Which One Are You?: A Follower? Or a Leader? | The Answer May Shock You

No pun intended.

During these uncertain times, especially amidst the corona/vaccine agendas, it has become increasingly clear that there are, sadly, a great percentage of conformed followers than there are questioning leaders.

I’d like to highlight the following social experiments to demonstrate this. Now unless these experiments were staged, because I can’t rule that out, but I am going under the assumption that it has not, and that these are legitimate.

Similar experiments like these have been conducted in the past as well, with varying results. However, just from these modern time experiments, it is worrying the lengths that conformity will go to in order to just be one of the pack, and not be considered an “outlier”. We can see it in abundance today, that humanity hasn’t changed much in their line of thinking. If anything, we have become even more docile, even more compliant, even more unquestioning of even the most inane decisions as long as it comes from a position of “authority”.

The below experiments show the need that people have to follow the group, even if it doesn’t make sense, and/or even if it’s wrong. While the first couple of experiments shown do not involve the welfare of others, the third example most certainly does, and the results are terrifying.

Do you know where you’d stand? Are you being completely honest with yourself? Take a deep, long look at what’s going on in the world; how desperate some people are to fit in, to not be considered a “conspiracy theorist”, or a “right-wing nut” that doesn’t agree with the “majority of the population”… or a dumb imbecile that doesn’t even listen to experts/authority…

Would you be okay going against the grain even though EVERYONE ELSE around you is following a certain narrative?

EXPERIMENT 1. Social Conformity

This first experiment shows a lady who, though there is no reason for doing so, other than everybody else was doing it, conforms to a practice of standing up when a buzzer goes off, then sitting back down after a second or two. There is LITERALLY no reason to do this, but slowly but surely, even those who were not hired actors who initiated this social conditioning from the start, became conformed to following the original test subject.

What would you have done?

It’s easy to say that we wouldn’t participate without being in the same situation as them, but would we, or wouldn’t we? Can we admit when we may just well follow along with the pack for the sake of not being ostracized or be the odd one out? Or would we be strong enough in our own resolution to not follow along with silly mandates, even though everyone else around is?

Experiment 2. Herd Mentality

The below video shows a modern day example of the Asch experiment in progress. The Asch experiment wanted to see how many people would be influenced in giving the wrong answer, simply because everyone else gave the wrong answer. In this line up, 10 people are given the task of choosing which line matches the singular line shown on a separate stand. The first 9 people are all in on the scam to choose the wrong answer, leaving the 10th person, the actual test subject, to decide their answer. Will they trust their instinct and choose the right answer, even if they’re the ONLY ONE to choose it?

Or will they follow along with the crowd?

Herd mentality and peer pressure are very real social dilemmas that affect people in our day to day lives. While some people did not conform to the rest of the group, indicating that there are some willing to follow their intuition and not follow the crowd, even at the risk of ostracization or looking silly, we also can’t overlook the fact that some people may already know about the Asch experiment, and realize that it is a social test; thus skewering the results.

As it is, being different and the only one to choose a different answer, can seem isolating; but if one has confidence in themselves, and doesn’t care what other people think, especially when they’re sure the other people are wrong, can we see real leadership – and perhaps make us second guess our initial reaction/response.

Now, while the first two examples had nothing to do with anything serious, what if the matter literally comes to life and death? What if we are coerced, say… by an authority figure, to carrying out an act that does significant harm to another human being?

Think people will be any less obedient/conforming?

Take a look at the Milgram experiment, which was conducted in the 1960’s to test people’s obedience to authority figures.

Experiment 3. “Listen to the Authorities”

This video is highly disturbing, because it shows the lengths that people will go to simply in the name of listening to an authority figure; even if they’re against it, even if they want nothing more to do with a particular action, if they are commanded by someone in a presumed position of authority, they will continue to commit life-threatening harm on another being.

Source: youtube | Brian Burak | Milgrim Experiment [Milgram]

The gentleman who has the unfortunate task of “punishing” the learner is clearly distraught over the commands to keep inflicting shocks to the other participant. However, at the continued prompting of the experimenter, ends up going all the way to the end of the shock board – even after the learner ceases to respond.

It’s important to note that he is not FORCED to keep pressing the switch. He could refuse – in fact, does so on numerous occasions, yet at the insisting prods of the experimenter, concedes, albeit begrudgingly, and continues to press the switches.

It’s clear that he cares about the other person at the end of the shocks, yet because this authority figure tells him to continue – to inflict terrible pain even to the point of no response – he finishes the task until the experimenter tells him to stop.

The following short interview between the gentleman and the experimenter(s) happens next:

Experimenter: “How do you feel, by the way?”

Subject: “I feel all right, but I don’t like what’s happened to that fellow in there. He’s been hollering – we had to keep giving him shocks – I didn’t like that one bit. I mean, he wanted to get out, and you just kept going, kept throwing 450 volts. I didn’t like that. He wouldn’t even look in on that gentleman.”

Experimenter 2: “But who’s actually pushing the switch?”

Subject: “I was. But he kept insisting. I told him no, but he said it got to keep going. I told him it’s time we stopped when we got up to 195, 210 volts.”

Experimenter 2: “But why didn’t you just stop?”

Subject: “He wouldn’t let me! I wanted to stop.”

Think the test would have been any different if a cute, little puppy was involved? …Well, you’d be wrong.

In an incredibly inhumane experiment, the same experiment was conducted, but this time using a puppy, with real shocks. I obviously DO NOT CONDONE the following test, but wanted to mention it here for further reference to people’s compliance to authority figures:

(And I usually don’t condone cussing on this site, but in some cases it’s warranted and drives the point home rather succinctly)

Charles Sheridan and Richard King took this experiment one step further, but asked subjects to shock a puppy for every incorrect action it made. Unlike Milgram’s experiment, this shock was real. Exactly 20 out of 26 subjects went to the highest voltage.

Almost 80 percent. Think about that when you’re walking around the mall: Eight out of ten of those people you see would torture the shit out of a puppy if a dude in a lab coat asked them to.

Words at the end of the above video from Stanley Milgram that should be immortalized:

“The results, as I observe them in the laboratory, are disturbing. They raised the possibility that human nature cannot be counted on to insulate men from brutality and inhumane treatment at the direction of malevolent authority.

A substantial proportion of people do what they are told to do irrespective of the content of the act and without limitations of conscience. So long as they perceive that the command comes from a legitimate authority.

If in this study, an anonymous experimenter could successfully command adults to subdue a 50 year old man and force on him painful electric shocks against his protests, one can only wonder what government, with its vastly greater authority and prestige, can command of its subjects.

I believe we are all under a social experiment of some kind, by design. The corrupt world leaders are sitting back, watching people follow in line of the most ridiculous and dangerous mandates; laughing at how many actually follow and enforce these rules, while at the same time seeing just how far they can go before people start realizing that it is all a farce.

Then when you consider exactly how much of an influence that social media presents on our life, and the excessive amount of bots programmed to give the users the illusion that a vast amount of the population thinks a certain way, including collusions with the mainstream media – one can see how easily the public could be swayed into a “groupthink” mentality.

So how far can humanity be pushed to following a narrative, a guideline, a rule, if seemingly “everybody” else does it too, and especially when those in a “position of authority” command it?

This is the question that is being asked. And chillingly, a large portion of people would rather follow the herd mentality, than be a brave individual that goes against the status quo. Even if one’s own moral conscience is on the line.

I think it’s high time for all of us, as an individual, to really take a step back and gauge our own actions (and inactions, for that matter). Can we develop our own fortitude, our own strong constitution, to do what’s right – even if “the majority” or “authority figures” demand we do otherwise? What is “right”, for that matter? 

Our moral compass is being tampered with. We need to fine-tune it, and get back on track. Regardless of peer pressure or authoritative control. And we need to be brave enough to stand apart from the herd, and help lead the pack away from this destructive nature.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Crystal Clear Learning

Demoralization: What Happens When We Feel Like Giving Up - Sometimes the world seems so dark - it almost feels hopeless...
You Are Much More Than You Realize | But You Need to Believe It - What do you believe in? Do you REALLY believe it?
The Other Virus: Learned Helplessness - Compliance leading to our downfall.
Why I Believe, What I Believe - Personal Experiences.
Is God calling out to you? | If not, are you SURE? - And if so, are you heeding His call?
Is Unconditional Love Enabling “Wrong” Behavior? - Can we be loving, yet judge at the same time?

Christopher Langan, One of the Smartest Men in the World, Denounces Vaccine Agenda

And calls out the depopulation agenda.

Christopher Langan, dubbed as “the smartest man in America” with a purported IQ of 195-210, has spoken up about his skepticism of the covid vaccine.

Top 30 Smartest People In The World (Updated)

In a facebook post he made on the CTMU (“Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe) group, not only does Mr. Langan call out the dubious quality of the covid vaccine, but he also mentions the “global elites” and the depopulation / sterilization goal.

[ Typed below for search capability: ]

Comment: “I’ve been wondering if there was a nefarious motivation behind the V@x. If I were an sociopathic oligarch and thought mankind needed to be reduced massively to protect the earth, would I use the vax to cause a mass die off, or would I cause mass sterilization? While either approach would cause huge turmoil, the mass sterilization might cause the least disruption.”

Response: “First, according to the usual definition of “vaccine”, the current injections are not “vaccines”. They are just another strain of dangerous technology that the parasitic overclass is funding and using for the purpose of global domination and control.

A mass human die-off would be traumatic and threaten the status quo. If the human population crashes and the economy follows suit, the elite will have nothing, no innate superiority or adaptivity, that might protect them and conduce to their survival. Hence, they prefer mass sterilization and a slower (but still rapid) population decline.

Obviously, the parasitic overclass is worried that its environment is being destroyed by human overpopulation. Unfortunately, it’s right about that – whereas the Earth and its resources are finite, population growth is exponential. But there are at least three major problems with their approach.

(1) Instead of addressing population control the right way, by upgrading the population through education and genetic hygiene, appealing to what is best in the human species, and convincing it to control its own reproductive behavior for its own good and that of the Earth, they prefer to lie and sneak around behind everyone else’s back, conning and threatening us into “vaccination” on false pretenses. Hence, their conspicuous neglect of Logos. Instead of upgrading humankind, they are degrading it, relying on a combination of public ignorance, misplaced trust, and dead-end ideas and ideologies like atheism, materialism, communism, multiculturalism and forced ethnic “diversification”, and tyrannical “global governance” to snooker humanity into compliance.

(2) While the global elite desperately want total control of the planet including its human population, they are neither intelligent nor morally good enough to deserve it, and have no idea how to properly use it to the advantage of the human species and the planet as a whole.

(3) This is reflected in the fact that their control agenda is limited to quantity control and totally excludes quality control. They assume that all the true genetic wealth of mankind resides in themselves despite their conspicuous lack of merit (genius, moral rectitude). Subscribing to an outworn idea called “Social Darwinism”, they simply assume that everyone else, no matter how much better and how much smarter one may be, is inferior and expendable and should be either culled or sterilized, or downbred, deracinated, and melted into a vast mocha-colored slave race for elite convenience.

In short, by virtue of stuffing their pockets and pushing everyone else around, the elite consider themselves a “Master Race”, a kind of global livestock breeding association to which the rest of the species is nothing but a herd of docile cattle to be bred for servility and barely enough intelligence to follow orders. This has been clearly and irrefutably documented by, e.g., the “White genocide” agenda described a century ago by R.N. Coudenhove-Kalergi, originally funded by the Rothschilds, Warburgs, and other international bankers and now pursued as international policy throughout the Western World.

It’s easy to see where this leads, and it’s nowhere good. Personally, I’m willing if necessary to do severe physical harm to anyone attempting to force one of these injections on me, and the same should be true of any other decent self-respecting person.”

A separate post he made on June 13, 2021:

Q: “Why would the Global Plantation Owners want to kill off or reduce the fertility of their most subservient, obedient subjects?”

A: “You may not quite understand. Resisting the “vaccine” helps the elite identify you as someone who is better killed and therefore eligible for “lead vaccination”. [winky face emoji]

Besides, they think they can force everyone to take the “vaccine”, so it’s moot. Take it now, and you may be eligible for zombification and enslavement as a chemical cyborg; don’t take it, and you’re ripe for culling, no “vaccine” required. Any “worthwhile” slaves who die immediately are acceptable collateral damage; besides, every death serves the depopulation agenda. (Never assume these control addicts haven’t calculated every move they make for its “heads we win, tails you lose” value. Even when they don’t know their asses from their elbows, which is quite often, this is their primary policy criterion.)

Remember, the elite $uppose themselve$ to be the genetic creme-de-la-creme, and assume that everyone else is genetically inferior garbage and thus ultimately susceptible to their mind-control techniques. This is a mass-scale operation in which human error makes it impossible to efficiently select for “quality”, whether quality is defined on objective merit, or serviceability to the parasitic overclass.

In the elite worldview, only the elite are “elite”. Everyone else is sh*t and therefore expendable.”

Hm… I am not a genius by any means, but somehow both of us have come to the same conclusion regarding this nefarious vaccine agenda and the corrupt organizations behind it.

As an added bonus, he also mentions his suspicions about these very dubious mask mandates and the strange fibers that have been found within certain masks; stating his uncertainty on why these substances are found in them to begin with:

“As most here should know, I’m not a proponent of Covidmania, mask-mania, “vaccine”-mania, social distancing-mania, lockdown-mania, or ongoing effects to exploit the coronavirus “pandemic” for purposes such as Operation Lockstep, the Great Reset, the Digital Dollar, ID2020, and similar.

My concern here is the surgical masks being sold by the billions to citizens forced to use them under threat from governments, law enforcement, and businesses and corporations including airlines.

Some masks have been found, under high magnification, to contain strange fibers which, while they react normally to air movement, react with alarmingly lifelike behavior to changes in heat and humidity (due to, e.g., warm human breath). The fibers are darker than the white filter material into which they are woven, and can thus be distinguished.

Some have speculated that these fibers can free themselves and be inhaled. Given that they are woven into the masks, it is more likely that they are hollow tubes containing minute particles that can be released and inhaled when the fibers deform. Similar fibers are incorporated in certain sophisticated drug-delivery systems and are known to industry as “micelles” (the word is derived from mica or “particle” and technically describes a colloidal aggregate).

Note the (probably unintended) fungal connotation. The vegetative part of a fungus, consisting of a network of fine white filaments called hyphae, is known as the mycelium (pl. mycelia), derived from myc-, “fungus” or “mushroom”. The mycelium is roughly analogous to the roots of a plant, and can be found attached to (e.g.) mushrooms. This is an odd but telling etymological coincidence given the quasi-organic behavior of the fibers. (Think “interdimensional fungus”. 😉 )

Until such a time as these fibers and their chemical or biological cargo have been adequately explained, examine your masks to see if such fibers are present. If you have a reasonably powerful microscope or magnifier, this should be no problem for you.

If the fibers are present and react as described when you breathe on them, discard the masks, and if you still feel comfortable with “mask mandates”, buy clean ones.

End message.”

For additional context, I made this post on April 12, 2021; also questioning the suspicious fibers found within specific masks – as well as some of the covid test swabs…

Strange Moving White and Black Fibers Found on Masks and Test Swabs

While I don’t need validation for my thoughts on these matters, since, quite frankly, a lot of the evidence speaks for itself, it’s still nice when some of the most intelligent individuals share the same thought process.

Speaking of, it’s interesting when we have one of the most intelligent men alive (written about in several different magazines and websites) speaking up about this agenda that SO many people are trying to label as a “ridiculous conspiracy theory”. Many other well-respected doctors/scientists/lawyers, etc. are also saying THE SAME THING.

The REAL Purpose of the Covid “Vaccine”

When you have thousands upon thousands of highly intelligent and professional individuals, PLUS a well known GENIUS IQ figure saying that these “vaccines” have a nefarious purpose, for goodness sakes people, it’s time to WAKE UP!

This is not a joke. It is not a conspiracy theory. It is not the delusions of a crazy paranoid schizophrenic. This is a REAL AGENDA meant to attack humanity. It is a BIOWEAPON and it has been created to cull the population and/or create an excessive amount of sick individuals to keep the corrupt pharmaceutical companies alive and experimenting on human beings.

I know the horrors of believing that the “for the people” government agencies are actually against us, because that is honestly the only logical conclusion I can come to when putting all of these pieces together. And if anyone with even a lick of common sense sees the evidence piling up against certain individuals and agencies, that’s the only conclusion that they can come to as well.

Consider, how many times has the government been caught experimenting on our lives, giving us tainted vaccines, unleashing terrible diseases on the public, engaging in false flag events, etc.? How many of these events will it take for people to finally understand that they DO NOT have our best interest in mind?

13 Horrifying U.S. Government Human Experiments

Not to mention the very real agenda of certain factions to infiltrate news media (and everywhere else? – health industries, education, religion, politics, entertainment…) in order to sway public opinion and INFLUENCE [manipulate] the population.

“In 1977 Carl Bernstein published an article titled “The CIA and the Media” reporting that the CIA had covertly infiltrated America’s most influential news outlets and had over 400 reporters who it considered assets in a program known as Operation Mockingbird. It was a major scandal, and rightly so. The news media is meant to report truthfully about what happens in the world, not manipulate public perception to suit the agendas of spooks and warmongers.”

The CIA Used to Infiltrate the Media

Along with everything else mentioned above, referencing “conspiracy theories”, Christopher Langan also provides his thoughts on this matter:

Screenshot taken from: twitter | @RealChrisLangan

Could secret organizations exist?

“Yes. Otherwise, why would there be a legal concept called “criminal conspiracy”, defined as an agreement between two or more parties to commit an unlawful act? As the act is unlawful, the conspirators generally keep their agreement secret to avoid being arrested. So by definition, almost any criminal conspiracy qualifies as a “secret organization”. (Conversely, many secret organizations amount to criminal conspiracies.)

Nevertheless, many people would answer this question negatively for fear of harassment. In this day and age, daring to call out the members of a conspiracy is likely to get one mocked and ostracized as a “conspiracy theorist”. But this is absurd, for well-designed conspiracies occasion more gain than risk for those in a position to keep their secrets. Such people often find conspiracy economically and/or politically rational, a fact which virtually guarantees its widespread existence.

One example of a gainful but very secret organization was the Italian Mafia, whose existence was admitted only relatively recently. There have been countless others, up to and including hidden layers of government.”

Now while I am highlighting these pertinent references from Mr. Langan, I need to reiterate to not just blindly believe or follow someone based on their IQ or expertise. Yes, while Mr. Langan has a very high IQ, I’m sure many other “genius” figures, even with the same IQ as him, may condone these vaccines. So there is a difference between high IQ, and common sense / logical reasoning. There is also a difference between high IQ, and corrupt individuals. Just because someone is a, quote: “genius” or “expert in their field”, does not mean that they won’t have ulterior motives.

Bottom line, what is stopping me from believing someone like Mr. Langan compared to Dr. Fauci? Well, trying to speak from an unbiased point of view, although I recognize I clearly am (considering my views are very similar to those of Langan’s), there are multiple variables to consider. And it mostly boils down to being informed, and doing one’s own research. The history behind Fauci (and Gates) are riddled with corruption and malfeasance. Just a cursory glance at their history, not to mention the government’s involvement in heinous public experiments and sinister operations, provides an eye-opening revelation of what these institutions are (or have become).

With that, I leave one last statement from Chris Langan:

Screenshot taken from: twitter | @RealChrisLangan

“Corporations and financial institutions ARE the government. The part with politicians is mostly mere theater – one might as well think of it as “corruption porn”. Only a stupid and heavily sedated population could possibly be fooled by it.”

To a point, I agree with this assessment. I also think it can be much deeper than this. Besides a fool, who would be most susceptible to this obvious theater?

The people who are too afraid to admit that they are being lied to.

“They would rather believe the lie, than face the truth.”

Emotions of a foolish person? Perhaps. Because with their refusal to see these things as they truly are, they are unwittingly (or maybe even wittingly…) perpetuating this egregious abuse on the rest of the population, including themselves. People are willingly participating in this great deception, because to do so otherwise would upset their entire way of life and they are either too lazy, too fearful, too apathetic to fight against this status quo.

As I have quoted before, “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing.”

Turning a blind eye to all of this obvious corruption is enabling / allowing these “ptsb” to carry out their heinous agenda, and helping them to pit the rest of humanity and our future into a dystopian, tyrannical nightmare. It is indeed foolish, and stupid, and smacks of cowardice.

I am not one for baseless name-calling. This is not that. It is just a matter of fact.

It’s time for people everywhere to wake up, refuse to comply to this tyrannical system, and make better decisions for not only humanity’s future, but that of the planet as well. These ridiculous agendas to block out the sun, release genetically modified mosquitos, modify crops, experiment on everything (and everyone) they can get their hands on, vaccinate inject every individual on the planet (except those who are within their own tight-knit circle) are heinous, sinister agendas that we must stand up against. Stop complying. Stop consenting.

As the motto of Project Veritas states, “Be Brave. Do Something.” Even something as simple as saying “NO” is doing something. Stand up for yourself and for others. Be strong.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

Revelation 2021? High-profile Soccer Figures, Players (“Footballers”) Forcing Conversation after Three More Soccer Players Collapse in Three Days - Sport's commentator gets cut off from a live feed after asking if the player who collapsed has gotten the vaccine.
Is Mankind Able to Prevent Abuse of New Technologies Against Democracy and Human Rights? - An investigative look into the government's attempts to assault (control) our mind.
Vaccines to Genetically Modify/Change Our DNA – Mind Control and Weaponization – Anthony Patch Prediction From 2014 - What is the REAL reason for the vaccines? Some say depopulation. Some say mind control. Maybe it's both.
Vaccination Status Is Temporary, Boosters For Life Required - Constant changing of definitions and moving of goalposts... "Fully vaccinated" and "vaccines" are an endless misnomer.
Don’t Vaccinate Kids: Urgent Message from Doctors’ Summit - Speakers at the Summit included Doctors: Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Paul Alexander, Tara Gesling, Pierre Kory, Ryan Cole and more.

Youtube To Get Rid of Dislike Button – As an “Experiment”

More media manipulation.

If it wasn’t obvious before how much youtube manipulates viewers’ opinions, maybe this will finally shed some light on the matter.

Not only do we have facebook, who has admitted outright that it was experimenting on its users:

Facebook manipulated users’ moods in secret experiment

(Keep in mind, this experiment was allegedly done in 2012, with word coming out in 2014 about the results. Imagine what they have been doing since then…)

but we also have other big tech conglomerates engaging in mass experimentation with its users in order to steer public opinion.

Youtube to hide the dislike count is only one of them.

I made this post: Youtube Trigger Words, a couple of weeks ago, and it explains how there are certain suspicious words that will initiate an information panel to “guide” the viewers to additional information (that supposedly come from a third party – but that youtube obviously recommends. Again – in order to manipulate viewers’ opinions…)

And these words are of a highly controversial, and conspiratorial nature. It brings to mind why youtube would go to such measures to implement this system on such a small amount of very specific trigger words. Could they be working with organizations that are attempting to “debunk” certain theories and speculations? …You be the judge. (And then the question becomes ‘why’? If these subjects and theories are so ridiculous and outlandish, why spend so much time and effort into ‘debunking’ these topics? It seems as if more and more people are starting to believe it, and it damages certain organizations’ reputations and credibility. That would be a very good reason to target and manipulate people who aren’t onboard with the official narrative.)

And now, with the experiment of removing the dislike count (oh, but don’t worry. You can still press the “dislike” button, according to the youtube spokesperson, but you just can’t see it. Only the creators of the video can see the results.) it is only another agenda in order to sway public opinion. And/or a way to suppress people’s opinions. And it is unclear at this moment, if the “like” results will be hidden as well. If not, then obviously only the LIKE results will be shown, while the DISLIKE results will be seen with NO dislikes. But it couldn’t possibly be an effort to skew the public’s opinion on what’s good content and what’s not… right?

Let’s take the speculation of the current US presidency results, for example.

Youtube has already been caught removing some of the dislikes from The White House channel. These screenshots were taken from reclaimthenet.org: YouTube scrubs thousands of dislikes from Joe Biden videos on official White House channel where you can see many more examples.

Let’s say that youtube is initiating this “experiment” because of the incredible amounts of dislikes that The White House youtube channel has been receiving due to the 2020 presidency.

Is it a targeted dislike campaign, like youtube is suggesting? Or is it simply people expressing their sincere dislike of being fooled and manipulated into believing that Joe Biden actually won the presidency fair and square? And even if he did win the election fairly, people are allowed to express their disappointment of the current president’s handling, are they not? And if they disagree with the president’s statements, then they are allowed to have their own opinions and thoughts on the matter, are they not?

Or is everyone expected to just fall in line with what many see as an egregious over-step on the voters’ rights and who most suspect of election fraud? (…Which, by the way, “U.S. Elections” just so happens to be a “trigger word” on youtube that initiates an information bar on certain videos.)

And what gives youtube the right to alter the like/dislike algorithm to begin with? Sure, it’s their platform, but then they can’t say that they’re not attempting a deliberately targeting “like campaign” to counter the “dislike campaign”. Or to even apply to any video they want. Again, just like with facebook’s experimentation on their users, it might just boil down to manipulating and steering people’s moods, opinions, and thought patterns. Which is exactly the goal.

I do want to make this clear, I am not for Trump or Biden. I think most politicians are corrupt. But taking away the people’s voice – because not only is youtube taking away the dislike counter on some videos “as an experiment”, but there is of course the option to disable comments as well. Even though each content creator has their own option to do so, to disable comments on a widely used platform geared to present important information to the public by the government, but then take away the public’s ability to express their own opinions and disagreements, is completely against the democracy that the government was supposedly built upon. (And they call themselves democrats?)

We are not living in a democratic society. Or even a republican one. Everything that you are witnessing is the result of an ARISTOCRACY – and we have most likely been living in one for most of our lives.

And for other controversial circumstances that could have added to youtube’s decision to remove the DISLIKE counter, is the entire coronavirus situation and the debate surrounding the efficacy of the vaccine and mask mandates (along with other several different issues), and the general disagreement to the Klaus Schwab, World Economics Forum’s “great reset” proposal.

Both of these topics have been heavily opposed with many people expressing their distrust and suspicions regarding these institutions.

Of course with so many shady practices and everyone in each other’s back pockets,

YouTube CEO Says They’ll Censor Content Not In Line With World Health Org
The World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization are launching an emergency coronavirus task force of 200 business leaders — including execs from Alphabet and KPMG
A timeline of the great reset agenda: from foundation to Event 201 and the pandemic of 2020

these big industries are obviously trying to protect each other, and what better way to do this than to silence dissent and make it appear as if no one is against these agendas?

As we can see from just these three links, we have youtube partnering with WHO, which youtube’s own CEO Susan Wojcicki has explicity stated that “anything that would go against World Health Organization [WHO] recommendations would be a violation of our policy” and would therefore be classified as “misinformation”.

And then from there, we can see a whole camaraderie between the biggest establishments running the current covid situation at the moment.

The WHO, partnering with not only youtube but also the WEF, who has partnered with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who have partnered with Anthony Fauci’s NIAID, and so on and so forth. All of which are highly involved in pushing this vaccine mandate/”new normal”/great reset dictatorship scheme, and trying to get everyone to follow along.

This is no accident, and no mere coincidence. Everything has a purpose and a meaning.

Because George Carlin said it best (rest his soul) and it is still very relevant, here is a transcript of part of his infamous Big Club speech (emphasis added – and strong language ahead) :

“The real owners, the big, wealthy business interests control things and make all the important decisions – forget the politicians – the politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice.

You don’t. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls – they got the judges in their back pockets and they own all the big media companies so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear.

They got you by the balls! They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying, lobbying to get what they want!

Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. But I’ll tell you what they don’t want.

They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests.

That’s right.

They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly they’re getting f***ed by a system that threw them overboard thirty f***ing years ago. They don’t want that.

You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly sh**tier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours to reduce benefits, the end of overtime, the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it and now they’re coming for your Social Security money. They want your f***ing retirement money. They want it back. So they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They’ll get it. They’ll get it all from you sooner or later, ’cause they own this f***ing place.

It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it!

You and I, are not in the “big club”.

By the way, it’s the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe – all day long, beating you over the head in their media, telling you what to believe, what to think, and what to buy. (both literally, and figuratively…)

The table is tilted, folks.The game is rigged. And nobody seems to notice, and nobody seems to care. Good, honest, hard-working people – white-collor, blue-collar, doesn’t matter what color shirt you have on – good, honest, hard-working people continue – these are people of modest means – continue to elect these rich c**k-s**kers who don’t give a f*** about them. They don’t give a f*** about you. They don’t give a f*** about you! They don’t care about you, at all! At all! At all!

…(small excerpt taken out due to content)…

The owners of this country know the truth. It’s called the American dream… because you have to be asleep to believe it.” – George Carlin

The key point to all of this is to be self-aware. Think critically, think for yourself, and stop letting all of these corrupt agencies/big tech media corporations think for us.

Like what you like, not because of what other people say or how the supposed majority thinks and feels, but because you are confident enough in yourself to know who you are and what your own individual personal likes and dislikes are. As long as it’s not hurting anyone, you should feel complete within your own self to not care what other people think and instead stick to the truth of what you like and your own opinions, and not so easily cave into societal pressure or demand.

This is the goal of big tech and businesses. They push their agenda on the population to get as many people on board as they possibly can, and if that doesn’t work, then they skewer and manipulate the public opinion to coerce others either through fake popularity, and through bots and shills – which are a very real media manipulation tactic.

Maybe we can better learn to support and socialize with one another in real life and still be able to expose injustices and ridiculous propaganda, since these companies are deadset in taking away our capability to do this online. And help each other to learn to build our awareness in order to realize when we’re ultimately being taken for a ride.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by mohamed Hassan from Pixabay (with some slight alterations).

Get an Earful

Revelation 2021? High-profile Soccer Figures, Players (“Footballers”) Forcing Conversation after Three More Soccer Players Collapse in Three Days - Sport's commentator gets cut off from a live feed after asking if the player who collapsed has gotten the vaccine.
Is Mankind Able to Prevent Abuse of New Technologies Against Democracy and Human Rights? - An investigative look into the government's attempts to assault (control) our mind.
Vaccines to Genetically Modify/Change Our DNA – Mind Control and Weaponization – Anthony Patch Prediction From 2014 - What is the REAL reason for the vaccines? Some say depopulation. Some say mind control. Maybe it's both.
Vaccination Status Is Temporary, Boosters For Life Required - Constant changing of definitions and moving of goalposts... "Fully vaccinated" and "vaccines" are an endless misnomer.
Don’t Vaccinate Kids: Urgent Message from Doctors’ Summit - Speakers at the Summit included Doctors: Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Paul Alexander, Tara Gesling, Pierre Kory, Ryan Cole and more.