An Essential Question We All Must Ask Ourselves: How Far Will We Go to Save Our Own Life?

How much is our life worth? Or our child? Where is the limit?

As some of my dear readers may be aware of, I have been covering an interesting figure of the 1990’s in a few of my posts by the name of Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov.

His history is fraught with mystery and intrigue, since it is claimed that he came to this world in order to warn this current generation that we will be the one to see the rise of the antichrist.

Now, I will just add this caveat: I cannot be entirely sure that this is a true account. Of course, I don’t think any of us can. There have been a lot of speculation and guesses as to who, what, where, when and how THE antichrist will make his appearance. And there are many who don’t follow the biblical testaments or believe in any religious/philosophical heralding of an impeding apocalypse, so don’t wonder about this at all and/or think it is only a conspiracy-theory-doomsday-delusion.

However, I am a believer in Jesus Christ and do believe that there are biblical warnings that point to what we should be on the lookout for. And because of this reason, I have been researching several different subjects, and Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov is one that just happened to catch my eye. And whether his is a true account or not, the topics that have been allegedly covered by this young individual – retold through his mother – resonates with me and I find a lot of truth within the subjects that he has mentioned.

For instance, the topic that I’m covering today is something that I have wondered about and struggled with in my pursuit of the truth and the reality of life and death; even before I came across this young prophet and his point of view. Which is incredibly deep coming from such a young child (he passed away at the age of 10). While this article is not about him personally, it is about a topic that he has broached, and because I have contemplated on this matter as well, wanted to delve deeper into the truth of this subject.

The Quest for Immortality (or even an extended life)

In my musings, I have wondered whether the notion of transfusions/transplants goes against what God intended. I know this might be an incredibly sensitive topic, but if we are pursuing the truth, then we must address difficult questions with a genuine and sincere approach, instead of aversion and antagonism. It is not my intention to offend anyone or pass judgement. Only to discuss this matter from a perspective that may not have been considered before.

With that being said, are we fully aware of the implications that may arise when pursuing this route when trying to save ourselves or a loved one?

Where are the organ donations coming from?…

The horrors of black market organ harvesting cannot be ignored, nor can the unscrupulous actions of the medical industry when faced with the possibility of a patient who is willing to pay ungodly amounts of money in order to save their own life, or one of their loved ones.

While some could never believe that such atrocities exist, the sad reality is that the love of money (and of one’s life) can push someone to make unethical decisions. Even if an organ transplant patient or blood transfusion recipient has no idea of the sinister back alley handed dealings, this secret, behind the scenes business may still be taking place.

“How was forced organ harvesting uncovered? The story starts with a whistleblower, a woman with a pseudonym Annie, who made a public statement in March 2006 that her ex-husband had been harvesting corneas of Falun Gong practitioners from 2003 to 2005 in Sujiatun hospital in Shenyang City in Liaoning Province in China. Other doctors in the hospital had been harvesting other organs. The Falun Gong were killed through organ extraction. Their bodies, after organ extraction, were cremated.”

How Was Forced Organ Harvesting Uncovered

As if this wasn’t horrific enough, the implications that the “cabal” may be behind some of the organ harvesting/trafficking may be in play as well.

In a harrowing interview, Stew Peters gives a child-trafficking victim a platform to speak on the tragic and devastating encounters she’s had within the corrupt “elite’s” cult and what she’s learned. It is a very heartbreaking and disturbing account – certainly not for the faint of heart. (I can’t watch this video without crying.)

A short testimony about the organ/body-harvesting trade:

Ally Carter @23:38: “- this is not about a sexual experience, this is not about just cash; this is about something else and it’s deeper than that. Because this is decades of tactics, this is decades of issues, these are decades of problems. Satanic ritual abuse exists, um, human sex-trafficking exists, organ-harvesting exists all over the place. The black market exists.

Um, humans, babies, children, 4 year olds/6 year olds, having their bodies sliced open and used as human suitcases over the border. I have been trafficked over the border.

Those babies are moved as if they’re still alive. They put clothes on them, they sit them up, and they use them until their bodies cannot be used anymore.

This is not just about sex. Because after your body is used for sex, your organs are used for organ harvesting and selling on the black market, which goes to your hospitals; you wonder why a heart costs so much. You wonder why a liver or kidney costs so much.”

Source: VICTIM: “BIDEN & OBAMA RAPED ME”: POWERFUL ELITES, CELEBS, DEMONIC SEX ABUSE RING

And while she claims to have evidence of the abuse that she’s had to endure – by the hands of some of the most prominent figures in our world today, no less – she doesn’t specify if she has the proof for the organ-harvesting claims.

However, this most certainly should not detract from the reality that this is a very real criminal enterprise.

In 2012, Patrick McMahon, Air Force combat veteran and nurse practitioner, made waves when he accused The New York Organ Donor Network for pressuring the doctors to prematurely declare patients “brain dead” in order to meet a quote, “and even hired “coaches” to train staffers how to be more persuasive” in convincing next-of-kin to sign their deceased love one over as an organ donor.

In one chilling allegation, Patrick McMahon submitted the following as an example of their gross misconduct:

“In September 2011, a 19-year-old man injured in a car wreck was admitted to Nassau University Medical Center. He was still trying to breathe and showed signs of brain activity, the suit charged.

But doctors declared him brain dead under pressure from donor-network officials, including Director Michael Goldstein, who allegedly said during a conference call: “This kid is dead, you got that?” the suit charged.” Organs taken from patients that doctors were pressured to declare brain dead: suit

An update to this lawsuit in 2017 had The New York Donor Network deny Mr. Patrick McMahon’s allegations, but also refused to release the documents of the patients in question, even after the judge court ordered them to do so; the New York Donor Network even going so far as to appeal this request through the Manhattan Supreme Court.

In another shocking Stew Peters exposé, a nurse claims to have found the connection between the deadly push of Remdesivir and the seemingly strategic planning of their patient’s deaths:

“I am an RN working in case management at _______ Hospital in California, and I know why the hospitals are killing their own patients.” Upon receiving this nurse’s horrific findings, The Stew Peters Show was able to get this whistleblower nurse to come on the show and answer the tough questions about the connection she found between the use of deadly Remdesivir, Vancomycin, and organ donors.

In the email, the whistleblower stated: “There is a link between the hospital deaths and organ harvesting in the state of California…Every patient’s license is in their medical records, and they can tell if they are organ donors or not.”Whistleblower: Hospitals Killing For Organs, “This is Absolutely Evil And A Crime Against Humanity!”

Are organs being harvested from LIVE people?

To add on to the controversial aspect of this medical intervention, is the huge debate surrounding the vitality of the organs and how long someone must stay alive – either naturally or through mechanical means – in order to keep their organs viable for distribution.

The medical condition of the person at the time of death can determine what organs and tissues can be donated and what cannot be. Organs need to be removed as soon as the person is declared brain-dead. Without the necessary oxygen supply, the organs stop functioning right.

The approximate amount of time between recovering the tissues/organs and transplanting them is:

    • Lung – 4 to 6 hours
    • Heart – 4 hours
    • Liver – 24 hours
    • Pancreas – 24 hours
    • Kidney – 72 hours
    • Cornea – 14 days
    • Bones – 5 years
    • Skin – 5 year
    • Heart Valves – 10 years

This is why creating a tissue bank (heart valves, skin, bones etc.) is possible but creating an organ bank is not. In case of organ transplantation, the process has to be very quick in order to save a life.

Keeping a brain-dead person on ventilator support helps as the organs continue receiving oxygen, providing a window of time for doctors to conduct organ transplantation.

Source: Time in which organs need to be donated after death

According to the above website, the heart and lungs are only viable within a 4 hour time frame. I assume this to mean that by the time the donor is “deceased”, the organs must immediately be transplanted to the intended recipient within the designated time. Otherwise it is too late and the organs (and therefore the payment) is no longer an option.

So by these conditions, the body must technically still be alive during the extraction of the organs, and the definition on what “brain dead” and “not legally alive” means is hotly contested in areas of not only ethical considerations, but scientific data as well.

For instance, there are reports of near-death experiencers being declared “brain dead“, “clinically dead”, “dead dead” (being in the morgue for 3 days…), yet still coming back from that brink with a story to tell. If their body was announced as technically dead, for all intents and purposes, then how is it at all possible for their “consciousness” to return to their body and having the lucidity return to them?

(DISCLAIMER: Please take these claims with a grain of salt. Always use discernment as most of these are anecdotal accounts and cannot be proven or provided with evidence.)

And how does this bode for the several thousands and thousands of people who have been declared “brain dead”, all in order for doctors/nurses/black market organ workers… to rush in to cut open their bodies (while still technically alive) and start harvesting for organs and tissue? And with that in mind, what would happen if a person who is declared “brain dead” suddenly regains their consciousness WHILE HAVING THEIR ORGANS REMOVED?

In some nerve-wrecking and heartbreaking reports, the following accounts demonstrates that this may, in fact, be possible:

– “April 2012 – Doctors declared british teen Stephen Thorpe “brain dead,” telling the father that the boy would never recover from a serious car accident. Despite pressure from the doctors, the father would not consent to allow the boy’s organs to be donated. With the help of other doctors, five weeks later Thorpe left the hospital, having almost completely recovered.”

– “July 2013 – A New York woman who was pronounced ‘brain dead’ by doctors unexpectedly awoke just as her organs were about to be removed for transplant.”

– “2014 U.S. man wakes up in morgue in body bag: An American man wasn’t pronounced “brain” dead, but dead dead. Hospital workers in Lexington, Mississippi zippered him into a sack and shipped to the morgue where he freaked out the workers preparing to embalm him by kicking his way out of his body bag. When Walter Williams actually did die, his nephew told a TV reporter, “I think he’s gone this time.” Shesh. If a nurse, a doctor, a coroner, and other hospital staff could get “dead” so very wrong…”

– 2014 – “Swedish man hears doctors urging the harvesting of his organs: Doctors in Sweden discussed organ donation within earshot of Jimi Fritze as he lay in hospital after a stroke. To the doctor’s shocking surprise, Fritze could hear every word they said. However, he couldn’t object because he couldn’t move. He had suffered a stroke, and after the doctors looked at a scan of his brain, they gave his family bad news, and claimed that “there was no hope,” Fritze said.”

– March 2018 – Thirteen-year-old Trenton McKinley of Alabama recovered and is doing well after doctors pronounced him “brain dead” and “his organs were matched to five children who needed them”, never mind the fact that he needed them himself.

There is also the aborted fetuses trade, which includes corrupt organizations such as the NIH and Planned Parenthood; both of which have been exposed for what I, and many others, consider crimes against humanity:

“David Daleiden, founder and president of The Center for Medical Progress, states, “The NIH grant application for just one of Pitt’s numerous experiments with aborted infants reads like an episode of American Horror Story. Infants in the womb, some old enough to be viable, are being aborted alive and killed for organ harvesting, in order to bring in millions of dollars in taxpayer funding for Pitt and the Planned Parenthood abortion business it supports.”Aborted Infants’ Continued Blood Flow Advertised in Racist University of Pittsburgh Grant Application to NIH

With these serious ethical concerns and implications, we have to really reflect on whether it is worth it to potentially be taking another person’s life to save our own, even if we are not fully cognizant of this fact. While I’m sure many of us are assured that the organ donor does not feel or suffer any of the procedures, unless we are actually under the knife, there is no way to know for sure. And the guilt that one may feel knowing that the person could have died while still having a chance to recover would undoubtedly weigh on some consciences.

Blood donors (again, from who…?)

Now, while not only considering organ donations to save or extend our life, we have to also address the practice of blood transfusions as well.

Again, the possibility of underhanded dealings in the black market and criminal enterprises needs to be mentioned.

As many may be familiar with, Silicon Valley is largely composed of a technocratic, transhumanist industry who is helping to usher us all in the “great reset”, biotech age; whether we like it or not.

In an endeavor that I have mentioned a few times before, because I am haunted by the stark coldness and unfeeling ramifications that it would most likely entail, is a statement from the Newsweek article titled, “Can Blood from Young People Slow Aging? Silicon Valley Has Bet Billions It Will“:

“One chilling missive came from a man who offered to provide all the blood Wyss-Coray might need for such an experiment—he claimed he could obtain it from human children of any age.”

In my opinion, this admission should be investigated to the fullest degree. I fail to see how this is even possible, unless one has a huge bank of blood already from “human children of any age”… or whether they can procure this amount through whatever means they have available to them – which again, raises severe alarm bells.

Either way, it is a grisly and sinister agenda. And the purpose for what this “young blood” will be used for, to keep the older generations alive and feeling young, is something right out of a dystopian playbook.

As Nir Barzilai puts it, “You have no idea how many people are interested to investing money in longevity,” said Nir Barzilai, the founding director of the Institute for Aging Research at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, and the founder of a company aimed at mitochondrial health. “There are billions of dollars.”

What’s in it for me?

Now that I’m finished talking about the ethical considerations (for now), it’s time to tackle why the recipient may not be getting off scott-free either. (Besides the medical bill, of course.)

Since the recipient will be under the knife and therefore have no idea what, exactly, is being transplanted/transfused into their body, and since many of us know how complicit some health/medical institutions really are, we have to wonder – not only how healthy the organ/blood being donated is, but also if the recipient is not subjected to an experiment as well.

Some, like David Bennett, consented to giving a very risky trial run to have a pig heart implanted in him. Not just any pig heart. A genetically modified one.

“In a medical first, doctors transplanted a pig heart into a patient in a last-ditch effort to save his life and a Maryland hospital said Monday that he’s doing well three days after the highly experimental surgery.

While it’s too soon to know if the operation really will work, it marks a step in the decades-long quest to one day use animal organs for life-saving transplants. Doctors at the University of Maryland Medical Center say the transplant showed that a heart from a genetically modified animal can function in the human body without immediate rejection.

The patient, David Bennett, 57, knew there was no guarantee the experiment would work but he was dying, ineligible for a human heart transplant and had no other option, his son told The Associated Press.”

Doctors transplant a genetically modified pig heart into a human for the 1st time

Again, the desperation to cling so tightly to one’s own life may compel them to make decisions they may later on regret. Turning yourself into a genetically modified organism might trend highly on that list. David Bennett had this to say on his decision:

“It was either die or do this transplant. I want to live. I know it’s a shot in the dark, but it’s my last choice,” Bennett said a day before the surgery, according to a statement provided by the University of Maryland School of Medicine.”

Doctors transplant a genetically modified pig heart into a human for the 1st time

This procedure has effectively, in a sense, created a human-animal hybrid. A genetically modified human hybrid.

That was David’s choice.

But what if you had no choice?

Far be it for me to assume that organ/blood recipients have not been getting all their donated organs/blood transfusions in a kosher manner… Already, there are attempts at not only implanting genetically modified animal parts in human being, but there are also endeavors to implant synthetic organisms/organs into us as well.

While history dictates that the government and mad scientists have taken certain liberties with their citizen’s bodies and lives, we have to wonder if there are even more clandestine operations hidden in the background that we are not aware of.

Now, even if these speculations are not true, what IS true is that there is a highly dangerous, suspicious “vaccine” containing mRNA and which have admissions that it does, indeed, modify our cells.

“Ultimately, the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cellular gene therapy. I always like to say, if we had surveyed 2 years ago, in the public, would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy, and inject it into your body, we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate.

I think this pandemic has also opened many people’s eyes to innovation in the way that was maybe not possible before.”

CEO of Big Pharma Bayer “mRNA vaccines are an example of cellular gene therapy”

So with that in mind, how would vaccinated individual’s organs and blood be, not only in the short term, but in the long term as well? There has already been a sudden increase in blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, myocardial  infarctions, neurological symptoms, miscarriages/stillbirths, cancers, etc., etc., etc. reported by Thomas Renz/DoD due to the vaccine intake.

Now imagine getting an organ/blood transfusion from a vaccinated individual with these conditions? And do we have a say in whose organs/blood we get in order to save ours or a loved one’s life? And even if they assure us that it is completely healthy and safe, are we really going to take the word of the same organizations who have assured us that brain dead individuals have no chance of recovery, only to have that same person wake up in the morgue?

This is all without even considering that the vaccines may, in fact, be injecting us with nanochip technology, hydrogels, graphene oxide, etc. in attempts at connecting us to a control-power grid. And as mentioned earlier, synthetic organ creations seem to be the next step in evolution for these “biomedical” technocrats, working on 3d printing organs like the heart, out of, again, their wonder material: hydrogel.

So now we have to consider whether we are okay with being a potentially genetically modified, human-animal hybrid, with synthetic (and possibly deadly) materials inside of us. In order to sustain/extend our life. Rather than “Godspeed” to the Lord.

This is, of course, not to say you would not want to find relief for yourself or a loved one who is suffering, but the serious subject matter of changing our natural, human born genetics with that of unnatural/man-made substances and mutation with animal DNA should be highly examined.

For those with (and without…) Biblical inclinations, there are specific verses that addresses this:

“But God gives it a body as he has chosen, and to each kind of seed its own body. For not all flesh is the same, but there is one kind for humans, another for animals, another for birds, and another for fish.”1 Corinthians 15:38-39

“Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.”Romans 1:22

“So God looked upon the earth, and indeed it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth.”Genesis 6:12

What’s in the blood?

So, now we get to, what was the initial reason why I decided to approach this topic to begin with?

Again, because of the testimony of Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov. In his life, he refused to get a blood transfusion because, as he claimed it, the sins of the blood could be transferred to the recipient.

It may seem like an outlandish claim.

However, there are some scientific literature to back this up, as eerie as it sounds.

blood carries a person’s DNA, the signature that is supposed to be unique to their body.”

Scientific American explains that when donor blood is mixed into the body with a transfusion, that person’s DNA will be present in your body for some days”

“That publication notes studies have shown that highly sensitive equipment can pick up donor DNA from blood transfusions up to a week after the procedure, but with particularly large transfusions, donor white blood cells were present for up to a year and a half afterward.”

Source: How Does A Blood Transfusion Change Your Body And DNA?

And in this 2017 study, the conclusion these scientists/doctors came to is that they are considering having physicians receive informed consent from the recipient before agreeing to the transfusion because of this possible personality change:

“In conclusion, our results showed that the majority of the subjects could conceive that RBC transfusion might transmit some of the donor’s traits. Furthermore, three subjects out of seven indicated that they had perceived changes in behaviors or values after their own RBC transfusion. Better understanding the frequency and importance of these perceived changes is important as physicians might have to include such information while getting informed consent for transfusion.”

Source: Perceived changes in behavior and values after a red blood cell transfusion

Organ transplants are no different, and have been documented for decades, according to the following pubmed article:

“Personality changes following heart transplantation, which have been reported for decades, include accounts of recipients acquiring the personality characteristics of their donor.”

“Four categories of personality changes are discussed in this article: (1) changes in preferences, (2) alterations in emotions/temperament, (3) modifications of identity, and (4) memories from the donor’s life. The acquisition of donor personality characteristics by recipients following heart transplantation is hypothesized to occur via the transfer of cellular memory, and four types of cellular memory are presented: (1) epigenetic memory, (2) DNA memory, (3) RNA memory, and (4) protein memory.”

Implications for the future of heart transplantation are explored including the importance of reexamining our current definition of death, studying how the transfer of memories might affect the integration of a donated heart, determining whether memories can be transferred via the transplantation of other organs, and investigating which types of information can be transferred via heart transplantation. Further research is recommended.”

Source: Personality changes following heart transplantation: The role of cellular memory

In another startling account, a recipient of a liver transplant was documented as having not only a complete change in blood type, but she acquired the immune system of her donor as well…

In a recent case of possible cell memory, Australian girl Demi-Lee Brennan’s blood group was changed after receiving a liver transplant from her donor, reports the AFP. Nine months after the initial transplant, doctors discovered that Brennan had changed blood types and she acquired the immune system of the donor due to the stem cells of her new liver transferring over to her bone marrow. “In effect she had had a bone marrow transplant. The majority of her immune system had also switched over to that of the donor,” Michael Stormon, a hepatologist who treated Brennan at the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, reported to the AFP.

Source: Can An Organ Transplant Change A Recipient’s Personality? Cell Memory Theory Affirms ‘Yes’

It amazes me that this foresight came from a 10 year-old child, who chose to end his life, rather than receive a potential change in personality and genetic make up.

And we have to wonder, what is the risk when it comes to this incredibly sensitive topic? What if our little one was sick, dying of leukemia? I can’t imagine how heartbreaking that would be, yet people go through these types of sorrow everyday. And on one hand I understand their heartfelt desperation at keeping their loved one alive, but again, at what cost?

Again, this is not to presume, or cast judgement, only to bring this topic to light in a different perspective. Perhaps we’re clinging on to life so hard, that we forget and/or ignore that this is only a temporary life/death. Even doctors/scientists/skeptics are having to come around to the mystery of the consciousness, and that there is more to this life than meets the eye.

“If you try to hang on to your life, you will lose it. But if you give up your life for my sake and for the sake of the Good News, you will save it.” – Mark 8:35

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Sofia Smallstorm Warned of DNA Genetic Altering and the Transhumanist Agenda Back in 2011

“- self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself.”

Sofia Smallstorm is an independent researcher who has been following information about nanotechnology for several years, making interesting correlations that are definitely worth a more intensive investigation and study to understand better the technocratic oligarchs’ agendas at connecting everyone and everything to the IoT/IoB (Internet of Things/Internet of Bodies).

It is one of which I have speculated upon as well, and is a chilling revelation since presumably this plan has already been set in motion and we are (and have been) in the midst of it for many, many years.

Keep in mind, this conference was held in 2011, and Sofia Smallstorm connects these hypothetical dots (which are getting quite obvious as the years have rolled by and less of a hypothetical speculation) from the materials/articles that were presented during that time. Of course, since then, there has been an abundant amount of information that only further validates her theories.

As it is, these are her statements and conclusions, which are presented as her findings. I am not claiming that all of her assessments are true. Only presenting it here for you to consider, and that there may be more truth to this than we realize, or are willing to admit.

There were many photos throughout this presentation, so for the sake of brevity and to refrain from using up too much space for the site, I referenced the time for some of the more pertinent photos that were mentioned specifically by Sofia Smallstorm.

I have also separated her presentation into sections for easier/faster searching capabilities.

Many thanks to Sofia Smallstorm for her research and insights into what has been going on throughout these years.

Introduction: “This is also, more importantly, she’s an expert in chemtrails, weather control, synthetic biology… She’s the preeminent researcher in this of what’s happening in your skies that affect you in a biological or synthetic level. This is very cutting-edge stuff. “The Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology.

Please, I won’t waste any more time. Welcome, the very wonderful Sofia Smallstorm.”

Sofia Smallstorm: “Thank you. Well, this actually is an hour or so, this presentation. We might not have time for questions, but you can ask me at the banquet or you can come to my table tomorrow and ask me as many questions as you like. Which I probably won’t be able to answer. 

So the thing about what’s going on now is, how big is the big picture? And I used to think that if you went outside the box, you could see more. And a lot of people believe that this settles at the level of power and control; that if they have all the power, they have all the control – that’s what they want.

There’s actually something beyond that, and that’s what I started to explore.

The big picture, I may be wrong, but I want you to follow the dots that I connect. Which are basically in the form of a square. I’ll start here, I’ll go here, I’ll go here, I’ll go there, and a shape will be made. The terrain is huge; it’s much much bigger than I ever dreamed of. And so, it’s about, really, impressions and perspective.

And I had a friend who’s now no longer alive, Harriet. Harriet used to keep me awake at night on the phone, and tell me things until 1 o’clock in the morning. Notes that she had taken from listening to radio shows. She really taught me how to see.

So, “the real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes… but in having new eyes.”

Now here is a photograph. [image of a landscape]

Chemtrails/contrails

And here is an impression. So I am going to give you the impressions that I have gathered, and see what you think of them by the end of this evening. 

[@2:20] We’re getting new impressions of the sky. [shows several pictures of the sky] Once upon a time, clouds used to be puffy like this. [shows two pictures of clouds] Today, you see a lot of streaks, feathers, and unnatural crisscross configurations.

When you look closely at what forms your impression, you can see that this is the impression version, you will see streaks, feathers, more feathers, lines. [shows several photos of unnatural cloud formations]

When you look closely at the lines, you see this. Looking at a collage of lines…”

Credited to: Sofia Smallstorm/Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology 2011

Sofia Smallstorm: ” – with what appears to be a plane. You see ropes in the sky made by planes; forming a web, a haze. 

The formation of manmade clouds is admitted to by NASA. They call it “jet cirrus”.

We’re told that new atmospheric conditions are causing jet contrails to linger in the sky. But anything that stays in the sky for many hours fans out, as you see here and forms a layer of material thick enough to block sunlight for miles, is not condensation.

The “con” in contrail is for condensation. So if it isn’t condensation, meaning water droplets, that under normal circumstances quickly evaporate, then what is it?

[@4:35] Here’s the result of one; it was a huge donut. This is Cardiff State Beach where I live, and it literally formed a big oval halo in the sky. [shows image of a cloud formation]

Contrails typically form behind high flying jets, so that’s high altitude in low humidity. Clouds typically form at low altitude in higher humidity. So the rule is this: clouds and contrails need opposite conditions to form.

But today, we have vapor trails, as they call them, condensation trails turning into clouds and spreading out to form a low altitude white haze.

In many parts of the world we’re losing our blue sky. You see New Mexico in the past, and New Mexico in the present.”

Credited to: Sofia Smallstorm/Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology 2011

Sofia Smallstorm: “The word for this, many people call it “whiteout”.

@5:40: If you travel in a plane, this is what you’re going to see from the window. [shows image of a white line in the sky] There’s a demarcation line where the white arrow is; I call it the spray line, below which the world is seen through a veil. And above which, you have that true deep blue sky.

We live in the veil. We live in a white world of whatever it is that’s descending on us from above. Our visibility is impaired, the sky as we look up at it is now a much lighter blue. But the change has been so incremental that most of us are too busy to have noticed.

When you look at airborne environmental samples, and the soil and water samples that people have collected throughout the country, you get three types of materials: metallic salts, filaments of fibers, and engineered biologicals.

Metallic salts are oxides: aluminum, titanium, barium, are three examples. And it appears, now, that the air around us has been filled with these metallic oxides which are conductive; conductive particles.

So the air is no longer neutral. Air is supposed to be neutral to support life. It is not supposed to be charged. The air around us is also filled with fibers. And if you get a blacklight, apparently you can buy them at Home Depot, you can see… gotta find my mouse… – this: [Clip insert from youtube “Dry Particle Storm” @7:27]

All right. How do you make clouds and rain? Clouds are formed from moisture that evaporates from the Earth’s surface, carried upward, on air that’s warmed by the sun. As the warm air rises, it begins to cool. There’s a certain point, they call it the “dew point”. DEW. And at that point the moisture in the air begins to condense around particulates which are in the air and these particulates are usually dust or salt. These particulates are called condensation nuclei. They have an affinity for moisture. Dust, salt like water. Okay?

As more water vapor gathers around the particulates, the combination becomes unstable. Which is a raindrop. So we know that particulates in the atmosphere nucleate, meaning they gather into raindrops.

Now here is something interesting. Daniel Rosenfeld, he’s an atmospheric scientist, Hebrew University Jerusalem, he claims that pollution particulates actually prevent rain by forming very tiny, very stable droplets that remain suspended and do not fall earthward.

Now this was, um, headlines. You can google, ‘pollution stops rain’. If this is correct, then it suggests that the smaller the particulate, the more stable the droplet. So this is how you would get clouds to hang in the sky as haze – or so-called clouds. And so it would seem that you could create cloud-like masses, simply by releasing small enough particulates into the atmosphere. And those clouds would not fall; they would spread outwards instead to form haze.

Which leads us to the subject of geoengineering. Defined as the large-scale manipulation of the Earth’s environment to suit human needs and promote habitability.

Last year scientists began to discuss something called “SAG”: stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, which was supposedly spraying soot and sulfates in the atmosphere to form a shield against the heat of the sun. This presumes the notion of manmade warming. The idea being that atmospheric science can rescue us from climate change. Which is, nature’s retaliation against us for creating global warming.

For now we’re told that this is a future consideration, but for years we’ve already been seeing strange clouds and hazy skies. What exactly is dripping here? This is a photo I took. [@11:20: shows photo of dark, blackened misty clouds] Cardiff, California, and I call these the bearded clouds.

And here you have this new form, they tell us, new form of cloud, a hooked cloud called cirrus uncinas. [@11:30] And here you have asperatus. [@11:35] This is like the canopy effect; blanket. This is another picture I took. I had never seen this kind of cloud before. I had only seen photos of it. And then it suddenly appeared.

The presence of strange clouds, persistent haze and impaired visibility is not just in the air and sky. It must be having an effect on the ground, on the Earth’s soil and water.

Effect of particulates on earth’s environment

[@12:05] Francis Mangels is a retired federal wildlife biologist and botanist from Mount Shasta. And he notes that between the 1950s and 60s, jets did not leave many contrails. Today what appeared to be jet contrails are much more frequent and last for 10 to 20 hours. And here’s what they look like over these beautiful mountains and lakes. Now this would make a lovely view, don’t you think?

Counting all trails in every direction over Mount Shasta, Mangels says, the FAA indicates there can’t be that many flights per day. The number has been as high as over 30 contrails at once and I’ve counted 100 just before weather fronts. Typically heavy spraying days are just before weather fronts that come in from the Pacific.

So here you have a photo of this man, who is a retired federal wildlife biologist and a water specialist, lab test from Northern California show very high levels of aluminum and barium in soil and pond water.

Francis Mangels told me that at 100 micrograms per liter, when he was working for the federal government, you were shut down. 100 micro – I’m sorry, 1,000 micrograms per liter. So I asked him what normal is, what’s tolerable? And he said, 5 tenths, 0.5 micrograms per liter is considered normal.

So here you have the findings from pond water in Mount Shasta. [@13:45] You can see 12,000 micrograms per liter; “ug” is short for microgram. Which is 24,000 times normal. Snowdrift at 8,000 feet; 61,100 micrograms per liter. Way way past normal.

And here you have a lined pond. So please picture a lined pond. A pond with a liner; vinyl something in Bella Vista. And you got a reading, or the person who did this, I know him, Dane Wigington, got a reading 375,000 micrograms per liter in this little pond.

Mangles has a ma- I repeat, a Masters of Science, in water related subjects. And he also reports that a house, the soil tested outside this house in Northern California, was 3,000 times – 3,000 micrograms of aluminum more than the soil under the house. I’m sorry, I said 3,000 times.

Anyway, so what does this mean? It means that something is dropping from above and is affecting the soil around the house, but not underneath it. So you can’t say that this is in the groundwater. You can’t say that this is in the earth itself, coming from the earth. It’s got to be coming from the environment.

“The Dying of the Trees”. I’ve spoken to Charles Little. He’s the author of this absolutely fantastic book which you can buy still by going to half.com or Amazon used books.

It is about the natural or biotic reasons for tree death and also the effects of industry and deforestation, which began decades ago when manufacturing exploded, acid rain, different forms of pollution started to affect trees. But what has come along since this book was written is this: [shows image of crisscrossing contrails @15:40]

Nowadays, we have an effect coming out of the environment that can’t possibly be natural. Look at this corkscrew. [@15:55] I took this picture myself. This is the wine opener style.

You have nature trying to cope with the introduction of new substances; particularly, metallic oxides, which are also the metallic salts. Living things, as I said before, um, the metallic salts have an affinity for water. So living things take up these salts, along with the water that they’re seeking. The natural world which gets its food from the ground is sucking this stuff up.

This is a scraggly pine tree [@16:30] outside the post office in Cardiff, California where I go everyday. And you can see how brittle it is, lots of needles… lost. If you look closely at the needles when you stand under the tree, you see that they’re all frosted with brown; signs of tree death are these sagging limbs – these leafless, scraggly branches. You also see infestation by bugs, insects, mites, fungus… These are spider mites that have taken up in a tree that was right next to my house. The entire tree had to be felled because of these white webs in it that were killing off the tree. But again, I’ll explain why in a minute, this isn’t the primary source of the death.

Here you have some phenomenon that Debra Whitman, who’s here with us today, has done a lot of research on the white, we call it the tube sock effect on trees. You see white bark, and when we tested the bark of this tree, it showed it had these readings: aluminum 387 – now this is milligrams per kilogram, because this is a mass analysis rather than a liquid… liquid context. So you have barium at 18.4, strontium 113, and titanium 15.2.

You can see again in these photos [@18:00] the enormous, scorched look that’s a very dying, very unhealthy tree, and you see this other thing called secondary growth. The tufts on the trunk poking out, that’s the tree giving itself – desperately trying to give itself a second stab at life. So when you look around you and you see these little growths, sometimes they’re all the way along the trunk from the ground up.”

Problem – Reaction – Solution: GMOs

“The beauty of an induced problem is that its twin is the solution. As nature begins to die, we will be told that science will have to step in to save it. So, you’ll have GMO trees as the answer. The silent forest, they call it. Genetically engineered trees: non-reproductive, no fruit, nuts, blossoms, no insects, animals, birds. Low lignin, that’s the wood fiber, which makes the tree very easy to cut and pulp.

The silent forest will grow straight and tall and will be replenished by the state in what will be considered appropriate numbers and in appropriate locations.

In May 2010, from this article, we learned that the USDA approved large-scale field trials of 200,000 GMO eucalyptus trees made by ArborGen biotech company, to be planted from Florida to Texas. Now we’re told that the purpose of the trial planting is to evaluate whether such GM trees can become new sources of wood for paper and biofuels. Also in the name of conservation and improvement. This is a story they give us: ‘we’re trying to conserve, we’re trying to go green, we’re trying to help’.

But, then you come in – up against articles like this, 2008.”

[@20:05: shows article titled: “Toxicity-Resistant Crops” with slide information:]

2008: Scientists produce aluminum-resistant crops

“The plant is effectively blind to what’s happening in the cell.” – Paul Larsen, biochemist University of California Riverside

MIT Technology Review:
A simple mutation to a single gene that makes plants thrive in spite of levels of aluminum that would normally be toxic

“This was from something called MIT Technology Review. An article announcing biochemistry’s development of toxicity resistant crops. In particular in this article, “aluminum-resistant plants”. So the article tells us that aluminum in soil stunts the growth of crops. Wheat corn and barley don’t fare well in aluminum-laden soils. But now, scientists – plant scientists have found a way to get the plant to shut down its own cell division – sorry, to stop the plant from shutting down its own cell division. Because when a plant encounters toxins in the soil, it says to itself, I don’t want to keep growing, so it shuts down the cell division. But they have figured out a way to keep prompting those plants to produce, um, reproduction.

So this is a gene mutation, a single gene mutation that inactivates a protein so that the plant continues to grow.

The quote from this article is very interesting, “the plant is effectively blind to what’s happening in the cell”, and that’s from biochemist Paul Larsen. The mutant plants can maintain high levels of growth in the presence of toxic levels of aluminum, even if they sustain DNA damage.

When something begins to die in nature, it attracts bugs, blight, molds, even viruses and bacteria. This is nature’s way of hastening decomposition so that the dying form can become food for other living things.

Today we have an epidemic of tree decline all over the world. Not just in America. But it’s in Australia, it’s in Europe; thousands of square miles of die off in the savannas and forests of many many continents, and in cities and suburbs. Trees are rotting as they stand; swooning, breaking. They are hazards to property, requiring removal. 6 trees around my house have been taken out in the last two years.

Sunlight is a natural disinfectant. As hazy skies limit the sunlight, molds and fungus grow. As plants that are taking up toxins struggle to live, molds, viruses, bacteria… begin to take them over. This is all part of nature. And bioremediation will be the obvious answer.

Metallic salts have made our air conductive. This means that we, and everything around us, can transmit and propagate energy. The air is no longer neutral. It no longer supports in a healthy way, living things.

Fibers & Filaments: Morgellons

[@22:55] The second group of materials found in these environmental samples is unidentifiable fibers – and I really want you to appreciate the meaning of unidentifiable. These fibers have been sent to sophisticated laboratories and there is nothing, nothing in the databases that match them.

So, these are fibers we could say that do not exist in nature. People around the world are developing lesions on their skin that ooze and produce fibers. This is known as Morgellons syndrome. Tissue samples cultured from ordinary people without this ailment contain and grow the very same fibers.

[@23:45] Here’s a 5 inch lesion on a woman’s body that has never healed. 5 inches.

Credited to: Sofia Smallstorm/Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology 2011

“The fibers, or filaments, are actually tubules with hollow insides. When these fibers are cultured, they produce colonies of filaments. You can see the extension filaments. And these colonies continue to grow and reproduce; branching out into more filaments and more colonies.

The filament cultures can be grown from saliva samples, tissue from the skin, mucus, urine, blood… from animals and people, regardless of the presence of the Morgellons condition. The fibers are segmented with visible structures inside them.

So where do these fibers or filaments come from? Airborne environmental samples that were collected by Clifford Carnicom, he is a researcher in this subject, in 2000, the year 2000, gathered at high altitude on a mountain in New Mexico, showed the presence of those fibers; whose structures matches exactly the tubular filaments – when I say fibers and filaments, basically interchangeable, showing up in our blood, tissues and skin.

Additionally, the samples collected by Mr. Carnicom showed what he calls, and was called in biology “dessicated erythrocytes”. This is a multi-syllabic term, but it means dried red blood cells.

So, why these were in the air? Why are dried red blood cells in the air? Very puzzling.

A medical microscopist, a biologist specializing in microscopy, confirmed to him that they were human red blood cells. But that they had been engineered in some way so as to be preserved. So again you have to ask yourself, if I were five years old, I would say, “Mommy, what are red blood cells doing falling out of the sky?”

Biology divides life into three kingdoms: bacteria, archaea and eukarya. Bacteria and archaea are simple organisms with no subcellular compartments. Eukarya are complex with defined cell compartments and internal organelles; many organs, like mitochondria that make DNA and energy for the cell.

Plants, animals and humans are eukaryotic, as are fungi and slime molds. The archaea are the hardiest of the life forms. They’re able to withstand grinding pressure, heat, acidity, and alkalinity. They can live in volcanoes, geysers, and the ice shelf. Bacteria, on the other hand, will die in extreme heat and cold, which is why we cook and freeze our food.

Now the materials appearing within these filaments are as tough as archaea, they look like bacteria, and they self-replicate. One looks like something called mycoplasma, but is not. One looks like chlamydia, but is not. And natural fibers, or filaments, would be classified as fungal, in the domain of eukaryotes. But these fibers contain forms from the other two groups inside them.

[@27:15] You’re look at a tubular fiber with self-replicated internal elements resembling bacteria and behaving like archaea. That does not happen in the natural world.

Transbiology / Nanotechnology

So what are they? What’s going on? It appears that within our bodies we now have all three life kingdoms replicating themselves. What does that make us? Are we still eukaryotes? Or are we becoming something else? You could call this transbiology – a crossing of biology, the creation of hybrid forms.

[@28:00] Materials are forming in our bodies that are not native to us, not natural, and entirely new. You can see in these pictures the tubular filaments – with the branches they’re branching off, that’s their self-replication, they’re creating new colonies. And you can also see in the bottom picture a little bud; that’s the beginning of a new fiber.

Credited to: Sofia Smallstorm/Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology 2011

“The territory of things on the scale of atoms and molecules is the nanoworld. Science has opened up the nano-universe, where incredible new creations are possible. Nanotechnology explores materials that are less than a micron in size, or from 1 to 100 nanometers. And a nanometer is a billionth – one billionth of a meter.

Nature and biology continually work on the nanoscale assembling proteins and building with crystals to conduct the business of life. Spider webs are an example of that very fine filaments with enormous strength and flexibility because they contain nanoscale crystals.

So, let’s go back to the filaments and the structures they contain. These ones that Clifford Carnicom has found. In those unidentifiable filaments, he has observed the formation of red blood cells and submicron sized structures. So now you’ve got a filament making its own red blood cells. The engineered cells, the red blood, very very tough, withstanding excesses of heat and chemicals; indicating that they are designed to endure almost anything. He has put them in a Bunsen flame, he has poured bleach on them, acid, and they still endure. In addition, they are able to replicate, growing outside of the body in a petri dish.

This is highly sophisticated technology, going on by itself, not in a laboratory. So we are having – we’re witnessing red blood growing outside, having nothing to do with the bone marrow, in a petri dish, in somebody’s… um, very… low level lab.

Could it be that artificial materials are being introduced into living things?

Here you have, this comes from the nanotech industry. It’s what I call the nanotech pyramid. You start with materials, you go up to structures, processes and devices. Could it be that artificial materials are being introduced into us to create new processes from the ground up? Which processes will override our own natural biology, our own internal systems?

People with advanced Morgellons syndrome started with fibers coming out of their skin. And they’re now observing very strange crystalline forms and metallic devices. The fibers became multi-colored and now they were accompanied by plaques – strange, hard, little, almost like shards; people say they’re like glass, and they’re colored. The lesions keep emitting these things. They don’t heal over or close, sometimes for years.

[@31:30] Here are more plaque structures, even grooved metallic devices. On the right you’ll see one device, the front and the back.

Credited to: Sofia Smallstorm/Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology 2011

Genetically mutating humans

“These images are supplied by Jan Smith of morgellonsexposed.com [editor’s note: website no longer in effect], who has done extensive research on biotech websites, looking for things that match what comes out of her body. And she’s finding them. The fibers from her skin were from high-density polyethylene. And I’m going to read what she’s written on her website.

“The bizarre nature of my findings suggest a man-made source. It occurred to me that if these pathogens were being bio-engineered in a lab, they were made of multiple components. The mutated material might reproduce and intermittently send out a batch of identifiable debris, much like the original genetics. I call this type of debris “throwbacks”.”

It’s her theory that when new life forms are made through this gene splicing and mutation, bioengineering and nanotechnology, they will self-replicate in all kinds of ways, creating different mutations in each generation.

Morgellons specimens can sometimes be identified with the original spores before those mutations occurred.

Jan found three varieties of something called “oomycota fungus” in her specimens, as well as something else called “dictyostelium discoidium”, which is a slime mold that is a major player in biomedical research today.

[@33:00] The material coming from her body was ribbony and motile. It was grooved and oval, very much like the oomycota spore you see here. At the bottom with the purple arrow, from the bottom, is a – it’s a diagram of oomycota. And on the upper right you see something that came out of Jan’s body that looks exactly like oomycota.

The fiber strands that you see here were made of cellulose and GNA. GNA is glucans polysaccharide sugars, and this was confirmed by microscopy. GNA is a synthetic cousin of DNA. It has a 3 carbon glycerol sugar in it instead of the 5 carbon that you find in DNA.

Here’s a news report from April 2008, in which we are told, big headlines, GNA is DNA’s chemical cousin – is a nanotechnology building block. The Biodesign Institute at Arizona State develops the first self-assembled nanostructures composed entirely of GNA, synthetic analog of DNA. The nanostructures contain additional properties not found in DNA, including the ability to form mirror image structures.

An NIH article from Japan on research from Japan also tells us that various conductive polymers and gold nanoparticles are entrapped within the helical super structure of this GNA. Now the particular sugar found in this GNA is called beta 1,3 glucans. And here you see it, under what’s called a Raman spectroscope; very sophisticated equipment.

[@34:45] It looks, um, the microscopist who looked at this, called it a sugar snake. So this is the GNA that you’re looking at.

Credited to: Sofia Smallstorm/Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology 2011
Credited to: Sofia Smallstorm/Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology 2011

Creating human-machine hybrids using DNA/Nanotech

“When Jan’s fibers were put to a high heat flame, they released what she calls a gold payload. So they dropped out this tiny little bead of gold. And here’s more. The fibers that contain a head, she calls it a golden head, orbs, and they all have this payload in them.

Here you have a nano array that she found, a couple of them, in her body. Nano array is a tiny device used in biotech for DNA hybridization. And on the left you see a diagram [@35:30] from an industry website of a nano array, and on the slide you can see actually two of them. She’s marked them with red exits that came out of her body looking exactly like this. And again, I’ll say it again, that nano arrays are these tiny devices that are used for DNA hybridization.

So, I’m going to repeat my nanotech pyramid. We begin with the emergence of basic filaments, followed by more complex structures. So what processes are going on here? Are these materials combining to form devices that are working together inside us? What is happening to our biology?

And remember that tissue samples obtained from ordinary people who have no Morgellons symptoms, no lesions, can be cultured to produce the very same filaments found in people with Morgellons. So we would have to conclude that Morgellons is like the canary in the coal mine, and that only some people are exuding the materials. And could that be because their bodies are rejecting it, while our bodies are integrating it?

Jan’s body has been sending out these plaques, colored plaques, which are hard pieces of silica. Some of them have these dots on them. They’re very small, they require handling with a needle, and she places them under a microscope. The plaques are fragile, they can shatter.

Quantum dots, which are the colors you see, are nanocrystal semiconductors made of heavy metal surrounded by an organic shell. Now I want you to remember some of these terms: heavy metals, okay? Heavy metals, aluminum, and so forth.

So these are nanocrystal semiconductors surrounded by an organic shell, but they are made of heavy metals.

[@37:30] And Morgellons subjects are also finding this stuff – jewel like hexagons, faceted pyramids, crystals.

Credited to: Sofia Smallstorm/Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology 2011

“Hexagons have shown up environmentally not only in tissues, but they are in environmental fallout. This specimen is provided by Morgellons Research Group and we have a table here this weekend. Mike and Jennifer from Morgellons Research Group.

[@38:00] Here is a pink, ruby-colored, pink layered crystalline. The little inset image you can see actually the layers in it. This was an environmental crystal found.

[@38:10] Here is something that was not visible to the naked eye, but the woman who told me about it and sent me the photo was looking at hay. She lives in Oregon and she was looking at a piece of hay under her microscope and she found this bright pink, teeny tiny little crystal.

[@38:30] You get crystals with embedded hexagons, strands that glitter, the one on the right, that’s a glittering strand that came out of somebody’s body.

[@38:40] Here’s a picture of tissue from a lesion with several crystals – you can see the arrows attached to it and you can see the fiber coming out from the bottom.

[@38:50] You have combinations of wires and those quantum dots. Now here are the nanotechnology dyes. And there you see the colored plaques that have been coming out of people’s bodies. One on the below has fibers attached to it.

Electricity & Frequency to control biology/biotechnology

The industry tells us that quantum dots are tiny nano crystals whose small size gives them unprecedented tunability. Okay? Tunability.

The Piezoelectric effect is the internal generation of a voltage when an outside pressure is applied, and vice-versa. You can google the Piezo effect. The Piezo effect occurs in crystals, ceramics, DNA and certain proteins.

So an example is, when you put a frequency to a crystal, it generates a voltage. And when you put a voltage to a crystal, it responds with a frequency. We call this Piezoelectricity. Electricity resulting from applied compression or frequency.

Recent work by Clifford Carnicom reveals that a filament culture, subjected to a blue light frequency, that’s 375 nanometers, resulted in explosive growth of the culture within 24 hours after the initial incubation. So he put the blue light on, incubated it for 5 to 7 days, and then it exploded into all those little fibers that you see.

We now live in a frequency filled world. I don’t have time to address HAARP, artificial weather, and the enormous spread of unnatural frequencies that are affecting the earth today, but I will say this: I came across a very well known paper on electromagnetic fields in neurology, neurological function, written by Professor Ross Adey, Loma Linda School of Medicine, with the subtitle, “A possible paradigm shift in biology”. We learn that the Earth’s own natural magnetic field peaks, that means peaks, top, at 32 Hertz. And that only happens in certain equatorial thunderstorms.

The electronics we use today generate electromagnetic fields that are tremendous, in the megahertz and gigahertz; million Hertz and billion Hertz range.

So here you can see earth and nature up at the top, 3 to 30 Hertz. You can see HAARP has a low range. Then you see the Gwen Towers, that’s Groundwave Emergency Network – blue. HAARP again has another range right after that, and GWEN has another range after that. And look at the phones and internet. We’re talking about million Hertz and billion Hertz.

Professor Adey reminds us that chemical bonds are magnetic bonds, formed between atoms by paired electrons with opposite spins that are attracted magnetically.

So if nature itself moves in the 3 to 30 Hertz range, what is happening to us on the biochemical level, with all the different frequencies our bodies are experiencing? What is being done to our biology?

Again, I’ll repeat Ross Adey’s little tenant here: “chemical bonds are magnetic bonds”. Electromagnetism is capable of changing what is happening in our bodies. Frequencies are capable of supplying to the synthetic materials in our bodies; the force or power that activates them, gets them working, makes them come alive.

[@42:40] Nothing about us today is normal. We have hair that glows, and skin that shimmers.

This is from a healthy woman in Oregon who’s been doing microscopy. And if you go to Mike and Jennifer’s table, they can demonstrate some of this iridescent effect for you.

[@43:00] Here is a glowing, little arrow-shaped thing found in rainwater. When the same woman who supplied the former, um, images, previous images, was scanning – she was scanning water from a puddle under her microscope, and she saw this arrow-shaped thing that glowed.

[@43:20] And here’s a hexagon that grew a fiber in 20 seconds as it was being observed under the microscope.

The Singularity: 2045 – The Year Man Becomes Immortal

The field of synthetic biology is a new frontier of science. It draws from biochemistry and biomedicine, genetics, robotics, radiation biology, and information technologies. Using nanotechnologies, its goals are to improve and transcend the limits of nature.

On February 21st of this year, Time magazine had a feature story on the singularity – the term signifying the merging of man with machine. The story was released on Valentine’s Day, February 14th, to underscore a love affair; the marriage of humanity and technology. The article tells us that a transformation is coming and our species, homo sapien, will no longer be recognizable as itself. We will be something new, something better.

The time predicted for this transformation is 2045. The man who is making this prediction is Ray Kurzweil, a futurist known for his uncanny accuracy in just this area: the pace at which technology grows and improves, such that it will one day be smarter and better than us.

That’s the singularity. There is a singularity university hosted by NASA, sponsored by Google to teach people about the intelligence explosion.

Ray Kurzweil has made fortunes over and over as an engineer and inventor. A documentary about him is called the Transcendent Man. He wrote the best-selling book that you see here, The Singularity is Near, which came out in 2005.

Singularity is a word from astrophysics referring to a point in space-time where the rules of ordinary physics no longer apply. Kurzweil has correctly predicted the growth of information technologies. He has made it clear to the world that technological progress is exponential, not linear. Which means that advancement begins to advance itself, in a manner of speaking. Exponential curve starts slowly, and then explode.

A quote from the Time magazine article, “In Kurzweil’s future, biotechnology and nanotechnology give us the power to manipulate our bodies and the world around us at will, at the molecular level. We ditch Darwin and take charge of our own evolution.”

The question is, who is “we”, and what is “at will”? Whose will?

Artificial Intelligence to lead the world – The Transcendent Man

Kurzweil predicts that by 2020 we will have successfully reverse-engineered the human brain. And when hyper-intelligent artificial intelligence arrives, all we have to do is hand ourselves off to it. Armed with advanced nanotechnology, AI will solve the problems of the world.

Strong AI, they use this term, is a super powerful, broad spectrum intelligence that operates as easily and comfortably as a human being. It isn’t just a chess playing computer. It’s a machine intelligence that can pass for human in a blind test; which is as close as you can get to consciousness or sentience.

Now once this kind of intelligence is here, what will it do as a newly created inhabitant of the earth? Would it compete with us for resources? More intelligent than we are, would it treat us as lesser beings? Would it recognize that we made it? Or would it overrun us?

Kurzweil is one of the world’s leading transhumanists; number 30 on Times most influential list. Transhumanists believe that we ourselves should merge with machines. Imagine a time, when we can download our brains into a computer and upload a computer into our brains.

[@47:42: Clip insert from “The Transcendent Man”]

Ray Kurzweil: “The three great overlapping revolutions, sometimes goes by the letters GNR. And G stands for genetics. Really another word for it is biotechnology, is mastering the information processes in our biology. And we ultimately will actually be able to reprogram biology away from disease, and from aging.

N stands for nanotechnology. For the next 25 years we will have blood cell sized devices that go inside your body and keep you healthy from inside. They go in your brain, and interact with your biological neurons and allow us to merge with non-biological intelligence.

The third one goes by the letter R, which stands for robotics/robots. Really though refers to artificial intelligence, and that’s the most significant revolution of all.

In about 20 years, I’ve set the date, 2029, a machine, an AI, will be able to match human intelligence and go beyond it. Artificial intelligence, which will give us not just more human intelligence, but will actually give us superhuman intelligence, will enable us to solve problems that we’re not able to solve today.”

Sofia Smallstorm: “Artificial blood cells are mentioned again in the Transcendent Man.” [brief pause before the video clip continues]

[@49:29: Clip insert from “The Transcendent Man”]

Ray Kurzweil: “Biology is very impressive and intricate, clever, but also very suboptimal compared to what we ultimately will be able to engineer with nanotechnology. 

We are building devices now that are at the nanoscale.

This is a design for robotic red blood cell. Conservative analysis of these respirocytes shows that if you would replace a portion of your red blood cells with these robotic versions, you could do an Olympic sprint for 15 minutes without taking a breath or sit at the bottom of your pool for four hours.

We’ll be able to download software against specific pathogens including ones that have never been seen before. Not be subject to autoimmune disorders.

And if you look at what will be, in principle, feasible with nanotechnology, we can go far beyond the limitations of our version 1 bodies.”

IoT & IoB: Internet of Things / Internet of Bodies

The robotic blood cells will supposedly improve us and keep us healthy, as he says, but what if that’s just the gloss to sell us on such bodily intrusions? Just as we’re being sold on the idea of a smart environment, a techno matrix that will vibrate with not just intelligence, but connection?

What indeed is the world wide web? We may think it’s the internet, but it will be the humming network of everything connected through ubiquitous intelligence; intelligence that is everywhere.

Artificial intelligence will connect the world, homo sapien will be transformed into homo evolutis, biological processes will be run by technology, living things will not be reproductive. The earth will be populated with engineered species and all processes will be patented, licensed, and controlled.

You could consider nanotechnology the installation of artificial intelligence in living and non-living things. Smart dust and smart modes, for instance, are tiny nanosensors that can float and land anywhere.

As Kurzweil declares, self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself.”

[@51:55: Clip insert from “The Transcendent Man”]

Scientist commentator 1: “I see as a person, I’m human, and I’m really limited and restricted in what I do. So if I could come out of the singularity, being mentally and physically upgraded… yeah, I’d go for that. So I don’t mind changing dramatically from what I am.”

Scientist commentator 2: “I believe fully there will be flash memories you can plug into your brain. We’ll be able to hook our brains into calculators and statistics programs, and have Google directly into the frontal lobes. I mean there’s going to be a lot of expansion of the mind through interfacing the human brain with, with technology. There is an unanswered question of how far can you go and still be human?”

Scientist commentator 3: “As we merge with machines, and I think it’s inevitable that we will, we will transform into something new.”

Scientist commentator 4: “And as the technology becomes vastly superior to what we are, then the small proportion that’s still human gets smaller and smaller and smaller until it’s just utterly negligible.”

Scientist commentator 3: “Anybody who is going to be resisting this progress forward, is going to be resisting evolution. And, and fundamentally, they will die out. It’s not a matter of whether it’s good or bad, it’s going to happen.”

Tailoring “posthumans” to behave and act in a certain way

“You have seen, today, the deposition and active presence of artificial materials in the sky, environment, and in living things. Nanotechnology has arrived at our personal doorstep without our permission.

It isn’t that this will happen in 2045. It’s already here.

Human enhancement is being sold to us as leaping tall buildings in a single bound, and having better, faster, higher intelligence, perfect health. But all of that is the sales pitch. Enhancement may in fact be degradation; our being devolved to someone else’s specifications.

While nanotechnology promises in headlines to make our world better, it may in fact be busy taking us over, so it can tailor us to the plan for the hive. Already transhumanists are looking forward to the creation of the posthuman. An improved human that will have no gender, will not reproduce, will be a better performer in the workplace, will not be distracted by love or lust, will be free of disease, thanks to these nanobots keeping it healthy.

But all this is part of the fantasy. In reality, thanks to stressors on our physiology, infertility is soaring, our sexuality’s diversifying and the nuclear family is falling apart.

Biotech is an exploding frontier. It is clever enough and small enough to enter and change our very cells. New forms of DNA have been invented. There is GNA, as I have told you about, and PNA, a hybrid of protein and DNA, that will add to our double helix a third strand.

When nano biotech has a firm footing in us, it will be easy to upgrade and downgrade anyone and anything, in any way. Oliver Curry, an evolutionist at the London School of Economics, predicted in 2007, “The human race will one day split into two separate species: an attractive, intelligent, ruling elite, and an underclass of dim-witted, ugly, goblin-like creatures.” So here you have the e-workers, and the elites.

Transhumans will presumably be involved in this process. The process of transformation, the process of renovation; remaking us into what someone considers improved. We are transhumans now. Improved is only what fits certain specifications.

For instance, a specimen that can work 18 hours a day, a specimen that is sterile, that will never have the responsibility of caring for others, a specimen that is even-tempered, with a narrow, predictable range of expression. All this is enhanced/improved. Better performance is just that, the ability to produce a better result. It does not mean a specimen with greater skills. It may be in a specimen with narrower skills, and the ability to repeat a task.

Ethical considerations & patenting human beings…

So while the current ethical debate is about whether or not we should upload computers into our brains, and how human we will be when that happens, there is something happening on the nanoscale right now. What it is exactly is unknown to us, as attempts by lay people to communicate with scientists about Morgellons type materials are going nowhere. There is a blackout on this subject. Its victims are dismissed, as having a psychological problem, that is called delusional parasitosis.

The presence of patented creations in our bodies gives rise to intellectual property issues. We know what has been done to small farmers into whose fields the winds have brought genetically engineered strains. They are sued by the powerful agricultural companies who own the patents.

Will the day come when we are subjected to the jurisdiction of corporations whose patented materials we are carrying in our bodies? It doesn’t matter how it got there. The fault is yours if it is simply in your possession.

This is a forest partnership between us and them. This is how we will be eternally owned by them. This is how they can push our biology from homo sapien to homo evolutis without our having a say in it.

For now, engineer technology in all living things is a secret. But one day we may be charged with unlawful possession of something that has become a part of us, that we cannot get rid of.

The nature of biology is to adapt. As more unnatural elements enter our bodies, if we cannot reject them, we will find ways to accommodate them. You could call it, Invasion of the Body Snatchers meets Sleeping With the Enemy. In fact, the original Body Snatchers movie contains some interesting lines.

“Your new bodies are taking you over – cell for cell, atom for atom… and you’ll be born into an untroubled world.” / “Don’t fight it Miles. It’s no use.” / “Their bodies were now hosts harboring an alien form of life – a cosmic form.”

Metabiology was a term coined by the famous Jonas Salk of the Salk polio vaccine. It describes a form of biological prospecting, exploiting genetics – using chemistry physics and radiation for commercial and other goals.

The 1940s and 50s gave us the birth of radiation biology. The techniques of which were used to decipher the mysteries of heredity genes and immunity. Geneticists plumbed chemistry and physics, using X-rays and UV light to irradiate plants, fungi and fruit flies to see how mutations altered amino acids and enzymes to form a new biochemistry.

All this continues today. We are living, walking laboratories, for powerful science in a society of increasing control. We are being altered. The future being spoken of is happening now. My question is, how will we transcend this?

And I have one more clip for you.”

[@1:00:23: Clip insert from “The Transcendent Man”]

Ray Kurzweil: “Nanobots will infuse all the matter around us with information. Rocks, trees, everything will become these intelligent computers.

So at that point, we’re going to expand out into the rest of the universe. We will be sending, basically nanotechnology infused with artificial intelligence. Swarms of those will go out of the universe and basically find other matter and energy that we can then harness to expand the overall intelligence of our human machine civilization.

The universe will wake up; it’ll become intelligent, and that will multiply our intelligence trillions of trillions fold. You know, we can’t really fully contemplate. And that’s really the main reason this is called the singularity. But regardless what you call it, it will be the universe waking up.

So does God exist? Well, I would say not yet.”

Questions and Answers

[@1:02:47 Sofia Smallstorm then responds to some audience members’ questions and comments:]

Sofia Smallstorm: “I think I heard the question a little bit. It was about Dr. Mary’s monkey?”

Audience member 1: “Yeah, correct. Dr. Mary’s monkey. With the Jonas Salk – brought up to Jonas Salk studies, with the simian viruses, monkey viruses that contaminated the polio vaccines.”

Sofia Smallstorm: “Um, I have a research associate who will be covering this at length on a website called waypasthuman.com*. So it was in the list of websites that I gave. But I don’t have time to go into Dr. Mary’s monkey and the viral – the virology issues right now. It’s kind of off this subject.”

Audience member 1: “There’s a lot of studies that’s done that shows that the soft tissue cancers are caused by those viruses that were inoculated through the polio vaccine.”

Sofia Smallstorm: “If you go to waypasthuman.com*, which will be up soon, you will find a lot of information there. So ‘way past human’, that’s where they’re taking us. Don’t forget it.” [*editor’s note: this website is no longer in effect]

***

Audience Member 2: “Quick comment, given that black budget projects are decades in advance of conventional technology, have some groups already reached the singularity and are implementing it for the rest of us?”

Sofia Smallstorm: “Well, yes. I would say that, um, people ask me all the time, well these people breathe chemtrails. What are they – why don’t they care? And the fact is that they want this conversion. They want this convergence, they want the singularity.

I couldn’t tell you whether they’ve attained it or not. But this is what is desired for humanity and all living things. And as you saw Ray Kurzweil, he said it’s going to be everywhere. The entire universe is going to be filled with material that – that responds to external control. That’s really what it is. Intelligence is just that, in their definition.”

***

Audience Member 3: “Is there a way to shut down the Morgellons in your body, or kill the nano stuff that’s in you?”

Sofia Smallstorm: “Well, this is what we’re going to have to explore ourselves. Where is this coming from? What… we have to become metabiological ourselves. Beyond our own biology. I don’t know if the frequencies that we’re capable of generating through our consciousness – this is where you go into the metaphysics.

And I have not been able to put anything conclusive together. Because, who am I? I’m just like you. I saw different things, I came on those things with a perspective, and I showed you that perspective here. I just pulled stuff together. From afar.

I went way out of the box. So we’re going to have to go way out of the box. We are stuck here on the third dimension, reacting and responding. We have forgotten that we are creatures of intention, of creation. If we can remember that, wake that up in ourselves, we have a chance. That’s where we have to go.” [audience applauds]

***

Audience Member 4: “Quick question. Have any of these people working on these projects been able to share with you? Are they willing to talk to you and open up?”

Sofia Smallstorm: “Um, I’ve never approached them. I don’t believe that they would.

– Morgellons, I almost called it McDonald’s, can you believe that? That’s how ubiquitous it is. Morgellons is not acknowledged. It’s acknowledged only as a psychological problem. And in fact I think it was the um… some large organization just declared it moot and not pertinent.”

***

Audience Member 5: “This is a commented question about a previous elite, very strong here in California called the Eugenicist’s Society… that were elites. And this was the early 1900s or early 1910. They felt the elite, and this is prominent people in the universities, that said that certain ethnic types we had to weed out. What we needed is Anglo-Saxon only; we didn’t need Eastern European, Blacks, Mexicans, Greeks, Irish, and these were leading people in our universities in California, and they influenced the Nazi party and how they view, uh, you know, superiority.

So what I’m saying is, we’ve had elites make plans for us before. And this is another one where they’re making plans for control.”

Sofia Smallstorm: “I will just say something quickly. The term eugenics was changed in the early 1950s to transhumanism. It’s the same thing. It’s just a new word. So the transhumanist are pushing for the posthuman.

And I will say again, the posthuman will have no gender, the posthuman will be non-reproductive, and the posthuman will be “improved” in the sense that it will be tailored to specific tasks. Remember the picture I showed you of the dairy cows. Posthuman, the “improved” human is not going to be superman. It’s not going to be Einstein. It’s not going to be anybody fancy.

When you have technological control of all living things, you can confer attributes to some, and you can degrade and devolve others. So you and I are going to be the goblins.”

[END OF TRANSCRIPT]

Once again, many thanks to Sofia Smallstorm and other independent/investigative researchers who have been connecting the dots and giving us warnings and advice as to what to look for.

With so many admissions and endeavors of the transhumanist technocrats, there can be no doubt that this is indeed a horrendous agenda that infringes not only on our human rights, but also our bodily autonomy.

As a creation of God, as we all are, their attempts at merging us with machine will be met with righteous judgement.

In the meantime, we should continue to inform ourselves of the best way forward, how to detox, raise our consciousness/frequency, and stay strong against this tyrannical takeover.

God bless, everyone.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Tal Zaks, Former Chief Scientist at Moderna, Speaks of Nanomedicine, Personalized Vaccines and Genetic Engineering in 2017

Scientist quote/unquote: “hacking the software of life.”

Tal Zaks, former Chief Medical Officer at Moderna (currently partnering with Orbimed) – gives us another look at their terminology of “hacking the software of life”, i.e. – changing/modifying our genes.

Piggybacking off of Klaus Schwab’s statements that gene-editing changes YOU, not to mention Craig Venter’s (of the Human Genome Project) admission that:

“It’s pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in the cell, and the cell instantly starts reading that new software, starts making a whole different set of proteins. And within a short while, all the characteristics of the first species disappear. And a new species emerges from this software that controls that cell going forward.”

Craig Venter of the NIH and Human Genome: Creating Synthetic Life | ” – trying to design what we want biology to do”

– it is clear that, by definition, “rewriting the genetic code” changes what it means to be human – or changes whatever species is being modified. Craig Venter himself says that a “new species emerges from this software”.

So while these doctors and scientists try to sugarcoat these ill-conceived endeavors (even if they were born of good intentions initially… “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”), the attempts at genetically changing our DNA have grave consequences; not only on the physical-molecular level, but on the conscious-soul level as well.

Here, Tal Zaks, in a Tedx Talk from November 2017, specifically mentions vaccines (a total of 17 times in a 10 minute presentation) to administer this genetic-changing software. In addition, he also alludes to collecting DNA in order to make “personalized vaccines”. An endeavor that DARPA is also invested in:

DNA Script Partners with Moderna to Develop On-Demand Vaccines and Therapeutics for DARPA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., and PARIS | April 27, 2021

[ https://www.dnascript.com/press-releases/dna-script-partners-with-moderna-to-develop-on-demand-vaccines-and-therapeutics-for-darpa/ ]

“Rewriting the Genetic Code” – Tal Zaks (2017)

Source: odysee | @RedPillman | Rewriting the Genetic Code

Full transcript below. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Tal Zaks: “So I started my professional life about thirty years ago as a nurse and the pediatric intensive care unit.

And I remember this one infant, let’s call him Jonathan, who came in really really ill. Seemed to have a rare genetic defect, but in those days, gene diagnosis was still in its infancy so we couldn’t really figure out what’s wrong with him.

And in the years since, as I’ve trained as a physician scientist, we’ve been living in this phenomenal digital and scientific revolution. And I’m here today to tell you that we’re actually hacking the software of life. And that it’s changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease.

So here’s all the biology you need to know in 30 seconds. Our body is made out of organs, our organs are made out of cells, and in every cell there’s this thing called “messenger RNA” or mRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA, our genes, to the protein, which is really the stuff we’re all made of.

This is the critical information that determines what a cell will actually do. And so we think of it like an operating system. And it’s not just in every cell of our body. It’s actually in every cell of every organism of life. It’s the same thing.

And so, if you could actually change that, which we call the software of life, you could introduce a line of code, or change a line of code, it turns out that has profound implications for everything from the flu, to cancer. And I’m going to demonstrate that with three short examples.

Let’s start with the flu. So many of us get a vaccine. What is a vaccine? It is an injection in our arm where we get bits and pieces of the virus; the protein, and that teaches our immune system to recognize the virus and so when we get infected we’re not sick.

Now imagine if instead of giving the protein, we would give the instructions on how to make the protein. How the body can make its own vaccine. That’s an mRNA vaccine.

And here’s what it looks like from the cell.”

Image Source: Tal Zaks / Tedx Talks

“So the traditional approach has protein floating around your cells. An mRNA vaccine approach has the cells themselves in your own body making the vaccine.

What’s more alarming: a stranger prowling the neighborhood, or somebody who’s just broke into your ground-floor, and tripped the alarm?

That’s what happens with an mRNA vaccine. You’re tripped the alarm wire and now the cell is dialing 9-1-1. It’s calling the police at the same time as it’s making the protein and saying, ‘that’s the bad guy’.

That’s how an mRNA works. And for the last several years we’ve shown this actually works in a whole multitude of animal models. Earlier this year we published the first actual study in people. And it actually works in people.

We took a group of volunteers and injected them with a messenger RNA vaccine against a variant of flu/influenza. And all of these volunteers got the immune response we were hoping to see. The side-effect profile was pretty benign, what you would see with any normal type vaccine.

So we’ve proven the principle, this actually can work. It works in people and now we’re going to be developing a whole slew of vaccines against diseases for which we don’t have one. So that’s infectious disease.

Now for the second example, let’s talk for a minute about cancer. Horrible disease. Cancer has affected the lives of many of us and will affect the lives of many more of us as we age.

The problem with cancer at the cellular level is that the DNA is screwed up. You’ve got these mutation on this screwed up DNA, leads up to screwed up information that makes screwed up protein. And so the cell loses control.

Now, how do you figure out what is actually screwed up? Well, you got to figure out the whole sequence, right?

It took us decades and billions of dollars to sequence the human genome, and we’ve done that. We achieved that in 2003. And now we’re less than 15 years later, and it takes us a week. And we can do it for every patient. So now we can go and figure out what exactly is screwed up in a patient, and we can use that information to make a vaccine.

We take that information, say a patient with lung cancer, and we take it – we take the biopsy, we figure out the sequence, we figure out their immune system, we – and that all becomes information. It goes up in the cloud into a bioinformatic algorithm and then automatically makes a vaccine that we administer into their normal tissue; into the muscle to try and wake up their immune system.

Now the challenge, of course, is that every person’s cancer is different. Mutation happened by random chance. And so to do this you have to make it personalized.

So this is me, but if every patient is different, what we’re going to have to do is make a personalized cancer vaccine for every patient. And that’s exactly what we’ve started to do. Every patient gets a vaccine that’s based on the sequence and their own tumor.

So when we started to do this a couple years ago, my CEO stopped by one evening and said, “Tal, I get the idea but is this going to work?” And I said, “Look, Stefan. I don’t know, but we’ve got all the pieces to try and answer the question so we should try.”

And today I can tell you that I still don’t know if it’s going to work. But I know we’re able to actually run the experiment. Earlier this week the first patient was treated with a personalized cancer vaccine we made just for her.

So in the months and years to come we will know the answer of whether we can actually wake the immune system against somebody’s cancer with a personalized cancer vaccine so stay tuned.

I’m gonna finish with a third example of something called “methylmalonic acidemia” or MMA for short. Now the name doesn’t matter. Okay? This is just a disease that is caused by an enzyme that’s critical for metabolism. And children are born and they lack this one crucial gene. And so their body is not able really to fight infection properly or anytime they have any sort of stress, their body goes into crisis. They have one gene that’s gone awry and it causes a really significant disease.

If you look at what happens over time, for these children, about 1/3 of them don’t make it to the age of 10. You see here the survival curve whether the gene is completely lost or whether there’s just an aberration in it, the survival is impaired.

And, what do we do? Well there’s not much you can do because the missing protein is actually missing inside their cells. So what do we do? Well, here’s what we do. We take out their liver and we transplant the liver from a donor that is healthy and normal into these kids.

Think about it. They’re missing one critical piece of information and what we do is transplant an entire organ. Well, it fixes the problem, but what if there’s a better way? What if we could fix the missing information?

So based on innovations, nanomedicine, a new class of invention that Bob Langer across the river at MIT in Cambridge has been inventing, we’re now able to package this information and messenger RNA with a goal of giving it as an infusion, and then having it go to the liver to replace that missing information.

Is this going to work? Well we know the biology works. So together with the National Institutes of Health, we’ve studied this in a mouse model and this mouse has been engineered to have the exact same problem that the kids have. They’re lacking the one – the same gene. And you can see in the red line what happens to these mice when they’re born. Pretty much immediately they die. They cannot cope with stress. But if you inject messenger RNA that codes for the one missing protein that replaces that information, these mice, all of them survive, as you can see in the green line. And if you look at them they not only survive, they’re actually growing, they’re gaining weight, they look like they’re healthy littermates.

We’re hoping to start the clinical trial in the near future and the idea is the same thing here. If you think about what it is we’re trying to do, we’ve taken information and our understanding of that information and how that information is transmitted in a cell, and we’ve taken our understanding of medicine and how to make drugs and we’re fusing the two. We think of it as information therapy.

I started by telling you about Jonathan and 30 years ago, and I was a nurse in the intensive care unit, I worked two night shifts, and Jonathan came in when he was about 12 months old and very quickly became dependent on a ventilator. And for the next 15 months or so, every time I came into the unit he was my patient to care for. You know, bathe, feed, treat, play with – he couldn’t talk, he was on a ventilator, but he was very much alive and you could tell – you could play with him, his eyes would – would follow me. After a while he would recognize me. Until one day I came into the unit for my shift and he was no longer there. He had died because of an infection in between shifts.

Imagine a world where we cannot just diagnose, but we can actually use the information to create vaccines to wake up the immune system to something like cancer and to fix the missing information for children with diseases like Jonathan, so that they can leave the ICU and live a healthy life.

Thank you.”

What is “nanomedicine”?

“Nanomedicine is defined as the medical application of nanotechnology. Nanomedicine can include a wide range of applications, including biosensors, tissue engineering, diagnostic devices, and many others. In the Center for Nanomedicine at Johns Hopkins, we focus on harnessing nanotechnology to more effectively diagnose, treat, and prevent various diseases.”

[ https://cnm-hopkins.org/what-is-nanomedicine/ ]

Interestingly, but not surprisingly, Johns Hopkins was the organization that the WEF (World Economic Forum / Klaus Schwab – famous for the “Great Reset” agenda) chose to moderate the EVENT 201 Plandemic Pandemic exercise, with the help of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation…

And while, of course, Mr. Zaks ends his speech high-lighting the beneficial aspects of a “gene-editing vaccine” and reminds the audience that it is to “cure cancer” or any other number of diseases, we must be alert to alternative motives and the implications of what could arise from such technological tampering of the human genome, not to mention a collection of the population’s DNA in a database – to control and alter at their discretion.

Now aside from those chilling prospects, is it worth it to forever alter a human being, and what it means to be human, by injecting them with genetic changing software? What possibilities might arise from such an endeavor? Are we SURE that they have our best interest in mind? (that is a rhetorical question, by the way… because of course they don’t) If they can change us as a species, then it follows suit that it can change our emotions, our thoughts, even our very purpose.

There are some things in life which should not be meddled with. “Life” itself, is definitely one of them.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay