An Essential Question We All Must Ask Ourselves: How Far Will We Go to Save Our Own Life?

How much is our life worth? Or our child? Where is the limit?

As some of my dear readers may be aware of, I have been covering an interesting figure of the 1990’s in a few of my posts by the name of Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov.

His history is fraught with mystery and intrigue, since it is claimed that he came to this world in order to warn this current generation that we will be the one to see the rise of the antichrist.

Now, I will just add this caveat: I cannot be entirely sure that this is a true account. Of course, I don’t think any of us can. There have been a lot of speculation and guesses as to who, what, where, when and how THE antichrist will make his appearance. And there are many who don’t follow the biblical testaments or believe in any religious/philosophical heralding of an impeding apocalypse, so don’t wonder about this at all and/or think it is only a conspiracy-theory-doomsday-delusion.

However, I am a believer in Jesus Christ and do believe that there are biblical warnings that point to what we should be on the lookout for. And because of this reason, I have been researching several different subjects, and Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov is one that just happened to catch my eye. And whether his is a true account or not, the topics that have been allegedly covered by this young individual – retold through his mother – resonates with me and I find a lot of truth within the subjects that he has mentioned.

For instance, the topic that I’m covering today is something that I have wondered about and struggled with in my pursuit of the truth and the reality of life and death; even before I came across this young prophet and his point of view. Which is incredibly deep coming from such a young child (he passed away at the age of 10). While this article is not about him personally, it is about a topic that he has broached, and because I have contemplated on this matter as well, wanted to delve deeper into the truth of this subject.

The Quest for Immortality (or even an extended life)

In my musings, I have wondered whether the notion of transfusions/transplants goes against what God intended. I know this might be an incredibly sensitive topic, but if we are pursuing the truth, then we must address difficult questions with a genuine and sincere approach, instead of aversion and antagonism. It is not my intention to offend anyone or pass judgement. Only to discuss this matter from a perspective that may not have been considered before.

With that being said, are we fully aware of the implications that may arise when pursuing this route when trying to save ourselves or a loved one?

Where are the organ donations coming from?…

The horrors of black market organ harvesting cannot be ignored, nor can the unscrupulous actions of the medical industry when faced with the possibility of a patient who is willing to pay ungodly amounts of money in order to save their own life, or one of their loved ones.

While some could never believe that such atrocities exist, the sad reality is that the love of money (and of one’s life) can push someone to make unethical decisions. Even if an organ transplant patient or blood transfusion recipient has no idea of the sinister back alley handed dealings, this secret, behind the scenes business may still be taking place.

“How was forced organ harvesting uncovered? The story starts with a whistleblower, a woman with a pseudonym Annie, who made a public statement in March 2006 that her ex-husband had been harvesting corneas of Falun Gong practitioners from 2003 to 2005 in Sujiatun hospital in Shenyang City in Liaoning Province in China. Other doctors in the hospital had been harvesting other organs. The Falun Gong were killed through organ extraction. Their bodies, after organ extraction, were cremated.”

How Was Forced Organ Harvesting Uncovered

As if this wasn’t horrific enough, the implications that the “cabal” may be behind some of the organ harvesting/trafficking may be in play as well.

In a harrowing interview, Stew Peters gives a child-trafficking victim a platform to speak on the tragic and devastating encounters she’s had within the corrupt “elite’s” cult and what she’s learned. It is a very heartbreaking and disturbing account – certainly not for the faint of heart. (I can’t watch this video without crying.)

A short testimony about the organ/body-harvesting trade:

Ally Carter @23:38: “- this is not about a sexual experience, this is not about just cash; this is about something else and it’s deeper than that. Because this is decades of tactics, this is decades of issues, these are decades of problems. Satanic ritual abuse exists, um, human sex-trafficking exists, organ-harvesting exists all over the place. The black market exists.

Um, humans, babies, children, 4 year olds/6 year olds, having their bodies sliced open and used as human suitcases over the border. I have been trafficked over the border.

Those babies are moved as if they’re still alive. They put clothes on them, they sit them up, and they use them until their bodies cannot be used anymore.

This is not just about sex. Because after your body is used for sex, your organs are used for organ harvesting and selling on the black market, which goes to your hospitals; you wonder why a heart costs so much. You wonder why a liver or kidney costs so much.”


And while she claims to have evidence of the abuse that she’s had to endure – by the hands of some of the most prominent figures in our world today, no less – she doesn’t specify if she has the proof for the organ-harvesting claims.

However, this most certainly should not detract from the reality that this is a very real criminal enterprise.

In 2012, Patrick McMahon, Air Force combat veteran and nurse practitioner, made waves when he accused The New York Organ Donor Network for pressuring the doctors to prematurely declare patients “brain dead” in order to meet a quote, “and even hired “coaches” to train staffers how to be more persuasive” in convincing next-of-kin to sign their deceased love one over as an organ donor.

In one chilling allegation, Patrick McMahon submitted the following as an example of their gross misconduct:

“In September 2011, a 19-year-old man injured in a car wreck was admitted to Nassau University Medical Center. He was still trying to breathe and showed signs of brain activity, the suit charged.

But doctors declared him brain dead under pressure from donor-network officials, including Director Michael Goldstein, who allegedly said during a conference call: “This kid is dead, you got that?” the suit charged.” Organs taken from patients that doctors were pressured to declare brain dead: suit

An update to this lawsuit in 2017 had The New York Donor Network deny Mr. Patrick McMahon’s allegations, but also refused to release the documents of the patients in question, even after the judge court ordered them to do so; the New York Donor Network even going so far as to appeal this request through the Manhattan Supreme Court.

In another shocking Stew Peters exposé, a nurse claims to have found the connection between the deadly push of Remdesivir and the seemingly strategic planning of their patient’s deaths:

“I am an RN working in case management at _______ Hospital in California, and I know why the hospitals are killing their own patients.” Upon receiving this nurse’s horrific findings, The Stew Peters Show was able to get this whistleblower nurse to come on the show and answer the tough questions about the connection she found between the use of deadly Remdesivir, Vancomycin, and organ donors.

In the email, the whistleblower stated: “There is a link between the hospital deaths and organ harvesting in the state of California…Every patient’s license is in their medical records, and they can tell if they are organ donors or not.”Whistleblower: Hospitals Killing For Organs, “This is Absolutely Evil And A Crime Against Humanity!”

Are organs being harvested from LIVE people?

To add on to the controversial aspect of this medical intervention, is the huge debate surrounding the vitality of the organs and how long someone must stay alive – either naturally or through mechanical means – in order to keep their organs viable for distribution.

The medical condition of the person at the time of death can determine what organs and tissues can be donated and what cannot be. Organs need to be removed as soon as the person is declared brain-dead. Without the necessary oxygen supply, the organs stop functioning right.

The approximate amount of time between recovering the tissues/organs and transplanting them is:

    • Lung – 4 to 6 hours
    • Heart – 4 hours
    • Liver – 24 hours
    • Pancreas – 24 hours
    • Kidney – 72 hours
    • Cornea – 14 days
    • Bones – 5 years
    • Skin – 5 year
    • Heart Valves – 10 years

This is why creating a tissue bank (heart valves, skin, bones etc.) is possible but creating an organ bank is not. In case of organ transplantation, the process has to be very quick in order to save a life.

Keeping a brain-dead person on ventilator support helps as the organs continue receiving oxygen, providing a window of time for doctors to conduct organ transplantation.

Source: Time in which organs need to be donated after death

According to the above website, the heart and lungs are only viable within a 4 hour time frame. I assume this to mean that by the time the donor is “deceased”, the organs must immediately be transplanted to the intended recipient within the designated time. Otherwise it is too late and the organs (and therefore the payment) is no longer an option.

So by these conditions, the body must technically still be alive during the extraction of the organs, and the definition on what “brain dead” and “not legally alive” means is hotly contested in areas of not only ethical considerations, but scientific data as well.

For instance, there are reports of near-death experiencers being declared “brain dead“, “clinically dead”, “dead dead” (being in the morgue for 3 days…), yet still coming back from that brink with a story to tell. If their body was announced as technically dead, for all intents and purposes, then how is it at all possible for their “consciousness” to return to their body and having the lucidity return to them?

(DISCLAIMER: Please take these claims with a grain of salt. Always use discernment as most of these are anecdotal accounts and cannot be proven or provided with evidence.)

And how does this bode for the several thousands and thousands of people who have been declared “brain dead”, all in order for doctors/nurses/black market organ workers… to rush in to cut open their bodies (while still technically alive) and start harvesting for organs and tissue? And with that in mind, what would happen if a person who is declared “brain dead” suddenly regains their consciousness WHILE HAVING THEIR ORGANS REMOVED?

In some nerve-wrecking and heartbreaking reports, the following accounts demonstrates that this may, in fact, be possible:

– “April 2012 – Doctors declared british teen Stephen Thorpe “brain dead,” telling the father that the boy would never recover from a serious car accident. Despite pressure from the doctors, the father would not consent to allow the boy’s organs to be donated. With the help of other doctors, five weeks later Thorpe left the hospital, having almost completely recovered.”

– “July 2013 – A New York woman who was pronounced ‘brain dead’ by doctors unexpectedly awoke just as her organs were about to be removed for transplant.”

– “2014 U.S. man wakes up in morgue in body bag: An American man wasn’t pronounced “brain” dead, but dead dead. Hospital workers in Lexington, Mississippi zippered him into a sack and shipped to the morgue where he freaked out the workers preparing to embalm him by kicking his way out of his body bag. When Walter Williams actually did die, his nephew told a TV reporter, “I think he’s gone this time.” Shesh. If a nurse, a doctor, a coroner, and other hospital staff could get “dead” so very wrong…”

– 2014 – “Swedish man hears doctors urging the harvesting of his organs: Doctors in Sweden discussed organ donation within earshot of Jimi Fritze as he lay in hospital after a stroke. To the doctor’s shocking surprise, Fritze could hear every word they said. However, he couldn’t object because he couldn’t move. He had suffered a stroke, and after the doctors looked at a scan of his brain, they gave his family bad news, and claimed that “there was no hope,” Fritze said.”

– March 2018 – Thirteen-year-old Trenton McKinley of Alabama recovered and is doing well after doctors pronounced him “brain dead” and “his organs were matched to five children who needed them”, never mind the fact that he needed them himself.

There is also the aborted fetuses trade, which includes corrupt organizations such as the NIH and Planned Parenthood; both of which have been exposed for what I, and many others, consider crimes against humanity:

“David Daleiden, founder and president of The Center for Medical Progress, states, “The NIH grant application for just one of Pitt’s numerous experiments with aborted infants reads like an episode of American Horror Story. Infants in the womb, some old enough to be viable, are being aborted alive and killed for organ harvesting, in order to bring in millions of dollars in taxpayer funding for Pitt and the Planned Parenthood abortion business it supports.”Aborted Infants’ Continued Blood Flow Advertised in Racist University of Pittsburgh Grant Application to NIH

With these serious ethical concerns and implications, we have to really reflect on whether it is worth it to potentially be taking another person’s life to save our own, even if we are not fully cognizant of this fact. While I’m sure many of us are assured that the organ donor does not feel or suffer any of the procedures, unless we are actually under the knife, there is no way to know for sure. And the guilt that one may feel knowing that the person could have died while still having a chance to recover would undoubtedly weigh on some consciences.

Blood donors (again, from who…?)

Now, while not only considering organ donations to save or extend our life, we have to also address the practice of blood transfusions as well.

Again, the possibility of underhanded dealings in the black market and criminal enterprises needs to be mentioned.

As many may be familiar with, Silicon Valley is largely composed of a technocratic, transhumanist industry who is helping to usher us all in the “great reset”, biotech age; whether we like it or not.

In an endeavor that I have mentioned a few times before, because I am haunted by the stark coldness and unfeeling ramifications that it would most likely entail, is a statement from the Newsweek article titled, “Can Blood from Young People Slow Aging? Silicon Valley Has Bet Billions It Will“:

“One chilling missive came from a man who offered to provide all the blood Wyss-Coray might need for such an experiment—he claimed he could obtain it from human children of any age.”

In my opinion, this admission should be investigated to the fullest degree. I fail to see how this is even possible, unless one has a huge bank of blood already from “human children of any age”… or whether they can procure this amount through whatever means they have available to them – which again, raises severe alarm bells.

Either way, it is a grisly and sinister agenda. And the purpose for what this “young blood” will be used for, to keep the older generations alive and feeling young, is something right out of a dystopian playbook.

As Nir Barzilai puts it, “You have no idea how many people are interested to investing money in longevity,” said Nir Barzilai, the founding director of the Institute for Aging Research at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, and the founder of a company aimed at mitochondrial health. “There are billions of dollars.”

What’s in it for me?

Now that I’m finished talking about the ethical considerations (for now), it’s time to tackle why the recipient may not be getting off scott-free either. (Besides the medical bill, of course.)

Since the recipient will be under the knife and therefore have no idea what, exactly, is being transplanted/transfused into their body, and since many of us know how complicit some health/medical institutions really are, we have to wonder – not only how healthy the organ/blood being donated is, but also if the recipient is not subjected to an experiment as well.

Some, like David Bennett, consented to giving a very risky trial run to have a pig heart implanted in him. Not just any pig heart. A genetically modified one.

“In a medical first, doctors transplanted a pig heart into a patient in a last-ditch effort to save his life and a Maryland hospital said Monday that he’s doing well three days after the highly experimental surgery.

While it’s too soon to know if the operation really will work, it marks a step in the decades-long quest to one day use animal organs for life-saving transplants. Doctors at the University of Maryland Medical Center say the transplant showed that a heart from a genetically modified animal can function in the human body without immediate rejection.

The patient, David Bennett, 57, knew there was no guarantee the experiment would work but he was dying, ineligible for a human heart transplant and had no other option, his son told The Associated Press.”

Doctors transplant a genetically modified pig heart into a human for the 1st time

Again, the desperation to cling so tightly to one’s own life may compel them to make decisions they may later on regret. Turning yourself into a genetically modified organism might trend highly on that list. David Bennett had this to say on his decision:

“It was either die or do this transplant. I want to live. I know it’s a shot in the dark, but it’s my last choice,” Bennett said a day before the surgery, according to a statement provided by the University of Maryland School of Medicine.”

Doctors transplant a genetically modified pig heart into a human for the 1st time

This procedure has effectively, in a sense, created a human-animal hybrid. A genetically modified human hybrid.

That was David’s choice.

But what if you had no choice?

Far be it for me to assume that organ/blood recipients have not been getting all their donated organs/blood transfusions in a kosher manner… Already, there are attempts at not only implanting genetically modified animal parts in human being, but there are also endeavors to implant synthetic organisms/organs into us as well.

While history dictates that the government and mad scientists have taken certain liberties with their citizen’s bodies and lives, we have to wonder if there are even more clandestine operations hidden in the background that we are not aware of.

Now, even if these speculations are not true, what IS true is that there is a highly dangerous, suspicious “vaccine” containing mRNA and which have admissions that it does, indeed, modify our cells.

“Ultimately, the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cellular gene therapy. I always like to say, if we had surveyed 2 years ago, in the public, would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy, and inject it into your body, we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate.

I think this pandemic has also opened many people’s eyes to innovation in the way that was maybe not possible before.”

CEO of Big Pharma Bayer “mRNA vaccines are an example of cellular gene therapy”

So with that in mind, how would vaccinated individual’s organs and blood be, not only in the short term, but in the long term as well? There has already been a sudden increase in blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, myocardial  infarctions, neurological symptoms, miscarriages/stillbirths, cancers, etc., etc., etc. reported by Thomas Renz/DoD due to the vaccine intake.

Now imagine getting an organ/blood transfusion from a vaccinated individual with these conditions? And do we have a say in whose organs/blood we get in order to save ours or a loved one’s life? And even if they assure us that it is completely healthy and safe, are we really going to take the word of the same organizations who have assured us that brain dead individuals have no chance of recovery, only to have that same person wake up in the morgue?

This is all without even considering that the vaccines may, in fact, be injecting us with nanochip technology, hydrogels, graphene oxide, etc. in attempts at connecting us to a control-power grid. And as mentioned earlier, synthetic organ creations seem to be the next step in evolution for these “biomedical” technocrats, working on 3d printing organs like the heart, out of, again, their wonder material: hydrogel.

So now we have to consider whether we are okay with being a potentially genetically modified, human-animal hybrid, with synthetic (and possibly deadly) materials inside of us. In order to sustain/extend our life. Rather than “Godspeed” to the Lord.

This is, of course, not to say you would not want to find relief for yourself or a loved one who is suffering, but the serious subject matter of changing our natural, human born genetics with that of unnatural/man-made substances and mutation with animal DNA should be highly examined.

For those with (and without…) Biblical inclinations, there are specific verses that addresses this:

“But God gives it a body as he has chosen, and to each kind of seed its own body. For not all flesh is the same, but there is one kind for humans, another for animals, another for birds, and another for fish.”1 Corinthians 15:38-39

“Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.”Romans 1:22

“So God looked upon the earth, and indeed it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth.”Genesis 6:12

What’s in the blood?

So, now we get to, what was the initial reason why I decided to approach this topic to begin with?

Again, because of the testimony of Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov. In his life, he refused to get a blood transfusion because, as he claimed it, the sins of the blood could be transferred to the recipient.

It may seem like an outlandish claim.

However, there are some scientific literature to back this up, as eerie as it sounds.

blood carries a person’s DNA, the signature that is supposed to be unique to their body.”

Scientific American explains that when donor blood is mixed into the body with a transfusion, that person’s DNA will be present in your body for some days”

“That publication notes studies have shown that highly sensitive equipment can pick up donor DNA from blood transfusions up to a week after the procedure, but with particularly large transfusions, donor white blood cells were present for up to a year and a half afterward.”

Source: How Does A Blood Transfusion Change Your Body And DNA?

And in this 2017 study, the conclusion these scientists/doctors came to is that they are considering having physicians receive informed consent from the recipient before agreeing to the transfusion because of this possible personality change:

“In conclusion, our results showed that the majority of the subjects could conceive that RBC transfusion might transmit some of the donor’s traits. Furthermore, three subjects out of seven indicated that they had perceived changes in behaviors or values after their own RBC transfusion. Better understanding the frequency and importance of these perceived changes is important as physicians might have to include such information while getting informed consent for transfusion.”

Source: Perceived changes in behavior and values after a red blood cell transfusion

Organ transplants are no different, and have been documented for decades, according to the following pubmed article:

“Personality changes following heart transplantation, which have been reported for decades, include accounts of recipients acquiring the personality characteristics of their donor.”

“Four categories of personality changes are discussed in this article: (1) changes in preferences, (2) alterations in emotions/temperament, (3) modifications of identity, and (4) memories from the donor’s life. The acquisition of donor personality characteristics by recipients following heart transplantation is hypothesized to occur via the transfer of cellular memory, and four types of cellular memory are presented: (1) epigenetic memory, (2) DNA memory, (3) RNA memory, and (4) protein memory.”

Implications for the future of heart transplantation are explored including the importance of reexamining our current definition of death, studying how the transfer of memories might affect the integration of a donated heart, determining whether memories can be transferred via the transplantation of other organs, and investigating which types of information can be transferred via heart transplantation. Further research is recommended.”

Source: Personality changes following heart transplantation: The role of cellular memory

In another startling account, a recipient of a liver transplant was documented as having not only a complete change in blood type, but she acquired the immune system of her donor as well…

In a recent case of possible cell memory, Australian girl Demi-Lee Brennan’s blood group was changed after receiving a liver transplant from her donor, reports the AFP. Nine months after the initial transplant, doctors discovered that Brennan had changed blood types and she acquired the immune system of the donor due to the stem cells of her new liver transferring over to her bone marrow. “In effect she had had a bone marrow transplant. The majority of her immune system had also switched over to that of the donor,” Michael Stormon, a hepatologist who treated Brennan at the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, reported to the AFP.

Source: Can An Organ Transplant Change A Recipient’s Personality? Cell Memory Theory Affirms ‘Yes’

It amazes me that this foresight came from a 10 year-old child, who chose to end his life, rather than receive a potential change in personality and genetic make up.

And we have to wonder, what is the risk when it comes to this incredibly sensitive topic? What if our little one was sick, dying of leukemia? I can’t imagine how heartbreaking that would be, yet people go through these types of sorrow everyday. And on one hand I understand their heartfelt desperation at keeping their loved one alive, but again, at what cost?

Again, this is not to presume, or cast judgement, only to bring this topic to light in a different perspective. Perhaps we’re clinging on to life so hard, that we forget and/or ignore that this is only a temporary life/death. Even doctors/scientists/skeptics are having to come around to the mystery of the consciousness, and that there is more to this life than meets the eye.

“If you try to hang on to your life, you will lose it. But if you give up your life for my sake and for the sake of the Good News, you will save it.” – Mark 8:35

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Embalmers are Finding Fibrous, Worm-like Structures in Some of the Vaccinated Individual’s Veins. | Could They be Parasites? Or Something Else Entirely?

What is causing the formation of these strange, unusual tendrils inside human bodies?

UPDATED TO ADD CORRECTION (1/30/2022): Original article stated Richard ‘Hirschner’ but has been corrected to Richard ‘Hirschman’.

During some of my research addressing the possible contents of the vaccine, I have come across some images in an attempt to try and identify multiple different substances – the parasitic-looking materials, for one, morgellons, nanosensors, etc.

And with the most recent bombshell of white, fibrous like structures found in the veins of several vaccinated individuals, courtesy of Richard Hirschman (embalmer and funeral director) and others in his field, has brought this topic back to the forefront of what else, exactly, is this COVID vaccine doing to humanity.

The tragic deaths that have surrounded this injection have been growing more noticeable as even the mainstream media outlets are having a difficult time covering up for these devastating numbers. And as more information is being discovered about these dangerous shots, the question of why it is still being pushed in certain countries remains a mystery.

Unless, of course, it is on purpose.

The video below is the interview between Richard Hirschman and Dr. Jane Ruby which describes his findings in a little bit more detail.

This post and the video below has some GRAPHIC IMAGERY that may be disturbing to some. Please keep this in mind and I apologize in advance for what is possibly controversial images that may provoke visceral reactions.

So when looking at these fibrous textures that Richard Hirschman has uncovered in his attempt to embalm the deceased, the familiarity of it to parasitic organisms was hard to ignore.

Here is a side by side comparison of these white-ish tendrils to just one group of similar looking substances:

Image Credited to: Richard Hirschman / Stew Peters Show / Dr. Jane Ruby
Image credited to:

As far as I understand, the image from is coming from the stool of the individual after they’ve taken anti-parasitic medicine. And it was taken 14 years ago.

I’d also like to add a disclaimer that I am using this image for educational and research purposes ONLY. Not to shame or offend anyone who is going through something similar. This is an attempt to try and identify what is going inside the human body, with or without the “COVID vaccine”. If anyone has any information as to what these tendrils may be, please comment and help share this information with others.

Now as you can see, both of these images look practically identical. The only difference is that the substances found by Richard Hirschman were recovered from the veins of the individuals he was trying to embalm, while the second image was recovered after a bowel movement.

While they may very well be the same thing, the question still remains on why these organic looking structures are found in the veins/stools to begin with. As Richard Hirschman emphasizes throughout the interview, this is the first time he’s seen anything like this, and has been seeing it growing in numbers – starting during the initial rollout of the COVID “vaccines” in late 2020.

One hypothesis is that the liquid that is being used inside the vials may come from a contaminated source. Say a polluted and/or infected water source. If this is possible, and I’m quite certain it is, (not only because of the ineptitude of these facilities but also the corrupt complicity of the deliberate nature of this agenda…) then it would make sense.

When consuming contaminated water or food, the chances of having gastrointestinal issues increases. As many people have found out, this may cause a parasitic infection in the gut. Using an anti-parasitic drug (like Ivermectin?…) will cause these parasites to get flushed out through the stool.

Now, what happens if the very same contaminated water with these parasitic organisms gets injected directly into the vein?

…Could this be what these embalmers and coroners are seeing?

Of course, this is just one hypothesis. But the similarities are decidedly extremely uncanny. We must also keep in mind that there could be several different experiments going on at once during this COVID injection rollout. And the parasitic infection may just be one of them.

Another hypothesis, and again, this is just speculation based on some scientific literature, and may not be true at all, so please keep this in mind – I am just theorizing – perhaps the parasitic-like organisms are being injected through discreet measures to evade discovery.

For instance, in a number of the publications that I have listed below show, there are attempts by several organizations (big key institutions who are already in the spotlight for unleashing this “COVID” narrative onto humanity), the NIH and DARPA, for example, to be able to inject a drug-delivery mechanism, or even a bacteria/parasite-delivery system into a host through an encapsulation method.

Therefore, even if one were to “analyze” the contents of the vial, a cursory glance at the substances would be unlikely to return something as devastatingly obvious as a fibrous, worm-like construction. And as we can see from the images above, the tendrils are incredibly way too large to be in such a small vial. Unless, of course, it were possible to administer a chemical/organism that would be able to grow after it’s been injected.

This is where the now famous “hydrogel” comes in.

Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds
(July 2012)

This article summarizes the recent progress in the design and synthesis of hydrogels as tissue-engineering scaffolds. Hydrogels are attractive scaffolding materials owing to their highly swollen network structure, ability to encapsulate cells and bioactive molecules, and efficient mass transfer. Various polymers, including natural, synthetic and natural/synthetic hybrid polymers, have been used to make hydrogels via chemical or physical crosslinking. Recently, bioactive synthetic hydrogels have emerged as promising scaffolds because they can provide molecularly tailored biofunctions and adjustable mechanical properties, as well as an extracellular matrix-like microenvironment for cell growth and tissue formation.”

“This insoluble cross-linked structure allows effective immobilization and release of active agents and biomolecules. Owing to their high water content, hydrogels resemble natural soft tissue more than any other type of polymeric biomaterials. Hydrogel materials generally exhibit good biocompatibility and high permeability for oxygen, nutrients and other water-soluble metabolites, making them attractive scaffolds for use in cell encapsulation. Most hydrogel materials are injectable and can be formed via photopolymerization, which can be carried out under mild conditions in the presence of living cells. This allows homogeneous seeding of cells throughout the scaffold materials and formation of hydrogels in situ.”*


*Funded in part by the NIH.

Take note that the above publication (2012) was a progress report of the hydrogel material that’s already being studied during that time.

And not only does it mention “cell encapsulation”, but it also makes other important references: “hydrogels resemble natural soft tissue” / “mass transfer” / “tissue-engineering” / “hydrogel materials are injectable”, and it can be formed through irradiation with light. I also took the initiative to show a brief definition of what photopolymerization is…

Photopolymerization is a light-induced reaction, which converts a liquid or gel monomer into a solid polymer. These reactions require the use of an appropriate photoinitiator, which is a light sensitive molecule that produces an active species upon irradiation with UV, visible, or infrared light.”

Photopolymerization | Surface Coating Processes

Shear-thinning and self-healing hydrogels as injectable therapeutics and for 3D-printing
(August 2017)

“The design of injectable hydrogel systems addresses the growing demand for minimally invasive approaches for local and sustained delivery of therapeutics. We developed a class of hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels that form through noncovalent guest-host interactions, undergo disassembly (shear-thinning) when injected through a syringe and then reassemble within seconds (self-healing) when shear forces are removed. Its unique properties enable the use of this hydrogel system for numerous applications, such as injection in vivo (including with cells and therapeutic molecules) or as a ‘bioink’ in 3D-printing applications.

We furthermore demonstrate how to encapsulate cells in vitro and provide procedures for quantitative assessment of in vivo hydrogel degradation by imaging of fluorescently derivatized materials.”

And in a whopper of a title, we have this study:

Shear-thinning and self-healing nanohybrid alginate-graphene oxide hydrogel based on guest-host assembly.
(March 2021)

The study aims to develop a novel nanohybrid shear-thinning hydrogel with fast gelation, and variable mechanical and biological properties. This nanohybrid hydrogel was developed via self-assembly guest-host interaction between β-cyclodextrin modified alginate (host macromere, Alg-CD) and adamantine modified graphene oxide (guest macromere, Ad-GO) and subsequent ionic crosslinking process.

In conclusion, the nanohybrid Alg-GO hydrogel could be used as an injectable hydrogel for soft tissue engineering applications.

Hydrogel-based biocontainment of bacteria for continuous sensing and computation
(April 2021)

Genetically modified microorganisms (GMMs) can enable a wide range of important applications including environmental sensing and responsive engineered living materials. However, containment of GMMs to prevent environmental escape and satisfy regulatory requirements is a bottleneck for real-world use. While current biochemical strategies restrict unwanted growth of GMMs in the environment, there is a need for deployable physical containment technologies to achieve redundant, multi-layered and robust containment. We developed a hydrogel-based encapsulation system that incorporates a biocompatible multilayer tough shell and an alginate-based core. This deployable physical containment strategy (DEPCOS) allows no detectable GMM escape, bacteria to be protected against environmental insults including antibiotics and low pH, controllable lifespan and easy retrieval of genomically recoded bacteria. To highlight the versatility of DEPCOS, we demonstrated that robustly encapsulated cells can execute useful functions, including performing cell–cell communication with other encapsulated bacteria and sensing heavy metals in water samples from the Charles River.”**

**In the acknowledgments, the NIH, DARPA, University of Pennsylvania and MIT are thanked for their funding of this study.

Interesting that DARPA and co. are investing in studies which allow for GMMs (genetically modified microorganisms) to escape a containment of sorts without being detected, as well as protecting bacteria so that they are resilient against antibiotics… Must I mention the eerie parallels that bacteria have with parasites?

“If bacteria can infect a host, multiply inside the body and eventually spread to another organism, it exhibits the behavior of a parasite. Many bacterial diseases do this.”

What Types of Bacteria Are Parasites?

There are also studies detailing how useful hydrogel is when attempting to connect electricity/machines/computing interfaces with living beings – such as humans; giving credence to the theories that hydrogel will be one of the key catalysts to propel us into the 4th Industrial Revolution. And it doesn’t help when one of these studies directly links it to being an important platform for the Internet-of-Things capabilities.

Hydrogel bioelectronics
(March 2019)

“Bioelectronic interfacing with the human body including electrical stimulation and recording of neural activities is the basis of the rapidly growing field of neural science and engineering, diagnostics, therapy, and wearable and implantable devices. Owing to intrinsic dissimilarities between soft, wet, and living biological tissues and rigid, dry, and synthetic electronic systems, the development of more compatible, effective, and stable interfaces between these two different realms has been one of the most daunting challenges in science and technology. Recently, hydrogels have emerged as a promising material candidate for the next-generation bioelectronic interfaces, due to their similarities to biological tissues and versatility in electrical, mechanical, and biofunctional engineering. In this review, we discuss (i) the fundamental mechanisms of tissue-electrode interactions, (ii) hydrogels’ unique advantages in bioelectrical interfacing with the human body, (iii) the recent progress in hydrogel developments for bioelectronics, and (iv) rational guidelines for the design of future hydrogel bioelectronics. Advances in hydrogel bioelectronics will usher unprecedented opportunities toward ever-close integration of biology and electronics, potentially blurring the boundary between humans and machines.”

Ultrastretchable and Wireless Bioelectronics Based on All-Hydrogel Microfluidics
(August 2019)

Hydrogel bioelectronics that can interface biological tissues and flexible electronics is at the core of the growing field of healthcare monitoring, smart drug systems, and wearable and implantable devices. Here, a simple strategy is demonstrated to prototype all-hydrogel bioelectronics with embedded arbitrary conductive networks using tough hydrogels and liquid metal. Due to their excellent stretchability, the resultant all-hydrogel bioelectronics exhibits stable electrochemical properties at large tensile stretch and various modes of deformation. The potential of fabricated all-hydrogel bioelectronics is demonstrated as wearable strain sensors, cardiac patches, and near-field communication (NFC) devices for monitoring various physiological conditions wirelessly. The presented simple platform paves the way of implantable hydrogel electronics for Internet-of-Things and tissue-machine interfacing applications.”

Anyone who is saying that “they” are not attempting to merge humans with machines is not doing their homework.

Hydrogel facilitated bioelectronic integration
(January 2021)

“Hydrogels represent a unique category of materials to bridge the gap between biological and electronic systems because of their structural/functional similarity to biological tissues and design versatility to accommodate cross-system communication. In this review, we discuss the latest progress in the engineering of hydrogel interfaces for bioelectronics development that promotes (1) structural compatibility, where the mechanical and chemical properties of hydrogels can be modulated to achieve coherent, chronically stable biotic-abiotic junctions; and (2) interfacial signal transduction, where the charge and mass transport within the hydrogel mediators can be rationally programmed to condition/amplify the bioderived signals and enhance the electrical/electrochemical coupling. We will further discuss the application of functional hydrogels in complex physiological environments for bioelectronic integration across different scales/biological levels. These ongoing research efforts have the potential to blur the distinction between living systems and artificial electronics, and ultimately decode and regulate biological functioning for both fundamental inquiries and biomedical applications.”

Tissue adhesive hydrogel bioelectronics
(June 2021)

“Flexible bioelectronics have promising applications in electronic skin, wearable devices, biomedical electronics, etc. Hydrogels have unique advantages for bioelectronics due to their tissue-like mechanical properties and excellent biocompatibility. Particularly, conductive and tissue adhesive hydrogels can self-adhere to bio-tissues and have great potential in implantable wearable bioelectronics. This review focuses on the recent progress in tissue adhesive hydrogel bioelectronics, including the mechanism and preparation of tissue adhesive hydrogels, the fabrication strategies of conductive hydrogels, and tissue adhesive hydrogel bioelectronics and applications.”

And of course, this article would not be complete without mentioning a direct correlation between the World Economic Forum and this strange “goo”, since they are the front-runners of initiating this transhumanism effort.

    • Scientists have developed new 3D printing technology, which is 10-50 times faster than the industry standard with the ability to print larger sample sizes.
    • It involves jelly-like materials known as hydrogels, which are used to create products such as contact lenses.
    • This method and material is also useful for creating scaffolds in tissue engineering.

Researchers say the method is particularly suitable for printing cells with embedded blood vessel networks, a nascent technology expected to be a central part of the production of 3D-printed human tissue and organs.

3D printing method turns goo into a hand in minutes

So now the question is, could these strange strands that people are seeing in their stools, and perhaps what the embalmers are seeing, the hydrogel-structures themselves? If these fibrous substances are not parasites, then the collection of publications above may be pointing to the possibility that these tissue-like materials are hydrogels that have already been in testing mode in humans for a very long time.

Whether they have been delivered through medication, injections (such as through flu shots/vaccines), contaminating water/food supply, GMOs, etc.

There is also an interesting correlation between the fibrous textures that Richard Hirschman and other embalmers have found, that closely resemble veins themselves. As Mr. Hirschman claims, he has been in this business for decades, and has never really seen anything like this. Pulling veins… from veins?

Well, there may be some legitimacy to this as well.

Arteriovenous Malformation
Image source:
Image source:

“An arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is an abnormal tangle of blood vessels connecting arteries and veins, which disrupts normal blood flow and oxygen circulation.”

“When an AVM disrupts this critical process, the surrounding tissues may not get enough oxygen. Also, because the tangled blood vessels that form the AVM are abnormal, they can weaken and rupture. If the AVM is in the brain and ruptures, it can cause bleeding in the brain (hemorrhage), stroke or brain damage.

“The cause of AVMs is not clear. They’re rarely passed down among families.”

“AVMs result from development of abnormal direct connections between arteries and veins, but experts don’t understand why this happens. Certain genetic changes might play a role, but most types are not usually inherited.”


Throughout numerous articles about arteriovenous malformations, it is usually repeated that the cause of AVM is not known. So again, I am hypothesizing, what if these AVMs, extra tangled webs of veins/arteries/tissue, etc. – are in fact hydrogels meant to be administered throughout our system to replicate our neural/circulatory system to better connect us to their biotechnological agendas?

We’ve already seen the numerous studies above describing hydrogels as “stretchable“, “tissue-engineering“, “similarities to biological tissues“, and the hydrogel material is being used for 3D printing because “the method is particularly suitable for printing cells with embedded blood vessel networks“.

We would have to be extremely gullible if we were to believe that these technocrats suddenly found out all of this technology in the last few years without first spending many years and time/money/effort into the research and experimentation of this on living beings – including, of course, humans.

And for those who are inclined to refuse to believe that an agenda this huge would ever be possible, the notion of huge funds being dished out to certain institutions – including the medical/healthcare/psychological field, to prescribe certain medications for the purpose of “healing”/”curing” their patients, while simultaneously documenting the results of the patient’s reaction to said prescriptions, would not be too far-off the mark.

Regardless if infiltration has been happening in these fields or not, there are most likely a huge group of people who won’t even realize that this is an agenda, and therefore are participating in it without even realizing what they are doing. Keeping up with the perception that it is for “the better good”, while unknowingly serving the purpose of those with hidden goals.

Dr. James Giordano shared this information in his lecture “The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future”. A direct quote from this lecture:

“But what you also need to appreciate is that that DARPA program, like any program that is oriented towards engaging brain function to then alter those functions in certain ways, directional ways, can be harnessed for what’s called dual-use. Medical purposes that are then depurposed in medicine and used for other agenda

Dr. James Giordano – From DARPA Mind Weapon Tools, to Nanotechnology | Hacking Our Mind is the Ultimate Agenda

So whether these substances are parasites, synthetic-hydrogel tissue, or a different fibrous structure altogether, the point is that these are being found in human beings, and there is no clear answer as to why and how this occurs.

Researchers and doctors have been investigating these types of phenomena and formulating theories about what this is all about.

Celeste Solum is a FEMA whistleblower and researcher who has been connecting the dots on these hydrogel technologies and the goals of the “global elitists”.

In an article she wrote in July 30, 2020, she uses a snippet from a professor at Hokkaido University which states, “Hydrogels are excellent candidates to mimic biological functions because they are soft and wet like human tissues,” says Gong. “We are excited to demonstrate how hydrogels can mimic some of the memory functions of brain tissue.”

Dr. Carrie Madej is an outspoken speaker about bringing awareness to the hydrogel material, and how it may be related to the COVID vaccine.

Dr. Andrew Kaufman has also been speaking about the hydrogel technologies and the attempts of connecting this material with our body.

In a quote that was stated over a year ago, he says, “[Hydrogel is a] synthetic biopolymer compatible with our own tissue (that could) even develop its own blood supply as blood vessels can grow right into it.”

Maybe this is, indeed, what we are seeing in more and more vaccinated individuals and what many others are suffering in their day to day lives. And this also raises the question that if an anti-parasitic drug could release fibrous strands from the bowels like the one pictured above from, and if the strands are hydrogel… then would anti-parasitic drugs be helpful in detoxing these foreign substances from our body? (and is this another reason why drugs like Ivermectin are so highly ridiculed and ostracized?…)

Now the issue is, if this is all true, how do we stop this assault on humanity and how can we rise up to hold those accountable for these atrocities from carrying out anymore criminal activity? These are organizations at the top with the audacity “authority” to dictate what goes into our bodies, without our full, informed consent.

Perhaps it’s time to stop listening to certain “authority” figures. And take a good, long look at what’s going on around us; keeping a close eye on the medical/health industries, as well as the “medication(s)/injections” that are being prescribed.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Paul McManus from Pixabay

Combining Health/Medical/Biodata Together with Artificial Intelligence – For OUR Benefit? Or For a Different Reason Altogether?

A.I. technology has made significant advances. But what if it never stops advancing?

As I was researching an individual (who shall not be named to protect their anonymity) – I came across a rather… intriguing company that they had an interest in.

For a little background, this individual has been speculated as getting their really young son vaccinated, even before it was authorized in their area. For additional reference, it would seem that being involved in the NHS is also an important part of their repertoire – so perhaps they are of the UK region.

Again, these are more of a supposition based on their information, so please take it with a grain of salt.

Sadly, this individual lost their son not too long ago.

Now, just out of curiosity sakes (not to condemn, provoke, judge, or anything of the sort) I took an initiative to research their twitter page for additional information. What were their other interests/involvements? What makes this person a pro-vaccine advocate? Etc. This is where the information about the NHS comes from.

And in addition, there was another company listed that really took me aback. And that will be the focus of what this post is about.

The DEMON Network

“We are the international network for the application of data science and AI to dementia research. The Deep Dementia Phenotyping (DEMON) Network brings together academics, clinicians and other partners from across the world. By connecting these people, we can identify innovative approaches to interdisciplinary collaborative dementia research across multiple institutions.

Our vision is to revolutionise dementia research and healthcare by bringing innovators together and harnessing the power of data science and AI.”

Source: [ ]

Further research into this group and the above individual’s interests revealed human genomes/genetics and deep brain integration with AI as additional fields of pursuit.

Very interesting.

And once again, just as the SATiN technology – I have to point out the incredibly unnecessary and non-sense acronym that they have decided to choose for their company.

“Deep Dementia Phenotyping (DEMON)”?

It is quite obvious the allusion that they were going for.

Now, for the sake of playing Devil’s advocate (no pun intended), perhaps they only mean it as a reference that ‘dementia’ is such an awful disease and so they are calling dementia itself a “demon”, in the most figurative of sense. Or, one can construe it in the sense that some people have described the symptoms of dementia as that of someone being demonically possessed – the change in personality, the trembling/shaking, sudden aggression, etc. So perhaps their motive was to highlight this detail – as controversial as that would be.

However, under the assumption that anyone who has faith/belief in God/Jesus Christ, or even who believes in preserving humanity in our natural state, and who would not want to tamper with His creations in such a way as to genetically modify and/or merge us (or any other living being) with man-made technology, the rationale that the groups of people initiating this sort of invasive work would deliberately choose the acronym it did for more of a shock value than anything else, and to perhaps mock those who are against this sort of contentious work, would make more sense.

There is, of course, the darker side of the argument, and that’s that the founder(s) of something like DEMON Network, fully believe that they are serving a “demonic” agenda.

No one likes to contemplate on this subject. No one wants to believe that someone running a large organization in manipulating, modifying, genetically changing, hacking the software of life, collecting medical/biological/DNA information – could possibly be involved in such a thing as “demonic worship”, or idolizing machines – like artificial intelligence, for example – or would attempt to personify a computer learning algorithm/intelligence as a “beast system”.

Yet, when digging into transhumanism, technological advancements, the agendas of certain “philanthropic” billionaires and globalists, government agencies… one thing seems to tie them all together. And that is, indeed, a reset of humanity in some way, that involves merging us with machine.

This is NO SECRET, and has been admitted by everyone from Klaus Schwab, to Bill Gates, to Elon Musk, to Henry Kissinger (who was a professor of Klaus Schwab) to institutions such as DARPA.

Getting back to the DEMON Network, who has partnered with the UK Dementia Research Institute, I have selected a few short excerpts from an interview between David Llewellyn (founder of DEMON Network) and Bart De Strooper of the UK DRI that can be found at the following link: [ ] “Podcast: Using AI & data to fight dementia”

David Llewellyn: “We deliberately, I mean, it’s designed to encourage collaboration and new ideas, dangerous ideas, so we want people to join who don’t know anything about dementia. Maybe they know all about transfer learning, or other forms of machine learning, or artificial intelligence.”

Interviewer Megan O’Hare: “When we got given the topic for this podcast, thought to myself, I should probably actually, work out what artificial intelligence is. Obviously we use the word a lot, and you think of that Will Smith film, and – but, and so I had to look around and there’s the cheering test. Which is basically the test of a machine’s ability to exhibit intelligent behavior equivalent to or indistinguishable from that of a human.

But I wanted, because you’re both coming at it from different places, how you view A.I.? Um, to how you think it will impact dementia research? Maybe, David, we start with you?”

David Llewellyn: “Well, it’s a difficult thing to pin down. Because it obviously means different things to different people. But I think in its, in its broader sense, artificial intelligence is the idea that we’ll create machines that think for themselves, and they’re able to exhibit intelligent characteristics without, without us pulling levers; manually inputting and prodding and poking them into what they should be doing.

And the most ambitious form of artificial intelligence is a sort of creation of a new digital, sentient being, which will take over the world and enslave us.

And that’s the – that’s the thing that, that some people worry about. You know, the point at which machines don’t just match our performance, but start to exceed our performance. So that – that’s the, that is a fascinating and yet, and as yet unachieved ambition. That not everyone thinks we should be aiming for either.

I don’t think many people are arguing we’ve created a super-intelligent yet. But it’s possible. It’s possible.

Bart De Strooper: “These are the advances of molecule biology, and how it’s done at the moment is it’s very simplistic. We use a – we use a… […] I apologize to my colleagues – but we take a cell, we put a DNA in it, we express the protein, and then we see things happening, of course, and everything that’s biology. Of course! Biology’s much more complicated.

You need to – to, and that’s – so the next step in molecule biology was, if I’m boring you please interrupt me, but next step was the mouse stuff. When we changed the gene, and then we saw the whole thing change in the mouse.”

Bart De Strooper: “There will be a moment, and that’s also the vision of the DRI, there is a moment that most of the research will be in silico.

Bart De Strooper: “I think that in the 10 years, I foresee for me now, still going on, that’s – a lot of the classical biology will be replaced by, by this combination of silico prediction, and then tested. In 20 years, it’s probably going to be the classical biologists will be a rare species.

David Llewellyn: “Well if you listen to some people, artificial intelligence will make us all redundant.”

Image credited to: UK Dementia Research Institute

And as Dr. James Giordano so succinctly put it, when given funding from multiple different organizations, the possibility of “dual-use” medical/scientific interventions becomes an obvious motive.

Take a study/research that involves David Llewellyn and others on behalf of the European Task Force for Brain Health Services:

[ ] “Modifiable risk factors for dementia and dementia risk profiling. A user manual for Brain Health Services”

Some noteworthy possible Conflicts of Interest that could have influenced some of the research/funding/studies, etc. of such endeavors involves the following companies:

Source: [ ] “Modifiable risk factors for dementia and dementia risk profiling. A user manual for Brain Health Services”

Elan Pharmaceuticals

Those are some extremely familiar names. Now why is this so important?

Well, aside from the very unusual name (DEMON Network) and their possible involvement/affiliations with the above listed organizations – imagine a company being able to provide a cure for such a debilitating illness – like dementia/Alzheimer’s for instance. In fact, imagine a complete cure for anything you can think of.

Cancer. The common cold. Heart attacks. Depression. Schizophrenia. ADHD. AIDS. So on and so forth.

Now ask yourself, what happens to these companies when the cure is established and no one is sick from anything anymore? Well, quite obviously, people won’t need on-going medicine/drugs/therapists/vaccines… etc., etc. Thus, putting the medical field largely out of a very lucrative business. As long as they can keep flourishing with an abundance of “sick” people, an actual CURE would destroy their whole entire foundation.

So from a strictly financial/business point of view, the medical field would be shooting themselves in the foot if they were to ever find such a beneficial treatment. The smart, yet extremely underhanded thing to do, would be to keep the falsehood going that they are treating you, while keeping you sick all the while to peddle drugs and even more treatments to “cure” additional ailments.

Now, am I necessarily saying that this is exactly what’s going on here? Well… there are many signs that certainly do point in that direction. But I am also of the belief that there are people in those institutions that don’t believe this, and who are, in fact, very honest and genuine people trying to help others with their illnesses. But it doesn’t mean that it’s not going on.

Perhaps even some in that field are becoming disillusioned with their very own profession/career and the suspicious activities that their organizations have engaged in. But one can’t help but wonder if this is the true motive of the medical institutions.

And again, it certainly does not help when they pair up with foundations named DEMON Network who are interested in implementing A.I. algorithms and tracking/monitoring human being’s physiology; under the false guise, in my opinion, of helping people.

Elon Musk makes an eerie reference

As mentioned earlier, Elon Musk, who is eager to start implementing his Neuralink implants into human beings next year (2022), has said this rather… interesting “hyperbole” about A.I.’s back in 2014:

Elon Musk: “And with artificial intelligence, we are summoning the demon. You know? You know all those stories where, there’s the guy with the pentagram and the holy water, and he’s like, yeah, he’s sure he can control the demon. [exaggerated winking]

It didn’t work out.

Sure this very well could have been strictly a metaphor, but in context of the individuals/organizations who truly are interested in A.I. technology, and the transhumanism efforts, and who also seem to have an uncanny alliance/affiliation with the Lucis Trust (formerly the Lucifer Trust), the supposition that it is all just a coincidence gets less and less certain.

Metabolic Machines and Demons of Life

In addition to all of that, are even more allusions to the “demonic” qualities that artificial intelligence/computing systems seem to possess. (again, no pun intended)

Thomas Feuerstein is an artist who focuses a lot on biotechnology and fuses biological organisms (algae, human cells) into his artwork. Again, with an interest in artificial intelligence as well, his take on what artificial intelligence is, coupled with his artwork, presents an even deeper meaning into a “demon network” that I don’t think many of us are aware of.

Take the following excerpts from Feuerstein’s presentation for consideration:

All quotes by Thomas Feuerstein:

“Data metabolic systems, I mean works that eat and […] digest data autonomously, and convert them into new data, always based on a software that I call “demon”.

In ancient Greece, the daemon was a translator between ideas and meta, gods and humans. And furthermore, a daemon or demon was a distributor of fate, of resources, goods and information.”

“To this day, the word “demon” hides in many common words, theories and concepts. For example, democracy comes from demos, which means people or nations. And “daemos” derives from daemon. In this sense, a daemon is a governor, a decision maker, and an allocator.”

“Demons today are not only fictional or mythical creatures in literature, religions, superstition, or pop culture. We find them also in science, technology, art, economics, and politics.

And as I said before, without demons there can be no governance, and no cybernetics.

Our daily lives are full of demons, and with the emergence of new technologies and A.I., cultural demons are becoming more and more relevant in a networked society. We find them in electronic devices, in the form of algorithmic trading, in biotechnology, surveillance technology – “

“The ancient concepts of demons we have to sink in new contexts. More and more demons become machines; biochemical and digital machines.”

“Another very strong demon, the Holy Spirit, enters not as a higher source any longer. It enhances the brain, digital and molecular. In future times maybe we are all enlightened people, speaking in tongues and glossolalia becomes a molecular and digital application in our brain.

For example, the company Neuralink, wants to implant brain computer interfaces – so called BCI, to connect the brain with the internet.

Ironically I can say in the future we may not only have artificial intelligence, we may have artificial identity.”

“Deep meaning reminds me of DeepDream from Google [editor’s note: who, unironically, removed the motto “Don’t be evil” from their code of conduct policy…], and shows that the genius is not a person with special abilities, but someone who is controlled by a higher intelligence and ruled like a puppet.”

” – Fernando Corbato and the science team at the MIT, wrote the computer program “daemon”. It was a simple backup program, and daemon was a backronym for a disk and execution monitor. And this is important, because it was the beginning of machines started to talk to themselves. It influenced all later programs from chat BOTS to search BOTS to viruses and artificial intelligence agents. And in this sense, the most mightful and greedy demon who haunts the internet today is the Google bot.”

“More and more demons take possession of our environment and connect us imperceptibly with networked processes. These demons lurk in smartphones and smart homes.”

“Another cosmist, Nikolai Federov, describes the machinist of the future as a place not for death, but for technical reanimated humans. This was science fiction at the time, but today where Google, Facebook […] are constantly collecting data, a digital reapers is approaching technical feasability.

Ironically I would say, we will end not in graves, we will end as demons in cyberspace.”

And like Thomas Feuerstein mentioned, the demon/daemon terminology to describe computer programs/artificial intelligence is an expression  – at least from a computer programmer/hacker’s point of view.

In The Original Hacker’s Dictionary, it describes daemon and demon as the following:

DAEMON (day’mun, dee’mun) [archaic form of “demon”, which has slightly different connotations (q.v.)] n. A program which is not invoked explicitly, but which lays dormant waiting for some condition(s) to occur. The idea is that the perpetrator of the condition need not be aware that a daemon is lurking (though often a program will commit an action only because it knows that it will implicitly invoke a daemon). For example, writing a file on the lpt spooler’s directory will invoke the spooling daemon, which prints the file. The advantage is that programs which want (in this example) files printed need not compete for access to the lpt. They simply enter their implicit requests and let the daemon decide what to do with them. Daemons are usually spawned automatically by the system, and may either live forever or be regenerated at intervals. Usage: DAEMON and DEMON (q.v.) are often used interchangeably, but seem to have distinct connotations. DAEMON was introduced to computing by CTSS people (who pronounced it dee’mon) and used it to refer to what is now called a DRAGON or PHANTOM (q.v.). The meaning and pronunciation have drifted, and we think this glossary reflects current usage.

DEMON (dee’mun) n. A portion of a program which is not invoked explicitly, but which lays dormant waiting for some condition(s) to occur. See DAEMON. The distinction is that demons are usually processes within a program, while daemons are usually programs running on an operating system. Demons are particularly common in AI programs. For example, a knowledge manipulation program might implement inference rules as demons. Whenever a new piece of knowledge was added, various demons would activate (which demons depends on the particular piece of data) and would create additional pieces of knowledge by applying their respective inference rules to the original piece. These new pieces could in turn activate more demons as the inferences filtered down through chains of logic. Meanwhile the main program could continue with whatever its primary task was.”

So now one has to wonder, are the agendas of the “DEMON Network” really to help those with dementia? Or, as Professor David Llewellyn implied himself, are they more interested in:

“Dr Megan O’Hare interviews Professor Bart De Strooper and Professor David Llewellyn, discussing the new UK Dementia Research Institute and DEMON Network partnership to unlock the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI).”?

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Tayeb MEZAHDIA from Pixabay