“Year of the Vaccine” – Plandemic in the Making. 2011 Kickstarted a Campaign to Condition the World to Accepting Worldwide Vaccines

Preparedness 101: Getting the world ready for a global vaccination plan.

Making the case for a zombie apocalypse wasn’t as hard as I thought it’d be. And while that post is still in the making, I had to take this moment to comment on something incredibly unnerving and foreboding, especially in light of what’s been going on around us lately, that I found while researching this possible “zombie apocalypse scenario”.

With figureheads such as the CDC (although, who can forget their complete ineptitude, read: complicity, when it comes to the “coronavirus/vaccine pandemic” – or perhaps EVERYTHING in their history…), the U.S. government/military (again, same thing could apply – even if the majority in the agencies don’t realize it), and other organizations, like Amazon, detailing what it would be like in a zombie apocalypse – it wasn’t too difficult to bring these pieces together.

There are allusions to this incredibly alarming and frightening possibility.

However, this post reveals their ultimate goal whether we’re having a zombie apocalypse, or even a thunderstorm watch. It has nothing to do with being “prepared” but is instead a misdirection to promote, what else?

THE VACCINE.

For instance, taking the CDC to task with their Preparedeness 101: Zombie Apocalypse post, which has now been deleted, by the way (linked article is to the web archived version) – after 10 years of being available – which is strange in itself. (Too much feedback? Misunderstandings on what the post was really about? What was the reason they had to delete this article – isn’t publicity what they wanted?)

And yes, while this information has been available for over 10 years, it’s interesting when connecting that to the details of what’s going on today. For an intriguing look, I took a read into their comic book that they created (yes, they even went so far as to making a comic book about an impending zombie apocalypse…), and selected some key choice words to reflect on:

News report: “Stay in your homes. Do not go outside. If you or your family begin showing symptoms such as slowed movement, slurred speech, or violent behaviors, isolate them to a secure area of the house. Stay tuned for more information on where to go… Stay in your…”

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 12)

Dr. Chang: “It appears to be a highly mutated form of the flu. They’ve labeled it Z5N1.”

Dr. Greene: “Interesting… do we know what the source is?”

Dr. Chang: “No sir… the field staff are still trying to investigate where it started. But several of them have now become infected. The zombie virus is spreading rapidly infecting 21 people for every infected person.”

Dr. Greene: “All the more reason to get this vaccine made… and fast!”

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 15/16)

Scientist: “We’re using the same type of vaccine that we use for the seasonal flu… but engineering it to target Z5N1.”

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 18)

News report: “…CDC shipped out its first supply of vaccines against this novel virus that has been ravaging the nation. The first round should reach safe zones as early as this evening…”

Crowd members: “What?!”

Worker: “Hey folks, the vaccines are on their way!”

Julie (one of the main characters):We’re saved?! I can’t believe it!”

Crowd members: “Vaccines?!”

“Yay!!”

Narration: [“While the shelter erupts in cheers, hugs and tears of relief… outside the school’s protective fence, shadowy figures are closing in…”]

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 26)

Keep in mind, this is VERBATIM. I am not changing any of the words or punctuation, or bold print.

Health worker: “Alright folks, listen up… at 0600 we start shipping out the first round of vaccine and supplies to the states…

From there the state health departments will divvy up the supplies and take them to the various points of dispensing.

We’ve got a lot of work to do so don’t expect to get any breaks until everyone has been vaccinated. Now let’s move!”

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 27)

SPOILER ALERT! – The zombie apocalypse scenario was all a dream… based on the spooky scary movie that Todd (main character) watched at the beginning of this comic.

Which obviously begs the question, while the CDC uses this as an example of Emergency Preparedness, even listing a group of items that would be useful in case of emergency, what on EARTH does that have to do with vaccines?

In my opinion, it would have to be obvious to even the most stubborn and hard-headed of people that this whole comic book about “preparedness” was all about endorsing vaccines. Even at the end of the comic, after Todd wakes up from his zombie apocalypse dream, he realizes that a weather emergency truly is on the way and it would be wise to gather important items for an emergency kit.

Even the last page left us with this message:

“We hope you enjoyed reading this fictional story. It’s meant to be both educational and entertaining. Now that you’ve seen the importance of being prepared, take the time to put together an emergency kit with the items included in the checklist on the inside of the back cover. You’ll be ready for any kind of disaster, even zombies.”

So again, I have to ask, what does this have to do with vaccines?

Unless, of course, they’re slyly implying that vaccines will save the day in case of a real zombie apocalypse. Although it would seem, those of us who are astute enough to observe the actions and reactions of the CDC, the W.H.O., NIH, etc. they would most likely BE THE CAUSE of the zombie apocalypse… for the sole reason of introducing a vaccine to us.

If that wasn’t bad enough, on their hurricane guideline article, right after suggesting basic steps to prepare for a hurricane, is the advice to get a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as you can. …

Preparing for a Hurricane

Follow these important hurricane preparedness tips from CDC:

      • Prepare for a hurricane: Take basic steps now to ensure your safety should a storm hit.
      • Get a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as you can. COVID-19 vaccines help protect you from getting sick or severely ill with COVID-19 and may also help protect people around you.
      • Get emergency supplies: Stock your home and your car with supplies. Give yourself more time than usual to prepare your emergency food, water, and medicine supplies. Home delivery is the safest choice for buying disaster supplies; however, that may not be an option for everyone. If in-person shopping is your only choice, take steps to protect your and others’ health when running essential errands.
      • Make a plan: Create a family disaster plan.
      • Prepare to evacuate: Never ignore an evacuation order. Pay attention to local guidance about updated plans for evacuations and shelters, including shelters for your pets.
      • Protect older adults: Understand older adult health and medical concerns.
      • Protect your pets: Ensure your pet’s safety before, during, and after a hurricane.
      • When you check on neighbors and friends, be sure to follow social distancing recommendations (staying at least 6 feet from others) and other CDC recommendations to protect yourself and others.

Now, if there really was a deadly disease outbreak (COVID is not – it has been admitted from several agencies that “COVID” is on par with the common cold and seasonal flu in the majority of people) I would be inclined to agree to protect oneself and their friends/family from it, whether there was an imminent hurricane (or zombie apocalypse) coming or not. However, the unusually high efforts to push vaccines so forcefully has made me reassess that vaccines (perhaps all of them) are nothing more than deliberate poison and/or alternative agenda to inject people with a substance(s) that “they”, for some reason, REALLY want to get into us.

Continuing on with the creepy obvious promotion of vaccines, we have the movie Contagion, also about a respiratory illness and – what else?

Vaccines to save the day.

And, in what’s perhaps an incredible coincidence (it’s not), Contagion also came out in 2011, the same year as the CDC comic Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse.

And for your perusal, here are some interesting lines/events from that film as well, as a brief run through:

SPOILERS for the movie Contagion:

[starts out with a woman coughing – turns out that this woman is cheating on her husband – tactic to make people believe that’s how she got sick?]

[then it pans to the words: “KOWLOON HONG KONG population 2.1 million” – this trope is used throughout the film to show us the population of the various different cities that they cover. Interesting that this would be one of the focal points, seeing as how the globalists are obsessed with population control…]

[@~4:35 into the movie, the CDC makes an appearance. Soon after that, we’re introduced to Alan, the “conspiracy theorist“.]

[Mitch Emhoff, the main character, watches as his wife, Beth Emhoff, and stepson dies.]

[Strangely, Geneva Switzerland does not get a population control monitor.]

[@11:50 into the film, the World Health Organization shows up]

CDC Dr. Erin Mears @17:55: “At this point, I think we have to believe that this is respiratory. Maybe fomites too. … It refers to transmission from surfaces. The average person touches their face 2 or 3,000 times a day. … 3-5 times every waking minute. In between, we’re touching doorknobs, water fountains, elevator buttons, and each other. Those things become fomites.

How fast it multiples depends on a variety of factors. The incubation period. How long a person is contagious. Sometimes people can be contagious without even having symptoms.

Dr. Ian Sussman @21:40: “Shows novel characteristics. It appears to be chimeric in origin.”

Alan: “This is a biological weapon.”

[@22:30, the Department of Homeland Security steps in. Shortly after, the CIA is mentioned.]

DHS worker: “Is there any way that someone can weaponize the bird flu? Is that what we’re looking at?”

CDC Dr. Ellis Cheever: “Someone doesn’t have to weaponize the bird flu. The birds are doing that.”

Dr. Hextall @28:25: “We’re getting the same results as Dr. Sussman. We’ve sequenced the virus and determined its origin and we’ve modeled the way it enters the cells of the lung and the brain. And the virus contains both bat and pig sequences.

Somewhere in the world, the wrong pig met up with the wrong bat.

CDC Dr. Ellis Cheever: “You ever seen anything like this before?”

Dr. Hextall: “No. And… it’s still changing. It’s figuring us out faster than we’re figuring it out.”

CDC Dr. Erin Mears @39:14:FEMA can handle food in the basement.” [@40:00 – Minnesota Army National Guard Armory building to be used as an Emergency Operation and Readiness Center]

[@51:50 – Dr. Leonora Orantes (who works at the W.H.O.) gets kidnapped by a Chinese group that is holding her hostage until a cure is ready in order to trade her for the cure for his village]

[@54:30 – Alan, the “conspiracy theoriest” blogger/journalist, is working to convince his viewers that Forsythia (early treatment medicine) will work against the virus.]

Dr. Ellis Cheever @ 55:26: “I mean, we’re just putting healthy people next to sick people and hoping that the healthy people don’t get sick. It’s ridiculous.”

[@58:15 – Panic and chaos erupt as people rush to get the limited supply of Forsythia. Film shows the city decimated with smoke and fire and stores/buildings are destroyed and looted. Editor’s note: clearly depicting a world that the globalists are hoping for in order to justify their “new world order”. ]

[@1:00:55 – Alan is leaving flyers around that say:

THE CDC LIES. THEY COLLABORATE WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES. THERE IS A CURE.  TO EFFECTIVELY TREAT MEV-1. FORSYTHIA IS A NATURAL AND SAFE THERAPY. DON’T LET THE GOVERNMENT MISLEAD YOU IN ORDER TO GAIN A PROFIT. JOIN THE MOVEMENT AND SPREAD THE WORD OF HOPE.]

[@1:03:40 – We are “treated” to a dialogue between the CDC’s Dr. Cheever and CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta, as well as Alan.

Sanjay Gupta: “Alan, today on Twitter you wrote that the truth about this virus is being kept from the world by the CDC, by the World Health Organization, to allow friends of the current administration to benefit from it, both financially and physically.

On your blog, you also wrote that the World Health Organization is somehow in bed with pharmaceutical companies?”

Alan: “Because they are. That’s who stands to gain from this. They’re working hand in glove. And the hand is reaching into our pocket.”

Dr. Cheever: “We’re working very hard to find out where this virus came from. To treat it, and to vaccinate against it if we can.” [Editor’s note: this was not the first time that a vaccine was mentioned in this film]

Dr. Hextall @1:07:58: “It’s mutated. It’s moved into an African HIV/AIDS population.”

Huh. Interesting. It’s almost as if this film is a blue-print for everything that COVID will eventually entail. Again, not a coincidence… Moving on:

Oh, but first, a number that the “elites” love to display, and also tied in with the vaccines:

Still image from the film Contagion (2011)

Dr. Cheever @1:08:30: “I thought you said that once we grow it we can vaccinate against it?”

Dr. Hextall: “We tried using dead virus, combined with several adjuvants to boost immune response.”

Dr. Cheever: “And?”

Dr. Hextall: “No protective antibodies. A lot of dead monkeys.

Now we have to try a live attenuated virus. … The only danger with live virus is the possibility that it will revert to wild type and kill the host.”

Dr. Cheever @1:09:18: “Without a vaccine, we can anticipate that approximately 1 in 12 people on the planet will contract the disease.”

[@1:10:55 – Another chaotic outbreak ensues as a military officer announces they have exhausted their supply of MREs for that day.]

Dr. Cheever @1:15:12: “Well, Homeland Security wants to know if we can put a vaccination in the water supply. Like… fluoride – cure everyone all at once.”

[Dr. Hextall does not answer this question. Says that she is going home.]

[@1:18:10 – The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) is mentioned as the agency to “accelerate approval” of the vaccines which has finally been found by Dr. Hextall]

[@1:22:20 – Alan is arrested for spreading misinformation and impeding the health/government agency’s efforts]

RADM (Rear Admiral) Haggerty @1:22:40: We may never know where this disease came from, but we do know that this vaccine is the result of the courage and perseverance of a remarkable few.”

Mitch Emhoff @1:24:58: It’s gonna start getting normal again.”

[@1:28:30 – Dr. Leonora Orantes is traded for the vaccines for the Chinese village, but it’s revealed that the vaccines are a placebo. Dr. Orantes leaves her “rescuer” – clearly perturbed by the situation.]

[@1:30:00 – Mitch Emhoff shows his vaccination and/or immunity status by a bright orange wrist band with a UPC (Universal Product code) barcode on it in order to get into a mall.]

[@1:30:20 – It is insinuated that Alan, the “conspiracy theorist” journalist made up the early treatment cure for money.
Officer French:
“And now you want to tell people not to get vaccinated when that’s the best chance they got.”]

[@1:35:50 – Shows Dr. Hextall at the CDC lab adding what appears to be the MEV-1 culture to a container that has both the SARS and H1N1 culture.]

[@1:40:25 – Right before the end of the movie, we see a flashback of how the “virus” all started. Starting with a tree which is torn down by the very same company that Beth Emhoff worked at; releasing a group of bats. One of the bats takes a bite out of a banana, which subsequently drops a piece of it into a pig pen. (…I think we can see where this is going…) A pig happens to eat it, which is then selected as the prize token for a restaurant to butcher and serve to its patrons.

While this is happening, the chef, who has just handled raw pork – from obviously the same pig that ate the bat infested banana… – shakes hands with Beth Emhoff after brusquely wiping his hands on his apron.

The end.

Whew. Just when you thought they wouldn’t trace the virus back to bats and/or pigs, this movie managed to do it within the last minute.

As you can see, the whole movie was just one, large propaganda piece to market vaccines as the end all-be-all. Even casting a large shadow on alternative media and other data as a hypocritical means to exploit people at their most vulnerable, while at the same time absolving any government agency of complicity and tying it all back together to bats.

Basically, to sum this movie up in one sentence, “A multi-million dollar, 1 hour and 45 minute promotional ad to paint the CDC, WHO, and other government/health agencies as the unsung heroes of our age while peddling the vaccines as the savior of mankind.”

One can, of course, argue that they were going for realism, and since Mr. Sanjay Gupta also had a cameo appearance in this film, I feel it prudent to once again bring up his interview with Mr. Bill Gates, ALSO CONDUCTED IN 2011, talking about the Year of the Vaccines, which would be 2021 – according to this snippet:

Sanjay Gupta: “10 billion dollars over the next ten years to make it the year of the vaccines… what, what does that mean exactly?

Bill Gates: “Well, over this decade, uh, we believe unbelievable progress can be made, both inventing new vaccines and making sure they get out to all the children who need them. Uh, we can cut the number of children who die every year from about 9 million to half of that uh, if we have success on it. The benefits are in terms of reducing sickness, reducing the population growth; it really allows a society a chance to take care of itself, uh, once you’ve made the intervention.

“Realism” indeed. Or planned out specifically to condition people to accepting a worldwide vaccine.

And because I watched the WHOLE movie (much to my chagrin), credits included, I noticed this little addition: “IN ASSOCIATION WITH PARTICIPANT MEDIA“. [Los Angeles, California-based film production company founded in 2004 by Jeffrey Skoll, dedicated to entertainment intended to spur social change. – wiki]

And who funds/grants Participant Media?

Screenshot image @gatesfoundation.org

Oh Bill Gates. You never let us down.

There was also special thanks to the CDC, the United States Department of Defense, and California/Illinois/Georgia National Guards.

They also have this lovely warning: “IT’S NOT IF, BUT WHEN.

And to make matters even worse, a 2011 Forbes article titled “With Vaccines, Bill Gates Changes the World Again“, used the following for its web address: [ https://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2011/11/02/the-second-coming-of-bill-gates/?sh=692eb8dc13fd ]

(No. Just, no.)

Some interesting information and opinion pieces from that article:

GAVI set out to do things differently in two ways. First, buy-in: It forced ­developing countries to cofinance vaccination programs, even at the nominal amount of 20 cents a dose. And second, accountability: It required clear record-keeping to ensure the vaccines were getting to children and to establish a sustainable delivery system.

“The blogosphere still expels dark plumes of “I Hate Bill Gates” posts and websites, accusing him of bilking taxpayers because Seattle granted him free land to build the new campus or spreading autism through vaccines (now a widely discredited theory) or of playing God through his foundation. Some clinicians criticize him, wistfully, for fixating on vaccines to the exclusion of other medical causes. But for someone once pilloried as the Antichrist of technology, a brutal monopolist who strangled innovation, this generosity—less of the heart than the head—has made him a saint among those most familiar with his efforts.”

With Vaccines, Bill Gates Changes The World Again (November 2, 2011)

Quite a mixture of words there.

The adulation aside, which is overflowing in the article, there is, of course, the efforts to ridicule any dissenting opinion (or even facts) about vaccine efficacy.

With all of that being said, even if one doesn’t believe that these health agencies and “philanthropists” and government bodies are intentionally doing something drastic to humanity, there has to be SOMEthing within them that is telling them that something is not right with what’s been going on; especially now during the “COVID pandemic”.

There are more and more data showing that the very same agencies that are supposed to be helping to heal people, are in fact introducing the illness to us, in whatever way they can – perhaps through the air, water, foods, flu shots or other injections, drugs, EMF, radiation, etc., and that these vaccines, for whatever reason, are their main goal.

These plans have been decades in the making. We must develop our awareness and knowledge about these attempts, and make informed decisions based on this data. People’s continuous refusal to acknowledge that there are sinister goals of those in high positions throughout several institutions are falling into the trap of “disbelief” and labeling everything as a “conspiracy theory”, just as the C.I.A. has promulgated into society. And because of this disbelief, they are deceived and taken advantage of.

There are conspiracies going on in the world. And sadly, they’re not just theories.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Johaehn from Pixabay

The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability”

“The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection.”

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca

Original article written by Dr. Joseph Mercola and Alix Mayer
on Mercola 9 January 2022

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @globalresearch_crg.

***

The reason our children are being targeted by COVID mandates is because vaccine makers want to get the shots onto the childhood vaccination schedule.

Once a vaccine is added to the childhood schedule, the vaccine maker is shielded from financial liability for injuries, unless the manufacturer knows about vaccine safety issues and withholds that information

Products must satisfy four criteria in order to get emergency use authorization:

    1. There must be an emergency;
    2. a vaccine must be at least 30% to 50% effective;
    3. the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product;
    4. and there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). Unless all four criteria are met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained

According to a U.S. federal court decision, the Pfizer shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are not interchangeable

Comirnaty is not fully approved and licensed. It’s only “ready for approval.” Comirnaty is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not yet available in the United States. They’re waiting for it to be added to the childhood vaccination schedule, to get the liability shield

*


In this interview, Alix Mayer explains why our children are being so aggressively targeted for the COVID-19 injection even though they’re not at risk of serious SARS-CoV-2 infection, and clarifies the status of Comirnaty.

Mayer, board president of Children’s Health Defense — California Chapter, is herself vaccine injured; not from the COVID jab, but from a series of vaccines she received 20 years ago. (Incidentally, Mayer grew up in the Oscar Mayer family in the 5th generation descended from the original Oscar Mayer, a German immigrant who started as a butcher boy. Despite Mayer’s vaccine injury, her family does not share her views on vaccine safety issues.)

Mayer graduated from Duke University with a BA and from Northwestern University with an MBA in finance and management strategy. She worked for Apple in the mid-1990s. When she was 29, Apple promoted her to acting manager of worldwide customer research.

In preparation for a family trip to Bali, her doctor recommended getting six vaccines: hepatitis A vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, diphtheria, tetanus, polio and oral typhoid, which she did. Eventually, 13 years later, she finally realized it was these shots that triggered her health problems.

“They gave me brain damage and total disability,” she says. “I spent three years in my early 30s being 80% housebound, and I really I didn’t know if I was ever going to get better.

I went through a whole bunch of diagnoses: lupus, chronic fatigue syndrome, Lyme disease. Ultimately, none of those made sense and none of the treatments made me any better, until we put the pieces together and figured out that I was actually vaccine injured.

It’s literally just a cause and effect. If you look back at my history and lay out my vaccine schedule, you can see that my health declined two weeks after I got the vaccines.

I had encephalitis and encephalopathy … digestive issues, hypersomnia — sleeping 16 hours a day — flu-like symptoms, a 24/7 migraine, joint pain. I really had no life at all in my early 30s until I went on a gluten-free diet. That started my health recovery.

I then became an award-winning medical journalist with a bunch of different blogs, and then a health consultant. In 2018, I retired from all that and joined Children’s Health Defense.”

The COVID Jab Tragedy

While many vaccines have a questionable safety profile, especially when combined, data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) suggest there’s never been a vaccine as dangerous as the experimental mRNA gene transfer injections for COVID.

What’s more, while lack of transparency and accountability has been a chronic problem within the vaccine industry, the obvious hazards associated with vaccines are really being highlighted by the COVID jabs.

Many now know of someone who has been injured by the COVID jab, and most were injured so shortly after the shot that it’s hard to deny a correlation. The staggering number of injuries reported among adults who have received the COVID shot in turn highlights the insanity of rolling it out to young children.

According to Mayer, the reason they’re trying to mandate the COVID shot for children is to evade liability for injuries, because once a vaccine is on the childhood vaccination schedule, vaccine makers have immunity against lawsuits for injuries.

Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability

The COVID shots currently have legal immunity against liability because they’re still under emergency use authorization (EUA). If you think BioNTech’s Comirnaty has been fully licensed, you’d be mistaken. Mayer explains:

“I put together a slide deck about Emergency Use Authorization (which you can see in the video interview above) because there is so much confusion over this and what’s really going on. Once you understand the genesis of EUA and the standards they have to meet in order to keep these products on the market, then you understand the behaviors [we’re now seeing].

They’re falling all over themselves to protect the EUAs for these products and also introduce other very confusing kinds of approval to get away with stuff. So, let me just start to clarify it right now.

This presentation is all about these three strangleholds that the vaccine makers and our government are never going to let go of … These are the things they’re guarding with their lives.

First of all, they need to guard the emergency … so they cannot have any early treatments. Those cannot exist. They’re also going for full liability protection, and children will be used as pawns to get them full liability protection.

Vaccine makers love EUA products because they have this huge liability shield. If you’re injured by an EUA vaccine, you can’t sue the manufacturer, you can’t sue the person who gave it to you, you can’t sue the institution where you got the shot.

You have to go through something called the CICP, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, where they’ll only cover unpaid medical expenses, and probably only for pharmaceuticals and lost wages.

Now, if you’re vaccine injured, let me tell you right now, you are not going to be using pharmaceuticals because they do not work for vaccine injury. They will make you sicker. You’ll be on two dozen pharmaceuticals before you know it and you’re going to be sick from those. They do not work. The only thing that’s going to get you better if you’re vaccine injured is natural treatments …

That’s the kind of treatment you’re going to need, and that’s not even covered, even if you were to get compensation. Everybody I know with chronic illness, whether it’s a child or an adult who has chronic fatigue syndrome, vaccine injury, Lyme disease, they’re paying $50,000 out of pocket per year.

If you can’t work and you have to pay for your treatment out of pocket, I don’t know how you ever get by. People suffer like crazy, they lose homes, they go into bankruptcy.”

Since its inception, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which pays for injuries caused by vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule, has paid out about one-third of claims. It’s a long, arduous process that oftentimes takes years and in the end rarely provides adequate compensation.

“If you do end up getting compensation … they don’t pay it out in one lump sum, they pay it out year by year, and they pretty much hope that whoever is injured is actually going to die of their injuries before they get compensated.

That’s been said to me a bunch of times by people who’ve been through this horrible process. Now, the CICP has only compensated 3% of claims. And so far, there have been no approvals for [compensation] for COVID shot injuries,” Mayer says. [Editor’s note: The first COVID case was recently determined “eligible” for compensation, but the case has not yet been adjudicated.1]

Stages of Liability: EUA

In her slide show, Mayer reviews each of the stages of product liability, and whether the mRNA shots can be mandated. As mentioned, vaccine makers have no liability as long as their product is under EUA, as the product is investigational.

“Investigational is a synonym for experimental,” Mayer says. “And the word experimental ties it directly into the Nuremberg Code, which says that we cannot be experimented on [without consent]. We always have the right to accept or refuse a medical treatment.

[The Nuremberg Code] is not a law, but it’s a code under which the whole world is supposed to be operating by. And it is actually codified into some local and federal laws as well … So, what everybody needs to know is that coercion and duress are considered de facto mandates and illegal. De facto means that it’s basically the same as an outright mandate.

It’s illegal medical segregation, medical apartheid [because that is a form of coercion or duress.] So, if you go to a restaurant and they demand your vaccine passport, only let you eat outside, and they might not let you use the bathroom, that’s medical segregation.

That is illegal and I do not support businesses that do that and you shouldn’t either. Any access privileges that are different between the vaccinated and unvaccinated are illegal, and any visual indication of vaccine status like a sticker or a bracelet … that’s also illegal because that creates segregation and medical apartheid, [since they are all forms of coercion or duress.]”

Importantly, mass violation of the law does not make something legal.

“If we all drove 100 miles an hour on Interstate 80, would we watch the speed limit signs suddenly changed to 100 miles per hour? No, it’s not going to happen. Mass violation of the law has never made anything legal. And just because schools and businesses and our government are mandating these shots, it doesn’t make it legal. It’s all illegal …

Now, they know full well that it’s illegal to mandate these [COVID shots]. President Biden knows it’s illegal. But what they’re counting on is that the court cases overturning their illegal mandates will take a while, and in that interim, people are going to be scared enough to get the shots. And unfortunately, it’s worked.”

Stages of Liability: Full Licensure and Childhood Scheduling

The next stage is full licensure (FDA approval). Once a product is fully licensed, the company becomes liable for injuries. At that point, the product can be legally mandated. Of course, knowing how dangerous the COVID shots are, no manufacturer wants to be financially liable for injuries. They’d be sued out of business.

This is the holy grail if you’re a manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule. ~ Alix Mayer

To get immunity against liability again, the vaccine manufacturers need to get their product onto the childhood vaccination schedule. This will also allow government to mandate the shots. As noted by Mayer:

“This is the holy grail if you’re a vaccine manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put it on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule.”

DOJ Redefines Medical ‘Consequence’

In Doe v. Rumsfeld,2 the court held that service members could refuse an EUA product without punitive consequences such as dishonorable discharge or other punishments. Therefore, there were no consequences to refusing an EUA product, other than the natural consequence of possibly getting the disease.

However, in July 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice attempted to redefine the term “consequences” just for the COVID shot, to suggest that punitive consequences, like job loss or being separated from your working or learning location, are legal when a person refuses an EUA vaccine.

“But this type of consequence, a punitive consequence, has never been adjudicated,” Mayer says. “That’s not in any law. This is just an opinion from the DOJ. And it absolutely means nothing, except it came from our DOJ, so people give it a lot of authority.

They also stated twice — and this is so hard to understand because it’s just beyond reason — that the right to accept or refuse an EUA product is ‘purely informational.’

Literally, you can read that you could die by taking it, but it’s purely informational. You cannot act on it. That’s what the DOJ says. Again, it’s not adjudicated, so it doesn’t mean anything. It’s an opinion. It holds no legal weight at all. So, as we said before, these mandates are starting to be overturned.”

Four Standards for EUA

There are four standards that must be fulfilled for an EUA. If any of these criteria are not met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained. First, the secretary of Health and Human Services has to declare and maintain a state of emergency. If the emergency were to go away, all EUA products would have to come off the market. And that doesn’t just mean vaccines. It also includes the PCR tests and even surgical masks.

The second standard is evidence of effectiveness. Historically, vaccines had to show a 70% or greater effectiveness, as measured by a fourfold increase in antibody levels, in order to qualify. For an EUA vaccine, the efficacy threshold is only 30% to 50%. In another departure from prior vaccine approvals, the COVID vaccine clinical trials relied on the RT-PCR test, not antibodies, to demonstrate effectiveness in the small “challenge phase” of the trials.

Now, you probably heard that the Pfizer shot was 95% effective when it first rolled out, but that was relative risk reduction, not absolute risk reduction. Confounding these two parameters is a common strategy used to make a product sound far better than it actually is. The absolute risk reduction for Pfizer’s shot was just 0.84%.3

For example, if a study divided people into two groups of 1,000 and two people in the group who didn’t get a fictional vaccine got infected, while only one in the vaccinated group got infected, the relative risk reduction would be reported as 100%. In terms of absolute risk reduction, the fictional vaccine only prevented 1 in 1,000 from getting the infection — a very poor absolute risk reduction.

The take-home message here is that even though the minimal threshold for effectiveness is ludicrously low, in terms of absolute risk reduction, these shots still don’t measure up. Within six months, even the relative risk reduction bottoms out at zero. What’s more, there’s evidence that the clinical trials were manipulated as well.

“I remember an analysis very early in lockdowns [that showed] if you added back all the probable cases of COVID to the clinical trial [data], the effectiveness went from 90% to between 19% and 29%,”4 Mayer says.

The third standard is that the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. In the case of COVID shots, there’s overwhelming evidence showing they do more harm than good.

The fourth and last standard that must be met is there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). “This is why hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were quashed,” Mayer says. This is also another reason Comirnaty is not treated as a fully approved product in the U.S., because if it were, then all the other COVID shots that are under EUA would have to be removed from the market.

“This is a four-legged stool,” Mayer says. “If any one of these legs goes away, you have to take your EUA products off the market … by law. I put [state of] emergency and [treatment] alternatives in red, because those are two of the things that they have a stranglehold on; those are things they are guarding like crazy.

This means that every variant that comes out, they have to make it sound super scary to keep the emergency going. So, the variants serve a purpose. You have to think about these variants in the context of this crime, where they have to keep the emergency going to keep their products on the market.

You would think this emergency would stop maybe when we get to herd immunity, maybe if we get 90% vaccination uptake, maybe COVID is just going to go away, like smallpox did in the early 1900s [even though] only 5% of people were vaccinated. [But it won’t] go away [until] the shots get full approval and the manufacturers get a full liability shield.”

Comirnaty’s Quasi Approval

With regard to Comirnaty, is it or is it not fully approved and licensed? The answer is more complex than a simple yes or no. Mayer explains:

“Comirnaty’s quasi approval is just for BioNTech. It doesn’t have to do with Pfizer, and this is why I’m doing this presentation because I’m going to explain what’s going on with that.

This is the race to get liability protection. Remember, that’s the other stranglehold that they want. They really want to get this liability protection. Once the COVID shots are fully approved, the manufacturer has full liability.

There’s all this confusion about Comirnaty. Was it fully approved? Is it on the market? Is it interchangeable with the Pfizer shot? And does it make the COVID shot mandate legal? It’s all the same answer. No, no, no, no.

The FDA issued an intentionally confusing biological license application approval for Comirnaty. It was an unprecedented approval to both license the Comirnaty shot, saying it’s ‘interchangeable’ with the Pfizer shot. But they also said it’s ‘legally distinct.’

In that same approval, they retain the vaccine’s liability shield by designating it EUA as well. They want it to be fully approved, but they want the liability protection, so they did this BS dual approval.

So, [Comirnaty] is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not available in the United States. It’s available in the U.K., New Zealand and other places, but it is not available in the United States because they’re really scared of liability.

Now, are you ready for this one? The BLA actually states that Comirnaty is only ‘ready for approval.’5 It doesn’t say it’s approved anywhere in the document. And they buried this language in a pediatric section to confuse people even more.

Here’s what they said; ‘We’re deferring submission of your pediatric studies for ages younger than 16. For this application, because this product is ready for approval for use in individuals 16 years of age and older, as pediatric studies for younger ages have not been completed.’

Why did they do this? Sixteen is a very important number. You would think the age break would be 18. That’s a very typical age break for everything else that we do in this country. Why 16?

The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection. That’s why this is ready to be approved for 16 and up, not 18 and up.”

Comirnaty Is Not Fully Licensed

This confusion is clearly intentional. On the one hand, the FDA claims Comirnaty is interchangeable with the Pfizer shot, yet it’s also legally distinct. Courts have had to weigh in on the matter, and a federal judge recently rejected the DoD claim that the two shots are interchangeable. They’re not interchangeable. That means Comirnaty vaccine is still EUA. It doesn’t have full approval and it’s not on the market.

“Military members involved in lawsuits are challenging the military’s COVID vaccine mandate. They filed an amended complaint seeking a new injunction after the judge last month rejected the assertion that the Pfizer COVID shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are interchangeable. So, we’re still hammering on this legally, but a court has ruled that they’re not interchangeable.

[Editor’s note: This information is accurate at the time of the interview, but legal challenges are ongoing and courts may issue new rulings. December 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court announced6 it has slated January 7, 2022, to hear arguments challenging Biden’s vaccine and testing mandates.]

So, how do we know that Comirnaty is not being treated as fully approved? First, the approval states you have the right to accept or refuse the product. That means it’s an EUA. Second, it’s not available in the U.S. because Comirnaty doesn’t have liability protection. Third, if it were available, it’s an alternative [treatment] and all other EUA shots would have to come off the market.

No. 4, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) would have to recommend it for ages 16 to 18 and the CDC would have added it to the children’s recommended schedule. That’s how we know it’s not fully approved and on the market.

Here is the label for Comirnaty. It says it’s emergency use authorization. It doesn’t say it’s fully approved, because it’s not. But look at the safety information they are recognizing: Myocarditis and pericarditis have occurred in some people who’ve received the vaccine, more commonly in males under 40 years of age than among females and older males.

So, this is saying that young men are getting heart inflammation. And what we know from all the anecdotal reports is 300 athletes have died or collapsed on the field, and children in schools have died of heart attacks. That’s what’s going on here.

And the reason they have to declare this is because they know it. They know it’s happening. And the only way they can be sued is if they know there’s a problem with their vaccine and they don’t declare it. So, they declare it here, in very mild language as if it’s not that big of a deal, but it’s a very big deal. Young people are dying [from the shots] who have a 99.9973% chance of recovering from COVID …

The holy grail is to get the shot on the CDC recommended schedule for children, because then it gets full liability protection according to the 1986 Act. This is why they’re going after our children when they have a 99.9973% recovery rate …

Every medical intervention is a risk benefit equation, and it doesn’t calculate for kids at all. They should never be getting COVID shots. The shots don’t prevent transmission. They don’t prevent cases. They don’t prevent hospitalization or death.”

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Notes

1 Reuters October 19, 2021

2 Biotech Law December 22, 2003

3 Maryannedemasi.com November 11, 2021

4 The BMJ Opinion

5 FDA BioNTech BLA Approval

6 USA Today December 22, 2021

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS:

How egregious that the big pharmaceutical companies are trying to use children as a liability shield to protect their criminal organization. Even worse, however, are the governments/politicians and health officials/institutions that are letting them. No amount of “contracts” should ever protect criminal activity, which is what we’re seeing right now in what is quite possibly the largest racketeering scandal in the history of humankind.

(And in my opinion, this isn’t even covering the ACTUAL REAL reason that they want to vaccinate children so much. This is only the watered-down, “scientific”, realistic version…)

Any documents/legal dealings (keyword here: LEGAL – although, what does that matter when corrupt enterprises are able to re-define terms according to their purpose?) and NDA’s should automatically become null and void if there is fraudulent activity happening.

However, when those “in charge” are allowed to investigate themselves, they, of course, end up finding no wrong-doing. And when there are multiple conflicts of interest, all for the purpose of financial bribery and protecting each other, there needs to be effective systems in place to address this obvious malfeasance.

It would seem, the “law” (and even us, everyday/ordinary people) literally needs to take matters into its own hands, and stop catering to enforcing illegal mandates and nonsensical “policies”. When will they go after the REAL criminals, instead of innocent civilians who are simply trying to defend not only their rights and freedoms, but everyone else’s as well? Including law enforcement?

We all need to pick our side in history. Let’s hope we’re picking the right one.

Prominent US Hospitals Drop Vax Mandates after Massive Shortage of Key Staff

“thousands of nurses have left the industry or lost their jobs rather than get vaccinated” for COVID-19.

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca
Original article written by Ashley Sadler / LifeSiteNews (December 13, 2021)

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

Major hospital systems have had to reevaluate their coercive COVID-19 jab policies after crucial employees, especially nurses, have opted to quit rather than get the experimental injections.

Facing serious staffing shortages, some of the largest and most prominent hospital systems in the United States, including HCA Healthcare Inc., Tenet Healthcare Corp., AdventHealth, and Cleveland Clinic have been forced to backpedal on their COVID-19 jab mandates in hopes of retaining crucial employees, The Wall Street Journal reported Monday

Townhall reported that University Hospitals in the Cleveland, Ohio area also recently announced the reversal of its jab mandate for hospital workers.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the major hospital systems have been forced to reevaluate their coercive COVID-19 jab policies after needed healthcare industry employees, especially nurses, chose to quit rather than get the experimental injections.

 

“Vaccine mandates have been a factor constraining the supply of healthcare workers, according to hospital executives, public-health authorities and nursing groups,” the report noted, adding that “thousands of nurses have left the industry or lost their jobs rather than get vaccinated” for COVID-19.

The Journal cited the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in reporting that as of September, unvaccinated employees accounted for a massive 30% of workers employed by over 2,000 U.S. hospitals.

Many people, including healthcare professionals, have been skeptical of the push toward mass immunization. The CDC reports an infection survival rate of greater than 99.95% for those under age 50. Meanwhile, the list of FDA-recognized adverse events has grown from severe anaphylactic reactions to include fatal thrombotic events, the inflammatory heart condition myocarditis, and neurologically disabling disease like Guillain Barré Syndrome, as well as thousands of recorded deaths and permanent disabilities.

The staggering percentage of healthcare workers who have refused to comply with the jab requirements imposed by their hospital systems — many of whom are vitally necessary nursing personnel — could have a crippling effect on America’s hospitals if the establishments move to fire all noncompliant workers.

Recognizing this dilemma, an employee-benefits lawyer has suggested that hospitals that don’t mandate the jabs could see an influx of interested applicants fleeing hospitals with more coercive policies.

“It’s been a mass exodus, and a lot of people in the healthcare industry are willing to go and shop around,” Wade Symons, head of the consulting firm Mercer’s U.S. regulatory practice, told the Journal.

News of the major hospital systems dropping their injection mandates comes after a federal judge in Louisiana blocked the Biden administration’s top-down federal COVID-19 jab mandate for healthcare workers that would have impacted at least 10 million Americans.

The judge’s late-November decision was in response to President Joe Biden’s September 9 announcement of a series of vaccine mandates for public and private sectors, including one with no testing option for millions of healthcare workers employed by medical facilities that receive Medicare and Medicaid funding.

 

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has subsequently announced it will temporarily halt enforcement of its healthcare worker mandate pending appeal of a federal injunction blocking the measure.

“I don’t think the mandates were helpful and I think the court in Louisiana did everyone a service,” Alan Levine, chief executive officer of Ballad Health, told The Journal. 

Levine, who told the newspaper his company employs about 14,000 people, of whom roughly 2,000 have opted not to get the shot, said firing “[t]hat many people … would have been devastating to our system.”

Before the Louisiana judge blocked the mandate, at least 22 states had joined a duo of joint lawsuits against the Biden administration over the rule.

States, companies, and private individuals have filed a raft of lawsuits taking issue not only with the mandate for healthcare workers but also the mandate for federal contractors and another for businesses with 100 or more employees.

In early November, a federal court blocked the mandate for large businesses, just two days after it was published. The mandate would have used the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to impose massive fines on noncompliant companies and individuals for failing to get the experimental shots.

By early December, all three of the Biden administration’s private sector jab mandates were stalled by federal judges.

 

The latest mandate to be blocked was halted December 7 by a federal judge who sided with South Carolina’s attorney general and Republican governor and stopped the Biden administration’s COVID-19 jab mandate for federal contractors, freezing the requirement nationwide and marking the third federal injection mandate to be blocked across all 50 states.

A shift in public policy toward the reversal of coercive jab mandates comes as many Americans remain concerned that the experimental drugs on the market have not been sufficiently studied for negative effects given their accelerated clinical trials. Many also harbor serious moral reservations about the use of cells from aborted babies in the development of the shots.

Still others simply consider the injections unnecessary given COVID-19’s high survivability among most groups, low risk of asymptomatic spread, and research indicating that post-infection natural immunity is either just as protective against reinfection or provides even greater protection.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image is from Shutterstock