FLASHBACK | COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci

A look into Anthony Fauci’s involvement into medical/health corruption.

In light of recent revelations, with the now admission from Fauci himself, that the coronavirus may have originated (been created) in the Wuhan lab instead of occurring naturally, and that it would be worth it to take a closer look –

(although last year every mainstream news media and “fact-checker” on the planet was insisting that this assertion was “debunked” and a “baseless conspiracy theory”)

– not to mention the gain of function controversy and the $600,000 funding (at least) that Fauci sent to the Wuhan Institute specifically for bat-to-human transmission viruses – and Fauci’s OWN admission in May 2020 that “The best evidence shows the virus behind the pandemic was not made in a lab in China”,

I felt it would be prudent to bring up the following article as a flashback to the corruption that Fauci and his cohorts have been engaged in with other viruses that have haunted humankind.

Before I get into that, I also want to highlight this particular section as another opportunity to present how many times the lead talking head of directing the coronavirus response has flip-flopped on his OPINION (NOT FACT) – on what should be founded on scientific basis and actual research, not just based on assumptions, “leanings”, and “indications”:

“If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats, and what’s out there now it’s very, very strongly leaning toward this [virus] could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated—the way the mutations have naturally evolved,” he responded.

“A number of very qualified evolutionary biologists have said that everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that it evolved in nature and then jumped species,” Fauci added.

In May 2021, PolitiFact’s Kate Sanders asked Fauci if he was “still confident” that COVID-19 developed in nature.

“No, actually … I am not convinced about that,” Dr. Fauci said. “I think we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we continue to find out to the best of our ability what happened.”

“Certainly, the people who investigated it say it likely was the emergence from an animal reservoir that then infected individuals,” he continued, “but it could have been something else, and we need to find that out. So, you know, that’s the reason why I said I’m perfectly in favor of any investigation that looks into the origin of the virus.”

– Source: Dr. Fauci Keeps Changing His Wuhan Lab Funding Story, Jay Battacharya Tells Laura Ingraham

Uh huh… And why has his sudden inclination to actually investigate the origins of the coronavirus instead of dismissing it as most likely from a natural biological transmission now such a huge agenda for Mr. Fauci? After A WHOLE YEAR of repeated insinuations that it was naturally occurring?

It couldn’t possibly have anything to do with Rand Paul’s testimony that he has proof that the gain-of-function research for this SPECIFIC virus came under the direction of Fauci and his institution, right? Exposing the relationship that Dr. Shi Zhengli (who perhaps unwittingly made mention of her collaboration) has with the NIH institution, thanking Fauci personally for funding the research at the end of her paper?

VIDEO: Rand Paul Says Fauci ‘Absolutely’ Committed Perjury When Denying Wuhan Gain-of-Function Research

Methinks the WHO is obviously complicit in this whole ordeal as well…

“A joint report into the origins of COVID by the World Health Organization (WHO) and China has found it is “extremely unlikely” that the virus escaped from a lab, according to a draft version seen by AP News.”
‘Extremely Unlikely’ COVID Came From Lab Draft WHO Report Says, As Ex-CDC Head Touts Claim

I don’t know if I have to mention it, but Mr. Fauci is not the only one who should be under the radar… We already know about Bill and Melinda Gates’ involvement in all of this as well, but what about Mrs. Fauci? What does she do, again?

“Christine Grady is an American nurse, bioethicist, and a senior investigator. She currently serves as the Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. She also serves as Head of the Department’s Section on Human Subjects Research.”
Christine Grady Wiki Bio

“Head of the Department’s Section on Human Subjects Research

…Hmm… make of that what you will.

FLASHBACK: The original article was first published on April 05, 2020.

The following information has been reblogged from rielpolitick.com
(original post can be found at journal-neo.org | The Remarkable Doctor A. Fauci)

COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci

Source – journal-neo.org

“…Fauci, Birx and Redfield, all incestuously complicit in the HIV/AIDS frauds and malpractice, today hold the future of not only American public health, but also of the entire world economy in their hands. Not a good situation. As their work on the proved HIV=IDS fraud shows, the coronavirus tests do not at all prove presence of a deadly virus in any patient. If this is so, it is perhaps the greatest criminal fraud in medical history”

The Remarkable Doctor A. Fauci – By F. William Engdahl

Dramatic political and social decisions are being made across the United States and around the world on what emergency quarantine measures and other steps must be taken. In many cases the radical and severe measures, such as shutting down the world economy, are being justified by COVID-19 case projections of morbidity into the future. If there is one person who is the face of the current strategy of dealing with the coronavirus in Washington it is the Director of the US National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the NIH, Dr. Tony Fauci. What major media conveniently leave out in discussing Fauci’s role is his highly controversial and conflicted history since he first joined NIAID in 1984 during the beginnings of the AIDS panic. His role then sheds valuable light on his remarkable and highly controversial actions today.

Tony Fauci, a leading member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, is being promoted by major US media such as CNN, MSNBC or the New York Times as the great expert on all related to the Covid19 outbreak. He had dismissed the President’s efforts to promote a known malaria medication as treatment for severe corona patients as “anecdotal,” even though seven years before he backed the same drug. He has publicly taken projections from an institute created in Washington State by the Gates Foundation, the same foundation that virtually owns the WHO and owns major stakes in the leading vaccine makers, to claim that up to 200,000 Americans could die from COVID19. Fauci stated that COVID19 is “probably about 10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu,” which would mean 300-600,000 coronavirus deaths this year, at the same time in a respected medical journal he compared Covid-19 as similar to seasonal flu in morbidity. When questioned how long the shutdown of much of the US economy must last, Fauci replied only when there is zero new covid19 positive tested cases, something impossible given the defective testing. He has also backed direct human tests of novel vaccines with no prior animal tests, including with radical non-tested mRNA gene-edited vaccines.

Fauci has more influence over US national policy on the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic than anyone, including the President.

Much of media treats him with awe as an unimpeachable scientist, one of the world’s finest. A closer look at Anthony Fauci’s career gives a starkly different picture, a very alarming one in fact.

America’s AIDS Czar

Tony Fauci has held the top post at the NIAID in Washington for an astonishing 36 years. Today he is well past retirement age at 79, and holds the funds to determine which drug companies or university researchers will get precious government funds or not from NIAID’s annual $5 billion budget.

Let’s go back to 1984 when Fauci was named head of NIAID during the Reagan era. That year an AIDS researcher, Robert Gallo, working under Fauci, held a press conference to announce that he had “discovered” the AIDS virus. He said it was HIV– human immunodeficiency virus. The shocking announcement which went around the world, was in complete disregard of scientific procedures of prior peer-reviewed published scientific evidence, including the required electron microscope analyses. It was a case of “science by press conference” as a critical scientist, Prof. Peter H. Duesberg described it. Duesberg was an award-winning researcher at Berkeley who isolated the first cancer gene through his work on retroviruses in 1970, and mapped the genetic structure of these viruses.

For Gallo and Fauci, that was unimportant as millions in research funds flowed into NIAID to research the new virus, HIV. Fauci and Gallo claimed that AIDS was highly contagious, also by sexual transmission, especially among homosexual men. Notably, before the Gallo claim to have found the HIV AIDS virus, NIAID had been doing research on the role of drugs, poppers or nitrites, proven immune-suppressants, in the deaths of the earliest AIDS patients. That was quickly dropped in favor of researching a “cure” for AIDS. Media was told that AIDS was the “public health threat of the Century.” Gallo went on to make millions on his patented blood test for HIV, despite the fact that the test was often giving false positives and did not test directly for the alleged virus but for active antibodies, something immunology practice said was not valid, as antibodies merely suggested a past infection response and not necessarily presence of AHIV. At this time in the 1980’S Fauci was responsible for AIDS research at NIAID, a post he still holds.

False Tests?

The issue of HIV/AIDS tests is central. While a frightened world was clamoring for a test, Gallo and Fauci promoted their deeply flawed tests of antibodies. In 2006 Gallo claimed, “HIV tests were highly accurate from the time they were developed in 1984 and have become much more accurate over time…” Highly accurate in 1984 but more accurate than highly over time? Gallo added in response to criticism, “A PCR test for the presence of the virus itself can accurately determine a child’s HIV status.”

In a sharp rebuttal of the Gallo claims, claims endorsed by Fauci and the NIAID as well as CDC, Roberto A. Giraldo, MD and Etienne de Harven, MD, the scientist who produced the first electron micrograph of a retrovirus, pointed out that both the ELISA and Western blot, and a genetic test, the PCR or ‘Viral Load’ test,” the two major tests used to determine if one has AIDS, are invalid. “None of these tests detect the HIV virus itself, nor do they detect HIV particles.” They add that there are “more than 70 different documented conditions that can cause the antibody tests to react positive without an HIV infection.” Among the false positive cases are influenza, the common cold, leprosy or the existence of pregnancy. The same tests are used today to determine SARS-CoV-2-positive.

They concluded, “The fact that after 25 years of intense research HIV has been neither isolated nor purified in terms of classical virology indicates to us that the infectious view of AIDS as a contagious viral disease is based on an apparently non-existent microbe!”

Giraldo and de Harven declared, “The alleged existence of HIV was asserted from the study of proteins, reverse transcriptase activity (RT), and RNA fragments that were found in culture supernatants, not from the direct analysis of purified viral particles.” The CDC requires a positive antibody test for HIV to determine AIDS in the USA. Yet in Africa since 1985 the WHO requires no HIV test or any other laboratory test. Merely the patient’s symptoms that can include weight loss, chronic diarrhea, prolonged fever, persistent cough and such, symptoms endemic to chronic poverty, malnutrition and lack of sanitation.

Yet this fraud has shaped the career of Tony Fauci for more than 35 years. Fauci as head of NIAID has taken millions from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as well as the Clinton Foundation along with tens of billions from US taxpayers for this bogus research. Suspiciously, the 2006 article by Giraldo and de Harven was suddenly retracted by the journal in 2019 just before the coronavirus Wuhan outbreak.

Despite the fact that he knew the established rules of virology, Fauci, as head of NIAID, recommended the Burroughs Wellcome chemotherapy drug, AZT as a “preventive drug” for HIV diagnosed patients even without symptoms! Burroughs Wellcome gave NIAID the study that was deliberately biased for AZT. Fauci even backed AZT for pregnant women despite the grave risk to the fetus.

One mark of pregnancy in all women is a higher level of antigens as the natural immune system fights any infection to protect the fetus. AZT or Retrovir, a failed leukemia drug, has been proven to be a highly toxic drug. It was approved for AIDS testing in a record 5 days by Fauci and the US Government in 1987. Today despite more than thirty years funded research and billions of dollars, no effective vaccine for HIV/AIDS exists.

Fauci and Gilead

According to people who have studied the role of Tony Fauci as head of NIAID, his focus has been what is called scientific reductivism, described as “a 19 Century-style, single-germ theory for a complex web of factors that collapsed the immune systems of a subset of gay men in the early 1980s.” He has refused to explore the documentation that a variety of lethal drugs and other toxins such as nitrites could play a role. As a result he has wasted tens of billions of taxpayer dollars since 1984 on dead end experiments.

One of his most nefarious was his collaboration with Gilead Sciences.

Not satisfied with having developed a false positive test for AIDS and having gained FDA fast-track approval for AZT to treat HIV-positive patients with serious illness symptoms, Fauci decided to collaborate with Gilead (as in the Biblical “balm of Gilead”) on what came to be called PrEP experiments.

Fauci in 2007 began to finance clinical trials of the AZT drugs in HIV “negatives,” on the theory the chemotherapy would “protect” them from becoming “positive.” That is, testing toxic HIV drugs on otherwise healthy persons to “insure” they never got AIDS. If it sounds mad, it was. Gilead supplied the drug, Truvada, to NIAID between 2007-2012 for Phase III human tests on HIV negative subjects. Four tests of at least 2,000 and up to 5,000 test subjects each, were done. The project was called “pre-exposure prophylaxis” or “PrEP.” Healthy subjects were given doses of chemotherapy drug Truvada on the thesis it could prevent them from one day getting HIV-positive. CDC, in its May 2014 recommendation urged physicians to prescribe Truvada for negatives in the so-called “risk groups,” an official government imprimatur for an extremely profitable drug.

The FDA ignored two of the four Truvada tests that had failed and been halted. Despite that and owing to data manipulation by Fauci’s NIAID and Gilead, the FDA approved the dangerous Truvada for PrEP. Today Gilead lists the side effects of Truvada: Kidney problems, including kidney failure; worsening Hepatitis B; too much lactic acid in your blood (lactic acidosis), which can lead to death; severe liver problems, which can lead to death; bone problems. They state that Truvada “can help reduce the risk of getting HIV-1 through sex, when taken every day and used together with safer sex practices.”

The Fauci-Gilead scam of promoting Truvada for healthy people to “reduce risk” of HIV is a marker for the level of medical malpractice and in some cases evident criminal abuse of human health that the current White House coronavirus guru, A. Fauci, represents.

Fauci and COVID-19

In October, 2019 Fauci and his NIAID got $100 million from the Gates Foundation to develop “gene-based” therapies for HIV and sickle cell disease. That means Fauci still to the time of the first claims of novel coronavirus in Wuhan China, Fauci was still promoting a 35-year fraud around HIV. Fauci is also part of the Gates Foundation cabal. In 2012 Fauci was named one of the five Leadership Council of the Gates Foundation-created Global Vaccine Action Plan.

This is highly relevant to his role today as the Trump Administration coronavirus “pope.” Has his NIAID or any other laboratory in the world rigorously, with electron microscopy, isolated and purified samples of patients tested SARS-CoV-2 positive for Covid-19? Or are the virus proofs as faulty as Fauci and the AIDS clique have made for HIV?

In addition NIAID is working with Gilead to conduct Phase II human trials on Gilead’s drug, remdesivir, as a potential treatment for hospitalized adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

A coincidence?

Relevant also is the fact that all top scientific advisers to the US President’s Task Force on COVID-19 are tied since decades to the bogus and destructive HIV/AIDS research and propagation of false theories. Alongside Tony Fauci of NIAID stands Deborah L. Birx, M.D., Obama appointee as US Global AIDS Coordinator who worked under Tony Fauci at NIAID from 1983-1986.

Robert Redfield is the current Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, center of the recent coronavirus testing scandal. Redfield cofounded with the discredited Robert Gallo, former Fauci colleague in the AIDS scandals of the early 1980’s at NIH, the Institute of Human Virology based at University of Maryland. Redfield and Birx also coauthored numerous scientific articles on purported HIV vaccines, none of which have been effective.

Fauci, Birx and Redfield, all incestuously complicit in the HIV/AIDS frauds and malpractice, today hold the future of not only American public health, but also of the entire world economy in their hands. Not a good situation. As their work on the proved HIV=IDS fraud shows, the coronavirus tests do not at all prove presence of a deadly virus in any patient. If this is so, it is perhaps the greatest criminal fraud in medical history.

_____________________

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”

https://journal-neo.org/2020/04/15/the-remarkable-doctor-a-fauci/

ONE LAST NOTE FROM E.A.R. (excerpt below taken from the post “Anthony Fauci Caught ‘Lying’ – Several Times”)

An interesting piece from 1994 on Kary Mullis and his views on a couple of questionable individuals:

In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.

The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.

But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done.

“I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.”

He pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.”

(Kary Mullis)
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus

It seems as if this self-described “ass” actually has a heart of gold and was trying to expose possible corruption as early as the 1990’s.

As Celia Farber, the interviewer, mentions: “One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears.

Sadly Kary Mullis passed away on August 17, 2019, allegedly from pneumonia. Just weeks away from when Event 201 took place in October 2019, and a few more weeks from when an actual “surprise outbreak” erupted, allegedly as early as November 2019. And just a couple of months after that, we have the PCR tests that Mr. Kary Mullis himself invented and was against using for viral detection, being used (and abused) for viral detection en masse – at the behest of the “expert scientists”.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

Vernon Coleman Speech at the London Worldwide Freedom Rally | July 24, 2021 - Dr. Vernon Coleman exposing COVID/vaccine corruption.
Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths - America's Frontline Doctors addressing the fraudulent use of the EUA for COVID vaccines.
Might COVID Injections Reduce Lifespan? - "Yeadon, Montagnier, Zelenko and others are raising concerns about global genocide."
Scam of the Medical Industry and a Depopulation Agenda Revealed at the ITNJ - Robert O. Young's Testimony at the International Tribunal of Natural Justice
COVID Presenting Same Exact Symptoms as… THE COMMON COLD - We have been lied to on a MASSIVE SCALE; all to enforce the vaccine on us.
NOT ON THE BEEB: Dr. T | Mask, Swabs, ‘Vaccine’, Magnetism & Genocide [Full Transcript] - Dr. T proposes a hypothesis that involves hydrogel and EMF.

What is Bill Gates’ Motive?

And why does he seem to smile and smirk all the time?

It’s strange that the main person pushing for the vaccine and contact tracing is also one of the hugest supporters of population reduction and genetic manipulation.

Even stranger, are the people that will refuse to believe that Bill Gates has said anything of the sort, or been involved in anything of the sort, and will maintain to this day that he is just trying to help “save the world”.

So I am not going to inundate anyone with fancy words of my own. I will just point you to words and actions of Bill Gates himself and those of his institutions and partners, and let him do the talking for me.

As you’re watching the video, which helps to paint a broader picture of Mr. Bill Gates other than just reading his words, keep in mind the term “duper’s delight”, and see if this might apply to anything we’re being told.

Duping delight is a particular micro expression a person will display that betrays a sense of enjoyment they are getting out of controlling and deceiving another person. It is a very important expression to watch out for in catching dishonesty in a person. In fact it is a form of body language pretty much exclusively reserved for pathological character types such as psychopaths.

The phrase was coined by the psychologist and body language expert Dr Paul Ekman and was defined by him as “the pleasure we get over having someone else in our control and being able to manipulate them”.

Duping delight most often manifests as a grin or a smirk which will flash across a person’s face, and is usually completely inappropriate to the situation or the topic that is being spoken about. The psychopath is either about to lie, or is lying to someone and they are believing it, and the smirk is a leaked expression of pleasure that they are getting away with it. – psychopathsinlife.com

Click to watch video (bitchute.com)

(Picture is from Bill Gates from his presentation youtube.com | wwwAAASorg | )

Original videos can be found at the following links: (unless they get deleted due to youtube’s always-changing definition of their “policies”. Please let me know if this happens and I will try and fix it.)

1.  00:00 – 00:32 | Bill and Melinda Gates assure you of a second wave that will “get your attention” | Exigent News |
2.  00:33 – 01:52 | Bill Gates: We Could See Early Results From Coronavirus Vaccine Trials This Summer | The Late Show with Stephen Colbert |
3.  01:53 – 05:15 | Bill Gates on Fighting Coronavirus | The Daily Social Distancing Show | The Daily Show with Trevor Noah |
4.  05:15 –  05:37 | Bill, Melinda Gates advocate GMOs to a Brussels audience | EURACTIV |
5.  05:37 – 06:29 | “These vaccines are unlikely to “completely sterilize” a population. Professor Sir John Bell, SAGE! | Steve Willis | (John Bell – leads the development of Oxford’s health research strategies and chairs the Gates Foundation’s scientific advisory committee)
6.  06:29 – 08:17 | Innovating to zero! | Bill Gates | TED |
7.  08:17 – 09:13 | Bill Gates on Overpopulation and Global Poverty | The Borgen Project |
8.  09:13 – 09:47 | Year Of The Vaccine (Bill Gates) | POPS Maroon |
9.  09:47 – 12:50 | Gene editing can now change an entire species — forever | Jennifer Kahn | TED |
10. 12:51 – 16:29 | Bill Gates: How Gene Editing, AI Can Benefit World’s Poorest | wwwAAASorg |

11. 16:29 – 16:58 | How to spot a liar | Pamela Meyer | TED |
12. 16:59 – 17:26 | Bill Gates on US reopening: We didn’t get away with it like we thought | CNN |

Transcripts of the video segments 1-10 can be found below:

1. Is this a threat? A promise?

“In fact, the testing could’ve been ramped up, uh, very quickly. And a few countries that have almost avoided the epidemic entirely, like, Taiwan, New Zealand, Australia, you know, they took their experience and actually prepared and so they moved a lot faster. Uh, so we, you know, will have to prepare for the next one. That, you know, I’d say, is, uh… will get attention this time.” – Bill Gates

2. Bunkering down

Stephen Colbert: “You tried to warn us about this pandemic, um, and we didn’t listen. What’s the next thing you’re warning us about that’s gonna happen 5 years from now that we’re not listening to at the present.”

Bill Gates: “Well, I didn’t want to be right. What I wanted to do is, uh-

SC: “I understand. I’m not saying you won. Everybody loses. Nobody wins with this. And I’m not saying that you’re, that you’re, this is not an endzone dance.”

BG: (laughs)

SC: “I’m just saying, what else are we not listening to that we need to take action on now.”

BG: “Well, the, the idea being a bioterrorist attack is kind of the nightmare scenario because they’re a pathogen with a high death rate would be – now the good news is, I’m not trying to depress you, it’s tough enough right now-

SC: “Too late! Too late.”

BG: “That most of the work we’re going to do to be ready for pandemic 2, I, I call this pandemic 1, most of what we’ll do to be ready for that are also the things we need to do, uh, to minimize the threat of, of bioterrorism.

SC: “Well, um, Mr. Gates, thank you so much for being here. Thanks so much for the efforts you and your organization are doing to try and find the cure for this. And uh… we’ll see you again. Stay safe.

BG: “All right. Great talk.

SC: “Give our best to everybody else in the bunker.

BG: “Thank you.” (laughs)

3. Vaccinating the whole world

But the ultimate solution, the only thing that really lets us go back completely to normal, and feel good about sitting in stadiums with lots of other people, is to create a vaccine and not just take care of our country, but take that vaccine out to the global population and, um, so we have vast immunity, and this thing no matter what, isn’t going to spread in large numbers.” – Bill Gates

Again sadly, the richer countries that do contain the epidemic will not allow people from those countries (poorer countries) to come in, you know, unless they are quarantined or tested or-or proved they’re immune. Uh, and so this is gonna stop people going across borders very dramatically these next few years till we get to that full vaccination.

Within the United States is different because we’re not gonna partition the country. Uh, and so therefore we are all in it together. We can’t do what we’re gonna do with foreign nationals, which is reduce the numbers a lot and have very strict screening there. We’re not gonna have at every state border, you know, some complex quarantine center.

Uh, and- so the whole country needs- even when you have small numbers, because those can exponentiate  to big numbers so quickly. You know, the doubling time is like three days when you’re still behaving uh, in the pre-epidemic way.

Uh, so you know, each country, uh, you know, has to get the entire populace, even some who- who, uh, initially resisted, maybe for very good reasons, because the economic effect on them, uh, is- is strong.”

So this is powerful medicine. But if you take a big dose of it earlier, you, you don’t have to take it for nearly as long.” – Bill Gates

Bill Gates: “We’ll have a lot of unusual measures until we get the world vaccinated. You know, 7 billion people- that’s a tall order. But it is, it is where we need to get to uh… uh despite a lot of things in between now and then- to minimize the damage.”

Trevor Noah: “You predicted this pandemic almost to a T, and maybe it was because we were dealing with other things at the time we didn’t really pay that much attention. Is there anything else you want to warn us about now that we should-

BG: (laughs)

TN: “that we should be looking forward to. Is there anything else that keeps you up at night?

BG: “Well, this is a naturally caused epidemic. And as bad as it is, it looks- if you have reasonable treatment, to have a one percent fatality. There could be epidemics that are worse than that, including, uh, ones that aren’t naturally caused that are a form of bioterrorism. But I do- one thing that I feel good about it, this is such a big, uh, change to the world, that this time it won’t be like ebola, which was just there in West Africa or Central Africa. This time, the 10’s of billions to have the diagnostic standing by, the vaccine manufacturing standing by- this time we will, uh, get ready for the next epidemic.”

4. Gleefully injecting GMO’s in little kid’s arms…

You know, is there something to worry about with medicines that is might, some of them have side effects- do we need safety testing? I mean, and we’re taking things that are, you know, genetically modified organisms and we’re injecting them in little kid’s arms- we just shoot ’em right into the vein.

So, yeah… I think maybe we should have a safety system where we, you know, do trials and test things out.” – Bill Gates

5. Sterilizing the Population

John Bell: “And don’t forget, there, these vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilize a population. They’re very likely to have an effect which works in a percentage, say, 60 or 70 percent. We’ll have to look quite carefully, and the regulators will have to look quite carefully to make sure that it’s done what we need it to do before it gets approved. So there will be a delay between the outcome of the trial and the decision whether it can be approved as a vaccine. Uh, and of course anything that happens-

Jon Snow: “Professor Sir John Bell…

John Bell: “Yeah?

Jon Snow: (pauses) “I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to cut you right off like that-

John Bell: “Can I just say that anything that happens to undermine the legitimacy of the regulators to make independent decisions is, in my view, profoundly unhelpful.

Jon Snow: (long pause) “Professor Sir John Bell, thank you very much indeed for joining us.”

6. Innovating to Zero

And the answer is, until we get near to zero, the temperature will continue to rise. And so that’s a big challenge. It’s very different than saying, “We’re a twelve-foot high truck trying to get under a ten-foot bridge, and we can just sort of squeeze under.” This is something that has to get to zero.

Now, we put out a lot of carbon dioxide every year- over 26 billion tons. For each American, it’s about 20 tons. For people in poor countries, it’s less than one ton. It’s an average of about 5 tons for everyone on the planet. And somehow we have to make changes that will bring that down to zero.

It’s been constantly going up. It’s only various economic changes that have even flattened it at all, so we have to go from rapidly rising to falling, and falling all the way to zero.

Bill Gates Innovate to Zero Equation
Bill Gates presented this infograph/equation to show how we would need to get the carbon dioxide emissions down to zero. "People" takes a role in part of the equation. Bill Gates | TED2010

This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication. So you’ve got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero, and that’s going to be based on the number of people, the services each person is using on average, the energy on average, for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy.

So let’s look at each one of these, and see how we can get this down to zero. Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero. That’s back from high school algebra. But let’s take a look.

First we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion.

Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.” – Bill Gates

7. What is “health care” and “reproductive health”?

When our foundation first started up, it was focused on reproductive health. That was the main thing we did because I thought, you know, population growth in poor countries is the biggest problem they face. You’ve got to help mothers who want to limit family size have the tools and education to do that. Now that’s the only thing that really counts.

Well, then, I came across articles that showed that the key thing you can do to reduce population growth is actually improve health. And that sounds paradoxical. You think, ok, better health means more kids, not less kids.

Well in fact, what parents are doing is they’re trying to have two kids survive to adulthood to take care of them. And so the more disease-burden there is, the more kids they have to have, have that high probability. So there’s a perfect correlation that as you improve health, within half a generation, the population growth rate goes down.” – Bill Gates

health care:

“All three components that Gates mentioned can involve direct forms of population control. “Reproductive health” is a euphemism for contraception and abortion. By now “health care” includes an increasingly wide scope for euthanasia, including in Canada. Contraceptive (or more literally, abortive) vaccines also exist, meaning that the use of vaccinations for more direct population control is at least a possibility.”

Gates, WHO, and Abortion Vaccines (fcpp.org)

8. Year of the Vaccines – 2021 (interview was with Sanjay Gupta on 2011)

Sanjay Gupta: “10 billion dollars over the next ten years to make it the year of the vaccines… what, what does that mean exactly?

Bill Gates: “Well, over this decade, uh, we believe unbelievable progress can be made both inventing new vaccines and making sure they get out to all the children who need them. Uh, we can cut the number of children who die every year from about 9 million to half of that uh, if we have success on it. The benefits are in terms or reducing sickness, reducing the population growth, it really allows us society, a chance to take care of itself, uh, once you’ve made the intervention.

9. Dangers of gene-editing

They engineered two mosquitos to carry the anti-malaria gene and also this new tool, a gene drive, which I’ll explain in a minute. Finally, they set it up so that any mosquitos that had inherited the anti-malaria gene wouldn’t have the usual white eyes, but would instead have red eyes. That was pretty much just for convenience, so they could tell at a glance which was which.

So they took their two anti-malarial, red-eyed mosquitos and put them in a box with 30 ordinary white-eyed ones, and let them breed.

In 2 generations, those had produced 3,800 grandchildren.

That is not the surprising part.

This is the surprising part: given that you started with just 2 red-eyed mosquitos and 30 white-eyed ones, you’d expect mostly white-eyed descendants. Instead, when James opened the box, all 3,800 mosquitos had red-eyes.

When I asked Ethan Bier about this moment, he became so excited that he was literally shouting into the phone. That’s because getting only red-eyed mosquitos violates a rule that is the absolute cornerstone of biology, Mendelian genetics.

I’ll keep this quick but Mendelian genetics says when a male and a female mate, their baby inherits half of its DNA from each parent. So if our original mosquitos was “aa” and our new mosquito is “aB”, where “B” is the anti-malarial gene, the babies should come out in 4 permutations: “aa”, “aB”, “aa”, “Ba”. Instead, with the new gene drive, they all came out “aB”. Biologically, that shouldn’t even be possible.

So what happened?

The first thing that happened was the arrival of a gene-editing tool known as CRISPR in 2012. Many of you have probably heard about CRISPR so I’ll just say briefly that CRISPR is a tool that allows researchers to edit genes very precisely, and easily and quickly.

It does this by harnessing a mechanism that already existed in bacteria. Basically there’s a protein that acts like a scissors and cuts the DNA, and there’s an RNA molecule that directs the scissors to any point on the genome you want.

The result is basically a word processor for genes. You can take an entire gene out, put one in, or even edit just a single letter within a gene. And you can do it in nearly any species.” – Jennifer Kahn

Say you want to get rid of an invasive species, like get Asian carp out of the Great Lakes. All you have to do is release a gene drive that makes the fish produce only male offspring. In a few generations, there’ll be no females left, no more carp. In theory, this means we could restore hundreds of native species that have been pushed to the brink.

Ok, that’s the good news. This is the bad news:

Gene drives are so effective that even an accidental release could change an entire species, and often very quickly.” – Jennifer Kahn

The last worrisome thing, is that the technology to do this, to genetically engineer an organism and include a gene drive, is something that basically any lab in the world can do. An undergraduate can do it. A talented highschooler with some equipment can do it.” – Jennifer Kahn

10. Bill Gates excited about certain new technologies

And therefore, we’re not taking the best of science, uh, in creating something that can have, uh, its potential impact. And so, a, you know, a redirection either of the market signals or the role of governments and philanthropy or scientists themselves against this broader goal, would help us make, uh, far greater progress, even more than we have today.

We have an opportunity with the advance of tools like artificial intelligence in gene-based editing technologies to build this new generation of health solutions. Uh, so that they are available to everyone on the planet. And I’m very excited about this.” – Bill Gates

Even so, the machine learning tools that we have today, uh, are going to be applied in a broad range of domains, including modeling disease, uh, finding drugs for disease, understanding biological systems, uh, and so it is a very exciting time.

The capacity to execute those AI models is, is doubling more than once a year. So we’re going up even faster than so-called Moore’s Law by building these very, uh, uh, special purpose things to execute both the creation of deep learning models and the execution of those, those models.

And so applying those in a broad way and really understanding whether they’re applicable, that data revolution is here today and it’s suffusing itself through many many problems, including these health problems that are, are so critical.

We also have recent breakthroughs like the gene-editing technologies including CRISPR, uh, and so we should be able to use that, uh, for very low cost point-of-care precision diagnostics, um, we should be able to use that for therapeutics and we should gain understandings of how to do, uh, vaccines, even vaccines that the turnaround time, instead of being the typical, uh, three or four years- literally at some point we’d be able to create in months. And we want to use these tools, not just for orphan diseases or not just for diseases in rich countries but also for the diseases that predominantly afflict, uh, people in countries where most of humanity lives in, the, the middle-income and the low-income countries.

In terms of genetics I’m sure we’ve all ready the history uh, you know going back to when, you know, people didn’t know, Pauline didn’t know, where is that information encoded? And you know Crick Watson and Franklin laid the foundation for modern genetics by understanding how, uh, DNA encoded that information and it’s only 15 years ago that the human genome project gave us, uh, the basic blueprint and let us now identify sequences that are associated with different diseases.

It was 8 years ago that CRISPR came along and it continues to evolve in some pretty fantastic ways and including the accuracy of the editing. Today, over 89 percent of genetic variants that we know are associated with human disease can be corrected, that is, if you get in to the cells of interest, uh, you can, uh, make those corrections.” – Bill Gates

eugenics: the practice or advocacy of controlled selective breeding of human populations (as by sterilization) to improve the population’s genetic composition – merriam-webster.com

Introduction to Eugenics:
Eugenics is a movement that is aimed at improving the genetic composition of the human race. Historically, eugenicists advocated selective breeding to achieve these goals. Today we have technologies that make it possible to more directly alter the genetic composition of an individual. However, people differ in their views on how to best (and ethically) use this technology. – knowgenetics.org

Other useful links that also help tie in between Bill Gates’ history into eugenics and his partnership with Planned Parenthood: (which was born out of an agenda to exterminate the “Negro population” – according to the founder, Margaret Sanger)

BILL GATES AND EUGENICS: THE WORLD NEEDS FEWER PEOPLE

The Gates Family, Eugenics and COVID-19

Margaret Sanger: “We Want to Exterminate the Negro Population.” Her Wish is Coming True

Bill Gates, Monsanto, and Eugenics

Melinda Gates: ‘Black People, Indigenous People’ Should Get Coronavirus Vaccine First

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

Vernon Coleman Speech at the London Worldwide Freedom Rally | July 24, 2021 - Dr. Vernon Coleman exposing COVID/vaccine corruption.
Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths - America's Frontline Doctors addressing the fraudulent use of the EUA for COVID vaccines.
Might COVID Injections Reduce Lifespan? - "Yeadon, Montagnier, Zelenko and others are raising concerns about global genocide."
Scam of the Medical Industry and a Depopulation Agenda Revealed at the ITNJ - Robert O. Young's Testimony at the International Tribunal of Natural Justice
COVID Presenting Same Exact Symptoms as… THE COMMON COLD - We have been lied to on a MASSIVE SCALE; all to enforce the vaccine on us.
NOT ON THE BEEB: Dr. T | Mask, Swabs, ‘Vaccine’, Magnetism & Genocide [Full Transcript] - Dr. T proposes a hypothesis that involves hydrogel and EMF.