Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on the COVID Vaccine Scam – LETHAL DOSE FINDINGS: “Trying to figure out how to kill as many people as possible, without alerting too many people.”

“There’s no benign explanation for what they have done. This is not innocent. This is intentional.”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and a team of lawyers/doctors/scientists have come together during the last year and a half to form a Corona Investigative Committee set on exposing the COVID plandemic and holding those who are perpetrating these crimes responsible for their actions.

In the interview below, Reiner Fuellmich shares some incredibly important information and data that they’ve been discussing in these meetings, mentioning some of the groups responsible, and the steps that they are taking to address these issues.

It is extremely relevant and essential to consider the exact magnitude that is being discussed in this interview. Dr. Reiner Fuellmich describes scientific findings and factual details and connects that with profound implications that helps to explain the state of the world.

While it may be hard to believe, especially perhaps for those with a strong, scientific background, as some doctors and researchers have been admitting, the conclusions that they’ve come to have inevitably revealed the truth of the matter – as difficult as it is to face. However, with several proofs and evidence explaining certain agendas, there can be no doubt what it all boils down to.

I sincerely thank Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and everyone else on these teams for being brave enough to address these issues head on, and exposing the egregious corruption we’re surrounded in.

The video has been transcribed in full. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Maria Zeee: “Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, thank you so much for joining us this evening.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is the leading lawyer and member of the German Corona Investigative Committee, and specializes globally on the prosecution of fraudulent corporations. You might have heard of him from the famous “Nuremberg 2.0″. Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, thank you – Reiner Fuellmich, thank you so much for joining us this evening, or this afternoon for you.”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: “Yeah, thank you very much for having me. It’s a pleasure.”

Maria Zeee: “Uh, look, for the sake of the audience, I always do this, could you please just give us a brief career history and what led you to… spearheading Nuremberg 2.0?”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: “Well, I don’t – I prefer not to call it Nuremberg 2.0. But I know that a lot of people have tried to pin that on me, so that… um, a lot of hopes – very high hopes are riding on what we’re doing here.

But, first of all, I’m not the only one. I’m just one of many. Um, the Corona Investigative Committee is, was founded by my friend Viviane Fischer, she’s an attorney here in Berlin, and myself, on July 10th of 2020.

Before that, I was completely in line with the mainstream. Um, I did have some suspicions because of the – because of my law practice; I had been going after the larger, German global corporations such as one of the most criminal organizations in the world, Deutsche Bank, VW, and the world’s largest shipping company, Kuehne and Nagel [Kuehne+Nagel]. I did have my suspicions, so did all of my colleagues, because it looked like the cards were stacked against us in these cases, in the courts of law.

In the meantime, of course, we’ve learnt a lot and the cards are not just stacked against us. It’s a fact, that the other side – um, Catherine Austin Fitts calls them Mr. Global, but that the people who are behind this agenda – and we have come to the conclusion that this is an agenda that’s being rolled out – that these people have been infiltrating our societies for decades.

It is hard to imagine, but this is what we’ve come – this is the conclusion that we’ve come to. Not just through the World Economic Forum, not just through their Young Global Leaders, or Global Young Leaders program, which produced graduates like Angela Merkel and Bill Gates, and of course Jacinda Ardern, and Macron in France, and uh, what’s his name… Justin Trudeau in Canada.

But, to make a very long story very short, my wife and I were still in the U.S. at our ranch in Northern California, when we received the news – this is in March of 2021, uh, 2020 rather, when we got all these phone calls from our friends and relatives telling us about a lockdown. Which I thought this is – this is ridiculous. This is crazy. And the stories that we heard reminded me a lot of what had happened during the swine flu, even though I had forgotten most of it.

And because I couldn’t understand what was going on, I got in touch with my friend Wolfgang Wodarg. Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, he is the man who, more or less – hang on one second – who more or less single-handedly stopped the swine flu some ten years/eleven years ago. He was capable of doing that because he’s a very – he’s a doctor, lung-specialist with lots of experience, and he was in a position of power. He was a member of the German Parliament, and he was a member of the Council of Europe. And that’s why he was – why he managed to expose that hoax back then as a mild flu.

However, even then, the very same protagonists, including Professor Dr. Drosten, he’s the guy who invented – who invented the PCR test which he claims can tell us something about infections, which is a complete lie. That guy, and his British counterpart, Neil Ferguson. Both of them are blatant liars. They had – they had come very far. They had, in fact, helped the pharmaceutical industry introduce their “vaccines” even then. It didn’t work that well in Germany, but in the Scandinavian countries, they vaccinated lots of people, and by – through this vaccination now, there’s 1,300 children, young adults now, who are permanently disabled because they suffer from narcolepsy. So that’s how it all started.

My wife said, “We’ve got to go back, we’ve got to do something, you know how to fight these bastards”; she used other words, of course, um, so, “You gotta do it. You gotta find some allies and go ahead.” And I said, I don’t think I’m gonna find any allies because the Germans, in particular, the German judiciary, is a bunch of cowards. They’re in it for the money, they’re in it for their careers, I don’t think I can count on anyone.

But Wolfgang put me in touch with Viviane Fischer, she’s not in it for the money, she’s in it for the cause, and we set up the Corona Investigative Committee on July 10th. Wanted answers to those questions which we believe our government, which is not our government anymore, and the mainstream media, which are owned, of course, by the same people who are owning this corona plandemic, that they wouldn’t give us any answers to.

How dangerous is the virus, how reliable is the PCR test, and how much damage do the anti-corona measures do? In the meantime, we know that it’s devastating and that’s why we talk about crimes against humanity. The latest evidence is so compelling that the – I just spoke with Dr. Mike Yeadon, former Vice-President of Pfizer – “

Maria Zeee: “I was about to ask you about this. Because what I’ve heard, is that this is – this is not about money, this original plan was to roll it out back – all the way in 2050, but they’ve accelerated it.

And this recent finding from Mike Yeadon and others, is that this is worse than what happened in World War 2, and we’ve found evidence, undeniable evidence, that this is a kill-shot, it being used to murder or maim people. Could you please go into – into those findings for us.”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. This is the – this is the most recent findings that Dr. Mike Yeadon came up with. But he does emphasize he’s not the only one. And this is a group of 5 or 6 scientists, it’s just that he’s the one I think that, who connected the dots.

And I don’t know if you know, have you seen his video, the one that… it’s a bitchute video and I think he calls it compelling evidence for pre-meditated mass murder. This video shows in great detail, and we’re going to do this again, tomorrow, on our next Corona Committee session. It shows in great detail how – and he’s focusing on 3 vaccine makers. Or, they claim it’s vaccines; we know it’s not a vaccine. It’s not even experimental gene-therapy, it’s experimental gene-manipulation. This is what we’re talking about. And so he took a closer look at BioNTech/Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson and Johnson.

And the evidence that he showed us, is really so compelling that we think we’re going to make this a center piece of our International Criminal Trial. Which will start in… a couple of weeks and it’s going to be, probably going to be a grand jury investigation asking the jury, which is the people, to, for indictments against 4 of their figureheads: Bill Gates, Drosten, Fauci, and Tedros, of the W.H.O.

But the findings that he showed us, is that – but – all 3, all 3 of these vaccine makers, quote/unquote “vaccine makers”, are deliberately – they’re looking for lethal doses. They’re trying out the dosage – I forget the precise technical term he used, but we’re going to come up with it tomorrow in our committee. It is very obvious that if you follow the lot numbers, I think the British called it ‘charges’? Batches, rather, but the Americans call it lots. So, if you follow these lot numbers, there’s some that don’t seem to cause any problems whatsoever. At least not now.

As we have learned from one of our scientist professor, she’s a biologist and immunologist [undetermined] University, even those shots that seem to be harmless, if it is mRNA, they shut off your immune system. That doesn’t necessarily mean you’re going to die immediately; no you’re not. But sooner or later you’re going to run into a virus or some kind of illness and your body won’t be able to fight it, because your immune system has been shut off.

But some of these lots are so dangerous that if you look at them, and follow them through the United States, through the – in that case, 36 states of the United States, they were extremely harmful, caused thousands and thousands of deaths, all across the country. And from the way that he explained it to us, it seems very very obvious that they did this, taking turns. First Moderna, then BioNTech/Pfizer, then Johnson&Johnson. And you could also see that they were sort of taking breaks in between. And there’s a couple of lots that were completely harmless again, and all of a sudden it starts again, with these very lethal batch- lots, rather.”

Maria Zeee: “What do its breaks signify? What do they mean, the fact that they took breaks?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “We think – we’re trying to establish a baseline. Something like that. But we’re going to look into this in greater detail. By the time that we start our criminal investigation, our grand jury investigation, we will have the complete story.

But even now, it is – it is so compelling. It is undeniable and irrefutable that they’re – that this is what they’re trying to do. Trying to figure out how to kill as many people as possible, without alerting too many people. Cause if they had started, if they had used these lethal doses right from the start, it would’ve killed everyone and everybody would have been, “Ooh, I don’t think I’m gonna get this shot.” So that’s why they’re trying to figure out a way through which they can cause a lot of harm but in such a way that people will not be alarmed.

It is… it is devilish. It’s just… we looked at each other, and we just couldn’t believe it. How can people be so evil? So evil.

Maria Zeee: “I will find the video that you’re talking about from Mike Yeadon. [Reiner Fuellmich: “I’ll send it to you.”] I’ll upload it onto my website for the viewers so that I can see that afterwards.

So, let me get this straight. There have been, just to recap, there have been batches released purposely by these big pharma giants… placebo, knowing that they’re – that they’re saline shots, then knowing that they’re releasing kill shots, taking a break, releasing some more saline, releasing some more kill shots, on purpose, knowing full well what they are doing?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “That is the conclusion that we have arrived at. It is inescapable. There’s no benign explanation for what they have done. This is not innocent. This is intentional.

Maria Zeee: “You made a comment recently that this is not about money, Dr. Fuellmich. Can you talk to us about what that means?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. The people who are behind this, maybe 300, maybe 3000, we don’t know. It’s not very many people, but the people who are behind this and who are – they have so much money, they don’t need any more. They can buy tens or thousands of yachts if they wanted to because they’ve stolen so much from us. They don’t care about money.

But, they’re using money. They’re using money to buy politicians, mainstream media people, doctors, lawyers, those are the two tools that they use in order to get people under control to do their bidding. Money, bribing them, and the other tool is extortion. And this extortion thing is very very difficult to figure out. We do believe that ritual child abuse has – plays a big role in this. But money is very – “

Maria Zeee: “Why do you believe that? Why do you believe that? Is there evidence to suggest that – “

Reiner Fuellmich: “Well, we had whistleblowers approaching us and telling us about these things. And 18 years ago, I know a little bit about that scene because 18 years ago, I represented some of the victims of this ritual child abuse. A friend of mine who’s a well known member of the German journalistic scene, and myself; I did the legal work and he published it in – even on our national public radio and television. Until they stopped him, because they didn’t want him to do it anymore and, my ex-wife, she also, she couldn’t handle it anymore.

So I know a few things about this. I just couldn’t believe how big it possibly is. It may be much bigger than we think. But we don’t have enough evidence for that yet, so I’m not going to make this public, yet.”

Maria Zeee: “Sure. So we’re saying that all of these global leaders are taking part in this. If this is part of it, this ritual child abuse, how does it tie in with this depopulation plan?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Well, we think, after having spoken with a number of psychology and psychiatry professors, we think this is a huge psychological operation. It has been planned for at least 3 decades, maybe longer. And, they’re using all kinds of panic mongering tools. We have, for example, here in Germany, the so-called “panic paper” was leaked. It was written by the German Secretary of the Interior, and in detail, in great detail, it explains how to get the population to panic.

For example, “We want to make children feel responsible for the tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they don’t wash their hands, if they don’t wear masks”, etc. That’s what it says. Explicit. This is insanity. That’s why we believe the people who are behind this are psychopaths and sociopaths. They’re using many many puppets because they’re bribing them, or there’s extortion, we don’t know.

But it’s not about money. They’re using money, but they don’t want money. Ultimately, money plays a big role in this. Because we believe that it’s the financial industry, or, better put, the financial mafia: Blackrock, Vanguard – which they’re using as vehicles to invest their money in and then these funds – invest their money in Deutsche Bank, VW, and all the other international global corporations. Thus, owning through I think 147 corporations, owning pretty much everything on this planet.

Um, so, this is what’s been going on for at least 30 years or so. It was about to blow up, this financial mafia scheme was about to blow up in 2008 and 9, which is when we had the first financial scandal; it started out as a housing scandal in the United States. I, coincidentally, had been going after these people, after Deutsche Bank in particular, for the same crimes which had been committed in Germany since 1992.

But I guess it’s the – because of the fact that the German courts of law, for some reason, now we know why, because they were stacked by their own people, didn’t want to follow up on this, they felt motivated, Deutsche Bank and others felt motivated to play this game on a much grander scale in the United States. That’s where the whole, we now call it ‘predatory lending schemes’, started.

This should’ve blown up in 2008 and 9. Um, lots of people stepped forward, including our chancellor, and our then secretary of finance, and “we’re gonna get these people, they’re gonna have to pay a price” – No. No one paid a price. The only thing that happened is that they started to print money. Truckloads of money.

In September of 2019, this whole thing was about to explode again. But, they – and they wanted to explode. But they wanted to explode, or implode, rather, on their terms. They want to… because there’s no other way. There’s no other way to solve this problem.

Because, if this explodes, in an uncontrolled way, then the people will understand that it’s the – we now call them the DAVOS clique, the people who regularly meet once a year on this platform of the World Economic Forum, all of them crooks and gangsters, mafia-like structures – then we would have found out that it’s these people and they’re mingling with its self-appointed corporate elites and the self-appointed political elites. The political elites are their own. They’ve bought them. They’ve trained them, through their Young Global Leaders program, for example. Private public partnership means a hostile takeover of our politicians, by them. We think it’s our politicians – no, it’s theirs.

So this whole thing would’ve exploded, and we all would’ve found out about it and they wanted to keep us from learning this, and that’s why they needed a distraction. And that’s why, in December of 2019, they came up with a corona pandemic, even though there were no cases. They needed to create – that’s what drove them into an early start, and that’s why they’re making so many mistakes. Apart from the fact that most of them are stupid as hell. But they’re making many many mistakes and that is helping us. Because they were driven into an early start.

They didn’t have any cases. Even in Wuhan, China. Which is where they, they claim the whole thing started. We don’t know if it’s true. They didn’t have any cases. So what they needed is cases. Why did they need cases? Because they needed to declare the international – what is it called – the Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Was short, PHEIC [pronounced “fake”]. PHEIC. Fake. So obvious. It’s in our faces.

But in order to declare this – and why did they need this? Not for the mask mandates. Not for social distancing. But they needed it for the introduction of untested new drugs. For the vaccines. Cause that is the only basis on which they can use untested new drugs. On the basis of an international health emergency. And that’s what this Public Health Emergency of International Concern is.

Therefore, didn’t have any cases, so they called Drosten. This – he’s neither a professor nor is he a doctor of medicine, he’s a fake. So they called him and told him, just as they had done 10 years earlier, or 20 years earlier during the bird flu, come up with a PCR test that will tell us about infections. And he claims he did that.

The two basic lies on which everything rides here is – come from him. One is, there are asymptomatic infections; of course there aren’t any. And even if there were they don’t play a role in this. The most recent study is that, which was conducted in Wuhan, with 10 million people involved, this is at the end of 2020 and it shows there are no asymptomatic infections. And this is a question of just of logic. You know? If you want to go – if you go see a doctor and tell him, “I have a problem.” The doctor – the first thing the doctor’s gonna ask you is, “What symptoms do you have?” What are you going to say? “I don’t have any!” Except Drosten and Fauci… yeah right. Go see an exorcist or something like that.

So there are no asymptomatic infections but he needed that. Or the W.H.O. which promoted his ideas and recommended them to the entire world, they needed this in order to make everyone afraid of everyone. Because even if you look perfectly healthy, you pose a potential danger, according to their logic. And then he came and said, “But I do have a solution for this. Because I have invented a new PCR test and I can tell you precisely who is infectious and who isn’t.”

That is the second lie. I’m saying ‘lie’ because we can prove that he lied when he said asymptomatic infections, cause he was referring, in a preprint, he was referring to a woman who traveled into Germany – Frankfurt, Germany from China, and he pointed at her as an example of someone having absolutely no symptoms but being very infectious, because she infected some people down in Southern Germany, in Bavaria. But another scientist read this preprint and pointed out to Drosten, “You’re wrong! This woman did have symptoms.” Because she was eating anti-flu medication and you don’t do that because it tastes so great. And ultimately it turned out she had been infected by her own parents and of course she had symptoms. She was sweating, etc., etc.

Second lie, he says, “I have invented the PCR test which will tell you who really is infectious”, and of course that’s a blatant lie because PCR tests as the real inventor, Kary Mullis, has said over and over and over again, is not for diagnostic purposes. It is for scientific purposes, but not for diagnostic purposes. Because it cannot tell the difference between dead and live matter. So when you test positive, it is very likely that it tests positive because the test finds the fragments of your body’s immune system’s fight against the common cold or the flu. It cannot tell the difference. Also, for someone to be infected with the virus, you need a whole virus to enter your cells and start replicating there. These tests – the Roche machines, all they see is fragments of virus; they never see whole viruses.

So for these two reasons, and there’s others, for these two reasons, it is absolutely totally, completely impossible for a PCR test to tell you anything about infections. On top of this, he, Drosten, and following his lead – the World Health Organization, who used, or which used his PCR test as a blueprint, they sent the test so that it was guaranteed to create false positives.

Last night, Mike Yeadon said, “Reiner, I think all of these cases were false positives. Not just 97%.” Why is he saying that? Well you take the, what you get from the nose and the throat, the swab, you can’t see anything because it’s invisible to the human eye. So you put them into the machines, all of them owned by Roche, they’re making truckloads of money right now, and in this machine you magnify the stuff that’s in there. It’s called cycles of amplification. 2, 4, 6 – 2, 4, 8, 16 – whatever. At 24 cycles of amplification, I think you’re in the billions of magnifying this stuff. At 24 cycles of amplification, even the Frankfurt Health Institute says we disregard anything that’s beyond that because it makes absolutely no sense.

Mike Yeadon says, remember, he’s the former Vice President of Pfizer, and he was their Chief Science Officer for 16 years, he says at 35 cycles of amplifications, you end up with at least 97 positives. The Drosten test and all the others were set at 45. So that’s how they created the cases, in order to be able to declare the Public Health Emergency of International Concern, in order to walk us through, make us obedient to walk us through mask mandates, social distancing, lockdowns, until finally we would agree to anything to have this end. Anything meaning, the deadly shots.”

Maria Zeee: “And speaking of the deadly shots, we – so we now know, that these, according to Karen Kingston, also an ex-Pfizer employee who’s been analyzing the patents, that these undoubtedly, all COVID-19 vaccines approved by the World Health Organization, have tracking abilities in them. They will not approve them, if they are not able to track citizens.

So on that note, knowing that these are kill shots, knowing that they’re able to track people, what are they trying to really do here, Dr. Fuellmich? Are they trying to reach this DAVOS clique, you know, this goal of reduced population that are easier to control… is this the final goal?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “I think it’s two-fold. They want, and they euphemistically call it population control, but it’s really about population reduction. Some people say that they want to reduce us to 500 million; I don’t know if that’s true. But population reduction is one of their major goals. That is definitely true.

Even Robert Malone, who said that if somebody had told him this a year ago, he would’ve said, “Yeah right.” And, myself! I mean, had you told me this a year and a half ago, I would’ve said, “Go take your pills. Go see a doctor. And things will get better.” No! In the meantime we’re running out of conspiracy theories. So this is one of their major goals.

The other one is, and that’s why all this tracking stuff comes into play, the other is to control the rest of us. To make us really into slaves. That will not think, that will not fight back, but that simply do as they’re ordered. So that’s why they’re trying to control us, why they’re trying to manipulate our DNA, through these mRNA shots.

There’s lots of experiments within this gigantic experiment going on. We don’t know what’s in the shot. Only they do. Our governments, as I said, are not our governments anymore. They’re completely controlled by the other side. This is especially true here in Europe where they’re about to install the first mini-world government – the real world government, as the pope who’s also in on this declared in his, what was it, ‘fratelli tutti’ thing in 2020. He said we must all submit to a new world government under the U.N. Yeah right.

But they’re gonna start with Europe, the program that they – the agenda that they’re following here is called HERA, Health Emergency Response Agency, and this is going to be the net result after it turns out that our national governments are incapable of dealing with this grave threat of the coronavirus.

I don’t think they’re going to get that far, because too many people have woken up in the meantime. And even here in Europe, where much of this is playing out, even here in Europe people are taking to the streets, again; hundreds of thousands of people, everywhere. In Italy, in particular in the former East European countries, and even in Germany again. So they’re not going to get much further than this.”

Maria Zeee: “We’ve seen many people taking it to the streets, Dr. Fuellmich, but it seems like the plan just keeps accelerating and accelerating. Do we think that it’s actually making a difference to these people that so many are protesting?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “I think it is. It’s a question of time until it will be absolutely impossible for them to sweep any of this under the rug. They have been able to do this because they have complete control of the mainstream media. But it is more and more obvious that even though nobody knows anyone who died of COVID or who suffered serious damage of COVID, all of a sudden EVERYONE knows someone who’s suffered serious problems, even death, after vaccination.

And this is another thing, latest figures are telling us, and this was confirmed by the CEO of an American life insurance company, that since the beginning of the measures, in particular, since the beginning of the shots of the vaccinations, we have had for the past year or so, we have excess mortality of 40%. This is unheard of. Totally unheard of. This cannot be swept under the rug much longer.”

Maria Zeee: “I agree. And some mainstream have had to start reporting – they don’t have a choice. Because too many people are talking about the people that they know that are now disabled or dead from the kill shot.

You mentioned the 4 people: Gates, Tedros, and a couple of others; this trial that’s going on. Can you give us more detail about that?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “I think i t’s gonna – we have put a lot of time and energy into this because we believe that it’s so important… because there’s so many people out there who’re talking about Nuremberg 2.0. What they really want is, they want us as lawyers, and as scientists, who are going to be our experts, they want us to show them the facts, and they want us to give them a legal platform, on which they can safely resist. 

We’ve come to this conclusion after we discussed this in great detail, in particular with people, very smart people, like Catherine Austin Fitts, who knows a lot about this, the aforementioned financial mafia structures. Which are doing their best to distract our attention from what they’ve been doing. We need not – of course we want – this is a formalized proceeding, patterned after the American grand jury investigation which shows all of the evidence we have, with real experts, with real witnesses, with real attorneys. We’re gonna have a real judge.

All of the evidence to the jury, which is going to be our viewers, and then ask them to return, to give us indictments against Drosten, who is their major puppet, as far as the PCR test is concerned. Fauci, Tedros, and of course Bill Gates. I don’t know how important these people are, they’re probably just figureheads. Maybe Bill Gates thinks that he’s one of them who pulls the strings. I don’t think he is, but we’ll see.

But much more important than these indictments, is to give the people full information. Verifiable information from real experts. People who really know what they’re talking about. Robert Malone, for example. He was on the other side, for a very long time. He knows everything that’s been going on there. So does Peter McCullough. So does Catherine Austin Fitts. I mean, she was a member of the American government, for awhile, and she’s also a very experienced investment banker.

So all of these people, including many of the politicians who have joined our ranks, will testify in great detail to what has really happened. To how this is a long planned agenda which is being rolled out in order to distract our attention from what is really going on. And what’s really going on is population reduction, and population control. And what is really going on is the deliberate destruction of our economies for the benefit of American platforms, such as Amazon, for example.

Whistleblowers have been telling us that at the same time the Chinese are taking over our and the American car industry. We don’t know how true that is, but there’s some evidence that shows us that it could be true. But whatever we’re seeing, it is two things: deliberate destruction of our economies, deliberate destruction of our health.

Maria Zeee: “And what can we, first of all, so this is happening in an international court, correct? [Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes.”] What we’ve seen in local courts is truly corruption of judges that throw out cases. [Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes.”] What are the chances of that happening in the international court? If all of this big players are in on it?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Excellent question. And I just spoke with a couple of my colleagues here in Germany. I just spoke with them a couple of minutes before – before we started your show. We think that if we’re lucky, we’re going to run into individual judges who are still willing to uphold the law.

However, here in Germany, that is next to impossible. Why is that? Because Germans traditionally have been very obedient for at least 150 years. Bismarck started all this. This is, it’s especially bad in the judiciary because back in the day, 150 years ago, you could only join the judiciary if you were completely in line with the government. So this is not an invention by Hitler. He made it worse, yeah. But it’s never gotten better.

And right now we can see the results of this decades long education. That has to change. I believe that if we want to make an inroad, if we want to make progress, on our international judicial levels, we’re going to have to start on an international level. We’re going to have to show the people that we, the people, are in charge. We do not need their system.

We, for example, even the American colleagues and our South African colleague, have been telling us, we’re starting our own judiciary. We’re already working on this. Because the system is so corrupt, we can’t depend on them anymore. This is not just true for the judiciary. It’s also true for the economic system, for the education system, we’re gonna have to start our own system. We’re gonna have to disconnect from these global corporations and global NGOs, revert – and focus on our regional economies on our regional governments, because this is really what it is. It’s back to the roots. That’s democracy.

That’s why I joined this new party, grassroots party here in Germany. Because they truly believe that we – the only people who really know what’s good for them is the people in the region. In our own communities. We cannot allow these people to control us through a world government. No way! We’ve seen how, where this got us. This is where it got us. And it can’t get any worse. That’s why we have to fight up, fight back; set up our own systems, including our own system of law, so that we can have all these regional governments, we can connect. Each of us can connect all of these separate systems can connect. But we should never again allow any global entity to rule over us.

Like this is what the W.H.O. is doing right now. No one, not even the lawyers, understand about the – what is it called? International Health Regulations? This is an invention of the W.H.O. This is not democracy. Democracy is when we vote for someone who’s going to represent us in parliament. No one, no one has elected these people at the World Health Organization.

I mean, keep in mind, Tedros, the guy who runs the show, their major puppet, I think they filed a criminal complaint against him in New York last year, for genocide. And I’ve seen pictures of him wearing a gun and dead people behind him. So, this is who we’re dealing with. It’s the mafia. [Maria Zeee: “He’s a known terrorist.”] Yes. He’s a known terrorist.”

Maria Zeee: “Yes. He’s giving the world health advice all of a sudden wanting to save humanity through the World Health Organization solutions. It’s unbelievable. What are the possible – what are the possible consequences for these murderers? What could come of this? Dr. Fuellmich. People are angry. People want justice.”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. I think we have to be very careful not to let this spin out of control into violence. Because that’s what they want. If we start to get… acting violently, I think they’re gonna try and bring in their own troops. If they have any. I don’t know about that. There’s lots of rumors – we haven’t been able to verify anything.

But we should continue with peaceful protests. We should also continue with the efforts to refocus on our regions, instead of this globalism. We will… there’s another factor to this. There’s 3 levels on which we, on which we have to fight.

One is, education. Bring out the truth. Expose them all. The other is, legal efforts. We have to continue with our legal efforts; in particular with the international legal efforts. But there’s also the spiritual side.

If, again, if you had told me about this a year ago, I would’ve said, “Yeah right. Take your pills.” But, this – and even Robert Malone agrees with that. I mean, he is a stone-cold scientist. We all agree that there’s something else. And that’s spirituality. Some call it religion; I’m not a religious person, because I don’t believe in organized religion. It’s all about power, in my view. But there is a spiritual side to this. And I think we’re going to get help from this spiritual side.

This is what connects us, by the way. This is why so many of us, despite the fact that they claim, “Oh, I’ve lost many friends.” Nah. Not really. These people were never our friends. But we’ve made so many new friends. People who we immediately felt connected with. Without having to even talk for an hour or so. But, there’s an immediate connection. So this spirituality is going to help us.

There is a spiritual force out there, and I’ve come to this conclusion after talking to someone from Australia. Aboriginal by the name of David Cole. Very smart man. And I reminded him, “David, I spoke to one of your people. A very famous, very old aboriginal by the name of Max.” He said, “Yeah, that’s Uncle Max! He guided us through the ceremony a couple of weeks ago, but unfortunately he passed away.”

Now this man, when I spoke to him, he made a great impression on me. Just like the indigenous people from Canada and the United States who I spoke with. They said, “We are, we’re on your side. We’re protecting you.” Because I for awhile thought, when I go running with my dogs, I mean, I’m a perfect target for them. And they said, “Well you are. But we’re gonna protect you. No matter what happens.” And I believe this is true. That’s why, when people tell me, “Don’t you feel that? Aren’t you scared?” Nah. I’m not scared. There’s no other way. We have to fight. All of us. We have to stand up and fight.”

Maria Zeee: “Many many people, Dr. Fuellmich, in this time, have asked for deeper answers, as to what’s wrong with the world. And what, you know, many people have run to God, in this time, to – for shelter, for comfort, for protection. For all of these things.

I, much like you, am a person that just does not feel fear. We have a task, we are on the right side of history, and we have to do this at whatever cost. But, again, what are the potential consequences for those that are guilty? If they are found guilty, what are the potential consequences for these people?

Reiner Fuellmich:They’re going to pay a very very very high price. Um, I think, ultimately, we the people will turn this thing around. It’s not the courts of law. The courts of law will then come in and clean up. In the aftermath.

There will be a – I’m absolutely convinced, there will be a, a real… a final reckoning. Which has been overdue for hundreds of years, probably. There will be a final reckoning. That’s why I think they’re going to pay a really steep price. And those who survive this, well, we’re going to deal with them in the courts of law.

Ultimately, if I look at the legal picture, which is evolving right now, but it’s clear enough. It’s like a huge puzzle of a thousand pieces but I think there’s only 10 or 15 pieces missing. So you can see exactly what’s going on. Despite the fact that a couple of pieces are still missing. So this is, Mike Yeadon is right. This – the facts that we can see, are compelling evidence – irrefutable evidence, for pre-meditated murder. And for that you have to pay a price. There is no immunity. Even under our legal systems. There is no immunity for anyone for pre-meditated murder. How can there be?

So all of the doctors, who are taking part in this, all of the pharmaceutical companies who are – which are taking part in this, everyone who’s involved in this, all of the people – all of the so-called VIPs, the politicians, who are trying to talk people into getting the shots, they’re all going to have to pay a very high price.

And this price, is… it’s, I mean you could throw out a figure, like, everyone who – EVERYONE, suffered damages because of what’s been going on for the past 2 years. EVERYONE. So if you start with a price tag in damages of a million dollars, that would probably be not too high. But we’re not talking about just a million dollars. In pain and suffering, for example. If that’s all you have. But there’s gonna be destroyed businesses, there’s gonna be your health destroyed. But if you start at 1 million dollars, and I think that’s a very low figure, you can multiply this, because we’re talking about intentional infliction of harm. Intentional infliction of harm leads us directly to, what the Americans call ‘punitive damages’.

Ultimately, the only way to pay for this, is by taking apart all of these global corporations, taking back what they stole from us, and using their money for a brand new society. One that’s humane, one that is built on cooperation, one that makes sense, in the human sense.”

Maria Zeee: “Will they go to prison?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. Those who survive the great reckoning, they’re definitely going to go to prison. Yes.”

Maria Zeee: “What do you mean by those who survive?”

Reiner Fuellmich:I think there’s gonna be a Great Reckoning and people, many of those who are… who are responsible, were stupid enough to take the shots themselves. I don’t think they’re gonna survive that. And I don’t have a clear image of how this spiritual reckoning is going to work. But I think they’re going to have to pay a really really really high price.

And that’s why I’m saying, the legal systems will – our new legal system, will deal with them. Those of them who are still there. But we’re only going to have to do the cleanup work, I think.”

Maria Zeee: “And have you got the support of lawyers all over the world, in every country committed to the cause? [Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes.”] I know that Tony Nikolic in Australia has been a great help. He’s a dear friend of mine and he’s helped me too. So…”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yeah. He’s a good – a great character. He’s a great activist. He’s tough. I love him. He’s cool.”

Maria Zeee: “And so you’ve got, you got people all over the world supporting you and on board with this. These public trials.”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. We’re a big team. It’s a team of people. There’s no ego involved in this. None of us has to prove anything to any of us. We’re doing it because we believe in what we’re doing. And we know that this is, ultimately, this is really a fight of good against evil. And we know we’re the good guys. We know it.”

Maria Zeee: “And this new system, this new society, who’s responsible for dictating how that goes?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “No one. It’s just us. We’re all going to set up our own systems of – in our own regions. We’re first going to start in our region. Because – and we’re all different. That’s why I keep telling the people here in Europe, get rid of this f*cking EU. The EU is only – it’s an instrument to steal money from the people, from the member states of the EU. That’s why it was a very smart move of the British to leave the EU. And now the former Eastern European countries are about to leave the EU as well.

We’re going to have to start from scratch. Build up our own systems, supplies systems, as far as energy, as far as food is concerned, in our regions. And then connect with each other. Exchange ideas. But never again shall we allow anyone to rule from above; from very far away.”

Maria Zeee: “And will we have an exposure of all of these organizations, all of these companies, everyone involved? Will that all be uncovered?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. I think absolutely. No one’s going to get away.”

Maria Zeee: “How can the public track this, and track what’s going on?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “I think it’s already happening. The news cannot be suppressed any more. As I said, all of these so-called side effects, which are not side effects, really, of the vaccinations, cannot be swept under the rug anymore. 40% excess mortality; I mean, what more can you say?

But if you want to – if you want to keep, or if you want to get detailed information, we, the Corona Committee, I don’t want to heap all this praise on ourselves, but the Corona Committee has interviewed over 150 experts from all walks of science.

Luc Montagnier, he’s a professor who won a Nobel Prize, from France. Catherine Austin Fitts, I already mentioned her. Dr. Mike Yeadon. Robert Malone. Peter McCullough. All of these people, we have interviewed them in great detail.

Robert Malone was very hesitant, at first. This is a few months ago. But in these few months, he has completely come around and understood that what he thought was conspiracy theories, involving the W – the World Economic Forum, for example, is absolutely true. And he says it’s in our face! You can read it. They’re publishing this! They’re so stupid. They’re really stupid.

But, we must not underestimate them, we must take them seriously, because they have paid a lot of people a lot of money to do their bidding and many of them are in strategically important positions. So we have to deal with these people. And we will. And we will.”

Maria Zeee: “And this plan, for the “great reset”, potentially, the cyber COVID shutting down all the networks… Do we know any more about that?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Anything is possible. I don’t think it’s going to happen. There’s so many rumors out there. There’s so much panic mongering. Much of this is part of the illusion that they’re creating. Much of this is part of the psychological operation, which depends to a large degree on keeping us disoriented, keeping us in a panic-mode.

Keeping us in a position – there’s a… what is it called? The Biderman Chart of Coercion? Incredible. You should look this up. This is from the 1950’s or so. It is a deliberate psychological operation which Professor Mattias Desmet explained to us, it’s as though they are, and he says it’s not ‘as though’, it is, they’re hypnotizing 30% of the population. This is how it works with 30% of the population. You cannot reach them anymore. Because if you’re hypnotized, you can’t see anything, you can’t feel anything.

And he compared this with an old Chinese technique. They, in China, they still perform surgery – not all of them, but in some cases by hypnotizing people. So if you have open heart surgery, and you’re being hypnotized, of course you can’t listen to anything. You will not hear anything we’re telling them. So that’s what he said.

But! The good news is, 40% of the population can still be reached. 40% are sort of sitting on the fence, don’t know which way to get off, and they can still be approached by us. And more and more of them are waking up. Including those who have gotten the shots. Because they feel that they’ve been fooled. All of a sudden, they’re telling – they’re getting, they’re being told, “No! You’re unvaccinated because you haven’t gotten your third shot, or your fourth shot.” And this is just going too far.

Maria Zeee: “Or your fifth! In the Netherlands. Your fifth, now. My goodness. And, are the number of people that are vaccinated, what they’re telling us true? Because we just had a report out of the UK, stating that there’s only 25 million that have – 25 million that have not even received 1 dose.”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yeah. I think, I think the numbers are completely false. They’re lying to us. They’re lying whenever they’re opening up their mouths. Here in Germany, we believe that 40% of the population have not been vaccinated yet. They claim that 80%, or more, have been vaccinated. But we don’t believe that.

The same is true in the United States. Except in the United States it’s even worse, as far as they’re concerned. Because we believe that maybe 50%, maybe 55% have been vaccinated. But no more.

And now people from the health care industry are beginning to walk off their jobs. They’re gonna, they’re gonna shut down the entire healthcare business, and we’re gonna do the same in Austria and in Germany. Because we have founded unions, and one of the most important sections of these unions is the healthcare section. Because we know that many members of the healthcare business, including nurses, for example, in particular nurses, will not get the shots. So they need protection. And that’s why we founded these unions.”

Maria Zeee: “Right. And these unions, you plan to extend them globally? Everywhere? [Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. Yes.”] Set up for those people?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. We’re already discussing this amongst ourselves with the international group of lawyers. Yeah.”

Maria Zeee: “That’s wonderful news. That’s wonderful news. So, so there is hope. [Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes.”] Many people are feeling like it is a lost cause, and the World Health Organization gave us this, this deadline of the 1st of July, 2022, to fully vaccinate 70% of the world. And what is fully va- what is “fully vaccinated” mean to them, by the 1st of July as they keep moving the goalpost?

But we are saying that there is hope. So… what, Dr. Fuellmich, you go to Telegram, and the website that the people can find you on as well, the – my apologies, the Corona Investigative Committee?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yeah. You can find it – I think much of this is in English. Or I think there’s a button “ENGLISH”. If you push that then everything comes up in English. Um, I don’t know a lot about these IT things, but if you want to look it up, the German – the website is corona-ausscuss.de [correction: corona-ausschuss.de]. Ausschuss is a German word for committee. And of course I have my telegram channel, which my friend and our manager Corvin Rabenstein, handles.

And I mean, I get hundreds and hundreds of emails every day. But my colleagues filter them so that ultimately I get about a hundred per day. But then there’s another 150 or so text messages through Threema, Telegram, Signal, Wire – all of these messenger services. Plus I have to write my briefs. Last night I wrote a couple of briefs, plus I have to do interviews, beyond Zoom calls and phone conferences, etc., etc. But, I know it’s worth it. And I know we’re making progress.

Maria Zeee: “That’s good to hear. What I’ll do, is after this interview, I will include those links for the audience so that they can track what’s going on, on your Telegram. Will there be an announcement on your Telegram about this 2 week international – [Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes.”] Yes? There will be?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yes. There will be – we’re going to try and get as much attention for this trial, because there’s so many really good people working on this. As much attention as possible. Because we do know that, as Catherine Austin Fitts says, it’s not just about getting the indictments, it’s about giving the people factual and a legal platform on which to stand up, rise up, and fight these bastards.

We’re probably going to have a couple of constitutional law professors who will give us their view on whether we can really do this. Because the German constitution, unlike all of the others, has a section: 20 subsection 4, which explicitly gives the people a right to resist if there is evidence that someone is trying to over – is trying to get rid of the constitution or democracy altogether.

And, there’s not just some evidence, there’s clear and convincing evidence that that’s what’s happening right now. Because they’re trying to introduce a fascist system, and that’s why they have to get rid of democracy.”

Maria Zeee: “And how do the people get involved while… with what’s happening?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “I think the most important thing is to just get the information and spread it. Give the information to as many people as possible. Because that is what empowerment is all about. You have to know what’s going on. You have to know the true facts.”

Maria Zeee: “Well I certainly think that telling people that are on the fence that there are international crimes against humanity being, you know, being lodged – cases being lodged for this, surely, that this would prick up their ears. I mean, I personally been talking to people who are saying there’s no way I’m going back for more. This is ludicrous.

So there are people that are waking up and yes, you’re right. 30% of the population, they cannot wake up; they may even believe, after it’s all out in the open, that this was all for our health. But the power is still in the people.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, thank you so much.

For the audience, please do subscribe to this channel; I will include all the links at the bottom in the end. Thank you for watching and share this information everywhere. Everyone must know that the lies are being exposed. They can no longer hide this plan. This global mass depopulation, kill-shot, has to stop.

Goodnight everyone. And goodnight, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich.”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Thank you, and good luck. Do not give up. Fight.”

Maria Zeee: “Thank you. We will not stop. Goodnight everyone.”

REFERENCED LINKS:

Dr. Mike Yeadon: Evidence for Premeditated Mass Murder
Foundation Corona Committee: https://corona-ausschuss.de/en/
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s Telegram: https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS: What is occurring around us is no less than a huge global overreach of abuse and power through means of extortion, malfeasance and deception. And as more information is being revealed, it is getting clearer that all of these different groups – multiple governments/politicians, agencies (WHO, UN, WEF, NIH, FDA, NHS, CDC, DARPA, etc.), pharma companies (Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson&Johnson, etc.), and other institutions (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Johns Hopkins University, MIT, Wuhan Lab, etc.), including many mainstream media channels, have been colluding together to bring this totalitarian agenda on to humanity.

It’s not just about enacting legal ramification on the deadly vaccines and the manufacturers. There is a much bigger plot involved in this sinister scheme, and it involves companies and organizations throughout the whole world which have been infiltrated and perpetuating this global dictatorship behind the scenes for many decades.

But now it’s up to us, the rest of the people, to end this madness and refuse to participate in this hostile takeover – DO NOT COMPLY / DO NOT CONSENT to this tyranny.

God bless you all, and many, many thanks to Reiner Fuellmich, Mike Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts, and everyone else who is remaining strong and defending humanity from this oppressive assault on our rights and freedom.

*Featured image/screenshot credited to: Maria Zeee@rumble / Reiner Fuellmich

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Walensky and Fauci Fumble in Their Responses to the Senate Committee, with Rand Paul’s Call for Fauci to Resign – But is the Senate Culpable as Well?

Rand to Fauci: “You won’t admit that it’s dangerous, and for that lack of judgement, I think it’s time that you resign.”

This post is not meant to convey whether or not there is an existence of a “deadly virus” or not. But it is to point out the suspicious nature of experiments that the NIH has funded/endorsed in regards to gain-of-function research, and also to show the indirect and dishonest responses from two individuals who have been spear-heading the shady “coronavirus/vaccine” situation.

The spotlight is on CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, and NIH/NIAID Infectious Disease “expert” Anthony Fauci.

Now, I want to first preface by saying that I am withholding judgement on the legitimacy of Senate hearings to begin with. While I would love to believe that there are indeed good politicians in high places that can make real change in ousting corruption in big establishments, many are speculating that psyops have been put in place to prolong certain narratives while keeping people’s hopes alive that something will be done about it. And of course we can’t ignore the possibility that even if there are those who are trying to make a real positive change, they may be set against a huge criminal organization who will stop at nothing in order to drive their own agenda forward.

Case in point: Walensky, the FDA, Pfizer, etc. have already gone ahead with their atrocious approval of these dangerous COVID “vaccines” on children, in which this agenda should never have gone on so far to begin with since there is ample evidence that the vaccines have nothing to do with our health and are definitely NOT “safe and effective”.

So to continue witnessing this farce without arrests being made casts a dubious look into the justice system as it is. Not only do Fauci, Bourla, Gelman, Daszak, Walensky, Gates, their agencies, as well as complicit governmental bodies, including Joe Biden, etc. have immense crimes to answer for, but the whole legal/legislative systems seems to be right behind them if this is allowed to continue further.

(This is, of course, under the assumptions that the whole of the legal/legislative structure isn’t already completely corrupted/broken to begin with…)

With that being said, I would still like to point out the following two Senators that are at least calling out Walensky and Fauci for their complicity in keeping this ruse going. Senators Rand Paul and Bill Cassidy certainly seem as if they are trying to get to the bottom of these narratives. But could they be merely actors on a stage? Keeping us happily engaged in believing that the “good guys” are making progress? Or are they genuinely one of the few brave souls standing up to deceit and subterfuge?

I will say this: while Anthony Fauci is a known liar, how good is his acting? He certainly looks shaken up as Rand Paul questions him…

Senator Rand Paul@58:24: “Fauci, I don’t expect you today to admit that you approved of NIH funding for gain-of-function research at Wuhan. But your repeated denials have worn thin and the majority of Americans, frankly, don’t believe you.

Even the NIH now admits that EcoHealth Alliance did perform experiments in Wuhan that created viruses not found in nature that actually did gain in lethality.

The facts are clear. The NIH did fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan despite your protestations. You can deny it all you want, but even the Chinese authors of the paper, in their paper, admit that viruses not found in nature were created, and yes they gained in infectivity.

Your persistent denials though are not simply a stain on your reputation, but are clear and present danger to the country, and to the world. As Professor Kevin Esvelt of MIT has written, “Gain of function research looks like a gamble that civilization can’t afford to risk.” And yet here we are again, with you steadfast in your denials. Why does it matter? Because gain-of-function research with laboratory created viruses not found in nature, could cause a pandemic even worse the next time.

We’re suffering today from one that has a mortality of approximately 1%, they’re experimenting with viruses that have mortalities of between 15 and 50%. Yes, our civilization could be at risk from one of these viruses.

Experiments that combine unknown viruses with known pandemic causing viruses are incredibly risky. Experiments that combine unknown viruses with coronaviruses that have as much as 50% mortality could endanger civilization as we know it.

And here you sit. Unwilling to accept any responsibility for the current pandemic, and unwilling to take any steps to prevent gain-of-function research from possibly unleashing an even more deadly virus.

You mislead the public by saying that the published viruses could not be COVID. Well exactly no one is alleging that. No one is alleging that the published viruses by the Chinese are COVID. What we are saying is that this was risky type of research; gain-of-function research. It was risky to share this with the Chinese, and that COVID may have been created from a not yet revealed virus. We don’t anticipate the Chinese are going to reveal the virus if it came from their lab.

You know that, but you continue to mislead. You continue to support NIH money going to Wuhan. You continue to say you trust the Chinese scientist. You appear to have learned nothing from this pandemic.

Will you today finally take some responsibility for funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan?”

Anthony Fauci: “Senator, with all due respect, I disagree with so many of the things that you’ve said.

Gain – first of all, gain-of-function is a very nebulous term. We have spent, not us, but outside bodies, a considerable amount of effort to give a more precise definition to the type of research that is of concern that might lead to a dangerous situation.

You are aware of that. That is called P3CO.”

Senator Rand Paul: “We’re aware that you deleted “gain-of-function” from the NIH website.”

Anthony Fauci: “Well I can get back to that a moment, if we have time. But let’s get back to the operating framework and guide rails of which we operate under. And you have ignored them. The guidelines are very very clear, that you have to be dealing with a pathogen that clearly is shown and very likely to be highly transmissible in an uncontrollable way in humans and to have a high degree of morbidity and mortality, and that you do experiments to enhance that. Hence the word EPPP: Enhanced Pathogens of Potential Pandemic.”

Senator Rand Paul: “So when EcoHealth Alliance took the virus SHC-014 and combined it with WIV-1 and caused a recombinant virus that doesn’t exist in nature, and it made mice sicker, mice that had humanized cells, you’re saying that that’s not gain-of-function research?”

Anthony Fauci: “According to the framework and guidelines of – “

Senator Rand Paul: “So what you’re doing is defining away gain-of-function. You’re simply saying it doesn’t exist because you changed the definition on the NIH website. This is terrible and you’re – you’re completely trying to escape the idea that we should do something about trying to prevent a pandemic from leaking from a lab.

There’s – the preponderance of evidence now points towards this coming from the lab, and what you’ve done is change the definition on your website to try to cover your ass, basically. That’s what you’ve done. You’ve changed the website to try to have a new definition that doesn’t include the risky research that’s going on.

Until you admit that it’s risky, we’re not going to get anywhere. You have to admit that this research was risky. The NIH has now rebuked them. Your own agency has rebuked them.

But the thing is, you’re still unwilling to admit that they gained in function when they say that they became sicker. They gained in lethality; it’s a new virus. That’s not gain-of-function?”

Anthony Fauci: “According to the definition that is currently operable… you know – Senator, let’s make it clear for the people who are listening.

The current definition was done over a 2-3 year period by outside bodies, including the NSABB, two conferences by the National Academy of Science, Engineering and Medicine, on December 2014, March 2016. We commissioned external risk benefit assessment, and then on January of 2017, the office of science and technology policy of the White House issued the current policy.

I have not changed any definition.”

Senator Rand Paul: “And coincidentally, coincidentally the definition appeared on the same day the NIH said that, yes, there was a gain of function in Wuhan, the same day the definition appeared – the new definition, to try to define a way what’s going on in Wuhan.

Until you accept it, until you accept responsibility, we’re not going to get anywhere close to trying to prevent another lab leak of this dangerous sort of experiment. You won’t admit that it’s dangerous, and for that lack of judgement, I think it’s time that you resign.”

Chairman Murray: “Thank you Senator Paul. And I would like, um, to give the time to Dr. Fauci.”

Anthony Fauci: “Yeah, well, there were so many things that are egregious misrepresentation here, uh, Madame Chair, that I don’t think I’d be able to refute all of them, but just a couple of them, for the listens to here for – 

You has said that I’m unwilling to take any responsibility for the current pandemic. I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. The current pandemic. Okay?

Number two, you said the overwhelming amount of evidence indicates that’s a lab leak; I believe most card-carrying viral phylogenists and molecular virologists would disagree with you, that is much more likely, even though we leave open all possibilities, it’s much more likely that this was a natural occurrence.

Third, you say we continue – “

Senator Rand Paul: “We’ve tested 80,000 animals and no animals have been found with COVID.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, the time is for Dr. Fauci to respond.”

Anthony Fauci: “And third, you made a statement just a moment ago that’s completely incorrect. Where you say we continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Senator Rand Paul: “You approved it in August of last year…”

Anthony Fauci: “No no, your statements say, quote, I wrote it down as you were writing, “You continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology – “

Senator Rand Paul: “Your committee a month ago says you still trust the Chinese scientist and you still support the research over there. You said it a month ago in the committee.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, I have allowed Dr. Fauci to respond. You’ve had your time and I’m going to give him one more minute.”

Senator Rand Paul: “If he’s going to be dishonest he ought to be challenged.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, we will allow Dr. Fauci to respond after you’ve given accusations like that. Dr. Fauci.”

Anthony Fauci: “Well I don’t have any more to say except to say that as usual, and I’ve – I have a great deal of respect for this body of the Senate and it makes me very uncomfortable to have to say something, but he is egregiously incorrect in what he says. Thank you.”

Senator Rand Paul: “History will figure that out on its own.”

While Rand Paul seems to be on the right side of history, the complete negligence and willful ignorance on the part of the Senate committee as a whole to not continuously address the many, MANY adverse events of the COVID vaccines which have harmed MILLIONS of people, according to VAERS, and who instead continue to humor the narrative that the vaccine is the end all be all, is, quite frankly, ludicrous and criminal in and of itself. While they may allude to the information about the adverse events, no steps have been taken to fully investigate and analyze the hundreds of thousands of ACTUAL DATA provided.

There is enough substantial evidence declaring that the COVID vaccines are NOT safe nor effective, yet the ruse continues to go on.

Not to mention the push now to mass vaccinate millions of children, who were never at high risk from “COVID” to begin with… it is obvious that the vaccine effort should have been halted A LONG TIME AGO.

Keep in mind that it is common knowledge that the adverse events are under-reported by a factor of only 1-10% being reported for non-serious side effects, and a speculative estimation of 10-50% being reported for serious events.

There is also the suspicious account of the FDA presentation that flashed for a brief split-second showing a list of the “possible” side effects from the COVID vaccines to be on the lookout for:

Screenshot from: [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XTiL9rUpkg ] U.S. Food and Drug Administration@2:33:40

So to continue to ignore these facts and people’s plights from the devastating effects of the vaccines and prolonging this “pandemic” and the vaccine narrative is either complete obliviousness, to put it nicely, or downright complicity.

Again, this is not to speak of everyone in the Senate individually (unless it is in fact true…), but to point out the incredibly inane decisions of those ultimately in charge of these committees and giving their final verdict which has enabled these atrocious crimes against humanity to continue.

It is my opinion that a call for Anthony Fauci to resign does not do the damage that he has caused throughout the years (including his organizations: NIH/NIAID) justice, but instead efforts to make arrests of those initiating these crimes should be pursued as well.

Moving on to the second portion (from the same hearing), we see Rochelle Walensky responding to Senator Bill Cassidy’s inquiries to address natural immunity versus vaccine-induced immunity, and also her refusal to answer uncertainty in how many CDC employees are vaccinated.

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Dr. Walensky, couple things: as I walked in, I came in late, one of you – either you or Dr. Fauci – were saying that the reason that we’re not saying that natural immunity is protective as is a vaccine, even though there’s recent publication showing that 6-8 months out, 92% of those with natural immunity have T cells, B cells and antibodies that would be considered adequate to protect, and indeed B cell continues to climb, that we don’t have data.

Now in your response to Mr. Casey, you just mentioned that CDC has access to tens of thousands of EHRs [electronic health records]. And I’ve been told that HHS or CDC has access to patient identifiable data, as to who test positive. So I do that as a prologue.

If we don’t know that natural immunity confers protection against future infection, is because we’ve decided not to look. Because I’ve learned that there is a cohort of people that we know have been previously infected, we’ve got the bench research showing that the triad of antibodies, T cells and B cells are there, and that 92% of them are still there at 6 months out, so why don’t we – why have we not done the research showing that natural immunity confers protection against recurrent infection?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Yeah, thank you so much for allowing me to clarify this point, because I understand, I understand the question.

Um, first of all, let me just reiterate that our current stand after reviewing 96 papers in the scientific brief on this issue is that everyone who’s been previously infected should be vaccinated.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But that’s not my question.”

Rochelle Walensky: “Right, agreed. So, so – and part of the challenge here is as you know the infection induced immunity and the biases associated with retrospectively looking at the data. Several of those papers that we reviewed for that brief have demonstrated that the kind of disease that you had at the time you had it matters.

Um, did you have disease a year and a half ago? Did you have – were you an older person? Were you – ?”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “May I stop you for a second?

We could do this prospectively, because you know who is actually, apparently I’m told, you’ve got patient identifiable data, and you would be able to say, okay, 6 months ago we’re going to start everybody infected within the last 6 months, and be able to follow their EHR, prospectively, to see this.

I mean, theoretically, CDC has the ability to do this right now.”

Rochelle Walensky: “Yet that too would have its own biases. So one of the things that we have demonstrated in the scientific brief is that asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic people, who might not present to their providers, might present to an urgent care clinic who might not be recorded in their own EHR, likely have less robust protection than those who’ve been severely affected.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But that could be established prospectively if using the data that you have. And you could even say, if you had symptomatic infection, you don’t need to be vaccinated, we would consider you immune, you don’t have to be subjected to the mandate, but – “

Rochelle Walensky: “If we had data – if we had data that demonstrated a correlation of protection, Dr. Fauci already mentioned data that they’re working on to look at correlates of protection, not just in antibodies, but as you noted in T cell function as well. So if we were able to document a correlate of protection we absolutely could prospectively follow – “

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But this paper that I’m reading from NIH, speaks that there is durable memory of the virus up to 8 months after infection in 95% of the people who recovered, including B cells, which continue to climb, and T cells and antibodies.

And I’m also saying you could do it clinically, because we have data that’s patient identifiable, that we could go back and look and see if they were exposed. They could be in a hot spot like Louisiana, where you know they’re being exposed, and then you would see. Not just by lab data, but empirically.

I can tell you, the American people intuitively understand this, and they feel a little bit like we’re being willfully blind to it.

I have limited time, let me just ask you something else. What percent of CDC employees are vaccinated?”

Rochelle Walensky: “We’re actively encouraging vaccination in all of our employees and doing a lot of education and outreach in order to get our agency fully vaccinated.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “And the – but the percent?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have that for you today.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “I’m told that 75… some north of 75% of CDC employees at headquarters are still working remotely. Is that correct?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Um, we are following regulations through HHS and the federal government.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “No, that’s not my question. I apologize to be rude, but – but I’m asking a very straightforward question.

I’ve been told that north of 75% of employees at CDC headquarters are working remotely. Is that correct?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Senator, I don’t actually know the number off the top of my head. So I’d have to – “

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “When you look down the hallway, are there empty desks? Are over 50% of the desk empty?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Senator, I don’t have the numbers off the top of my head. What I will tell you is that we’re working closely within HHS and the administration to follow the governmental rules for return to the workplace.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “There was a recent GAO report that shows, it was released in the last 2 weeks, that there’s been no coordinated response in the federal government to get people back into work.

Now if there’s any agency that – since we have teachers in Fulton county are back at work, that the caseload of COVID in Fulton county is about 88, at its peak it was 606, if what I’ve been told by someone who frankly kind of knows, that people in laboratories are not showing up, I have no clue how people, how laboratory workers who presumably are vaccinated, wearing PPE, would consider themselves eligible to stay at home.

I say this because, I just want to echo – we’ve got to lead by example in the federal government. If our public health agencies don’t have enough confidence in the immunization and the PPE to go back to work, fighting infectious diseases, there’s going to be a lot of undermining of a willingness to further fund public health.”

Rochelle Walensky: “We absolutely have our central labs back at work, conducting their essential research towards this response, and um, we are following the regulations and providing technical assistance and technical support to the federal government for return to work policies.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Uh, one more thing, I had – Angus King and I had sent a letter dated February the 25th, asking about genomic surveillance. We’ve still not received a response. You reference it in your earlier remarks. Both Senator King and I would appreciate a response.”

Rochelle Walensky: “We’ll get back to you. Thank you very much.”

I can sum up Walensky’s testimony in 5 short dialogues; paraphrasing, of course:

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Do you have data showing that natural immunity may offer better protection than vaccine immunity; and if not, then why?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

(By the way, I want to interject here by saying that Senator Bill Cassidy is absolutely correct when he posits that the reason that they “don’t have the data” is because they deliberately did not look for it. I also want to add the shady practice of the pharmaceutical companies breaking protocol and completely getting rid of the control group after only a few weeks into the COVID vaccine trial…)

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “What percentage of CDC employees are vaccinated?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Are around 75% of CDC employees still working remotely from home?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “When you go into the CDC headquarters, how much percentage of desks have no workers there?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Bill Cassidy: “Senator King and I asked you about “genomic sequence” back in February but have not received a response yet. We would appreciate a response.”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time… but we’ll get back to you.”

This is the Director of the CDC, ladies and gentlemen. This is who is in charge of an organization that we are supposed to entrust our lives to in order to help get us through a “deadly pandemic”.

When she cannot say, in all honesty, that 100% of her CDC employees – who presumably have complete trust in the vaccines that she kept reiterating is the most important thing needed for our health – is fully vaccinated, while at the same time preaching that young children most definitely should get it, is EXTREMELY suspect and I am amazed at the continual indulgence of these hearings to not call out this hypocrisy for what it is. (Save for a small handful of Senators, that is.)

But at least we know that Rochelle Walensky hasn’t lied about how many of her employees have been vaccinated… yet.

Lastly, during the committee hearing, there were other Senators posing additional queries as to the questionable responses and suspicious nature of those testifying and their habits of skirting away from certain questions, which I want to mention here as well.

Senators Marshall, Burr and Moran (of the additional 3 testimonies that I watched, there may have been more with similar interests) have also raised legitimate concerns over the vaccines, mandates and debates about natural immunity versus vaccine efficacy – and was also met with a jumble of non-answers mixed with endless endorsements of the COVID vaccines.

Honestly, if I, an average American citizen, can see through their facade, then surely well-educated and seemingly experienced individuals in detecting deceit and malpractice would be able to determine the illegitimacy of these corrupt establishments and their cohorts as well.

So again I have to wonder at the incredibly unnecessary perpetuation of these fraudulent activities, instead of finally taking appropriate steps to shut down this criminal conspiracy.

To those Senators and other researchers who are genuinely seeking the truth and attempting to uncover the treasons, misconduct, and egregious scandal that has corrupted our governmental body and health/medical industries, my sincere gratitude and respect to you for standing strong and having enough integrity to stand up against these depravities.

God bless.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Edward Lich from Pixabay

Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates

Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.

Somewhat of a disclaimer: I put “may” in the title of this post to deflect direct allegations that “may” end up turning out to be false. Of course, in the world we find ourselves in, where money, power and hidden motives rule, it seems the same key players are involved, over and over again. I’d say that is no coincidence and holds incredible importance when addressing the strange situations that are occurring around us.

I also focus on the names given above because they are the most prominent figure-heads of the “health initiative” and have high-ranking positions who may also just happened to have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. Again, coincidence? I’m inclined not to think so.

Why is bringing up connections of Jeffrey Epstein to the NIH and the Human Genome Project so important?

Well, other than the obvious reasons (convicted serial pedophile and blackmail extraordinaire – along with Ghislaine Maxwell, currently under trial) are the incredibly suspicious interests that Epstein has divulged and perhaps invested in to further his goals.

Take the following, for consideration:

“- He hoped to seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women / Epstein told scientists and businessmen about his ambitions to use his New Mexico ranch as a base where women would be inseminated with his sperm and would give birth to his babies

– longstanding fascination with what has become known as transhumanism: the science of improving the human population through technologies like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence

– Epstein discussed the financier’s interest in cryonics, an unproven science in which people’s bodies are frozen to be brought back to life in the future. Mr. Epstein told this person that he wanted his head and penis to be frozen.

– Epstein said he was fascinated with how certain traits were passed on, and how that could result in superior humans.”

Original source: Jeffrey Epstein Hoped to Seed Human Race With His DNA
Alternative source found here: [ https://storageunit.home.blog/2020/02/17/jeffrey-epstein-hoped-to-seed-human-race-with-his-dna-at-zorro-ranch/ ]

Some studies that Jeffrey Epstein supported and sponsored are the following:

(all 4 published wholly or in part by Martin A. Nowak – “Professor of Mathematics and of Biology at Harvard University. He works on the mathematical description of evolutionary processes, including the evolution of cooperation and human language, as well as the dynamics of virus infections and human cancer” [ https://oeb.harvard.edu/people/martin-nowak ])

2006[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279745/ ] “Five rules for the evolution of cooperation”

“Support from the John Templeton Foundation and the NSF/NIH joint program in mathematical biology (NIH grant 1R01GM078986-01) is gratefully acknowledged. The Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University is sponsored by Jeffrey Epstein.”

2007[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2387227/ ] “Breaking the symmetry between interaction and replacement in evolutionary dynamics on graphs”

“Support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (H.O.), the John Templeton Foundation and the NSF/NIH joint program in mathematical biology (NIH grant 1R01GM078986-01) (M.A.N.) and FCT-Portugal (J.M.P.) is gratefully acknowledged. The Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University is sponsored by Jeffrey Epstein.”

2008[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567469/ ] “Prevolutionary dynamics and the origin of evolution”

“This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (H.O.), the National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health joint program in mathematical biology (NIH Grant R01GM078986), and J. Epstein.”

2010[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842638/ ] “Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of direct reciprocity”

“This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation, the National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health Joint Program in Mathematical Biology (National Institutes of Health grant R01GM078986) and J. Epstein.”

Of course, the studies mentioned above are all tied into one particular grant, by the NIH, no less. And again, as a reminder, who is the head (soon to be former) of the NIH? Mr. Francis Collins (who is also known for his leadership position of the Human Genome Project), who is to step down from the NIH role at the end of the year, but yet continue his research at his lab.

And that of course ties into with Anthony Fauci as a close colleague and friend of Francis Collins, and as most of us know about Fauci, is the lead of the Coronavirus Task Force and director of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases – a branch within the NIH) – and I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention Mrs. Christine Grady, wife of Anthony Fauci and also Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.

But that also brings up a Mr. Eric Lander, well known for his work on the Human Genome Project, who has met Jeffrey Epstein at least twice, according to records. Does this necessarily mean that Eric Lander was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and all of the allegations and crimes he has been engaged in? Of course not. But it does set a suspicious light in regards to Jeffrey Epstein’s close relationships to other scientific researchers, who many have alleged to have known about Epstein’s interests and various fundings into these projects, not to mention his sordid history. It would appear that Jeffrey Epstein was quite a prolific (no pun intended) character in the scientific and medical community.

And it would make sense that someone with money, plus a sinister desire to populate the world with his offspring, would attempt to get close to those who could further his goals. So for multiple scientists and researchers to have a passing acquaintance with Jeffrey Epstein would not be unheard of. However, this points a very specific light on those who do seem to entertain Mr. Epstein’s ideals.

And now with Mr. Eric Lander, selected by Joe Biden as the head of the Science and Technology division,

Jeffrey Epstein (left), Eric Lander (right)

it makes one wonder, to what degree would money be a motivational factor, even if ideologies differ? Would some scientists care? There would not only be excessive financial compensation, but it may also satiate a scientific curiosity of a “what if” scenario.

Then of course we have to mention Bill Gates, who isn’t necessarily a scientist or medical researcher, but who has “philanthropic” ventures into transhumanism, synthetic meat, genetically modifying products and human beings, as it is, despite what “fact-checkers” try to refute.

“Gene editing in animals or even humans raises more complicated questions of safety and ethics. In 2014, the World Health Organization issued guidelines for testing genetically modified mosquitoes, including standards for efficacy, biosafety, bioethics, and public participation. In 2016, the National Academy of Sciences built on the WHO’s guidelines with recommendations for responsible conduct in gene-drive research on animals. (The Gates Foundation co-funded this work with the National Institutes of Health, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.)”

[ https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-04-10/gene-editing-good?linkId=50322894 ] “Gene Editing for Good | How CRISPR Could Transform Global Development” by Bill Gates

“Gene editing in animals or even humans raises more complicated questions of safety and ethics.”

…Well, it’s a good thing Bill Gates is such good friends with Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci, both of whom work in the NIH and have leadership roles; including Fauci’s wife, head of Bioethics at the NIH. Very useful and convenient, I’m sure.

And who, by several accounts, has met with Jeffrey Epstein not once, not twice, but NUMEROUS times.

“In fact, beginning in 2011, Mr. Gates met with Mr. Epstein on numerous occasions — including at least three times at Mr. Epstein’s palatial Manhattan townhouse, and at least once staying late into the night, according to interviews with more than a dozen people familiar with the relationship, as well as documents reviewed by The New York Times.”

Bill Gates (left), Francis Collins (middle), Anthony Fauci (right) – Source: nih.gov

Now, of course we can’t claim “guilty by association”, right? But what about when the individuals/institutions listed above have direct funding and sponsorships from Jeffrey Epstein and sit on the Board of Directors of these very organizations? Can they claim plausible deniability?

“Even though Epstein did not donate to PED or Harvard after 2007, he played an “indirect but significant role” in facilitating a grant from the John Templeton Foundation to PED in 2015.”

Epstein, Martin Nowak, Eric Lander, MIT and a very sinister genome project tied to the Covid test

“Epstein had suggested at one point that the John Templeton Foundation could match any donations dollar for dollar. Unfortunately for Ito and Epstein, a spokesperson for the Foundation could find no record of Epstein’s plan, and provided no funding, according to Farrow.”

MIT’s Media Lab Director Resigns From NYT Company Board After Pocketing Millions In ‘Anonymous’ Epstein Donations

Although these two statements seem to contradict each other, and the fact that Jeffrey Epstein is mentioned as a sponsor on Martin A. Nowak’s published studies (unless we are to conclude that Mr. Nowak is lying about his sponsorships; though in light of multiple various sources agreeing that this was a huge interest of Epstein, and with proof of various meetings with those in higher positions, the supposition that Mr. Nowak is lying is highly unlikely), we can’t ignore the fact that anonymous donors and facilitators were likely happening, especially when groups/foundations involved knew what kind of detrimental publicity would arise from a known connection with this infamous criminal.

Continuing on with the John Templeton Foundation, who named Francis Collins as the recipient of the 2020 Templeton Award, and who was involved in the very studies that Jeffrey Epstein sponsored and funded, according to the ncbi/pubmed articles listed above (of which were also supported by a NIH grant, I should add) also sponsors BioLogos, a “Christian” outlet founded by Francis Collins who is eager to combine science and religion together. Make no mistake, the material exposed on the BioLogos site is meant to lead Christians astray; with many articles a propaganda piece to influence and convince Christians that getting the vaccine is for the betterment of humankind.

But again, this still raises the issue that even if Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci aren’t directly involved with Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Gates is, and seems to be a very significant one at that. With such financial sway and investments, including funding and sponsorships of numerous organizations, largely of which consist of pharmaceutical companies that just so happen to be insisting that everyone on the planet needs to take these mRNA/DNA “vaccines” – and when researching their possible involvement in CRISPR technology as well – this sets a very alarming precedence on who’s really in charge of our health system.

So again, why is it such a concern that the heads of the National Institutes of Health, and the heads of the Human Genome Projects, and prominent scientists/researchers, and professors at acclaimed universities, and billionaire philanthropists who have a vested interest in CRISPR/gene editing technology, have such business (and perhaps personal) ties and gains related to a man who wanted to populate the world with his seed and went so far as developing a “breeding ranch” and funded studies devoted to human evolution?

The answer speaks for itself, honestly.

Now, with all of Epstein’s connections and influence, not to mention all of his funding of numerous projects, are we to really believe that those involved with his projects have the best interest of humankind at heart? The same people, mind you, who are directly involved with pushing a “COVID vaccine” on the WHOLE WORLD?

And are we to really believe that the Director of the NIH, Francis Collins, and Eric Lander, a very prominent figure in the scientific community, including at Harvard and MIT:

“An influential geneticist, molecular biologist, and mathematician, Dr. Lander has won many awards and recognitions for his work in mapping and discovering the human genome. Among other former positions, Dr. Lander was a leader in the international Human Genome Project (1990-2003) and served as co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) for President Barack Obama (2009-2017). He was a professor of biology at MIT, professor of systems biology at Harvard Medical School, and President and Founding Director of the Board Institute at MIT and Harvard before going on leave in 2021 to serve at the White House.”

[ https://chinaus-icas.org/biden-administration-international-affairs-personnel-tracker/biden-personnel-tracker-climate-health-and-technology/eric-lander-presidential-science-advisor-director-of-the-ostp/ ]

had NO idea about Jeffrey Epstein’s involvement in these studies, supported by the very same institutions they oversee? This either speaks to their complicity, or their ineptitude in directing these organizations. Is this an unfair assessment? Does it instead speak of the inherent flaws (or perhaps strengths, depending on who’s looking at it) of compartmentalization and the excessive ways it can get out of control without proper supervision? But this would ultimately ignore the very real dilemma of bribery, coercion, threats and blackmail – of which Mr. Jeffrey Epstein seems to have been adept in and the center of in various circles.

With credentials such as boasting of sponsoring scientific giants, some of which have won the Nobel Prize:

“The Foundation has also had the priviledge of sponsoring many prominent scientists including Gerald Edelman, Murray Gell-Mann, Eric Lander, George Church, Stephen Hawking, Kip Thorne, Marvin Minsky, Lawrence Krauss, Lee Smolin and Gregory Benford and Nobel laureates, Gerard ‘t Hooft, David Gross and Frank Wilczek.” – Web archive: Jeffrey Epstein Ideas Forum

we have to ask ourselves, why would Jeffrey Epstein lie about Eric Lander, out of everyone? Are we sure he embellished his sponsorships, as multiple articles claim? Or is perhaps the person who has been chosen as President Joe Biden’s top Science Advisor and Director of OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy) denying such claims in order to preserve his own reputation? In the same sense, wouldn’t a person selected for such a prestigious title undergo a stringent selective process, including investigations of past connections and potential involvement in secret programs?

That is, of course, if the presidential/government committees aren’t involved in it themselves…

One last note: am I saying that Jeffrey Epstein was the mastermind behind these nefarious ideas? No. I think there were individuals above him who were directing where these studies and blackmailing efforts were going and who keep themselves largely hidden from the public eye; and who, in my opinion, may have supplied Epstein’s budget. There may also have been connections with certain alphabet agencies involved in these schemes, although these suspicions remain to be substantiated.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”