Vaccines to Genetically Modify/Change Our DNA – Mind Control and Weaponization – Anthony Patch Prediction From 2014

What is the REAL reason for the vaccines? Some say depopulation. Some say mind control. Maybe it’s both.

This interview with Anthony Patch was conducted in 2014, in which he describes vaccines altering our DNA and creating hybridized humans.

Source: bitchute | exposethejeugenda | Zombie Apocalypse – Anthony Patch Interview 1/14/2014

Anthony Patch: “Well, we’ve all heard of the bird flu and we’ve heard of tuberculosis, and we’ve heard of flesh-eating diseases, and there’s a number of things that have been going around in the media the last few years. Including AIDS, which is still there.

And now we have… even, strange as it sounds, we have a rise to almost an epidemic level now of rabies. Which we typically associate with animals. But when it crosses to the human barrier, to the barrier between animal and human, crosses that barrier into the human, there is no treatment. There is no cure, for rabies.

Now, you may not have heard this. This is – not necessarily new, but it’s coming to the forefront in the mass media now.”

Interviewer: “You know what this makes me think of?”

Anthony Patch: “What’s that?”

Interviewer: “The zombie apocalypse.”

Anthony Patch: “Absolutely. And that is the context in which the mainstream media right now is placing it; is in the zombie apocalypse. Because that’s exactly how people present themselves, if you will, when speaking medically. But, um, that’s how they appear and how they behave. It’s like a zombie. Because of the effects of rabies on the nervous system.

There were, last year, and even earlier this year, there were actually drills conducted by our government on the zombie apocalypse and how would, you know, first responders, police officers, firefighters, paramedics, how would they deal with these people?

So, it sounds far-fetched to the average person who hasn’t heard this before, but this is nothing new.

But let’s go beyond the rabies. Let’s talk about people getting the flu shot. Or getting an avian flu inoculation. There is another very insidious disease, if you will. Which is really a manmade disease. It’s a biological construct, called MERS coronavirus, out in the Middle East. It’s a Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. It’s made its way into Europe to a certain extent. And eventually because of, you know, air travel, it will reach around the world.

It’s another example of where inoculations or vaccines are being derived, or they’re trying to derive for… that again, I always like to go all the way to the end. What’s the purpose? What’s the goal? If you have a manmade – a man made or engineered virus, why was it created? Is it simply just to kill people?

Well, that’s one part of it. But, if you go further and you go deeper than that, it is to get people to demand a vaccine. A shot, if you will. Or a pill. Why would, if you’re in a position of control, and power, of ultimate power, why would you want people to demand a vaccine?


Well, it’s because something’s in the vaccine that you want people to then have as a part of their body. Well what is in the vaccine that you want everybody to have inside their body?

It is a DNA manipulator. Or modifier.

I mentioned earlier ‘3rd strand DNA’. There is already, and you can find this on the internet, in existence, a 3rd strand of DNA constructed of silicone. Again, we go back to the silicon chip in computers. The 3rd strand is made of silicone. It is also coated in gold. If you talk about nanotechnology and nano layers, this is extremely thin coating of gold. Down to a billionth of a millimeter of gold that is coating the silicone from which you are building a 3rd strand of DNA. The purpose of the gold is to increase the surface area around the strand, so that more information can be digitally imparted or programmed.

You’re essentially what you’re doing is you’re creating a 3rd strand of DNA, you are transferring that, or imparting it into a person’s body through a vaccine, that that person’s demanding because they’re afraid of contracting MERS coronavirus, or avian flu, or whatever it may be.

And so, the government, if you will, or the powers that be, sit back and they kind of chuckle and they say, “Well, we couldn’t have forced people to take this vaccine. Or to take this hidden 3rd strand of DNA. They would rebel against it. But if we create the problem, and present the solution, people will demand the solution; thus we achieve our ultimate goal of having this DNA in every person changed.”

Well let’s go deeper. What’s the goal? What’s the purpose? Yeah, you go around change everyone’s DNA, what do they become? They become a hybrid.

The insidious part of this is that once a person is injected, almost immediately their DNA undergoes transformation. Almost immediately they lose all awareness of the fact that they’ve lost their independence. Their ability to think on their own. To make decisions on their own. And to affect them on a moral level. Their moral independence, their beliefs, religious, moral, ethical, legal – all of those go away. If you remove the independent thought and that awareness that you’ve lost your independence is gone, what then do the powers that be do with these new forms of humans? Hybrids?

They can control them. They can turn them into a serf class. Not s.u.r.f. Not surfers. An s.e.r.f. A class of slaves. To serve the elite. To serve the Ray Kurzwells of the world, who want to achieve immortality. But they need to have labor. To manufacture/develop all of the technologies. And they have enough technologies now.

The technology, the scientific world, if you will, has reached the level where they don’t care about hiding it anymore. Their agenda is so far advanced, both politically, philosophically, their sense of morals, and technologically that no longer are they worried about you and me as the “serf class” and the coming serf class.

They’re not worried about what we think. They’re not worried about us rebelling. And in fact, we won’t rebel. Partly because right now we’ve been so dumbed down, through a variety of mechanisms.

But once people demand the virus [vaccine] and they truly are dumbed down, to where they’ve lost that awareness that something’s happened to me, now they can do what they want with us. They are achieving what I call the “hive mentality”. Like the bee hive. Worker bees. Soldier bees. Serving the queen. The queen in my estimation is this “elite” class that’s in power. And it’s not the politicians; forget the politicians. This has nothing to do with Republicans, Democrats, Tea Party, Libertarians, it has nothing to do with political structure classes.

It has to do with the small group that is in control, and has been in control since ancient times.”

Now, it’s one thing for a researcher to be talking about possible DNA technologies to be initiated onto the population as a means of changing people and controlling them… people can just shrug this off as just a madman conspiracy theorist losing his mind.

Right?

Well… not according to Microsoft researchers and doctors talking about the very same thing. However, in their case, keeping faithful to the “computer programming” that Microsoft is so well known for, they refer to DNA as a “programmable system”.

Microsoft ventures into DNA

[ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cmQJhoCvI0 ]

Video made in 2016, by Microsoft (of all companies…) – doctors discussing DNA as a “programmable computer”

 

Professor Georg Seelig: “Imagine a world where we can do computation inside living cells.”

Dr. Neil Dalchau: “Problem we’re trying to solve is, really trying to have a more sophisticated diagnosis that can happen automatically inside cells.”

Dr. Andrew Phillips:Imagine a biological computer that operates inside a living cell. So for example, it could be used to determine whether a cell is cancerous and if so then trigger the death of the cell.”

Georg Seelig: “So here we’re talking about little molecular systems that you can, you know, work – that run in a test tube or maybe even in the live cell, so they’re really small. The type of work that they’re doing is essentially they’re trying to sense, analyze and control molecular information.

Neil Dalchau: “In this project, we’re trying to use DNA as a programmable material.”

Andrew Phillips: “DNA is highly programmable, just like a computer. And we can program a whole range of complex behaviors using DNA molecules.”

Neil Dalchau:So we’re taking advantage of a phenomenon called DNA strand displacement.”

Georg Seelig: “So DNA strand displacement is essentially a competitive hybridization reaction. So it’s two strands of DNA that come together and as they bind to one another, a third strand that was initially bound is kicked off.

One issue with any biology research or biomolecular research is that it’s always a sort of a cycle of trial and error. You test it, it doesn’t work, so you go back to the drawing board, and you do that over and over again. And it’s a slow cycle because doing experiments just is hard, and it takes a lot of time.”

Andrew Phillips:We’ve developed a language for programming molecular circuits made of DNA. So the programmer would write down a collection of DNA strands, and the software will work out how these DNA strands interact with each other. And can be used to predict their behavior over time. And this kind of software could, for example, be used to detect and fix bugs in a molecular circuit design before that circuit is built.”

“For decades biologists have been using chemical reaction networks as a means of describing the behavior of biological systems. So what our technology enables for the first time is that any system described as a chemical reaction network can now be translated, implemented in biology at the molecular level.”

Neil Dalchau: “One of the things that we’ve done recently, which I’m particularly excited about, is that we have created, designed, using our tool, and created experimentally, is an implementation of the so-called approximate majority algorithm. At the moment, really the technology is very much in its infancy. It’s still very much at the research stage, so most of what we’re doing is in – is in the test tube. An enormous goal would be to have what we’re able to do in the test tube also working inside cells. That’s a hugely enormous challenge.”

Andrew Phillips: “So this could enable a whole range of biotechnology applications. For example, it could allow us to both detect and treat disease to a level of precision that has not been possible so far. It could also allow us to make new compounds far more efficiently. These compounds could be medicines, or biomaterials, and ultimately it could allow us to make biological computers that operate at the molecule scale.

Lovely that Bill Gates’ company is so vested in turning DNA into programmable systems… Combine that with his outrageous push for worldwide vaccines… not to mention his efforts at digitally tracking everyone, and Anthony Patch’s predictions seems more likely by the day.

But, that’s just ridiculous. I mean, “hive mind”? Taking away people’s independence? And perhaps even their awareness of moral and ethical boundaries? Surely you jest. It’s not like the government would ever try to govern our mind or our behavior…

Genetically engineered ‘Magneto’ protein remotely controls brain and behaviour (2016)

“Researchers in the United States have developed a new method for controlling the brain circuits associated with complex animal behaviours, using genetic engineering to create a magnetised protein that activates specific groups of nerve cells from a distance.

“The most powerful of these is a method called optogenetics, which enables researchers to switch populations of related neurons on or off on a millisecond-by-millisecond timescale with pulses of laser light. Another recently developed method, called chemogenetics, uses engineered proteins that are activated by designer drugs and can be targeted to specific cell types.

“- they used genetic engineering to fuse the protein to the paramagnetic region of ferritin, together with short DNA sequences that signal cells to transport proteins to the nerve cell membrane and insert them into it.

“Mice expressing Magneto spent far more time in the magnetised areas than mice that did not, because activation of the protein caused the striatal neurons expressing it to release dopamine, so that the mice found being in those areas rewarding. This shows that Magneto can remotely control the firing of neurons deep within the brain, and also control complex behaviours.

“This system is a single, elegant virus that can be injected anywhere in the brain

The Government Is Serious About Creating Mind-Controlled Weapons

“DARPA, the Department of Defense’s research arm, is paying scientists to invent ways to instantly read soldiers’ minds using tools like genetic engineering of the human brain, nanotechnology and infrared beams.”

“Participants are tasked with developing technology that will provide a two-way channel for rapid and seamless communication between the human brain and machines without requiring surgery.”

Genetically tweaking human brains

“To do this, Robinson’s team plans to use viruses modified to deliver genetic material into cells — called viral vectors — to insert DNA into specific neurons that will make them produce two kinds of proteins.

The first type of protein absorbs light when a neuron is firing, which makes it possible to detect neural activity. An external headset would send out a beam of infrared light that can pass through the skull and into the brain. Detectors attached to the headset would then measure the tiny signal that is reflected from the brain tissue to create an image of the brain. Because of the protein, the targeted areas will appear darker (absorbing light) when neurons are firing, generating a read of brain activity that can be used to work out what the person is seeing, hearing or trying to do.

The second protein tethers to magnetic nanoparticles, so the neurons can be magnetically stimulated to fire when the headset generates a magnetic field. This could be used to stimulate neurons so as to induce an image or sound in the patient’s mind.”

I don’t know about you, but the more I inform myself of what’s possibly going on with the world, the less researchers like Anthony Patch look like crazy conspiracy theorists, and the more insane, power-hungry and evil tptsb become.

While disinfo and psyops could very well be an agenda with some whistleblowers, I do not put it past these corrupt institutions and agencies to legitimately have these diabolical mind-controlling and DNA changing goals for all of humanity.

Sadly, those who do not inform themselves will be, as Anthony Patch has stated, DEMANDING that they get the so-called vaccines, as well as DEMANDING that others get it as well. Already a part of the “hive mind”? Sure seems like it in some cases.

Though if it is true that some people can maintain their sensibilities and common sense through these agendas, even after taking the “vaccine”, we must still remain vigilant and strong to resist anything else “they” try to throw our way. While “they” may sit back and laugh and say that people were marching off to their own demise, most were not fully informed and were tricked/deceived into it. In my opinion, this wipes out any “karmic balance” that seems to be a part of their belief structure. And God will judge them accordingly anyway.

Stay strong, and God bless.

Craig Venter of the NIH and Human Genome: Creating Synthetic Life | ” – trying to design what we want biology to do”

Agenda of the Human Genome Project: ” – for manufacturing and operating a complete human being.”

Playing God in Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Synthetic Biology and the Meaning of Life
– [ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837218/ ]

Thanks to a pingback post by the following site: There Is No Pandemic, it led me to a very interesting video featuring a Mr. Craig Venter, delving into an incredibly topical subject – even though the video was made in 2010.

Don’t think synthetic life-forms are possible in vaccines? Or that there’s even an agenda to do this?

Craig Venter, genetic researcher for the NIH and the Human Genome Project, would tell you otherwise…

“operating system”

“all the characteristics of the first species disappear”

“new species emerges from this software”

“making the flu vaccine each year by using these new synthetic techniques”

Click image for archived video. Original source can be found here: [ https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/may/20/craig-venter-synthetic-life-form ]
“Craig Venter creates synthetic life form”
Full transcript. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Craig Venter: “Well this has been about a 15 year process. It started back in 1995, when we sequenced the first two genomes in history. Including the smallest genome, that of mycoplasma genitalium. And we set out a goal to try and understand what the smallest genome you can have as an operating system, to try and understand the basic components of life. It’s taken us through this long journey. Much longer than we ever anticipated. But that’s what happens when you enter into areas that nobody’s ever been before.

So at first we had to learn how to write the genetic code to synthesize pieces. Because the largest piece that ever has been synthesized other than our work has been only 30,000 letters. The first chromosome we were trying to make was over 500,000. And the one that we ultimately made and report in this paper is over 1,000,000 letters of genetic code. And we start with 4 bottles of chemicals, and the computer code in the computer, the digital code in the computer from DNA sequence. So, just learning how to do the synthesis was mastering a lot of chemistry that has never been done before. And we learned sequentially over the years how to build larger and larger molecules.

In 2003 we reported making a 5,000 letter bacterial virus, 5X174, and how to error correct the pieces. So, we start with pieces of DNA coming off DNA synthesizers; they’re only about 50-80 letters long. That’s pretty much the limit of what you can make with a chemical synthesizer. So everything we make from that has to be putting these little pieces together. Much like having a box of legos and having to assemble them back in the right order to get what you started with. So it’s been progressive over this entire time period. We thought we would have this almost 3 years ago. But we kept running into very significant biological roadblocks.”

Interviewer: “All right. And what do you ultimately hope to do with a method like this?

Craig Venter: “Well, this is an important step, we think, both scientifically and philosophically. It certainly changed my views of definitions of life and how life works. It’s pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in the cell, and the cell instantly starts reading that new software, starts making a whole different set of proteins. And within a short while, all the characteristics of the first species disappear. And a new species emerges from this software that controls that cell going forward.

When we look at life forms we see them as sort of fixed entities. But this shows, in fact how dynamic they are. That they change from second to second. And that life is basically a result of an information process, a software process. Our genetic code is our software. And our cells are dynamically constantly reading that genetic code, making new proteins, the proteins make the other cellular components, and that’s what we see. But it’s hard to imagine how dynamic it is until we found, simply by replacing the software, it started making a whole new cell, whatever is defined by that software. So that’s, that’s a pretty important change in how we approach and think about life.

Also this is now the first time where we’ve started with information in the computer, built that software molecule, now over a million letters of genetic code, put that into a recipient cell, and have this process start where that information converted that cell into a new species. So this becomes a very powerful tool for trying to design what we want biology to do.

As leaders of competing genome projects, Francis Collins, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, and J. Craig Venter, president of Celera Genomics, were recognized, correctly, as the two most important players in the worldwide effort to spell out the 3 billion “letters” of the human genome–the biochemical recipe, encoded in our DNA, for manufacturing and operating a complete human being.

[ https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,998842,00.html ]

We have a wide range of applications, so at the biotech company that funded the synthetic genomics that Ham Smith and I started a few years back, we have a major deal with ExxonMobil to try and use algae to capture carbon dioxide and make new hydrocarbons that can go into the Exxon refineries. To try and replace taking the oil out of the ground.

There’s no natural algaes that we know that can do this at the scale it’s needed. So we’re going to have to use our synthetic genomic techniques to either heavily modify existing algaes or develop whole new ones from scratch that have all the parameters that we want. These same tools, these same processes can be used for making chemicals, for making food substances, we hope for cleaning up water.

But perhaps the most important immediate application is we’re already working at the Venter Institute and working with Novartis to try and make new vaccines very quickly; we think we can shorten the process by 99% for making the flu vaccine each year by using these new synthetic techniques. But I think it’s going to be one of those situations I tell audiences I talk to that ‘we’re entering a new era we’re limited mostly by our imaginations’.”

Interviewer: “Could you ever use a method like this with a higher organism? Something more complex than bacteria?

Craig Venter: “Well, it’s certainly not in the immediate future. Bacteria have much more simplified genetic systems. They don’t have the same complex regulation that higher organisms have. But there are a number of single cell eukaryotes.

So we’re eukaryotes because we have a nucleus, I think one of the key things we mastered with our studies, particularly since 2003, and we reported the latest results a few months ago in Science at the end of last year, is we can move chromosomes across the branches of life. So we can move from bacteria into eukaryotes, we use yeast for all these processes. We can take the chromosomes out of yeast and move them back into bacteria to create new life forms.

So a next step would be try to make a simplified eukaryote. Yeast is very key for bio-manufacturing, for ethanol production, etc. And if we can have even a more efficient yeast cell, and at the same time, try and understand all its components, I think we’ll be able to make synthetic eukaryotes. Higher animals, multi-cellular systems are, I think, projects for the much more distant future.”

Interviewer: “Actually I have a couple more questions. Just about how we distinguish between any sort of synthetically – organisms with synthetic genomes versus the natural ones? One question I guess would be about containment.”

[Interview cuts out a section]

Craig Venter: ” – we were when we first started down this process, what could be an artifact that could fool us into thinking we had created synthetic life, when in fact it was just a contaminate of the native chromosome? And, where would even a single molecule of native chromosome could fool us into thinking we had created a new cell?

So early on we started designing a process of putting watermarks in the genetic code. We did this in the first chromosome we reported two years ago, basically all of us that helped build the genetic code signed the DNA, coded our names into the chromosome.

With this genome we’ve gone a little bit further; we’ve put 4 major watermarks in. We’ve developed a new code for writing English language, other languages, with punctuation and numbers into the genetic code. In the first watermark we actually have this code that needs to be decoded for people to read the rest. We even have a website built into the genetic code that if people solve it they can let us know that they’ve been able to read it.

“- and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”Revelation 13:17

All the authors of this study over the… certainly the last decade, our names are all encoded in this first genome. And we have three quotations built in there of adding a little philosophy to the genetic code at the same time. Which I think the chance of finding any of these in a naturally occurring genome is about as close to zero as you can get. So we can absolutely prove from the genetic changes, that we’ve been built in to the design of the chromosomes that it’s unquestionably the synthetic DNA that we made, not some natural contaminant.

A containment, that’s a really critical issue, and it’s one of the most important issues to us, and one of the number one questions I get asked in all my litera- all my lectures around the globe. And when we look at molecular biology for the last several decades, we all use e. coli in the laboratory, that genes from multiple species have been put in it over the years – probably tens of millions of experiments. And there’s not been a single accident. And the reason for that is that e. coli has a chemical dependency for growing in the laboratory.

So these are things we can start to build in to the design of synthetic genomes, we can build in suicide genes so they can’t escape. And so we can use artificial amino acids. There’s a number of approaches that we’re developing and other labs are developing to guarantee absolute containment.

And this first proof of principle, we’ve largely copied the mycoides genome, because as a control, if we couldn’t boot up something that was already known, we could never get to the design phase. We deleted 14 genes from this genome, and made all these other genetic modifications. This cell only grows on extremely rich [media(sp?)] on the laboratory.

The only other place it goes, the mycoides genome is a minor goat pathogen that causes mastitis in goats. We think we’ve eliminated the genes associated with that, but it will not grow outside of the laboratory unless it’s deliberately injected or sprayed into a goat. So, we don’t work with goats, so we think we have pretty good containment systems in the lab.

There’s selectable markers that’s dependent on a specific antibiotic. So these are early attempts, I think. These containment approaches would get far more sophisticated with the next versions of what we and others do.”

Interviewer: “All right. Well, are there any final points you’d like to make before we close?”

Craig Venter: “Well, this is the first synthetic cell that’s been made and we call it synthetic because the cell is totally derived from a synthetic chromosome made from 4 bottles of chemicals on a chemical synthesizer. Starting with information in the computer.

Before we did these experiments starting back in the late 90’s, we asked for a complete bioethical review, knowing we were going into uncharted territory, trying to create new species. The review group at the University of Pennsylvania published the results in Science in 1999. Since then there’s been lots of different review processes around the world. The Sloan Foundation funded my institute, the Venter Institute, along with MIT, and a Washington think tank, to look at the security issues concerning this. That report was published and can be downloaded from JCVI.org.

There’s been ongoing discussions in the U.S. government, in the E.U., the National Academy of Sciences has done reports on this. So I think this is the first incidence in science where the extensive bioethical review took place before the experiments were done. And it’s part of an ongoing process that we’ve been driving, trying to make sure that the science proceeds in an ethical fashion, that we’re being thoughtful about what we do, and looking forward to the implications to the future.”

End of transcript.

So here is undeniable proof, that the folks at the NIH and Human Genome Project have been trying to synthesize organisms for the sole purpose of creating new species/life forms, and using these techniques for vaccines, AND states that these synthetic substances WILL CHANGE DNA.

It all ties back to the NIH and the HUMAN GENOME PROJECT. The theory that the COVID vaccines are an attempt at a worldwide genome experiment project is becoming clearer every single day, backed up with all of the data that has come forward, backed up with all of the studies pointing to this very agenda, backed up with countless interviews, positions and documentations of the likes of Anthony Fauci, Christine Grady, Bill Gates, Craig Venter, Eric Lander, Klaus Schwab, Francis Collins, their institutes and cohorts GAVI, WEF, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIH, Human Genome Project, World Health Organization, United Nations, MIT, Harvard, etc., etc., etc.

“Venter and colleagues published their paper about creating a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome in the journal Science in May 2010.

“Some of you are asking, why do this? It’s great basic science, but there are some more compelling reasons,” he said, noting that synthetic DNA can be used to develop genomics-based vaccines.

“The National Institutes of Health has funded my institute to create synthetic pieces of every known flu virus, so anytime we need a new vaccine, we can just take these pieces off the shelf, and go through the assembly and have flu vaccine stocks in a very short time,” he said. “In the next year or two, you might get the first synthetic DNA vaccines.”

Web archive version: Synthetic life forms can produce vaccines, gobble up CO2 and more, says expert

Although the below excerpt specifies “intranasal”, there are also endeavors of injectable live attenuated vaccines as well:

“The company’s breakthrough Synthetic Attenuated Virus Engineering (SAVE) platform utilizes a computer algorithm to recode the genomes of viruses and construct live-attenuated vaccines to prevent viral infections or treat solid tumors.”

Web archive version: Codagenix and Serum Institute of India Announce Commencement of First-in-Human Trial of COVI-VAC, A Single Dose, Intranasal Live Attenuated Vaccine for COVID-19

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16778323/ ] “Genetically modified live attenuated parasites as vaccines for leishmaniasis” (2006)

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28620583/ ] “Engineering of Genetically Arrested Parasites (GAPs) For a Precision Malaria Vaccine” (2017)

[ https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/investigational-malaria-vaccine-gives-strong-lasting-protection ] “Investigational Malaria Vaccine Gives Strong, Lasting Protection” (2021)“The vaccine combines live parasites with either of two widely used antimalarial drugs—an approach termed chemoprophylaxis vaccination.”

Now, with all of that being said, and with this outright admission by Craig Venter about their agenda, I have to bring up one of Richard Fleming’s latest criticism of ALL the doctors that have claimed to find what seems to be graphene oxide, nanobots, and/or parasitic-like organisms in the vaccines.

Firstly, this should have been approached in a more scientific approach to researching the vaccine’s contents.

While the other doctors are investigating these vaccines and are questioning its contents, even inviting other scientists and researchers to help them identify what these substances are, Dr. Fleming is undermining their research and dismissing their conclusions. Even implying, at one point, the mention of “credentials” as to whether or not to take one seriously.

Secondly… isn’t that precisely why we’re in the mess we’re in right now? Because SO many people decided to trust the likes of Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins? Does it matter how many so-called credentials one has to determine their sincerity and integrity or even professionalism? Doesn’t look like it to me. As long as a researcher is honest and looking for the truth, I will take their word over an overpaid “expert” any day. Especially ones who conduct inhumane, atrocious experiments on other living beings.

Then, of course, when addressing anything in a scientific approach, and certainly before reaching concrete conclusions and dismissing any other research (like the fraudulent Lancet paper did, for example…) one must consider ALL variables. Take the following for consideration:

how many vials total did Richard Fleming test?

were they from the same batch, or all different batches? Different brands, or all the same brand?

were all these vials from the same country? – it is becoming more and more apparent that different countries are getting different doses/batches

at what magnification did Fleming conduct his tests compared to all of the other doctors/scientists?

are we considering that some batches/doses will contain certain substances while others consist of saline solutions only – as what has already been theorized?

if different countries are getting different batches, there is a chance that there will be different substances for each country – to perhaps test a wider set of material/organisms and/or to target certain people’s DNA/ethnicity/etc.?

what is the “garbage” and “debris” that Fleming is referencing? “Garbage” has to be something. Was there an attempt to identify these compositions? Or just label them all with the term “debris” and “garbage”?

Fleming also mentions the term “crystalline” on more than one occasion… does he realize that there are indeed nanocrystal-graphene hybrid material that has been synthesized? Does he know every possible thing that can be synthesized or genetically modified using either Venter’s DNA genetic modification technique or the CRISPR technology?

“Nanocrystal-graphene have been proposed as a new kind of promising hybrid for a wide range of application areas including catalysts, electronics, sensors, biomedicine, and energy storage, etc. Although a variety of methods have been developed for the preparation of hybrids, a facile and general synthetic approach is still highly required.”

“A rich library of highly crystalline nanocrystals, with types including noble metal, metal oxide, magnetic material and semiconductor were successfully grown on chemically converted graphene (CCG), which is simultaneously reduced from GO during the synthesis.”

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22699842/ ] “Generalized syntheses of nanocrystal-graphene hybrids in high-boiling-point organic solvents”

Is Mr. Fleming aware of all the technological and biological advancements and agendas in the arena of nanotechnology in combination with virus-based particles?

“Genetically modified viruses offer a general route for the production of materials with complex nanoscale detail, for use either directly or as templates. It appears likely that modified viruses will feature prominently in the nanotechnology of the immediate future. The possible commercial exploitation of virus-templated materials includes nanowires, high surface area materials for battery electrodes, detectors, catalytic material, light harvesting devices, quantum dots, and tunable photonic devices.”

[ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9783527671403.hlc094 ] “7 Virus Particle-Based Liquid Crystals”

Will Mr. Fleming attempt to identify these so-called “garbage” and “debris” and conduct further studies with a higher magnification, or continue to shoot down other’s legitimate attempts at trying to figure out exactly what these particles are? Notice he never tries to identify what ANYTHING in the vaccine is, other than mentioning “lipid nanoparticles”. Only giving his opinion of what it’s not.

And with all of the evidence showing that genetically modified organisms is not only highly probable but also incredibly likely, considering the NIH’s many, many, MANY horrific experiments and crimes against humanity (and animal life), and Craig Venter’s ventures, not to mention Bill Gates’ very own admission and extensive funding in this matter, I am ultimately left questioning Fleming’s motives.

Bill Gates: “You know, is there something to worry about with medicines, that is might – some of them might have side effects? Do we need safety testing? I mean and we’re taking things that are… you know, genetically modified organisms and we’re injecting them in little kids arms. We just shoot them right into the vein.”

Bottom line: yes, these vaccines are extremely dangerous. And if the ones in control of pushing these worldwide vaccines are also in control of the Human Genome Project and attempts at re-writing our DNA, our best bet would be to avoid these at all costs and address these as the crimes they are.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay