Dr. Richard Fleming Interview with Mike Adams | “The Vaccines ARE the Bioweapon” [Full Transcript]

“This is a violation of science. This is a violation of medicine. This is a violation of humanity.”

In keeping with providing written transcripts for those who prefer to read text as opposed to watching videos, I have transcribed the following interview between Mike Adams and Dr. Richard Fleming.

Another in-depth/informative video that Mike Adams conducted, this time with Dr. Peter McCullough, that is transcribed in full can be found here:
Dr. Peter McCullough Interview with Mike Adams | “All to prepare the population for mass vaccination.” [Transcript]

Thank you to Mike Adams and Dr. Richard Fleming. While all of the information is incredibly helpful and insightful, I did provide some embellishments to highlight exceptionally pertinent topics.

 

Also thank you to all the doctors/scientists/researchers, etc. who have been brave enough to stand up for their patients and for humanity in general. Your bravery and integrity speaks volumes of your character and exemplifies what it means to be a strong, compassionate individual, especially in the midst of adversity and vitriol.

Mike Adams @00:33: “Welcome to BrighteonConversations, I’m Mike Adams, the founder and host of brighteon.com, today. 

We have a special guest, first-time guest. A brilliant individual who’s an author of a book called “Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?” His name is Dr. Richard Fleming, his website is flemingmethod.com, and he is not only trained as a physicist and a nuclear cardiologist, but, of course he’s an author and researcher and doctor – we’re going to talk to him, ask him lots of questions about what’s going on with COVID today.

So thank you for joining me. It’s an honor to have you on, welcome to BrighteonConversations.”

Dr. Richard Fleming @1:07: “It’s my pleasure to be here, thank you for the invitation.”

Mike Adams: “Well absolutely.

It’s fascinating, just really fascinating to be able to hear from people like you. Let’s start with some basics. Your book asks the question, ‘is the COVID-19 a bioweapon?’ And there’s a lot behind that, but, what’s the short answer? And what else does the book provide to support that?”

Dr. Richard Fleming @1:30: “Well there’s – ahem, the short answer, um, I think… I’m going to leave to the readers, for them to decide. I think, uh… a year ago, that question would have been heresy, and, you know, even though I was asking it a year ago, but it’s amazing how just as information comes out, people become much more aware of reality.

This book really lays out in detail a lot of information with people. It tells you to begin with what ‘gain of function’ is. Which is what the topic of the day is. The ability of scientists to take infections like a virus and make them more infective or potentially more dangerous. But it also, it provides a lot of information sequentially so you can understand where the moneys came from to build this virus, who published research – just literally published the research over the, you know, two to three decades, showing a nice paper trail of data, who got the patents on it, whose names are connected, how the funding got connected with it; and then, you know, really addressing that spike protein which is the actual bioweapon itself.

You know, the gain of function, man-made, altered, critical component to this virus being so infectious and dangerous – um, and amazingly enough that in and of itself explains to you why the drug vaccine biologics aren’t working at this point in time. Which we can get into if we have time. And then just an explanation also about the intentional release of this, of this virus, and recognition that this is not the first one of these viruses. It’s kind of a version number 2. And even though there’s a number of coronaviruses, which means viruses that look like a crown when you look at them under an electron microscope, this one is the 7th one that has been identified to infect in people, and it’s the 2nd one that holds the name of ‘severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus’. And it’s number 2 because number 1 was from 2002, also delivered to the world out of China. And by very much the same people.”

Mike Adams @3:52: “That leads me to a recent video by Dr. David Martin that I’d like your comment on. And I just happen to have these notes in front of me here. He was referring to a patent: April 19th 2002, U.S. patent, 7279327 – in which it appears that U.S. scientists created SARS. The – one of the early renditions of SARS, which later on was altered, was transformed to become SARS-CoV-2, eventually. But as you just said, some of these patents go back 22 years, and the research goes back even before that.

It appears that, like you said, there’s a long paper trail that they have been funding these efforts and deliberately working to engineer these viral – I don’t know – nanoparticles, pathogens, for some reason. But what about the motivation, then? Do you get into that in your book? What’s the – why are they doing this? Why?”

Dr. Richard Fleming @4:54: “Right, well, I think to understand the motivation of the people involved, you have to understand who’s involved. And when you look at, as explained in the book, where the funding from the United States came from. You know, more than 60 million dollars, which may not sound like much when we’re talking about throwing a trillion out here, and a trillion out there, I mean, 60 million dollars is still a fair amount of money for research scientists to work with; particularly when you consider over three decades, that amount of money was substantial.

And you simply asked, where did that money come from? Well it came from National Institutes of Health. It came from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. It came from the Department of Defense. In fact, more than half of it came from the Department of Defense, along with, as you’ll see in the book, a David Franz, who was a former deputy commander at Fort Detrick.

And in case anybody wants to take the argument that, ‘wait a minute, Fort Detrick is the U.S. military base, it doesn’t have anything to do with viruses and NIAID’, I would point out to you that I have received several emails from people trying to recruit me as a physicist for imaging at Fort Detrick, of viruses funded by NIAID. So I actually have documents of my own that have been sent to me, trying to recruit me, [Mike Adams laughs: “That’s great.”] to be involved in this, in this work. So, I think probably not anybody else has that. Um, you need to be a physicist to get that type of query from them. So clearly they are involved.

And then you asked the question, ‘what do these agencies work with?’ Well, as I frequently tell people, the DOD is not involved with the girlscouts. They don’t sell thin mints and they don’t help boyscouts sell popcorn. Um, they do other things. And what that really means is when you get right down to it, is that if you build a biologic – like this virus – which has no beneficial effect or benefit for mankind, which it clearly doesn’t, then you have violated the biologic weapons convention treaty. [Mike Adams: “Good point.”] And you are now, you are now an international criminal.”

Mike Adams @7:08 “Now, we spoke with doctor Francis Boyle on that issue, he’s an expert in that area, but from what you’re saying, I’m asking you to confirm this, if it is so, that it seems like the United States military was attempting to offshore the research in order to circumvent limitations on such research in the United States. So they funneled money through EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak and so on, to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and then partnered essentially with the People’s Liberation Army, controlling the Wuhan Institute. 

So now you have the military of the United States and the military of China conducting research in China on biological weapons, which is obviously that intellectual property would be shared with both nations. Is that an accurate statement, or am I wrong in any point there?”

Dr. Richard Fleming @7:54: “No, that’s – that’s pretty good. I mean, the federal fundings in the United States, much of it, although not all of it, got circumvented through Peter Daszak at EcoHealth. He paid moneys off to Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina, but that’s not the only American Institution, and to Shi Zheng-li at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. And we’ve seen decades of them working back and forth.

In fact, there’s some data that I have that isn’t yet in the book, and I’m saving it for a special purpose, um, and I’ll let your readers think about what that special purpose might be, showing that these same people also worked genetically to alter viruses so that they would escape the ability of our immune system to fight them off. And they successfully proved this. So this particular virus doesn’t have that aspect to it, but clearly if you’re developing one biological weapon, you know research scientists like myself don’t work on a project and go, ‘Well, that’s good. We’re going home now for the rest of our lives.’ I mean, you’re constantly working on new things. And one of the ways to think about this is the United States is playing China, China was playing the United States, and look who got caught in the crossfire.”

Mike Adams @9:07 “And the institution of this twisted science was playing us all, because my next question to you is about – remember when Peter Daszak authored that article, I think it was published in the Lancet, that initially proclaimed: “Oh, this is zoonotic. This couldn’t possibly have come from a lab.” I mean they were very insistent and they were arm-twisting and they were recruiting. And some of this came out in the FOIA request of Fauci’s emails where Daszak and Fauci were coordinating this, this fairy tale, to try to proclaim this wasn’t built in a lab. What are your comments on that?”

Dr. Richard Fleming @9:42: “Well, I have a very personal comment. You know, a lot of people spend their lives as research scientist, trying to become reviewers and editors for major league journals; it’s a big plus for us. I resigned in 2020 from two journals: The British Medical Journal Open Quality, and the Lancet. And I did that because of this type of use of a journal that used to be prestigious, to represent science at its best, being used as a manipulative tool for somebody to drive their agenda. And that unfortunately was the prostitution of our research journals.”

Mike Adams @10:22 “Wow. Wow! So, you said something to me related to this before we started our interview, that Fauci does not represent science. And, this is my next question, cause I’m very concerned about that. I mean, my background, I’m a food scientist. I run a mass spec food science lab. And we do very accurate quantitation and method development for glyphosate concentration and things like that for our business. That’s what we do. We test everything. Right? So we’ve very practical application. And I have always believed in the tenets of science. You know, let’s develop a method, let’s calibrate the instrument, let’s run it, let’s compare it to certified reference materials, do all these things. Yeah, that’s valid. That’s legit. And yet I see the institution of science committing suicide! Apparently. Committing suicide – credibility suicide. What do you think?”

Dr. Richard Fleming @11:13: “Right. Well I think part of the, part of the problem is because somebody calls themselves “scientist” doesn’t mean that they were actually practicing science. I mean, it’s more of a pseudoscience when you get into that. I was in medical college at the time that HIV hit. You know? And we got to see it first-hand. And I am hard-pressed, and that was in the early 1980’s, I am hard-pressed to find any substantive quality published research since that time that has Anthony Fauci’s name to it. So… you may be in charge of an agency, but that doesn’t mean that you’ve contributed to the field of science. Science builds upon all the work that, just as you said, you have to – you have to figure out what you’re doing, research-wise, you have to figure out how you’re going to answer that question, you have to be able to make your equipment work.

A good point to stop, at PCR, right there. Equipment working.

Kary Mullis developed the PCR test to look for genetic sequence. That’s what the patent is for. It looks for genetic sequence. If you read that patent, Kary Mullis said you stop at 20 cycles. It gets you a 100% of the genetic material if it’s there; anything else becomes gobbledy-gook, using that good scientific term that my parents taught me a long time ago. And what happened to that scientific tool? Well it got abused. By people who claim that they’re running science, but didn’t really understand the science.

You know, Mullis and I have two things – couple things in common. One, both patents, [owners]. And the second, we both think that Fauci is anything but science and we don’t think he’s much of a scientist. And we’ve both declared that we would love an opportunity to debate with him at any point in time about the science.

And that’s an offer that, you know, I make here again, which is: Anthony Fauci – anytime, anyday, anywhere, any place, you want to have a debate about SARS-CoV-2 and real science, let’s do it, so the American people can see what the truth of this is.

Mike Adams @13:18: “Is he hearing you say that, Dr. Fleming?

This is what gives me hope in the future of science. Because you are obviously an informed, intelligent, analytical person. And this is what desperately needs to be applied right now.

Because just going back to PCR, I’ve heard from other people, cause I’m always interviewing and talking to people, there are individuals out there who would just go to Thermo Fisher, and they would purchase PCR equipment, that they had never been trained on, they’d never run before – and it’s not that expensive, in terms of lab science. For a hundred grand or a hundred and twenty grand, you can get a PCR and a sample prep, you know, instrument. And they would run these things, and they would make a million dollars in one weekend doing tests for a local clinic or a hospital. Cause it’s all being billed out to the government.

And so, this is the case, exactly as you said, it was abused! And they would turn the cycle thresholds up to 35 or more! And they’re just – they’re basically just reporting instrument noise. This is background noise and they call it COVID. Wow!”

Dr. Richard Fleming @14:24: “Yeah, noise to signal ratio is the physics term, and they’ve introduced a bunch of noise into this. You know, what we have demonstrated very clearly in the almost 2 years here is that using PCR tests, we have demonstrated that respiratory viruses are transmitted from person to person, by respiratory pathways. We have proven that the inflammation and blood-clotting that’s associated with COVID-19, that I talked about first in 1994, is the cause of these diseases; that if you don’t treat that, people die.

And we have shown that if you take a drug vaccine, that is directed towards just a part of one type of variant of a species of coronavirus, and you make an immune response to that, you’ll make an immune response, but when you dump billions of that into the body, you’ll make a massive immune response and have very adverse effects, which is what we’re seeing.

It didn’t make any – it didn’t make any difference in the number of people who end up with the COVID or dying; vaccinated versus not. But we managed to devote massive immune responses and then we were able to put pressure on the virus to promote one of the variants, in this case delta – but there’s lambda and a whole series of these that are out there, that if you actually attack one part of, in this case the virus, you’ll promote the spread of the other types that are immune. Because the antibodies are completely different for that type of spike protein.”

Mike Adams @15:57: “Right. Viral, just viral evolution add up to host adaptation.” 

Dr. Richard Fleming: “Yeah, I mean the virus – it’s like antibody resistant bacteria. Those anti – those bacteria are already resistant. But if you dump antibiotics into the system indiscriminately, you’ll kill off the ones that can’t handle that, but the antibody resistant ones will flourish. And that’s all we’ve done. Is we have demonstrated, wow, pressure selection works.

So we know that viruses pass by air, we know that if you don’t treat patients they die, and we know that if you put pressure on a species like this virus, it will select out for the ones that are most viable to live and cause a problem. And like Albert Einstein said, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.” Well, let me ask everybody: how did our masking, quarantining, deprivation of medical treatment, and pressure selection on a virus work? – Wait a minute. We’re doing the same thing we did 2 years ago. I think that answers the question. 

And, with the book, we now who know who’s paying for it and the people who paid to develop it, are the same people that are blocking the treatments, are the same people getting money for the vaccines; and that should raise just a few eyebrows out there, among the at least 30% of the U.S. population that we know are beginning to listen to the science, as opposed to the pseudoscience political speech.”

Mike Adams @17:29: “My, you raised so many issues here, let me see if I can remember all the questions. Just from that.

So, one thing you’re referring to is the epidemiological effects of the viral adaptation pressures caused by mass vaccinations of people during a strong outbreak. Now, Geert Vanden Bossche, Dr. Bossche, if I’m pronouncing it correctly – Bossche – he’s warned about that exact scenario. And he’s an epidemiologist, a pro-vaccine epidemiologist, or researcher, and it seems now, when you have certain countries like Israel and Australia that are very heavily vaccinated and now they’re starting to see that the severe patients who are experiencing hospitalization, have now sometimes 74% of them have been vaccinated. Is that – seeing that, is that consistent with what you are describing?”

Dr. Richard Fleming @18:23: “Absolutely. And when they talk about the unvaccinated having problems as well, well of course, because it’s all been selected out to produce these slightly more infective delta variants. So yeah, they’ve done a brilliant job of proving science is correct, um, they just haven’t figured out quite how to handle this. And that would require that they step back and go, ‘You know, maybe we should have been more upfront and honest with you about what we were doing with this money and the development of this bioweapon.’

Um, because now, now these people are criminally culpable. They have violated a Biological Weapons Convention treaty. They have violated informed consent with the Declaration of Helsinki. They have violated the International Covenant of Civil Political Rights Treaty. They have violated the Nuremberg Code.

Physicians in the United States that are vaccinating people who have not read the package inserts to obtain the information about the drugs are violating their Hippocratic Oath – but, wait a minute, there’s actually nothing on those package inserts. They say that they are intentionally blank, so had they read them, they would have seen that they were intentionally blank and that they don’t have informed consent to give to the patients.

What we’re seeing from the VAERS is that all the inflammation and blood-clotting that I warned about in 1994 is exactly what we’re seeing in healthy people with this massive immune response, causing heart damage, liver damage, neurologic diseases; all the things that we’ve been warning about. All the things that we have made worse by the very approach that we’ve done to this.

And you know, if we were just human beings and we actually had gotten exposed to a virus that was doing this to us, that would be one thing, and you could say ‘oops, my bad’, you know, using the vernacular. But the problem is, we’re the ones who developed it. And by ‘we’ I don’t mean me. I mean the people that are talked about in this book. The people that, and you’ll see in the book, where they took one part of one virus, combined it with another part of another virus, then inserted separate nuclei type bases in there to make it more infective.

I mean, this is – I don’t know… you know, they might have at one point in time thought they were doing something for mankind decades ago, but when you get to the place that you’ve jumped evolutionary barriers, by decades and tens and hundreds and perhaps thousands of years, and produced something that we would not have to be worrying about, and now you’ve produced this gain of function weapon, in violation of treaties?

First off, you’re criminally accountable, and secondly, anybody who requires mandated vaccines without these informed consents, have violated international treaties. And if you are an elected official, or an appointed official, and you’ve taken an oath to defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States, you have violated that oath. And under that oath and the Constitution, that’s treason.”

Mike Adams @21:36: “So what you are describing, and I think our audience agrees with everything that you’ve just described, but I want to ask you one step further on this.

What you appear to be describing, is a large-scale organized crime, racketeering, money-laundering operation, you know, the government’s laundering money into the hands of big pharma, while big pharma is funding the FDA and funding the politicians and the CDC, which owns patents on some of the earlier coronaviruses. Probably receiving royalties of some kind on all of this. And keep people like Walensky, the director of the CDC, her husband, his company, receive millions of dollars in NIH grant money; approved by Fauci and so on.

This is an incestuous money-laundering racket with the cost being born by the people. Because the vaccine companies have legal immunity from indemnification from lawsuits. But the people then have to bear their own medical cost from the adverse reactions, long-term effects, long-term blood clot, inflammation effects; all of these things. This is – if this is all true, it’s beyond insidious, it’s beyond criminal, it is – it is perhaps the most diabolical attack on humanity that has ever been waged on this planet. Would that be accurate?”

Dr. Richard Fleming @22:56: “Absolutely. When Adolf Hitler started the Nazi regime, the first people that they put in concentration camps were not the Jews. It was the intellectuals. The people that would open debate discussions about what was going on. After he accomplished that, then he went after the Jews and the homeless and anybody else he thought that was undesirables.

So the first thing you do, if you want to have this type of effect, is you take out the intellectuals so that people will not discuss and debate what’s really going on and figure it out. And what happened in Germany? The doctors went along with it, the politicians went along with it, the judges went along with it. The only difference is that they really had a very small group of people that they were experimenting on, compared to what’s going on today, because this is a global experiment. And you’re either part of the experimental, or you’re part of the control group, right now.

You know? And the data is pouring in, whether we like it or not. And history is being written whether we like it or not. So, Adolf Hitler and Josef Mengele are turning over in their graves right now going, ‘wow, we could not have imagined being able to pull anything off on this massive scale’. And yet, we’ve shown repeatedly that if you lockdown people and quarantine them and keep them from talking, and feed them the agenda.

Goebbels – no, Goering, rather, at the Nuremberg Trial in 1947, when he was being held accountable for his crimes against humanity, looked at the prosecutors – the American prosecutors, and said, “If you want to manipulate a people, and have them do what you want as a government, all you have to do is tell them there’s a problem, tell them what the answer to that problem is. Tell them that anybody who opposes that answer is a traitor to the country. And you can get them to do it.”

And the Americans said, “You, you are so wrong. We live in the United States. We elect our officials.” And he laughed at them and he said, “Look. A republic. A parliament. Communist. Socialist. Fascist. It doesn’t matter. People are controlled the same way. You isolate them, you tell them there’s a problem, you tell them what the answer to the problem is, you tell them anybody who opposes that, is a traitor to the country. You put the people against each other.”

And that’s what’s happened. We’ve seen it in families. We’ve seen it in churches. We’ve seen it in businesses. We’ve seen it in cities. We’ve seen it in states. We’ve seen it in countries. I have colleagues in Italy that tell me right now, that the response that the non-vaccinated are receiving from the vaccinated people in Italy was the same response that they saw when Mussolini was in charge of Italy during World War 2. The same pressures, threatens, accusations; not a thoughtful discussion. You know?

If somebody is nuts, – you know, if this book is wrong, well I’ve pretty much laid out all the data; it’s – it would be easy to refute it. The problem is, I’ve laid out all the data. And you can’t refute it. The documents have been saved by the way, in case they try to pull them off the internet. They’ve been, they’ve been given to several sources for safe-keeping for hard copies, for use in courts around the world as we hold these people accountable.”

Mike Adams @26:24: “So once again, you’ve – we’re going to have to do more interviews, because you’re, you’re just flagging all of these things. Let me just, let me bring up the Stanford Prison Experiment. I’m sure you’re familiar with it, it was based on the Milgram Experiment, but the Stanford Prison Experiment, for the viewers who may not be familiar, they took volunteers, who I believe were Stanford graduate students, and they divided them up. Just, half of you are going to play the role of guards, prison guards, and the other half are going to play the role of prisoners. And then they role-played that for not very long, when the guards became, you know, diabolical, cruel, in their treatment. Because they began to adopt these psychological roles.

And that’s what you’re describing, Dr. Fleming. Where the vaccinated, now, become the prison guards of society. And where this is going is now very clear, because the CDC has a document on their website that we’re covering. It talks about “green zones”, which are COVID quarantine camps.

Governor Lee of Tennessee, just on Friday, signed an Executive Order authorizing National Guard and State Guard to take people away from their homes with telephone assessments, determining who needs to be taken away, to be put into involuntary internment camps, that are being constructed in the state of Tennessee. And the CDC saying we’re going to have “community level neighborhood enforcers” of some kind, who are checking in with you to make sure you’re complying.

This – this is, this is an Orwellian nightmare, come to life.”

Dr. Richard Fleming @28:00: “Yeah. This is Nazi, Germany. And by the way, Executive Orders don’t have legal authority if the legislative bodies is Mr. Executive, in this case, the governor, you don’t have the authority to do that.

And this is where I point it out earlier in our discussion. Anybody who takes the oath of office to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, and, same thing for their states, the supreme law of land in the United States is the U.S. Constitution. Statutes passed by the Congress of the United States and treaty law, it’s in the Constitution, violation of any of those by anybody who has an oath is a violation of the Constitution, is treason by definition. Treason is punishable by death. [Mike Adams: “By definition. Also. Yes.”]

By definition. Violation of the Biologic Weapons Convention treaty, the ICCPR treaty, the Nuremberg Code, and the Helsinki Declaration, are international treaty violations before the International Criminal Court, is – are crimes against humanity, just as they were in Nuremberg. So I’m calling for Nuremberg 2. We are much closer to that than anybody else has and perhaps I’ll come back another day to let you know exactly where we’re at on that. [Mike Adams: “We need that update, yes.”] 

These crimes are crimes against humanity, and they are punishable by death, just like they were in Nuremberg, and bear – remember, that in Nuremberg, there wasn’t just one trial. There were a dozen of them. After the first trial, came the doctors trial, and the couple after that the jurists, or the judges, and the attorneys and the law-maker trials. They were all held accountable in International Court for crimes against humanity.”

Mike Adams @29:57: “How – I don’t know, the historical record in detail. How many people were sentenced to death for being complicit in that?”

Dr. Richard Fleming: “Um, I’ve actually got that on the site in some of the presentations I’ve done so I know. I can try to really pull up, real quick, one of the PowerPoint slides.”

Mike Adams: “While you’re looking for that, let me just tell the audience that the title of your book is, “Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?” It’s currently available on Amazon, somehow. I’m not sure how. They’ll probably pull it at some point. So get it while you can. “Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?”

Dr. Richard Fleming: “So, there were, in the initial trial, of the 24 defendants, with Goering and the rest, of the initial 24, 12 were given the death sentence. 3 were given life imprisonments. 4 were sentenced between 10 and 20 years. None of them received the treatment that they wanted. Some of them thought, well, we were – they were German high officials, they should be treated with more respect. And the court just laughed at that.

And then there were a couple, Hitler and Goering – or Goebbels, both committed suicide before the war came to an end. And Goering laughed at them and committed suicide the day before they were going to execute him. There were 12 trials, after that one came the doctors trial, and 7, there were 7 German doctors who argued that they weren’t doing anything different than American and other – and Russian doctors were doing. And the truth of the matter is, they really weren’t doing things worse. But they were physicians – excuse me, they were physicians who came up and said, the problem with that is that these things were wrong no matter who did it and we’re not going to let them get by with it. So that was the Nuremberg Code that was developed. And uh… let’s see… if I have that numbers on that.

Of the 16, let’s see, of the 23 doctors, 16 were found guilty, and 7 were executed. [Mike Adams: “Wow. Wow.”] So if you think you get by free on this one, um, you don’t. Because as long as I’m still living and breathing, I plan to see this through. Because this is a violation. This is a violation of science. This is a violation of medicine. This is a violation of humanity.”

Mike Adams @32:40: “What will it take, Dr. Fleming, before we can have that kind of public pressure to call for Nuremberg 2.0? Because, you know, looking back at World War 2, they – the Nazi regime got away with genocide for many years. Murdered millions of people, while these so-called good Germans went along with it. And it was happening in their own backyards; they wanted to be part of the party. One of the economic benefits of having the war factories running, and so on. We have a lot of good Germans in America today, I’ve noticed. Because they’re going along with it. It might be half the country at this point. Going along with it.”

Dr. Richard Fleming @33:19: “Yeah, there’s a nice sign that I’ve seen that I’m sure has been spread around through our social media system that we have. Where it says, “If you wondered what you would’ve done in Nazi, Germany 1930’s, you now know.” 

Mike Adams: “That’s right. That’s right. And, you can look at your friends, family members, co-workers, whatever, you can now tell who would’ve been right at home in the Nazi regime.

Dr. Richard Fleming @33:43: “Here’s the important thing your listeners need to realize. The people that recognize there’s a problem, need to reach out to the people who have been taken advantage of. Because most of the people who get vaccinated, for example, did so because they were worried about someone they loved and care about.

Vaccines don’t keep you from getting infected. For them to work, you have to get infected. Okay? Vaccines don’t keep you from spreading infection. They simply make it possible for your body to respond sooner, to whatever you get vaccinated with so that your symptoms are shorter in duration. Which is a great way to increase asymptomatic carriers. Or minimally symptomatic carriers. And the problem is, it doesn’t do a thing for the pressure strains of the variants that exists. And those are going to continue.

These viruses have a lot of variants, we’re tracking, I as a research scientist, I’m actually watching the data that’s being done on the changes in these viruses to watch what’s going on. To watch what changes are occurring, what changes are happening naturally, evolutionary wise to this virus. Because even though it was man-made, it’s still a virus. It’s a living thing, and it’s making the changes like living organisms do.

Some of it looks like it’s trying to delete some of the inserts that were put into it. The consequences of some of that is becoming even more infective, but it’s not becoming more dangerous. Remember that if a virus becomes too dangerous, it will kill whatever it’s in, and then it can’t spread. So it’s not like these things become more dangerous. They get dangerous enough to get their benefit, naturally, and when idiot humans work on them and make them – well, all bets are off.

And what we saw was an ideal bioweapon, because the idea of a bioweapon isn’t to kill your enemy. We learned in Vietnam, my era, that if you wanted to win, you didn’t shoot to kill your enemy; you shot to maim your enemy because a wounded soldier on the other side might have friends that will come to the rescue of their friend and drag them off the field. Right? Now instead of killing one person, you’ve taken 2 or 3 people off the field. So maiming is much more effective.

Now if you can demoralize and damage a society by putting it – I don’t know – by shutdown and economic tailspin and, and keeping its people from talking, you have developed the ideal bioweapon.”

Mike Adams @36:18: “But, to that point, the people who built this, and the people who have pushed this and promoted the hysteria, they have gained so much power and profit. Also through the assertion of false authority, like the CDC claiming they now control all private property rental contracts, somehow, for some reason out of the blue. But why wouldn’t they now release something more dangerous and more deadly if they have it in the freezer? You know, the Fauci Freezer 2.0. Why wouldn’t that now be their next play?”

Dr. Richard Fleming @36:52: “There isn’t any reason why it wouldn’t be. Remember earlier I made the comment that research scientists don’t stop and say, “Okay, I guess we’re done with this project. Let’s go home.” They’re constantly working on it. You know, if you got the people doing what you want the people to do, well, you now have a perfect setup for continuing to run your experiment. You know? And which may not be the way people want to think about it, but it’s, from that point of view, it’s a great experimental design of ‘what can we get by with what can we do?’

And one thing that, you know, I didn’t mention before, I was working in my Master’s in psychology before I entered medical college. And so we had done all the work on these types of things, as graduate students in psychology, including the Stanford study and things like that. And it’s amazing what people will do. They will do it because they like power and control. They will do it because they don’t want to be hurt, and so they’d rather go along with it. It’s very easy to turn people against people.

But again, going back to the idea, if you can reach out to your neighbors and your friends and the people that maybe you’ve been alienated from, and say, “You know, this isn’t us. This isn’t us fighting us.” We’ve gotta stop fighting us and start looking at the science and the information. Which is what this book does, “Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?” tells you what you need to know.

Well you can go find it, and prove for yourself because – like Galileo? You know? He got put under house arrest for telling everybody – most people think he got put under house arrest for saying the Earth goes around the sun. What he got put under house arrest for was saying, “You know what? Don’t take my word for it. And don’t take anybody else’s word for it. If you look up at the sun and the stars and the moon, and you think about these few things… you know what? You’re smart enough to figure this out on your own.”

And oh my goodness. Do we really want people having common sense and saying, wait a minute. If this approach was so good, why would we have to offer Krispy Kreme donuts, and marijuana, and lottery tickets, and major league baseball tickets – I mean, we wouldn’t have to bribe the American people for doing that.

Recognize that, as a research scientist with 53 years, if these drug vaccines had actually been tested properly, and done correctly so that they produce the desired end result? I’d be the first person in line saying, “Go get ’em!” That’s not what you’re hearing. What you’re hearing, is that’s not what’s going on, and these are the people who built it.”

Mike Adams @39:26: “Okay, your experience in psychology leads me to this next question. One of the things that we find, in trying to reach out to people, is that those who have already taken the vaccine, then, they of course are now looking for data and filtering out anything, so that they can reinforce their previous behavior. So they’re taking the vaccine, they cannot cognitively accept contradictory information that would show, retroactively, that they made a bad decision. That phenomenon is very real.”

Dr. Richard Fleming @39:57: “Right. Right. But here’s the good news for them. Because part of the problem for them is that they’re going, “Well, if I accept that, now it means… I’m in trouble. And the people that I thought I was protecting are in trouble.”

Well here’s the good news. Number one: it turns out that we did research on people that had the infection or developed COVID-19 and we showed success in 99.83% of the cases by treating the inflammation, the blood clotting and the attachment of the virus and its ability to replicate. So with the stress of all this, I actually put together a protocol based upon prior published research, from lots of different people. You can go to the website, the one area of published research on SARS has more than a hundred and sixty research papers on it.”

Mike Adams @40:47: “And this is all at flemingmethod.com?”

Dr. Richard Fleming: “Flemingmethod.com. That will explain these different drugs, and the vaccines themselves. The EUA documents. And drugs that work and why they work.

So one of the examples is, Ivermectin has not been known, the way I do it, with tissue measurement, to interfere with the attachment of replication of the virus. What it has been shown to do, is protect the nucleus of the cell from being, from having genetic material from outside the cell get into your cell and become part of your DNA.

So one of the problems of the vaccines, is it’s dumping BILLIONS, versus hundreds of viral particles, but BILLIONS of genetic codes for spike proteins. And we’re talking for Pfizer/Moderna, 13.1 billion, and for Janssen and AstraZeneca, 50 billion. You know. In Novavax it’s nothing more than just dumping in a load of that spike protein made inside moth cells. And God knows what’s actually in the spike protein since it had to get in the DNA of the moth cell to then be made.

I mean, you know, at what – I don’t know. Right? Because they’re not actually showing it, so injecting that is not more intelligent. It’s injecting spike proteins made by moth cells, into you, with probably something else.

And so, what these protocols that I put on the website for people who have been vaccinated or have shedding problems, which we know shedding’s a real thing because the FDA and Health and Human Services published 2 papers: 1 in August of 2015, talking about, what do you do with mRNA and DNA viral and bacterial gene therapies? Their words, not mine. And then in January of 2020, came out with an updated report, FDA and Health and Human Services and CDERs on the shedding byproducts are the products of what you inject in the body. Which are, you know, spike protein and who knows what else? Right?

So as a result of that, we’ve put together the best evidence available, treatment protocols, and we have been testing that in Europe and some places in the United States, and we’re seeing positive results from people. So we know the sooner that gets started the better, and, you know, if you’re not symptomatic, you don’t see anything, you know, you have nothing to measure. But it’s not a done deal just because you got vaccinated and you had problems or you’re concerned about it.

We know from the animal models right now that the humanized mice developed brains that look like sponges; so what I would call spongiform encephalopathy, and what the general public calls mad cow disease. We know the rhesus macaque animal models – the rhesus macaque animal models showed Lewy bodies, which causes Alzheimer’s disease in the brains of all the animals that were given these spike proteins. We know this is true whether you get it naturally or by the vaccine. The difference is that these drug vaccine biologics have BILLIONS compared to hundreds or thousands. Right? So you don’t have to be a rocket scientist. You don’t have to have a PhD, MD, JD to figure this out. You know, my parents would have told you, “Yeah, billions versus hundreds, big difference.”

Mike Adams @44:12: “But, but I’ve actually, I’ve heard from people who were trying to justify why they took the vaccine, and they would actually tell me that they wanted the smallest possible exposure and that the vaccine could provide that. And I said, “Are you kidding me?” I mean, that’s not a small exposure. What are they injecting – 250 microliters? And, you know, spike protein particles are really tiny. So there’s a lot of ’em in there.”

Dr. Richard Fleming @44:37: “Yeah, when you do the math, and you can – there’s actually, I’ve got that on the website so you can do the math based upon the volume, and for the lipid nanoparticles, Pfizer and Moderna, it’s 13.1 BILLION. And Janssen and AstraZeneca it’s 50 BILLION. Okay? [Mike Adams: “Incredible.”]

And you have to understand, once you appreciate that this spike protein is a man-made gain of function bioweapon, and then you realize that the vaccines are nothing more than the genetic code for the bioweapon, now you realize that the vaccines ARE the bioweapon. In addition to the virus.”

Mike Adams @45:16: “But, what you’re saying makes perfect, logical, rational sense. But how can mainstream doctors be so self-convinced it seems, when you can give them research. Hey, the Salk Institute says the spike protein causes widespread vascular damage, and the spike protein is IN the AstraZeneca vaccine that’s been linked to blood clots and so on. And they will – they will somehow, they will delete that from their consciousness. They will say that they don’t believe there is a spike protein. Or that they think that that antigen target is harmless. They just delete, from their consciousness – It’s like, it’s like mass hypnosis or something. Really.”

Dr. Richard Fleming @45:27: “Yeah, and one of the reasons we’re having so many papers – that 160+ papers and it’s growing every day, on the website, is doctors do want to do the right thing, by and large. But they haven’t had the data. They haven’t known where to go look for it. And they haven’t had the data to look and say, “Wait a minute. This was a gain of function bioweapon. This was something man-made.”

The benefit of putting this information out there, for the general public to read, and for the doctors to read, is to bring everybody up to speed. You know, last year, a year ago, I’d have said, “You know what, doctors? I get it. You’re just going along with what we’ve done before. We know vaccines can be beneficial for people.”

I’m not anti-vaccine. I’m just anti-bad medicine. Okay? People have heard me say that now probably too much. But I’m just anti, anti-stupidity, okay? Richard doesn’t suffer fools gladly. That’s what my original mentor used to tell people. And I don’t. I don’t. I don’t care what position or power, authority they have. And the more of that they have, the more responsibility they have to be honest and upright, and honest with people.

So the truth of the matter is, a year ago, I could give a break to my medical colleagues and say, “Okay, you just didn’t know. You were going along with what’s been taught. But look guys. We’ve never seen this much of a blithering disaster before in our lives.” Right?

I mean, we’ve never had a problem where we’ve promoted a variant that’s more infective of something as a result of the vaccines we’ve done. Our vaccines in the past have taken a virus, say… measles. Okay? And we’ve taken the whole, the whole family of measles, right? You know, because there’s not one thing. It’s just one human, right? Humans vary, but they’re all humans. There’s not one type of bacteria, you know, e. coli, but there’s a variety of them, but they’re all e. coli. Well there’s not just one type of SARS-CoV-2. There’s varieties of those.

So in the past we’ve always taken those viruses, we’ve weakened them, attenuated them, and then injected it into people. So what did people see? They saw all of them. And they saw all the parts of the virus. So they didn’t just see a spike protein. They saw the nucleocaps, and the envelope, and the HE and all the other components of it that they can then make antibodies to, and t-cell responses to. So if they saw any of that in the future, they responded.

What did we do this time around? We didn’t give you the whole thing. We gave you the genetic code of a bioweapon, of one type of spike protein, so that the further you get away from that, the less likely you’ll respond to it, and you won’t recognize the virus if you get a variant of it for real, because not only will the spike protein be different, but you’ll never have had any exposure, the HE component, or the envelope component, or the nucleocapsid component. So it’s all brand new to you; you’ve got NO immunity.

And there’s papers that have been published that show that people with natural exposure to SARS-CoV-2 have long lasting natural immunity with t-cell and antibody major responses – it doesn’t matter how bad the exposure was or how bad the infection was. And there’s data that shows that there’s no relapse for people who have had influenza A inside a megalovirus. 

Mike Adams @49:14: “Yeah, robust natural immunity was the term. Now, now Dr. Walensky of the CDC has admitted a recent quote. She said that we’re only a couple of mutations away from the original vaccines being completely ineffective. So, she’s saying what you just said. I mean, she’s confirming it. That’s almost a direct quote from her. It’s astonishing! Even they realize their vaccines are failing.”

Dr. Richard Fleming @49:40: “This is a dog chasing its tail. And while that’s fun to do with a dog, particularly if it’s your dog and you like him, okay? This isn’t exactly the same thing, is it? I mean, people – people are dying, because they get infected and then when they get ill, they’re not getting treatment. That doctors KNOW work. Okay? These agencies do not have the legal authority to be telling doctors not to use these treatments. [Mike Adams: “It’s extraordinary.”]

Agencies don’t have the right to ship people off to camps. That governor, doesn’t have a legal right in his state, to do that. His legislature needs to step up, the people in that state need to look at their elected officials and go, “Guys. You want to be elected next term? You need to put a hold on this. You don’t have this authority.” This did not become the Third Reich/Fourth Reich in the last 2 years. Even though they’ve been playing with this for 3 decades.”

Mike Adams @50:41: “Well, knowing some people from Tennessee, I have a feeling there’s going to be a shorter John Rope coming up real soon. But we’ll, we’ll leave that to people’s imagination.

Let me ask you about inflammation. This is our last 5 minutes here. You’re an expert on inflammation and I think one of your patents you said relates to the measurement of inflammation in tissues. I want to ask you about your estimate of the progression of the inflammatory response, specially based on the mRNA technology that’s causing people to generate these spike protein bioweapons in their bodies.

And again, the Salk Institute says, yeah, these spike protein cause vascular damage. We’ve seen blood clots, especially in young, healthy males with otherwise healthy cardiovascular function. We’ve seen myocarditis, we’ve seen strokes, we’ve seen heart attacks, lots of things.

What’s the prognosis if people don’t do the things that you describe on your website? Because there are interventions that can be post-vaccine interventions, that can help tremendously. But if they don’t do those things, because it’s all being censored, what’s the progression that we can expect to see even antibody dependent enhancement?”

Dr. Richard Fleming @51:46: “Yeah, so an antibody dependent enhancement is very unique to this virus. Which is also another trigger for you to realize that it’s not a naturally occurring one. Because in this virus, the antibody dependent enhancement is actually the result of antibodies being made to the end terminal domain of the spike protein. And when those antibodies attach, they open up the spike protein and make it 4 to 10 times as infective. That’s the real antibody dependent enhancement.

It’s different than anything we’ve seen before. But this is – so the body is going to produce this InflammoThrombotic Response that I talked about originally in ’94 or ’95, put in my textbook in ’99. Did the bacterial work from 2000 to 2003 and was on 20/20 talking about it in 2004, so you would’ve thought we’d have this down by now. But your body sees something infected, whether it’s a spike protein or the virus, and it dumps chemicals from your t-cells to try and kill anything that’s been attached to it, to try to stop the replication of the virus. That happens at about 3-5 days, and then in 7-10 days your b-cells kick in and do much of the same thing chemically, but then also make antibodies. Right? So they’re going to go in and they’re going to attach to that tissue.

Now, all you need to go back and do is look at strep pharyngitis, when people get strep throat and doctors like myself say, particularly cardiologists like myself say, ‘you need antibiotics for that’. Why do we write that? Because those antibodies that respond to streptococcus pneumoniae, or what you call strep throat, also recognize the valves of your heart as looking an awful lot like it, and produce rheumatic heart disease. There’s different heart valves. And over the course of time, you’ll end up with a valve replacement. So when these attacks occur on your heart, if you don’t stop them sooner than later, it causes inflammation and damage and weakness to the heart. And the longer that goes on, the more that damage is going to occur and it’s going to add up over the course of time.

And you’re going to take, for the love of God, vaccinating our kids, and – and you know, all the way down, and our college students, our university students, our athletes, with these – these vaccines that are producing, we know, 6,000 cases so far reported on VAERS of heart attacks, or damage/death to the heart. And cardiomyopathies, or inflammation of the heart that produce viral cardiomyopathies – that we’ve known about since, I don’t know, at least I – when I was in medical school in the Dark Ages in the early 80’s, 1980’s, it’s going to get progressively worse and worse and worse.

We know from the animal models that the brain disease that occurs in those animals means that at about a year and a half, we’re going to start seeing this occur in people. Now it’s going to depend on how much they got exposed to, and how much got into the brain, how much damage was done to the heart. But we’re going to see these progressive diseases take more and more of a toll if people don’t take action to address them.”

Mike Adams @54:46: “Well Dr. Hoffe from Canada has spoken about using d-dimer tests, I believe to – and some microscopy, to look at micro blood clots in the vascular system of post-vaccine patients. And he’s expressed tremendous concern about medium term 2-3 years out, vascular damage that is accumulating and leading to severe cardio events. Have you seen what he’s talking about?”

Dr. Richard Fleming @55:16: “Yeah, FlemingMethod is the only way that – is the way that we monitored those treatments so we can fine-tune in our study what was going on. And you can monitor people every 3 days and you can see the change; you can see whether they’re getting better on the treatment or not making any change or getting worse. So this stuff doesn’t take a ton of time to start seeing any effect.

You know, once the immune system kicks in, 3-5 days for t-cells, 7-10 days for antibody production, from the delayed humoral response, and you’re going to start seeing damage occur. If you don’t do something about that damage, and you develop COVID-19 as a result, you’re going to see the consequences of that. A slow smoldering process is still a fire that’s burning. It may not end you up in the hospital, but it’s going to – and it’s going to depend on the person. How bad that turns out over the course of time. And we’re going to get to see it.”

Mike Adams @56:12: “I’ve got to ask you this question. I hope you can stay another couple of minutes, but, what about the proinflammatory properties of certain low-grade seed oils that are heavily used in the diet – such as soy oil, corn oil, and so on – perhaps canola. Do you think there’s kind of a confluence of synergistic toxic effects from COVID-19 vaccines, spike protein injections, and dietary factors such as proinflammatory ingredients?”

Dr. Richard Fleming @56:41: “Right, so the original theory that I talked about in 1994 that’s on the website, includes all of those factors together. I mean, basically I joined American Heart in 1976 as the youngest faculty member ever. And that put me on 3 major committees right upfront: Basic Cardiac Life Support, Advanced Cardiac Life Support, and the newly formed Physician Cholesterol Education Faculty.

So I went around talking about cholesterol and training physicians and the general public on all these different aspects. And then in 1994, after doing a lot of research on heart disease and diets and, you know, I was, I did several dietary studies; I’ve done more dietary studies that I ever wanted to do in my life, on the effect of various diseases including heart disease.

And in 1994 I walked into American Heart and I said, “Look guys, okay, I’ve been – I’ve looked at my data, I’ve looked at all the other data.” You know. I’ve looked at data outside of the U.S., outside of medicine; I’ve looked at everybody’s data. I had something like 5 or 6 hundred papers at that time, and I said, “Here’s the 12 things that I think play a role to varying degrees in different people. Much like a spider’s web, where you can tug on one part, it’ll affect everything else. And it produces this inflammation wall of the arteries, make it impossible for the arteries to relax and carry more blood flow, and that’s really what heart disease is.” And I got told I didn’t know what I was talking about, you know.

In fact, the HERS 2 trial, or HERS trial was coming out where they were talking about estrogen replacement, and I said, “Look. This is going to be a problem.” And they said, “No no no. We know this is going to come out well.” And that study they presented in ’94, they said, “Whoops. Look. So bad. This actually causes more heart disease.” And I said, “Really? You think so?”

Because what I was trying to tell people is, what are the general practice doctors, the family practice doctors usually do when they talk to young women that are just getting married and they say, “Doctor, I don’t want to have children right away. I want to just have time with my husband.” So they prescribe them birth control pill. Right? Estrogens, right? Right? And what’s the question the doctor says? “Well, you have any clotting problems in your family?” Why? Because we know that with the estrogens at that level, and clotting problems, you end up with problems.

Well, gee. I was part of the theory. So the theory said, yeah, cholesterol, triglycerides, saturated fats, highly processed foods, homocysteine, lipoprotein little a, fibrinogen, manipulation of things, bacteria, and viruses. All played a role, and some other things that I’d have to go look at the theory again. I put it in a nice schematic for people. All play a role to varying degrees.

So, when this hit, all SARS-CoV-2 did was, deformally prove the entire theory. Which wasn’t exactly what I was going for. But you know, back in the 90’s, I was working on these neuro five ac receptors, that I had concerns about as far as causing inflammation from animal, animal meats, and what was going – it turns out that that’s exactly what these people were working on the virus at the time, because the GP120 uses that same receptor. It’s called a sialic raft receptor, just to first hook into to help stabilize the virus to infect. But it’s also a prion region of that.

So, and when Shi Zhengli, as you’ll see in the book, put glycoprotein 120 in 2004, my original thought was she was doing it to try and get it into the nucleus of the cell, because she didn’t have that data. The Human Genome Project was being completed at that time showing that you didn’t need to do it that way. The cells would do it if you give them the right virus or bacteria. But what it did do is it anchored into the cell, and it’s a prion. And she knew that, because the data was already published in 2004 that showed GP120 produces prion diseases.

Well, it got put into the spike protein, along with everything else, produced another prion region of the spike protein that attached. That’s the regional binding site that attaches to the ace2 receptor. So, they knew this, they played with it, they intentionally did it, they knowingly did it. They violated international treaties. Violating informed consent violates more of those international treaties. So, yeah. All these things play a role.”

Mike Adams @1:01:01: “What if the, the Fauci 2.0 Special, that they might release next, this gets back to something you mentioned right at the very beginning, that the research was continuing into pushing what sounds like HIV portions, into the genetic code to achieve some sort of immunodeficiency effect? What if that’s the next bioweapon? It’s an aggressive, now novel bioweapon; none of the current vaccines touch it at all. It causes more vascular damage and it turns off the immune system. Wouldn’t that be kind of a global killer right there? Like a – like an extinction level, you know, attempt?”

Dr. Richard Fleming @1:01:41: “One of the things you’re going to see in the book is that there’s 1,770 nucleotide bases in the spike protein, that are identical to HIV and SIV, which is simian immunodeficiency virus. 

Mike Adams: “Okay. All right. So we’re not too far off the mark. Yeah, exactly. Wow. Well I hope, I hope – I mean, I can ask you questions for hours if you had the time, but I hope you’ll come back and do this again. You’re a fascinating individual, I really honor your courage in speaking out, but also the brilliance of your understanding of this. I think it – if science is to be saved at all, it’s going to be due to people like yourself, by the way. So thank you for what you’re doing. And thank you for joining us today.”

Dr. Richard Fleming: “Thank you. My pleasure to be here.”

Mike Adams: “Absolutely. Now, folks, Dr. Fleming’s book is, “Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?” Check out his website, I’m going to: flemingmethod.com. Now I’m fascinated about all his research into inflammation prevention.

I’m drinking my turmeric smoothie right here. This is part of my anti-inflammatory response. My neuro-protective potion, right there.

So, spread the word, folks. This is going to be censored on youtube, but you are free to post it everywhere else. Thank you for watching. I’m Mike Adams, the founder of brighteon.com. Take care.”

Thank you to everyone reading and/or watching the interview. Please help spread the word and stay informed. Research is incredibly important, especially in these uncertain times and with the incredible amount of propaganda and deliberate media suppression.

Thank you to everyone exposing these corruptions.

Scam of the Medical Industry and a Depopulation Agenda Revealed at the ITNJ

Robert O. Young’s Testimony at the International Tribunal of Natural Justice

I always hear from others, especially those who DON’T WANT TO HEAR DIFFERENTLY, if something sinister and nefarious were going on in the world, especially one that includes a worldwide effort to dictate the actions (and the populations) of everyone else, wouldn’t SOMEONE be talking about it?

So I’ve been making posts that reveal that more and more people HAVE talked about this, and to be honest, I’m having a hard time catching up. There are SO many people talking out against this agenda, and the reason why it’s not heard about?

Because “they” largely keep it out of the press. It is literally being suppressed. And no wonder, with these “powers that shouldn’t be” owning the media, owning big tech, owning big pharma, owning the government agencies, owning the health industries, owning the entertainment business, owning the education system… These “elites” have already infiltrated most aspects of our lives.

So. Of. Course. We’re. Not. Going. To. Hear. About. Corruption.

Unless we’re actively looking for it.

And don’t get me wrong. I don’t want to believe all of this is happening either. But once you open this door, even just a tiny little crack, the flood of information comes pouring through. And then it’s up to common sense, common decency, and common courage (all of which, sadly, aren’t so common anymore…) to keep the door open and expose it for the depravity it is.

The below testimony is from Dr. Robert O. Young, who reveals how he and other doctors of his position are treated when they go against the health/medical establishment, and the corruption of multiple agencies accused of perpetuating, quote/unquote, “new viruses” on the public all for the sake of fear-mongering, and driving people to turn to drugs and vaccines to “cure/treat” them. In reality, the true purpose is so much worse.

It is, in no other better terms, the BIGGEST SCAM on humanity.

Some excerpts with timestamps below [embellishment has been added for emphasis]. All quotes by Robert Young unless otherwise stated:

Sacha Stone: “Our next witness is Dr. Robert O. Young, who has graciously come to be here today from California in the United States.

Dr. Robert Young is widely recognized as one of the top researchers and clinical scientists in the world. He has developed his life to researching the true causes of diseases, subsequently developing something known as the new biology, to help people around the world reverse any sickness, any ailment, any disease. And to begin to rebalance their lives to reclaim their health and their wellness.

Mr. Young is a controversial character, in as much as he appears to be. One of the most targeted individuals on Earth, amongst the 7.5 odd billion souls that inhabit the surface of the Earth. Mr. Robert Young is probably one of the top dozen targeted individuals by the global corporatocracy, the global pharmaceutical enterprise, that element of the global pharmaceutical enterprise, which appears, I say advisedly, appears to have been weaponized against humanity. And it is the very reason why we are here today, and this week. Unapologetically.

Dr. Robert Young, you are very welcome to this tribunal. Thank you for coming.”

Silencing dissenting opinions… not just from censorship

Robert O. Young @3:50:There are powers to be that want to put impediments in the way, to slow you down. And if you don’t slow down, then they notch it up a few. And they gave me a warning in 1996, where I was charged with two counts. Those went away because there was no evidence that they could prosecute me on. And yet, not wikipedia, I call it wackipedia, uses that as a bullet, because I learned that what the opposite side is trying to achieve is headlines. And the headlines is what they use through the media to destroy you.

I didn’t really get the picture, even after being on major network shows. Constantly on Fox news, having been on Oprah Winfrey, having a good relationship with Dr. Oz, who told me I was on the top 10 list – he was number 7; I was number 8. As you know he had to testify in front of Congress about his actions as he deviates away from conventional medicine to more alternative medicine thought. You notice that his program trains changed dramatically.

So… yes. I was on that top 10 list, as Sacha referred to. I wasn’t sure what that all meant, but as I saw my friends and colleagues being taken out one by one, through assassination, I realized that potentially I had my life at risk and I also realized, which I’m very very sensitive, because I love my family, I love my children, I love my grandchildren, that if they can’t get you, then they take out those who they love. And in January, one of those people was taken out, and he was a colleague and a friend. He’s no longer with us.”

Dr. Young wouldn’t approve of hospital protocols

@14:05: “I asked Dr. Jonathan, should I return back to medical school, and he said, “You wouldn’t survive it.” And I said, “Why?” He said, “Because you would get to the emergency room and start doing things that were totally off the protocol. You would not survive it, nor would you approve of what’s going on.” It wasn’t a matter of education or being able to comprehend, it was a matter of… “there would be a very difficult thing for you to be in that environment.”

“Over time, acquired two bachelors, three masters, and three doctorates. One being in nutrition. One being in biochemistry, which I’m still trying to help people understand, which is called pathological blood coagulation. People still read it and scratch their head. But it’s something that I really cherish and I’m happy to provide the court with this dissertation, pathological blood coagulation, because it answers a very very important question: “Why does the blood coagulate inside the blood vessel?” No one’s ever been able to figure that out. Well it took me many many years to figure it out and to write schematics on how that process happens. And a lot of the work that I’ve been doing over the last 30 – or 35 years, is a result of this.”

Malfeasance/bribery/coercion in the medical industry

@21:57: [referring to a former client who was treated from metastatic breast cancer by Robert O. Young] “she subsequently left the ranch and she went home and eventually she, for some reason, decided to move from what she believed in and was passionate about, that literally saved her life, and become a witness for the district attorney.

And it was one of the ones which was shocking because never did I ask for anything in return. There was no financial consideration. In fact I was paying her to be there, she wasn’t paying me to be there on the ranch. So there was no – my attorney at that time, says this is a perfect example of no good deed goes unpunished.

And during the trial she did testify against me. And… you know, as I looked into her eyes, I noticed that something had seriously changed. I still, today, am shocked when I even talk about it. I later learned that the district attorney, not so much from her, but from others, are offered financial consideration for testifying against me. I have an affidavit in my possession that one of those who worked for me and worked for me for close to 17 years was offered close to a hundred thousand dollars to testify against me.”

@26:15: “This woman which is just shocking and what was not presented at the case, it was not allowed to come in, were the PET scans from the oncologist showing the remission of her cancer. She was diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, three months after being on my program. Three months after, PET scans were taken, showing that there was no cancer anywhere in her body.”

 

@27:56:If however, someone like myself comes along with a new idea, that contradicts the credo that has been recited for years and passed on to others, and in fact, even threatened to overturn it, which my science does, then all passions are raised against this threat, and no method is left unturned to suppress it. People resist it in every way possible, pretending not to have heard of it. Speaking disparagingly of it. As if it were not even worth the effort of looking into the matter. And so a new truth can have a long wait before finally being accepted.”

No virus has ever been isolated

@30:31: “Once you understand the new biology, the new chemistry, the new physics, it literally underwrites everything you understand and even how wonderful and courageous Dale’s work is. Once he puts the other component, when he understands that the biggest fraud against this humanity, our humanity, is the fact that viruses have never been isolated! None!

There is no measle virus, and once you understand the basic chemistry and biology of the fraud that they’ve perpetuated on the human race and each year, if you ever thought about this, why is there a new virus every year? With a new name? With a similar types of symptomologies? This all started with the third reich, and Dr. Enders, and the so-called viruses. I write about this in one of my books. A Second Thoughts About Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV AIDS Hypothesis. And I’m not alone.

Those who have been brave enough, who stood up, even Peter Duesberg, at Berkeley University, a friend of mine, who wrote the book, Inventing AIDS Virus, lost all of his funding at the University. When the Nobel Prize winner for discovering the so-called HIV virus gets exiled to Beijing because he’s changing his mind about the existence of a virus. This is how bad things are.

What actually causes sickness?

@34:10: [while under house arrest] “But I didn’t stop working. I was not allowed to post to facebook. But I was still allowed to publish. And so I published a lot of the things that I’m talking about now even though it goes clear back to the 90’s. I began publishing in 2015 and 2016. And more recently, I shared this slide with the New Earth’s conference that 95% of all sickness and diseases are caused by what you eat, what you drink, what you breathe, and what you think. And I added additional thought in there. What you believe.

Your beliefs become biology. Only 5% of all sickness and disease is caused by genetics. And yet that 5% of genetics is only triggered based upon what you eat, what you drink, what you think, and what you believe. So you have to manage your thoughts. You have to manage your beliefs. Because they do change the biochemistry of the body.

Therefore, 100% of all sickness and disease is caused by what you eat, what you drink, what you breathe, what you think and what you believe.”

@37:38: “The unfortunate thing, many doctors do not understand this simple principle: germs do not cause disease. Period. We have been sold a bill of goods. We have been deceived.”

“We are putting you out of business. We are shutting you down.”

@46:03: “The trustee, of Martin Luther King, said to me, “Dr. Young, you have to be very careful. You are the Martin Luther King of the 21st century. Your message is so powerful, it destroys complete industries.”

When I was in China, when I lectured at Jinhua University, after my lecture, I was pulled aside again, he said, “Dr. Young, your science is incredible. But I want to say this, you are not Western medicine, you’re not Eastern medicine, you’re something totally different. You need to be very careful.”

At that time, being proud and youthful in my thinking, not having experienced the strong hand of the government, not having been charged 3 times: 1996, 1999, and then 2013. Having… maybe a little bit of egotistical thinking, ‘how can they ever get me?’

You can make up a lot of stuff. And uh, that’s what happened on July 23rd 2013. They came in; when I asked them what was their purpose? They had investigators, said, “We are putting you out of business.” “We are shutting you down.”

Why would you need drugs if natural treatment/diet can cure you?

@54:51: “And I want to stop this madness. I want to stop the so-called “good-doers”, who think they’re doing right, are doing evil. You can see it, in their eyes. You can feel it, in their voice.

Their only gratification is, they got their headline off of me. They published it on “wackipedia”, who – and google, who promotes disinformation, of what the truth really is. No one’s going to publish my pleomorphic documents. Because that would cause a lot of upset in the medical community. Well. It would also cause a lot of upset in big pharma. Why would you need drugs?

Mass chemical poisoning – to wipe out the “deplorables”

@57:00: “I would like to provide two papers that are published, The Possible Cause of Polio, Post-polio, CNS, PVIPD, Legionnaires, AIDS and the Cancer Epidemic – and the reason I did a hyphen? Because I know these aren’t viruses. It’s mass chemical poisoning.

People in New Zealand, that are doing this, aren’t doing it to kill the rats. The people that are doing this in India, are not doing it to kill the rats. The people that are doing this in New York, are not doing this to kill the rats. They are doing it to kill humanity; and wipe out the scourge of billions of people of those who they considered, you know, the “deplorables”. Quote, unquote, you know, Hillary Clinton.”

Dangerous substances in vaccines that we are injecting into children

@58:07: “So you asked the question of Dale, about vaccinations. This is what a child in the first years of life receives in micrograms and milligrams, etc.:

Screenshot taken from the video.

“This is what we are injecting into our newborn babies. As I said earlier, not in this format, the only thing you prove by vaccinating your children, is that if they live through it, is you just poisoned them and they survived it. There is no such thing as providing immunity or antibodies against these so-called assaults, when it’s not about the matter, it’s about the environment around the matter.”

“Viral existence has NEVER been scientifically demonstrated”

@1:01:26: “Viral existence has NEVER been scientifically demonstrated, it’s never even been proven, all viruses from HIV, EBV, CMV, Hepatitis C, West Nile Virus, Ebola, Measles, Zika, polio, the list goes on and on.

[shows slide] This is how you centrifuge for determining or demonstrating the existence of virus. This is what they talk about that they do.

Now here’s the fraud. They don’t do it! And if they do it, they don’t find a virus!”

Renaming the same “virus/illness” to perpetuate “cures/vaccines”

@1:03:48: “So you see polio incidence and pesticide production, as it rises up, and as it drops down – so we’re going to be seeing more incidence of paralysis – what they do, “We can’t have polio, we already cured that. So we’re going to put another name on it.”

That’s what they do in the cancer business. That’s what they’ve done in HIV. HIV would just quietly go away and there’ll be a new name for AIDS, auto-acquired immune deficiency.”

@1:04:21: “Poliomyelitis Incidence Timeline: from 1912 to 1970, why is Polio on the rise? Because DDT somewhere in the world is being used and they’re importing that food into the U.S. market. And if it’s not DDT, it’s Roundup. Glycophosphates. And they were so convinced that it was helpful, they actually sprayed it on everyone. Even children during school; they were sprayed.

So here we see the polio incidence and DDT production from 1940 to 70, in millions of pounds, and what happened as that came off? Has nothing to do with the efficacy of vaccines.

I want you to understand my position on this. See, once you understand that there’s no virus, what’s the point? What are you inoculating for? So what they did, they said, “Well wait a minute. Polio can’t come back. We have a cure. So let’s call it a… something else. Acute flaccid paralysis. Because we can’t have polio.”

Tragic deaths of multiple holistic/naturopathic doctors

Sacha Stone: @1:24:39: “Underpinning the imperative of this commission of inquiry, is the recent apparent murders, assassinations, of multiple natural practitioners and advocates of natural cures.”

“You also reminded us, incredibly succinctly, that we have made very little, if any, progress since the medieval times, as it relates to how the greatest souls amongst us – healing, treating, curing, redeeming, saving humanity from itself are witch hunted, as heretics, burned at the stake.”

Depopulation agenda by biological/chemical warfare

Sacha Stone: @1:32:14: “Where does any synthetic molecule serve the living?”

Robert Young: “They don’t. I mean, none.”

Sacha Stone: “And, am I right in suggesting that a medicine, by definition, is something which contains synthetic molecules. Something that is registered, patented, put in the market as a medicine?”

Robert Young: “Absolutely.”

Sacha Stone: “So, what I’m learning from you, Dr. Young, is that a quadrillion dollar enterprise is at work amongst us, decimating, culling, the human family…”

Robert Young: “Intentionally.”

Sacha Stone: “Intentionally. Using synthetic molecules, which by design are our cancer aids – “

Robert Young: “Yes, for the purpose of sterilization and population control. There’s too many people on the planet, we need to get rid of, in the words of Bill Gates, at least 3 billion people, need to die. So we’ll just start off in Africa, we’ll start doing our research there, and we’ll eliminate most of the Africans, because they’re deplorable. They’re worthless. They’re not part of this “world economy”. So they have their rights taken away, and they’re suppressed and they’re experimented.”

Sacha Stone: “And the multilateral agencies and the health and regulatory, so-called, authorities and agencies appear in the main to have become weaponized. And appear, I again use the word ‘appear’ advisedly, we’re not casting judgements here, we’re taking depositions listening to expert testimonies, appear to be weaponized, and appear to be working in collusion against the living men and women of the soil. Is that a fair statement?”

Robert Young: “It is. It’s not a bacterial war, it’s a systemic poisoning war. And they’re using chemical warfare against all of us.”

Sacha Stone: “Have you in your years defined anything close to the atoms seed of who and what they are? We know about the agencies, we understand the acronyms, but have you come close at all to identifying who and what they are?”

Robert Young: “I haven’t met these Luciferian people. Wherever they may be. They hide because they fear the light, of which I represent.”

Culling of at least a third of the population – using VACCINES – starting with Africa

Sir John Walsh of Brannagh ITNJ Chief Justice: “This is not a question. You said that you’d heard that there was basically a plan to eliminate a third of the population. A colleague – population of the world, and that Africa was the main target because the people there are worthless… I just want to say, that a colleague of mine, and I make it clear when I say ‘colleague’ – someone I know professionally who is very highly placed – he’s not a friend, he’s just someone I know who went to the conference at Davos just recently, and the people who go to Davos are the architects and controllers of money and the politics of the world, and he came back and he said to me, that it is a definite systematic plan, because they have worked out they need to get rid of at least a third of the people on the Earth. And I said to him, “Does that include me?” And he said, “No, it doesn’t include you, because you’re of European stock.”

Robert Young: “Yeah, well, these are not my words. These are Bill Gates’ words. Just google Bill Gates and depopulation and sterilization, and you’ll hear out of his own mouth the plan. And then if that’s not enough for you, then listen to Henry Kissinger, and his words, where he talks about how this is a win-win situation and the mandation and mandating vaccines is part of the plan for depopulation

“Never lose hope. You’re gonna win.”

Bishop Riah Abu el Assal ITNJ Commissioner @1:37:17: “I have much in common with you. I’ve been blacklisted for almost a quarter of a century. They try to plant weapons in our home. I was accused that I subsidized terroristic and subversive activity – different activities in Israel and the West Bank. And then I ended up invited by the different parties witnessing the Nobel Peace Prize given to Chairman Arafat, Prime Minister Lavigne, and later President Pence. I was there in Mosul. Never lose hope. You’re gonna win.”

For further reading of Dr. Robert O. Young and his views, please visit:
Dr. Robert O. Young | Your Ultimate Guide for Healthy Living

So many people are speaking out against this agenda. Good, honest people risking their livelihood, their reputation, their safety… for our sake.

Are we going to continue to turn a blind eye and deaf ear to them? Or finally open ourselves up to accepting the truth and commending these brave people for standing up against these corrupt institutions and take action? Stop consenting, bring these injustices to light, and hold the groups responsible accountable for these egregious crimes.

This takes an effort on everyone’s part. The media. The politicians. The health industry. The education system. The entertainment business. Big tech. Law enforcement. The government… There ARE honest people within all of these establishments. As corrupt as some of these institutions are. Perhaps people are unwittingly going along with the plan because they see no other choice.  YOU ARE THE CHOICE! When more and more people stand up and refuse this system, it crumbles and fails. Be a part of the fight FOR humanity. Not against it.

History is Repeating Itself: Fauci Was Accused of Genocide Almost 30 Years Ago

“The Greatest Lie Ever Told” …until now.

The very one and the same, Dr. Fauci, our coronavirus “expert”, has been accused of perpetuating a lie to the public surrounding infectious diseases not only currently (literally RIGHT NOW), but was also accused of practically the same thing almost 30 years ago.

The malpractice of using false PCR tests… raising alarm bells on a new “dangerous virus” – that was embellished for the sake of proposing a cure/not cure to the public, and resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths.

Sound familiar?

What began as a supposed epidemic of an AIDS outbreak back in the 1980’s to the 1990’s, Fauci has been called out by numerous sources for elaborating/manufacturing this lie.

One well-known figure who has spoken openly about Fauci’s fraudulent activities is Dr. Kary Mullis, who had no bones about picking a debate with the supposed expert.

I have cited this excerpt before, but it so relevant and significant, that I feel it necessary to add here again for reference:

PCR Inventory Kary Mullis on “Dr” Fauci:

He should not be in the position like he’s in.

Those guys have got an agenda. Which is not, what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to – and they smugly – like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”

“You can’t expect the sheep, to really respect the best and the brightest. They don’t know the difference, really. I mean, I like humans, don’t get me wrong, but, basically, there is a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn’t a really good scientist. I mean, that’s a problem, that’s a main problem, actually with science, I’d say in this century, because scientists being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don’t understand it.”

President of the University of South Carolina asked Fauci if he’d come down there and debate me on stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody who was, from the other side, to come down there and balance my – because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that’s going to tell me the other side. But Fauci didn’t want to do it…

In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.

The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.

But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done.

“I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.”

He pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.”

(Kary Mullis)
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus

As Celia Farber, the interviewer, mentions: “One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears.”

Robert Willner: Calls out Fauci by name for being a FRAUD

Another noted doctor, who wrote the book “Deadly Deception”, dealing with the so-called AIDS epidemic and the huge corruption/collusion to mislead the public, which you can read here:

Deadly Deception by Robert Willner

“THERE IS NO EPIDEMIC”

“YOU ARE THE VICTIM OF A MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR FRAUD”

“An incredible story of the arrogance, ignorance, corruption, and deception of establishment medicine, the pharmaceutical industry and agencies of the U.S. Government. A factual account, completely documented, of the most horrendous and deadly scientific fraud in history.”

had this to say about the Director of the NIH and current head of the coronavirus taskforce, and the insidious deceitful agendas committed at the time during the AIDS scandal:

The below quotes are several excerpts with the corresponding timestamps of Robert Willner’s perspective of Fauci and the pandemic fraud of the century at that time – (in which we now have “conveniently” Fauci again spearheading the current fraud of this century. NOT A COINCIDENCE.)

Robert Willner exposing the truth

@4:00: “But I am against lying to our young people. I am against causing death and destruction through that lie. I am against telling a lie to the young people so that they can continue in other behaviors which are truly causing AIDS.

Now you’ve got to ask yourself, the reason that I’m here today. And it’s been suggested that I’m here to sell a book. Called Deadly Deception. There’s only two ways that you can get the truth to people. By your own words out of your own mouth, and by putting them on paper. And that’s the reason for the book.

We’re talking about probably the most horrible scandal and scam ever perpetrated, not only in the name of science, but in humanity and in all history.

Hitler would ENVY the job being done by the NIH

@5:00: “Today is December 7th. And I was uh… 12 years old when the attack on Pearl Harbor came. And I remember WW2 very well. And it’s a very significant day today. Because I see an incredible parallel between what is going on in the so-called AIDS epidemic, and what happened in the years preceding and resulting in WW2.

The great lie of Hitler. It’s amazing. I think he would envy the job being done by members of the National Institutes of Health. And even the media. Especially in this country.

I charge the media with part of the responsibility; and a very significant one, in a current holocaust. That can end up being worse than the one that occurred during WW2.”

Media “proving” a deadly virus / but not scientists

@6:04: “When it was first announced that Dr. Robert Gallo had found the virus that probably caused AIDS, that announcement was made with Margaret Heckler in 1984 to the press and to the media, without one single scientific document appearing in any journal in the United States.

And as we know now, without any proof whatsoever, that the virus caused any disease.

The media picked up on it. For the sake of a story. And soon the virus that probably caused AIDS, was now the virus that caused AIDS. It was proven in the press. And nowhere else.

Now it’s interesting. A lot of questions are asked of me whenever I appear before the cameras, and do what some people have called “the stunt”, to sell books. – I’m from the planet Earth. I honestly believe that these people are from the planet Uranus. How anyone could suggest that I would stick myself with a virus that is supposedly deadly? For the purpose of selling a book; that’s complete insanity.”

Fauci guilty of genocide / killer drug

@7:24: “And I will put the lies of the individuals of the NIH, particularly Gallo and Fauci and [William] Haseltine and [Max] Essex, and the rest of these scoundrels, of the worst order. Criminals guilty of genocide, without a doubt. I invite them to take me to court! I wish Burroughs Wellcome would take me to court. Because they have been putting out a killer drug knowingly!

Dissenting expert opinions that go against the narrative

@8:03: “Now I’m not alone in what I’m doing here today. How does the press escape such obvious truths? Why would the finest virologist in the world, the most noted virologist, member of our National Academy of Sciences, Peter Duesberg, why would he put his entire career on the line? What did he have to gain? He’s already lost his laboratory. And his funding. They can’t take away his professorship because he’s tenured.

Why would a Charles A. Thomas, professor of Merit of Harvard say the same thing? Why would Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize in Virology last year, why would he stick his neck out? What did he have to gain? These are the questions reporters should be asking.

Deadly drugs causing acquired immunity deficiency

@9:32: “We have known what causes acquired immunity deficiency diseases for at least 70 years. It’s in the medical textbooks. It’s there for you to read.

Number one cause on the face of this Earth, is malnutrition and starvation. That’s Africa. Look to the headlines of the October 3rd issue of the London Times, Sunday Times last year [1993]. And inside headlines that screamed across 2 pages “The Plague That Never Was”.

@10:20: “There is no epidemic! It doesn’t exist!”

@10:54:Number two, is drugs. And don’t just think of street drugs. Because the number one cause of AIDS today is actually TWO medical drugs! AZT. A drug that was discovered in the 60’s as a chemotherapeutic drug for cancer. And was shelved because it was too toxic to treat cancer. A drug worse than cancer. Is being used to treat people who are immuno-suppressed.”

[Number three cause of AIDS], is radiation. Whether they worry about Chernobyl and Nagasaki and Hiroshima.”

Number four, is chemotherapy.

The most toxic chemo therapeutic drug of all times, AZT, is what they’re now using to treat AIDS.

Corruption of pharma drugs and sabotaged tests

@12:40: “But did anybody here bother to look at the insert, the paper that comes with the drug?

It’s a DNA terminator! It means it is a terminator! Just like the movie. It terminates life! You terminate DNA, you terminate life.”

“And they talk about side effects in the insert. When are you going to learn there is no such thing as a side effect in medicine? It’s an unwanted DIRECT effect! And you know what one of the unwanted direct effects of AZT is? Lymphoma! Cancer! One of the diseases of AIDS, as they call it.

Oh! Another so-called side effect? Which is really an unwanted direct effect? Pancytopenia. You need a definition? Pancytopenia.
Pan, “all”. Cyto, “cells”. Penia, “loss of”. Loss of all your cells. That’s AIDS. That is the definition of AIDS.

So AZT, by definition, by their own drug insert, causes AIDS. And NOBODY survives AZT. That will eventually lead to your death. And they’ve cut the dosage way down! Because it was killing them too fast. It’s like giving somebody a large dose of strychnine and they die within 5 minutes. And so the next person you give them a few drops of it and they last four or five days and you say, “Strychnine’s a wonderful drug. This person last 5 times longer.” This is the kind of thing they present to the world.”

NIH and CDC complicit in perpetrating mass fraud cover-up

@14:35:It is a scandal and a scam beyond belief. The virologists who are responsible for this, what do they have to gain? Now, I don’t know what Duesberg had to gain, or Charles A. Thomas, or Kary Mullis; he already got his Nobel Prize. Why does he come out and say? And he’s the one who found the test. The PCR reaction. And he said that there is no body of evidence that supports that the virus causes any disease whatsoever.

But what about the individuals who have perpetrated this lie? They are all multi-millionaires.

What do we have to say about the National Institutes of Health when a private laboratory, independent laboratory, found AZT to be 1,000 times more toxic than the laboratory of the NIH? We can understand a 5% error in the laboratory, even a 10% error – but a 10,000% error? Or a 100,000% error? That’s fraud.

And as I understand it, the word has gone out, and there is even documents and letters to prove it. That the CDC, the same organization that let blacks go untreated with syphilis, well-documented, just to see what would happen with the disease. The same organization who had to admit that they can’t give in on the AIDS thing, now, because nobody would ever be able to trust the government.”

“Science” and politicians – one in the same…

@16:17: “But “science” is acting no differently than politicians do. And now we have disease by politics.”

Premeditated patents and HIGHLY inaccurate tests

@16:25: “Isn’t it strange, that the same day or the day after, Robert Gallo filed for a test for HIV after it was announced? This sounds like premeditation. You mean he just happened to have this test available? And so the same day or the following day he files for a patent? He had a test. He was simply looking for some kind of a disease he wanted to apply it to.

And that test… 30,000 Russians who tested positive for HIV were then tested with another test that’s supposedly far more accurate to confirm the positivity. And 66 out of 30,000 proved to be positive. That means that the test HIV is 99.997% inaccurate. You want to take a test that’s 3 thousandths of a percent right? And you’re going to rely on that? But that’s what they’re doing to people out there. They’re taking a test that is not only invalid, it’s TOTALLY misleading!”

How Fauci believes an “epidemic” virus gets around

@18:09: “And of course, Fauci said, that you need, or when he was answering what I did, in Cleveland, a week ago, he said, “Well, he’s going to have to stick himself 300 times, to transmit the virus.” Where are you people in the press? 300 times?! To transmit a virus? You cannot have an epidemic under those circumstances!”

Fauci and Gallo engaging in name-calling instead of facing scientific queries

@20:21: “And if you hear an argument amongst politicians, and one calls the other names and doesn’t answer the specific charges, scientifically, who’s the liar?

Fauci and Gallo, instead of answering the scientific conflicts, and contradictions, that Dr. Duesberg so brilliantly pointed out, instead of answering them, they call him a homophobe. Can you imagine? I’ve been called a homophobe too.”

Viruses are apparently prejudice too…

@21:01: I wonder, I come here with a message of hope, to not only the gays, but to the blacks, and the hispanics, and the all the other outcasts of society, which strangely enough are the only groups that have been connected with the so-called AIDS. Because you see, if you belong to one of those groups, you got AIDS. But if you don’t belong to one of those groups, you get the respectable diagnosis of ‘you have tuberculosis’, ‘you have lymphoma’, ‘you have leukemia’, ‘you have kaposi sarcoma’, ‘pneumocystis pneumonia’, 30+ diseases!”

Suppressed from the media – just a propaganda machine

@22:33: “So every time I’ve stuck myself with a needle, I get calls from major television shows, by excited young people who want to tell the truth. Then I get a call three days later, telling me that it’s been nixed at a higher level.

That’s no surprise. After all, who am I fighting? Two drug industries. One, supposedly legitimate, and the other, illegitimate. And they do an awful lot of advertising. The supposedly legitimate ones. All those things out there that they sell for your colds and for everything else that’s a pharmaceutical industry, and they also put out prescription drugs, most of them. And they pull the purse strings. And so we have, a better propaganda machine in the United States, than Hitler had in his time.

Fauci and Gallo, along with their cohorts, getting paid to murder

@23:46: “The liars and killers, like Fauci, and Gallo, and Haseltine and Essex and Flossie Wong-Staal, and Margaret Fischl, these people are getting by with the lie and getting paid immense sums of money for it, and praise from the rest of the world. While they murder.”

The government/health agencies want to give us a vaccine – even if we’re immune to a virus

@32:03: “They [government/health agencies] just spent another 20 billion dollars in only 10 years time. And they’re asking for more. [after spending billions of dollars failing to find a cancer virus] And now they want to give us a vaccine! See? Oh, well they make money with that. They not only have a test for HIV, which by the way, is not for the virus, it’s for immunity. Like I say, “It’s the first disease in the history of medicine where you’re immune to it you’re going to die from it.”

But now, they want to give us a vaccine.”

Why would some scientists risk their reputation to speak against the narrative? – Maybe because they’re HONEST

@33:34: “And yet, you want to condemn me and say that I’m out for publicity? Well what is it that Peter Duesberg is out for? He held the reputation, and still amongst honest scientists as being the foremost virologist in the world. What is Kary Mullis out for? He just won the Nobel Prize. Why does he want to put at risk that incredibly marvelous reputation of being a Nobel Prize winner? Why would he put that at risk, unless maybe there’s still some honest scientists around. 

Now what about the rest of them out there?”

The lie is being perpetuated, by those who keep silent

@34:12: “You know, I often ask myself the question, if my children were still in school, and I had house payments to make, and I had to put them through school, etc., would I be doing what I’m doing today? I don’t think I’ve ever answered the question because I’m… I’m kind of afraid of what I might answer if I was going to answer honestly.

And he who is without sin shouldn’t be casting any stones. So I won’t cast the stones at the thousands and thousands and thousands of virologists out there who are going along with this scam. Because you see, they would be out of jobs if they dared criticize Margaret Heckler, or the heads of the NIH. They’d be out of jobs and they’d have families that they have to support. And futures that would be down the drain. You don’t cross the establishment. And so the lie is being perpetuated, by the silence.

And even Gallo, would say to the press in answer to the question, what does he have to say about Duesberg’s challenges? And he says, “Well, if we’re wrong, why do so many people believe us?” I mean, I can just see Hitler and his stormtroopers saying to the press, “If we’re wrong, why does everybody do what we tell them to do?”

The choice we all have to make

@36:46: “If enough of the honest ones would stand up and take that chance, if you all stand together, you make a statement. And you can do that in your press associations. Even though the people who own the newspapers and the television shows are afraid of losing their sponsors, you can at least keep your dignity. 

That’s the choice you have to make.”

We all make mistakes – but we can still be decent and compassionate to each other

@38:03: “There’s no dishonor in being gay and admitting that you’ve been on drugs. The decent human beings in this world will give you the support and help you. Like we help drug addicts of all followings, so to speak.

Those that will turn against you have turned against you anyway. Because of what you feel and what you are. And there are even some religious groups who have turned against the gays, and said it was God’s vengeance. How can you believe in a loving God and believe that that God would cause such a terrible disease amongst humans?

No, this is a man caused disease. But we all make mistakes in life. And that shouldn’t stop the compassion and the love and the understanding of decent human beings.”

The ‘greatest lie ever told’ by “health criminals”

@42:15: [while injecting himself with the blood of an AIDS positive gentleman] “I say to my friends, Fauci, and Gottlieb, and Galpin, and Gallo and all the rest of those criminals, that this is for the sake of humanity, and no other reason.”

“And this is in the hopes that it’ll save the lives of millions of individuals who will die because of the greatest lie ever told.”

“It’s real easy to create an epidemic.”

@47:51: “It’s real easy, it’s real simple, to create an epidemic. You simply take a bunch of diseases and put them under one heading, and then claim that one virus is responsible for it.”

The TRUTH will destroy the credibility of the NIH, CDC, FDA, etc.

@49:43: “It wasn’t suitable for a scoundrel, like Robert Gallo in the 1940’s – he wasn’t old enough, or maybe he was born just about that time, for somebody to come along and to pull off a scam of this magnitude.

And now they’re caught up in a maelstrom. Now if the truth gets out, yes, it will deal a blow to the credibility of the NIH, and the CDC, and the FDA, and the AMA, and my God it is sorely needed! That blow is necessary! To clean up the act.”

CDC: “You have AIDS even if you have not tested for HIV”

@01:04:04: “The CDC that let syphilitics untreated, when they had drugs that could have treated – just to observe, the same CDC has already admitted that between 40 and 60% of the cases listed in AIDS were not even tested for HIV. And not that it makes any difference because the test is meaningless.”

“A person can have HIV without developing AIDS, but it is not possible to have AIDS without first having HIV.”

HIV vs. AIDS: What is the difference?

Malfeasance/lies of the health industries. Men and women responsible belong in jail.

@01:06:41: “The lie is so compounded and so idiotic and so unbelievable that you literally have to fight your way out of the maze of these lies! They are all unadulterated lies! And the men responsible for them, and women, belong in jail.”

How does disease fester? And can we prevent it?

@01:12:34: “In the United States, in 1919, 18 million people died of the flu. My question is, why didn’t the other 92 million die? The answer to that, and every reporter owes it to their readers, is very simple. The bugs do not cause the disease, unless there’s a suitable terrain. And so the answer to all disease, is not to take a shotgun and blow a human being apart. But to simply prevent the disease to begin with, by living at peace and in harmony, not only with your fellow human beings but with every organism on this planet.”

Now for a quick comparative rundown between the AIDS epidemic around 30 years ago, and the covid situation we have now:

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana

Or, those who don’t learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.

We are LITERALLY, right now, in the middle of history repeating itself. And if we don’t become aware and alert to these heinous agendas, a repeat of the Holocaust may be looming on the horizon.

We can stop it by banding together, realizing that we are being lied to on a MASSIVE SCALE, and refuse to participate in this system. It takes courage and integrity, but as so many HONEST doctors and scientists, inventors, activists, virologists, even former ceo’s/founders of the vaccine companies (Michael Yeadon, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Reiner Fuellmich, Pierre Kory, Carrie Madej, Sherri Tenpenny, Dolores Cahill, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Sucharit Bhakdi, Andrew Wakefield, Simone Gold, Andrew Kaufman, Charles Hoffe, etc., etc., etc.) are in the forefront and risking their reputation to warn us that this coronavirus/vaccine agenda is not what it seems, and is a dangerous affront to humanity. They, just like Peter Duesberg, Charles A. Thomas, Robert Willner, Kary Mullis – all of these brave people came out into the public light to expose this corruption – which, unironically, also involved Anthony Fauci.

There ARE honest people getting the truth out. And their sincere efforts and dedication is appreciated beyond measure. But we NEED to listen. Or we will continue to be victims of this planned genocide that has been long in the making.