Youtube Trigger Words

Can you guess what words trigger youtube’s algorithm software?

Some people may know of Youtube’s strange algorithm that will “demonetize” videos if they have certain keywords in the title. At least, according to this site and this list. And to say that some of these words are extremely innocuous is an understatement.

Take these common words for instance:

zero
Zelda (sorry, Zelda fans)
walk
get
people
film
game
food
theory

Now obviously this brings up the question if the popular youtuber MatPat from the Game/Film/Food Theorists series is demonetized. Of course, that’s unless he’s on another list like some people speculate that automatically puts his content on a “whitelist” instead of a “blacklist”, which would override the totalitarian regime of the youtube censors sensors.

This wouldn’t just apply to Matpat, but to anyone that youtube deems worthy enough to have monetized videos. And this is just pure speculation, and not about the youtubers, but youtube itself.

With not only the amount of words on the “blacklist” but also the quality of them, one could surmise that youtube just put the whole dictionary into their blacklist and just approve people who have passed their propaganda filter test first.

Or, another theory here, youtube is still able to get viewers and content creators with all of these demonetized videos while not having to pay them for ads – saving this, instead, for their “cream of the crop”.

Creators finally know how much money YouTube makes, and they want more of it
The YouTube demonetization controversy, explained

Whatever the case is, for youtube to target every single word from this sentence: “My exciting trip to Hawaii.” speaks VOLUMES of their extensive reach into dictatorship.

Seriously.

Every. Single. Word.

You can’t say “my“, you can’t say “to“, you can’t say proper pronouns; you can’t say “who“, “what“, “where“, “when“, “why“, you can’t say “the” … You can’t say ANY of the words in the following sentence:

Whatever the case is, for youtube to target every single word from this sentence: “My exciting trip to Hawaii.” speaks VOLUMES of their extensive reach into –

Funnily enough, though, you can still say “dictatorship”.

And you can’t say, “Jesus Christ said, “Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.” or “Love your neighbor.

Every single word in those sentences are targeted as well.

But hey, you can still say, “Hail Lucifer”, so that’s something.

 

I’m really hoping the list is a hoax and not legitimate…

Now, another interesting thing that I came across, are OTHER certain key words that trigger youtube’s algorithm in a different way.

Perhaps you’ve seen a screen like this on youtube while watching a certain video:

At the bottom of the video there is an “information panel” to present additional information to the viewer for that specific topic. Regardless of the opinions contained within that video. So these “information panels” are basically to guide the viewer to the “actual facts” of that subject matter.

In the above example, we can see that it is a COVID-19 related information panel, because tptsb want to enforce their idea onto the public about what covid is, how severe it is, and how we all MUST take the vaccine in order to go back to normal. …Clicking on that specific LEARN MORE link will take you to the cdc website.

Now besides their use of the information bar for specific news sources, like they use for BBC, PBS, etc., this specific information bar for covid is meant to combat “misinformation” on topical subjects.

Source: Youtube/Google support page | Information panel giving topical context

Huh. They must have read my mind. Because the “moon landing” is exactly what I was looking up when noticing this very helpful “information” bar. Sure, I’ve seen it before, but it never really caught my attention until just recently.

While researching interesting information about NASA (there’ll be a post about them coming up soon), I noticed that the youtube video I was watching mentioned “flat Earth” and the dome/firmament allegedly around us that would prevent NASA from actually going into outer space and showing us all these lovely videos and photographs of the Earth from a distance, etc., etc., and the alleged Mars rover landings. This topic is a whole different subject altogether, which I won’t get into here, but thought it was interesting that the youtube algorithm would specifically give an information bar about “flat Earth”.

“YouTube had faced criticism for allowing the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories through its platform. In 2019, YouTube stated that it was making changes in its software to reduce the distribution of videos based on conspiracy theories including flat Earth.” – Wikipedia | Flat Earth

If you notice, the video does not mention “flat earth” in the title, but it is a subject discussed in the video. Now, why would an affiliate of youtube (if it’s not youtube themselves) go through the time and effort to specifically put this additional information bar trying to lead the viewers to a third-party website to “combat misinformation”, if youtube is supposedly a platform highlighting the following (found on their own About page) –

For the harder to read texts:

Freedom of Expression: “We believe people should be able to speak freely, share opinions, foster open dialogue, and that creative freedom leads to new voices, formats and possibilities.

Freedom of Information: “We believe everyone should have easy, open access to information and that video is a powerful force for education, building understanding, and documenting world events, big and small.

Freedom of Opportunity: “We believe everyone should have a chance to be discovered, build a business and succeed on their own terms, and that people—not gatekeepers—decide what’s popular.

Freedom to Belong: “We believe everyone should be able to find communities of support, break down barriers, transcend borders and come together around shared interests and passions.

Either they are lying through their teeth about their own beliefs and values, or they have no idea what “freedom” means. …Or I guess it could be both.

Some people will try to defend youtube’s rights to deplatform or demonetize anyone they wish, but you can’t tell me that their “views” aligns with what they are actually doing.

And why are these “critics” so afraid of people believing in flat earth to begin with? If it’s such a RIDICULOUS claim and all of these people are dolts for entertaining the idea, what’s the harm if they believe in a nonsense conspiracy theory? If the world is really a globe then just chalk it up to a whole bunch of people being foolishly misled and move on. …Unless, of course, too many people are believing it and it’s harming the very fabric of a billion-dollar enterprise that uses the tax-payers money to engage in fraudulent mass manipulation and deception. Just food for thought.

Getting to the other trigger words I’ve found that will bring up a similar information bar, along with “flat Earth” and “covid“, there are also these:

– flat earth
– covid-19
– illuminati
– qanon
– freemasonry
– U.S. elections
– assassination of John F. Kennedy
– Apollo space program
– climate change
– contrail (chemtrail)
– reptilian humanoid
– Bohemian Club

Now why would these very few and very specific words trigger an “information” bar?

I’ve tried a long list (being of a conspiratorial or controversial nature) of what I thought would trigger an information bar, but the above were the only ones I’ve seen so far. I’ve tried:

– vaccine
– Fauci
– Bill Gates
– Epstein
– royal family
– pope
– vatican
– satan
– hydroxychloroquine
– lgbqt
– gender
– abortion

– pizzagate
– wikileaks
– government
– cia
– moon landing
– Roswell
– ufo
– alien
– nasa
– bible
– God
– Jesus

– Jew
– semite
– darpa
– cern
– LHC
– Haarp
– mrna
– 9/11
– September 11
– Hitler
– Saddam Hussein
– capitol riot

(Now I’m probably on a list for making this list…)

I’ve searched many more terms, but these are just ones I’ve decided to highlight to show the diversity of the topics that I looked up. None of these triggered the information bar. So it’s very interesting that the few words above did.

While youtube back in its glory days was more of a fair, user-friendly platform that tried to treat everyone equally, that is no longer the case. Now, the company is nothing more than a propaganda driven love-fest with the efforts being spent on highlighting biased, partisan views (their own views or that of their top monetary donors…) instead of an outlet where people are allowed to say their own opinions (and facts! in some cases) – within reason, of course. Yes, hate speech is still something that is hard to tackle, but when one can literally call anything and everything “hate speech”, the lines become severely blurred and prevents anyone from saying anything due to unfair criticism and judgement.

Debate is no longer an option. Now it is, “Do as I say, and think as I do, or you’re a terrorist. White supremacist. Conspiracy theorist. Engaging in hate speech. Fake news. Misinformation. Dangerous far-right dissenter. We must de-platform, ban, censor, delete, dox – anything we can do to get you in line or shut you out.”

This is what we’re faced with. Why are people getting attacked for their different belief structures? Is it because it dares to fly in the face of a corrupt organization(s) that is trying to implement their absolute tyranny over the whole planet? Does it threaten their ideologies and/or the wool that they’ve put over the public’s eyes? Why are certain “theories” being so harshly condemned and persecuted?

And strange theories, they are. Could these possibly have an ounce (or a ton) of truth to them? And this is why these immoral establishments are trying so hard to reign the control back in? Are people waking up to the possibility that we’re all being massively lied to on a grand scale? (And could it also be a diversionary tactic to keep our attention away from something completely different?)

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Steve Buissinne from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Strange Moving White and Black Fibers Found on Masks and Test Swabs - Are these Morgellons? Some kind of experiment?
Are We Perpetuating Violence and Negativity? - Are we unwittingly encouraging it?
Creating Our Own Reality - Do we allow evil to run rampant in the world?
Humanity is under attack Humanity Is Under Attack - Not just physically, but spiritually as well.
Exposing NASA’s Many Lies - Revealing some dubious actions of the most infamous space enterprise.
Youtube Trigger Words - Can you guess what words trigger youtube's algorithm software?
Are we in the Matrix? Are We In The Matrix? - And are NPCs real?

10 Legitimate Reasons People are Concerned About Getting the Vaccine Shot

Several Reasons Why People May Fear the Vaccine

This post isn’t meant to fear-monger or spread outrageous “baseless theories”. No, this is meant to inform people of the justifiable reasons why people would be apprehensive about taking this covid vaccine. (Not just this vaccine, mind you, but any shots.)

And, before anyone labels me as an “anti-vaxxer”, I am not. I just can recognize when certain things we’re being told, especially as it has been increasingly rampant lately, are not what they seem and while there are certainly good, honest, morally ethic scientists/researchers etc., there are unfortunately also those that would exploit that trust and do not have the benefits of humankind in mind.

1. Fake vaccine shots caught on camera:

What would definitely quelch any doubts from people who are wary about taking a vaccine?

How about we film a few healthcare workers/politicians on video taking these mystery vaccines? What could go wrong?

More examples for your viewing pleasure:

– Image of Sadiq Kahn (mayor of London) staring at what appears to be an uncapped syringe.
– Original image can be seen at @MayorofLondon. Unless, of course, it gets taken down

Now whether these people on the receiving end of the shots were fully aware of these mishaps or not, this does not deter from the fact that these were staged and/or deliberately falsified to give the viewer a semblance of trust in the vaccine.

And while the “leading authority” of fact-checking sources all over the world are so quick to point out, that doesn’t mean that these folks did not get the vaccine shot. “They just didn’t get a good enough picture so had to retake.” Or “We absolutely, honest-to-goodness, cross-my-heart-and-hope-to-die, made sure that they definitely received the vaccine after the cameras stopped rolling.” Or “The picture was obviously doctored.” (no pun intended)

2. The ineptitude (or sometimes outright callous attitude) of some doctors/nurses:

While I’m sure there are a high number of very professional and responsible doctors and nurses, the fact of the matter is that we’re all human and can make mistakes. (Some make more mistakes than others.) Now while this isn’t necessarily a reason to distrust all hospitals and the medical industry (there are plenty of other reasons for that as well…), we have to be aware that negligence does exist, and our lives are literally at the mercy of those medically (and psychologically) in charge of us.

Any number of mistakes can happen when confronted with an illness, disease, pain, etc.

The doctor may misdiagnose an illness.

The nurse/doctor may accidentally give you the wrong shot.

Incorrect surgery on the wrong limb.

Wrong prescription may be given out.

Tools left inside the body after surgery.

Reusing the same syringe/needle.

And this awful, tragic, unjustifiable situation… (Trust the doctors and experts, right?)

I think you see where this is going. There are many mistakes that can happen no matter how many safety procedures are in place. And when money’s on the line (or some other strange ulterior motive), as we can see in the last couple of links, for some our integrity to do what’s right flies out the window and we take drastic measures and shortcuts even at the cost of someone’s well-being.

3. Possibility of hospitals to be bribed/bought off to suit a particular agenda (or just plain out stupidity):

Echoing the sentiments of Sen. Dr. Scott Jensen, the very shady practice of paying hospitals in regards to carrying out unorthodox procedures is extremely alarming, and we shouldn’t undermine the possibilities that might arise from these questionable dictates.

“Right now Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you’ll get paid $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000; three times as much. Nobody can tell me, after 35 years in the world of medicine, that sometimes those kinds of things [don’t] [have] impact on what we do…”

My conversation with State Senator and doctor who exposes Medicare payouts for COVID-19 patients

Then we have the inconceivable decision to place covid-infected patients in a nursing home – a place where the most vulnerable of people can be found and who is at most risk of contracting this illness – and who the government keeps alleging are the very same people we’re trying to save from getting sick.

I honestly don’t know how anyone in their right mind does not see a problem with this. It flies against the very propaganda they’re trying to enforce on everybody that lockdown mode was a must to most specifically save our elderly population. Yet they’re going to quarantine covid positive patients with them? HAS THE WORLD GONE MAD?

Due to this move, all eyes have turned to Rachel Levine, who was the spokesperson and proponent for this event. (Un)Ironically, this very same person had her own mother removed from a nursing home facility and placed in a safer environment.

The health official responsible for overseeing nursing homes in Pennsylvania — where nearly 70 percent of the state’s coronavirus-related deaths have occurred — has reportedly moved her elderly mother out of a facility as deaths skyrocketed.

Pennsylvania health official moved mother from nursing home as deaths skyrocketed

As an added note, who do we have as Biden’s nomination for assistant secretary of health? None other than Rachel Levine, who mandated this outrageous order.

You would think that with the very specific prompts to not go see grandma or grandpa over Thanksgiving/Christmas, or their birthday, or EVER, because you might be asymptomatic and unknowingly passing along an illness to them and it’s only for their own good, it would dawn on these “health experts” that knowingly sending in actual positive patients (and even that is debatable) to the elderly people would be more likely to get them sick. But it’s okay because the HEALTH EXPERTS know what they’re doing.

#clownworld

4. Fake Vaccines on the Rise:

Due to the fallible (and sometimes gullible) nature of man, it is sadly not uncommon that one would fall prey to a scam, even when trying to follow all of the protocols.

“As [the] vaccine is now becoming available, the large demand will trigger different criminal activities,” Europol spokesperson Jan Op Gen Oorth told DW. This includes circulation of falsified vaccines on illicit markets or their introduction into the legal market, trafficking of fake or substandard vaccines that have fallen out of the cold chain, and the theft of cargo and even medical waste such as empty vials.

Officials warn of fake COVID-19 vaccines

In early December, when COVID-19 vaccines became officially available worldwide, illicit vaccines were offered for sale with prices starting at around $250. Now, as multiple vaccines are being approved and rolled out globally, the number of advertisements for vaccines “has exploded, and the asking prices have doubled or even quadrupled. Now, the researchers found that the vendors on the dark net were asking for $500 or even $1,000 for an unspecified dose.

In Britain too, the National Crime Agency (NCA) have reported that scammers were offering fake Covid-19 vaccines to elderly and vulnerable people in return for payment and has urged the public to be vigilant.

Beware of fake Covid-19 vaccines: When, where and how to receive the genuine vaccine? (that’s assuming you want the “genuine vaccine” to begin with…)

Are we sure the politicians, administrators and healthcare officials realize this also? Because with the very bizarre order that Rachel Levine/Andrew Cuomo were carrying out in regards to the covid patients and nursing homes, perhaps they were also merely pawns in a pandemic scam gone wrong. (or right, depending on which side of the fence you’re sitting on.)

5. The fact that we’ve been lied to (misled) many times over during this coronavirus situation:

One name that keeps popping up who has changed his opinion (which should be based on fact) on several different matters about the covid pandemic countless times is Dr. Anthony Fauci – the head of the NIAID and the talking “authority” on the coronavirus pandemic.

As I outlined in this article here:

Anthony Fauci Caught ‘Lying’ – Several Times (Science doesn’t lie. But people sure do.)

we need to be aware that just because someone is labeled an “expert” or an “authority leader”, etc., does not mean that they follow a morally ethic code.

Our “leading experts” during the covid pandemic has been seen numerous times changing their mind, changing the narrative, misleading the public, and even changing the very definition of certain scientific terminology in regards to the situation we’re in today. As some people speculate, could all of this deception and changing narratives be politically charged? Are we merely being used for the stranglehold of certain politically-leaning agendas?

Then we have the times that news outlets such as CBS aired the wrong footage of an Italian hospital and passed it off as if it was happening in the Unites States. Not just once, but twice. And we shouldn’t forget about the time that, once again, CBS aired footage of a staged coronavirus testing center. Whether due to CBS’ foreknowledge or not, they still aired it. And what followed were multiple excuses outlining why it happened. – When News Media Lies

These establishments, however, are never targeted for spreading false information or fake news. We are just to accept their lies and manipulation and changing narratives because it’s allegedly for the “better good”. (For whose benefit?)

6. Government involvement in vaccines to experiment on people:

And since we’ve mentioned unethical “experts”, I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention the many times the government were actively involved in this agenda as well.

One of the most famous cases of this, was the Tuskegee Syphilis experiment, which is also mentioned in the below links. Included are a few other cases where the government and/or medical industry conducted awful, heinous studies on human lives.

9 Absolutely Evil Medical Experiments

Top 10 US Government Experiments Done On Its Own Citizens

There’s a phrase, “in the name of science“, which alludes to giving those with the scientific capabilities and know-how the “right” and “authority” to conduct any number of experiments and research into any and all subjects – including human beings – all for the sake of “learning” more and finding out how the world works. This is at least, the softer definition of what the phrase means.

Of course, one could delve deeper into the possibilities that all of this “scientific experimentation” (on the surface, for our benefit) is in fact nothing more than merely an excuse to satisfy their own curiosity. And that’s putting it nicely. And sure, there are allegedly rules and laws put in place to deter abuse of this power. But as we all should know, it seems as if the laws imposed on everyone else does not apply to those of a “higher authority”. There are other darker theories of what is to be gained for experimenting with nature as well – but I will leave that for you to research if you so wish.

(I have not read the following book, and after reviewing the responses of people who have, it is sure to be a grim and harsh look into the experiments that were done behind closed curtains “all in the name of science”:
In the Name of Science: A History of Secret Programs, Medical Research, and Human Experimentation)

Is there no wonder we don’t trust these agencies?

7. Certain vaccines for certain people?:

One video that I recall seeing immediately gave me a nervous, suspicious feeling. Was this born out of just simple paranoia? Or do I have a good reason for feeling anxious about what this could possibly entail:

How to Vaccinate Anti-Vaxxers | Allen Pan – Sufficiently Advanced

This video is meant to mock anti-vaxxers, but as Allen Pan went to get his vaccine, both he and his friend, Shani (who was already suspicious of the vaccine), couldn’t even hide their confusion as to why the hospital was going to give Shani a different vaccine.

Caption on the video: “They tried to give Shani a different brand than what they gave me

Shani:No, that… give me the good one.

Allen Pan:That’s weird.

Shani:So they gotta be different.” (indistinguishable) “You better include this in the video. ‘Try to give her a different type of vaccine’.”

Then we have reddituser nachotacocat11 expressing concern that an electronic form asked the patient to choose which vaccine they’d prefer. After selecting Pfizer, realized that the nurse administered the Moderna vaccine instead.

The responses run the gamut from others expressing their concern as well and their understanding of the situation, all the way to people shaming her for even daring to question the establishment and that she should feel lucky she got the vaccine at all. I won’t even get into the different reasons why different vaccines for different people may be necessary, because I’m not a scientist or molecular biologist. But it is something to consider when they even have the option to fill out on their form in the first place if they’re just going to give you whichever one they feel necessary anyway.

Another issue that has arisen is why the extreme push to vaccinate so quickly the black and latino communities, the poorer countries and less fortunate first with this new, clinical trial, only authorized for emergency use, vaccine?

Is it REALLY because they’re determined to save the less fortunate and most vulnerable people and the mistreated black community? Is it a show of good faith that these agencies REALLY care about the minority groups and their efforts are to simply save their lives first and foremost above all others? Are we REALLY to believe this as their ultimate goal? Even after reading about all the atrocities committed in several countries by the government and medical communities? (Not to mention even more crimes on humanity coming up, courtesy of Mr. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. exposing Bill Gates – one of the hugest leads in this whole “vaccinate the whole world” ordeal.)

8. Alternative methods are being censored and banned worldwide:

Some scientists have touted the use of hydroxychloroquine (mixed with other important factors) and ivermectin – which have both been debated in the “leading expert” community as not being effective. Yet there are tons of actual altruistic doctors and scientists vouching for these methods.

Doctors cure 6,000 patients with Covid-19 with Ivermectin

Finally, States Are Retracting Hydroxychloroquine Bans

Why would these alternative medicines be banned? Could it simply be because they actually save lives and it’s cost effective? If this is true, then there would be no need for a world-wide plan to vaccinate the whole planet. Even more mysterious, why does it seem as if specific factories are being targeted? Coincidence?

Second Largest Hydroxychloroquine Factory Explodes In Giant Fireball

If it is indeed true that these two are actual, proven methods in effectively curing sars/covid, then the yearly (or more) need to keep vaccinating people over and over and over again with different chemicals (which presumably would keep giving side effects that would require even more medication) would not be needed. Who would hurt from that? The pharmaceutical industry.

9. The “ingredients” in the vaccines – and the fact that some of the producers aren’t liable for short-term/long-term damage caused by this rushed vaccine:

Speaking of the vaccines and all of the chemicals that are possibly in it, we have again the moral and ethic code that some people will abide by. Whether you’re a believer or not, there are some who are opposed to being injected with aborted cell lines and/or the other chemicals, etc. that one feels doesn’t need to be in our system.

Which COVID-19 vaccines are connected to abortion?

There is also the questionable new technology that is going into this vaccine, most notably the mRNA component, that has yet to be extensively studied. (If we are to believe their accounts…)

mRNA Vaccines Might Prove Catastrophic in a Rushed Coronavirus Response

Are our immune systems so compromised that we need a vaccine for all of these diseases and possibly unknown ones as well? Could it be that these diseases/illnesses/plagues, etc. are created by the very hands that make the vaccines? Is the pharmaceutical and medical industry one of the largest, longest running scams on the planet?

No… that’s just silly, crazy talk and I’m definitely not saying that…

And when you pair up everything together on top of these rushed vaccines that haven’t been vetted/tested properly with no long-term data to its name, and the efforts of these vaccine production companies to be exempt from any liability due to short-term or long-term damage… well, that’s a red flag and a huge problem.

Drug Companies Continue to Shed Liability for Rushed Coronavirus Treatments

So even if you agree to being injected with this potentially harmful and ethically controversial cocktail of ingredients and technology, there’s little one can do as far as monetary compensation if something goes wrong.

10. Bill Gates’ history into eugenics and depopulation agenda:

In this post What is Bill Gates’ Motive, it highlights some of the agendas that Mr. Bill Gates himself has presented and spoken about.

In the following link, we see a video that expands upon Bill Gates’ ties to the eugenics history and Planned Parenthood (whose biggest business operation has been abortion) and his partnership with Anthony Fauci.

SHOCKING! Historian Exposes Bill Gates’ Ties To NAZIs And More

A rather lengthy (but extremely pertinent) excerpt from the above link is repeated here, from Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s instagram post he made on April 8, 2020 about Gates and the damage that his and those of his co-horts has caused across the world:

Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously.

In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines.

By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines. In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died.

Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children. During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa,

Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers”.

Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless” and immoral”.

In 2010, Gates committed $ 10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”.

In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign.

Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.
Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.

A 2017 study (Morgensen et.Al.2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP is killing more African than the disease it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children.

Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually. Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of – hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development.

They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish – that good health only comes in a syringe.

In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical -industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance.

In this recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.…”

SHOCKING! Historian Exposes Bill Gates’ Ties To NAZIs And More

And if one digs further into this agenda, a pattern starts to emerge of Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood) and her agenda of wiping out the “unfit”. (Her words, not mine.)

“It seems to me from my experience…that while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table which means their ignorance, superstitions and doubts.

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal.

We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

Birth control is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defective.”

“No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth…”

7 Incredibly Shocking Quotes From Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger
21 Quotes by Margaret Sanger that Will Probably Make You Sick

It is an absolute infringement and affront to have our very own lives dictated in this manner.

So why might people be wary of this highly rushed and questionable vaccine? The above list might help explain it. And we have to realize, even if someone had NO real reason for not wanting to take this vaccine, it is still their body, their right to not have foreign substances from suspected corrupt agencies injecting them without their consent.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by torstensimon from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Strange Moving White and Black Fibers Found on Masks and Test Swabs - Are these Morgellons? Some kind of experiment?
Are We Perpetuating Violence and Negativity? - Are we unwittingly encouraging it?
Creating Our Own Reality - Do we allow evil to run rampant in the world?
Humanity is under attack Humanity Is Under Attack - Not just physically, but spiritually as well.
Exposing NASA’s Many Lies - Revealing some dubious actions of the most infamous space enterprise.
Youtube Trigger Words - Can you guess what words trigger youtube's algorithm software?
Are we in the Matrix? Are We In The Matrix? - And are NPCs real?

Anthony Fauci Caught ‘Lying’ – Several Times

Science doesn’t lie. But people sure do.

What is “science”?

SCIENCE:
 
1. a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws.
2. systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.
3. any of the branches of natural or physical science.
4. systematized knowledge in general.
5. knowledge, as of facts or principles; knowledge gained by systematic study.
6. a particular branch of knowledge.
7. any skill or technique that reflects a precise application of facts or principles.

Science is a set of facts and principles gained from knowledge and study into the experience and observation of the physical/material world.

FACTS. TRUTHS. PRINCIPLES.

I know I’m not the only one questioning why “science” seems to be changing at the whim of a small few. And who do we have at the helm of it all? Especially during these very confusing/controversial covid times?

Anthony Fauci, NIH, WHO, FDA and the CDC. (All “gold-standard, leading experts” that ironically are shifting, changing, removing what “science” has defined throughout all these years.)

Even his very own statements about science should shed some light on what science is supposed to be: “He added, “So, when they see someone up in the White House, which has an air of authority to it, who’s talking about science, that there are some people who just don’t believe that — and that’s unfortunate because, you know, science is truth. … If you go by the evidence and by the data, you’re speaking the truth.”
Anthony Fauci lied about masks; now he complains that people ‘distrust authority’

Yes. “If you go by the evidence and by the data, you’re speaking the truth.” – not if you’re making it up and changing it as you go along because it suits a particular agenda.

Let’s see how many times Mr. Dr. Expert Anthony Fauci and the co-horts of this agenda were caught lying or “changing” goalposts/rules and even the very definition of what herd immunity means (keep in mind, this is just a very small sample out of many) :

Wearing a mask:

1. Feb. 17 (2020): Fauci told USA Today that wearing a mask is for the infected to protect others. “Now, in the United States, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to wear a mask.
The Fauci Timeline — Sorting Fact From Fiction

2. March 2020: “When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences — people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face,” said Fauci at that time.
FLASHBACK: Dr. Fauci claims masks don’t provide COVID protection, only help people ‘feel…better’

3. In June 2020, Fauci admitted that he and other public health officials had downplayed the benefit of masks — with some even advising against wearing them — because of a fear of equipment shortages for front-line health care workers.
Dr. Anthony Fauci Admits Shifting Goalposts on ‘Herd Immunity’

4. September 2020: “At that point, which is now months and months ago, I have been on the airways, on the radio, on TV, begging people to wear masks. And I keep talking in the context of wear a mask, keep physical distance, avoid crowds, wash your hands and do things more outdoors versus indoors.”

Fauci says Trump took his stance on masks ‘out of context’ during debate

5. By October (2020), Dr. Fauci had completely reversed course on mask-wearing, saying that it may be time to impose a nationwide mask-wearing mandate, something he termed “universal mask-wearing.”

“Well, if people are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandating it,” Fauci told CNN’s Erin Burnett Oct. 23.
FLASHBACK: Dr. Fauci claims masks don’t provide COVID protection, only help people ‘feel…better’

From a personal opinion: I want to point out how adamant Anthony Fauci is about flouting wearing a mask, yet here, he is not wearing one throughout his entire speech. Doesn’t he realize how far his droplets are landing? Not to mention that at the 19 minute mark we see press secretary Jen Psaki take the stand, without wiping down the potentially dangerous, deadly virus that Anthony Fauci could have been dispensing all over the podium.

Including that is the fact that Jen Psaki then takes her face masks (because, “double the protection”…) off as well, and flips it mouth-side down on the very podium that expert Anthony Fauci was just speaking at and spreading his germs. At the very end of the video, Jen is seen putting the mask back on, after letting it sit and fester on top of the stand that Dr. Fauci was just speaking over.

What has our common sense been reduced to?

Herd immunity:

6. Earlier on in the pandemic, Fauci had said the United States would need 60 to 70 percent of people to be vaccinated in order to reach herd immunity, according to the Times.
REPORT: Fauci Admits He Lied Because ‘Country Wasn’t Ready’ To Hear The Truth

7. Dr Fauci’s estimate for reaching herd immunity has been steadily inching up, @nytimes’ Donald McNeil Jr reports. Fauci told us at last week’s @CNBC #HealthyReturns that it may be 75-85%. https://t.co/j18nUYZ3cV pic.twitter.com/hIKewMAFim

— Meg Tirrell (@megtirrell) December 24, 2020
REPORT: Fauci Admits He Lied Because ‘Country Wasn’t Ready’ To Hear The Truth

8. “When polls said only about half of all Americans would take a vaccine, I was saying herd immunity would take 70 to 75 percent,” Fauci told the Times. “Then, when newer surveys said 60 percent or more would take it, I thought, ʻI can nudge this up a bit,’ so I went to 80, 85.”

“We need to have some humility here,” he added. “We really don’t know what the real number is. I think the real range is somewhere between 70 to 90 percent. But, I’m not going to say 90 percent.”
Fauci doubles down after being confronted over startling admission that he deceived the public about herd immunity

We even have the WHO, who is constantly changing / “updating” their definition for what herd immunity means depending on the alleged “new” results and information that they determine from their studies.

Another change, once again, on December 21, 2020:

Yet another "update" explaining their change in definition.

Very suspect, Anthony Fauci and WHO. Very suspect.

And perhaps because of this exposure, they felt the need to “clarify”, this time taking into account not only the vaccines that they heap enormous praise and focus on, but this time alluding to the Samaritan goodness of their hearts that they do not feel as if herd immunity should be achieved by exposing people to the virus. But instead by using the vaccine. (Because they care so much.)

The question then is, who is going to protect us from the vaccine if/when it turns out (since new information comes out all the time…) that the vaccine was not as “safe and effective” as they once thought? Their inclusion that “WHO will continue to update these answers as new information becomes available.” leaves the door wide open to skirt away from any responsibility of the side effects of the vaccine due to not enough foresight because of the ever-evolving nature of this new virus and the vaccine that has yet to be studied thoroughly for long-term safety and effectiveness.

The argument then possibly becomes that their sincere effort to “save humanity” from this deadly pandemic overrides the vaccine effectiveness because of the huge demand to save the population (let’s not get into the depopulation agenda of Bill Gates – in which he and Anthony Fauci are close friends – and others… although, by all means, please research this to gain more information) and that they honestly, truly, genuinely sought to cure us all from this virus. The tragic outcome of the vaccine that they “earnestly” thought was for the benefit of the people would be unprecedented and the blame would then go to, again, the changing nature of the virus and/or our immune response system not adhering well to their honest-to-goodness efforts.

Sorry, but, I’m not buying it.

Asymptomatic vs. Symptomatic

9. January 2020: “But the one thing historically that people need to realize is that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory viruses of any type asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there is a rare symptomatic transmission that may transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.
Here Is a Video of Fauci Explaining in January 2020 That Asymptomatic Transmission Is NEVER the Driver of Outbreaks

10. June 2020: Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove: “We’re constantly looking at this data, and we’re trying to get more information from countries to truly answer this question,” she added. “It still appears to be rare that an asymptomatic individual actually transmits onward.”

Anthony Fauci: “We know from epidemiological studies they can transmit to someone who is uninfected even when they’re without symptoms,” Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told ABC’s “Good Morning America” on Wednesday. “So to make a statement to say that’s a rare event was not correct.”
Fauci says asymptomatic coronavirus transmission is possible following WHO confusion

11. September 2020: “I can tell you right now that we should be testing more and we should be testing asymptomatic people,” Fauci told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes on Thursday night. “Take that to the bank and trust me on it.”
CDC reverses course on testing asymptomatic people for Covid-19, again

The PCR / covid tests:

12. Yet a PCR test instruction document from the CDC that had been revised five times as of July 13, 2020, specified testing and interpretation of the test using a Ct of 40. On September 28, 2020, a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases from Jaafar et al. had asserted, based on patient labs and clinical data involving nearly 4,000 patients, that a Ct of 30 was appropriate for making public policy. An update to the CDC instructions for PCR testing from December 1, 2020, still uses a Ct of 40.
The WHO Finally Updates Its COVID-19 Testing Policy… One Hour After Biden’s Inauguration

13. Anthony Fauci (July 16, 2020): “…If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…it’s just dead nucleoids, period.”
Fauci Himself Admits Covid PCR Test at Over 35 Cycles Is Deceitful, Worse Than Useless

14. Article published on September 30, 2020: The reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test used to identify those people infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus uses a nasal swab to collect RNA from deep within the nasal cavity of the individual being tested. The RNA is reverse transcribed into DNA and amplified through 40 or more cycles, or until virus is detected. The result is reported as a simple “yes” or “no” answer to the question of whether someone is infected.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials state they do not specify the cycle threshold ranges used to determine who is positive, and that commercial manufacturers and laboratories set their own threshold ranges.

Any test with a cycle threshold (CT) above 35 is too sensitive, says Juliet Morrison, PhD, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 [cycles] could represent a positive.” A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35, she added. Dr. Mina said he would set the figure at 30, or even less.

Coronavirus Cases Plummet When PCR Tests Are Adjusted

Yikes. There is so much wrong with these examples. Who is in charge, again? The labs/manufacturers can set their own threshold? Yet officials wouldn’t recommend anything higher than 35? Or even 30? Even Anthony Fauci, who finally wasn’t lying about the amount of cycles? Yet at what threshold were all of these tests being done to crank out all of these false positives that are, again, just now being addressed and changed? The FDA recommended threshold of 40 or as many as it takes “until virus is detected“?

Then pair that up with what Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test had to say:
“I don’t think you can misuse PCR. [It is] the results; the interpretation of it. If they can find this virus in you at all – and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”
Dr. Fauci admits the PCR test for coronavirus is all but useless as it is administered in the US

15. Dr. David Samadi (January 21, 2021): The World Health Organization has now released guidance to laboratories around the world to reduce the cycle count in PCR tests to get a more accurate representation of COVID cases.

The current cycle was much too high and resulting in any particle being declared a positive case.

The WHO notice concluded by suggesting that “most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.”
World Health Organization updates PCR test guidelines

So apparently all this time they weren’t assessing all of the other necessary relative data needed to confirm a positive case, and instead ran as many cycles as they possibly could to detect the virus – against the numerous prompts of the medical community who said all along that this was a huge oversight – meanwhile suspiciously cranking out positive numbers for the media to drool over. And as some people have pointed out, all of these new changes are “coincidentally” just in time to greet the new president as an illusion of control and miraculously reduced numbers of positive coronavirus cases. (Or it’s due to the fantastic work of the rushed vaccine – or both.)

Hydroxychloroquine

16. The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.

So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump street? He didn’t even launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9 (2020), by which time 33,000 people had died.

Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 — nobody needed to die

17. August 12, 2020: Since the start of the pandemic, hundreds of doctors have successfully used hydroxychloroquine to treat patients symptomatic of COVID-19 infections. In frustration at the media negativity about this safe, effective medicine American doctors have sent an open letter to Dr Fauci raising their concerns.
Doctors Send Open Letter to Fauci About HCQ COVID Cure

Other doubts from multiple outlets about the supposed “expert” decisions of those in charge:

Up until COVID hit in 2020, neither WHO nor the CDC had ever considered a single positive PCR test sufficient for diagnosing viral infection.

TOTAL COINCIDENCE ALERT: C19 Diagnostic Criteria Tightened by WHO on Biden Inauguration Day!

Sen. Marco Rubio just called out Anthony Fauci in a penned piece posted on Fox News as a lying liar who arrogantly used his position as the nation’s top infectious disease bureaucrat to lie to the American people “in order to manipulate their behavior.”

“[P]lacing blind faith in unelected celebrity scientists,” Rubio warned, “has its limits, and we must not be afraid to call them out when they’re caught overstepping their legitimate authority.”

Anthony Fauci’s ‘lying’ is hardly surprising

Also, the nation’s testing data has been called into question, as this week the CDC and 11 states were forced to admit that they were mixing testing results in a way that might make the data less useful in assessing the rate of the disease’s spread.

If it isn’t the nation’s mood, nor the science, could it be… politics?

Did Anthony Fauci Get Out-Foxed? Why His Reversal On Reopening Is So Troubling

Mea culpa: I spent a lot of time on these here digital pages defending Dr. Anthony Fauci. Brother, was I wrong. Fauci is a stone-cold liar. And if he’s not a stone-cold liar, his only defense is that he is a fraud. Either way, shame on him … and me.

Nolte: Dr. Fauci Is Either a Liar or a Fraud

Why all the changing rules contradicting those of other scientists/doctors?

One would think if an expert in his field had any real experience and knowledge about viruses, transmission, etc., that their “rules” would not keep changing based on the “popular view” or pressure to conform to what politics demands. With the “leadership” blaming all of the changes on this new virus/pandemic and that they have to adjust their position based on new findings/studies about it, it makes one wonder why their (the leading expert’s) initial view was so out of touch compared with the MANY other doctors/scientists who were saying all along that masks don’t work, lockdowns don’t work, we don’t need a vaccine because HCQ works and ivermectin, etc., etc., etc.

So again I ask you… what makes the NIH, CDC, WHO experts so much more knowledgeable about this ‘virus’, if they have been wrong countless times and only changing their views (they claim: “based on new findings”) if all of the scientists and doctors they were trying to silence this whole time due to “misinformation” and “false news” were RIGHT ALL ALONG?

What makes these few “leading experts”, who have been proven wrong time and time again, and who has changed their mind, time and time again, so much more authoritative and knowledgeable about this coronavirus situation than the numerous other doctors and scientists who have been right from the very beginning? The very same scientists and doctors who have been gaslighted and ridiculed, censored and banned, doxxed and attacked for sticking to their values and scientific findings that these other so-called “leading experts” are just now admitting are correct?

Why aren’t Fauci and the rest of the government alphabet crew (NIH, WHO, CDC, FDA, etc.) labeled as “misinformation” and “false news” when they were peddling all of their uncertain information to begin with; yet the actual scientific facts and findings of the medical community were called into question? Should the media who helped propagate these incorrect assessments be held liable as well?

How many people could have been saved if the world leaders (far be it for me to imply that some (most?) are in on a huge conspiratorial agenda…) would have listened to the multiple doctors and scientists/researchers advice instead of those at the head of these (quite possibly corrupt) funded agencies?

Has Anthony Fauci been lying this whole time (blaming citing ‘new information’) and just changing the goal posts to suit some other purpose?

PCR Inventory Kary Mullis on “Dr” Fauci:

He should not be in the position like he’s in.

Those guys have got an agenda. Which is not, what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to – and they smugly – like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”

“You can’t expect the sheep, to really respect the best and the brightest. They don’t know the difference, really. I mean, I like humans, don’t get me wrong, but, basically, there is a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn’t a really good scientist. I mean, that’s a problem, that’s a main problem, actually with science, I’d say in this century, because scientists being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don’t understand it.”

President of the University of South Carolina asked Fauci if he’d come down there and debate me on stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody who was, from the other side, to come down there and balance my – because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that’s going to tell me the other side. But Fauci didn’t want to do it…

An interesting piece from 1994 on Kary Mullis and his views on a couple of questionable individuals:

In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.

The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.

But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done.

“I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.”

He pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.”

(Kary Mullis)
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus

It seems as if this self-described “ass” actually has a heart of gold and was trying to expose possible corruption as early as the 1990’s.

As Celia Farber, the interviewer, mentions: “One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears.

Sadly Kary Mullis passed away on August 17, 2019, allegedly from pneumonia. Just weeks away from when Event 201 took place in October 2019, and a few more weeks from when an actual “surprise outbreak” erupted, allegedly as early as November 2019. And just a couple of months after that, we have the PCR tests that Mr. Kary Mullis himself invented and was against using for viral detection, being used (and abused) for viral detection en masse – at the behest of the “expert scientists”.

Science doesn’t lie. But people sure do.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Peggy und Marco Lachmann-Anke from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Strange Moving White and Black Fibers Found on Masks and Test Swabs - Are these Morgellons? Some kind of experiment?
Are We Perpetuating Violence and Negativity? - Are we unwittingly encouraging it?
Creating Our Own Reality - Do we allow evil to run rampant in the world?
Humanity is under attack Humanity Is Under Attack - Not just physically, but spiritually as well.
Exposing NASA’s Many Lies - Revealing some dubious actions of the most infamous space enterprise.
Youtube Trigger Words - Can you guess what words trigger youtube's algorithm software?
Are we in the Matrix? Are We In The Matrix? - And are NPCs real?