Are These Findings the Death Blow for Vaccine Passports?

“COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus”

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca
Written by Joseph Mercola (September 17, 2021)

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

More than 15 studies now show the natural immunity you get after recovering from COVID-19 is far superior and more long-lasting than what you get from the COVID shot

Lawsuits challenge vaccine requirements that fail to accept natural immunity as an alternative to the COVID injection

Todd Zywicki, a law professor at George Mason University in Virginia, sued over the school’s vaccine mandate, which did not recognize natural immunity. The school settled out of court, granting Zywicki a medical exemption. They did not, however, change their general policy to recognize other staff and students who have natural immunity

Some of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed against Rutgers University in New Jersey also object to the vaccine mandate on the basis that they have natural immunity. This lawsuit is still pending

Since COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus, and COVID-jabbed individuals carry the same viral load when symptomatic as unvaccinated individuals, the argument that vaccine passports will identify and separate “public health threats” from those who are “safe” to be around simply falls apart

*

While governments around the world are going full steam ahead with plans for vaccine passports, two key things have occurred that blow irreparable holes in the whole argument.

First, more than 15 studies now show the natural immunity you get after recovering from COVID-19 is far superior and longer-lasting than what you get from the COVID shot, and secondly, lawsuits have challenged vaccine requirements that fail to accept natural immunity as an alternative to the COVID injection. Other lawsuits highlighting the illegalities of vaccine mandates have also been filed.

The Zywicki Case

As reported by the New York Post,1 August 4, 2021, when George Mason University in Virginia decided to implement a vaccine mandate, law professor Todd Zywicki sued.2 Mason recovered from COVID-19 in 2020 and has natural immunity, as demonstrated by several antibody tests. One of his attorneys, Harriet Hageman, stated:

Common sense and medical science should underpin GMU’s actions. Both have gone missing with this latest effort to force a distinguished professor to take a vaccine that he does not need — not for his own protection nor for anyone else’s safety at Scalia Law School.”

The lawsuit pointed out that people with natural immunity have an increased risk of adverse reactions to the COVID shot — according to one study3 up to 4.4 times the risk of clinically significant side effects — and that the requirement not only violates due process rights and the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment, but is not compliant with the Emergency Use Authorization.4

A Win for GMU Professor but No Legal Precedent

August 17, 2021, George Mason University caved before the case went to trial and granted Zywicki a medical exemption to the vaccine requirement.5 Unfortunately, and irrationally, the school did not revise its general policy. As reported by Citizens Journal:6

“The school’s acknowledgment of natural immunity is significant given the serial case of amnesia that seems to have overtaken the world on this basic point of biology.

However, the school still maintains the vaccination requirement for all other members of the GMU community, regardless of naturally acquired immunity. At the time of this writing, the same medical exemption has not been offered on a broader scale.

Furthermore, the lawsuit would have served as an interesting test case for vaccine mandate-related litigation, which will become more prevalent as time goes on. Regardless, the victory still serves as a sliver of hope that some universities will entertain reasonable arguments and that individuals can fight back with litigation …

With the GMU case resolved without trial, many critical legal arguments went untested. For example, does the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause apply to vaccine mandates, or does the state have the ability to suspend such rights when responding to a public health emergency?

How does the reliability of natural immunity affect the constitutionality of policies that fail to recognize it? Can the government simply cherry-pick whatever science it wants to justify its policies? According to the court filing,7

‘The Supreme Court has recognized that the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual’s right to privacy. A ‘forcible injection … into a nonconsenting person’s body represents a substantial interference with that person’s liberty[.]’ Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 229 (1990).’

Given this precedent, as well as the state’s police powers to suspend individual rights under compelling circumstances, how will this apply to Covid-19 in a low-risk environment such as a college campus?

If the right still holds, how will it apply to city-wide vaccine passport programs, given that Covid-19 is a relatively mild disease? … The move is also mysterious, given the relevance of the matter. As a result, it did not create a binding legal precedent.”

In a statement, lead counsel Jenin Younes with the New Civil Liberties Alliance, said:8

“NCLA is pleased that GMU granted Professor Zywicki’s medical exemption, which we believe it only did because he filed this lawsuit. According to GMU, with the medical exemption, Prof. Zywicki may continue serving the GMU community, as he has for more than two decades, without receiving a medically unnecessary vaccine and without undue burden.

Nevertheless, NCLA remains dismayed by GMU’s refusal — along with many other public and private universities and other employers — to recognize that the science establishes beyond any doubt that natural immunity is as robust or more so than vaccine immunity.”

Other Lawsuits Challenging Schools’ Vaccine Mandates

While not specifically centered around the validity of natural immunity, a lawsuit filed by more than a dozen students and Children’s Health Defense against Rutgers University in New Jersey does include this aspect, as some of the plaintiffs object to the mandate on the basis that they have natural immunity. This lawsuit was filed in mid-August 20219 and is still pending.

Earlier this year, in April 2021, the Los Angeles Unified School District was sued over its vaccine requirement by California Educators for Medical Freedom and the Health Freedom Defense Fund.10July 27, a California court dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice, as it concluded the LAUSD had voluntarily abandoned its mandatory vaccine requirement. As reported by The Defender:11

“This is a BIG win — because of the lawsuit, LAUSD represented to the court on the record that it does not have a policy requiring vaccination with EUA products. Since the court has now confirmed the absence of any policy requiring vaccination at LAUSD, all teachers and staff are safe to return to work without vaccination or furnishing proof of vaccination in the fall.”

Time will tell if the Children’s Health Defense case against Rutgers University will bring the legal precedent needed to more effectively thwart this tyrannical trend. Still, even smaller wins like Zywicki’s are important and demonstrate there are ways we can fight back, if only we’re willing.

Natural Immunity Surpasses Vaccine-Induced Protection

While vaccine passports are immoral and unconstitutional in and of themselves, medical science is also proving them useless and irrational. As reported by Daniel Horowitz in an August 25, 2021, article in The Blaze,12 there are at least 15 studies that show natural immunity from previous infection is more robust and longer-lasting than what you get from the COVID shot. He writes:

“The debate over forced vaccination with an ever-waning vaccine is cresting right around the time when the debate should be moot for a lot of people. Among the most fraudulent messages of the CDC’s campaign of deceit is to force the vaccine on those with prior infection, who have a greater degree of protection against all version of the virus than those with any of the vaccines.

It’s time to set the record straight once and for all that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is broader, more durable, and longer-lasting than any of the shots on the market today. Our policies must reflect that reality.”

We now have data showing vaccine immunity rapidly wanes regardless of variants, but especially when a new variant becomes predominant. According to the Mayo Clinic, as of July 2021, Pfizer’s COVID injection was only 42% effective against infection,13 which doesn’t even meet the Food and Drug Administration’s requirement of 50% efficacy14 for COVID vaccines.

This matches Israeli data, which show Pfizer’s shot went from a 95% effectiveness at the outset, to 64% in early July 2021 and 39% by late July, when the Delta strain became predominant.15,16 Pfizer’s own trial data also demonstrate rapidly waning effectiveness. BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi discussed this in an August 23, 2021, blog.17

By the fifth month into the trial, efficacy had dropped from 96% to 84%, and this drop could not be due to the emergence of the Delta variant since 77% of trial participants were in the U.S., where the Delta variant didn’t emerge until months later. So, even without a predominance of a new variant, effectiveness drops off. In an August 20, 2021, report, BPR noted:18

“‘The data we will publish today and next week demonstrate the vaccine effectiveness against SARS COVID 2 infection is waning,’ the CDC director [Rochelle Walensky] began … She cited reports of international colleagues, including Israel ‘suggest increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early’ …

‘In the context of these concerns, we are planning for Americans to receive booster shots starting next month to maximize vaccine induced protection. Our plan is to protect the American people and to stay ahead of this virus,’ Walensky shared …

The CDC director appears to all but admit that the vaccine’s efficacy rate has a strict time limit, and its protections are limited in the ever-changing environment.”

You’re Far Safer Around a Naturally Immune Person

Add to this a) the fact that the COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus and b) the fact that COVID-jabbed individuals carry the same viral load when symptomatic as unvaccinated individuals,19,20 and the whole argument that vaccine passports will identify and separate “public health threats” from those who are “safe” to be around simply fails miserably.

As noted by Horowitz, anyone capable of rational thought understands that a person with natural immunity from a previous infection is “exponentially safer to be around than someone who had the vaccines but not prior infection.”21

As for the unvaccinated who do not have natural immunity from prior infection, well, their status poses no increased risk to anyone but themselves. Conversely, since the COVID shot cannot prevent infection or transmission, and only promises to reduce your risk of serious illness, the only one who can benefit from the shot is the one who got it. It protects no one else.

In fact, you may actually pose an increased risk to others, because if your symptoms are mild or nonexistent, but your viral load high, you’re more likely to walk around as usual. Rather than staying home because you suspect you’re infected and infectious, you’re out spreading the virus around to others, vaccinated and unvaccinated alike.

What Does the Research Say?

In his article, Horowitz reviews 15 studies that should, once and for all, settle the debate about whether people who have had COVID are now immune and whether that immunity is comparable to that of the COVID shots. Here’s a select handful of those studies. For the rest, please see the original Blaze article.22

  • Immunity May 202123 New York University researchers concluded that while both SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination elicit potent immune responses, the immunity you get when you’ve recovered from natural infection is more durable and quicker to respond.

The reason for this is because natural immunity conveys more innate immunity involving T cells and antibodies, whereas vaccine-induced immunity primarily stimulates adaptive immunity involving antibodies.

  • Nature May 202124 This research dispels fears that SARS-CoV-2 infection might not produce long-lasting immunity. Even in people with mild COVID-19 infection, whose anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) antibodies levels might rapidly decline in the months’ post-recovery, persistent and long-lived bone marrow plasma cells start churning out new antibodies when the virus is encountered a second time.

According to the authors, “Consistently, circulating resting memory B cells directed against SARS-CoV-2 S were detected in the convalescent individuals. Overall, our results indicate that mild infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces robust antigen-specific, long-lived humoral immune memory in humans.”

  • Nature July 202025 The Nature findings above support findings from Singapore published in July 2020, which found patients who had recovered from SARS in 2002/2003 had robust immunity against SARS-CoV-2 17 years later.
  • Cell Medicine July 202126 Here, they found that most previously infected patients produced durable antibodies and memory B cells, along with durable polyfunctional CD4 and CD8 T cells that target multiple parts of the virus.

According to the authors: “Taken together, these results suggest that broad and effective immunity may persist long-term in recovered COVID-19 patients.” The same clearly cannot be said for vaccine-induced immunity.

  • BioRxiv July 202127 Echoing the Cell Medicine findings above, University of California researchers concluded that “Natural infection induced expansion of larger CD8 T cell clones occupied distinct clusters, likely due to the recognition of a broader set of viral epitopes presented by the virus not seen in the mRNA vaccine.”

We’re Creating a Pandemic of the Vaccinated

If natural immunity is better than vaccine-induced antibodies, you’d expect to see fewer reinfections among those who have already had COVID-19, compared to breakthrough infections occurring among those who got the COVID shot. And that’s precisely what we see.

In a preprint titled “Necessity of COVID-19 Vaccination in Previously Infected Individuals,”28 the researchers looked at reinfection rates among previously infected health care workers in the Cleveland Clinic system.

Of the 1,359 frontline workers with natural immunity from previous infection, not a single one was reinfected 10 months into the pandemic, despite heavy exposure to COVID-19-positive patients.

A second preprint,29 posted August 25, 2021, compared SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity by looking at reinfection and breakthrough rates. Four outcomes were evaluated: SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptomatic disease, COVID-19-related hospitalization and death.

Results showed that, compared to those with natural immunity, SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals who had received a two-dose regimen of Pfizer’s COVID shot had:30

  • A 5.96-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection
  • A 7.13-fold increased risk for symptomatic disease
  • A 13.06-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant
  • A higher risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations

After adjusting for comorbidities, SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals who had received two Pfizer doses were 27.02 times more likely to experience symptomatic breakthrough infection than those with natural immunity.31 No deaths were reported in either of the groups. In closing the authors concluded:32

“This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.”

Majority of Hospitalizations Are Actually in the Vaccinated

The oft-repeated refrain is that we’re in a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” meaning those who have not received the COVID jab make up the bulk of those hospitalized and dying from the Delta variant. However, we’re already seeing a shift in hospitalization rates from the unvaccinated to those who have gotten one or two injections.

For example, in Israel, the fully “vaccinated” made up the bulk of serious cases and COVID-related deaths in July 2021, as illustrated in the graphs below.33 The red is unvaccinated, yellow refers to partially “vaccinated” and green fully “vaccinated” with two doses. By mid-August, 59% of serious cases were among those who had received two COVID injections.34

new hospitalizations

new severe covid 19 patients
deaths trend

Data from the U.K. show a similar trend among those over the age of 50. In this age group, partially and fully “vaccinated” people account for 68% of hospitalizations and 70% of COVID deaths.35

COVID-19 delta variant hospital admission and death in England

Data36 from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also refute the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” narrative. Between July 6,2021, and July 25, 2021, 469 COVID cases were identified in a Barnstable County, Massachusetts, outbreak.

Of those who tested positive, 74% had received two COVID injections and were considered “fully vaccinated.” Even despite using different diagnostic standards for non-jabbed and jabbed individuals, a whopping 80% of COVID-related hospitalizations were also in this group.37,38

COVID Shot May Harm Immunity in Those Previously Infected

While the authors of that August 25, 2021, preprint39 claim in their abstract that “Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant,” in the body of the article they admit they “could not demonstrate significance in our cohort.”

Unless significance is demonstrated, the finding is basically irrelevant, so I would not rely on this paper if I wanted to argue for vaccination of those with preexisting natural immunity. Besides, there’s research40 showing the COVID shots may actually harm the superior T cell immunity built up from prior infection, especially after the second dose. As reported by Horowitz in The Blaze:41

“Immunologists from Mount Sinai in New York and Hospital La Paz in Madrid have raised serious concerns. In a shocking discovery after monitoring a group of vaccinated people both with and without prior infection, they found ‘in individuals with a pre-existing immunity against SARS-CoV-2, the second vaccine dose not only fail to boost humoral immunity but determines a contraction of the spike-specific T cell response.’

They also note that other research has shown ‘the second vaccination dose appears to exert a detrimental effect in the overall magnitude of the spike-specific humoral response in COVID-19 recovered individuals.’”

Arguments for Vaccine Passports Are Null and Void

FEE.org reported the August 25 findings under the headline, “Harvard Epidemiologist Says the Case for COVID Vaccine Passports Was Just Demolished”:42

“Harvard Medical School professor Martin Kulldorff said research showing that natural immunity offers exponentially more protection than vaccines means vaccine passports are both unscientific and discriminatory, since they disproportionately affect working class individuals.

‘Prior COVID disease (many working class) provides better immunity than vaccines (many professionals), so vaccine mandates are not only scientific nonsense, they are also discriminatory and unethical,’ Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist, observed on Twitter …

Vaccine passports would be immoral and a massive government overreach even in the absence of these findings. There is simply no historical parallel for governments attempting to restrict the movements of healthy people over a respiratory virus in this manner.

Yet the justification for vaccine passports becomes not just wrong but absurd in light of these new revelations. People who have had COVID already have significantly more protection from the virus than people who’ve been vaccinated.

Meanwhile, people who’ve not had COVID and choose to not get vaccinated may or may not be making an unwise decision. But if they are, they are principally putting only themselves at risk.”

Positive Signs

arihasanaj tiktok video

While we still have a long and likely hard fight ahead of us, there is reason to be optimistic. In a recent TikTok video,43 a young man named Ari Hasanaj who lives in New York City describes how he printed up posters that say:

“We do not discriminate against ANY customer based on sex, gender, race, creed, age, vaccinated or unvaccinated. All customers who wish to patronize are welcome in our establishment.”

He then went around the city, from one store to the next, asking each owner if they would agree to post the sign on their door to protest NYC’s vaccine passport requirement. A majority said yes. He is now asking others to join him in this effort.

In Denmark, vaccine passports will no longer be used to restrict movement as of September 10, 2021. The health minister, Magnus Heunicke, has stated, though, that the passport system may be reinstated if rising infection rates threaten important functions.

Denmark was among the first to announce the development of a digital vaccine passport, which came into effect in April 2021.44 For months, Danes repeatedly demonstrated against the COVID passes, and it seems the protests eventually had the desired effect. It just goes to show that if enough people resist, tyrannical overreach can be reined in.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Notes

1 New York Post August 4, 2021

2, 7 Zywicki vs George Mason University Case 1:21-cv-00894

3 JAMA Internal Medicine August 16, 2021 [Epub ahead of print]

4, 5, 6, 8 Citizens Journal August 25, 2021

9 Children’s Health Defense vs Rutgers Case 2: 21-cv-15333

10 The College Fix April 10, 2021

11 The Defender August 12, 2021

12, 21, 22, 41 The Blaze August 25, 2021

13 MedRxiv August 8, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.06.21261707

14 FiercePharma June 30, 2020

15 CNBC July 23, 2021

16, 17 The BMJ Opinion August 23, 2021

18 BPR August 20, 2021

19, 36, 37 CDC MMWR July 30, 2021; 70

20 NBC News August 7, 2021

23 Immunity May 3, 2021

24 Nature May 24, 2021; 595: 421-425

25 Nature July 15, 2020; 584: 457-462

26 Cell Medicine July 20, 2021; 2(7): 100354

27 BioRxiv July 15, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.14.452381

28 MedRxiv June 19, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.01.21258176

29, 30, 31, 32, 39 MedRxiv August 25, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415

33 Twitter Alex Berenson July 18, 2021

34 Science August 16, 2021

35 Evening Standard August 20, 2021

38 CNBC July 30, 2021

40 BioRxiv March 22, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.22.436441

42 FEE.org August 30, 2021

43 TikTok September 2, 2021

44 Sundhedsministeriet, August 27, 2021

Featured image is from NaturalNews.com

Jerm Warfare Interview with Dr. Zelenko: “These “vaccines”, which I call ‘poison death shots’ “

“The only reason you’d vaccinate your child is if you believe in child sacrifice.”

Dr. Zelenko, the doctor who created a treatment protocol for COVID, sits down with Jerm Warfare to discuss COVID, the dangers of the vaccines, and the worldwide suppression and agendas that are occurring around us.

The below video of the interview has been transcribed in full, with some embellishment added for emphasis.

Intro message from Dr. Zelenko: “Hi, my name is Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, I’m the original owner of the Zelenko protocol, which is a pre-hospital treatment for COVID-19.

What I believe is going on: that the enemies of humanity have weaponized fear and anxiety in order to effectuate a change in your life to mold society into the direction that they believe to be correct. And that involves taking away our freedom, and anxiety is a tool to which they enslave us.

So I’m here just to give you a simple message: that COVID-19 is highly treatable. There are treatment approaches as well as prevention – preventive, prophylactic approaches, and there’s no need to be afraid. There’s plenty of information available and even over the counter options without prescriptions that can save your life. You really don’t have any reason to be afraid once you have the right information. The information will set your mind and your soul free. And you don’t have to live with paralyzing anxiety.”

Jerm Warfare @1:54: “My name is Jerm. This is Jerm Warfare, the battle of ideas. That was the face and the voice of Dr. Vladimir Zelenko who is joining me right now on the other side.

It’s a great pleasure, Dr. Zelenko. Thank you for being here.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Thank you so much for having me.”

Jerm Warfare: “You posted a video saying that your cancer has returned.”

” – worst global crime in the history of humanity.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @2:18: “Yeah, I have a very rare – actually the rarest form of cancer there is. And there’s around 10 cases a year in the world. Always found at autopsy. And I was diagnosed with it three and half years ago during an emergency surgery, where they thought that I had a blood clot and turned out to be a tumor that killed my right lung in the pulmonary artery. I had that resected and I went through very difficult chemo which I had to design myself, cause there was no treatment available.

And that was good for two years, and then it came back last summer. Had another open heart surgery and had my heart valves replaced because of the tumor. And then just last week I found out it came back again, again in the pulmonary artery. And so now we’re putting together a plan to deal with this, but the game is not over. I’m very hopeful and optimistic about the future. Both mine and that of the world.

I really believe that my heart is still beating because of the prayers and the positive energy of so many decent people around the world. It’s what happened last time. I had millions of people praying. And so statistically, naturally I shouldn’t really be talking to you. I should be under the ground. And yet God has spared me for now, and I ended up, just a few years after having this type of cancer diagnosed, being the tip of the spear of the worst global crime in the history of humanity. And so part of the reason I was spared is becoming… revealed to me, I would say. But God’s ways are very mysterious, so.”

Jerm Warfare: “If you get through, which I’m hoping you will, you can call it the Zelenko Miracle.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Well, listen, it’s already a miracle, every second of my life. And your life is a miracle. And those are things that we don’t necessarily focus on or appreciate, until our lives are threatened.

See the address between life and death is something very familiar to me. And so when someone lives in that state of being, you realize that: I want to say Happy Birthday to you. And not because – I don’t really think it’s your biological birthday, but what it is, is that every second of existence is a recreation; creation ex nihilo, something from nothing. God is making us in the present tense. And so since we’re being made every nano-second, that implies a few things. That He knows about us, He cares about us, He wants us to be. And if He wants us to be then you’re never alone. If you’re never alone there’s no room for anxiety.”

Government’s protocol: ‘Send them home and give them tylenol’
Meanwhile, patients were getting sicker and eventually put on ventilators – in which 80% DIED.

Jerm Warfare @5:08: “This – let’s go back 18 months or so. Life was somewhat normal, and then suddenly this weird thing happened.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “So I didn’t choose COVID, it chose me. What I mean by that is that I was practicing family medicine in upstate New York, in a small community of 35,000 people that live within a square mile. Very high population density. And when COVID arrived, it spread to everyone. Immediately. And I found my practice, my little practice of – we used to see 50 patients a day – inundated with over 250 patients. And there was no treatment at that time.

The government was telling us, “Send people home. Give them tylenol. When they get sicker, send them to the hospital. They’ll end up on a respirator.” And 80% were dying… on the ventilator. So that didn’t seem like a good idea to me. So, just like 3 years before, I had to develop my own cancer treatment, because nothing existed. I figured, well, why not innovate and find something to help my patients. These are people that I care about; these are people that I’ve cared about for 2 decades.

And so, I actually prayed; at 2 o’clock in the morning. I couldn’t sleep – You know, when people look at you and say, “Doctor, please help us.” And they – and you care about them, and then you have nothing to offer them. It’s a terrible feeling.

It’s, it’s – so, I just was studying what other countries have been doing. And something made sense to me. That in South Korea they were using hydroxychloroquine and zinc. And France, in Marseille, France, they were using hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin. And I understood the mechanism of action of these drugs and I said, you know, why don’t we just combine the three of them, modify the dosing and see what happens? Why not? This is battlefield medicine. You know? This is World War 3, the whole world is fighting the same virus, there’s no studies, there’s nothing that I could rely upon. So what do you do? You innovate.

They say necessity is the mother of all innovation. I had a necessity. I had to take care of my patients. I’m an outpatient doctor. Meaning pre-hospital doctor. My job is to keep people out of the hospital. That’s what I’ve always done, 20 years, in every other aspect of medicine. So why would I allow my patients to go home and just get sicker? It didn’t make sense.”

Dr. Zelenko develops a treatment protocol for COVID

@7:38: “So, since I understood the virology, I understood that this virus is an RNA virus that uses certain pathway for viral replication, and I found out that zinc inhibits that process, so zinc was the bullet. And I said, okay. But there was a problem with zinc. It didn’t get into the cell. Due to biochemical reasons. And so it was having like a bullet without a gun. So I needed a gun.

And it turned out that hydroxychloroquine is a zinc delivery system. So zinc ionophore; it lets zinc go from outside the cell to inside the cell. And by doing that we were able to inhibit the RNA dependent RNA polymerase; it’s just an enzyme, but all the COVID strains were using to… to use to make copies of themselves. And I shut down viral replication. So in other words, zinc was able to get to the right place at the right time, and stop the virus from making copies of itself. So that was the mechanism of action.

It was theoretical, but I deployed it. I also didn’t treat everyone. I treated the high-risk patients. And the way I found out who was high-risk, I just called the ICU near me, and I asked the doctor there, who is dying? And they said to me, “well, the old people and the people with chronic illnesses.” I said, “How about the younger people?” They said, “We’re not seeing them in ICU.” So right away I knew that this virus doesn’t kill equally.

So, I didn’t have any resources. Half my staff was sick, the outpatient service was like ‘blood-draw’, and radiology were closed. The hospitals were at near capacity. So I was like walking through my office; it was like a bomb went off. A mass casualty event – people all over. And so I had to triage. I had to make decisions; who to, who would get my attention. And who was low-risk enough that I can send them home. So I basically sent home everyone who wasn’t dying and it was young. And left the older patients; all those that had chronic medical problems.”

Treatment needs to be started IMMEDIATELY – against government “recommendations”

@9:46: “And I started treating them immediately. I didn’t wait for the results of tests. The tests took a week to get back. If I would wait a week, by the time the test result came back, the patient was dead. So instead of – I did the test, but I wouldn’t wait to treat – I used my head and said, “well, you know, the whole community has COVID, there’s no flu, they have all the symptoms, they’ve been exposed, this person has COVID.” Until proven otherwise. And I would treat them immediately. Within the first few days of the onset of symptoms.

From the moment I did that, people stopped going to the hospital and dying. So initially I didn’t believe it. I thought it was a fluke or – I couldn’t believe – But after 50 patients or so, I realized that I… stumbled across, or God gave a gift, of something that is a potential answer to a global problem that has no treatment.”

“Look, COVID is two diseases. There’s the viral infection phase, which is… lasts around 5 days/6 days. And then the immune reaction, your body’s immune system goes on overdrive and it’s the body’s immune reaction that kills the person. It destroys the lungs and causes blood clots. But the immune reaction does not start until a week – 6-7 days into the illness. So the key is to destroy the virus before then, so that the immune reaction, so the monster doesn’t wake up. We have a latent monster inside us – the immune system, in this particular case, and it’s ready to destroy the person. And it takes around a week to wake up. So if we could treat this infection within the first few days, it never wakes up. No problem. Patients get better.”

Media and NIH against the use of hydroxychloroquine – not interested in the treatment of COVID

Jerm Warfare @11:35: “Now, the elephant in the room is the amount of negative press, as you are well aware, surrounding hydroxychloroquine. I mean, Donald Trump, he spoke very highly of it. And funnily enough he took your treatment, didn’t he? As well as a bunch of people in the White House.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Yeah, I ended up treating most of them. What happened was that I made a video addressed to the president, telling – I felt like a front line soldier that found an important enemy map. I needed to get it to the five-star general immediately. Didn’t have time to go through the chain of command.

So I made a video and it was addressed to the president, and the next day his chief of staff, Mark Meadows, calls me on my cell phone. I’m not making – I wouldn’t believe it unless it happened to me. But that’s what happened. And then I told him what I was doing; they were interested. Two days later the commissioner of the FDA is calling me on my cell phone, in Wuhan.

@12:32: And then the – because no one knew what to do. Don’t you understand that at that time, I wasn’t saying that my treatment is the best treatment. I was saying it’s the only treatment! So, so people were looking for solutions. And so then he referred me to the NIH, which was a deadend. They weren’t interested.

And then Rudy Giuliani called me. And I ended up doing a podcast with Rudy; became my good friend. And millions of people saw it. And from that podcast my life has never been the same again. Um, so that’s how people got to know me. And I’ve ended up advising governments and hospital systems and thousands of other physicians.

Um, so I also sent a letter to the president after a few hundred patients summarizing my experience and making my recommendations. And I didn’t know if the president got it or not. Until there was a news conference where President Trump announces to the world that he’s taking hydroxychloroquine. And he says, “Yeah, I got a letter from a, your upstate New York doctor.” And he was telling me this and this and this. I couldn’t believe it. – [Jerm Warfare: “How did you feel?”] – it’s the president of the United States. So, that was pretty cool. And so, that’s how I got involved.

“COVID-19 is an artificially made bioweapon”

@13:50: But, to understand the essence of the problem, we need to understand the essence of the problem. And everything else will make sense. So if I would’ve told you 18 months ago that COVID-19 is an artificially made bioweapon, I would immediately be labeled a conspiracy theorist. [Jerm Warfare: “Yes.”] Now, even the liberal media admits that this is an artificially made bioweapon. It’s a conspiracy, it’s just not a theory. It’s a conspiracy to commit mass murder and genocide.

And to tell you to what degree of resolution we know things – so for example, I can tell you like this, in 1999, that the Ralph Baric, Baric, in the University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill, modified a surface protein on a bat coronavirus, and made it be able to infect human beings. And he has a patent number associated with that modification.

And then it became, this type of research became illegal in America. It was outsourced by Fauci and the NIH, to Wuhan! And then in 2005 or so, they were able to augment the lethality of this virus, so that it, it can destroy human lungs and cause blood clots. And we know the patent number is associated with those changes.

So no one’s denying that this is an artificially made bioweapon. So, okay. So now you have to understand why is there such opposition to the treatment of it in the pre-hospital setting. Cause what is the real desire goal of this bioweapon. It’s not to kill everyone. It’s to scare everyone. And if you studied psychological warfare, which I have, if you use fear – prolonged fear – and isolation: lockdown, what you do is you psychologically destroy the person. Most people will be compensated.

And then you dangle a false promise: the vaccine, and because you’re living in such chronic pain, and fear, you will gravitate – not intellectually – towards something that, anything, that will alleviate that emotional pain that you’re in. Now, that explains why people get so belligerent if you challenge them. Because if you challenge someone’s narrative, that they bought into, what you’re really doing is bringing them back into that anxiety state, and they, it causes so much pain they can’t stand it. So you can’t reason with them. It’s not a – it’s a super rational transformation of – it’s a way of enslaving people.

Denying the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin – because THEY WORK

@16:31: Now, the problem with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, for example, is that they work! And since they work, what that means is that it could reduce the amount of anxiety and fear in the world, which is contrary to the whole point of the bioweapon. It’s a weapon against the bioweapon.

So, you have to ask yourself, why was this released? Why was this bioweapon made? Why is there such a effort – sorry – why is there such a global coordinated attempt to maintain global fear? And there’s an answer.

Um, in 2015 – by the way, I have a disclaimer. I want no one to believe me. Please do not believe anything that I’m saying. But, you can take that information that I am giving you, and I’m giving you very specific information, and go do your due diligence. Do your research. Don’t make the same mistake that you did with the governments, with me. Don’t buy into my narrative. But at least listen. And then, go and look into it, do your research, your due diligence, your – use your brain. And then come to a conclusion. And whatever that conclusion is, it’s yours. But the point is, hear the other side.

Bill Gates and the eugenics agenda

@17:51: So anyway, so with that disclaimer, I’m going to say that in 2015, you can google, ‘Bill Gates, Ted lecture’. So this sociopath – [Jerm Warfare: “I saw it. I saw it.”] So this sociopath calls for the reduction of the world population, because of global warming. Okay. So first of all, what kind of human being, uh, feels entitled to decide how many people should live on the planet or not? So that’s someone who doesn’t believe in the divine nature of humanity. That’s someone believes that in eugenics, or survival of the fittest, or the godless version of our lives.

But anyway, I have a good joke for you, by the way.

A child goes to his mother and says, “Where did we come from?” So the mother says, “Well, we’re made in the image of God.” And then the child goes to the father and says, “Where did we come from?” And the father says, “We evolved from monkeys.” So the child’s confused. So he goes back to the mother and looks for an explanation. So the mother says, “That’s not a contradiction. That’s my side of the family, and that’s his side of the family.” [Jerm Warfare laughs]

So Bill Gates belongs on that, group of people, belong to the monkey side of humanity. Whereas most humanity belongs to the – the wind made in the image of God department. Now, since they think they’re the biggest monkey, they think they’re on top of the food chain. That they can do whatever they want with us.

So here – I’m going to ask you a question. The same sociopath – I’m picking on him, but he’s just representative of a mentality – in last year said that 7 billion people need to vaccinated. So one simple question. Why would I take a vaccine, supported and funded by someone – for my health, a vaccine for my health – supported by someone who wants to reduce the world population? [Jerm Warfare: “It makes no sense.”]

Risk versus benefit analysis: medical necessity / efficacy / safety

@19:57: Okay, so, if I evaluate any treatment, any vaccine, anything I do to someone, I do a risk versus benefit analysis. If what I’m going to do may be risky, but does the benefit outweigh the risk? Otherwise, why would I do it? So, to understand if something is beneficial, you need to assess three things.

Whether you need it: medical necessity. You know a surgeon who operates on everyone is not a surgeon. He’s a butcher. He’s not using medical judgement. Just because someone came to your office doesn’t mean you have to cut him. There has to be a need for it, a reason for it. And the real surgeons know when not to cut. A real doctor knows when not to do something. So necessity.

Does it work? Efficacy. That’ll be useful, right? If I’m going to do something to someone, it better work.

And is it safe?

Though, if you analyze these vaccines from that perspective, and I can do that for you, I don’t know how much time we have, but – [Jerm Warfare: “No, please. I’ve got all the time.”] All right, so let’s look at medical necessity.

Without a vaccine: healthy children have a 99.998% survival rate /
“For every one child that dies from COVID-19 naturally, a hundred will die from the vaccine.”

@21:05: 18 and under, healthy children, have a 99.998% survival rate, according to the CDC, with no treatment from COVID. Why would I immunize a group, a demographic, that has a near 100% chance of recovery with NO treatment, with an experimental substance of questionable efficacy and known danger? The answer is I wouldn’t. Unless, I believe in child sacrifice. Doctor, Dr. Michael – “

Jerm Warfare: “Yeah. Exactly right. But – sorry, sorry, sorry – doctor, the media keeps pushing out a different story. So the questions is, who do you believe?”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Well, you can look at the CDC and see the survival rate of COVID-19. Um, as a matter of fact, I mean I can look at the day outside right now and say it’s night. That doesn’t mean it’s true. So the media is a tool of the fear. Maintaining the fear. So, getting back to my point, which was that – yeah, the young demographic has a 100% survival, essentially, so why would I do something that would threaten that demographic?

If you look at Dr. Michael Yeadon, who was the head of Pfizer, vice president of Pfizer[Jerm Warfare: “Yeah, he was on my podcast also.”] So, you know what he says? The guy is a world expert on vaccine development. And he did his statistical analysis, and he said the following, and he said this to me directly, because I’m friends with him and I called him up, and he said “For every one child that dies from COVID-19 naturally, a hundred will die from the vaccine.” 

Jerm Warfare: “That is not something I want to hear, doc.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Well it’s not about what you want to hear or don’t want to hear, it’s about the truth. I don’t want to hear it either but it’s not going to help the children that are going to be sacrificed. 

Let me ask you a question. What’s the difference if I take a child, let’s say a five year old, and cut its throat, or throw this child off a cliff, or into a volcano or whatever, or inject them with something that they don’t need because they’re going to get better anyway, and it has a 100 to 1 kill ratio? [Jerm Warfare: “Yeah, no… this, um – “]

Without a vaccine: healthy 18-45 year olds have a 99.95% survival rate /
WITH TREATMENT (not vaccine), it’s near 100% survival rate

@23:26: So, okay, I’m gonna finish. Now, if we look at 18 to 45, many healthy adults, so the survival benefit there is according to the CDC, is 99.95%. With treatment, it’s near a 100%. So the same question. Why would I vaccinate a demographic of healthy adults, with something that, against the virus, that they’re gonna get better from, and with something that may kill them? It just doesn’t make sense.

And just yesterday, it was published, multiple studies, that proved what we all knew anyway, that natural immunity is multiple – many many times better than vaccine induced immunity. Which means, anyone who had COVID already and has antibodies have superior antibodies. So why would I inject in them a liquid that makes inferior antibodies and puts them at risk? There’s no medical – just – there’s no medical necessity there.

Okay. Now let’s get to the problematic group. The high risk group, 45 and over, or those that have medical problems, have a death rate, globally, of 7.5%. That’s unacceptable. That is… a huge number of dead people. However, if you treat them, properly, all the data, all the clinical trials or the peer reviewed studies, they’re dozens of them that have corroborated my initial observations. Which I had published in a peer-reviewed international journal, that if you treat people properly, you reduce the death rate and hospitalization rate by 85%.

So, just to explain what that actually means, at a 600,000 dead Americans, we could’ve prevented 510,000 from going to the hospital. So I can reduce that death rate from 7.5% to around 1%. So now comes a good question. If we have something that with treatment, has a 1% death rate, in a sub – in a small demographic of high risk patients, perhaps it’s better to vaccinate than let them get sick. We have to – we have – it’s a good idea – thought. It’s a question. I’m not denying it.
 

By the way, if there were good, effective and safe COVID-19 vaccines, I would recommend them. I’m not against the vaccines, I’m against being stupid. And, so let’s look if these vaccines have – if they work!

Booster shots suggested even though the initial vaccines
DON’T WORK

@26:07: The three most vaccinated countries in the world: Israel, Gibraltar, and in the Indian Ocean there’s an island nation called Seychelles, they all have more than 80% vaccination rates. All the countries are experiencing massive outbreaks of delta variant.

The CDC director, I think her name – Walensky or whatever he name is, said two days ago that it seems according to the Israeli data, anyone who was vaccinated early, has a higher risk to end up in the hospital, in the ICU, and therefore you should take another shot. [Jerm Warfare: “Why?”]

I’ll tell you why in a minute. But, so, so it doesn’t work. Apparently.

And now let’s look at the safety concerns, which is really – could keep us busy for the next hour. Let’s divide safety concerns over time. Because they vary over time. So there’s the first time period would be, let’s say from the moment of injection to 3 months. It’ll be the acute period. Then there’s the subacute period from 3 months to 3 years. And then there’s the long-term, more than 3 years. And I want to break it up in this way because it’s important to understand the mechanisms of action.

The – I’m sorry, my kids are calling me. Um, from the moment of injection until 3 months, people are dying from blood clots. And we know exactly why. The Salk Institute from San Diego published a paper, a landmark paper a few months ago explaining the mechanism. From the moment you’re injected, your entire body becomes a spike factory. Producing a viral spike protein.”

Jerm Warfare: “Sorry, before you go on, can you just explain what that means? Cause we keep hearing about that.”

The “vaccine”/”poison death shots” cause dangerous spike proteins to produce in our body – leading to blood clots

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @28:16: “Well, um, how do vaccines work? How – usually I would give you a piece of a virus, let’s say the flu virus. So, I’ll take a piece of it, not the whole living thing, although sometimes we do use living tenuated viruses, but in most cases – or polio – that’s a better example. I take a dead polio virus and I inject it into you. Your immune system recognizes that it doesn’t belong there. It mounts an immune response generating antibodies and now if you ever come into contact with real polio, all your soldiers are ready to pounce, and destroy it and you don’t get sick.

That’s how a normal, traditional vaccine would work. These quote/unquote vaccines, which I call ‘poison death shots’, they’re completely different. They don’t inject a piece of virus. At all. They inject a code, a formula, that converts your body into a factory that produces part of the virus. And a very specific part of the virus.

See the virus, coronavirus, is basically a ball with thorns. And it has these little spikes. Let’s call it the male organ. And in order to be able to get into the cell, it needs to attach to the receptor on the cell, which is the female organ. So the spike itself goes and finds its mate, and that allows the virus then to get into the cell. So, the spike is what actually gets the virus inside the cell.

So what we’re doing is giving you a code in the form of mRNA, which is the code. Your body’s cellular metabolism, your body’s own processes, are hijacked to manufacture all these little spikes. Not the whole virus, by the way. Just these little spikes. Trillions, hundreds of trillions of them, and it turns out that they migrate and end up in your blood vessels. Lining the endothelium, which is the inner skin. The inner lining of the blood vessel.

And it’s supposed to be smooth, obviously. Cause you have high rate of flow of blood cells, you don’t want them – [Jerm Warfare: “Yes, I understand.”] – you don’t want them to bump into stuff and break. In fact, all of a sudden you just coated lined wallpaper, inner lining of every vessel in your body with thorns. Little spikes. [Jerm Warfare: “Okay, yes.”] And then the blood cells get damaged. And when they get damaged, they leak stuff. That sets off a reaction in the body to cause blood clots.

So, the main cause of death in the first 3 months is blood clots in the form of heart attacks and strokes, or anywhere else. It could be kidneys, lungs, could be in your mesentery, your gut. So that’s what we’ve seen. And 40% of the deaths are happening within the first 3 days of injection.

How many people have to die from the COVID vaccines before we finally say, ENOUGH?

@31:45: Now, what’s the threshold of death? When do we say, you know, it’s too risky? It’s too much? In 1976 we had the swine flu vaccine. Um, it killed 26 people. The entire vaccine program was canceled.

According to the United States government already, this is according to the government, there’s 13,000 dead. According to the whistleblower, from the CDC, that wrote an affidavit, the number’s 45,000.

That’s not enough? I’m telling you, in 2009 there was a study on the system used for reporting. Called VAERS. That only 1% of events are actually reported. Now, I can make an argument, that maybe rashes are reported much less than death. Agreed. I’m not gonna deny that.

So what is the number? No one really took the time to figure it out. But, okay, it’s not 1%. So I’ll be very generous to VAERS. I’ll give ’em a 20% reporting rate. And that’s being generous. So what that means is that the number of deaths being reported, you have to multiply it by a factor of 5. [Jerm Warfare: “So over 200,000.] I think so.

And there are two other problems with this system. Which is that known reports are being scrubbed off the server. We have evidence of this. We have screenshots of reports that were there a few months ago that no longer exist. We can’t get ’em. And also I have colleagues that are trying to file reports. They lost patients, and the system won’t let them. It’s rejecting their reports, on technicalities.

So, there’s an obvious – and Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin is actually doing an investigation to see to what degree their suppression and obstruction and flow of true side effect information. So, that’s a lot of death already.

Issues of myocarditis and miscarriages – and no long-term assessment of the COVID vaccines

@33:55: The other problem is inflammation of the hearts. Called myocarditis. It damages the hearts it seems of young men. And the other problem is miscarriages in the first trimester in women that have been vaccinated is a much increased rate of losing their babies.

So that’s pretty bad. Remember, this is something that doesn’t work and you don’t need it. And then, let’s go to the longer term consequences. Well, it’s clear that the number of autoimmune diseases and cancers is going up. And there’s enough data concern/smoke, to require further inquiries to see if these mRNA vaccines are actually causing it. Remember, it went from laboratory to human use in less than a year. When on average it takes 10 years to vet a vaccine. So it’s not like we have long-term studies. So you need to know what’s going to be in a few years.

So there’s a concern already of autoimmune diseases and cancer – so that’s going to effect lifespan, and there’s also a real concern – there’s a leaked study from Pfizer that wasn’t supposed to get out. But someone leaked it from Japan. Where it showed the, when you inject it here [Dr. Zelenko points to his arm] where the vaccine actually ends up. And the largest amount ends up in the ovaries. So the question is, what is the long-term consequences on fertility? That has not been vet – that has not been ruled out. That has not been checked or assessed.

” – this vaccine program is the biggest threat to humanity in the history of humanity.”

@35:32: Okay. Now, but that’s – everything I just said is nothing compared to what I’m about to tell you. Between 3 months and 3 years, is a period where the world experts, the top minds in medicine and science, are SCREAMING, “Stop! You’re going to cause a genocide.”

So, for example. Remember, don’t believe me. Dr. Luc Montagnier, he happened to win the Nobel Prize – [Jerm Warfare: “For HIV.”] – for finding HIV. Yes. Pretty big boy. I wouldn’t say he’s the… he said like this. He’s never seen anything like this, and this vaccine program is the biggest threat to humanity in the history of humanity.

Okay. Then, Dr. Dolores Cahill, a top […] from Ireland, came out saying that within 2 years, she believes 90% of the people who got vaccinated will be dead.

Now, – [Jerm Warfare: “Wait! Two years?] – Yeah. So maybe she’s wrong. Maybe it’s 3 years. Or 4 years. And maybe it’s not 90%, what if it’s 5%? Not enough? So she’s raising a concern – hold on, and then Dr. Robert Malone invented the mRNA vaccine technology. It’s telling people, “Don’t take it. It’s too dangerous. The government is lying to you.”

And the, Dr. Michael Yeadon that I mentioned is saying the same exact thing.

Immune system, activated by the vaccine/virus, is attacking our own body –
Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE)

@37:15: What is the concern? And why are people going nuts about this? So, here’s the reason. In the 1960’s, an RSV vaccine was made, given to children, it killed children. No one understood why until they figured out that the children developed antibodies to RSV. And then when they were exposed to RSV, there was a – the immune system blew up and it was the immune system that killed the child. [Jerm Warfare: “What? The immune system?”]

It’s the child’s immune system that killed the child. It was an overreaction. That’s called antibody dependent enhancement. It’s not from the actual vaccine. What happens – listen again. They got the vaccine, they developed antibodies. Now you have these supposedly protective antibodies, then the RSV virus came, touched – came into contact with these antibodies and there was an explosion in unhealthy immune reaction.

Not every part of your immune system is good for you. You heard of autoimmune diseases? Lupus? Rheumatoid arthritis? That’s your body’s immune system attacking your body. That’s unhealthy. So it’s not always that your immune system is good for you.

So, in this particular case, the antibodies that were produced by the vaccine triggered a reaction, once coming into contact with the virus that killed the children.

So in 1970’s, there was something called the dengue fever virus vaccine, same thing happened. They would give it to people/adults; they died. It was the same exact mechanism of death called antibody dependent enhancement.

In all the attempts to make coronavirus vaccines, in the animal models, all of them manifested this reaction. And killed a large percentage of the animals that – in other words, the animals were vaccinated: mice, ferrets, and they produce antibodies, and then they’re purposefully infected with the virus that they’re immunized against. They’re challenged, to see if it works. And a large percentage of these animals died. Again, it’s called antibody dependent enhancement.

So here’s the question. Wouldn’t it be a good idea to rule that out by human beings, before you deploy a vaccine to 7 billion people?”

Jerm Warfare: “It sounds like an absolutely terrible idea. So, why – “

Leading experts warn of the many side effects of the vaccines –
and world suppression of the truth

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @40:13: “That’s exactly what happened. Said – there’s 2 billion people already in the United States, there’s been a deployment of a substance that has the potential to kill the organism that it was given to. And that potential has not been excluded. And there’s a historical precedent for these things to happen. And it’s being done to people that don’t need the vaccine. And it doesn’t even work.

So, I’m going to make it very simple. Um, this vaccine is being deployed not for medical reasons. At all.

So I already told you, look, the causes, blood clots, inflammation of hearts, miscarriages, increased rates of cancer potentially, increased rates of autoimmune diseases, potential infertility, and the potential of this autoimmune death process, that it’s not me saying it! I am nobody. There are world experts in the fields; you mean, the guy who invented the vaccine – that’s not enough for you? Or the guy who ran Pfizer? Or the guy who won the Nobel Prize for finding HIV? That’s not enough?

These people – so what would be the normal rational thing to do? Would be, well, take a step back, let’s test these more to see if they’re safe. Forget about – you don’t need it, but still. So, do you see what’s going on here?

There is the suppression of life-saving medications, there’s the suppression of knowledge of life-saving treatments. Anyone who dares to say against the accepted narrative that the media is pumping, is deplatformed. It could be the world expert who made the mRNA vaccine who says something against the policy of the government is immediately deplatformed from every social media site. Why is that? And then, the actual side effects of these vaccines are being artificially suppressed, so that we don’t know the truth. And no one really needs this vaccine. Because I explained to you – though… what’s going on here?”

Jerm Warfare: “I mean, Dr. Lee Merritt has said very much the same thing.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Yep, and Dr. Peter McCullough.

A need to reflect on our own values and freedom into the future

Jerm Warfare @42:47: “Yes. He also says the same thing. So, how – how do you, how do you respond, doc? What do you do, in a situation now when you’re hearing about the mandatory vaccines that are coming? And by the way, it’s not just in the United States. Our own government is now talking about making these vaccines mandatory.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Define mandatory. In other words, they’re going to come down and hold you down, and put a needle in your arm?”

Jerm Warfare: “I don’t think that – to that degree, but I think you won’t be able to get employment, you won’t be able to go into shops, etc., etc.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “I wouldn’t worry about it; I’ll tell you why. Because there’ll be so many dead people, rotting corpses in the streets, that the worse it’ll get, it will look like a kindergarten, and you’ll have plenty of job openings.”

Jerm Warfare: [laughs] “I’ve never heard that. That is such a dark joke, but it’s so true.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Look, I am not ready to sacrifice having a future for a few conveniences in the present. [Jerm Warfare: “Sure.”] I’d rather sacrifice the present, so that I have a future. And people have really messed up values. “All right. I can’t fly in a plane, so I’ll take the vaccine.” or, you know, “I’ll lose my job.” or, “I won’t be able to go to school.” And I look at these people and I say, well, you are making decisions on – that will potentially affect your lifespan and you’re doing it so willingly and blind – why? And so people are so gullible; it’s so easy to manipulate humanity.”

We’re in a life and death situation: not with the virus, but with the vaccine

Jerm Warfare @44:36: “Is it, is it literally a life and death kind of scenario? In your view.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Absolutely, yes. We’re at World War 3. And you know, if the Germans were bombing over your head, you wouldn’t be asking that question. But the bombs that are being sent at us are invisible. And sugar-coated. And, I mean, there’s already hundreds of thousands of deaths from the vaccine. How much more death do you need to see before you say enough?”

Jerm Warfare: “Well they’ll say – they’ll respond and say yes, but it’s not because of the vaccine. It’s because of other things.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Well they can say whatever they want. It’s just not consistent with truth. Not consistent with the data. And we know that COVID-19 is exceptionally treated.

It’s true that if there’s a fire and I don’t put it out, it’s going to burn the house down. So you’ve set a lot of fires, artificially. You go around and you set fires around the neighborhood and then you tell people, don’t put it out. Then the neighborhood burns down. Okay? That’s true. But doesn’t mean you have to put gasoline on the fire either. So, my answer to you is, don’t worry about the virus. Be prepared to deal with it. They’re over the counter options. And you’ll be fine. And don’t buy into the false – “

Assessing the difference between DNA and mRNA vaccines –
and the issues with “shedding”

Jerm Warfare @45:54: “Emma has got a question. She wants to know what your thoughts on the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. Because as far as I’m aware it’s not mRNA.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Yeah, it’s worse. It’s a DNA vaccine. In other words, the way it works is, mRNA is limited to the cytoplasm of a cell. To the – let’s call it your living room. It gets into your living room and it uses your television and it makes copies using the equipment that’s in your living room. And those proteins that are made are what are potentially killing you.

The Johnson and Johnson is a DNA vaccine. And that gets into your bed where you are, lying there, in your pajamas, and goes right into your core, into your essence, and makes – messes with your DNA, and then becomes mRNA and – in other words, it’s deeper penetrating. It’s much worse. It’s like having someone – difference of this: someone in your living room and someone in your bed. Johnson and Johnson gets into – into you, real deep.

Now in Texas they have a flag, ‘don’t tread on me’. So I made a meme, ‘don’t shed on me.’ But uh, I don’t like shedding, but it’s not really a major problem for most people. Because what shedding is, is in the first 3 months after you get vaccinated, you’re actually shedding the spikes. And it comes through your breath, droplets, it comes through your skin, comes through other bodily fluids.

Now most people, it may mess up their periods, it may make you feel not so well, but it’s not an enough of a dose to cause real problems. Except in 2 categories of people. Someone who has a blood-clotting predisposition. There are conditions where people are more prone to blood clots. That could trigger blood clots. Because that’s what the main concern is, in the first few months.

And then, miscarriages. It seems to cause miscarriages in, you know, pregnant women. So, if – or women that want to get pregnant; it messes with their ability to get pregnant. So, but it’s a short-lived problem. So it’s not – it’s a problem, but it’s not a problem worth over emphasizing, because there’s much bigger problems.”

Jerm Warfare: “She says, yeah, especially around pregnant women.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Yeah, so that – that’s a good question. Um, you don’t know who’s vaccinated, and again, if it’s more than 3 months they’re no longer radioactive. You know? But you don’t really know when and what – so, that becomes a hard question. So… pregnant women have to be a little bit more isolated, in my opinion, if they want to protect their pregnancies. But the majority of people should not isolate themselves because of shedding.

Inspiration and advice: ‘Stay away from bad, do good, and live’

@49:04: Whenever I need inspiration, I look back into bigger minds than me. And in the Psalms of David, King David writes the following, a very good prescription: ‘stay away from bad, do good, and live’. So that’s the prescription. So let’s break that up.

‘Stay away from bad’. Do not give into the fear, do not isolate yourself. Do not take a poison death shot. And if you did already, don’t do it again. Don’t harm yourself. Do no harm. Don’t destroy yourself psychologically, emotionally, and physically.

‘Do good’ means, that if you’re in the high risk category group, meaning anyone over the age of 45, or anyone with medical problems, or in my opinion anyone who got the vaccine, you should take prophylactics; it’s preventive therapy. And preventive therapy doesn’t mean to take another shot and make more bombs. Preventive therapy means that to prevent the detonation of those bombs that already exist by using antiviral drugs – um, and you can find them on my website: vladimirzelenkomd.com.

I have protocols with dosing and everything for prescription and for over the counter options. So people could have them in their hands. But they – and the idea is to protect yourself in advance so that you, if you do come into contact with the detonator, another virus, you don’t die. And if you do get sick, God forbid, you have to start treating day one. In other words, you don’t want the monster to wake up. And then you’ll live.”

Spirituality and the sanctity of life –
Godliness vs. godlessness

Jerm Warfare @51:03: “It seems like this is way more than a medical war that grew in. It seems like it’s a psychological war, isn’t it? Religious war, spiritual war, I don’t know what, but it’s certainly more – “

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “It’s a war against God. There are two systems of thought, that can’t co-exist anymore. There’s a system that is based on God centered consciousness. Which means like this, just follow the logic. If God makes you, that means your life, your life has sanctity. If your life has sanctity, that means you have human rights. If you have human rights, then it’s not in the realm of another human being to decide how long you should live and how many of us should be on the planet. That’s God’s department.

There’s another system, which is completely godless. It’s based on Darwin’s theories and Galton who developed eugenics. You know they were – he was a nephew of Charles Darwin. And their system is the survival of the fittest system. In other words, they believe that there’s a hierarchy of humanity, to be based on genetics or other factors, and it’s the strongest, on top of the food chain, that will dictate what happens to everyone else.

Now, this sounds like a fairy tale except that it killed 200,000,000 people 80 years ago. Because invariably it deteriorates into 3 categories of human beings. The super-human, the human and the sub-human. So the Nazis, the Aryans, believed that they were descendants of Aryan gods. And therefore felt entitled that they could enslave and murder anyone they wanted, and wage global war.

And the humans were the Anglo-Saxons, the Europeans that were meant to be enslaved and serve the super-humans. And the sub-humans that I belong to, the Jews, the slobs, the gypsies, handicapped, and political people that oppose them politically, they’re the sub-humans that needed to be thrown into gas chambers and then the ovens and vaporized into dust.

So, and this is not a fairytale. This is history. Recent history. So that mentality did not go away. That mentality went dormant for a bit, and now it’s woken up, but it’s not anti-semitic, actually. What it is, is something else.

On top of the super-human is these, what they perceive themselves as evolved higher level of consciousness people that think that they know better for what the rest of us need, and therefore can make policies that will control how many of us live, and how long we live. In reality, these are not evolved people. These are devolved pagans. These are sociopaths, these are wannabe deities, these are just the biblical historical replay of maniacs that are denying the existence of God and believe in their own immortality.

People who are dictating the rest of the world keep themselves hidden

@54:17: And what – so let’s – who are they? Um, honestly speaking, 70% of all corporate wealth in the world is owned by 150 people. So I would suspect it’s some – some people in that group. And because they control media, politics, academia, and one of their policies – what do they want?

The real people who are doing this are too smart to be in the news. It’s not Fauci, it’s not even Soros or Gates, or Schwab. Because the people that are really doing it are really really smart. And they hide themselves like layers of proxies, to do their bidding. And ‘why would I sacrifice myself – I’m too smart for that’.

But if you look at the World Economic Forum, which is a good example of despotic thinking – tyrannical thinking – and they crafted a 2030 UN plan. It’s already being implemented. And, you know, Hitler wrote Mein Kampf, and wrote it many years before he took control. He laid out his plans. These people are not even hiding their agenda. So what is their agenda? Go look at the 2030 World Economic Forum plan, and you’ll see – [Jerm Warfare: “You’ll own nothing.”] – and you’ll be happy, yeah.

What kind of sociopath, what kind of human being feels that they can decide whether you own property or not? Possessions or not? What else do they say? Um, you won’t eat meat except on special occasions. [Jerm Warfare: “And insects, also.”] All right. I didn’t hear that one. They – you won’t use fossil fuels. America will no longer be a super-power. A few European countries will run the world. There’ll be a billion refugees. So, what you have are – this guy, Schwab, said in 2016, it’s on an interview in French, that within 10 years, by 2026, everyone will have a digital tag and identifier in them.

Jerm Warfare: [jokes] “You are really ruining my Friday evening, doc.”

Test on humanity – on our decisions

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @56:58: “You know, that’s good. Because reality – you need a reality check. And the next people that are willing to stand their ground and sacrifice even their own lives so that humanity’s – the soul of humanity is… remains. Because that’s, it’s an attack on the core of what is means to be a human being. And the core of our souls, and the core of our relationship with Creator.

And ultimately I think there’s a divine test, here. Which is, no one’s making you take this. You’re choosing to do it. There’s no such thing ‘you were forced’. Because, you could be pressured, you could be coerced, but you still have the ability to say ‘no’.

And if you put your trust – if I was God, I would be asking this following question: “I know you’re scared and the world is crazy. But who are you going to put your trust in? Me, who makes you? You’re going to ask me to fill the… your anxiety space? Are you going to ask me for protection? Because I’ll do it. Or are you going to go around to false gods, despotic governments, sociopathic oligarchs, and the golden calf of this vaccine? Because if you are going to do that, then let them protect you. Let’s see how that’s going to work out for you.”

Reflecting on the future – God conscious living vs. immorality

Jerm Warfare @58:20: “In front of you, doc, there is a crystal ball. What do you see?”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “I see a glorious future. I see a… we’re in the cusp of a redemptive process. Where there’s going to be – people are going to self select into… God conscious living, versus idolatry.

And then I believe what the prophets say. Not me. That the spirit of inequity will be removed from the Earth. God will take out His big broom, clean out the garbage, and then the world will be filled with the knowledge and glory of God.

I think, I think that God has had enough of people who, for example, if these despots had their way, a 30 year old man who thinks he’s a woman would be sharing a bathroom with my 4 year old daughter. [Jerm Warfare: “It’s unreal.”]

So this type of erosion – you know, in the Bible it says that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed. The Talmud asks why. So one suggestion is because of immorality. The answer’s no. The whole world was immoral. What was so special about them that they were singled out? You know what the answer is? That they codified it into law. It became the law of the land. Immorality became codified as the norm.

[Jerm Warfare: “That’s what’s happening now.”] You think? What do you think I”m telling you this? So I think that we’re in a glorious journey that there’s going to be a transformation. It’s going to be bumpy. Be some turbulence. But at the end, the world will be cleaned up, just like the flood. And we’ll be left with, with people that want to live a God centered moral life.

I’m not afraid of dying. It’s not my department. You know? How I’m going to die, how long I’m going to live, no one knows. And it’s ultimately in God’s hands and He could do whatever He wants.

What I’m afraid of is living. In other words, am I living to my fullest potential? When I have to stand before the King of Kings, and give an accounting – he’s not going to ask me why I wasn’t like you. He’s going to ask me, “Why weren’t you like you could’ve been?” Me. Zev Zelenko. “Why didn’t you reach the potential that I had for you?”

And, so, I want to use my thoughts, of check and control, my speech, and my actions of check and control, and my time. I want to use that in a way that makes the world cleaner and better and healthier, and more Godly, and beautiful. I think that’s a worthy, worthy of my time and efforts. And that’s what I focus on, and that’s what I try to do. And that’s why I’m talking to you.

Jerm Warfare: “I’ve been waiting for 30 minutes to say what I’m about to say, but you are making medicine great again.

Thank you so much for your time. It’s been a great pleasure.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “God bless you. Thank you.” 

Jerm Warfare: “You too. Thank you, man.

My name is Jerm, this is Jerm Warfare, the battle of ideas.”

Thank you so much to Jerm Warfare and Dr. Vladimir Zelenko for this interview. Your efforts to spread awareness and the truth is extremely important especially in these suppressed times, where going against the narrative is ridiculed and censored.

And a special thank you to Dr. Zelenko and other doctors/healthcare providers who made the decision to help treat the people who needed it. Your compassion and integrity speaks volumes of your character and is the role model that people need to get through these uncertain times.

Lastly, a huge thank you to everyone for reading and spreading these messages. God bless.

Featured image by HeungSoon from Pixabay

Dr. Haruo Ozaki of the Tokyo Medical Association on Ivermectin: “It looks like we’re blocking supply because we believe it’s going to work.”

Why would a drug be blocked if it’s believed to cure an illness?

After researching some information on Japan’s recall of over 1.6 million doses of the Moderna vaccine due to possible metal contamination, I went investigating further and found some conflicting information involving Chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association, Dr. Haruo Ozaki, and the Ivermectin situation.

Many websites are reporting that Dr. Haruo Ozaki came out in a press conference this month (August 2021) suggesting the use of Ivermectin in a now widely shared video.

However, this is incorrect. In actuality, Dr. Haruo Ozaki made this announcement in February 2021.

Here is the video with provided transcript thanks to the subtitles that were added:

If this video no longer exists, please let me know and I will find an alternative. Thank you.

“In Africa, if we compare countries distributing ivermectin once a year with countries which do not give ivermectin, I mean, they don’t give ivermectin to prevent COVID, but to prevent parasitic diseases. But anyway, if we look at COVID numbers in countries that give ivermectin, the number of cases is 134.4 per 100,000 and the number of death is 2.2 per 100,000. 

Now African countries which do not distribute Ivermectin: 950.6 cases per 100,000 and 29.3 deaths per 100,000.

I believe the difference is clear.

Of course, one cannot conclude that ivermectin is effective only on the basis of these figures, but when we have all these elements, we cannot say that ivermectin is absolutely not effective, at least not me.

We can do other studies to confirm its efficacy, but we are in a crisis situation. With regard to the use of ivermectin, it is obviously necessary to obtain the informed consent of the patients, and I think we’re in a situation where we can afford to give them this treatment.” – Dr. Haruo Ozaki

Now with that cleared up, I want to bring attention to a more recent report that did come out in August 2021 (allegedly), from a Japanese website: yomiuri.co.jp

The following will be a translated version using this service: translate.com
I have provided a copy/pasted format for search capabilities. Viewing would be easier in desktop/tablet mode. For those on mobile, the Japanese text will be shown first, followed by the translation in English. Please keep in mind that since this is using a translation website, there may be inaccuracies and missing context.

Lastly, I want to point out that I personally do not agree with every assessment made in the following account; such as, “there is a potent delta strain going around”, or so forth. I think these notions are embellished news stories to give the illusion that the virus is deadlier and harder to contain, just to push for a worldwide vaccine effort. However, there are still many intelligent/educated individuals who are not yet fully aware of this agenda, but are waking up to the realization that something is not right with the vaccine push and the suppression of actual treatments that are working against several known illnesses. If Ivermectin is acknowledged to be beneficial in combatting respiratory viruses, then it concludes that it could be helpful in treating coronaviruses that would also involve the common cold/flu/influenza/pneumonia/COVID/SARS, etc.

It therefore goes without saying, that a cheap, effective wonder drug capable of treating such illnesses and other known diseases would be a pharmaceutical’s worst nightmare that would ultimately hurt their own pockets as well as that of the medical/health industry, and any stakeholders who share in their profits.

So with that out of the way, here is a current, updated account of what the President of the Tokyo Medical Association has to say about Ivermectin. All quotes in italics are by Dr. Haruo Ozaki.

The below image is a screenshot of the first page of the Japanese website:

Screenshot taken from: yomiuri.co.jp
Some embellishment has been added for emphasis:

「今こそイベルメクチンを使え」東京都医師会の尾崎治夫会長が語ったその効能

POINT
■イベルメクチンが新型コロナの予防にも治療にも効果があるという論文が相次いで発表されているが、すでに「使用国」とされている日本では使用が進んでいない。

■感染爆発が進む今こそ使用すべきだが、使おうにもイベルメクチンがない、政府の副作用被害救済制度の対象になっていないなどの課題がある。

■日本版EUAを早く整備して、現場の医師が使用できる体制になれば、自宅待機や療養の患者にも投与できる。政府は積極的に使用促進に取り組むべきだ。

“Use ivermectin now,” said Haruo Ozaki, president of the Tokyo Medical Association

POINT
A series of papers have been published that ivermectin is effective in preventing and treating the new corona, but its use has not progressed in Japan, which is already considered a “country of use”.

■ It should be used only now when the infection explosion progresses, but there are issues such as the absence of ivermectin even if it is used, and the fact that it is not subject to the government’s side effect damage relief system.

■ If the Japanese version of EUA is developed as soon as possible so that doctors in the field can use it, it can be administered to patients who are staying at home or recuperating. The government should actively promote its use.

東京オリンピックの開催中にインドを起源とするデルタ株が猛威を振るい、感染者の拡大が続いている。副作用の報告がほとんどなく、諸外国の臨床試験で効果が報告されているイベルメクチンを日本はなぜ使おうとしないのか。早くからイベルメクチンの有効な使用法を提言してきた東京都医師会の尾崎会長に8月5日、緊急インタビューした。
聞き手・構成 認定NPO法人・21世紀構想研究会理事長
科学ジャーナリスト 馬場錬成

During the Tokyo Olympics, delta strains originating in India are raging and the spread of infected people continues. Why does Japan not try to use ivermectin, which has been reported to be effective in clinical trials in other countries with few reports of side effects?

On August 5, I interviewed Mr. Ozaki, president of the Tokyo Metropolitan Medical Association, who had been proposing effective use of ivermectin from an early age.

Listening and Composition President, 21st Century Conception Society, Certified NPO Science Journalist Rensei Baba

まだ見えない感染拡大のピーク

――第5波ともいわれる今回の爆発的な感染拡大は、まだ右肩上がりが続いているようです。自宅待機・療養者が急増していますが、東京都医師会はどのように対応していますか。

「1月の第3波で自宅待機、療養の人が急増したとき、これではダメだということになって、24時間支援を目標に東京都と東京都医師会が一緒になって体制構築に取り組み、47地区医師会のうち37まで対応できるまでになりました。ところが、毎日1000人を超える自宅療養者が積みあがる今の状況は、限界を超えています。診療所の医師は、一般診療、ワクチン接種、健康診断、往診などで手が回らない。いま、保健所が入院調整をしています。東京都には入院調整センターもありますが、急変したコロナ患者を迅速に受け入れて治療できる体制が確立されるところまではいっていません」

The peak of the spread of infection that has not yet been seen

―― This explosive spread, also known as the fifth wave, seems to be still rising. The number of people staying at home and recuperating is increasing rapidly, but how is the Tokyo Medical Association responding?

“When the number of people staying at home and recuperating increased rapidly in the third wave in January, this was not enough, and the Tokyo Metropolitan Government and the Tokyo Medical Association worked together to build a system with the goal of 24-hour support, and we were able to respond to up to 37 of the 47 district medical associations. However, the current situation where more than 1,000 home care persons are accumulated every day is over the limit. Doctors at clinics are available for general medical care, vaccinations, medical examinations, house contacts, etc. The public health center is adjusting hospitalization now. There is also an inpatient coordination center in Tokyo, but we are not well into establishing a system that can quickly accept and treat corona patients who have suddenly changed.”

多くの臨床試験結果は「予防にも治療にも効果」

――これまで世界で発表されているイベルメクチンの臨床試験の論文を読むと、予防にも治療にも効いている例が多数出ています。

「中南米、アジアなどを中心にイベルメクチンがコロナの予防・治療に効いているという論文が多数出ていることは承知しています。次々と発症する患者の対応に迫られるが有効な治療薬もない。ワクチンは間に合わない。そういう差し迫ったときに、イベルメクチンがコロナに効いているという論文が出ているのだから、これを使ってみようと思うのは臨床医としては当たり前の対応です。医師主導の臨床試験論文が多数出てきたのは、そういう事情があったからです」

Many clinical trial results are “effective for prevention and treatment”

―― Reading the papers of ivermectin clinical trials published around the world, there are many cases that are effective in prevention and treatment.

I am aware that there are many papers that ivermectin is effective in preventing and treating corona, mainly in Latin America and Asia. There is no effective treatment which is pressed for the correspondence of the patient who develops one after another either. The vaccine will not be in time. It is a natural correspondence as a clinician to think that this is used because the thesis that ivermectin works for the corona has come out at such an imminent time. That’s why so many doctor-led clinical trial papers came out.”

――普通は製薬企業が大がかりな臨床試験をして効果を見るのですが、イベルメクチンはオンコセルカ症(河川盲目症)、リンパ系フィラリア症などの熱帯病の特効薬として、世界保健機関(WHO)をはじめ世界中の国々が20年以上前に承認した薬剤です。新型コロナにも効果があるなら適応外だがパンデミックの中で使用しよう、ということになったのはやむを得ないということですね。

 「そうです。パンデミックの医療現場は戦場です。野戦病院と同じです。患者が運び込まれ次々と容態が悪化して亡くなっていく。そのとき副作用もほとんどなく、コロナにも効くという論文が多数出てきたので、これにすがりつくようにして投与する医師の気持ちはよく分かります」

――Usually, pharmaceutical companies conduct large-sized clinical trials to see its effects, but ivermectin is a drug approved more than 20 years ago by the World Health Organization (WHO) and other countries around the world as a special effect of tropical diseases such as oncocelacia (river blindness) and lymphatic filariasis. If the new corona is also effective, it is not adaptable, but it is no use in a pandemic.

“That’s right. The medical field of the pandemic is a battlefield. It is the same as the field hospital. The patient is carried in, and the condition deteriorates one after another and it dies. At that time, there were few side effects, and many papers came out that it works for corona, so I understand the feelings of the doctor who administers it by following this.”

「つい先日、インドでコロナ感染症の治療ガイドラインを決めている全インド医科大学(All India Institute of Medical Sciences/AIIMS)の研究グループが、イベルメクチンの予防効果を調べた論文を発表しています。それによると、約3900人の医療従事者(職員及び学生)を対象に、イベルメクチン体重1キロ当たり0.3ミリ・グラムを3日間隔で2回投与した群、1回のみ投与した群、そして投与しなかった群の三つの群に分けて臨床試験を行った結果、イベルメクチンを2回投与された人は、新型コロナ感染が83%減少したというのです。論文を発表したのは世界でも第一級の研究グループですから、非常に信頼性が高いものです」

“Just recently, a research group from the All Institute of Medical Sciences/AIIMS, which has set guidelines for treating coronal infections in India, published a paper examining the preventive effects of ivermectin. According to the study, about 3,900 healthcare professionals (staff and students) were given 0.3 milligrams per kilo of ivermectin weight twice every three days, administered only once, and in three groups that did not, and those who were given ivermectin twice had an 83% reduction in new corona infections. It’s a very reliable research group because it’s one of the first-class research groups in the world to publish a paper.”

日本はすでに使用国に区分け

――日本では2020年5月18日に通達した「新型コロナウイルス感染症(COVID-19)診療の手引き第2版」から、イベルメクチンをCOVID-19治療に使用することを認めています。世界でも、日本はイベルメクチンの使用国に区分けされています。

「日本では以前から皮膚病の 疥癬 などに、『ストロメクトール』という商品名でイベルメクチンが適応薬として承認されており、改定手引きでは、『適応外』として新型コロナの治療にも承認する通達を出しています。適応外とは、医師と患者の判断で使用してもいいということです。通達を出したころまでに、世界では27か国、36件の臨床試験が行われており、イベルメクチンが予防・治療に効果が出ていると報告されていました。だから厚生労働省も適応外を認めたのです。効果がないと出ていたら通達は出さないでしょう」

Japan has already been classified as a country of use

―― Japan has admitted to using ivermectin for COVID-19 treatment from the “New Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19) Medical Care Guidelines 2nd Edition” announced on May 18, 2020. In the world, Japan is classified as a country where ivermectin is used.

“In Japan, ivermectin has been approved as an indication drug under the product name ‘stromectol’ for scabies for skin diseases, etc., and in the revised guidelines, we have issued a public order to approve the treatment of the new corona as ‘not adapted’.

It is not indication and can be used at the judgment of the doctor and the patient. By the time of the report, 36 clinical trials had been conducted in 27 countries around the world, and it was reported that ivermectin was effective in prevention and treatment. Therefore, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare also admitted the outside adaptation. If it was ineffective, I wouldn’t get a good by it.”

政府は使用に前向きな国会答弁、しかし…

――国会でも政府はイベルメクチンの使用を進めるような答弁をしています。

「さる2月17日の衆議院予算委員会で、立憲民主党の中島克仁議員がイベルメクチンについて、『国として早期にコロナの治療薬として承認できるように治験に最大限のバックアップをすべきである』との提案を行いました。田村厚生労働大臣は『適応外使用では今でも使用できる。医療機関で服用して自宅待機するという使用法もある』と答弁しています。菅首相は『日本にとって極めて重要な医薬品であると思っているので、最大限努力する』と答弁し、積極的な取り組みを示すような発言でした。しかし現実には(取り組みは)できていません」

The government has responded positively to the use of the Diet, but…

――the government has also responded to the Diet to advance the use of ivermectin.

“At the House of Representatives Budget Committee meeting on February 17, Katsuhito Nakajima, a member of the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, proposed that Ivermectin should be backed up to the clinical trial to be approved as a treatment for corona at an early date. Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare Tamura said, “It can still be used for use outside of adaptation. There is also a usage of taking it at a medical institution and staying at home.”

Prime Minister Kan responded, “I believe it is an extremely important drug for Japan, so I will do my utmost,” and made a statement that indicated his proactive efforts. But in reality, we’re not working on it.”

――なぜ、できないのでしょうか?

「私たちも、日本の承認薬を供給する企業とその先にあるアメリカのメルク社がどういう供給体制にあるのか調べました。メルク社は治療薬を開発中であるせいか、イベルメクチンは新型コロナの治療・予防には効かないという見解で、疥癬などの皮膚病以外に使わせないとの意向が働いている。つまり、新型コロナに使うといっても、実際にはメルクが出さなければ国内のイベルメクチン供給には結びつかない。医師がイベルメクチンの処方を書いても、薬局には薬剤がない。これでは事実上使えないことになります」

「しかし、(メルクは)イベルメクチンは効かないと言っているのだから、何も供給を制限する必要はないはずです。効かないなら需要がないのですから。効くと信じているから供給をブロックしているように見えてしまいます」

――Why can’t you do it?

“We also looked at the supply structure of japanese companies that supply approved drugs and merck in the U.S. beyond. Perhaps because Merck is developing therapeutic drugs, the company believes that ivermectin is not effective in treating and preventing the new corona, and the intention is not to use it for anything other than skin diseases such as scabies. In other words, even if it is used for the new corona, it will not actually lead to the supply of ivermectin in Japan if Merck does not put it out. Even if the doctor writes a prescription for ivermectin, the pharmacy does not have the drug. This makes it virtually inable.”

“But [Merck] says ivermectin doesn’t work, so there shouldn’t be any need to limit the supply. If it doesn’t work, there’s no demand. It looks like we’re blocking supply because we believe it’s going to work.”

ジェネリックも普及しない理由は

――イベルメクチンのジェネリック薬品は中国、インドなどでも大量に製造されています。メルクが出さないなら、それを輸入して供給する手段もあるはずです。

「そうです。医師でもある中島議員が中心になって衆議院に提出した『新型インフルエンザ等治療用特定医薬品の指定及び使用に関する特別措置法案』(日本版EUA*整備法案)が成立すれば、ジェネリック製剤も使用できるようになります。しかし、現時点では政府は全く動いていないのではないでしょうか」

Why are generics not popular?

――Ivermectin’s generics are manufactured in large quantities in China, India, and other countries. If Merck doesn’t, there should also be a way to import and supply it.

“Yes, if the “Special Measures Bill on the Designation and Use of Specified Drugs for Treatment of New Influenza” (Japanese version of the EUA* Maintenance Bill) submitted to the House of Representatives, mainly by Mr. Nakajima, who is also a doctor, is enacted, generic formulations will also be available. But at the moment, the government is not moving at all.

「もう一つの問題は、イベルメクチンがすでに世界の多くの国で使われ、用法や用量、安全性・有効性などが確認されているのに、日本ではまだ臨床試験段階でそうはなっていない、ということです。このため、イベルメクチンは医薬品副作用の被害救済制度の対象になっていません。これでは医師は使いにくい。しかし、そういう不安と不利な状況の中でも、イベルメクチンの効果を確信している医師たちの中には、自らの責任でイベルメクチンを処方している医師が出てきています。私は日本版EUA整備法を早く成立させてほしいと願っています」

*EUA(Emergency Use Authorization)緊急時に未承認薬などの使用を許可したり、既承認薬の適応を拡大したりする米食品医薬品局(FDA)の制度。FDAが<1>生命を脅かす疾患である<2>疾患の治療などで一定の有効性が認められる<3>使用した際のメリットが、製品の潜在的なリスクを上回る<4>ほかに疾患を診断、予防、または治療する適当な代替品がない――という条件を満たすと判断した場合に使用が認められる。

“Another problem is that ivermectin has already been used in many countries around the world, and although usage, dosage, safety and efficacy have been confirmed, it has not yet been done in Japan during the clinical trial phase. For this reason, ivermectin is not subject to the drug side effect damage relief system. This makes it difficult for doctors to use it. However, even in such anxiety and adverse situations, some doctors who are convinced of the effect of ivermectin are prescribing ivermectin at their own responsibility. I hope that the Japanese version of the EUA Development Act will be enacted as soon as possible.”

*Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) A U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) system that allows the use of unappreciated drugs in emergencies and expands the indication of approved drugs. It is found to be used when the FDA determines that <1> the benefits of using <3>, which have certain efficacy in treating life-threatening diseases< <2> diseases, etc., outweigh the potential risks of the product <4> and are found to meet the condition that there is no suitable alternative to diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease.

[NOTE FROM E.A.R.: Not sure why when translating that the numbers 2 and 3 got reversed…]

筆者のインタビューに応じる尾崎会長(右) / Chairman Ozaki (right) who responds to an interview with the author
使用国なのに現実には使えない

――適応外を認めたので、世界では日本は「イベルメクチン使用国」に区分けされていますが、現実には使えない体制になっているということですね。

「その通りです。要するに政府はイベルメクチンを供給できる体制も構築せずにいるわけで、推進体制にはなっていない。日本版EUAを早く整備して、現場の医師が使用できる体制になれば、田村厚労大臣が国会で答弁したように、現実的に自宅待機、療養の患者さんにも投与できるわけですが、いまの体制では事実上何もできません。よく『国民の安全のため』と言いますが、このような有事の際にも慎重姿勢を崩さないのでは、国民の安全を犠牲にしているとしか理解のしようがありません」

Even if it is a country of use, it cannot be used in reality.

―― Because it admitted not to adapt, Japan is classified as a “country using ivermectin” in the world, but it is a system that can not be used in reality.

“That’s it. In short, the government does not build a system that can supply ivermectin, so it has not been promoted. If the Japanese version of EUA is developed early and becomes a system that doctors on site can use, it can be administered to patients who are practically staying at home and recuperating, as Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare Tamura answered in the Diet, but virtually nothing can be done with the current system. I often say ‘for the safety of the people’, but if you don’t lose your cautious attitude in the event of such an event, you can only understand that it is at the expense of the safety of the people.”

自ら手を出さない学術現場や研究者

――日本の問題点はほかにもないでしょうか。

「イベルメクチンは大村智博士が発見してノーベル賞までいただいた薬剤です。コロナに本当に効いているかどうか日本が世界に先駆けて取り組む実行力があるべきです。WHOやアメリカの国立衛生研究所(NIH)がコロナへの効果が未確定だとの見解を取り続けていますが、パンデミックの中でこれだけ世界中でイベルメクチンが使われているのですから、科学的なエビデンス(証拠)を得られる臨床試験を国が主導して行い、客観的で納得できるような結論を示せば、日本の研究水準のアップにもつながります」

Academic sites and researchers who do not take their own hands

―― Are there any other problems in Japan?

“Ivermectin is a drug discovered by Dr. Satoshi Omura and received the Nobel Prize. Japan should be the first in the world to be effective in whether corona is really working or not. WHO and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) continue to take the view that the effect on corona is indeterminate, but since ivermectin is used all over the world during the pandemic, if the government conducts clinical trials that can obtain scientific evidence and present objective and convincing conclusions, it will lead to an increase in the level of research in Japan.”

「南米、アジアなどでイベルメクチンがコロナに効いているという結果をアメリカの臨床医師たちのグループ(FLCCC)が発表し、イギリスのイベルメクチン推奨団体(BIRD)などの医師グループは、多くの論文を総合的に分析したメタ解析から『効果あり』を確信し、世界中の医療現場にイベルメクチンを推奨しています。日本オリンピック委員会にも、東京オリンピックの開催にあたってイベルメクチンの有効使用をすべきだと伝えてきましたが、政府は何も対応しませんでした」

 「学術現場の研究者や大学の先生にも問題があります。自らは何もやらないで、WHOのような国際機関や欧米の大きな保健機関が出した『イベルメクチンはコロナに効くかどうかは未確定』という見解を自分たちの見解にしている人が多い。主体的にやらないで、人の意見だけで動いています。どうしてイベルメクチンが効くか効かないか、自分たちで確かめてやろうという気にならないのか。やりもしないで批判ばかりしている評論家や研究者・学者がいるのは嘆かわしいことです。日本のアカデミアはもっと積極的に貢献してほしいと思います」

“A group of Clinical Physicians in the United States (FLCCC) has published the results of ivermectin’s effects on corona in South America, Asia, and other countries, and physician groups such as the Ivermectin Recommended Organization (BIRD) in the United Kingdom are convinced that it is ‘effective’ from a meta-analysis that comprehensively analyzes many papers, and recommends ivermectin to medical settings around the world. The Japanese Olympic Committee has also told us that ivermectin should be used effectively to host the Tokyo Olympics, but the government has not responded to anything.

“There are also problems with academic researchers and university teachers. Many people do not do anything, but take their own view of the view that “whether ivermectin works for corona is indeterminate” issued by international organizations such as WHO and large health organizations in Europe and the United States. Don’t be proactive, we’re moving only on people’s opinions. Why doesn’t we feel like we’re going to see if ivermectin works or not? It is deplorable that there are critics, researchers, and scholars who are criticizing without doing anything. I hope academia in Japan will contribute more actively.”

都医師会は「使用に取り組みたい」

――日本でもようやく、製薬企業大手の興和(コーワ)が主体になった臨床試験が予定されています。どのように対応しますか。

「東京都も医師会もこの臨床試験を積極的に支援・協力する方針です。協力する医療機関などを積極的に探して提供することにしました。外国が開発したワクチンや治療薬に頼っている国ではどうしようもない。自分たちでイベルメクチンのデータをきちんと出し、日本発として重症化や死亡の減少につながる貢献を目指すことがわれわれのやるべきことです」

The Tokyo Medical Association wants to work on its use

— Clinical trials are finally scheduled in Japan led by Kowa, a leading pharmaceutical company. How do you respond?

“The Tokyo Metropolitan Government and the Medical Association will actively support and cooperate in this clinical trial. We have actively searched for and provided medical institutions to cooperate with. We can’t help it in countries that rely on vaccines and therapeutics developed by foreign countries. We need to properly provide ivermectin data ourselves and aim to contribute to the reduction of serious diseases and deaths from Japan.”

――コロナ・パンデミックの体験から日本の医療制度が学ぶべきことは。

「日本の国民皆保険制度のもとで、今回のようなパンデミック有事のときの対応は厳しいことがはっきりしました。民間医療施設は稼働率を精いっぱい高めて効率を上げることで経営しています。そういう中では、今回のように『急激に感染者が増えたから対応せよ』と言われても極めて難しいのです」

「対応策の一例をあげれば、公的医療機関・病院などで1000床くらいの空きベッドを持つ病院を建て、ふだんは研究施設や医師、看護師、検査技師らの研修や訓練機関として運用し、パンデミックが発生した際には医療機関として活用する、という方法があります。スキルを磨いて人材を養成し、パンデミック発生時には育成した人材も投入できる体制にするのです。運用方法を具体化するには課題もあると思いますが、今後、検討・研究すべきだと思います」

――What should the Japanese health care system learn from the corona pandemic experience?

“Under Japan’s national health insurance system, it has become clear that the response in the event of such a pandemic is severe. Private medical facilities are run by increasing the utilization rate to the maximum and increasing efficiency. In such a situation, it is extremely difficult to say that “respond because the number of infected people has increased rapidly” as this time.”

“If you give an example of countermeasures, we will build a hospital with about 1,000 vacant beds in public medical institutions and hospitals, usually operate it as a training and training organization for research facilities, doctors, nurses, laboratory technicians, etc., and use it as a medical institution in the event of a pandemic.  There is a method. We will develop human resources by honing our skills, and in the event of a pandemic, we will be able to bring in the human resources we have developed. I think there are issues to materialize the operation method, but I think we should consider and research it in the future.”

インタビューを終えて

使用に慎重なWHOへの反発も

デルタ株(インド変異株)が、日本の感染者のほぼすべてに置き換わろうとしている状況下で、新型コロナの新規感染者数が日々、過去最高を更新している。

都内の自宅療養者は2万人を超え、全国では7万人を超えている。医師でもある中島克仁衆議院議員は「抗体カクテル療法は有効だが、確保量と体制整備に課題がある。コロナ患者の重症化を防ぐため、早期治療の選択肢を広げることが必要だ」と強調する。その選択肢のひとつがイベルメクチンの投与――というのが尾崎会長を強く動かしていると感じた。

After the interview

There is also a backlash against WHO is cautious about its use.

With Delta (India Mutant) about to replace nearly all of Japan’s infected people, the number of new corona infections is hitting a record high every day.

There are more than 20,000 home recuperators in Tokyo and more than 70,000 nationwide. Katsuhito Nakajima, a member of the House of Representatives who is also a doctor, said, “Antibody cocktail therapy is effective, but there are issues in securing the amount and the system. In order to prevent corona patients from becoming more severe, we need to expand our options for early treatment.” I felt that one of the options was the administration of ivermectin, which strongly moved Chairman Ozaki.

コロナ治療・予防へのイベルメクチンの評価はまだ固まっていない。WHOやNIHなど、世界のメジャーな保健機関は、「世界中の科学者を納得させるだけのエビデンスを示した臨床試験結果は出ていない」という見解を維持している。しかし、「これらの主張は根拠が薄い」と反論する医師グループが米英に多数出てきているのも事実だ。

 重症化して死に至る人も出る中で、世界中の医療現場では日夜、医師たちが懸命に治療に取り組んでいる。感染急拡大期のインドの医療現場は、まさに戦場だった。治療薬も治療機器類も十分でない医療現場では、新型コロナに効いているとの多数の論文を頼りにイベルメクチンが投与され、大きな効果を上げる例が多数出た。

The evaluation of ivermectin for coronal treatment and prevention has not yet been solidified. The world’s major health organizations, such as the WHO and NIH, maintain the view that “no clinical trial results have shown enough evidence to convince scientists around the world.” However, it is also true that a large number of doctor groups have come out in the United States and Britain to counter that “these claims are unfounded”.

Doctors are working hard day and night in medical situations around the world as some people die from serious each other. India’s medical scene during the rapid spread of infection was truly a battleground. In medical sites where there are not enough therapeutic agents and treatment equipment, ivermectin was administered relying on a number of papers that said it was effective for the new corona, and there were many cases that raised a large effect.

インド弁護士会は、WHOがイベルメクチンを治療使用に推奨しないとしているのは「患者を見殺しにする殺人罪に等しい」と激しく批判した文書を作り、テドロス事務局長や主任サイエンティストに送り、その文書を世界に向けて公表している。

イベルメクチンの効果ありとする医師団体がアメリカのFLCCCとイギリスのBIRDである。FLCCCは、世界の613人の科学者(医師・研究者)が2万6398人を対象に行った63件の臨床試験のメタ分析(8月15日現在)の結果をまとめ、以下のように判定している。

▽14件の予防試験において86%の予防効果
▽27件の初期症状治療試験において73%の改善効果
▽22件の重症治療試験において40%の改善効果
▽25件の臨床試験において61%の死亡率低下

 メタ解析した約半数の31件が、世界の臨床試験標準とされ、エビデンスを重視するランダム化比較試験(RCT)であり、ここで60%の改善効果が出ている。尾崎会長は、これを信じて治療にイベルメクチンを使おうとする臨床医がいてもおかしくない、との見解を示している。

The Indian Bar Association has made a document that sharply criticized the WHO’s [indemnity] in its insumping ivermectin for therapeutic use, “equal to murder charges that kill patients,” and sent it to Director-General Tedros and its chief scientist, who published the document to the world.

The doctors’ organizations that have the effect of ivermectin are FLCCC in the United States and BIRD in The United Kingdom.The FLCCC compiled the results of a meta-analysis (as of August 15) of 63 clinical trials conducted by 613 scientists (physicians and researchers) around the world in 26,398 people, and determined as follows:

86% preventive effect in 14 preventive trials , 73% improvement in 27 initial symptom treatment trials , 40% improvement in 22 severe treatment trials – 61% mortality rate decrease in 25 clinical trials

About half of the 31 meta-analyses are global clinical trial standards, and evidence-focused randomized trials (RCTs) have a 60% improvement. Chairman Ozaki shows the opinion that there is a clinician who believes this and tries to use Ivermectin for treatment.

イベルメクチンを否定する主張も根強い

 一方で、コロナ治療・予防にイベルメクチンを使うことに疑問を呈したり、反対する声が根強くあることは事実だ。筆者はイベルメクチン効果なしとする論文を3本読んだが、うち2本は研究者から臨床試験の方法に間違いがあると指摘されたものだ。それ以外に効果なしとする論文はないのではないか。

 確かに、「効果あり」としたエジプトの医師グループの論文が、データが 捏造 された疑いがあると指摘されて撤回されるといった事例もあった。しかし、前述の通り、イベルメクチンが新型コロナに効果ありとする論文の方が圧倒的に多い事実は揺るがない。イベルメクチンには副作用もほとんどなく、ジェネリックが行き渡っていて価格も安い。使ってみようという考えは無謀とはいえない。使用を否定することは、パンデミックへの対応策をつぶすことになりかねないのではないか。

While there are persistent claims that ivermectin is denied, it is true that there are persistent voices questioning or opposing the use of ivermectin for coronal treatment and prevention. I have read three papers that have no ivermectin effect, two of which were pointed out by researchers as erring in the way clinical trials are conducted. There might be no thesis which does not have the effect other than that. 

Indeed, there were cases where papers by egyptian doctors who said they were “effective” were withdrawn because they were pointed out that the data was suspected to have been fabricated. However, as mentioned above, the fact that there are overwhelmingly more papers that Ivermectin is effective for the new corona is unwavering. Ivermectin has few side effects, generics are all over the place, and the price is low. The idea of using it is not reckless. Denying its use could crush responses to pandemics.

日本版EUA法案成立に期待

田村厚生労働大臣は、国会で「適応外使用では今でも使用できる。医療機関で(イベルメクチンを)服用して自宅待機するという使用法もある」と答弁している。これが簡単にできるなら、東京都医師会はわざわざ「イベルメクチンを使用すべきだ」と主張する必要はないはずだ。

尾崎会長は「適応外使用では、副作用などで健康被害があっても救済制度の対象にはならないし、第一、処方してもモノがない」と語っている。ジェネリック製剤が使えるようにならない限り、イベルメクチンは現実的には「いつまでも使えない薬」であり続けてしまう。

その壁を越えるのが、医師でもある立憲民主党の中島克仁衆議院議員らが国会に提出した「日本版EUA整備法案」の成立だ。しかしいま、国会の休会で棚ざらしになったままだ。

Japan’s eua bill is expected to be enacted, and Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare Tamura told the Diet, “It can still be used for use outside of adaptation. There is also a use to take (ivermectin) at a medical institution and stay at home. “If this is easy to do, the Tokyo Medical Association should not have to insist that Ivermectin should be used. 

Chairman Ozaki says, “In non-adaptive use, even if there is a health hazard due to side effects, etc., it is not subject to the relief system, and first, there is no thing even if it prescribes it”. Unless generic formulations become possible, ivermectin will realistically continue to be a “drug that cannot be used forever.” 

Beyond that barrier is the enactment of the “Japanese version of the EUA Development Bill”, which was submitted to the Diet by Katsuhito Nakajima, a member of the House of Representatives of the Constitutional Democratic Party, who is also a doctor. However, it remains shelved by the holiday of the Diet now.

筆頭提案者の中島議員は「この法案を成立させれば、すべて解決します」と言う。疥癬治療薬のイベルメクチンがコロナ治療に使えるようになり、ジェネリック製剤の使用にも道が開け、副作用などの健康被害は救済できるようになる。これなら医師は積極的に処方するようになるだろう、と考えているのだ。

 日本国民全体に対するワクチン接種率は、1回目が約50%、2回目はまだ40%にも届いていない。国内で最大の地域人口を抱える東京都医師会の尾崎会長の最大の懸念は、重症患者を受け入れる医療施設の 逼迫 と、自宅療養者らが重症化して病態が急変することへの対応策だ。尾崎会長の言葉には、緊急にイベルメクチンを使えるようにするしかないという危機感がこもっていた。

 日本で発見されたイベルメクチンは、コロナ・パンデミックの「救世主」となる可能性を秘めている。これまでの世界の臨床試験報告を見ても、全く効かないということはあり得ない。インドをはじめ多くの国が、緊急的にイベルメクチンを投与して感染拡大を抑え込んだ実績がある。緊急時のいま、コロナ感染に使用することに 躊躇 する理由は見当たらない。私はイベルメクチンの活用は、決して「賭け」ではないと確信している。

Mr. Nakajima, the lead proponent, said, “If we pass this bill, we will solve everything.” Ivermectin, a scabies drug, can now be used to treat corona, opening up a path to the use of generic formulations and relief of side effects and other health hazards. They think this will make doctors more aggressive in prescribing it. 

The vaccination rate for the japanese people as a whole has not reached about 50% for the first time and 40% for the second time yet. The biggest concern of Ozaki, president of the Tokyo Medical Association, which has the largest regional population in Japan, is the tightness of medical facilities that accept critically ill patients and measures to prevent home recuperators from becoming more severe and their conditions suddenly changing. Chairman Ozaki’s words expressed a sense of urgency that he had no choice but to be able to use ivermectin urgently. 

Ivermectin found in Japan has the potential to be the “savior” of the coronal pandemic. Looking at the world’s clinical trial reports so far, it is unlikely that it will not work at all. Many countries, including India, have an urgent experience of administering ivermectin to suppress the spread of infection. In an emergency, I see no reason to hesitate to use it for coronal infection. I’m sure the use of ivermectin is never a “bet”.

Credit goes to Haruo Ozaki and Rensei Baba for this interview/report.

プロフィル
尾崎 治夫氏( おざき・はるお )
 おざき内科循環器科クリニック院長。疾病予防に有効なたばこ対策と要介護を未然に防ぐためのフレイル対策に特に力を入れてきた。東京都医師会長として政府や東京都、医療機関などに新型コロナ対策の要望や提言を続けている。順天堂大学卒、69歳。

Profile Haruo Ozaki Director, Ozaki Internal Medicine Cardiology Clinic. We have been particularly focusing on tobacco control effective for disease prevention and frail measures to prevent nursing care before they are required. As chairman of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government, he continues to make requests and proposals for new corona countermeasures to the government, Tokyo Metropolitan Government, and medical institutions.Graduated from Juntendo University, aged 69.

プロフィル
馬場 錬成氏( ばば・れんせい )
 1940年生まれ。読売新聞社社会部、科学部、解説部を経て論説委員。退社後は東京理科大学知財専門職大学院教授、早稲田大学客員教授、文部科学省科学技術・学術政策研究所客員研究官、内閣府総合科学技術会議委員などを歴任。現在、認定NPO法人・21世紀構想研究会理事長。「大丈夫か 日本のもの作り」(プレジデント社)、「大丈夫か 日本の特許戦略」(同)、「ノーベル賞の100年」(中公新書)、「大村智 2億人を病魔から守った化学者」(中央公論新社)、「知財立国が危ない」(共著:日本経済新聞出版社)ほか著書多数。

Profile Mr. Rensei Baba Was born in 1940. After studying at the Yomiuri Shimbun’s Social, Science, and Commentary Departments, he became an editorial board member. After leaving the company, he served as a professor at the Graduate School of Intellectual Property Professionals at Tokyo University of Science, a visiting professor at Waseda University, a visiting researcher at the Institute for Science and Technology Policy of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and a member of the Council for Science and Technology Policy of the Cabinet Office. Currently, he is the president of the 21st Century Conception Society, a certified NPO.

He has written many books, including “All Right or Japanese Making” (President), “Is It Okay or Japan’s Patent Strategy” (Same), “100 Years of the Nobel Prize” (Nakako Shin book), “Satoshi Omura, chemist who protected 200 million people from disease” (ChuoKoron Shinsha), and “Intellectual Property State Is Dangerous” (co-author: Nihon Keizai Shimbun Publishing Co., Ltd.).

Again, while I do not agree with everything stated in the above interview, I do agree with the consensus that there is a worldwide suppression of this treatment.

It is interesting getting the perspective from those in other countries, especially in contrast (comparison) to that of the United States, for one. The similarities of Dr. Ozaki’s concerns echoing that of several frontline doctors/healthcare workers and virologists with their struggles in getting an already approved medicine in the hands of patients that might need them, is a huge testament to the strange conflict we see between several health organizations recommending and showing benefits of this treatment, to that of the “powerhouse” industries [WHO, NIH, FDA, CDC, etc.] and the various governments that are refusing to acknowledge the ivermectin studies.

As Dr. Ozaki states: “But [Merck] says ivermectin doesn’t work, so there shouldn’t be any need to limit the supply. If it doesn’t work, there’s no demand. It looks like we’re blocking supply because we believe it’s going to work.”

This is rather chilling. It is implying, in not so subtle terms, that the supply of Ivermectin is being blocked ON PURPOSE because “they” think it will work in treating COVID. …This is a speculation that many are having, because to continue to deny the efficacy and safety of a drug that has been used for decades, yet suddenly make the drug harder and harder to access, ESPECIALLY after it was shown to be effective against COVID… Something tells me that it has NOTHING to do with our health.

Please continue to stay informed and keep doing research. Thank you for reading, and thank you to those who are speaking up and voicing your concerns instead of just following along with the establishments. God bless.