Doctors/Whistleblower: LARGE Amounts of Graphene Oxide Found in Certain COVID Vaccines

Proof with patents/documents and lab results shows that graphene oxide is in the vaccine.

Researching this subject of course brings up several “fact-checking” websites set on debunking this claim; however, as educated individuals have found out, these fact-checking websites serve one main purpose – and that is to perpetuate only one side of the narrative, even if they’re WRONG.

So instead of me attempting to fact-check the fact-checkers or debunk the doctors/scientists – which I know I can’t do since I am not adept in their fields, my sole purpose in this post is to point out what these doctors/scientists ARE saying and let people decide for themselves what may be the truth.

Of course, the truth is the truth and nothing can change that, but with so much misinformation and misleading content running rampant in today’s world, it’s crucial to scrutinize all of the information and discern the truth from the lies.

The following quotes/transcripts offered here allege to have found a substantially dangerous amount of graphene oxide in several different vaccines. And some speculation as to why these same companies are insisting that just one shot, two shots, booster shots, etc., may not be enough.

(…Again, I’m not a scientist. But what would multiple doses of large graphene oxide amounts do in the human body, especially if it is administered several times per year?… Another haunting question, why have there been graphene oxide found in masks and test swabs as well?)

Graphene Oxide in Jabs, Masks and Swabs

La Quinta Columna discovers large amount of graphene oxide in the vaccination

The following excerpts (timestamps were added for the time of the subtitles) were taken from orwell.city / La Quinta Columna: ‘98% to 99% of the vaccination vial is graphene oxide’ Please visit their site for a full transcript and video of the interview.

Ricardo Delgado @3:43: “Graphene is toxic, it is a chemical, a toxic chemical agent. Introduced in the organism in large quantities, it causes thrombi. It causes blood clots. We have all the scientific articles to back it up. It causes post inflammatory syndrome, it causes alteration of the immune system. And when the redox balance is broken, in the sense that there is less of the body’s own reserve glutathione than an introduced toxicant such as graphene oxide, it generates a collapse of the immune system and a cytokine storm. In other words, something very similar to the fashionable disease, isn’t it?”

José Javier Esparza: “The entire COVID disease. And then you, who already suspected what all this was about, got a vial of vaccination and took it to the Public University of Almeria.”

Ricardo Delgado @5:51: ” – because remember that the marketing of face masks was stopped precisely because they carried graphene particles, both a run of 500 thousand in Madrid, in La Rioja, in Castilla-La Mancha, etc., in a large part of the world and in Canada. You all know that masks with nanotechnology, such as those of Decathlon, and with the graphene symbol, are still being marketed. So, what we have to ask ourselves is: if the masks were removed because they caused or could cause pulmonary affections by introducing the graphene toxicant, how is it possible for it to be introduced into the vial? Moreover, in a considerable amount.

What we have found there, according to what the university that has done this study says, is that the main component is precisely graphene oxide and in a very small amount of something else, but above all it is graphene oxide. And given that all the people who are inoculated with the Pfizer vaccine, which was the one we sent for analysis, as well as Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson&Johnson, Janssen, Sinovac, and all types of vaccines acquire magnetic properties, we suspect with many indications that they all contain more or less doses of graphene, of graphene oxide.”

Ricardo Delgado @7:36: “It seems that the body has a certain capacity to naturally eliminate graphene oxide through certain immunological mechanisms. Once inside the body it acts as if it were a biological agent as such, as if it were precisely SARS-CoV-2. precursor of glutathione. So that is why, we probably suspect, they are trying to introduce a second and a third dose. Now intranasally. They are already talking about new intranasal vaccines with graphene oxide nanoparticles. Both for influenza and COVID-19, because in aerosols it is much more potent.”

Ricardo Delgado @11:53: “98% to 99% of the vial is precisely graphene oxide, that is, the main component of the vaccine is graphene oxide.”

Former Pfizer employee CONFIRMS La Quinta Columna’s findings of graphene oxide in the vaccines

(Some excerpts with corresponding timestamps and embellishment added for emphasis):

Stew Peters: “Well we have gone back and forth with fact-checkers – some independent researchers who have attempted to debunk the findings of Spanish researchers called La Quinta Columna, originally broken here on the Stew Peters Show by Dr. Jane Ruby. That video revealing that graphene oxide, a toxic substance – a poison!, was found in the Pfizer vaccines. Those researchers later found that the same applied to Moderna and AstraZeneca, is now being tested as a result of our reporting. The truth is here.

USA Today and Lead Stories, all funded by the cabal, were all over me, all over Dr. Jane Ruby, and out and out calling us liars for reporting those findings to the world in a video that has now soared over well I think about a million views on Rumble.

We have sought the input of many medical experts, world-renowned doctors, Dr. Jane Ruby, Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Judy Mikovitz, Dr. David Martin, they have all confirmed that report. But despite all of that confirmation, the assaults on our truth continue.”

Karen Kingston @1:50: “Well, thank you for giving me a platform to share my findings and to spread the truth. And you’re right, it is extremely difficult to find this information and link it together.

I do have a unique set of skills, this is what I do in the industry; I analyze intellectual property, the legal landscape, for both physicians, pharma and consumers, and then I’m also a scientific writer and do the clinical analysis as well. So you can’t expect everyone to have that skill set to find this information, and the truth is I’m – you know, the whole do your own research was born out of the reality that the mainstream media has been lying to us and big tech and social media have been blocking the truth. And that’s why people have had to do their own research. And that’s – that violates our first amendment.”

Stew Peters @2:38: “So, just lay it out there. Is graphene oxide in these shots?

Karen Kingston:100% it is, and it’s irrefutable. And I’ll walk you through it.

So, what’s really important to know is that all of the mRNA vaccines contain what’s called a PEGylated lipid nanoparticle. And that’s what we’re going to go through. So if you take a look at the Moderna patent, it says, right there, that this contains lipid nanoparticle formulation. And as you go through the patent, which I’ll show you, they specifically talk about various ingredients and various PEGylated formulations that have alpha-numeric codes. And then you can also find them in the filings with the FDA with the IND [investigational new drug] and phase 3 trials for both Moderna and Pfizer. And you can also find them, you know, across the pond with the UK filings. I hope that’s making sense so far.

So here’s the important thing about the patent. I read the patent; it’s 193 pages plus attachments. And I read the patent to look for graphene oxide. It is not listed in the patent because it is a trade secret. So remember Bill Gates saying that there was a trade secret? Trade secrets are not, you know, privy to the public, so they cannot be in the patent. So graphene oxide is not listed in the patent, and it lists everything BUT that. But I’m still going to show you evidence that these contain graphene oxide and the patent in China that shows they contain graphene oxide.

Stew Peters: “So let me just ask you, why would they put every other ingredient on the patent, with the exception of the standalone, graphene oxide? Why would they not put that on there?”

Karen Kingston:I would say the number one reason is because it’s poisonous to humans and well-known that it’s poisonous to humans.

Karen Kingston @4:58:They’re just seeing, you know, how much they can put into people before they die, I think, honestly.

Stew Peters: “So this is a dose finding study? Basically a live dose finding study, and those that are dying or multiple sclerosis, Guillan-Barre, these tremors, the magnetism, all these things – “

Karen Kingston:Well remember, we’re supposed to get boosters every 6 months. So we’re gonna get graphene oxide boosters every 6 months, to see how much we can build up in the system. We’ll go through this, because when you see the nations that are being injected, we’re the guinea pigs, you know, and so once they perfect this technology, I think there’s a second plan. I actually am not super comfortable talking about this stuff, because I don’t like to, you know, opinions on things, you know, and hypothesize, so I’d rather just stick to the data, if that’s okay.”

Karen Kingston @9:15: And so if you want to know what is graphene, you know, what they explain here on SINOPEG, is, it is the ‘core-shell structure polyethylene glycol functionalized graphene for energy-storage polymer dielectrics: combined mechanical and dielectric performances’.

So what that means is that graphene is a conductor – it can be a conductor of electricity. If it has a positive charge, and this is in all the – some of the studies from the NIH and Moderna and stuff, if graphene gets a positive charge, it annihilates anything that it comes in contact with. Right now they’re not charged. They’re neutralized. You know, well like, how does a positive charge get into the cell? That’s that other lipid. That ionizable lipid that gives it the positive charge for cell penetration. But these currently are not – they’re neutral, they have a neutral field. But if they are, if there’s an electrical magnetic field that activates a positive charge, potentially there’ll be damage and potentially death, depending on where these nanoparticles ended up in people’s bodies and how much of them did.”

Karen Kingston @11:47: ” – there’s a company called Shanghai Nanotech, and they filed a patent, and you can – for graphene oxide for the use in COVID-19 excipients, and this is a meeting of them at their headquarters and that looks like, I think his name is Tal Zaks, the chief technology officer for Moderna, and if you go to the World Health Organization website, there is a page where they talk about how the global world needs to work together on these COVID-19 vaccines. It’s from some time last year. And you’ll see the usual suspects there. You’ll see like Peter Daszak and the names from Moderna and several names from the NIH and NIAID, so… there is a large group of billionaires and millionaires, many many times over that have coordinated for the development and execution of these products.” 

Dr. Andreas Kalcker’s team finds graphene oxide in the vaccines

There is also further confirmation of Ricardo Delgado’s findings from Dr. Andreas Kalcker’s team, showing similar research results and investigations of graphene oxide in the vaccines.

The following excerpts (timestamps were added for the time of the subtitles) were taken from orwell.city / Andreas Kalcker’s team confirms evidence of graphene oxide in ‘vaccines’ Please visit their site for a full transcript and video of the interview.

Dr. Isignares @00:12: “For example, there is an issue that concerns us a lot because we had already detected certain things in the vaccines. And that’s that these vaccines contain graphene oxide. It’s been verified by electronic microscopy by someone from our team. The question is: why is there graphene?”

Dr. Andreas Kalcker: “To make it crystal clear. What varies is the biological composition of the vaccines. What doesn’t change in any of them, and that’s in all of them, are the crystals that are present in different amounts. They’re present in all the vials. There is both the magnetite, which has a Chinese patent, by the way. It’s patented. You can see… It’s not magnetite. It’s graphene.

Dr. Andreas Kalcker @1:51: “What happens then? The body needs its electromolecular capabilities to work. The heart beats because there’s a magnetic field that creates, subsequently, the electricity for pumping and everything else. And, therefore, what graphene is doing is that it’s completely altering our electromagnetic field. Something that has never happened before. And, let’s say, what we’re seeing is something ‘in vivo’ with some dramatic effects.

To understand more, we have also been watching a lot of videos of people who are dying after being vaccinated. There’re others where you see people spasming. These spasms have, for example, very specific frequencies, and they are, basically the same in all kinds of spasms. These spasms, clearly indicate that there is a disruption of the human electromagnetic fields.”

Research and studies proving that graphene oxide is being attempted to use in vaccines

It’s almost humorous that all of these fact-checking websites are refusing to acknowledge that there might be large amounts of graphene oxide in these vaccines, although the doctors/scientists above have allegedly found evidence that it does, and there are also some published studies that might suggest that graphene oxide will be used in vaccines as well. (please let me know if any of the links are no longer working)

An article on pubmed published the following research in 2016:
Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity

“Our work not only presents a novel, highly effective GO-based vaccine nano-adjuvant, but also highlights the critical roles of surface chemistry for the rational design of nano-adjuvants.”

Another article on pubmed published this research in 2018:
Effects of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles on the Immune System Biomarkers Produced by RAW 264.7 and Human Whole Blood Cell Cultures

“These applications include batteries, super capacitors, drug delivery and biosensing. However, few studies have investigated the effects of these nanoparticles on the immune system.”


The current study shows that GONPs modulate immune system biomarkers and that these may pose a health risk to individuals exposed to this type of nanoparticle.”

And yet another article from pubmed published in 2020:
Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant

“Our work describes the surface modification of graphene oxide and for the first time summarizes that functionalized graphene oxide serves as a vaccine carrier and shows significant adjuvant activity in activating cellular and humoral immunity. In the future, it is expected to be introduced into vaccine research to improve the efficacy of vaccines.”

“Keywords: Adjuvant delivery; Antigen delivery; Functionalized-GO; Immune adjuvant; Vaccine adjuvant; Vaccine nano-carrier.”

There is also this study showing how graphene oxide can inhibit certain responses, such as anxiety, fear, etc. (which, just theorizing, may perhaps take away someone’s natural instinct to perceive danger or threats…) when injected into certain parts of the brain. (Which also begs the question… what happens when this material gets injected into other parts of the brain…)

Soothing the symptoms of anxiety with graphene oxide

Of course the title of the link downplays the implications that this graphene oxide can cause – which seems to be a manipulative tactic that people employ to try and convince others of the benefits of a potentially dangerous substance and/or decision. And while on the surface drugs and medicines may have advantageous effects, we can’t overlook the possibility that others may use the same drugs and medicines/procedures/gene therapy, etc. and twist it to fit their own purposes.

From the same link:

“Serge Picaud, Deputy Leader of the Graphene Flagship’s Biomedical Technologies Work Package, comments: “This work provides another great demonstration of the therapeutic potential of graphene, used either alone or included in a medical device.”

Now I propose a theory of my own: In the near future, the same fact-checking writers/articles that were “debunking” all of the ‘graphene oxide in vaccines research’ will state something to the effect of: “Even though there is graphene oxide in the vaccines, there’s no reason for alarm” and/or “The graphene oxide material found in vaccines are not large enough to cause harm”, etc., etc., until the headlines change once again to state, “Why too much graphene oxide in your system is detrimental to your health” and “Further booster shots will not contain graphene oxide due to its dangers”.

Only time will tell…

Thank you to the Stew Peters Show and all those exposing this egregious corruption.
And a special thank you to Orwell City for translating and transcribing the videos with Ricardo Delgado and Andreas Kalcker & team.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by seagul from Pixabay

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”

CDC to Withdraw Emergency Use Authorization for RT PCR Test Because It Cannot Distinguish Between SARS-CoV-2 and the Flu

The whole COVID narrative was based on fraudulent tests…

Reblogged from globalresearch.ca/Health Impact News:
by Brian Shilhavy on July 25, 2021

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

The CDC quietly announced last week that it was withdrawing its request to the FDA for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Most of the public is probably unaware that similar to the current COVID-19 injections that are not yet approved by the FDA, but only given Emergency Use Authorization, so too the hundreds of diagnostic tests that supposedly detect COVID-19 are also NOT approved by the FDA, but only authorized via an EUA.

What is the reason the CDC is withdrawing its EUA request for the Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel?

In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test.

CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. (Source.)

Caitlin McFall, writing for Fox News, is the only one in the corporate media I could find that even reported this, and the few reports I found in the Alternative media so far have been mostly inaccurate.

McFall reports:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urged labs this week to stock clinics with kits that can test for both the coronavirus and the flu as the “influenza season” draws near.

The CDC said Wednesday it will withdrawal its request for the “Emergency Use Authorization” of real-time diagnostic testing kits, which were used starting in February 2020 to detect signs of the coronavirus, by the end of the year.

“CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives,” the agency said.

The U.S. has reported more than 34.4 million cases of the coronavirus since the pandemic began in 2020 and more than 610,000 deaths.

But while cases of COVID-19 soared nationwide, hospitalizations and deaths caused by influenza dropped.

According to data released by the CDC earlier this month, influenza mortality rates were significantly lower throughout 2020 than previous years.

There were 646 deaths relating to the flu among adults reported in 2020, whereas in 2019 the CDC estimated that between 24,000 and 62,000 people died from influenza-related illnesses.

The CDC urged laboratories to “save both time and resources” by introducing kits that can determine and distinguish a positive test for the coronavirus and flu. (Source.)

So there you have it. The CDC just basically admitted that many of the COVID-19 cases this past year could not be distinguished from “flu cases.” No wonder flu cases decreased to zero in so many places. See: Health Officials Admit that Only Those Vaccinated for the Flu are Getting the Flu This Year

The ending of the EUA for the Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel will not happen until the end of the year, December 31, 2021, and the CDC recommends that laboratories start transitioning to other types of COVID-19 diagnostic tests that have been given an EUA by the FDA here.

At the time of publication of this article, the FDA has issued 251 EUAs for COVID-19 diagnostic tests since April 1, 2020. The vast majority of them are for the RT-PCR tests, including about 20 that were just issued EUAs since the beginning of this month, July, 2021.

The cash cow for these tests and the hundreds of companies that got rich selling them will now have to move on to the next phase to be able to cash in.

Diagnostic Testing Fraud: Controlling the Masses and Medical Kidnapping

We have been covering the corruption in the medical diagnostic testing field for the better part of a decade now, and we exposed it early on in the COVID-19 Plandemic last year as well.

Here are some of our previous articles from last year exposing the fraud of COVID-19 diagnostic testing.

When we started MedicalKidnap.com back in 2014, we learned that fraudulent diagnostic testing was a common way for doctors and hospitals to order children be removed from their homes.

Often they create false drug test positive results to remove children from their parents.

Alabama Lab Owner Arrested for Falsifying Results of Drug Tests Used to Medically Kidnap Children

The worst offender, by far, in medically kidnapping children by use of a medical diagnostic test, is within the field of radiology and finding “proof” of child abuse simply by looking at x-rays.

This whole field has developed a recent new class of pediatricians “certified” as “Child Abuse Pediatricians,” and the lucrative jobs of these doctors depend on them finding abused children and putting them into the lucrative child trafficking network known as “foster care.”

We have actually published an eBook on this topic, or you can look up individual cases on our MedicaKidnap.com website to learn how this evil system works.

When it comes to diagnosing “influenza,” we have exposed the fraud there as well, as pre-COVID-19 the CDC simply used estimates of cases of the flu, since they cannot verify actual numbers each year by diagnostic testing.

Annual Flu Deaths Scam Unwittingly Exposed and Replaced by the COVID Deaths Scam

So COVID-19 allowed them to just further exploit the fraud of diagnostic testing to create fear and panic, and achieve their goals of enslaving the public and rolling out their experimental mRNA injections.

With this latest announcement by the CDC that they are now going to retire the RT-PCR Diagnostic tests and replace them with other tests that can now test both COVID and influenza, it is pretty easy to see what their game plan is for later this year.

Just about everyone in the U.S. will be able to be tested “positive” for something by this Fall when the flu season starts.

This will be the “Hegelian principle” implementation for 2021. The government creates the problem, and then they create the solution, which we know now is more “vaccines” for everything in life that ails us, and try to punish those who don’t want to play their game.

I’m ready. Are you?

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image is from Health Impact News

ADDITIONAL NOTE from Expanding Awareness Relations in regards to the above post:

Interesting timing that at around the same time that the CDC announces this egregious oversight of the flawed PCR tests and their efforts to find a new testing system, news of Bill Gates and George Soros teaming up to buy a COVID testing company is in the works.

I’m sure that’s not a coincidence at all…

Bill Gates and George Soros team up to buy Covid testing company for $41 Million…

And it must be said that we are always told to “trust the science”, and yet for OVER A YEAR we were basing lockdowns, harmful mask mandates and tragic social distancing practices on false positive cases until they FINALLY announced that the tests were ineffective in detecting this virus. Yet, “trust the science”… And still, even with the information that the COVID cases were not counted accurately, there are many places continuing to enforce the mandatory masks, social distancing, etc., etc. and even vaccine passports.

Meanwhile, the ACTUAL scientists/doctors, who have no government funding and/or alternative motive to embellish or entertain one certain narrative, has been telling us THIS WHOLE ENTIRE TIME that the tests were ineffective and counting too many false positives – enough to indicate that the COVID situation was widely overblown. And they were the ones censored and labeled “misinformation” or “misleading” while the INCORRECT (albeit, deliberately…) scientists/doctors were given airtime and endorsed in perpetuating the “deadly virus” message.

It is INJUSTICE that the public have been misinformed on such a large scale by big tech social media platforms and mainstream media complicit in allowing this deception to continue while those who have been speaking the truth all along have been censored and banned. Where are the efforts to ban these platforms and the erroneously WRONG doctors and scientists for spreading ACTUAL MISINFORMATION?

Of course, those of us in the know have already determined that this was a very intentional tactic, with the collusion of the media and the government/health industries, to manipulate as many people as possible into taking the vaccine, which is what this whole “pandemic” boils down to.

Unfortunately, until people open their eyes and actually do their own research on these matters, and admit that there is indeed a sinister motive of a small, yet powerful group of individuals working to enforce worldwide vaccines and a tyrannical control of the population, then they will remain lost in the deception and not only get their rights and freedom taken away from them, but also create a dark and bleak world for future generations. People need to swallow their pride, admit when they’re wrong, face the truth, and stand up for what’s right.

Two Whistleblowers from Facebook Expose Worldwide Effort to Censor Vaccine Concerns

Project Veritas releases new leaked information.

Ever wonder why certain posts you share on facebook, instagram, youtube, etc. never get much attention? Or perhaps get deleted altogether?

With the rollout of these covid “vaccines”, the tech industries have been hard at work aiming to discredit and/or ban ANYONE who has announced a certain form of “hesitancy” or flat out refusal to be a part of the vaccine bandwagon.

And even if certain individuals DID take the vaccine, and only wanted to share their testimony on the side effects, or perhaps a statement of what happened to their friend or family member, Facebook has initiated a global ranking and employee driven effort to tag specific posts that cross a certain threshold of “vaccine hesitancy”.

Even if the data that is being shared is TRUE, and come from verifiable health/medical papers and documents, if the data veers more towards an unflattering light of the vaccines, it is being targeted and consequently censored from these huge tech platforms. Which obviously deters the truth about the covid vaccines from getting out.

Yesterday, May 24, 2021, Project Veritas uploaded a video and a post highlighting two Facebook employees that have come out against this egregious abuse of private companies’ being able to dictate what information is allowed to be seen and what should be hidden in order to support certain agendas. The aim to target the “vaccine hesitant” is just one of them.

Here is James O’Keefe discussing the leak with Fox’s Sean Hannity:

Sean Hannity: “Now let’s turn to a brand new investigative report from Project Veritas just uncovering an algorithm that reportedly could be used to target facebook’s political enemies. Now, Fox news, we’re just seeing this for the first time, but as always, we let you decide. Listen, to this.”

Whistleblower #1: “Facebook uses classifiers in their algorithms to determine certain content, to be what they call “vaccine hesitant”, or they call it “vaccine hesitancy”. And without the user’s knowledge, they assign a score to these comments that’s called the VH score, the “vaccine hesitancy” score. And then based on that score will demote or leave the comment alone depending on the content within the comment. And that narrative being, get the vaccine… the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out… as an enemy of society.

They want to build a community where everybody complies, not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life. The policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it.”

Sean Hannity: “Here now, is the founder and CEO, Project Veritas, James O’Keefe. Okay, there’s a lot of significance to this, and, facebook has responded. I’ll let you tell the story.”

James O’Keefe: “Thanks, Sean. We’ve had two whistleblowers within facebook, come to us and leak us these documents regarding “vaccine hesitancy”.

What does that mean? Essentially facebook has beta tested this, these algorithms, 1.5 percent of their almost 3 billion users are getting a tiered ranking system, something called “vaccine hesitancy” – tier 1 and tier 2. Tier 1 is alarmist and critical remarks about covid and the vaccine, and tier 2 is something called “indirect vaccine discouragement”.

Now what’s remarkable about these private documents that facebook has not wanted you to see, until tonight, is that tier 2 says that even if the facts are true, that you will be targeted and demoted. Your comments will be targeted and demoted, Sean. “Vaccine hesitancy” score tiering system at facebook – these whistleblowers have given Project Veritas these documents and spoken to us in the shadows. It’s a 20 minute long video online, the documents are on our website.

And Sean, after we publish this report, we reached out to facebook, they’ve actually given us a comment – I’m going to read it to you, it says, quote, facebook has responded to Project Veritas for the first time, quote, “We proactively announce this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.” So as, in response to us publishing this, they’re claiming to now make this public but we just checked, and they haven’t yet made most of these documents public, Sean.”

Sean: “Okay, do I, knowing your ammo, is there more to come in the days to come?”

James: “Yes, there’s more to come. What’s remarkable about it, is that this has been private, they don’t want you to know that they’re doing this, and this is the town square, as you all know. We’re trying to retake our town square. Governor deSantis just signed a bill in Florida; I’m in Florida today, I was with him when he did that.

But they’re (facebook) tiering users without them knowing that they’re doing it. They’re demoting your comments, deboosting you on facebook without you knowing that they’re doing that.

And they’re obviously terrified of this report because they’re actually responding to Project Veritas – before they would attack us, or ignore us. And they have this system, you can see the documents online. They clearly have a ranking system, a tiered system, Sean. The author of this report we’ve named him, Amit Bahl, is an employee at facebook, we have the document showing that he authored the report and the chain of command from him to Mark Zuckerberg.

So there’s more to come, another one tomorrow. Two whistleblowers, on the record with Project Veritas, current facebook insiders, leaking us these documents. We consider them brave heroes and we hope that there’s a legion of more insiders that follow their lead, coming public to projectveritastips@protonmail.com with this information.”

Sean: “James O’Keefe, thank you for sharing with us, we appreciate it, we’re going to follow closely.”

Here is the Project Veritas video that was uploaded yesterday featuring one of the whistleblowers who came forward to reveal facebook’s tiering system plan:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

“I have to do something.”

“When it comes time to standing up for a world, I want my children to live in, I don’t want to leave them a world to where they don’t have these liberties.”

“People aren’t allowed to have voice and yet, facebook touts itself with promoting people’s opportunity to have voice.”

“They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it.”

“If I lose my job, it’s like, what do I do? But that’s less of a concern to me.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “We have just obtained multiple leaked documents from inside facebook, this time detailing a plan to curb, quote, “vaccine hesitancy” on a global scale. It was so concerning it brought us not one, but two whistleblowers from inside facebook who are ready to speak out on what this means for free speech and public discourse on their own platform.”

Interview with first whistleblower starts @1:00:

Whistleblower #1 (Data Center Technician):

Whistleblower #1: “Facebook uses classifiers in their algorithms to determine certain content, to be what they call “vaccine hesitant”, or they call it “vaccine hesitancy”. And without the user’s knowledge, they assign a score to these comments that’s called the VH score, the “vaccine hesitancy” score. And then based on that score will demote or leave the comment alone depending on the content within the comment.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Our first facebook insider is a data center technician who leaked us multiple internal documents detailing an algorithm test being run on 1.5 percent of facebook and instagram’s nearly 3.8 billion users worldwide.

The goal? To quote, “Drastically reduce user exposure to vaccine hesitancy (VH) in comments”.

Whistleblower #1: “And it’s the same thing. You’ll see a lot of this difference in their public policy verses the private policy where the public policy is very vague. It’s very ambiguous. It’s designed to be questioned because it’s designed to be able to easily defend. But then if look at the private policy, it’s much, much more clear, much more specific. I think that they’re trying to make it seem like they’re not doing as much or that they’re just kind of like generalizing it, like, “Oh, well we just have some robot that just tags your post. And then, you know, we look at it.” but I think they don’t want people to know, “Oh no, we actually have something that we made specifically for vaccine hesitancy.”

So there’s a main document along with all the, all the attachments and stuff that goes with it. So basically when they write this algorithm that goes through facebook content, and it looks for certain keywords that are related to vaccination, or, you know, not getting a vaccine and stuff like that. And it gives it a score. And the VH score means vaccine hesitancy, which is defined as being hesitant to get a vaccine, but not just like, “Well, I don’t know.” It’s even, “Well, I saw a study that said that someone died that got the vaccine.” That’s vaccine hesitancy.”

James O’Keefe: “So this is a beta test. This is all a beta test.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right, right.”

James: “And how big is this beta test?”

Whistleblower #1: “They refer to the test size as 1.5%. I’m not exactly sure which pool that pulls from, but I think it’s comments on authoritative health pages.”

James: “You seem to think that they’ve already ruled this out. Why do we believe they’ve already ruled this out?”

Whistleblower #1: “In one slideshow that they have, they call it their weekly progress tracker. They actually lay all this out in a chart and you can see it, you can look at the slides, they go by date. So we’ve got here – Covid-19 Vaccine Safety and Efficacy “Global”, “Currently Global” 13 languages, facebook plus instagram. All C-19 Vaccine [Global], “Currently Global” 66 languages. And the very first thing that brought me to the conclusion that they’re wanting to do this globally is they were developing it in like, you know, as many languages as they can get their hands on.”

James: “So this is like a product launch, almost?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. Yeah, in their last quarterly report, they reported 2.79 billion people on Earth use some kind of facebook app.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Who’s behind this new algorithm policy? Well, one thing is for sure, the authors of this experiment Joo Ho Yeo, Nick Gibian, Hendrick Townley, Amit Bahl, and Matt Gilles are not low-level employees. In fact, one of the internal documents Project Veritas obtained was a facebook flow chart that showed they’re only a few clicks away from Mark Zuckerberg, himself.”

James: “Who makes these decisions?”

Whistleblower #1: “These are teams at facebook and they call themselves, they work with what they call B2V “Barriers to Vaccination”. So that’s one of their core terms – is Barriers to Vaccination. And then the people on these teams, they call them Health Integrity Teams. So there’s a Health Integrity Team for messenger, there’s a Health Integrity Team for every system that facebook has.”

James: “An integrity team?”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “Is it came about after March 2020 – covid?”

Whistleblower #1: “No.”

James: “This is something that’s existed?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. Yes.”

James: “So, the Health Integrity Teams, and Barrier to Vaccination Teams at facebook.”

Whistleblower #1: “So this here, Amit Bahl, he is a Research Scientist for the Core Data Science Team at facebook. He also works in Health Integrity. Everyone who works on this project works in Health Integrity. Hendrick Townley, this is the experiment launch post, as you can see, this is on April 16th. This is 2021. That why there’s no year there. Cause it’s this year. And Hendrick Townley is one of the Software Engineers that worked on this. There were – I think it was him and two other software engineers. And then Amit Bahl wrote the actual classifier itself. I don’t – I’m sure he had like a team of developers, but he is considered the one who wrote it. Amit Bahl, and then as you go up, it’s like his boss, boss’s boss. Boss’s boss’s boss.”

James: “So Amit Bahl works for Udi Weinsberg, who works for Nicolas Stier – do I have that correct?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “And that person works for Danny Ferrante, and that person works for Javier Olivan, and Javier Olivan reports directly to Mark Zuckerberg.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “So this is a chain that goes all the way down to Amit Bahl.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “This kind of censorship sounds similar to shadowbanning – when users are unaware their posts can’t be seen. A term one of our own investigations coined when exposing twitter, just a few years ago. But this time, we’re exposing facebook and instagram’s methods to quash an entire side of a conversation. Arguably, one of the most pressing issues of the day.”

James: “According to these documents, facebook tiers users, 0 to 5, and a score of 0 to 1. Can you talk a little bit about this tier system?”

Whistleblower #1: “Oh yeah. So basically this is what they’re using to structure how, how they’re going to judge this content on, on a scale to how vaccine hesitant it actually is, or if it’s explicitly discouraging. In my opinion, the main reason why they built this as was for the human, what they call “raters” so that they can use this as a reference when they, so if the algorithm can’t make a decision on a certain post, it’ll send it to a human rater and then the human rater looks at it and they will make a decision on whether or not it’s vaccine hesitant or not.”

James: “So we have tier 2 – Indirect Discouragement. What happens when you are a tier 2?”

Whistleblower #1: “So basically your comment is going to be suppressed. As to the scale of that suppression, it’s hard to say, we would have to look at it like a case by case basis. But what they’re saying is it’s going to get, they call it a position change – on some of these comments, you can see, it’ll say position change: seven. And I’m not sure whether the seven refers to like a 7% or if it’s just like seven positions down in the comment chains.”

James: “So it’s suppressed?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “But we don’t know the extent of this suppression?”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “And we’ve heard “shadowban”, we’ve heard “deboost”, I have not heard “position change”.

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Facebook has not been shy about combating “vaccine hesitancy” as reported in their own press release stated May 11 of this year. However, what they say publicly in their own policy doesn’t scratch the surface of what is written in these internal leaked documents. By the facebook whistleblower.”

James: “If I read this correctly, facebook is saying it doesn’t matter if the story is true, so long as it doesn’t cause people to hesitate getting the vaccine? What’s your read on this?”

Whistleblower #1: ” ‘The Borderline Vaccine Framework – Shocking Stories: Potentially, or actually true events or facts that can raise safety concerns.’ “

James: “That post was done by a user. And they’ve taken a screenshot and observed it for the tier system.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right. Yeah.”

James: “What about this gives them alarm?”

Whistleblower #1: ” ‘How is this not scary?’ That would be considered indirect discouragement.”

James: “Indirect discouragement. Which would be considered tier 2.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “So this is an example of indirect discouragement of the vaccine.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah. Questioning the vaccine, questioning anything involving the vaccine.”

James: “And this was then demoted.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah.”

James: “So this is another example of tier 2 indirect discouragement – why don’t you tell us why this would be indirect discouragement, according to facebook.”

Whistleblower #1: “So this would be considered “vaccine hesitant” because they don’t want people to see someone had a bad effect. They’re not saying, “Don’t get the vaccine,” but they’re saying, “Look at all this negative stuff that happened after I got the vaccine.”

James: “Okay, they’re reporting facts, but truth doesn’t matter.”

Whistleblower #1: “No, because it doesn’t match the narrative. So, and the narrative being: Get the vaccine, the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out… as an enemy of society.

So the VAERS is a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It looks like they’re measuring the comments where they’re mentioning, you know, that the patient died.”

James: “So is VAERS a CDC supported program?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes, I think so. Really they support all of this because you know, they released the standards, the CDC themselves. And that’s really one of, one of the primary things that facebook is basing their policy off of is, well, if you looked at their public policy, it would be according to the authoritative health pages.”

James: “So they are open about the fact that they essentially coordinate with the CDC, here.”

Whistleblower #1: “Of course.”

James: “From the internal document, ‘Content pointing to the Vaccine Adverse Effects [Events] Reporting System data that suggest extreme risks without providing full context’ – full context… What do they mean by that?”

Whistleblower #1: “I think so, like in the previous comments, like she said, “Oh, during this study 653 people died” and then they don’t put the rest of the study in there. It’s like, okay, so you want me to write like a 10-page comment? What’s full context? Another ambiguous term. If they saw a study from someone they didn’t like, would they say, “Well, that’s not the full context because ABCDEFG.”

James: “Ultimately it seems like any facts that escape a particular narrative are omitted, demoted, deboosted, banned…”

Whistleblower #1: “Absolutely. Yes.”

James: “Considered dangerous to society.”

Whistleblower #1: “Suppressed in any way possible.”

James: “Where do you think this is headed? Does it get worse from here?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “How so?”

Whistleblower #1: “I think people accept it and they see people like twitter, facebook, google, and stuff like that, they see that this is accepted by the public and then they go, that’s like a green light to be like, “Oh, well we can go ahead and do this more.” So not only are we going to start doing vaccines stuff, we’re going to spread it to everything. So we’re going to start saying, “Oh if you make a post that could put somebody in danger or it could compromise someone’s safety,” whatever that means, “then we’re going to go ahead and look at that and assign that a score of some unknown classifier.” Who knows what it could be. They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it. And when you’re scrolling on your phone, I think they’re afraid of what people would conclude.”

James: “Tell me they don’t think about the underlying value.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah. Or what could, what it could turn into: the slippery slope.”

James: “They’re not even thinking about that.”

Whistleblower #1: “Nope.”

James: “And do you think there’s a lot of people inside facebook that agree with you or some percentage? What would you estimate that number of people to be?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. I would say at least 25%.”

James: “So you’re telling me, that 25% of the people there, agree that what they’re doing with this vaccine hesitancy coding and algorithms, is morally wrong?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. That would not surprise me at all. The policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it. What would happen if this was scaled larger and scaled to twitter and the internet as a whole is way worse than anything that could happen from me getting fired from my job. To me, that, it far outweighs that. Because it’s about more than me. It’s about really everyone in the world.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “It’s clear this facebook insider is not alone in his concerns of facebook’s new policy that would promote discourse on vaccines in general. As a matter of fact, the next insider you’re about to meet, felt so compelled to come forward, he goes so far as to compare the new policy to an abusive relationship.”

Interviewer with second whistleblower starts @11:58:

Whistleblower #2 (Data Center Engineer):

James: “What do you do at facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “I’m a data center engineer.

I’d say that in a sense it’s prohibiting people from being able to have an open dialogue about issues that affect their personal security. Some of these things, the questions, the comments that are being presented, you know, are from people that have concerns about their personal health or their personal security being affected. It’s kind of like having a relationship with somebody that’s controlling and abusive in a sense like an abusive partner, not allowing their spouse to speak out about the things that are going on in their marriage or their relationship and limiting their voice. It’s very damaging from that sense. You know, if you think about this logically, it just, you know, it’s very incriminating in my opinion.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Just months ago, the same insider leaked us a tape of Mark Zuckerberg privately speaking to his team last July, showcasing his own vaccine hesitancy when talking about covid.”

Inside clip of Mark Zuckerberg on July 16, 2020: “I just want to make sure that I share some caution on this because we just don’t know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people’s DNA and RNA.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Today, his own words would violate their new public policy.”

James: “You were the source who brought us the Mark Zuckerberg vaccine footage from July 2020, is that correct?”

Whistleblower #2: “That’s correct.”

James: “Zuckerberg seemed to change his mind – evolve on the issue of vaccine, and the facebook policy itself would have prevented Zuckerberg from saying what it is he had said just a few months ago. Pretty crazy!

What prompted you to give that footage to Project Veritas?”

Whistleblower #2: “Well, based on my own knowledge and research of, you know, the adverse effects and the potential side effects of vaccines of any medication really. So I think it’s important for people to be understanding of the – of those facts. We’re able to have these conversations at work with our, with our coworkers about our medical decisions. And we do. We have them, you know, frequently.

Why is it okay for us to have these conversations at work as adults and not have somebody step in and say, “Hey, you need to stop talking about that and you shouldn’t talk about that. You’re not allowed to talk about – that’s ‘fact-checked’. That’s false.”

Occasionally people do, in the conversation, but, but we’re allowed to have open dialogue. And, and here – “

James: “You’re saying that you can have these conversations at the water cooler and office – “

Whistleblower #2: “Absolutely. Even in the midst of the office.”

James: “In the midst of the office?”

Whistleblower #2: “Yes.”

James: “At facebook, the location, facebook, but you’re not allowed to go onto facebook and write this stuff.”

Whistleblower #2: “No.”

James: “That’s ironic.”

Whistleblower #2: “It is very ironic.”

James: “What is your message to Mr. CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who is certainly watching this video?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would ask, you said that you support freedom of expression. My question to you is, why, in a sense, you don’t support freedom of expression in the most basic sense, that’s available to all people everywhere: which is to exist as God created them – without any interference or intrusion by any corporation or government to exist as they are? And why push a narrative that it’s not okay for people to go ahead and exist to express themselves as God’s creation, without taking a vaccine? Why is there this push to suppress that ideology?”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “This insider’s biggest concern is facebook building a quote, “community of compliance”, unquote. And feels the topic may go beyond the authority of Zuckerberg himself.”

Whistleblower #2: “It’s the platform that they want to build. It’s the community that they want to build. They want to build a community where everybody complies, not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life, which regarding their own body, their own health.”

James: “And based upon your position, and what you’ve seen, and your role at facebook, why do they want people to comply? Why is that the culture at facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “For the promotion of a society that is focused on medical progress in a sense or medical, you know, medical experimentation.”

James: “What is facebook doing to promote covid vaccines to its billions of users?”

Whistleblower #2: “Specifically encouraging people to post, you know, to take on the profile frame for showing that they’ve been vaccinated and to promote in a sense, solidarity amongst other people that have taken the vaccine and encourage users to also go and get the vaccine. It’s interesting that they would, you know, encourage one side, but not allow the other side to speak of, you know, why they wouldn’t be making the decision to get a vaccine. There’s no solidarity, there’s no opportunity to be united around that. It’s just basically: Get the vaccine or feel left out.

You know, people aren’t allowed to have voice and yet, you know, facebook touts itself with promoting people’s opportunity to have voice. And, you know, as stated before, you know, have a voice about the most important decisions anyone has to face in their life is pretty important and it’s shocking and disturbing really to see people that are willing to go to the lengths of limiting those discussions around the world, you know, for things that, that concern people’s own personal security.

I almost feel like there’s, there’s outside sources pressuring Mark, or could be, I’m not saying that’s a fact, but you know, it does make me concerned. And, and you look at the video with Fauci and, you know, Mark discussing it, Mark doesn’t seem too pleased with you know, the fact that he had to bring it up. It’s almost like he was, you know, he had to mention it.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “These two brave insiders know, that they risk it all standing against facebook – one of the most powerful institutions of the day. Yet, they are still putting it all on the line in order to preserve our liberties.”

Whistleblower #2: “I think that’s also the main reason why people don’t want to come out with it, because what if I, you know, I have, I had two kids, I have my wife and if I lose my job, it’s like, what do I do? But that’s less of a concern to me.”

James: “And the people who may do what you did, next, but they’re not sure if they should do it, what’s your message to those people?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would say, go ahead and do it. And I – and then just think about what I said. There’s a lot of blowback to telling the truth. And that’s true, as far as human history is concerned. And yeah, you are going to receive blowback, but just weigh, weigh it out.

Can you live with yourself for the rest of your life if you work at facebook and you knew about this? Especially if it came out later and you’re like, “Man, I saw that so many times. I could have said something and I didn’t.” How are you going to feel about that? That’s my thing. My morality. I have to show somebody this because at least, even if nothing were to come of this, and for some reason everything was scrapped, I would still think that it, that it was worth it. Cause I’m like, well, at least I tried, I tried to show somebody this.”

James: “It’s almost like you’re saying that your desire to follow your conscience outweighs any potential risk there might be to you. Doing this.”

Whistleblower #2: “Yes. Yes.”

James: “What is your message to those people? That are watching this who agree with you inside facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would say that you’re not alone. The biggest thing with social media, that we’ve seen throughout the years is that ranking people’s comments, their posts, even, even like news media, there’s this view that tries to make you think that you’re alone in this and that you’re not the majority. And even people that say that they agree with internally, they deal with struggles. Internally, they question things. It’s just that they’re not able to overcome that, that cognitive dissonance that sits in and they resort to what is safe. It’s easier to comply with things than it is to come forward and say, “This is wrong.” Or to really awaken to understanding that the way you’re being treated or the way other people are being treated is wrong.

And so that’s challenging, but know that you’re not alone. And that if you do come forward and you do speak up that you can live peacefully, knowing that you did the right thing, no matter what. And that’s encouraging, not just to other people, but it’s also encouraging to yourself. It’s an – and it won’t make you feel as alone anymore.”

James: “That’s very profound, I think.”

Whistleblower #2: “I’m a father. So, you know, obviously like I fear for my family, for my children’s safety. And, but I also understand that I have to, as I told, you know, my wife, I have to do something. You know, when it comes time to standing up for a world I want my children to live in, I don’t want to leave them a world to where they don’t have these liberties, these personal securities to where they can willingly make their own medical decisions between them, their doctor, and, those that are closest to them. That’s not something I can live in. That’s not something I could do. And it came down to the point where I had to make a decision to do what was right.”

After Project Veritas received the leaked documents, a team member from PV reached out to facebook for a response. Mario Balaban contacted a spokesperson to address a couple of questions about the “vaccine hesitancy” policy.

Rather than answering the questions, a facebook spokesperson responded with this line, “We proactively announced this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.”

As of this moment, there is no indication that they have updated their policies regarding this information, and they did not respond back when Project Veritas requested a follow-up to answer the questions directed to them from the original email.

For more information and images of the documents that were leaked from the insiders, please visit Project Veritas’s website at:

Thank you to James O’Keefe and the Project Veritas team for going to such incredible lengths to get the Truth out to the public. Your hard work and dedication to these efforts are sincerely appreciated!

And a HUGE thank you to the brave individuals who have spoken out against these oppressive establishments and who are helping to expose the corruption within. Your honesty and integrity is greatly needed in these uncertain times.

Thank you!

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image (slight alterations have been added – original artist created the “f” used in the image and not the addition of words) by kropekk_pl from Pixabay

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”