Our Grave Concerns About the Handling of the COVID Pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK

Open letter from several healthcare professions to the UK government/administrators.

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

Mr Boris Johnson, Prime Minister

Ms Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister for Scotland

Mr Mark Drakeford, First Minister for Wales

Mr Paul Givan, First Minister for Northern Ireland

Mr Sajid Javid, Health Secretary

Dr Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer

Dr Patrick Vallance, Chief Scientific Officer

 

22 August 2021

Dear Sirs and Madam,

Our grave concerns about the handling of the COVID pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK.

We write as concerned doctors, nurses, and other allied healthcare professionals with no vested interest in doing so. To the contrary, we face personal risk in relation to our employment for doing so and / or the risk of being personally “smeared” by those who inevitably will not like us speaking out.

We are taking the step of writing this public letter because it has become apparent to us that:

  • The  Government (by which we mean the UK government and three devolved governments/administrations and associated government advisors and agencies such as the CMOs, CSA, SAGE, MHRA, JCVI, Public Health services, Ofcom etc, hereinafter “you” or the “Government”) have based the handling of the COVID pandemic on flawed assumptions.
  • These have been pointed out to you by numerous individuals and organisations.
  • You have failed to engage in dialogue and show no signs of doing so. You have removed from people fundamental rights and altered the fabric of society with little debate in Parliament. No minister responsible for policy has ever appeared in a proper debate with anyone with opposing views on any mainstream media channel.
  • Despite being aware of alternative medical and scientific viewpoints you have failed to ensure an open and full discussion of the pros and cons of alternative ways of managing the pandemic.
  • The pandemic response policies implemented have caused massive, permanent and unnecessary harm to our nation, and must never be repeated.
  • Only by revealing the complete lack of widespread approval among healthcare professionals of your policies will a wider debate be demanded by the public.

In relation to the above, we wish to draw attention to the following points. Supporting references can be provided upon request.

  1. No attempt to measure the harms of lockdown policies

The evidence of disastrous effects of lockdowns on the physical and mental health of the population is there for all to see. The harms are massive, widespread, and long lasting. In particular, the psychological impact on a generation of developing children could be lifelong.

It is for this reason that lockdown policies were never part of any pandemic preparedness plans prior to 2020. In fact, they were expressly not recommended in WHO documents, even for severe respiratory viral pathogens and for that matter neither were border closures, face coverings, and testing of asymptomatic individuals. There has been such an inexplicable absence of consideration of the harms caused by lockdown policy it is difficult to avoid the suspicion that this is willful avoidance.

The introduction of such policies was never accompanied by any sort of risk/benefit analysis. As bad as that is, it is even worse that after the event when plenty of data became available by which the harms could be measured, only perfunctory attention to this aspect of pandemic planning has been afforded. Eminent professionals have repeatedly called for discourse on these health impacts in press-conferences but have been universally ignored.

What is so odd, is that the policies being pursued before mid-March 2020 (self-isolation of the ill and protection of the vulnerable, while otherwise society continued close to normality) were balanced, sensible and reflected the approach established by consensus prior to 2020. No cogent reason was given then for the abrupt change of direction from mid-March 2020 and strikingly none has been put forward at any time since.

  1. Institutional nature of COVID

It was actually clear early on from Italian data that COVID (the disease – as opposed to SARS-Cov-2 infection or exposure) was largely a disease of institutions. Care home residents comprised around half of all deaths, despite making up less than 1% of the population. Hospital infections are the major driver of transmission rates as was the case for both SARS1 and MERS. Transmission was associated with hospital contact in up to 40% of cases in the first wave in Spring 2020 and in 64% in winter 2020/2021.

Severe illness among healthy people below 70 years old did occur (as seen with flu pandemics) but was extremely rare.

Despite this, no early, aggressive and targeted measures were taken to protect care homes; to the contrary, patients were discharged without testing to homes where staff had inadequate PPE, training and information. Many unnecessary deaths were caused as a result.

Preparations for this coming winter, including ensuring sufficient capacity and preventative measures such as ventilation solutions, have not been prioritised.

  1. The exaggerated nature of the threat

Policy appears to have been directed at systematic exaggeration of the number of deaths which can be attributed to COVID. Testing was designed to find every possible ‘case’ rather than focusing on clinically diagnosed infections and the resulting exaggerated case numbers fed through to the death data with large numbers of people dying ‘with COVID’ and not ‘of COVID’ where the disease was the underlying cause of death.

The policy of publishing a daily death figure meant the figure was based entirely on the PCR test result with no input from treating clinicians. By including all deaths within a time period after a positive test, incidental deaths, with but not due to COVID, were not excluded thereby exaggerating the nature of the threat.

Moreover, in headlines reporting the number of deaths, a categorisation by age was not included. The average age of a COVID-labelled death is 81 for men and 84 for women, higher than the average life expectancy when these people were born. This is a highly relevant fact in assessing the societal impact of the pandemic. Death in old age is a natural phenomenon. It cannot be said that a disease primarily affecting the elderly is the same as one which affects all ages, and yet the government’s messaging appears designed to make the public think that everyone is at equal risk.

Doctors were asked to complete death certificates in the knowledge that the deceased’s death had already been recorded as a COVID death by the Government. Since it would be virtually impossible to find evidence categorically ruling out COVID as a contributory factor to death, once recorded as a “COVID death” by the government, it was inevitable that it would be included as a cause on the death certificate. Diagnosing the cause of death is always difficult and the reduction in post mortems will have inevitably resulted in increased inaccuracy. The fact that deaths due to non-COVID causes actually moved into a substantial deficit (compared to average) as COVID-labelled deaths rose (and this was reversed as COVID-labelled deaths fell) is striking evidence of over-attribution of deaths to COVID.

The overall all-cause mortality rate from 2015-2019 was unusually low and yet these figures have been used to compare to 2020 and 2021 mortality figures which has made the increased mortality appear unprecedented. Comparisons with data from earlier years would have demonstrated that the 2020 mortality rate was exceeded in every year prior to 2003 and is unexceptional as a result.

Even now COVID cases and deaths continue to be added to the existing total without proper rigour such that overall totals grow ever larger and exaggerate the threat. No effort has been made to count totals in each winter season separately which is standard practice for every other disease.

You have continued to adopt high-frequency advertising through publishing and broadcast media outlets to add to the impact of “fear messaging”. The cost of this has not been widely published, but government procurement websites reveal it to be immense – hundreds of millions of pounds.

The media and government rhetoric is now moving onto the idea that “Long Covid” is going to cause major morbidity in all age groups including children, without having a discussion of the normality of postviral fatigue which lasts upwards of 6 months. This adds to the public fear of the disease, encouraging vaccination amongst those who are highly unlikely to suffer any adverse effects from COVID.

  1. Active suppression of discussion of early treatment using protocols being successfully deployed elsewhere.

The harm caused by COVID and our response to it should have meant that advances in prophylaxis and therapeutics for COVID were embraced. However, evidence on successful treatments has been ignored or even actively suppressed. For example, a study in Oxford published in February 2021 demonstrated that inhaled Budesonide could reduce hospitalisations by 90% in low risk patients and a publication in April 2021 showed that recovery was faster for high risk patients too. However, this important intervention has not been promoted.

Dr. Tess Lawrie, of the Evidence Based Medical Consultancy in Bath, presented a thorough analysis of the prophylactic and therapeutic benefits of Ivermectin to the government in January 2021. More than 24 randomised trials with 3,400 people have demonstrated a 79-91% reduction in infections and a 27-81% reduction in deaths with Ivermectin.

Many doctors are understandably cautious about possible over-interpretation of the available data for the drugs mentioned above and other treatments, although it is to be noted that no such caution seems to have been applied in relation to the treatment of data around the government’s interventions (eg the effectiveness of lockdowns or masks) when used in support of the government’s agenda.

Whatever one’s view on the merits of these repurposed drugs, it is totally unacceptable that doctors who have attempted to merely open discussion about the potential benefits of early treatments for COVID have been heavily and inexplicably censored. Knowing that early treatments which could reduce the risk of requiring hospitalisation might be available would alter the entire view held by many professionals and lay people alike about the threat posed by COVID, and therefore the risk / benefit ratio for vaccination, especially in younger groups.

  1. Inappropriate and unethical use of behavioural science to generate unwarranted fear.

Propagation of a deliberate fear narrative (confirmed through publicly accessible government documentation) has been disproportionate, harmful and counterproductive. We request that it should cease forthwith.

To give just one example, the government’s face covering policies seem to have been driven by behavioural psychology advice in relation to generating a level of fear necessary for compliance with other policies. Those policies do not appear to have been driven by reason of infection control, because there is no robust evidence showing that wearing a face covering (particularly cloth or standard surgical masks) is effective against transmission of airborne respiratory pathogens such as SARS-Cov-2. Several high profile institutions and individuals are aware of this and have advocated against face coverings during this pandemic only inexplicably to reverse their advice on the basis of no scientific justification of which we are aware. On the other hand there is plenty of evidence suggesting that mask wearing can cause multiple harms, both physical and mental. This has been particularly distressing for the nation’s school children who have been encouraged by government policy and their schools to wear masks for long periods at school.

Finally, the use of face coverings is highly symbolic and thus counterproductive in making people feel safe. Prolonged wearing risks becoming an ingrained safety behaviour, actually preventing people from getting back to normal because they erroneously attribute their safety to the act of mask wearing rather than to the remote risk, for the vast majority of healthy people under 70 years old, of catching the virus and becoming seriously unwell with COVID.

  1. Misunderstanding of the ubiquitous nature of mutations of newly emergent viruses.

The mutation of any novel virus into newer strains – especially when under selection pressure from abnormal restrictions on mixing and vaccination – is normal, unavoidable and not something to be concerned about. Hundreds of thousands of mutations of the original Wuhan strain have already been identified. Chasing down every new emergent variant is counterproductive, harmful and totally unnecessary and there is no convincing evidence that any newly identified variant is any more deadly than the original strain.

Mutant strains appear simultaneously in different countries (by way of ‘convergent evolution’) and the closing of national borders in attempts to prevent variants travelling from one country to another serves no significant infection control purpose and should be abandoned.

  1. Misunderstanding of asymptomatic spread and its use to promote public compliance with restrictions.

It is well-established that asymptomatic spread has never been a major driver of a respiratory disease pandemic and we object to your constant messaging implying this, which should cease forthwith. Never before have we perverted the centuries-old practice of isolating the ill by instead isolating the healthy. Repeated mandates to healthy, asymptomatic people to self-isolate, especially school children, serves no useful purpose and has only contributed to the widespread harms of such policies. In the vast majority of cases healthy people are healthy and cannot transmit the virus and only sick people with symptoms should be isolated.

The government’s claim that one in three people could have the virus has been shown to be mutually inconsistent with the ONS data on prevalence of disease in society, and the sole effect of this messaging appears to have been to generate fear and promote compliance with government restrictions. The government’s messaging to ‘act as if you have the virus’ has also been unnecessarily fear-inducing given that healthy people are extremely unlikely to transmit the virus to others.

The PCR test, widely used to determine the existence of ‘cases’, is now indisputably acknowledged to be unable reliably to detect infectiousness. The test cannot discriminate between those in whom the presence of fragments of genetic material partially matching the virus is either incidental (perhaps because of past infection), or is representative of active infection, or is indicative of infectiousness. Yet, it has been used almost universally without qualification or clinical diagnosis to justify lockdown policies and to quarantine millions of people needlessly at enormous cost to health and well-being and to the country’s economy.

Countries that have removed community restrictions have seen no negative consequences which can be attributed to the easing. Empirical data from many countries demonstrates that the rise and fall in infections is seasonal and not due to restrictions or face coverings. The reason for reduced impact of each successive wave is that: (1) most people have some level of immunity either through prior immunity or immunity acquired through exposure; (2) as is usual with emergent new viruses, mutation of the virus towards strains causing milder disease appears to have occurred. Vaccination may also contribute to this although its durability and level of protection against variants is unclear. 

The government appears to be talking of “learning to live with COVID” while apparently practicing by stealth a “zero COVID” strategy which is futile and ultimately net-harmful.

  1. Mass testing of healthy children

Repeated testing of children to find asymptomatic cases who are unlikely to spread virus, and treating them like some sort of biohazard is harmful, serves no public health purpose and must stop.

During Easter term, an amount equivalent to the cost of building one District General Hospital was spent weekly on testing schoolchildren to find a few thousand positive ‘cases’, none of which was serious as far as we are aware.

Lockdowns are in fact a far greater contributor to child health problems, with record levels of mental illness and soaring levels of non-COVID infections being seen, which some experts consider to be a result of distancing resulting in deconditioning of the immune system.

  1. Vaccination of the entire adult population should never have been a prerequisite for ending restrictions.

Based merely on early “promising” vaccine data, it is clear that the Government decided in summer 2020 to pursue a policy of viral suppression within the entire population until vaccination was available (which was initially stated to be for the vulnerable only, then later changed – without proper debate or rigorous analysis – to the entire adult population).

This decision was taken despite massive harms consequent to continued lockdowns which were either known to you or ought to have been ascertained so as to be considered in the decision making process.

Moreover, a number of principles of good medical practice and previously unimpeachable ethical standards have been breached in relation to the vaccination campaign, meaning that in most cases, whether the consent obtained can be truly regarded as “fully informed” must be in serious doubt:

  • The use of coercion supported by an unprecedented media campaign to persuade the public to be vaccinated, including threats of discrimination, either supported by the law or encouraged socially, for example in co-operation with social media platforms and dating apps.
  • The omission of information permitting individuals to make a fully informed choice, especially in relation to the experimental nature of the vaccine agents, extremely low background COVID risk for most people, known occurrence of short-term side-effects and unknown long-term effects.

Finally, we note that the Government is seriously considering the possibility that these vaccines – which have no associated long-term safety data – could be administered to children on the basis that this might provide some degree of protection to adults. We find that notion an appalling and unethical inversion of the long-accepted duty falling on adults to protect children.

  1. Over-reliance on modeling while ignoring real-world data

Throughout the pandemic, decisions seem to have been taken utilising unvalidated models produced by groups who have what can only be described as a woeful track record, massively overestimating the impact of several previous pandemics.

The decision-making teams appear to have very little clinical input and, as far as is ascertainable, no clinical immunology expertise.

Moreover, the assumptions underlying the modeling have never been adjusted to take into account real-world observations in the UK and other countries.

It is an astonishing admission that, when asked whether collateral harms had been considered by SAGE, the answer given was that it was not in their remit – they were simply asked to minimise COVID impact. That might be forgivable if some other advisory group was constantly studying the harms side of the ledger, yet this seems not to have been the case.

Conclusions

The UK’s approach to COVID has palpably failed. In the apparent desire to protect one vulnerable group – the elderly – the implemented policies have caused widespread collateral and disproportionate harm to many other vulnerable groups, especially children. Moreover your policies have failed in any event to prevent the UK from notching up one of the highest reported death rates from COVID in the world.

Now, despite very high vaccination rates and the currently very low COVID death and hospitalisation rates, policy continues to be aimed at maintaining a population handicapped by extreme fear with restrictions on everyday life prolonging and deepening the policy-derived harms. To give just one example, NHS waiting lists now stand at 5.1m officially, with – according to the previous Health Secretary – a likely further 7m who will require treatment not yet presented. This is unacceptable and must be addressed urgently.

In short, there needs to be a sea change within the Government which must now pay proper attention to those esteemed experts outside its inner circle who are sounding these alarms. As those involved with healthcare, we are committed to our oath to “first do no harm”, and we can no longer stand by in silence observing policies which have imposed a series of supposed “cures” which are in fact far worse than the disease they are supposed to address.

The signatories of this letter call on you, in Government, without further delay to widen the debate over policy, consult openly with groups of scientists, doctors, psychologists and others who share crucial, scientifically-valid and evidence-based alternative views and to do everything in your power to return the country as rapidly as possible to normality with the minimum of further damage to society.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Jonathan Engler, MB ChB LLB (Hons) DipPharmMed

Professor John A Fairclough, BM BS B Med Sci FRCS FFSEM,  Consultant Surgeon, ran vaccination program for a Polio Outbreak, Past President BOSTA, for Orthopaedic Surgeons, Faculty member FFSEM

Mr Tony Hinton, MB ChB, FRCS, FRCS(Oto), Consultant Surgeon

Dr Renee Hoenderkamp, BSc (Hons) MBBS MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr Ros Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician

Mr Malcolm Loudon, MB ChB MD FRCSEd FRCS (Gen Surg) MIHM VR

Dr Geoffrey Maidment, MBBS, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician

Dr Alan Mordue, MB ChB, FFPH (ret), Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine

Mr Colin Natali, BSc(Hons), MBBS FRCS FRCS(Orth), Consultant Spine Surgeon

Dr Helen Westwood, MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner

Click here for the complete list of signatories and if you wish to add your name to the letter.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image: Prime Minister Boris Johnson during a press conference on 16 March, with Chief Medical Officer Prof Chris Witty and Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance. Picture by Andrew Parsons

Ask The Experts (Covid-19 Vaccine) – Now Banned on YouTube and Facebook

Transcript of the “Ask the Experts” video.

brandnewtube.com – Ask The Experts (Covid-19 Vaccine) – Now Banned on YouTube and Facebook

The video above shows many different health care workers, including doctors, nurses, practitioners, medical journalists, researchers, etc. speaking out on the coronavirus/covid-19/vaccine narrative we’re being told everywhere we turn. They speak out against the vaccine, the lockdown measures, even the disease itself.

Because of its importance, I have decided to transcribe the video for those that want to translate this into different languages, or for those that are hard of hearing, or simply for people who prefer to read text as opposed to watching a video.

The below gives a rundown of the times in the video these presenters spoke, their name, their professional history, and the speech they gave.

Message from the creator of the video:

Share. Download. Mirror.

⁣This video is merely a compilation of doctors, scientists and activist who are offering their opinions. IN NO WAY do the views of any individual contributor to this video represent the views of anyone else shown. To confirm, this video contains a wide variety of views, all of which are exclusive to the individual expressing them.

With the rollout of the you-know-what just around the corner, we ask a worldwide panel of experts the question on everybody’s minds #asktheexperts
Produced by Oracle Films
https://oraclefilms.com

In collaboration with Fiona Hine, Founder of CoviLeaks
https://covileaks.co.uk

If you like our videos, please consider donating to help us keep producing content like this: https://paypal.me/oraclefilms

This video can be downloaded and re-uploaded on any non-monetised media channels.

1. 00:06 – 00:46 | Dr. Andrew Kaufman |
Medical Doctor & Forensic Psychiatrist from the USA

“My name is Andrew Kaufman. I’m a medical doctor and board certified forensic psychiatrist. This pandemic is not a real medical pandemic. The covid-19 vaccine is not proven safe or effective, because there’s not been enough time. In addition, there is not a clear definition of any new disease for which it can be tested against. There has not been a virus that has been purified or shown to be the cause of an illness. Thus there is no target for a vaccine. However, the bottom line is that since no additional deaths have occurred in relation to a new disease, there is simply no need for a new vaccine.”

2. 00:47 – 01:50 | Dr. Hilde De Smet |
Medical Doctor from Belgium

“Hi, my name is Hilde de Smet. I’m a Belgium medical doctor and I’d like to say that, the new covid-19 vaccine is not safe and that there is no global medical pandemic. For almost 20 years the pharmaceutical industry has been trying to develop corona vaccines but never managed because they saw in the animal trials that there was serious side effects, autoimmune disorders when the animals was exposed to a new wild type virus. These autoimmune disorders are compatible with the complications we have seen in some covid-19 patients. Now, due to the excuse of a global pandemic, the pharma industry has the permission to skip the animal trials. This means that we humans will be the guinea pigs and we might get severe side effects when we are exposed to new viruses.”

3. 01:50 – 02:12 | Dr. Nils R. Fosse |
Medical Doctor from Norway

“My name is Nils Fosse, I’m a medical doctor in Bergen, Norway. The covid-19 vaccine has not been proven safe and effective. It’s a new technology and it’s been tested on a few thousands of people in a few months. Please do your own research. This is not a real medical pandemic. The death rates in Norway are not higher than on an average year.”

4. 02:12 – 02:52 | Dr. Elizabeth Evans |
Medical Doctor from the UK

“Dr. Elizabeth Evans, retired doctor and co-founder of the UK Medical Freedom Alliance. The covid-19 vaccines are not proven to be safe or effective. We believe that it is reckless and unnecessary to role out these essentially experimental vaccines that are using a completely new mRNA technology to millions of people when there is only limited short-term safety data, no evidence that they will prevent transmission of the virus, and no long-term safety data to rule out late onset negative effects like autoimmune diseases, infertility and cancers.”

5. 02:53 – 03:50 | Dr. Mohammad Adil |
Medical Doctor from the UK

“This is Dr. Mohammad Adil from United Kingdom. I am Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of the UK and Consultant Surgeon. I’ve been working for the National Health Services for the last 30 years with unblemished record. I am chairman of the Global Nishtarian Organization, All Pakistan Medical Association in the UK and recently we have developed World Doctor’s Alliance in collaboration with (uncertain: ‘dozens’ or ‘hundreds’?) of health professionals across the world. Recently we had a very successful webinar which has been viewed by millions of people across the world. I am standing for the cause of the humanity especially in the current situation of the devastating effect due to coronavirus and its restrictions imposed on the public. Many thanks.”

6. 03:50 – 04:37 | Dr. Vernon Coleman |
General Practitioner from the UK

“Doctors aren’t allowed to question covid-19 in public. Material containing the truth about the alleged disease and the vaccine is banned. In the last year, I’ve been demonized and lied about and a 50 year career and reputation trashed by those promoting a pandemic that never was and a vaccine that was never needed. The whole covid-19 scam is as I said in March 2020 the greatest hoax in history. The principle of informed consent is essential in medicine but patients now having vaccines can’t give informed consent because they aren’t being informed. Thank heavens for sites such as BrandNewTube which carry uncensored videos by doctors who have been censored or banned elsewhere.”

7. 04:37 – 05:29 | Prof. Dolores Cahill |
Molecular Biologist and Immunologist from Ireland

“My name is Professor Dolores Cahill, I’m a molecular biologist and immunologist and we have good news – the coronavirus and the lockdown was not as severe as we’re told. We know that we can treat the symptoms of covid-19 very successfully with vitamins D, C and zinc, and with very safe medicines. So therefore, the lockdown and the measures like quarantining, social distancing and masks were not necessary. And also a vaccine is then also not necessary. There has never been a license RNA vaccine and this is not because there have been many clinical trials but that in the safety studies there was significant adverse events and death in the animals that were used in these studies over the past 20 years.”

8. 05:30 – 05:59 | Dr. R. Zac Cox |
Holistic Dentist and Homeopath from UK

“My name is Zac Cox, I’m a holistic dentist and a homeopath. I’m a founder member of the World Doctor’s Alliance. I believe that the pandemic is fundamentally over and was so in the summer. I also firmly believe that there is no long-term safety data on any of the covid vaccines. This means that they are essentially experimenting on us which is against the Nuremberg code. I will not be taking the vaccine.”

9. 05:58 – 06:35 | Dr. Anna Forbes |
Medical Doctor from the UK

“Hello, I’m Dr. Anna Forbes. I’m a UK medical doctor here representing the UK Medical Freedom Alliance. This is a growing body of doctors, scientists, academics, and lawyers. We believe that there has been an overestimation of the public health’s risk from SARS-CoV-2 due to misrepresentation of data and inappropriate use of the PCR test. We call for the preservation of informed consent, medical choice and bodily autonomy. As doctors, we believe this is absolutely crucial to maintain. Thank you.”

10. 06:36 – 07:29 | Dr. Ralf ER Sundberg |
Medical Doctor from Sweden

“I am Ralf Sundberg, MD, PhD, former associate professor in transplant surgery at Karolinska Institute. My opinion of this coronavirus crisis is that the PCR test is inaccurate. It actually causes so many false positives so we’re scared to vaccination and I don’t trust this vaccine.”

11. 07:30 – 08:46 | Dr. Johan Denis |
Medical Doctor and Homeopath from Belgium

“My name is Dr. Johan Denis from Belgium. The corona vaccine is not proven safe or effective. There is no medical emergency. It is a fake pandemic. The coronavirus is in terms of harmfulness, mortality and transmissability comparable to a seasonal flu. And I can only reject the extreme disproportionate measures that are taken by our governments. There is no emergency situation. It was all orchestrated to make you fearful enough to take the vaccine. This vaccine is just not proven safe. It has been developed too quickly. We have no idea what the long-term effect will be. It needs much more investigation. There is no hurry or emergency. It might possibly change your DNA. This is irreversible and irreparable for all future generations. An experiment on humanity. I would never give it to myself, my patients or my loved ones. We are no guinea pigs.”

12. 08:46 – 09:14 | Dr. Daniel Cullum |
Chiropractic Physician from USA

“Hi, I’m Dr. Daniel Cullum, chiropractic physician, from Turpin, Oklahoma USA. This is not a real medical pandemic the world is enduring at this time. The vaccine has not been proven safe or effective and I will not be taking and or recommending it because there is no safe vaccine, period. “

13. 09:14 – 09:26 | Moritz von der Borch |
Medical Journalist from Germany

“My name is Moritz von der Borch. I’m working as a journalist in science and medicine and I’m from Germany. Do not take this vaccine. This vaccine is dangerous. This pandemic is a fraud.”

14. 09:26 – 10:46 | Dr. Anne Fierlafijn |
Medical Doctor from Belgium

“My name is Anne Fierlafijn. I’m a medical doctor from Belgium, specialized in chronic, infectious diseases such as Lyme, Epstein-Barr, molds, etc. The covid-19 vaccine is not proven safe nor effective. And I think it’s unacceptable that all liabilities have been waived for the companies that are producing it. If pharma doesn’t take responsibility for the products they make, how can they expect doctors to inject them to their patients without doubt of doing harm? More and more, we see that this is really not a medical pandemic. The measures for corona cause far more collateral damage than the virus causes itself. Worldwide, we see that the numbers of cases are falsely presented in order to drive the population to obedient behavior and to vaccination. So please be critical. Do your own research and don’t let the media manipulate you. I think it’s time to react, time to stand up for your freedom, for the future of your children. Don’t give in to anxiety, to paralyzation, to governmental control and to restriction of your freedom, all under the false pretext of a virus, because that’s what’s happening.”

15. 10:46 – 11:05 | Dr. Tom Cowan |
Medical Doctor from the USA

“Hi, this is Dr. Tom Cowan and I just want to remind people that we have to remember that health does not come from the injection of toxins into our bodies but rather from deciding what it means to be human and pursuing that with all your heart.”

16. 11:06 – 12:44 | Dr. Kevin P. Corbett |
Retired Nurse and Health Scientist from the UK

“I’m Dr. Kevin Corbett, a retired registered nurse and health scientist in the United Kingdom. The covid vaccines are not proven safe or effective. Covid is not a real, medical epidemic. The vaccines use synthetic products that will alter your genes, allow monitoring of your vaccination status and produce dangerous chemical reactions. Scientists are therefore demanding that all covid vaccinations be immediately stopped. The real epidemic is fear and hysteria. It started in China and quickly spread by the World Health Organization. The hysteria was accelerated by corporations who gain financially through selling fast-tracked, flawed medical tests, toxic anti-viral drugs and now unproven and potentially dangerous vaccines. Standard precautions, which normally protect the public, have been disregarded due to ignorance, hysteria and profits. For example, the vaccines have not undergone proper phase-3 tests. The covid test, the PCR, is fatally flawed. It was never examined in the standard way by the United Kingdom National Health Service and it should never have been used on sick people or those with no symptoms. You can read about the flaws in the PCR test at www.cormandrostenreview.com

17. 12:44 – 14:13 | Dr. Carrie Madej |
Medical Doctor from the USA

“My name is Dr. Carrie Madej. I am an internal medicine physician from the United States of America. I own my own clinic and I’ve been medical director of two different clinics as well as being an attending physician for medical students over the last 19 years. I’m here to tell you that there is no worldwide pandemic for covid-19. We’re using testing mechanisms called PCR that have never been indicated or created to diagnose any infection. This is not the way we should be diagnosing. In addition, hospitals and doctors are getting financial incentives to diagnose covid-19. On top of that, we have multiple lab errors happening around the world over and over indicating more false positives. On top of that, I am here to tell you that I will not take the covid-19 vaccine and I will not recommend the covid-19 vaccine for any of my patients. This vaccine is experimental on the human race because they are proposing to use modified messenger RNA or modified DNA synthetic to the human body. This is the first time ever this will ever be launched on the human race. We don’t know what could happen to us. In addition, they are proposing to use nano lipid technology, or nanotechnology, on the human race as well. There are so many different awful things that can happen to us and we need to investigate this before we go forward. This is my alarm call to the world.”

18. 14:14 – 14:30 | Dr. Barre Lando |
Physician from the USA

“My name is Dr. Barre Lando and I’ve treated many vaccine-damaged children. Due to the lack of proper testing and this spurious condition surrounding the alleged pandemic, I would highly caution anyone considering taking the covid-19 vaccine.”

19. 14:31 – 15:05 | Kate Shemirani |
Natural Nurse from the UK

“I am Kate Shemirani, natural nurse in a toxic world. Do I believe there is a pandemic? Absolutely not. There’s no evidence of that. Do I believe that covid-19 exists? Absolutely not. It has never been proven. Do I believe that the population need this new, covid-19 dangerous vaccine, that’s not had the safety trials done and it hasn’t ever been done before? Absolutely not. No one needs it. Do I believe that our government should be arrested for possibly genocide? Absolutely.”

20. 15:05 – 00:00 | Sandy Lunoe |
Pharmacist from Norway

“My name is Sandy Lunoe, retired pharmacist, and I live in Norway. The covid-19 vaccines are not proven safe or effective. I’ll focus on just two safety issues. The vaccines carry the risk of immune enhancement. Instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus. Secondly, in the UK, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has made an urgent request. Quote: “The MHRA urgently seeks an artificial intelligence software tool to process the expected high volume of covid-19 vaccine adverse drug reations.” “

21. 16:02 – 17:11 | Boris Dragin |
Licensed Acupuncturist from Sweden

“My name is Boris Dragin and I am a licensed acupuncturist based in Sweden. I have been running a private complementary medical clinic for over 40 years. This covid pandemic is NOT a real pandemic!! This is an assault on our Human Rights, our freedom and our societies. You’d have to be completely mad to accept untested experimental vaccine from a criminal manufacturer that rushes its safety programs and profits enormously from pressuring people to take it. And do you really think that there is an insurance company somewhere in the world that would dare to insure such a vaccine? Let our ‘leaders’ and all other proponents of this toxic mix take it.”

22. 17:12 – 17:44 | Dr. Piotr Rubas |
Medical Doctor from Poland

“Hello everybody. My name is Piotr Rubas. I come from Poland. I work as an internist in Germany currently as ______(uncertain). I strongly disagree to getting vaccinated with this experimental preparation called a corona vaccine. Firstly, each and every new vaccine has to undergo a period of clinical trials which is at least 5 years. Secondly, why should I expose my body to something unknown due to the virus which mortality rate is similar to that of seasonal influenza virus?”

23. 17:45 – 17:56 | Dr. Natalia Prego Cancelo |
Medical Doctor from Spain

“The covid-19 vaccine is not proven safe or effective. This is not a real medical pandemic.”

24. 17:57 – 18:24 | Dr. Rashid Buttar |
Medical Doctor from the USA

“I want you to remember that each one of you, every single one of you, independently, is a beacon of light for those around you. So set the example, stand up, continue to fight, continue to speak out. And especially for your children. Let your children see what it means to be free. Allow your children to witness your heroism and that you are willing to stand up and do what’s right regardless of what’s going on around you.”

25. 18:24 – 19:00 | Dr. Nour De San |
Medical Doctor from Norway

“The problem is not the principle of the vaccine, rather the problem is that they want us to believe that it was possible to develop a new vaccine in less than one year against a new disease, using new adjuvant technologies, and to do so on such a very, very large scale. It’s not just the target population that will be vaccinated, they plan to vaccinate nearly every person on Earth. Anyone who has worked on vaccinations, knows that it requires time, so that we are able to collect enough data to ensure its efficacy and safety, and properly understand the long-term effects on our health.”

26. 19:00 – 19:52 | Dr. Kelly Brogan |
Medical Doctor from the USA

“For the better part of the century, vaccination has relied on corrupt science, propaganda and systemic suppression of true, informed consent. With the covid vaccine, we reach an inflection point where the truth is available for all to see. Will you trust gmo, pharmaceutical and 5G subsidizing, eugenicist technocrats with your health? Or will you see through their claims to a transhumanist agenda that aims to dispossess you of trust in your body of any agency around your own life, and even of the fabric of your own humanity? Vaccination is penetration of the body, mind and spirit by the state. The covid-19 vaccine is not proven safe or effective. This is not a real medical pandemic.”

27. 19:52 – 21:15 | Prof. Konstantin Pavlidis |
Metaphysicist from the UK

“My name is Konstantin Pavlidis and I’m a professor of cognitive science, a biomedical researcher, and an integrated health care practitioner in London. I feel that the covid-19 virus is not a real medical pandemic and for this reason the vaccine is being produced is not proven safe or effective because there are 4 stages: the latent, asymptomatic stage, the developmental stage, where there is a manifestation of symptoms, the virus convinces the t-cells that it’s not an invader and that it hacks into the immune system, and finally the 4th stage is the decline of the virus’s presence where it is undetectable by any test and it’s not present in the body liquids. The viral DNA becomes a part of the DNA’s host’s immune cells. So for this reason, no covid tests are truly accurate and no produced vaccine could be accurate as it treats the immune system into reacting as if there is a real viral attack. Well, this triggers monocytes in the attempt to access the immune memory cells. These actions appear as viral symptoms. For example, chronic fatigue, muscular contractions or mental health disorders ranging from depression to suicidal tendencies. And all of these are in fact side effects of the vaccine’s influence.”

28. 21:16 – 22:24 | Dr. Sherri Tenpenny |
Medical Doctor from the USA

“Know that when they developed this, it’s under the umbrella of the 2005 PREP act. They have complete liability protection. You can’t sue them and you have no recourse if this vaccine harms you. They have been trying to develop a coronavirus vaccine since 2002, since we had SARS. And every animal study that they’ve done, particularly the ferrets, the ferret study, which the ferret’s immune system, it most mimics the human, adult immune system – ferret studies, rabbits, and rat studies – all the animals ended up with a paradoxical immune response, in which the antibody levels that were very high actually accelerated the infection; made it much worse and allowed the pieces of the virus to go inside of the cell and be incorporated into the DNA of the recipient of that vaccine by a process called ‘transduction’. That transduction irreversibly puts that virus, snip of virus, into your DNA and transforms your cells.”

29. 22:24 – 24:02 | Senta Depuydt |
Journalist from Belgium

“Hello. I’m Senta Depuydt. I am a freelance journalist and I represent Children’s Health Defense in Europe with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. We want to alert you to the fact that the current covid vaccines are an experimental product, based on the injection of genetic material into our cells. And the risk of using this new technologies on humans and the environment are unknown, while they could have irreversible consequences. In April, the pandemic Accelerator ACT of the European Union allowed vaccine producers to have a free pass for safety. And on July 15, the European Parliament agreed to remove the need of risk evaluation requested under the gmo regulations. That decision was made in 10 days. There were no scientific reports, no hearings in health commission, no debate and no amendments prior to this vote. So Children’s Health Defense Europe has asked for the annulment of this decision in the European Court of Justice, in Luxembourg. Please share this information as it is extremely important to understand that the current covid vaccines are not proven safe. Our legislators have abandoned the principle of precaution by putting blind faith in a dangerous experiment.”

30. 24:02 – 24:50 | Dr. Heiko Santelmann |
Medical Doctor from Germany

“My name is Heiko Santelmann. I am a German medical doctor, now working in Norway. I have been working with general practice for 40 years, doing research for 20 years, the last 10 years especially on vaccines. I have to shout out that this is not a real medical pandemic and the covid-19 vaccine is not proven to be safe or effective. I agree with the British Medical Journal that the testing is not done honestly. They claim 90 percent effect is really only 0.2 percent if you study the results. I wonder, why did Gates and his conspiracy theorists spend billions to develop vaccines that can sterilize men, women and even their unborn children?”

31. 24:51 – 25:33 | Dr. Margareta Griesz-Brisson |
Neurologist from Germany

“Uniform and forceful measures, medical measures, are unethical and cannot be implemented on a defenseless population, neither as tests nor as vaccines. Any medical intervention, testing, treatment or vaccine can only implement it in an ethical and legal way, based on an individual medical consideration, well-informed patient consent and clinical evidence of harmlessness beyond doubt. Thank you.”

32. 25:33 – 26:27 | Dr. Mikael Nordfors |
Medical Doctor from Sweden

“My name is Mikael Nordfors. I’m a medical doctor from Sweden. I’m working with Integrative Medicine and there is no pandemic and the vaccine is neither safe nor effective, and to give untested vaccine to entire humanity and use them as guinea pigs is complete madness and nothing else and we must stop it now. And it’s even more madness to give it to children when children don’t suffer from covid-19, no one had died under the age of 15, in my country so far. And then there is only side effects and risks and costs and that’s a waste of money and waste of human life and safety. Just stop it now. And I also bet that there will never be a vaccine as safe and effective as vitamin D that can reduce mortality between 50 to 95 percent depending on the level of vitamin D you have in your blood. Thank you very much.”

33. 26:27 – 27:20 | Dr. Elke F. de Klerk |
Medical Doctor from Holland

“Hello, I’m Elke de Klerk. I’m a medical doctor from the Netherlands. I have informed myself about the vaccine and I want to tell you about three things. First of all, this vaccine could be sterilizing women and girls. Secondly, this vaccine could cause a viral interference, a priming, and then it could cause a cytokine storm which is very dangerous for your health, for people. This has been seen in humans and animals, animal testing with other corona vaccines. And then thirdly, this vaccine could change your genetic blueprint, your genetic code, your DNA forever and we don’t know what this is going to bring. Thank you very much. Inform yourself, protect yourself, protect your children and look it up. Thank you.”

27:21 – 27:48 | End Credits |

#ASKTHEEXPERTS

 

THANK YOU TO EVERY SINGLE EXPERT BRAVE ENOUGH TO SPEAK OUT

 

SPECIAL THANKS TO
FIONA HINE
COVILEAKS UK
DR. ANDREW KAUFMAN, M.D.

 

ORACLE FILMS

Originally, the videos were uploaded to youtube, but very soon afterwards deleted. The main reason that these main tech platforms give us for deleting different opinions and information, especially due to the coronavirus narrative, is that they want to suppress “misleading” and “false” information. But for those who can look at this in a discerning way… why would all of these doctors and medical professionals lie about the different studies and medicines that they have knowledge about and their own experience with pandemics and vaccines – and in the process, risking their reputation and livelihood to try and expose what they see as a possible propaganda to push the extremely suspicious vaccine on the rest of the public? We have to ask ourselves, why would so many health care workers do this?

On the flip side, ask yourself why this strange new technological vaccine is so important to the global leaders that they want (allegedly) everyone to have? Is it truly because this coronavirus is legitimately out of hand and they are just doing it for the benefit of all humanity? Or is there a different, more dubious reason? (These questions are supposed to be rhetorical, of course, but I really want you to think on this if you’re not on the same page…)

Also, I wanted to say that I admire the people in this video for speaking out on what they see as a possible covert agenda unfolding before our very eyes. It takes honesty, courage, and integrity to stand up and speak the truth when everyone and everything else is trying to lead the population into a different way of thinking.

None of what we’re presented with in the mainstream media adds up, and the things we’re being told by these huge media corporations are being refuted left and right by various different sources (those like the ones in this video who are in the direct line of all these cases), but it is strangely not being covered by these huge media corporations. Instead, those with different opinions (and even facts, in some cases) are being banned, censored, deleted, and even “disputed” and smeared across several news outlets. The example of this video being deleted from youtube is not the only one. Numerous accounts, posts and videos have been banned from not only youtube, but also twitter, facebook, instagram, reddit – the list goes on.

I want to leave readers with this: no matter the agenda of the government, pharmaceutical industries, “global leaders”, even the very people on this video, please do your own research and open up your awareness and look at the bigger picture.

Regardless if this covid situation is or is not what it seems, or whether or not this vaccine is ultimately safe…¬_¬ , it is simply not wise to believe the push that anyone, including the government and other world leaders, huge media corporations, mainstream news, etc. is trying to dictate upon the world. It is strange, unnatural, and the censorship and banning has been at an unprecedented level under what I believe is a guise used to deceive the public as “doing what’s best for us”.

Please stay informed. Bless you all.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

BOMBSHELL: Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds [Full Transcript] - " - it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it's a way for them to know who's vaccinated because their blood will glow."
Studies PROVE That Live Parasites and Parasite Proteins Are Being Used/Tested in Vaccines | Are Parasites the Cause of ALL Illnesses? - At least 650,000 - 800,000 CHILDREN have been injected with a malaria vaccine to test its efficacy.
Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates - Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.
The War on COVID-19: Man’s Final Conquest of Nature. The Great Reset Requires “Merging Humans with the Machine” - "Man's conquest of nature, if the dreams of some scientific planners are realized, means the rule of a few hundreds of men over billions upon billions of men."
Taking a Look Back at the 2012 Olympics London Closing Ceremony: Does it Hold Secrets to What’s Going on in the World? - The world has been blind-sided for centuries, while underhanded organizations operate behind the curtain.
VMAT2 “God Gene” Has Been Studied Extensively Throughout the Years – And is Being Used in CRISPR Studies/Vaccines - According to studies, scientists can manipulate and "tightly experimentally tune" our level of spirituality.