Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT)

Dr. Pierre Kory: “And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”

On January 24, 2022, Senator Ron Johnson held a panel discussion with several highly acknowledged doctors and medical experts, as well as testimonial accounts from witnesses, describing the medical tyranny and corruption that has been unleashed since “COVID-19” hit. The conference was ~5 hours long, and as Senator Ron Johnson put it, “we didn’t even scratch the surface of what we need to discuss”, because there is just so much data and information to be exposed.

In the highlight video below, some of the key points have been addressed, and have been transcribed including timestamps for easier search and maneuverability.

While there will likely be some disagreements to some of the assertions that have been stated (some question the legitimacy of COVID, for one, since it has been speculated that it is a rebranding of the flu and marketed to be deadlier in order to push the vaccines, and whether we’re even in a “pandemic” – or ever was, etc.) the number one thing that most of the members of this panel have concluded upon, is that the measures and protocols put in place by the government and health agencies, namely the CDC, NIH and FDA, have either failed miserably, and/or was implemented on purpose for ulterior reasons – and the “COVID vaccines” are not only unnecessary, but are also causing an unprecedented amount of injuries and death.

Many thanks to the speakers at this event, and to Senator Ron Johnson for giving them a platform to discuss the suspicious nature of what has been happening due to this COVID/vaccine narrative.

The video below has been transcribed in full. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

To watch the full version, please go here.

Source: rumble | Senator Ron Johnson | COVID-19: A Second Opinion (Shorter Highlight Video)

Senator Ron Johnson: “All I can ask, is the viewers to share this. Tell your friends. I know this is long. This is, this is a 5 hour long panel. And we didn’t even scratch the surface of what we need to discuss! This shouldn’t be necessary. As our information grew, as we became better and better educated; less ignorant about… the coronavirus, COVID, the COVID vaccines – This, this should’ve been made public every step along the way.

But it wasn’t.

So again, I’m just asking the viewing public to have an open mind, respect these individuals who have paid a significant price. Professionally, reputationally.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @00:53: “How many of you in this room, recognizing there are doctors, there are PhDs, there are attorneys, media experts, other scientists, public citizens… how many of you personally have witnessed censorship, intimidation, or professional reprisal, and damage as a result of your advocacy for patients?”

[several members raise their hand]

“I want this to be recorded. That is 80% of this room have experienced something negative in their life in trying to promote and help compassionately something positive for patients suffering with a potentially fatal illness.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @01:35: “I’d like to start really quick with a story. So, a high risk individual approaches me: 50 years old, obese, Type 1 diabetic, calls me, “I have COVID.” This is about a year ago. “What do I do? Help. Help. I’m going to the ER. My oxygen’s 86. I have excruciating pain in my lungs.” So I said, “You’re going to the pharmacy; don’t go to the ER.”

I called in some early treatment medications, are the drugs which shall not be named. Said individual calls me a couple of hours later and says, “You know that excruciating 9 out of 10 lung pain, and it’s now a 2 out of 10 six hours later.” Well I know the mechanisms of the medication I prescribed. A few hours later in the next morning he calls me, he says, “You know that oxygen saturation of 86? It’s now a 98%.” I said, “Isn’t that fantastic? Early treatment works.”

That individual’s my brother. I am my brother’s keeper.”

__________

Dr. Harvey Risch @02:32: “This warning says, “FDA cautions against the use of hydroxychloroquine in out-patients outside of the hospital setting.” But then, in the justification, it says, “We base this on information to treat hospitalized patients.”

Hospital disease, as we’ll hear, and as we know, from two years of dealing with COVID, it’s a completely different illness, treated with different drugs, different medications, in the hospital. Outpatient disease is flu-like. Hospital disease is a [undetermined] pneumonia.

And so the fact that the FDA would base recommendations and warnings on hospital disease, which is a totally different disease than outpatient disease, is a fraud. This website is still there today, and constitutes an outright fraud.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @03:20: “Again, I’ll point out, there is so much we don’t know. I would’ve liked to seen a much larger dose of modesty coming out of our federal health officials, and the Legacy Media, and big tech, when it came to – we would be so much better off, if there was robust debate and discussion.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @03:42: I have to say, I’m going to call it out, and I’m known for this, I call it like I see it, I’m calling attention to the corruption. If you look at these innumerable failed policies, there’s only one way to understand them. They are literally written by pharmaceutical companies. Almost every single policy serves the interest of the pharmaceutical company.

However, if you look outside the United States and look around the world, there have been numerous successes. As one of the world experts on Ivermectin, let me just talk about some programs which used Ivermectin. My colleagues here, as Dr. Risch just pointed out, there are a number of compounds that we’ve identified that are effective in early treatment. Almost all of them are repurposed or generic.

But let me just say a few words about Ivermectin and what it’s doing around the world. Not in the United States. In the United States it’s a “horse de-wormer”, it’s “horse-paste”, and only the illiterate, ignorant and/or unvaccinated use it.”

“That medication has been shown to literally solve the pandemic in numerous regions around the world.”

__________

Dr. Richard Urso @04:50: “And as time went on, they were told, in no uncertain terms, if you use these drugs, you probably will be fired. And nobody had to tell them; they’re smart people, you don’t have to draw a map.”

“- is why is an ophthalmologist treating? Because patients were languishing at home. And I’ve treated over 1600 patients because patients were languishing at home with no treatment for inflammation, with no treatment for respiratory distress, with no treatment for blood clotting. It’s absolutely absurd, and I wasn’t going to let it happen. And I think as you see in this room, all of us feel the same.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @05:27: “Are African-Americans, are they denied early treatment in the community?”

Dr. Christina Parks:“Well yes they are. My dad just died. Right? He died Friday. Couldn’t get a test. Couldn’t get monoclonal antibodies. We treated him at home, unfortunately we had an oxygen machine that didn’t work. So he – blood saturation went down to the point where he was incoherent. We called EMS; they said your problem is your oxygen machine doesn’t work. They put oxygen on him, he went to 98% saturation.

We moved him to the hospital, he recovered all of his cognitive functions, he was doing quite well. But he was no longer getting medications that reduces inflammation. He was no longer getting medications that block the histamine response. He was no longer getting the medications that he needed. And he was no longer getting, you know, lung steroids, and he just declined, and declined, and declined. Until he passed away, on Friday, and I say he passed away from lack of appropriate care.”

__________

Dr. Mary Bowden @06:28: “So in the last 6 months, I’ve really evolved into a early treatment advocate. I’ve used a combination of medications and up until recently I was using monoclonal antibodies, and sadly we can’t get those anymore. But, you know, I just hear so many stories. At first it was, you know, “my PCP won’t see me”. So they came to see me, and ENT. I became the PCP. Now it’s people are terrified to go to the hospital. So I’ve become the emergency room. And I’m giving high dose IV steroids, I’m giving, you know, 25 grams of IV, vitamin C, but I am keeping people out of the hospital, and I’ve kept over 2,000 people out of the hospital. And if you look at current statistics, 20 of those people should be dead. And they’re not. So…”

“And the turning point for me, when I really got angry, was a patient that his wife reached out to me, he’s trapped in the ICU. Father of 6, sheriff’s deputy, refused to give anything but, you know, these hospitals give them low dose steroids, they give them 6 milligrams of dexamethasone, you know, 3 times a day. A lot of these hospitals won’t even give breathing treatments; it’s ridiculous. They won’t give them the vitamins! I mean – and so, basically she called me in desperation, and I testified, she sued the hospital to try to get her husband the medications he needed.

I testified; we won. The hospital refused to grant me privileges. Even though I have a spotless record. And I was furious. That’s when it all changed for me and I became… I became thrust into the public because of Methodist Hospital. But, it’s just, you know, we – I’ve seen a lot, and I’m angry, and I’m exhausted. I mean, I’ve one hospital I can send patients to that I feel safe to.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @08:17: “Some of those heart wrenching stories I’m hearing, where a loved one’s in the hospital, and their… the family’s begging the hospital to do more. To try and save the person’s life. And they’re just being told, “Nah, your loved one – there’s not much hope, you know. Get ready for the worst.” and they just won’t do anything.”

__________

Dr. Paul Marik @08:37: “So the question is, why? Why have cheap, safe and effective drugs being ignored for the treatment of COVID-19, which could have saved maybe 500,000 lives? And I think Dr. Kory has told us exactly why.”

__________

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty @08:57: “I want to talk about medical ethics. Because I’m concerned that many of our pandemic policies have ignored foundational principles of medical ethics.”

“We effectively abandoned patients that were suffering from other conditions and had other medical needs. The disastrous fruits of this myopia include an unprecedented 40% increase in all cause mortality among working age adults, 18-64, over the last year. Most of which, 2/3 to 3/4 , depending on the state, was not related to COVID. Actuaries tells us that a 10% rise in all cause mortality is a once in 200 year disaster. This was a 40% rise.”

__________

Dr. Robert Malone @09:48: “In my opinion, we should not have politicized the public health response to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. This is a bipartisan issue, and the physicians represented here are truly a bipartisan group. I’m not, although I’ve been characterized as a right-wing proud boy, I’ve previously supported, um, both President Obama and President Biden’s campaigns. But, the course of events have forced me to rethink a lot of my positions, and I think that’s the case with many of my peers.”

“If I may quote, in May of 1995, Nelson Mandela said, “There can be no keener revelation of a society’s soul, than the way in which it treats its children.” In my opinion, our public policies in managing this, have had a particularly strong adverse effect on our children, and vaccine mandates for our children are completely unjustified at this point.”

__________

Dr. David Wiseman @10:52: “So my friend told me a week ago, he said, “Watch this new movie. It’s called Don’t Look Up.” And I told him, “Listen, I don’t need to look at this movie. I’ve been in this movie for the last 2 years.”

__________

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya @11:03: “We have better treatments, and we should be investing in research to continue to improve our treatments and strategies to make sure that we have treatments available everywhere, where someone vulnerable especially gets sick.”

“If you put these strategies together, our society can continue to function in a much more healthy way than we have functioned these past 2 years. While at the same time, working to protect older people, the strategies we followed, basically by ignoring the possibility of early treatment, by not focusing our efforts on the protection of vulnerable populations, and worst of all, these restrictions on human behavior, on human connection, have wreaked enormous damage. And it’s far past time that we stop those policies and instead followed an alternate plan.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @11:56: “So Dr. Bhattacharya was joined by colleagues from Harvard and from Oxford. And put together the Great Barrington Declaration, I’m pretty sure they published that in, I think it was October 2020. We’ve since seen emails between Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci, head of NIH and NIAID, basically with a concerned effort to destroy, reputationally destroy, Dr. Bhattacharya and his co-authors.

Now, let’s ask the listening audience, does that sound like a crazy individual? Sounds to me like a highly qualified, very reasonable person, as we have in this – we’ve assembled in this room.”

__________

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty @12:40: “One worry, that public health officials have mentioned is, well, if we acknowledge that natural immunity is a reality, which, of course it is, and it’s been – it’s epidemiology and immunology 101, they’re worried that people will go out and deliberately get COVID rather than getting the vaccine.

But of course, the issue around acknowledging natural immunity is, what about the people who already have had COVID? That’s what we’re talking about here. Right? And we can give people advice on, you know, avoiding infection and so forth. But ignoring all the folks that have already recovered from COVID is not a good public health policy.”

“Acknowledging natural immunity, would lead to the next very basic question: how many people have it? And the fact that 2 years into the pandemic, we still do not know exactly how many Americans have had COVID… is aston- it’s an astonishing failure of the public health to do basic epidemiological research. The two most basic facts that every medical student learns first, about every new illness that they learn about, are incidence and prevalence. How many new cases, and how many total cases over a given period of time?”

“One very important fact about natural immunity, is that there has not been a single reported case of someone getting reinfected and subsequently transmitting the virus to others. Which we know is not the case for vaccines. Vaccines don’t offer, against COVID, that kind of sterilizing immunity.

So we FOIA’d the CDC, please show us any evidence of someone with natural immunity getting reinfected and transmitting the virus to others. They couldn’t come up with any data. We actually put that in our lawsuit. The university’s experts could not come up with a single counter example.

That’s a very dangerous thing to say. Right? Because almost nothing in medicine and science is a 100%. You can always find outliers. But natural immunity – people with natural immunity are the safest people to be around. You are not going to get COVID from somebody who’s already had COVID.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @14:45: “So, we are seeing actually the vaccinated carry a high volume of virus, because they don’t have the secretory IgA. So this false construct from our federal agencies that “this is a pandemic, and the unvaccinated are spreading”, is a pathophysiological lie. The vaccinated are carrying high volumes in their nose, their tears, their mouth, the virus. Because the vaccine does not neutralize in that location of the body where the virus comes in.

So this is very important. This is why mandates are absolutely now moot, irrelevant, and out the window and need to go away worldwide like most of the world has done already. This is the funny uncle. This is not SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19. This is, COVID-22 meh.”

__________

Dr. Richard Urso @15:40: “Zero randomized control trials that show masks stop the spread of respiratory disease. And that’s including N95. And for everyone, N stands for ‘non-oil resistant’, 95 stands for 95% of airborne particles of which all viruses fit through.

So I usually tell people that, you know, wearing N95 also has not been shown in randomized control trials to be effective. But more importantly, that the capsule on these viruses aren’t oil capsule. And I tell people, it’s like peeing in the pool, it goes right through. It doesn’t stick to water, water molecules, it’s an oil capsule virus.

At the end of the day, the data is what it is, there’s zero, repeat, zero randomized control trials at all, showing that masks stop the spread of upper respiratory disease.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @16:25: “So you’ve treated, through Telemedicine [Dr. Ben Marble:Yes.”] 150,000 COVID patients? [Dr. Ben Marble:“Yes, sir.”] With your team?”

Dr. Ben Marble: “Yes, with the team. We have a team of volunteer free doctors, that donate their time to help treat these patients that come to us. They go to myfreedoctor.com, and they answer our questionnaires, we deliver the early treatment protocols to them as early as we can, and we have a 99.99% survival rate. So I believe myfreedoctor.com, the volunteer free doctor team, we have settled the science on this, early treatment works, period.”

__________

Dr. Harpal Mangat @17:02: “For the key answer is to find a doctor who is gonna treat you. And then that doctor’s gonna be cognizant that a lot of its scripts will not be prescribed. Like I have patients in Virginia, I treat them. I have to figure out where I can get the relevant drugs. And that often means independent pharmacists.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @17:23: “But these are crimes. You know what is going on in this country right now? Is that the CDC, has been captured by the pharmaceutical industry. They sent out a memo in August of 2021. They sent out a similar memo back in the spring of 2020, telling the nations’ physicians and pharmacists not to use generic medicines. We are now in the state, in this country, where it – Senator Johnson asked the question, how can we get the average US citizen to treat, or get treated?

We have pharmacists across the land who are refusing – refusing, to fill these. Because they’ve been manipulated and brain-washed into thinking that it – that the FDA hasn’t approved the use, as if that matters. Off-label prescriptions and prescribing has been going on for decades. It’s encouraged, when there are no effective treatments. Yet I have to, when I’m trying to treat my patients, and Dr. Marble can attest to this, we have pharmacists who refuse to fill some of the safest and the low cost medicines known in the history of medicine.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @18:32: “All of the different drugs that there have been some research on… and what’s interesting about this chart is that Dr. Kory circled the ones that are recommended by our health agencies. They all range from seven hundred bucks, up to 3200. All the ones that are not recommended are, the ones that are, you know, a couple of bucks. Uh, go figure.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @18:56: “I’ve lost a third of my business because insurance contracts have pulled away from me for unprofessional conduct for using these “dangerous” drugs, Ivermectin, for the which my patients have had no adverse reactions. I’ve treated 500,000 patients, or diagnosed 500,000 patients diagnostically in my career. I’ve not had one single complaint against me. I have 4 complaints against licenses in 4 different states for saving lives. So the adverse reaction from these drugs is being attacked for being a good doctor. That’s the bad adverse reaction. And I know many of my colleagues on this panel as well.” [audience applauds]

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @19:29: “And I can tell you 201, the patients that I’ve lost, is because we’ve gotten a late start on early treatment. I’ve recently published a paper with Fazio and colleagues from Italy, we have shown the golden window to treat COVID-19 is the first 72 hours. And the patients that I have lost, and they’ve been very few, but if people listen to this out here, they will recognize that it’s a late start at treatment that is, in a sense, the failure of early treatment. If we start early, we have uniformed successes. I’ve reviewed hundreds and hundreds of reports of hospitalized patients. And of those who’ve died of COVID-19. And in those reports, the clear observation is, that determinants of hospitalization and death are the lack of early treatment.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @20:17: “I am completely agnostic when it comes to whatever drug will end this pandemic. Vaccine, whatever, I don’t care. I want this pandemic over, I want people to live.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @20:27: “We also had the wrong bodies leading the vaccine program. Remember, the FDA’s supposed to be the safety watchdog. The National Institutes of Health is the government research body and the CDC is the outbreak investigation body. Right now, the CDC and the FDA are the named sponsors of a vaccine program.

If America can learn anything, we should never have the FDA and CDC be a sponsor of a public program in administering a product. [audience applauds] It has been a giant and colossal mistake. We should have had a separate body, a government body be the sponsor of the vaccine program. The vaccine manufacturers can supply the products, and then we needed the separate data safety monitoring board, clinical event committee and human ethics committee there in oversight. And if this would have happened based on the emergence of unexplained deaths, I am testifying today that the program would have been shutdown in February, because of excess mortality.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @21:26: “They will attack you, they will threaten you, they will put you in a state of fear and say, “You can only do what we say, but don’t save a life.” And by the way, the vaccines are expired because Omicron is here. And now they still want to mandate them. So they threaten us, and threaten us, and threaten us, and we’re hunted for caring and being compassionate and empathetic and wanting to help humanity.”

__________

Kyle Warner @21:50: “Is it, you know, logical to think that if you’ve been harmed by the first dose, then you shouldn’t get a second dose? And if you get the second dose and you’re harmed, would a booster potentially do more harm and, if you were on the 7th booster, would that potentially cause more harm down the road?”

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: “Of course. You don’t have to be a physician to know the answer to that question. A 4 year old, knows the answer to that question.”

Dr. Richard Urso: “Yeah, and I just want to partner off of what Dr. McCullough said. I don’t think people realize that all these people who had COVID were excluded from the trials. All of them. So we’re going to take our 5-11 year olds, that there’s 28 million, that means 14 – it was about half and half, it’s probably more 60% have had COVID already. So let’s say 12 million have had – have not had COVID. So if those 12 million had the vaccine, and it was a perfect vaccine, it’s 0.1 per hundred thousand, you might save 12 [million] children.

What’s going to happen to the 16 children – 16 million children who haven’t… who’ve already had the virus, who already have immunity, and we’re going to subject them to something that wasn’t even tested in that group? It’s literally absurd. And that’s the thing I would say, Senator, is that it’s – we’re not here about civil liberties and mandates. We’re here to save lives. And this group of people should be excluded, absolutely.

There’s an Achilles Heel to the program of natural immunity. Natural immunity denial should not be happening. It should be a major focus of what we’re trying to do here. Because you’re going to harm, I don’t know how many children by force vaccinating 16 million children. It’s absurd.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @23:22: “In listening to my colleagues, call out all of the inanities, the insanities, the absurdities. Okay? These departures of our policies from what we know are to be scientific truths. These things like denial of natural immunity. We have to understand why. To sit here and point fingers, ‘they’re doing this wrong, and that wrong’

WHY are they doing this? There could be multiple reasons. The simplest and most easily understandable and proveable is, every vaccine, every – these, you know, these novel patented high-cost drugs, is profits. They are putting profits ahead of patients. You know, we can call attention to all of these policies; they are non-scientific. They are failing at having scientific support, yet they’ve been carrying out and they’re being distributed across the country. And doctors, and states, and health departments are willingly accepting these without question, without critical thinking.

And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!” [audience applauds]

__________

Dr. Christina Parks @24:25: “Why are they vaccinating our children? Because once it’s on the vaccine, um, once it’s on the childhood schedule, they are no longer liable for injury. So they’re going to get off that EUA, put it right on the childhood vaccine schedule, and then have no liability going forward.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @24:42: “So I’m going to tell you – read you a quick little news story out of Vietnam. Just got this today.

A 9th grader, in the northern province of Phu Tho, died Tuesday after getting her second Pfizer vaccine dose, the local medical center said Thursday. The girl had gotten her first Pfizer dose on December 3rd 2021. After which she experienced dizziness and had difficulty breathing. She was taken to a medical center for treatment and later recovered.

She had her second dose last Monday. Her mother told healthcare workers about the girl’s side effects following her first shot, but they asked her to get the second shot anyway. Again, this is a… 9th grader. Doesn’t have much risk from COVID. Has a reaction to the first dose, but let’s give her the second dose anyway.

2o minutes following the second shot, the girl experienced tightness in her chest, dizziness, difficulty breathing and seizures. She received emergency treatment on the spot before being transferred to a district medical center. On arrival, she began to vomit blood, fell into a coma, and her heart stopped. Her family received news that she died Tuesday morning.

Now, I guess this isn’t evidence that a death might be related to the vaccine. But it certainly would concern me more than it’s concerned Dr. [Anthony] Fauci, Dr. [Rochelle] Walenksy, Dr. [Francis] Collins, Dr. [Janet] Woodcock, Dr. [Peter] Marks – I know one of your favorites, Brianne [Dressen].

Um, this is reality. This is reality that’s being ignored by our federal health officials, by the Legacy Media,”

__________

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty @26:27: “But every patient is a new textbook, every patient is a unique human being that has unique factors that only we and the patient really understand, with sufficient depth to make difficult medical judgments. And this is the first time in my career – I think the other clinical physicians in the room would agree, where I’ve worried about, is somebody going to be looking over my shoulder asking me why I’ve prescribed fluvoxamine for this indication rather than that indication? I prescribe it for depression, no problem. ‘Are you giving this to treat COVID?’ Why should it matter to you? So it -”

Senator Ron Johnson: “So you’re saying – this is the first time in your – [Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: “The last 2 years.”] Is that true?”

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: “The last 2 years. Now, there’s – there are things that hospital administrators do that have annoyed physicians for years. But the kind of hamstringing of physicians, in terms of doing what we believe to be the right and best and good for this vulnerable patient in front of me right now, that is my only responsibility, as a physician, this patient who has placed their trust in me as their physician, to do what is best for them, and not be, not be acting as the agent of a social program. Or a state program. Or any other interest, that could compromise -”

__________

Dr. Paul Marik @27:54: “So I can tell you what happened to me. So I was using our protocol to treat critically ill patients in the ICU with a whole host of repurposed drugs. I then – this is a memo, this is a memo sent to the entire healthcare system, but they targeted me personally. And what did this memo say? This said I can use Remdesivir, and then I will quote, it was an added section,

Do not endorse section which includes medications that may cause harm and efficacy is not supported in peer-reviewed published RCTs. These medications will not be verified or dispensed for the prevention or treatment of COVID. This list includes: Ivermectin, bicalutamide, etoposide, fluvoxamine, dutasteride, and finasteride.”

And then, just to stick it to me, they added ‘ascorbic acid’ [vitamin C]. [audience laughs] The healthcare system was effectively preventing me treating my patients according to my best clinical judgment.

And then how did this progress? I objected. So the first week I was in the ICU, I didn’t know what to do. What was I to do? My hands were tied. As a clinician for the first time in my entire career I could not be a doctor. I could not treat patients the way I had to be to treat patients. I had 7 COVID patients. Including a 31 year old woman. I was not allowed to treat these people. I had to stand by idly, I had to stand by idly, watching these people die.

I then tried to sue the system and you know what they did? They did something called peer-sham review. It is a disgusting and evil concept. They then accused me of 7 most outrageous crimes that I had committed. And that I was such a severe threat to the safety of patients, they immediately suspended my hospital privileges because I possessed – I posed such an outright threat to these patients. Ignoring the fact that under my care, the mortality was 50% those of my colleagues.

I then went on through the sham-peer review, I went to a kangaroo court, where they continued this, and the end result was I lost my hospital privilege and was reported to the national practitioner data bank. So here I was standing up for patients’ rights, and this hospital – this evil hospital, ended my medical career. So that’s what they do. It’s an outright outrage; it’s evil to the core.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @31:05: “You can use safe, effective, off-label drugs for other conditions outside COVID?”

Dr. Paul Marik: “Absolutely. If this was pneomococcal pneumonia, this wouldn’t be an issue. This is specifically for COVID.”

__________

Jennifer Bridges @31:18: “So I’m still a nurse, but I was fired from Houston Methodist. I’m the one you might have seen all over the news. We were the first one mandated with a COVID shot. So I blew it up on the national media. We have a huge state and federal lawsuit because we didn’t want to be guinea pigs. We saw for ourselves, in the hospital, people coming in with adverse reactions after getting the Pfizer shot.

And the crazy thing is, let me tell you a couple of things about Methodist Hospital down in Houston, Texas. When they first started with COVID, I did that COVID unit on and off the whole time till they fired me in June, right? They started the first two months with hydroxychloroquine. They actually used it in the hospital, then they cut it back real quick, switched it to Remdesivir, and all these other expensive drugs. And we’re like, why? And we would ask these doctors; no one could give us a reason. They just said, “Well the hospital policy changed.” But they didn’t know why.

And you know most of those doctors in that hospital would not even go in those COVID rooms. There was maybe 2 that would. They would stand outside, make us dress up head to toe and go in with an ipad. So the only form of communication those doctors would have at Houston Methodist with the COVID patients was through an ipad. So literally we go in there, they’d be talking to them, never assess the lungs, never look at them, nothing. Go to discharge them; I would come back out and be like, “No. Have you listened to them? They can’t breathe.” Like the wheezing’s horrible – they had no clue.”

__________

Brienne Dressen @32:48: “For 80% of us, are misdiagnosed with anxiety initially; and then months down the road we get appropriate diagnosis, and that’s when we are able to find doctors that are actually willing to go against the directive. Because like these physicians were discussing, their licenses have been threatened. And because their licenses have been threatened, we cannot get medical care. They are afraid to treat us. We have had patients who are severely injured and are dying, who cannot get in the door to get seen by physicians, because physicians are afraid of the word “COVID vaccine”.

So instead, what they’re doing is they’ve made us like Kyle Warner and myself, and our membership of over 12,000 COVID vaccine injured, we are ground-zero to take care of the COVID vaccine injured. When we have highly qualified practitioners, across the globe, that have been silenced and threatened, if they even so much as see us for what’s going on.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @33:37: “There is the father of a boy here in this room who’s died of myocarditis. …One death is too many. One! One! We have 21,000 cases of myocarditis, and climbing, in the United States that the CDC has verified. One was too many.

Under no circumstances, under any circumstances, should a young person ever receive one of these vaccines, let alone ever be pressured to receive a vaccine, let alone ever be mandated to take a vaccine. This is crystal clear. The FDA agrees; there can be no controversy over this.”

“We are seeing unprecedented numbers of athletes dying on the field in Europe. Unprecedented. Of these cardiac arrests, half of them don’t come back. We now have a report out of the heart group in the UK where actuarial mortality for those under age 15, mortality in the UK, is higher than expected.”

__________

Dr. Robert Malone @34:58: “And I am concerned about our children. I am concerned about all of those effects. Brain, heart, blood coagulation, reproductive system, immunologic system, and furthermore, they’re not at risk for this virus. Why are we doing this? And mandating these vaccines for children just breaks my heart.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @35:25: “This is, this is what we get, when I investigate. [holds up two completely redacted sheets of paper – audience laughs and groans] I mean this isn’t, to do with this. But this is after a couple of years trying to get information out of another agency, and we finally get the information, and it’s all redacted.

This is, this is how the administrate – the, you know, the federal government, the agency is complying with congressional oversight.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @35:47: “This dose that was tested in a major trial, and which made corticosteroids the standard of care worldwide, and I’ll also want to, I also want to give praise to Senator Johnson. You know, Senator Johnson invited me to give testimony in the Senate, in May of 2020. And I remember my first conversation with him when he reached out. He was so, he was so, um… enthusiastic about hearing about the work that Dr. Marik and myself were doing, that we were putting out protocols and we’re trying to treat this disease.

You know, and he said he couldn’t understand why the system wasn’t reacting; why the entire system wasn’t reacting the way we were. And I remember he told me – he goes, I want the doctors to take their gloves off. And they’re not.”

They were sitting idly by the bedside, institutions were paralyzed, waiting for randomized control trials to be done. And then finally a randomized control – so at that time, I testified, to the world, that corticosteroids were critical in the treatment of this disease. Nothing happened. Until a trial came out 8 weeks later and proved the life saving properties of corticosteroids. But that dose that was tested was ridiculous. It was the lowest dose, and the dose that’s being used, helps the few and fails the many.”

__________

Dr. Richard Urso @36:58: “I want to personally thank you. Um, in the past, medical schools and conferences would, like this, would take place. We’d debate on how to treat these kinds of diseases, and, you know, I – it’s kind of strange that we – this meeting has to take place in the U.S. Senate. Um, you know, given the current state of affairs, that’s where we are. But, in the past, we would think that somehow the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, we would have basically maybe a message board, exchange ideas.

And I really want to reach out and say thank you for what you’ve done. To Dr. McCullough and Dr. Risch, who initially set all of this up. You know, the extreme censorship and attacks have led us to come to this place. And so I wanted just to thank you, for what you’ve done. You’ve really pushed this all forward, you know, as a – you know, you’ve been yourself become a researcher and a scientist over this last 2 years. So thank you very much.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @37:57: “Uh, these are highly qualified individuals. They speak from experience. We’ve got to fix this problem. We can’t let this continue, we can’t let it happen in the future. So again, thank all of you for coming. Thank you for being doctors, for being nurses, for being aca-magicians, for being medical researchers, and thank all of you for viewing this. Share this with your friends.

God bless you all.” [audience applauds]

Once again, a huge thank you to everyone who participated in this panel. Your thoughts and efforts at exposing this corruption is a perfect example of bravery and integrity in the face of adversity – especially since it is going against what these depraved institutions are trying to implement as the new status quo.

Thank you so much for your heroism, compassion and steadfastness at bringing awareness to these topics.

And a sincere thank you to the readers/viewers who are staying informed and sharing these important information with others; and the many who have refused to comply with these outrageous policies/mandates.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by fernando zhiminaicela from Pixabay

Our Grave Concerns About the Handling of the COVID Pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK

Open letter from several healthcare professions to the UK government/administrators.

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

Mr Boris Johnson, Prime Minister

Ms Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister for Scotland

Mr Mark Drakeford, First Minister for Wales

Mr Paul Givan, First Minister for Northern Ireland

Mr Sajid Javid, Health Secretary

Dr Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer

Dr Patrick Vallance, Chief Scientific Officer

 

22 August 2021

Dear Sirs and Madam,

Our grave concerns about the handling of the COVID pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK.

We write as concerned doctors, nurses, and other allied healthcare professionals with no vested interest in doing so. To the contrary, we face personal risk in relation to our employment for doing so and / or the risk of being personally “smeared” by those who inevitably will not like us speaking out.

We are taking the step of writing this public letter because it has become apparent to us that:

  • The  Government (by which we mean the UK government and three devolved governments/administrations and associated government advisors and agencies such as the CMOs, CSA, SAGE, MHRA, JCVI, Public Health services, Ofcom etc, hereinafter “you” or the “Government”) have based the handling of the COVID pandemic on flawed assumptions.
  • These have been pointed out to you by numerous individuals and organisations.
  • You have failed to engage in dialogue and show no signs of doing so. You have removed from people fundamental rights and altered the fabric of society with little debate in Parliament. No minister responsible for policy has ever appeared in a proper debate with anyone with opposing views on any mainstream media channel.
  • Despite being aware of alternative medical and scientific viewpoints you have failed to ensure an open and full discussion of the pros and cons of alternative ways of managing the pandemic.
  • The pandemic response policies implemented have caused massive, permanent and unnecessary harm to our nation, and must never be repeated.
  • Only by revealing the complete lack of widespread approval among healthcare professionals of your policies will a wider debate be demanded by the public.

In relation to the above, we wish to draw attention to the following points. Supporting references can be provided upon request.

  1. No attempt to measure the harms of lockdown policies

The evidence of disastrous effects of lockdowns on the physical and mental health of the population is there for all to see. The harms are massive, widespread, and long lasting. In particular, the psychological impact on a generation of developing children could be lifelong.

It is for this reason that lockdown policies were never part of any pandemic preparedness plans prior to 2020. In fact, they were expressly not recommended in WHO documents, even for severe respiratory viral pathogens and for that matter neither were border closures, face coverings, and testing of asymptomatic individuals. There has been such an inexplicable absence of consideration of the harms caused by lockdown policy it is difficult to avoid the suspicion that this is willful avoidance.

The introduction of such policies was never accompanied by any sort of risk/benefit analysis. As bad as that is, it is even worse that after the event when plenty of data became available by which the harms could be measured, only perfunctory attention to this aspect of pandemic planning has been afforded. Eminent professionals have repeatedly called for discourse on these health impacts in press-conferences but have been universally ignored.

What is so odd, is that the policies being pursued before mid-March 2020 (self-isolation of the ill and protection of the vulnerable, while otherwise society continued close to normality) were balanced, sensible and reflected the approach established by consensus prior to 2020. No cogent reason was given then for the abrupt change of direction from mid-March 2020 and strikingly none has been put forward at any time since.

  1. Institutional nature of COVID

It was actually clear early on from Italian data that COVID (the disease – as opposed to SARS-Cov-2 infection or exposure) was largely a disease of institutions. Care home residents comprised around half of all deaths, despite making up less than 1% of the population. Hospital infections are the major driver of transmission rates as was the case for both SARS1 and MERS. Transmission was associated with hospital contact in up to 40% of cases in the first wave in Spring 2020 and in 64% in winter 2020/2021.

Severe illness among healthy people below 70 years old did occur (as seen with flu pandemics) but was extremely rare.

Despite this, no early, aggressive and targeted measures were taken to protect care homes; to the contrary, patients were discharged without testing to homes where staff had inadequate PPE, training and information. Many unnecessary deaths were caused as a result.

Preparations for this coming winter, including ensuring sufficient capacity and preventative measures such as ventilation solutions, have not been prioritised.

  1. The exaggerated nature of the threat

Policy appears to have been directed at systematic exaggeration of the number of deaths which can be attributed to COVID. Testing was designed to find every possible ‘case’ rather than focusing on clinically diagnosed infections and the resulting exaggerated case numbers fed through to the death data with large numbers of people dying ‘with COVID’ and not ‘of COVID’ where the disease was the underlying cause of death.

The policy of publishing a daily death figure meant the figure was based entirely on the PCR test result with no input from treating clinicians. By including all deaths within a time period after a positive test, incidental deaths, with but not due to COVID, were not excluded thereby exaggerating the nature of the threat.

Moreover, in headlines reporting the number of deaths, a categorisation by age was not included. The average age of a COVID-labelled death is 81 for men and 84 for women, higher than the average life expectancy when these people were born. This is a highly relevant fact in assessing the societal impact of the pandemic. Death in old age is a natural phenomenon. It cannot be said that a disease primarily affecting the elderly is the same as one which affects all ages, and yet the government’s messaging appears designed to make the public think that everyone is at equal risk.

Doctors were asked to complete death certificates in the knowledge that the deceased’s death had already been recorded as a COVID death by the Government. Since it would be virtually impossible to find evidence categorically ruling out COVID as a contributory factor to death, once recorded as a “COVID death” by the government, it was inevitable that it would be included as a cause on the death certificate. Diagnosing the cause of death is always difficult and the reduction in post mortems will have inevitably resulted in increased inaccuracy. The fact that deaths due to non-COVID causes actually moved into a substantial deficit (compared to average) as COVID-labelled deaths rose (and this was reversed as COVID-labelled deaths fell) is striking evidence of over-attribution of deaths to COVID.

The overall all-cause mortality rate from 2015-2019 was unusually low and yet these figures have been used to compare to 2020 and 2021 mortality figures which has made the increased mortality appear unprecedented. Comparisons with data from earlier years would have demonstrated that the 2020 mortality rate was exceeded in every year prior to 2003 and is unexceptional as a result.

Even now COVID cases and deaths continue to be added to the existing total without proper rigour such that overall totals grow ever larger and exaggerate the threat. No effort has been made to count totals in each winter season separately which is standard practice for every other disease.

You have continued to adopt high-frequency advertising through publishing and broadcast media outlets to add to the impact of “fear messaging”. The cost of this has not been widely published, but government procurement websites reveal it to be immense – hundreds of millions of pounds.

The media and government rhetoric is now moving onto the idea that “Long Covid” is going to cause major morbidity in all age groups including children, without having a discussion of the normality of postviral fatigue which lasts upwards of 6 months. This adds to the public fear of the disease, encouraging vaccination amongst those who are highly unlikely to suffer any adverse effects from COVID.

  1. Active suppression of discussion of early treatment using protocols being successfully deployed elsewhere.

The harm caused by COVID and our response to it should have meant that advances in prophylaxis and therapeutics for COVID were embraced. However, evidence on successful treatments has been ignored or even actively suppressed. For example, a study in Oxford published in February 2021 demonstrated that inhaled Budesonide could reduce hospitalisations by 90% in low risk patients and a publication in April 2021 showed that recovery was faster for high risk patients too. However, this important intervention has not been promoted.

Dr. Tess Lawrie, of the Evidence Based Medical Consultancy in Bath, presented a thorough analysis of the prophylactic and therapeutic benefits of Ivermectin to the government in January 2021. More than 24 randomised trials with 3,400 people have demonstrated a 79-91% reduction in infections and a 27-81% reduction in deaths with Ivermectin.

Many doctors are understandably cautious about possible over-interpretation of the available data for the drugs mentioned above and other treatments, although it is to be noted that no such caution seems to have been applied in relation to the treatment of data around the government’s interventions (eg the effectiveness of lockdowns or masks) when used in support of the government’s agenda.

Whatever one’s view on the merits of these repurposed drugs, it is totally unacceptable that doctors who have attempted to merely open discussion about the potential benefits of early treatments for COVID have been heavily and inexplicably censored. Knowing that early treatments which could reduce the risk of requiring hospitalisation might be available would alter the entire view held by many professionals and lay people alike about the threat posed by COVID, and therefore the risk / benefit ratio for vaccination, especially in younger groups.

  1. Inappropriate and unethical use of behavioural science to generate unwarranted fear.

Propagation of a deliberate fear narrative (confirmed through publicly accessible government documentation) has been disproportionate, harmful and counterproductive. We request that it should cease forthwith.

To give just one example, the government’s face covering policies seem to have been driven by behavioural psychology advice in relation to generating a level of fear necessary for compliance with other policies. Those policies do not appear to have been driven by reason of infection control, because there is no robust evidence showing that wearing a face covering (particularly cloth or standard surgical masks) is effective against transmission of airborne respiratory pathogens such as SARS-Cov-2. Several high profile institutions and individuals are aware of this and have advocated against face coverings during this pandemic only inexplicably to reverse their advice on the basis of no scientific justification of which we are aware. On the other hand there is plenty of evidence suggesting that mask wearing can cause multiple harms, both physical and mental. This has been particularly distressing for the nation’s school children who have been encouraged by government policy and their schools to wear masks for long periods at school.

Finally, the use of face coverings is highly symbolic and thus counterproductive in making people feel safe. Prolonged wearing risks becoming an ingrained safety behaviour, actually preventing people from getting back to normal because they erroneously attribute their safety to the act of mask wearing rather than to the remote risk, for the vast majority of healthy people under 70 years old, of catching the virus and becoming seriously unwell with COVID.

  1. Misunderstanding of the ubiquitous nature of mutations of newly emergent viruses.

The mutation of any novel virus into newer strains – especially when under selection pressure from abnormal restrictions on mixing and vaccination – is normal, unavoidable and not something to be concerned about. Hundreds of thousands of mutations of the original Wuhan strain have already been identified. Chasing down every new emergent variant is counterproductive, harmful and totally unnecessary and there is no convincing evidence that any newly identified variant is any more deadly than the original strain.

Mutant strains appear simultaneously in different countries (by way of ‘convergent evolution’) and the closing of national borders in attempts to prevent variants travelling from one country to another serves no significant infection control purpose and should be abandoned.

  1. Misunderstanding of asymptomatic spread and its use to promote public compliance with restrictions.

It is well-established that asymptomatic spread has never been a major driver of a respiratory disease pandemic and we object to your constant messaging implying this, which should cease forthwith. Never before have we perverted the centuries-old practice of isolating the ill by instead isolating the healthy. Repeated mandates to healthy, asymptomatic people to self-isolate, especially school children, serves no useful purpose and has only contributed to the widespread harms of such policies. In the vast majority of cases healthy people are healthy and cannot transmit the virus and only sick people with symptoms should be isolated.

The government’s claim that one in three people could have the virus has been shown to be mutually inconsistent with the ONS data on prevalence of disease in society, and the sole effect of this messaging appears to have been to generate fear and promote compliance with government restrictions. The government’s messaging to ‘act as if you have the virus’ has also been unnecessarily fear-inducing given that healthy people are extremely unlikely to transmit the virus to others.

The PCR test, widely used to determine the existence of ‘cases’, is now indisputably acknowledged to be unable reliably to detect infectiousness. The test cannot discriminate between those in whom the presence of fragments of genetic material partially matching the virus is either incidental (perhaps because of past infection), or is representative of active infection, or is indicative of infectiousness. Yet, it has been used almost universally without qualification or clinical diagnosis to justify lockdown policies and to quarantine millions of people needlessly at enormous cost to health and well-being and to the country’s economy.

Countries that have removed community restrictions have seen no negative consequences which can be attributed to the easing. Empirical data from many countries demonstrates that the rise and fall in infections is seasonal and not due to restrictions or face coverings. The reason for reduced impact of each successive wave is that: (1) most people have some level of immunity either through prior immunity or immunity acquired through exposure; (2) as is usual with emergent new viruses, mutation of the virus towards strains causing milder disease appears to have occurred. Vaccination may also contribute to this although its durability and level of protection against variants is unclear. 

The government appears to be talking of “learning to live with COVID” while apparently practicing by stealth a “zero COVID” strategy which is futile and ultimately net-harmful.

  1. Mass testing of healthy children

Repeated testing of children to find asymptomatic cases who are unlikely to spread virus, and treating them like some sort of biohazard is harmful, serves no public health purpose and must stop.

During Easter term, an amount equivalent to the cost of building one District General Hospital was spent weekly on testing schoolchildren to find a few thousand positive ‘cases’, none of which was serious as far as we are aware.

Lockdowns are in fact a far greater contributor to child health problems, with record levels of mental illness and soaring levels of non-COVID infections being seen, which some experts consider to be a result of distancing resulting in deconditioning of the immune system.

  1. Vaccination of the entire adult population should never have been a prerequisite for ending restrictions.

Based merely on early “promising” vaccine data, it is clear that the Government decided in summer 2020 to pursue a policy of viral suppression within the entire population until vaccination was available (which was initially stated to be for the vulnerable only, then later changed – without proper debate or rigorous analysis – to the entire adult population).

This decision was taken despite massive harms consequent to continued lockdowns which were either known to you or ought to have been ascertained so as to be considered in the decision making process.

Moreover, a number of principles of good medical practice and previously unimpeachable ethical standards have been breached in relation to the vaccination campaign, meaning that in most cases, whether the consent obtained can be truly regarded as “fully informed” must be in serious doubt:

  • The use of coercion supported by an unprecedented media campaign to persuade the public to be vaccinated, including threats of discrimination, either supported by the law or encouraged socially, for example in co-operation with social media platforms and dating apps.
  • The omission of information permitting individuals to make a fully informed choice, especially in relation to the experimental nature of the vaccine agents, extremely low background COVID risk for most people, known occurrence of short-term side-effects and unknown long-term effects.

Finally, we note that the Government is seriously considering the possibility that these vaccines – which have no associated long-term safety data – could be administered to children on the basis that this might provide some degree of protection to adults. We find that notion an appalling and unethical inversion of the long-accepted duty falling on adults to protect children.

  1. Over-reliance on modeling while ignoring real-world data

Throughout the pandemic, decisions seem to have been taken utilising unvalidated models produced by groups who have what can only be described as a woeful track record, massively overestimating the impact of several previous pandemics.

The decision-making teams appear to have very little clinical input and, as far as is ascertainable, no clinical immunology expertise.

Moreover, the assumptions underlying the modeling have never been adjusted to take into account real-world observations in the UK and other countries.

It is an astonishing admission that, when asked whether collateral harms had been considered by SAGE, the answer given was that it was not in their remit – they were simply asked to minimise COVID impact. That might be forgivable if some other advisory group was constantly studying the harms side of the ledger, yet this seems not to have been the case.

Conclusions

The UK’s approach to COVID has palpably failed. In the apparent desire to protect one vulnerable group – the elderly – the implemented policies have caused widespread collateral and disproportionate harm to many other vulnerable groups, especially children. Moreover your policies have failed in any event to prevent the UK from notching up one of the highest reported death rates from COVID in the world.

Now, despite very high vaccination rates and the currently very low COVID death and hospitalisation rates, policy continues to be aimed at maintaining a population handicapped by extreme fear with restrictions on everyday life prolonging and deepening the policy-derived harms. To give just one example, NHS waiting lists now stand at 5.1m officially, with – according to the previous Health Secretary – a likely further 7m who will require treatment not yet presented. This is unacceptable and must be addressed urgently.

In short, there needs to be a sea change within the Government which must now pay proper attention to those esteemed experts outside its inner circle who are sounding these alarms. As those involved with healthcare, we are committed to our oath to “first do no harm”, and we can no longer stand by in silence observing policies which have imposed a series of supposed “cures” which are in fact far worse than the disease they are supposed to address.

The signatories of this letter call on you, in Government, without further delay to widen the debate over policy, consult openly with groups of scientists, doctors, psychologists and others who share crucial, scientifically-valid and evidence-based alternative views and to do everything in your power to return the country as rapidly as possible to normality with the minimum of further damage to society.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Jonathan Engler, MB ChB LLB (Hons) DipPharmMed

Professor John A Fairclough, BM BS B Med Sci FRCS FFSEM,  Consultant Surgeon, ran vaccination program for a Polio Outbreak, Past President BOSTA, for Orthopaedic Surgeons, Faculty member FFSEM

Mr Tony Hinton, MB ChB, FRCS, FRCS(Oto), Consultant Surgeon

Dr Renee Hoenderkamp, BSc (Hons) MBBS MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr Ros Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician

Mr Malcolm Loudon, MB ChB MD FRCSEd FRCS (Gen Surg) MIHM VR

Dr Geoffrey Maidment, MBBS, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician

Dr Alan Mordue, MB ChB, FFPH (ret), Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine

Mr Colin Natali, BSc(Hons), MBBS FRCS FRCS(Orth), Consultant Spine Surgeon

Dr Helen Westwood, MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner

Click here for the complete list of signatories and if you wish to add your name to the letter.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image: Prime Minister Boris Johnson during a press conference on 16 March, with Chief Medical Officer Prof Chris Witty and Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance. Picture by Andrew Parsons

Doctors Dan Stock and Ryan Cole Share Their Expert Opinion on the Dangers of the “Vaccine” [Full Transcripts]

“This is NOT a vaccine.” / “This is a poisonous attack on our population.”

Numerous doctors and healthcare workers have been speaking out against the egregious vaccine narrative that has overrun our planet.

However, there has been a huge censorship and banning of these alternative opinions/accounts that are trying to prevent these important voices from being heard on the social media platforms or on mainstream media. Facebook, twitter, youtube, instagram… known for silencing this crucial information because it creates a form of “vaccine hesitancy”, using the pretense of a “deadly virus” as their excuse, has initiated a totalitarian stance in their push to mandate these vaccines to the whole population, and has largely banned many dissenting opinions, facts, or even basic discussion regarding the vaccines and its efficacy.

Meanwhile, the efforts to hire influencers and celebrities to endorse these vaccines have reached an outrageous precedent, and the continued effort to FUND THESE INDIVIDUALS, who are NOT EXPERTS, to speak so highly of an experimental vaccine, while DISMISSING ACTUAL SCIENTISTS AND DOCTORS, should tell you everything you need to know about the safety of these vaccines.

I honestly wish I didn’t have to spell it out, but the dishonest tactics and malfeasance that has gone on within the government, health industries, and media/big tech collusions has reached a terrifying height, and their oppressive attempts at restricting not just rational/irrational conversations, but individuals’ OWN PERSONAL TESTIMONIES, has overstepped a dangerous boundary that looms ever closer to a dystopian society in which any form of dissenting opinion is attacked, criticized, and silenced.

Thankfully though, we continue to have several ACTUAL EXPERTS and HONEST CITIZENS coming to the forefront and offering their knowledge and experience with what they’ve seen during the COVID pandemic.

This post will cover two gentlemen: Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Dan Stock. As I have done in the past, I provide transcriptions of videos in order for people to have the ability to read the text in case that is a preferred method for them. It is also helpful in order to search for specific key words that the reader may be looking for.

Dr. Dan Stock at the Mt. Vernon School Board in Indiana

[All quotes by Dan Stock, with some embellishment added to highlight pertinent information.]

“Dr. Dan Stock, 5777 West 700 North, Mccordsville, Indiana.

To address your comment, geez, it’s hard to believe we’re 18 months into this and still having a problem, and I would suggest the reason we still have a problem is because we’re doing things that are not useful and we’re getting our sources of information from the Indiana State Board of Health and the CDC, who actually don’t bother to read science before they do this.

I’m actually a functional family medicine physician. And that means that I am specially trained in immunology and inflammation regulation, and everything being recommended by the CDC and the State Board of Health is actually contrary to all the rules of science.

So things you should know about coronavirus and all other respiratory viruses. They are spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through every mask, by the way. The literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive that we’ve presented to you has been given to the secretary.

As a matter of fact, it quotes at least 3 studies sponsored by the NIH to that exact fact, even though the CDC and the NIH have chosen to ignore the very science that they paid to have done.

That is why you keep struggling with this, is because you cannot make these viruses go away. The natural history of all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter, or become deranged, as has happened recently with these vaccines, and then they cause symptomatic disease. Because they cannot be filtered out and they have animal reservoirs.

And this is a very important point. No one can make this virus go away. The CDC has managed to convince everybody that we can handle this like we did small pox, where we could make a virus go away. Smallpox had no animal reservoirs. The only thing it learned to infect was humans. That’s why we’re able to make that virus go away. That will not happen with this anymore than it will with influenza, the common cold, respiratory syncitial virus, adenoviral respiratory syndromes or anything else that has animal reservoirs. So the reason you can’t do this is because you’re trying to do something which has already been tried and can’t be done.

Equally important is that vaccination changes none of this, especially with this vaccine. And I would hope this board would start asking itself, before it considers taking the advice of the CDC, the NIH, and the State Board of Health, ‘why were you doing things about this that we didn’t do for the common cold, influenza, or respiratory syncitial virus?’

And then ask yourself, why is a vaccine that is supposedly so effective, having a breakout in the middle of the summer when respiratory viral syndromes don’t do that? And to help you understand that, you need to know the condition that is called ‘antibody mediated viral enhancement’. That is a condition done when vaccines work wrong, as they did in EVERY coronavirus study done in animals, on coronaviruses after the SARS outbreak, and done in respiratory syncitial virus where a vaccine used in a vulnerable individual, done the wrong way, which by – cannot be done right for respiratory virus, which has a very low pathogenicity rate, causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong and let the virus become WORSE than it would with native infection.

And that is why you’re seeing an outbreak right now. In fact, in that flash drive you’re going to have coming to you and in the emails with 6 extra, there’ll be a study showing that 75% of people who had COVID-19 positive symptom cases in Barnstable, Massachusetts outbreak, were FULLY vaccinated. [audience applauds]

Therefore, there is no reason for treating any person vaccinated any differently than any person unvaccinated. You should also know that NO vaccine, even the ones that I support and would give to myself and my children, EVER stops infection.

In 2014, there was outbreaks of mumps in the National Hockey League. The only people who came down with symptoms were the people who are unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status. Boy, that sounds like a great argument for vaccines. But a question that you should ask yourself, knowing that half of the people who came down with symptomatic disease had NO contact with an unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status individual: ‘where did they get the disease?’ And the answer was, from the VACCINATED individuals.

No vaccine prevents you from getting infection. You get infected. You shed pathogen. This is especially true of viral respiratory pathogens. You just don’t get symptomatic from it. So you cannot stop spread. You cannot make these numbers that you’ve planned on get better by doing any of the things you’re doing. Because that is the nature of viral respiratory pathogens. And you can’t prevent it with a vaccine because they don’t do they very thing you’re wanting them to do.

And you will be chasing this the remainder of your life until you recognize that the Center for Disease Control and the Indiana State Board of Health are giving you very bad scientific guidance, and instead read the articles that are going to come in the email and on this flash drive and listen to the people in this audience here tonight who actually have recognized the advice they are getting from the CDC and the NIH is counter factual. And that’s why you’re still fighting this with this vaccine that is supposedly was gonna make all of this go away, but it suddenly managed to make an outbreak of COVID-19 develop in the middle of the summer when vitamin D levels are at their highest.

By the way, the other thing that would be necessary any vaccine and restriction to be considered is if there were no other treatment available. And I can tell you, having treated over fifteen COVID-19 patients, that between active loading with vitamin D, Ivermectin, and zinc, that there is not a single person who has come anywhere near the hospital. And we already have studies that show that if you achieve a 25 hydroxy vitamin D level greater than 55, your risk of COVID-19 death will drop down to one quarter of the population average for the United States. And there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that show the same is true.

So if you were going to discriminate based upon vaccine, you should also discriminate based upon 25 hydroxy vitamin D level, zinc taste test response, and probably previous infections since there are also studies on that flash drive that show that people who have recovered from COVID-19 infection actually get no benefit from vaccination AT ALL. No reduction in symptoms, no reduction in hospitalization, and suffer 2-4 times the rate of side effects if they are subsequently vaccinated.

Therefore the policies that you are basing on are totally counter factual. I don’t blame this board for that, ’cause I know you aren’t scientists and you’ve thought it was reasonable to listen to the CDC, NIH and the Indiana State Board of Health, but I would encourage that instead you listen to the people out here in this audience and read what’s on that data drive.

And if anybody here in this board has any questions about anything on that, I will happily come back and sit with you individually if you would like to explain the science behind this, and if you’re worried about being sued by somebody because you don’t follow the guidance of the CDC and the NIH, I will tell you, you have a free pro-bono expert testimony at your disposal. [audience applauds] I will testify in defense of this board turning down all these recommendations for free, at any time, in any court. Thank you.”

Dr. Ryan Cole, Speaking at the White Coat Summit

Source: odysee | Divide et Impera | Dr Ryan Cole Exposes Safety Dangers, Red Flags & Unknowns

[All quotes by Ryan Cole, with some embellishment added to highlight pertinent information.]

“Howdy howdy. I’m Dr. Cole. It’s an honor to be here with my colleagues. Some brilliant minds as you’ve already seen. So I’m humbled to be on this stage with them. I’m excited to be here with attorneys that fight for freedom as well. And it’s fantastic to be in a room with smiling faces not covered with unnecessary cloth that does nothing. [audience applauds] So…

So who is this random doctor on stage?

I’m Dr. Ryan Cole, I’m a male clinic trained, board-certified, anatomic pathologist, clinical pathologist, dermatopathologist, way too many years at school. Also did some phD research in immunology. So immunology/virology is right up my alley. So, if you want mechanisms of action and how things work and what not, go ahead and pick my brain.

Anyway, so what about the vaccine and what about deaths? You know, Dr. Urso had alluded to that, that we have some concerns about these high numbers. What’s going on?

You know, we see the headlines, like Dr. Merritt mentioned: 13 year old, 3 days after a shot, dies. 15 year old dies of a heart attack, you know, 10 children so far in the VAERS reports, probably more now. Death after heart attacks. 39 year old mom of 3, death after the shot, etc., etc., etc. So we see the headlines.

So here’s the question. One would think in this era of a new virus and a new experimental… – I don’t even like calling it a vaccine – an investigational vaccine [audience member: “A fake vaccine!”] A fake vaccine. Okay. I can… a “clot shot”, a “needle rape”, whatever you want to call it [audience members laugh] – um, okay. So, going to the VAERS data, um… 11,000 deaths. 12,000 deaths. 45,000 deaths.

In the literature so far, about a month ago, “First Post Vaccine Autopsy”. Out of 11,000 deaths?! Are you KIDDING me? Is this science anymore? No! No, “medical technocracy”. “Fear, suffering, shot. Fear, suffering, shot. That’s all you’re supposed to have. Listen to us and that’s all you get.”

No!

So how can we do science, if we’re not looking? One cannot find that, for which they do not look. Where is the funding?

And the independent pathologists – pathology, you know, I do a lot of biopsies, cancer diagnostics, what not, we never complain about getting too much tissue. Well, when you get the autopsy you get all the tissue. But guess what? You find all the answers, too. But if we’re not looking, we’re not going to find it. And if they’re saying, “Well, don’t autopsy that. It wasn’t the vaccine. These are not the droids you’re looking for. Don’t look here.” [audience laughs]

 

So, how, how on God’s green Earth are we going to know? Where is the funding? Autopsies are expensive, yes. But if we have billions to advertise a clot shot to children that don’t need it… Dr. Fauci, where’s the funding for science? [loud applause]

Okay. When an unapproved new drug therapy vaccine is put onto the market, well you need to use the French legal system. Guilty until proven innocent. So, IF there’s an adverse reaction, IF there’s a death, it happened from that therapy, until you prove that it didn’t. And we’re doing the “Look the other way, look the other way. Follow the money.”

Who’s behind this? I don’t know. I’m not going to conspiracy theory anything. I’m not going to be political, but I’m saying if you want the data, then you need to use that French legal system, say, “This is guilty until we prove it didn’t happen from something else.” And we’re doing just the opposite right now.

Okay, what about the spike protein? We’re giving a sequence, a gene sequence, into the bodies of human beings. And the sequence goes into our deltoid and we’re informed that it has a little anchoring protein and once that is translated and makes a little protein and it’s on the surface of your cell it stays there. Well, guess what? It doesn’t. And there are studies, and of course, the “fact-checkers” are “Oh, this isn’t true. This isn’t true.” – I’m a scientist. Don’t ask the journalists, ask the scientist. Okay?

So this spike protein doesn’t stay just in the deltoid, the spike circulates in your blood, it lands in multiple organs in the body. And you know what happens? That spike protein, without the body of the virus present, we did studies in lab animals; in the lab animals, just in injecting the spike, with no body of the virus, the spike induced the same disease as COVID-19 induced. The same lung disease. The same vascular disease. The same heart disease. The same brain disease. The spike is the toxin. So again, why are we injecting something into the human body that IS the toxin? It IS the toxin. It CAUSES the disease. This isn’t a vaccine! [audience applauds]

@5:25 : Okay, so we know that the virus who everybody’s heard about, this ACE2 receptor, here’s an example. So on the left hand side, this is a – one of the cells that lines your blood vessels – I’ll show you a chart in a minute, where we have ACE2 receptors. So on the left hand side you see a kind of in the corner of that upper grid and that bottom grid, these nice smooth lines. On the right hand side, this is what the spike protein – just the spike alone, from the vaccine, is doing to the mitochondria, your cells, that’s the engine of your cells. That’s what gives you energy, the power of your cells.

Compare the left: the smooth, nice, put together; compare the right: blown apart, fragmented. That’s from the VACCINE. Not from the virus. From the vaccine.

@6:08 : Okay, so here’s the human body. You can see the plethora of sites where we have ACE2 receptors. Now think about it. I mentioned, they tell us, “Oh gosh, the spike stays in your deltoid.” It doesn’t. It circulates. In the Harvard study in 13 nurses, they showed it circulating for at least 2 weeks. A lot of people lacked something called mRNAs, an enzyme that breaks down the RNA, so it may be circulating for even longer.

Now you hear, well gosh, they died, you know, just so long after the shot. So, you know, it was 2 weeks, 3 weeks, Hank Aaron, whoever. You know what? That spike’s circulating. They tried to pull the wool over our eyes and say, “Well, it couldn’t have been the shot. We’re too far out.” Not if the toxin’s still circulating! Not if the toxin’s still circulating. The spike is the toxin. Damage to the lungs, like I mentioned.

@6:57 : On the left hand side, healthy lung tissue; nice, spaced out. See, this is what pathologists do. We look at all these cells all day long. That’s kind of fun. We’re nerds this way.

On the right hand side, see how much more purple and blue that is? That’s all inflammation. Why? ACE2 receptors in that lung. Spike binding to it, inflammatory response, immune system attacking your own body. Disease FROM the spike. Disease FROM your own “clot shot” / “investigational vaccine”. They keep lying to the American public by calling it a vaccine. They keep taking the word “investigational” off, it’s what they call it in the emergency authorization. They keep not calling it what it is. “Investigational”. An experiment on humanity. And that’s what they’re doing. And I’m showing you why. Spike is a toxin. It crosses the blood-brain barrier. Kind of like my brain cells to be where they are, and not be blown apart, right? [audience applauds]

So why in the world would we put a toxin into the human body that’s going to disrupt the blood vessels in your brain, allow the spike in there and cause inflammation? The brain fog you hear about the COVID patients? Guess what. You hear about it in the post-vaccinated damaged individuals as well.

 

“But no. Nobody’s hurt by the shot. There’s not been one death. There’s not been one injury.” That’s what they tell you. It’s a lie. And this is science.

@8:15 [slides presented]: Okay, here we go. That’s – all the blue on top, those are brain cells, all the blue doesn’t belong there. That’s inflammation from the spike.

What about the kiddos? Heart inflammation. Guess what? Blots of ACE2 receptors in the heart. And here you can see, on the left hand side, see those blue arrows around the white? That’s inflammation in the heart. That’s not normal. That’s after a shot. That’s a spike protein landing there. That’s your immune system attacking your own tissues.

See on the right, that’s the red arrows, that’s the pericardium. The sac that surrounds your heart. That’s inflammation. That doesn’t belong there.

Once you have heart damage, the heart does not heal itself.

@8:54 : Okay, left hand side, all the blue dots: inflammation. See that gray in the middle? That’s early scarring. Guess what? Once a heart cell is damaged, it’s damaged forever. It doesn’t replace itself with another heart cell. It replaces itself with a scar. So you tell me you want to give a 12 year old, a 5 year old, a 13 year old, an 18 year old, a shot? And we see about a 200 times increase in myocarditis in our society right now? “That’s a good idea, let’s give a kid a tox and ruin his heart for life.”

Stop and think about what we’re doing. Insanity. We need to stop the insanity IMMEDIATELY.

This is OVER. Game over. This is no longer good science. This is a poisonous attack on our population. And it needs to stop NOW. [audience cheers]
 

@9:51 [slides presented]: Kidney, same thing. Kidney’s are kind of important. Three things in life. Blood goes round and round, gotta breathe, gotta make pee. You don’t do those three things, you die. Kidney, you want to damage your kidney with a clot shot? Not a good idea either.

Liver? Kind of need your liver to detoxify everything in your life. Same thing. Damage to the liver. See all that blue? That’s inflammation. Doesn’t belong there.

Testes. Kind of important for the next generation, right? As much as that looks like a lovely heart, see all the blue in it? Inflammation.

Same thing in the ovaries. Here’s the problem. Essentially absent from the literature. What are they hiding from us?

Okay?

Japanese bio-distribution study, took some doing to find this study. Dr. Bridle up in Canada, of course he was attacked for telling the truth. The lipid nanoparticle that surrounds the little mRNA they’re injecting into people’s bodies; yes, a lot of it stays in the deltoid, but it circulates as well. Guess where it likes to concentrate? A really biologically active organ. The ovary.

And, in the Pfizer paperwork and application, it clearly states that in the rats there was a 16% decrease in fertility. One of the most fertile little critter mammals on the planet. And they – “These are not the droids you’re looking for. Nevermind.”

So what’s it doing to humanity? Guess what? The answer is, we don’t know. Because we don’t have long-term safety data yet. That’s the tragedy and the crime in all of this. They’re pushing it. It’s an experiment! It’s emergency authorized. It’s not approved. We don’t – humanity is the phase 3 trial.

COVID’s a clotting disease as some of my colleagues have mentioned. After a shot, we as physicians, especially if patients complaining of post-vaccine symptoms, a d-dimer will go up when we have clots. We can’t see these clots on x-ray or scan. These are micro-clots. All these inflammatory patterns that I’m showing you, are from micro-clots as well. If we look at this in the patients, we know that they’re micro-clotting.

So this is something – Dr. Noorchashm, just like Dr. Urso mentioned – patient who has already had COVID, COVID recovered, broad beautiful immunity, they’re LYING to you to say that it’s not equal to a vaccine immunity. I love the blue pan rainbow analogy Dr. Urso gave. Screen before vaccine, there’s a multiple-fold increase risk of adverse reactions if you’ve had COVID and have recovered. You get a shot, you hyper-rev that immune system – you may be screwed. And/or dead.

All right. I’m going to reiterate, one cannot find that for which they do not look. Billions of dollars spent on advertising of, again, a toxin into the human body. Investigational vaccines, again, I will say to our agencies and our federal government, where’s the funding for real science? They don’t want you to see, what we’re seeing.

In the laboratory, I have the tissues of a dead man on the back of my desk. I have two more coming next week. Guess what? Just couple days after a shot: 50 year old, healthy triathlete. One of my favorite surgeons in town that I worked with? Second shot: mountain biking, gone.

All right. The other concern I already brought up, we have no long-term safety data. This is what we need to emphasize to society, and ask the authoritative agencies: what’s the risk for cancer after the shot? We don’t know. What’s the risk for autoimmune disease? We don’t know. What’s the risk for impairing fertility for a life-time? We don’t know. So why in the world would we willy-nilly push forward at the pace and the rate that we’re going, without knowing these things? Complete anti-science. And a complete attack on us.

No more mandatory forcing of employees – how in the world are these hospitals and these employers saying, “You can’t work for me if you don’t sign up to be a subject in an experiment on humanity.” Go back to the 1947 Nuremberg Code. We’re absolutely violating this as a nation and a people.

Where are the billions to do the autopsies? Where are the billions to prove the science? Where are the autopsies? I will go back – crickets. They’re not there.

Dismissal by the collusive media, of any adverse events or death. That’s a problem. And what happened to the concept of the “#metoo movement”? Believe everybody? What happened to “believe her”? Believe the story. What happened to “believe anyone”? Why won’t they believe the science? They won’t believe the science, they dismiss the science. What happened to this movement of “believe it until you can disprove it”? Gone. Gone.

All right. Couple side by side notes, really critically, and I’m almost out of time, what we’re seeing in the laboratory is the shots dysregulate your immune response. We have very important cells that keep other viruses in check. They keep cancers in check. There’s a type of cell called a CD8 killer t-cell. Well there’s a study out of Germany and the Netherlands that showed a shifted immune profile. And at the end, their conclusion was, we see a concerning pattern of the cells we normally need, to fight off these other things.

But the answer is, we don’t know for how long that shifted pattern lasts. It’s like having 8 blockers on the frontline – this is Texas, we talk football – having 8 blockers on the frontline and paralyzing 3 or 4 of them. But the answer is, we don’t know if they’re paralyzed for the rest of the game or the rest of their career.

And then what we see from this, in the laboratory is an uptick of herpes family viruses. Molluscum, human papillomavirus, all sorts of viruses. Mononucleosis, etc., reactivating. Reactivating at levels, and I’m a pathologist, so we see this in the laboratory and I’m seeing the early signal. Well guess what else that CD8 cell does? And some receptors on some of these t-cells called toll-like receptors, and there’s a certain pattern of them. They keep cancer in check. I have seen a 10 to 20 fold increase of uterine cancer in the last 6 months in my laboratory. And I keep data, year to year to year. In the last 6 months, when did we start the shots? January.

How much solid tumor cancer increase are we going to see over the next several years? Probably a lot. What’s the real answer? We don’t know, and sometimes that’s the most honest answer in medicine, is we don’t know.

A doctor that tells you he or she knows everything, don’t believe them. Find a new doctor.

Increase in latent viruses, etc., etc…

So anyway, I know I’m out of time for questions, thank you so much, and God bless.”

A huge thank you to these doctors and everyone else who has been speaking out against these affronts to our health, rights and freedom. These concerned, caring individuals are pointing out the corruption of the COVID/vaccine narrative, and we as a whole NEED TO LISTEN and REFUSE these unnecessary vaccines and lockdown/passport measures.

It is not about our health – as HONEST doctors/scientists/virologists/nurses, etc. around the world are exposing. If it were about our health, then proper studies and research grounded on facts would be offered, and transparency that people are suffering from an unparalleled amount of tragic side effects and death and the acknowledgement that these vaccine efforts should be STOPPED.

Instead, what we are getting are straight up LIES and COVERUPS, and an incessant push to get everyone vaccinated while disregarding the science and the dangers that these injections are imposing on the world. We are always told to “trust the science” – but “not THAT science”. Not the science that contradicts the official narrative. “Trust the scientists.” – “But not THOSE scientists.”

We need to be able to discern who has our best interest at heart – and one thing is certain: it is NOT the CDC, NIH, WHO, UN, NIAID, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, WEF, paid off institutions/influencers/celebrities/politicians or anyone else who continues to endorse these vaccines.

Please stay informed, and stay safe.

Featured image by Pete Linforth from Pixabay