Dr. Peter McCullough Interview with Mike Adams | “All to prepare the population for mass vaccination.” [Transcript]

“It’s astonishing how dangerous the vaccines are.”

In keeping with providing written transcripts for those who prefer to read text as opposed to watching videos, I have transcribed the following interview between Mike Adams and Dr. Peter McCullough.

Another in-depth/informative video with Dr. Peter McCullough that is transcribed in full can be found here: Dr. Peter McCullough / John Leake – Full Interview [Transcript]

Thank you to Mike Adams and Dr. Peter McCullough. While all of the information is incredibly helpful and insightful, I did highlight some pertinent topics that were discussed and some embellishments were added for emphasis.

 

Also thank you to all the doctors/scientists/researchers, etc. who have been brave enough to stand up for their patients and for humanity in general. Your bravery and integrity speaks volumes of your character and exemplifies what it means to be a strong, compassionate individual, especially in the midst of adversity and vitriol.

Mike Adams: “Welcome everyone to another extraordinary interview here on Brighteon Conversations. Remember, we are the platform where we can exercise free speech that is not allowed on the major big tech platforms. And today we have a first time guest, but you’ve seen him in other interviews, or perhaps you haven’t since some of those interviews have been banned.

But, his name is Dr. Peter McCullough, and he is just an extraordinary individual. He’s a professor of medicine, Texas A&M, Dallas; he’s published I think 42 peer reviewed papers on covid. He’s been on the forefront of trying to help save lives in this and he has a very powerful and very timely message for what’s happening with medicine and science, and covid.

So Dr. McCullough, it’s an honor to have you on, thank you for joining me today.”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “Yeah, thanks for having me, Mike, it’s great to be here.”
Mike Adams: “Well, it’s great to have you on. You’ve been one of the most requested guest for our audience; they’ve been just really enthralled by what you have said in other interviews. Can you give us kind of a summary of where you think we are right now with covid, and the failed response by government authorities around the world? Why are they not doing the right thing?”

Safe treatment for COVID is available – NO VACCINE NEEDED (and in certain cases, treatment isn’t even needed)

Dr. Peter McCullough @1:49: “Well, a quick summary is that doctors, independent doctors innovated and learned how to treat the virus. So your audience can really settle down and understand that if someone’s over age 50 with multiple medical problems, they can be treated with a standard multi drug protocol plus nutraceuticals, get through the illness just fine, and avoid hospitalization and death. So we’ve taken the fear out of covid-19, we treat it at home.

Individuals under age 50, no medical problems, they can breeze through the illness, no treatment needed, unless severe symptoms develop, and again it just it’s nutraceutical bundle, which is probably modestly helpful. The drugs that really helped, I mean, we used EUA monoclonal antibodies, the Regeneron products – all doctors can make a call to their local emergency room, patients get an antibody infusion, just like president Trump got. You saw how he breezed through covid, that can be done. So if I got a senior call me today, I’d have him go to the Baylor ER, get an antibody infusion, they’ll breeze right through it. We used drugs in sequence, oral drugs to reduce viral replication, we use inhaled and oral steroids – “

Mike Adams: “Can you list some of those medications, please? Because people want to write these down.”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “Right, so the first thing we do is we use nutraceuticals, that would be zinc, 50 milligrams / vitamin D, 5,000 International Units / vitamin C, 3,000 milligrams / quercetin 500 milligrams, twice a day – that’s a good nutraceutical bundle right there. Probably modestly helpful and actually there are some supportive data. For the antibodies we have a Regeneron product that’s given IV and it’s given over an hour, with an hour observation down in the ER; you can go in by schedule in the first couple days of illness, but to get it done.

If someone is admitted, on the other side of the admission we can actually give a GlaxoSmithKline monoclonal antibodies. These are very helpful drugs and patients should demand them. So they should ask for these drugs, they shouldn’t be a mystery to get them. Just ask for the Regeneron antibody infusion – it’s what president Trump got – “

Mike Adams: “What’s your take on hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin?”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “Yeah, so after the antibody infusion, then we can use oral drugs. And we have hydroxychloroquine, over 200 supportive studies, 200 milligrams, twice a day; ivermectin about 60 supportive studies there, and we can use about 18 milligrams a dose every other day for 3 doses. And then outside the United States favipiravir. We combine them with azithromyacin or doxycycline, to reduce bacterial super infection and to reduce overlap between what’s called atypical organisms, and then we use inhaled budesonide, 800 milligrams twice a day – micrograms twice a day. If on day 5 respiratory symptoms, we use oral prednisone for about a quick 5 days, no taper. We use a drug called colchicine once a day, for 30 days. Reduces inflammation. And then really on the backend we use aspirin, 325 milligrams a day as a blood thinner; then high risk patients we use lovenox.

So the doctor will decide with the patient which kind of program it’s going to be, but it’s typically things to reduce viral replication, things to reduce inflammation, and then thrombosis. None of the drugs are individually essential. There are protocols where no hydroxychloroquine and no ivermectin is used, and just the anti-inflammatories and blood thinners are used. That’s the South African Pedi approach. Others kind of, kind of feature hydroxy or ivermectin – that’s fine too.

Access to doctors treating COVID (free services available)

Peter McCullough @5:30: But what the listeners need to know is that there are adequate signals of benefit and acceptable safety to use drugs in combination. The only people who get admitted to the hospital and die, are the ones who get no outpatient treatment. So we have to demand treatment. We have the American Physicians and Surgeons, AAPS, online’s got a free guide. Download it, everybody should have it; it’s been downloaded millions of times. We have a list of treating doctors.

There’s another wonderful site called the Frontline Critical Care Consortium, FLCC. They also have a great network of doctors. We have 4 national telemedicine services. The featured one is called MyFreeDoctor.com. And that’s a free service! You don’t need your insurance or anything. You just give a donation if you want to. Doctors work 24 by 7, they will take your intake, they’ll get the medicines called in to your pharmacy. If your pharmacy won’t fill them, we’ll use a mail order pharmacy, we’ll get the drugs to you – get going, and nobody has to suffer through this illness. There are 15 regional telemedicine services, 500 treating doctors, It’s called Sequence Multi Drug Therapy, it’s published in the peer review literature – been used millions of times.

Let me say this much, this has really kicked in the early part of January. We crushed our curve – that’s what crushed our curve. That was before anybody was vaccinated. We crushed our curve. Since that time we’ve been flat, kind of flat at leveling out through the pandemic. Mexico City crushed their curve with the early treatment. Down in South America, countries did; India just crushed their curve with early treatment. Early treatment treats the problem! Masks and vaccines don’t actually treat the illness. We need to treat the illness with multiple drugs.”

Huge censorship from big tech/media and health agencies | Medical dictatorship

Mike Adams @7:11: “Well how shocked are you in observing the official response to this? How shocked are you as a trained, published physician, who has the, the right motivation to help save lives, to help people get well, to reduce human suffering… This is supposed to be the moral code of being a physician. How shocked are you of the suppression of all the things that you just mentioned? From big tech censoring the mention and the CDC censoring, and the WHO censoring – why didn’t we have a national response that said, “Hey, let’s use what works.”?

Dr. Peter McCullough: “Well, we should have. We should have had doctors in charge who actually are real doctors who are board certified who are taking care of patients with covid-19. We needed doctors who had courage, who actually behaved like trauma surgeons. We don’t need doctors on TV who are not working in teams, who are not board certified, who have never seen a covid patient. That’s what America in the world has been looking at here and it’s really an atrocity.

You know, doctors always work in teams. We should never have a single doctor say anything on TV. Get a team! Get a team. We work in teams in rounds. We’ve seen no international collaboration. Do you know, I gave […] rounds today by webex to France. And we were collaborating. We were exchanging ideas. Americans have not seen any exchange of ideas between doctors on TV. They’ve basically seen a medical dictatorship. From one person. And Americans should be very alarmed on where’s the teams of doctors, where’s the international collaboration.

You know here I’m sitting here in Texas and you know a few hours south of us they’re handing out treatment kits by the millions! In baggies. And Texas would never know about it. Because there’s not any window to the outside world.”

Deliberate suppression of medical treatment and malfeasance in the health industry

Mike Adams @8:57: “Now, you’ve published many, many papers. You’re one of the most prolific writers in the area of internal medicine, and your work is sided by thousands of other studies and papers. So your history here of research and medicine is unassailable.

And what you just said about a medical dictatorship seems so true when last year, remember when states and I believe Michigan was one of them, actually outlawed the prescribing of hydroxychloroquine for covid. Why would a state government criminalize – oh, and by the way, that happened after the Lancet published that, later retracted, a bogus study that said hydroxychloroquine caused heart tissue/scarring and so on. But this seems like a medical dictatorship as you said, prohibiting the practice of good medicine by doctors who are on the frontlines. Would that be an accurate assessment?”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “It’s accurate. Someone just sent me a treatment protocol from one of the Baylor Scott & White hospitals in our health system in central Texas. Kind of right applies to you. And that protocol to this day says ‘Do not use hydroxychloroquine to treat covid-19.’

We have 200 supportive studies. Lancet published a fraudulent paper. The FDA, based on the fraudulent paper said ‘do not use hydroxychloroquine’. Here we are, a year later, and hospital treatment guidelines say don’t use hydroxychloroquine. No one reviewed the literature. No one updated the literature. We have 200 studies. There’s a 30,000 patient study from Iran showing a giant reduction in hospitalization and death with hydroxychloroquine based program.

So what you’re seeing here is bad research. It’s bad medicine. People aren’t updated. There should be weekly updates. Monthly guidelines updates. Here, we’re frozen in time, fraudulent paper, ill-advised guidance from the FDA, and frozen in time with no contemporaneous review. None. It’s malfeasance.

Mike Adams: “Well that’s the thing. It seems, at least in my assessment, they deliberately pushed a fraudulent study through the Lancet, and I believe also in the New England Journal of Medicine, knowing that the retractions might never really happen. Like they’ve established now that hydroxychloroquine is dangerous and it’s hard to ever get that taken back out of the medical literature or even in the minds of the people who rely on that literature. So it’s kind of like, you know, the New York Times publishing something that’s false and then the retraction comes on page 8 in small print, you know, a day later – nobody sees the retraction.”

Intentional corruption for the purpose of hurting people | Attack on hydroxychloroquine

Dr. Peter McCullough @11:36: “I agree with this. I agree with you. I think it was intentional. I think the entire action was intentional and it was aligned to do harm. It was aligned to hurt people. And hydroxychloroquine became the focal point of how individuals with intent to do harm could do harm.

You know hydroxychloroquine, the second largest hydroxychloroquine plant outside of Taipei, was mysteriously burned to the ground. We heard words of hydroxychloroquine being burned at night in the pharmacies across Africa. In Queensland, Australia, in August, or – in early in April of last year, Queensland, Australia, they put it on the books that they would put a doctor in jail if a doctor tried to help a patient with hydroxychloroquine.

Now come on! I prescribe this every day. Rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, we can give it to pregnant women. I mean we prescribe hydroxychloroquine – you can give it to patients with dry eyes and other rheumatologic conditions. And suddenly in covid-19, we can’t use a simple, safe drug to help people?

Something Americans should think: something is REALLY wrong. We should have been, you know, we had the right idea – we stockpiled hydroxychloroquine, we had it ready to go, but then we didn’t release it from the stockpile! We made it impossible to use.”

Mike Adams: “Well, you just hinted at something, I want to explore this a little more deeply with you, that you got to intent. You believe that the intent was to cause harm. And I think most of our viewers would absolutely agree with you. And I do too, although I’m here asking your view, not really my views here today, but, if their intent was to cause harm and not just complacency or bureaucracy or inadvertent mistakes, what does this mean about this, the institution of medicine and science in the context of this pandemic? I mean, why aren’t they trying to save as many lives as possible? What’s going on here?”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “It’s in the minds of doctors. In fact, there was a doctor who has done some of the, really just, I think, probably low-quality research, some very poor randomized trials that were stopped early – and they always stop early. Hydroxychloroquine is always a little bit ahead, and it’s winning; they stop early and say, ‘Oh, there’s no difference. Hydroxychloroquine didn’t do anything.’ Well, there’s a doctor who’s been leading some of these studies, he put out a message on twitter and said, ‘Oh, most good doctors have moved on from hydroxychloroquine.’

It’s like, you know, why state that, when hydroxychloroquine is a worldwide standard. It’s a standard, it’s always been a standard in Europe, in Rome, in Italy, it has a whole program called Treatment Domiciliary at Home. [Erik Rimaldi – sp?], who leads that effort, they’ve had major rallies in piazzas all over Italy, declaring ZERO hospitalizations with an early approach to hydroxychloroquine. Thousands and thousands of people. It’s standard in Iran. It’s standard in Russia. Used widely in India.

And you know what? When the first wave of covid-19 hit, in March of last year, that was the Wuhan version. That was the wild-type. That was the most serious version. You know, covid’s gotten easier and easier to treat. But the most serious wave, we had a very little blip in the United States. You know why? Because we had a massive use of hydroxychloroquine. It was then when agencies tried to kill it. That’s when the epidemic got out of control. We should have stuck with hydroxy hard all the way through. And you know, ivermectin works fine. We don’t use them alone. But when we sync them in with aspirin and steroids, blood thinners and colchicine, the program works tremendously. 85% reductions in hospitalizations and death.” 

Mike Adams: “Well, how much do you think a profit motive is behind this? I mean, do you get the feeling that if hydroxychloroquine were a new, on-patent drug, that just came out, Johnson & Johnson let’s say, and it were a thousand dollars a dose, and all governments offered to buy it at a thousand dollars a dose, do you get the feeling that suddenly it would be a miracle cure in the media if that were the case?”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “No I don’t, believe it or not. I don’t think it’s a profit motive. You know, Merck, in Santa Fe, have had oral drugs. In development. They’re a part of Operation Warp Speed. They’ve been on slow gear with these oral drugs. Slow gear. You’d think if these companies wanted to make some money on oral drugs, then these drug companies, they know how to do big trials. They know how to move fast. Why are they moving at a snail’s pace? You know, we are overloaded with millions of cases of covid-19. You know what we needed? We needed 20,000 person outpatient trials of multiple drugs. And we needed it last year. Nobody did that. And believe me, they all had the resources. So I don’t think it’s profit driven.”

MOTIVE: Mass vaccination | “A NEEDLE IN EVERY ARM”

Mike Adams @16:30: “What do you think is the motive of this suppression of the treatments?”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “I think it was all to prepare the population for mass vaccination. I think it was very intentional, to maximize the amount of fear, suffering, hospitalization and death, to prepare the population to accept mass vaccination. And when mass vaccination came out, they didn’t say targeted, or just for the seniors, or just for the maximum benefit is, they said ‘A NEEDLE IN EVERY ARM’. And they meant it.

And nowadays, that’s all you hear about, morning/noon/and night, is vaccination. You don’t see a word about treatment in the hospital, any updates on treatment; it’s vaccination morning/noon/and night, and people are dreaming of mass vaccination. We have doctors screaming at patients telling them they have to be vaccinated. Doctors saying that only vaccinated patients can be in their waiting room. I mean, everything has been set up on this vaccine. There’s been Saturday Night Live skits, about the vaccine. Since when do we do that? Vaccines are never that exciting!”

McCullough Report available on americaoutloud.com

Mike Adams @17:36: “I want to ask you more details about the vaccine, I just want to remind our viewers here that you have a broadcast; it’s on americaoutloud.com, americaoutloud.com. It’s the McCullough Report – is that once a week, or what’s the schedule on that?”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “Yeah, it comes out – so it’s run twice on weekends, and then it comes out on the iheartradio and the big podcast platforms – what I do is I bring in experts, who are absolutely – and we go through their backgrounds, so America knows these are the top people, all over the world, and we do interviews. You know, I try to go 8 to 10 minutes and really get the key information out. And I’ve interviewed absolutely the top people in order to break through to America.

“We are going to squash any valid scientific information on treatment and on safety and just mass promote the vaccine.”

Peter McCullough @18:21: Because we have what’s called the Trusted News Service. I hope everybody understands this. We have an overt censoring program that all the major media signed on to at the beginning of December. And the agreement was, that they were going to mass promote the vaccine, and they were going to suppress all information on treatment and vaccine safety. And everybody signed off on it. Everybody did! So MSNBC, NBC, CNN, twitter! Youtube! They have explicitly said, ‘we are going to squash any valid scientific information on treatment and on safety and just mass promote the vaccine.’ And that’s what we got.”

Mike Adams: “Yeah, and you’re exactly right. It’s just been propaganda and a couple of things that I’ve noticed in the media about vaccines, is number 1, any vaccine injuries are always designated ‘rare’, no matter how many people they impact. Such as the myocarditis affecting young healthy men, right now.”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “Can I address that, because I agree with you. It has been said to be rare – any claim that something is rare means, that you have to go through every person vaccinated and see if they got it! You just can’t take a small number of cases that got pushed forward and divide it by everybody who got it and, and on priority, say that people who on the denominator didn’t get it, that’s not true.

So last night I was on Fox news, and the announcer said, ‘Well what about, you know these are rare cases.’ I said, “Listen, there’s 387,000 safety reports with the vaccines. That’s more than any medical product in history by a mile.” And he goes, ‘Well these are rare.’ I said, “Well, I don’t think so. That’s not rare.” So the answer is with these vaccines, none of these things are rare. In fact, they are far too common and it’s worrisome.”

Mike Adams: “Well, and it shows the intellectual dishonesty. Because they can use that word ‘rare’ in whatever way they want. You can bet that if a dietary supplement were causing this number of reports, it would be called a danger to the public and common. It wouldn’t be rare.”

Excessive deaths from COVID vaccine shows it is NOT “safe and effective”

Dr. Peter McCullough @20:31: “Well let me give you some standards: 1976, Swine flu pandemic, 25 deaths, 500 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, it was 22 million people vaccinated, it’s off the market. Ok.

A drug, typically a drug, 5 unexplained deaths, gets a black box warning for death. 50 unexplained deaths, off the market! Ok? With all the vaccines combined, 500 million shots a year, 70 vaccines, we get about a 150 or 160 deaths that roll in, not related in time to the vaccine over the course of a year.

Covid-19, we’re at 6,100 deaths; 44% occur in the 48 hours after the shot. And we started to see the mortality diverge from expected, on January 22nd, and there’s been NO safety report from the FDA or NIH. Or nothing on the media. No press briefing on vaccine safety. None!

Americans should be alarmed that we have not had a press briefing on safety. We should be very alarmed! The vaccines, it may not work, but it should be safe! And if we don’t have any update or press briefing on safety, no publication of safety, I think Americans should be greatly alarmed.”

Mike Adams: “Well, but the other thing that the media does is they say, even when they acknowledge some adverse reactions, they say the benefits are worth the risks. But, as you know, as a scientist yourself, when you’re talking about an age group that only has maybe a one in a million chance of mortality from the vaccine – I’m sorry, from covid, what possible benefit can there be that outweighs any substantial risk, right? There’s no benefit to taking it in those age groups.”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “No, there’s some countries that really – for instance, Germany, is pretty similar to the United States, I want to say maybe they have 30% of people vaccinated? They’re just kind of focusing on people over 65. I think Governor Ron DeSantis in Florida had the right thing. Remember, he didn’t fool around. He got the people over 65 vaccinated then the rest of it.

It’s very hard at this point in time with the amount of safety and amount of neurologic damage, heart damage, blood clots and deaths with these vaccines, it’s very hard to find any group that would benefit right now. I was, you know, encouraging the vaccine to my patients, about 70% of them got it in December/January/February, and right now based on the safety, I can’t in good conscience – I can’t, you know, I can’t recommend it to anybody. Maybe on a case by case basis.

There’s going to be a far safer vaccine coming called NovaVax, and NovaVax… [indistinguishable] and should be much much better in terms of safety. We’re hoping that they can speed this one in and phase out the first generation of vaccines.”

Deceptive terminology used to mislead the public. Vaccine consent form says “This is not approved.”

Mike Adams @23:37: “So another thing that I’ve noticed that the media doing on this is they conflate emergency authorization use with quote “approval” of the vaccine. So you’ll see newscasters tell their audiences things like, ‘Well, the FDA has approved all these vaccines’, but they haven’t, really. It hasn’t gone through the long-term clinical trials, it hasn’t been declared safe or efficacious, either one. What – do you think this is just part of the deliberate deception, or what?

Dr. Peter McCullough:Yeah, I think it is deliberate, deceptive. Americans who have gotten the vaccine, and 45% of Americans have gotten the vaccine, so that’s about half of your audience, Mike, they’ve signed the consent! They know exactly what the vaccine consent says. It says ‘This is not approved.’ It says ‘We don’t know if this is going to work.’ It says ‘It’s investigational.’ Means it’s research. Means you’re signing up for research. And they collect your personal information to track you. And it says ‘We don’t know what the side effects are.’ They can range all the way from a sore arm to death. And that’s what the consent form – 45% of Americans signed up for this.

Genetic gene delivery vaccines create dangerous spike protein that cause damage to cells, blood vessels and cause blood clots.

Peter McCullough @24:47: The vaccines that they signed up for are considered genetic gene delivery medicines. Ok? They are genetic, biologically active products. Ok? The typical vaccine is either a protein, or a dead virus, or an inactivated virus. It’s never a gene transfer substance. So whoever signed up for this, and 45% of your listeners signed up for this, they took Pfizer, Moderna, or J&J, they took a genetic product. Ok? That product transfers genetic material into your cells. That’s what it did. And then inside the cells, and there’s cells all over the body, they produce a dangerous protein called the spike protein. And wherever the genetic material goes, and we know, it goes to the brain, it goes to the heart – it produces the spike protein, which is inside cells, damages those cells, it damages the surface of those cells, causes inflammation, and then from there it travels in the body for about 2 weeks causing damage to blood vessels and causing blood clots.

So Senator Johnson, last night, had a townhall for vaccine injury victims. And there were dozens of them and they told America about how they’ve sustained brain damage. Or heart damage from the vaccine. And this has occurred in thousands and thousands of people. 21,000 people have been hospitalized after the vaccine. 27% of them are below age 50. It’s astonishing how dangerous the vaccines are.

Mike Adams: “Yeah, and you just mentioned several bombshells there that I want to get into. You referred to the bio-distribution study – one of which I’m aware is out of Japan; and the mainstream vaccine industry claims that these spike protein nanoparticles do not circulate throughout the body, but the studies show they do. Think there’s another pharmacokinetic study as well that establishes that.

What you just mentioned is huge. I mean, just based on that research alone, it seems like the FDA should pull the emergency authorization and say, ‘Wait a second, we need to study this in more depth. We can’t inject people if this is circulating throughout the entire body.’ But they’re not doing that. What’s going on?”

Nanoparticles in the vaccines concentrating in the ovaries – causing drop in fertility

Dr. Peter McCullough @27:11: “The vaccines that Johnson & Johnson/Pfizer/Moderna have a very dangerous mechanism action. We cannot have genetic substances circulating in our body in lipid nanoparticles or other forms of matrix nanoparticles and go to our brain! We can’t do that! I mean, that cannot be allowed. It’s a dangerous mechanism action.

The Japanese did not trust Pfizer, and when Pfizer said it stayed locally in the arm, the Japanese said ‘We don’t trust you. Show us where this goes’, and it was a biodistribution study done of the nanoparticles, not the messenger RNA, but the nanoparticles, and they went everywhere. They did wash out of organs in a couple of days but they hyper-concentrated in the ovaries.

In Europe, they didn’t trust Moderna on fertility. And they asked them, ‘What happens to fertility with Moderna?’ They did an animal study and Moderna dropped fertility.

The FDA, Mike, told Pfizer/Moderna and J&J,  ‘No pregnant women. No women of child-bearing potential who cannot assure contraceptive.’ They did that for a reason. They knew the vaccines should not be used in young women and they knew that.”

Mike Adams: “And yet the vaccine is being promoted for pregnant women all across America today by the medical establishment, but just getting back to that study, as I recall, one of the other areas where the nanoparticles tended to cluster was in the adrenals. So now we’re talking about a hormonal interference which could affect fertility, it could affect mental states, moods, it could affect SO many things. Right? In the body. Unknown effects.”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “Right. Well there have been nanoparticle studies, there was one from China published about 8 years or so ago that tested these nanoparticles. And they asked, ‘Where did they go?’ And they made a brilliant nice rainbow of all the organs where the nanoparticles showered, and they did show that they go to the ovaries. So the point is, and the adrenals, so the point is, the FDA, Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, they KNEW or they should have known that these particles are gonna hit these vital organs. And then when they drop their genetic payload then they’re going to start producing the spike protein and damaging cells in those organs. So it was not surprising when young women were ill-advised and took the vaccines they started having problems with their periods. That was not unexpected.

“These vaccines are directly killing babies in the first trimester and it is absolutely atrocious. Horrible!”

Peter McCullough @29:41: In a New England Journal of Medicine paper of pregnancy, women who took the vaccine, the authors concluded that it was safe to give the vaccine in pregnancy. Now, no woman carried the baby 9 months because the vaccines haven’t been around 9 months, but they looked at different windows of time, and they divided all the pregnancy loss rates by the largest denominator possible, so it was really false reporting. When we zeroed in on the first trimester, and just divided by those who got the vaccine in the trimester, not those who got it later on, there was an 83% loss in fetal – in the babies. So these vaccines are directly killing babies in the first trimester and it is absolutely atrocious. Horrible!

@30:27: [indistinguishable] – college right now, is recommending that women, pregnant women, take the covid-19 vaccine. Pregnant women can breeze right through covid-19. There has been some bad outcomes, but it is very treatable with our drugs, we can even use hydroxychloroquine through pregnancy, we can use prednisone and other drugs. No woman should EVER take the risk with the covid-19 vaccine during pregnancy. Period! If the FDA, Pfizer/Moderna didn’t allow it in their clinical trials, it should be – not be allowed in practice today.”

Mike Adams: “Yeah, and that’s – you’re talking common sense medicine, here. But it seems like common sense has been thrown out the window. But I’m so glad you brought this up, because it seems like beginning in about maybe 6 months and continuing on we may see a collapse in birth rates, and maybe ongoing infertility problems. But that brings up the obvious question: do you think that there is an infertility or long-term population reduction agenda? Many people believe that. Lots of my guests have discussed that. Is that something that you subscribe to, or is it – we don’t have enough data yet to conclude that?”

Addressing “conspiracy theories” and the brainwashing of the public

Dr. Peter McCullough @31:32: “You know, I can’t – I’ve been so focusing on the medical response and taking care of my patients. I know others are working on, you know, people have called them “conspiracy theories”; the, you know the rapper, RC rapper, says, you know, it’s not a conspiracy theory if it keeps coming true. And I’m not going to comment on conspiracy theories but if you ask me, do you think these vaccines are going to have an impact on fertility, I think the answer is yes.

We’ve already seen that with the Moderna application and now with the fetal loss. Data fairly calculated from the New England Journal of Medicine study, there’s no doubt about it. Pregnant women are going to lose their babies if they take the vaccine. And it’s worse than that. Once they’ve conceived and they’re breastfeeding, we now have events in the Vaccine Adverse reporting system where women take the vaccine, they generate the spike protein, and we infer the spike protein goes through the milk and kills the baby.

So these vaccines need to stay away from babies and mothers and women who are trying to conceive. I mean, that can’t be a more clear message.

You know, women are concerned about drinking half a glass of wine during pregnancy. How in the world can they take a shot of a wildly experimental, unproven, unsafe vaccine for the first time? How could they ever do it? It’s almost as if Americans and doctors and everybody are just brainwashed together. They are brainwashed! They’ve been propagandized and they are blindly accepting something that they should just stay away from.”

Doctors getting silenced, threatened, fired for speaking out against the narrative

Mike Adams @32:58: “Well I think most of our audience would agree with that. And by the way, you mentioned earlier about the percentage of people getting the vaccine, and I think I’m proud to say close to zero percent of our audience has taken this vaccine. Very close to zero percent. Because they’re well educated and well informed.

But I want to ask you about possible pushback because, you know, many doctors have been threatened, censored, fired for speaking out. They’ve been silenced. Even early on. I remember New York City, back in late March of last year, one particular doctor was saying, ‘Woah! We need to be treating this as an oxygen deprivation condition affecting hemoglobin.’ And he was silenced! And this has happened ever since then. What kind of pushback are you getting? Are they trying to silence you from doing interviews like this?”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “No, I have to tell you, I have over 600 peer-review publications. I’m the editor of two major journals, senior associate editor of a third. I’m the most published person in my field in the world. I’ve had covid-19 myself. I’ve suffered through it. My wife’s side of the family, we’ve had fatalities in her side of the family. I can tell you right now, I am supremely qualified to give my opinions. I have the right to give my opinions. And anybody who thinks they can threaten me or take me on, bring it on. No one’s had the guts to do it. And they would absolutely, positively be pummeled. And be ashamed.

Lack of courage and lack of compassion in the health care industry | Long line of shame

Peter McCullough @34:25: In fact, I’ve had a couple people in Indiana, I think they feel shame. They feel ashamed for their lack of courage and their lack of ability to compassionately help patients. Patients cried out for help. 600,000 of them cried out for help. Doctors, health care systems, and clinics turned them down. They suffered. Then they were hospitalized. They went into isolation, Mike, they never saw their families again and then they died.

We have a long, long line of shame. And there’s a lot of people walking that line of shame. Most of them can’t look me in the eye. I’ll tell you right now. They cannot look me in the eye. They are so ashamed of themselves.”

Awakening out of the trance | Facing the horrific blind actions of “just following orders”

Mike Adams @35:05: “Do you think that there will be, at some point, looking back, some kind of awakening? In previous interviews you’ve described some doctors as being almost like they’re in a trance. Or under a spell of some kind. Do you think that they will be able to awaken from that trance and look at what happened and recognize that that was not a high integrity practicing of medicine?”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “Some people have said that the awakening out of a trance will be like a Nazi war crime doctors. Where they’ll somehow come out of their trance and they’re going to be terrified at what they did. And I would bring obstetricians right to the very front. And when they come out of their trance and they realize in horror that they were advising pregnant women to get injections of genetic biological – these are gene transfer platforms. Wildly experimental, that produce in an uncontrolled manner, a dangerous protein for the human body that gouges blood vessels, causes blood clots.

We KNOW this. We’ve known that this is a blood-clotting illness for a long time. That they advise this – I think these obstetricians are going to wake up in a cold sweat and they’re going to be HORRIFIED with what they recommended! They are going to be – and it’s going to be – I gotta tell you, we have years of reckoning on this. We have years of reckoning. There is a line of shame that these doctors and nurses and mid-level providers, and clinics, and hospitals will walk, that is atrocious.

In pregnancy, above ALL conditions, it’s “primum non nocere”, we will never do harm to a pregnant woman. We would, you know, we have drugs. We have pregnancy classes, A, B and C. We would NEVER ever give a drug that we even thought had a chance of causing harm to a pregnant woman. Let alone just jack’em up with a genetic juice which we now know is absolutely, positively dangerous.

It is atrocious what’s going on right now and we can’t be more alarmed. I think any woman listening to this, who has any ounce of common sense, ought to absolutely talk to every other woman – and you know what? Have some real conversations with your obstetrician. Give them a phone call. Send an email. And say, ‘Listen. Wake up. What are you doing right here, right now? That’s causing harm.’

Worldwide distrust | Grandparents demanding grandchildren to get vaccinated

Mike Adams @37:22: “And now along with doctors at one point waking up, as you were just describing, do you think that there’s also a very real risk that… when all of this eventually comes out, and looking back on it that the public’s faith in the entire institution of medicine and science, may be so fractured that at that point the public may refuse to even consider helpful interventions and therapies that could save lives. Because all of it may be discredited at some point depending on how big this thing goes.”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “Right. So with things are really going off the rails, so public […] doesn’t trust the media, doesn’t trust the public agencies, doesn’t trust their doctors or doctor groups, and they don’t trust each other! They don’t trust – do you know right now that there are grandparents that say that they won’t see their grandchildren unless they’re vaccinated! So now they’re putting – and the grandparents are vaccinated. So now they’re putting the risk of blood clots and myocarditis and death onto their grandchildren and saying that they won’t see each other for Disney.

Colleges mandating vaccines for students while faculty (and the FDA/CDC/NIH) are not taking it.

Peter McCullough @38:25: Do you know we have 9% of colleges that are mandating the investigational vaccines. So they’re actually mandating their student bodies participate in research with this, which is openly dangerous biological products. They have no ability to help these youngsters. And you know in many of these colleges: there’s no policy, there’s no exemption process.

And do you know that in many of these colleges their faculties aren’t taking it! Now the FDA, the CDC and the NIH, they’re not taking the vaccine! They’re not taking it! And the faculty’s not taking it! So they’re going to make the students take it under duress!

So the vaccine has been propagandized and now socially weaponized so the universities can hurt the student population! Just like the obstetricians are hurting their patients. Like the grandparents are hurting their grandchildren.

Mike, something is REALLY disturbing; wrong. And there are so many players in this.

The need for integrity, courage, principles… and justice.

Mike Adams @39:23: “Well said, and we’re up against the time here, I mean, we can continue to talk. Maybe, hopefully you can come back and join us again but, I just want to say, the people watching this, thank you for your integrity. And thank you for your courage but also for sticking to your principles. You want evidence, you want to show efficacy, you want to reduce risk and save lives. And that’s what every doctor should be in America, and somehow that – that seems like it’s lost. And that’s what freaks people out as much covid. It’s that ‘who can we trust anymore?’

Dr. Peter McCullough: “Well, I gotta tell you, if there’s ever a time for courage, for integrity, for commitment to principles of medical ethics, and commitment to biomedical science, and lastly, a commitment to justice, now is the time. And listen, if that’s my role, and that’s your role, that’s our role that we’re serving right now. And America needs to get behind its heroes. Because we’ve got a long uphill battle. There is a disturbing trance that is basically like a black cloud over the world right now. And we’re trying to find a way out. There’s so much harm and suffering going on, and NONE of it is needed.”

Mike Adams: “And I’ll tell you, and you are one of the bright points of light in this darkness, and the AAPS, this is a shining moment for that organization. They are so right, they – I don’t even know what to say, but we’re going to interview, I think, other prominent people from the AAPS because their voices are desperately needed right now to save lives and end human suffering. And also help stop this pandemic.

So, thank you Dr. McCullough. It’s an honor to have you on. I really enjoyed this conversation. You’re a wonderful person; I really honor your knowledge and your courage. Thank you.”

Dr. Peter McCullough: “Thanks Mike. Great interview.”

Thank you to everyone reading and/or watching the interview. Please help spread the word and stay informed. Research is incredibly important, especially in these uncertain times and with the incredible amount of propaganda and deliberate media suppression.

Thank you to everyone exposing these corruptions.

What Determines “Vaccine Hesitancy”? | Intelligence? Paranoia? Experience?

Or perhaps plain, old “common sense”?

My previous post: Christopher Langan, One of the Smartest Men in the World, Denounces Vaccine Agenda, addresses the perspective that one of the smartest people in the world has when it comes to the unprecedented push to get the whole world vaccinated against a disease that has a high survival rate among the younger and healthier population.

Even without mentioning the alternative treatments that have largely been suppressed by big tech platforms and mainstream media – all in order to promote these vaccines – Chris Langan voices his opinions on the “global elites” and his awareness that there are organizations/individuals orchestrating this charade in order to cull the population.

Heck, even people, perhaps unaware that they are unconsciously thinking the same thing, have let it out in a Freudian slip of some kind – an example of deep-seated belief in something, yet being prevented in expressing it?

“We were talking about the goal of at least 70% of Americans with at least one shot by July 4th. The White House says, “Okay. We’re not going to reach that cull- goal, we’ll be close, but we won’t reach it.”

Have you asked yourselves, those who came up with that goal, and thought it was doable, what went wrong? Why wasn’t it reached?”

“It’s worrying health officials, who call mass vaccinations the only path to a return to normalcy. Almost 4 months into the vaccination effort, providers are beginning to run out of people who want to be euthani- err, immunized.

With these strange anomalies, it makes one wonder, how does a person decide what’s best for them, and what they should inevitably stay away from? Using this vaccination goal as an example, what makes people so certain that it’s in our best interest, in order to save the population from this “deadly covid virus” and its numerous “variants” (which poses such tragic symptoms – like the sniffles, sneezing, runny nose – very similar to that of the COMMON COLD or even ALLERGIES, for that matter, – that so many people seem to have forgotten existed for centuries…)?

Also bringing up the fact that there are ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS that ACTUALLY WORK yet are being ACTIVELY DISCOURAGED and ATTACKED by government agencies, health organizations, news media, etc. And while censorship of this alternative solution is out of control, not to mention the incredible amount of insane propaganda built to prop up these vaccines as the savior of mankind – (while simultaneously letting thousands of people die due to refusing them early treatment of covid), one has to consider, who can possibly be blind to all of this blatant manipulation?

And that brings me to this topic. How does someone become “vaccine hesitant”? How are some people on the extreme side of the vaccine hesitancy chart and absolutely refuse to take this vaccine?

I keep seeing debates about what equates to intelligence. But this one label opens up a whole other can of worms.

For instance, there is a difference between “intelligence” and “wisdom”. As well as there is a difference between “common sense” and “book knowledge”. And “experience” has a lot to do with this topic as well, as while one grows and matures, they LEARN what to do and what not to do. Even learning from past mistakes or history in general, and taking others’ experiences into account.

Too many times, however, all of these different traits get bundled up together under the same meaning. But there is a vast difference.

Take the following sentences, for example:

“It’s common sense to trust the experts and scientists. They are “experts” for a reason and know a lot more than I do. I’d be stupid not to listen to them.”

vs.

“It’s common sense to not just blindly believe in the “experts”. Just because they’re experts doesn’t mean they don’t have an ulterior motive or can’t be bribed, manipulated, coerced, threatened, etc.”

Without further context, the first group of sentences sounds rather logical. It’s common sense to listen to an expert, since they are often respected and heralded for being knowledgeable and experienced in their field.

However, in light of OTHER information, we realize (or we would, if we’re paying attention…) that certain “experts” do indeed have an ulterior motive.

Then what happens when the context becomes:

“Trust these experts, but not those experts.”

“Trust us. We’re the experts.”
Anthony Fauci Caught ‘Lying’ – Several Times (picture shown here shows Dr. Fauci making the “hidden hand” gesture.

Where would our direction of common sense then lead? And when you have multiple outlets, especially huge social platforms and mainstream news media all dictating to following one particular narrative, over and over and over again, while refusing to consider alternative view points, and at the same time publicly shaming and smearing, and suppressing, differing opinions, one would think the question then would be “why”?

Is it simply because these corrupt industries truly care about our well being and don’t want any misinformation out? …Really? As far as I can see it, there are two important distinctions that people need to consider when it comes to anyone’s agenda: healthy skepticism, and just plain out gullibility.

Far too often people end up falling into the lane of gullibility and wanting to believe that our government and health industries want nothing more than to provide for our benefit and save grandma and grandpa.

Now, wonder why there is a huge push to label anyone who is “hesitant” about these vaccines (or anything in general…) as a paranoid conspiracy theorist or far-right extremist, etc. These “powers that shouldn’t be” are fighting against people thinking for themselves and who are questioning authority figures. That’s what all of these ridiculous labels are all about.

The easily misled individuals will believe what the news/media/politicians tell them, because to them, it’s “common sense”, and/or because they are easily swayed by the media and don’t want to be labeled as an “anti-vax” or any other version of name-calling rhetoric that’s been spewed in order to discredit someone. (Akin to children in middle school calling others “lame” or “loser” or “nerd”… but I digress.)

Unfortunately, many people have missed the memo that these very same “experts” / “authority figures” / “news journalists”, are specifically hired for their role in order to dictate the population into following certain narratives. And these groups of individuals believing them fell for that trap, hook, line and sinker.

OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD

“In 1977 Carl Bernstein published an article titled “The CIA and the Media” reporting that the CIA had covertly infiltrated America’s most influential news outlets and had over 400 reporters who it considered assets in a program known as Operation Mockingbird. It was a major scandal, and rightly so. The news media is meant to report truthfully about what happens in the world, not manipulate public perception to suit the agendas of spooks and warmongers.”

Nowadays the CIA collaboration happens right out in the open, and people are too propagandized to even recognize this as scandalous. Immensely influential outlets like The New York Times uncritically pass on CIA disinfo which is then spun as fact by cable news pundits. The sole owner of The Washington Post is a CIA contractorand WaPo has never once disclosed this conflict of interest when reporting on US intelligence agencies per standard journalistic protocol.”

“This isn’t Operation Mockingbird. It’s so much worse. Operation Mockingbird was the CIA doing something to the media. What we are seeing now is the CIA openly acting as the media. Any separation between the CIA and the news media, indeed even any pretence of separation, has been dropped.”

“There’s a common delusion in our society that depraved government agencies who are known to have done evil things in the past have simply stopped doing evil things for some reason. This belief is backed by zero evidence, and is contradicted by mountains of evidence to the contrary. It’s believed because it is comfortable, and for literally no other reason.”

The CIA Used to Infiltrate the Media. Now the CIA *is* the Media

The mockingbird’s latin name is Mimus polyglottos, which literally translates to “many-tongued mimic.

10 Fun Facts About the Northern Mockingbird | There’s more to this flying copycat than meets the eye . . . or ear.

Multiple news sources from Sinclair repeat the same script, verbatim, denouncing sharing and repeating the same “false news”. “Copycat” / “mimic” indeed…

I believe in most cases, like Mr. Christopher Langan, the people who refuse this vaccine are using COMMON SENSE and CRITICAL THINKING. A skill that even an “intelligent” person may not necessarily have. After all, one can be incredibly smart when it comes to “book knowledge”, yet lack the skills to apply this book knowledge in real life.

Take someone with intense photographic memory, for example. They are able to recall complete books, down to every last word, and even recall what page a specific piece of text is on. From this, one can consider this person to be extremely smart. However, as different and incredible as this brain/mind process is, it is still reading from a book; not necessarily comprehending what they are reading.

Also take into account savants, who are outstanding and a genius in their field, however may not have the other capabilities to make sense of other important information.

Conditioned to follow the masses…

Then there is the sad issue of FOMO (fear of missing out) and social conditioning. Even if someone is smart enough to see through this charade, some are easily coerced and manipulated into following through just because everyone else is falling in line. So even if they are “intelligent” in the traditional sense, they may not have enough resolution and fortitude to stick to their morals and integrity, and instead they end up caving into societal pressure.

With all of that being said, I am not an “expert”. I am not a psychologist. Far be it for me to really delve deep down and be able to determine the whys and whos of the mentality of the people that decide to get this vaccine compared to those who don’t.

But to be frank, it’s not even about common sense anymore. It’s OBVIOUS. And I’m not even joking. Fine, if someone lacks common sense. But with all of the different pieces of evidence coming together to paint this circumstance, it’s actually not even about “intelligence” or “common sense” or even “critical thinking”.

It’s about pure and simple denial. Blindness. A refusal to even look at the pieces of evidence that clearly points to what’s going on. Because to do so, would upset millions of people’s psychological state out of the structural social conditioning that they’ve been indoctrinated into, and it would literally shatter their whole preconceived notion and mental state of what their whole lives have revolved around up until that point. Perhaps their fear in realizing that the government and corrupt industries such as the pharmaceutical companies / health organizations / military, etc. AREN’T there to protect us, is too much to overcome, so they withdraw into their safe space and continue to believe this lie.

This is the only logical conclusion that makes sense when seeing so many ignore the OBVIOUS signs that we are actually under attack by these institutions.

To be fair, I don’t want to believe it either. I wish I could go back in my hovel and continue to live life unawares that humanity is being attacked and targeted for genocidal mass de-population. But my eyes are open and once you see it, you can’t un-see it.

And it’s interesting how when discussing this situation amongst my own friends and acquaintances I see a plethora of different results.

For instance, people who I was absolutely sure would have nothing to do with this vaccine, ended up taking it. Why? “Because everyone else was doing it.” …[sigh]

On the flip side, people who I was almost certain would get it, “just because everyone else is doing it”, DIDN’T GET IT.

Life lesson. Never judge someone, because you never know what they’re truly thinking on the inside.

That brings me back to intelligence. IMHO, deciding to take this vaccine or not doesn’t even have anything to do with intelligence at this point. There are very intelligent scientists, engineers, doctors, etc. who have decided to take the vaccine. And there have been plenty of ordinary citizens that have decided not to take it.

And if we take ethics into account, with some people refusing to take this vaccine due to religious/spiritual reasons, or even a natural approach, with a lot of people not keen in having a plethora of different chemicals/substances/aborted fetus cells, etc. injected into their body, then I can see where the “vaccine refusal” comes from.

I myself have no intentions of getting this vaccine. EVER. I personally don’t care if the FDA finally APPROVES it once/if it passes its trial phase (that it’s still in, by the way…) because I DON’T TRUST THE FDA EITHER, and there are a combination of reasons why I refuse it, including the ethically moral aspect of things.

The true NATURE of things?

With the multitude of different reasons why people might be “hesitant” about this vaccine, in my opinion, intelligence is just one small part of it, and doesn’t necessarily mean that someone is smart or idiotic for getting it / refusing it.

So does it ultimately come down to mistrust? And/or perhaps an innate knowing that something nefarious is happening, with the realization that if something is being pushed THIS hard, like this covid vaccine agenda, then an instinctual defense mechanism takes hold and alerts one that it’s dangerous and isn’t beneficial?

Perhaps it boils down to a simple “natural” survival instinct kicking in, that some of us can tap into? If so, why does it not affect all of us? Are perhaps some of us too deeply indoctrinated to recognize this potential threat to not only our society, but humanity as a whole?

Is this some kind of humanized form of domestication? People have largely been conditioned and trained to not resist oncoming dangers? Or even to discern this possibility?

Are we modern day cattle, being led like sheep to the slaughter; our survival instinct bred out of us due to blind trust in the government and authorities to take care of us – not realizing that they are the herd masters?

Control of the Press / WE CONTROL THE PRESS: “4. NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.”

Distractions / WE DECEIVE WORKERS: “In order that the masses themselves may not guess what they are about WE FURTHER DISTRACT THEM WITH AMUSEMENTS, GAMES, PASTIMES, PASSIONS, PEOPLE’S PALACES …. SOON WE SHALL BEGIN THROUGH THE PRESS TO PROPOSE COMPETITIONS IN ART, IN SPORT IN ALL KINDS: these interests will finally distract their minds from questions in which we should find ourselves compelled to oppose them. Growing more and more unaccustomed to reflect and form any opinions of their own, people will begin to talk in the same tone as we because we alone shall be offering them new directions for thought …”

Ruthless Suppression / GENTILES ARE CATTLE: “9. Death is the inevitable end for all. It is better to bring that end nearer to those who hinder our affairs than to ourselves, to the founders of this affair. WE EXECUTE MASONS IN SUCH WISE THAT NONE SAVE THE BROTHERHOOD CAN EVER HAVE A SUSPICION OF IT, NOT EVEN THE VICTIMS THEMSELVES OF OUR DEATH SENTENCE, THEY ALL DIE WHEN REQUIRED AS IF FROM A NORMAL KIND OF ILLNESS“

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Bottom line: It’s not about “vaccine hesitancy”. It’s about putting the pieces together, looking at the whole picture along with our past and present, and coming to an educated and elucidated conclusion.

Does it take high intelligence like that of Mr. Christopher Langan, or expertise in biology/virology in order to realize that these vaccines are not created for the benefit of humankind?

No. It is a combination of all forms of common sense, knowledge, survival skills, logical reasoning, perceptions of people, healthy skepticism, past experience, moral ethics, etc. One does not need to be a rocket scientist to see that this vaccine agenda is nefarious in purpose.

But it does take someone strong, courageous, and willing to challenge the mainstream narrative to consider this as a possibility and rise up in defense against this tyrannical control that is trying to silence all alternative opinions.

Bless the people who recognize this outrageous scheme, and who are speaking up to expose it.

Video: “Crimes Against Humanity”: The German Corona Investigation. “The PCR Pandemic”

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Mvezo Karamchand Hay from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Vernon Coleman Speech at the London Worldwide Freedom Rally | July 24, 2021 - Dr. Vernon Coleman exposing COVID/vaccine corruption.
Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths - America's Frontline Doctors addressing the fraudulent use of the EUA for COVID vaccines.
Might COVID Injections Reduce Lifespan? - "Yeadon, Montagnier, Zelenko and others are raising concerns about global genocide."
Scam of the Medical Industry and a Depopulation Agenda Revealed at the ITNJ - Robert O. Young's Testimony at the International Tribunal of Natural Justice
COVID Presenting Same Exact Symptoms as… THE COMMON COLD - We have been lied to on a MASSIVE SCALE; all to enforce the vaccine on us.
NOT ON THE BEEB: Dr. T | Mask, Swabs, ‘Vaccine’, Magnetism & Genocide [Full Transcript] - Dr. T proposes a hypothesis that involves hydrogel and EMF.

Two Whistleblowers from Facebook Expose Worldwide Effort to Censor Vaccine Concerns

Project Veritas releases new leaked information.

Ever wonder why certain posts you share on facebook, instagram, youtube, etc. never get much attention? Or perhaps get deleted altogether?

With the rollout of these covid “vaccines”, the tech industries have been hard at work aiming to discredit and/or ban ANYONE who has announced a certain form of “hesitancy” or flat out refusal to be a part of the vaccine bandwagon.

And even if certain individuals DID take the vaccine, and only wanted to share their testimony on the side effects, or perhaps a statement of what happened to their friend or family member, Facebook has initiated a global ranking and employee driven effort to tag specific posts that cross a certain threshold of “vaccine hesitancy”.

Even if the data that is being shared is TRUE, and come from verifiable health/medical papers and documents, if the data veers more towards an unflattering light of the vaccines, it is being targeted and consequently censored from these huge tech platforms. Which obviously deters the truth about the covid vaccines from getting out.

Yesterday, May 24, 2021, Project Veritas uploaded a video and a post highlighting two Facebook employees that have come out against this egregious abuse of private companies’ being able to dictate what information is allowed to be seen and what should be hidden in order to support certain agendas. The aim to target the “vaccine hesitant” is just one of them.

Here is James O’Keefe discussing the leak with Fox’s Sean Hannity:

Sean Hannity: “Now let’s turn to a brand new investigative report from Project Veritas just uncovering an algorithm that reportedly could be used to target facebook’s political enemies. Now, Fox news, we’re just seeing this for the first time, but as always, we let you decide. Listen, to this.”

Whistleblower #1: “Facebook uses classifiers in their algorithms to determine certain content, to be what they call “vaccine hesitant”, or they call it “vaccine hesitancy”. And without the user’s knowledge, they assign a score to these comments that’s called the VH score, the “vaccine hesitancy” score. And then based on that score will demote or leave the comment alone depending on the content within the comment. And that narrative being, get the vaccine… the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out… as an enemy of society.

They want to build a community where everybody complies, not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life. The policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it.”

Sean Hannity: “Here now, is the founder and CEO, Project Veritas, James O’Keefe. Okay, there’s a lot of significance to this, and, facebook has responded. I’ll let you tell the story.”

James O’Keefe: “Thanks, Sean. We’ve had two whistleblowers within facebook, come to us and leak us these documents regarding “vaccine hesitancy”.

What does that mean? Essentially facebook has beta tested this, these algorithms, 1.5 percent of their almost 3 billion users are getting a tiered ranking system, something called “vaccine hesitancy” – tier 1 and tier 2. Tier 1 is alarmist and critical remarks about covid and the vaccine, and tier 2 is something called “indirect vaccine discouragement”.

Now what’s remarkable about these private documents that facebook has not wanted you to see, until tonight, is that tier 2 says that even if the facts are true, that you will be targeted and demoted. Your comments will be targeted and demoted, Sean. “Vaccine hesitancy” score tiering system at facebook – these whistleblowers have given Project Veritas these documents and spoken to us in the shadows. It’s a 20 minute long video online, the documents are on our website.

And Sean, after we publish this report, we reached out to facebook, they’ve actually given us a comment – I’m going to read it to you, it says, quote, facebook has responded to Project Veritas for the first time, quote, “We proactively announce this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.” So as, in response to us publishing this, they’re claiming to now make this public but we just checked, and they haven’t yet made most of these documents public, Sean.”

Sean: “Okay, do I, knowing your ammo, is there more to come in the days to come?”

James: “Yes, there’s more to come. What’s remarkable about it, is that this has been private, they don’t want you to know that they’re doing this, and this is the town square, as you all know. We’re trying to retake our town square. Governor deSantis just signed a bill in Florida; I’m in Florida today, I was with him when he did that.

But they’re (facebook) tiering users without them knowing that they’re doing it. They’re demoting your comments, deboosting you on facebook without you knowing that they’re doing that.

And they’re obviously terrified of this report because they’re actually responding to Project Veritas – before they would attack us, or ignore us. And they have this system, you can see the documents online. They clearly have a ranking system, a tiered system, Sean. The author of this report we’ve named him, Amit Bahl, is an employee at facebook, we have the document showing that he authored the report and the chain of command from him to Mark Zuckerberg.

So there’s more to come, another one tomorrow. Two whistleblowers, on the record with Project Veritas, current facebook insiders, leaking us these documents. We consider them brave heroes and we hope that there’s a legion of more insiders that follow their lead, coming public to projectveritastips@protonmail.com with this information.”

Sean: “James O’Keefe, thank you for sharing with us, we appreciate it, we’re going to follow closely.”

Here is the Project Veritas video that was uploaded yesterday featuring one of the whistleblowers who came forward to reveal facebook’s tiering system plan:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

“I have to do something.”

“When it comes time to standing up for a world, I want my children to live in, I don’t want to leave them a world to where they don’t have these liberties.”

“People aren’t allowed to have voice and yet, facebook touts itself with promoting people’s opportunity to have voice.”

“They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it.”

“If I lose my job, it’s like, what do I do? But that’s less of a concern to me.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “We have just obtained multiple leaked documents from inside facebook, this time detailing a plan to curb, quote, “vaccine hesitancy” on a global scale. It was so concerning it brought us not one, but two whistleblowers from inside facebook who are ready to speak out on what this means for free speech and public discourse on their own platform.”

Interview with first whistleblower starts @1:00:

Whistleblower #1 (Data Center Technician):

Whistleblower #1: “Facebook uses classifiers in their algorithms to determine certain content, to be what they call “vaccine hesitant”, or they call it “vaccine hesitancy”. And without the user’s knowledge, they assign a score to these comments that’s called the VH score, the “vaccine hesitancy” score. And then based on that score will demote or leave the comment alone depending on the content within the comment.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Our first facebook insider is a data center technician who leaked us multiple internal documents detailing an algorithm test being run on 1.5 percent of facebook and instagram’s nearly 3.8 billion users worldwide.

The goal? To quote, “Drastically reduce user exposure to vaccine hesitancy (VH) in comments”.

Whistleblower #1: “And it’s the same thing. You’ll see a lot of this difference in their public policy verses the private policy where the public policy is very vague. It’s very ambiguous. It’s designed to be questioned because it’s designed to be able to easily defend. But then if look at the private policy, it’s much, much more clear, much more specific. I think that they’re trying to make it seem like they’re not doing as much or that they’re just kind of like generalizing it, like, “Oh, well we just have some robot that just tags your post. And then, you know, we look at it.” but I think they don’t want people to know, “Oh no, we actually have something that we made specifically for vaccine hesitancy.”

So there’s a main document along with all the, all the attachments and stuff that goes with it. So basically when they write this algorithm that goes through facebook content, and it looks for certain keywords that are related to vaccination, or, you know, not getting a vaccine and stuff like that. And it gives it a score. And the VH score means vaccine hesitancy, which is defined as being hesitant to get a vaccine, but not just like, “Well, I don’t know.” It’s even, “Well, I saw a study that said that someone died that got the vaccine.” That’s vaccine hesitancy.”

James O’Keefe: “So this is a beta test. This is all a beta test.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right, right.”

James: “And how big is this beta test?”

Whistleblower #1: “They refer to the test size as 1.5%. I’m not exactly sure which pool that pulls from, but I think it’s comments on authoritative health pages.”

James: “You seem to think that they’ve already ruled this out. Why do we believe they’ve already ruled this out?”

Whistleblower #1: “In one slideshow that they have, they call it their weekly progress tracker. They actually lay all this out in a chart and you can see it, you can look at the slides, they go by date. So we’ve got here – Covid-19 Vaccine Safety and Efficacy “Global”, “Currently Global” 13 languages, facebook plus instagram. All C-19 Vaccine [Global], “Currently Global” 66 languages. And the very first thing that brought me to the conclusion that they’re wanting to do this globally is they were developing it in like, you know, as many languages as they can get their hands on.”

James: “So this is like a product launch, almost?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. Yeah, in their last quarterly report, they reported 2.79 billion people on Earth use some kind of facebook app.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Who’s behind this new algorithm policy? Well, one thing is for sure, the authors of this experiment Joo Ho Yeo, Nick Gibian, Hendrick Townley, Amit Bahl, and Matt Gilles are not low-level employees. In fact, one of the internal documents Project Veritas obtained was a facebook flow chart that showed they’re only a few clicks away from Mark Zuckerberg, himself.”

James: “Who makes these decisions?”

Whistleblower #1: “These are teams at facebook and they call themselves, they work with what they call B2V “Barriers to Vaccination”. So that’s one of their core terms – is Barriers to Vaccination. And then the people on these teams, they call them Health Integrity Teams. So there’s a Health Integrity Team for messenger, there’s a Health Integrity Team for every system that facebook has.”

James: “An integrity team?”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “Is it came about after March 2020 – covid?”

Whistleblower #1: “No.”

James: “This is something that’s existed?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. Yes.”

James: “So, the Health Integrity Teams, and Barrier to Vaccination Teams at facebook.”

Whistleblower #1: “So this here, Amit Bahl, he is a Research Scientist for the Core Data Science Team at facebook. He also works in Health Integrity. Everyone who works on this project works in Health Integrity. Hendrick Townley, this is the experiment launch post, as you can see, this is on April 16th. This is 2021. That why there’s no year there. Cause it’s this year. And Hendrick Townley is one of the Software Engineers that worked on this. There were – I think it was him and two other software engineers. And then Amit Bahl wrote the actual classifier itself. I don’t – I’m sure he had like a team of developers, but he is considered the one who wrote it. Amit Bahl, and then as you go up, it’s like his boss, boss’s boss. Boss’s boss’s boss.”

James: “So Amit Bahl works for Udi Weinsberg, who works for Nicolas Stier – do I have that correct?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “And that person works for Danny Ferrante, and that person works for Javier Olivan, and Javier Olivan reports directly to Mark Zuckerberg.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “So this is a chain that goes all the way down to Amit Bahl.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “This kind of censorship sounds similar to shadowbanning – when users are unaware their posts can’t be seen. A term one of our own investigations coined when exposing twitter, just a few years ago. But this time, we’re exposing facebook and instagram’s methods to quash an entire side of a conversation. Arguably, one of the most pressing issues of the day.”

James: “According to these documents, facebook tiers users, 0 to 5, and a score of 0 to 1. Can you talk a little bit about this tier system?”

Whistleblower #1: “Oh yeah. So basically this is what they’re using to structure how, how they’re going to judge this content on, on a scale to how vaccine hesitant it actually is, or if it’s explicitly discouraging. In my opinion, the main reason why they built this as was for the human, what they call “raters” so that they can use this as a reference when they, so if the algorithm can’t make a decision on a certain post, it’ll send it to a human rater and then the human rater looks at it and they will make a decision on whether or not it’s vaccine hesitant or not.”

James: “So we have tier 2 – Indirect Discouragement. What happens when you are a tier 2?”

Whistleblower #1: “So basically your comment is going to be suppressed. As to the scale of that suppression, it’s hard to say, we would have to look at it like a case by case basis. But what they’re saying is it’s going to get, they call it a position change – on some of these comments, you can see, it’ll say position change: seven. And I’m not sure whether the seven refers to like a 7% or if it’s just like seven positions down in the comment chains.”

James: “So it’s suppressed?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “But we don’t know the extent of this suppression?”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “And we’ve heard “shadowban”, we’ve heard “deboost”, I have not heard “position change”.

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Facebook has not been shy about combating “vaccine hesitancy” as reported in their own press release stated May 11 of this year. However, what they say publicly in their own policy doesn’t scratch the surface of what is written in these internal leaked documents. By the facebook whistleblower.”

James: “If I read this correctly, facebook is saying it doesn’t matter if the story is true, so long as it doesn’t cause people to hesitate getting the vaccine? What’s your read on this?”

Whistleblower #1: ” ‘The Borderline Vaccine Framework – Shocking Stories: Potentially, or actually true events or facts that can raise safety concerns.’ “

James: “That post was done by a user. And they’ve taken a screenshot and observed it for the tier system.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right. Yeah.”

James: “What about this gives them alarm?”

Whistleblower #1: ” ‘How is this not scary?’ That would be considered indirect discouragement.”

James: “Indirect discouragement. Which would be considered tier 2.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “So this is an example of indirect discouragement of the vaccine.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah. Questioning the vaccine, questioning anything involving the vaccine.”

James: “And this was then demoted.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah.”

James: “So this is another example of tier 2 indirect discouragement – why don’t you tell us why this would be indirect discouragement, according to facebook.”

Whistleblower #1: “So this would be considered “vaccine hesitant” because they don’t want people to see someone had a bad effect. They’re not saying, “Don’t get the vaccine,” but they’re saying, “Look at all this negative stuff that happened after I got the vaccine.”

James: “Okay, they’re reporting facts, but truth doesn’t matter.”

Whistleblower #1: “No, because it doesn’t match the narrative. So, and the narrative being: Get the vaccine, the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out… as an enemy of society.

So the VAERS is a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It looks like they’re measuring the comments where they’re mentioning, you know, that the patient died.”

James: “So is VAERS a CDC supported program?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes, I think so. Really they support all of this because you know, they released the standards, the CDC themselves. And that’s really one of, one of the primary things that facebook is basing their policy off of is, well, if you looked at their public policy, it would be according to the authoritative health pages.”

James: “So they are open about the fact that they essentially coordinate with the CDC, here.”

Whistleblower #1: “Of course.”

James: “From the internal document, ‘Content pointing to the Vaccine Adverse Effects [Events] Reporting System data that suggest extreme risks without providing full context’ – full context… What do they mean by that?”

Whistleblower #1: “I think so, like in the previous comments, like she said, “Oh, during this study 653 people died” and then they don’t put the rest of the study in there. It’s like, okay, so you want me to write like a 10-page comment? What’s full context? Another ambiguous term. If they saw a study from someone they didn’t like, would they say, “Well, that’s not the full context because ABCDEFG.”

James: “Ultimately it seems like any facts that escape a particular narrative are omitted, demoted, deboosted, banned…”

Whistleblower #1: “Absolutely. Yes.”

James: “Considered dangerous to society.”

Whistleblower #1: “Suppressed in any way possible.”

James: “Where do you think this is headed? Does it get worse from here?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “How so?”

Whistleblower #1: “I think people accept it and they see people like twitter, facebook, google, and stuff like that, they see that this is accepted by the public and then they go, that’s like a green light to be like, “Oh, well we can go ahead and do this more.” So not only are we going to start doing vaccines stuff, we’re going to spread it to everything. So we’re going to start saying, “Oh if you make a post that could put somebody in danger or it could compromise someone’s safety,” whatever that means, “then we’re going to go ahead and look at that and assign that a score of some unknown classifier.” Who knows what it could be. They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it. And when you’re scrolling on your phone, I think they’re afraid of what people would conclude.”

James: “Tell me they don’t think about the underlying value.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah. Or what could, what it could turn into: the slippery slope.”

James: “They’re not even thinking about that.”

Whistleblower #1: “Nope.”

James: “And do you think there’s a lot of people inside facebook that agree with you or some percentage? What would you estimate that number of people to be?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. I would say at least 25%.”

James: “So you’re telling me, that 25% of the people there, agree that what they’re doing with this vaccine hesitancy coding and algorithms, is morally wrong?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. That would not surprise me at all. The policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it. What would happen if this was scaled larger and scaled to twitter and the internet as a whole is way worse than anything that could happen from me getting fired from my job. To me, that, it far outweighs that. Because it’s about more than me. It’s about really everyone in the world.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “It’s clear this facebook insider is not alone in his concerns of facebook’s new policy that would promote discourse on vaccines in general. As a matter of fact, the next insider you’re about to meet, felt so compelled to come forward, he goes so far as to compare the new policy to an abusive relationship.”

Interviewer with second whistleblower starts @11:58:

Whistleblower #2 (Data Center Engineer):

James: “What do you do at facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “I’m a data center engineer.

I’d say that in a sense it’s prohibiting people from being able to have an open dialogue about issues that affect their personal security. Some of these things, the questions, the comments that are being presented, you know, are from people that have concerns about their personal health or their personal security being affected. It’s kind of like having a relationship with somebody that’s controlling and abusive in a sense like an abusive partner, not allowing their spouse to speak out about the things that are going on in their marriage or their relationship and limiting their voice. It’s very damaging from that sense. You know, if you think about this logically, it just, you know, it’s very incriminating in my opinion.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Just months ago, the same insider leaked us a tape of Mark Zuckerberg privately speaking to his team last July, showcasing his own vaccine hesitancy when talking about covid.”

Inside clip of Mark Zuckerberg on July 16, 2020: “I just want to make sure that I share some caution on this because we just don’t know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people’s DNA and RNA.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Today, his own words would violate their new public policy.”

James: “You were the source who brought us the Mark Zuckerberg vaccine footage from July 2020, is that correct?”

Whistleblower #2: “That’s correct.”

James: “Zuckerberg seemed to change his mind – evolve on the issue of vaccine, and the facebook policy itself would have prevented Zuckerberg from saying what it is he had said just a few months ago. Pretty crazy!

What prompted you to give that footage to Project Veritas?”

Whistleblower #2: “Well, based on my own knowledge and research of, you know, the adverse effects and the potential side effects of vaccines of any medication really. So I think it’s important for people to be understanding of the – of those facts. We’re able to have these conversations at work with our, with our coworkers about our medical decisions. And we do. We have them, you know, frequently.

Why is it okay for us to have these conversations at work as adults and not have somebody step in and say, “Hey, you need to stop talking about that and you shouldn’t talk about that. You’re not allowed to talk about – that’s ‘fact-checked’. That’s false.”

Occasionally people do, in the conversation, but, but we’re allowed to have open dialogue. And, and here – “

James: “You’re saying that you can have these conversations at the water cooler and office – “

Whistleblower #2: “Absolutely. Even in the midst of the office.”

James: “In the midst of the office?”

Whistleblower #2: “Yes.”

James: “At facebook, the location, facebook, but you’re not allowed to go onto facebook and write this stuff.”

Whistleblower #2: “No.”

James: “That’s ironic.”

Whistleblower #2: “It is very ironic.”

James: “What is your message to Mr. CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who is certainly watching this video?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would ask, you said that you support freedom of expression. My question to you is, why, in a sense, you don’t support freedom of expression in the most basic sense, that’s available to all people everywhere: which is to exist as God created them – without any interference or intrusion by any corporation or government to exist as they are? And why push a narrative that it’s not okay for people to go ahead and exist to express themselves as God’s creation, without taking a vaccine? Why is there this push to suppress that ideology?”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “This insider’s biggest concern is facebook building a quote, “community of compliance”, unquote. And feels the topic may go beyond the authority of Zuckerberg himself.”

Whistleblower #2: “It’s the platform that they want to build. It’s the community that they want to build. They want to build a community where everybody complies, not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life, which regarding their own body, their own health.”

James: “And based upon your position, and what you’ve seen, and your role at facebook, why do they want people to comply? Why is that the culture at facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “For the promotion of a society that is focused on medical progress in a sense or medical, you know, medical experimentation.”

James: “What is facebook doing to promote covid vaccines to its billions of users?”

Whistleblower #2: “Specifically encouraging people to post, you know, to take on the profile frame for showing that they’ve been vaccinated and to promote in a sense, solidarity amongst other people that have taken the vaccine and encourage users to also go and get the vaccine. It’s interesting that they would, you know, encourage one side, but not allow the other side to speak of, you know, why they wouldn’t be making the decision to get a vaccine. There’s no solidarity, there’s no opportunity to be united around that. It’s just basically: Get the vaccine or feel left out.

You know, people aren’t allowed to have voice and yet, you know, facebook touts itself with promoting people’s opportunity to have voice. And, you know, as stated before, you know, have a voice about the most important decisions anyone has to face in their life is pretty important and it’s shocking and disturbing really to see people that are willing to go to the lengths of limiting those discussions around the world, you know, for things that, that concern people’s own personal security.

I almost feel like there’s, there’s outside sources pressuring Mark, or could be, I’m not saying that’s a fact, but you know, it does make me concerned. And, and you look at the video with Fauci and, you know, Mark discussing it, Mark doesn’t seem too pleased with you know, the fact that he had to bring it up. It’s almost like he was, you know, he had to mention it.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “These two brave insiders know, that they risk it all standing against facebook – one of the most powerful institutions of the day. Yet, they are still putting it all on the line in order to preserve our liberties.”

Whistleblower #2: “I think that’s also the main reason why people don’t want to come out with it, because what if I, you know, I have, I had two kids, I have my wife and if I lose my job, it’s like, what do I do? But that’s less of a concern to me.”

James: “And the people who may do what you did, next, but they’re not sure if they should do it, what’s your message to those people?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would say, go ahead and do it. And I – and then just think about what I said. There’s a lot of blowback to telling the truth. And that’s true, as far as human history is concerned. And yeah, you are going to receive blowback, but just weigh, weigh it out.

Can you live with yourself for the rest of your life if you work at facebook and you knew about this? Especially if it came out later and you’re like, “Man, I saw that so many times. I could have said something and I didn’t.” How are you going to feel about that? That’s my thing. My morality. I have to show somebody this because at least, even if nothing were to come of this, and for some reason everything was scrapped, I would still think that it, that it was worth it. Cause I’m like, well, at least I tried, I tried to show somebody this.”

James: “It’s almost like you’re saying that your desire to follow your conscience outweighs any potential risk there might be to you. Doing this.”

Whistleblower #2: “Yes. Yes.”

James: “What is your message to those people? That are watching this who agree with you inside facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would say that you’re not alone. The biggest thing with social media, that we’ve seen throughout the years is that ranking people’s comments, their posts, even, even like news media, there’s this view that tries to make you think that you’re alone in this and that you’re not the majority. And even people that say that they agree with internally, they deal with struggles. Internally, they question things. It’s just that they’re not able to overcome that, that cognitive dissonance that sits in and they resort to what is safe. It’s easier to comply with things than it is to come forward and say, “This is wrong.” Or to really awaken to understanding that the way you’re being treated or the way other people are being treated is wrong.

And so that’s challenging, but know that you’re not alone. And that if you do come forward and you do speak up that you can live peacefully, knowing that you did the right thing, no matter what. And that’s encouraging, not just to other people, but it’s also encouraging to yourself. It’s an – and it won’t make you feel as alone anymore.”

James: “That’s very profound, I think.”

Whistleblower #2: “I’m a father. So, you know, obviously like I fear for my family, for my children’s safety. And, but I also understand that I have to, as I told, you know, my wife, I have to do something. You know, when it comes time to standing up for a world I want my children to live in, I don’t want to leave them a world to where they don’t have these liberties, these personal securities to where they can willingly make their own medical decisions between them, their doctor, and, those that are closest to them. That’s not something I can live in. That’s not something I could do. And it came down to the point where I had to make a decision to do what was right.”

After Project Veritas received the leaked documents, a team member from PV reached out to facebook for a response. Mario Balaban contacted a spokesperson to address a couple of questions about the “vaccine hesitancy” policy.

Rather than answering the questions, a facebook spokesperson responded with this line, “We proactively announced this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.”

As of this moment, there is no indication that they have updated their policies regarding this information, and they did not respond back when Project Veritas requested a follow-up to answer the questions directed to them from the original email.

For more information and images of the documents that were leaked from the insiders, please visit Project Veritas’s website at:

Thank you to James O’Keefe and the Project Veritas team for going to such incredible lengths to get the Truth out to the public. Your hard work and dedication to these efforts are sincerely appreciated!

And a HUGE thank you to the brave individuals who have spoken out against these oppressive establishments and who are helping to expose the corruption within. Your honesty and integrity is greatly needed in these uncertain times.

Thank you!

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image (slight alterations have been added – original artist created the “f” used in the image and not the addition of words) by kropekk_pl from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Vernon Coleman Speech at the London Worldwide Freedom Rally | July 24, 2021 - Dr. Vernon Coleman exposing COVID/vaccine corruption.
Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths - America's Frontline Doctors addressing the fraudulent use of the EUA for COVID vaccines.
Might COVID Injections Reduce Lifespan? - "Yeadon, Montagnier, Zelenko and others are raising concerns about global genocide."
Scam of the Medical Industry and a Depopulation Agenda Revealed at the ITNJ - Robert O. Young's Testimony at the International Tribunal of Natural Justice
COVID Presenting Same Exact Symptoms as… THE COMMON COLD - We have been lied to on a MASSIVE SCALE; all to enforce the vaccine on us.
NOT ON THE BEEB: Dr. T | Mask, Swabs, ‘Vaccine’, Magnetism & Genocide [Full Transcript] - Dr. T proposes a hypothesis that involves hydrogel and EMF.