Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on the COVID Vaccine Scam – LETHAL DOSE FINDINGS: “Trying to figure out how to kill as many people as possible, without alerting too many people.”

“There’s no benign explanation for what they have done. This is not innocent. This is intentional.”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and a team of lawyers/doctors/scientists have come together during the last year and a half to form a Corona Investigative Committee set on exposing the COVID plandemic and holding those who are perpetrating these crimes responsible for their actions.

In the interview below, Reiner Fuellmich shares some incredibly important information and data that they’ve been discussing in these meetings, mentioning some of the groups responsible, and the steps that they are taking to address these issues.

It is extremely relevant and essential to consider the exact magnitude that is being discussed in this interview. Dr. Reiner Fuellmich describes scientific findings and factual details and connects that with profound implications that helps to explain the state of the world.

While it may be hard to believe, especially perhaps for those with a strong, scientific background, as some doctors and researchers have been admitting, the conclusions that they’ve come to have inevitably revealed the truth of the matter – as difficult as it is to face. However, with several proofs and evidence explaining certain agendas, there can be no doubt what it all boils down to.

I sincerely thank Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and everyone else on these teams for being brave enough to address these issues head on, and exposing the egregious corruption we’re surrounded in.

The video has been transcribed in full. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Maria Zeee: “Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, thank you so much for joining us this evening.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is the leading lawyer and member of the German Corona Investigative Committee, and specializes globally on the prosecution of fraudulent corporations. You might have heard of him from the famous “Nuremberg 2.0″. Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, thank you – Reiner Fuellmich, thank you so much for joining us this evening, or this afternoon for you.”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: “Yeah, thank you very much for having me. It’s a pleasure.”

Maria Zeee: “Uh, look, for the sake of the audience, I always do this, could you please just give us a brief career history and what led you to… spearheading Nuremberg 2.0?”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: “Well, I don’t – I prefer not to call it Nuremberg 2.0. But I know that a lot of people have tried to pin that on me, so that… um, a lot of hopes – very high hopes are riding on what we’re doing here.

But, first of all, I’m not the only one. I’m just one of many. Um, the Corona Investigative Committee is, was founded by my friend Viviane Fischer, she’s an attorney here in Berlin, and myself, on July 10th of 2020.

Before that, I was completely in line with the mainstream. Um, I did have some suspicions because of the – because of my law practice; I had been going after the larger, German global corporations such as one of the most criminal organizations in the world, Deutsche Bank, VW, and the world’s largest shipping company, Kuehne and Nagel [Kuehne+Nagel]. I did have my suspicions, so did all of my colleagues, because it looked like the cards were stacked against us in these cases, in the courts of law.

In the meantime, of course, we’ve learnt a lot and the cards are not just stacked against us. It’s a fact, that the other side – um, Catherine Austin Fitts calls them Mr. Global, but that the people who are behind this agenda – and we have come to the conclusion that this is an agenda that’s being rolled out – that these people have been infiltrating our societies for decades.

It is hard to imagine, but this is what we’ve come – this is the conclusion that we’ve come to. Not just through the World Economic Forum, not just through their Young Global Leaders, or Global Young Leaders program, which produced graduates like Angela Merkel and Bill Gates, and of course Jacinda Ardern, and Macron in France, and uh, what’s his name… Justin Trudeau in Canada.

But, to make a very long story very short, my wife and I were still in the U.S. at our ranch in Northern California, when we received the news – this is in March of 2021, uh, 2020 rather, when we got all these phone calls from our friends and relatives telling us about a lockdown. Which I thought this is – this is ridiculous. This is crazy. And the stories that we heard reminded me a lot of what had happened during the swine flu, even though I had forgotten most of it.

And because I couldn’t understand what was going on, I got in touch with my friend Wolfgang Wodarg. Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, he is the man who, more or less – hang on one second – who more or less single-handedly stopped the swine flu some ten years/eleven years ago. He was capable of doing that because he’s a very – he’s a doctor, lung-specialist with lots of experience, and he was in a position of power. He was a member of the German Parliament, and he was a member of the Council of Europe. And that’s why he was – why he managed to expose that hoax back then as a mild flu.

However, even then, the very same protagonists, including Professor Dr. Drosten, he’s the guy who invented – who invented the PCR test which he claims can tell us something about infections, which is a complete lie. That guy, and his British counterpart, Neil Ferguson. Both of them are blatant liars. They had – they had come very far. They had, in fact, helped the pharmaceutical industry introduce their “vaccines” even then. It didn’t work that well in Germany, but in the Scandinavian countries, they vaccinated lots of people, and by – through this vaccination now, there’s 1,300 children, young adults now, who are permanently disabled because they suffer from narcolepsy. So that’s how it all started.

My wife said, “We’ve got to go back, we’ve got to do something, you know how to fight these bastards”; she used other words, of course, um, so, “You gotta do it. You gotta find some allies and go ahead.” And I said, I don’t think I’m gonna find any allies because the Germans, in particular, the German judiciary, is a bunch of cowards. They’re in it for the money, they’re in it for their careers, I don’t think I can count on anyone.

But Wolfgang put me in touch with Viviane Fischer, she’s not in it for the money, she’s in it for the cause, and we set up the Corona Investigative Committee on July 10th. Wanted answers to those questions which we believe our government, which is not our government anymore, and the mainstream media, which are owned, of course, by the same people who are owning this corona plandemic, that they wouldn’t give us any answers to.

How dangerous is the virus, how reliable is the PCR test, and how much damage do the anti-corona measures do? In the meantime, we know that it’s devastating and that’s why we talk about crimes against humanity. The latest evidence is so compelling that the – I just spoke with Dr. Mike Yeadon, former Vice-President of Pfizer – “

Maria Zeee: “I was about to ask you about this. Because what I’ve heard, is that this is – this is not about money, this original plan was to roll it out back – all the way in 2050, but they’ve accelerated it.

And this recent finding from Mike Yeadon and others, is that this is worse than what happened in World War 2, and we’ve found evidence, undeniable evidence, that this is a kill-shot, it being used to murder or maim people. Could you please go into – into those findings for us.”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. This is the – this is the most recent findings that Dr. Mike Yeadon came up with. But he does emphasize he’s not the only one. And this is a group of 5 or 6 scientists, it’s just that he’s the one I think that, who connected the dots.

And I don’t know if you know, have you seen his video, the one that… it’s a bitchute video and I think he calls it compelling evidence for pre-meditated mass murder. This video shows in great detail, and we’re going to do this again, tomorrow, on our next Corona Committee session. It shows in great detail how – and he’s focusing on 3 vaccine makers. Or, they claim it’s vaccines; we know it’s not a vaccine. It’s not even experimental gene-therapy, it’s experimental gene-manipulation. This is what we’re talking about. And so he took a closer look at BioNTech/Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson and Johnson.

And the evidence that he showed us, is really so compelling that we think we’re going to make this a center piece of our International Criminal Trial. Which will start in… a couple of weeks and it’s going to be, probably going to be a grand jury investigation asking the jury, which is the people, to, for indictments against 4 of their figureheads: Bill Gates, Drosten, Fauci, and Tedros, of the W.H.O.

But the findings that he showed us, is that – but – all 3, all 3 of these vaccine makers, quote/unquote “vaccine makers”, are deliberately – they’re looking for lethal doses. They’re trying out the dosage – I forget the precise technical term he used, but we’re going to come up with it tomorrow in our committee. It is very obvious that if you follow the lot numbers, I think the British called it ‘charges’? Batches, rather, but the Americans call it lots. So, if you follow these lot numbers, there’s some that don’t seem to cause any problems whatsoever. At least not now.

As we have learned from one of our scientist professor, she’s a biologist and immunologist [undetermined] University, even those shots that seem to be harmless, if it is mRNA, they shut off your immune system. That doesn’t necessarily mean you’re going to die immediately; no you’re not. But sooner or later you’re going to run into a virus or some kind of illness and your body won’t be able to fight it, because your immune system has been shut off.

But some of these lots are so dangerous that if you look at them, and follow them through the United States, through the – in that case, 36 states of the United States, they were extremely harmful, caused thousands and thousands of deaths, all across the country. And from the way that he explained it to us, it seems very very obvious that they did this, taking turns. First Moderna, then BioNTech/Pfizer, then Johnson&Johnson. And you could also see that they were sort of taking breaks in between. And there’s a couple of lots that were completely harmless again, and all of a sudden it starts again, with these very lethal batch- lots, rather.”

Maria Zeee: “What do its breaks signify? What do they mean, the fact that they took breaks?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “We think – we’re trying to establish a baseline. Something like that. But we’re going to look into this in greater detail. By the time that we start our criminal investigation, our grand jury investigation, we will have the complete story.

But even now, it is – it is so compelling. It is undeniable and irrefutable that they’re – that this is what they’re trying to do. Trying to figure out how to kill as many people as possible, without alerting too many people. Cause if they had started, if they had used these lethal doses right from the start, it would’ve killed everyone and everybody would have been, “Ooh, I don’t think I’m gonna get this shot.” So that’s why they’re trying to figure out a way through which they can cause a lot of harm but in such a way that people will not be alarmed.

It is… it is devilish. It’s just… we looked at each other, and we just couldn’t believe it. How can people be so evil? So evil.

Maria Zeee: “I will find the video that you’re talking about from Mike Yeadon. [Reiner Fuellmich: “I’ll send it to you.”] I’ll upload it onto my website for the viewers so that I can see that afterwards.

So, let me get this straight. There have been, just to recap, there have been batches released purposely by these big pharma giants… placebo, knowing that they’re – that they’re saline shots, then knowing that they’re releasing kill shots, taking a break, releasing some more saline, releasing some more kill shots, on purpose, knowing full well what they are doing?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “That is the conclusion that we have arrived at. It is inescapable. There’s no benign explanation for what they have done. This is not innocent. This is intentional.

Maria Zeee: “You made a comment recently that this is not about money, Dr. Fuellmich. Can you talk to us about what that means?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. The people who are behind this, maybe 300, maybe 3000, we don’t know. It’s not very many people, but the people who are behind this and who are – they have so much money, they don’t need any more. They can buy tens or thousands of yachts if they wanted to because they’ve stolen so much from us. They don’t care about money.

But, they’re using money. They’re using money to buy politicians, mainstream media people, doctors, lawyers, those are the two tools that they use in order to get people under control to do their bidding. Money, bribing them, and the other tool is extortion. And this extortion thing is very very difficult to figure out. We do believe that ritual child abuse has – plays a big role in this. But money is very – “

Maria Zeee: “Why do you believe that? Why do you believe that? Is there evidence to suggest that – “

Reiner Fuellmich: “Well, we had whistleblowers approaching us and telling us about these things. And 18 years ago, I know a little bit about that scene because 18 years ago, I represented some of the victims of this ritual child abuse. A friend of mine who’s a well known member of the German journalistic scene, and myself; I did the legal work and he published it in – even on our national public radio and television. Until they stopped him, because they didn’t want him to do it anymore and, my ex-wife, she also, she couldn’t handle it anymore.

So I know a few things about this. I just couldn’t believe how big it possibly is. It may be much bigger than we think. But we don’t have enough evidence for that yet, so I’m not going to make this public, yet.”

Maria Zeee: “Sure. So we’re saying that all of these global leaders are taking part in this. If this is part of it, this ritual child abuse, how does it tie in with this depopulation plan?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Well, we think, after having spoken with a number of psychology and psychiatry professors, we think this is a huge psychological operation. It has been planned for at least 3 decades, maybe longer. And, they’re using all kinds of panic mongering tools. We have, for example, here in Germany, the so-called “panic paper” was leaked. It was written by the German Secretary of the Interior, and in detail, in great detail, it explains how to get the population to panic.

For example, “We want to make children feel responsible for the tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they don’t wash their hands, if they don’t wear masks”, etc. That’s what it says. Explicit. This is insanity. That’s why we believe the people who are behind this are psychopaths and sociopaths. They’re using many many puppets because they’re bribing them, or there’s extortion, we don’t know.

But it’s not about money. They’re using money, but they don’t want money. Ultimately, money plays a big role in this. Because we believe that it’s the financial industry, or, better put, the financial mafia: Blackrock, Vanguard – which they’re using as vehicles to invest their money in and then these funds – invest their money in Deutsche Bank, VW, and all the other international global corporations. Thus, owning through I think 147 corporations, owning pretty much everything on this planet.

Um, so, this is what’s been going on for at least 30 years or so. It was about to blow up, this financial mafia scheme was about to blow up in 2008 and 9, which is when we had the first financial scandal; it started out as a housing scandal in the United States. I, coincidentally, had been going after these people, after Deutsche Bank in particular, for the same crimes which had been committed in Germany since 1992.

But I guess it’s the – because of the fact that the German courts of law, for some reason, now we know why, because they were stacked by their own people, didn’t want to follow up on this, they felt motivated, Deutsche Bank and others felt motivated to play this game on a much grander scale in the United States. That’s where the whole, we now call it ‘predatory lending schemes’, started.

This should’ve blown up in 2008 and 9. Um, lots of people stepped forward, including our chancellor, and our then secretary of finance, and “we’re gonna get these people, they’re gonna have to pay a price” – No. No one paid a price. The only thing that happened is that they started to print money. Truckloads of money.

In September of 2019, this whole thing was about to explode again. But, they – and they wanted to explode. But they wanted to explode, or implode, rather, on their terms. They want to… because there’s no other way. There’s no other way to solve this problem.

Because, if this explodes, in an uncontrolled way, then the people will understand that it’s the – we now call them the DAVOS clique, the people who regularly meet once a year on this platform of the World Economic Forum, all of them crooks and gangsters, mafia-like structures – then we would have found out that it’s these people and they’re mingling with its self-appointed corporate elites and the self-appointed political elites. The political elites are their own. They’ve bought them. They’ve trained them, through their Young Global Leaders program, for example. Private public partnership means a hostile takeover of our politicians, by them. We think it’s our politicians – no, it’s theirs.

So this whole thing would’ve exploded, and we all would’ve found out about it and they wanted to keep us from learning this, and that’s why they needed a distraction. And that’s why, in December of 2019, they came up with a corona pandemic, even though there were no cases. They needed to create – that’s what drove them into an early start, and that’s why they’re making so many mistakes. Apart from the fact that most of them are stupid as hell. But they’re making many many mistakes and that is helping us. Because they were driven into an early start.

They didn’t have any cases. Even in Wuhan, China. Which is where they, they claim the whole thing started. We don’t know if it’s true. They didn’t have any cases. So what they needed is cases. Why did they need cases? Because they needed to declare the international – what is it called – the Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Was short, PHEIC [pronounced “fake”]. PHEIC. Fake. So obvious. It’s in our faces.

But in order to declare this – and why did they need this? Not for the mask mandates. Not for social distancing. But they needed it for the introduction of untested new drugs. For the vaccines. Cause that is the only basis on which they can use untested new drugs. On the basis of an international health emergency. And that’s what this Public Health Emergency of International Concern is.

Therefore, didn’t have any cases, so they called Drosten. This – he’s neither a professor nor is he a doctor of medicine, he’s a fake. So they called him and told him, just as they had done 10 years earlier, or 20 years earlier during the bird flu, come up with a PCR test that will tell us about infections. And he claims he did that.

The two basic lies on which everything rides here is – come from him. One is, there are asymptomatic infections; of course there aren’t any. And even if there were they don’t play a role in this. The most recent study is that, which was conducted in Wuhan, with 10 million people involved, this is at the end of 2020 and it shows there are no asymptomatic infections. And this is a question of just of logic. You know? If you want to go – if you go see a doctor and tell him, “I have a problem.” The doctor – the first thing the doctor’s gonna ask you is, “What symptoms do you have?” What are you going to say? “I don’t have any!” Except Drosten and Fauci… yeah right. Go see an exorcist or something like that.

So there are no asymptomatic infections but he needed that. Or the W.H.O. which promoted his ideas and recommended them to the entire world, they needed this in order to make everyone afraid of everyone. Because even if you look perfectly healthy, you pose a potential danger, according to their logic. And then he came and said, “But I do have a solution for this. Because I have invented a new PCR test and I can tell you precisely who is infectious and who isn’t.”

That is the second lie. I’m saying ‘lie’ because we can prove that he lied when he said asymptomatic infections, cause he was referring, in a preprint, he was referring to a woman who traveled into Germany – Frankfurt, Germany from China, and he pointed at her as an example of someone having absolutely no symptoms but being very infectious, because she infected some people down in Southern Germany, in Bavaria. But another scientist read this preprint and pointed out to Drosten, “You’re wrong! This woman did have symptoms.” Because she was eating anti-flu medication and you don’t do that because it tastes so great. And ultimately it turned out she had been infected by her own parents and of course she had symptoms. She was sweating, etc., etc.

Second lie, he says, “I have invented the PCR test which will tell you who really is infectious”, and of course that’s a blatant lie because PCR tests as the real inventor, Kary Mullis, has said over and over and over again, is not for diagnostic purposes. It is for scientific purposes, but not for diagnostic purposes. Because it cannot tell the difference between dead and live matter. So when you test positive, it is very likely that it tests positive because the test finds the fragments of your body’s immune system’s fight against the common cold or the flu. It cannot tell the difference. Also, for someone to be infected with the virus, you need a whole virus to enter your cells and start replicating there. These tests – the Roche machines, all they see is fragments of virus; they never see whole viruses.

So for these two reasons, and there’s others, for these two reasons, it is absolutely totally, completely impossible for a PCR test to tell you anything about infections. On top of this, he, Drosten, and following his lead – the World Health Organization, who used, or which used his PCR test as a blueprint, they sent the test so that it was guaranteed to create false positives.

Last night, Mike Yeadon said, “Reiner, I think all of these cases were false positives. Not just 97%.” Why is he saying that? Well you take the, what you get from the nose and the throat, the swab, you can’t see anything because it’s invisible to the human eye. So you put them into the machines, all of them owned by Roche, they’re making truckloads of money right now, and in this machine you magnify the stuff that’s in there. It’s called cycles of amplification. 2, 4, 6 – 2, 4, 8, 16 – whatever. At 24 cycles of amplification, I think you’re in the billions of magnifying this stuff. At 24 cycles of amplification, even the Frankfurt Health Institute says we disregard anything that’s beyond that because it makes absolutely no sense.

Mike Yeadon says, remember, he’s the former Vice President of Pfizer, and he was their Chief Science Officer for 16 years, he says at 35 cycles of amplifications, you end up with at least 97 positives. The Drosten test and all the others were set at 45. So that’s how they created the cases, in order to be able to declare the Public Health Emergency of International Concern, in order to walk us through, make us obedient to walk us through mask mandates, social distancing, lockdowns, until finally we would agree to anything to have this end. Anything meaning, the deadly shots.”

Maria Zeee: “And speaking of the deadly shots, we – so we now know, that these, according to Karen Kingston, also an ex-Pfizer employee who’s been analyzing the patents, that these undoubtedly, all COVID-19 vaccines approved by the World Health Organization, have tracking abilities in them. They will not approve them, if they are not able to track citizens.

So on that note, knowing that these are kill shots, knowing that they’re able to track people, what are they trying to really do here, Dr. Fuellmich? Are they trying to reach this DAVOS clique, you know, this goal of reduced population that are easier to control… is this the final goal?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “I think it’s two-fold. They want, and they euphemistically call it population control, but it’s really about population reduction. Some people say that they want to reduce us to 500 million; I don’t know if that’s true. But population reduction is one of their major goals. That is definitely true.

Even Robert Malone, who said that if somebody had told him this a year ago, he would’ve said, “Yeah right.” And, myself! I mean, had you told me this a year and a half ago, I would’ve said, “Go take your pills. Go see a doctor. And things will get better.” No! In the meantime we’re running out of conspiracy theories. So this is one of their major goals.

The other one is, and that’s why all this tracking stuff comes into play, the other is to control the rest of us. To make us really into slaves. That will not think, that will not fight back, but that simply do as they’re ordered. So that’s why they’re trying to control us, why they’re trying to manipulate our DNA, through these mRNA shots.

There’s lots of experiments within this gigantic experiment going on. We don’t know what’s in the shot. Only they do. Our governments, as I said, are not our governments anymore. They’re completely controlled by the other side. This is especially true here in Europe where they’re about to install the first mini-world government – the real world government, as the pope who’s also in on this declared in his, what was it, ‘fratelli tutti’ thing in 2020. He said we must all submit to a new world government under the U.N. Yeah right.

But they’re gonna start with Europe, the program that they – the agenda that they’re following here is called HERA, Health Emergency Response Agency, and this is going to be the net result after it turns out that our national governments are incapable of dealing with this grave threat of the coronavirus.

I don’t think they’re going to get that far, because too many people have woken up in the meantime. And even here in Europe, where much of this is playing out, even here in Europe people are taking to the streets, again; hundreds of thousands of people, everywhere. In Italy, in particular in the former East European countries, and even in Germany again. So they’re not going to get much further than this.”

Maria Zeee: “We’ve seen many people taking it to the streets, Dr. Fuellmich, but it seems like the plan just keeps accelerating and accelerating. Do we think that it’s actually making a difference to these people that so many are protesting?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “I think it is. It’s a question of time until it will be absolutely impossible for them to sweep any of this under the rug. They have been able to do this because they have complete control of the mainstream media. But it is more and more obvious that even though nobody knows anyone who died of COVID or who suffered serious damage of COVID, all of a sudden EVERYONE knows someone who’s suffered serious problems, even death, after vaccination.

And this is another thing, latest figures are telling us, and this was confirmed by the CEO of an American life insurance company, that since the beginning of the measures, in particular, since the beginning of the shots of the vaccinations, we have had for the past year or so, we have excess mortality of 40%. This is unheard of. Totally unheard of. This cannot be swept under the rug much longer.”

Maria Zeee: “I agree. And some mainstream have had to start reporting – they don’t have a choice. Because too many people are talking about the people that they know that are now disabled or dead from the kill shot.

You mentioned the 4 people: Gates, Tedros, and a couple of others; this trial that’s going on. Can you give us more detail about that?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “I think i t’s gonna – we have put a lot of time and energy into this because we believe that it’s so important… because there’s so many people out there who’re talking about Nuremberg 2.0. What they really want is, they want us as lawyers, and as scientists, who are going to be our experts, they want us to show them the facts, and they want us to give them a legal platform, on which they can safely resist. 

We’ve come to this conclusion after we discussed this in great detail, in particular with people, very smart people, like Catherine Austin Fitts, who knows a lot about this, the aforementioned financial mafia structures. Which are doing their best to distract our attention from what they’ve been doing. We need not – of course we want – this is a formalized proceeding, patterned after the American grand jury investigation which shows all of the evidence we have, with real experts, with real witnesses, with real attorneys. We’re gonna have a real judge.

All of the evidence to the jury, which is going to be our viewers, and then ask them to return, to give us indictments against Drosten, who is their major puppet, as far as the PCR test is concerned. Fauci, Tedros, and of course Bill Gates. I don’t know how important these people are, they’re probably just figureheads. Maybe Bill Gates thinks that he’s one of them who pulls the strings. I don’t think he is, but we’ll see.

But much more important than these indictments, is to give the people full information. Verifiable information from real experts. People who really know what they’re talking about. Robert Malone, for example. He was on the other side, for a very long time. He knows everything that’s been going on there. So does Peter McCullough. So does Catherine Austin Fitts. I mean, she was a member of the American government, for awhile, and she’s also a very experienced investment banker.

So all of these people, including many of the politicians who have joined our ranks, will testify in great detail to what has really happened. To how this is a long planned agenda which is being rolled out in order to distract our attention from what is really going on. And what’s really going on is population reduction, and population control. And what is really going on is the deliberate destruction of our economies for the benefit of American platforms, such as Amazon, for example.

Whistleblowers have been telling us that at the same time the Chinese are taking over our and the American car industry. We don’t know how true that is, but there’s some evidence that shows us that it could be true. But whatever we’re seeing, it is two things: deliberate destruction of our economies, deliberate destruction of our health.

Maria Zeee: “And what can we, first of all, so this is happening in an international court, correct? [Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes.”] What we’ve seen in local courts is truly corruption of judges that throw out cases. [Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes.”] What are the chances of that happening in the international court? If all of this big players are in on it?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Excellent question. And I just spoke with a couple of my colleagues here in Germany. I just spoke with them a couple of minutes before – before we started your show. We think that if we’re lucky, we’re going to run into individual judges who are still willing to uphold the law.

However, here in Germany, that is next to impossible. Why is that? Because Germans traditionally have been very obedient for at least 150 years. Bismarck started all this. This is, it’s especially bad in the judiciary because back in the day, 150 years ago, you could only join the judiciary if you were completely in line with the government. So this is not an invention by Hitler. He made it worse, yeah. But it’s never gotten better.

And right now we can see the results of this decades long education. That has to change. I believe that if we want to make an inroad, if we want to make progress, on our international judicial levels, we’re going to have to start on an international level. We’re going to have to show the people that we, the people, are in charge. We do not need their system.

We, for example, even the American colleagues and our South African colleague, have been telling us, we’re starting our own judiciary. We’re already working on this. Because the system is so corrupt, we can’t depend on them anymore. This is not just true for the judiciary. It’s also true for the economic system, for the education system, we’re gonna have to start our own system. We’re gonna have to disconnect from these global corporations and global NGOs, revert – and focus on our regional economies on our regional governments, because this is really what it is. It’s back to the roots. That’s democracy.

That’s why I joined this new party, grassroots party here in Germany. Because they truly believe that we – the only people who really know what’s good for them is the people in the region. In our own communities. We cannot allow these people to control us through a world government. No way! We’ve seen how, where this got us. This is where it got us. And it can’t get any worse. That’s why we have to fight up, fight back; set up our own systems, including our own system of law, so that we can have all these regional governments, we can connect. Each of us can connect all of these separate systems can connect. But we should never again allow any global entity to rule over us.

Like this is what the W.H.O. is doing right now. No one, not even the lawyers, understand about the – what is it called? International Health Regulations? This is an invention of the W.H.O. This is not democracy. Democracy is when we vote for someone who’s going to represent us in parliament. No one, no one has elected these people at the World Health Organization.

I mean, keep in mind, Tedros, the guy who runs the show, their major puppet, I think they filed a criminal complaint against him in New York last year, for genocide. And I’ve seen pictures of him wearing a gun and dead people behind him. So, this is who we’re dealing with. It’s the mafia. [Maria Zeee: “He’s a known terrorist.”] Yes. He’s a known terrorist.”

Maria Zeee: “Yes. He’s giving the world health advice all of a sudden wanting to save humanity through the World Health Organization solutions. It’s unbelievable. What are the possible – what are the possible consequences for these murderers? What could come of this? Dr. Fuellmich. People are angry. People want justice.”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. I think we have to be very careful not to let this spin out of control into violence. Because that’s what they want. If we start to get… acting violently, I think they’re gonna try and bring in their own troops. If they have any. I don’t know about that. There’s lots of rumors – we haven’t been able to verify anything.

But we should continue with peaceful protests. We should also continue with the efforts to refocus on our regions, instead of this globalism. We will… there’s another factor to this. There’s 3 levels on which we, on which we have to fight.

One is, education. Bring out the truth. Expose them all. The other is, legal efforts. We have to continue with our legal efforts; in particular with the international legal efforts. But there’s also the spiritual side.

If, again, if you had told me about this a year ago, I would’ve said, “Yeah right. Take your pills.” But, this – and even Robert Malone agrees with that. I mean, he is a stone-cold scientist. We all agree that there’s something else. And that’s spirituality. Some call it religion; I’m not a religious person, because I don’t believe in organized religion. It’s all about power, in my view. But there is a spiritual side to this. And I think we’re going to get help from this spiritual side.

This is what connects us, by the way. This is why so many of us, despite the fact that they claim, “Oh, I’ve lost many friends.” Nah. Not really. These people were never our friends. But we’ve made so many new friends. People who we immediately felt connected with. Without having to even talk for an hour or so. But, there’s an immediate connection. So this spirituality is going to help us.

There is a spiritual force out there, and I’ve come to this conclusion after talking to someone from Australia. Aboriginal by the name of David Cole. Very smart man. And I reminded him, “David, I spoke to one of your people. A very famous, very old aboriginal by the name of Max.” He said, “Yeah, that’s Uncle Max! He guided us through the ceremony a couple of weeks ago, but unfortunately he passed away.”

Now this man, when I spoke to him, he made a great impression on me. Just like the indigenous people from Canada and the United States who I spoke with. They said, “We are, we’re on your side. We’re protecting you.” Because I for awhile thought, when I go running with my dogs, I mean, I’m a perfect target for them. And they said, “Well you are. But we’re gonna protect you. No matter what happens.” And I believe this is true. That’s why, when people tell me, “Don’t you feel that? Aren’t you scared?” Nah. I’m not scared. There’s no other way. We have to fight. All of us. We have to stand up and fight.”

Maria Zeee: “Many many people, Dr. Fuellmich, in this time, have asked for deeper answers, as to what’s wrong with the world. And what, you know, many people have run to God, in this time, to – for shelter, for comfort, for protection. For all of these things.

I, much like you, am a person that just does not feel fear. We have a task, we are on the right side of history, and we have to do this at whatever cost. But, again, what are the potential consequences for those that are guilty? If they are found guilty, what are the potential consequences for these people?

Reiner Fuellmich:They’re going to pay a very very very high price. Um, I think, ultimately, we the people will turn this thing around. It’s not the courts of law. The courts of law will then come in and clean up. In the aftermath.

There will be a – I’m absolutely convinced, there will be a, a real… a final reckoning. Which has been overdue for hundreds of years, probably. There will be a final reckoning. That’s why I think they’re going to pay a really steep price. And those who survive this, well, we’re going to deal with them in the courts of law.

Ultimately, if I look at the legal picture, which is evolving right now, but it’s clear enough. It’s like a huge puzzle of a thousand pieces but I think there’s only 10 or 15 pieces missing. So you can see exactly what’s going on. Despite the fact that a couple of pieces are still missing. So this is, Mike Yeadon is right. This – the facts that we can see, are compelling evidence – irrefutable evidence, for pre-meditated murder. And for that you have to pay a price. There is no immunity. Even under our legal systems. There is no immunity for anyone for pre-meditated murder. How can there be?

So all of the doctors, who are taking part in this, all of the pharmaceutical companies who are – which are taking part in this, everyone who’s involved in this, all of the people – all of the so-called VIPs, the politicians, who are trying to talk people into getting the shots, they’re all going to have to pay a very high price.

And this price, is… it’s, I mean you could throw out a figure, like, everyone who – EVERYONE, suffered damages because of what’s been going on for the past 2 years. EVERYONE. So if you start with a price tag in damages of a million dollars, that would probably be not too high. But we’re not talking about just a million dollars. In pain and suffering, for example. If that’s all you have. But there’s gonna be destroyed businesses, there’s gonna be your health destroyed. But if you start at 1 million dollars, and I think that’s a very low figure, you can multiply this, because we’re talking about intentional infliction of harm. Intentional infliction of harm leads us directly to, what the Americans call ‘punitive damages’.

Ultimately, the only way to pay for this, is by taking apart all of these global corporations, taking back what they stole from us, and using their money for a brand new society. One that’s humane, one that is built on cooperation, one that makes sense, in the human sense.”

Maria Zeee: “Will they go to prison?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. Those who survive the great reckoning, they’re definitely going to go to prison. Yes.”

Maria Zeee: “What do you mean by those who survive?”

Reiner Fuellmich:I think there’s gonna be a Great Reckoning and people, many of those who are… who are responsible, were stupid enough to take the shots themselves. I don’t think they’re gonna survive that. And I don’t have a clear image of how this spiritual reckoning is going to work. But I think they’re going to have to pay a really really really high price.

And that’s why I’m saying, the legal systems will – our new legal system, will deal with them. Those of them who are still there. But we’re only going to have to do the cleanup work, I think.”

Maria Zeee: “And have you got the support of lawyers all over the world, in every country committed to the cause? [Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes.”] I know that Tony Nikolic in Australia has been a great help. He’s a dear friend of mine and he’s helped me too. So…”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yeah. He’s a good – a great character. He’s a great activist. He’s tough. I love him. He’s cool.”

Maria Zeee: “And so you’ve got, you got people all over the world supporting you and on board with this. These public trials.”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. We’re a big team. It’s a team of people. There’s no ego involved in this. None of us has to prove anything to any of us. We’re doing it because we believe in what we’re doing. And we know that this is, ultimately, this is really a fight of good against evil. And we know we’re the good guys. We know it.”

Maria Zeee: “And this new system, this new society, who’s responsible for dictating how that goes?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “No one. It’s just us. We’re all going to set up our own systems of – in our own regions. We’re first going to start in our region. Because – and we’re all different. That’s why I keep telling the people here in Europe, get rid of this f*cking EU. The EU is only – it’s an instrument to steal money from the people, from the member states of the EU. That’s why it was a very smart move of the British to leave the EU. And now the former Eastern European countries are about to leave the EU as well.

We’re going to have to start from scratch. Build up our own systems, supplies systems, as far as energy, as far as food is concerned, in our regions. And then connect with each other. Exchange ideas. But never again shall we allow anyone to rule from above; from very far away.”

Maria Zeee: “And will we have an exposure of all of these organizations, all of these companies, everyone involved? Will that all be uncovered?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. I think absolutely. No one’s going to get away.”

Maria Zeee: “How can the public track this, and track what’s going on?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “I think it’s already happening. The news cannot be suppressed any more. As I said, all of these so-called side effects, which are not side effects, really, of the vaccinations, cannot be swept under the rug anymore. 40% excess mortality; I mean, what more can you say?

But if you want to – if you want to keep, or if you want to get detailed information, we, the Corona Committee, I don’t want to heap all this praise on ourselves, but the Corona Committee has interviewed over 150 experts from all walks of science.

Luc Montagnier, he’s a professor who won a Nobel Prize, from France. Catherine Austin Fitts, I already mentioned her. Dr. Mike Yeadon. Robert Malone. Peter McCullough. All of these people, we have interviewed them in great detail.

Robert Malone was very hesitant, at first. This is a few months ago. But in these few months, he has completely come around and understood that what he thought was conspiracy theories, involving the W – the World Economic Forum, for example, is absolutely true. And he says it’s in our face! You can read it. They’re publishing this! They’re so stupid. They’re really stupid.

But, we must not underestimate them, we must take them seriously, because they have paid a lot of people a lot of money to do their bidding and many of them are in strategically important positions. So we have to deal with these people. And we will. And we will.”

Maria Zeee: “And this plan, for the “great reset”, potentially, the cyber COVID shutting down all the networks… Do we know any more about that?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Anything is possible. I don’t think it’s going to happen. There’s so many rumors out there. There’s so much panic mongering. Much of this is part of the illusion that they’re creating. Much of this is part of the psychological operation, which depends to a large degree on keeping us disoriented, keeping us in a panic-mode.

Keeping us in a position – there’s a… what is it called? The Biderman Chart of Coercion? Incredible. You should look this up. This is from the 1950’s or so. It is a deliberate psychological operation which Professor Mattias Desmet explained to us, it’s as though they are, and he says it’s not ‘as though’, it is, they’re hypnotizing 30% of the population. This is how it works with 30% of the population. You cannot reach them anymore. Because if you’re hypnotized, you can’t see anything, you can’t feel anything.

And he compared this with an old Chinese technique. They, in China, they still perform surgery – not all of them, but in some cases by hypnotizing people. So if you have open heart surgery, and you’re being hypnotized, of course you can’t listen to anything. You will not hear anything we’re telling them. So that’s what he said.

But! The good news is, 40% of the population can still be reached. 40% are sort of sitting on the fence, don’t know which way to get off, and they can still be approached by us. And more and more of them are waking up. Including those who have gotten the shots. Because they feel that they’ve been fooled. All of a sudden, they’re telling – they’re getting, they’re being told, “No! You’re unvaccinated because you haven’t gotten your third shot, or your fourth shot.” And this is just going too far.

Maria Zeee: “Or your fifth! In the Netherlands. Your fifth, now. My goodness. And, are the number of people that are vaccinated, what they’re telling us true? Because we just had a report out of the UK, stating that there’s only 25 million that have – 25 million that have not even received 1 dose.”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yeah. I think, I think the numbers are completely false. They’re lying to us. They’re lying whenever they’re opening up their mouths. Here in Germany, we believe that 40% of the population have not been vaccinated yet. They claim that 80%, or more, have been vaccinated. But we don’t believe that.

The same is true in the United States. Except in the United States it’s even worse, as far as they’re concerned. Because we believe that maybe 50%, maybe 55% have been vaccinated. But no more.

And now people from the health care industry are beginning to walk off their jobs. They’re gonna, they’re gonna shut down the entire healthcare business, and we’re gonna do the same in Austria and in Germany. Because we have founded unions, and one of the most important sections of these unions is the healthcare section. Because we know that many members of the healthcare business, including nurses, for example, in particular nurses, will not get the shots. So they need protection. And that’s why we founded these unions.”

Maria Zeee: “Right. And these unions, you plan to extend them globally? Everywhere? [Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. Yes.”] Set up for those people?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. We’re already discussing this amongst ourselves with the international group of lawyers. Yeah.”

Maria Zeee: “That’s wonderful news. That’s wonderful news. So, so there is hope. [Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes.”] Many people are feeling like it is a lost cause, and the World Health Organization gave us this, this deadline of the 1st of July, 2022, to fully vaccinate 70% of the world. And what is fully va- what is “fully vaccinated” mean to them, by the 1st of July as they keep moving the goalpost?

But we are saying that there is hope. So… what, Dr. Fuellmich, you go to Telegram, and the website that the people can find you on as well, the – my apologies, the Corona Investigative Committee?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yeah. You can find it – I think much of this is in English. Or I think there’s a button “ENGLISH”. If you push that then everything comes up in English. Um, I don’t know a lot about these IT things, but if you want to look it up, the German – the website is corona-ausscuss.de [correction: corona-ausschuss.de]. Ausschuss is a German word for committee. And of course I have my telegram channel, which my friend and our manager Corvin Rabenstein, handles.

And I mean, I get hundreds and hundreds of emails every day. But my colleagues filter them so that ultimately I get about a hundred per day. But then there’s another 150 or so text messages through Threema, Telegram, Signal, Wire – all of these messenger services. Plus I have to write my briefs. Last night I wrote a couple of briefs, plus I have to do interviews, beyond Zoom calls and phone conferences, etc., etc. But, I know it’s worth it. And I know we’re making progress.

Maria Zeee: “That’s good to hear. What I’ll do, is after this interview, I will include those links for the audience so that they can track what’s going on, on your Telegram. Will there be an announcement on your Telegram about this 2 week international – [Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes.”] Yes? There will be?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. There will be – we’re going to try and get as much attention for this trial, because there’s so many really good people working on this. As much attention as possible. Because we do know that, as Catherine Austin Fitts says, it’s not just about getting the indictments, it’s about giving the people factual and a legal platform on which to stand up, rise up, and fight these bastards.

We’re probably going to have a couple of constitutional law professors who will give us their view on whether we can really do this. Because the German constitution, unlike all of the others, has a section: 20 subsection 4, which explicitly gives the people a right to resist if there is evidence that someone is trying to over – is trying to get rid of the constitution or democracy altogether.

And, there’s not just some evidence, there’s clear and convincing evidence that that’s what’s happening right now. Because they’re trying to introduce a fascist system, and that’s why they have to get rid of democracy.”

Maria Zeee: “And how do the people get involved while… with what’s happening?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “I think the most important thing is to just get the information and spread it. Give the information to as many people as possible. Because that is what empowerment is all about. You have to know what’s going on. You have to know the true facts.”

Maria Zeee: “Well I certainly think that telling people that are on the fence that there are international crimes against humanity being, you know, being lodged – cases being lodged for this, surely, that this would prick up their ears. I mean, I personally been talking to people who are saying there’s no way I’m going back for more. This is ludicrous.

So there are people that are waking up and yes, you’re right. 30% of the population, they cannot wake up; they may even believe, after it’s all out in the open, that this was all for our health. But the power is still in the people.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, thank you so much.

For the audience, please do subscribe to this channel; I will include all the links at the bottom in the end. Thank you for watching and share this information everywhere. Everyone must know that the lies are being exposed. They can no longer hide this plan. This global mass depopulation, kill-shot, has to stop.

Goodnight everyone. And goodnight, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich.”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Thank you, and good luck. Do not give up. Fight.”

Maria Zeee: “Thank you. We will not stop. Goodnight everyone.”

REFERENCED LINKS:

Dr. Mike Yeadon: Evidence for Premeditated Mass Murder
Foundation Corona Committee: https://corona-ausschuss.de/en/
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s Telegram: https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS: What is occurring around us is no less than a huge global overreach of abuse and power through means of extortion, malfeasance and deception. And as more information is being revealed, it is getting clearer that all of these different groups – multiple governments/politicians, agencies (WHO, UN, WEF, NIH, FDA, NHS, CDC, DARPA, etc.), pharma companies (Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson&Johnson, etc.), and other institutions (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Johns Hopkins University, MIT, Wuhan Lab, etc.), including many mainstream media channels, have been colluding together to bring this totalitarian agenda on to humanity.

It’s not just about enacting legal ramification on the deadly vaccines and the manufacturers. There is a much bigger plot involved in this sinister scheme, and it involves companies and organizations throughout the whole world which have been infiltrated and perpetuating this global dictatorship behind the scenes for many decades.

But now it’s up to us, the rest of the people, to end this madness and refuse to participate in this hostile takeover – DO NOT COMPLY / DO NOT CONSENT to this tyranny.

God bless you all, and many, many thanks to Reiner Fuellmich, Mike Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts, and everyone else who is remaining strong and defending humanity from this oppressive assault on our rights and freedom.

*Featured image/screenshot credited to: Maria Zeee@rumble / Reiner Fuellmich

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

BREAKING: Attorney Thomas Renz reveals DoD data proving covid vaccines WORSEN infections and hospitalizations

“60% of hospitalized cases are breakthroughs”

As more and more information comes out, even from the CDC, WHO, FDA, etc.’s own admission, it is getting harder and harder to refute the fact that the COVID vaccines are absolutely unnecessary and are, in fact, even more dangerous than “COVID” itself. There is no justifiable reason to continue this egregious mandatory farce, and those who keep endorsing this obvious malfeasance should absolutely be held complicit in these crimes.

The following interview expands upon the DoD documents which shows a trend that is now becoming common place (although HIGHLY condemned as “misinformation” at the beginning – though it is to be said, big tech and mainstream media is STILL labeling even information from the government and health agencies’ own websites as “misinformation”…) that shows that individuals who are fully vaccinated are more at risk for a “breakthrough infection”.

And keep in mind, as more data is coming out, showing that the COVID situation may have been pneumonia/flu, HCAP (healthcare associated pneumonia) all along (perhaps even brought about due to an organized experimental campaign) , disguised as a “new virus”, the vaccines themselves, therefore, are causing these legitimate various illnesses and diseases amongst those who have taken it.

The below video is a full transcript of the interview between Attorney Thomas Renz and Mike Adams discussing the DoD/Humetrix documents that was revealed to Attorney Renz through a whistleblower account. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Mike Adams: “Welcome to brighteon.tv. Mike Adams here. Today we’re going to be joined by attorney Thomas Renz from Renz Law.

He has breaking news about new aggregate data that was compiled by a branch, an artificial intelligence branch of the Department of Defense. It’s called the JAIC. It’s called Project Salus. And the aggregate data was brought in about 5.6 million medicare patients from a company called Humetrix, which runs the data analytics platform for medicare outcomes.

Now, this is bombshell information that obliterates the official narrative of Biden and Fauci, which falsely claims that we’re experiencing a pandemic of the “unvaccinated”. These data that you are about to see, we’re going to show you the slides, courtesy of Attorney Thomas Renz. These data blow that away. So stay with us, we’ll be right back with Thomas Renz. This is brighteon.tv.

All right, welcome back. Mike Adams here, thank you for joining me. We’re going to welcome Attorney Thomas Renz right now to the program.

Thomas, how are you doing today, sir? It’s great to have you on.”

Thomas Renz: “I’m – you know, I’m doing great, Mike. I really appreciate it. 

Mike Adams: “Well, absolutely. Now, you have this bombshell document from the Department of Defense; I gave a little bit of an intro there, but you want to go ahead and tell us the big picture of what we’re looking at?

Thomas Renz: “Yeah, so, in my whistleblower stuff that we’ve been talking about a lot lately – we say that the fact that in the prior FDA presentation, they had said that, you know, they were going to monitor CMS for outcomes and for vaccine safety and things like that. Well, it turns out that that is correct, apparently. That is exactly what we did. They’ve monitored CMS.

So using that same CMS data that we’ve just broke a whole bunch of information on, the Department of Defense, through Humetrix, put out something on the 28th of September. At least, that’s the date on the front of this, talking about these vaccines. There’s just an immense amount of stuff in here, talking about how their effectiveness wanes over time. But probably the biggest and most important thing in here is this, and I’m going to read this, it’s a direct quote: “60% of hospitalized cases are breakthroughs” after the delta variant hit 90%, right? “71% of COVID cases are breakthroughs”, and then we get delta at 90%.”

Mike Adams: “And just, let me just, for the audience, “breakthrough” means someone was previously fully vaccinated, and essentially breakthrough means vaccine failure. That they were infected anyway.”

Thomas Renz: “Yeah, yeah. So when Biden and his crew are telling us that this is a problem with the unvaccinated, why are 60% of the break- of the hospitalized people who are fully vaccinated? 60% are FULLY VACCINATED, in the hospitals. 

Now by the way, Mike, so within this document, it also makes really clear: until you are 14 days post full vaccination, you’re not counted. So what that means for the audience is, that if you got Pfizer or Moderna, you had to have both shots, if you had Janssen you only had to have the one, and then 14 days later. So if you only got one shot and got sick or got hospitalized, it doesn’t count. If you’ve had, you know, both shots but got sick within 14 days it doesn’t count. So still, despite all of that, we’re looking at a 60% hospitalization – 60% of the hospitalized cases. 60%!”

Mike Adams: “So… looking at slide 2, from this 17 slide set, I also want to bring attention to the summary, just to underscore what you just said, it outlines that the effectiveness of vaccines wanes over time. All the way out to 6 months, where a person who was previously vaccinated has a 2.5 times higher odds, they say – they use the word ‘odds’ – 2.5 times odds factor increase of being infected or hospitalized with COVID. So the vaccine actually makes outcomes worse over time.

And then the other bombshell from this, I think, though there are many, as you said, but one of them is that for, for those who are unvaccinated, their risk of infection and hospitalization is falling over time. Compared – even as delta is rising, the risk of unvaccinated people getting sick is falling, falling, falling, falling. So… wow! I mean, if these continue, look where it’s going.”

Thomas Renz: “Yeah, well, I mean, so if you look also on that second page, we got a couple of other really important things to look at there, right? So this statement, “Prior COVID-19 infection has a major protective effect” – MAJOR protective effect. That’s because as we all know, there is no stronger immunity than natural immunity. So once you’ve survived this, you’re golden. 

The other thing is, is it’s kind of interesting, because, you know, this really, I think, is very demonstrative. And we don’t have all their data. But based on what I’m seeing, this is really showing the ADE, right? This is showing that, or at least providing indication based on the overall analysis of this, that the people who are getting the vaccine, you know, instead of this disease getting less dangerous and more contagious, as usual, for some people, particularly it looks like the people who have gotten it, it looks like it’s getting more dangerous.

And I mean, you know typically when this started out according to the curve and what they’re saying, you know, you had a really high death and hospitalization rate when COVID first came out. And then typically that drops off with any disease. Now, you’re seeing it really bumping back up. And there should – and it’s really a, you know, it looks very much like what we were all afraid of – that we’d have a massive ADE type situation going on this fall, where we had a stronger, more dangerous variant, especially for the people who went out and got the shot.”

Mike Adams: “Yeah, that – that’s exactly right. And by the way, I want to mention, it was slide 15 that I think you were referring to earlier; I’m looking at it now. It says 71% of COVID-19 cases are breakthroughs, in weeks after the delta variant became more than 90% of the detected variant. So, that’s critical to the record, guys, and we’re talking almost three-fourths of the hospitalizations are people who were vaccinated.”

Mike Adams (continued): “But there’s something else here, Thomas. The very last slide, this is another bombshell: the risk model for breakthrough hospitalization, in this slide, it talks about how Native Americans have the highest increase risk of hospitalization after vaccination, of any ethnic group. And then Hispanic is underneath that, and Black-Americans are further down the list, but think about it. You know, this is hitting Native Americans more than any other group, and yet nobody is warning the Native American community about what is effectively ADE from vaccines.”

Thomas Renz: “Well, and yeah, and I mean, so listen. These vaccines seem to have a disproportionate impact on certain minority communities. Now that’s not something that I’ve really been able to flesh out in a way where I can say, “Listen, we know this for sure.” And I haven’t got the experts, and I – you know I am, I don’t say it unless I can prove it. But I have heard numerous, numerous reports about the dangers these vaccines pose to the minority communities especially. It has to do with certain genetic differences – um, you know, I just don’t have, I don’t have enough to really go on record and say it for sure, but it sure does look like that.

But, luckily for us, I also just got a report, that in New York City, you know, one of the most vaccinated places in the universe, only 26% of African-Americans are vaccinated. If that’s true, good! Good! I said yesterday in an interview, I said, there’s not a whole lot of times in my life where Louis Farrakhan and I have been on the same page, but when it comes to this vaccine, we’re dead on there. So – “

Mike Adams: “Well yeah, exactly right. Louis Farrakhan, I also agree with his point on this particular issue. He’s absolutely correct. And he, among many people in different sectors of Black communities across America, he is nation of Islam, but there are many other different groups of course, they are recognizing that this appears to be a, in their view, a biological weapon targeting Blacks and Hispanics and basically people of dark skin. Now, from a medical science point of view, though, dark skin also blocks vitamin D production upon exposure to sunlight. So this could also be a vitamin D deficiency colliding with vaccine mortality or ADE problems. Perhaps vitamin D deficiency causes an exaggeration of ADE, but that’s just conjecture at this point. As you said, we don’t have supporting data, but it’s a plausible theory.

Thomas Renz: “Yeah, yeah. I would agree with you. And like I said, there’s just been something that’s been kind of very quietly kicked around amongst experts, and we just haven’t had anyone that’s done the proper studies to know. But you know, if I were, if I were a person of color, I would certainly want to know, you know, where are these studies? Why aren’t we looking at these numbers? You know? Where are they? So I’m hoping they come out.

But I mean, regardless of what they do, and regardless of ethnic issues, 60%. 60%. I mean, what more can you say? And, and – I mean, this is a disastrous number, and it’s an outright lie. This is from a weekly report, right. This is a weekly report. So just as we said last week on our whistleblower presentation, you know, this is something that they’re supposed to be getting briefed on regularly, which it appears that they are.

Biden, Fauci, all these guys – I mean you can see where they talk about they reference the CDC and different things, you know, graphs from CDC presentation, things like that throughout this. There is zero question these guys know this. They’re lying to the American people outright. This is a crooked marketing project for big pharma, big tech, big government, at the expense of American lives, and it’s got to stop.

This is it. This is smoking gun. You know, we had – we had the whistleblower stuff that’s on renz-law.com. You can look at that. This presentation’s going to be up there. How much evidence do we need to put out before someone’s held accountable for this?”

Mike Adams: “Well, that’s my next question to you. Would you support a call for the FDA withdrawing it’s emergency use authorization or so-called approval of these vaccines, based on these new data from the DoD’s artificial intelligence project? I mean, is this, you said it’s a smoking gun. Is it enough in your view to say, we’ve got to halt all the vaccines?”

Thomas Renz: “I don’t think there’s any question it’s enough. This is illegal from the start. From the start under the EUA rules, and the – actually the law for an EUA, there has to be a risk benefit analysis. Well, there was never – I mean, 1% absolute risk reduction was never enough to warrant authorizing something that had no long-term studies. Now, we not only have a 1% absolute risk reduction, but we have a very clear case of an increased danger.

I mean, go get the vaccine. You can get COVID again. Congratulations. You know. If you survive it, then you know, you’ll probably have stronger immunity, assuming that the vaccine hasn’t destroyed your immune system. You know, this is – there is literally no legal justification for this vaccine being available at all. Let alone the fact that they tried to prove a vaccine that isn’t even out yet. You know, that, that’s a whole ‘nother story.

But this has to be withdrawn. Fauci has to be charged criminally; he needs to be in jail and there needs to be RICO, RICO suits, and I’m going to do this right here, right now, Mike. I’m going to call – I want any attorneys that are willing to do so, I’m going to put a button up on my website that says, you know, now hiring/taking volunteers, something. I don’t know. I’ve never put a button up. And if you’re willing to volunteer, or to work, or whatever, if I’ve got funding I’ll pay you. But if you’re willing to help, I want to do a RICO case against the entire trusted news initiative for covering this up, because they’ve been bought off by pharma. RICO, the FDA, Fauci, all these people that is one giant criminal conspiracy. We need to sue their butts and they need to be in jail.”

Mike Adams: “Well I think many viewers would agree with your assessment, but – so you’re talking about organized crime, racketeering, this is um… it’s, it’s a pretty high standard of proof in order to prove such cases. The DOJ is unlikely to want to prosecute this because the DOJ is probably part of the organized criminal operation. Would – would you say that?”

Thomas Renz: “Yeah. But we can do a civil case. We could do a civil case. And I’m all on board for it. I just need to get some experts and RICO, because I’m not a RICO expert. I need to get some people who are willing to help fight this. Because we don’t have enough attorneys. But I think we need to file a major suit.

I mean, listen, we know this entire trusted news initiative has been bought off by Gates Foundation, by big pharma, by all these different groups. We know how that works. We got all sorts of evidence on it. We know that the FDA, the CDC, we know – we got, right here, rock-solid evidence. These guys know that they’re lying when they say it’s safe and effective. They know that we know that they’re lying when they’re pushing this out there.

I don’t know how it could be anything but fraud, and I think we need a massive lawsuit to the tune of probably trillions, to get back the – to get back the just a portion of the damage these people have done on the American economy, on the world economy, to the lives and families of these people. This is so outrageous it is beyond words. In history, in history, I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything in the American world that compares with the lies we’re seeing here. It’s just horrific.

Mike Adams: “Since you’re bringing up history, many people have called for international tribunals. War crimes tribunals against some of the individuals and organizations that you just named. Is RICO even enough? Does this need to go to more of a Nuremberg level of investigation of potential prosecution?”

Thomas Renz: “Well, so legally that would require a buy-in from our political leaders, and since most of them should actually be charged, I’m not sure that they’re going to do that, but yeah, I mean, I certainly think that this is a war crimes type thing. There’s no question what’s happened. There is zero question.

 

At this point, you know, you could argue that you didn’t believe my whistleblower. Okay, fine. How about – how about a document with the stamp from the DoD on it? Do you believe that? I mean, what do we gotta do? This is their words. This is as smoking of a gun as you can get.

Yes. There should definitely be an international war crimes tribunals for this. This is absolutely a violation of the principles of Nuremberg. By the way, World War II, you know this Mike. You know, this started out by trying to paint the Jews as unclean. And putting them in ghettos and, you know, testing vaccinations on them. That’s where this all started. Now we got to stop this before we get anyone – it gets any – goes any – who knows where they’re going with this. What I do know is that we’re not going there.”

Mike Adams: “But that’s my next question. The vaccines have already been administered according to the CDC to over 200 million Americans. We see from the data that you’ve just shown us here, that the outcomes worsen over time. Since you can’t undo a vaccine, where is this going? What does this mean for people who got vaccinated and are now looking at these data and saying, “Woah! What happens in November? Or December? January?” What are we looking at here, really?”

Thomas Renz: “Well if – so early on, what I had suggested was that this was going to be something where you’re going to be stuck getting booster shots for the rest of your life or die. Now, I don’t know if that’s going to be the case or not, but what I do know, is the best I can do for those people right now is pray and hope that we can find a way to undo the genetic modifications that they’ve done to themselves.

Because, you know, I mean, listen, we also in that whistleblower presentation, we laid out, this is a gene therapy. This is changing your genetics. So, I don’t know how we undo that, but what I do know is you all have been experimented on, with a dangerous experiment, that it turns out is going really badly, or maybe just as planned. I don’t know. But what I do know is it looks like it’s a real bad thing. It looks like there’s more people and more danger every day, and – nobody wanted to believe us. When you and I, Mike, were talking about this early on, no one wanted to believe it. But now – “

Mike Adams: “But now, right. The data are clear. So, just to refocus people on this, this is from the JAIC, division of the DoD. The JAIC uses artificial intelligence algorithms to study things like COVID-19 induced supply line disruptions. So they are out there trying to pinpoint critical supply failures in the supply chaining, including for parts for the military itself. They then took that A.I. system and they applied it to this Humetrix data set of 5.6 million Medicare recipients and their health outcomes, and then they were able to spot these patterns and they put it all in chart form.

So, you know, one of the big astonishing things about this, Tom, and thank you for sharing this and coming on to comment about it is, aren’t the people who, who are looking at this, aren’t they freaking out too? I mean, within the DoD, surely they see what this is!”

Thomas Renz: “You know, that’s a great question. I got to be honest with you, Mike. It – listen. This looks – makes it look really clear that they’ve been looking at it for awhile. Right? I mean, when you look at this, it’s a weekly report. So it’s not like this is new information. It’s been out for awhile. It’s been clear where the trends are going.

I – you know, to me, I don’t know how you argue that this is, you know, what, you’re sitting on your hands? You know? Because, I don’t know. On one side we can give them the benefit of the doubt and say, “Well this was such a political disaster that they just didn’t know what to do with it.” or, on the other side, you could just say, “Listen, this was intentional.”

I don’t know what it is, but either way there’s a lot of people dying and going to die that don’t need to die. And by the way, they’re lying here, which they are. Obviously we got – I mean, their evidence; this is as good as it gets. If they’re lying here, what else are they lying about? You remember, you know, we’ve been pushing early treatment: Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, D, zinc, all these different things. Hey. We’ve got doctors with thousands of people that have been treated with this and not die. THOUSANDS!

 

They’re lying about that too. [editor’s note to clarify: The CDC, NIH, FDA, etc. is lying that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine don’t work] And P.S., I think I got some more data that just came in not too long ago. I haven’t had time to analyze it yet, that will show exactly that. So just, stay tuned. We’ll have more. We’re not done.”

Mike Adams: “Okay. And just a little flashback to something that you recently put out, that you have a whistleblower who has access to the Medicare aggregate data system, that showed close to 50,000 – I think it was 48,000 something deaths following vaccination of Medicare tracked patients. When are you going to get new data on, from that database, potentially?”

Thomas Renz: “Well, I’ve got, I’ve got stuff that I’m sending over, and you can put that up today if you’d like. You know, we’ve got a breakdown of a bunch more states. So, I think we’ve got 8 or 9 states now, with all their side effects, right? And by the way, just to be clear, that data is from the same servers that these guys are pulling from. So, so you know, if you want to doubt me before, it seems like this is pretty good vindication for me.

You know, you can look at these numbers. We’ve got them broken down – I know we’ve got New York, I know we’ve got California, I know we’ve got Ohio, we’ve got Florida, Texas, Missouri…

And you know, listen, look at this data and ask yourself, what is your governor doing? Because your governor should have access to this. Now thankfully in Texas and Florida you guys have governors who have kind of stood up. But if the words ‘safe and effective’ come out of their mouth, you need to show them this data, you need to show them this stuff, and you need to say, “Who the hell bought you?” Because that’s the ONLY way they can say this with a straight face, is if they’ve been bought and paid for.

And I don’t care who you are, it is very clear, they have or should have access to CMS data. If they’re not getting that then they’re not doing their homework or their public health people are lying to them. But guess what. They can’t claim ignorance any more because we put it out there.”

Mike Adams: “All right, all right. Well said. We’ve only got less than 2 minutes remaining here. I want to remind our audience your law firm is at renz-law.com. That’s the correct url, right?”

Thomas Renz: “Yes sir. Yes sir. Please check us out there. Renz-law.com.

Mike Adams: “Okay, and what do you say to all the people right now who themselves are dealing with legal issues with hospitals abusing their family members, or denying access to family members to – I mean, this is happening everywhere. I’m sure you’re getting flooded with requests for help, right?”

Thomas Renz: “Yeah. More than you can imagine. I’m praying for you, I’m praying for your families; it’s devastating to see. We’re trying to get cases developed on this as quickly as possible. They’ve done a ton of stuff to try and make it hard to sue these guys. ‘Cause they knew they were going to use them as killing fields. But we’re going to – we’re going to make them pay at some point.”

Mike Adams: “Okay, that’s great to know. And you also said previously, you can’t wait to sue over and over again, all of those who are complicit in this. Which is the – parts of the so-called media and big tech as well.”

Thomas Renz: “They’re going down. I want you to please – we’re going to get that button up as soon as possible. We want everybody that’s willing and able, click on that, tell us what you’re willing to do; we need good good people who are willing to bust their butts researching and writing.”

Mike Adams: “Okay. All right. Well said. Thomas, thank you so much for joining me today. It’s – your work is really courageous; you are doing amazing things to help save lives in this country. Thank you so much for joining us.”

Thomas Renz: “Thank you.”

Mike Adams: “All right. For those of you watching, feel free to repost this video on any platform – the original source is brighteon.tv. You can also find this on my channel: healthrangerreport@brighteon.com. Thank you for joining us today, and look for the article detailing this document at naturalnews.com. Thank you for joining us. God bless, take care.”

Note from Expanding Awareness Relations: As mentioned in the above interview, please visit the following links for more detailed information including more slides from the DoD documents and for additional Mike Adams videos:

RENZ LAW

BREAKING: AI-powered DoD data analysis program named “Project Salus” SHATTERS official vaccine narrative, shows A.D.E. accelerating in the fully vaccinated with each passing week

Health Ranger Report @ Brighteon

Thank you so much to Mike Adams and Thomas Renz for continuously bringing these important data and information to our attention. Your dedication and fortitude in standing strong against these tyrannical, unnecessary measures is incredibly needed and much appreciated during these perilous and unprecedented times.

And thank you to everyone who has stood up and spoken out against these nefarious agendas; and also thank you to everyone who is reading/watching and sharing these news to help get the word out about these corrupted organizations.

God bless.

Are These Findings the Death Blow for Vaccine Passports?

“COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus”

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca
Written by Joseph Mercola (September 17, 2021)

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

More than 15 studies now show the natural immunity you get after recovering from COVID-19 is far superior and more long-lasting than what you get from the COVID shot

Lawsuits challenge vaccine requirements that fail to accept natural immunity as an alternative to the COVID injection

Todd Zywicki, a law professor at George Mason University in Virginia, sued over the school’s vaccine mandate, which did not recognize natural immunity. The school settled out of court, granting Zywicki a medical exemption. They did not, however, change their general policy to recognize other staff and students who have natural immunity

Some of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed against Rutgers University in New Jersey also object to the vaccine mandate on the basis that they have natural immunity. This lawsuit is still pending

Since COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus, and COVID-jabbed individuals carry the same viral load when symptomatic as unvaccinated individuals, the argument that vaccine passports will identify and separate “public health threats” from those who are “safe” to be around simply falls apart

*

While governments around the world are going full steam ahead with plans for vaccine passports, two key things have occurred that blow irreparable holes in the whole argument.

First, more than 15 studies now show the natural immunity you get after recovering from COVID-19 is far superior and longer-lasting than what you get from the COVID shot, and secondly, lawsuits have challenged vaccine requirements that fail to accept natural immunity as an alternative to the COVID injection. Other lawsuits highlighting the illegalities of vaccine mandates have also been filed.

The Zywicki Case

As reported by the New York Post,1 August 4, 2021, when George Mason University in Virginia decided to implement a vaccine mandate, law professor Todd Zywicki sued.2 Mason recovered from COVID-19 in 2020 and has natural immunity, as demonstrated by several antibody tests. One of his attorneys, Harriet Hageman, stated:

Common sense and medical science should underpin GMU’s actions. Both have gone missing with this latest effort to force a distinguished professor to take a vaccine that he does not need — not for his own protection nor for anyone else’s safety at Scalia Law School.”

The lawsuit pointed out that people with natural immunity have an increased risk of adverse reactions to the COVID shot — according to one study3 up to 4.4 times the risk of clinically significant side effects — and that the requirement not only violates due process rights and the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment, but is not compliant with the Emergency Use Authorization.4

A Win for GMU Professor but No Legal Precedent

August 17, 2021, George Mason University caved before the case went to trial and granted Zywicki a medical exemption to the vaccine requirement.5 Unfortunately, and irrationally, the school did not revise its general policy. As reported by Citizens Journal:6

“The school’s acknowledgment of natural immunity is significant given the serial case of amnesia that seems to have overtaken the world on this basic point of biology.

However, the school still maintains the vaccination requirement for all other members of the GMU community, regardless of naturally acquired immunity. At the time of this writing, the same medical exemption has not been offered on a broader scale.

Furthermore, the lawsuit would have served as an interesting test case for vaccine mandate-related litigation, which will become more prevalent as time goes on. Regardless, the victory still serves as a sliver of hope that some universities will entertain reasonable arguments and that individuals can fight back with litigation …

With the GMU case resolved without trial, many critical legal arguments went untested. For example, does the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause apply to vaccine mandates, or does the state have the ability to suspend such rights when responding to a public health emergency?

How does the reliability of natural immunity affect the constitutionality of policies that fail to recognize it? Can the government simply cherry-pick whatever science it wants to justify its policies? According to the court filing,7

‘The Supreme Court has recognized that the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual’s right to privacy. A ‘forcible injection … into a nonconsenting person’s body represents a substantial interference with that person’s liberty[.]’ Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 229 (1990).’

Given this precedent, as well as the state’s police powers to suspend individual rights under compelling circumstances, how will this apply to Covid-19 in a low-risk environment such as a college campus?

If the right still holds, how will it apply to city-wide vaccine passport programs, given that Covid-19 is a relatively mild disease? … The move is also mysterious, given the relevance of the matter. As a result, it did not create a binding legal precedent.”

In a statement, lead counsel Jenin Younes with the New Civil Liberties Alliance, said:8

“NCLA is pleased that GMU granted Professor Zywicki’s medical exemption, which we believe it only did because he filed this lawsuit. According to GMU, with the medical exemption, Prof. Zywicki may continue serving the GMU community, as he has for more than two decades, without receiving a medically unnecessary vaccine and without undue burden.

Nevertheless, NCLA remains dismayed by GMU’s refusal — along with many other public and private universities and other employers — to recognize that the science establishes beyond any doubt that natural immunity is as robust or more so than vaccine immunity.”

Other Lawsuits Challenging Schools’ Vaccine Mandates

While not specifically centered around the validity of natural immunity, a lawsuit filed by more than a dozen students and Children’s Health Defense against Rutgers University in New Jersey does include this aspect, as some of the plaintiffs object to the mandate on the basis that they have natural immunity. This lawsuit was filed in mid-August 20219 and is still pending.

Earlier this year, in April 2021, the Los Angeles Unified School District was sued over its vaccine requirement by California Educators for Medical Freedom and the Health Freedom Defense Fund.10July 27, a California court dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice, as it concluded the LAUSD had voluntarily abandoned its mandatory vaccine requirement. As reported by The Defender:11

“This is a BIG win — because of the lawsuit, LAUSD represented to the court on the record that it does not have a policy requiring vaccination with EUA products. Since the court has now confirmed the absence of any policy requiring vaccination at LAUSD, all teachers and staff are safe to return to work without vaccination or furnishing proof of vaccination in the fall.”

Time will tell if the Children’s Health Defense case against Rutgers University will bring the legal precedent needed to more effectively thwart this tyrannical trend. Still, even smaller wins like Zywicki’s are important and demonstrate there are ways we can fight back, if only we’re willing.

Natural Immunity Surpasses Vaccine-Induced Protection

While vaccine passports are immoral and unconstitutional in and of themselves, medical science is also proving them useless and irrational. As reported by Daniel Horowitz in an August 25, 2021, article in The Blaze,12 there are at least 15 studies that show natural immunity from previous infection is more robust and longer-lasting than what you get from the COVID shot. He writes:

“The debate over forced vaccination with an ever-waning vaccine is cresting right around the time when the debate should be moot for a lot of people. Among the most fraudulent messages of the CDC’s campaign of deceit is to force the vaccine on those with prior infection, who have a greater degree of protection against all version of the virus than those with any of the vaccines.

It’s time to set the record straight once and for all that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is broader, more durable, and longer-lasting than any of the shots on the market today. Our policies must reflect that reality.”

We now have data showing vaccine immunity rapidly wanes regardless of variants, but especially when a new variant becomes predominant. According to the Mayo Clinic, as of July 2021, Pfizer’s COVID injection was only 42% effective against infection,13 which doesn’t even meet the Food and Drug Administration’s requirement of 50% efficacy14 for COVID vaccines.

This matches Israeli data, which show Pfizer’s shot went from a 95% effectiveness at the outset, to 64% in early July 2021 and 39% by late July, when the Delta strain became predominant.15,16 Pfizer’s own trial data also demonstrate rapidly waning effectiveness. BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi discussed this in an August 23, 2021, blog.17

By the fifth month into the trial, efficacy had dropped from 96% to 84%, and this drop could not be due to the emergence of the Delta variant since 77% of trial participants were in the U.S., where the Delta variant didn’t emerge until months later. So, even without a predominance of a new variant, effectiveness drops off. In an August 20, 2021, report, BPR noted:18

“‘The data we will publish today and next week demonstrate the vaccine effectiveness against SARS COVID 2 infection is waning,’ the CDC director [Rochelle Walensky] began … She cited reports of international colleagues, including Israel ‘suggest increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early’ …

‘In the context of these concerns, we are planning for Americans to receive booster shots starting next month to maximize vaccine induced protection. Our plan is to protect the American people and to stay ahead of this virus,’ Walensky shared …

The CDC director appears to all but admit that the vaccine’s efficacy rate has a strict time limit, and its protections are limited in the ever-changing environment.”

You’re Far Safer Around a Naturally Immune Person

Add to this a) the fact that the COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus and b) the fact that COVID-jabbed individuals carry the same viral load when symptomatic as unvaccinated individuals,19,20 and the whole argument that vaccine passports will identify and separate “public health threats” from those who are “safe” to be around simply fails miserably.

As noted by Horowitz, anyone capable of rational thought understands that a person with natural immunity from a previous infection is “exponentially safer to be around than someone who had the vaccines but not prior infection.”21

As for the unvaccinated who do not have natural immunity from prior infection, well, their status poses no increased risk to anyone but themselves. Conversely, since the COVID shot cannot prevent infection or transmission, and only promises to reduce your risk of serious illness, the only one who can benefit from the shot is the one who got it. It protects no one else.

In fact, you may actually pose an increased risk to others, because if your symptoms are mild or nonexistent, but your viral load high, you’re more likely to walk around as usual. Rather than staying home because you suspect you’re infected and infectious, you’re out spreading the virus around to others, vaccinated and unvaccinated alike.

What Does the Research Say?

In his article, Horowitz reviews 15 studies that should, once and for all, settle the debate about whether people who have had COVID are now immune and whether that immunity is comparable to that of the COVID shots. Here’s a select handful of those studies. For the rest, please see the original Blaze article.22

  • Immunity May 202123 New York University researchers concluded that while both SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination elicit potent immune responses, the immunity you get when you’ve recovered from natural infection is more durable and quicker to respond.

The reason for this is because natural immunity conveys more innate immunity involving T cells and antibodies, whereas vaccine-induced immunity primarily stimulates adaptive immunity involving antibodies.

  • Nature May 202124 This research dispels fears that SARS-CoV-2 infection might not produce long-lasting immunity. Even in people with mild COVID-19 infection, whose anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) antibodies levels might rapidly decline in the months’ post-recovery, persistent and long-lived bone marrow plasma cells start churning out new antibodies when the virus is encountered a second time.

According to the authors, “Consistently, circulating resting memory B cells directed against SARS-CoV-2 S were detected in the convalescent individuals. Overall, our results indicate that mild infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces robust antigen-specific, long-lived humoral immune memory in humans.”

  • Nature July 202025 The Nature findings above support findings from Singapore published in July 2020, which found patients who had recovered from SARS in 2002/2003 had robust immunity against SARS-CoV-2 17 years later.
  • Cell Medicine July 202126 Here, they found that most previously infected patients produced durable antibodies and memory B cells, along with durable polyfunctional CD4 and CD8 T cells that target multiple parts of the virus.

According to the authors: “Taken together, these results suggest that broad and effective immunity may persist long-term in recovered COVID-19 patients.” The same clearly cannot be said for vaccine-induced immunity.

  • BioRxiv July 202127 Echoing the Cell Medicine findings above, University of California researchers concluded that “Natural infection induced expansion of larger CD8 T cell clones occupied distinct clusters, likely due to the recognition of a broader set of viral epitopes presented by the virus not seen in the mRNA vaccine.”

We’re Creating a Pandemic of the Vaccinated

If natural immunity is better than vaccine-induced antibodies, you’d expect to see fewer reinfections among those who have already had COVID-19, compared to breakthrough infections occurring among those who got the COVID shot. And that’s precisely what we see.

In a preprint titled “Necessity of COVID-19 Vaccination in Previously Infected Individuals,”28 the researchers looked at reinfection rates among previously infected health care workers in the Cleveland Clinic system.

Of the 1,359 frontline workers with natural immunity from previous infection, not a single one was reinfected 10 months into the pandemic, despite heavy exposure to COVID-19-positive patients.

A second preprint,29 posted August 25, 2021, compared SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity by looking at reinfection and breakthrough rates. Four outcomes were evaluated: SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptomatic disease, COVID-19-related hospitalization and death.

Results showed that, compared to those with natural immunity, SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals who had received a two-dose regimen of Pfizer’s COVID shot had:30

  • A 5.96-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection
  • A 7.13-fold increased risk for symptomatic disease
  • A 13.06-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant
  • A higher risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations

After adjusting for comorbidities, SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals who had received two Pfizer doses were 27.02 times more likely to experience symptomatic breakthrough infection than those with natural immunity.31 No deaths were reported in either of the groups. In closing the authors concluded:32

“This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.”

Majority of Hospitalizations Are Actually in the Vaccinated

The oft-repeated refrain is that we’re in a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” meaning those who have not received the COVID jab make up the bulk of those hospitalized and dying from the Delta variant. However, we’re already seeing a shift in hospitalization rates from the unvaccinated to those who have gotten one or two injections.

For example, in Israel, the fully “vaccinated” made up the bulk of serious cases and COVID-related deaths in July 2021, as illustrated in the graphs below.33 The red is unvaccinated, yellow refers to partially “vaccinated” and green fully “vaccinated” with two doses. By mid-August, 59% of serious cases were among those who had received two COVID injections.34

new hospitalizations

new severe covid 19 patients
deaths trend

Data from the U.K. show a similar trend among those over the age of 50. In this age group, partially and fully “vaccinated” people account for 68% of hospitalizations and 70% of COVID deaths.35

COVID-19 delta variant hospital admission and death in England

Data36 from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also refute the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” narrative. Between July 6,2021, and July 25, 2021, 469 COVID cases were identified in a Barnstable County, Massachusetts, outbreak.

Of those who tested positive, 74% had received two COVID injections and were considered “fully vaccinated.” Even despite using different diagnostic standards for non-jabbed and jabbed individuals, a whopping 80% of COVID-related hospitalizations were also in this group.37,38

COVID Shot May Harm Immunity in Those Previously Infected

While the authors of that August 25, 2021, preprint39 claim in their abstract that “Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant,” in the body of the article they admit they “could not demonstrate significance in our cohort.”

Unless significance is demonstrated, the finding is basically irrelevant, so I would not rely on this paper if I wanted to argue for vaccination of those with preexisting natural immunity. Besides, there’s research40 showing the COVID shots may actually harm the superior T cell immunity built up from prior infection, especially after the second dose. As reported by Horowitz in The Blaze:41

“Immunologists from Mount Sinai in New York and Hospital La Paz in Madrid have raised serious concerns. In a shocking discovery after monitoring a group of vaccinated people both with and without prior infection, they found ‘in individuals with a pre-existing immunity against SARS-CoV-2, the second vaccine dose not only fail to boost humoral immunity but determines a contraction of the spike-specific T cell response.’

They also note that other research has shown ‘the second vaccination dose appears to exert a detrimental effect in the overall magnitude of the spike-specific humoral response in COVID-19 recovered individuals.’”

Arguments for Vaccine Passports Are Null and Void

FEE.org reported the August 25 findings under the headline, “Harvard Epidemiologist Says the Case for COVID Vaccine Passports Was Just Demolished”:42

“Harvard Medical School professor Martin Kulldorff said research showing that natural immunity offers exponentially more protection than vaccines means vaccine passports are both unscientific and discriminatory, since they disproportionately affect working class individuals.

‘Prior COVID disease (many working class) provides better immunity than vaccines (many professionals), so vaccine mandates are not only scientific nonsense, they are also discriminatory and unethical,’ Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist, observed on Twitter …

Vaccine passports would be immoral and a massive government overreach even in the absence of these findings. There is simply no historical parallel for governments attempting to restrict the movements of healthy people over a respiratory virus in this manner.

Yet the justification for vaccine passports becomes not just wrong but absurd in light of these new revelations. People who have had COVID already have significantly more protection from the virus than people who’ve been vaccinated.

Meanwhile, people who’ve not had COVID and choose to not get vaccinated may or may not be making an unwise decision. But if they are, they are principally putting only themselves at risk.”

Positive Signs

arihasanaj tiktok video

While we still have a long and likely hard fight ahead of us, there is reason to be optimistic. In a recent TikTok video,43 a young man named Ari Hasanaj who lives in New York City describes how he printed up posters that say:

“We do not discriminate against ANY customer based on sex, gender, race, creed, age, vaccinated or unvaccinated. All customers who wish to patronize are welcome in our establishment.”

He then went around the city, from one store to the next, asking each owner if they would agree to post the sign on their door to protest NYC’s vaccine passport requirement. A majority said yes. He is now asking others to join him in this effort.

In Denmark, vaccine passports will no longer be used to restrict movement as of September 10, 2021. The health minister, Magnus Heunicke, has stated, though, that the passport system may be reinstated if rising infection rates threaten important functions.

Denmark was among the first to announce the development of a digital vaccine passport, which came into effect in April 2021.44 For months, Danes repeatedly demonstrated against the COVID passes, and it seems the protests eventually had the desired effect. It just goes to show that if enough people resist, tyrannical overreach can be reined in.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Notes

1 New York Post August 4, 2021

2, 7 Zywicki vs George Mason University Case 1:21-cv-00894

3 JAMA Internal Medicine August 16, 2021 [Epub ahead of print]

4, 5, 6, 8 Citizens Journal August 25, 2021

9 Children’s Health Defense vs Rutgers Case 2: 21-cv-15333

10 The College Fix April 10, 2021

11 The Defender August 12, 2021

12, 21, 22, 41 The Blaze August 25, 2021

13 MedRxiv August 8, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.06.21261707

14 FiercePharma June 30, 2020

15 CNBC July 23, 2021

16, 17 The BMJ Opinion August 23, 2021

18 BPR August 20, 2021

19, 36, 37 CDC MMWR July 30, 2021; 70

20 NBC News August 7, 2021

23 Immunity May 3, 2021

24 Nature May 24, 2021; 595: 421-425

25 Nature July 15, 2020; 584: 457-462

26 Cell Medicine July 20, 2021; 2(7): 100354

27 BioRxiv July 15, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.14.452381

28 MedRxiv June 19, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.01.21258176

29, 30, 31, 32, 39 MedRxiv August 25, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415

33 Twitter Alex Berenson July 18, 2021

34 Science August 16, 2021

35 Evening Standard August 20, 2021

38 CNBC July 30, 2021

40 BioRxiv March 22, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.22.436441

42 FEE.org August 30, 2021

43 TikTok September 2, 2021

44 Sundhedsministeriet, August 27, 2021

Featured image is from NaturalNews.com