Embalmers are Finding Fibrous, Worm-like Structures in Some of the Vaccinated Individual’s Veins. | Could They be Parasites? Or Something Else Entirely?

What is causing the formation of these strange, unusual tendrils inside human bodies?

UPDATED TO ADD CORRECTION (1/30/2022): Original article stated Richard ‘Hirschner’ but has been corrected to Richard ‘Hirschman’.

During some of my research addressing the possible contents of the vaccine, I have come across some images in an attempt to try and identify multiple different substances – the parasitic-looking materials, for one, morgellons, nanosensors, etc.

And with the most recent bombshell of white, fibrous like structures found in the veins of several vaccinated individuals, courtesy of Richard Hirschman (embalmer and funeral director) and others in his field, has brought this topic back to the forefront of what else, exactly, is this COVID vaccine doing to humanity.

The tragic deaths that have surrounded this injection have been growing more noticeable as even the mainstream media outlets are having a difficult time covering up for these devastating numbers. And as more information is being discovered about these dangerous shots, the question of why it is still being pushed in certain countries remains a mystery.

Unless, of course, it is on purpose.

The video below is the interview between Richard Hirschman and Dr. Jane Ruby which describes his findings in a little bit more detail.

This post and the video below has some GRAPHIC IMAGERY that may be disturbing to some. Please keep this in mind and I apologize in advance for what is possibly controversial images that may provoke visceral reactions.

So when looking at these fibrous textures that Richard Hirschman has uncovered in his attempt to embalm the deceased, the familiarity of it to parasitic organisms was hard to ignore.

Here is a side by side comparison of these white-ish tendrils to just one group of similar looking substances:

Image Credited to: Richard Hirschman / Stew Peters Show / Dr. Jane Ruby
Image credited to: curezone.org

As far as I understand, the image from curezone.org is coming from the stool of the individual after they’ve taken anti-parasitic medicine. And it was taken 14 years ago.

I’d also like to add a disclaimer that I am using this image for educational and research purposes ONLY. Not to shame or offend anyone who is going through something similar. This is an attempt to try and identify what is going inside the human body, with or without the “COVID vaccine”. If anyone has any information as to what these tendrils may be, please comment and help share this information with others.

Now as you can see, both of these images look practically identical. The only difference is that the substances found by Richard Hirschman were recovered from the veins of the individuals he was trying to embalm, while the second image was recovered after a bowel movement.

While they may very well be the same thing, the question still remains on why these organic looking structures are found in the veins/stools to begin with. As Richard Hirschman emphasizes throughout the interview, this is the first time he’s seen anything like this, and has been seeing it growing in numbers – starting during the initial rollout of the COVID “vaccines” in late 2020.

One hypothesis is that the liquid that is being used inside the vials may come from a contaminated source. Say a polluted and/or infected water source. If this is possible, and I’m quite certain it is, (not only because of the ineptitude of these facilities but also the corrupt complicity of the deliberate nature of this agenda…) then it would make sense.

When consuming contaminated water or food, the chances of having gastrointestinal issues increases. As many people have found out, this may cause a parasitic infection in the gut. Using an anti-parasitic drug (like Ivermectin?…) will cause these parasites to get flushed out through the stool.

Now, what happens if the very same contaminated water with these parasitic organisms gets injected directly into the vein?

…Could this be what these embalmers and coroners are seeing?

Of course, this is just one hypothesis. But the similarities are decidedly extremely uncanny. We must also keep in mind that there could be several different experiments going on at once during this COVID injection rollout. And the parasitic infection may just be one of them.

Another hypothesis, and again, this is just speculation based on some scientific literature, and may not be true at all, so please keep this in mind – I am just theorizing – perhaps the parasitic-like organisms are being injected through discreet measures to evade discovery.

For instance, in a number of the publications that I have listed below show, there are attempts by several organizations (big key institutions who are already in the spotlight for unleashing this “COVID” narrative onto humanity), the NIH and DARPA, for example, to be able to inject a drug-delivery mechanism, or even a bacteria/parasite-delivery system into a host through an encapsulation method.

Therefore, even if one were to “analyze” the contents of the vial, a cursory glance at the substances would be unlikely to return something as devastatingly obvious as a fibrous, worm-like construction. And as we can see from the images above, the tendrils are incredibly way too large to be in such a small vial. Unless, of course, it were possible to administer a chemical/organism that would be able to grow after it’s been injected.

This is where the now famous “hydrogel” comes in.

Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds
(July 2012)

This article summarizes the recent progress in the design and synthesis of hydrogels as tissue-engineering scaffolds. Hydrogels are attractive scaffolding materials owing to their highly swollen network structure, ability to encapsulate cells and bioactive molecules, and efficient mass transfer. Various polymers, including natural, synthetic and natural/synthetic hybrid polymers, have been used to make hydrogels via chemical or physical crosslinking. Recently, bioactive synthetic hydrogels have emerged as promising scaffolds because they can provide molecularly tailored biofunctions and adjustable mechanical properties, as well as an extracellular matrix-like microenvironment for cell growth and tissue formation.”

“This insoluble cross-linked structure allows effective immobilization and release of active agents and biomolecules. Owing to their high water content, hydrogels resemble natural soft tissue more than any other type of polymeric biomaterials. Hydrogel materials generally exhibit good biocompatibility and high permeability for oxygen, nutrients and other water-soluble metabolites, making them attractive scaffolds for use in cell encapsulation. Most hydrogel materials are injectable and can be formed via photopolymerization, which can be carried out under mild conditions in the presence of living cells. This allows homogeneous seeding of cells throughout the scaffold materials and formation of hydrogels in situ.”*


*Funded in part by the NIH.

Take note that the above publication (2012) was a progress report of the hydrogel material that’s already being studied during that time.

And not only does it mention “cell encapsulation”, but it also makes other important references: “hydrogels resemble natural soft tissue” / “mass transfer” / “tissue-engineering” / “hydrogel materials are injectable”, and it can be formed through irradiation with light. I also took the initiative to show a brief definition of what photopolymerization is…

Photopolymerization is a light-induced reaction, which converts a liquid or gel monomer into a solid polymer. These reactions require the use of an appropriate photoinitiator, which is a light sensitive molecule that produces an active species upon irradiation with UV, visible, or infrared light.”

Photopolymerization | Surface Coating Processes

Shear-thinning and self-healing hydrogels as injectable therapeutics and for 3D-printing
(August 2017)

“The design of injectable hydrogel systems addresses the growing demand for minimally invasive approaches for local and sustained delivery of therapeutics. We developed a class of hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels that form through noncovalent guest-host interactions, undergo disassembly (shear-thinning) when injected through a syringe and then reassemble within seconds (self-healing) when shear forces are removed. Its unique properties enable the use of this hydrogel system for numerous applications, such as injection in vivo (including with cells and therapeutic molecules) or as a ‘bioink’ in 3D-printing applications.

We furthermore demonstrate how to encapsulate cells in vitro and provide procedures for quantitative assessment of in vivo hydrogel degradation by imaging of fluorescently derivatized materials.”

And in a whopper of a title, we have this study:

Shear-thinning and self-healing nanohybrid alginate-graphene oxide hydrogel based on guest-host assembly.
(March 2021)

The study aims to develop a novel nanohybrid shear-thinning hydrogel with fast gelation, and variable mechanical and biological properties. This nanohybrid hydrogel was developed via self-assembly guest-host interaction between β-cyclodextrin modified alginate (host macromere, Alg-CD) and adamantine modified graphene oxide (guest macromere, Ad-GO) and subsequent ionic crosslinking process.

In conclusion, the nanohybrid Alg-GO hydrogel could be used as an injectable hydrogel for soft tissue engineering applications.

Hydrogel-based biocontainment of bacteria for continuous sensing and computation
(April 2021)

Genetically modified microorganisms (GMMs) can enable a wide range of important applications including environmental sensing and responsive engineered living materials. However, containment of GMMs to prevent environmental escape and satisfy regulatory requirements is a bottleneck for real-world use. While current biochemical strategies restrict unwanted growth of GMMs in the environment, there is a need for deployable physical containment technologies to achieve redundant, multi-layered and robust containment. We developed a hydrogel-based encapsulation system that incorporates a biocompatible multilayer tough shell and an alginate-based core. This deployable physical containment strategy (DEPCOS) allows no detectable GMM escape, bacteria to be protected against environmental insults including antibiotics and low pH, controllable lifespan and easy retrieval of genomically recoded bacteria. To highlight the versatility of DEPCOS, we demonstrated that robustly encapsulated cells can execute useful functions, including performing cell–cell communication with other encapsulated bacteria and sensing heavy metals in water samples from the Charles River.”**

**In the acknowledgments, the NIH, DARPA, University of Pennsylvania and MIT are thanked for their funding of this study.

Interesting that DARPA and co. are investing in studies which allow for GMMs (genetically modified microorganisms) to escape a containment of sorts without being detected, as well as protecting bacteria so that they are resilient against antibiotics… Must I mention the eerie parallels that bacteria have with parasites?

“If bacteria can infect a host, multiply inside the body and eventually spread to another organism, it exhibits the behavior of a parasite. Many bacterial diseases do this.”

What Types of Bacteria Are Parasites?

There are also studies detailing how useful hydrogel is when attempting to connect electricity/machines/computing interfaces with living beings – such as humans; giving credence to the theories that hydrogel will be one of the key catalysts to propel us into the 4th Industrial Revolution. And it doesn’t help when one of these studies directly links it to being an important platform for the Internet-of-Things capabilities.

Hydrogel bioelectronics
(March 2019)

“Bioelectronic interfacing with the human body including electrical stimulation and recording of neural activities is the basis of the rapidly growing field of neural science and engineering, diagnostics, therapy, and wearable and implantable devices. Owing to intrinsic dissimilarities between soft, wet, and living biological tissues and rigid, dry, and synthetic electronic systems, the development of more compatible, effective, and stable interfaces between these two different realms has been one of the most daunting challenges in science and technology. Recently, hydrogels have emerged as a promising material candidate for the next-generation bioelectronic interfaces, due to their similarities to biological tissues and versatility in electrical, mechanical, and biofunctional engineering. In this review, we discuss (i) the fundamental mechanisms of tissue-electrode interactions, (ii) hydrogels’ unique advantages in bioelectrical interfacing with the human body, (iii) the recent progress in hydrogel developments for bioelectronics, and (iv) rational guidelines for the design of future hydrogel bioelectronics. Advances in hydrogel bioelectronics will usher unprecedented opportunities toward ever-close integration of biology and electronics, potentially blurring the boundary between humans and machines.”

Ultrastretchable and Wireless Bioelectronics Based on All-Hydrogel Microfluidics
(August 2019)

Hydrogel bioelectronics that can interface biological tissues and flexible electronics is at the core of the growing field of healthcare monitoring, smart drug systems, and wearable and implantable devices. Here, a simple strategy is demonstrated to prototype all-hydrogel bioelectronics with embedded arbitrary conductive networks using tough hydrogels and liquid metal. Due to their excellent stretchability, the resultant all-hydrogel bioelectronics exhibits stable electrochemical properties at large tensile stretch and various modes of deformation. The potential of fabricated all-hydrogel bioelectronics is demonstrated as wearable strain sensors, cardiac patches, and near-field communication (NFC) devices for monitoring various physiological conditions wirelessly. The presented simple platform paves the way of implantable hydrogel electronics for Internet-of-Things and tissue-machine interfacing applications.”

Anyone who is saying that “they” are not attempting to merge humans with machines is not doing their homework.

Hydrogel facilitated bioelectronic integration
(January 2021)

“Hydrogels represent a unique category of materials to bridge the gap between biological and electronic systems because of their structural/functional similarity to biological tissues and design versatility to accommodate cross-system communication. In this review, we discuss the latest progress in the engineering of hydrogel interfaces for bioelectronics development that promotes (1) structural compatibility, where the mechanical and chemical properties of hydrogels can be modulated to achieve coherent, chronically stable biotic-abiotic junctions; and (2) interfacial signal transduction, where the charge and mass transport within the hydrogel mediators can be rationally programmed to condition/amplify the bioderived signals and enhance the electrical/electrochemical coupling. We will further discuss the application of functional hydrogels in complex physiological environments for bioelectronic integration across different scales/biological levels. These ongoing research efforts have the potential to blur the distinction between living systems and artificial electronics, and ultimately decode and regulate biological functioning for both fundamental inquiries and biomedical applications.”

Tissue adhesive hydrogel bioelectronics
(June 2021)

“Flexible bioelectronics have promising applications in electronic skin, wearable devices, biomedical electronics, etc. Hydrogels have unique advantages for bioelectronics due to their tissue-like mechanical properties and excellent biocompatibility. Particularly, conductive and tissue adhesive hydrogels can self-adhere to bio-tissues and have great potential in implantable wearable bioelectronics. This review focuses on the recent progress in tissue adhesive hydrogel bioelectronics, including the mechanism and preparation of tissue adhesive hydrogels, the fabrication strategies of conductive hydrogels, and tissue adhesive hydrogel bioelectronics and applications.”

And of course, this article would not be complete without mentioning a direct correlation between the World Economic Forum and this strange “goo”, since they are the front-runners of initiating this transhumanism effort.

    • Scientists have developed new 3D printing technology, which is 10-50 times faster than the industry standard with the ability to print larger sample sizes.
    • It involves jelly-like materials known as hydrogels, which are used to create products such as contact lenses.
    • This method and material is also useful for creating scaffolds in tissue engineering.

Researchers say the method is particularly suitable for printing cells with embedded blood vessel networks, a nascent technology expected to be a central part of the production of 3D-printed human tissue and organs.

3D printing method turns goo into a hand in minutes

So now the question is, could these strange strands that people are seeing in their stools, and perhaps what the embalmers are seeing, the hydrogel-structures themselves? If these fibrous substances are not parasites, then the collection of publications above may be pointing to the possibility that these tissue-like materials are hydrogels that have already been in testing mode in humans for a very long time.

Whether they have been delivered through medication, injections (such as through flu shots/vaccines), contaminating water/food supply, GMOs, etc.

There is also an interesting correlation between the fibrous textures that Richard Hirschman and other embalmers have found, that closely resemble veins themselves. As Mr. Hirschman claims, he has been in this business for decades, and has never really seen anything like this. Pulling veins… from veins?

Well, there may be some legitimacy to this as well.

Arteriovenous Malformation
Image source: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Image source: ctisus.com

“An arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is an abnormal tangle of blood vessels connecting arteries and veins, which disrupts normal blood flow and oxygen circulation.”

“When an AVM disrupts this critical process, the surrounding tissues may not get enough oxygen. Also, because the tangled blood vessels that form the AVM are abnormal, they can weaken and rupture. If the AVM is in the brain and ruptures, it can cause bleeding in the brain (hemorrhage), stroke or brain damage.

“The cause of AVMs is not clear. They’re rarely passed down among families.”

“AVMs result from development of abnormal direct connections between arteries and veins, but experts don’t understand why this happens. Certain genetic changes might play a role, but most types are not usually inherited.”


Throughout numerous articles about arteriovenous malformations, it is usually repeated that the cause of AVM is not known. So again, I am hypothesizing, what if these AVMs, extra tangled webs of veins/arteries/tissue, etc. – are in fact hydrogels meant to be administered throughout our system to replicate our neural/circulatory system to better connect us to their biotechnological agendas?

We’ve already seen the numerous studies above describing hydrogels as “stretchable“, “tissue-engineering“, “similarities to biological tissues“, and the hydrogel material is being used for 3D printing because “the method is particularly suitable for printing cells with embedded blood vessel networks“.

We would have to be extremely gullible if we were to believe that these technocrats suddenly found out all of this technology in the last few years without first spending many years and time/money/effort into the research and experimentation of this on living beings – including, of course, humans.

And for those who are inclined to refuse to believe that an agenda this huge would ever be possible, the notion of huge funds being dished out to certain institutions – including the medical/healthcare/psychological field, to prescribe certain medications for the purpose of “healing”/”curing” their patients, while simultaneously documenting the results of the patient’s reaction to said prescriptions, would not be too far-off the mark.

Regardless if infiltration has been happening in these fields or not, there are most likely a huge group of people who won’t even realize that this is an agenda, and therefore are participating in it without even realizing what they are doing. Keeping up with the perception that it is for “the better good”, while unknowingly serving the purpose of those with hidden goals.

Dr. James Giordano shared this information in his lecture “The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future”. A direct quote from this lecture:

“But what you also need to appreciate is that that DARPA program, like any program that is oriented towards engaging brain function to then alter those functions in certain ways, directional ways, can be harnessed for what’s called dual-use. Medical purposes that are then depurposed in medicine and used for other agenda

Dr. James Giordano – From DARPA Mind Weapon Tools, to Nanotechnology | Hacking Our Mind is the Ultimate Agenda

So whether these substances are parasites, synthetic-hydrogel tissue, or a different fibrous structure altogether, the point is that these are being found in human beings, and there is no clear answer as to why and how this occurs.

Researchers and doctors have been investigating these types of phenomena and formulating theories about what this is all about.

Celeste Solum is a FEMA whistleblower and researcher who has been connecting the dots on these hydrogel technologies and the goals of the “global elitists”.

In an article she wrote in July 30, 2020, she uses a snippet from a professor at Hokkaido University which states, “Hydrogels are excellent candidates to mimic biological functions because they are soft and wet like human tissues,” says Gong. “We are excited to demonstrate how hydrogels can mimic some of the memory functions of brain tissue.”

Dr. Carrie Madej is an outspoken speaker about bringing awareness to the hydrogel material, and how it may be related to the COVID vaccine.

Dr. Andrew Kaufman has also been speaking about the hydrogel technologies and the attempts of connecting this material with our body.

In a quote that was stated over a year ago, he says, “[Hydrogel is a] synthetic biopolymer compatible with our own tissue (that could) even develop its own blood supply as blood vessels can grow right into it.”

Maybe this is, indeed, what we are seeing in more and more vaccinated individuals and what many others are suffering in their day to day lives. And this also raises the question that if an anti-parasitic drug could release fibrous strands from the bowels like the one pictured above from curezone.org, and if the strands are hydrogel… then would anti-parasitic drugs be helpful in detoxing these foreign substances from our body? (and is this another reason why drugs like Ivermectin are so highly ridiculed and ostracized?…)

Now the issue is, if this is all true, how do we stop this assault on humanity and how can we rise up to hold those accountable for these atrocities from carrying out anymore criminal activity? These are organizations at the top with the audacity “authority” to dictate what goes into our bodies, without our full, informed consent.

Perhaps it’s time to stop listening to certain “authority” figures. And take a good, long look at what’s going on around us; keeping a close eye on the medical/health industries, as well as the “medication(s)/injections” that are being prescribed.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Paul McManus from Pixabay

Craig Venter of the NIH and Human Genome: Creating Synthetic Life | ” – trying to design what we want biology to do”

Agenda of the Human Genome Project: ” – for manufacturing and operating a complete human being.”

Playing God in Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Synthetic Biology and the Meaning of Life
– [ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837218/ ]

Thanks to a pingback post by the following site: There Is No Pandemic, it led me to a very interesting video featuring a Mr. Craig Venter, delving into an incredibly topical subject – even though the video was made in 2010.

Don’t think synthetic life-forms are possible in vaccines? Or that there’s even an agenda to do this?

Craig Venter, genetic researcher for the NIH and the Human Genome Project, would tell you otherwise…

“operating system”

“all the characteristics of the first species disappear”

“new species emerges from this software”

“making the flu vaccine each year by using these new synthetic techniques”

Click image for archived video. Original source can be found here: [ https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/may/20/craig-venter-synthetic-life-form ]
“Craig Venter creates synthetic life form”
Full transcript. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Craig Venter: “Well this has been about a 15 year process. It started back in 1995, when we sequenced the first two genomes in history. Including the smallest genome, that of mycoplasma genitalium. And we set out a goal to try and understand what the smallest genome you can have as an operating system, to try and understand the basic components of life. It’s taken us through this long journey. Much longer than we ever anticipated. But that’s what happens when you enter into areas that nobody’s ever been before.

So at first we had to learn how to write the genetic code to synthesize pieces. Because the largest piece that ever has been synthesized other than our work has been only 30,000 letters. The first chromosome we were trying to make was over 500,000. And the one that we ultimately made and report in this paper is over 1,000,000 letters of genetic code. And we start with 4 bottles of chemicals, and the computer code in the computer, the digital code in the computer from DNA sequence. So, just learning how to do the synthesis was mastering a lot of chemistry that has never been done before. And we learned sequentially over the years how to build larger and larger molecules.

In 2003 we reported making a 5,000 letter bacterial virus, 5X174, and how to error correct the pieces. So, we start with pieces of DNA coming off DNA synthesizers; they’re only about 50-80 letters long. That’s pretty much the limit of what you can make with a chemical synthesizer. So everything we make from that has to be putting these little pieces together. Much like having a box of legos and having to assemble them back in the right order to get what you started with. So it’s been progressive over this entire time period. We thought we would have this almost 3 years ago. But we kept running into very significant biological roadblocks.”

Interviewer: “All right. And what do you ultimately hope to do with a method like this?

Craig Venter: “Well, this is an important step, we think, both scientifically and philosophically. It certainly changed my views of definitions of life and how life works. It’s pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in the cell, and the cell instantly starts reading that new software, starts making a whole different set of proteins. And within a short while, all the characteristics of the first species disappear. And a new species emerges from this software that controls that cell going forward.

When we look at life forms we see them as sort of fixed entities. But this shows, in fact how dynamic they are. That they change from second to second. And that life is basically a result of an information process, a software process. Our genetic code is our software. And our cells are dynamically constantly reading that genetic code, making new proteins, the proteins make the other cellular components, and that’s what we see. But it’s hard to imagine how dynamic it is until we found, simply by replacing the software, it started making a whole new cell, whatever is defined by that software. So that’s, that’s a pretty important change in how we approach and think about life.

Also this is now the first time where we’ve started with information in the computer, built that software molecule, now over a million letters of genetic code, put that into a recipient cell, and have this process start where that information converted that cell into a new species. So this becomes a very powerful tool for trying to design what we want biology to do.

As leaders of competing genome projects, Francis Collins, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, and J. Craig Venter, president of Celera Genomics, were recognized, correctly, as the two most important players in the worldwide effort to spell out the 3 billion “letters” of the human genome–the biochemical recipe, encoded in our DNA, for manufacturing and operating a complete human being.

[ https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,998842,00.html ]

We have a wide range of applications, so at the biotech company that funded the synthetic genomics that Ham Smith and I started a few years back, we have a major deal with ExxonMobil to try and use algae to capture carbon dioxide and make new hydrocarbons that can go into the Exxon refineries. To try and replace taking the oil out of the ground.

There’s no natural algaes that we know that can do this at the scale it’s needed. So we’re going to have to use our synthetic genomic techniques to either heavily modify existing algaes or develop whole new ones from scratch that have all the parameters that we want. These same tools, these same processes can be used for making chemicals, for making food substances, we hope for cleaning up water.

But perhaps the most important immediate application is we’re already working at the Venter Institute and working with Novartis to try and make new vaccines very quickly; we think we can shorten the process by 99% for making the flu vaccine each year by using these new synthetic techniques. But I think it’s going to be one of those situations I tell audiences I talk to that ‘we’re entering a new era we’re limited mostly by our imaginations’.”

Interviewer: “Could you ever use a method like this with a higher organism? Something more complex than bacteria?

Craig Venter: “Well, it’s certainly not in the immediate future. Bacteria have much more simplified genetic systems. They don’t have the same complex regulation that higher organisms have. But there are a number of single cell eukaryotes.

So we’re eukaryotes because we have a nucleus, I think one of the key things we mastered with our studies, particularly since 2003, and we reported the latest results a few months ago in Science at the end of last year, is we can move chromosomes across the branches of life. So we can move from bacteria into eukaryotes, we use yeast for all these processes. We can take the chromosomes out of yeast and move them back into bacteria to create new life forms.

So a next step would be try to make a simplified eukaryote. Yeast is very key for bio-manufacturing, for ethanol production, etc. And if we can have even a more efficient yeast cell, and at the same time, try and understand all its components, I think we’ll be able to make synthetic eukaryotes. Higher animals, multi-cellular systems are, I think, projects for the much more distant future.”

Interviewer: “Actually I have a couple more questions. Just about how we distinguish between any sort of synthetically – organisms with synthetic genomes versus the natural ones? One question I guess would be about containment.”

[Interview cuts out a section]

Craig Venter: ” – we were when we first started down this process, what could be an artifact that could fool us into thinking we had created synthetic life, when in fact it was just a contaminate of the native chromosome? And, where would even a single molecule of native chromosome could fool us into thinking we had created a new cell?

So early on we started designing a process of putting watermarks in the genetic code. We did this in the first chromosome we reported two years ago, basically all of us that helped build the genetic code signed the DNA, coded our names into the chromosome.

With this genome we’ve gone a little bit further; we’ve put 4 major watermarks in. We’ve developed a new code for writing English language, other languages, with punctuation and numbers into the genetic code. In the first watermark we actually have this code that needs to be decoded for people to read the rest. We even have a website built into the genetic code that if people solve it they can let us know that they’ve been able to read it.

“- and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”Revelation 13:17

All the authors of this study over the… certainly the last decade, our names are all encoded in this first genome. And we have three quotations built in there of adding a little philosophy to the genetic code at the same time. Which I think the chance of finding any of these in a naturally occurring genome is about as close to zero as you can get. So we can absolutely prove from the genetic changes, that we’ve been built in to the design of the chromosomes that it’s unquestionably the synthetic DNA that we made, not some natural contaminant.

A containment, that’s a really critical issue, and it’s one of the most important issues to us, and one of the number one questions I get asked in all my litera- all my lectures around the globe. And when we look at molecular biology for the last several decades, we all use e. coli in the laboratory, that genes from multiple species have been put in it over the years – probably tens of millions of experiments. And there’s not been a single accident. And the reason for that is that e. coli has a chemical dependency for growing in the laboratory.

So these are things we can start to build in to the design of synthetic genomes, we can build in suicide genes so they can’t escape. And so we can use artificial amino acids. There’s a number of approaches that we’re developing and other labs are developing to guarantee absolute containment.

And this first proof of principle, we’ve largely copied the mycoides genome, because as a control, if we couldn’t boot up something that was already known, we could never get to the design phase. We deleted 14 genes from this genome, and made all these other genetic modifications. This cell only grows on extremely rich [media(sp?)] on the laboratory.

The only other place it goes, the mycoides genome is a minor goat pathogen that causes mastitis in goats. We think we’ve eliminated the genes associated with that, but it will not grow outside of the laboratory unless it’s deliberately injected or sprayed into a goat. So, we don’t work with goats, so we think we have pretty good containment systems in the lab.

There’s selectable markers that’s dependent on a specific antibiotic. So these are early attempts, I think. These containment approaches would get far more sophisticated with the next versions of what we and others do.”

Interviewer: “All right. Well, are there any final points you’d like to make before we close?”

Craig Venter: “Well, this is the first synthetic cell that’s been made and we call it synthetic because the cell is totally derived from a synthetic chromosome made from 4 bottles of chemicals on a chemical synthesizer. Starting with information in the computer.

Before we did these experiments starting back in the late 90’s, we asked for a complete bioethical review, knowing we were going into uncharted territory, trying to create new species. The review group at the University of Pennsylvania published the results in Science in 1999. Since then there’s been lots of different review processes around the world. The Sloan Foundation funded my institute, the Venter Institute, along with MIT, and a Washington think tank, to look at the security issues concerning this. That report was published and can be downloaded from JCVI.org.

There’s been ongoing discussions in the U.S. government, in the E.U., the National Academy of Sciences has done reports on this. So I think this is the first incidence in science where the extensive bioethical review took place before the experiments were done. And it’s part of an ongoing process that we’ve been driving, trying to make sure that the science proceeds in an ethical fashion, that we’re being thoughtful about what we do, and looking forward to the implications to the future.”

End of transcript.

So here is undeniable proof, that the folks at the NIH and Human Genome Project have been trying to synthesize organisms for the sole purpose of creating new species/life forms, and using these techniques for vaccines, AND states that these synthetic substances WILL CHANGE DNA.

It all ties back to the NIH and the HUMAN GENOME PROJECT. The theory that the COVID vaccines are an attempt at a worldwide genome experiment project is becoming clearer every single day, backed up with all of the data that has come forward, backed up with all of the studies pointing to this very agenda, backed up with countless interviews, positions and documentations of the likes of Anthony Fauci, Christine Grady, Bill Gates, Craig Venter, Eric Lander, Klaus Schwab, Francis Collins, their institutes and cohorts GAVI, WEF, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIH, Human Genome Project, World Health Organization, United Nations, MIT, Harvard, etc., etc., etc.

“Venter and colleagues published their paper about creating a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome in the journal Science in May 2010.

“Some of you are asking, why do this? It’s great basic science, but there are some more compelling reasons,” he said, noting that synthetic DNA can be used to develop genomics-based vaccines.

“The National Institutes of Health has funded my institute to create synthetic pieces of every known flu virus, so anytime we need a new vaccine, we can just take these pieces off the shelf, and go through the assembly and have flu vaccine stocks in a very short time,” he said. “In the next year or two, you might get the first synthetic DNA vaccines.”

Web archive version: Synthetic life forms can produce vaccines, gobble up CO2 and more, says expert

Although the below excerpt specifies “intranasal”, there are also endeavors of injectable live attenuated vaccines as well:

“The company’s breakthrough Synthetic Attenuated Virus Engineering (SAVE) platform utilizes a computer algorithm to recode the genomes of viruses and construct live-attenuated vaccines to prevent viral infections or treat solid tumors.”

Web archive version: Codagenix and Serum Institute of India Announce Commencement of First-in-Human Trial of COVI-VAC, A Single Dose, Intranasal Live Attenuated Vaccine for COVID-19

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16778323/ ] “Genetically modified live attenuated parasites as vaccines for leishmaniasis” (2006)

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28620583/ ] “Engineering of Genetically Arrested Parasites (GAPs) For a Precision Malaria Vaccine” (2017)

[ https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/investigational-malaria-vaccine-gives-strong-lasting-protection ] “Investigational Malaria Vaccine Gives Strong, Lasting Protection” (2021)“The vaccine combines live parasites with either of two widely used antimalarial drugs—an approach termed chemoprophylaxis vaccination.”

Now, with all of that being said, and with this outright admission by Craig Venter about their agenda, I have to bring up one of Richard Fleming’s latest criticism of ALL the doctors that have claimed to find what seems to be graphene oxide, nanobots, and/or parasitic-like organisms in the vaccines.

Firstly, this should have been approached in a more scientific approach to researching the vaccine’s contents.

While the other doctors are investigating these vaccines and are questioning its contents, even inviting other scientists and researchers to help them identify what these substances are, Dr. Fleming is undermining their research and dismissing their conclusions. Even implying, at one point, the mention of “credentials” as to whether or not to take one seriously.

Secondly… isn’t that precisely why we’re in the mess we’re in right now? Because SO many people decided to trust the likes of Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins? Does it matter how many so-called credentials one has to determine their sincerity and integrity or even professionalism? Doesn’t look like it to me. As long as a researcher is honest and looking for the truth, I will take their word over an overpaid “expert” any day. Especially ones who conduct inhumane, atrocious experiments on other living beings.

Then, of course, when addressing anything in a scientific approach, and certainly before reaching concrete conclusions and dismissing any other research (like the fraudulent Lancet paper did, for example…) one must consider ALL variables. Take the following for consideration:

how many vials total did Richard Fleming test?

were they from the same batch, or all different batches? Different brands, or all the same brand?

were all these vials from the same country? – it is becoming more and more apparent that different countries are getting different doses/batches

at what magnification did Fleming conduct his tests compared to all of the other doctors/scientists?

are we considering that some batches/doses will contain certain substances while others consist of saline solutions only – as what has already been theorized?

if different countries are getting different batches, there is a chance that there will be different substances for each country – to perhaps test a wider set of material/organisms and/or to target certain people’s DNA/ethnicity/etc.?

what is the “garbage” and “debris” that Fleming is referencing? “Garbage” has to be something. Was there an attempt to identify these compositions? Or just label them all with the term “debris” and “garbage”?

Fleming also mentions the term “crystalline” on more than one occasion… does he realize that there are indeed nanocrystal-graphene hybrid material that has been synthesized? Does he know every possible thing that can be synthesized or genetically modified using either Venter’s DNA genetic modification technique or the CRISPR technology?

“Nanocrystal-graphene have been proposed as a new kind of promising hybrid for a wide range of application areas including catalysts, electronics, sensors, biomedicine, and energy storage, etc. Although a variety of methods have been developed for the preparation of hybrids, a facile and general synthetic approach is still highly required.”

“A rich library of highly crystalline nanocrystals, with types including noble metal, metal oxide, magnetic material and semiconductor were successfully grown on chemically converted graphene (CCG), which is simultaneously reduced from GO during the synthesis.”

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22699842/ ] “Generalized syntheses of nanocrystal-graphene hybrids in high-boiling-point organic solvents”

Is Mr. Fleming aware of all the technological and biological advancements and agendas in the arena of nanotechnology in combination with virus-based particles?

“Genetically modified viruses offer a general route for the production of materials with complex nanoscale detail, for use either directly or as templates. It appears likely that modified viruses will feature prominently in the nanotechnology of the immediate future. The possible commercial exploitation of virus-templated materials includes nanowires, high surface area materials for battery electrodes, detectors, catalytic material, light harvesting devices, quantum dots, and tunable photonic devices.”

[ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9783527671403.hlc094 ] “7 Virus Particle-Based Liquid Crystals”

Will Mr. Fleming attempt to identify these so-called “garbage” and “debris” and conduct further studies with a higher magnification, or continue to shoot down other’s legitimate attempts at trying to figure out exactly what these particles are? Notice he never tries to identify what ANYTHING in the vaccine is, other than mentioning “lipid nanoparticles”. Only giving his opinion of what it’s not.

And with all of the evidence showing that genetically modified organisms is not only highly probable but also incredibly likely, considering the NIH’s many, many, MANY horrific experiments and crimes against humanity (and animal life), and Craig Venter’s ventures, not to mention Bill Gates’ very own admission and extensive funding in this matter, I am ultimately left questioning Fleming’s motives.

Bill Gates: “You know, is there something to worry about with medicines, that is might – some of them might have side effects? Do we need safety testing? I mean and we’re taking things that are… you know, genetically modified organisms and we’re injecting them in little kids arms. We just shoot them right into the vein.”

Bottom line: yes, these vaccines are extremely dangerous. And if the ones in control of pushing these worldwide vaccines are also in control of the Human Genome Project and attempts at re-writing our DNA, our best bet would be to avoid these at all costs and address these as the crimes they are.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay