Modern Day Heroes: Kari Lake, Daniel Thompson, Myanmar Journalists

Earning Admiration and Respect (pt. 2)

Along with exposing lies, corruption and hypocrisy on this website, I also think it’s necessary to address the opposite side of the spectrum. The people who stand up for what they believe in, who tell the truth, and who truly care about people.

We can’t forget that there are still people doing the right thing, and that they are fighting for the good of the world.

This second part of this series takes a look at three people/groups that deserve incredible recognition for their integrity and moral ethics, and the bravery and steadfast resolution to stand up for their beliefs and values, even in the midst of extreme adverse establishments. Their belief into upholding honorable conduct in light of bringing truth and news to the public compelled them to quit their job in journalism when it became clear that the industry is more interested in reporting negativity, controversy, and outright lies – or, hiding the truth altogether.

Thank you to the following people for having the courage to speak out on this egregious agenda.

1. Kari Lake (Fox 10 Phoenix News Anchor)

You can also check out Kari Lake’s personal tweet announcing her resignation (showing the same video as above) here, as well as showing tons of supportive comments. Thank goodness there are people who realize what the news media establishments are up to, and that there are people like Kari Lake and others that have had enough and refuse to be a part of it any longer.

A common theme, throughout most of the controversy surrounding media journalism, is the left and right dichotomy that is pervading the United States.

As Kari Lake illuminates, Sadly, journalism has changed a lot since I first stepped into a newsroom, and I’ll be honest, I don’t like the direction its going. The media needs more balance in coverage and a wider range of viewpoints represented in every newsroom at every level and at each position.

Kari went on, stating: “In the past few years, I haven’t felt proud to be a member of the media. I’m sure there are other journalists out there who feel the same way. I found myself reading news copy that I didn’t believe was fully truthful, or only told part of the story.

And I began to feel that I was contributing to the fear and division in this country by continuing on in this profession.

An event in 2019 between the Fox 10 Phoenix News station and Kari Lake’s reference to Parler on her Twitter account caused backlash as the station urged Kari to remove her connection with Parler. Since Parler is accused of being a “far-right” haven, of course anyone in the msm can’t have anyone with even the most miniscule connection to it. Understandably, this upset Kari and she was caught on video expressing her frustration at this obvious sign of suppressing people’s individuality and differing points of views. It may have been this, as well as other injustices like it, that ultimately culminated and led to the emmy-award winner resigning.

Local News Anchor Demonized Merely for Joining Parler

Kari Lake has been a news anchor for Fox 10 for over 20 years, and in so doing earned the number-one spot alongside her co-host several times. Those are very large shoes to fill, and I can only hope that the “replacement” that Fox hires holds themselves to the same high degree that Kari herself has shown by refusing to participate with corrupt media reporting. But with all the “yes-people” willing to sell their own soul for money and/or fame, we can only hope that more and more people wake up to what’s been going on and finally realize that the news is meant to manipulate and control what people think; and I hope more in this field will follow in Kari Lake’s footsteps and do what’s right for humanity.

Thank you Kari for taking a stand and leaving this twisted corporate mentality.

READ MORE  about Kari Lake’s resignation: WATCH: Top-rated news anchor resigns, destroys media bias

2. Daniel Thompson (Former Editor from the Kenosha News)

Daniel Thompson shows the huge heart and compassion he has, not only for the family of Jacob Blake, a man who was shot 7 times by police, but also that of his whole community – and thereby the whole world.

The details surrounding the shooting is unclear (although you can hear a recount from Jacob Blake himself, here) as is usually what happens when dishonest, biased media reports and news stations are on the loose and geared to swaying public opinion. But the detrimental effect of this mass media manipulation of the public became a front-row seat for Mr. Thompson, who was actually at one of the rallies honoring Jacob Blake.

After witnessing many heartwarming speeches from people calling for peaceful protests and unity, including from Jacob Blake’s own father, Daniel Thompson was dismayed to see the one headline his own news platform decided to run with: “WATCH NOW: Kenosha Speaker: ‘If you kill one of us, it’s time for us to kill one of yours.” The Kenosha News media decided to highlight the ONE speech that an unknown speaker made, literally “inciting violence” as the main take away from the otherwise beautiful and touching rally.

It was this blatant attempt at influencing people’s thoughts to the side of division and negativity instead of showing the main message of peace and love that struck a chord with Thompson and spurred him to take the matter up with the Kenosha News Executive Editor Bob Heisse.

“Thompson said he messaged Kenosha News Executive Editor Bob Heisse to strongly express that the headline needed to be changed. According to a text message exchange from Saturday that Thompson posted on Facebook, Heisse at the paper urged him to “calm down” citing the quote as a “threat and an exact quote” that was “totally on message with the rally.”

Thompson later resigned, saying the headline did not reflect the otherwise peaceful message from Saturday’s rally.

“I have officially resigned from the Kenosha News effective immediately because of this headline and response from my boss,” Thompson wrote. “I can stand for being unemployed. I cannot stand for this.”

“Today is not my day, I did what I did because today is about Jacob Blake and his family, it’s about moving forward together peacefully and I saw that today,” Thompson said in a video he posted on Facebook over the weekend. “And that headline did not reflect it. And when they refused to change it, I quit.”

Kenosha News Editor Resigns Over ‘Damaging’ Jacob Blake Headline

This is absolutely beautiful and amazing that Daniel Thompson was so touched by what he saw at the rally, so much so that when his own news platform depicted (and highlighted) the one mar throughout the whole event, it stirred him to quit when they wouldn’t change the headline to encompass what really happened. And even though the speech of revenge and negativity did happen and should be reported on as well, it should not have been the main focus of the rally.

After Daniel Thompson quit, the Kenosha News platform did indeed change the headline to “WATCH NOW: Kenosha speaker strays from message at rally” It’s so sad that it took an honest, morally ethic journalist to quit before a change for the better could be made.

Thank you so much to Daniel, for being one of the few brave ones to stick to your values and care enough about fellow people to do so.

WATCH VIDEO  to hear more from Daniel Thompson’s side of the story (with interviewer Egberto Willies): The Kenosha News editor Daniel Thompson resigned over a misleading headline about Jacob Blake Rally

3. Myanmar Members and Journalists from the Myanmar Press Council and The Myanmar Times

The rights of personal freedom and even our own opinions are being infringed upon and is under attack.

In stark contrast to the events that unfolded before Daniel Thompson’s eyes of unity and peace, and an effort of his publication to highlight the hostility of one person, Myanmar is doing the exact opposite – instructing the journalists and reporters to avoid certain words like “coup” or “regime” that would paint the Myanmar military in a negative light, and instead use terms such as “transfer of power” and “chair of the State Administrative Council”; deliberately taking away the rights of the journalists to give an honest account of what’s really happening.

In addition to that, there is also the push for a “cyber bill” that will allow the military to arrest individuals for going against the narrative of the establishment, and give them the ability to block access to certain websites.

The Myanmar Press Council last week had condemned the draft cyber bill that would give the military access to user data and the power to block websites and jail critics.  In its statement, the press council called the law unconstitutional and said it would obstruct journalists’ ability to report.
Myanmar Press Council Members Resign Over Military Directives    

Due to these outrageous efforts, according to this article “Myanmar Journalists Leave Jobs in Face of Military Regime Restrictions on Media Freedom, eleven members of the Myanmar Press Council and more than a dozen journalists and The Myanmar Times left their jobs in the face of new restrictions by the military regime that threaten media freedom.

While it is commendable that these individuals refuse to be a part of this oppressive “transfer of power”, and I applaud them for their integrity to do so – it sets a dangerous precedent, since if all of the honest, morally ethical journalists are leaving these establishments, it leaves the news platforms wide-open to hiring only “yes-people” who will fall in line no matter what rules they enforce.

And this, I surmise, is exactly their plan. The msm and news platforms only want “journalists” who will read out from a script and mislead the public stance on whatever they dictate. They don’t want people who can think for themselves and they don’t want ethically honest individuals because that will conflict with their extremely biased narratives.

This agenda is extremely important to realize so that people around the world will understand that the news has been compromised and corrupted to suit only those who would benefit from the reports. (Hint: it’s not the average citizen.) And in so doing, REFUSE to watch these one-sided, obviously tainted messages – or at least, watch it with a discerning eye and realize that most of these establishments are pushing an agenda, and be wise enough to spot it.

The brave members at Myanmar Press Council and the journalists at The Myanmar Times who have quit their positions in light of this dictatorship, deserve recognition and accolades for exemplifying truth and integrity in refusing to participate in their tyrannical scheme.

READ MORE  about the mass arrests implemented by the Myanmar military, and even police officers resigning in the midst of this infringement on rights: More Than 600 Police Join Myanmar’s Anti-Regime Protest Movement

Regardless of one’s political affiliation, the fact that there is clearly a biased agenda unfolding before our eyes, has thankfully reached these journalists; and also with large thanks, they have the courage to announce it and leave this oppressive regime, even at the cost of their career and reputation.

They are brave, concerned citizens reaching out to the population to open their eyes and look at the bigger picture of what’s going on.

These are the people who deserve respect and esteemed recognition. Not corrupt government officials or the media giants or celebrities who peddle around the same narrative over and over to coerce (and threaten and demoralize) anyone who doesn’t fall in line; and certainly not all the yes-people that simply follow the narrative even though they know it’s wrong.

I want to give a personal, heartfelt thank you to everyone standing up for these injustices and corruption, and having the conscious fortitude to stay strong even in the line of what seems to be the majority and risking ridicule and scorn from the immoral establishment.

I also want to give thanks and credit to the following links for covering these subjects in detail, and give them high accolades for not shying away from these topics even though the msm and social media giants have attacked anyone who has dared to go against their own biased “news reporting”.

(Although there are many independent websites, bloggers, reporters etc. who are addressing these matters, the below links are what is covered in this post and who are repeatedly covering this important information to unravel these controversial events. Thank you to every website who is offering honest and upfront material instead of spreading the propaganda and biased narrative of the msm and their partners.)

Thank you for your reporting and coverage!

wnd.com
townhall.com

If you know of others who are deserving of some recognition for their honesty, kindness, bravery, etc., please contact me and let me know who you’d like me to feature. It can range from anything from compassionate teachers, to whistleblowing doctors/nurses, to honest journalists, and beyond. I’d like to highlight more people who have integrity and are doing the right thing, than to just focus on the corruption and negativity of others.

We have role models in this world, and they deserve to be seen and heard.

Thank you so much, and please share.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
Edmund Burke

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Alexey Hulsov from Pixabay

Crystal Clear Learning

Why I Believe, What I Believe - Personal Experiences.
Is God calling out to you? | If not, are you SURE? - And if so, are you heeding His call?
Is Unconditional Love Enabling “Wrong” Behavior? - Can we be loving, yet judge at the same time?
Are you in Control of Your Thoughts? - Or do your thoughts control you?
Welcome to the New Year Welcome to 2021 - Have any New Year's resolutions?
The Importance of Raising Vibrations - And why you should try it.

The Hypocrisy of “Authority Figures”: Starring Nancy Pelosi

Are government officials above the law?

“RULES FOR THEE, BUT NOT FOR ME”

It’s amazing the hypocrisy that some of those in authoritative positions delve into. They give the orders, but don’t follow it themselves. They state one thing, but flip their opinion on the same subject when it suits them. To be sure, Nancy Pelosi is not the only one, and surely not the last, sadly, but being the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives and surrounded by much controversy, puts her in the spotlight. And with so many civilians caught up in the middle of it, it was only fair to shed some justifiable material on this topic.

This post does not come from a place of hate or disdain. Merely an objective view of misconduct from those in a leading position.

Praises, then Condemns – (2011 / 2021)

Thank goodness for the enduring quality of internet content that preserves our most important and heartfelt memories, right? (Other than all the ones that big tech has decided to delete, for one reason or another…)

Let’s take Pelosi’s tweet ~10 years ago making this statement:

This tweet came after 100,000 people stormed the Wisconsin State Capitol as an effort to fight for union’s rights. At the time, Nancy Pelosi was all for it.

Then we have how Nancy Pelosi addressed the destruction of several long-important monuments destroyed by mob groups in July 2020:

Interviewer: “Shouldn’t that be done by a commission or the city council, not a mob in the middle of the night throwing it into a harbor?

Nancy Pelosi: (dismissively shrugging the question off) “People will do what they do.

Then, fast forward to actions done on her very own property:

YouTuber Arrested for Livestreaming Himself Defecating in Driveway of Nancy Pelosi’s Mansion — Says It Was a ‘Peaceful Protest’
Report: Nancy Pelosi’s California Home Vandalized with Pig’s Head, Fake Blood

And now, this year (2021) after the capitol riots (of which her and her team were allegedly in charge of security… and who, ironically, are accused of actually letting the rioters in) her stance on “democracy in action” is vastly different:

Interesting that during this case, “democracy in action” is now called an “assault”, out of many terms Nancy Pelosi has used. And yes, one can counter this argument with the tragedy that did erupt out of the Jan 6. riots as opposed to the 2011 riots, but again, one has to ask, was this set up from the beginning just to spin a sordid view on the Trump protestors? After all, as word has gotten around (and video proof), it seems as the security detail simply opened the doors and allowed the rioters to enter the building.

And as most of us (should) know, it wouldn’t be the first time that outside agencies (such as Antifa, perhaps?) has been hired to disrupt what was supposed to be a peaceful protest. False flags and hired guns (to put it frankly) are becoming more and more known thanks to investigative research and more video surveillance/coverage.

Inciting Violence – (2020 / 2021)

And speaking of “inciting violence” and/or condemning/supporting it, we have the below comment from Pelosi made in August of 2020:

“We take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. And sadly, the domestic enemies to our voting system and honoring our Constitution are right at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with their allies in the Congress of the United States. But again, let’s just get out there and mobilize, organize, and not let the President deter anybody from voting.”

The above quote, if one were to choose to in such context, could imply that Nancy Pelosi was inciting violence. Calling out these “domestic enemies” and even providing the address for her constituents to take action. After all, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc. has deleted/banned/censored for less than this while continuously decrying that it was only for the “benefit of the users”.

Now, we can take a look at Donald Trump’s speech and the violence that he was, apparently, encouraging:

Now it is up to Congress to confront this egregious assault on our democracy.

You will have an illegitimate president, that’s what you’ll have. And we can’t let that happen.

‘Yes, it does because the constitution says you have to protect our country and you have to protect our constitution and you can’t vote on fraud,’ and fraud breaks up everything, doesn’t it? When you catch somebody in a fraud, you’re allowed to go by very different rules.

Honestly, I could go on and on with this, because truthfully, you can take any statement, put a spin on it, and claim that you thought it was an attempt at someone trying to “incite violence”.

To be honest, this video is terrifying and could be misconstrued as someone threatening Tubby… (if we are to follow the vague procedures and guidelines of big tech/media/authority leaders who make up the rules as they go along).

Nancy Pelosi: “Refusing to accept reality” – (2017 / 2020)

Back in 2017, Nancy Pelosi and a huge number of her colleagues contested the results of the 2016 election. Claiming that there “was no question” that it was stolen.

However, now that 2020 has arrived, and their newly elect leader, Joe Biden, is at the helm (supposedly…), any question of election results being manufactured is ridiculous and couldn’t possibly happen. At least, according to the very same people that complained about it to begin with in 2016 and refused to believe Donald Trump was elected fairly.

In November (2020), the House Speaker slammed Republicans for their response to the election results.

“They’re engaged in an absurd circus right now, refusing to accept reality,” Pelosi said.

“Stop the circus and get to work on what really matters to the American people — their health and their economic security.”

Chuck Schumer echoed Pelosi’s sentiments, urging Republicans to “stop their shenanigans.”

SHORT MEMORY? Nancy Pelosi accused of hypocrisy after her tweet claiming 2016 election was ‘HIJACKED’ resurfaces

Regardless of who cheated when, or even if both parties did, (or none, for that matter), the amount of hypocrisy on this point is outrageous. One can’t whine and complain for 4 years that their election was stolen, but then refuse that it can even happen in the next one. That’s basically saying that they were lying for 4 years and knew that the previous election was won fairly this whole time. (As long as we can believe that this election was won fairly…)

Keeping up the Image (just the wrong one) – (2020)

When the coronavirus first started making its rounds, it, indeed, caused massive confusion and chaos with seemingly no one being on the same page. To add to that confusion, we have the very political leaders who were relaying these rules and guidelines, not following it themselves. Creating a double-standard and making the public worldwide wonder why those in specific positions were allowed to do the very thing they announced was not allowed.

Nancy Pelosi was called out on this after being caught at a hair salon (which was allegedly shutdown and only opened to take care of her, personally – since there was an outdoor mandate only) and walking around without a mask covering her mouth even though there was a mask mandate in that city during the time, in which “the average citizen” could be fined for not following the policy.

There is a lot of debate and “she-said / she-said” (if these gender-terms are still allowed… which we will sort of address in the next section) between Nancy Pelosi and the hair salon owner, Erica Kious. But seeing as how Erica herself stated, “It was a slap in the face that she went in, you know, that she feels that she can just go and get her stuff done while no one else can go in, and I can’t work,” Kious said. “We’re supposed to look up to this woman, right?“.

And when you add into that the other numerous accounts of government officials that are defying these mandates that THEY THEMSELVES ordered (whether at the behest of other higher mandates or not…) and this emotional and heartbreaking plea from Angela Marsden (one of many) that echoes Erica Kious’ sentiments, it would not be a stretch to “presume” who may be at fault here.

Identity Crisis – (2021)

And here we have the latest in controversies and contradictions that Nancy Pelosi has been involved in. Honestly, it’s incredible that she’s in the position she’s in while engaging in the duplicitous behavior and actions she’s been behind. Even if not from a malignant stand point, the fact that those in governing positions are entitled to defying the very orders they’re mandating, yet expecting everybody else to fall in line is unethical and untrustworthy. (And then they wonder why they’re not trusted.)

On Jan 1, 2021, a press release was announced detailing a few of the new House rules that were proposed and unveiled to be voted on. Among these rules was this statement:

It promotes inclusion and diversity. That includes changes that would: establish the Select Committee on Economic Disparity and Fairness in Growth; require standing committees to include in their oversight plans a discussion of how committee work over the forthcoming Congress will address issues of inequities on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, age, or national origin; honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships in the House rules to be gender neutral; make permanent the Office of Diversity and Inclusion to facilitate a diverse workforce that is reflective of our Members and the districts they represent; and survey the diversity of witness panels at committee hearings to ensure we are hearing from diverse groups of experts as we craft legislation.

To further clarify:
In clause 8(c)(3) of rule XXIII, strike ‘‘father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half sister, grandson, or granddaughter’’ and insert ‘‘parent, child, sibling, parent’s sibling, first cousin, sibling’s child, spouse, parent-in-law, child-in-law, sibling-in-law, stepparent, stepchild, stepsibling, half-sibling, or grandchild’

In the wise words of Rep. Kevin McCarthy: “This is stupid.
Then he smartly followed up with “Signed, – A father, son, and brother

It’s funny, because he wasn’t the only one throwing some shade on this confusing proposal:

This happened just a few days after the proposal:

I stand before you as a wife, a mother, a grandmother, a daughter. A daughter whose father served in this congress.” – Nancy Pelosi

So let me get this straight…

Just a few days after Nancy Pelosi proposed to remove all gender specific pronouns from Congress (even if, as some “fact-checkers” claim, it was from just one document – whatever the heck that means, and allegedly wouldn’t have to be followed in speeches and such – because, you know, only government officials are allowed to bend the rules for themselves but that everyone else has to follow… do I have that right?) Nancy Pelosi herself still mentioned, in her own speech – (because she’s allowed to do that, of course) – FIVE different pronouns that are recommended to be changed to gender neutral (due to “equality”), in a matter of less than TEN SECONDS?

Does she even believe the own rules she’s trying to set forth? Is she for gender-equality, or not? Is she willing to admit that this is a silly proposal and she, quite obviously, prides herself on identifying as a “wife, a mother, a grandmother, and a daughter”?

I guess I just don’t understand the ever-changing rules and unfair guidelines that certain government officials impose on others but don’t have to follow themselves.

Unfortunately, the unfair treatment of others by those in a higher authority has been an ongoing conflict, and the injustices that we are subjected to are only exacerbated by the laws placed in order to protect those very same people. The corruption of this system needs to be addressed.

This is just one person in a sea of many. And again, this post is not meant to condemn, harass, or ridicule any individual, but just to point out the hypocrisy and biased dichotomy between authority figures and everyone else.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

WORLD PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY! Stop Big Pharma’s DNA “Vaccine” Experiment! - “Mass Vaccination will Breed Dangerous Variants & Destroy Our Immunity” — Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD
Dr. Peter McCullough / John Leake – Full Interview [Transcript] - Renowned doctor exposes worldwide covid treatment suppression and corruption of the medical and governmental agencies.
Anthony Fauci’s Wife: Christine Grady – Hidden Face of the Vaccine Trials? - What is Christine Grady's role in the vaccine agenda?
REPOST: Proof that the Pandemic Was Planned With a Purpose - Many connections involving complicit huge name individuals and organizations.
FLASHBACK | COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci - A look into Anthony Fauci's involvement into medical/health corruption.
David Goldberg’s FINAL WORDS: Project Pogo and Project Zyphr | Full Transcript - Extermination effort and implementation of a world government.
“America’s Pastor” Billy Graham Exposed - Exposing Graham's ties to freemasonry and their agendas.