Craig Venter of the NIH and Human Genome: Creating Synthetic Life | ” – trying to design what we want biology to do”

Agenda of the Human Genome Project: ” – for manufacturing and operating a complete human being.”

Playing God in Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Synthetic Biology and the Meaning of Life
– [ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837218/ ]

Thanks to a pingback post by the following site: There Is No Pandemic, it led me to a very interesting video featuring a Mr. Craig Venter, delving into an incredibly topical subject – even though the video was made in 2010.

Don’t think synthetic life-forms are possible in vaccines? Or that there’s even an agenda to do this?

Craig Venter, genetic researcher for the NIH and the Human Genome Project, would tell you otherwise…

“operating system”

“all the characteristics of the first species disappear”

“new species emerges from this software”

“making the flu vaccine each year by using these new synthetic techniques”

Click image for archived video. Original source can be found here: [ https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/may/20/craig-venter-synthetic-life-form ]
“Craig Venter creates synthetic life form”
Full transcript. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Craig Venter: “Well this has been about a 15 year process. It started back in 1995, when we sequenced the first two genomes in history. Including the smallest genome, that of mycoplasma genitalium. And we set out a goal to try and understand what the smallest genome you can have as an operating system, to try and understand the basic components of life. It’s taken us through this long journey. Much longer than we ever anticipated. But that’s what happens when you enter into areas that nobody’s ever been before.

So at first we had to learn how to write the genetic code to synthesize pieces. Because the largest piece that ever has been synthesized other than our work has been only 30,000 letters. The first chromosome we were trying to make was over 500,000. And the one that we ultimately made and report in this paper is over 1,000,000 letters of genetic code. And we start with 4 bottles of chemicals, and the computer code in the computer, the digital code in the computer from DNA sequence. So, just learning how to do the synthesis was mastering a lot of chemistry that has never been done before. And we learned sequentially over the years how to build larger and larger molecules.

In 2003 we reported making a 5,000 letter bacterial virus, 5X174, and how to error correct the pieces. So, we start with pieces of DNA coming off DNA synthesizers; they’re only about 50-80 letters long. That’s pretty much the limit of what you can make with a chemical synthesizer. So everything we make from that has to be putting these little pieces together. Much like having a box of legos and having to assemble them back in the right order to get what you started with. So it’s been progressive over this entire time period. We thought we would have this almost 3 years ago. But we kept running into very significant biological roadblocks.”

Interviewer: “All right. And what do you ultimately hope to do with a method like this?

Craig Venter: “Well, this is an important step, we think, both scientifically and philosophically. It certainly changed my views of definitions of life and how life works. It’s pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in the cell, and the cell instantly starts reading that new software, starts making a whole different set of proteins. And within a short while, all the characteristics of the first species disappear. And a new species emerges from this software that controls that cell going forward.

When we look at life forms we see them as sort of fixed entities. But this shows, in fact how dynamic they are. That they change from second to second. And that life is basically a result of an information process, a software process. Our genetic code is our software. And our cells are dynamically constantly reading that genetic code, making new proteins, the proteins make the other cellular components, and that’s what we see. But it’s hard to imagine how dynamic it is until we found, simply by replacing the software, it started making a whole new cell, whatever is defined by that software. So that’s, that’s a pretty important change in how we approach and think about life.

Also this is now the first time where we’ve started with information in the computer, built that software molecule, now over a million letters of genetic code, put that into a recipient cell, and have this process start where that information converted that cell into a new species. So this becomes a very powerful tool for trying to design what we want biology to do.

As leaders of competing genome projects, Francis Collins, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, and J. Craig Venter, president of Celera Genomics, were recognized, correctly, as the two most important players in the worldwide effort to spell out the 3 billion “letters” of the human genome–the biochemical recipe, encoded in our DNA, for manufacturing and operating a complete human being.

[ https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,998842,00.html ]

We have a wide range of applications, so at the biotech company that funded the synthetic genomics that Ham Smith and I started a few years back, we have a major deal with ExxonMobil to try and use algae to capture carbon dioxide and make new hydrocarbons that can go into the Exxon refineries. To try and replace taking the oil out of the ground.

There’s no natural algaes that we know that can do this at the scale it’s needed. So we’re going to have to use our synthetic genomic techniques to either heavily modify existing algaes or develop whole new ones from scratch that have all the parameters that we want. These same tools, these same processes can be used for making chemicals, for making food substances, we hope for cleaning up water.

But perhaps the most important immediate application is we’re already working at the Venter Institute and working with Novartis to try and make new vaccines very quickly; we think we can shorten the process by 99% for making the flu vaccine each year by using these new synthetic techniques. But I think it’s going to be one of those situations I tell audiences I talk to that ‘we’re entering a new era we’re limited mostly by our imaginations’.”

Interviewer: “Could you ever use a method like this with a higher organism? Something more complex than bacteria?

Craig Venter: “Well, it’s certainly not in the immediate future. Bacteria have much more simplified genetic systems. They don’t have the same complex regulation that higher organisms have. But there are a number of single cell eukaryotes.

So we’re eukaryotes because we have a nucleus, I think one of the key things we mastered with our studies, particularly since 2003, and we reported the latest results a few months ago in Science at the end of last year, is we can move chromosomes across the branches of life. So we can move from bacteria into eukaryotes, we use yeast for all these processes. We can take the chromosomes out of yeast and move them back into bacteria to create new life forms.

So a next step would be try to make a simplified eukaryote. Yeast is very key for bio-manufacturing, for ethanol production, etc. And if we can have even a more efficient yeast cell, and at the same time, try and understand all its components, I think we’ll be able to make synthetic eukaryotes. Higher animals, multi-cellular systems are, I think, projects for the much more distant future.”

Interviewer: “Actually I have a couple more questions. Just about how we distinguish between any sort of synthetically – organisms with synthetic genomes versus the natural ones? One question I guess would be about containment.”

[Interview cuts out a section]

Craig Venter: ” – we were when we first started down this process, what could be an artifact that could fool us into thinking we had created synthetic life, when in fact it was just a contaminate of the native chromosome? And, where would even a single molecule of native chromosome could fool us into thinking we had created a new cell?

So early on we started designing a process of putting watermarks in the genetic code. We did this in the first chromosome we reported two years ago, basically all of us that helped build the genetic code signed the DNA, coded our names into the chromosome.

With this genome we’ve gone a little bit further; we’ve put 4 major watermarks in. We’ve developed a new code for writing English language, other languages, with punctuation and numbers into the genetic code. In the first watermark we actually have this code that needs to be decoded for people to read the rest. We even have a website built into the genetic code that if people solve it they can let us know that they’ve been able to read it.

“- and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”Revelation 13:17

All the authors of this study over the… certainly the last decade, our names are all encoded in this first genome. And we have three quotations built in there of adding a little philosophy to the genetic code at the same time. Which I think the chance of finding any of these in a naturally occurring genome is about as close to zero as you can get. So we can absolutely prove from the genetic changes, that we’ve been built in to the design of the chromosomes that it’s unquestionably the synthetic DNA that we made, not some natural contaminant.

A containment, that’s a really critical issue, and it’s one of the most important issues to us, and one of the number one questions I get asked in all my litera- all my lectures around the globe. And when we look at molecular biology for the last several decades, we all use e. coli in the laboratory, that genes from multiple species have been put in it over the years – probably tens of millions of experiments. And there’s not been a single accident. And the reason for that is that e. coli has a chemical dependency for growing in the laboratory.

So these are things we can start to build in to the design of synthetic genomes, we can build in suicide genes so they can’t escape. And so we can use artificial amino acids. There’s a number of approaches that we’re developing and other labs are developing to guarantee absolute containment.

And this first proof of principle, we’ve largely copied the mycoides genome, because as a control, if we couldn’t boot up something that was already known, we could never get to the design phase. We deleted 14 genes from this genome, and made all these other genetic modifications. This cell only grows on extremely rich [media(sp?)] on the laboratory.

The only other place it goes, the mycoides genome is a minor goat pathogen that causes mastitis in goats. We think we’ve eliminated the genes associated with that, but it will not grow outside of the laboratory unless it’s deliberately injected or sprayed into a goat. So, we don’t work with goats, so we think we have pretty good containment systems in the lab.

There’s selectable markers that’s dependent on a specific antibiotic. So these are early attempts, I think. These containment approaches would get far more sophisticated with the next versions of what we and others do.”

Interviewer: “All right. Well, are there any final points you’d like to make before we close?”

Craig Venter: “Well, this is the first synthetic cell that’s been made and we call it synthetic because the cell is totally derived from a synthetic chromosome made from 4 bottles of chemicals on a chemical synthesizer. Starting with information in the computer.

Before we did these experiments starting back in the late 90’s, we asked for a complete bioethical review, knowing we were going into uncharted territory, trying to create new species. The review group at the University of Pennsylvania published the results in Science in 1999. Since then there’s been lots of different review processes around the world. The Sloan Foundation funded my institute, the Venter Institute, along with MIT, and a Washington think tank, to look at the security issues concerning this. That report was published and can be downloaded from JCVI.org.

There’s been ongoing discussions in the U.S. government, in the E.U., the National Academy of Sciences has done reports on this. So I think this is the first incidence in science where the extensive bioethical review took place before the experiments were done. And it’s part of an ongoing process that we’ve been driving, trying to make sure that the science proceeds in an ethical fashion, that we’re being thoughtful about what we do, and looking forward to the implications to the future.”

End of transcript.

So here is undeniable proof, that the folks at the NIH and Human Genome Project have been trying to synthesize organisms for the sole purpose of creating new species/life forms, and using these techniques for vaccines, AND states that these synthetic substances WILL CHANGE DNA.

It all ties back to the NIH and the HUMAN GENOME PROJECT. The theory that the COVID vaccines are an attempt at a worldwide genome experiment project is becoming clearer every single day, backed up with all of the data that has come forward, backed up with all of the studies pointing to this very agenda, backed up with countless interviews, positions and documentations of the likes of Anthony Fauci, Christine Grady, Bill Gates, Craig Venter, Eric Lander, Klaus Schwab, Francis Collins, their institutes and cohorts GAVI, WEF, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIH, Human Genome Project, World Health Organization, United Nations, MIT, Harvard, etc., etc., etc.

“Venter and colleagues published their paper about creating a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome in the journal Science in May 2010.

“Some of you are asking, why do this? It’s great basic science, but there are some more compelling reasons,” he said, noting that synthetic DNA can be used to develop genomics-based vaccines.

“The National Institutes of Health has funded my institute to create synthetic pieces of every known flu virus, so anytime we need a new vaccine, we can just take these pieces off the shelf, and go through the assembly and have flu vaccine stocks in a very short time,” he said. “In the next year or two, you might get the first synthetic DNA vaccines.”

Web archive version: Synthetic life forms can produce vaccines, gobble up CO2 and more, says expert

Although the below excerpt specifies “intranasal”, there are also endeavors of injectable live attenuated vaccines as well:

“The company’s breakthrough Synthetic Attenuated Virus Engineering (SAVE) platform utilizes a computer algorithm to recode the genomes of viruses and construct live-attenuated vaccines to prevent viral infections or treat solid tumors.”

Web archive version: Codagenix and Serum Institute of India Announce Commencement of First-in-Human Trial of COVI-VAC, A Single Dose, Intranasal Live Attenuated Vaccine for COVID-19

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16778323/ ] “Genetically modified live attenuated parasites as vaccines for leishmaniasis” (2006)

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28620583/ ] “Engineering of Genetically Arrested Parasites (GAPs) For a Precision Malaria Vaccine” (2017)

[ https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/investigational-malaria-vaccine-gives-strong-lasting-protection ] “Investigational Malaria Vaccine Gives Strong, Lasting Protection” (2021)“The vaccine combines live parasites with either of two widely used antimalarial drugs—an approach termed chemoprophylaxis vaccination.”

Now, with all of that being said, and with this outright admission by Craig Venter about their agenda, I have to bring up one of Richard Fleming’s latest criticism of ALL the doctors that have claimed to find what seems to be graphene oxide, nanobots, and/or parasitic-like organisms in the vaccines.

Firstly, this should have been approached in a more scientific approach to researching the vaccine’s contents.

While the other doctors are investigating these vaccines and are questioning its contents, even inviting other scientists and researchers to help them identify what these substances are, Dr. Fleming is undermining their research and dismissing their conclusions. Even implying, at one point, the mention of “credentials” as to whether or not to take one seriously.

Secondly… isn’t that precisely why we’re in the mess we’re in right now? Because SO many people decided to trust the likes of Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins? Does it matter how many so-called credentials one has to determine their sincerity and integrity or even professionalism? Doesn’t look like it to me. As long as a researcher is honest and looking for the truth, I will take their word over an overpaid “expert” any day. Especially ones who conduct inhumane, atrocious experiments on other living beings.

Then, of course, when addressing anything in a scientific approach, and certainly before reaching concrete conclusions and dismissing any other research (like the fraudulent Lancet paper did, for example…) one must consider ALL variables. Take the following for consideration:

how many vials total did Richard Fleming test?

were they from the same batch, or all different batches? Different brands, or all the same brand?

were all these vials from the same country? – it is becoming more and more apparent that different countries are getting different doses/batches

at what magnification did Fleming conduct his tests compared to all of the other doctors/scientists?

are we considering that some batches/doses will contain certain substances while others consist of saline solutions only – as what has already been theorized?

if different countries are getting different batches, there is a chance that there will be different substances for each country – to perhaps test a wider set of material/organisms and/or to target certain people’s DNA/ethnicity/etc.?

what is the “garbage” and “debris” that Fleming is referencing? “Garbage” has to be something. Was there an attempt to identify these compositions? Or just label them all with the term “debris” and “garbage”?

Fleming also mentions the term “crystalline” on more than one occasion… does he realize that there are indeed nanocrystal-graphene hybrid material that has been synthesized? Does he know every possible thing that can be synthesized or genetically modified using either Venter’s DNA genetic modification technique or the CRISPR technology?

“Nanocrystal-graphene have been proposed as a new kind of promising hybrid for a wide range of application areas including catalysts, electronics, sensors, biomedicine, and energy storage, etc. Although a variety of methods have been developed for the preparation of hybrids, a facile and general synthetic approach is still highly required.”

“A rich library of highly crystalline nanocrystals, with types including noble metal, metal oxide, magnetic material and semiconductor were successfully grown on chemically converted graphene (CCG), which is simultaneously reduced from GO during the synthesis.”

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22699842/ ] “Generalized syntheses of nanocrystal-graphene hybrids in high-boiling-point organic solvents”

Is Mr. Fleming aware of all the technological and biological advancements and agendas in the arena of nanotechnology in combination with virus-based particles?

“Genetically modified viruses offer a general route for the production of materials with complex nanoscale detail, for use either directly or as templates. It appears likely that modified viruses will feature prominently in the nanotechnology of the immediate future. The possible commercial exploitation of virus-templated materials includes nanowires, high surface area materials for battery electrodes, detectors, catalytic material, light harvesting devices, quantum dots, and tunable photonic devices.”

[ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9783527671403.hlc094 ] “7 Virus Particle-Based Liquid Crystals”

Will Mr. Fleming attempt to identify these so-called “garbage” and “debris” and conduct further studies with a higher magnification, or continue to shoot down other’s legitimate attempts at trying to figure out exactly what these particles are? Notice he never tries to identify what ANYTHING in the vaccine is, other than mentioning “lipid nanoparticles”. Only giving his opinion of what it’s not.

And with all of the evidence showing that genetically modified organisms is not only highly probable but also incredibly likely, considering the NIH’s many, many, MANY horrific experiments and crimes against humanity (and animal life), and Craig Venter’s ventures, not to mention Bill Gates’ very own admission and extensive funding in this matter, I am ultimately left questioning Fleming’s motives.

Bill Gates: “You know, is there something to worry about with medicines, that is might – some of them might have side effects? Do we need safety testing? I mean and we’re taking things that are… you know, genetically modified organisms and we’re injecting them in little kids arms. We just shoot them right into the vein.”

Bottom line: yes, these vaccines are extremely dangerous. And if the ones in control of pushing these worldwide vaccines are also in control of the Human Genome Project and attempts at re-writing our DNA, our best bet would be to avoid these at all costs and address these as the crimes they are.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay

SHOCKING: Dr. Carrie Madej Releases FIRST LOOK at Pfizer Vial Contents [ Transcript ]

” – they really are trying to put an artificial intelligence network inside of a human being.”

Dr. Carrie Madej, who presented findings of a parasitic organism that was identified as hydra vulgaris found in a COVID vaccine, presents more images of different suspicious looking synthetic and/or organic like substances from the Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson vaccines.

What are these materials? Dr. Madej attests that there is nothing listed on the manufacturer’s ingredient list that could possibly identify what these substances are. …Simply contamination? If that’s the case, why are all of these contaminants found in the vaccines/vials in the first place? Why did Japan have to halt 1.6 MILLION vaccines due to possible metal contaminants in the vials? How could such an egregious oversight bypass supposed stringent safety and health protocols to ensure a quality product? Especially products that are to be injected into people’s bodies?

Pure accident? Or is there something nefarious going on that the governmental/”health”/pharma industries aren’t telling us? Could there really be a worldwide attempt at a large-scale experimentation on human hosts without people’s consent?

Knowing who is behind this vaccine push is crucial to understanding their agendas. Bill Gates, eugenicist and transhumanist / Francis Collins, Human Genome Project and the NIH / Anthony Fauci, NIH and ties to gruesome and horrific experiments on rats, dogs, aborted fetuses, and who knows what else / Anthony Fauci’s wife, Christine Grady – also NIH and head of the bioethics Human Subjects Research division (yes, really), etc., etc., etc. Just these few names should give one an idea of where their agendas really lie.

With that being said, here is a transcription of the video below between Dr. Carrie Madej and Stew Peters. Another huge thank you to the Stew Peters platform and to Carrie Madej for addressing these topics and having the courage to speak up against it.

Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Stew Peters: “Well the fresh water hydra is a pretty incredible organism. It’s named after a creature from Greek mythology that at any time one of its heads was cut off, it would grow back two or more in its place.

Scientists chose that name well. The fresh water hydra is biologically immortal. Its cells never age, and as far as we can tell, they never die of old age. Only from predators or environmental factors. If you cut off a piece of the hydra, it will grow back. If you cut the hydra into many pieces, all of them will grow into a new hydra. And how about if you stick the hydra in a blender? Literally chop it up into thousands of pieces until it’s just a messy soup? Well, if you ball all of the pieces back together they’ll merge and become a hydra again.

Not surprisingly, scientists are very interested in the hydra. Our government spends millions of dollars a year researching them for possible findings in biology, genetics and medicine. But is it only research that’s happening, or is something more going on?

We have Dr. Carrie Madej on the show, several weeks ago last time she told us about the horrifying things that she saw when she put vials of the Moderna and Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 “shots/vaccines” under the microscope. Now, she’s giving us a first look at the Pfizer vials, and she wants to tell us the things that she has seen.

Dr. Carrie Madej joins us now. You sent me some horrific slides and videos – I don’t know what any of this is, so I’m going to rely on your expertise to tell us.”

Dr. Carrie Madej: “Thanks Stew. Yeah, I’m happy to help. So, I was, I have worked with Project Veritas, an amazing team there. And they were able to work with the whistleblower from Pfizer and through chain of custody they brought forth some of the vials, so I have some of my own images, but Project Veritas will be, you know, giving their story very soon, which will have so much details, so much data, so please look for that.

Anyhow, I also wanted to show a short video from one of the Johnson and Johnson vials that I was able to examine. And this – what I’m seeing in all of these manufactures, are synthetic substances; you know, graphene like, also these nano-carbon tubes, you know, the metallic flecks, etc. But what I was seeing and this particular Johnson and Johnson was a – these round spheres, which were not air bubbles; people say they are – there’s no way they were.

@02:30 – Screenshot image by Dr. Carrie Madej and the Stew Peters Show

Carrie Madej (cont.): “And over – there’s many of these rings, and as time moving on, they would get thinner, thinner, thinner and expand out and then finally extrude out some gelatinous material. Not sure what it was, but different kinds of things were inside these spheres. So they’re almost like a delivery structure, that’s what they were doing.

[ short video clip @02:58 – 03:05 ] Well on one of these spheres – these rings – there was an organism, it looked like; a translucent organism that went around and back and forth… Um, I don’t know – at first I thought it was another water parasite, another kind. And then I saw it – I kept looking at its movements, and then I thought, well perhaps it was moving in a more robotic way. And we do have the ability for nano-bots. Very much so. I don’t know if I gave you a reference for that, but their – they can put a one million nano-bots inside one syringe needle. Not the syringe itself, the needle. One million. So this is a possibility. So we need to examine this and see what is it exactly. Or is it part organic and part synthetic.

It’s frightening to know that these are being put inside of human beings. And now they want to put them inside little children. We have to stop this right now. These are an extreme experimentations. The future of us is in peril; danger when we’re doing something like this. This is not informed consent by any means. They are, you know, trying to use wordplay and going around our human rights, the Nuremberg Code, and definitely extending out this emergency use authorization in the worst way ever.

So, that’s very important to see that video. And then looking at the slides from Pfizer, we see the same kind of synthetic things in there. Also something called – it looks similar to teslaphoresis. That’s when these little graphite like black metallic particles start to coalesce into strings, like a spider web. They do that through any external force. It could be light, it could be a magnetic force, it could be an impulse, like a frequency… Anyhow, all these little particles will then coalesce and form their own neural network. Or their own fibers or wires.”

Stew Peters: “So like they’re building infrastructure.”

Dr. Carrie Madej: “Yeah, like you’re taking Lincoln Logs and putting them together and making your own new computer. Or your motherboard, or your wires. You can see that happen in real time.

Stew Peters: “Uh… this is just – I mean, this is absolutely mind-blowing – I’m sitting here looking at you, and you’re telling me this, it’s like I’m watching a seriously bad B-movie, a horror/thriller. I mean, this is… these images are real. I mean, there’s no way to – and look, this is, this is the same, this is like almost – what do you call that, when it’s a replication almost, I guess.

I don’t know if that’s the scientific word we can use, but me as a lay guy would say that, look, I mean, we had one scientist, a microscopy expert bring us this, and we don’t really know what this is. And then Dr. Botha brought these discs, and then she’s like, well I need somebody to tell me what this is, because I don’t really know what this is. I mean, these things just keep on – keep on getting substantiated and like this verification that this is going on. And these things are alive?”

Dr. Carrie Madej: “I mean, yes. We’re confirming it. I’m confirming it. I don’t want it to be right, Stew. I’m – I’m upset, I’m angry, I’m frightened. What would happen. These are parasitic agents being injected into people. I’ve seen them from multiple different states, multiple different batches, multiple different manufacturers, multiple different times. How much more evidence does anyone need to know that something terribly wrong is going on? [ Stew Peters: “Ok, so 100%?” ] And now we’re seeing it from other countries. [ Stew Peters: “From other countries?” ]

Yeah, well, Spain, Poland – you’ve seen the, Dr. Zalewski. Yes.”

Stew Peters: “So you’re saying absolute, unequivocally, 100%, as a doctor with your reputation on the line, that there are parasites in these shots?” 

Dr. Carrie Madej: “They appear to be parasites to me, and I don’t see anything in the ingredient list for any kind of structure that would look like a water parasite in these manufacturers. That is correct.”

Stew Peters: “Okay, so, what else did you – I mean, not that we need anything else here, but, I mean, what from your perspective are you seeing with these things that – why are they there? I mean, what is really going on? Is there a health benefit to these?”

Dr. Carrie Madej: “Well, if you, if you look at the organism hydra vulgaris, it is one of the model organisms that many of the transhumanists like to study and look at. They feel that this is an amazing organism for humanity. Because a) it’s immortal; in a lab setting, at least. It continuously produces its own stem cells, it never stops and it can make itself innumerable times; you can chop it up into little bits, put it in a petri dish – it forms itself again, and again, and again. It can, you know, chop one of its tentacles off, it makes a new one. It’s over and over.

Well, they’re thinking, well wouldn’t this be great if we can put this inside of a human body’s genome and then if you’re hand was chopped off by a trauma, you’d grow a new hand. Grow a new hand. Right? Be careful for what you wish for, though. Maybe you couldn’t die. And you think that’s a great thing? It could be a nightmare, too. And maybe you’d grow more than one – what if you grew three hands instead of one? But this is a Frankenstein kind of experiment.

Is anyone getting permission to do this to us? No. We don’t know what they’re doing. Well we do know that they’re interested in doing that kind of thing to humanity at some point. The other thing that they’re interested in, is that this organism has its own neural network – the tentacles that go out have not a brain, but a neural network, so it’s still a thinking kind of organism, but in a different way. And these neural networks look like our human neuron. Our human nerve. They look just like it. So if there’s more than one, here one, here one, here one, here – they can form a mesh network. They actually could communicate between each other; almost like if you had your own intranet inside your body.

So if these organisms were able to keep growing, because they’re obviously in the vials, if they’re able to keep growing in a body, well, let’s – let’s, you know, surmise they could make their own neural network. Their own outside of yours. This is not good. That means its own communication system. So let’s say, if it’s got its own communication system, something outward could affect it. Like an impulse, a frequency, something from 5G, a light, a magnet… right?

What if something influenced that communication network, and not yours? Would you start thinking things that you – aren’t really your thoughts? And how would you know it wasn’t your thought? What if you started to get really angry and you didn’t know why? What if you had this impulse to do something? Like get a shot? What would happen –

I’m just giving hypothesis out here, because I am looking at what I’m seeing under the microscope, then I’m looking at why would I see it? Because it’s not in the manufacturers ingredient list. So I look at their research of the people behind it. Like the transhumanist movement. I see why they’re interested. They’re interested because of this continuous renewal of cells, they’re also interested in – because of its ability to have its own neural network, and to be influenced by magnets and other outside forces.

So you have to look at the people behind this. What are they doing? They’ve lied to us from the beginning, why would they be telling us the truth now? What would this do to a tiny, tiny baby, or child they want to start introducing this to? You know, they don’t change the amounts they give from a baby to an adult. Usually it’s the same amount.

And then, what are these delivery rings – what do they really have inside of them? And why are we seeing the phenomenon of teslaphoresis happen? That’s some synthetic kind of network happening – some wires and tubes kind of happening. Well that means they really are trying to put an artificial intelligence network inside of a human being.

Did we consent to that? No! Again, if you want a deal like that, that’s your choice as an adult, right? But we are not given a choice right now. This is wrong on SO many levels. We don’t know what’s going to happen. This is the grandest of experiments.

So this is – I’m providing these pictures, I’m providing this data for everyone to think for themselves. And to know that we can disagree on things, but we have to come together on this, because we have to protect our human rights. We have to protect our bodily autonomy, because the future of us is at stake.”

Stew Peters: “Maybe they don’t want us to be human anymore. Because then we don’t have certain rights. They can transfer – I mean, look, if we’re going to start thinking about stuff like this…

Um, so let me ask you something, as an internal medicine specialist, I mean, that’s your specialty, internal medicine, so we’ve seen a lot of the common adverse events, side effects, of these shots. Stroke, myocarditis, Guillain Barre, tremors, magnetism… what you’re seeing now in the vials, does – do these things make sense to you? I mean, I can’t make any sense of it. I’m not a doctor.”

Dr. Carrie Madej: “Well, let’s just take the parasites. We’re not even going to the spike proteins right now. That’s a whole different story, right? Dr. Sherri Tenpenny does a wonderful job of saying how inflammatory and dangerous they are. Let’s just look at these water parasites. These things have the potential to grow. And be innumerable, right? If you’re growing things, that’s going to clog your arteries. It can clog capillaries, it can clog lymphatics.

So, that we’re seeing blood clotting happening, and plus the body’s response to having an infection, or a parasitic invasion, right? Would be an inflammatory response. Would be to have inflammation, perhaps clotting in the area. So, they’re pulling out clots, sometimes, Stew, that is almost as big as my hand. You know, it has finger-like extensions coming from like, say the heart. That’s just, it’s crazy. It’s in young people.”

@12:43 – Screenshot image from the Stew Peters Show

Stew Peters: “Yeah, I know. I’ve seen pictures of one of them that was cut out of somebody who was a personal friend of somebody that I know and trust. I mean, it wasn’t a fake, this thing was huge.”

Dr. Carrie Madej: “Yeah. And I think they need to start examining the clot, taking it straight to the microscope, getting a pathology examination, looking at the tissue, and seeing is there any evidence of an organism. A parasitic organism in there. These things can grow to sontimeters [centimeters]. You know? That’s, that’s pretty large in a body, right? We don’t know –  [ Stew Peters: If you know this – go ahead.” ] No, I said we don’t know what the potential is in the human body. But I do know they should never be injected into us, ever. Under any circumstances.”

Stew Peters: “If you know this stuff, right? I mean, you’ve looked at these – these are images being provided, that this is indisputable evidence that these things exist inside of these things.”

@13:41 – Screenshot image from Dr. Carrie Madej and the Stew Peters Show

@13:45 – Screenshot image from Dr. Carrie Madej and the Stew Peters Show

Stew Peters (cont.): “If you know all of this stuff, and if Project Veritas is going to be doing a big expose on this, this obviously is not a secret to those people that are making it. Where are all of they? Why, why aren’t these people coming forward and saying, this is what’s happening. I mean literally, if what you’re saying is true, millions of people around the world are in on this plan know this. What gain do they have?”

Dr. Carrie Madej: “Well, I mean, just like doctors, if you speak up, you lose your job, you lose your profession, and people will cave for money. Most 99% of people cave for money. Which is a sad fact, but that’s true. They’re looking for self-preservation, but they don’t understand in doing that that they won’t have any self-preservation. Because we’re all at risk here, no one’s going to be exempt from this kind of exp – this kind of experimentation on humanity, of course.

So you have – we have to speak up. It’s so foolish to think that you can be exempt from this kind of experimentation. So I don’t understand why more people aren’t speaking up. They don’t get the gravity of what is happening right here. They don’t truly understand – Our lives will never go back to normal. You know that, Stew, right? And I don’t understand why people think that there – it’s going to be normal again.

Right now, we need to understand who the real enemy is. It’s not one another, it’s not Blacks and Whites, or Latinos, or whatever. It’s not left and right. It’s humankind, against a bigger threat. Okay? So there are other people – I don’t know if you can call them people – but I don’t think they’re people, because they don’t, they’re psychopathic, they don’t have a conscience or empathy, and they don’t care for us. They don’t care how many people are killed in their experimentation. That’s who we really need to be uniting and fighting against.

Because that’s – this is not human kind of medicine. This is not human kind of technology. This is something inhuman. And when I look at it, I know that it didn’t come from us or God, our Father in Heaven, and that we’re fighting a spiritual war. So we need to unite and be one with God again. Be close with our Father God in Heaven.

Stew Peters: “Man. This is really nerve-wracking stuff, but I agree with everything that you just said, wholeheartedly. That is exactly right. This is good versus evil, get right with God, do it right now. We know how that book ends. So. I’m comfortable there.

Dr. Carrie Madej, thank you so much for your bravery. I don’t know why more people are not coming forward either. So it’s really a blessing to have you and we commend you for your courage. Thanks. Appreciate it.”

Dr. Carrie Madej: “Thank you Stew. My pleasure.”

Stew Peters: “Wow. We just, we need to boldly pray, out in the wide open, fervently. Pray. Please, God, do not let our kids be the price that we pay. This has to be stopped. There has to be a worldwide call to stop this, right now. 

Those images, those things that Dr. Carrie Madej just said, I mean, just… wow. I – I’m at a loss for words.”

Thank you again to Dr. Carrie Madej and the Stew Peters Show for bringing these things to our attention. And thank you to everyone reading/watching about this information and remaining aware.

Stay strong, stay resolute in not taking these vaccines, and pray for humanity. This is a diabolic agenda to genetically modify humankind and experiment with our mind, body and soul.
DO NOT CONSENT.

God bless.

Featured image by Sabine Zierer from Pixabay

Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates

Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.

Somewhat of a disclaimer: I put “may” in the title of this post to deflect direct allegations that “may” end up turning out to be false. Of course, in the world we find ourselves in, where money, power and hidden motives rule, it seems the same key players are involved, over and over again. I’d say that is no coincidence and holds incredible importance when addressing the strange situations that are occurring around us.

I also focus on the names given above because they are the most prominent figure-heads of the “health initiative” and have high-ranking positions who may also just happened to have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. Again, coincidence? I’m inclined not to think so.

Why is bringing up connections of Jeffrey Epstein to the NIH and the Human Genome Project so important?

Well, other than the obvious reasons (convicted serial pedophile and blackmail extraordinaire – along with Ghislaine Maxwell, currently under trial) are the incredibly suspicious interests that Epstein has divulged and perhaps invested in to further his goals.

Take the following, for consideration:

“- He hoped to seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women / Epstein told scientists and businessmen about his ambitions to use his New Mexico ranch as a base where women would be inseminated with his sperm and would give birth to his babies

– longstanding fascination with what has become known as transhumanism: the science of improving the human population through technologies like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence

– Epstein discussed the financier’s interest in cryonics, an unproven science in which people’s bodies are frozen to be brought back to life in the future. Mr. Epstein told this person that he wanted his head and penis to be frozen.

– Epstein said he was fascinated with how certain traits were passed on, and how that could result in superior humans.”

Original source: Jeffrey Epstein Hoped to Seed Human Race With His DNA
Alternative source found here: [ https://storageunit.home.blog/2020/02/17/jeffrey-epstein-hoped-to-seed-human-race-with-his-dna-at-zorro-ranch/ ]

Some studies that Jeffrey Epstein supported and sponsored are the following:

(all 4 published wholly or in part by Martin A. Nowak – “Professor of Mathematics and of Biology at Harvard University. He works on the mathematical description of evolutionary processes, including the evolution of cooperation and human language, as well as the dynamics of virus infections and human cancer” [ https://oeb.harvard.edu/people/martin-nowak ])

2006[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279745/ ] “Five rules for the evolution of cooperation”

“Support from the John Templeton Foundation and the NSF/NIH joint program in mathematical biology (NIH grant 1R01GM078986-01) is gratefully acknowledged. The Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University is sponsored by Jeffrey Epstein.”

2007[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2387227/ ] “Breaking the symmetry between interaction and replacement in evolutionary dynamics on graphs”

“Support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (H.O.), the John Templeton Foundation and the NSF/NIH joint program in mathematical biology (NIH grant 1R01GM078986-01) (M.A.N.) and FCT-Portugal (J.M.P.) is gratefully acknowledged. The Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University is sponsored by Jeffrey Epstein.”

2008[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567469/ ] “Prevolutionary dynamics and the origin of evolution”

“This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (H.O.), the National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health joint program in mathematical biology (NIH Grant R01GM078986), and J. Epstein.”

2010[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842638/ ] “Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of direct reciprocity”

“This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation, the National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health Joint Program in Mathematical Biology (National Institutes of Health grant R01GM078986) and J. Epstein.”

Of course, the studies mentioned above are all tied into one particular grant, by the NIH, no less. And again, as a reminder, who is the head (soon to be former) of the NIH? Mr. Francis Collins (who is also known for his leadership position of the Human Genome Project), who is to step down from the NIH role at the end of the year, but yet continue his research at his lab.

And that of course ties into with Anthony Fauci as a close colleague and friend of Francis Collins, and as most of us know about Fauci, is the lead of the Coronavirus Task Force and director of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases – a branch within the NIH) – and I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention Mrs. Christine Grady, wife of Anthony Fauci and also Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.

But that also brings up a Mr. Eric Lander, well known for his work on the Human Genome Project, who has met Jeffrey Epstein at least twice, according to records. Does this necessarily mean that Eric Lander was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and all of the allegations and crimes he has been engaged in? Of course not. But it does set a suspicious light in regards to Jeffrey Epstein’s close relationships to other scientific researchers, who many have alleged to have known about Epstein’s interests and various fundings into these projects, not to mention his sordid history. It would appear that Jeffrey Epstein was quite a prolific (no pun intended) character in the scientific and medical community.

And it would make sense that someone with money, plus a sinister desire to populate the world with his offspring, would attempt to get close to those who could further his goals. So for multiple scientists and researchers to have a passing acquaintance with Jeffrey Epstein would not be unheard of. However, this points a very specific light on those who do seem to entertain Mr. Epstein’s ideals.

And now with Mr. Eric Lander, selected by Joe Biden as the head of the Science and Technology division,

Jeffrey Epstein (left), Eric Lander (right)

it makes one wonder, to what degree would money be a motivational factor, even if ideologies differ? Would some scientists care? There would not only be excessive financial compensation, but it may also satiate a scientific curiosity of a “what if” scenario.

Then of course we have to mention Bill Gates, who isn’t necessarily a scientist or medical researcher, but who has “philanthropic” ventures into transhumanism, synthetic meat, genetically modifying products and human beings, as it is, despite what “fact-checkers” try to refute.

“Gene editing in animals or even humans raises more complicated questions of safety and ethics. In 2014, the World Health Organization issued guidelines for testing genetically modified mosquitoes, including standards for efficacy, biosafety, bioethics, and public participation. In 2016, the National Academy of Sciences built on the WHO’s guidelines with recommendations for responsible conduct in gene-drive research on animals. (The Gates Foundation co-funded this work with the National Institutes of Health, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.)”

[ https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-04-10/gene-editing-good?linkId=50322894 ] “Gene Editing for Good | How CRISPR Could Transform Global Development” by Bill Gates

“Gene editing in animals or even humans raises more complicated questions of safety and ethics.”

…Well, it’s a good thing Bill Gates is such good friends with Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci, both of whom work in the NIH and have leadership roles; including Fauci’s wife, head of Bioethics at the NIH. Very useful and convenient, I’m sure.

And who, by several accounts, has met with Jeffrey Epstein not once, not twice, but NUMEROUS times.

“In fact, beginning in 2011, Mr. Gates met with Mr. Epstein on numerous occasions — including at least three times at Mr. Epstein’s palatial Manhattan townhouse, and at least once staying late into the night, according to interviews with more than a dozen people familiar with the relationship, as well as documents reviewed by The New York Times.”

Bill Gates (left), Francis Collins (middle), Anthony Fauci (right) – Source: nih.gov

Now, of course we can’t claim “guilty by association”, right? But what about when the individuals/institutions listed above have direct funding and sponsorships from Jeffrey Epstein and sit on the Board of Directors of these very organizations? Can they claim plausible deniability?

“Even though Epstein did not donate to PED or Harvard after 2007, he played an “indirect but significant role” in facilitating a grant from the John Templeton Foundation to PED in 2015.”

Epstein, Martin Nowak, Eric Lander, MIT and a very sinister genome project tied to the Covid test

“Epstein had suggested at one point that the John Templeton Foundation could match any donations dollar for dollar. Unfortunately for Ito and Epstein, a spokesperson for the Foundation could find no record of Epstein’s plan, and provided no funding, according to Farrow.”

MIT’s Media Lab Director Resigns From NYT Company Board After Pocketing Millions In ‘Anonymous’ Epstein Donations

Although these two statements seem to contradict each other, and the fact that Jeffrey Epstein is mentioned as a sponsor on Martin A. Nowak’s published studies (unless we are to conclude that Mr. Nowak is lying about his sponsorships; though in light of multiple various sources agreeing that this was a huge interest of Epstein, and with proof of various meetings with those in higher positions, the supposition that Mr. Nowak is lying is highly unlikely), we can’t ignore the fact that anonymous donors and facilitators were likely happening, especially when groups/foundations involved knew what kind of detrimental publicity would arise from a known connection with this infamous criminal.

Continuing on with the John Templeton Foundation, who named Francis Collins as the recipient of the 2020 Templeton Award, and who was involved in the very studies that Jeffrey Epstein sponsored and funded, according to the ncbi/pubmed articles listed above (of which were also supported by a NIH grant, I should add) also sponsors BioLogos, a “Christian” outlet founded by Francis Collins who is eager to combine science and religion together. Make no mistake, the material exposed on the BioLogos site is meant to lead Christians astray; with many articles a propaganda piece to influence and convince Christians that getting the vaccine is for the betterment of humankind.

But again, this still raises the issue that even if Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci aren’t directly involved with Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Gates is, and seems to be a very significant one at that. With such financial sway and investments, including funding and sponsorships of numerous organizations, largely of which consist of pharmaceutical companies that just so happen to be insisting that everyone on the planet needs to take these mRNA/DNA “vaccines” – and when researching their possible involvement in CRISPR technology as well – this sets a very alarming precedence on who’s really in charge of our health system.

So again, why is it such a concern that the heads of the National Institutes of Health, and the heads of the Human Genome Projects, and prominent scientists/researchers, and professors at acclaimed universities, and billionaire philanthropists who have a vested interest in CRISPR/gene editing technology, have such business (and perhaps personal) ties and gains related to a man who wanted to populate the world with his seed and went so far as developing a “breeding ranch” and funded studies devoted to human evolution?

The answer speaks for itself, honestly.

Now, with all of Epstein’s connections and influence, not to mention all of his funding of numerous projects, are we to really believe that those involved with his projects have the best interest of humankind at heart? The same people, mind you, who are directly involved with pushing a “COVID vaccine” on the WHOLE WORLD?

And are we to really believe that the Director of the NIH, Francis Collins, and Eric Lander, a very prominent figure in the scientific community, including at Harvard and MIT:

“An influential geneticist, molecular biologist, and mathematician, Dr. Lander has won many awards and recognitions for his work in mapping and discovering the human genome. Among other former positions, Dr. Lander was a leader in the international Human Genome Project (1990-2003) and served as co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) for President Barack Obama (2009-2017). He was a professor of biology at MIT, professor of systems biology at Harvard Medical School, and President and Founding Director of the Board Institute at MIT and Harvard before going on leave in 2021 to serve at the White House.”

[ https://chinaus-icas.org/biden-administration-international-affairs-personnel-tracker/biden-personnel-tracker-climate-health-and-technology/eric-lander-presidential-science-advisor-director-of-the-ostp/ ]

had NO idea about Jeffrey Epstein’s involvement in these studies, supported by the very same institutions they oversee? This either speaks to their complicity, or their ineptitude in directing these organizations. Is this an unfair assessment? Does it instead speak of the inherent flaws (or perhaps strengths, depending on who’s looking at it) of compartmentalization and the excessive ways it can get out of control without proper supervision? But this would ultimately ignore the very real dilemma of bribery, coercion, threats and blackmail – of which Mr. Jeffrey Epstein seems to have been adept in and the center of in various circles.

With credentials such as boasting of sponsoring scientific giants, some of which have won the Nobel Prize:

“The Foundation has also had the priviledge of sponsoring many prominent scientists including Gerald Edelman, Murray Gell-Mann, Eric Lander, George Church, Stephen Hawking, Kip Thorne, Marvin Minsky, Lawrence Krauss, Lee Smolin and Gregory Benford and Nobel laureates, Gerard ‘t Hooft, David Gross and Frank Wilczek.” – Web archive: Jeffrey Epstein Ideas Forum

we have to ask ourselves, why would Jeffrey Epstein lie about Eric Lander, out of everyone? Are we sure he embellished his sponsorships, as multiple articles claim? Or is perhaps the person who has been chosen as President Joe Biden’s top Science Advisor and Director of OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy) denying such claims in order to preserve his own reputation? In the same sense, wouldn’t a person selected for such a prestigious title undergo a stringent selective process, including investigations of past connections and potential involvement in secret programs?

That is, of course, if the presidential/government committees aren’t involved in it themselves…

One last note: am I saying that Jeffrey Epstein was the mastermind behind these nefarious ideas? No. I think there were individuals above him who were directing where these studies and blackmailing efforts were going and who keep themselves largely hidden from the public eye; and who, in my opinion, may have supplied Epstein’s budget. There may also have been connections with certain alphabet agencies involved in these schemes, although these suspicions remain to be substantiated.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”