or harmful medicine, a healing or poisonous herb; a drug, poisonous potion; magic (potion), dye, raw material for physical or chemical processing.”

This is from pharmakeus (fem. pharmakis) “a preparer of drugs, a poisoner, a sorcerer” from pharmakon “a drug, a poison, philter, charm, spell, enchantment.” Beekes writes that the original meaning cannot be clearly established, and “The word is clearly Pre-Greek.” The ph- was restored 16c. in French, 17c. in English (see ph).”

https://www.etymonline.com/word/pharmacy

Hm… it started out promising, but some keywords that stuck out to me gave me quite the shock, and never realized that there were rather COMPLETELY DIFFERENT definitions for the same word. “Poisonous potion”? “Poisoner”? “Sorcerer”? “Harmful medicine”? …

Then, again taking the medical profession into account, is a symbol that is often used to represent the medical industry – especially in the US military field:

However, there is a lot of confusion and debate when it comes to this symbol – known as the Caduceus – especially when comparing it to the Rod of Asclepius, which is also used as a medical symbol and is represented with a rod/stick with a single snake (contested – some scholars believe it depicts a worm or parasite) wrapped around it.

The history of these two designs go way back to Greek Mythology, and perhaps even further than that, with some believing that the Rod of Asclepius is the true symbol of healing, and the Caduceus is a misrepresentation of the health/medical field. Instead, it is a symbol of Hermes/Mercury, who was commonly known as the god of commerce, god of thieves, and the herald of the gods, amongst many other meanings – some benign and helpful, and others that are more darker in nature.

I do want to mention that it cannot be lost on us how this symbol is used widely in the United States military/medical field, and that caduceus literally means “herald”, which if we are looking at the etymology of this word, gives us the following information:

caduceus: “in ancient Greece or Rome, “herald’s staff,” 1590s, from Latin caduceus, alteration of Doric Greek karykeion “herald’s staff,” from kēryx (genitive kērykos) “a herald,” probably a Pre-Greek word. Token of a peaceful embassy; originally an olive branch. Later especially the wand carried by Mercury, messenger of the gods, usually represented with two serpents twined round it and wings. Related: Caducean.

The caduceus is a symbol of peace and prosperity, and in modern times figures as a symbol of commerce, Mercury being the god of commerce. The rod represents power; the serpents represent wisdom; and the two wings, diligence and activity. [Century Dictionary]”

https://www.etymonline.com/word/caduceus

herald: “messenger, envoy,” late 13c. (in Anglo-Latin); c. 1200 as a surname, from Anglo-French heraud, Old French heraut, hiraut (12c.), from Frankish *hariwald “commander of an army” or a similar Germanic source, from Proto-Germanic *harja “army” (from PIE root *koro- “war;” see harry) + *waldaz “to command, rule” (see wield). The form fits, but the sense evolution is difficult to explain, unless it is in reference to the chief officer of a tournament, who introduced knights and made decisions on rules (which was one of the early senses, often as heraud of armes, though not the earliest in English).”

https://www.etymonline.com/word/herald

To make things even more interesting, when looking up “commerce medicine list”, found the following site:

Source: [ https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/07/2020-27754/commerce-control-list-clarifications-to-the-scope-of-export-control-classification-number-1c991-to ]

which has some information on what to classify “vaccines” as. I am not a data analyst. But when you combine vaccines in a control list, with the terms “chemical / biological weapons” and “anti-terrorism” and “weapons of mass destruction” [anti-terrorism and weapons of mass destruction are mentioned in a separate section of the document], well – it doesn’t exactly give me a warm and fuzzy feeling like the government and health industries are trying to get us to believe.

While anything in the hands of corrupt individuals can twist something that is supposed to be beneficial to mankind into a harmful weapon of destruction – the labeling and control of vaccines under this heading is rather alarming. While I agree that it is necessary to put restrictions and controls in place for this very reason, the fact that it is acknowledged that vaccines can very well be determined as a chemical/biological weapon should not be lost on others.

I have not thoroughly researched this document since there are a plethora of technical terms and viruses listed that I am unfamiliar with, but thought it was rather fitting and interesting enough to include on this list.

2. January 1981 – Eyes of Darkness mentions a bioweapon that comes from Wuhan

The title of this section is not technically correct. As others have pointed out, the first edition of the book “Eyes of Darkness”, published in 1981, mentions Gorki-400 (Russia) as the origins of a deadly virus/bioweapon from a research center.

However, a few years later, some sources state that Koontz was allegedly approached by his editors who asked him to change Gorki to something else – purportedly to not create waves with the Russians at the time. But whether it was solely Koontz’s decision to change the name to Wuhan-400, or whether it was suggested to him by other influences, only he and his editors would know for sure. And this is if it was Dean Koontz’s decision in the first place. There are some speculations that the publisher/editor changed it of their own accord. It is also possible that for a more thorough novel, authors employ some research and use real life accounts to make the story more engaging, which is what may have given Koontz the idea to use the Wuhan lab, which was created in 1956.

The below tweet shows an excerpt from page 333 of a paperback copy of the Eyes of Darkness book (the year that this specific publication came out seems to be from 2008 – although many people still state the original publication date of 1981).

Source: twitter | Manish Tewari

While it is incredibly uncanny that the book mentions Wuhan-400, a biological weapon created in a lab in China – combined with the current events of the coronavirus being suspected of being a man-made virus from a gain-of-functions attempt from the Wuhan Institute of Virology – there are differences that many fact-checkers are fond of pointing out to derail the similarities that garnered attention in the first place.

The mortality rate, for one – indicating that the virus in the book has a 100% mortality rate – even though even that is not technically correct since “Danny” survives… compared to that of the COVID-19, which has a reported range of .002 to 6% mortality rate – depending on one’s age and health condition.

Even if the book is not indicative of predictive programming, the strange specific terms that are so widely prevalent in today’s time caused quite a stir when it was first mentioned in social media, and is still shocking people who first learn of this “coincidental” connection.

For added overall summaries of the book, which doesn’t bode well right after all of the chemical/biological weapons talk in the previous section:

“As the cat gets out of the bag, Christina and Elliot come to know that, it is actually a Government Research Project laboratory for “chemical warfare”, established to develop biological and chemical weapons, to be used against the enemy countries.

They become aware of the fact that all the young Boy Scouts’ death was staged and, in reality, they were captured to be used in the experiments who unfortunately died, save for Danny. All their biological weapons failed to kill him. Meanwhile, he gained powers to talk to his mother, at the same time killing the main researchers in his final bid to escape.”Dean Koontz the eyes of darkness plot

***

“After storming the facility and arriving the correct room, the truth was uncovered. Danny was a victim of an accident: of viral proportions. As it turns out, this secret installation was actually a centre of biological weaponry. Danny and his expedition team accidentally came across and were infected by a Chinese-constructed virus with the name “Wuhan-400”. It had a 100% mortality rate. But Danny survived.

Danny was in a room next door, looking completely starved. He had a bunch of electrodes over his head. The scientist explained he was only the survivor of the virus and they extracted the antibodies responsible for saving him. After that, he was useless. Danny was constantly infected and reinfected to see how long he would last.

During this time, he developed an increased size of his parietal lope, which Evan and Stryker surmised must be the factor allowing him to practice his psychic-telekinetic abilities. They decide to hide this information from the scientist to prevent any potential studies of a such a kind in the future.

They eventually escape the facility after Danny uses his psychic abilities to take down the enemy helicopter.”The Eyes of Darkness — A Dean Koontz Book Review

***

It especially isn’t very reassuring considering all of the real life terrible experiments that the governments have conducted on their own people…

1 Measles Vaccine Experiment


Experiments involving the measles vaccine were conducted from 1990 to 1991 by the Centers for Disease Control. The doctors wanted to know if they could use it to replace natural antibodies in babies. To test this, doctors injected thousands of babies in the Third World with the drug. The vaccine eventually led to several immune problems in the babies and caused many deaths, although the exact number is unknown.

Knowing the drug had this effect, the government still tested on African American and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles. They injected more than 1,500 babies in the United States with the experimental drug. However, the study came to an end when it was discovered that African children were dying at an alarming rate up to three years after receiving the vaccinations.

The CDC later admitted that the parents were unaware that their children were being injected with an experimental drug that had not yet been verified by the Federal Drug Administration.[10]

Source: Top 10 U.S. Government Experiments Done on Its Own Citizens

3. February 2011 – “Year of the Vaccines”

In 2011, Bill Gates sat down with Sanjay Gupta and discussed vaccines and vaccine hesitancy.

Chillingly, knowing what we know now about the incessant push to get everyone on the planet vaccinated this year, Sanjay seems to repeat a quote made by Mr. Gates himself as he states the following – again, keep in mind that this interview was conducted in 2011:

Sanjay Gupta: “10 billion dollars over the next ten years to make it the year of the vaccines… what, what does that mean exactly?

Bill Gates: “Well, over this decade, uh, we believe unbelievable progress can be made, both inventing new vaccines and making sure they get out to all the children who need them. Uh, we can cut the number of children who die every year from about 9 million to half of that uh, if we have success on it. The benefits are in terms of reducing sickness, reducing the population growth; it really allows a society a chance to take care of itself, uh, once you’ve made the intervention.

I often see Bill Gates’ apologists and “fact-checkers” try to justify and defend Mr. Gates’ words by saying that he doesn’t mean what we think he means… however, considering all of the shady practices he’s been involved in, including some of the unsavory company that he has been connected with, I’d say that there’s a fine line between “entertaining an idea” and just plain common sense…

On a personal note, once you see the “duper’s delight” that Mr. Gates just can’t conceal himself from revealing, you can’t unsee it.

4. January 2017 – Anthony Fauci predicts “surprise” outbreak

On January 10, 2017, during a Keynote Address, Anthony Fauci shares his… “expertise”, on what the upcoming administration will face as far as infectious diseases go:

“The idea that we are now a few days away from a new administration, I obviously prompted the really extraordinarily, very enjoyable – and I have, I’m really pleased I had the opportunity to listen to the panel, both of Amy and Ron, as well as Bill, and Dr. Jafari. Which really, I think, set the stage for so many of the things that we are going to be dealing with over the coming years.

Given, as you heard from the introduction, that I have been around for awhile and have had the opportunity and the privilege and the pleasure of serving in 5 administrations, I thought I would bring that perspective to the topic today is the issue of pandemic preparedness.

And if there’s one message that I want to leave with you today, based on my experience, and you’ll see that in a moment, is that there is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration, in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease, and we have certainly a large burden of that, but also there will be a surprise outbreak.

And I hope by the end of my relatively short presentation you’ll understand why history, the history of the last 32 years that I’ve been the director of NIAID, will tell the next administration that there’s NO DOUBT in anyone’s mind that they will be faced with the challenges that their predecessors were faced with.”
– Anthony Fauci

How he’s so confident on this matter is anyone’s guess, although those who “vouch for Fauci” are convinced it’s just because he’s such a knowledgeable, intelligent human being.

Those who have known him in the past, however, have quite some different things to say about him…

“Those guys have got an agenda. Which is not, what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to – and they smugly – like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”
PCR inventor Kary Mullis on “Dr” Fauci

While “Dr. Fauci” was mistaken and/or flip-flopped on a lot of topics related to this “pandemic”, in which he predicted would happen years in advance – yet still fumbled the response on – he was right about one thing: there was a “surprise outbreak”… planned or otherwise…

5. January 2019 – Flu shots for everyone

This is quite possibly one of the cringiest things I’ve seen in a long time. And incredibly fake, as actors and actresses are adept at being (not intending to be harsh – but it is their job to pretend to be other people…).

Sandra Oh and Andy Samberg, in what seems to be an obvious bit to cater to the pharma overlords, announces excitedly (maybe a little too excitedly) that it’s time for everyone to get flu shots! Just what I’ve always looked forward to whenever I attend an awards ceremony.

Source: youtube | RandomCooking&ENTClips | Golden Globes FLU Shot Skit

Andy Samberg: “At this point of the show, the host would do something fun and spontaneous to show how we’re all just ordinary people, like ordering pizza for everyone.”

Sandra Oh: “But since we already got food at the Globes, we thought we’d mix it up and try something new. So roll up your sleeves, Hollywood, because you’re all getting – “

Both Andy Samberg and Sandra Oh: “Flu shots!”

Cue marching “healthcare workers” holding needles up while approaching various Hollywood stars. In the background, Oh and Samberg are embarrassingly chanting “Shots, shots, shots, shots, shots!” to the tune of LMFAO’s Shots. But not to fear, because Sandra reassures the audience that “these nurses are all licensed professionals straight from the Rite Aid in Echo Park.”

Then Mr. Samberg, in a speech I’m sure he wrote all by himself, states: “And look, if you’re an anti-vaxxer, just put a napkin over your head and we’ll skip you.”

And because the shots were seemingly freely administered (with no informed consent or anything) – and that it “costs 50 grand”, Samberg and Oh ends this atrocity great Samaritan act on human kind with a “you’re welcome!”. Such caring individuals.

However, it was of course later on found to be fake. 🙁

“5:45 P.M. The mood was muted and the syringes were fake. I ran into the main ballroom area to ask Linda Cardellini if the flu shot administered during the ceremony as part of a bit was, well, actually a flu shot. Interrupting her chat with her Green Book co-star Mahershala Ali, she assured that it was fake. Apparently, performers weren’t asked ahead of time, either. At least Willem Dafoe’s people said he wasn’t. —N.S.”
The Golden Globes 2019: What You Didn’t See on TV

So they lied? And here I thought they were being honest when they said getting flu shots was “fun and spontaneous”.

6. March 2019 – Project Runway: Kovid mask

In March 2019, Project Runway aired an episode which featured Kovid Kapoor, an Indian designer, which showed the model he was partnered with donning a face mask to match his outfit.

Many people brought this back into attention in 2020, when news of COVID first broke out, and the widely insistent push to urge everyone to wear face masks.

Tiktok user @joanschumachermartin shared the following video:

@joanschumachermartin

When project runway has a designer named Kovid who makes a look with a mask…. in 2019…##foryourpage ##fyp

♬ original sound – Joan Schumacher-Mart

Offered two links in case one gets taken down. (Please let me know if both links no longer work and I will replace it.)

Some things I can honestly say may just be a crazy coincidence. This, however, hits extremely close to home.

7. 2019-2021 Coin Collection

2019
Polio vaccine is highlighted for the U.S. $1 coin

2020
Prints for fruit bat coins were introduced in early January 2020

2021
Tuskegee is focused on for the Alabama 2021 coin

I realize some of this could be selection bias and just pure simple coincidence, but when combined with the suspicious timing of the last few years, I wouldn’t take any bets.

While the 2021 coin is highlighting Tuskegee Airmen specifically, it does tend to remind one of the Tuskegee Syphilis abuse that occurred from 1932-1972 – yet devastated for far longer than that.

As for the fruit bat coins, it’s interesting how the WHO declared the first case of coronavirus on December 31st, 2019, while the bat coins were announced in early January 2020. At around the same time, bats were first mentioned as a possible source of the coronavirus outbreak.

8. October 2019 – Event 201: Conveniently timed meeting of what would happen during an infectious outbreak.

Event 201, ironically occuring around 2-3 months before the first known case of coronavirus, was a simulation exercise created to show what would purportedly happen during a coronavirus pandemic.

It highlighted economic crises, social crises, health crises, “misinformation”, and so on.

Some speakers and attendees during the conference included:

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security: Anita Cicero / Dr. Caitlin Rivers / Tom Inglesby
Johnson and Johnson: Adrian Thomas
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: Christopher Elias
UN Foundation: Sofia Borges
The UPS Foundation: Eduardo Martinez
Former US Deputy National Security Advisor: Avril Haines
–  ANZ Bank Group: Jane Halton
China CDC: George Gao
US CDC: Stephen Redd
Henry Schein: Brad Connett
Formerly World Bank Group: Tim Evans
Lufthansa Group Airlines: Martin Knuchel
Marriott International: Latoya Abbott
NBCUniversal: Hasti Taghi
Edelman: Matthew Harrington
Monetary Authority of Singapore: Lavan Thiru

This list was comprised just from the 11 minute video of the highlights that the Johns Hopkins Centers for Health Security made available at the following archive: https://archive.org/details/og-event201/Event+201+Pandemic+Exercise_+Segment+1%2C+Intro+and+Medical+Countermeasures+(MCM)+Discussion+(1080p_30fps_H264-128kbit_AAC).mp4

The 11 minute video ended with labeling the contributors of this “pandemic exercise” event:

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
World Economic Forum
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

I might end up doing a whole post on this interesting event in a completely separate article, because the videos in this archive alone have a combined total of over 3.5 hours, and have incredibly pertinent, and even more disturbing, correlations to the events happening today. (Almost as if it was all PLANNED… and not just for altruistic “pandemic preparedness”…)

9. November 2019 – Netflix series Explained, airs episode called “The Next Pandemic”

“If you’re not worried about a looming global pandemic, you probably should be. Are we prepared for an outbreak? Bill Gates and other experts weigh in.”

Featuring two of our favorite sponsors of the vaccines: Bill Gates and Peter Daszak.

Hm… I have not personally seen this episode (I canceled Netflix a while ago) but according to reviews and research history, it seems that the genius Bill Gates accurately predicts the situation we find ourselves only a short 2-3 months later. Fascinating.

Actually, if determining how long the production of this episode took, who knows when it was actually taped. But when also considering the interesting timing of when the episode first aired, with the alleged timing of the “very first coronavirus case” – with some people claiming that it might have come out as early as September of 2019 – is too strange to ignore.

Combine that with the suspicious connections between Daszak/EcoHealth Alliance/Wuhan/Fauci/NIAID/NIH/Lancet etc., there seems to be an obvious paper trail, conflicts of interest, and cahoots going on within several agencies/industries that all point to a gain-of-funds gain-of-functions agenda, with the same key players over and over and over again.

And while Mr. Gates has been a huge advocate of vaccines and tweets about it all the time, there is still a sense of uncanny foreshadowing considering his past history with vaccines and the harm that they have caused in several countries, and the tweet he sent a few days before 2020:

BillGates
What’s next for our foundation? I’m particularly excited about what the next year could mean for one of the best buys in global health: vaccines.

Mm hm… Of course you are, Bill. Of course you are.

10. November 2019 & January 2020 – Kobe / COVID connections

There are some suspicious events surrounding Mr. Kobe Bryant and his name being mentioned in conspiracy circles, with some alluding to deep, rabbit hole theories, such as tptsb using Kobe as a sacrifice to fully present the coronavirus onto the rest of the world, and/or a pharmaceutical company’s feud with him in order to use his moniker “Black Mamba” for one of their dietary products, in which Kobe alleged was using illegal substances to begin with…

Kobe Bryant Accused Big Pharma Company Of Using Illegal Substances In Black Mamba Lawsuit Weeks Before His Death

So this legal battle aside, which compellingly enough, also insinuates pharma companies of malfeasance, the focus of this section aims at Kobe’s name being tied to something much more revealing. 

I am not sure where the original source came from, although a youtuber leaves a comment that White Board Gematria was the first to notice this, but the youtube video below shows Kobe’s name being translated from English to Hebrew. (The google translation has since been changed to no longer indicate this.)

Source: youtube | KOS 137 | COVID = KOBE (prod. Eskry)

And as the video shows as well, Mr. Bryant was buried in Corona del Mar – which is another interesting coincidence. On top of that, another youtube user points out that Mr. Bryant also has a crown tattoo on his arm.

Then there’s the article that came out on January 27, 2020, featuring Kobe Bryant’s death on the front page, with a smaller article to the side of it, titled: Rush is on to develop vaccine for coronavirus. At the time, there were purportedly 5 illnesses in the US due to the coronavirus, and widespread recognition and alarm of the disease did not even truly begin until late February.

And if it ended there, it wouldn’t be so bad. But no. There’s more, actually. From another video that KOS 137 has on their channel, it mentions the 2019 book that Kobe Bryant created with Ivy Claire, called “Epoca: The Tree of Ecrof”. In that video, along with other conspiracy material that I won’t get into, is a reference made to the Kabbalah’s Tree of Life.

Keep this tree in mind, because there’s an interesting correlation coming up in the next section.

For another “fun” coincidence, there are two main characters involved in Epoca: The Tree of Ecrof. Rovi and Pretia. Currently, there are some issues involving Japan and suspected contaminated vials of the Moderna vaccine. The manufacturer where the Moderna vaccines are filled is called Rovi, a pharmaceutical company based in Spain, where an investigation is being held for the contamination issue. Additionally, another “fun fact”, you can spell Pretia with the word “pharmaceutical”. While yes, the Spanish spelling of pharmaceuticals is ‘farmaceuticos’, the organization has their own English counterpart on Linkedin titled ROVI Pharmaceutical Company.

Lastly, there’s this rather chilling video, that while it doesn’t really have anything to do with the coronavirus specifically, it does have eerie connotations to the duality of the Tree of Life/Tree of Death (good/evil dichotomy – light/dark musings) that Kobe seems to be alluding to in his book.

11. November 2020 – More “fun” with translations / and other strange “coincidences”

I wasn’t sure whether to put this near the beginning of this list, since the alleged publication date of the “2020” book ranges from the late 1980’s to mid 1990’s (depending on various sources), but since I didn’t find out about this interesting tidbit of data until just recently, I decided to put the date of the article that I found this information in. Plus it fits in rather well right after the Kobe/COVID translation fiasco.

Raul Diego posted an article on mintpressnews.com titled: Predictive Programming? Israeli Publishers Have Been Writing About a COVID-Like Pandemic for Years which focuses on some incredibly coincidental, if not deliberately intentional, events that have happened throughout the years, that also sheds a strange spotlight onto some well-known conspiratorial figures.

1st off: A subject that I’ve already covered on number 8 of this post, Raul Diego references the Netflix series “Explained”. Which is bad enough since it again puts Bill Gates on this list. But then we come to the 2nd topic:

2nd: Another interesting “coincidence”: a book titled “2020” was allegedly written over 20 years ago by Chamutal Shabtai, detailing eerie similarities between the virus written in the book, and the events (whether exaggerated or not) we find ourselves in today [2020-current]. The book was published by an Israeli company named Keter Press.

3rd: Which brings me to the next point. Keter Press, translated from English to Hebrew, means “Corona Press”. Now tying this back to the Kabbalah’s “Tree of Life”, which bears an incredible resemblance to Kobe Bryant’s book, the very top of the tree is labeled Keter.

While it’s not improbable that an Israeli company would use the term Keter/Crown to name their own press industry, the probability of it doing that, while also publishing a book titled “2020” that is all about a virus going on – which we now find ourselves in with an illness labeled specifically for its corona-like appearance, is a little hard to swallow…

I took the liberty of providing a short video showing this, since the Kobe/covid translations ended up being changed shortly after it was shown.

A bonus that I added, “corona”, at least in English – automatically translates to “coronavirus” in Hebrew – which I wasn’t exactly expecting…

4th: Pairing that up with this next section, Raul Deigo provides even more interesting connections between Keter Press and its history:

“Keter Press began as an Israeli-government program called The Israel Program for Scientific Translations in 1959 and was dedicated to translating and publishing scientific and technical manuscripts from Russian into English for the National Science Foundation in the United States, which is the technical counterpart of the National Institutes of Health.”Predictive Programming? Israeli Publishers Have Been Writing About a COVID-Like Pandemic for Years

Hm…

5th: [From the same article] “In 1987, the same year 2020 was written as a movie script, Keter became a public company. Two years later British tycoon and spymaster Robert Maxwell – father of Ghislaine Maxwell ­– acquired control of the publishing house after Maxwell Communication Corporation bought Macmillian, which then owned Keter. The publishing house was passed on to an Israeli investment concern called Arledan after Maxwell’s death in 1991, which owned it until 2016.”

And who’s currently undergoing trials for child/sex-trafficking crimes? Ghislaine Maxwell. And I’m not sure if I have to mention, but this brings up convicted sex-offender and misconduct/blackmail-extraordinaire Jeffrey Epstein into this mix.

In a similar vein, who is currently trying to shake off allegations of a possible friendship and/or business venture connected with Jeffrey Epstein? Again, our very own “philanthropist”, Bill Gates, who is very much tied up in the current corona/COVID/vaccine scheme.

Sure this could be just random conglomerates coming together as large businesses usually do, with no nefarious conspiracy behind it… but… when considering all options and the misconduct they’ve engaged in, being willfully blind is what enables these organizations to keep getting away with their criminal practices to begin with.

Credit for most of this section goes to Raul Diego for all of this information.

BONUS: May / August 2020 – Corona Crop Circle Conspiracy

For a true conspiracy, let’s take a look at the strange crop circle that appeared in May of 2020, with a bizarrely shaped “crop circle” that looks EXACTLY like a coronavirus/spike protein would.

It is obvious that whatever the case is, it goes without saying that we can safely rule out fungi, as a possible contributor; at least to THIS crop circle. And maybe rule out “overactive hedgehogs”, like some people apparently speculate…

Crop Circles Explained

So the question is, who made this crop circle, and for what purpose? Was it to try and help scientists figure out this illness or possibly alert us to the spike protein that would be found in the vaccines – which is causing untold numbers of harm in people? Maybe a hoax that fools people into looking at something completely unrelated to keep them preoccupied and looking the wrong way?

Was it someone boasting of what they were doing to the population? Gloating of pulling off a mastermind villainous attack through this biological weapon?

Alien visitors trying to give us hints as to what this whole coronavirus/vaccine agenda is all about?

Overactive hedgehogs just having a good old time in the field, that just so happened to make an uncanny resemblance to a spike protein? 😛

And how would one carry this crop circle out? Lasers, perhaps; maybe coming from a satellite? Drones programmed to map out a particular picture in the crops? Some kind of radiation that has already been patterned out to make a perfect image on a field? Just hours and hours of physical man-labor; for the funzies?

Another crop circle that was created, this time in August 2020, shows a chemical composition that someone identified as 2,4,dimethyl-3-isopropylpentane, according to the same site: Was There A Coronavirus Crop Circle Laid Down On May 28, 2020?

Does this crop circle have anything to do with the coronavirus one? Are they completely unrelated?

And again, one has to ask, who is making these, and for what reason? If they’re alien beings, perhaps they’re better off just making a radio broadcast telling us exactly what it means, because at this point, all of these cryptic symbols are confusing people even more and no one has a clue what is going on. (except those creating these crop designs, of course…)

And one more crop circle that I just learned about is the following, also created in August 2020, which is suspiciously built around a single tree in the middle of a field (or the tree was specifically placed there – and if so, again, for what reason?) and ~2 miles away from the coronavirus crop circle.

Is this another allusion to the tree of life? What does the 4 circles around it represent? Does this have no bearing on this at all, and is just a fun prank that someone engaged in? Or is there some esoteric meaning behind it to decipher?

There are many more events that have shed a shady light onto the “coronavirus pandemic” and the vaccine narrative, and these listed were just a small few.

While some could be completely coincidental – yet incredibly bizarre – some of the others tend to feature the same people over and over again in what cannot be described as mere coincidence. While there are those who work to defend these people/institutions for just being alert and aware to the possibilities of a new strain of coronavirus, and who are just “genuinely looking after the well-being of humankind”, a look into their history would suggest otherwise. It is dark, and foreboding, and the only ones who benefit are those already at the top.

I think collectively, we need to get out of this mindset of labeling EVERYTHING as a “conspiracy theory”, and take a really good, long look at the deception and collusion going on behind the scenes. Maybe then we can finally admit that some “conspiracies” aren’t so fake and ridiculous after all.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by 12222786 from Pixabay