What REALLY Happened with Evergreen at the Suez Canal?

Theories abound.

On March 23, 2021, the Ever Given / Evergreen vessel container ship became lodged in the Suez Canal and obstructed any passage through that particular route for almost a week.

Including this extremely huge dilemma, the container ship is still under investigation and has been impounded while authorities work on liabilities, compensation, and cause.

With a little bit of searching around – we can see multiple mainstream media outlets rehashing the same article, word for word, originating from the Associated Press.

Suez Canal chief: Vessel impounded amid financial dispute (ABCNews)
Egyptian authorities impound ship that blocked Suez Canal amid financial dispute (CBSNews)
Egypt seizes control of massive ship Ever Given after it blocked Suez Canal for days (USAToday)
Massive Ship That Blocked Suez Canal Now Impounded in Egypt Over Financial Dispute (NBCDFW)

Of course, this is the “official” narrative, which as many people (but not nearly enough) are starting to realize, aren’t providing the honest accounts of what’s REALLY going on. So in order to reveal the truth of the matter, or even get close to it, one must look outside of the msm, and into alternative news sources.

With that being said, this obviously does not guarantee that the information from these contrasting reports are stating the truth either. But it does give further insight and a deeper look into what may be going on rather than being force-fed the same anecdote, told over and over again by the same factions who are, un-coincidentally, owned by the few top organizations of the world and who are known for protecting each other.

Now, there has been a lot of resistance into following certain “conspiratorial” content, but for the sake of digging in deep into these suspicious circumstances, I will be raising these issues up starting with a news report outside of the msm, that was announced by a group named Mavi Gazetem.

Mavi Gazetem: New News & Breaking Reports on the Evergreen Suez Canal Incident

According to Turkish to English translation, “Mavi Gazetem” means “Blue Newspaper”.

What’s interesting about this organization, is that it is incredibly new, with what looks like it began its operation of social media presence in March of this year.

Twitter: @mavigazetem (Joined March 2021)
Instagram: mavigazetem (9 posts presently, as of April 14, 2021)
youtube: Mavi Gazetem (Joined April 03, 2021)
Website: mavigazetem.com.tr (First article published on March 20, 2021)

Now, everyone has to start somewhere, and if this news organization is a branch-off of a currently existing one, I have no knowledge of that. Unfortunately, I cannot read Turkish. But, thankfully, the publication has offered a few articles already translated to English. (There are also websites that can translate languages to a preferred one, but I appreciate the articles presenting the translations themselves to preserve accuracy.)

The below links show all of the articles that the Mavi Gazetem website offers in English as of this writing:

Published on April 09, 2021: The Secret Contents of Ever Given / Evergreen Container Ship
Published on April 10, 2021: The Truth About Suez Canal
Published on April 10, 2021: The Secret Contents of Ever Given – Evergreen Container Ship – Translated Video By Kaan Sariaydin
Published on April 13, 2021: The Second Act of the Evengreen Theatre

In the article The Secret Contents of Ever Given – Evergreen Container Ship – Translated Video By Kaan Sariaydin they also link to a youtube video that shows Kaan Sariaydin explaining what REALLY happened to the Evergreen/Ever Given container ship, and points to putting a halt to the Global cabal capitalists’ plans of initiating their Climate Change agenda.

Thank you to Kaan Sariaydin and the Mavi Gazetem team for making this transcript available. Before I knew it was available at their website, I was going to take the initiative in writing it all up in order to present it to readers who would rather read the text or who cannot hear. Because their website made the content available, please visit them also in order to give them viewership.

While Kaan Sariaydin states that the takedown of the Evergreen ship was a concerted effort maintained by several countries: Turkey, Egypt, Qatar, Israel (namely, although also mentioning Russia in a separate article) – please keep an open mind and do not automatically trust or disbelieve any subject matter brought forth. I am just presenting the information that I find and as always, I recommend doing your own research in addition to any news you may come across.

Kaan Sariaydin delves in deeper as to why the Evergreen ship was taken offline to begin with, referring to the Globalists’ plans to initiate the Climate Change scheme sometime this month. Also describing the theories that certain “conspiracists” have been talking about for quite a while.

(Ever wonder why the msm and shills target “conspiracy theorists” so hard? It’s because they’ve been proven right on a large number of occasions, and that threatens the plans that tptsb have in store. 25 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out to Be True. While Kaan himself advises to stay away from ‘conspiracy theories’, the uncanny relationship between what he is saying and the speculations that theorists (critical thinkers) have been proposing for years are eerily similar.)

What does Kaan Sariaydin suggest?

A connection with 5G and Bill Gates

Below are a few chosen excerpts from the transcript of Kaan Sariaydin’s reports on why the Evergreen ship was targeted (some embellishment added for emphasis):

“Without going into (too much) detail, let me tell you in a few words:
Mr Bill Gates have got his fingers in this pie
Very Simple actually! As we all know, for years he has been working on vaccines.
Recently he has been crazy about buying land, he has just bought 56,000 decares, which is 56 million m2 land just in Turkey
Today there was an announcement that He bought over 1 million decares in Arizona.”


“The Contents of those containers had the Chemicals that would activate the Second Techno Weapon which works with 5G Radiation Beams and transforms earth’s soil using Special Information Technologies.”


“After this, accompanied with the Classic Vegan “Project”, Faux (Fake) Meat Project, This is a very dangerous thing because
If you know little bit about this (Fake Meat) and it Biochemical Content; I happen to know quite bit about this
If you consume just 1 Type of Protein (in your food) the profiles of your Amino Acids become insufficient. No one (No Media) is talking (explaining) about this!
(Fake Meat Project) Terrible things could be caused here, specialist have spoken about this.
(Specialist) have actually explained this in very good way. People should research and listen carefully. This was The Project! In Mr Bill Gates style, he was planning to own: Food and Agriculture !
Because, Those Who Own the Food sources own the World, Ok?”


“Yes Those materials, that ship was to transport them to the relevant 5G Transmitters. When used with those transmitters, this would cause huge infestations.
do you know why Mr. Bill Gates needed this and what he needed to use it for?
To END beef farming and completely destroy Animal farming in general.”

– Source: Kaan Sariaydin The Secret Contents of Ever Given – Evergreen Container Ship – Translated Video By Kaan Sariaydin

Yes, Bill Gates was mentioned numerous times in Kaan’s account. Along with this suspicious individual, Kaan also mentions Joe Biden and China, working in cahoots in initiating this globalist takeover as well.

It honestly doesn’t matter which country anyone is from, the insane agendas that these “elites” are trying to implement hurt the WHOLE WORLD, and I am against these schemes 100%.

It is no secret that Bill Gates is buying up a ton of farmland, it’s no secret that he is one of, if not THE MOST, largest spokesperson for EVERYONE to take this shady vaccine, it’s no secret that he is ushering for people to switch to synthetic meat, it’s no secret that he has a deranged plan to block out the sun…

However, unfortunately, there are still so many people who don’t realize the outrageous efforts that Bill Gates has been engaged in, including some other incredulous acts that involve Planned Parenthood and other vaccine-related atrocities across different countries. Hopefully people around the world will wake up and open their eyes to the corrupt operations that have been running in the background for decades/centuries instead of dismissing it all because they’re too afraid (and/or too blind, too stubborn) to face this possibility.

Of course, this is just one of the proposed theories, so please tread lightly when coming across any information that hasn’t yet been solidly confirmed – and this also comes as a reminder to be alert about anything you hear from not only the mainstream media but independent sites as well. The point of “critical thinking” is to take in all of the data and possible scenarios, and come to an educated hypothesis that connects the necessary and prudent dots – while at the same time realizing that until the data is confirmed, it is a conjecture that may ultimately prove false.

So who is Kaan Sariaydin and does he know for sure that this is the real reason why the Evergreen ship was stuck in the canal? Or is he proposing this theory based on intel/information that he’s gathered through various sources?

If this source is true, could it also be in conjunction with other assumptions that various people have offered that may shed further light on this Suez canal incident?

Other speculations

A huge theory that has been making its way around the internet, are the possible connections of the Evergreen ship to Hillary Clinton. There are actually multiple associations that one could correlate to this supposition, and I will cover some of them below.

Those who have followed Q, politics (chiefly, the apparent clash between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton), the wiki-leak scandals involving Anthony Weiner’s laptop, etc. may already know of the accusations that the Clinton Foundation is directly participating – if not the ringleader – of a huge human/child trafficking organization (and yes, adding “child” instead of just “human” is intentional, as it needs to be driven home that young children are innocent victims of this heinous scheme as well, and not just adults being trafficked – which is terrible in itself).

A post from Q made in 2018 alleges a connection of the phone number to the Clinton Foundation being the same one as the Child Trafficking Hotline:

Screenshots courtesy of Weekend Warrior | Evergreen

And then there is also the relation of Laura Silsby (whose jail time was reduced by the Clintons for attempting to smuggle 33 children out of Haiti in 2010 – with even a prior history of trying to smuggle 40 people out of Haiti) who was employed as one of the leaders of the AlertSense (Amber Alert) program even after her entanglement with the child-trafficking crimes.

“Since her release from detention in Haiti, Laura Silsby has returned to Idaho. In 2015, she married and took the last name Gayler. Silsby is currently (no longer?) employed by software company AlertSense as their Vice President of Marketing. AlertSense works with the Federal Government on FEMA’s Integrated Public Alert & Warning System (IPAWS). One of IPAWS functions is to issue Amber Alerts during kidnapping events.”The Clintons, Laura Silsby, Haiti, Amber Alerts & Human Trafficking

So we have the Clintons protecting Laura Silsby, who was arrested and sentenced to jail time for the abduction of several Haitians, and then we have this interesting picture of the Clintons with what appears to be Haitians and “coincidentally” in front of what seems to be actual Evergreen cargo containers…

Screenshot courtesy of Weekend Warrior | Evergreen

The below video is a disturbing premise into the reality that we live in, with what some speculate is yet another strangely bizarre “predictive programming” at work: (just coincidence?)

Source: youtube | Years of the pandemic | (Dexter) Child saved from EVERGREEN shipping container. No coincidences. part 1 (clip is from Dexter, Season 1, Episode 12 “Born Free” – Aired on December 17, 2006)

It gets even stranger, when you realize that “Evergreen” is Hillary Clinton’s codename, and the callsign for the Evergreen ship container that became lodged in the Suez Canal is H3RC.

Even the “all-mighty” mainstream media admits that Hillary Clinton’s codename is Evergreen, so this, at least, is NOT a conspiracy theory…

Screenshot courtesy of Weekend Warrior | Evergreen

More interesting connections:

Just a few days after the Evergreen/Ever Given shipping container became stuck in the Suez Canal, this happens in China, almost as if it is mimicking it’s water counterpart.

And who do we have trying to come to the Evergreen/H3RC ship’s rescue?

Screenshot courtesy of Weekend Warrior | Evergreen

But it couldn’t be in any way related to “Barack”, right? A slight play on words? No… that would be a little much.

And it’s not like both HRC and Barack were involved in the wikileak/p!zz4g4t3 scandal that suspected them of using pedophilia-related codewords to describe underhanded sinister acts or rituals or anything.

…Wait…

Pedophile Code Words Found In John Podesta E-Mails
“Sacrificing a Chicken to Moloch” – The Clinton-Podesta Email Scandal

#p!zz4g4t3wasnotdebunked!

One last picture that shows what could be an ominous foreshadowing (of course depending on the truth of what it means – if anything – or if it really is just a random set of letters that don’t mean anything catastrophic):

Screenshot courtesy of Weekend Warrior | Evergreen

I hope “WMD” in this case doesn’t mean what it normally means in the world of the military and government…
weapon of mass destruction, WMD, W.M.D.(noun)
a weapon that kills or injures civilian as well as military personnel (nuclear and chemical and biological weapons)

What does WMD mean in Military?

And tie this theory into what Kaan Sariaydin was suggesting, “The Climate Change Weapon, Yes this containers carried the substances (Weapons) that would accelerate the Climate Change!” and it starts to paint a very sordid and terrifying picture. And while the WMD callsign ship seems to be designated to a stalled ship infront of the Evergreen cargo transporter, it offers the possibility that multiple ships were deliberately blocked from passage as well in order to prevent even more suspicious product from getting to their destination.

The Great Reproach Reset

Of course, some people propose that the blocking of the Suez Canal was indeed done on purpose, but not to stop a vile plot, but to implement one.

This theory insinuates that the huge ship was stalled in the canal to help initiate the Great Reset (strangely also connected to Bill Gates – along with the WEF, WHO, NIAID, and so on…), and in so doing, preventing nations around the world from getting their product; causing the market to drive up the costs, thus ushering in their New World Order plan to “help” the world.

Regardless if the Suez Canal was blocked due to this specific reason or not, the Great Reset and the NWO are actual plans of the global elites, and this alone should raise red flags to what’s been happening on this planet.

It honestly begs the question, if this is widely known, with multiple countries against these agendas, why have certain individuals not been apprehended and charged with ‘crimes against humanity’, as so many inclinations of this egregious pursuit of dictatorship has been running rampant throughout our history? Is it really that challenging to address the few people pushing their oppression on everyone else? Is our world so polluted in our thinking and ambition?

And if the Clintons are indeed involved in the heinous activity that they are accused of, why, for the love of everything Holy, are they not in custody (and if they are and/or are not the real culprits, and we’re not getting the full story, then who is REALLY running the show here)? Are the rumors that the cia and the secret service (and perhaps other corrupt agencies), protecting them true? There’s apparently no other option to come to that would make sense other than this supposition. Who else is involved in this illicit cover-up, if true?

Just a coincidence?

While it would be difficult to cover every theory regarding this event, there is, of course, one more that we should all entertain.

That is, could this all, in fact, be one huge coincidence and these theories being proposed are so far off base and truly worthy of tin-foil hat wearing delusional crackpots?

Was the Evergreen container ship just extremely unfortunate to getting stuck in the canal the way it did with no bearing on anything sinister or nefarious going on? Was it simply one huge mistake and all the containers on that ship (and perhaps the other ships that remained halted due to the blockage) just have your average, ordinary, everyday standard supplies with no malevolent intent behind them?

One can only hope.

But knowing the depravity and wickedness that some people have within them, and the deplorable lengths that they will go to in order to remain at the top, and the troubling awareness that nothing happens by chance, I’d say it’s a longshot.

Perhaps I’ll be proven wrong.

(Legitimately wrong – not just told it was all nothing more than “baseless conspiracy theories”…)

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

The REAL Purpose of the Covid “Vaccine” - IT IS NOT FOR YOUR BENEFIT
The Corona Crisis: Has “Depopulation” Already Begun? - Please share and spread awareness.
Reiner Fuellmich on suing the WHO / Jerm Warfare (Transcript) - Dr. Reiner Fuellmich to Lead 1,000 Lawyers and Over 10,000 Medical Experts in Trials of Crimes Against Humanity
Whistleblowers Exposing the Coronavirus/Vaccine Narrative - Brave individuals speaking out to expose this fraudulent activity.
Vaccination Deaths/Frontline Workers Testimonies & VAERS Reports - Vaccination Deaths / Side Effects / Adverse Reactions
Down the Rabbit Hole: “Conspiracy Theories” Playing Out in Real Time - Scandalous plots? Yes. They have been planned for a long time...
Revealing Some Controversial Themes About the “Sound of Freedom” Movie, Starring Jim Caviezel - Jim Caviezel portrays Tim Ballard. But is everything on the up and up?

Youtube Trigger Words

Can you guess what words trigger youtube’s algorithm software?

Some people may know of Youtube’s strange algorithm that will “demonetize” videos if they have certain keywords in the title. At least, according to this site and this list. And to say that some of these words are extremely innocuous is an understatement.

Take these common words for instance:

zero
Zelda (sorry, Zelda fans)
walk
get
people
film
game
food
theory

Now obviously this brings up the question if the popular youtuber MatPat from the Game/Film/Food Theorists series is demonetized. Of course, that’s unless he’s on another list like some people speculate that automatically puts his content on a “whitelist” instead of a “blacklist”, which would override the totalitarian regime of the youtube censors sensors.

This wouldn’t just apply to Matpat, but to anyone that youtube deems worthy enough to have monetized videos. And this is just pure speculation, and not about the youtubers, but youtube itself.

With not only the amount of words on the “blacklist” but also the quality of them, one could surmise that youtube just put the whole dictionary into their blacklist and just approve people who have passed their propaganda filter test first.

Or, another theory here, youtube is still able to get viewers and content creators with all of these demonetized videos while not having to pay them for ads – saving this, instead, for their “cream of the crop”.

Creators finally know how much money YouTube makes, and they want more of it
The YouTube demonetization controversy, explained

Whatever the case is, for youtube to target every single word from this sentence: “My exciting trip to Hawaii.” speaks VOLUMES of their extensive reach into dictatorship.

Seriously.

Every. Single. Word.

You can’t say “my“, you can’t say “to“, you can’t say proper pronouns; you can’t say “who“, “what“, “where“, “when“, “why“, you can’t say “the” … You can’t say ANY of the words in the following sentence:

Whatever the case is, for youtube to target every single word from this sentence: “My exciting trip to Hawaii.” speaks VOLUMES of their extensive reach into –

Funnily enough, though, you can still say “dictatorship”.

And you can’t say, “Jesus Christ said, “Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.” or “Love your neighbor.

Every single word in those sentences are targeted as well.

But hey, you can still say, “Hail Lucifer”, so that’s something.

 

I’m really hoping the list is a hoax and not legitimate…

Now, another interesting thing that I came across, are OTHER certain key words that trigger youtube’s algorithm in a different way.

Perhaps you’ve seen a screen like this on youtube while watching a certain video:

At the bottom of the video there is an “information panel” to present additional information to the viewer for that specific topic. Regardless of the opinions contained within that video. So these “information panels” are basically to guide the viewer to the “actual facts” of that subject matter.

In the above example, we can see that it is a COVID-19 related information panel, because tptsb want to enforce their idea onto the public about what covid is, how severe it is, and how we all MUST take the vaccine in order to go back to normal. …Clicking on that specific LEARN MORE link will take you to the cdc website.

Now besides their use of the information bar for specific news sources, like they use for BBC, PBS, etc., this specific information bar for covid is meant to combat “misinformation” on topical subjects.

Source: Youtube/Google support page | Information panel giving topical context

Huh. They must have read my mind. Because the “moon landing” is exactly what I was looking up when noticing this very helpful “information” bar. Sure, I’ve seen it before, but it never really caught my attention until just recently.

While researching interesting information about NASA (there’ll be a post about them coming up soon), I noticed that the youtube video I was watching mentioned “flat Earth” and the dome/firmament allegedly around us that would prevent NASA from actually going into outer space and showing us all these lovely videos and photographs of the Earth from a distance, etc., etc., and the alleged Mars rover landings. This topic is a whole different subject altogether, which I won’t get into here, but thought it was interesting that the youtube algorithm would specifically give an information bar about “flat Earth”.

“YouTube had faced criticism for allowing the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories through its platform. In 2019, YouTube stated that it was making changes in its software to reduce the distribution of videos based on conspiracy theories including flat Earth.” – Wikipedia | Flat Earth

If you notice, the video does not mention “flat earth” in the title, but it is a subject discussed in the video. Now, why would an affiliate of youtube (if it’s not youtube themselves) go through the time and effort to specifically put this additional information bar trying to lead the viewers to a third-party website to “combat misinformation”, if youtube is supposedly a platform highlighting the following (found on their own About page) –

For the harder to read texts:

Freedom of Expression: “We believe people should be able to speak freely, share opinions, foster open dialogue, and that creative freedom leads to new voices, formats and possibilities.

Freedom of Information: “We believe everyone should have easy, open access to information and that video is a powerful force for education, building understanding, and documenting world events, big and small.

Freedom of Opportunity: “We believe everyone should have a chance to be discovered, build a business and succeed on their own terms, and that people—not gatekeepers—decide what’s popular.

Freedom to Belong: “We believe everyone should be able to find communities of support, break down barriers, transcend borders and come together around shared interests and passions.

Either they are lying through their teeth about their own beliefs and values, or they have no idea what “freedom” means. …Or I guess it could be both.

Some people will try to defend youtube’s rights to deplatform or demonetize anyone they wish, but you can’t tell me that their “views” aligns with what they are actually doing.

And why are these “critics” so afraid of people believing in flat earth to begin with? If it’s such a RIDICULOUS claim and all of these people are dolts for entertaining the idea, what’s the harm if they believe in a nonsense conspiracy theory? If the world is really a globe then just chalk it up to a whole bunch of people being foolishly misled and move on. …Unless, of course, too many people are believing it and it’s harming the very fabric of a billion-dollar enterprise that uses the tax-payers money to engage in fraudulent mass manipulation and deception. Just food for thought.

Getting to the other trigger words I’ve found that will bring up a similar information bar, along with “flat Earth” and “covid“, there are also these:

– flat earth
– covid-19
– illuminati
– qanon
– freemasonry
– U.S. elections
– assassination of John F. Kennedy
– Apollo space program
– climate change
– contrail (chemtrail)
– reptilian humanoid
– Bohemian Club

Now why would these very few and very specific words trigger an “information” bar?

I’ve tried a long list (being of a conspiratorial or controversial nature) of what I thought would trigger an information bar, but the above were the only ones I’ve seen so far. I’ve tried:

– vaccine
– Fauci
– Bill Gates
– Epstein
– royal family
– pope
– vatican
– satan
– hydroxychloroquine
– lgbqt
– gender
– abortion

– pizzagate
– wikileaks
– government
– cia
– moon landing
– Roswell
– ufo
– alien
– nasa
– bible
– God
– Jesus

– Jew
– semite
– darpa
– cern
– LHC
– Haarp
– mrna
– 9/11
– September 11
– Hitler
– Saddam Hussein
– capitol riot

(Now I’m probably on a list for making this list…)

I’ve searched many more terms, but these are just ones I’ve decided to highlight to show the diversity of the topics that I looked up. None of these triggered the information bar. So it’s very interesting that the few words above did.

While youtube back in its glory days was more of a fair, user-friendly platform that tried to treat everyone equally, that is no longer the case. Now, the company is nothing more than a propaganda driven love-fest with the efforts being spent on highlighting biased, partisan views (their own views or that of their top monetary donors…) instead of an outlet where people are allowed to say their own opinions (and facts! in some cases) – within reason, of course. Yes, hate speech is still something that is hard to tackle, but when one can literally call anything and everything “hate speech”, the lines become severely blurred and prevents anyone from saying anything due to unfair criticism and judgement.

Debate is no longer an option. Now it is, “Do as I say, and think as I do, or you’re a terrorist. White supremacist. Conspiracy theorist. Engaging in hate speech. Fake news. Misinformation. Dangerous far-right dissenter. We must de-platform, ban, censor, delete, dox – anything we can do to get you in line or shut you out.”

This is what we’re faced with. Why are people getting attacked for their different belief structures? Is it because it dares to fly in the face of a corrupt organization(s) that is trying to implement their absolute tyranny over the whole planet? Does it threaten their ideologies and/or the wool that they’ve put over the public’s eyes? Why are certain “theories” being so harshly condemned and persecuted?

And strange theories, they are. Could these possibly have an ounce (or a ton) of truth to them? And this is why these immoral establishments are trying so hard to reign the control back in? Are people waking up to the possibility that we’re all being massively lied to on a grand scale? (And could it also be a diversionary tactic to keep our attention away from something completely different?)

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Steve Buissinne from Pixabay

Get an Earful

The REAL Purpose of the Covid “Vaccine” - IT IS NOT FOR YOUR BENEFIT
The Corona Crisis: Has “Depopulation” Already Begun? - Please share and spread awareness.
Reiner Fuellmich on suing the WHO / Jerm Warfare (Transcript) - Dr. Reiner Fuellmich to Lead 1,000 Lawyers and Over 10,000 Medical Experts in Trials of Crimes Against Humanity
Whistleblowers Exposing the Coronavirus/Vaccine Narrative - Brave individuals speaking out to expose this fraudulent activity.
Vaccination Deaths/Frontline Workers Testimonies & VAERS Reports - Vaccination Deaths / Side Effects / Adverse Reactions
Down the Rabbit Hole: “Conspiracy Theories” Playing Out in Real Time - Scandalous plots? Yes. They have been planned for a long time...
Revealing Some Controversial Themes About the “Sound of Freedom” Movie, Starring Jim Caviezel - Jim Caviezel portrays Tim Ballard. But is everything on the up and up?

Anthony Fauci Caught ‘Lying’ – Several Times

Science doesn’t lie. But people sure do.

What is “science”?

SCIENCE:
 
1. a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws.
2. systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.
3. any of the branches of natural or physical science.
4. systematized knowledge in general.
5. knowledge, as of facts or principles; knowledge gained by systematic study.
6. a particular branch of knowledge.
7. any skill or technique that reflects a precise application of facts or principles.

Science is a set of facts and principles gained from knowledge and study into the experience and observation of the physical/material world.

FACTS. TRUTHS. PRINCIPLES.

I know I’m not the only one questioning why “science” seems to be changing at the whim of a small few. And who do we have at the helm of it all? Especially during these very confusing/controversial covid times?

Anthony Fauci, NIH, WHO, FDA and the CDC. (All “gold-standard, leading experts” that ironically are shifting, changing, removing what “science” has defined throughout all these years.)

Even his very own statements about science should shed some light on what science is supposed to be: “He added, “So, when they see someone up in the White House, which has an air of authority to it, who’s talking about science, that there are some people who just don’t believe that — and that’s unfortunate because, you know, science is truth. … If you go by the evidence and by the data, you’re speaking the truth.”
Anthony Fauci lied about masks; now he complains that people ‘distrust authority’

Yes. “If you go by the evidence and by the data, you’re speaking the truth.” – not if you’re making it up and changing it as you go along because it suits a particular agenda.

Let’s see how many times Mr. Dr. Expert Anthony Fauci and the co-horts of this agenda were caught lying or “changing” goalposts/rules and even the very definition of what herd immunity means (keep in mind, this is just a very small sample out of many) :

Wearing a mask:

1. Feb. 17 (2020): Fauci told USA Today that wearing a mask is for the infected to protect others. “Now, in the United States, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to wear a mask.
The Fauci Timeline — Sorting Fact From Fiction

2. March 2020: “When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences — people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face,” said Fauci at that time.
FLASHBACK: Dr. Fauci claims masks don’t provide COVID protection, only help people ‘feel…better’

3. In June 2020, Fauci admitted that he and other public health officials had downplayed the benefit of masks — with some even advising against wearing them — because of a fear of equipment shortages for front-line health care workers.
Dr. Anthony Fauci Admits Shifting Goalposts on ‘Herd Immunity’

4. September 2020: “At that point, which is now months and months ago, I have been on the airways, on the radio, on TV, begging people to wear masks. And I keep talking in the context of wear a mask, keep physical distance, avoid crowds, wash your hands and do things more outdoors versus indoors.”

Fauci says Trump took his stance on masks ‘out of context’ during debate

5. By October (2020), Dr. Fauci had completely reversed course on mask-wearing, saying that it may be time to impose a nationwide mask-wearing mandate, something he termed “universal mask-wearing.”

“Well, if people are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandating it,” Fauci told CNN’s Erin Burnett Oct. 23.
FLASHBACK: Dr. Fauci claims masks don’t provide COVID protection, only help people ‘feel…better’

From a personal opinion: I want to point out how adamant Anthony Fauci is about flouting wearing a mask, yet here, he is not wearing one throughout his entire speech. Doesn’t he realize how far his droplets are landing? Not to mention that at the 19 minute mark we see press secretary Jen Psaki take the stand, without wiping down the potentially dangerous, deadly virus that Anthony Fauci could have been dispensing all over the podium.

Including that is the fact that Jen Psaki then takes her face masks (because, “double the protection”…) off as well, and flips it mouth-side down on the very podium that expert Anthony Fauci was just speaking at and spreading his germs. At the very end of the video, Jen is seen putting the mask back on, after letting it sit and fester on top of the stand that Dr. Fauci was just speaking over.

What has our common sense been reduced to?

Herd immunity:

6. Earlier on in the pandemic, Fauci had said the United States would need 60 to 70 percent of people to be vaccinated in order to reach herd immunity, according to the Times.
REPORT: Fauci Admits He Lied Because ‘Country Wasn’t Ready’ To Hear The Truth

7. Dr Fauci’s estimate for reaching herd immunity has been steadily inching up, @nytimes’ Donald McNeil Jr reports. Fauci told us at last week’s @CNBC #HealthyReturns that it may be 75-85%. https://t.co/j18nUYZ3cV pic.twitter.com/hIKewMAFim

— Meg Tirrell (@megtirrell) December 24, 2020
REPORT: Fauci Admits He Lied Because ‘Country Wasn’t Ready’ To Hear The Truth

8. “When polls said only about half of all Americans would take a vaccine, I was saying herd immunity would take 70 to 75 percent,” Fauci told the Times. “Then, when newer surveys said 60 percent or more would take it, I thought, ʻI can nudge this up a bit,’ so I went to 80, 85.”

“We need to have some humility here,” he added. “We really don’t know what the real number is. I think the real range is somewhere between 70 to 90 percent. But, I’m not going to say 90 percent.”
Fauci doubles down after being confronted over startling admission that he deceived the public about herd immunity

We even have the WHO, who is constantly changing / “updating” their definition for what herd immunity means depending on the alleged “new” results and information that they determine from their studies.

Another change, once again, on December 21, 2020:

Yet another "update" explaining their change in definition.

Very suspect, Anthony Fauci and WHO. Very suspect.

And perhaps because of this exposure, they felt the need to “clarify”, this time taking into account not only the vaccines that they heap enormous praise and focus on, but this time alluding to the Samaritan goodness of their hearts that they do not feel as if herd immunity should be achieved by exposing people to the virus. But instead by using the vaccine. (Because they care so much.)

The question then is, who is going to protect us from the vaccine if/when it turns out (since new information comes out all the time…) that the vaccine was not as “safe and effective” as they once thought? Their inclusion that “WHO will continue to update these answers as new information becomes available.” leaves the door wide open to skirt away from any responsibility of the side effects of the vaccine due to not enough foresight because of the ever-evolving nature of this new virus and the vaccine that has yet to be studied thoroughly for long-term safety and effectiveness.

The argument then possibly becomes that their sincere effort to “save humanity” from this deadly pandemic overrides the vaccine effectiveness because of the huge demand to save the population (let’s not get into the depopulation agenda of Bill Gates – in which he and Anthony Fauci are close friends – and others… although, by all means, please research this to gain more information) and that they honestly, truly, genuinely sought to cure us all from this virus. The tragic outcome of the vaccine that they “earnestly” thought was for the benefit of the people would be unprecedented and the blame would then go to, again, the changing nature of the virus and/or our immune response system not adhering well to their honest-to-goodness efforts.

Sorry, but, I’m not buying it.

Asymptomatic vs. Symptomatic

9. January 2020: “But the one thing historically that people need to realize is that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory viruses of any type asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there is a rare symptomatic transmission that may transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.
Here Is a Video of Fauci Explaining in January 2020 That Asymptomatic Transmission Is NEVER the Driver of Outbreaks

10. June 2020: Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove: “We’re constantly looking at this data, and we’re trying to get more information from countries to truly answer this question,” she added. “It still appears to be rare that an asymptomatic individual actually transmits onward.”

Anthony Fauci: “We know from epidemiological studies they can transmit to someone who is uninfected even when they’re without symptoms,” Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told ABC’s “Good Morning America” on Wednesday. “So to make a statement to say that’s a rare event was not correct.”
Fauci says asymptomatic coronavirus transmission is possible following WHO confusion

11. September 2020: “I can tell you right now that we should be testing more and we should be testing asymptomatic people,” Fauci told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes on Thursday night. “Take that to the bank and trust me on it.”
CDC reverses course on testing asymptomatic people for Covid-19, again

The PCR / covid tests:

12. Yet a PCR test instruction document from the CDC that had been revised five times as of July 13, 2020, specified testing and interpretation of the test using a Ct of 40. On September 28, 2020, a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases from Jaafar et al. had asserted, based on patient labs and clinical data involving nearly 4,000 patients, that a Ct of 30 was appropriate for making public policy. An update to the CDC instructions for PCR testing from December 1, 2020, still uses a Ct of 40.
The WHO Finally Updates Its COVID-19 Testing Policy… One Hour After Biden’s Inauguration

13. Anthony Fauci (July 16, 2020): “…If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…it’s just dead nucleoids, period.”
Fauci Himself Admits Covid PCR Test at Over 35 Cycles Is Deceitful, Worse Than Useless

14. Article published on September 30, 2020: The reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test used to identify those people infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus uses a nasal swab to collect RNA from deep within the nasal cavity of the individual being tested. The RNA is reverse transcribed into DNA and amplified through 40 or more cycles, or until virus is detected. The result is reported as a simple “yes” or “no” answer to the question of whether someone is infected.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials state they do not specify the cycle threshold ranges used to determine who is positive, and that commercial manufacturers and laboratories set their own threshold ranges.

Any test with a cycle threshold (CT) above 35 is too sensitive, says Juliet Morrison, PhD, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 [cycles] could represent a positive.” A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35, she added. Dr. Mina said he would set the figure at 30, or even less.

Coronavirus Cases Plummet When PCR Tests Are Adjusted

Yikes. There is so much wrong with these examples. Who is in charge, again? The labs/manufacturers can set their own threshold? Yet officials wouldn’t recommend anything higher than 35? Or even 30? Even Anthony Fauci, who finally wasn’t lying about the amount of cycles? Yet at what threshold were all of these tests being done to crank out all of these false positives that are, again, just now being addressed and changed? The FDA recommended threshold of 40 or as many as it takes “until virus is detected“?

Then pair that up with what Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test had to say:
“I don’t think you can misuse PCR. [It is] the results; the interpretation of it. If they can find this virus in you at all – and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”
Dr. Fauci admits the PCR test for coronavirus is all but useless as it is administered in the US

15. Dr. David Samadi (January 21, 2021): The World Health Organization has now released guidance to laboratories around the world to reduce the cycle count in PCR tests to get a more accurate representation of COVID cases.

The current cycle was much too high and resulting in any particle being declared a positive case.

The WHO notice concluded by suggesting that “most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.”
World Health Organization updates PCR test guidelines

So apparently all this time they weren’t assessing all of the other necessary relative data needed to confirm a positive case, and instead ran as many cycles as they possibly could to detect the virus – against the numerous prompts of the medical community who said all along that this was a huge oversight – meanwhile suspiciously cranking out positive numbers for the media to drool over. And as some people have pointed out, all of these new changes are “coincidentally” just in time to greet the new president as an illusion of control and miraculously reduced numbers of positive coronavirus cases. (Or it’s due to the fantastic work of the rushed vaccine – or both.)

Hydroxychloroquine

16. The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.

So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump street? He didn’t even launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9 (2020), by which time 33,000 people had died.

Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 — nobody needed to die

17. August 12, 2020: Since the start of the pandemic, hundreds of doctors have successfully used hydroxychloroquine to treat patients symptomatic of COVID-19 infections. In frustration at the media negativity about this safe, effective medicine American doctors have sent an open letter to Dr Fauci raising their concerns.
Doctors Send Open Letter to Fauci About HCQ COVID Cure

Other doubts from multiple outlets about the supposed “expert” decisions of those in charge:

Up until COVID hit in 2020, neither WHO nor the CDC had ever considered a single positive PCR test sufficient for diagnosing viral infection.

TOTAL COINCIDENCE ALERT: C19 Diagnostic Criteria Tightened by WHO on Biden Inauguration Day!

Sen. Marco Rubio just called out Anthony Fauci in a penned piece posted on Fox News as a lying liar who arrogantly used his position as the nation’s top infectious disease bureaucrat to lie to the American people “in order to manipulate their behavior.”

“[P]lacing blind faith in unelected celebrity scientists,” Rubio warned, “has its limits, and we must not be afraid to call them out when they’re caught overstepping their legitimate authority.”

Anthony Fauci’s ‘lying’ is hardly surprising

Also, the nation’s testing data has been called into question, as this week the CDC and 11 states were forced to admit that they were mixing testing results in a way that might make the data less useful in assessing the rate of the disease’s spread.

If it isn’t the nation’s mood, nor the science, could it be… politics?

Did Anthony Fauci Get Out-Foxed? Why His Reversal On Reopening Is So Troubling

Mea culpa: I spent a lot of time on these here digital pages defending Dr. Anthony Fauci. Brother, was I wrong. Fauci is a stone-cold liar. And if he’s not a stone-cold liar, his only defense is that he is a fraud. Either way, shame on him … and me.

Nolte: Dr. Fauci Is Either a Liar or a Fraud

Why all the changing rules contradicting those of other scientists/doctors?

One would think if an expert in his field had any real experience and knowledge about viruses, transmission, etc., that their “rules” would not keep changing based on the “popular view” or pressure to conform to what politics demands. With the “leadership” blaming all of the changes on this new virus/pandemic and that they have to adjust their position based on new findings/studies about it, it makes one wonder why their (the leading expert’s) initial view was so out of touch compared with the MANY other doctors/scientists who were saying all along that masks don’t work, lockdowns don’t work, we don’t need a vaccine because HCQ works and ivermectin, etc., etc., etc.

So again I ask you… what makes the NIH, CDC, WHO experts so much more knowledgeable about this ‘virus’, if they have been wrong countless times and only changing their views (they claim: “based on new findings”) if all of the scientists and doctors they were trying to silence this whole time due to “misinformation” and “false news” were RIGHT ALL ALONG?

What makes these few “leading experts”, who have been proven wrong time and time again, and who has changed their mind, time and time again, so much more authoritative and knowledgeable about this coronavirus situation than the numerous other doctors and scientists who have been right from the very beginning? The very same scientists and doctors who have been gaslighted and ridiculed, censored and banned, doxxed and attacked for sticking to their values and scientific findings that these other so-called “leading experts” are just now admitting are correct?

Why aren’t Fauci and the rest of the government alphabet crew (NIH, WHO, CDC, FDA, etc.) labeled as “misinformation” and “false news” when they were peddling all of their uncertain information to begin with; yet the actual scientific facts and findings of the medical community were called into question? Should the media who helped propagate these incorrect assessments be held liable as well?

How many people could have been saved if the world leaders (far be it for me to imply that some (most?) are in on a huge conspiratorial agenda…) would have listened to the multiple doctors and scientists/researchers advice instead of those at the head of these (quite possibly corrupt) funded agencies?

Has Anthony Fauci been lying this whole time (blaming citing ‘new information’) and just changing the goal posts to suit some other purpose?

PCR Inventory Kary Mullis on “Dr” Fauci:

He should not be in the position like he’s in.

Those guys have got an agenda. Which is not, what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to – and they smugly – like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”

“You can’t expect the sheep, to really respect the best and the brightest. They don’t know the difference, really. I mean, I like humans, don’t get me wrong, but, basically, there is a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn’t a really good scientist. I mean, that’s a problem, that’s a main problem, actually with science, I’d say in this century, because scientists being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don’t understand it.”

President of the University of South Carolina asked Fauci if he’d come down there and debate me on stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody who was, from the other side, to come down there and balance my – because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that’s going to tell me the other side. But Fauci didn’t want to do it…

An interesting piece from 1994 on Kary Mullis and his views on a couple of questionable individuals:

In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.

The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.

But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done.

“I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.”

He pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.”

(Kary Mullis)
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus

It seems as if this self-described “ass” actually has a heart of gold and was trying to expose possible corruption as early as the 1990’s.

As Celia Farber, the interviewer, mentions: “One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears.

Sadly Kary Mullis passed away on August 17, 2019, allegedly from pneumonia. Just weeks away from when Event 201 took place in October 2019, and a few more weeks from when an actual “surprise outbreak” erupted, allegedly as early as November 2019. And just a couple of months after that, we have the PCR tests that Mr. Kary Mullis himself invented and was against using for viral detection, being used (and abused) for viral detection en masse – at the behest of the “expert scientists”.

Science doesn’t lie. But people sure do.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Peggy und Marco Lachmann-Anke from Pixabay

Get an Earful

The REAL Purpose of the Covid “Vaccine” - IT IS NOT FOR YOUR BENEFIT
The Corona Crisis: Has “Depopulation” Already Begun? - Please share and spread awareness.
Reiner Fuellmich on suing the WHO / Jerm Warfare (Transcript) - Dr. Reiner Fuellmich to Lead 1,000 Lawyers and Over 10,000 Medical Experts in Trials of Crimes Against Humanity
Whistleblowers Exposing the Coronavirus/Vaccine Narrative - Brave individuals speaking out to expose this fraudulent activity.
Vaccination Deaths/Frontline Workers Testimonies & VAERS Reports - Vaccination Deaths / Side Effects / Adverse Reactions
Down the Rabbit Hole: “Conspiracy Theories” Playing Out in Real Time - Scandalous plots? Yes. They have been planned for a long time...
Revealing Some Controversial Themes About the “Sound of Freedom” Movie, Starring Jim Caviezel - Jim Caviezel portrays Tim Ballard. But is everything on the up and up?