Exposing NASA’s Many Lies

Revealing some dubious actions of the most infamous space enterprise.

Whew! What a rabbit hole, ladies and gentlemen.

After researching the NASA (national aeronautics and space administration) organization and the alleged space explorations they’ve been conducting, I’ve come to my own opinion that it is all one HUGE lie.

Below, we’ll take a look at the many, MANY times NASA has been caught lying, on top of other rather extremely suspicious circumstances.

Enjoy! (or don’t, being massively lied to by a billion-dollar organization on what they’re doing with people’s tax money… also thank the government for that.)

1. Caught staging a simulation or hologram?

The whole video makes a very interesting case about NASA and their illegitimacy, including CGI fakery, strange physics, continuity errors, etc. so I highly encourage viewing the whole video. But at the :30 second mark, you can see a gentleman literally disappearing through an entry port in this alleged spacecraft. This is just one of MANY times the “space exploration” teams have been caught using deception and different kinds of technology to simulate a trip into outer space.

2. NASA caught faking photos

Take a look at the following images and the bizarre excuses and “coincidences” that preside with it:

Some people will try and explain away this picture by stating that NASA had no other choice but to super impose duplicate areas of the Earth onto the image in order to fill in gaps (whatever that means…), but more than likely, someone in the editting room was just too lazy to render the fake image correctly, and quite possibly banked on the idea that people wouldn’t catch them in the act. And with the amount of shills pouring themselves over NASA (are they getting paid to do it?), knew that they would have some misled souls to come to their defense.

This isn’t the only example, by the way. There are tons of them. And this video also proposes additional theories as to what the planets could be textured by.

This image is directly shown on NASA’s own website, allegedly depicting the Earth in 2015. Now, either God is one huge practical joker, or NASA is pulling a fast one over the public’s eyes. Which one do you think it is?

The image on the left shows the landscape in Mauna Kea, Hawaii.

The image on the right shows the moon landscape from the Apollo 17 mission. (supposedly…)

By a bizarre set of pure coincidence, it just so happens that the Apollo 17 astronauts were able to land at a specific distance to that particular hill on the moon, which bears an uncanny resemblance to the same distance as the hill/summit of Mauna Kea. What are the chances?

Did I forget to mention? Mauna Kea was a direct training ground for the Apollo astronauts.

Investigating the Apollo Valley

Buzz Aldrin standing infront of the hills in Mauna Kea, Hawaii. There seems to have been some photo editing going on, as you can see the large mountain in the distance in this photo, but not in the other two. Unless it’s a matter of perspective being on the other side of the hills, coincidentally showing similar geographic terrain.

Screenshot taken from nasa.gov website

This is, quite frankly, the stupidest picture I’ve ever seen. Especially since it’s coming from a corporation who “allegedly” spends billions of dollars a year to explore space, yet they expect us to believe that this is an “actual image” captured from one of their satellites that’s positioned a MILLION miles from Earth. (But hey, I guess they win, because apparently some people DO believe this is real. #sigh – 2016 Tournament Earth Champion: The Dark Side of the Moon)

I worry about the human race. : (

And here is the image of Earth captured from the Apollo 11 mission that supposedly landed on the moon in 1969.

Screenshot taken from nasa.gov website

I don’t believe this is a real image either, but do we see any significant perspective changes between this image “taken in 1969” and the one from 2015? No? Just me? Did the Earth grow exponentially since then?

2011: “Now a new NASA study, published recently in Geophysical Research Letters, has essentially laid those speculations to rest. Using a cadre of space measurement tools and a new data calculation technique, the team detected no statistically significant expansion of the solid Earth.” – NASA research confirms it’s a small world, after all

Whew. I’m glad NASA could put that speculation to rest. Because after all, if it’s coming from NASA, it must be the truth. Still doesn’t explain how the two photos above both came from space though, while depicting the same objects with outrageous size differences. Unless between 2011-2015 the Earth did, in fact, grow to that massive size. Or the moon shrunk. Perhaps NASA will come out with another study to explain this.

3. “Astronauts” in water

The official claim made is that astronauts train underwater because it closely simulates what it would be like to be in outer space with the difference in gravity compared to Earth. However, even if this was a legitimate reason, how would that explain passing off these underwater escapades as actual “space exploration” footage for the public’s viewing pleasure?

This video makes a very compelling case exposing NASA trying to pass off underwater training as real outer space expeditions.

(Almost similar to how they were trying to pass off simulations from rocky Earth terrains as real moon landings…)

4. Obvious Hairspray is Obvious

If it’s a simple matter of keeping hair out of one’s face, even in zero g… then the usual routine would probably involve putting the hair up in a ponytail or a bun, and/or use hairpins.

But THIS:

is utterly ridiculous, and a waste of money.

Are we really to believe that just because someone puts on a ton of hairspray to deliberately style their hair to depict what it may look like in outer space, that everyone is just going to buy this notion and continue on with our blind faith in this dishonest institution?

Well, apparently, because as we all SHOULD know, hair obviously defies the laws of physics and just sticks straight up on space missions and then bounces back into a designated shape, even though a heavier, denser object – like metal (maybe a necklace, say, or a zipper) floats freely around.

And if you watch closely, you can also tell there’s something fishy about the gentleman’s necklace…

5. Responses of astronauts (both former and current) to certain questions/interviews

While Bart Sibrel is known for his “ambush” journalism, the takeaway from these interviews is that Mr. Sibrel makes these former astronauts extremely uncomfortable and extremely defensive.

If it was an honest manner of really going to the moon, like they’re claiming, then why are their reactions and responses so hostile, and even in some cases, fearful? Almost as if this investigative journalist is close to finding out the truth and the men involved in this corruption/coverup have been coerced into silence and they take out their vitriol on anyone who comes close to exposing this egregious scheme.

There are many more examples than just this, in which we can see the awkwardness and uncertainty in some of the officials being interviewed, and it lends a significant distrust in the eyes of the public. (At least, if the people haven’t been completely brain-washed by the different establishments – government/education/media, etc.)

Here’s a look at some different transcripts from other cringe-worthy interviews:

If you watch the link connected with this Q/A,  pay close attention to the “astronauts’ ” body language and nervous expressions. Not to mention the rather telling response that was given:

Question:What can we do in an age where, so many people seem so skeptical about what they see and hear to assure them that what they’re seeing from us is, as you explore space is actually real, and uh, can you also tell us where over the Earth you are, about right now?

Answer:Well I think uh, it’s our duty to continue to just produce imagery of all types. Video imagery and still imagery, and we’ll do it with a, integrity, and uh, and the more we put out there the more real it becomes to everyone.

NASA Busted! Clone tool overusage. Space is a photoshop production!

Keep in mind, low-Earth orbit is considered to be between 160-2,000 km (99-1200 miles), and by NASA’s own admission, the moon (which astronauts allegedly landed on in the late 60’s-70’s) is estimated to be ~384,000 km (238,855 miles).

3:37 – 3:50:But we’re also really pushing the boundaries in terms of where we’re going forward with exploration. I think, uh, humans are naturally driven to do this, and this is really the beginning, I think, of human beings leaving low-Earth orbit.

4:08 – 4:51:The plan that NASA has is to build a rocket called SOS, which is a heavy-lift rocket. It’s something that is, that is much bigger than what we have today, and it will be able to launch the Orion capsule with humans on board, as well as landers or other components to destinations beyond Earth orbit.

Right now, we only can fly in Earth orbit. That’s the farthest that we can go. And this new system that we’re building is going to allow us to go beyond, and hopefully take humans into the solar system to explore, so- the moon, Mars, asteroids, there’s a lot of destinations that we could go to and we’re building these building block components in order to allow us to do that eventually.

NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON

6. A threat to contact CIA to “wax” a researcher

At the end of Bart Sibrel’s “interview” with Ed Mitchell – as we can see at the end of the “Astronauts Gone Wild” video posted above, we not only have the direct threat from Mr. Mitchell to get a gun and shoot Bart, but then his son speaks up and says quite plainly, “Want to call the CIA and have them waxed?

Waxed for what, exactly? Questioning the NASA narrative that the moon walk was real? Coming to that house/office under “false pretenses”? Accusing him of satanic participation? (Michael Aquino, anyone?)

Are these legitimate reasons to have someone waxed? What about using taxpayers’ money to fraudulently claim to going to the moon just to have something to show for it while using that money for other reasons? Why are all these astronauts so concerned with the moral ethics of this journalist, and not their own moral ethics for possibly lying to billions of people while simultaneously protecting the industry who is working to deceive and manipulate everyone into following a certain scientific belief?

As some people have proposed, could these “astronauts” have been mind-controlled by the CIA into believing the very tale that the government/NASA has perpetrated worldwide, and/or these astronauts inherently know that they are in the wrong, but are under compliance as a means of “national security”?

After all, if the son of Edgar Mitchell was so cavalier as to announce that they basically have the CIA on speed dial (I may be embellishing the story a little – but I wouldn’t be surprised if it was close to the truth) to “take care of” opposition, it ties into the theory that the CIA was(is) indeed closely tied to the NASA missions. – NASA’s Secret Relationships with U.S. Defense and Intelligence Agencies

7. NASA logo

Not everything has to be about exposing the lies and cover-up that NASA in engaged in. Just take a look at their logo, which is obviously meant to depict a snake tongue flicking out towards Earth.

Why is that so suspect?

Well, when you have several other organizations, like the WHO (medical industry in general) and the Vatican, both of which are, imho, corrupt factions, that use a snake as their logo – not to mention the biblical side of things depicting the serpent as the wicked, sinful entity causing the fall of man, AND the fact that the serpent (many who claim is Satan/Devil/Lucifer) is called the “FATHER OF LIES” and “THE DECEIVER” – along with many other flattering nicknames, it makes one wonder the true reason why they would use the snake as their logo.

(Not to mention there’s some heated debate that nasa literally means “to deceive” in Hebrew. A lot of people claim that tptsb love to use symbolism and play on words/origin to indicate what they’re doing in secret. Another interesting coincidence: Neil A. (Armstrong) is “alien” backwards. Funny how he was the very first person that landed on the moon.)

Sure some may argue that it’s not really a snake tongue and instead some ribbon or some yada yada yada, but research into these organizations and their motives would suggest otherwise.

Back in 1830, there is an account of a vision of Mary who appeared to St. Catherine Labouré and told her to make a model of this vision: Mary, standing on a snake, which is curled on top of the Earth. What does this “Miraculous Medalreally mean?

8. Excuses, excuses, excuses

When was the last time we went to the moon?

1972? But why?

Because of this?

US spaceflight operations were focused entirely on Low Earth Orbit activities, as well as admirable cooperative international programs such as the International Space Station, and major scientific instruments such as Mars Pathfinder, Opportunity/Spirit and Curiosity. Other major concerns have redirected US attentions from spaceflight: the United States’ War on Terror, which is expected to cost US taxpayers over $5 trillion dollars in the long run.The Real Story Of Apollo 17… And Why We Never Went Back To The Moon

Really?

Or how about this reason?

A 2005 report by NASA estimated that returning to the moon would cost about $104 billion ($133 billion today, with inflation) over about 13 years. The Apollo program cost about $120 billion in today’s dollars.

Manned exploration is the most expensive space venture and, consequently, the most difficult for which to obtain political support,” Cunningham said during his testimony.Astronauts explain why nobody has visited the moon in more than 45 years — and the reasons are depressing

(Yes. Please don’t waste ANYMORE taxpayers money on staged programs that are a complete farce. Thank you.)

Maybe it’s THIS reason: ALIENS Here’s the real reason why NASA never returned to the Moon (Video)

Or this laughable reason: I’d go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it’s a painful process to build it back again.NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON

No, I think the real reason is that we’ve never been to begin with.

9.  Debate on the physics of the spacecraft landing

This is just a supposition, but if NASA really did go to the moon in 1969, and the total weight of the lunar lander when it landed was supposedly around 24 tons, of course not counting the gravity difference between the moon and the Earth (if that is even true…), one could wonder why there is no apparent disturbance to the ground underneath the spacecraft. Even a light bicycle will kick up some dust and disturb the terrain, depending on the conditions of the ground, of course.

Yet with this event, we are to believe that a 24 ton spacecraft merely spread out dust away from underneath the landing area and did nothing more to the ground. Due to our limited knowledge of the exact nature of the moon’s composition, it is honestly hard to say what this massive spacecraft could do.

However, if we take the following video into account, showing how easy it was for Neil Armstrong to disturb the dust around his feet, even kicking up the dust in a similar fashion to that of Earth:

And then seeing one of the legs of the craft on the solid ground, undisturbed by any collection of dust/sand/etc., compared to the footsteps RIGHT NEXT to it, clearly showing deep impressions from a much lighter object (a human being), I’m going to have to call B.S. on this whole operation. Even with the amount of distribution at the bottom of each leg, the physics of this phenomena do not add up.

And it is NOT indented into the ground on one side, as some people have proposed:

As with everything that NASA has been caught out on, they have some “scientific mumbo-jumbo” to try and back themselves up, as well as the poor deluded people that refuse to believe anything untowards is happening; other than conspiratorial minds just coming up with “crazy theories” due to their paranoia, that is. Refusing to look at the data and the evidence and instead just becoming talking points for this deceptive company and rehashing everything they’re peddling, is a tragic sign of how far mass manipulation has become.

10. “Moon rocks” came from Earth

Soon after Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins’ return to Earth from the Apollo mission, a moon rock was given to Willem Drees Jr. as a gift:

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing.” – Moon Rock Turns Out to be Fake

However, after scientific study of this rock, concluded that it was actually petrified wood.

And from the Apollo 14 mission, a 1.8 gram specimen was suspected of coming from Earth, having many qualities of rock compositions from our planet than what scientists would expect from the moon.

Research author Professor Alexander Nemchin, from Curtin’s School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, said in a statement the tiny 1.8-gram sample of Moon rock is similar in composition to granite.

The expert said: “The sample also contains quartz, which is an even more unusual find on the Moon.”

Professor Nemchin also added, “It is possible that some of these unusual conditions could have occurred very locally and very briefly on the Moon and the sample is a result of this brief deviation from normality.

However, a simpler explanation is that this piece was formed on the Earth and brought to the surface of the Moon as a meteorite generated by an asteroid hitting Earth about four billion years ago, and throwing material into space and to the Moon.” – NASA Moon landing SHOCK: Apollo 14 Moon rock sample came from EARTH – Not from space

Uh huh. An even simpler, simpler explanation is that they never went to the moon at all.

BONUS:

The questionable build of the lunar lander aside (just look at it), while capturing just the little bit of Earth off in the distance in 1969… compared to their award-winning Earth and moon photo in 2015/2016…

lol

It’s crazy the amount of things that NASA has been caught fibbing in; from their numerous shady interviews with supposed astronauts, who can’t come to the same conclusion of whether they could see stars in space or not, to the very obvious fake images. Keep in mind, this is just a very small list of the suspicious actions that NASA has engaged in. And it’s even crazier that people still believe these lies.

Sadly, until people open their eyes and finally concede that NASA and the government have been implementing this duplicitous scheme, the world will continue to be led astray. “Space” is not the answer.

And on another rather related mystery, I propose that there may just be a dome/firmament around us (that the world leaders don’t want us to know about), but that is another topic for a different day.

For additional reading into NASA’s very suspicious establishment, please visit the following websites:

NASA’S TRILLION DOLLAR TREASON
Something Shady About NASA
The Moon Landings: A Giant Hoax for Mankind?

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

Strange Moving White and Black Fibers Found on Masks and Test Swabs - Are these Morgellons? Some kind of experiment?
Are We Perpetuating Violence and Negativity? - Are we unwittingly encouraging it?
Creating Our Own Reality - Do we allow evil to run rampant in the world?
Humanity is under attack Humanity Is Under Attack - Not just physically, but spiritually as well.
Exposing NASA’s Many Lies - Revealing some dubious actions of the most infamous space enterprise.
Youtube Trigger Words - Can you guess what words trigger youtube's algorithm software?
Are we in the Matrix? Are We In The Matrix? - And are NPCs real?

10 Legitimate Reasons People are Concerned About Getting the Vaccine Shot

Several Reasons Why People May Fear the Vaccine

This post isn’t meant to fear-monger or spread outrageous “baseless theories”. No, this is meant to inform people of the justifiable reasons why people would be apprehensive about taking this covid vaccine. (Not just this vaccine, mind you, but any shots.)

And, before anyone labels me as an “anti-vaxxer”, I am not. I just can recognize when certain things we’re being told, especially as it has been increasingly rampant lately, are not what they seem and while there are certainly good, honest, morally ethic scientists/researchers etc., there are unfortunately also those that would exploit that trust and do not have the benefits of humankind in mind.

1. Fake vaccine shots caught on camera:

What would definitely quelch any doubts from people who are wary about taking a vaccine?

How about we film a few healthcare workers/politicians on video taking these mystery vaccines? What could go wrong?

More examples for your viewing pleasure:

– Image of Sadiq Kahn (mayor of London) staring at what appears to be an uncapped syringe.
– Original image can be seen at @MayorofLondon. Unless, of course, it gets taken down

Now whether these people on the receiving end of the shots were fully aware of these mishaps or not, this does not deter from the fact that these were staged and/or deliberately falsified to give the viewer a semblance of trust in the vaccine.

And while the “leading authority” of fact-checking sources all over the world are so quick to point out, that doesn’t mean that these folks did not get the vaccine shot. “They just didn’t get a good enough picture so had to retake.” Or “We absolutely, honest-to-goodness, cross-my-heart-and-hope-to-die, made sure that they definitely received the vaccine after the cameras stopped rolling.” Or “The picture was obviously doctored.” (no pun intended)

2. The ineptitude (or sometimes outright callous attitude) of some doctors/nurses:

While I’m sure there are a high number of very professional and responsible doctors and nurses, the fact of the matter is that we’re all human and can make mistakes. (Some make more mistakes than others.) Now while this isn’t necessarily a reason to distrust all hospitals and the medical industry (there are plenty of other reasons for that as well…), we have to be aware that negligence does exist, and our lives are literally at the mercy of those medically (and psychologically) in charge of us.

Any number of mistakes can happen when confronted with an illness, disease, pain, etc.

The doctor may misdiagnose an illness.

The nurse/doctor may accidentally give you the wrong shot.

Incorrect surgery on the wrong limb.

Wrong prescription may be given out.

Tools left inside the body after surgery.

Reusing the same syringe/needle.

And this awful, tragic, unjustifiable situation… (Trust the doctors and experts, right?)

I think you see where this is going. There are many mistakes that can happen no matter how many safety procedures are in place. And when money’s on the line (or some other strange ulterior motive), as we can see in the last couple of links, for some our integrity to do what’s right flies out the window and we take drastic measures and shortcuts even at the cost of someone’s well-being.

3. Possibility of hospitals to be bribed/bought off to suit a particular agenda (or just plain out stupidity):

Echoing the sentiments of Sen. Dr. Scott Jensen, the very shady practice of paying hospitals in regards to carrying out unorthodox procedures is extremely alarming, and we shouldn’t undermine the possibilities that might arise from these questionable dictates.

“Right now Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you’ll get paid $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000; three times as much. Nobody can tell me, after 35 years in the world of medicine, that sometimes those kinds of things [don’t] [have] impact on what we do…”

My conversation with State Senator and doctor who exposes Medicare payouts for COVID-19 patients

Then we have the inconceivable decision to place covid-infected patients in a nursing home – a place where the most vulnerable of people can be found and who is at most risk of contracting this illness – and who the government keeps alleging are the very same people we’re trying to save from getting sick.

I honestly don’t know how anyone in their right mind does not see a problem with this. It flies against the very propaganda they’re trying to enforce on everybody that lockdown mode was a must to most specifically save our elderly population. Yet they’re going to quarantine covid positive patients with them? HAS THE WORLD GONE MAD?

Due to this move, all eyes have turned to Rachel Levine, who was the spokesperson and proponent for this event. (Un)Ironically, this very same person had her own mother removed from a nursing home facility and placed in a safer environment.

The health official responsible for overseeing nursing homes in Pennsylvania — where nearly 70 percent of the state’s coronavirus-related deaths have occurred — has reportedly moved her elderly mother out of a facility as deaths skyrocketed.

Pennsylvania health official moved mother from nursing home as deaths skyrocketed

As an added note, who do we have as Biden’s nomination for assistant secretary of health? None other than Rachel Levine, who mandated this outrageous order.

You would think that with the very specific prompts to not go see grandma or grandpa over Thanksgiving/Christmas, or their birthday, or EVER, because you might be asymptomatic and unknowingly passing along an illness to them and it’s only for their own good, it would dawn on these “health experts” that knowingly sending in actual positive patients (and even that is debatable) to the elderly people would be more likely to get them sick. But it’s okay because the HEALTH EXPERTS know what they’re doing.

#clownworld

4. Fake Vaccines on the Rise:

Due to the fallible (and sometimes gullible) nature of man, it is sadly not uncommon that one would fall prey to a scam, even when trying to follow all of the protocols.

“As [the] vaccine is now becoming available, the large demand will trigger different criminal activities,” Europol spokesperson Jan Op Gen Oorth told DW. This includes circulation of falsified vaccines on illicit markets or their introduction into the legal market, trafficking of fake or substandard vaccines that have fallen out of the cold chain, and the theft of cargo and even medical waste such as empty vials.

Officials warn of fake COVID-19 vaccines

In early December, when COVID-19 vaccines became officially available worldwide, illicit vaccines were offered for sale with prices starting at around $250. Now, as multiple vaccines are being approved and rolled out globally, the number of advertisements for vaccines “has exploded, and the asking prices have doubled or even quadrupled. Now, the researchers found that the vendors on the dark net were asking for $500 or even $1,000 for an unspecified dose.

In Britain too, the National Crime Agency (NCA) have reported that scammers were offering fake Covid-19 vaccines to elderly and vulnerable people in return for payment and has urged the public to be vigilant.

Beware of fake Covid-19 vaccines: When, where and how to receive the genuine vaccine? (that’s assuming you want the “genuine vaccine” to begin with…)

Are we sure the politicians, administrators and healthcare officials realize this also? Because with the very bizarre order that Rachel Levine/Andrew Cuomo were carrying out in regards to the covid patients and nursing homes, perhaps they were also merely pawns in a pandemic scam gone wrong. (or right, depending on which side of the fence you’re sitting on.)

5. The fact that we’ve been lied to (misled) many times over during this coronavirus situation:

One name that keeps popping up who has changed his opinion (which should be based on fact) on several different matters about the covid pandemic countless times is Dr. Anthony Fauci – the head of the NIAID and the talking “authority” on the coronavirus pandemic.

As I outlined in this article here:

Anthony Fauci Caught ‘Lying’ – Several Times (Science doesn’t lie. But people sure do.)

we need to be aware that just because someone is labeled an “expert” or an “authority leader”, etc., does not mean that they follow a morally ethic code.

Our “leading experts” during the covid pandemic has been seen numerous times changing their mind, changing the narrative, misleading the public, and even changing the very definition of certain scientific terminology in regards to the situation we’re in today. As some people speculate, could all of this deception and changing narratives be politically charged? Are we merely being used for the stranglehold of certain politically-leaning agendas?

Then we have the times that news outlets such as CBS aired the wrong footage of an Italian hospital and passed it off as if it was happening in the Unites States. Not just once, but twice. And we shouldn’t forget about the time that, once again, CBS aired footage of a staged coronavirus testing center. Whether due to CBS’ foreknowledge or not, they still aired it. And what followed were multiple excuses outlining why it happened. – When News Media Lies

These establishments, however, are never targeted for spreading false information or fake news. We are just to accept their lies and manipulation and changing narratives because it’s allegedly for the “better good”. (For whose benefit?)

6. Government involvement in vaccines to experiment on people:

And since we’ve mentioned unethical “experts”, I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention the many times the government were actively involved in this agenda as well.

One of the most famous cases of this, was the Tuskegee Syphilis experiment, which is also mentioned in the below links. Included are a few other cases where the government and/or medical industry conducted awful, heinous studies on human lives.

9 Absolutely Evil Medical Experiments

Top 10 US Government Experiments Done On Its Own Citizens

There’s a phrase, “in the name of science“, which alludes to giving those with the scientific capabilities and know-how the “right” and “authority” to conduct any number of experiments and research into any and all subjects – including human beings – all for the sake of “learning” more and finding out how the world works. This is at least, the softer definition of what the phrase means.

Of course, one could delve deeper into the possibilities that all of this “scientific experimentation” (on the surface, for our benefit) is in fact nothing more than merely an excuse to satisfy their own curiosity. And that’s putting it nicely. And sure, there are allegedly rules and laws put in place to deter abuse of this power. But as we all should know, it seems as if the laws imposed on everyone else does not apply to those of a “higher authority”. There are other darker theories of what is to be gained for experimenting with nature as well – but I will leave that for you to research if you so wish.

(I have not read the following book, and after reviewing the responses of people who have, it is sure to be a grim and harsh look into the experiments that were done behind closed curtains “all in the name of science”:
In the Name of Science: A History of Secret Programs, Medical Research, and Human Experimentation)

Is there no wonder we don’t trust these agencies?

7. Certain vaccines for certain people?:

One video that I recall seeing immediately gave me a nervous, suspicious feeling. Was this born out of just simple paranoia? Or do I have a good reason for feeling anxious about what this could possibly entail:

How to Vaccinate Anti-Vaxxers | Allen Pan – Sufficiently Advanced

This video is meant to mock anti-vaxxers, but as Allen Pan went to get his vaccine, both he and his friend, Shani (who was already suspicious of the vaccine), couldn’t even hide their confusion as to why the hospital was going to give Shani a different vaccine.

Caption on the video: “They tried to give Shani a different brand than what they gave me

Shani:No, that… give me the good one.

Allen Pan:That’s weird.

Shani:So they gotta be different.” (indistinguishable) “You better include this in the video. ‘Try to give her a different type of vaccine’.”

Then we have reddituser nachotacocat11 expressing concern that an electronic form asked the patient to choose which vaccine they’d prefer. After selecting Pfizer, realized that the nurse administered the Moderna vaccine instead.

The responses run the gamut from others expressing their concern as well and their understanding of the situation, all the way to people shaming her for even daring to question the establishment and that she should feel lucky she got the vaccine at all. I won’t even get into the different reasons why different vaccines for different people may be necessary, because I’m not a scientist or molecular biologist. But it is something to consider when they even have the option to fill out on their form in the first place if they’re just going to give you whichever one they feel necessary anyway.

Another issue that has arisen is why the extreme push to vaccinate so quickly the black and latino communities, the poorer countries and less fortunate first with this new, clinical trial, only authorized for emergency use, vaccine?

Is it REALLY because they’re determined to save the less fortunate and most vulnerable people and the mistreated black community? Is it a show of good faith that these agencies REALLY care about the minority groups and their efforts are to simply save their lives first and foremost above all others? Are we REALLY to believe this as their ultimate goal? Even after reading about all the atrocities committed in several countries by the government and medical communities? (Not to mention even more crimes on humanity coming up, courtesy of Mr. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. exposing Bill Gates – one of the hugest leads in this whole “vaccinate the whole world” ordeal.)

8. Alternative methods are being censored and banned worldwide:

Some scientists have touted the use of hydroxychloroquine (mixed with other important factors) and ivermectin – which have both been debated in the “leading expert” community as not being effective. Yet there are tons of actual altruistic doctors and scientists vouching for these methods.

Doctors cure 6,000 patients with Covid-19 with Ivermectin

Finally, States Are Retracting Hydroxychloroquine Bans

Why would these alternative medicines be banned? Could it simply be because they actually save lives and it’s cost effective? If this is true, then there would be no need for a world-wide plan to vaccinate the whole planet. Even more mysterious, why does it seem as if specific factories are being targeted? Coincidence?

Second Largest Hydroxychloroquine Factory Explodes In Giant Fireball

If it is indeed true that these two are actual, proven methods in effectively curing sars/covid, then the yearly (or more) need to keep vaccinating people over and over and over again with different chemicals (which presumably would keep giving side effects that would require even more medication) would not be needed. Who would hurt from that? The pharmaceutical industry.

9. The “ingredients” in the vaccines – and the fact that some of the producers aren’t liable for short-term/long-term damage caused by this rushed vaccine:

Speaking of the vaccines and all of the chemicals that are possibly in it, we have again the moral and ethic code that some people will abide by. Whether you’re a believer or not, there are some who are opposed to being injected with aborted cell lines and/or the other chemicals, etc. that one feels doesn’t need to be in our system.

Which COVID-19 vaccines are connected to abortion?

There is also the questionable new technology that is going into this vaccine, most notably the mRNA component, that has yet to be extensively studied. (If we are to believe their accounts…)

mRNA Vaccines Might Prove Catastrophic in a Rushed Coronavirus Response

Are our immune systems so compromised that we need a vaccine for all of these diseases and possibly unknown ones as well? Could it be that these diseases/illnesses/plagues, etc. are created by the very hands that make the vaccines? Is the pharmaceutical and medical industry one of the largest, longest running scams on the planet?

No… that’s just silly, crazy talk and I’m definitely not saying that…

And when you pair up everything together on top of these rushed vaccines that haven’t been vetted/tested properly with no long-term data to its name, and the efforts of these vaccine production companies to be exempt from any liability due to short-term or long-term damage… well, that’s a red flag and a huge problem.

Drug Companies Continue to Shed Liability for Rushed Coronavirus Treatments

So even if you agree to being injected with this potentially harmful and ethically controversial cocktail of ingredients and technology, there’s little one can do as far as monetary compensation if something goes wrong.

10. Bill Gates’ history into eugenics and depopulation agenda:

In this post What is Bill Gates’ Motive, it highlights some of the agendas that Mr. Bill Gates himself has presented and spoken about.

In the following link, we see a video that expands upon Bill Gates’ ties to the eugenics history and Planned Parenthood (whose biggest business operation has been abortion) and his partnership with Anthony Fauci.

SHOCKING! Historian Exposes Bill Gates’ Ties To NAZIs And More

A rather lengthy (but extremely pertinent) excerpt from the above link is repeated here, from Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s instagram post he made on April 8, 2020 about Gates and the damage that his and those of his co-horts has caused across the world:

Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously.

In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines.

By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines. In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died.

Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children. During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa,

Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers”.

Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless” and immoral”.

In 2010, Gates committed $ 10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”.

In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign.

Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.
Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.

A 2017 study (Morgensen et.Al.2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP is killing more African than the disease it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children.

Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually. Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of – hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development.

They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish – that good health only comes in a syringe.

In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical -industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance.

In this recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.…”

SHOCKING! Historian Exposes Bill Gates’ Ties To NAZIs And More

And if one digs further into this agenda, a pattern starts to emerge of Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood) and her agenda of wiping out the “unfit”. (Her words, not mine.)

“It seems to me from my experience…that while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table which means their ignorance, superstitions and doubts.

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal.

We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

Birth control is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defective.”

“No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth…”

7 Incredibly Shocking Quotes From Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger
21 Quotes by Margaret Sanger that Will Probably Make You Sick

It is an absolute infringement and affront to have our very own lives dictated in this manner.

So why might people be wary of this highly rushed and questionable vaccine? The above list might help explain it. And we have to realize, even if someone had NO real reason for not wanting to take this vaccine, it is still their body, their right to not have foreign substances from suspected corrupt agencies injecting them without their consent.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by torstensimon from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Strange Moving White and Black Fibers Found on Masks and Test Swabs - Are these Morgellons? Some kind of experiment?
Are We Perpetuating Violence and Negativity? - Are we unwittingly encouraging it?
Creating Our Own Reality - Do we allow evil to run rampant in the world?
Humanity is under attack Humanity Is Under Attack - Not just physically, but spiritually as well.
Exposing NASA’s Many Lies - Revealing some dubious actions of the most infamous space enterprise.
Youtube Trigger Words - Can you guess what words trigger youtube's algorithm software?
Are we in the Matrix? Are We In The Matrix? - And are NPCs real?

Anthony Fauci Caught ‘Lying’ – Several Times

Science doesn’t lie. But people sure do.

What is “science”?

SCIENCE:
 
1. a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws.
2. systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.
3. any of the branches of natural or physical science.
4. systematized knowledge in general.
5. knowledge, as of facts or principles; knowledge gained by systematic study.
6. a particular branch of knowledge.
7. any skill or technique that reflects a precise application of facts or principles.

Science is a set of facts and principles gained from knowledge and study into the experience and observation of the physical/material world.

FACTS. TRUTHS. PRINCIPLES.

I know I’m not the only one questioning why “science” seems to be changing at the whim of a small few. And who do we have at the helm of it all? Especially during these very confusing/controversial covid times?

Anthony Fauci, NIH, WHO, FDA and the CDC. (All “gold-standard, leading experts” that ironically are shifting, changing, removing what “science” has defined throughout all these years.)

Even his very own statements about science should shed some light on what science is supposed to be: “He added, “So, when they see someone up in the White House, which has an air of authority to it, who’s talking about science, that there are some people who just don’t believe that — and that’s unfortunate because, you know, science is truth. … If you go by the evidence and by the data, you’re speaking the truth.”
Anthony Fauci lied about masks; now he complains that people ‘distrust authority’

Yes. “If you go by the evidence and by the data, you’re speaking the truth.” – not if you’re making it up and changing it as you go along because it suits a particular agenda.

Let’s see how many times Mr. Dr. Expert Anthony Fauci and the co-horts of this agenda were caught lying or “changing” goalposts/rules and even the very definition of what herd immunity means (keep in mind, this is just a very small sample out of many) :

Wearing a mask:

1. Feb. 17 (2020): Fauci told USA Today that wearing a mask is for the infected to protect others. “Now, in the United States, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to wear a mask.
The Fauci Timeline — Sorting Fact From Fiction

2. March 2020: “When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences — people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face,” said Fauci at that time.
FLASHBACK: Dr. Fauci claims masks don’t provide COVID protection, only help people ‘feel…better’

3. In June 2020, Fauci admitted that he and other public health officials had downplayed the benefit of masks — with some even advising against wearing them — because of a fear of equipment shortages for front-line health care workers.
Dr. Anthony Fauci Admits Shifting Goalposts on ‘Herd Immunity’

4. September 2020: “At that point, which is now months and months ago, I have been on the airways, on the radio, on TV, begging people to wear masks. And I keep talking in the context of wear a mask, keep physical distance, avoid crowds, wash your hands and do things more outdoors versus indoors.”

Fauci says Trump took his stance on masks ‘out of context’ during debate

5. By October (2020), Dr. Fauci had completely reversed course on mask-wearing, saying that it may be time to impose a nationwide mask-wearing mandate, something he termed “universal mask-wearing.”

“Well, if people are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandating it,” Fauci told CNN’s Erin Burnett Oct. 23.
FLASHBACK: Dr. Fauci claims masks don’t provide COVID protection, only help people ‘feel…better’

From a personal opinion: I want to point out how adamant Anthony Fauci is about flouting wearing a mask, yet here, he is not wearing one throughout his entire speech. Doesn’t he realize how far his droplets are landing? Not to mention that at the 19 minute mark we see press secretary Jen Psaki take the stand, without wiping down the potentially dangerous, deadly virus that Anthony Fauci could have been dispensing all over the podium.

Including that is the fact that Jen Psaki then takes her face masks (because, “double the protection”…) off as well, and flips it mouth-side down on the very podium that expert Anthony Fauci was just speaking at and spreading his germs. At the very end of the video, Jen is seen putting the mask back on, after letting it sit and fester on top of the stand that Dr. Fauci was just speaking over.

What has our common sense been reduced to?

Herd immunity:

6. Earlier on in the pandemic, Fauci had said the United States would need 60 to 70 percent of people to be vaccinated in order to reach herd immunity, according to the Times.
REPORT: Fauci Admits He Lied Because ‘Country Wasn’t Ready’ To Hear The Truth

7. Dr Fauci’s estimate for reaching herd immunity has been steadily inching up, @nytimes’ Donald McNeil Jr reports. Fauci told us at last week’s @CNBC #HealthyReturns that it may be 75-85%. https://t.co/j18nUYZ3cV pic.twitter.com/hIKewMAFim

— Meg Tirrell (@megtirrell) December 24, 2020
REPORT: Fauci Admits He Lied Because ‘Country Wasn’t Ready’ To Hear The Truth

8. “When polls said only about half of all Americans would take a vaccine, I was saying herd immunity would take 70 to 75 percent,” Fauci told the Times. “Then, when newer surveys said 60 percent or more would take it, I thought, ʻI can nudge this up a bit,’ so I went to 80, 85.”

“We need to have some humility here,” he added. “We really don’t know what the real number is. I think the real range is somewhere between 70 to 90 percent. But, I’m not going to say 90 percent.”
Fauci doubles down after being confronted over startling admission that he deceived the public about herd immunity

We even have the WHO, who is constantly changing / “updating” their definition for what herd immunity means depending on the alleged “new” results and information that they determine from their studies.

Another change, once again, on December 21, 2020:

Yet another "update" explaining their change in definition.

Very suspect, Anthony Fauci and WHO. Very suspect.

And perhaps because of this exposure, they felt the need to “clarify”, this time taking into account not only the vaccines that they heap enormous praise and focus on, but this time alluding to the Samaritan goodness of their hearts that they do not feel as if herd immunity should be achieved by exposing people to the virus. But instead by using the vaccine. (Because they care so much.)

The question then is, who is going to protect us from the vaccine if/when it turns out (since new information comes out all the time…) that the vaccine was not as “safe and effective” as they once thought? Their inclusion that “WHO will continue to update these answers as new information becomes available.” leaves the door wide open to skirt away from any responsibility of the side effects of the vaccine due to not enough foresight because of the ever-evolving nature of this new virus and the vaccine that has yet to be studied thoroughly for long-term safety and effectiveness.

The argument then possibly becomes that their sincere effort to “save humanity” from this deadly pandemic overrides the vaccine effectiveness because of the huge demand to save the population (let’s not get into the depopulation agenda of Bill Gates – in which he and Anthony Fauci are close friends – and others… although, by all means, please research this to gain more information) and that they honestly, truly, genuinely sought to cure us all from this virus. The tragic outcome of the vaccine that they “earnestly” thought was for the benefit of the people would be unprecedented and the blame would then go to, again, the changing nature of the virus and/or our immune response system not adhering well to their honest-to-goodness efforts.

Sorry, but, I’m not buying it.

Asymptomatic vs. Symptomatic

9. January 2020: “But the one thing historically that people need to realize is that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory viruses of any type asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there is a rare symptomatic transmission that may transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.
Here Is a Video of Fauci Explaining in January 2020 That Asymptomatic Transmission Is NEVER the Driver of Outbreaks

10. June 2020: Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove: “We’re constantly looking at this data, and we’re trying to get more information from countries to truly answer this question,” she added. “It still appears to be rare that an asymptomatic individual actually transmits onward.”

Anthony Fauci: “We know from epidemiological studies they can transmit to someone who is uninfected even when they’re without symptoms,” Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told ABC’s “Good Morning America” on Wednesday. “So to make a statement to say that’s a rare event was not correct.”
Fauci says asymptomatic coronavirus transmission is possible following WHO confusion

11. September 2020: “I can tell you right now that we should be testing more and we should be testing asymptomatic people,” Fauci told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes on Thursday night. “Take that to the bank and trust me on it.”
CDC reverses course on testing asymptomatic people for Covid-19, again

The PCR / covid tests:

12. Yet a PCR test instruction document from the CDC that had been revised five times as of July 13, 2020, specified testing and interpretation of the test using a Ct of 40. On September 28, 2020, a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases from Jaafar et al. had asserted, based on patient labs and clinical data involving nearly 4,000 patients, that a Ct of 30 was appropriate for making public policy. An update to the CDC instructions for PCR testing from December 1, 2020, still uses a Ct of 40.
The WHO Finally Updates Its COVID-19 Testing Policy… One Hour After Biden’s Inauguration

13. Anthony Fauci (July 16, 2020): “…If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…it’s just dead nucleoids, period.”
Fauci Himself Admits Covid PCR Test at Over 35 Cycles Is Deceitful, Worse Than Useless

14. Article published on September 30, 2020: The reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test used to identify those people infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus uses a nasal swab to collect RNA from deep within the nasal cavity of the individual being tested. The RNA is reverse transcribed into DNA and amplified through 40 or more cycles, or until virus is detected. The result is reported as a simple “yes” or “no” answer to the question of whether someone is infected.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials state they do not specify the cycle threshold ranges used to determine who is positive, and that commercial manufacturers and laboratories set their own threshold ranges.

Any test with a cycle threshold (CT) above 35 is too sensitive, says Juliet Morrison, PhD, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 [cycles] could represent a positive.” A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35, she added. Dr. Mina said he would set the figure at 30, or even less.

Coronavirus Cases Plummet When PCR Tests Are Adjusted

Yikes. There is so much wrong with these examples. Who is in charge, again? The labs/manufacturers can set their own threshold? Yet officials wouldn’t recommend anything higher than 35? Or even 30? Even Anthony Fauci, who finally wasn’t lying about the amount of cycles? Yet at what threshold were all of these tests being done to crank out all of these false positives that are, again, just now being addressed and changed? The FDA recommended threshold of 40 or as many as it takes “until virus is detected“?

Then pair that up with what Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test had to say:
“I don’t think you can misuse PCR. [It is] the results; the interpretation of it. If they can find this virus in you at all – and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”
Dr. Fauci admits the PCR test for coronavirus is all but useless as it is administered in the US

15. Dr. David Samadi (January 21, 2021): The World Health Organization has now released guidance to laboratories around the world to reduce the cycle count in PCR tests to get a more accurate representation of COVID cases.

The current cycle was much too high and resulting in any particle being declared a positive case.

The WHO notice concluded by suggesting that “most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.”
World Health Organization updates PCR test guidelines

So apparently all this time they weren’t assessing all of the other necessary relative data needed to confirm a positive case, and instead ran as many cycles as they possibly could to detect the virus – against the numerous prompts of the medical community who said all along that this was a huge oversight – meanwhile suspiciously cranking out positive numbers for the media to drool over. And as some people have pointed out, all of these new changes are “coincidentally” just in time to greet the new president as an illusion of control and miraculously reduced numbers of positive coronavirus cases. (Or it’s due to the fantastic work of the rushed vaccine – or both.)

Hydroxychloroquine

16. The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.

So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump street? He didn’t even launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9 (2020), by which time 33,000 people had died.

Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 — nobody needed to die

17. August 12, 2020: Since the start of the pandemic, hundreds of doctors have successfully used hydroxychloroquine to treat patients symptomatic of COVID-19 infections. In frustration at the media negativity about this safe, effective medicine American doctors have sent an open letter to Dr Fauci raising their concerns.
Doctors Send Open Letter to Fauci About HCQ COVID Cure

Other doubts from multiple outlets about the supposed “expert” decisions of those in charge:

Up until COVID hit in 2020, neither WHO nor the CDC had ever considered a single positive PCR test sufficient for diagnosing viral infection.

TOTAL COINCIDENCE ALERT: C19 Diagnostic Criteria Tightened by WHO on Biden Inauguration Day!

Sen. Marco Rubio just called out Anthony Fauci in a penned piece posted on Fox News as a lying liar who arrogantly used his position as the nation’s top infectious disease bureaucrat to lie to the American people “in order to manipulate their behavior.”

“[P]lacing blind faith in unelected celebrity scientists,” Rubio warned, “has its limits, and we must not be afraid to call them out when they’re caught overstepping their legitimate authority.”

Anthony Fauci’s ‘lying’ is hardly surprising

Also, the nation’s testing data has been called into question, as this week the CDC and 11 states were forced to admit that they were mixing testing results in a way that might make the data less useful in assessing the rate of the disease’s spread.

If it isn’t the nation’s mood, nor the science, could it be… politics?

Did Anthony Fauci Get Out-Foxed? Why His Reversal On Reopening Is So Troubling

Mea culpa: I spent a lot of time on these here digital pages defending Dr. Anthony Fauci. Brother, was I wrong. Fauci is a stone-cold liar. And if he’s not a stone-cold liar, his only defense is that he is a fraud. Either way, shame on him … and me.

Nolte: Dr. Fauci Is Either a Liar or a Fraud

Why all the changing rules contradicting those of other scientists/doctors?

One would think if an expert in his field had any real experience and knowledge about viruses, transmission, etc., that their “rules” would not keep changing based on the “popular view” or pressure to conform to what politics demands. With the “leadership” blaming all of the changes on this new virus/pandemic and that they have to adjust their position based on new findings/studies about it, it makes one wonder why their (the leading expert’s) initial view was so out of touch compared with the MANY other doctors/scientists who were saying all along that masks don’t work, lockdowns don’t work, we don’t need a vaccine because HCQ works and ivermectin, etc., etc., etc.

So again I ask you… what makes the NIH, CDC, WHO experts so much more knowledgeable about this ‘virus’, if they have been wrong countless times and only changing their views (they claim: “based on new findings”) if all of the scientists and doctors they were trying to silence this whole time due to “misinformation” and “false news” were RIGHT ALL ALONG?

What makes these few “leading experts”, who have been proven wrong time and time again, and who has changed their mind, time and time again, so much more authoritative and knowledgeable about this coronavirus situation than the numerous other doctors and scientists who have been right from the very beginning? The very same scientists and doctors who have been gaslighted and ridiculed, censored and banned, doxxed and attacked for sticking to their values and scientific findings that these other so-called “leading experts” are just now admitting are correct?

Why aren’t Fauci and the rest of the government alphabet crew (NIH, WHO, CDC, FDA, etc.) labeled as “misinformation” and “false news” when they were peddling all of their uncertain information to begin with; yet the actual scientific facts and findings of the medical community were called into question? Should the media who helped propagate these incorrect assessments be held liable as well?

How many people could have been saved if the world leaders (far be it for me to imply that some (most?) are in on a huge conspiratorial agenda…) would have listened to the multiple doctors and scientists/researchers advice instead of those at the head of these (quite possibly corrupt) funded agencies?

Has Anthony Fauci been lying this whole time (blaming citing ‘new information’) and just changing the goal posts to suit some other purpose?

PCR Inventory Kary Mullis on “Dr” Fauci:

He should not be in the position like he’s in.

Those guys have got an agenda. Which is not, what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to – and they smugly – like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”

“You can’t expect the sheep, to really respect the best and the brightest. They don’t know the difference, really. I mean, I like humans, don’t get me wrong, but, basically, there is a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn’t a really good scientist. I mean, that’s a problem, that’s a main problem, actually with science, I’d say in this century, because scientists being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don’t understand it.”

President of the University of South Carolina asked Fauci if he’d come down there and debate me on stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody who was, from the other side, to come down there and balance my – because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that’s going to tell me the other side. But Fauci didn’t want to do it…

An interesting piece from 1994 on Kary Mullis and his views on a couple of questionable individuals:

In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.

The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.

But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done.

“I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.”

He pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.”

(Kary Mullis)
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus

It seems as if this self-described “ass” actually has a heart of gold and was trying to expose possible corruption as early as the 1990’s.

As Celia Farber, the interviewer, mentions: “One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears.

Sadly Kary Mullis passed away on August 17, 2019, allegedly from pneumonia. Just weeks away from when Event 201 took place in October 2019, and a few more weeks from when an actual “surprise outbreak” erupted, allegedly as early as November 2019. And just a couple of months after that, we have the PCR tests that Mr. Kary Mullis himself invented and was against using for viral detection, being used (and abused) for viral detection en masse – at the behest of the “expert scientists”.

Science doesn’t lie. But people sure do.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Peggy und Marco Lachmann-Anke from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Strange Moving White and Black Fibers Found on Masks and Test Swabs - Are these Morgellons? Some kind of experiment?
Are We Perpetuating Violence and Negativity? - Are we unwittingly encouraging it?
Creating Our Own Reality - Do we allow evil to run rampant in the world?
Humanity is under attack Humanity Is Under Attack - Not just physically, but spiritually as well.
Exposing NASA’s Many Lies - Revealing some dubious actions of the most infamous space enterprise.
Youtube Trigger Words - Can you guess what words trigger youtube's algorithm software?
Are we in the Matrix? Are We In The Matrix? - And are NPCs real?