BREAKING: Attorney Thomas Renz reveals DoD data proving covid vaccines WORSEN infections and hospitalizations

“60% of hospitalized cases are breakthroughs”

As more and more information comes out, even from the CDC, WHO, FDA, etc.’s own admission, it is getting harder and harder to refute the fact that the COVID vaccines are absolutely unnecessary and are, in fact, even more dangerous than “COVID” itself. There is no justifiable reason to continue this egregious mandatory farce, and those who keep endorsing this obvious malfeasance should absolutely be held complicit in these crimes.

The following interview expands upon the DoD documents which shows a trend that is now becoming common place (although HIGHLY condemned as “misinformation” at the beginning – though it is to be said, big tech and mainstream media is STILL labeling even information from the government and health agencies’ own websites as “misinformation”…) that shows that individuals who are fully vaccinated are more at risk for a “breakthrough infection”.

And keep in mind, as more data is coming out, showing that the COVID situation may have been pneumonia/flu, HCAP (healthcare associated pneumonia) all along (perhaps even brought about due to an organized experimental campaign) , disguised as a “new virus”, the vaccines themselves, therefore, are causing these legitimate various illnesses and diseases amongst those who have taken it.

The below video is a full transcript of the interview between Attorney Thomas Renz and Mike Adams discussing the DoD/Humetrix documents that was revealed to Attorney Renz through a whistleblower account. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Mike Adams: “Welcome to brighteon.tv. Mike Adams here. Today we’re going to be joined by attorney Thomas Renz from Renz Law.

He has breaking news about new aggregate data that was compiled by a branch, an artificial intelligence branch of the Department of Defense. It’s called the JAIC. It’s called Project Salus. And the aggregate data was brought in about 5.6 million medicare patients from a company called Humetrix, which runs the data analytics platform for medicare outcomes.

Now, this is bombshell information that obliterates the official narrative of Biden and Fauci, which falsely claims that we’re experiencing a pandemic of the “unvaccinated”. These data that you are about to see, we’re going to show you the slides, courtesy of Attorney Thomas Renz. These data blow that away. So stay with us, we’ll be right back with Thomas Renz. This is brighteon.tv.

All right, welcome back. Mike Adams here, thank you for joining me. We’re going to welcome Attorney Thomas Renz right now to the program.

Thomas, how are you doing today, sir? It’s great to have you on.”

Thomas Renz: “I’m – you know, I’m doing great, Mike. I really appreciate it. 

Mike Adams: “Well, absolutely. Now, you have this bombshell document from the Department of Defense; I gave a little bit of an intro there, but you want to go ahead and tell us the big picture of what we’re looking at?

Thomas Renz: “Yeah, so, in my whistleblower stuff that we’ve been talking about a lot lately – we say that the fact that in the prior FDA presentation, they had said that, you know, they were going to monitor CMS for outcomes and for vaccine safety and things like that. Well, it turns out that that is correct, apparently. That is exactly what we did. They’ve monitored CMS.

So using that same CMS data that we’ve just broke a whole bunch of information on, the Department of Defense, through Humetrix, put out something on the 28th of September. At least, that’s the date on the front of this, talking about these vaccines. There’s just an immense amount of stuff in here, talking about how their effectiveness wanes over time. But probably the biggest and most important thing in here is this, and I’m going to read this, it’s a direct quote: “60% of hospitalized cases are breakthroughs” after the delta variant hit 90%, right? “71% of COVID cases are breakthroughs”, and then we get delta at 90%.”

Mike Adams: “And just, let me just, for the audience, “breakthrough” means someone was previously fully vaccinated, and essentially breakthrough means vaccine failure. That they were infected anyway.”

Thomas Renz: “Yeah, yeah. So when Biden and his crew are telling us that this is a problem with the unvaccinated, why are 60% of the break- of the hospitalized people who are fully vaccinated? 60% are FULLY VACCINATED, in the hospitals. 

Now by the way, Mike, so within this document, it also makes really clear: until you are 14 days post full vaccination, you’re not counted. So what that means for the audience is, that if you got Pfizer or Moderna, you had to have both shots, if you had Janssen you only had to have the one, and then 14 days later. So if you only got one shot and got sick or got hospitalized, it doesn’t count. If you’ve had, you know, both shots but got sick within 14 days it doesn’t count. So still, despite all of that, we’re looking at a 60% hospitalization – 60% of the hospitalized cases. 60%!”

Mike Adams: “So… looking at slide 2, from this 17 slide set, I also want to bring attention to the summary, just to underscore what you just said, it outlines that the effectiveness of vaccines wanes over time. All the way out to 6 months, where a person who was previously vaccinated has a 2.5 times higher odds, they say – they use the word ‘odds’ – 2.5 times odds factor increase of being infected or hospitalized with COVID. So the vaccine actually makes outcomes worse over time.

And then the other bombshell from this, I think, though there are many, as you said, but one of them is that for, for those who are unvaccinated, their risk of infection and hospitalization is falling over time. Compared – even as delta is rising, the risk of unvaccinated people getting sick is falling, falling, falling, falling. So… wow! I mean, if these continue, look where it’s going.”

Thomas Renz: “Yeah, well, I mean, so if you look also on that second page, we got a couple of other really important things to look at there, right? So this statement, “Prior COVID-19 infection has a major protective effect” – MAJOR protective effect. That’s because as we all know, there is no stronger immunity than natural immunity. So once you’ve survived this, you’re golden. 

The other thing is, is it’s kind of interesting, because, you know, this really, I think, is very demonstrative. And we don’t have all their data. But based on what I’m seeing, this is really showing the ADE, right? This is showing that, or at least providing indication based on the overall analysis of this, that the people who are getting the vaccine, you know, instead of this disease getting less dangerous and more contagious, as usual, for some people, particularly it looks like the people who have gotten it, it looks like it’s getting more dangerous.

And I mean, you know typically when this started out according to the curve and what they’re saying, you know, you had a really high death and hospitalization rate when COVID first came out. And then typically that drops off with any disease. Now, you’re seeing it really bumping back up. And there should – and it’s really a, you know, it looks very much like what we were all afraid of – that we’d have a massive ADE type situation going on this fall, where we had a stronger, more dangerous variant, especially for the people who went out and got the shot.”

Mike Adams: “Yeah, that – that’s exactly right. And by the way, I want to mention, it was slide 15 that I think you were referring to earlier; I’m looking at it now. It says 71% of COVID-19 cases are breakthroughs, in weeks after the delta variant became more than 90% of the detected variant. So, that’s critical to the record, guys, and we’re talking almost three-fourths of the hospitalizations are people who were vaccinated.”

Mike Adams (continued): “But there’s something else here, Thomas. The very last slide, this is another bombshell: the risk model for breakthrough hospitalization, in this slide, it talks about how Native Americans have the highest increase risk of hospitalization after vaccination, of any ethnic group. And then Hispanic is underneath that, and Black-Americans are further down the list, but think about it. You know, this is hitting Native Americans more than any other group, and yet nobody is warning the Native American community about what is effectively ADE from vaccines.”

Thomas Renz: “Well, and yeah, and I mean, so listen. These vaccines seem to have a disproportionate impact on certain minority communities. Now that’s not something that I’ve really been able to flesh out in a way where I can say, “Listen, we know this for sure.” And I haven’t got the experts, and I – you know I am, I don’t say it unless I can prove it. But I have heard numerous, numerous reports about the dangers these vaccines pose to the minority communities especially. It has to do with certain genetic differences – um, you know, I just don’t have, I don’t have enough to really go on record and say it for sure, but it sure does look like that.

But, luckily for us, I also just got a report, that in New York City, you know, one of the most vaccinated places in the universe, only 26% of African-Americans are vaccinated. If that’s true, good! Good! I said yesterday in an interview, I said, there’s not a whole lot of times in my life where Louis Farrakhan and I have been on the same page, but when it comes to this vaccine, we’re dead on there. So – “

Mike Adams: “Well yeah, exactly right. Louis Farrakhan, I also agree with his point on this particular issue. He’s absolutely correct. And he, among many people in different sectors of Black communities across America, he is nation of Islam, but there are many other different groups of course, they are recognizing that this appears to be a, in their view, a biological weapon targeting Blacks and Hispanics and basically people of dark skin. Now, from a medical science point of view, though, dark skin also blocks vitamin D production upon exposure to sunlight. So this could also be a vitamin D deficiency colliding with vaccine mortality or ADE problems. Perhaps vitamin D deficiency causes an exaggeration of ADE, but that’s just conjecture at this point. As you said, we don’t have supporting data, but it’s a plausible theory.

Thomas Renz: “Yeah, yeah. I would agree with you. And like I said, there’s just been something that’s been kind of very quietly kicked around amongst experts, and we just haven’t had anyone that’s done the proper studies to know. But you know, if I were, if I were a person of color, I would certainly want to know, you know, where are these studies? Why aren’t we looking at these numbers? You know? Where are they? So I’m hoping they come out.

But I mean, regardless of what they do, and regardless of ethnic issues, 60%. 60%. I mean, what more can you say? And, and – I mean, this is a disastrous number, and it’s an outright lie. This is from a weekly report, right. This is a weekly report. So just as we said last week on our whistleblower presentation, you know, this is something that they’re supposed to be getting briefed on regularly, which it appears that they are.

Biden, Fauci, all these guys – I mean you can see where they talk about they reference the CDC and different things, you know, graphs from CDC presentation, things like that throughout this. There is zero question these guys know this. They’re lying to the American people outright. This is a crooked marketing project for big pharma, big tech, big government, at the expense of American lives, and it’s got to stop.

This is it. This is smoking gun. You know, we had – we had the whistleblower stuff that’s on renz-law.com. You can look at that. This presentation’s going to be up there. How much evidence do we need to put out before someone’s held accountable for this?”

Mike Adams: “Well, that’s my next question to you. Would you support a call for the FDA withdrawing it’s emergency use authorization or so-called approval of these vaccines, based on these new data from the DoD’s artificial intelligence project? I mean, is this, you said it’s a smoking gun. Is it enough in your view to say, we’ve got to halt all the vaccines?”

Thomas Renz: “I don’t think there’s any question it’s enough. This is illegal from the start. From the start under the EUA rules, and the – actually the law for an EUA, there has to be a risk benefit analysis. Well, there was never – I mean, 1% absolute risk reduction was never enough to warrant authorizing something that had no long-term studies. Now, we not only have a 1% absolute risk reduction, but we have a very clear case of an increased danger.

I mean, go get the vaccine. You can get COVID again. Congratulations. You know. If you survive it, then you know, you’ll probably have stronger immunity, assuming that the vaccine hasn’t destroyed your immune system. You know, this is – there is literally no legal justification for this vaccine being available at all. Let alone the fact that they tried to prove a vaccine that isn’t even out yet. You know, that, that’s a whole ‘nother story.

But this has to be withdrawn. Fauci has to be charged criminally; he needs to be in jail and there needs to be RICO, RICO suits, and I’m going to do this right here, right now, Mike. I’m going to call – I want any attorneys that are willing to do so, I’m going to put a button up on my website that says, you know, now hiring/taking volunteers, something. I don’t know. I’ve never put a button up. And if you’re willing to volunteer, or to work, or whatever, if I’ve got funding I’ll pay you. But if you’re willing to help, I want to do a RICO case against the entire trusted news initiative for covering this up, because they’ve been bought off by pharma. RICO, the FDA, Fauci, all these people that is one giant criminal conspiracy. We need to sue their butts and they need to be in jail.”

Mike Adams: “Well I think many viewers would agree with your assessment, but – so you’re talking about organized crime, racketeering, this is um… it’s, it’s a pretty high standard of proof in order to prove such cases. The DOJ is unlikely to want to prosecute this because the DOJ is probably part of the organized criminal operation. Would – would you say that?”

Thomas Renz: “Yeah. But we can do a civil case. We could do a civil case. And I’m all on board for it. I just need to get some experts and RICO, because I’m not a RICO expert. I need to get some people who are willing to help fight this. Because we don’t have enough attorneys. But I think we need to file a major suit.

I mean, listen, we know this entire trusted news initiative has been bought off by Gates Foundation, by big pharma, by all these different groups. We know how that works. We got all sorts of evidence on it. We know that the FDA, the CDC, we know – we got, right here, rock-solid evidence. These guys know that they’re lying when they say it’s safe and effective. They know that we know that they’re lying when they’re pushing this out there.

I don’t know how it could be anything but fraud, and I think we need a massive lawsuit to the tune of probably trillions, to get back the – to get back the just a portion of the damage these people have done on the American economy, on the world economy, to the lives and families of these people. This is so outrageous it is beyond words. In history, in history, I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything in the American world that compares with the lies we’re seeing here. It’s just horrific.

Mike Adams: “Since you’re bringing up history, many people have called for international tribunals. War crimes tribunals against some of the individuals and organizations that you just named. Is RICO even enough? Does this need to go to more of a Nuremberg level of investigation of potential prosecution?”

Thomas Renz: “Well, so legally that would require a buy-in from our political leaders, and since most of them should actually be charged, I’m not sure that they’re going to do that, but yeah, I mean, I certainly think that this is a war crimes type thing. There’s no question what’s happened. There is zero question.

 

At this point, you know, you could argue that you didn’t believe my whistleblower. Okay, fine. How about – how about a document with the stamp from the DoD on it? Do you believe that? I mean, what do we gotta do? This is their words. This is as smoking of a gun as you can get.

Yes. There should definitely be an international war crimes tribunals for this. This is absolutely a violation of the principles of Nuremberg. By the way, World War II, you know this Mike. You know, this started out by trying to paint the Jews as unclean. And putting them in ghettos and, you know, testing vaccinations on them. That’s where this all started. Now we got to stop this before we get anyone – it gets any – goes any – who knows where they’re going with this. What I do know is that we’re not going there.”

Mike Adams: “But that’s my next question. The vaccines have already been administered according to the CDC to over 200 million Americans. We see from the data that you’ve just shown us here, that the outcomes worsen over time. Since you can’t undo a vaccine, where is this going? What does this mean for people who got vaccinated and are now looking at these data and saying, “Woah! What happens in November? Or December? January?” What are we looking at here, really?”

Thomas Renz: “Well if – so early on, what I had suggested was that this was going to be something where you’re going to be stuck getting booster shots for the rest of your life or die. Now, I don’t know if that’s going to be the case or not, but what I do know, is the best I can do for those people right now is pray and hope that we can find a way to undo the genetic modifications that they’ve done to themselves.

Because, you know, I mean, listen, we also in that whistleblower presentation, we laid out, this is a gene therapy. This is changing your genetics. So, I don’t know how we undo that, but what I do know is you all have been experimented on, with a dangerous experiment, that it turns out is going really badly, or maybe just as planned. I don’t know. But what I do know is it looks like it’s a real bad thing. It looks like there’s more people and more danger every day, and – nobody wanted to believe us. When you and I, Mike, were talking about this early on, no one wanted to believe it. But now – “

Mike Adams: “But now, right. The data are clear. So, just to refocus people on this, this is from the JAIC, division of the DoD. The JAIC uses artificial intelligence algorithms to study things like COVID-19 induced supply line disruptions. So they are out there trying to pinpoint critical supply failures in the supply chaining, including for parts for the military itself. They then took that A.I. system and they applied it to this Humetrix data set of 5.6 million Medicare recipients and their health outcomes, and then they were able to spot these patterns and they put it all in chart form.

So, you know, one of the big astonishing things about this, Tom, and thank you for sharing this and coming on to comment about it is, aren’t the people who, who are looking at this, aren’t they freaking out too? I mean, within the DoD, surely they see what this is!”

Thomas Renz: “You know, that’s a great question. I got to be honest with you, Mike. It – listen. This looks – makes it look really clear that they’ve been looking at it for awhile. Right? I mean, when you look at this, it’s a weekly report. So it’s not like this is new information. It’s been out for awhile. It’s been clear where the trends are going.

I – you know, to me, I don’t know how you argue that this is, you know, what, you’re sitting on your hands? You know? Because, I don’t know. On one side we can give them the benefit of the doubt and say, “Well this was such a political disaster that they just didn’t know what to do with it.” or, on the other side, you could just say, “Listen, this was intentional.”

I don’t know what it is, but either way there’s a lot of people dying and going to die that don’t need to die. And by the way, they’re lying here, which they are. Obviously we got – I mean, their evidence; this is as good as it gets. If they’re lying here, what else are they lying about? You remember, you know, we’ve been pushing early treatment: Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, D, zinc, all these different things. Hey. We’ve got doctors with thousands of people that have been treated with this and not die. THOUSANDS!

 

They’re lying about that too. [editor’s note to clarify: The CDC, NIH, FDA, etc. is lying that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine don’t work] And P.S., I think I got some more data that just came in not too long ago. I haven’t had time to analyze it yet, that will show exactly that. So just, stay tuned. We’ll have more. We’re not done.”

Mike Adams: “Okay. And just a little flashback to something that you recently put out, that you have a whistleblower who has access to the Medicare aggregate data system, that showed close to 50,000 – I think it was 48,000 something deaths following vaccination of Medicare tracked patients. When are you going to get new data on, from that database, potentially?”

Thomas Renz: “Well, I’ve got, I’ve got stuff that I’m sending over, and you can put that up today if you’d like. You know, we’ve got a breakdown of a bunch more states. So, I think we’ve got 8 or 9 states now, with all their side effects, right? And by the way, just to be clear, that data is from the same servers that these guys are pulling from. So, so you know, if you want to doubt me before, it seems like this is pretty good vindication for me.

You know, you can look at these numbers. We’ve got them broken down – I know we’ve got New York, I know we’ve got California, I know we’ve got Ohio, we’ve got Florida, Texas, Missouri…

And you know, listen, look at this data and ask yourself, what is your governor doing? Because your governor should have access to this. Now thankfully in Texas and Florida you guys have governors who have kind of stood up. But if the words ‘safe and effective’ come out of their mouth, you need to show them this data, you need to show them this stuff, and you need to say, “Who the hell bought you?” Because that’s the ONLY way they can say this with a straight face, is if they’ve been bought and paid for.

And I don’t care who you are, it is very clear, they have or should have access to CMS data. If they’re not getting that then they’re not doing their homework or their public health people are lying to them. But guess what. They can’t claim ignorance any more because we put it out there.”

Mike Adams: “All right, all right. Well said. We’ve only got less than 2 minutes remaining here. I want to remind our audience your law firm is at renz-law.com. That’s the correct url, right?”

Thomas Renz: “Yes sir. Yes sir. Please check us out there. Renz-law.com.

Mike Adams: “Okay, and what do you say to all the people right now who themselves are dealing with legal issues with hospitals abusing their family members, or denying access to family members to – I mean, this is happening everywhere. I’m sure you’re getting flooded with requests for help, right?”

Thomas Renz: “Yeah. More than you can imagine. I’m praying for you, I’m praying for your families; it’s devastating to see. We’re trying to get cases developed on this as quickly as possible. They’ve done a ton of stuff to try and make it hard to sue these guys. ‘Cause they knew they were going to use them as killing fields. But we’re going to – we’re going to make them pay at some point.”

Mike Adams: “Okay, that’s great to know. And you also said previously, you can’t wait to sue over and over again, all of those who are complicit in this. Which is the – parts of the so-called media and big tech as well.”

Thomas Renz: “They’re going down. I want you to please – we’re going to get that button up as soon as possible. We want everybody that’s willing and able, click on that, tell us what you’re willing to do; we need good good people who are willing to bust their butts researching and writing.”

Mike Adams: “Okay. All right. Well said. Thomas, thank you so much for joining me today. It’s – your work is really courageous; you are doing amazing things to help save lives in this country. Thank you so much for joining us.”

Thomas Renz: “Thank you.”

Mike Adams: “All right. For those of you watching, feel free to repost this video on any platform – the original source is brighteon.tv. You can also find this on my channel: healthrangerreport@brighteon.com. Thank you for joining us today, and look for the article detailing this document at naturalnews.com. Thank you for joining us. God bless, take care.”

Note from Expanding Awareness Relations: As mentioned in the above interview, please visit the following links for more detailed information including more slides from the DoD documents and for additional Mike Adams videos:

RENZ LAW

BREAKING: AI-powered DoD data analysis program named “Project Salus” SHATTERS official vaccine narrative, shows A.D.E. accelerating in the fully vaccinated with each passing week

Health Ranger Report @ Brighteon

Thank you so much to Mike Adams and Thomas Renz for continuously bringing these important data and information to our attention. Your dedication and fortitude in standing strong against these tyrannical, unnecessary measures is incredibly needed and much appreciated during these perilous and unprecedented times.

And thank you to everyone who has stood up and spoken out against these nefarious agendas; and also thank you to everyone who is reading/watching and sharing these news to help get the word out about these corrupted organizations.

God bless.

Revolver Exclusive: The Big Pharma “Shell Game” Tricking Our Military Into Mandatory Vaccinations

Commander Jay Furman alerting of deception and malfeasance within the government and pharmaceutical companies.

Reposted from Revolver and Commander Jay Furman
Original article written on September 25, 2021 (reprinted with permission)

Last month, Revolver exclusively published a paper by Navy CDR J.H. Furman, warning that the mandatory COVID-19 vaccination of the entire Navy could constitute a national security threat.

Now, Furman has produced another paper, describing what he calls a “shell game” by which other U.S. government agencies, and several pharmaceutical companies are tricking the Navy into embracing mandatory vaccination, at great risk to the United States.

 

His paper is reproduced below.

The views and opinions expressed in this paper do not in any way represent the United States Navy or the Department of Defense.

 

CDR Jay Furman, USN

At the turning point of the Spanish American War, a single American officer volunteered to hand carry a critical message through impossible enemy lines to a fateful ally named General Garcia, forever changing the course of that war and our country. Today, one million COVID-19 non-vaccinated brave military messengers would deliver a, no less, existential dispatch: the U.S. Military is being misled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Center for Disease Control (CDC), and the Pfizer and BioNTech drug companies, resulting in the current mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies. While some media outlets reflexively cheer on the deadly shell game, is our military leadership prematurely mandating a vaccine that their personnel cannot, or should not, legally receive? Could that decision prove to be more detrimental to military readiness than the disease itself, thereby posing a greater threat to U.S. national security?

 

On August 23, 2021, news broke that Pfizer had obtained an FDA license for its COVD-19 vaccine. The contrived FDA announcement:

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine [BioNTech’s COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA, not Pfizer]. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine [Pfizer’s non-FDA licensed vaccine], and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee) [only available in markets outside U.S.], for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older (emphasis added).

 

The agency charged with the public’s health in pharmaceutical matters issued two related official letters confounding the announcement, above. Reconciling those letters and the ensuing policy is tedious, leaving the truth one-layer too deep for most media outlets. Unfortunately, the resulting confusion appears more goal than incidental. Bottom-line, the FDA did not license a COVID-19 vaccine physically available to consumers in the U.S.

In their first letter, the FDA issued the only COVID-19 vaccination license for COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA (Comirnaty) owned by German company BioNTech (not Pfizer). It is not produced for a U.S.-licensed label anywhere in the FDA’s jurisdiction. In their second letter, the FDA re-issued the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (not a FDA license). The letter officially designates Comirnaty as the licensed name for COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA. This EUA explicitly states that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine “[…] has not been approved or licensed by the FDA, but has been authorized by emergency use [EUA] by the FDA […]” (emphasis added). It goes on to assert that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) formulations are the same and thereby can be clinically substitutable. The FDA notes the abundant supply of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and the non-availability of Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) in the U.S. market. They then explicitly re-affirm that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is, in fact, experimental and only covered by the EUA, not FDA licensed.

 

FDA License Letter:

 

EUA Re-issue Letter Excerpts:

Confused yet? The CDC did not help matters, either. On Monday, August 31, 2021, their Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) released an inaccurate statement. The committee’s public announcement unanimously endorsed the FDA license for the “Pfizer-BioNTech licensed vaccine.” They misstated the vaccine name and license holder, never mentioning the actual owner of the FDA license, BioNTech, conflating legal ownership of Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) as Pfizer’s. They neglected to mention it is not available in the U.S. and therefore not possible for consumers here to receive. Those inaccuracies further aided the public misperception that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is FDA licensed. Concurrently, two high-level career FDA officials resigned at the time of the CDC ACIP board announcement, citing frustration with overreach into FDA affairs by other parts of the Executive Branch.

 

The Pfizer company issued a “forward-looking” press release, that was also easily misinterpreted. Perhaps they were hoping the mundane went unnoticed, as the pharmaceutical giant intermingled complex terms and concepts: Pfizer, BioNTech, Comirnaty, COVID-19, mRNA, EUA, authorized, approved, licensed, manufacturer, legal owner, national markets, and etc. The corporate relationship between Pfizer and BioNTech is no less convoluted. The joint venture and vaccine names, also similar, only add to the confusion. All of which potentially prevented a clear understanding of important legal and regulatory nuances, and allowed a fearful U.S. public to believe an available vaccine was now regulatorily licensed for their safety and legal recourse, when in reality, it was not. In brief:

  • BioNTech is the marketing arm of the two company enterprise in the U.S., Europe, and UK.
  • Pfizer produced Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) for BioNTech, while both submitted supporting material for the license.
    BioNTech, alone, received an FDA license for Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA).
  • Both Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) were covered, in-part, by the re-issued EUA.
  • Both Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA may be available in other countries. Yet, Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is not available anywhere under FDA jurisdiction.
  • If and when this occurs, Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) will be “[…] manufactured, filled, labeled, and packaged at Pfizer.”
  • Both Pfizer produced vaccines are, at times, marketed as Comirnaty outside the U.S. While only COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is officially recognized as Comirnaty in this country.

Recent U.S. military vaccine mandates look to be a direct result of the manufactured confusion. August 24, 2021 DoD guidance stated that the Department “[…] will only use COVID-19 vaccines that receive full licensure from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) […]” (emphasis added). A fully FDA licensed COVID-19 vaccine is not available to U.S. service members. They are simply not able to legally comply with the DoD mandate.

By administrative and regulatory law, it appears that all public and private institutions are not allowed to mandate EUA medical products. In 21 U.S. Code 360bb-3-Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies for unapproved products (b)(2)(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), it says that recipients have “[…] the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” In the FDA’s own policy guidelines it is written that recipients “[…] have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product […].” Under U.S. Code 335(i)(4) and related regulations, “the informed consent process typically requires human subjects to agree to the receipt… upon a disclosure that the product in question is not yet FDA approved and that the receipt of such product is voluntary.” Informed consent is required to administer EUA vaccines with few exceptions.

 

The newly mandated Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is legally defined as an EUA and therefore cannot be mandated in the military unless informed consent is waived by a presidential waiver and, according to U.S. Code Section 1107a of Title 10 and DoDI 6200.02, only after meeting specific criteria. Two of these criteria apparently preclude its issuance in this case: 1) “[…] specified military operation presents a substantial risk that military personnel may be subject to a chemical, biological, nuclear, or other exposure likely to produce death or serious or life-threatening injury or illness […]” and; 2) “[…] no available satisfactory alternative therapeutic or preventive treatment in relation to the intended use of the investigational new drug.” In the first, a waiver of informed consent is limited to the support of a specific military operation. For the second, monoclonal antibody therapy is an FDA-authorized alternative COVID-19 treatment.

It does not matter that the FDA stated in their re-issued EUA, their website, or Fact Sheet that the vaccines are similarly formulated and can be clinically interchangeable. The simple fact is that the administration of an EUA vaccine, by law, requires informed consent. It is therefore illegal to mandate any of the three U.S. available COVID-19 vaccines that are not officially licensed. As the Department did not receive an informed consent waiver from the President to mandate the Pfizer-BioNTech CV-19 Vaccine, and the FDA licensed Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is not yet available in the U.S., it remains uncertain how the military can continue to incorrectly mandate COVID-19 vaccination.

Consequently, the Services’ mandatory vaccination orders are impossible to lawfully execute according to Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 90. U.S. military officers take an oath to the Constitution, and not to those appointed over them in the event orders are unlawful (enlisted service members swear allegiance to both). An officer may find themselves duty bound to refuse an unlawfully mandated vaccination in support and defense of the law of the land, on the behalf of their troops.

 

Meanwhile in other countries, Pfizer has not provided any COVID-19 vaccines without explicit (and extreme) indemnity contracts in place. They are requiring not only protection from all future product harm civil lawsuits, but also protection from Pfizer’s “[…] fraud, gross negligence, mismanagement, failure to follow good manufacturing processes… or malice […].” The company is requiring some countries to fund foreign bank accounts, take out insurance, and put up sovereign assets such as their Embassies or military bases, according to global health law lecturer Mark Eccleston-Turner of the University of England and statnews.com.

The aforementioned regulatory charade may be a U.S. version of Pfizer’s COVID-19 global indemnity project. Unfortunately, the company has a history of misbranding “with the intent to defraud or mislead.” In a landmark DOJ case they were found guilty of a felony, and fined $2.3 billion (the largest such fine ever) for fraudulent marketing. Interestingly, the FDA receives almost half of its current funding from industry in the form of “regulatory fees,” a clear conflict of interest which should be strongly questioned.

If the vaccine is actually safe and effective, then why all this confusion? Why did they only license “Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA),” exclusively available outside of this country? Why did they not license the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” the only label available in the U.S. Why does Pfizer not just import the approved label? Why are they so keen on some form of almost total indemnity everywhere their vaccines are available? Why are we told they are interchangeable, but their license and EUA are legally not? If what is in the vial is the same, then why the legal labyrinth? And what exactly was the cross-agency overreach into FDA licensing processes and why is there no formal Congressional inquiry?

 

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) is asking questions. He recently wrote a letter to the FDA requesting “why they did not grant full licensure for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that is already in use and available in the U.S., and how the agency will ensure that those being vaccinated under mandates will receive the FDA-approved version […].” Those concerned about our nation’s defense should consider asking their Congressmen and Senators to do the same.

The complex web of words, business structures, international legal agreements, and unforthright regulation may not collectively protect U.S. citizens. Rather, they enable a slight-of-hand scheme that increases global market-share, reduces expenses, and lowers potential legal exposure. All the while, this product (with no long-term studies and declining efficacy) is pushed on the consumer—at all costs—regardless of the potential harm. If the confusion were removed as it should be, informed citizens, their elected officials, and public servants would not stand for this carnival-like side show.

Nine months into the vaccination campaign, available evidence to-date does not look good for existing U.S. vaccines. The original “wild” version of SAR-CoV-2 is virtually dead and the increasingly immune variants dominate. Delta is highly contagious, but much less dangerous to the general population. The largest real-world analysis study, examining 700,000 records in Israel’s official health database, found that the COVID-19 vaccinated are 13 times more likely to be infected and 27 times more likely to demonstrate serious symptoms than those with recovered natural immunity. The Combined Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which tracks post-vaccination events for possible patterns, has through August recorded more than 600,000 events, including 81,000 serious or life-threatening events and about 13,000 deaths.

In contrast, as of 12 August, the COVID-19 mortality rate in the military was .001%, or 29 deaths in the almost 2.2 million-strong and exceptionally healthy U.S. service member population. Recent studies, meanwhile, indicate that teen boys and young men (the military’s dominant demographic) are more likely to suffer heart problems from vaccination than they are to be hospitalized from COVID-19 itself. It is not difficult at all to imagine that in a force as young and healthy as the military, universal vaccination could cause more harm than the disease itself.

We all, citizen, elected official and military, want to protect the Force, but the extent of national harm that could result from doing so in this way, with wrong or incomplete information, is staggering to contemplate. Industry, regulators, and media must be immediately cross-examined. We literally only get one shot at this, as these vaccines are irreversible experimental gene therapies. I have previously suggested a Department-wide safety pause to conduct further study, so as to not prematurely commit the entire U.S. fighting force to one permanent experimental group. Given all of the cross-agency confusion, Congressional inquiry may be necessary. A bipartisan body could better investigate the misperceptions informing national security decisions.

Until more is reliably known, DoD can still maintain a control group with almost half of the 2.2 million uniformed population still deciding not to vaccinate. We could easily commence prevention and treatment therapies like I-MASK+ currently used in nations around the world with great efficacy.

It would be a national calamity to “rush to failure” en masse with the entire U.S. troop strength, using vaccines that may be more harmful than the disease itself to this specific population entrusted with our nation’s defense. The pervasive misperception that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is FDA licensed, thereby justifying mandatory vaccination policy, is a logical syllogism based on a false premise and, therefore, invalid. The FDA, CDC, Pfizer, BioNTech and the media must reveal what is under all of the “shells” for the sake of this Republic.

Many U.S. military service members are carrying these messages to Garcia in the strongest terms possible, by tendering resignations. I am aware of many seasoned officers and enlisted who have done so, or done the effective equivalent (early retirement or non-reenlistment). This mandatory vaccination decision may, in the end, squander billions in training and readiness. The sudden loss of even a fraction of the one million non-vaccinated force could expose critical capabilities at scale. The talent capable of separating, at this time, have completed all service obligations, are fully trained and highly experienced, constituting the best of our warfighter expertise and lethality. Many others are declining to visit the military recruiter’s office for the first time. The already difficult task of recruiting for our all-volunteer force may become nearly impossible with a mandatory vaccination policy.

The most tragic are those already in the Service who have a remaining obligation (contracts or enlistments) and cannot choose to leave for risk of legal or financial ruin. Continue down this path, and our military will almost certainly suffer a heretofore-unseen morale deficit, further reducing overall fighting capability. If we run off or demoralize fully half of our armed force, then the defense of this nation will be significantly crippled.

And for what? To protect 0.001% of those in service? We would wreck our military, just after wrecking our economy, at the worst possible time, when U.S. soft power and perceived hard power are arguably at their lowest levels in half a century. This unnecessary vaccine mandate comes at a moment when strategic competitors are demonstrably more capable, more aggressive, and more able to project their will against U.S. interests than ever before.

If the mandatory COVID-19 vaccine policy is truly a military readiness initiative, then the reality is it will cause a far graver impact to our national defense posture than this disease. America’s foes do not care the reason why our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guard or Guardians are not on duty to prevent attack. Mandatory vaccination’s enterprise-level damage to recruiting, retention, and trust and confidence within the ranks could make us all more vulnerable than COVID-19 ever could alone. It has been said that this great nation can only be conquered from within. If the military self-inflicts a strategic sized wound (by persecuting half the troops), then it is possible we could gift this nation’s enemies our own mortal blow.

To review, the FDA licensed vaccine is not available to consumers in the U.S. and even DoD cannot mandate any emergency vaccine without a specifically conditional, presidential waiver of a service member’s informed consent. To do otherwise is unlawful. The way I see it, service members have three choices: 1) choose to receive the EUA shot; 2) submit a religious and/or medical waiver, or; 3) refuse the EUA shot, as only a fully licensed vaccine labeled Comirnaty, not available at your U.S. clinic, can be mandated at present.

As we do best, service members are helping service members. More information can be found at COVID-19 educational information hub: thecontrolgroup.us

Commander Furman is a career United States naval officer, naval aviator and foreign area officer with extensive experience advising senior military, diplomatic and international organization’s leadership. The Commander has spent years serving throughout Africa, Asia, Europe and the Middle East at sea, ashore and airborne. He holds a Master of Arts in Security Studies from the Naval Postgraduate School.

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS:
Thank you to Commander J.H. Furman and The Revolver for bringing these incredibly important issues to our attention. The amount of deception and manipulation that these “medical/health agencies”, government/politicians and pharmaceutical companies have employed to vaccinate everyone cannot in common sense terms be deemed as a beneficial goal and/or for health reasons. There is something else at work here.

Thank you again to Commander J.H. Furman and everyone else speaking up during these perilous times. Your bravery and integrity in coming forward is greatly appreciated and much needed to bring this awareness to the population.

God bless.

W.H.O. / Governments Working in Collusion with Big Pharma? | A Necessary Look Back at the Swine Flu Pandemic

STEPPING BACK IN TIME: Another attempt to vaccinate the whole world.

It is extremely important to learn about our history, because as this year has shown, not recognizing the troubles and past circumstances – especially when dealing with our very lives and those of our loved ones – is causing untold turmoil and unnecessary deaths/injuries.
 
The below video is an insightful and historic account of how quickly we forget (and/or didn’t realize) about what happened in the not-so-distant past. I would highly, highly suggest checking it out and sharing. It is CRUCIAL to understand the events that have led up to the situation we see ourselves in today. We must learn to recognize attacks on not only our health, but also our whole livelihood.

I have highlighted some key parts of it below, but the whole video is well worth the watch. Do the events sound familiar to you? What if we replaced the word “swine flu/h1n1/influenza” with “coronavirus”? This video is an eerie look back at the 2009 events and the goal, even at that time – 12 years ago – of the exact same thing we’re seeing today. It was never about the “virus”; and it was never about our health.

Source: odysee | Do You See What I See Productions | A-Necessary-Look-Back-at-the-Swine-Flu-Plandemic

Some embellishment has been added for emphasis:

“So what is technically a biological weapon is being sold to us as a prophylactic, and if we don’t take it voluntarily, if we don’t believe in the hysteria of the Media, we are finally forced to take it.”

[00:00-00:18] Jane Bürgermeister 2009: “After this health crisis, a new political force will be installed.

It will be the World Health Organization, the one in charge of organizing the enforcement of these things, also the U.N.”

[00:35-04:52] Jane Bürgermeister 2009: “And it will happen at the same time, more or less, in parallel in all countries, because all countries follow the same schedule for voluntary vaccinations.”

“And after this period, every government estate will be joined into a single, new structure, that will incorporate itself under the W.H.O. and U.N.”

(Some politicians have already suggested) “that the W.H.O. should be the natural global health authority. There are other clear plans for the creation of a world government. And the pandemic seems to be the means to this goal, the same as this vaccine also an instrument is, to fulfill that old dream of a single world power.

What I am stating here is that there is a secret biological war going on, an undeclared biological warfare against civilians is being waged, because it is carried out by a small group, against a larger majority of billions of people, carried out with cunning and deception.

So what is technically a biological weapon is being sold to us as prophylactic, and if we don’t take it voluntarily, if we don’t believe the hysteria of the Media, we are finally forced to take it.

What we see is the World Health Organization trying to succeed in enforcing vaccination on all people, a system according to which they’ll keep data about all people for the rest of their lives.”

“At meetings, many governments deny that they intend this, they state that it will be voluntary and so on, but all the while they are building the infrastructure for forced vaccinations.”

“You might say, “How is something like this possible?” “How can our health officials do this?” “What are health safety institutions doing, the Media…” “How can every security step be failing us?”

I believe this plan has been thought over many, many years. And unfortunately, many officials were “bought”. 

We have to accept that officials in charge of protecting people are actually not giving warnings and they let these things happen.

If I could have access to the documents of my research, then also they could.”

“An important role in this sad story is played by Media; as I said, I have learned myself that the important information never comes from Media, and as credible as it sounds, I have seen for myself how systematically it’s just a propaganda instrument.”

“Exactly because Media doesn’t report some essential facts, and instead just goes over trivial everyday stories, most people are absolutely clueless about what’s going on here.”

“It’s up now for each citizen to say: I will influence political events – “

Setting the stage for the Media hysteria

[05:44-06:35] WHO Director General, Dr. Margaret Chan: “On the basis of available evidence, and these expert assessments of the evidence, the scientific criteria for an influenza pandemic have been met.

I have therefore, decided to raise the level of influenza pandemic alert from phase 5 to phase 6. The world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.

Influenza pandemics, whether moderate or severe, are remarkable events. Because of the almost universal susceptibility of the world’s population to infection.

We are all in this together.”

Essentially impossible to distinguish between regular seasonal flu vs. 2009 H1N1 influenza

[06:59-07:47] : How can a person tell if they have the regular flu seasonal flu or if they’ve contracted the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus?

Anthony Fauci:Well, for a person, him or herself to be able to determine that, would essentially be impossible, because you can get everything from very very mild illness to severe illness with either seasonal flu or the H1N1 new 2009 pandemic flu. Most of the time it’s a mild disease, but there are unusual cases that can be severe. The only way a person can tell is if they get their blood drawn or other laboratory tests, which could specifically distinguish between one and the other. But that is something that is not done routinely.”

Role-playing? News anchor and correspondent look amused while discussing if they had swine flu. /
Also, “testing really doesn’t matter”

[07:48-10:26] Anderson Cooper: “As of tonight, more than 41,000 Americans have been infected with an H1N1 or swine flu virus. Maybe you know someone who’s come down with it.

We do. Our very own Sanjay Gupta. Our chief medical correspondent got the virus during a recent trip to Afghanistan. Sanjay said it was the sickest he’s ever been. He joins us now to talk about it; he’s a physician and a patient – Uh, Sanjay, first of all, how do you feel now?”

Sanjay Gupta: “You know, I feel fine, now, Anderson. And you know, it’s worth pointing out, you and I talked about this while we were both in Afghanistan, and you were quite sick as well. I’ve come to find out later on that the H1N1, the swine flu as it’s called, was circulating quite a bit, Anderson, in the area that we were in.”

Anderson Cooper: “Was it really? No one mentioned that to us. Or at least not me.”

Sanjay Gupta: “I know, I mean, you know, frankly speaking, we can talk about this now via satellite but you know, there’s a good chance, based on everything that I’m hearing, that you also had H1N1 virus infection.”

Anderson Cooper: “Well, cause I – I mean, I had similar symptoms to you, I was – the cough was the worst cough I’ve ever had, and it even hurt my heart when I was coughing, and I went to you, and you were really sick, and I asked you, “Is it possible it’s swine flu?” And you said, “Probably not, because usually swine flu has a very high fever right away.”

Sanjay Gupta: “That’s right. And you know, it’s interesting because I think the next day, I think maybe you had gone to a different province and I, I was feeling miserable the next day and I hadn’t checked my temperature, you know; you’re in the desert, it’s hot outside. Hadn’t really thought about it. I went there and my temperature was around 102 degrees, so, you know, pretty high for certainly for me, 98 being normal and 98.6.

So that was the first sign and then, you know, I had that same cough that you did. Light-headedness, and I was freezing cold. I don’t know if you had that as well. [Anderson Cooper: “Yeah.”] But that was really the most memorable part of it. I was freezing cold despite being in the desert.

Are you coughing right now?”

Anderson Cooper: “I- I’m still coughing. I will say. Just a little bit.”

Sanjay Gupta: “Thought I just heard that, yeah. I have a little bit of a cough as well. I don’t think we’re contagious though.”

Anderson Cooper: “I love that I just learned that I may have had swine flu from you, via satellite. Um, but what was it like? I mean, it was for you, you said it was the worst, worst sickness you ever had?”

Sanjay Gupta: “It really was. And I don’t get sick very often. I mean, I can’t remember the last time I was sick. I don’t remember the last time I had the flu. But this really floored me.

I think the day after you and I talked about it, the next morning, I was trying to get out of my sleeping bag, I could barely take a couple of steps without feeling really light-headed. And again, those just profound chills and shakes, despite the fact that it was over a hundred degrees outside. And then when I went to the – I went to the clinic, they had a role, it’s a role three battlefield clinic. You know, they gave me some IV fluids cause I hadn’t eaten in a while, and they also did the swab.

What we know is that H1N1 is circulating around the world. You mentioned how many cases have already been, Anderson, and what most doctors have told me, most infectious disease doctors, is that the testing really doesn’t matter.

Fauci, director of NIAID, suggests to vaccinate highly vulnerable groups such as pregnant women and children as young as 6 months old

[13:25-14:32]: This year, do I get a shot for the 2009 H1N1 flu in addition to the regular flu shot?

Anthony Fauci: “Well, you certainly should get your seasonal flu shot. That’s for sure. When we talk about the vaccination program for the H1N1, we’d like to be sure that the 5 priority groups of individuals get the H1N1 that becomes available early on. We fully expect that we would have enough so that you can cover not only the priority groups, but anyone else who feels they want it and need it. So the answer is, yes you should get the H1N1.

The 5 priority groups are:

pregnant women
– people who are the caretakers, parents or what have you, of children less than 6 months old,
– healthcare workers
young children and young adults from 6 months to 24 years old
– and individuals from 25-64 who have underlying medical conditions that would compromise them”

Vested interests of academics, governments, W.H.O. and drug companies to push unproven vaccinations

[14:32-15:48] News Segment: “In clinical trials on volunteers began on Wednesday in Australia for vaccine against swine flu.

But leading researchers now raising serious questions about the way the world is responding to this pandemic.

Dr. Tom Jefferson says the response to the virus is driven by vested interests. Academics, governments, the World Health Organization, and drug companies who all stand to gain.”

Dr. Tom Jefferson: “By declaring ‘pandemic’, they’ve pushed the button on this juggernaut that they’ve created. And of course, antivirals are part of that, and vaccines are part of that, and the whole panel plays a part of that.

All I’m saying, is let’s act with a little bit of caution and common sense. And let’s look at the evidence, the hard evidence.

Until they actually get used, we do not know whether it will work. Their seasonal counterparts don’t have a very good track record. The evidence from the hundreds of studies that we synthesized, is that sometimes they work a little, and sometimes they don’t.

We’ve been brought up, people in my generation, to understand that a pandemic means deaths and a lot of serious cases. And that seems to have dropped out of sight, and they’re lowering the threshold, of a definition of a ‘pandemic’. And that is not a good thing. In many ways.

Swine flu not much worse than a bad cold. /
Natural immunity would provide better immunity than the vaccine.

[17:09-18:23] [Guest doctor]: “Now 3 months later, and as a GP I’ve seen dozens of cases of swine flu, we can see that overwhelmingly, in healthy adults, it’s a very mild illness. Really not much worse than a bad cold. And you will have to question whether or not once you’ve vaccinate a population against an illness that is no worse than a bad cold.

But remember as well that by the time we get this vaccine here, in the country, a lot of us will have come across the virus anyway. And we’ll have developed natural immunity. So we’ll have better and longer lasting immunity than the vaccine would provide already. Which would make a vaccine completely unnecessary.

As I’ve said, the vaccine is being fast-tracked; it’s being rushed onto the scene and the normal safety tests that are done before a vaccine is introduced will be very, very limited. And the last time that a vaccine was given nationally, against a swine flu pandemic, was in the U.S.A. in 1976. And then after vaccinating millions of people, they stopped that vaccination trial because of an increased rate of side effects. There was something called Guillain-Barré syndrome, a paralyzing disorder. But then so they had to stop the trial. And we don’t know that that’s not going to happen again – “

Children used as guinea pigs /
Mercury found in vaccines linked to autism, brain disorders and Guillain–Barré syndrome

[19:10-21:41] Priya Sridhar: “Joining me to discuss all of this is RT contributor and investigative journalist, Wayne Madsen. Wayne, thanks so much for joining me.

First of all, can you tell me, who has taken the swine flu vaccine so far and what have you heard about it?”

Wayne Madsen: “Well apparently there has been a test community used already. We’re also hearing that the vaccine that’s being developed, they’re saying it’s not for everyone. Apparently, children were used as uh, for lack of a better term, guinea pigs in Oklahoma. I know from talking to people in the research community, even scientists who helped develop the vaccine for smallpox are saying they’re not going to take the vaccine and urging their friends and family not to take this vaccine either.

Priya Sridhar: “And what kind of side effects did these children have, if any?”

Wayne Madsen: “Well, contained in the vaccine is a component called thimerosal,  which has been proven – uh, half of it is composed of mercury. And it’s been proven to cause not only Guillain-Barré syndrome, but also autism, in young children. There’s been several court cases because of past vaccinations due to the autism issue.”

Priya Sridhar: “And so how will the swine flu vaccine be offered? Will it be mandatory for people? What have you heard about that?”

Wayne Madsen: “Well there was a conference here in Washington last week where we have two – two themes present. We have the research community, the medical community, saying, “Look, what we need to provide the public is good information and let them make the decision based on facts.”

We have the emergency community, the Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency people talking about forced vaccinations, forced quarantines… Basically the politicians running the show instead of the people who are from the medical community and know much better about the threat of this particular influenza.”

Reporter: “While there are fears the U.S. media is covering up the possible side effects of the swine flu trial vaccine, 28,000 human guinea pigs are sent to test the jab. Bad news outlets have so far kept their snouts clean over its link to rare brain disorder.”

Purpose of recalling 800,000 mercury-free vaccines intended for children…

[25:40-28:13] Reporter: “Health officials there are recalling 800,000 swine flu vaccines intended for children. They say their efficiency wears off after a short period of time. Now it comes as vaccination against H1N1 become available to any American who wants it.

Our correspondent Priya Sridhar – Priya, hi. This recall must have some people wondering what the whole point is in taking these vaccines. What is the feeling over there?”

Priya Sridhar: “Hi Kevin. Well, I think people have had reservations about this vaccine for a while. Previous reports showed that the vaccine may have been linked to the Guillain-Barré syndrome, and now this new report is say – causing many people to say, “What is the point?” And so joining me to help talk about this, is co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, Barbara Loe Fisher. Barbara, thanks so much for joining me.

So tell me about the latest numbers. 800,000 H1N1 vaccines that were supposed to be for children are now being recalled. What do you know about this?”

Barbara Loe Fisher: “Yes. Just this morning, Sanofi Pasteur recalled 800,000 doses of H1N1 vaccine. We think that it’s mercury-free vaccines – the single dose vials. I haven’t confirmed that, but if that’s true that means those children are going to be getting a multi-dose vial of vaccine that contains mercury. And of course mercury is something that a lot of parents in this country have been very concerned about giving their children through vaccination.

And, the issue is a lot of people in this country are not taking the H1N1 vaccine. There’s going to be potentially a surplus of vaccine that will then have to be disposed of. If it’s in the multi-dose vials that contain mercury, it will have to be disposed of under hazardous materials regulations. HAZMAT regulations. Because you can’t dispose of mercury in this country – mercury containing vaccines, by pouring it down the drain or throwing it into a regular garbage can. You have to undergo hazardous material regulations.”

Priya Sridhar: “And what are some of the concerns with the mercury?”

Barbara Loe Fisher: “Well the mercury has been associated with brain injury in children. Regression in children who have gotten these vaccines. Regressing into autism. It’s very controversial; the government denies that mercury has anything to do with these children’s autism.

But, in 1999, our Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration directed the vaccine manufacturers to take mercury out of childhood vaccines. But the flu vaccine, in multi-dose vials, contains mercury. And so I’m wondering what’s going on here with recalling these 800,000 doses of potentially mercury-free vaccines, and what’s going to happen with children who are going to get the mercury containing vaccines.”

[29:14-29:29] Barbara Loe Fisher: “There have been about 3,700 vaccine adverse events reported to the government, 12 deaths, 10 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, but this is only a tiny fraction of what’s actually occuring out there. Because most doctors don’t report vaccine adverse events to the government.

Compilation of news reports of children experiencing tragic side effects from the swine flu vaccine

[30:39-31:46]

Reporter: “6 year old Nikiyah Torres is all smiles now, but her mother Naomi Troy is still fuming about a medical mistake at PS 335 in Brooklyn. When a nurse there mistook Nikiyah for a new student, she was given an H1N1 vaccine, without parental consent.”

Naomi Troy: “She’s not a guinea pig. You don’t make a mistake with children lives.”

Reporter: “He has a lot of questions tonight after he said his son was given the H1N1 vaccination at school, without his permission. The child got the vaccination from Montgomery County Health Officials at Camargo Elementary School. But his dad says the child has other health issues that make this vaccination potentially dangerous.”

Reporter 1: “A Northern Virgina family dealing with a stunning turn of events. Their healthy, athletic son suddenly comes down with a debilitating illness. They believe that it’s connected to a swine flu vaccine he got 24 hours earlier.”

Reporter 2: “Thursday afternoon he got his flu shots. By 10 o’clock Friday morning he had chills and started feeling weak. And by 4 that afternoon, he was having spasms.”

Reporter: “A 4 year old Rochester boy is recovering tonight after nearly dying, after being vaccinated for H1N1.”

3 shots / booster shots recommended… “trust the government and health officials”

[32:31-32:41] Meredith Vieira: “Now you’re asking people to get 3; that’s a tough sell.”

Guest: “Oh, Meredith, I think you hit the nail on the head. This is going to be a public relations, ‘trust your government and your health officials’ public campaign.”

Package insert: “Safety and effectiveness of the H1N1 2009 vaccine have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers, or persons less than 18 years of age.”

[33:22-33:43] Deirdre Imus: “There’s 3 major reasons why the H1N1 for children is not safe. They say it right in the package insert, from the manufacturer, it says right here, virus vaccine manufacturer: “Safety and effectiveness of the H1N1 2009 vaccine have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers, or persons less than 18 years of age.” They say it right there! In the packaging insert!”

W.H.O.’s loyalty seems to be in pushing vaccines – continues to announce a “pandemic” when there isn’t one

[34:36-38:02] Wolfgang Wodarg [female voice over in English]: “And what I’ve heard from the W.H.O., my concerns have merely been strengthened. The only evidence we’ve heard is that many people were asked and figure was given to us how many people were asked, but no justification were given for the actions undertaken by the W.H.O.

So the core question remains, why was the definition of the pandemic changed? Mr. Fukuda repeated that we had a pandemic underway. That is to say that we have to look at the question as to how a pandemic is declared. And how the fears are then subsequently elate – that is to say, at what point do we say that there’s no longer a pandemic?

In October last year we knew that the flu had run its full course because they are at a season’s removed than we are, so we could observe Australia, the wave had passed, and there was a moreover a trigger which it was said the flu was a trigger which enabled people to be protected from other strains of the flu. So this is something that the W.H.O. knows and the W.H.O. still says ‘we have a pandemic underway, use up all the vaccines that we have in stock’.

I want to read you something, from the Associated Press, the 19th of May, 2009, precisely at the time when the discussions were underway as to what the phase of the pandemic was, [Wolfgang Wodarg in English]: ” – urge the World Health Organization to change its criteria for declaring a pandemic again.” So to take it back what they did. Saying the agency must consider how deadly a virus is, not just how far – not just only how far it spreads across the globe. Fearing a swine flu pandemic declaration could spark mass panic, and economic devastation, Britain, Japan, China and others, asked the global body on Monday to treat carefully before raising this alert.

Some cited the costly and potential risky consequences, such as switching from seasonal to pandemic vaccine. Even though the virus so far appears to be mild. In May already. All those national specialists asked W.H.O. to change the course; to change its direction.

And then, although no formal changes were made on Monday, W.H.O. said it would listen to its members request. ‘And it’s certainly something we look at very closely’, said Dr. Keiji Fukuda, W.H.O.’s flu chief.

This happened, and afterwards, the pandemic was declared on the 11th of June, and the vaccine was sold to everyone and children were vaccinated in vain. I just say this, this is a very serious facts we see and we knew this already when the pandemic was not yet – the alarm was not yet uttered. So I think it’s a very, it’s a very important thing to discuss about the definition of a pandemic.”

Explanation as to why W.H.O. continues to announce a pandemic

[42:40-42:57] Narrator: “Many countries, including Germany, Italy, France and Great Britain, concluded secret agreements with pharmaceutical companies before the swine flu incident. Which obliged them to purchase swine flu vaccinations; but only if the W.H.O. issued a pandemic level 6 alert.”

“Greatest medical scandals of the century”

[45:55-47:44] Jon Snow: “It is one of the greatest medical scandals of the century according to a leading health expert in Brussels. The Council of Europe Health’s Chief has accused major pharmaceutical firms of organizing a campaign of panic and unduly influencing World Health Organization decisions. And with European countries now burdened with bills from millions of unwanted doses, the swine flu vaccine, he wants an investigation.

Our science correspondent, Tom Clarke, has this report.”

Tom Clarke: “64,000 people dead – tens of thousands hospitalized, a country crippled by a virus. The predictions of the impact of swine flu on Britain were grim. The government’s response: spending hundreds of millions of pounds on antiviral drugs and vaccines, adverts, and leaflets. But 10 months into the pandemic, only 355 Britains have died. And globally, the virus hasn’t lived up to our fears.

Were governments misled into preparing for the worst? Politicians in Brussels are now asking for an investigation into the role pharmaceutical companies played in influencing political decisions that led to a swine flu spending spree.”

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg: “There must be a process to get more transparency out of the decisions and the W.H.O., how they function and who is influencing the decisions of the W.H.O. And what is the role of the pharmaceutical industry there? I’m very suspicious about processes which are behind this pandemic.”

Tom Clarke: “They also want to probe ties between key W.H.O. advisors and drug companies.”

Paul Flynn: “Who is deciding what the risk is? Is it the pharmaceutical companies? Who want to sell drugs? Or is it someone making a decision based on the perceived danger? In this case, it appears that the danger was vastly exaggerated. And was it exaggerated by the pharmaceutical companies in order to make money?”

Are the pharmaceutical companies and W.H.O. running the show?

[47:45-48:01] Bill Dod: ” – will launch a probe into pharmaceutical companies accused of manipulating swine flu data. This follows a claim by a renowned German scientist that vaccine manufacturers pressured the World Health Organization into declaring a swine flu pandemic, seeking to increase profits.

RT’s Laura Emmett has more.”

Laura Emmett: “It was supposed to be a deadly pandemic. But it’s so far nothing more than a serious cold. And it’s left a lasting headache as a debate rages over pharmaceutical companies deliberately misled governments about the seriousness of swine flu to make them stockpile vaccines.”

Paul Flynn: “And I believe when we have a thorough investigation, and we look at this, we’ll discover that that’s the story: the world has been subjected to a stunt, for their own greedy interests of the pharmaceutical companies.”

The H1N1 virus may have started in a lab /
Bioethics? Or Bioterrorism?

[49:30-49:38] Bill Dod: “U.S. investigative journalist and RT contributor Wayne Madsen says he’s gathering more and more evidence that the H1N1 virus started out in a lab.”

[51:16-51:38] Priya Sridhar: ” – how exactly did this happen? This is the 21st century. I mean, how could something – how could these gene sequences get manipulated and then be disseminated throughout the country?”

Wayne Madsen: “Well, apparently what we are seeing is this could have been a product of some over zealous research on the part of the research scientist, the microbiologist, or there may be something more sinister.”

[52:44-53:06] Wayne Madsen: “Well I think what we have here is a situation with bioethics. They talk a good game in the research – medical research community about bioethics, but it doesn’t seem like there’s any method to enforce the ethics. And if, in fact, this was developed to make money for a certain bio-pharmaceutical companies, of course this is a case of bioterrorism.”

Deep corruption involves everything from contamination of vaccines, to attempts to vaccinate 6 billion people, to assassination of officials who refuse to follow the narrative

[57:25-57:52] Jane Bürgermeister “The vaccine gave her narcolepsy; a brain disorder associated with uncontrollable sleep attacks, hallucinations, and catalepsy. “I trusted them.” she said. “I trusted them. One injection and my whole life changed.”

50,000 people in Germany now have narcolepsy, according to a report in the Welt from January of this year. Every 6th sufferer is a child; the average age is between 15 and 25 years old. The governments of Norway, Sweden, Finland and Ireland have confirmed that the many cases of narcolepsy are due to the pandemic vaccine.”

[59:25-1:00:06] “Baxter nearly started a global pandemic in 2009 when staff contaminated 72 kilos of the seasonal flu vaccine material with a deadly bird flu virus, at its bio-security level 3 facilities in Austria. Baxter had also pre-negotiated contracts to sell the pandemic vaccine.

It has since emerged that Baxter is a site which is critical to U.S. security, according to leaked diplomatic cables published by wikileaks. The question is, who runs this bio-security facility? Is it the CIA? Is it a secret bioweapons lab? How could an instance as sudden as the kind that occurred in 2009 happen at Baxter’s facility?”

[1:00:36-1:00:44] “In 2009, plans to vaccinate 6 billion people around the world were activated by W.H.O. Yes. 6 billion people.”

[1:02:59-1:03:55] “In Poland, no one took the vaccine. Because the health minister, Ewa Kopacz, a doctor, decided that it wasn’t safe enough. “As a doctor, my guiding principle has to be not to damage others.” Kopacz told Polish parliament in 2009. “We will not buy the vaccine against the swine flu.” The Polish health minister was alone in refusing to trigger the pandemic vaccine contract with big pharma. Apart from Russia, a country which also doesn’t have chemtrails. And the Polish government paid a terrible price.

Just days after Ewa Kopacz gave evidence about the pandemic vaccine at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, PACE, 96 top Polish government and military officials were killed in a mysterious plane crash in Smolensk. Itself now the subject of inquiry after enormous amount of evidence showed that this was not an accident. But an assassination attempt.”

Stage is now set

[1:06:06-1:06:45] Jane Bürgermeister: “The stage is now set for another event to trigger a pandemic. This time an act of bio-terrorism could be used, and spark yet another fake pandemic, and push for global mass vaccination campaign. This time, W.H.O. laboratories controlled by big pharma would hype the virus even more than they did in 2009. 

There are more and more signs of the global elite are planning a pandemic scare soon. Big pharma companies have got greater control over the W.H.O.’s pandemic early virus warning system. Allowing them great opportunities for virus/pandemic hype.”

Thank you to the Do You See What I See Productions odysee channel for collecting this footage and compiling it into this video. It is an incredible flashback of the very same attempts that the pharmaceutical industries, media, health organizations, and government have engaged in, in order to enforce vaccines onto the whole world.

And thank you to all of the whistleblowers and reporters who were/are a part of trying to expose these crimes against humanity. Although we are once again repeating history and undergoing these same attempts from the same industries, it is my hope that more and more people become aware of these corrupt organizations and refuse to participate; and instead have courage and integrity and stand up for humanity’s rights and freedom.

Thank you for reading. God bless.