The Super-Capitalists’ Depopulation Agenda

Please share and spread awareness.

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca | The Super-Capitalists’ Depopulation Agenda by Peter Koenig (May 17, 2021)

(Please visit and follow them on Instagram @crg_globalresearch.)

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

The masters behind covid-19 have designed the perfect WWIII scenario. No need for a war that destroys the infrastructure. The fear-mongering and coerced vaxxing apparatus is and will be massively sterilizing as well as resulting in mortality:

“More people, according to VAERS, have died after getting the shot in four months during a single vaccination campaign than from all other vaccines combined over more than a decade and a half.”

“The U.K.’s government vaccine adverse event system has collected more 2,200 reports of reproductive disorders after coronavirus injections, including excessive or absent menstrual bleeding, delayed menstruation, vaginal hemorrhaging, miscarriages, and stillbirths.” (Quoted in Koenig on Depopulation)

The article below is a followup on a previous article by Peter Koenig entitled:

The Corona Crisis: Has “Depopulation” Already Begun?

*

We are at the cross-roads of falling into the fangs of a diabolical super-capitalist “cult” that wants to decimate massively our world population. In fact, it has already started.

And what these “diabolical elites” usually do, is to announce their “horror plans” in advance in the form of  “scenario planning” and “simulations”.  And they did. We cannot say we were not told.

Let me just list a few instances where and when we were told that a “depopulation cum genocide” is part of a planned agenda.

1. The 2o10 Rockefeller Report entitled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development– pointed already more than 10 years ago to the “Lockstep Scenario” – which we are in right now, plus three more sinister scenarios. Preparation for this report – and the well-laid out plan started decades before. In its introduction, the report says,

“We believe that scenario planning has great potential for use in philanthropy to identify unique interventions, simulate and rehearse important decisions that could have profound implications, and highlight previously undiscovered areas of connection and intersection” …..

“The results of our first scenario planning exercise demonstrate a provocative and engaging exploration of the role of technology and the future of globalization….”

I believe it is not a coincidence that 9 years later, the so-called Event 201, sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation – BMGF (a close associate of the Rockefellers), the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine – JHSM (created and funded by The Rockefellers) and the World Economic Forum – WEF (a consortium of neoliberal capitalist entrepreneurs and thinkers), computer-simulated the first scenario outlines by the Rockefeller Report, the “Lockstep Scenario”, a corona virus outbreak creating worldwide havoc, killing 65 million people in 18 months, and destroying / destabilizing a large part of the world economy, creating misery, famine and death.

Although there is no direct reference to the clear eugenics agenda of the R-Report, its focus is on how philanthropy may help shape the future of the poor, of developing countries. There is enough insinuation to conclude that one of the tools to help is population reduction. See the following in the Introduction section:

“The results of our first scenario planning exercise demonstrate a provocative and engaging exploration of the role of technology and the future of globalization ….”

And

“…. how can we best position ourselves not just to identify technologies that improve the lives of poor communities but also to help scale (emphasis by author) and spread those that emerge? And how will the social, technological, economic, environmental, and political conditions of the future enable or inhibit our ability to do so?”

2. Event 201, organized by JHSM, simulated the coming Corona Crisis on 18 October 2019 in New York City.

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/videos.html

The main purpose of Event 201 was computer-simulating precisely what began a few months later in Wuhan, China, and is happening today.

It is what the R-Report referred to as scaling the population? And that in the presence of the famous and powerful, representatives of the highest levels of the UN, WHO, IMF, World Bank UNICEF, CDC, FDA, EU / EC, and many more.

For those who don’t know, the JHSM was created and is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation – a key propagator of eugenics. The Rockefellers already supported Hitler and his eugenics agenda, by supplying the Third Reich with petroleum to sustain its economy and, especially, to invade the Soviet Union, to destroy the capitalist threat of communism. Alas, they failed. (See analysis of historian Dr. Jacques Pauwels, The Myth of a Good War)

3. Henry Kissinger’s 1974  National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM200)– stating population growth as a national security threat. The report is still valid, more than ever – and its implementation in full swing.

While the report does not contain a direct quote of population reduction or otherwise a direct reference to a eugenics agenda, it is multiple times insinuated by referring to population growth being a “National Security Threat”, a State Department lingo for “controlling overpopulation”, i.e., reducing population.

Kissinger’s himself often infamously said:

Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money, controls the world.”

Well, Bill Gates and many of his billionaire cronies are working on food control, world wide, but especially beginning in the US, where Gates has become the largest private landowner of the United States with at least 242,000 acres (about 980 square kilometers) of American farmland, spread over several states.

4. Klaus Schwab’s (WEF founder and CEO for life) “The Great Reset” describes in detail what is to happen to humanity in the coming ten years, also called the UN Agenda 2030, with the infamous concluding quote, by 2030 “You will own nothing, and you will be happy”.

video “You’ll own nothing, And you’ll be happy.”

Again, there is no direct reference to a coming depopulation of the world.

However, in an interesting 2016 interview with Swiss French TV, Klaus Schwab talks about implanting microchips:

“What we see is a kind of fusion of the physical, digital and biological world”.

The referenced section of the interview was summarized in a 2 minutes youtube on 16 May 2021


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dg6BlXuj8cM .

These statements in 2016 clearly announce The Great Reset, with all its consequences, where Artificial Intelligence (AI) merges with humankind, whereby “human survivors” become fully controlled “transhumans”, responding to outside computer signals.

There is no limit of what such computer signals can do to humans, aka, “transhumans” – a term first invented by Klaus Schwab in his book, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution”.

Later he refers to covid-19  as “The pandemic [which] represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world”.

In other words, the world that we tirelessly built together for decades is no longer viable and satisfactory. Let’s scrap it and reconstruct it altogether as soon as possible.

What he doesn’t say, but is implicit in his Great Reset, is that his new world, a One World Order, will be reigned by a tyranny of an all-possessing few billionaire oligarchs. The infamous conclusion of the Great Reset is “You will own nothing, and you will be happy.”

5. The Georgia Guidestones, a granite monument,  “anonymously” erected in 1980 in Elbert County, Georgia, in the US of A, speaks for itself.

The monument makes ten predictions, of which the first one is “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”.

Given today’s world population of about 7.7 billion (2019), this implies a reduction of almost 95%. We can only hope that this remains but a pipedream. For details on the Guidestones monument see here

Concluding Remarks 

And there are many more signals which we may have heard of, or vaguely perceived, but soon forgotten. Some of them, like the full contents of the WEF’s Great Reset – is so horrifying that many who heard of it, or even read it, simply discard it, as unreal.

That’s a mistake. You should take note and realize this is a diabolical plan. BUT you should not be afraid – NEVER – instead bond together, with our spiritual and human positive-thinking power we can vibrate with the light – and overcome.

The crossroads dilemma is – do we accept this diabolical project, or do we choose the light?

Choosing the light, the truth – might be much more uncomfortable than “sticking with the darkness”, the lies we have been told and tolerated for so many years.

Choosing the light, the truth makes us strong, makes us swing on a high frequency.  But it requires togetherness and perseverance – the reinvention of the term “solidarity” – and spirituality. And we will.

For more details, see:

The Corona Crisis: Has “Depopulation” Already Begun?

By Peter Koenig, May 12, 2021

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he has worked for over 30 years on water and environment around the world. He lectures at universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly for online journals and is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; and  co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020);

He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.

Featured image is from Children’s Health Defense

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

WORLD PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY! Stop Big Pharma’s DNA “Vaccine” Experiment! - “Mass Vaccination will Breed Dangerous Variants & Destroy Our Immunity” — Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD
Dr. Peter McCullough / John Leake – Full Interview [Transcript] - Renowned doctor exposes worldwide covid treatment suppression and corruption of the medical and governmental agencies.
Anthony Fauci’s Wife: Christine Grady – Hidden Face of the Vaccine Trials? - What is Christine Grady's role in the vaccine agenda?
REPOST: Proof that the Pandemic Was Planned With a Purpose - Many connections involving complicit huge name individuals and organizations.
FLASHBACK | COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci - A look into Anthony Fauci's involvement into medical/health corruption.
David Goldberg’s FINAL WORDS: Project Pogo and Project Zyphr | Full Transcript - Extermination effort and implementation of a world government.
“America’s Pastor” Billy Graham Exposed - Exposing Graham's ties to freemasonry and their agendas.

Youtube To Get Rid of Dislike Button – As an “Experiment”

More media manipulation.

If it wasn’t obvious before how much youtube manipulates viewers’ opinions, maybe this will finally shed some light on the matter.

Not only do we have facebook, who has admitted outright that it was experimenting on its users:

Facebook manipulated users’ moods in secret experiment

(Keep in mind, this experiment was allegedly done in 2012, with word coming out in 2014 about the results. Imagine what they have been doing since then…)

but we also have other big tech conglomerates engaging in mass experimentation with its users in order to steer public opinion.

Youtube to hide the dislike count is only one of them.

I made this post: Youtube Trigger Words, a couple of weeks ago, and it explains how there are certain suspicious words that will initiate an information panel to “guide” the viewers to additional information (that supposedly come from a third party – but that youtube obviously recommends. Again – in order to manipulate viewers’ opinions…)

And these words are of a highly controversial, and conspiratorial nature. It brings to mind why youtube would go to such measures to implement this system on such a small amount of very specific trigger words. Could they be working with organizations that are attempting to “debunk” certain theories and speculations? …You be the judge. (And then the question becomes ‘why’? If these subjects and theories are so ridiculous and outlandish, why spend so much time and effort into ‘debunking’ these topics? It seems as if more and more people are starting to believe it, and it damages certain organizations’ reputations and credibility. That would be a very good reason to target and manipulate people who aren’t onboard with the official narrative.)

And now, with the experiment of removing the dislike count (oh, but don’t worry. You can still press the “dislike” button, according to the youtube spokesperson, but you just can’t see it. Only the creators of the video can see the results.) it is only another agenda in order to sway public opinion. And/or a way to suppress people’s opinions. And it is unclear at this moment, if the “like” results will be hidden as well. If not, then obviously only the LIKE results will be shown, while the DISLIKE results will be seen with NO dislikes. But it couldn’t possibly be an effort to skew the public’s opinion on what’s good content and what’s not… right?

Let’s take the speculation of the current US presidency results, for example.

Youtube has already been caught removing some of the dislikes from The White House channel. These screenshots were taken from reclaimthenet.org: YouTube scrubs thousands of dislikes from Joe Biden videos on official White House channel where you can see many more examples.

Let’s say that youtube is initiating this “experiment” because of the incredible amounts of dislikes that The White House youtube channel has been receiving due to the 2020 presidency.

Is it a targeted dislike campaign, like youtube is suggesting? Or is it simply people expressing their sincere dislike of being fooled and manipulated into believing that Joe Biden actually won the presidency fair and square? And even if he did win the election fairly, people are allowed to express their disappointment of the current president’s handling, are they not? And if they disagree with the president’s statements, then they are allowed to have their own opinions and thoughts on the matter, are they not?

Or is everyone expected to just fall in line with what many see as an egregious over-step on the voters’ rights and who most suspect of election fraud? (…Which, by the way, “U.S. Elections” just so happens to be a “trigger word” on youtube that initiates an information bar on certain videos.)

And what gives youtube the right to alter the like/dislike algorithm to begin with? Sure, it’s their platform, but then they can’t say that they’re not attempting a deliberately targeting “like campaign” to counter the “dislike campaign”. Or to even apply to any video they want. Again, just like with facebook’s experimentation on their users, it might just boil down to manipulating and steering people’s moods, opinions, and thought patterns. Which is exactly the goal.

I do want to make this clear, I am not for Trump or Biden. I think most politicians are corrupt. But taking away the people’s voice – because not only is youtube taking away the dislike counter on some videos “as an experiment”, but there is of course the option to disable comments as well. Even though each content creator has their own option to do so, to disable comments on a widely used platform geared to present important information to the public by the government, but then take away the public’s ability to express their own opinions and disagreements, is completely against the democracy that the government was supposedly built upon. (And they call themselves democrats?)

We are not living in a democratic society. Or even a republican one. Everything that you are witnessing is the result of an ARISTOCRACY – and we have most likely been living in one for most of our lives.

And for other controversial circumstances that could have added to youtube’s decision to remove the DISLIKE counter, is the entire coronavirus situation and the debate surrounding the efficacy of the vaccine and mask mandates (along with other several different issues), and the general disagreement to the Klaus Schwab, World Economics Forum’s “great reset” proposal.

Both of these topics have been heavily opposed with many people expressing their distrust and suspicions regarding these institutions.

Of course with so many shady practices and everyone in each other’s back pockets,

YouTube CEO Says They’ll Censor Content Not In Line With World Health Org
The World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization are launching an emergency coronavirus task force of 200 business leaders — including execs from Alphabet and KPMG
A timeline of the great reset agenda: from foundation to Event 201 and the pandemic of 2020

these big industries are obviously trying to protect each other, and what better way to do this than to silence dissent and make it appear as if no one is against these agendas?

As we can see from just these three links, we have youtube partnering with WHO, which youtube’s own CEO Susan Wojcicki has explicity stated that “anything that would go against World Health Organization [WHO] recommendations would be a violation of our policy” and would therefore be classified as “misinformation”.

And then from there, we can see a whole camaraderie between the biggest establishments running the current covid situation at the moment.

The WHO, partnering with not only youtube but also the WEF, who has partnered with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who have partnered with Anthony Fauci’s NIAID, and so on and so forth. All of which are highly involved in pushing this vaccine mandate/”new normal”/great reset dictatorship scheme, and trying to get everyone to follow along.

This is no accident, and no mere coincidence. Everything has a purpose and a meaning.

Because George Carlin said it best (rest his soul) and it is still very relevant, here is a transcript of part of his infamous Big Club speech (emphasis added – and strong language ahead) :

“The real owners, the big, wealthy business interests control things and make all the important decisions – forget the politicians – the politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice.

You don’t. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls – they got the judges in their back pockets and they own all the big media companies so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear.

They got you by the balls! They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying, lobbying to get what they want!

Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. But I’ll tell you what they don’t want.

They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests.

That’s right.

They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly they’re getting f***ed by a system that threw them overboard thirty f***ing years ago. They don’t want that.

You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly sh**tier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours to reduce benefits, the end of overtime, the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it and now they’re coming for your Social Security money. They want your f***ing retirement money. They want it back. So they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They’ll get it. They’ll get it all from you sooner or later, ’cause they own this f***ing place.

It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it!

You and I, are not in the “big club”.

By the way, it’s the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe – all day long, beating you over the head in their media, telling you what to believe, what to think, and what to buy. (both literally, and figuratively…)

The table is tilted, folks.The game is rigged. And nobody seems to notice, and nobody seems to care. Good, honest, hard-working people – white-collor, blue-collar, doesn’t matter what color shirt you have on – good, honest, hard-working people continue – these are people of modest means – continue to elect these rich c**k-s**kers who don’t give a f*** about them. They don’t give a f*** about you. They don’t give a f*** about you! They don’t care about you, at all! At all! At all!

…(small excerpt taken out due to content)…

The owners of this country know the truth. It’s called the American dream… because you have to be asleep to believe it.” – George Carlin

The key point to all of this is to be self-aware. Think critically, think for yourself, and stop letting all of these corrupt agencies/big tech media corporations think for us.

Like what you like, not because of what other people say or how the supposed majority thinks and feels, but because you are confident enough in yourself to know who you are and what your own individual personal likes and dislikes are. As long as it’s not hurting anyone, you should feel complete within your own self to not care what other people think and instead stick to the truth of what you like and your own opinions, and not so easily cave into societal pressure or demand.

This is the goal of big tech and businesses. They push their agenda on the population to get as many people on board as they possibly can, and if that doesn’t work, then they skewer and manipulate the public opinion to coerce others either through fake popularity, and through bots and shills – which are a very real media manipulation tactic.

Maybe we can better learn to support and socialize with one another in real life and still be able to expose injustices and ridiculous propaganda, since these companies are deadset in taking away our capability to do this online. And help each other to learn to build our awareness in order to realize when we’re ultimately being taken for a ride.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by mohamed Hassan from Pixabay (with some slight alterations).

Get an Earful

WORLD PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY! Stop Big Pharma’s DNA “Vaccine” Experiment! - “Mass Vaccination will Breed Dangerous Variants & Destroy Our Immunity” — Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD
Dr. Peter McCullough / John Leake – Full Interview [Transcript] - Renowned doctor exposes worldwide covid treatment suppression and corruption of the medical and governmental agencies.
Anthony Fauci’s Wife: Christine Grady – Hidden Face of the Vaccine Trials? - What is Christine Grady's role in the vaccine agenda?
REPOST: Proof that the Pandemic Was Planned With a Purpose - Many connections involving complicit huge name individuals and organizations.
FLASHBACK | COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci - A look into Anthony Fauci's involvement into medical/health corruption.
David Goldberg’s FINAL WORDS: Project Pogo and Project Zyphr | Full Transcript - Extermination effort and implementation of a world government.
“America’s Pastor” Billy Graham Exposed - Exposing Graham's ties to freemasonry and their agendas.

Anthony Fauci Caught ‘Lying’ – Several Times

Science doesn’t lie. But people sure do.

What is “science”?

SCIENCE:
 
1. a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws.
2. systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.
3. any of the branches of natural or physical science.
4. systematized knowledge in general.
5. knowledge, as of facts or principles; knowledge gained by systematic study.
6. a particular branch of knowledge.
7. any skill or technique that reflects a precise application of facts or principles.

Science is a set of facts and principles gained from knowledge and study into the experience and observation of the physical/material world.

FACTS. TRUTHS. PRINCIPLES.

I know I’m not the only one questioning why “science” seems to be changing at the whim of a small few. And who do we have at the helm of it all? Especially during these very confusing/controversial covid times?

Anthony Fauci, NIH, WHO, FDA and the CDC. (All “gold-standard, leading experts” that ironically are shifting, changing, removing what “science” has defined throughout all these years.)

Even his very own statements about science should shed some light on what science is supposed to be: “He added, “So, when they see someone up in the White House, which has an air of authority to it, who’s talking about science, that there are some people who just don’t believe that — and that’s unfortunate because, you know, science is truth. … If you go by the evidence and by the data, you’re speaking the truth.”
Anthony Fauci lied about masks; now he complains that people ‘distrust authority’

Yes. “If you go by the evidence and by the data, you’re speaking the truth.” – not if you’re making it up and changing it as you go along because it suits a particular agenda.

Let’s see how many times Mr. Dr. Expert Anthony Fauci and the co-horts of this agenda were caught lying or “changing” goalposts/rules and even the very definition of what herd immunity means (keep in mind, this is just a very small sample out of many) :

Wearing a mask:

1. Feb. 17 (2020): Fauci told USA Today that wearing a mask is for the infected to protect others. “Now, in the United States, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to wear a mask.
The Fauci Timeline — Sorting Fact From Fiction

2. March 2020: “When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences — people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face,” said Fauci at that time.
FLASHBACK: Dr. Fauci claims masks don’t provide COVID protection, only help people ‘feel…better’

3. In June 2020, Fauci admitted that he and other public health officials had downplayed the benefit of masks — with some even advising against wearing them — because of a fear of equipment shortages for front-line health care workers.
Dr. Anthony Fauci Admits Shifting Goalposts on ‘Herd Immunity’

4. September 2020: “At that point, which is now months and months ago, I have been on the airways, on the radio, on TV, begging people to wear masks. And I keep talking in the context of wear a mask, keep physical distance, avoid crowds, wash your hands and do things more outdoors versus indoors.”

Fauci says Trump took his stance on masks ‘out of context’ during debate

5. By October (2020), Dr. Fauci had completely reversed course on mask-wearing, saying that it may be time to impose a nationwide mask-wearing mandate, something he termed “universal mask-wearing.”

“Well, if people are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandating it,” Fauci told CNN’s Erin Burnett Oct. 23.
FLASHBACK: Dr. Fauci claims masks don’t provide COVID protection, only help people ‘feel…better’

From a personal opinion: I want to point out how adamant Anthony Fauci is about flouting wearing a mask, yet here, he is not wearing one throughout his entire speech. Doesn’t he realize how far his droplets are landing? Not to mention that at the 19 minute mark we see press secretary Jen Psaki take the stand, without wiping down the potentially dangerous, deadly virus that Anthony Fauci could have been dispensing all over the podium.

Including that is the fact that Jen Psaki then takes her face masks (because, “double the protection”…) off as well, and flips it mouth-side down on the very podium that expert Anthony Fauci was just speaking at and spreading his germs. At the very end of the video, Jen is seen putting the mask back on, after letting it sit and fester on top of the stand that Dr. Fauci was just speaking over.

What has our common sense been reduced to?

Herd immunity:

6. Earlier on in the pandemic, Fauci had said the United States would need 60 to 70 percent of people to be vaccinated in order to reach herd immunity, according to the Times.
REPORT: Fauci Admits He Lied Because ‘Country Wasn’t Ready’ To Hear The Truth

7. Dr Fauci’s estimate for reaching herd immunity has been steadily inching up, @nytimes’ Donald McNeil Jr reports. Fauci told us at last week’s @CNBC #HealthyReturns that it may be 75-85%. https://t.co/j18nUYZ3cV pic.twitter.com/hIKewMAFim

— Meg Tirrell (@megtirrell) December 24, 2020
REPORT: Fauci Admits He Lied Because ‘Country Wasn’t Ready’ To Hear The Truth

8. “When polls said only about half of all Americans would take a vaccine, I was saying herd immunity would take 70 to 75 percent,” Fauci told the Times. “Then, when newer surveys said 60 percent or more would take it, I thought, ʻI can nudge this up a bit,’ so I went to 80, 85.”

“We need to have some humility here,” he added. “We really don’t know what the real number is. I think the real range is somewhere between 70 to 90 percent. But, I’m not going to say 90 percent.”
Fauci doubles down after being confronted over startling admission that he deceived the public about herd immunity

We even have the WHO, who is constantly changing / “updating” their definition for what herd immunity means depending on the alleged “new” results and information that they determine from their studies.

Another change, once again, on December 21, 2020:

Yet another "update" explaining their change in definition.

Very suspect, Anthony Fauci and WHO. Very suspect.

And perhaps because of this exposure, they felt the need to “clarify”, this time taking into account not only the vaccines that they heap enormous praise and focus on, but this time alluding to the Samaritan goodness of their hearts that they do not feel as if herd immunity should be achieved by exposing people to the virus. But instead by using the vaccine. (Because they care so much.)

The question then is, who is going to protect us from the vaccine if/when it turns out (since new information comes out all the time…) that the vaccine was not as “safe and effective” as they once thought? Their inclusion that “WHO will continue to update these answers as new information becomes available.” leaves the door wide open to skirt away from any responsibility of the side effects of the vaccine due to not enough foresight because of the ever-evolving nature of this new virus and the vaccine that has yet to be studied thoroughly for long-term safety and effectiveness.

The argument then possibly becomes that their sincere effort to “save humanity” from this deadly pandemic overrides the vaccine effectiveness because of the huge demand to save the population (let’s not get into the depopulation agenda of Bill Gates – in which he and Anthony Fauci are close friends – and others… although, by all means, please research this to gain more information) and that they honestly, truly, genuinely sought to cure us all from this virus. The tragic outcome of the vaccine that they “earnestly” thought was for the benefit of the people would be unprecedented and the blame would then go to, again, the changing nature of the virus and/or our immune response system not adhering well to their honest-to-goodness efforts.

Sorry, but, I’m not buying it.

Asymptomatic vs. Symptomatic

9. January 2020: “But the one thing historically that people need to realize is that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory viruses of any type asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there is a rare symptomatic transmission that may transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.
Here Is a Video of Fauci Explaining in January 2020 That Asymptomatic Transmission Is NEVER the Driver of Outbreaks

10. June 2020: Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove: “We’re constantly looking at this data, and we’re trying to get more information from countries to truly answer this question,” she added. “It still appears to be rare that an asymptomatic individual actually transmits onward.”

Anthony Fauci: “We know from epidemiological studies they can transmit to someone who is uninfected even when they’re without symptoms,” Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told ABC’s “Good Morning America” on Wednesday. “So to make a statement to say that’s a rare event was not correct.”
Fauci says asymptomatic coronavirus transmission is possible following WHO confusion

11. September 2020: “I can tell you right now that we should be testing more and we should be testing asymptomatic people,” Fauci told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes on Thursday night. “Take that to the bank and trust me on it.”
CDC reverses course on testing asymptomatic people for Covid-19, again

The PCR / covid tests:

12. Yet a PCR test instruction document from the CDC that had been revised five times as of July 13, 2020, specified testing and interpretation of the test using a Ct of 40. On September 28, 2020, a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases from Jaafar et al. had asserted, based on patient labs and clinical data involving nearly 4,000 patients, that a Ct of 30 was appropriate for making public policy. An update to the CDC instructions for PCR testing from December 1, 2020, still uses a Ct of 40.
The WHO Finally Updates Its COVID-19 Testing Policy… One Hour After Biden’s Inauguration

13. Anthony Fauci (July 16, 2020): “…If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…it’s just dead nucleoids, period.”
Fauci Himself Admits Covid PCR Test at Over 35 Cycles Is Deceitful, Worse Than Useless

14. Article published on September 30, 2020: The reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test used to identify those people infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus uses a nasal swab to collect RNA from deep within the nasal cavity of the individual being tested. The RNA is reverse transcribed into DNA and amplified through 40 or more cycles, or until virus is detected. The result is reported as a simple “yes” or “no” answer to the question of whether someone is infected.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials state they do not specify the cycle threshold ranges used to determine who is positive, and that commercial manufacturers and laboratories set their own threshold ranges.

Any test with a cycle threshold (CT) above 35 is too sensitive, says Juliet Morrison, PhD, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 [cycles] could represent a positive.” A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35, she added. Dr. Mina said he would set the figure at 30, or even less.

Coronavirus Cases Plummet When PCR Tests Are Adjusted

Yikes. There is so much wrong with these examples. Who is in charge, again? The labs/manufacturers can set their own threshold? Yet officials wouldn’t recommend anything higher than 35? Or even 30? Even Anthony Fauci, who finally wasn’t lying about the amount of cycles? Yet at what threshold were all of these tests being done to crank out all of these false positives that are, again, just now being addressed and changed? The FDA recommended threshold of 40 or as many as it takes “until virus is detected“?

Then pair that up with what Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test had to say:
“I don’t think you can misuse PCR. [It is] the results; the interpretation of it. If they can find this virus in you at all – and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”
Dr. Fauci admits the PCR test for coronavirus is all but useless as it is administered in the US

15. Dr. David Samadi (January 21, 2021): The World Health Organization has now released guidance to laboratories around the world to reduce the cycle count in PCR tests to get a more accurate representation of COVID cases.

The current cycle was much too high and resulting in any particle being declared a positive case.

The WHO notice concluded by suggesting that “most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.”
World Health Organization updates PCR test guidelines

So apparently all this time they weren’t assessing all of the other necessary relative data needed to confirm a positive case, and instead ran as many cycles as they possibly could to detect the virus – against the numerous prompts of the medical community who said all along that this was a huge oversight – meanwhile suspiciously cranking out positive numbers for the media to drool over. And as some people have pointed out, all of these new changes are “coincidentally” just in time to greet the new president as an illusion of control and miraculously reduced numbers of positive coronavirus cases. (Or it’s due to the fantastic work of the rushed vaccine – or both.)

Hydroxychloroquine

16. The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.

So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump street? He didn’t even launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9 (2020), by which time 33,000 people had died.

Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 — nobody needed to die

17. August 12, 2020: Since the start of the pandemic, hundreds of doctors have successfully used hydroxychloroquine to treat patients symptomatic of COVID-19 infections. In frustration at the media negativity about this safe, effective medicine American doctors have sent an open letter to Dr Fauci raising their concerns.
Doctors Send Open Letter to Fauci About HCQ COVID Cure

Other doubts from multiple outlets about the supposed “expert” decisions of those in charge:

Up until COVID hit in 2020, neither WHO nor the CDC had ever considered a single positive PCR test sufficient for diagnosing viral infection.

TOTAL COINCIDENCE ALERT: C19 Diagnostic Criteria Tightened by WHO on Biden Inauguration Day!

Sen. Marco Rubio just called out Anthony Fauci in a penned piece posted on Fox News as a lying liar who arrogantly used his position as the nation’s top infectious disease bureaucrat to lie to the American people “in order to manipulate their behavior.”

“[P]lacing blind faith in unelected celebrity scientists,” Rubio warned, “has its limits, and we must not be afraid to call them out when they’re caught overstepping their legitimate authority.”

Anthony Fauci’s ‘lying’ is hardly surprising

Also, the nation’s testing data has been called into question, as this week the CDC and 11 states were forced to admit that they were mixing testing results in a way that might make the data less useful in assessing the rate of the disease’s spread.

If it isn’t the nation’s mood, nor the science, could it be… politics?

Did Anthony Fauci Get Out-Foxed? Why His Reversal On Reopening Is So Troubling

Mea culpa: I spent a lot of time on these here digital pages defending Dr. Anthony Fauci. Brother, was I wrong. Fauci is a stone-cold liar. And if he’s not a stone-cold liar, his only defense is that he is a fraud. Either way, shame on him … and me.

Nolte: Dr. Fauci Is Either a Liar or a Fraud

Why all the changing rules contradicting those of other scientists/doctors?

One would think if an expert in his field had any real experience and knowledge about viruses, transmission, etc., that their “rules” would not keep changing based on the “popular view” or pressure to conform to what politics demands. With the “leadership” blaming all of the changes on this new virus/pandemic and that they have to adjust their position based on new findings/studies about it, it makes one wonder why their (the leading expert’s) initial view was so out of touch compared with the MANY other doctors/scientists who were saying all along that masks don’t work, lockdowns don’t work, we don’t need a vaccine because HCQ works and ivermectin, etc., etc., etc.

So again I ask you… what makes the NIH, CDC, WHO experts so much more knowledgeable about this ‘virus’, if they have been wrong countless times and only changing their views (they claim: “based on new findings”) if all of the scientists and doctors they were trying to silence this whole time due to “misinformation” and “false news” were RIGHT ALL ALONG?

What makes these few “leading experts”, who have been proven wrong time and time again, and who has changed their mind, time and time again, so much more authoritative and knowledgeable about this coronavirus situation than the numerous other doctors and scientists who have been right from the very beginning? The very same scientists and doctors who have been gaslighted and ridiculed, censored and banned, doxxed and attacked for sticking to their values and scientific findings that these other so-called “leading experts” are just now admitting are correct?

Why aren’t Fauci and the rest of the government alphabet crew (NIH, WHO, CDC, FDA, etc.) labeled as “misinformation” and “false news” when they were peddling all of their uncertain information to begin with; yet the actual scientific facts and findings of the medical community were called into question? Should the media who helped propagate these incorrect assessments be held liable as well?

How many people could have been saved if the world leaders (far be it for me to imply that some (most?) are in on a huge conspiratorial agenda…) would have listened to the multiple doctors and scientists/researchers advice instead of those at the head of these (quite possibly corrupt) funded agencies?

Has Anthony Fauci been lying this whole time (blaming citing ‘new information’) and just changing the goal posts to suit some other purpose?

PCR Inventory Kary Mullis on “Dr” Fauci:

He should not be in the position like he’s in.

Those guys have got an agenda. Which is not, what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to – and they smugly – like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”

“You can’t expect the sheep, to really respect the best and the brightest. They don’t know the difference, really. I mean, I like humans, don’t get me wrong, but, basically, there is a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn’t a really good scientist. I mean, that’s a problem, that’s a main problem, actually with science, I’d say in this century, because scientists being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don’t understand it.”

President of the University of South Carolina asked Fauci if he’d come down there and debate me on stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody who was, from the other side, to come down there and balance my – because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that’s going to tell me the other side. But Fauci didn’t want to do it…

An interesting piece from 1994 on Kary Mullis and his views on a couple of questionable individuals:

In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.

The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.

But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done.

“I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.”

He pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.”

(Kary Mullis)
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus

It seems as if this self-described “ass” actually has a heart of gold and was trying to expose possible corruption as early as the 1990’s.

As Celia Farber, the interviewer, mentions: “One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears.

Sadly Kary Mullis passed away on August 17, 2019, allegedly from pneumonia. Just weeks away from when Event 201 took place in October 2019, and a few more weeks from when an actual “surprise outbreak” erupted, allegedly as early as November 2019. And just a couple of months after that, we have the PCR tests that Mr. Kary Mullis himself invented and was against using for viral detection, being used (and abused) for viral detection en masse – at the behest of the “expert scientists”.

Science doesn’t lie. But people sure do.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Peggy und Marco Lachmann-Anke from Pixabay

Get an Earful

WORLD PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY! Stop Big Pharma’s DNA “Vaccine” Experiment! - “Mass Vaccination will Breed Dangerous Variants & Destroy Our Immunity” — Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD
Dr. Peter McCullough / John Leake – Full Interview [Transcript] - Renowned doctor exposes worldwide covid treatment suppression and corruption of the medical and governmental agencies.
Anthony Fauci’s Wife: Christine Grady – Hidden Face of the Vaccine Trials? - What is Christine Grady's role in the vaccine agenda?
REPOST: Proof that the Pandemic Was Planned With a Purpose - Many connections involving complicit huge name individuals and organizations.
FLASHBACK | COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci - A look into Anthony Fauci's involvement into medical/health corruption.
David Goldberg’s FINAL WORDS: Project Pogo and Project Zyphr | Full Transcript - Extermination effort and implementation of a world government.
“America’s Pastor” Billy Graham Exposed - Exposing Graham's ties to freemasonry and their agendas.