The ‘Human’ Hundredth Monkey Effect Explained | Critical Mass, The Shift And What It Could Look Like

Sharing truth and compassion may catapult us into a new era of human-conscious development.

Because I think it’s incredibly important to assess and reassess who we are and what we are capable of, I’d like to bring attention to this post that was created over 6 years ago. In it, it details an incredible study (that wasn’t even the focal point of the study…) that occurred in the 1950’s.

Granted, the study happened in monkeys, but it is still an amazing insight into what’s possible using a sort of collective mind, a consciousness that lifeforms may be able to tap into in order to grow and develop for widespread benefit and harmonious synergy.

What would be better for humankind? To remain in a state of chaos and panic, division and hostility? Or to finally realize that we are all connected and we learn to love and understand one another instead?

If it’s true that there is a common kindredship between all of us, and I do believe there is, then eventually a conscious awakening is the inevitable step forward for our evolution.

While the below example simply involves washing potatoes to introduce a better way of living (and even then, this harmless act was still resisted by some in their communities…), the pursuit by many people to find the truth, the meaning of life, a more joyful and compassionate experience in the world – will spread and affect others to want to pursue the same enlightenment.

And while again, there may be some who will resist, that will be their choice – and they will have chosen to remain in the same bleak creation that they refuse to leave; while others will have moved on to create a new, more benevolent, honorable world while simultaneously phasing out the “old way”.

by Justin Deschamps

 

The 100th Monkey Effect is probably one of the most cited phenomenons in the awakening community, yet it is also greatly misunderstood.

Many contend that this effect is proof positive of an instantaneous and automatic ascension or awakening of all people will take place in the near future. A type of ‘tsunami’ of awakening will sweep the planet, forcing everyone to be more loving, honest and fair. But is this really true?

Related Science Suggests Love and Receptiveness to Truth Enhance Psi Abilities — Telepathy Can be Explained by Interacting Coherent Electromagnetic Fields

The 100th Monkey Effect

As the below article details, the 100th monkey effect is an accidental discovery by a team of researchers in the mid 1960’s. The team was studying the Japanese Macaca monkey that was provided sweet potatoes from the team that they enjoyed eating.

Here is an excerpt from the accounting below:

“In 1952, on the island of Koshima, scientists were providing monkeys with sweet potatoes dropped in the sand. The monkeys liked the taste of the raw sweet potatoes, but they found the dirt unpleasant.

“An 18-month-old female named Imo found she could solve the problem by washing the potatoes in a nearby stream. She taught this trick to her mother. Her playmates also learned this new way and they taught their mothers too.

“This cultural innovation was gradually picked up by various monkeys before the eyes of the scientists.

“Between 1952 and 1958 all the young monkeys learned to wash the sandy sweet potatoes to make them more palatable.

Only the adults who imitated their children learned this social improvement. Other adults kept eating the dirty sweet potatoes.

“Then something startling took place. In the autumn of 1958, a certain number of Koshima monkeys were washing sweet potatoes — the exact number is not known.

“Let us suppose that when the sun rose one morning there were 99 monkeys on Koshima Island who had learned to wash their sweet potatoes.

“Let’s further suppose that later that morning, the hundredth monkey learned to wash potatoes.

“Then it happened!

“By that evening almost everyone in the tribe was washing sweet potatoes before eating them.

“The added energy of this hundredth monkey somehow created an ideological breakthrough!

“But notice.

“A most surprising thing observed by these scientists was that the habit of washing sweet potatoes then jumped over the sea 

“Colonies of monkeys on other islands and the mainland troop of monkeys at Takasakiyama began washing their sweet potatoes.

And here is the most revealing passage:

“The new behavior pattern spread to most, but not all, of the monkeys. Older monkeys, in particular, remained steadfast in their established behavior patterns and resisted change. When the new behavior pattern suddenly appeared among monkey troupes on other islands, only a few monkeys on those islands picked up on the new idea. The ones most receptive to new ideas started imitating the new behavior and demonstrating it to the impressionable younger ones. Thus, they too began their own path towards their eventual hundredth monkey effect.”

First the effect was not a complete and total paradigm shift within the monkey population. At best, all that occurred was a transition of awareness; the newer monkeys learned about the washing method, but did not automatically begin washing the potatoes.

Second, the transmission occurred after a sufficient number of monkeys in the host population expressed the washing behavior. It was then that “only a few monkeys on those [new] islands” began washing the potatoes. In other words, it wasn’t enough to simply be aware of this new way, it had to be accepted and expressed in order to ‘build up’ in the host population, which eventually experienced a pandemic awareness of the better way.

Finally, the newly affected monkeys on the surrounding islands “began their own path towards their eventual hundredth monkey effect,” in other words, that the affected population had a time delay between transmission and the majority of monkeys displaying the washing behavior.

All of these points suggest an entrainment or synchronization process, which is a property of waveforms or systems of frequency. The mind and consciousness have long been associated to frequency and rhythmic patterns, and this transmission effect perfectly matches what can be observed in other phenomenon, such as synchronizing metronomes.

Related Entrainment, Communication, Information and Evolution

When two systems of motion come in contact with each other, such that information from one can be transmitted to the other, a slow and steady process of entrainment takes place. Eventually the two different systems synchronize to the point that the motion of one is reflective of the other. One of the better examples of this universal information transmission via frequency and resonance is metronomes.

Synchronizing Metronomes

 

Synchronization occurs in a four-step process and is symbolic of how the same process occurs within the mind.

  • Step 1: Initially, the metronomes are ticking at unique rhythms, unable to be transmitted to the others because no medium or channel is available to provide for the mechanical energy to flow. The swinging of each metronome arm moves from side to side, and is it does so, kinetic energy in the arm pushes against the base of the metronome. But because the devices are on an immoveable surface, this energy cannot be sent to their neighbors and it is absorbed by the table; no transmission can take place.
  • Step 2: The metronomes are placed on a board and moved on top of two cans. Now the motion of the arms has a pathway to travel to the other metronomes, which pushes against the base through the board and on to the other devices. The moment that they are placed together a new system is created with an ideal resonant frequency. This frequency will push against out of step motion and push with instep motion, which slowly alters the behavior of each individual device to match the larger board and metronome system; transmission is beginning to occur.
  • Step 3: The resonant frequency of the board metronome system is initially at a low intensity or ‘volume’, but as each metronome’s behavior is adjusted, they begin to tick in harmony. Eventually the intensity of the resonant frequency overtakes the frequencies of the individual metronomes. At this point the near instant synchronization begins to takes place; transmission is rapidly accelerating.
  • Step 4: The resonant frequency of the board metronome system is now dominant, exponentially working against out of step movements of the individual devices. The inertia of the initial frequencies of each metronome becomes less and less strong, until the whole system dramatically shifts into a synchronized state over a few seconds of time; transmission is fully complete.

Analysis and Integration with the 100th Monkey Effect

In the above example, metronomes were only able to synchronize under certain conditions. A metronome placed on a table that is too rigid, won’t allow for the unique frequency to be transmitted and harmonized with the group. This aspect represents free will, that a metronome can only be changed if it is open to the others. Finally the process took time, it wasn’t until the resonant frequency of the metronome board system reached a strong enough intensity that the ‘quantum leap’ process started.

Similarly, the same type of shift occurred in the Monkeys. For example, the subjects that were the most receptive to the washing behavior were the young monkeys, those able to recognize the advantage of doing so, and that were open minded enough to try the new way. The older monkeys that were more stubborn never learned to wash the potatoes at all. The key principle here is free will, the monkeys were not forced to change but instead had a choice. Finally the process took time, marked by definitive and recognizable hallmarks of progress. Once enough monkey’s made the choice to wash the potatoes, an ‘overnight’ shift took place, and almost all of the monkeys took up the new behavior.

Human ‘100th Monkey Effect’

How does this translate to human consciousness and the infamous paradigm shift spoken of in various circles?

Firstly, the key reason why the metronomes synchronized was because the resonant frequency was ‘better’ then the individual ones. Similarly, the washing behavior was ‘better’ then not washing them. This means that there was a real and bonafide objective improvement that was overriding the older behavior. For the human consciousness shift this translates as truth and practicality, that finding the truth and sharing it with others isn’t just a nice thing to do but it literally improves the quality of life of individuals and groups objectively. This is an essential aspect to consider because the shift in consciousness is objective and practical while also being ideal and subjective. It is a personal choice as well as a scientific process of discovering and finding the better way.

As each individual on the planet discovers the truth and understands it personally, they alter their behavior accordingly so as to embody the wisdom gained. For example, cutting wood with a small axe is less effective than using a large one, and in most cases a person would rather be more efficient then not. Therefore the shift in consciousness is not just a more positive way, it is literally a better way, the marriage of idealism and pragmatism.

Second, this better way can not be forced on to others, free will and the ability to choose is still in effect. This means that as the consciousness shift progresses forward, on average people will most likely embody these more accurate truths and change accordingly; but not everyone.

That being said, the nature of our social fabric is such that many people find value in what the collective is doing. In this sense, when a majority of humanity embodies this newer way it will naturally become more appealing to the minority; but free will choice of each individual is still the determining factor. Additionally, each person is on his or her own unique path towards discovering this better way, and while from our point of view it may seem as if others aren’t evolving fast enough they are still making progress. Even people who reject all forms of truth and hold on to the past are part of the shift taking place, their stubbornness in and of itself is an indication that the newer way is gaining strength and as such it requires more energy to deny. Compassion in these instances is far more helpful then peer pressure.

Finally, not everyone will shift. This is an idea that makes most people uncomfortable, as if some are being left behind. But in truth, since the whole process is founded on free will choice, is this not more honorable? If an individual denies the objective truth of the better ways, then that is their choice and the universe will not force it on to them, but they will continue to labor under the errors of their own making. This is just like the older monkeys chose not to wash the potatoes and suffered the displeasure of eating dirt as a result.

It is these contrasting experiences that help us open our minds to newer ways of being. As such we need not become frustrated at the close-mindedness of others because this is actually an indication they have received the transmission, but simply chose to reject it; a choice we would do well to honor so long as it does not harm others.

Conclusion

At this stage not enough data is available to make any kind of prediction as to how many people will shift. But since the shift is ultimately a personal choice based on knowledge and awareness, we can assist others in their path by sharing what we have come to understand as individuals. This means that the simple act of kindly sharing our truths is the single most important factor to the human 100th monkey effect.

Related Paths to Awakening: Spiritual Activism or Disempowerment | Understanding the Spiritual Causes of Depression

It may be difficult to see the shift occurring, but it undoubtedly is and we need only stay the course of seeking the truth, understanding it and sharing it with others to ensure things progress forward. They may not want to hear it at first, they might fight us and call us crazy, but all these things and more are indications the transmission has been received; we need only honor their choice while taking measures to ensure it does not harm another in the process.

It is my hope that these deep principles of free will and information transmission are understood so as to provide the surety in knowing our work is having an impact.

– Justin

The preceding article is a Stillness in the Storm original creation. Please share widely.

*Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

What is Bill Gates’ Motive?

And why does he seem to smile and smirk all the time?

It’s strange that the main person pushing for the vaccine and contact tracing is also one of the hugest supporters of population reduction and genetic manipulation.

Even stranger, are the people that will refuse to believe that Bill Gates has said anything of the sort, or been involved in anything of the sort, and will maintain to this day that he is just trying to help “save the world”.

So I am not going to inundate anyone with fancy words of my own. I will just point you to words and actions of Bill Gates himself and those of his institutions and partners, and let him do the talking for me.

As you’re watching the video, which helps to paint a broader picture of Mr. Bill Gates other than just reading his words, keep in mind the term “duper’s delight”, and see if this might apply to anything we’re being told.

Duping delight is a particular micro expression a person will display that betrays a sense of enjoyment they are getting out of controlling and deceiving another person. It is a very important expression to watch out for in catching dishonesty in a person. In fact it is a form of body language pretty much exclusively reserved for pathological character types such as psychopaths.

The phrase was coined by the psychologist and body language expert Dr Paul Ekman and was defined by him as “the pleasure we get over having someone else in our control and being able to manipulate them”.

Duping delight most often manifests as a grin or a smirk which will flash across a person’s face, and is usually completely inappropriate to the situation or the topic that is being spoken about. The psychopath is either about to lie, or is lying to someone and they are believing it, and the smirk is a leaked expression of pleasure that they are getting away with it. – psychopathsinlife.com

Click to watch video (bitchute.com)

(Picture is from Bill Gates from his presentation youtube.com | wwwAAASorg | )

Original videos can be found at the following links: (unless they get deleted due to youtube’s always-changing definition of their “policies”. Please let me know if this happens and I will try and fix it.)

1.  00:00 – 00:32 | Bill and Melinda Gates assure you of a second wave that will “get your attention” | Exigent News |
2.  00:33 – 01:52 | Bill Gates: We Could See Early Results From Coronavirus Vaccine Trials This Summer | The Late Show with Stephen Colbert |
3.  01:53 – 05:15 | Bill Gates on Fighting Coronavirus | The Daily Social Distancing Show | The Daily Show with Trevor Noah |
4.  05:15 –  05:37 | Bill, Melinda Gates advocate GMOs to a Brussels audience | EURACTIV |
5.  05:37 – 06:29 | “These vaccines are unlikely to “completely sterilize” a population. Professor Sir John Bell, SAGE! | Steve Willis | (John Bell – leads the development of Oxford’s health research strategies and chairs the Gates Foundation’s scientific advisory committee)
6.  06:29 – 08:17 | Innovating to zero! | Bill Gates | TED |
7.  08:17 – 09:13 | Bill Gates on Overpopulation and Global Poverty | The Borgen Project |
8.  09:13 – 09:47 | Year Of The Vaccine (Bill Gates) | POPS Maroon |
9.  09:47 – 12:50 | Gene editing can now change an entire species — forever | Jennifer Kahn | TED |
10. 12:51 – 16:29 | Bill Gates: How Gene Editing, AI Can Benefit World’s Poorest | wwwAAASorg |

11. 16:29 – 16:58 | How to spot a liar | Pamela Meyer | TED |
12. 16:59 – 17:26 | Bill Gates on US reopening: We didn’t get away with it like we thought | CNN |

Transcripts of the video segments 1-10 can be found below:

1. Is this a threat? A promise?

“In fact, the testing could’ve been ramped up, uh, very quickly. And a few countries that have almost avoided the epidemic entirely, like, Taiwan, New Zealand, Australia, you know, they took their experience and actually prepared and so they moved a lot faster. Uh, so we, you know, will have to prepare for the next one. That, you know, I’d say, is, uh… will get attention this time.” – Bill Gates

2. Bunkering down

Stephen Colbert: “You tried to warn us about this pandemic, um, and we didn’t listen. What’s the next thing you’re warning us about that’s gonna happen 5 years from now that we’re not listening to at the present.”

Bill Gates: “Well, I didn’t want to be right. What I wanted to do is, uh-

SC: “I understand. I’m not saying you won. Everybody loses. Nobody wins with this. And I’m not saying that you’re, that you’re, this is not an endzone dance.”

BG: (laughs)

SC: “I’m just saying, what else are we not listening to that we need to take action on now.”

BG: “Well, the, the idea being a bioterrorist attack is kind of the nightmare scenario because they’re a pathogen with a high death rate would be – now the good news is, I’m not trying to depress you, it’s tough enough right now-

SC: “Too late! Too late.”

BG: “That most of the work we’re going to do to be ready for pandemic 2, I, I call this pandemic 1, most of what we’ll do to be ready for that are also the things we need to do, uh, to minimize the threat of, of bioterrorism.

SC: “Well, um, Mr. Gates, thank you so much for being here. Thanks so much for the efforts you and your organization are doing to try and find the cure for this. And uh… we’ll see you again. Stay safe.

BG: “All right. Great talk.

SC: “Give our best to everybody else in the bunker.

BG: “Thank you.” (laughs)

3. Vaccinating the whole world

But the ultimate solution, the only thing that really lets us go back completely to normal, and feel good about sitting in stadiums with lots of other people, is to create a vaccine and not just take care of our country, but take that vaccine out to the global population and, um, so we have vast immunity, and this thing no matter what, isn’t going to spread in large numbers.” – Bill Gates

Again sadly, the richer countries that do contain the epidemic will not allow people from those countries (poorer countries) to come in, you know, unless they are quarantined or tested or-or proved they’re immune. Uh, and so this is gonna stop people going across borders very dramatically these next few years till we get to that full vaccination.

Within the United States is different because we’re not gonna partition the country. Uh, and so therefore we are all in it together. We can’t do what we’re gonna do with foreign nationals, which is reduce the numbers a lot and have very strict screening there. We’re not gonna have at every state border, you know, some complex quarantine center.

Uh, and- so the whole country needs- even when you have small numbers, because those can exponentiate  to big numbers so quickly. You know, the doubling time is like three days when you’re still behaving uh, in the pre-epidemic way.

Uh, so you know, each country, uh, you know, has to get the entire populace, even some who- who, uh, initially resisted, maybe for very good reasons, because the economic effect on them, uh, is- is strong.”

So this is powerful medicine. But if you take a big dose of it earlier, you, you don’t have to take it for nearly as long.” – Bill Gates

Bill Gates: “We’ll have a lot of unusual measures until we get the world vaccinated. You know, 7 billion people- that’s a tall order. But it is, it is where we need to get to uh… uh despite a lot of things in between now and then- to minimize the damage.”

Trevor Noah: “You predicted this pandemic almost to a T, and maybe it was because we were dealing with other things at the time we didn’t really pay that much attention. Is there anything else you want to warn us about now that we should-

BG: (laughs)

TN: “that we should be looking forward to. Is there anything else that keeps you up at night?

BG: “Well, this is a naturally caused epidemic. And as bad as it is, it looks- if you have reasonable treatment, to have a one percent fatality. There could be epidemics that are worse than that, including, uh, ones that aren’t naturally caused that are a form of bioterrorism. But I do- one thing that I feel good about it, this is such a big, uh, change to the world, that this time it won’t be like ebola, which was just there in West Africa or Central Africa. This time, the 10’s of billions to have the diagnostic standing by, the vaccine manufacturing standing by- this time we will, uh, get ready for the next epidemic.”

4. Gleefully injecting GMO’s in little kid’s arms…

You know, is there something to worry about with medicines that is might, some of them have side effects- do we need safety testing? I mean, and we’re taking things that are, you know, genetically modified organisms and we’re injecting them in little kid’s arms- we just shoot ’em right into the vein.

So, yeah… I think maybe we should have a safety system where we, you know, do trials and test things out.” – Bill Gates

5. Sterilizing the Population

John Bell: “And don’t forget, there, these vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilize a population. They’re very likely to have an effect which works in a percentage, say, 60 or 70 percent. We’ll have to look quite carefully, and the regulators will have to look quite carefully to make sure that it’s done what we need it to do before it gets approved. So there will be a delay between the outcome of the trial and the decision whether it can be approved as a vaccine. Uh, and of course anything that happens-

Jon Snow: “Professor Sir John Bell…

John Bell: “Yeah?

Jon Snow: (pauses) “I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to cut you right off like that-

John Bell: “Can I just say that anything that happens to undermine the legitimacy of the regulators to make independent decisions is, in my view, profoundly unhelpful.

Jon Snow: (long pause) “Professor Sir John Bell, thank you very much indeed for joining us.”

6. Innovating to Zero

And the answer is, until we get near to zero, the temperature will continue to rise. And so that’s a big challenge. It’s very different than saying, “We’re a twelve-foot high truck trying to get under a ten-foot bridge, and we can just sort of squeeze under.” This is something that has to get to zero.

Now, we put out a lot of carbon dioxide every year- over 26 billion tons. For each American, it’s about 20 tons. For people in poor countries, it’s less than one ton. It’s an average of about 5 tons for everyone on the planet. And somehow we have to make changes that will bring that down to zero.

It’s been constantly going up. It’s only various economic changes that have even flattened it at all, so we have to go from rapidly rising to falling, and falling all the way to zero.

Bill Gates Innovate to Zero Equation
Bill Gates presented this infograph/equation to show how we would need to get the carbon dioxide emissions down to zero. "People" takes a role in part of the equation. Bill Gates | TED2010

This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication. So you’ve got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero, and that’s going to be based on the number of people, the services each person is using on average, the energy on average, for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy.

So let’s look at each one of these, and see how we can get this down to zero. Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero. That’s back from high school algebra. But let’s take a look.

First we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion.

Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.” – Bill Gates

7. What is “health care” and “reproductive health”?

When our foundation first started up, it was focused on reproductive health. That was the main thing we did because I thought, you know, population growth in poor countries is the biggest problem they face. You’ve got to help mothers who want to limit family size have the tools and education to do that. Now that’s the only thing that really counts.

Well, then, I came across articles that showed that the key thing you can do to reduce population growth is actually improve health. And that sounds paradoxical. You think, ok, better health means more kids, not less kids.

Well in fact, what parents are doing is they’re trying to have two kids survive to adulthood to take care of them. And so the more disease-burden there is, the more kids they have to have, have that high probability. So there’s a perfect correlation that as you improve health, within half a generation, the population growth rate goes down.” – Bill Gates

health care:

“All three components that Gates mentioned can involve direct forms of population control. “Reproductive health” is a euphemism for contraception and abortion. By now “health care” includes an increasingly wide scope for euthanasia, including in Canada. Contraceptive (or more literally, abortive) vaccines also exist, meaning that the use of vaccinations for more direct population control is at least a possibility.”

Gates, WHO, and Abortion Vaccines (fcpp.org)

8. Year of the Vaccines – 2021 (interview was with Sanjay Gupta on 2011)

Sanjay Gupta: “10 billion dollars over the next ten years to make it the year of the vaccines… what, what does that mean exactly?

Bill Gates: “Well, over this decade, uh, we believe unbelievable progress can be made both inventing new vaccines and making sure they get out to all the children who need them. Uh, we can cut the number of children who die every year from about 9 million to half of that uh, if we have success on it. The benefits are in terms of reducing sickness, reducing the population growth, it really allows a society a chance to take care of itself, uh, once you’ve made the intervention.

9. Dangers of gene-editing

They engineered two mosquitos to carry the anti-malaria gene and also this new tool, a gene drive, which I’ll explain in a minute. Finally, they set it up so that any mosquitos that had inherited the anti-malaria gene wouldn’t have the usual white eyes, but would instead have red eyes. That was pretty much just for convenience, so they could tell at a glance which was which.

So they took their two anti-malarial, red-eyed mosquitos and put them in a box with 30 ordinary white-eyed ones, and let them breed.

In 2 generations, those had produced 3,800 grandchildren.

That is not the surprising part.

This is the surprising part: given that you started with just 2 red-eyed mosquitos and 30 white-eyed ones, you’d expect mostly white-eyed descendants. Instead, when James opened the box, all 3,800 mosquitos had red-eyes.

When I asked Ethan Bier about this moment, he became so excited that he was literally shouting into the phone. That’s because getting only red-eyed mosquitos violates a rule that is the absolute cornerstone of biology, Mendelian genetics.

I’ll keep this quick but Mendelian genetics says when a male and a female mate, their baby inherits half of its DNA from each parent. So if our original mosquitos was “aa” and our new mosquito is “aB”, where “B” is the anti-malarial gene, the babies should come out in 4 permutations: “aa”, “aB”, “aa”, “Ba”. Instead, with the new gene drive, they all came out “aB”. Biologically, that shouldn’t even be possible.

So what happened?

The first thing that happened was the arrival of a gene-editing tool known as CRISPR in 2012. Many of you have probably heard about CRISPR so I’ll just say briefly that CRISPR is a tool that allows researchers to edit genes very precisely, and easily and quickly.

It does this by harnessing a mechanism that already existed in bacteria. Basically there’s a protein that acts like a scissors and cuts the DNA, and there’s an RNA molecule that directs the scissors to any point on the genome you want.

The result is basically a word processor for genes. You can take an entire gene out, put one in, or even edit just a single letter within a gene. And you can do it in nearly any species.” – Jennifer Kahn

Say you want to get rid of an invasive species, like get Asian carp out of the Great Lakes. All you have to do is release a gene drive that makes the fish produce only male offspring. In a few generations, there’ll be no females left, no more carp. In theory, this means we could restore hundreds of native species that have been pushed to the brink.

Ok, that’s the good news. This is the bad news:

Gene drives are so effective that even an accidental release could change an entire species, and often very quickly.” – Jennifer Kahn

The last worrisome thing, is that the technology to do this, to genetically engineer an organism and include a gene drive, is something that basically any lab in the world can do. An undergraduate can do it. A talented highschooler with some equipment can do it.” – Jennifer Kahn

10. Bill Gates excited about certain new technologies

And therefore, we’re not taking the best of science, uh, in creating something that can have, uh, its potential impact. And so, a, you know, a redirection either of the market signals or the role of governments and philanthropy or scientists themselves against this broader goal, would help us make, uh, far greater progress, even more than we have today.

We have an opportunity with the advance of tools like artificial intelligence in gene-based editing technologies to build this new generation of health solutions. Uh, so that they are available to everyone on the planet. And I’m very excited about this.” – Bill Gates

Even so, the machine learning tools that we have today, uh, are going to be applied in a broad range of domains, including modeling disease, uh, finding drugs for disease, understanding biological systems, uh, and so it is a very exciting time.

The capacity to execute those AI models is, is doubling more than once a year. So we’re going up even faster than so-called Moore’s Law by building these very, uh, uh, special purpose things to execute both the creation of deep learning models and the execution of those, those models.

And so applying those in a broad way and really understanding whether they’re applicable, that data revolution is here today and it’s suffusing itself through many many problems, including these health problems that are, are so critical.

We also have recent breakthroughs like the gene-editing technologies including CRISPR, uh, and so we should be able to use that, uh, for very low cost point-of-care precision diagnostics, um, we should be able to use that for therapeutics and we should gain understandings of how to do, uh, vaccines, even vaccines that the turnaround time, instead of being the typical, uh, three or four years- literally at some point we’d be able to create in months. And we want to use these tools, not just for orphan diseases or not just for diseases in rich countries but also for the diseases that predominantly afflict, uh, people in countries where most of humanity lives in, the, the middle-income and the low-income countries.

In terms of genetics I’m sure we’ve all ready the history uh, you know going back to when, you know, people didn’t know, Pauline didn’t know, where is that information encoded? And you know Crick Watson and Franklin laid the foundation for modern genetics by understanding how, uh, DNA encoded that information and it’s only 15 years ago that the human genome project gave us, uh, the basic blueprint and let us now identify sequences that are associated with different diseases.

It was 8 years ago that CRISPR came along and it continues to evolve in some pretty fantastic ways and including the accuracy of the editing. Today, over 89 percent of genetic variants that we know are associated with human disease can be corrected, that is, if you get in to the cells of interest, uh, you can, uh, make those corrections.” – Bill Gates

eugenics: the practice or advocacy of controlled selective breeding of human populations (as by sterilization) to improve the population’s genetic composition – merriam-webster.com

Introduction to Eugenics:
Eugenics is a movement that is aimed at improving the genetic composition of the human race. Historically, eugenicists advocated selective breeding to achieve these goals. Today we have technologies that make it possible to more directly alter the genetic composition of an individual. However, people differ in their views on how to best (and ethically) use this technology. – knowgenetics.org

Other useful links that also help tie in between Bill Gates’ history into eugenics and his partnership with Planned Parenthood: (which was born out of an agenda to exterminate the “Negro population” – according to the founder, Margaret Sanger)

BILL GATES AND EUGENICS: THE WORLD NEEDS FEWER PEOPLE

The Gates Family, Eugenics and COVID-19

Margaret Sanger: “We Want to Exterminate the Negro Population.” Her Wish is Coming True

Bill Gates, Monsanto, and Eugenics

Melinda Gates: ‘Black People, Indigenous People’ Should Get Coronavirus Vaccine First

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”