Revolver Exclusive: The Big Pharma “Shell Game” Tricking Our Military Into Mandatory Vaccinations

Commander Jay Furman alerting of deception and malfeasance within the government and pharmaceutical companies.

Reposted from Revolver and Commander Jay Furman
Original article written on September 25, 2021 (reprinted with permission)

Last month, Revolver exclusively published a paper by Navy CDR J.H. Furman, warning that the mandatory COVID-19 vaccination of the entire Navy could constitute a national security threat.

Now, Furman has produced another paper, describing what he calls a “shell game” by which other U.S. government agencies, and several pharmaceutical companies are tricking the Navy into embracing mandatory vaccination, at great risk to the United States.

 

His paper is reproduced below.

The views and opinions expressed in this paper do not in any way represent the United States Navy or the Department of Defense.

 

CDR Jay Furman, USN

At the turning point of the Spanish American War, a single American officer volunteered to hand carry a critical message through impossible enemy lines to a fateful ally named General Garcia, forever changing the course of that war and our country. Today, one million COVID-19 non-vaccinated brave military messengers would deliver a, no less, existential dispatch: the U.S. Military is being misled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Center for Disease Control (CDC), and the Pfizer and BioNTech drug companies, resulting in the current mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies. While some media outlets reflexively cheer on the deadly shell game, is our military leadership prematurely mandating a vaccine that their personnel cannot, or should not, legally receive? Could that decision prove to be more detrimental to military readiness than the disease itself, thereby posing a greater threat to U.S. national security?

 

On August 23, 2021, news broke that Pfizer had obtained an FDA license for its COVD-19 vaccine. The contrived FDA announcement:

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine [BioNTech’s COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA, not Pfizer]. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine [Pfizer’s non-FDA licensed vaccine], and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee) [only available in markets outside U.S.], for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older (emphasis added).

 

The agency charged with the public’s health in pharmaceutical matters issued two related official letters confounding the announcement, above. Reconciling those letters and the ensuing policy is tedious, leaving the truth one-layer too deep for most media outlets. Unfortunately, the resulting confusion appears more goal than incidental. Bottom-line, the FDA did not license a COVID-19 vaccine physically available to consumers in the U.S.

In their first letter, the FDA issued the only COVID-19 vaccination license for COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA (Comirnaty) owned by German company BioNTech (not Pfizer). It is not produced for a U.S.-licensed label anywhere in the FDA’s jurisdiction. In their second letter, the FDA re-issued the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (not a FDA license). The letter officially designates Comirnaty as the licensed name for COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA. This EUA explicitly states that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine “[…] has not been approved or licensed by the FDA, but has been authorized by emergency use [EUA] by the FDA […]” (emphasis added). It goes on to assert that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) formulations are the same and thereby can be clinically substitutable. The FDA notes the abundant supply of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and the non-availability of Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) in the U.S. market. They then explicitly re-affirm that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is, in fact, experimental and only covered by the EUA, not FDA licensed.

 

FDA License Letter:

 

EUA Re-issue Letter Excerpts:

Confused yet? The CDC did not help matters, either. On Monday, August 31, 2021, their Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) released an inaccurate statement. The committee’s public announcement unanimously endorsed the FDA license for the “Pfizer-BioNTech licensed vaccine.” They misstated the vaccine name and license holder, never mentioning the actual owner of the FDA license, BioNTech, conflating legal ownership of Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) as Pfizer’s. They neglected to mention it is not available in the U.S. and therefore not possible for consumers here to receive. Those inaccuracies further aided the public misperception that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is FDA licensed. Concurrently, two high-level career FDA officials resigned at the time of the CDC ACIP board announcement, citing frustration with overreach into FDA affairs by other parts of the Executive Branch.

 

The Pfizer company issued a “forward-looking” press release, that was also easily misinterpreted. Perhaps they were hoping the mundane went unnoticed, as the pharmaceutical giant intermingled complex terms and concepts: Pfizer, BioNTech, Comirnaty, COVID-19, mRNA, EUA, authorized, approved, licensed, manufacturer, legal owner, national markets, and etc. The corporate relationship between Pfizer and BioNTech is no less convoluted. The joint venture and vaccine names, also similar, only add to the confusion. All of which potentially prevented a clear understanding of important legal and regulatory nuances, and allowed a fearful U.S. public to believe an available vaccine was now regulatorily licensed for their safety and legal recourse, when in reality, it was not. In brief:

  • BioNTech is the marketing arm of the two company enterprise in the U.S., Europe, and UK.
  • Pfizer produced Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) for BioNTech, while both submitted supporting material for the license.
    BioNTech, alone, received an FDA license for Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA).
  • Both Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) were covered, in-part, by the re-issued EUA.
  • Both Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA may be available in other countries. Yet, Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is not available anywhere under FDA jurisdiction.
  • If and when this occurs, Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) will be “[…] manufactured, filled, labeled, and packaged at Pfizer.”
  • Both Pfizer produced vaccines are, at times, marketed as Comirnaty outside the U.S. While only COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is officially recognized as Comirnaty in this country.

Recent U.S. military vaccine mandates look to be a direct result of the manufactured confusion. August 24, 2021 DoD guidance stated that the Department “[…] will only use COVID-19 vaccines that receive full licensure from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) […]” (emphasis added). A fully FDA licensed COVID-19 vaccine is not available to U.S. service members. They are simply not able to legally comply with the DoD mandate.

By administrative and regulatory law, it appears that all public and private institutions are not allowed to mandate EUA medical products. In 21 U.S. Code 360bb-3-Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies for unapproved products (b)(2)(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), it says that recipients have “[…] the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” In the FDA’s own policy guidelines it is written that recipients “[…] have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product […].” Under U.S. Code 335(i)(4) and related regulations, “the informed consent process typically requires human subjects to agree to the receipt… upon a disclosure that the product in question is not yet FDA approved and that the receipt of such product is voluntary.” Informed consent is required to administer EUA vaccines with few exceptions.

 

The newly mandated Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is legally defined as an EUA and therefore cannot be mandated in the military unless informed consent is waived by a presidential waiver and, according to U.S. Code Section 1107a of Title 10 and DoDI 6200.02, only after meeting specific criteria. Two of these criteria apparently preclude its issuance in this case: 1) “[…] specified military operation presents a substantial risk that military personnel may be subject to a chemical, biological, nuclear, or other exposure likely to produce death or serious or life-threatening injury or illness […]” and; 2) “[…] no available satisfactory alternative therapeutic or preventive treatment in relation to the intended use of the investigational new drug.” In the first, a waiver of informed consent is limited to the support of a specific military operation. For the second, monoclonal antibody therapy is an FDA-authorized alternative COVID-19 treatment.

It does not matter that the FDA stated in their re-issued EUA, their website, or Fact Sheet that the vaccines are similarly formulated and can be clinically interchangeable. The simple fact is that the administration of an EUA vaccine, by law, requires informed consent. It is therefore illegal to mandate any of the three U.S. available COVID-19 vaccines that are not officially licensed. As the Department did not receive an informed consent waiver from the President to mandate the Pfizer-BioNTech CV-19 Vaccine, and the FDA licensed Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is not yet available in the U.S., it remains uncertain how the military can continue to incorrectly mandate COVID-19 vaccination.

Consequently, the Services’ mandatory vaccination orders are impossible to lawfully execute according to Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 90. U.S. military officers take an oath to the Constitution, and not to those appointed over them in the event orders are unlawful (enlisted service members swear allegiance to both). An officer may find themselves duty bound to refuse an unlawfully mandated vaccination in support and defense of the law of the land, on the behalf of their troops.

 

Meanwhile in other countries, Pfizer has not provided any COVID-19 vaccines without explicit (and extreme) indemnity contracts in place. They are requiring not only protection from all future product harm civil lawsuits, but also protection from Pfizer’s “[…] fraud, gross negligence, mismanagement, failure to follow good manufacturing processes… or malice […].” The company is requiring some countries to fund foreign bank accounts, take out insurance, and put up sovereign assets such as their Embassies or military bases, according to global health law lecturer Mark Eccleston-Turner of the University of England and statnews.com.

The aforementioned regulatory charade may be a U.S. version of Pfizer’s COVID-19 global indemnity project. Unfortunately, the company has a history of misbranding “with the intent to defraud or mislead.” In a landmark DOJ case they were found guilty of a felony, and fined $2.3 billion (the largest such fine ever) for fraudulent marketing. Interestingly, the FDA receives almost half of its current funding from industry in the form of “regulatory fees,” a clear conflict of interest which should be strongly questioned.

If the vaccine is actually safe and effective, then why all this confusion? Why did they only license “Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA),” exclusively available outside of this country? Why did they not license the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” the only label available in the U.S. Why does Pfizer not just import the approved label? Why are they so keen on some form of almost total indemnity everywhere their vaccines are available? Why are we told they are interchangeable, but their license and EUA are legally not? If what is in the vial is the same, then why the legal labyrinth? And what exactly was the cross-agency overreach into FDA licensing processes and why is there no formal Congressional inquiry?

 

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) is asking questions. He recently wrote a letter to the FDA requesting “why they did not grant full licensure for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that is already in use and available in the U.S., and how the agency will ensure that those being vaccinated under mandates will receive the FDA-approved version […].” Those concerned about our nation’s defense should consider asking their Congressmen and Senators to do the same.

The complex web of words, business structures, international legal agreements, and unforthright regulation may not collectively protect U.S. citizens. Rather, they enable a slight-of-hand scheme that increases global market-share, reduces expenses, and lowers potential legal exposure. All the while, this product (with no long-term studies and declining efficacy) is pushed on the consumer—at all costs—regardless of the potential harm. If the confusion were removed as it should be, informed citizens, their elected officials, and public servants would not stand for this carnival-like side show.

Nine months into the vaccination campaign, available evidence to-date does not look good for existing U.S. vaccines. The original “wild” version of SAR-CoV-2 is virtually dead and the increasingly immune variants dominate. Delta is highly contagious, but much less dangerous to the general population. The largest real-world analysis study, examining 700,000 records in Israel’s official health database, found that the COVID-19 vaccinated are 13 times more likely to be infected and 27 times more likely to demonstrate serious symptoms than those with recovered natural immunity. The Combined Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which tracks post-vaccination events for possible patterns, has through August recorded more than 600,000 events, including 81,000 serious or life-threatening events and about 13,000 deaths.

In contrast, as of 12 August, the COVID-19 mortality rate in the military was .001%, or 29 deaths in the almost 2.2 million-strong and exceptionally healthy U.S. service member population. Recent studies, meanwhile, indicate that teen boys and young men (the military’s dominant demographic) are more likely to suffer heart problems from vaccination than they are to be hospitalized from COVID-19 itself. It is not difficult at all to imagine that in a force as young and healthy as the military, universal vaccination could cause more harm than the disease itself.

We all, citizen, elected official and military, want to protect the Force, but the extent of national harm that could result from doing so in this way, with wrong or incomplete information, is staggering to contemplate. Industry, regulators, and media must be immediately cross-examined. We literally only get one shot at this, as these vaccines are irreversible experimental gene therapies. I have previously suggested a Department-wide safety pause to conduct further study, so as to not prematurely commit the entire U.S. fighting force to one permanent experimental group. Given all of the cross-agency confusion, Congressional inquiry may be necessary. A bipartisan body could better investigate the misperceptions informing national security decisions.

Until more is reliably known, DoD can still maintain a control group with almost half of the 2.2 million uniformed population still deciding not to vaccinate. We could easily commence prevention and treatment therapies like I-MASK+ currently used in nations around the world with great efficacy.

It would be a national calamity to “rush to failure” en masse with the entire U.S. troop strength, using vaccines that may be more harmful than the disease itself to this specific population entrusted with our nation’s defense. The pervasive misperception that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is FDA licensed, thereby justifying mandatory vaccination policy, is a logical syllogism based on a false premise and, therefore, invalid. The FDA, CDC, Pfizer, BioNTech and the media must reveal what is under all of the “shells” for the sake of this Republic.

Many U.S. military service members are carrying these messages to Garcia in the strongest terms possible, by tendering resignations. I am aware of many seasoned officers and enlisted who have done so, or done the effective equivalent (early retirement or non-reenlistment). This mandatory vaccination decision may, in the end, squander billions in training and readiness. The sudden loss of even a fraction of the one million non-vaccinated force could expose critical capabilities at scale. The talent capable of separating, at this time, have completed all service obligations, are fully trained and highly experienced, constituting the best of our warfighter expertise and lethality. Many others are declining to visit the military recruiter’s office for the first time. The already difficult task of recruiting for our all-volunteer force may become nearly impossible with a mandatory vaccination policy.

The most tragic are those already in the Service who have a remaining obligation (contracts or enlistments) and cannot choose to leave for risk of legal or financial ruin. Continue down this path, and our military will almost certainly suffer a heretofore-unseen morale deficit, further reducing overall fighting capability. If we run off or demoralize fully half of our armed force, then the defense of this nation will be significantly crippled.

And for what? To protect 0.001% of those in service? We would wreck our military, just after wrecking our economy, at the worst possible time, when U.S. soft power and perceived hard power are arguably at their lowest levels in half a century. This unnecessary vaccine mandate comes at a moment when strategic competitors are demonstrably more capable, more aggressive, and more able to project their will against U.S. interests than ever before.

If the mandatory COVID-19 vaccine policy is truly a military readiness initiative, then the reality is it will cause a far graver impact to our national defense posture than this disease. America’s foes do not care the reason why our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guard or Guardians are not on duty to prevent attack. Mandatory vaccination’s enterprise-level damage to recruiting, retention, and trust and confidence within the ranks could make us all more vulnerable than COVID-19 ever could alone. It has been said that this great nation can only be conquered from within. If the military self-inflicts a strategic sized wound (by persecuting half the troops), then it is possible we could gift this nation’s enemies our own mortal blow.

To review, the FDA licensed vaccine is not available to consumers in the U.S. and even DoD cannot mandate any emergency vaccine without a specifically conditional, presidential waiver of a service member’s informed consent. To do otherwise is unlawful. The way I see it, service members have three choices: 1) choose to receive the EUA shot; 2) submit a religious and/or medical waiver, or; 3) refuse the EUA shot, as only a fully licensed vaccine labeled Comirnaty, not available at your U.S. clinic, can be mandated at present.

As we do best, service members are helping service members. More information can be found at COVID-19 educational information hub: thecontrolgroup.us

Commander Furman is a career United States naval officer, naval aviator and foreign area officer with extensive experience advising senior military, diplomatic and international organization’s leadership. The Commander has spent years serving throughout Africa, Asia, Europe and the Middle East at sea, ashore and airborne. He holds a Master of Arts in Security Studies from the Naval Postgraduate School.

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS:
Thank you to Commander J.H. Furman and The Revolver for bringing these incredibly important issues to our attention. The amount of deception and manipulation that these “medical/health agencies”, government/politicians and pharmaceutical companies have employed to vaccinate everyone cannot in common sense terms be deemed as a beneficial goal and/or for health reasons. There is something else at work here.

Thank you again to Commander J.H. Furman and everyone else speaking up during these perilous times. Your bravery and integrity in coming forward is greatly appreciated and much needed to bring this awareness to the population.

God bless.

Whistleblowers Exposing the Coronavirus/Vaccine Narrative

Brave individuals speaking out to expose this fraudulent activity.

I have to admit, it is EXHAUSTING trying to show people that this whole coronavirus stunt is NOT what they think it is, and there is a different agenda altogether for initiating it. People are still wrapped up in what the media presents, none the wiser, and trusting the corrupt organizations that have set this system in motion.

It’s been over a year since the “covid pandemic” started, and if one hasn’t done their research and looked outside of the lying msm, and through the coronavirus “guidelines” and protocols – and through the inane decisions and contradicting/nonsensical regulations, then they will be blind and gullible to the very obvious deception that the C.T.s have been aware of a long time ago.

(C.T. – Critical Thinker)

Yes, the media will try to manipulate and gaslight you, call you a “Conspiracy Theorist”, try to make you feel shameful and ridiculous for believing in these “baseless” speculations. And you know what? It works. People are so afraid of being name-called, that they parrot what they hear from the msm and the paid-out/complicit “experts” and shut everything else out.

However, for those who are confident in their own thoughts, confident in their own identity, confident in their ability to see through b.s., and they don’t care about the childish name-calling and instead, if they have integrity, begin to question the narrative and call it out for the absurd power grab that it is.

Courageous souls step forward

The following people have come forward to tell their accounts, to tell their insights and experiences as to what may be going on with the coronavirus situation.

I urge and recommend you to do your own research as well. I present the following links for you to try and fit the pieces together to find out what the truth of the matter is. Do you want to remain lost in the fake narratives that have been created for the sole purpose of fooling us all? Or do you want to finally wake up and realize that there are multiple things that we are not being told, and it is painting a sordid, twisted agenda that people are starting to finally realize may be a possibility – as much as it’s terrifying to admit?

The following people are breaking out of the fake narrative and exposing the reality of what we may be dealing with.

“They’re writing ‘covid’ on all the death certificates.”

Project Veritas did an exposé back in April of LAST YEAR (2020) revealing that a funeral home director, Michael Lanza, was admitting that their administration were encouraging (demanding?) the appropriate industries to label deaths as covid, despite the true cause of death.

“To be honest with you, all of the death certificates are writing COVID on it, they’re writing
COVID on all the death certificates
,” Lanza said.

Lanza said DeBlasio might see inflated COVID death tallies as a way to bring more money to New York City. “Whether they had a positive test or didn’t, so I think again this is my
personal opinion, I think like the mayor and our city–they’re looking for federal funding and the more they put COVID on the death certificate the more they can ask from the federal funds.”

Source: BREAKING: Funeral Directors in COVID-19 Epicenter Doubt Legitimacy of Deaths Attributed to Pandemic, Fear Numbers are ‘Padded’

Even Deborah Birx, who served as the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator during the time that the Project Veritas video came out, admitted that the protocol was to label deaths “with” covid as a covid death – thus inflating the covid death rate.

I remember the below video very specifically because at the time, this video was EVERYWHERE. Now, it’s been heavily scrubbed off of the internet, although you can still find it when searching for it. However, the keynote here is, usually youtube would be the first to recommend a video when trying to find a particular search word or phrase. Now? Well, take a look (we’re looking for a video of Deborah Birx in a pink scarf, and from youtube – see any?):

Out of the 36 top results, searching “deborah birx counting deaths with covid” on duckduckgo, there are only two results that depict Deborah Birx in the pink scarf from the mentioned video, one from realclearpolitics.com, and the other from the New York Post. None from youtube. Is there a reason why youtube would shadowban this video in particular? Is it “false information”? What’s the REAL reason that youtube would try to hide/delete videos containing this information?

Here is the video clip in question, originally posted at realclearpolitics:

Transcript (embellishment added for emphasis):

Reporter: “Can you talk about your concerns about deaths being misreported, uh, by coronavirus, because of either testing or standards for how they’re characterized?”

Deborah Birx: “So I think in this country, we’ve taken a very liberal approach to mortality… and I think the reporting here has been pretty straightforward over the last 5 to 6 weeks.

Prior to that, when there wasn’t testing in January and February, that’s a very different situation, and unknown. There are other countries that if you had a pre-existing condition, and let’s say the virus caused you to go to the ICU, and then have a heart or kidney problem, some countries are recording that as a heart issue, or a kidney issue, and not a covid-19 death.

Um, right now, we’re still recording it, and we’ll – and the great thing about having forms that come in and a form that has the ability to mark it as covid-19 infection – the intent is right now, that those, if someone dies with covid-19, we are counting that, as a covid-19 death.

(Deborah Birx slowly walks offscreen as the reporter addresses this answer.)

Reporter: “Are you, can you be sure – I mean, you hear from coroners that that’s not necessarily the case, or – are, are you sure, how can you be so confident about that? And is there any concern that it’s used…”

(Feed/video trails off before the reporter can finish her question. I have not been able to verify the full length of this video at this time.)

Scientists expose PCR tests

Speaking of the “testing” that Deborah Birx mentioned, how is that going, I wonder? Surely there’s nothing shady about the PCR test or anything, that could possibly lend to more fake covid cases, right?

A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it’s urgently axed. As they should

Yes, ladies and gentlemen. This world widespread test, which has been, in large part, a key determinant in keeping this farce going, has been falsely ramping up coronavirus cases when in reality, the tests have been found to detect minuscule (harmless) amounts of a “virus”, especially when cycled through to thresholds of 35-40 (“or however many cycles it needs” – as was the fda guideline at the time) and it presents as a false positive as much as up to 97% of the time.

The Trouble With PCR Tests
Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.

Scientists and researchers have been mentioning non-stop that a cycle of 35-40 is way too high to run these tests, and even Anthony Fauci himself admitted in July 2020 that a threshold this high would likely return misleading positive cases.

Kary Mullis, the very inventor of the PCR test, described the fallacy of using the pcr test to detect a virus – reiterating that it is not to be used for that reason. Why? Because as he stated, if you run the test at a high enough cycle, you can find almost anything in anybody. (coronavirus, anyone?) On a related note, he also said some revealing things about “Mr. Dr. Expert Anthony Fauci”…

I have written this before on my post Anthony Fauci Caught ‘Lying’ – Several Times (which I recommend for additional reading about the “expert” who has been the talking head of this suspicious circumstance) but it bears worth repeating:

Kary Mullis on Fauci:

“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything, really, about anything, and I’d say that to his face. Nothing.

“He should not be in the position like he’s in.“

“Those guys have got an agenda. Which is not, what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to – and they smugly – like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”

“You can’t expect the sheep, to really respect the best and the brightest. They don’t know the difference, really. I mean, I like humans, don’t get me wrong, but, basically, there is a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn’t a really good scientist. I mean, that’s a problem, that’s a main problem, actually with science, I’d say in this century, because scientists being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don’t understand it.”

“President of the University of South Carolina asked Fauci if he’d come down there and debate me on stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody who was, from the other side, to come down there and balance my – because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that’s going to tell me the other side. But Fauci didn’t want to do it…“

Source: You can watch the full interview of Kary Mullis with Gary Null here: Gary Null May 1996 interview of Kary Mullis: FULL

So why has this not been addressed for so long?! How long were labs running these tests at this high of a threshold? Is it any wonder the coronavirus cases were going up at an incredibly exponential rate? Especially with the constant pressure to get tested regularly, with some businesses expecting their employees to test twice a week?

Unreal.

But that’s not the end of it.

Because now due to the covid vaccine being rolled out everywhere, guess how many cycles are now suggested for testing covid vaccinated individuals ONLY?

CDC: maximum 28 CT for post-vaccine COVID PCR tests
Horowitz: CDC issues guidance for evaluating post-vaccination COVID tests at a lower standard

This is an egregious abuse and overstep of their authority and power. So because a person is vaccinated, now all of a sudden they want to change their covid tests to a lowered cycle of 28 – but yet keep it the same for everybody else who hasn’t been vaccinated? Does anyone else see a conflict of interest here? Making it seem as if the vaccine is suddenly a miracle-worker and voila! Even if they present symptoms of covid – it comes back negative. It must be the simple flu back, after a year long mysterious hiatus.

But behold the poor folks who didn’t get the vaccine. Their pcr test cycles are still set to over 35 cycles… tough luck. Guess the un-vaccinated will be more likely to get a (false) positive result of covid.

…Do I have to spell it out here? It is an obvious ploy to make it seem like the vaccine is working and is diminishing the coronavirus cases. Thus those who are left un-vaccinated will be seen as the remaining perpetrators of keeping the coronavirus alive.

I am almost at a loss to conceive how people do not see anything wrong with this deceptive, implemented system.

Nurses / doctors speak out

There are so many nurses/doctors stepping forward and revealing what they’ve witnessed, and while it is hard to determine the veracity of their experiences, eye-witness accounts have been used in courts as viable sources of information. It is also important in science/analysis to gather as much data as possible, even if it may be anecdotal, to study the topic further.

Here are some nurses/doctors (a small few, out of many) telling of their experiences during the coronavirus crisis:

Shelley Tasker speaks out against lying industry

Source: BRAVE Healthcare Worker Resigns Publicly – Shelley Tasker Resignation Speech

Shelley Tasker shares some truth bombs, and this video provides additional ones as well. Very insightful and sheds some interesting light on the matter.

Upset nurse in Brazil

Although I don’t understand the language that this lady is speaking, the message could not be any clearer.

She is walking through a completely empty facility, her voice echoing, reverberating throughout the large building, and showing an absolute ghost town. It is unclear when this video was made, but the various uploads I’ve seen show a date of May 5, 2021.

Erin Olszewski goes undercover

Source: Perspectives on the Pandemic – Episode 9 – The Undercover Epicenter Nurse – A Conversation with Erin Marie Olszewski

Erin Olszewski came out in early June of 2020, after recording her experience at Elmhurst hospital, exposing the amount of malpractice and corruption within those walls. Of course, there have been backlash against her testimonies, and far be it for me to assume it’s because she was single-handedly dismantling the covid-crisis at this hospital and exposing it for the insidious depravity that she saw – threatening to ruin the reputation of this establishment. And coincidentally enough, it was the “epicenter” of the coronavirus cases, and by listening to Erin Olszewski’s accounts, we can see why…

Her testimony lines up with everything else that the government/medical/health institutions have implemented, and we would be blind not to see it. (Of course, sadly, people are still blind to this fact…)

(NOTE: This is another video that has been widely scrubbed off of youtube.)

Doctors around the world fighting against the false narrative

Source: Ask The Experts (Covid-19 Vaccine) – Now Banned on YouTube and Facebook

I made a post in early December transcribing the video “Ask the Experts” that has been banned from multiple different platforms. Because of its importance and essential insights from multiple different experts in the health/medical/scientific field, I felt it necessary to add it here again. The video contains 33 different testimonies and researched opinions from those who are not just following the administrative protocol to vouch for these highly suspect vaccines. Please give it a watch and a listen because these are the individuals who care about your well-being – not the “yes-people” just following orders from their management/supervisors.

Bless these people for fighting against the narrative and trying to get the rest of the public to open their eyes.

To read the full transcript, please go here: Ask The Experts (Covid-19 Vaccine) – Now Banned on YouTube and Facebook

Nurse speaks out against the corrupt government

Source: Whistleblower Nurse Speaks Out Against The Corrupt Government & NHS

At what appears to be a protest, a nurse takes the stand and explains that this coronavirus situation is not what the media portrays, and she is speaking out to urge other nurses to step forward and do the right thing. Expose this corruption, expose this governmental/political plot, and do right by your fellow human being.

These nurses are brave, caring individuals who are tired of seeing this manipulative system and their honest feedback is desperately needed in these deceptive times.

I have already read the (gasp!) conspiracy theories… that some of these medical health members may be actors. But when you think about it, that’s kind of funny coming from people who believe the msm doesn’t employ false flag actors in their little dramatic reports… but I digress. If these doctors/nurses are actors, then they do a much better job than what the msm hires. Maybe the msm should take a lesson in watching them.

Or, we can give these whistleblowers the benefit of the doubt, and contemplate on what’s in it for them. Sure Erin Olszewski wrote a book about her experience at the New York hospital, which would give her incentive in exposing these heinous activities at that certain hospital (though it’s hubris of us to judge someone’s character based off of speculation of their motive anyway), but others have also risked their career and reputation to try and tell us the truth. They did it out of the sincerity of their conscience, and their compassion for humankind.

Can we say the same about the majority of the people pressuring others to take an unneeded and dubious vaccine? Even pressuring pregnant women and young children/older vulnerable people to take it? Especially given all the evidence that these coronavirus cases are highly exaggerated as it is, I’d say there’s a suspicious agenda in trying to bribe and manipulate/coerce people to take it. Not that these people are doing it from the goodness of their hearts.

Speaking of…

Influencers offered money to promote vaccines

Isn’t it funny how there’s a whole profession called “influencer” in social media? Has anyone really taken a step back and pondered on the meaning of this word?

Well, enter in this huge vaccine push to get the whole world jabbed with this mysterious chemical concoction, with no long-term efficacy or safety data, for a disease with a 99.97% survival rate for anyone without underlying conditions and under a certain age/weight (the average healthy and young/middle age John and Jane Doe) – and influencers, and what do you get?

People getting offered a payment in order to influence their followers into getting the vaccine.

Sure seems like that because the vaccine cannot legally be advertised – since it is NOT FDA approved, only authorized for emergency use only (which doctors and nurses around the world are contesting that we have not, nor have ever been, in an “emergency” with the covid situation – despite what the deceiving media and industries would have you believe – although by the time this suspect vaccine has done it’s damage, is probably when the real emergency is going to roll around…) then they have decided to workaround the legality of this issue and employ influencers and politicians/celebrities to do their work for them to convince the public to get the vaccine.

Pretty shady, if you ask me.

THANKFULLY, there are a few sane and coherent (and also caring and honest) influencers around that are exposing this disreputable practice for what it really is.

Whitney Rife

Source: Instagram influencer paid to promote vaccine -Apr 15 2021

“Not looking to debate or anything, but I’ve just seen, obviously the vaccine tab, and, to each their own, if you want to get the vaccine, get the vaccine, to each your own.

BUT! I did just want to make a little note, that I received 2 vaccine campaigns, paying thousands of dollars to go and get a vaccine – or go get the vaccine, and record it and take a selfie while getting the vaccine.

Just going to throw that out there.”Whitney Rife (because I appreciate her honesty so much, here is a link to her website: whitneyrife.com)

Allie May (Proverbs31girl)

Source: HOW THEY RECRUIT “VACCINE INFLUENCERS” HAVE YOU SOLD YOUR SOUL YET?

Transcript:

“And, it’s a little nerve-wrecking, because I am not meaning to step on anyone’s toes, and I’m not judging any decisions, but I wanted to be transparent, because I feel like there’s only one narrative really being pushed right now in the world… and it’s not for everyone. It’s just scary to go against the narrative a lot of times.

So, why not be my account? (laughs nervously) Um, but I wanted to tell you, that you know, I get like multiple collaborations everyday and I know that I need to, like, scale back – I just love working with these brands. Like, I only pick the ones I really am excited about.

But anyhow, I got this collaboration, this past week, and I’m just going to put it up here because no one is talking about it. But they are paying people to do this, and I’m not even going to say it, I’m just going to post it.”

“Okay, again, I want it to be known that your choice is your choice. And everyone can have different opinions and ideas, but in the end I would just think it would be amazing if we could all respect each other’s choices.

And, just knowing, that they had a billion dollars in the stimulus to use to advertise to get this is just was a big red flag for me. And to know that they are paying people that you trust and love… um, it’s… it just doesn’t sit right. For something that is going into you, that, you know, we don’t know the effects.

And so, I just wanted you to be aware that as you are seeing this message, displayed, from large corporations, from little tiny influencers, to big influencers, that there is a money trail behind it. And you need to be aware of that.

Okay, and I’m kind of shaking right now. Which is sad that I have to feel like afraid to even talk about this. Um, right? But, I just know that there is a megaphone on one voice, and there’s a megaphone on ONLY one voice, so if I could just do a tiny little… to allow people to see behind the scenes, ’cause I don’t think everyone even really truly understands what’s, you know, how, how this is going down. Um, then I guess I’m willing to take that risk, because this isn’t something to mess around with.”Allie May (Proverbs31girl)

Thank you to Allie May and Whitney Rife and anyone else who has been exposing this manipulative and untrustworthy tactic. Your honesty and integrity is greatly appreciated!

And so if it comes out that these vaccines really are harmful… can people hold the influencers/celebrities/politicians/etc., who have promoted the vaccine as safe and effective, liable and sue them for misinformation and giving out medical advice when they’re not a doctor? Can the public, since the vaccine companies aren’t responsible for any side-effects you get from their vaccine, sue the government, their employer, etc., etc. if these vaccines are proven unsafe? What are the legal ramifications of this case? Would everyone just be free of liability since, at the time, the vaccine was approved for “emergency use authorization” only?

I would definitely think about the ramifications of these incidences before injecting this highly suspicious mixture into your body. I am not straight up telling anyone NOT to get the vaccine, although my inclination is to just for your own safety, because in my opinion, this vaccine is far more dangerous than what they are labeling as “covid”. But I AM telling you to be informed and do research and fit all these different pieces together before you do so, if you decide to at all.

Michael Yeadon, former scientific researcher and Vice President at Pfizer

Michael Yeadon has opened up a can of worms and a smear campaign in his name.

Is it any wonder? With a background like his, and the knowledge and experience he brings to the table, tptsb are probably scrambling to bring his reputation down and quash any credibility that he has. Just a quick, cursory search of his name on google/duckduckgo presents top results of websites bashing his name and resorting to their usual name-calling rhetoric by labeling him as an “anti-vax” hero. Of course the title “hero” they use is sardonic – but to me, “hero” is quite fitting.

After all, it’s not everyday that a former Vice President of a huge, multi-billion dollar company comes out in the face of scrutiny and ridicule to go against the mainstream narrative and big tech/company conglomerates. No, most people of his stature would probably want to keep their reputation and protect the secrets they hold.

Not Michael Yeadon. He has the bravery and morally ethic fortitude to come out against this obvious attack on our rights and freedom, and exposes the corruption as he sees it, through his experienced and established knowledge. He KNOWS that there is a different agenda then what we’ve been told and led to believe. And he KNOWS that these vaccines and the coronavirus situation hold a darker goal that admittedly, is hard and terrifying to believe – but has ultimately come to the same conclusion that a lot of “critical thinkers” have proposed.

Being an expert in biotechnology, he is able to crunch the numbers and correlate all of the necessary data to realize that the information we’ve been presented with has been skewed, twisted, and manipulated to suit the agenda that the global elitists have planned for their own purpose. He gets technical in his post and eventually comes to the realization that we’ve all been lied to.

Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives

Keep in mind, this is just his data on the coronavirus tests and the suspicious nature of how they’ve been counting covid deaths, especially compared to other illnesses such as the regular flu, influenza, other respiratory illnesses… And this hasn’t even covered his analysis on what the vaccines are for…

Source: Michael Yeadon | Full Interview | Planet Lockdown

This is an extremely important video. While people may laugh and scoff at the “conspiracy theorists” – who honestly most are just ordinary people who can see through this deception and are worried and concerned for everyone else’s safety – Michael Yeadon is not someone to easily dismiss. For him to admit that his suspicions have finally led him to believe that this mass-vaccination effort is to curb the population (in not so subtle terms – kill off masses of people in what would most likely be the worst genocide in history) suddenly thrusts this possibility into the realm of serious contemplation.

I, as well as a multitude of people, have already tried explaining this possibility to those who would hear it – and those who don’t want to, because it is such an important facet of our lives. Those who can look beyond the laughs and scorn can see the connection between Bill Gates’ depopulation efforts, see Anthony Fauci for the “yes-man” he is, make the connection between REAL organizations who have been planning this curb of the population for a very long time – and yes, admitting that vaccines would be a good way to do it.

The whole video is a gem and definitely worth watching, but I am going to just highlight one, extremely relevant quote from Michael Yeadon @ the 45:40 mark,

“This system is being put in place, using lies, and it’s being put in place using lies for some purpose, and I believe that purpose is complete, totalitarian control. And I think the purpose of that, is going to be mass depopulation.”

Again, the whole video is well worth the watch. And just keep this in mind that it’s not just “crazy, delusional” people that are coming to this conclusion. When one looks at all of the evidence, this is the one conclusion that makes the most sense. It’s literally been talked about for centuries and quite possibly has been going on for centuries – just on a smaller scale through manufactured wars and other governmental/scientific “experiments” and who knows what else they do under “national security”.

As Michael Yeadon says, right before the quote I mentioned, “Simply think.

Sidenote:

I cannot make myself any clearer when I say, from the bottom of my heart, DO NOT TRUST FACT-CHECKING WEBSITES!!!!

They are EMPLOYED by the very same people pushing this false narrative and unnecessary lockdown procedures on everyone. Of course the “fact-checkers” are going to find everything in favor of their lord and masters (aka: their paycheck signers). Please keep this in mind, and DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.

Stopping at snopes.com to see that the headline in question has been “debunked” is NOT RESEARCH.

Glancing at the top search results on google/duckduckgo that are most likely “fact-checking” sites that say, “No, of course Bill Gates didn’t say that depopulation was his goal.” is NOT RESEARCH.

Asking your friends what they think of such and such “conspiracy” is NOT RESEARCH.

Trusting that a corrupt industry is denying any wrongdoing is NOT RESEARCH. (‘Oh yes, we had an internal audit and everything is tip-top, kosher. Nothing to see here, folks.‘ – Of course they’re not going to admit to committing underhanded/sinister schemes!)

So who has incentive to lie here? All of these people I’ve shown above – risking their own reputation and their own livelihood to try and get the truth out? Revealing the strange abnormalities and suspicious circumstances they’ve seen? Or the multiple institutions that are getting paid millions/billions of dollars in order to keep this narrative alive? For perhaps the sole purpose of getting as many people as possible to take this dubious “covid vaccine”?

If truth be told, it is OUTRAGEOUS to even consider that there is a sinister plot unfolding before our very eyes. It seems too inconceivable, too outlandish – too wild to even contemplate. These kinds of things only happen in the movies. Who would believe something like this? That there is a worldwide initiative to dictate humanity to following a single, one world directive…? How could anyone believe that there are so many people involved in this agenda?

I. Don’t. Blame. Them.

I wouldn’t want to believe this is possible either. But if we can set aside our fear and denial, our refusal to think that a huge, global conspiratorial plan to control (and curb) the population could be possible, then perhaps we can finally come together and bring awareness to these heinous goals, and start standing up for our rights and protecting our future. We have to realize, no matter what we WANT to believe, the fact of the matter is that there is something completely different than what we are told.

The mainstream media has been under the control of certain factions for a very long time. Their whole goal is to manipulate what the public thinks, even twisting and creating scenarios to lead the population into certain belief systems. When one can finally think for themselves and step outside of this corrupted structure, and who have integrity and courage, then we have these brave, morally ethic truth speakers who are speaking out against these establishments. Telling their accounts, telling the truth about what they are seeing with their very own eyes.

Are we going to ignore all of them, just to feel comfortable in our own skin and lie to ourselves to sleep better at night? Refusing to believe that their testimonies are true and instead, continue to listen to paid off companies working to manipulate and deceive the public? Are we going to let the heartfelt honesty of caring and fed-up citizens go to waste, and trust in these immoral institutions instead?

Are we that lost and weak that we can’t face this reality?

I give these brave figures commendation and respect for having the integrity and fortitude for doing what’s right, especially in a time when telling the truth is being condemned and attacked by multiple platforms, news outlets and huge corporations – and in the same vein, being attacked by the masses who don’t know any better. They are a testament to how genuinely compassionate individuals can speak up and spread awareness, even if it means going against the grain of their very own career and, quite literally, everyone else.

Thank you to those who are exposing this corruption for what it is. You are so widely appreciated and respected and I admire you from the bottom of my heart. Thank you so much for your honesty and integrity.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”