Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT)

Dr. Pierre Kory: “And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”

On January 24, 2022, Senator Ron Johnson held a panel discussion with several highly acknowledged doctors and medical experts, as well as testimonial accounts from witnesses, describing the medical tyranny and corruption that has been unleashed since “COVID-19” hit. The conference was ~5 hours long, and as Senator Ron Johnson put it, “we didn’t even scratch the surface of what we need to discuss”, because there is just so much data and information to be exposed.

In the highlight video below, some of the key points have been addressed, and have been transcribed including timestamps for easier search and maneuverability.

While there will likely be some disagreements to some of the assertions that have been stated (some question the legitimacy of COVID, for one, since it has been speculated that it is a rebranding of the flu and marketed to be deadlier in order to push the vaccines, and whether we’re even in a “pandemic” – or ever was, etc.) the number one thing that most of the members of this panel have concluded upon, is that the measures and protocols put in place by the government and health agencies, namely the CDC, NIH and FDA, have either failed miserably, and/or was implemented on purpose for ulterior reasons – and the “COVID vaccines” are not only unnecessary, but are also causing an unprecedented amount of injuries and death.

Many thanks to the speakers at this event, and to Senator Ron Johnson for giving them a platform to discuss the suspicious nature of what has been happening due to this COVID/vaccine narrative.

The video below has been transcribed in full. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

To watch the full version, please go here.

Source: rumble | Senator Ron Johnson | COVID-19: A Second Opinion (Shorter Highlight Video)

Senator Ron Johnson: “All I can ask, is the viewers to share this. Tell your friends. I know this is long. This is, this is a 5 hour long panel. And we didn’t even scratch the surface of what we need to discuss! This shouldn’t be necessary. As our information grew, as we became better and better educated; less ignorant about… the coronavirus, COVID, the COVID vaccines – This, this should’ve been made public every step along the way.

But it wasn’t.

So again, I’m just asking the viewing public to have an open mind, respect these individuals who have paid a significant price. Professionally, reputationally.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @00:53: “How many of you in this room, recognizing there are doctors, there are PhDs, there are attorneys, media experts, other scientists, public citizens… how many of you personally have witnessed censorship, intimidation, or professional reprisal, and damage as a result of your advocacy for patients?”

[several members raise their hand]

“I want this to be recorded. That is 80% of this room have experienced something negative in their life in trying to promote and help compassionately something positive for patients suffering with a potentially fatal illness.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @01:35: “I’d like to start really quick with a story. So, a high risk individual approaches me: 50 years old, obese, Type 1 diabetic, calls me, “I have COVID.” This is about a year ago. “What do I do? Help. Help. I’m going to the ER. My oxygen’s 86. I have excruciating pain in my lungs.” So I said, “You’re going to the pharmacy; don’t go to the ER.”

I called in some early treatment medications, are the drugs which shall not be named. Said individual calls me a couple of hours later and says, “You know that excruciating 9 out of 10 lung pain, and it’s now a 2 out of 10 six hours later.” Well I know the mechanisms of the medication I prescribed. A few hours later in the next morning he calls me, he says, “You know that oxygen saturation of 86? It’s now a 98%.” I said, “Isn’t that fantastic? Early treatment works.”

That individual’s my brother. I am my brother’s keeper.”

__________

Dr. Harvey Risch @02:32: “This warning says, “FDA cautions against the use of hydroxychloroquine in out-patients outside of the hospital setting.” But then, in the justification, it says, “We base this on information to treat hospitalized patients.”

Hospital disease, as we’ll hear, and as we know, from two years of dealing with COVID, it’s a completely different illness, treated with different drugs, different medications, in the hospital. Outpatient disease is flu-like. Hospital disease is a [undetermined] pneumonia.

And so the fact that the FDA would base recommendations and warnings on hospital disease, which is a totally different disease than outpatient disease, is a fraud. This website is still there today, and constitutes an outright fraud.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @03:20: “Again, I’ll point out, there is so much we don’t know. I would’ve liked to seen a much larger dose of modesty coming out of our federal health officials, and the Legacy Media, and big tech, when it came to – we would be so much better off, if there was robust debate and discussion.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @03:42: I have to say, I’m going to call it out, and I’m known for this, I call it like I see it, I’m calling attention to the corruption. If you look at these innumerable failed policies, there’s only one way to understand them. They are literally written by pharmaceutical companies. Almost every single policy serves the interest of the pharmaceutical company.

However, if you look outside the United States and look around the world, there have been numerous successes. As one of the world experts on Ivermectin, let me just talk about some programs which used Ivermectin. My colleagues here, as Dr. Risch just pointed out, there are a number of compounds that we’ve identified that are effective in early treatment. Almost all of them are repurposed or generic.

But let me just say a few words about Ivermectin and what it’s doing around the world. Not in the United States. In the United States it’s a “horse de-wormer”, it’s “horse-paste”, and only the illiterate, ignorant and/or unvaccinated use it.”

“That medication has been shown to literally solve the pandemic in numerous regions around the world.”

__________

Dr. Richard Urso @04:50: “And as time went on, they were told, in no uncertain terms, if you use these drugs, you probably will be fired. And nobody had to tell them; they’re smart people, you don’t have to draw a map.”

“- is why is an ophthalmologist treating? Because patients were languishing at home. And I’ve treated over 1600 patients because patients were languishing at home with no treatment for inflammation, with no treatment for respiratory distress, with no treatment for blood clotting. It’s absolutely absurd, and I wasn’t going to let it happen. And I think as you see in this room, all of us feel the same.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @05:27: “Are African-Americans, are they denied early treatment in the community?”

Dr. Christina Parks:“Well yes they are. My dad just died. Right? He died Friday. Couldn’t get a test. Couldn’t get monoclonal antibodies. We treated him at home, unfortunately we had an oxygen machine that didn’t work. So he – blood saturation went down to the point where he was incoherent. We called EMS; they said your problem is your oxygen machine doesn’t work. They put oxygen on him, he went to 98% saturation.

We moved him to the hospital, he recovered all of his cognitive functions, he was doing quite well. But he was no longer getting medications that reduces inflammation. He was no longer getting medications that block the histamine response. He was no longer getting the medications that he needed. And he was no longer getting, you know, lung steroids, and he just declined, and declined, and declined. Until he passed away, on Friday, and I say he passed away from lack of appropriate care.”

__________

Dr. Mary Bowden @06:28: “So in the last 6 months, I’ve really evolved into a early treatment advocate. I’ve used a combination of medications and up until recently I was using monoclonal antibodies, and sadly we can’t get those anymore. But, you know, I just hear so many stories. At first it was, you know, “my PCP won’t see me”. So they came to see me, and ENT. I became the PCP. Now it’s people are terrified to go to the hospital. So I’ve become the emergency room. And I’m giving high dose IV steroids, I’m giving, you know, 25 grams of IV, vitamin C, but I am keeping people out of the hospital, and I’ve kept over 2,000 people out of the hospital. And if you look at current statistics, 20 of those people should be dead. And they’re not. So…”

“And the turning point for me, when I really got angry, was a patient that his wife reached out to me, he’s trapped in the ICU. Father of 6, sheriff’s deputy, refused to give anything but, you know, these hospitals give them low dose steroids, they give them 6 milligrams of dexamethasone, you know, 3 times a day. A lot of these hospitals won’t even give breathing treatments; it’s ridiculous. They won’t give them the vitamins! I mean – and so, basically she called me in desperation, and I testified, she sued the hospital to try to get her husband the medications he needed.

I testified; we won. The hospital refused to grant me privileges. Even though I have a spotless record. And I was furious. That’s when it all changed for me and I became… I became thrust into the public because of Methodist Hospital. But, it’s just, you know, we – I’ve seen a lot, and I’m angry, and I’m exhausted. I mean, I’ve one hospital I can send patients to that I feel safe to.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @08:17: “Some of those heart wrenching stories I’m hearing, where a loved one’s in the hospital, and their… the family’s begging the hospital to do more. To try and save the person’s life. And they’re just being told, “Nah, your loved one – there’s not much hope, you know. Get ready for the worst.” and they just won’t do anything.”

__________

Dr. Paul Marik @08:37: “So the question is, why? Why have cheap, safe and effective drugs being ignored for the treatment of COVID-19, which could have saved maybe 500,000 lives? And I think Dr. Kory has told us exactly why.”

__________

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty @08:57: “I want to talk about medical ethics. Because I’m concerned that many of our pandemic policies have ignored foundational principles of medical ethics.”

“We effectively abandoned patients that were suffering from other conditions and had other medical needs. The disastrous fruits of this myopia include an unprecedented 40% increase in all cause mortality among working age adults, 18-64, over the last year. Most of which, 2/3 to 3/4 , depending on the state, was not related to COVID. Actuaries tells us that a 10% rise in all cause mortality is a once in 200 year disaster. This was a 40% rise.”

__________

Dr. Robert Malone @09:48: “In my opinion, we should not have politicized the public health response to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. This is a bipartisan issue, and the physicians represented here are truly a bipartisan group. I’m not, although I’ve been characterized as a right-wing proud boy, I’ve previously supported, um, both President Obama and President Biden’s campaigns. But, the course of events have forced me to rethink a lot of my positions, and I think that’s the case with many of my peers.”

“If I may quote, in May of 1995, Nelson Mandela said, “There can be no keener revelation of a society’s soul, than the way in which it treats its children.” In my opinion, our public policies in managing this, have had a particularly strong adverse effect on our children, and vaccine mandates for our children are completely unjustified at this point.”

__________

Dr. David Wiseman @10:52: “So my friend told me a week ago, he said, “Watch this new movie. It’s called Don’t Look Up.” And I told him, “Listen, I don’t need to look at this movie. I’ve been in this movie for the last 2 years.”

__________

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya @11:03: “We have better treatments, and we should be investing in research to continue to improve our treatments and strategies to make sure that we have treatments available everywhere, where someone vulnerable especially gets sick.”

“If you put these strategies together, our society can continue to function in a much more healthy way than we have functioned these past 2 years. While at the same time, working to protect older people, the strategies we followed, basically by ignoring the possibility of early treatment, by not focusing our efforts on the protection of vulnerable populations, and worst of all, these restrictions on human behavior, on human connection, have wreaked enormous damage. And it’s far past time that we stop those policies and instead followed an alternate plan.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @11:56: “So Dr. Bhattacharya was joined by colleagues from Harvard and from Oxford. And put together the Great Barrington Declaration, I’m pretty sure they published that in, I think it was October 2020. We’ve since seen emails between Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci, head of NIH and NIAID, basically with a concerned effort to destroy, reputationally destroy, Dr. Bhattacharya and his co-authors.

Now, let’s ask the listening audience, does that sound like a crazy individual? Sounds to me like a highly qualified, very reasonable person, as we have in this – we’ve assembled in this room.”

__________

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty @12:40: “One worry, that public health officials have mentioned is, well, if we acknowledge that natural immunity is a reality, which, of course it is, and it’s been – it’s epidemiology and immunology 101, they’re worried that people will go out and deliberately get COVID rather than getting the vaccine.

But of course, the issue around acknowledging natural immunity is, what about the people who already have had COVID? That’s what we’re talking about here. Right? And we can give people advice on, you know, avoiding infection and so forth. But ignoring all the folks that have already recovered from COVID is not a good public health policy.”

“Acknowledging natural immunity, would lead to the next very basic question: how many people have it? And the fact that 2 years into the pandemic, we still do not know exactly how many Americans have had COVID… is aston- it’s an astonishing failure of the public health to do basic epidemiological research. The two most basic facts that every medical student learns first, about every new illness that they learn about, are incidence and prevalence. How many new cases, and how many total cases over a given period of time?”

“One very important fact about natural immunity, is that there has not been a single reported case of someone getting reinfected and subsequently transmitting the virus to others. Which we know is not the case for vaccines. Vaccines don’t offer, against COVID, that kind of sterilizing immunity.

So we FOIA’d the CDC, please show us any evidence of someone with natural immunity getting reinfected and transmitting the virus to others. They couldn’t come up with any data. We actually put that in our lawsuit. The university’s experts could not come up with a single counter example.

That’s a very dangerous thing to say. Right? Because almost nothing in medicine and science is a 100%. You can always find outliers. But natural immunity – people with natural immunity are the safest people to be around. You are not going to get COVID from somebody who’s already had COVID.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @14:45: “So, we are seeing actually the vaccinated carry a high volume of virus, because they don’t have the secretory IgA. So this false construct from our federal agencies that “this is a pandemic, and the unvaccinated are spreading”, is a pathophysiological lie. The vaccinated are carrying high volumes in their nose, their tears, their mouth, the virus. Because the vaccine does not neutralize in that location of the body where the virus comes in.

So this is very important. This is why mandates are absolutely now moot, irrelevant, and out the window and need to go away worldwide like most of the world has done already. This is the funny uncle. This is not SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19. This is, COVID-22 meh.”

__________

Dr. Richard Urso @15:40: “Zero randomized control trials that show masks stop the spread of respiratory disease. And that’s including N95. And for everyone, N stands for ‘non-oil resistant’, 95 stands for 95% of airborne particles of which all viruses fit through.

So I usually tell people that, you know, wearing N95 also has not been shown in randomized control trials to be effective. But more importantly, that the capsule on these viruses aren’t oil capsule. And I tell people, it’s like peeing in the pool, it goes right through. It doesn’t stick to water, water molecules, it’s an oil capsule virus.

At the end of the day, the data is what it is, there’s zero, repeat, zero randomized control trials at all, showing that masks stop the spread of upper respiratory disease.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @16:25: “So you’ve treated, through Telemedicine [Dr. Ben Marble:Yes.”] 150,000 COVID patients? [Dr. Ben Marble:“Yes, sir.”] With your team?”

Dr. Ben Marble: “Yes, with the team. We have a team of volunteer free doctors, that donate their time to help treat these patients that come to us. They go to myfreedoctor.com, and they answer our questionnaires, we deliver the early treatment protocols to them as early as we can, and we have a 99.99% survival rate. So I believe myfreedoctor.com, the volunteer free doctor team, we have settled the science on this, early treatment works, period.”

__________

Dr. Harpal Mangat @17:02: “For the key answer is to find a doctor who is gonna treat you. And then that doctor’s gonna be cognizant that a lot of its scripts will not be prescribed. Like I have patients in Virginia, I treat them. I have to figure out where I can get the relevant drugs. And that often means independent pharmacists.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @17:23: “But these are crimes. You know what is going on in this country right now? Is that the CDC, has been captured by the pharmaceutical industry. They sent out a memo in August of 2021. They sent out a similar memo back in the spring of 2020, telling the nations’ physicians and pharmacists not to use generic medicines. We are now in the state, in this country, where it – Senator Johnson asked the question, how can we get the average US citizen to treat, or get treated?

We have pharmacists across the land who are refusing – refusing, to fill these. Because they’ve been manipulated and brain-washed into thinking that it – that the FDA hasn’t approved the use, as if that matters. Off-label prescriptions and prescribing has been going on for decades. It’s encouraged, when there are no effective treatments. Yet I have to, when I’m trying to treat my patients, and Dr. Marble can attest to this, we have pharmacists who refuse to fill some of the safest and the low cost medicines known in the history of medicine.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @18:32: “All of the different drugs that there have been some research on… and what’s interesting about this chart is that Dr. Kory circled the ones that are recommended by our health agencies. They all range from seven hundred bucks, up to 3200. All the ones that are not recommended are, the ones that are, you know, a couple of bucks. Uh, go figure.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @18:56: “I’ve lost a third of my business because insurance contracts have pulled away from me for unprofessional conduct for using these “dangerous” drugs, Ivermectin, for the which my patients have had no adverse reactions. I’ve treated 500,000 patients, or diagnosed 500,000 patients diagnostically in my career. I’ve not had one single complaint against me. I have 4 complaints against licenses in 4 different states for saving lives. So the adverse reaction from these drugs is being attacked for being a good doctor. That’s the bad adverse reaction. And I know many of my colleagues on this panel as well.” [audience applauds]

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @19:29: “And I can tell you 201, the patients that I’ve lost, is because we’ve gotten a late start on early treatment. I’ve recently published a paper with Fazio and colleagues from Italy, we have shown the golden window to treat COVID-19 is the first 72 hours. And the patients that I have lost, and they’ve been very few, but if people listen to this out here, they will recognize that it’s a late start at treatment that is, in a sense, the failure of early treatment. If we start early, we have uniformed successes. I’ve reviewed hundreds and hundreds of reports of hospitalized patients. And of those who’ve died of COVID-19. And in those reports, the clear observation is, that determinants of hospitalization and death are the lack of early treatment.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @20:17: “I am completely agnostic when it comes to whatever drug will end this pandemic. Vaccine, whatever, I don’t care. I want this pandemic over, I want people to live.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @20:27: “We also had the wrong bodies leading the vaccine program. Remember, the FDA’s supposed to be the safety watchdog. The National Institutes of Health is the government research body and the CDC is the outbreak investigation body. Right now, the CDC and the FDA are the named sponsors of a vaccine program.

If America can learn anything, we should never have the FDA and CDC be a sponsor of a public program in administering a product. [audience applauds] It has been a giant and colossal mistake. We should have had a separate body, a government body be the sponsor of the vaccine program. The vaccine manufacturers can supply the products, and then we needed the separate data safety monitoring board, clinical event committee and human ethics committee there in oversight. And if this would have happened based on the emergence of unexplained deaths, I am testifying today that the program would have been shutdown in February, because of excess mortality.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @21:26: “They will attack you, they will threaten you, they will put you in a state of fear and say, “You can only do what we say, but don’t save a life.” And by the way, the vaccines are expired because Omicron is here. And now they still want to mandate them. So they threaten us, and threaten us, and threaten us, and we’re hunted for caring and being compassionate and empathetic and wanting to help humanity.”

__________

Kyle Warner @21:50: “Is it, you know, logical to think that if you’ve been harmed by the first dose, then you shouldn’t get a second dose? And if you get the second dose and you’re harmed, would a booster potentially do more harm and, if you were on the 7th booster, would that potentially cause more harm down the road?”

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: “Of course. You don’t have to be a physician to know the answer to that question. A 4 year old, knows the answer to that question.”

Dr. Richard Urso: “Yeah, and I just want to partner off of what Dr. McCullough said. I don’t think people realize that all these people who had COVID were excluded from the trials. All of them. So we’re going to take our 5-11 year olds, that there’s 28 million, that means 14 – it was about half and half, it’s probably more 60% have had COVID already. So let’s say 12 million have had – have not had COVID. So if those 12 million had the vaccine, and it was a perfect vaccine, it’s 0.1 per hundred thousand, you might save 12 [million] children.

What’s going to happen to the 16 children – 16 million children who haven’t… who’ve already had the virus, who already have immunity, and we’re going to subject them to something that wasn’t even tested in that group? It’s literally absurd. And that’s the thing I would say, Senator, is that it’s – we’re not here about civil liberties and mandates. We’re here to save lives. And this group of people should be excluded, absolutely.

There’s an Achilles Heel to the program of natural immunity. Natural immunity denial should not be happening. It should be a major focus of what we’re trying to do here. Because you’re going to harm, I don’t know how many children by force vaccinating 16 million children. It’s absurd.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @23:22: “In listening to my colleagues, call out all of the inanities, the insanities, the absurdities. Okay? These departures of our policies from what we know are to be scientific truths. These things like denial of natural immunity. We have to understand why. To sit here and point fingers, ‘they’re doing this wrong, and that wrong’

WHY are they doing this? There could be multiple reasons. The simplest and most easily understandable and proveable is, every vaccine, every – these, you know, these novel patented high-cost drugs, is profits. They are putting profits ahead of patients. You know, we can call attention to all of these policies; they are non-scientific. They are failing at having scientific support, yet they’ve been carrying out and they’re being distributed across the country. And doctors, and states, and health departments are willingly accepting these without question, without critical thinking.

And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!” [audience applauds]

__________

Dr. Christina Parks @24:25: “Why are they vaccinating our children? Because once it’s on the vaccine, um, once it’s on the childhood schedule, they are no longer liable for injury. So they’re going to get off that EUA, put it right on the childhood vaccine schedule, and then have no liability going forward.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @24:42: “So I’m going to tell you – read you a quick little news story out of Vietnam. Just got this today.

A 9th grader, in the northern province of Phu Tho, died Tuesday after getting her second Pfizer vaccine dose, the local medical center said Thursday. The girl had gotten her first Pfizer dose on December 3rd 2021. After which she experienced dizziness and had difficulty breathing. She was taken to a medical center for treatment and later recovered.

She had her second dose last Monday. Her mother told healthcare workers about the girl’s side effects following her first shot, but they asked her to get the second shot anyway. Again, this is a… 9th grader. Doesn’t have much risk from COVID. Has a reaction to the first dose, but let’s give her the second dose anyway.

2o minutes following the second shot, the girl experienced tightness in her chest, dizziness, difficulty breathing and seizures. She received emergency treatment on the spot before being transferred to a district medical center. On arrival, she began to vomit blood, fell into a coma, and her heart stopped. Her family received news that she died Tuesday morning.

Now, I guess this isn’t evidence that a death might be related to the vaccine. But it certainly would concern me more than it’s concerned Dr. [Anthony] Fauci, Dr. [Rochelle] Walenksy, Dr. [Francis] Collins, Dr. [Janet] Woodcock, Dr. [Peter] Marks – I know one of your favorites, Brianne [Dressen].

Um, this is reality. This is reality that’s being ignored by our federal health officials, by the Legacy Media,”

__________

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty @26:27: “But every patient is a new textbook, every patient is a unique human being that has unique factors that only we and the patient really understand, with sufficient depth to make difficult medical judgments. And this is the first time in my career – I think the other clinical physicians in the room would agree, where I’ve worried about, is somebody going to be looking over my shoulder asking me why I’ve prescribed fluvoxamine for this indication rather than that indication? I prescribe it for depression, no problem. ‘Are you giving this to treat COVID?’ Why should it matter to you? So it -”

Senator Ron Johnson: “So you’re saying – this is the first time in your – [Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: “The last 2 years.”] Is that true?”

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: “The last 2 years. Now, there’s – there are things that hospital administrators do that have annoyed physicians for years. But the kind of hamstringing of physicians, in terms of doing what we believe to be the right and best and good for this vulnerable patient in front of me right now, that is my only responsibility, as a physician, this patient who has placed their trust in me as their physician, to do what is best for them, and not be, not be acting as the agent of a social program. Or a state program. Or any other interest, that could compromise -”

__________

Dr. Paul Marik @27:54: “So I can tell you what happened to me. So I was using our protocol to treat critically ill patients in the ICU with a whole host of repurposed drugs. I then – this is a memo, this is a memo sent to the entire healthcare system, but they targeted me personally. And what did this memo say? This said I can use Remdesivir, and then I will quote, it was an added section,

Do not endorse section which includes medications that may cause harm and efficacy is not supported in peer-reviewed published RCTs. These medications will not be verified or dispensed for the prevention or treatment of COVID. This list includes: Ivermectin, bicalutamide, etoposide, fluvoxamine, dutasteride, and finasteride.”

And then, just to stick it to me, they added ‘ascorbic acid’ [vitamin C]. [audience laughs] The healthcare system was effectively preventing me treating my patients according to my best clinical judgment.

And then how did this progress? I objected. So the first week I was in the ICU, I didn’t know what to do. What was I to do? My hands were tied. As a clinician for the first time in my entire career I could not be a doctor. I could not treat patients the way I had to be to treat patients. I had 7 COVID patients. Including a 31 year old woman. I was not allowed to treat these people. I had to stand by idly, I had to stand by idly, watching these people die.

I then tried to sue the system and you know what they did? They did something called peer-sham review. It is a disgusting and evil concept. They then accused me of 7 most outrageous crimes that I had committed. And that I was such a severe threat to the safety of patients, they immediately suspended my hospital privileges because I possessed – I posed such an outright threat to these patients. Ignoring the fact that under my care, the mortality was 50% those of my colleagues.

I then went on through the sham-peer review, I went to a kangaroo court, where they continued this, and the end result was I lost my hospital privilege and was reported to the national practitioner data bank. So here I was standing up for patients’ rights, and this hospital – this evil hospital, ended my medical career. So that’s what they do. It’s an outright outrage; it’s evil to the core.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @31:05: “You can use safe, effective, off-label drugs for other conditions outside COVID?”

Dr. Paul Marik: “Absolutely. If this was pneomococcal pneumonia, this wouldn’t be an issue. This is specifically for COVID.”

__________

Jennifer Bridges @31:18: “So I’m still a nurse, but I was fired from Houston Methodist. I’m the one you might have seen all over the news. We were the first one mandated with a COVID shot. So I blew it up on the national media. We have a huge state and federal lawsuit because we didn’t want to be guinea pigs. We saw for ourselves, in the hospital, people coming in with adverse reactions after getting the Pfizer shot.

And the crazy thing is, let me tell you a couple of things about Methodist Hospital down in Houston, Texas. When they first started with COVID, I did that COVID unit on and off the whole time till they fired me in June, right? They started the first two months with hydroxychloroquine. They actually used it in the hospital, then they cut it back real quick, switched it to Remdesivir, and all these other expensive drugs. And we’re like, why? And we would ask these doctors; no one could give us a reason. They just said, “Well the hospital policy changed.” But they didn’t know why.

And you know most of those doctors in that hospital would not even go in those COVID rooms. There was maybe 2 that would. They would stand outside, make us dress up head to toe and go in with an ipad. So the only form of communication those doctors would have at Houston Methodist with the COVID patients was through an ipad. So literally we go in there, they’d be talking to them, never assess the lungs, never look at them, nothing. Go to discharge them; I would come back out and be like, “No. Have you listened to them? They can’t breathe.” Like the wheezing’s horrible – they had no clue.”

__________

Brienne Dressen @32:48: “For 80% of us, are misdiagnosed with anxiety initially; and then months down the road we get appropriate diagnosis, and that’s when we are able to find doctors that are actually willing to go against the directive. Because like these physicians were discussing, their licenses have been threatened. And because their licenses have been threatened, we cannot get medical care. They are afraid to treat us. We have had patients who are severely injured and are dying, who cannot get in the door to get seen by physicians, because physicians are afraid of the word “COVID vaccine”.

So instead, what they’re doing is they’ve made us like Kyle Warner and myself, and our membership of over 12,000 COVID vaccine injured, we are ground-zero to take care of the COVID vaccine injured. When we have highly qualified practitioners, across the globe, that have been silenced and threatened, if they even so much as see us for what’s going on.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @33:37: “There is the father of a boy here in this room who’s died of myocarditis. …One death is too many. One! One! We have 21,000 cases of myocarditis, and climbing, in the United States that the CDC has verified. One was too many.

Under no circumstances, under any circumstances, should a young person ever receive one of these vaccines, let alone ever be pressured to receive a vaccine, let alone ever be mandated to take a vaccine. This is crystal clear. The FDA agrees; there can be no controversy over this.”

“We are seeing unprecedented numbers of athletes dying on the field in Europe. Unprecedented. Of these cardiac arrests, half of them don’t come back. We now have a report out of the heart group in the UK where actuarial mortality for those under age 15, mortality in the UK, is higher than expected.”

__________

Dr. Robert Malone @34:58: “And I am concerned about our children. I am concerned about all of those effects. Brain, heart, blood coagulation, reproductive system, immunologic system, and furthermore, they’re not at risk for this virus. Why are we doing this? And mandating these vaccines for children just breaks my heart.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @35:25: “This is, this is what we get, when I investigate. [holds up two completely redacted sheets of paper – audience laughs and groans] I mean this isn’t, to do with this. But this is after a couple of years trying to get information out of another agency, and we finally get the information, and it’s all redacted.

This is, this is how the administrate – the, you know, the federal government, the agency is complying with congressional oversight.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @35:47: “This dose that was tested in a major trial, and which made corticosteroids the standard of care worldwide, and I’ll also want to, I also want to give praise to Senator Johnson. You know, Senator Johnson invited me to give testimony in the Senate, in May of 2020. And I remember my first conversation with him when he reached out. He was so, he was so, um… enthusiastic about hearing about the work that Dr. Marik and myself were doing, that we were putting out protocols and we’re trying to treat this disease.

You know, and he said he couldn’t understand why the system wasn’t reacting; why the entire system wasn’t reacting the way we were. And I remember he told me – he goes, I want the doctors to take their gloves off. And they’re not.”

They were sitting idly by the bedside, institutions were paralyzed, waiting for randomized control trials to be done. And then finally a randomized control – so at that time, I testified, to the world, that corticosteroids were critical in the treatment of this disease. Nothing happened. Until a trial came out 8 weeks later and proved the life saving properties of corticosteroids. But that dose that was tested was ridiculous. It was the lowest dose, and the dose that’s being used, helps the few and fails the many.”

__________

Dr. Richard Urso @36:58: “I want to personally thank you. Um, in the past, medical schools and conferences would, like this, would take place. We’d debate on how to treat these kinds of diseases, and, you know, I – it’s kind of strange that we – this meeting has to take place in the U.S. Senate. Um, you know, given the current state of affairs, that’s where we are. But, in the past, we would think that somehow the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, we would have basically maybe a message board, exchange ideas.

And I really want to reach out and say thank you for what you’ve done. To Dr. McCullough and Dr. Risch, who initially set all of this up. You know, the extreme censorship and attacks have led us to come to this place. And so I wanted just to thank you, for what you’ve done. You’ve really pushed this all forward, you know, as a – you know, you’ve been yourself become a researcher and a scientist over this last 2 years. So thank you very much.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @37:57: “Uh, these are highly qualified individuals. They speak from experience. We’ve got to fix this problem. We can’t let this continue, we can’t let it happen in the future. So again, thank all of you for coming. Thank you for being doctors, for being nurses, for being aca-magicians, for being medical researchers, and thank all of you for viewing this. Share this with your friends.

God bless you all.” [audience applauds]

Once again, a huge thank you to everyone who participated in this panel. Your thoughts and efforts at exposing this corruption is a perfect example of bravery and integrity in the face of adversity – especially since it is going against what these depraved institutions are trying to implement as the new status quo.

Thank you so much for your heroism, compassion and steadfastness at bringing awareness to these topics.

And a sincere thank you to the readers/viewers who are staying informed and sharing these important information with others; and the many who have refused to comply with these outrageous policies/mandates.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by fernando zhiminaicela from Pixabay

The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability”

“The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection.”

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca

Original article written by Dr. Joseph Mercola and Alix Mayer
on Mercola 9 January 2022

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @globalresearch_crg.

***

The reason our children are being targeted by COVID mandates is because vaccine makers want to get the shots onto the childhood vaccination schedule.

Once a vaccine is added to the childhood schedule, the vaccine maker is shielded from financial liability for injuries, unless the manufacturer knows about vaccine safety issues and withholds that information

Products must satisfy four criteria in order to get emergency use authorization:

    1. There must be an emergency;
    2. a vaccine must be at least 30% to 50% effective;
    3. the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product;
    4. and there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). Unless all four criteria are met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained

According to a U.S. federal court decision, the Pfizer shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are not interchangeable

Comirnaty is not fully approved and licensed. It’s only “ready for approval.” Comirnaty is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not yet available in the United States. They’re waiting for it to be added to the childhood vaccination schedule, to get the liability shield

*


In this interview, Alix Mayer explains why our children are being so aggressively targeted for the COVID-19 injection even though they’re not at risk of serious SARS-CoV-2 infection, and clarifies the status of Comirnaty.

Mayer, board president of Children’s Health Defense — California Chapter, is herself vaccine injured; not from the COVID jab, but from a series of vaccines she received 20 years ago. (Incidentally, Mayer grew up in the Oscar Mayer family in the 5th generation descended from the original Oscar Mayer, a German immigrant who started as a butcher boy. Despite Mayer’s vaccine injury, her family does not share her views on vaccine safety issues.)

Mayer graduated from Duke University with a BA and from Northwestern University with an MBA in finance and management strategy. She worked for Apple in the mid-1990s. When she was 29, Apple promoted her to acting manager of worldwide customer research.

In preparation for a family trip to Bali, her doctor recommended getting six vaccines: hepatitis A vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, diphtheria, tetanus, polio and oral typhoid, which she did. Eventually, 13 years later, she finally realized it was these shots that triggered her health problems.

“They gave me brain damage and total disability,” she says. “I spent three years in my early 30s being 80% housebound, and I really I didn’t know if I was ever going to get better.

I went through a whole bunch of diagnoses: lupus, chronic fatigue syndrome, Lyme disease. Ultimately, none of those made sense and none of the treatments made me any better, until we put the pieces together and figured out that I was actually vaccine injured.

It’s literally just a cause and effect. If you look back at my history and lay out my vaccine schedule, you can see that my health declined two weeks after I got the vaccines.

I had encephalitis and encephalopathy … digestive issues, hypersomnia — sleeping 16 hours a day — flu-like symptoms, a 24/7 migraine, joint pain. I really had no life at all in my early 30s until I went on a gluten-free diet. That started my health recovery.

I then became an award-winning medical journalist with a bunch of different blogs, and then a health consultant. In 2018, I retired from all that and joined Children’s Health Defense.”

The COVID Jab Tragedy

While many vaccines have a questionable safety profile, especially when combined, data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) suggest there’s never been a vaccine as dangerous as the experimental mRNA gene transfer injections for COVID.

What’s more, while lack of transparency and accountability has been a chronic problem within the vaccine industry, the obvious hazards associated with vaccines are really being highlighted by the COVID jabs.

Many now know of someone who has been injured by the COVID jab, and most were injured so shortly after the shot that it’s hard to deny a correlation. The staggering number of injuries reported among adults who have received the COVID shot in turn highlights the insanity of rolling it out to young children.

According to Mayer, the reason they’re trying to mandate the COVID shot for children is to evade liability for injuries, because once a vaccine is on the childhood vaccination schedule, vaccine makers have immunity against lawsuits for injuries.

Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability

The COVID shots currently have legal immunity against liability because they’re still under emergency use authorization (EUA). If you think BioNTech’s Comirnaty has been fully licensed, you’d be mistaken. Mayer explains:

“I put together a slide deck about Emergency Use Authorization (which you can see in the video interview above) because there is so much confusion over this and what’s really going on. Once you understand the genesis of EUA and the standards they have to meet in order to keep these products on the market, then you understand the behaviors [we’re now seeing].

They’re falling all over themselves to protect the EUAs for these products and also introduce other very confusing kinds of approval to get away with stuff. So, let me just start to clarify it right now.

This presentation is all about these three strangleholds that the vaccine makers and our government are never going to let go of … These are the things they’re guarding with their lives.

First of all, they need to guard the emergency … so they cannot have any early treatments. Those cannot exist. They’re also going for full liability protection, and children will be used as pawns to get them full liability protection.

Vaccine makers love EUA products because they have this huge liability shield. If you’re injured by an EUA vaccine, you can’t sue the manufacturer, you can’t sue the person who gave it to you, you can’t sue the institution where you got the shot.

You have to go through something called the CICP, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, where they’ll only cover unpaid medical expenses, and probably only for pharmaceuticals and lost wages.

Now, if you’re vaccine injured, let me tell you right now, you are not going to be using pharmaceuticals because they do not work for vaccine injury. They will make you sicker. You’ll be on two dozen pharmaceuticals before you know it and you’re going to be sick from those. They do not work. The only thing that’s going to get you better if you’re vaccine injured is natural treatments …

That’s the kind of treatment you’re going to need, and that’s not even covered, even if you were to get compensation. Everybody I know with chronic illness, whether it’s a child or an adult who has chronic fatigue syndrome, vaccine injury, Lyme disease, they’re paying $50,000 out of pocket per year.

If you can’t work and you have to pay for your treatment out of pocket, I don’t know how you ever get by. People suffer like crazy, they lose homes, they go into bankruptcy.”

Since its inception, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which pays for injuries caused by vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule, has paid out about one-third of claims. It’s a long, arduous process that oftentimes takes years and in the end rarely provides adequate compensation.

“If you do end up getting compensation … they don’t pay it out in one lump sum, they pay it out year by year, and they pretty much hope that whoever is injured is actually going to die of their injuries before they get compensated.

That’s been said to me a bunch of times by people who’ve been through this horrible process. Now, the CICP has only compensated 3% of claims. And so far, there have been no approvals for [compensation] for COVID shot injuries,” Mayer says. [Editor’s note: The first COVID case was recently determined “eligible” for compensation, but the case has not yet been adjudicated.1]

Stages of Liability: EUA

In her slide show, Mayer reviews each of the stages of product liability, and whether the mRNA shots can be mandated. As mentioned, vaccine makers have no liability as long as their product is under EUA, as the product is investigational.

“Investigational is a synonym for experimental,” Mayer says. “And the word experimental ties it directly into the Nuremberg Code, which says that we cannot be experimented on [without consent]. We always have the right to accept or refuse a medical treatment.

[The Nuremberg Code] is not a law, but it’s a code under which the whole world is supposed to be operating by. And it is actually codified into some local and federal laws as well … So, what everybody needs to know is that coercion and duress are considered de facto mandates and illegal. De facto means that it’s basically the same as an outright mandate.

It’s illegal medical segregation, medical apartheid [because that is a form of coercion or duress.] So, if you go to a restaurant and they demand your vaccine passport, only let you eat outside, and they might not let you use the bathroom, that’s medical segregation.

That is illegal and I do not support businesses that do that and you shouldn’t either. Any access privileges that are different between the vaccinated and unvaccinated are illegal, and any visual indication of vaccine status like a sticker or a bracelet … that’s also illegal because that creates segregation and medical apartheid, [since they are all forms of coercion or duress.]”

Importantly, mass violation of the law does not make something legal.

“If we all drove 100 miles an hour on Interstate 80, would we watch the speed limit signs suddenly changed to 100 miles per hour? No, it’s not going to happen. Mass violation of the law has never made anything legal. And just because schools and businesses and our government are mandating these shots, it doesn’t make it legal. It’s all illegal …

Now, they know full well that it’s illegal to mandate these [COVID shots]. President Biden knows it’s illegal. But what they’re counting on is that the court cases overturning their illegal mandates will take a while, and in that interim, people are going to be scared enough to get the shots. And unfortunately, it’s worked.”

Stages of Liability: Full Licensure and Childhood Scheduling

The next stage is full licensure (FDA approval). Once a product is fully licensed, the company becomes liable for injuries. At that point, the product can be legally mandated. Of course, knowing how dangerous the COVID shots are, no manufacturer wants to be financially liable for injuries. They’d be sued out of business.

This is the holy grail if you’re a manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule. ~ Alix Mayer

To get immunity against liability again, the vaccine manufacturers need to get their product onto the childhood vaccination schedule. This will also allow government to mandate the shots. As noted by Mayer:

“This is the holy grail if you’re a vaccine manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put it on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule.”

DOJ Redefines Medical ‘Consequence’

In Doe v. Rumsfeld,2 the court held that service members could refuse an EUA product without punitive consequences such as dishonorable discharge or other punishments. Therefore, there were no consequences to refusing an EUA product, other than the natural consequence of possibly getting the disease.

However, in July 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice attempted to redefine the term “consequences” just for the COVID shot, to suggest that punitive consequences, like job loss or being separated from your working or learning location, are legal when a person refuses an EUA vaccine.

“But this type of consequence, a punitive consequence, has never been adjudicated,” Mayer says. “That’s not in any law. This is just an opinion from the DOJ. And it absolutely means nothing, except it came from our DOJ, so people give it a lot of authority.

They also stated twice — and this is so hard to understand because it’s just beyond reason — that the right to accept or refuse an EUA product is ‘purely informational.’

Literally, you can read that you could die by taking it, but it’s purely informational. You cannot act on it. That’s what the DOJ says. Again, it’s not adjudicated, so it doesn’t mean anything. It’s an opinion. It holds no legal weight at all. So, as we said before, these mandates are starting to be overturned.”

Four Standards for EUA

There are four standards that must be fulfilled for an EUA. If any of these criteria are not met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained. First, the secretary of Health and Human Services has to declare and maintain a state of emergency. If the emergency were to go away, all EUA products would have to come off the market. And that doesn’t just mean vaccines. It also includes the PCR tests and even surgical masks.

The second standard is evidence of effectiveness. Historically, vaccines had to show a 70% or greater effectiveness, as measured by a fourfold increase in antibody levels, in order to qualify. For an EUA vaccine, the efficacy threshold is only 30% to 50%. In another departure from prior vaccine approvals, the COVID vaccine clinical trials relied on the RT-PCR test, not antibodies, to demonstrate effectiveness in the small “challenge phase” of the trials.

Now, you probably heard that the Pfizer shot was 95% effective when it first rolled out, but that was relative risk reduction, not absolute risk reduction. Confounding these two parameters is a common strategy used to make a product sound far better than it actually is. The absolute risk reduction for Pfizer’s shot was just 0.84%.3

For example, if a study divided people into two groups of 1,000 and two people in the group who didn’t get a fictional vaccine got infected, while only one in the vaccinated group got infected, the relative risk reduction would be reported as 100%. In terms of absolute risk reduction, the fictional vaccine only prevented 1 in 1,000 from getting the infection — a very poor absolute risk reduction.

The take-home message here is that even though the minimal threshold for effectiveness is ludicrously low, in terms of absolute risk reduction, these shots still don’t measure up. Within six months, even the relative risk reduction bottoms out at zero. What’s more, there’s evidence that the clinical trials were manipulated as well.

“I remember an analysis very early in lockdowns [that showed] if you added back all the probable cases of COVID to the clinical trial [data], the effectiveness went from 90% to between 19% and 29%,”4 Mayer says.

The third standard is that the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. In the case of COVID shots, there’s overwhelming evidence showing they do more harm than good.

The fourth and last standard that must be met is there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). “This is why hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were quashed,” Mayer says. This is also another reason Comirnaty is not treated as a fully approved product in the U.S., because if it were, then all the other COVID shots that are under EUA would have to be removed from the market.

“This is a four-legged stool,” Mayer says. “If any one of these legs goes away, you have to take your EUA products off the market … by law. I put [state of] emergency and [treatment] alternatives in red, because those are two of the things that they have a stranglehold on; those are things they are guarding like crazy.

This means that every variant that comes out, they have to make it sound super scary to keep the emergency going. So, the variants serve a purpose. You have to think about these variants in the context of this crime, where they have to keep the emergency going to keep their products on the market.

You would think this emergency would stop maybe when we get to herd immunity, maybe if we get 90% vaccination uptake, maybe COVID is just going to go away, like smallpox did in the early 1900s [even though] only 5% of people were vaccinated. [But it won’t] go away [until] the shots get full approval and the manufacturers get a full liability shield.”

Comirnaty’s Quasi Approval

With regard to Comirnaty, is it or is it not fully approved and licensed? The answer is more complex than a simple yes or no. Mayer explains:

“Comirnaty’s quasi approval is just for BioNTech. It doesn’t have to do with Pfizer, and this is why I’m doing this presentation because I’m going to explain what’s going on with that.

This is the race to get liability protection. Remember, that’s the other stranglehold that they want. They really want to get this liability protection. Once the COVID shots are fully approved, the manufacturer has full liability.

There’s all this confusion about Comirnaty. Was it fully approved? Is it on the market? Is it interchangeable with the Pfizer shot? And does it make the COVID shot mandate legal? It’s all the same answer. No, no, no, no.

The FDA issued an intentionally confusing biological license application approval for Comirnaty. It was an unprecedented approval to both license the Comirnaty shot, saying it’s ‘interchangeable’ with the Pfizer shot. But they also said it’s ‘legally distinct.’

In that same approval, they retain the vaccine’s liability shield by designating it EUA as well. They want it to be fully approved, but they want the liability protection, so they did this BS dual approval.

So, [Comirnaty] is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not available in the United States. It’s available in the U.K., New Zealand and other places, but it is not available in the United States because they’re really scared of liability.

Now, are you ready for this one? The BLA actually states that Comirnaty is only ‘ready for approval.’5 It doesn’t say it’s approved anywhere in the document. And they buried this language in a pediatric section to confuse people even more.

Here’s what they said; ‘We’re deferring submission of your pediatric studies for ages younger than 16. For this application, because this product is ready for approval for use in individuals 16 years of age and older, as pediatric studies for younger ages have not been completed.’

Why did they do this? Sixteen is a very important number. You would think the age break would be 18. That’s a very typical age break for everything else that we do in this country. Why 16?

The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection. That’s why this is ready to be approved for 16 and up, not 18 and up.”

Comirnaty Is Not Fully Licensed

This confusion is clearly intentional. On the one hand, the FDA claims Comirnaty is interchangeable with the Pfizer shot, yet it’s also legally distinct. Courts have had to weigh in on the matter, and a federal judge recently rejected the DoD claim that the two shots are interchangeable. They’re not interchangeable. That means Comirnaty vaccine is still EUA. It doesn’t have full approval and it’s not on the market.

“Military members involved in lawsuits are challenging the military’s COVID vaccine mandate. They filed an amended complaint seeking a new injunction after the judge last month rejected the assertion that the Pfizer COVID shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are interchangeable. So, we’re still hammering on this legally, but a court has ruled that they’re not interchangeable.

[Editor’s note: This information is accurate at the time of the interview, but legal challenges are ongoing and courts may issue new rulings. December 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court announced6 it has slated January 7, 2022, to hear arguments challenging Biden’s vaccine and testing mandates.]

So, how do we know that Comirnaty is not being treated as fully approved? First, the approval states you have the right to accept or refuse the product. That means it’s an EUA. Second, it’s not available in the U.S. because Comirnaty doesn’t have liability protection. Third, if it were available, it’s an alternative [treatment] and all other EUA shots would have to come off the market.

No. 4, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) would have to recommend it for ages 16 to 18 and the CDC would have added it to the children’s recommended schedule. That’s how we know it’s not fully approved and on the market.

Here is the label for Comirnaty. It says it’s emergency use authorization. It doesn’t say it’s fully approved, because it’s not. But look at the safety information they are recognizing: Myocarditis and pericarditis have occurred in some people who’ve received the vaccine, more commonly in males under 40 years of age than among females and older males.

So, this is saying that young men are getting heart inflammation. And what we know from all the anecdotal reports is 300 athletes have died or collapsed on the field, and children in schools have died of heart attacks. That’s what’s going on here.

And the reason they have to declare this is because they know it. They know it’s happening. And the only way they can be sued is if they know there’s a problem with their vaccine and they don’t declare it. So, they declare it here, in very mild language as if it’s not that big of a deal, but it’s a very big deal. Young people are dying [from the shots] who have a 99.9973% chance of recovering from COVID …

The holy grail is to get the shot on the CDC recommended schedule for children, because then it gets full liability protection according to the 1986 Act. This is why they’re going after our children when they have a 99.9973% recovery rate …

Every medical intervention is a risk benefit equation, and it doesn’t calculate for kids at all. They should never be getting COVID shots. The shots don’t prevent transmission. They don’t prevent cases. They don’t prevent hospitalization or death.”

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Notes

1 Reuters October 19, 2021

2 Biotech Law December 22, 2003

3 Maryannedemasi.com November 11, 2021

4 The BMJ Opinion

5 FDA BioNTech BLA Approval

6 USA Today December 22, 2021

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS:

How egregious that the big pharmaceutical companies are trying to use children as a liability shield to protect their criminal organization. Even worse, however, are the governments/politicians and health officials/institutions that are letting them. No amount of “contracts” should ever protect criminal activity, which is what we’re seeing right now in what is quite possibly the largest racketeering scandal in the history of humankind.

(And in my opinion, this isn’t even covering the ACTUAL REAL reason that they want to vaccinate children so much. This is only the watered-down, “scientific”, realistic version…)

Any documents/legal dealings (keyword here: LEGAL – although, what does that matter when corrupt enterprises are able to re-define terms according to their purpose?) and NDA’s should automatically become null and void if there is fraudulent activity happening.

However, when those “in charge” are allowed to investigate themselves, they, of course, end up finding no wrong-doing. And when there are multiple conflicts of interest, all for the purpose of financial bribery and protecting each other, there needs to be effective systems in place to address this obvious malfeasance.

It would seem, the “law” (and even us, everyday/ordinary people) literally needs to take matters into its own hands, and stop catering to enforcing illegal mandates and nonsensical “policies”. When will they go after the REAL criminals, instead of innocent civilians who are simply trying to defend not only their rights and freedoms, but everyone else’s as well? Including law enforcement?

We all need to pick our side in history. Let’s hope we’re picking the right one.

Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible

While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise – our own minds pose even more important concerns.

In my previous post, which described a supposedly 900 year old prophetic warning for what is to come, I mentioned that I was going to focus on a specific section from that list for this article.

I believe it’s incredibly crucial to address (as well as many of the verses that were in the alleged prophecies – even if it’s revealed to be a forgery, since many of the topics are indeed imperatively important – especially when it pertains to children), and since this particular topic has become the forefront of where our society is heading, wanted to bring awareness to it so that we can make the most prepared, informed decisions for what’s best for us and for our loved ones.

Now, while every fiber in my being wants to shake you by the shoulders and yell, “DON’T PARTAKE IN THIS!!!!”, I obviously cannot dictate what you choose to do with your life. But I will offer up some information and warnings of what this event may be leading into.

So without further adieu, the topic I will be covering today is:

24. When the Year Thousand that comes after Year Thousand begins
Men will know how to make mirages live
The senses will be deceived and they will believe they are touching that which is not
They will follow paths which are seen only by the eyes
And in this way dreams will be able to come alive.

But man will no longer know how to separate
That which is from that which is not
He will be lost inside false labyrinths
Those who will know how to make the mirages live
Will take advantage of the naive man by deceiving him
And a lot of men will become grovelling dogs.

Many of us have likely already heard of Mark Zuckerberg’s newest venture “Metaverse” – which is to, on one hand, replace Facebook – and perhaps attempt to re-establish his reputation after Facebook’s many legal complications – and on the other hand give the users an incredible new experience where people can play games, learn, socialize, etc. in an immersive virtual wonderworld built upon anyone’s limitless imagination, basically.

Of course, this is the “official” version. And yes, while it sounds fabulous and looks amazing, this is exactly the kind of trap that’s set to engage us in a perpetual state of false livelihoods and pointless dreams in which we abandon our natural life and sole(soul) purpose for the escape and frivolous existence of a technological world where nothing is real and nothing of true substance can be found.

Mind Games

The assault on our minds is an ever-growing pursuit by the “global elitists”. Now whether they can attain that through psychological manipulation/mass formation psychosis (the current trending topic), nanoparticles that seep through the skin and up to our neurological functions, direct gene-therapy injections through a “vaccine”, other forms of drugs/medication, implantable microchips, some form of MK-Ultra mind control, entertainment – TV, movies, music, games, etc. (“entertain” literally means to “to keep up, maintain, to keep (someone) in a certain frame of mind,“…) – the fact remains that this is an on-going effort that they have initiated through several means and constant pretenses, mostly using medical/biological/mental health developments as a reason.

While the verses mentioned above certainly do allude to the fact that it may have nothing to do with invading our mind – more that we will be tricked/deceived into believing images are real, a further section (#26) of the prophecies had this to say (after mentioning a very devastating warning of child sex abuse, slavery and trafficking):

But even the one being protected by his family
Will be in danger of having a dead mind
He will live inside games and mirages
Which will guide him because there will be no more educators
No-one will have taught him to hope and how to act.

It certainly does seem to reek of the Metaverse agenda. But add to that the statement that the child succumbs to this lifestyle/mentality because he will not be taught how to behave and respond, and that it will be the games/mirages that will inevitably guide him.

This is INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT. It must be said that not only are adults also finding themselves in the trap of being allured by these technological advances (I could have been one of them since I used to find the idea of Star Trek’s Holodeck an amazing prospect and once loved it if it could be true), but parents are also allowing their children to get deeply involved in these types of systems.

Besides the fact that it’s EXCEEDINGLY DANGEROUS for children to be engaged in such online interactions, and certainly in a virtual world where they will be fully immersed and surrounded by a multitude of other users whose motives may or may not be completely innocent – is the frightening prospect of what’s possible through this holographic dreamscape.

Some women have already stated that they were sexually harassed and stalked and generally felt uncomfortable in this virtual world – which was at the time filled with more men and kids – even though access is supposedly limited to those 18 years old and up.

Woman claims she was virtually ‘groped’ in Meta’s VR metaverse

Then there are the further advancements and accompaniments that are sure to follow along to bring the users even more “reality” to the virtual reality. There have already been developments that sell full/partial body gear (jackets, suits, gloves, etc.) to let the player/user feel practically every aspect of the digital world around them.

One can only wonder what kinds of problems this will arise through physical bullying, more sexual abuse/harassment (again… I cannot stress this enough, please keep your children away from this kind of tech…) or even the severity of the game’s mechanics in conjunction with the body suit – gunshots/punches/falling from a high place/etc. While I’m sure there will be safeguards in place to prevent actual bodily harm, one can never be sure that the A.I. and/or gear won’t malfunction and actually cause grievances to the body and even to the mind.

Of course, this would only apply to those who choose to get the body gear. Or will it? Our minds are incredibly powerful tools. I remember distinctly playing a Mario game when I was little, and while playing as the flying Mario, there were instances where I could actually sense my own body floating/flying. This was without being fully immersed in a virtual world and without any body gear on. Simply by staring at a TV set and playing as the character.

Now, some may claim that they know the difference between real life and augmented reality, virtual reality, holograms, etc., etc., and they will be responsible enough to limit their exposure. So would never be “trapped” in any kind of mirage/vision. Although I could imagine some people will not be responsible with this technology and will, quite literally, live their lives through this virtual world.

And certainly there will be many who won’t ever cross the line to harass/abuse others, and will keep their children away from this technology.

Some, like myself, aren’t even interested in it and will never participate in this endeavor.

But what if you had no choice?

In section 4. Holographic images to trick/deceive of the post WHAT TO LOOK OUT FOR: New Toxic Vaccine, Massive Deception, “Great Reset”, Destroying Humanity…, I provided a few videos for the readers to consider how technologically advanced we are (and again, keep in mind, this is just the technology that they allowed us to see at the time…).

I believe, that through the use of satellites, drones, nanoparticles filling the sky, and the 5G towers being installed everywhere, along with other advanced technology that are kept hidden from lay peoples’ eyes, this will indeed trick people into seeing “mirages”, images that aren’t really there, but that we will fully believe are there – and, more frighteningly, will seem so real to us, that we will be able to touch and feel these images.

This will be so extensive, that everyone throughout the world may be able to see these images. We will not be given a choice to don virtual reality headsets – the digital world will be brought to us, whether we like it or not.

Another possibility could be through the use of old-fashioned holographic images, re-fashioned into an incredible collaboration that involves current technologies to bring us a new way of looking and interacting with things – real or visualized.

The following, for example, is a demonstration of what’s possible using a combination of different technologies (ultrasound/ultrasonic waves and frequencies, mirrors/holograms, sensor arrays, etc.) to create haptic feedback that not only works on real objects, but works on “cloned” objects as well. This video was created over 6 years ago and is just using a prototype… so imagine what could be accomplished since then and using a much bigger device…

Source: youtube | ShinodaLab | Haptoclone (web archive version) (2015)

But what if there’s another way to induce mirages/images, that has nothing to do with holographic tech?

Hypnotic illusions… literally

While the topic of hypnosis is regarded with a high dose of ridicule and skepticism by many people, there are on-going studies conducted by even the most “prestigious” of institutions whose researchers are positive that hypnotism is a real phenomenon to take seriously.

Professor of Psychology Stephen M. Kosslyn – “who has specialized in mental imagery and the connection between vision and the brain at Harvard since 1977, teamed up with Stanford University’s David Spiegel, a major figure in hypnosis research, five years ago at a conference for mind-body interaction. Kosslyn had no previous association with the field, but with the help of a MacArthur Foundation grant, Spiegel and Kosslyn took on the challenge of proving hypnosis’ legitimacy.”

Harvard Professor Demonstrates Hypnosis Is Real (2002)

“Now that we know which brain regions are involved, we may be able to use this knowledge to alter someone’s capacity to be hypnotized or the effectiveness of hypnosis for problems like pain control,” said the study’s senior author, David Spiegel, MD, professor and associate chair of psychiatry and behavioral sciences.”

“Hypnosis is the oldest Western form of psychotherapy, but it’s been tarred with the brush of dangling watches and purple capes,” said Spiegel, who holds the Jack, Samuel and Lulu Willson Professorship in Medicine. “In fact, it’s a very powerful means of changing the way we use our minds to control perception and our bodies.”

“We’re certainly interested in the idea that you can change people’s ability to be hypnotized by stimulating specific areas of the brain,” said Spiegel.”

Study identifies brain areas altered during hypnotic trances (2016)

However, the one thing that is crucially missing is what our brain is capable of doing through suggestion only. Hence, the very real dangers of what hypnotism may achieve if we are not aware of it, and if we’re not building up our own thoughts and resistance to it.

While there have been many accounts of beneficial outcomes of hypnotism/hypnotherapy to help someone through addiction problems, repressed memories, addressing certain phobias, etc. – we must realize the other side of the coin that it can potentially be used to harm/deceive as well.

The following link, for example, highlights 10 Criminal Hypnotists – their crimes boiling down to thievery, and sexual assault.

And yes, while this is egregiously awful, what if the power of suggestion is so strong that hypnotists can compel us to see each other as enemies? What if we see our own family members as brutal bandits wielding guns/knives? What if they can convince us that we’re being invaded by a hostile alien horde – using a combination of haptic holographic images, the power of suggestion, mass formation psychosis, 5G frequencies/waves, and real aircraft/Directed Energy Weapons mixed in to cause actual damage and chaos?

Imagine how many people will succumb to this illusion/reality. With the combination of all of these techniques and technologies, it will seem very, very real.

And with the amount of people willingly being put under hypnosis, and even events that cater to this experience on a mass-scale, such as the very interesting (ominous…) Swedish Festival, scheduled for this year (2022):

“At gala screenings for three films at this year’s festival — Apichatpong Weerasethakul’s Memoria starring Tilda Swinton, Shirin Neshat’s Land of Dreams with Matt Dillion and Isabella Rossellini and Christian Tafdrup’s psychological thriller Speak No Evil — a hypnotist will perform a mass hypnosis on the audience, “transforming the audience’s state of mind in accordance with the mood and theme of the film,” organizers said Tuesday.”

“According to Goteborg artistic director Jonas Holmberg, the experiment is meant to “raise questions about submission, transgression and control,”

Sweden’s Goteborg Festival to Experiment With Mass Hypnosis

one has to wonder, how many of us could have been put under the spell of hypnosis without our consent or awareness of it?

The many victims of criminal hypnotists were not aware that they were being put under a subjugation of control merely by someone else’s manipulation and suggestions. Would we be able to say, for sure, that we were never under a hypnotic trance?

Could different beats – binaural beats – for instance, reach to us in our subconcious mind and implant certain suggestions/images/memories/emotions without us realizing it?

Could a movie, commercial ads, etc. subliminally trigger something within us at a designated time, by a certain sound, a specific word, a specific image…

If we were in the audience of a “stage hypnotist” – just for the “entertainment” of it, – or, as the Swedish Festival admits – the experiment of it, could we be sure that we were not accidentally on-purpose put under to serve a specific motive at a later date?

Although many of the events and considerations proposed in this post my sound too incredulous to take seriously, there are enough testimonies, accounts, evidence, scientific research and literature, etc. that lends credibility to these theories.

We have to realize, if our own minds can play tricks on us, what could a group of highly intelligent and extremely funded organizations do to take advantage of this neural scientific frontier?

And to leave one last context, which is what technically led me to researching this topic, along with Serge Monast exposing the Blue Beam Project, I offer another portion of the young prophet Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov’s words that suddenly don’t seem too far off the mark… and shows incredibly eerie parallels to Serge Monast’s testimony (if they’re not implicitly coincided… Vyacheslav died in 1993, Serge Monast exposed the Blue Beam Project in 1994)

@2:19:25: “What did Slavochka say about the antichrist? He said, “Mommy when he comes, he will proclaim himself to be “god”.” Ultimately, he will proclaim himself “god”. People will be under extremely powerful hypnosis. Everyone will recognize his own messiah in him.

When Christians look at him, they will see Jesus Christ, Buddhists will see Buddha, Muslims will see Mohammed. Buddhists, – even though Slavochka said that this religion is from satan, – will think that something isn’t right here because Buddha did not intend to return. Buddha is not supposed to come, therefore, Buddhists will doubt. They will feel that there is something wrong.

Slavochka said, “Mommy, he is surrounded by so many demons and they don’t even hide, but people will look at them and see angels instead.” And satan himself, Slavochka said, smells so badly, he stinks, but people will not smell his stench. Everyone will see his own “god” in him.

He will seem handsome to people. Slavochka said, “Mommy, he has such a white face as if it was powdered with flour and his eyes are so red. He is leering at me. He is so frightful.”

Slavochka said that he will have extremely powerful hypnosis. People will be coming from everywhere and gathering around him. All of a sudden, they will be so eager to look at him.

He said to me, “Mommy, even you will want to see him. It will take so much effort for you not to go there. You will struggle with your desire to go there and admire this “beauty”. But you will resist this temptation. And those who will go to see him will perish.”

@2:29:14: “Slavochka said that the antichrist will show a real fire coming down from the sky. He will be moving around at a tremendous speed, therefore, he will be here and there. People will be saying, “Look, here is the Christ. Look, there the Christ is!” Moving at incredible speed, he will be everywhere almost at once.

He will indeed say to a mountain, “Stand up and move!” The hypnosis will be so powerful that people will come forward, touch the mountain, pat it and try to push it. They will feel that this is a stone mountain and it will seem real to them. But the mountain will not be there. It will be a deception.”

Russian Angel Youth Vyacheslav Film 2 Part 3 (English Subtitles) – 360p

“Men will know how to make mirages live
The senses will be deceived and they will believe they are touching that which is not”

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by ChiemSeherin from Pixabay