“Year of the Vaccine” – Plandemic in the Making. 2011 Kickstarted a Campaign to Condition the World to Accepting Worldwide Vaccines

Preparedness 101: Getting the world ready for a global vaccination plan.

Making the case for a zombie apocalypse wasn’t as hard as I thought it’d be. And while that post is still in the making, I had to take this moment to comment on something incredibly unnerving and foreboding, especially in light of what’s been going on around us lately, that I found while researching this possible “zombie apocalypse scenario”.

With figureheads such as the CDC (although, who can forget their complete ineptitude, read: complicity, when it comes to the “coronavirus/vaccine pandemic” – or perhaps EVERYTHING in their history…), the U.S. government/military (again, same thing could apply – even if the majority in the agencies don’t realize it), and other organizations, like Amazon, detailing what it would be like in a zombie apocalypse – it wasn’t too difficult to bring these pieces together.

There are allusions to this incredibly alarming and frightening possibility.

However, this post reveals their ultimate goal whether we’re having a zombie apocalypse, or even a thunderstorm watch. It has nothing to do with being “prepared” but is instead a misdirection to promote, what else?

THE VACCINE.

For instance, taking the CDC to task with their Preparedeness 101: Zombie Apocalypse post, which has now been deleted, by the way (linked article is to the web archived version) – after 10 years of being available – which is strange in itself. (Too much feedback? Misunderstandings on what the post was really about? What was the reason they had to delete this article – isn’t publicity what they wanted?)

And yes, while this information has been available for over 10 years, it’s interesting when connecting that to the details of what’s going on today. For an intriguing look, I took a read into their comic book that they created (yes, they even went so far as to making a comic book about an impending zombie apocalypse…), and selected some key choice words to reflect on:

News report: “Stay in your homes. Do not go outside. If you or your family begin showing symptoms such as slowed movement, slurred speech, or violent behaviors, isolate them to a secure area of the house. Stay tuned for more information on where to go… Stay in your…”

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 12)

Dr. Chang: “It appears to be a highly mutated form of the flu. They’ve labeled it Z5N1.”

Dr. Greene: “Interesting… do we know what the source is?”

Dr. Chang: “No sir… the field staff are still trying to investigate where it started. But several of them have now become infected. The zombie virus is spreading rapidly infecting 21 people for every infected person.”

Dr. Greene: “All the more reason to get this vaccine made… and fast!”

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 15/16)

Scientist: “We’re using the same type of vaccine that we use for the seasonal flu… but engineering it to target Z5N1.”

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 18)

News report: “…CDC shipped out its first supply of vaccines against this novel virus that has been ravaging the nation. The first round should reach safe zones as early as this evening…”

Crowd members: “What?!”

Worker: “Hey folks, the vaccines are on their way!”

Julie (one of the main characters):We’re saved?! I can’t believe it!”

Crowd members: “Vaccines?!”

“Yay!!”

Narration: [“While the shelter erupts in cheers, hugs and tears of relief… outside the school’s protective fence, shadowy figures are closing in…”]

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 26)

Keep in mind, this is VERBATIM. I am not changing any of the words or punctuation, or bold print.

Health worker: “Alright folks, listen up… at 0600 we start shipping out the first round of vaccine and supplies to the states…

From there the state health departments will divvy up the supplies and take them to the various points of dispensing.

We’ve got a lot of work to do so don’t expect to get any breaks until everyone has been vaccinated. Now let’s move!”

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 27)

SPOILER ALERT! – The zombie apocalypse scenario was all a dream… based on the spooky scary movie that Todd (main character) watched at the beginning of this comic.

Which obviously begs the question, while the CDC uses this as an example of Emergency Preparedness, even listing a group of items that would be useful in case of emergency, what on EARTH does that have to do with vaccines?

In my opinion, it would have to be obvious to even the most stubborn and hard-headed of people that this whole comic book about “preparedness” was all about endorsing vaccines. Even at the end of the comic, after Todd wakes up from his zombie apocalypse dream, he realizes that a weather emergency truly is on the way and it would be wise to gather important items for an emergency kit.

Even the last page left us with this message:

“We hope you enjoyed reading this fictional story. It’s meant to be both educational and entertaining. Now that you’ve seen the importance of being prepared, take the time to put together an emergency kit with the items included in the checklist on the inside of the back cover. You’ll be ready for any kind of disaster, even zombies.”

So again, I have to ask, what does this have to do with vaccines?

Unless, of course, they’re slyly implying that vaccines will save the day in case of a real zombie apocalypse. Although it would seem, those of us who are astute enough to observe the actions and reactions of the CDC, the W.H.O., NIH, etc. they would most likely BE THE CAUSE of the zombie apocalypse… for the sole reason of introducing a vaccine to us.

If that wasn’t bad enough, on their hurricane guideline article, right after suggesting basic steps to prepare for a hurricane, is the advice to get a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as you can. …

Preparing for a Hurricane

Follow these important hurricane preparedness tips from CDC:

      • Prepare for a hurricane: Take basic steps now to ensure your safety should a storm hit.
      • Get a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as you can. COVID-19 vaccines help protect you from getting sick or severely ill with COVID-19 and may also help protect people around you.
      • Get emergency supplies: Stock your home and your car with supplies. Give yourself more time than usual to prepare your emergency food, water, and medicine supplies. Home delivery is the safest choice for buying disaster supplies; however, that may not be an option for everyone. If in-person shopping is your only choice, take steps to protect your and others’ health when running essential errands.
      • Make a plan: Create a family disaster plan.
      • Prepare to evacuate: Never ignore an evacuation order. Pay attention to local guidance about updated plans for evacuations and shelters, including shelters for your pets.
      • Protect older adults: Understand older adult health and medical concerns.
      • Protect your pets: Ensure your pet’s safety before, during, and after a hurricane.
      • When you check on neighbors and friends, be sure to follow social distancing recommendations (staying at least 6 feet from others) and other CDC recommendations to protect yourself and others.

Now, if there really was a deadly disease outbreak (COVID is not – it has been admitted from several agencies that “COVID” is on par with the common cold and seasonal flu in the majority of people) I would be inclined to agree to protect oneself and their friends/family from it, whether there was an imminent hurricane (or zombie apocalypse) coming or not. However, the unusually high efforts to push vaccines so forcefully has made me reassess that vaccines (perhaps all of them) are nothing more than deliberate poison and/or alternative agenda to inject people with a substance(s) that “they”, for some reason, REALLY want to get into us.

Continuing on with the creepy obvious promotion of vaccines, we have the movie Contagion, also about a respiratory illness and – what else?

Vaccines to save the day.

And, in what’s perhaps an incredible coincidence (it’s not), Contagion also came out in 2011, the same year as the CDC comic Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse.

And for your perusal, here are some interesting lines/events from that film as well, as a brief run through:

SPOILERS for the movie Contagion:

[starts out with a woman coughing – turns out that this woman is cheating on her husband – tactic to make people believe that’s how she got sick?]

[then it pans to the words: “KOWLOON HONG KONG population 2.1 million” – this trope is used throughout the film to show us the population of the various different cities that they cover. Interesting that this would be one of the focal points, seeing as how the globalists are obsessed with population control…]

[@~4:35 into the movie, the CDC makes an appearance. Soon after that, we’re introduced to Alan, the “conspiracy theorist“.]

[Mitch Emhoff, the main character, watches as his wife, Beth Emhoff, and stepson dies.]

[Strangely, Geneva Switzerland does not get a population control monitor.]

[@11:50 into the film, the World Health Organization shows up]

CDC Dr. Erin Mears @17:55: “At this point, I think we have to believe that this is respiratory. Maybe fomites too. … It refers to transmission from surfaces. The average person touches their face 2 or 3,000 times a day. … 3-5 times every waking minute. In between, we’re touching doorknobs, water fountains, elevator buttons, and each other. Those things become fomites.

How fast it multiples depends on a variety of factors. The incubation period. How long a person is contagious. Sometimes people can be contagious without even having symptoms.

Dr. Ian Sussman @21:40: “Shows novel characteristics. It appears to be chimeric in origin.”

Alan: “This is a biological weapon.”

[@22:30, the Department of Homeland Security steps in. Shortly after, the CIA is mentioned.]

DHS worker: “Is there any way that someone can weaponize the bird flu? Is that what we’re looking at?”

CDC Dr. Ellis Cheever: “Someone doesn’t have to weaponize the bird flu. The birds are doing that.”

Dr. Hextall @28:25: “We’re getting the same results as Dr. Sussman. We’ve sequenced the virus and determined its origin and we’ve modeled the way it enters the cells of the lung and the brain. And the virus contains both bat and pig sequences.

Somewhere in the world, the wrong pig met up with the wrong bat.

CDC Dr. Ellis Cheever: “You ever seen anything like this before?”

Dr. Hextall: “No. And… it’s still changing. It’s figuring us out faster than we’re figuring it out.”

CDC Dr. Erin Mears @39:14:FEMA can handle food in the basement.” [@40:00 – Minnesota Army National Guard Armory building to be used as an Emergency Operation and Readiness Center]

[@51:50 – Dr. Leonora Orantes (who works at the W.H.O.) gets kidnapped by a Chinese group that is holding her hostage until a cure is ready in order to trade her for the cure for his village]

[@54:30 – Alan, the “conspiracy theoriest” blogger/journalist, is working to convince his viewers that Forsythia (early treatment medicine) will work against the virus.]

Dr. Ellis Cheever @ 55:26: “I mean, we’re just putting healthy people next to sick people and hoping that the healthy people don’t get sick. It’s ridiculous.”

[@58:15 – Panic and chaos erupt as people rush to get the limited supply of Forsythia. Film shows the city decimated with smoke and fire and stores/buildings are destroyed and looted. Editor’s note: clearly depicting a world that the globalists are hoping for in order to justify their “new world order”. ]

[@1:00:55 – Alan is leaving flyers around that say:

THE CDC LIES. THEY COLLABORATE WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES. THERE IS A CURE.  TO EFFECTIVELY TREAT MEV-1. FORSYTHIA IS A NATURAL AND SAFE THERAPY. DON’T LET THE GOVERNMENT MISLEAD YOU IN ORDER TO GAIN A PROFIT. JOIN THE MOVEMENT AND SPREAD THE WORD OF HOPE.]

[@1:03:40 – We are “treated” to a dialogue between the CDC’s Dr. Cheever and CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta, as well as Alan.

Sanjay Gupta: “Alan, today on Twitter you wrote that the truth about this virus is being kept from the world by the CDC, by the World Health Organization, to allow friends of the current administration to benefit from it, both financially and physically.

On your blog, you also wrote that the World Health Organization is somehow in bed with pharmaceutical companies?”

Alan: “Because they are. That’s who stands to gain from this. They’re working hand in glove. And the hand is reaching into our pocket.”

Dr. Cheever: “We’re working very hard to find out where this virus came from. To treat it, and to vaccinate against it if we can.” [Editor’s note: this was not the first time that a vaccine was mentioned in this film]

Dr. Hextall @1:07:58: “It’s mutated. It’s moved into an African HIV/AIDS population.”

Huh. Interesting. It’s almost as if this film is a blue-print for everything that COVID will eventually entail. Again, not a coincidence… Moving on:

Oh, but first, a number that the “elites” love to display, and also tied in with the vaccines:

Still image from the film Contagion (2011)

Dr. Cheever @1:08:30: “I thought you said that once we grow it we can vaccinate against it?”

Dr. Hextall: “We tried using dead virus, combined with several adjuvants to boost immune response.”

Dr. Cheever: “And?”

Dr. Hextall: “No protective antibodies. A lot of dead monkeys.

Now we have to try a live attenuated virus. … The only danger with live virus is the possibility that it will revert to wild type and kill the host.”

Dr. Cheever @1:09:18: “Without a vaccine, we can anticipate that approximately 1 in 12 people on the planet will contract the disease.”

[@1:10:55 – Another chaotic outbreak ensues as a military officer announces they have exhausted their supply of MREs for that day.]

Dr. Cheever @1:15:12: “Well, Homeland Security wants to know if we can put a vaccination in the water supply. Like… fluoride – cure everyone all at once.”

[Dr. Hextall does not answer this question. Says that she is going home.]

[@1:18:10 – The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) is mentioned as the agency to “accelerate approval” of the vaccines which has finally been found by Dr. Hextall]

[@1:22:20 – Alan is arrested for spreading misinformation and impeding the health/government agency’s efforts]

RADM (Rear Admiral) Haggerty @1:22:40: We may never know where this disease came from, but we do know that this vaccine is the result of the courage and perseverance of a remarkable few.”

Mitch Emhoff @1:24:58: It’s gonna start getting normal again.”

[@1:28:30 – Dr. Leonora Orantes is traded for the vaccines for the Chinese village, but it’s revealed that the vaccines are a placebo. Dr. Orantes leaves her “rescuer” – clearly perturbed by the situation.]

[@1:30:00 – Mitch Emhoff shows his vaccination and/or immunity status by a bright orange wrist band with a UPC (Universal Product code) barcode on it in order to get into a mall.]

[@1:30:20 – It is insinuated that Alan, the “conspiracy theorist” journalist made up the early treatment cure for money.
Officer French:
“And now you want to tell people not to get vaccinated when that’s the best chance they got.”]

[@1:35:50 – Shows Dr. Hextall at the CDC lab adding what appears to be the MEV-1 culture to a container that has both the SARS and H1N1 culture.]

[@1:40:25 – Right before the end of the movie, we see a flashback of how the “virus” all started. Starting with a tree which is torn down by the very same company that Beth Emhoff worked at; releasing a group of bats. One of the bats takes a bite out of a banana, which subsequently drops a piece of it into a pig pen. (…I think we can see where this is going…) A pig happens to eat it, which is then selected as the prize token for a restaurant to butcher and serve to its patrons.

While this is happening, the chef, who has just handled raw pork – from obviously the same pig that ate the bat infested banana… – shakes hands with Beth Emhoff after brusquely wiping his hands on his apron.

The end.

Whew. Just when you thought they wouldn’t trace the virus back to bats and/or pigs, this movie managed to do it within the last minute.

As you can see, the whole movie was just one, large propaganda piece to market vaccines as the end all-be-all. Even casting a large shadow on alternative media and other data as a hypocritical means to exploit people at their most vulnerable, while at the same time absolving any government agency of complicity and tying it all back together to bats.

Basically, to sum this movie up in one sentence, “A multi-million dollar, 1 hour and 45 minute promotional ad to paint the CDC, WHO, and other government/health agencies as the unsung heroes of our age while peddling the vaccines as the savior of mankind.”

One can, of course, argue that they were going for realism, and since Mr. Sanjay Gupta also had a cameo appearance in this film, I feel it prudent to once again bring up his interview with Mr. Bill Gates, ALSO CONDUCTED IN 2011, talking about the Year of the Vaccines, which would be 2021 – according to this snippet:

Sanjay Gupta: “10 billion dollars over the next ten years to make it the year of the vaccines… what, what does that mean exactly?

Bill Gates: “Well, over this decade, uh, we believe unbelievable progress can be made, both inventing new vaccines and making sure they get out to all the children who need them. Uh, we can cut the number of children who die every year from about 9 million to half of that uh, if we have success on it. The benefits are in terms of reducing sickness, reducing the population growth; it really allows a society a chance to take care of itself, uh, once you’ve made the intervention.

“Realism” indeed. Or planned out specifically to condition people to accepting a worldwide vaccine.

And because I watched the WHOLE movie (much to my chagrin), credits included, I noticed this little addition: “IN ASSOCIATION WITH PARTICIPANT MEDIA“. [Los Angeles, California-based film production company founded in 2004 by Jeffrey Skoll, dedicated to entertainment intended to spur social change. – wiki]

And who funds/grants Participant Media?

Screenshot image @gatesfoundation.org

Oh Bill Gates. You never let us down.

There was also special thanks to the CDC, the United States Department of Defense, and California/Illinois/Georgia National Guards.

They also have this lovely warning: “IT’S NOT IF, BUT WHEN.

And to make matters even worse, a 2011 Forbes article titled “With Vaccines, Bill Gates Changes the World Again“, used the following for its web address: [ https://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2011/11/02/the-second-coming-of-bill-gates/?sh=692eb8dc13fd ]

(No. Just, no.)

Some interesting information and opinion pieces from that article:

GAVI set out to do things differently in two ways. First, buy-in: It forced ­developing countries to cofinance vaccination programs, even at the nominal amount of 20 cents a dose. And second, accountability: It required clear record-keeping to ensure the vaccines were getting to children and to establish a sustainable delivery system.

“The blogosphere still expels dark plumes of “I Hate Bill Gates” posts and websites, accusing him of bilking taxpayers because Seattle granted him free land to build the new campus or spreading autism through vaccines (now a widely discredited theory) or of playing God through his foundation. Some clinicians criticize him, wistfully, for fixating on vaccines to the exclusion of other medical causes. But for someone once pilloried as the Antichrist of technology, a brutal monopolist who strangled innovation, this generosity—less of the heart than the head—has made him a saint among those most familiar with his efforts.”

With Vaccines, Bill Gates Changes The World Again (November 2, 2011)

Quite a mixture of words there.

The adulation aside, which is overflowing in the article, there is, of course, the efforts to ridicule any dissenting opinion (or even facts) about vaccine efficacy.

With all of that being said, even if one doesn’t believe that these health agencies and “philanthropists” and government bodies are intentionally doing something drastic to humanity, there has to be SOMEthing within them that is telling them that something is not right with what’s been going on; especially now during the “COVID pandemic”.

There are more and more data showing that the very same agencies that are supposed to be helping to heal people, are in fact introducing the illness to us, in whatever way they can – perhaps through the air, water, foods, flu shots or other injections, drugs, EMF, radiation, etc., and that these vaccines, for whatever reason, are their main goal.

These plans have been decades in the making. We must develop our awareness and knowledge about these attempts, and make informed decisions based on this data. People’s continuous refusal to acknowledge that there are sinister goals of those in high positions throughout several institutions are falling into the trap of “disbelief” and labeling everything as a “conspiracy theory”, just as the C.I.A. has promulgated into society. And because of this disbelief, they are deceived and taken advantage of.

There are conspiracies going on in the world. And sadly, they’re not just theories.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Johaehn from Pixabay

Walensky and Fauci Fumble in Their Responses to the Senate Committee, with Rand Paul’s Call for Fauci to Resign – But is the Senate Culpable as Well?

Rand to Fauci: “You won’t admit that it’s dangerous, and for that lack of judgement, I think it’s time that you resign.”

This post is not meant to convey whether or not there is an existence of a “deadly virus” or not. But it is to point out the suspicious nature of experiments that the NIH has funded/endorsed in regards to gain-of-function research, and also to show the indirect and dishonest responses from two individuals who have been spear-heading the shady “coronavirus/vaccine” situation.

The spotlight is on CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, and NIH/NIAID Infectious Disease “expert” Anthony Fauci.

Now, I want to first preface by saying that I am withholding judgement on the legitimacy of Senate hearings to begin with. While I would love to believe that there are indeed good politicians in high places that can make real change in ousting corruption in big establishments, many are speculating that psyops have been put in place to prolong certain narratives while keeping people’s hopes alive that something will be done about it. And of course we can’t ignore the possibility that even if there are those who are trying to make a real positive change, they may be set against a huge criminal organization who will stop at nothing in order to drive their own agenda forward.

Case in point: Walensky, the FDA, Pfizer, etc. have already gone ahead with their atrocious approval of these dangerous COVID “vaccines” on children, in which this agenda should never have gone on so far to begin with since there is ample evidence that the vaccines have nothing to do with our health and are definitely NOT “safe and effective”.

So to continue witnessing this farce without arrests being made casts a dubious look into the justice system as it is. Not only do Fauci, Bourla, Gelman, Daszak, Walensky, Gates, their agencies, as well as complicit governmental bodies, including Joe Biden, etc. have immense crimes to answer for, but the whole legal/legislative systems seems to be right behind them if this is allowed to continue further.

(This is, of course, under the assumptions that the whole of the legal/legislative structure isn’t already completely corrupted/broken to begin with…)

With that being said, I would still like to point out the following two Senators that are at least calling out Walensky and Fauci for their complicity in keeping this ruse going. Senators Rand Paul and Bill Cassidy certainly seem as if they are trying to get to the bottom of these narratives. But could they be merely actors on a stage? Keeping us happily engaged in believing that the “good guys” are making progress? Or are they genuinely one of the few brave souls standing up to deceit and subterfuge?

I will say this: while Anthony Fauci is a known liar, how good is his acting? He certainly looks shaken up as Rand Paul questions him…

Senator Rand Paul@58:24: “Fauci, I don’t expect you today to admit that you approved of NIH funding for gain-of-function research at Wuhan. But your repeated denials have worn thin and the majority of Americans, frankly, don’t believe you.

Even the NIH now admits that EcoHealth Alliance did perform experiments in Wuhan that created viruses not found in nature that actually did gain in lethality.

The facts are clear. The NIH did fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan despite your protestations. You can deny it all you want, but even the Chinese authors of the paper, in their paper, admit that viruses not found in nature were created, and yes they gained in infectivity.

Your persistent denials though are not simply a stain on your reputation, but are clear and present danger to the country, and to the world. As Professor Kevin Esvelt of MIT has written, “Gain of function research looks like a gamble that civilization can’t afford to risk.” And yet here we are again, with you steadfast in your denials. Why does it matter? Because gain-of-function research with laboratory created viruses not found in nature, could cause a pandemic even worse the next time.

We’re suffering today from one that has a mortality of approximately 1%, they’re experimenting with viruses that have mortalities of between 15 and 50%. Yes, our civilization could be at risk from one of these viruses.

Experiments that combine unknown viruses with known pandemic causing viruses are incredibly risky. Experiments that combine unknown viruses with coronaviruses that have as much as 50% mortality could endanger civilization as we know it.

And here you sit. Unwilling to accept any responsibility for the current pandemic, and unwilling to take any steps to prevent gain-of-function research from possibly unleashing an even more deadly virus.

You mislead the public by saying that the published viruses could not be COVID. Well exactly no one is alleging that. No one is alleging that the published viruses by the Chinese are COVID. What we are saying is that this was risky type of research; gain-of-function research. It was risky to share this with the Chinese, and that COVID may have been created from a not yet revealed virus. We don’t anticipate the Chinese are going to reveal the virus if it came from their lab.

You know that, but you continue to mislead. You continue to support NIH money going to Wuhan. You continue to say you trust the Chinese scientist. You appear to have learned nothing from this pandemic.

Will you today finally take some responsibility for funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan?”

Anthony Fauci: “Senator, with all due respect, I disagree with so many of the things that you’ve said.

Gain – first of all, gain-of-function is a very nebulous term. We have spent, not us, but outside bodies, a considerable amount of effort to give a more precise definition to the type of research that is of concern that might lead to a dangerous situation.

You are aware of that. That is called P3CO.”

Senator Rand Paul: “We’re aware that you deleted “gain-of-function” from the NIH website.”

Anthony Fauci: “Well I can get back to that a moment, if we have time. But let’s get back to the operating framework and guide rails of which we operate under. And you have ignored them. The guidelines are very very clear, that you have to be dealing with a pathogen that clearly is shown and very likely to be highly transmissible in an uncontrollable way in humans and to have a high degree of morbidity and mortality, and that you do experiments to enhance that. Hence the word EPPP: Enhanced Pathogens of Potential Pandemic.”

Senator Rand Paul: “So when EcoHealth Alliance took the virus SHC-014 and combined it with WIV-1 and caused a recombinant virus that doesn’t exist in nature, and it made mice sicker, mice that had humanized cells, you’re saying that that’s not gain-of-function research?”

Anthony Fauci: “According to the framework and guidelines of – “

Senator Rand Paul: “So what you’re doing is defining away gain-of-function. You’re simply saying it doesn’t exist because you changed the definition on the NIH website. This is terrible and you’re – you’re completely trying to escape the idea that we should do something about trying to prevent a pandemic from leaking from a lab.

There’s – the preponderance of evidence now points towards this coming from the lab, and what you’ve done is change the definition on your website to try to cover your ass, basically. That’s what you’ve done. You’ve changed the website to try to have a new definition that doesn’t include the risky research that’s going on.

Until you admit that it’s risky, we’re not going to get anywhere. You have to admit that this research was risky. The NIH has now rebuked them. Your own agency has rebuked them.

But the thing is, you’re still unwilling to admit that they gained in function when they say that they became sicker. They gained in lethality; it’s a new virus. That’s not gain-of-function?”

Anthony Fauci: “According to the definition that is currently operable… you know – Senator, let’s make it clear for the people who are listening.

The current definition was done over a 2-3 year period by outside bodies, including the NSABB, two conferences by the National Academy of Science, Engineering and Medicine, on December 2014, March 2016. We commissioned external risk benefit assessment, and then on January of 2017, the office of science and technology policy of the White House issued the current policy.

I have not changed any definition.”

Senator Rand Paul: “And coincidentally, coincidentally the definition appeared on the same day the NIH said that, yes, there was a gain of function in Wuhan, the same day the definition appeared – the new definition, to try to define a way what’s going on in Wuhan.

Until you accept it, until you accept responsibility, we’re not going to get anywhere close to trying to prevent another lab leak of this dangerous sort of experiment. You won’t admit that it’s dangerous, and for that lack of judgement, I think it’s time that you resign.”

Chairman Murray: “Thank you Senator Paul. And I would like, um, to give the time to Dr. Fauci.”

Anthony Fauci: “Yeah, well, there were so many things that are egregious misrepresentation here, uh, Madame Chair, that I don’t think I’d be able to refute all of them, but just a couple of them, for the listens to here for – 

You has said that I’m unwilling to take any responsibility for the current pandemic. I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. The current pandemic. Okay?

Number two, you said the overwhelming amount of evidence indicates that’s a lab leak; I believe most card-carrying viral phylogenists and molecular virologists would disagree with you, that is much more likely, even though we leave open all possibilities, it’s much more likely that this was a natural occurrence.

Third, you say we continue – “

Senator Rand Paul: “We’ve tested 80,000 animals and no animals have been found with COVID.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, the time is for Dr. Fauci to respond.”

Anthony Fauci: “And third, you made a statement just a moment ago that’s completely incorrect. Where you say we continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Senator Rand Paul: “You approved it in August of last year…”

Anthony Fauci: “No no, your statements say, quote, I wrote it down as you were writing, “You continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology – “

Senator Rand Paul: “Your committee a month ago says you still trust the Chinese scientist and you still support the research over there. You said it a month ago in the committee.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, I have allowed Dr. Fauci to respond. You’ve had your time and I’m going to give him one more minute.”

Senator Rand Paul: “If he’s going to be dishonest he ought to be challenged.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, we will allow Dr. Fauci to respond after you’ve given accusations like that. Dr. Fauci.”

Anthony Fauci: “Well I don’t have any more to say except to say that as usual, and I’ve – I have a great deal of respect for this body of the Senate and it makes me very uncomfortable to have to say something, but he is egregiously incorrect in what he says. Thank you.”

Senator Rand Paul: “History will figure that out on its own.”

While Rand Paul seems to be on the right side of history, the complete negligence and willful ignorance on the part of the Senate committee as a whole to not continuously address the many, MANY adverse events of the COVID vaccines which have harmed MILLIONS of people, according to VAERS, and who instead continue to humor the narrative that the vaccine is the end all be all, is, quite frankly, ludicrous and criminal in and of itself. While they may allude to the information about the adverse events, no steps have been taken to fully investigate and analyze the hundreds of thousands of ACTUAL DATA provided.

There is enough substantial evidence declaring that the COVID vaccines are NOT safe nor effective, yet the ruse continues to go on.

Not to mention the push now to mass vaccinate millions of children, who were never at high risk from “COVID” to begin with… it is obvious that the vaccine effort should have been halted A LONG TIME AGO.

Keep in mind that it is common knowledge that the adverse events are under-reported by a factor of only 1-10% being reported for non-serious side effects, and a speculative estimation of 10-50% being reported for serious events.

There is also the suspicious account of the FDA presentation that flashed for a brief split-second showing a list of the “possible” side effects from the COVID vaccines to be on the lookout for:

Screenshot from: [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XTiL9rUpkg ] U.S. Food and Drug Administration@2:33:40

So to continue to ignore these facts and people’s plights from the devastating effects of the vaccines and prolonging this “pandemic” and the vaccine narrative is either complete obliviousness, to put it nicely, or downright complicity.

Again, this is not to speak of everyone in the Senate individually (unless it is in fact true…), but to point out the incredibly inane decisions of those ultimately in charge of these committees and giving their final verdict which has enabled these atrocious crimes against humanity to continue.

It is my opinion that a call for Anthony Fauci to resign does not do the damage that he has caused throughout the years (including his organizations: NIH/NIAID) justice, but instead efforts to make arrests of those initiating these crimes should be pursued as well.

Moving on to the second portion (from the same hearing), we see Rochelle Walensky responding to Senator Bill Cassidy’s inquiries to address natural immunity versus vaccine-induced immunity, and also her refusal to answer uncertainty in how many CDC employees are vaccinated.

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Dr. Walensky, couple things: as I walked in, I came in late, one of you – either you or Dr. Fauci – were saying that the reason that we’re not saying that natural immunity is protective as is a vaccine, even though there’s recent publication showing that 6-8 months out, 92% of those with natural immunity have T cells, B cells and antibodies that would be considered adequate to protect, and indeed B cell continues to climb, that we don’t have data.

Now in your response to Mr. Casey, you just mentioned that CDC has access to tens of thousands of EHRs [electronic health records]. And I’ve been told that HHS or CDC has access to patient identifiable data, as to who test positive. So I do that as a prologue.

If we don’t know that natural immunity confers protection against future infection, is because we’ve decided not to look. Because I’ve learned that there is a cohort of people that we know have been previously infected, we’ve got the bench research showing that the triad of antibodies, T cells and B cells are there, and that 92% of them are still there at 6 months out, so why don’t we – why have we not done the research showing that natural immunity confers protection against recurrent infection?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Yeah, thank you so much for allowing me to clarify this point, because I understand, I understand the question.

Um, first of all, let me just reiterate that our current stand after reviewing 96 papers in the scientific brief on this issue is that everyone who’s been previously infected should be vaccinated.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But that’s not my question.”

Rochelle Walensky: “Right, agreed. So, so – and part of the challenge here is as you know the infection induced immunity and the biases associated with retrospectively looking at the data. Several of those papers that we reviewed for that brief have demonstrated that the kind of disease that you had at the time you had it matters.

Um, did you have disease a year and a half ago? Did you have – were you an older person? Were you – ?”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “May I stop you for a second?

We could do this prospectively, because you know who is actually, apparently I’m told, you’ve got patient identifiable data, and you would be able to say, okay, 6 months ago we’re going to start everybody infected within the last 6 months, and be able to follow their EHR, prospectively, to see this.

I mean, theoretically, CDC has the ability to do this right now.”

Rochelle Walensky: “Yet that too would have its own biases. So one of the things that we have demonstrated in the scientific brief is that asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic people, who might not present to their providers, might present to an urgent care clinic who might not be recorded in their own EHR, likely have less robust protection than those who’ve been severely affected.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But that could be established prospectively if using the data that you have. And you could even say, if you had symptomatic infection, you don’t need to be vaccinated, we would consider you immune, you don’t have to be subjected to the mandate, but – “

Rochelle Walensky: “If we had data – if we had data that demonstrated a correlation of protection, Dr. Fauci already mentioned data that they’re working on to look at correlates of protection, not just in antibodies, but as you noted in T cell function as well. So if we were able to document a correlate of protection we absolutely could prospectively follow – “

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But this paper that I’m reading from NIH, speaks that there is durable memory of the virus up to 8 months after infection in 95% of the people who recovered, including B cells, which continue to climb, and T cells and antibodies.

And I’m also saying you could do it clinically, because we have data that’s patient identifiable, that we could go back and look and see if they were exposed. They could be in a hot spot like Louisiana, where you know they’re being exposed, and then you would see. Not just by lab data, but empirically.

I can tell you, the American people intuitively understand this, and they feel a little bit like we’re being willfully blind to it.

I have limited time, let me just ask you something else. What percent of CDC employees are vaccinated?”

Rochelle Walensky: “We’re actively encouraging vaccination in all of our employees and doing a lot of education and outreach in order to get our agency fully vaccinated.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “And the – but the percent?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have that for you today.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “I’m told that 75… some north of 75% of CDC employees at headquarters are still working remotely. Is that correct?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Um, we are following regulations through HHS and the federal government.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “No, that’s not my question. I apologize to be rude, but – but I’m asking a very straightforward question.

I’ve been told that north of 75% of employees at CDC headquarters are working remotely. Is that correct?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Senator, I don’t actually know the number off the top of my head. So I’d have to – “

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “When you look down the hallway, are there empty desks? Are over 50% of the desk empty?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Senator, I don’t have the numbers off the top of my head. What I will tell you is that we’re working closely within HHS and the administration to follow the governmental rules for return to the workplace.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “There was a recent GAO report that shows, it was released in the last 2 weeks, that there’s been no coordinated response in the federal government to get people back into work.

Now if there’s any agency that – since we have teachers in Fulton county are back at work, that the caseload of COVID in Fulton county is about 88, at its peak it was 606, if what I’ve been told by someone who frankly kind of knows, that people in laboratories are not showing up, I have no clue how people, how laboratory workers who presumably are vaccinated, wearing PPE, would consider themselves eligible to stay at home.

I say this because, I just want to echo – we’ve got to lead by example in the federal government. If our public health agencies don’t have enough confidence in the immunization and the PPE to go back to work, fighting infectious diseases, there’s going to be a lot of undermining of a willingness to further fund public health.”

Rochelle Walensky: “We absolutely have our central labs back at work, conducting their essential research towards this response, and um, we are following the regulations and providing technical assistance and technical support to the federal government for return to work policies.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Uh, one more thing, I had – Angus King and I had sent a letter dated February the 25th, asking about genomic surveillance. We’ve still not received a response. You reference it in your earlier remarks. Both Senator King and I would appreciate a response.”

Rochelle Walensky: “We’ll get back to you. Thank you very much.”

I can sum up Walensky’s testimony in 5 short dialogues; paraphrasing, of course:

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Do you have data showing that natural immunity may offer better protection than vaccine immunity; and if not, then why?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

(By the way, I want to interject here by saying that Senator Bill Cassidy is absolutely correct when he posits that the reason that they “don’t have the data” is because they deliberately did not look for it. I also want to add the shady practice of the pharmaceutical companies breaking protocol and completely getting rid of the control group after only a few weeks into the COVID vaccine trial…)

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “What percentage of CDC employees are vaccinated?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Are around 75% of CDC employees still working remotely from home?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “When you go into the CDC headquarters, how much percentage of desks have no workers there?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Bill Cassidy: “Senator King and I asked you about “genomic sequence” back in February but have not received a response yet. We would appreciate a response.”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time… but we’ll get back to you.”

This is the Director of the CDC, ladies and gentlemen. This is who is in charge of an organization that we are supposed to entrust our lives to in order to help get us through a “deadly pandemic”.

When she cannot say, in all honesty, that 100% of her CDC employees – who presumably have complete trust in the vaccines that she kept reiterating is the most important thing needed for our health – is fully vaccinated, while at the same time preaching that young children most definitely should get it, is EXTREMELY suspect and I am amazed at the continual indulgence of these hearings to not call out this hypocrisy for what it is. (Save for a small handful of Senators, that is.)

But at least we know that Rochelle Walensky hasn’t lied about how many of her employees have been vaccinated… yet.

Lastly, during the committee hearing, there were other Senators posing additional queries as to the questionable responses and suspicious nature of those testifying and their habits of skirting away from certain questions, which I want to mention here as well.

Senators Marshall, Burr and Moran (of the additional 3 testimonies that I watched, there may have been more with similar interests) have also raised legitimate concerns over the vaccines, mandates and debates about natural immunity versus vaccine efficacy – and was also met with a jumble of non-answers mixed with endless endorsements of the COVID vaccines.

Honestly, if I, an average American citizen, can see through their facade, then surely well-educated and seemingly experienced individuals in detecting deceit and malpractice would be able to determine the illegitimacy of these corrupt establishments and their cohorts as well.

So again I have to wonder at the incredibly unnecessary perpetuation of these fraudulent activities, instead of finally taking appropriate steps to shut down this criminal conspiracy.

To those Senators and other researchers who are genuinely seeking the truth and attempting to uncover the treasons, misconduct, and egregious scandal that has corrupted our governmental body and health/medical industries, my sincere gratitude and respect to you for standing strong and having enough integrity to stand up against these depravities.

God bless.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Edward Lich from Pixabay

Israel News: “The almost vast majority of the deceased are vaccinated people” due to “immuno-erosion”

Compilation of Israel news clips shows they are questioning the “vaccine” efficacy.

Because it’s important to also get outside perspective when dealing with a situation of this magnitude, and because we cannot rely on American news sources to accurately portray the events around us, I wanted to highlight the following compilation that was created using Israeli news clips and whom someone has graciously translated and subtitled with English captions.

And although many of us already know about the ineffectiveness of the so-called “vaccines” and may have already heard about the news coming from Israel about the vaccines waning over time, the following clips gives us a bird’s eye view of how their news media is handling the information.

Due to the many different clips and my unfamiliarity with following Israel’s news and the Hebrew language, I cannot determine the dates (if they were from days/weeks/months ago) or the legitimacy of what has been translated. I have read comments confirming that the subtitles are correct, and I have also read comments stating “If Israel says anything, it is a lie.” I am also unfamiliar if the Israeli news stations has similar motives as the United States mainstream media – in which, as research has indicated, is to promote certain narratives/propaganda and to cause division and chaos.

So please take everything into account and do not just believe everything you read, see and hear.

There is also the confusing nature of ongoing booster shots apparently scheduled for the people in Israel, and one has to question the decision-making in these matters seeing as how if the vaccines didn’t work the first time, or second time, or third time around… – what makes anyone believe that continuous ineffective “booster” shots will be any better? For all of what? 2-3 months of maybe mediocre “protection” until another booster is needed? It would seem the best way forward would be to denounce these dangerous “gene-therapy” tools, and seek alternative/repairing medicines instead and build up on natural immunity which many studies have proven to be far more effective than any vaccine. (But I digress…)

Lastly, I do want to send a huge thank you to hasifot@telegram for compiling the clips and whomever translated/subtitled them to English in case it was a different person/group. With anything of this type of endeavor, it takes a lot of time and effort to create, and I appreciate the work that has gone into it. Many, many thanks.

1st Clip: “In this wave we’re seeing infection and illness in vaccinated individuals. We’re seeing vaccinated individuals that are… sick… and arrive at the hospitals in serious condition… And we’re seeing deaths as well!

The increase in the number of seriously ill, who have been vaccinated, is an increase that we have seen over the past few days very significantly.”

@00:25: 2nd Clip:The almost vast majority of the deceased are vaccinated people, that seemingly have gone through… “immuno-erosion”… 83 dead just in the past month.”

@00:35: 3rd Clip: “At the same time, in addition to this number that we see on the screen, there are also 15 sick that are in serious condition.”

@00:42: 4th Clip: “Let’s admit the truth. At the moment we don’t really know. Because, as Bennett himself said in his opening statement, “We don’t have anyone to learn from, we’re the only country that is vaccinated to such an extent. In the entire world this is a completely novel challenge. And therefore we must gather just a bit more data, and then decide.” 

@00:57: 5th Clip: “I today don’t see a difference. Really, I don’t see a difference. Between if I, as someone that has been vaccinated with two doses, got sick so, so badly. So what does it matter if you take the vaccines or not?”

@01:08: 6th Clip: “Certainly it is starting to bother us.”

@01:11: 7th Clip – Speaker 1: “Meanwhile we are becoming aware of the fact that the Director General of the Sheba Hospital, Professor Yitzhak Kreiss, he was, if you recall, the third person to get vaccinated (in Israel), after the Prime Minister and Minister of Health. He also has become sick with COVID despite being vaccinated.

Do you have a clear position, Professor, regarding what they call the “boost”? That is, an additional dose, which we must say, is still not to be found in Pfizer’s protocols.”

Speaker 2: We must say, decisively, even, that there isn’t any medical basis, as of today, for massive and bulk vaccination of the population with a third vaccine, with a booster. We really are not at the point in time that we need to vaccinate the bulk of the population with a third dose.”

@01:56: 8th Clip – Speaker 1: “Yesterday, around eight in the evening, the Health Ministry published data seemingly about a decline in the efficacy of the vaccine. And that’s, at the very least, a bit strange…”

Speaker 2: “Yes, it’s a bit strange. In general the Health Ministry isn’t exceptional in sharing information, isn’t exceptional in sharing data with the public. And that’s a matter that… – “

Speaker 3: “By the way, what about the transparency of the “Corona Cabinet”? All of the Ministers of the Cabinet promised us, they fought for it during the previous administration.”

[undetermined who is speaking at this time but it appears as if it is Speaker 2]: “Yes, “we’ll publish the protocols”, okay, so, on with it!

30 years (of confidentiality), what’s the big deal? So where do we see it happening? We’re in favor of the protocols being published, and we’re especially in favor of much more data from the Health Ministry.”

Off-camera speaker: “But they came out against this secrecy, now they (the new government) are there and they’re continuing with the secrecy!”

Speaker 3: “No, now there’s really state secrets. We have to make sure that the virus doesn’t find out! (jokingly) If the coronavirus finds out what we’re going to do, it will… you know…”

Speaker 2:There is very problematic conduct in the data of the Health Ministry.

This week, in response to our request, they gave us the breakdown of the seriously ill into vaccinated and non-vaccinated. They’ve promised us that starting next week it will be published on a regular basis.

I’m waiting to see. Yes, there is a very significant discrepancy between the data of the studies done in Israel on the efficacy of the vaccine versus those published in Britain and in the United States. Especially pertaining to infection. Because according to the study that was conducted here in Israel, the efficacy against infection fell to 40%, the efficacy of the vaccine. And really, many questions arise how we’ve arrived at such a low number. Even though, like Arad said…”

@03:09: 9th Clip: “Most of the patients right now, are vaccinated, obviously.”

@03:13: 10th Clip: “And the funniest thing is that we ask them. “Okay, I got infected. But before she did the test, I got infected, you informed me that I’m sick with COVID. What happens with her?”

So, they ask me on the phone: “Did she get vaccinated?”

I told her, “Yes, we both got vaccinated.”

“No problem, she doesn’t need to quarantine, she can travel freely.”

Okay, so she was going around freely. And now a few days later we did a test again and she’s positive. What happened during that time that she was going around outside?”

We have to realize, no matter what race we are, no matter what nationality we are, we are all human beings that deserve the truth and the morality of being treated with dignity and respect. As it is, it seems that ALL OF US, across ALL countries, have been lied to, save for the corrupt individuals/institutions that are running this program. There is no doubt that a criminal conspiracy is in the works, and it all points to a “one world government” / “great reset” agenda.

Why the huge demand to get “EVERYONE” vaccinated? The full scope and true motives are still unclear, but one thing is certain: it is not for everyone’s “health and safety”. But perhaps it is for “their” safety. Those that are familiar with the organizations involved, may know/speculate of who “they” are; often referred to as the “elite”, “deep state”, freemasons, “global leaders”, etc.

Now the question is, will we allow their stranglehold on our freedoms and rights to continue? Or will we finally stand up and say, “I do not comply.”?

I, for one, and I’m sure in the sea of many, WILL NOT COMPLY.

Many blessings to all, and once again, many thanks to those involved in the creation of this compilation.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Alexandra_Koch from Pixabay