W.H.O. / Governments Working in Collusion with Big Pharma? | A Necessary Look Back at the Swine Flu Pandemic

STEPPING BACK IN TIME: Another attempt to vaccinate the whole world.

It is extremely important to learn about our history, because as this year has shown, not recognizing the troubles and past circumstances – especially when dealing with our very lives and those of our loved ones – is causing untold turmoil and unnecessary deaths/injuries.
 
The below video is an insightful and historic account of how quickly we forget (and/or didn’t realize) about what happened in the not-so-distant past. I would highly, highly suggest checking it out and sharing. It is CRUCIAL to understand the events that have led up to the situation we see ourselves in today. We must learn to recognize attacks on not only our health, but also our whole livelihood.

I have highlighted some key parts of it below, but the whole video is well worth the watch. Do the events sound familiar to you? What if we replaced the word “swine flu/h1n1/influenza” with “coronavirus”? This video is an eerie look back at the 2009 events and the goal, even at that time – 12 years ago – of the exact same thing we’re seeing today. It was never about the “virus”; and it was never about our health.

Source: odysee | Do You See What I See Productions | A-Necessary-Look-Back-at-the-Swine-Flu-Plandemic

Some embellishment has been added for emphasis:

“So what is technically a biological weapon is being sold to us as a prophylactic, and if we don’t take it voluntarily, if we don’t believe in the hysteria of the Media, we are finally forced to take it.”

[00:00-00:18] Jane Bürgermeister 2009: “After this health crisis, a new political force will be installed.

It will be the World Health Organization, the one in charge of organizing the enforcement of these things, also the U.N.”

[00:35-04:52] Jane Bürgermeister 2009: “And it will happen at the same time, more or less, in parallel in all countries, because all countries follow the same schedule for voluntary vaccinations.”

“And after this period, every government estate will be joined into a single, new structure, that will incorporate itself under the W.H.O. and U.N.”

(Some politicians have already suggested) “that the W.H.O. should be the natural global health authority. There are other clear plans for the creation of a world government. And the pandemic seems to be the means to this goal, the same as this vaccine also an instrument is, to fulfill that old dream of a single world power.

What I am stating here is that there is a secret biological war going on, an undeclared biological warfare against civilians is being waged, because it is carried out by a small group, against a larger majority of billions of people, carried out with cunning and deception.

So what is technically a biological weapon is being sold to us as prophylactic, and if we don’t take it voluntarily, if we don’t believe the hysteria of the Media, we are finally forced to take it.

What we see is the World Health Organization trying to succeed in enforcing vaccination on all people, a system according to which they’ll keep data about all people for the rest of their lives.”

“At meetings, many governments deny that they intend this, they state that it will be voluntary and so on, but all the while they are building the infrastructure for forced vaccinations.”

“You might say, “How is something like this possible?” “How can our health officials do this?” “What are health safety institutions doing, the Media…” “How can every security step be failing us?”

I believe this plan has been thought over many, many years. And unfortunately, many officials were “bought”. 

We have to accept that officials in charge of protecting people are actually not giving warnings and they let these things happen.

If I could have access to the documents of my research, then also they could.”

“An important role in this sad story is played by Media; as I said, I have learned myself that the important information never comes from Media, and as credible as it sounds, I have seen for myself how systematically it’s just a propaganda instrument.”

“Exactly because Media doesn’t report some essential facts, and instead just goes over trivial everyday stories, most people are absolutely clueless about what’s going on here.”

“It’s up now for each citizen to say: I will influence political events – “

Setting the stage for the Media hysteria

[05:44-06:35] WHO Director General, Dr. Margaret Chan: “On the basis of available evidence, and these expert assessments of the evidence, the scientific criteria for an influenza pandemic have been met.

I have therefore, decided to raise the level of influenza pandemic alert from phase 5 to phase 6. The world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.

Influenza pandemics, whether moderate or severe, are remarkable events. Because of the almost universal susceptibility of the world’s population to infection.

We are all in this together.”

Essentially impossible to distinguish between regular seasonal flu vs. 2009 H1N1 influenza

[06:59-07:47] : How can a person tell if they have the regular flu seasonal flu or if they’ve contracted the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus?

Anthony Fauci:Well, for a person, him or herself to be able to determine that, would essentially be impossible, because you can get everything from very very mild illness to severe illness with either seasonal flu or the H1N1 new 2009 pandemic flu. Most of the time it’s a mild disease, but there are unusual cases that can be severe. The only way a person can tell is if they get their blood drawn or other laboratory tests, which could specifically distinguish between one and the other. But that is something that is not done routinely.”

Role-playing? News anchor and correspondent look amused while discussing if they had swine flu. /
Also, “testing really doesn’t matter”

[07:48-10:26] Anderson Cooper: “As of tonight, more than 41,000 Americans have been infected with an H1N1 or swine flu virus. Maybe you know someone who’s come down with it.

We do. Our very own Sanjay Gupta. Our chief medical correspondent got the virus during a recent trip to Afghanistan. Sanjay said it was the sickest he’s ever been. He joins us now to talk about it; he’s a physician and a patient – Uh, Sanjay, first of all, how do you feel now?”

Sanjay Gupta: “You know, I feel fine, now, Anderson. And you know, it’s worth pointing out, you and I talked about this while we were both in Afghanistan, and you were quite sick as well. I’ve come to find out later on that the H1N1, the swine flu as it’s called, was circulating quite a bit, Anderson, in the area that we were in.”

Anderson Cooper: “Was it really? No one mentioned that to us. Or at least not me.”

Sanjay Gupta: “I know, I mean, you know, frankly speaking, we can talk about this now via satellite but you know, there’s a good chance, based on everything that I’m hearing, that you also had H1N1 virus infection.”

Anderson Cooper: “Well, cause I – I mean, I had similar symptoms to you, I was – the cough was the worst cough I’ve ever had, and it even hurt my heart when I was coughing, and I went to you, and you were really sick, and I asked you, “Is it possible it’s swine flu?” And you said, “Probably not, because usually swine flu has a very high fever right away.”

Sanjay Gupta: “That’s right. And you know, it’s interesting because I think the next day, I think maybe you had gone to a different province and I, I was feeling miserable the next day and I hadn’t checked my temperature, you know; you’re in the desert, it’s hot outside. Hadn’t really thought about it. I went there and my temperature was around 102 degrees, so, you know, pretty high for certainly for me, 98 being normal and 98.6.

So that was the first sign and then, you know, I had that same cough that you did. Light-headedness, and I was freezing cold. I don’t know if you had that as well. [Anderson Cooper: “Yeah.”] But that was really the most memorable part of it. I was freezing cold despite being in the desert.

Are you coughing right now?”

Anderson Cooper: “I- I’m still coughing. I will say. Just a little bit.”

Sanjay Gupta: “Thought I just heard that, yeah. I have a little bit of a cough as well. I don’t think we’re contagious though.”

Anderson Cooper: “I love that I just learned that I may have had swine flu from you, via satellite. Um, but what was it like? I mean, it was for you, you said it was the worst, worst sickness you ever had?”

Sanjay Gupta: “It really was. And I don’t get sick very often. I mean, I can’t remember the last time I was sick. I don’t remember the last time I had the flu. But this really floored me.

I think the day after you and I talked about it, the next morning, I was trying to get out of my sleeping bag, I could barely take a couple of steps without feeling really light-headed. And again, those just profound chills and shakes, despite the fact that it was over a hundred degrees outside. And then when I went to the – I went to the clinic, they had a role, it’s a role three battlefield clinic. You know, they gave me some IV fluids cause I hadn’t eaten in a while, and they also did the swab.

What we know is that H1N1 is circulating around the world. You mentioned how many cases have already been, Anderson, and what most doctors have told me, most infectious disease doctors, is that the testing really doesn’t matter.

Fauci, director of NIAID, suggests to vaccinate highly vulnerable groups such as pregnant women and children as young as 6 months old

[13:25-14:32]: This year, do I get a shot for the 2009 H1N1 flu in addition to the regular flu shot?

Anthony Fauci: “Well, you certainly should get your seasonal flu shot. That’s for sure. When we talk about the vaccination program for the H1N1, we’d like to be sure that the 5 priority groups of individuals get the H1N1 that becomes available early on. We fully expect that we would have enough so that you can cover not only the priority groups, but anyone else who feels they want it and need it. So the answer is, yes you should get the H1N1.

The 5 priority groups are:

pregnant women
– people who are the caretakers, parents or what have you, of children less than 6 months old,
– healthcare workers
young children and young adults from 6 months to 24 years old
– and individuals from 25-64 who have underlying medical conditions that would compromise them”

Vested interests of academics, governments, W.H.O. and drug companies to push unproven vaccinations

[14:32-15:48] News Segment: “In clinical trials on volunteers began on Wednesday in Australia for vaccine against swine flu.

But leading researchers now raising serious questions about the way the world is responding to this pandemic.

Dr. Tom Jefferson says the response to the virus is driven by vested interests. Academics, governments, the World Health Organization, and drug companies who all stand to gain.”

Dr. Tom Jefferson: “By declaring ‘pandemic’, they’ve pushed the button on this juggernaut that they’ve created. And of course, antivirals are part of that, and vaccines are part of that, and the whole panel plays a part of that.

All I’m saying, is let’s act with a little bit of caution and common sense. And let’s look at the evidence, the hard evidence.

Until they actually get used, we do not know whether it will work. Their seasonal counterparts don’t have a very good track record. The evidence from the hundreds of studies that we synthesized, is that sometimes they work a little, and sometimes they don’t.

We’ve been brought up, people in my generation, to understand that a pandemic means deaths and a lot of serious cases. And that seems to have dropped out of sight, and they’re lowering the threshold, of a definition of a ‘pandemic’. And that is not a good thing. In many ways.

Swine flu not much worse than a bad cold. /
Natural immunity would provide better immunity than the vaccine.

[17:09-18:23] [Guest doctor]: “Now 3 months later, and as a GP I’ve seen dozens of cases of swine flu, we can see that overwhelmingly, in healthy adults, it’s a very mild illness. Really not much worse than a bad cold. And you will have to question whether or not once you’ve vaccinate a population against an illness that is no worse than a bad cold.

But remember as well that by the time we get this vaccine here, in the country, a lot of us will have come across the virus anyway. And we’ll have developed natural immunity. So we’ll have better and longer lasting immunity than the vaccine would provide already. Which would make a vaccine completely unnecessary.

As I’ve said, the vaccine is being fast-tracked; it’s being rushed onto the scene and the normal safety tests that are done before a vaccine is introduced will be very, very limited. And the last time that a vaccine was given nationally, against a swine flu pandemic, was in the U.S.A. in 1976. And then after vaccinating millions of people, they stopped that vaccination trial because of an increased rate of side effects. There was something called Guillain-Barré syndrome, a paralyzing disorder. But then so they had to stop the trial. And we don’t know that that’s not going to happen again – “

Children used as guinea pigs /
Mercury found in vaccines linked to autism, brain disorders and Guillain–Barré syndrome

[19:10-21:41] Priya Sridhar: “Joining me to discuss all of this is RT contributor and investigative journalist, Wayne Madsen. Wayne, thanks so much for joining me.

First of all, can you tell me, who has taken the swine flu vaccine so far and what have you heard about it?”

Wayne Madsen: “Well apparently there has been a test community used already. We’re also hearing that the vaccine that’s being developed, they’re saying it’s not for everyone. Apparently, children were used as uh, for lack of a better term, guinea pigs in Oklahoma. I know from talking to people in the research community, even scientists who helped develop the vaccine for smallpox are saying they’re not going to take the vaccine and urging their friends and family not to take this vaccine either.

Priya Sridhar: “And what kind of side effects did these children have, if any?”

Wayne Madsen: “Well, contained in the vaccine is a component called thimerosal,  which has been proven – uh, half of it is composed of mercury. And it’s been proven to cause not only Guillain-Barré syndrome, but also autism, in young children. There’s been several court cases because of past vaccinations due to the autism issue.”

Priya Sridhar: “And so how will the swine flu vaccine be offered? Will it be mandatory for people? What have you heard about that?”

Wayne Madsen: “Well there was a conference here in Washington last week where we have two – two themes present. We have the research community, the medical community, saying, “Look, what we need to provide the public is good information and let them make the decision based on facts.”

We have the emergency community, the Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency people talking about forced vaccinations, forced quarantines… Basically the politicians running the show instead of the people who are from the medical community and know much better about the threat of this particular influenza.”

Reporter: “While there are fears the U.S. media is covering up the possible side effects of the swine flu trial vaccine, 28,000 human guinea pigs are sent to test the jab. Bad news outlets have so far kept their snouts clean over its link to rare brain disorder.”

Purpose of recalling 800,000 mercury-free vaccines intended for children…

[25:40-28:13] Reporter: “Health officials there are recalling 800,000 swine flu vaccines intended for children. They say their efficiency wears off after a short period of time. Now it comes as vaccination against H1N1 become available to any American who wants it.

Our correspondent Priya Sridhar – Priya, hi. This recall must have some people wondering what the whole point is in taking these vaccines. What is the feeling over there?”

Priya Sridhar: “Hi Kevin. Well, I think people have had reservations about this vaccine for a while. Previous reports showed that the vaccine may have been linked to the Guillain-Barré syndrome, and now this new report is say – causing many people to say, “What is the point?” And so joining me to help talk about this, is co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, Barbara Loe Fisher. Barbara, thanks so much for joining me.

So tell me about the latest numbers. 800,000 H1N1 vaccines that were supposed to be for children are now being recalled. What do you know about this?”

Barbara Loe Fisher: “Yes. Just this morning, Sanofi Pasteur recalled 800,000 doses of H1N1 vaccine. We think that it’s mercury-free vaccines – the single dose vials. I haven’t confirmed that, but if that’s true that means those children are going to be getting a multi-dose vial of vaccine that contains mercury. And of course mercury is something that a lot of parents in this country have been very concerned about giving their children through vaccination.

And, the issue is a lot of people in this country are not taking the H1N1 vaccine. There’s going to be potentially a surplus of vaccine that will then have to be disposed of. If it’s in the multi-dose vials that contain mercury, it will have to be disposed of under hazardous materials regulations. HAZMAT regulations. Because you can’t dispose of mercury in this country – mercury containing vaccines, by pouring it down the drain or throwing it into a regular garbage can. You have to undergo hazardous material regulations.”

Priya Sridhar: “And what are some of the concerns with the mercury?”

Barbara Loe Fisher: “Well the mercury has been associated with brain injury in children. Regression in children who have gotten these vaccines. Regressing into autism. It’s very controversial; the government denies that mercury has anything to do with these children’s autism.

But, in 1999, our Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration directed the vaccine manufacturers to take mercury out of childhood vaccines. But the flu vaccine, in multi-dose vials, contains mercury. And so I’m wondering what’s going on here with recalling these 800,000 doses of potentially mercury-free vaccines, and what’s going to happen with children who are going to get the mercury containing vaccines.”

[29:14-29:29] Barbara Loe Fisher: “There have been about 3,700 vaccine adverse events reported to the government, 12 deaths, 10 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, but this is only a tiny fraction of what’s actually occuring out there. Because most doctors don’t report vaccine adverse events to the government.

Compilation of news reports of children experiencing tragic side effects from the swine flu vaccine

[30:39-31:46]

Reporter: “6 year old Nikiyah Torres is all smiles now, but her mother Naomi Troy is still fuming about a medical mistake at PS 335 in Brooklyn. When a nurse there mistook Nikiyah for a new student, she was given an H1N1 vaccine, without parental consent.”

Naomi Troy: “She’s not a guinea pig. You don’t make a mistake with children lives.”

Reporter: “He has a lot of questions tonight after he said his son was given the H1N1 vaccination at school, without his permission. The child got the vaccination from Montgomery County Health Officials at Camargo Elementary School. But his dad says the child has other health issues that make this vaccination potentially dangerous.”

Reporter 1: “A Northern Virgina family dealing with a stunning turn of events. Their healthy, athletic son suddenly comes down with a debilitating illness. They believe that it’s connected to a swine flu vaccine he got 24 hours earlier.”

Reporter 2: “Thursday afternoon he got his flu shots. By 10 o’clock Friday morning he had chills and started feeling weak. And by 4 that afternoon, he was having spasms.”

Reporter: “A 4 year old Rochester boy is recovering tonight after nearly dying, after being vaccinated for H1N1.”

3 shots / booster shots recommended… “trust the government and health officials”

[32:31-32:41] Meredith Vieira: “Now you’re asking people to get 3; that’s a tough sell.”

Guest: “Oh, Meredith, I think you hit the nail on the head. This is going to be a public relations, ‘trust your government and your health officials’ public campaign.”

Package insert: “Safety and effectiveness of the H1N1 2009 vaccine have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers, or persons less than 18 years of age.”

[33:22-33:43] Deirdre Imus: “There’s 3 major reasons why the H1N1 for children is not safe. They say it right in the package insert, from the manufacturer, it says right here, virus vaccine manufacturer: “Safety and effectiveness of the H1N1 2009 vaccine have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers, or persons less than 18 years of age.” They say it right there! In the packaging insert!”

W.H.O.’s loyalty seems to be in pushing vaccines – continues to announce a “pandemic” when there isn’t one

[34:36-38:02] Wolfgang Wodarg [female voice over in English]: “And what I’ve heard from the W.H.O., my concerns have merely been strengthened. The only evidence we’ve heard is that many people were asked and figure was given to us how many people were asked, but no justification were given for the actions undertaken by the W.H.O.

So the core question remains, why was the definition of the pandemic changed? Mr. Fukuda repeated that we had a pandemic underway. That is to say that we have to look at the question as to how a pandemic is declared. And how the fears are then subsequently elate – that is to say, at what point do we say that there’s no longer a pandemic?

In October last year we knew that the flu had run its full course because they are at a season’s removed than we are, so we could observe Australia, the wave had passed, and there was a moreover a trigger which it was said the flu was a trigger which enabled people to be protected from other strains of the flu. So this is something that the W.H.O. knows and the W.H.O. still says ‘we have a pandemic underway, use up all the vaccines that we have in stock’.

I want to read you something, from the Associated Press, the 19th of May, 2009, precisely at the time when the discussions were underway as to what the phase of the pandemic was, [Wolfgang Wodarg in English]: ” – urge the World Health Organization to change its criteria for declaring a pandemic again.” So to take it back what they did. Saying the agency must consider how deadly a virus is, not just how far – not just only how far it spreads across the globe. Fearing a swine flu pandemic declaration could spark mass panic, and economic devastation, Britain, Japan, China and others, asked the global body on Monday to treat carefully before raising this alert.

Some cited the costly and potential risky consequences, such as switching from seasonal to pandemic vaccine. Even though the virus so far appears to be mild. In May already. All those national specialists asked W.H.O. to change the course; to change its direction.

And then, although no formal changes were made on Monday, W.H.O. said it would listen to its members request. ‘And it’s certainly something we look at very closely’, said Dr. Keiji Fukuda, W.H.O.’s flu chief.

This happened, and afterwards, the pandemic was declared on the 11th of June, and the vaccine was sold to everyone and children were vaccinated in vain. I just say this, this is a very serious facts we see and we knew this already when the pandemic was not yet – the alarm was not yet uttered. So I think it’s a very, it’s a very important thing to discuss about the definition of a pandemic.”

Explanation as to why W.H.O. continues to announce a pandemic

[42:40-42:57] Narrator: “Many countries, including Germany, Italy, France and Great Britain, concluded secret agreements with pharmaceutical companies before the swine flu incident. Which obliged them to purchase swine flu vaccinations; but only if the W.H.O. issued a pandemic level 6 alert.”

“Greatest medical scandals of the century”

[45:55-47:44] Jon Snow: “It is one of the greatest medical scandals of the century according to a leading health expert in Brussels. The Council of Europe Health’s Chief has accused major pharmaceutical firms of organizing a campaign of panic and unduly influencing World Health Organization decisions. And with European countries now burdened with bills from millions of unwanted doses, the swine flu vaccine, he wants an investigation.

Our science correspondent, Tom Clarke, has this report.”

Tom Clarke: “64,000 people dead – tens of thousands hospitalized, a country crippled by a virus. The predictions of the impact of swine flu on Britain were grim. The government’s response: spending hundreds of millions of pounds on antiviral drugs and vaccines, adverts, and leaflets. But 10 months into the pandemic, only 355 Britains have died. And globally, the virus hasn’t lived up to our fears.

Were governments misled into preparing for the worst? Politicians in Brussels are now asking for an investigation into the role pharmaceutical companies played in influencing political decisions that led to a swine flu spending spree.”

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg: “There must be a process to get more transparency out of the decisions and the W.H.O., how they function and who is influencing the decisions of the W.H.O. And what is the role of the pharmaceutical industry there? I’m very suspicious about processes which are behind this pandemic.”

Tom Clarke: “They also want to probe ties between key W.H.O. advisors and drug companies.”

Paul Flynn: “Who is deciding what the risk is? Is it the pharmaceutical companies? Who want to sell drugs? Or is it someone making a decision based on the perceived danger? In this case, it appears that the danger was vastly exaggerated. And was it exaggerated by the pharmaceutical companies in order to make money?”

Are the pharmaceutical companies and W.H.O. running the show?

[47:45-48:01] Bill Dod: ” – will launch a probe into pharmaceutical companies accused of manipulating swine flu data. This follows a claim by a renowned German scientist that vaccine manufacturers pressured the World Health Organization into declaring a swine flu pandemic, seeking to increase profits.

RT’s Laura Emmett has more.”

Laura Emmett: “It was supposed to be a deadly pandemic. But it’s so far nothing more than a serious cold. And it’s left a lasting headache as a debate rages over pharmaceutical companies deliberately misled governments about the seriousness of swine flu to make them stockpile vaccines.”

Paul Flynn: “And I believe when we have a thorough investigation, and we look at this, we’ll discover that that’s the story: the world has been subjected to a stunt, for their own greedy interests of the pharmaceutical companies.”

The H1N1 virus may have started in a lab /
Bioethics? Or Bioterrorism?

[49:30-49:38] Bill Dod: “U.S. investigative journalist and RT contributor Wayne Madsen says he’s gathering more and more evidence that the H1N1 virus started out in a lab.”

[51:16-51:38] Priya Sridhar: ” – how exactly did this happen? This is the 21st century. I mean, how could something – how could these gene sequences get manipulated and then be disseminated throughout the country?”

Wayne Madsen: “Well, apparently what we are seeing is this could have been a product of some over zealous research on the part of the research scientist, the microbiologist, or there may be something more sinister.”

[52:44-53:06] Wayne Madsen: “Well I think what we have here is a situation with bioethics. They talk a good game in the research – medical research community about bioethics, but it doesn’t seem like there’s any method to enforce the ethics. And if, in fact, this was developed to make money for a certain bio-pharmaceutical companies, of course this is a case of bioterrorism.”

Deep corruption involves everything from contamination of vaccines, to attempts to vaccinate 6 billion people, to assassination of officials who refuse to follow the narrative

[57:25-57:52] Jane Bürgermeister “The vaccine gave her narcolepsy; a brain disorder associated with uncontrollable sleep attacks, hallucinations, and catalepsy. “I trusted them.” she said. “I trusted them. One injection and my whole life changed.”

50,000 people in Germany now have narcolepsy, according to a report in the Welt from January of this year. Every 6th sufferer is a child; the average age is between 15 and 25 years old. The governments of Norway, Sweden, Finland and Ireland have confirmed that the many cases of narcolepsy are due to the pandemic vaccine.”

[59:25-1:00:06] “Baxter nearly started a global pandemic in 2009 when staff contaminated 72 kilos of the seasonal flu vaccine material with a deadly bird flu virus, at its bio-security level 3 facilities in Austria. Baxter had also pre-negotiated contracts to sell the pandemic vaccine.

It has since emerged that Baxter is a site which is critical to U.S. security, according to leaked diplomatic cables published by wikileaks. The question is, who runs this bio-security facility? Is it the CIA? Is it a secret bioweapons lab? How could an instance as sudden as the kind that occurred in 2009 happen at Baxter’s facility?”

[1:00:36-1:00:44] “In 2009, plans to vaccinate 6 billion people around the world were activated by W.H.O. Yes. 6 billion people.”

[1:02:59-1:03:55] “In Poland, no one took the vaccine. Because the health minister, Ewa Kopacz, a doctor, decided that it wasn’t safe enough. “As a doctor, my guiding principle has to be not to damage others.” Kopacz told Polish parliament in 2009. “We will not buy the vaccine against the swine flu.” The Polish health minister was alone in refusing to trigger the pandemic vaccine contract with big pharma. Apart from Russia, a country which also doesn’t have chemtrails. And the Polish government paid a terrible price.

Just days after Ewa Kopacz gave evidence about the pandemic vaccine at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, PACE, 96 top Polish government and military officials were killed in a mysterious plane crash in Smolensk. Itself now the subject of inquiry after enormous amount of evidence showed that this was not an accident. But an assassination attempt.”

Stage is now set

[1:06:06-1:06:45] Jane Bürgermeister: “The stage is now set for another event to trigger a pandemic. This time an act of bio-terrorism could be used, and spark yet another fake pandemic, and push for global mass vaccination campaign. This time, W.H.O. laboratories controlled by big pharma would hype the virus even more than they did in 2009. 

There are more and more signs of the global elite are planning a pandemic scare soon. Big pharma companies have got greater control over the W.H.O.’s pandemic early virus warning system. Allowing them great opportunities for virus/pandemic hype.”

Thank you to the Do You See What I See Productions odysee channel for collecting this footage and compiling it into this video. It is an incredible flashback of the very same attempts that the pharmaceutical industries, media, health organizations, and government have engaged in, in order to enforce vaccines onto the whole world.

And thank you to all of the whistleblowers and reporters who were/are a part of trying to expose these crimes against humanity. Although we are once again repeating history and undergoing these same attempts from the same industries, it is my hope that more and more people become aware of these corrupt organizations and refuse to participate; and instead have courage and integrity and stand up for humanity’s rights and freedom.

Thank you for reading. God bless.

Pfizer-BioNTech/COMIRNATY Vaccine Is Still Under “STUDY” Runs to be Completed at Different Intervals Between 2022-2026

” – known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis”

In addition to the many debates and conflicts surrounding the “approval” of the Pfizer/BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine, there is interesting information to glean from the documents involved surrounding this controversy.

The below documents, some from the FDA’s own website, sheds further light into what seems to be a product still in its experimental/study phase. Some of the revelations are chilling, and doesn’t quite give the reassurance that an “approved” drug of this magnitude is more beneficial to us than what it is purported to be saving us from.

Screenshot of the FDA NEWS RELEASE: FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine
taken on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine ]
Content current as of August 23, 2021

Selected quotes in gray text boxes are from the above document:

“Specifically, in the FDA’s review for approval, the agency analyzed effectiveness data from approximately 20,000 vaccine and 20,000 placebo recipients ages 16 and older who did not have evidence of the COVID-19 virus infection within a week of receiving the second dose. The safety of Comirnaty was evaluated in approximately 22,000 people who received the vaccine and 22,000 people who received a placebo 16 years of age and older.

Based on results from the clinical trial, the vaccine was 91% effective in preventing COVID-19 disease.

More than half of the clinical trial participants were followed for safety outcomes for at least four months after the second dose. Overall, approximately 12,000 recipients have been followed for at least 6 months.

The most commonly reported side effects by those clinical trial participants who received Comirnaty were pain, redness and swelling at the injection site, fatigue, headache, muscle or joint pain, chills, and fever. The vaccine is effective in preventing COVID-19 and potentially serious outcomes including hospitalization and death.”

There are a couple of notes to take away from this document. In the above quote, it doesn’t quite specify how long the clinical trial lasted. Only that more than half of the clinical trial participants were followed for safety outcomes for 4 months after the second dose. It also states that 12,000 of the recipients were followed for at least 6 months.

Both of these numbers (4 and 6) are incredibly low quantities when taking into account pregnant women who are at the beginning of their pregnancy. The length of the clinical trial does not take into account the full 9 months needed to determine a healthy pregnancy, nor does it allow for any time to safely assess the development of the baby once born.

The data in this document also does not include differences between those of the placebo group compared to that of the “vaccine” group. In addition, if we are to only take the 12,000 participants into account, which from the wording of the document seems to allude that these are the recipients of the vaccine, that would still leave 10,000 participants unaccounted for. Just from the amount of vaccine recipients (22,000), this is 45% of their study that the data does not reflect. If we are to include the 22,000 of the participants who received the placebo, the data that was not tracked would rise to 72%.

There is also the challenge of how they determined that the vaccine actually prevented COVID. Were these recipients exposed to someone with COVID or were deliberately inoculated with the disease to see if they would get infected? Many people, myself included, have gone on for more than a year without developing COVID, or at least “COVID symptoms”. Since this data only involved a 4-6 month trial period, how many of us (vaccinated, placebo, or otherwise) can say that we have not contracted COVID during this time-frame either? Is this implying that unless you’re vaccinated, you will most likely get COVID every 4-6 months?

Another consideration to take into account are the many testimonies from well-respected and renowned doctors/scientists/virologists who are adamant in their assessment that these vaccines are unnecessary and instead further harms the immune system rather than help it.

In the same regard, those who are unvaccinated will obviously then not contract any of the possible side effects that are listed in this document as well as the many adverse events that are reported to VAERS. Which leaves one to wonder if the benefits really outweigh the risks of the COVID vaccines.

There is also the slight alteration on a different page of the FDA website that gives further clarification as to the efficacy of the COVID vaccines – which does not reflect that of what many people are influenced to believe:

Under the heading:

Q: What safety information did FDA evaluate to authorize the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for emergency use and approve Comirnaty?

Screenshot of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
taken on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions ]
Content Current as of August 23, 2021

UPDATE on September 6, 2021: Since the FDA website decided to remove this particular section from their FAQ (as of 9/1/2021), here is a screenshot taken from the web archive showing its existence:

“While the vaccine may not prevent infection, symptoms or transmission of the virus from person to person – “

This seems to be the heart of the matter, and although it continues with, “it is effective in preventing hospitalization and death.” it is in direct conflict with what we were led to believe this whole time. Most of the mainstream media, big tech platforms, health agencies, etc. have insisted that vaccines are needed to stop transmission of the virus and to protect those around us. However, this one simple statement defies everything that people were coerced into believing.

And with the last part of the sentence concluding that it prevents hospitalization and death, which even that is debatable when looking at the scope of the situation, it leaves one to wonder why this would not be an option for people to decide to take that risk on their own account. When comparing data of young individuals as well and their extremely low risk of hospitalization and death in the COVID setting, there ARE acknowledged threats when they are injected with the vaccine.

“Additionally, the FDA conducted a rigorous evaluation of the post-authorization safety surveillance data pertaining to myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and has determined that the data demonstrate increased risks, particularly within the seven days following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age compared to females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had resolution of symptoms. However, some individuals required intensive care support. Information is not yet available about potential long-term health outcomes. The Comirnaty Prescribing Information includes a warning about these risks.”

The FDA is also acknowledging that there are higher risks involved with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and myocarditis and pericarditis, especially in males aged 12-17, and up to age 40.

“Information is not yet available about potential long-term health outcomes.”

“In addition, the FDA is requiring the company to conduct postmarketing studies to further assess the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with Comirnaty. These studies will include an evaluation of long-term outcomes among individuals who develop myocarditis following vaccination with Comirnaty. In addition, although not FDA requirements, the company has committed to additional post-marketing safety studies, including conducting a pregnancy registry study to evaluate pregnancy and infant outcomes after receipt of Comirnaty during pregnancy.”

The document is also stating that the possibility of myocarditis and pericarditis is an accepted issue and will continue to be monitored after the marketing of the Comirnaty vaccine.

And in a rather blunt admission, FDA states on their own website that Comirnaty is not required to evaluate pregnancy and infant outcomes after receipt of Comirnaty during pregnancy. This would explain why the initial trial run was only monitored for 4-6 months. An outline in the BLA (Biologics License Approval) also states that Comirnaty will conduct studies on this group as we see in a later section.

BLA documents state Comirnaty vaccine studies to be conducted for the next several years

Screenshot taken from from the FDA BLA Approval on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
Document dated August 23, 2021

Text below is page 5 of the FDA BLA Approval document

Your deferred pediatric studies required under section 505B(a) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) are required postmarketing studies. The status of
these postmarketing studies must be reported according to 21 CFR 601.28 and section
505B(a)(4)(C) of the FDCA. In addition, section 506B of the FDCA and 21 CFR 601.70
require you to report annually on the status of any postmarketing commitments or
required studies or clinical trials.

Label your annual report as an “Annual Status Report of Postmarketing Study
Requirement/Commitments”
and submit it to the FDA each year within 60 calendar
days of the anniversary date of this letter until all Requirements and Commitments
subject to the reporting requirements under section 506B of the FDCA are released or
fulfilled. These required studies are listed below:

1. Deferred pediatric Study C4591001 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in children 12 years through 15 years of age.

Final Protocol Submission: October 7, 2020

Study Completion: May 31, 2023

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2023

2. Deferred pediatric Study C4591007 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in infants and children 6 months to <12 years of age.

Final Protocol Submission: February 8, 2021

Study Completion: November 30, 2023

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024

3. Deferred pediatric Study C4591023 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in infants <6 months of age.

Final Protocol Submission: January 31, 2022

Study Completion: July 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2024

Submit the protocols to your IND 19736, with a cross-reference letter to this BLA STN
BL 125742 explaining that these protocols were submitted to the IND. Please refer to
the PMR sequential number for each study/clinical trial and the submission number as
shown in this letter.

Submit final study reports to this BLA STN BL 125742. In order for your PREA PMRs to
be considered fulfilled, you must submit and receive approval of an efficacy or a labeling supplement. For administrative purposes, all submissions related to these required
pediatric postmarketing studies must be clearly designated as:

• Required Pediatric Assessment(s)

As the document states, the completion study of Comirnaty postmarketing (after approval) is not due until May 31, 2023 / Novermber 20, 2023 / July 31, 2024 respective of older to lower age groups. There is also another important acronym to consider, which is the IND, which stands for Investigational New Drug.

With this knowledge in hand, it’s important to note that the clinical trial run was monitored for 4-6 months after the second dose on around 55% of the recipients, while the actual “approved” drug still in its investigational/study stages is set to be monitored for 2-3 years. This is a sizeable difference in the amount of time to determine safety and efficacy, especially when considering the many events already reported to VAERS. And according to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions page from the FDA website:

Screenshot taken from the FDA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions ]
Content current as of August 23, 2021

Q: Are vaccine providers required to report side effects?
A: Providers administering Comirnaty or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine must report to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and to Pfizer the following information associated with the vaccine of which they become aware:
  • Vaccine administration errors whether or not associated with an adverse event
  • Serious adverse events (irrespective of attribution to vaccination)
  • Cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome
  • Cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death

Acknowledged myocarditis and pericarditis issues being studied on children

” – known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis”

Screenshot taken from from the FDA BLA Approval on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
Document dated August 23, 2021

Text in the gray box below are from pages 6-8 of the FDA BLA Approval documents
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]

We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events
reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known
serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of
subclinical myocarditis.

Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under
section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks.

Therefore, based on appropriate scientific data, we have determined that you are
required to conduct the following studies:

4. Study C4591009, entitled “A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of
the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in the United States,” to evaluate
the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of
COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: August 31, 2021

Monitoring Report Submission: October 31, 2022

Interim Report Submission: October 31, 2023

Study Completion: June 30, 2025

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2025

5. Study C4591021, entitled “Post Conditional Approval Active Surveillance Study
Among Individuals in Europe Receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine,” to evaluate the occurrence of myocarditis
and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: August 11, 2021

Progress Report Submission: September 30, 2021

Interim Report 1 Submission: March 31, 2022

Interim Report 2 Submission: September 30, 2022

Interim Report 3 Submission: March 31, 2023

Interim Report 4 Submission: September 30, 2023

Interim Report 5 Submission: March 31, 2024

Study Completion: March 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024

6. Study C4591021 substudy to describe the natural history of myocarditis and
pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: January 31, 2022

Study Completion: March 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024

7. Study C4591036, a prospective cohort study with at least 5 years of follow-up for
potential long-term sequelae of myocarditis after vaccination (in collaboration
with Pediatric Heart Network).

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021

Study Completion: December 31, 2026

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2027

8. Study C4591007 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical
myocarditis following administration of the second dose of COMIRNATY in a
subset of participants 5 through 15 years of age.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this assessment according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: September 30, 2021

Study Completion: November 30, 2023

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024

9. Study C4591031 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical
myocarditis following administration of a third dose of COMIRNATY in a subset of
participants 16 to 30 years of age.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021

Study Completion: June 30, 2022

Final Report Submission: December 31, 2022

It is interesting that the timing to be considered for approval of these vaccines was only a 4-6 month timeframe, however, known dangers/risks, identified as “serious”, are still allowed to be approved and to be studied for 2+ years.

The document also recognizes that myocarditis and pericarditis is enough of a concern to happen after administration of the Comirnaty vaccine, since it mentions several studies just for this specific adverse event, and to continue to assess these reports.

In addition to all of the substudies to be conducted, there is a study to be initiated on a select group of participants to administer a third dose of the Comirnaty vaccine.

All of this information leads credence to the fact that even though the Comirnaty vaccine has “officially been approved” by the FDA, it is still in the investigational stages and being experimented upon on the public. And it goes without saying, but if myocarditis and pericarditis (on top of other reported side effects) are serious risks especially in children (“The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age.”), then for this known risk to be offered to infants/toddlers defies any ethically moral boundaries and is in direct violations of the Nuremberg Code.

The next section also provides further evidence that there have been NO studies in the safety/efficacy of the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine on pregnant women.

Pregnancy/Births were not studied during the initial Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty trial runs

Another snippet from the FDA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions website page, states the following:

Screenshot taken from the FDA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions ]
Content current as of August 23, 2021

Q: Can pregnant or breastfeeding women receive the Comirnaty or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine?

A: While there have been no specific studies in these groups, there is no contraindication to receipt of the vaccine for pregnant or breastfeeding women. Pregnant or breastfeeding women should discuss potential benefits and risks of vaccination with their healthcare provider.

The acknowledgement above seems to indicate that the FDA and Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty company have side-stepped this particular group in their vaccine studies, and have left it up to the healthcare provider to determine whether or not to administer this vaccine to pregnant women or women who are breastfeeding. This alone should be enough of a statement that there is no sufficient/professional data to analyze if the Comirnaty is safe during pregnancies/breastfeeding stages.

And if one were to consider the VAERS reporting system, in which the Pfizer-BioNTech company is required to report to, there have been numerous conditions of miscarriages/stillbirths/complications during pregnancy after administration of the COVID vaccine. While it is difficult to determine if these complications were a direct result of the vaccine, it is up to the scientific/healthcare community to investigate these cases in a thorough, unbiased and uninfluenced manner.

Another extremely alarming section of the FDA BLA Approval documents shows the following trial to be monitored in pregnant women:

Screenshot taken from from the FDA BLA Approval on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
Document dated August 23, 2021

Text in the gray box below are from pages 9-10 of the FDA BLA Approval documents
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
POSTMARKETING COMMITMENTS SUBJECT TO REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
UNDER SECTION 506B

We acknowledge your written commitments as described in your letter of August 21, 2021 as outlined below:

10. Study C4591022, entitled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Exposure during
Pregnancy: A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of Pregnancy and
Infant Outcomes in the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists
(OTIS)/MotherToBaby Pregnancy Registry.”

Final Protocol Submission: July 1, 2021

Study Completion: June 30, 2025

Final Report Submission: December 31, 2025

There are a couple of key takeaways in this section that are of incredible importance. One major term to focus on is the word “NON-INTERVENTIONAL“.

According to What is a Non Interventional Study?, “In general, a non interventional study (NIS) (also called a non interventional trial) is where a patient takes regular medicine, prescribed according to the label. In an NIS, the researcher sets out to exert as little influence as possible on the patient’s condition while studying a medicine’s “…effectiveness, safety and tolerability under real life conditions” (Mishra & Vora, 2010).”

The article also reiterates multiple times that “non-interventional” studies are observational studies – the researchers are not to interfere with the dosages in any way but to prescribe them exactly as listed on the label. It also seems to imply that even if severe side effects show up, they are to still carry through with the “medicinal product” in that patient as prescribed. Another insinuation that one can make is that in order to not interfere with the study, it is not recommended to prescribe treatments that may help alleviate potential side effects. The term “tolerability” is implying to keep the patient going through the side effects in order to continue to study the long-term effects of the investigational new drug.

However, with the inclusion of “real life conditions”, it doesn’t indicate whether the patient can seek out physicians to investigate what is causing the side effects in their system and engage in therapeutic treatments to alleviate these effects. If a study is to be conducted in real life conditions, then it is to be expected that patients will seek treatments on their own while the researcher is only required to observe the patient to see how the alternative treatments interact with the drug/symptoms.

The same article goes on to state that the UK/EU have different definitions of what “non-interventional” means. “Aronson (2004) states… “the term ‘non-interventional’ in the Directive doesn’t mean non-interventional (i.e. non-interference) at all; it refers to an intervention with a licensed medicinal product.”

There is controversy and conflicts in this statement as another article, Interventional or Non-Interventional? Analyzing the Differences Between Clinical Studies Using Medicines in the European Union points out:

“Although defined in DIR 2001/20/EC, non-interventional studies are outside its scope. Due to the lack of harmonized regulation, some studies designed to be non‑interventional may be considered clinical trials by EU authorities. The two blinded studies described in Table 4 (see PDF) were considered clinical trials in the EU for planning on collection of data to support the marketing authorization application of experimental IMPs, despite no IMP being given and normal clinical practice being kept during the study period. Sponsors are thus advised to consult with authorities when planning studies under these conditions and/or whenever the objectives or design may raise questions.”

Further in the article, it states the following, which again, is not reassuring considering the policies/guidelines/mandates that authorities have been engaging in in order to mandate these investigational new drugs (COVID vaccines) onto the public:

“There is no centralized submission procedure for non-interventional studies with the exception of non-interventional PASSs, imposed as an obligation by an EU competent authority.{9} Because non-interventional studies do not have harmonized legislation, some Member States require submissions to regulatory authorities, while others do not. It is therefore important that sponsors are familiar with the regulatory framework of target EU Member States, and that they consult with local competent authorities and ethics committees (ECs) when justified.”

It’s sad to have to point this out, but the quote does specify “competent” authorities. And even the inclusion of “ethics committees” is not comforting seeing as how one of the leading figures in ethics study is Christine Grady, Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, and wife of Anthony Fauci – Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Chief Medical Advisor to the president, and who is also a large spokesperson for the experimental injections.

The other takeaway from section 10 of the FDA BLA documents is the term “TERATOLOGY“.

Definition of teratology
: the study of malformations or serious deviations from the normal type in developing organisms
merriam-webster/teratology

Teratology, branch of the biological sciences dealing with the causes, development, description, and classification of congenital malformations in plants and animals and with the experimental production, in some instances, of these malformations. Congenital malformations arise from interruption in the early development of the organism. Malformations in human infants, for example, may occur because the infant’s genotype contains mutant genes or includes an abnormal number of chromosomes; they also may occur if early in pregnancy the mother has had German measles (rubella), has taken some injurious drug, or has been exposed to an injurious dosage of radiation. Experimental studies suggest similar types of factors can cause malformations in animals and plants.”
britannica/teratology

Now when you combine the terms “non-interventional” and “teratology” together, it is suggesting that the ongoing studies (that were not conducted to begin with even in a clinical trial setting, as per the FDA’s own response) on pregnant women with Comirnaty and on the developing baby, will be monitored with as little intervention as possible and is mostly to be observed for malformations/genetic defects/miscarriages/etc.

In other words, safety and efficacy were never studied in this particular group, and neither was it studied in infants. It has also not been studied for long-term analysis, as the 4-6 month trial runs proves. The current “approval” it is undergoing now is an authorized experiment on the human population that is posing incredibly unnecessary risks when considering the many effective treatments that are already available to combat respiratory illnesses. And the insistent assertiveness to push this “investigational new drug” onto babies/children who are at extremely low risk for this illness is a disastrous decision from those in an “authoritative” position and should be investigated for malfeasance and misconduct.

This is also not the first time that government agencies/health industries/etc. have conducted experiments on the public.

The Tuskegee/Syphilis experiment was initiated onto a selection of African American men between 1932-1972. The study was only stopped (allegedly) after a publication was released on Associated Press in 1972 about the immorally unethical experiments being conducted on this group:

“Of about 600 Alabama black men who originally took part in the study, 200 or so were allowed to suffer the disease and its side effects without treatment, even after penicillin was discovered as a cure for syphilis. Treatment then probably could have saved or helped many of the experiment participants, PHS officials say.”AP WAS THERE: Black men untreated in Tuskegee Syphilis Study

This study seems to echo the sentiments we see going on with the coronavirus situation, in which only one type of drug is being promoted (the COVID vaccines) while suppression of other treatments that have been proven to work (such as Ivermectin) has been denounced by the very same government/health/medical fields that have conducted these experimental studies.

A study that involved the CDC/FDA’s approval, this time on Black and Latino babies, was conducted in the early 1990’s and involved the measles vaccine:

“1990: CDC Inoculated Black and Latino Babies with an Unlicensed Measles Vaccine
A covert clinical trial by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Kaiser Permanente inoculated Black and Latino babies with an experimental measles vaccine without informing parents the vaccine was experimental. More than 1500 six-month old black and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles are given the deadly “experimental” measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States; a vaccine that had been tested in African and Mexican babies resulting in high death rates. The parents were never informed and they never gave their consent. The CDC harmed babies, violated federal law, and trampled on parental rights with impunity.”
1990 FDA Issued a Waiver From Consent; Covert CDC Experimental Vaccine Test on Black / Latino Babies

It’s interesting that the measles vaccine experiment identifies Kaiser Permanente specifically, because as we see in another section of the FDA BLA Approval for Comirnaty, it seems as if Kaiser Permanente makes another appearance in the role of human experimentation:

Text in the gray box below is from page 10 of the FDA BLA Approval documents
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]

13. Study C4591014, entitled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 BNT162b2 Vaccine
Effectiveness Study – Kaiser Permanente Southern California.”

Final Protocol Submission: March 22, 2021

Study Completion: December 31, 2022

Final Report Submission: June 30, 2023

It would seem that the approval by the FDA of these IND drugs (Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine) is a way for the government/health agencies to skirt away from liability by stating that since the vaccines are no longer “experimental” by their definition, and that they are FDA “approved”, it is no longer required to gain informed consent of these drugs. In addition, as to the technicality of their terms and protocols, there are a multitude of ways to interpret their “informed consent” rules, which officials can then bend or define in any way that best reflects the use of their study/drug.

[ https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/informed-consent#exceptions ]

Also keeping in mind how long it was determined before the “health agencies” granted approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine – (4-6 months) – it would be conclusive to state that the vaccines have NOT sufficiently been studied in young children or pregnant women (or even the rest of the age groups because of the short amount of time the clinical trial study was conducted in), and the subsequent approval of this vaccine is to continue this research on the population who is exceedingly being pressured into taking this investigational new drug.

There is also the matter of the many adverse events that have been reported since the inoculation of these injections, that have largely gone unheeded within the health/medical institutions that are endorsing this drug. Other than the widely acknowledged myocarditis and pericarditis, most common in young males, which is still being studied and allowed to persist onto the public.

So again, taking into account the collusion of the government/health/medical/research fields to conduct experiments on the public, it would be necessary to reflect upon these agencies for additional breaches upon human rights, consent, and ethical behavior.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Ahmad Ardity from Pixabay

Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths

America’s Frontline Doctors addressing the fraudulent use of the EUA for COVID vaccines.

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

America’s Frontline Doctors filed a motion to stop the use of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID vaccines for anyone under 18, anyone with natural immunity or anyone who hasn’t received informed consent.

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) filed a motion July 19, seeking immediate injunctive relief in Alabama Federal District Court to stop the use of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID vaccines — Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) — for three groups of Americans.

According to a press release, AFLDS is asking to immediately stop administration of experimentalCOVID vaccines in anyone 18 and younger, all those who have recovered from COVID and acquired natural immunity, and every other American who has not received informed consent as defined by federal law.

The 67-page motion requests the judge issue a preliminary injunction pursuant to § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C) for the following reasons:

  • There is no emergency, which is a prerequisite to issuing EUA and EUA renewals for COVID vaccines.
  • There is “no serious or life-threatening disease or condition.”
  • Vaccines do not diagnose, treat or prevent SARS-CoV-2 or COVID.
  • Known and potential risks of the vaccine outweigh their known and potential benefits.
  • There are adequate, approved and available alternatives to vaccines.
  • Healthcare professionals and vaccine candidates are not adequately informed.

The authors of the motion attached a declaration by a whistleblower who came forward alleging deaths occurring within 72 hours of receiving a COVID vaccine are significantly under-reported in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

As of July 9, reported deaths in the VAERS totaled 10,991. Of those, 4,593 occurred within 72-hours of vaccination.

The whistleblower — a computer programmer who developed more than 100 distinct healthcare fraud algorithms, and who has expertise in healthcare data analytics that allows her to access Medicare and Medicaid data obtained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Systems (CMS) — filed a sworn statement under penalty of perjury alleging the actual number of COVID vaccine-related deaths is closer to 45,000.

 

The whistleblower alleged that VAERS, while extremely useful, is under-reported by a conservative factor of at least five.

In her statement, she said:

“On July 9, 2021, there were 9,048 deaths reported in VAERS. I verified these numbers by collating all of the data from VAERS myself, not relying on a third party to report them. In tandem, I queried data from CMS medical claims with regard to vaccines and patient deaths, and have assessed that the deaths occurring within 3 days of vaccination are higher than those reported in VAERS by a factor of at least 5. This would indicate the true number of vaccine-related deaths was at least 45,000. Put in perspective, the swine flu vaccine was taken off the market which only resulted in 53 deaths.”

AFLDS said the findings were shocking, and informed consent is impossible when safety data is not accurate.

In a press release, AFLDS said:

“It is unlawful and unconstitutional to administer experimental agents to individuals who cannot make an informed decision as to the true benefits and risks to the vaccine on an independent basis. They must be of an age or a capacity to make informed decisions and have been provided with all of the risk/benefit information necessary to make an informed decision.”

One of the named plaintiffs, Deborah Sobczak, the mother of a 15- and 17-year-old, said in the press release:

“My child will not be the subject of an experiment. What kind of monsters are we allowing to control us? Perfectly healthy children have developed heart inflammation, brain bleeding and even died! I have had enough. I am not sacrificing my child so a pharmaceutical company can experiment on her. This madness has to stop.”

There is no emergency warranting EUA of COVID vaccines, plaintiffs allege

According to the complaint, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary, named as one of the defendants in the lawsuit, declared on Feb. 4, 2020, pursuant to § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C), that SARS-CoV-2 created a “public health emergency.”

This initial emergency declaration has been renewed repeatedly and remains in force today — a necessary legal prerequisite for the issuance of vaccine EUAs, the complaint states. EUA allowed the mass use of the vaccines by the American public before the completion of the standard regimen of clinical trials and FDA approval.

Plaintiffs allege the emergency declaration and its multiple renewals are illegal because there is no underlying emergency. Using HHS COVID death data, SARS CoV-2 has an overall survivability rate of 99.8% globally, which increases to 99.97% for persons under the age of 70. This is consistent with the seasonal flu, the complaint states.

Plaintiffs argue HHS deliberately inflated COVID case data

Plaintiffs allege HHS’ data is deliberately inflated. On March 24, 2020, HHS changed the rules applicable to coroners and others responsible for producing death certificates and making “cause of death” determinations exclusively for COVID.

The rule change states: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”

According to the complaint, HHS statistics showed 95% of deaths classified as “COVID-19 deaths” involved an average of four additional comorbidities. Plaintiffs claim the CDC knew the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death would result in COVID being the underlying cause more often than not.

Plaintiffs said the actual number of COVID cases is also far lower than the reported number due to emergency use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, which are used as a diagnostic tool for COVID. The PCR tests are themselves experimental products, authorized by the FDA under separate EUAs. The package inserts state PCR tests should not be used to diagnose COVID.

The complaint alleges the way in which the PCR tests are being administered knowingly guarantees an unacceptably high number of false positive results.

COVID vaccine risks undisclosed and under-reported, lawsuit says 

AFLDS medico-legal researchers analyzed the accumulated COVID vaccine risk data and found migration of the pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the body. Yet vaccines were authorized without any studies demonstrating where the spike proteins traveled in the body following vaccination, how long they remain active and what effect they have, the complaint states.

AFLDS researchers analyzed VAERS and discovered an increased risk of death from COVID vaccines. The database indicated vaccine deaths in the first quarter of 2021 represented a 12,000% to 25,000% increase in vaccine deaths, year-on-year.

From 2009 to 2019, there were 1529 reported deaths associated with all vaccines reported to VAERS, according to the motion. In the first quarter of 2021, there were more than 4,000 reported deaths with 99% of all reported vaccine deaths in 2021 attributed to the COVID vaccine. Only 1% were attributed to other vaccines in the system.

Plaintiffs also disclosed evidence of reproductive harm, vascular disease, autoimmune disease, neurological damage and they highlighted an increased risk of harm for children with COVID vaccines to support their position.

Why the secrecy around V-Safe data?

The complaint called attention to the secrecy of the CDC’s V-Safe system — a parallel system used to track reported adverse events via a smartphone app controlled exclusively by the CDC.

Plaintiffs raised concerns that information in V-Safe exceeds that in VAERS. They claim VAERS is inaccurate because it potentially includes fewer than 1% of all vaccine adverse events, and the federal government is failing to provide data from other monitoring sources such as V-Safe, CMS and the military.

Plaintiffs stated informed consent cannot be given without understanding the risks. They said they can’t help but wonder why HHS would fail to disclose to the public critical information related to risk from it’s reporting systems, “particularly in light of the fact that they have had the time and resources to study and extend the authorizations on the vaccines, build an enormous vaccine marketing machine and roll out vaccine clinics all over the nation.”

The lawsuit was filed by several law firms, including RENZ Law. The complaint and whistleblower declaration can be read here.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Megan Redshaw is a freelance reporter for The Defender. She has a background in political science, a law degree and extensive training in natural health.

Featured image is from CHD