Down the Rabbit Hole: “Conspiracy Theories” Playing Out in Real Time

Scandalous plots? Yes. They have been planned for a long time…

It amazes me, that even with all the resources we have today, and all of the brave people coming forward or even offering information anonymously in order to expose dark corruptions going on in our world, some people will still not realize this and instead refuse to believe any such conspiracy could be possible. There are even doctors and scientists that state, point blank, what they are aiming for. And people will STILL NOT BELIEVE that it is happening.

Their arguments usually contain some form of the following, if not all of them:

“But why would they do this? It doesn’t make sense.”

“I find it hard to believe that a world-wide conspiracy for a “new world order” is possible. Too many people would have to be involved. Somebody would say something.” (That’s exactly what some people are doing, but people are still not believing them…)

“That’s just a crazy conspiracy theory. You crazy conspiracy theorist.”

“Bill Gates is wonderful. He’s spending billions of dollars to help us. I can’t believe you think he’s some evil villain.” (Not to say that I think he’s an evil villain… *cough*)

“There’s no way they have a diabolical plan to inject people with harmful substances. You watch too much tv.”

I’m sure you get the gist of it.

Yes, trying to wake people up is a difficult endeavor. Us critical thinkers can point out the obvious, but it’s up to them to actually LOOK at what is presented, and come to an epiphany that, “Wow, they may be right after all.” Instead of plugging their ears and closing their eyes, saying, “La la la! I can’t hear you!”

Therefore, I am going to present some actual footage and forms that show that what is going on around us RIGHT NOW has been already planned by immoral agencies for decades/centuries/millenia.

Keep in mind, this is just a small sample out of all of the testimonies and admissions that have been exposed. While some may be anecdotal in nature, it cannot be lost on us that some of these testimonies and reveals were made many years ago, and as we can see in our current timeline, these agendas are being played out as stated.

(Also be aware, due to the nature of our reality, some of these propositions may be somewhat unorthodox depending on one’s belief structure… which is another topic that needs to be seriously looked into without automatically caving into a dismissive attitude. While it may be hard to believe, especially for those who are more inclined to believing only in a physical/materialistic world, the implications that this physical construct is most certainly not our true being is the core of the struggles we’re enduring today.)

This post contains disturbing material.

Jump to:

1. Rudolf Steiner predicted (in 1917) worldwide vaccines to damage/alter our personality/spirituality

1917

(All quotes by Rudolf Steiner. Some embellishment added for emphasis)

“The time will come — and it may not be far off — when quite different tendencies will come up at a congress like the one held in 1912 and people will say: It is pathological for people to even think in terms of spirit and soul. ‘Sound’ people will speak of nothing but the body. It will be considered a sign of illness for anyone to arrive at the idea of any such thing as a spirit or a soul. People who think like that will be considered to be sick and — you can be quite sure of it — a medicine will be found for this. At Constantinople the spirit was made non-existent. The soul will be made non-existent with the aid of a drug. Taking a ‘sound point of view’, people will invent a vaccine to influence the organism as early as possible, preferably as soon as it is born, so that this human body never even gets the idea that there is a soul and a spirit.”

“…the heirs of modern materialism, will look for the vaccine to make the body ‘healthy’, that is, makes its constitution such that this body no longer talks of such rubbish as soul and spirit…”

“Materialistic physicians will be asked to drive the souls out of humanity.”

Source: Fall of the Spirits of Darkness | Fall/Darkness: Lecture 5: Changes in Humanity’s Spiritual Make-up

1917

Rudolf Steiner: “I have told you that the spirits of darkness are going to inspire their human hosts, in whom they will be dwelling, to find a vaccine that will drive all inclination towards spirituality out of people’s souls when they are still very young, and this will happen in a roundabout way through the living body. Today, bodies are vaccinated against one thing and another; in future, children will be vaccinated with a substance which it will certainly be possible to produce, and this will make them immune, so that they do not develop foolish inclinations connected with spiritual life — ‘foolish’ here, of course, in the eyes of materialists.”

Source: Fall of the Spirits of Darkness | Fall/Darkness: Lecture 13: The Fallen Spirits’ Influence in the World

You can read the entire lecture, which delves in deeper into the subject of spirituality, human evolution and our morality, and even the hidden influences that coerce us into specific decision making, here.

The above quotes mention specifically the advent of a vaccine to drive out any inclinations of spirituality and souls from human beings. Very strange that a materialistic physician would even entertain the idea if they did not believe in this aspect to begin with. Of course, if they believe that it is only a false belief and not a real essence, then I’m sure scientists really could attempt to address this “problem” by attacking the brain, perhaps, maybe even by genetically modifying our dna, let’s say, and/or performing surgery on the “disillusioned believer”.

How could they do this? Maybe through a worldwide effort to inject everyone with a vaccine that targets this phenomena – just as a far out theory? (I mean, it’s not like there’s an agenda to vaccinate the whole world in today’s time, right?)

Which brings me to the released footage from 2005, allegedly from the Pentagon describing this very process.

2. Meeting (from 2005) announcing vaccine/respiratory illness to suppress spirituality/religious inclinations (FunVax / VMAT2 / God gene)

Transcript from the above video (again, embellishment added for emphasis):

2005

FunVax scientist: “On the left over here, we have individuals who are religious fundamentalists, religious fanatics. And this is the expression of rt-pcr, real-time pcr expression of the VMAT2 gene.

Over here we have individuals, so – so let me complete –  so over here we have individuals who are not particularly fundamentalists, not particularly religious, and you can see there’s a much reduced expression of this particular gene – that the VMAT2 gene.

Another evidence that, that supports our hypothesis for the development of this approach. -“

Audience attendee: “What you’re suggesting here is by, by spreading this virus we’re going to eliminate individuals from donning on a bomb vest and going into a market, blowing up the market.”

FunVax scientist: “So our hypothesis is that these are fanatical people, that they have over expression of the VMAT2 gene and that by vaccinating them against this, will eliminate this behavior.

So we have some, some very, very remarkable data in this next slide. Here we have two brain scans, these are fMRIs – these are two different individuals with different levels of expression of the VMAT2.

On top is an individual who’s a religious fanatic, and individual, and we’ve repeated this numerous times that, that has high levels of VMAT2. Now, um, this individual down here who had low levels of the VMAT2 gene, this individual would self-describe as, as not particularly religious. In each case, these individuals were read a religious text – this individual light – lit up the right middle frontal gyrus, shown here, and that’s a part of the brain that’s associated with theory of mind. It’s a part of the brain that has to do with intense and in beliefs and desires.

In contrast, in mark contrast, here’s an individual who would not particularly self-describe as, as religious, and when they’re read a religious text, what you see is that this part of the brain called the anterior insula lights up. This is a part of the brain that’s associated with disgust or displeasure on hearing something.”

Audience attendee: “Do you suggesting, like, take a CT scan with me when I’m evaluating people to determine whether I put a bullet in their head?”

FunVax scientist: “So, so um the data that I’m presenting here, uh, supports the concept that we’re proposing, uh, and I think that we would not propose to do CT scans or fMRIs on individuals out in the hinterlands of Afghanistan.

The virus would immunize against this VMAT2 gene and that would have the effect that you see here which is, it’s essentially to turn a fanatic into a, a normal person. And we think that will have major effects in the Middle East.”

Audience attendee: “How would you suggest that this is going to be dispersed? Aerosol? Or…?”

FunVax scientist: “Well, so, so the present plan, and the test that we’ve done so far have used respiratory viruses such as flu, or rhinoviruses, and we believe that that’s a satisfactory way to get the exposure of the largest part of the population. Most of us, of course, have been exposed to both of those viruses and we’re, we’re quite confident that this will be a very successful approach.”

Audience attendee: “This is fascinating. What’s the name of this proposal?”

FunVax scientiest: “Yes, so, so the name of this project is FunVax, which is the vaccine for religious fundamentalism.

Audience attendee: “And you have a proposal already?”

FunVax Scientist: “The proposal has just been submitted and I think that the data that I have shown you today would, would support the, the development of this project and we think it has great promise.”

Footage from a proposed FunVax Documentary initiated by Ryan Harper that I don’t believe has been fully created yet… for one reason or another:

Source: youtube | FunVaxDoc | Is FunVax Possible? Dean Hamer and FunVax Scientist Discuss

(If any of the links on this site no longer work or exist, please let me know. Citing sources is very important and since certain sites go through purges, I’d like to be informed if this goes down so I can rectify it if I can. Thanks!)

Transcript: (embellishment added)

Narrator: “So let’s get back to reality for a minute. Is a vaccine against religious fundamentalism even possible?”

Same FunVax scientist from leaked 2005 footage: “So somebody asked me to design a vaccine for religious fundamentalism or fanaticism, uh, basically what I would do is to try to better understand why people are fanatical. Why do they have extreme behavior? Uh, it’s pretty clear these days that, that all behavior results from, uh, activity of our own brains. And so there must be pathways that are important in generating this kind of behavior.”

Dean Hamer (worked as director of the Gene Structure and Regulation Unit and as an independent research at the NIH): “So if indeed spirituality is this series of chemical reactions in the brain, and if it can be enhanced by certain types of drug, then, natually it follows that it can be inhibited as well. ‘Cause for every activator there must be an inhibitor. And so I can easily imagine under the right circumstances, the right stimuli, or the right drugs, and the right inhibitors, might have some effect on a person’s spirituality.

At least in the short run. Whether or not that would have a long term effect, or people would undergo homeostasis and alter, uh, is an open question. We really don’t know the answer to that.”

FunVax scientist: “It would be quite useful to eliminate some of the fanatical, um… religious nuts in the world. And I think that, that, um, maybe a vaccine would be the way to do that. It’s difficult to know how successful it would be, but it’s certainly an interesting idea. From the point of view of a, uh, medical professional, um, the question of spreading a virus that is – has not been approved by regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, is a major issue.

For additional investigation and information into this VMAT2 / vaccine proposal, please visit:

FUNVAX – Revisited
Interview With Joey Lambardi About The Fundamentalism Vaccine (FunVax)
Geneticist claims to have found ‘God gene’ in humans

Dean Hamer “The GOD Gene: How Faith is Hardwired into Our Genes” (published in 2004)

TIME magazine “THE GOD GENE” (October 25, 2004 edition)

Proof is right in front of your eyes. Now whether you choose to believe “fact-checking” and “debunking” websites, that are EMPLOYED/FINANCIALLY SUPPORTED by the very same organizations that are under question, or whether you decide to give the honest journalists/researchers/concerned citizens trying to expose the corruption a try (and keep an open mind) remains up to you.

“You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink.”

You can lead a person to the facts, but you can’t make him believe it.”

3. Who is a “religious fanatic”? Sounds like it could be a cult to me…

Now that brings me to, how do you label a “religious fundmentalist”? Whose right is it to determine who is a “religious nut” – a label graciously attributed by a scientist whom we’re all supposed to trust because we’re always told to “trust the science” and “trust the experts”, and who also believes it would be, and again I quote, “quite useful to eliminate some (of them)”?

What if I were to label this scientist and Dean Hamer, and all other researchers/scientists who aim to discover everything there is to know about humanity, life and the world, and who would go to such great lengths that upset the moral, ethical boundaries that no one should ever cross all in the “name of science”, as a “science fundamentalist”, who are just as damaging, if not EVEN MORE SO, than these religious fanatics?

Can we honestly say that scientists/inventors have not done horrific crimes “all in the name of science”? (That was a rhetorical question.)

Now besides just mentioning scientists and religious fanatics, I also have to bring up other cult-like organizations.

Michael Aquino (founder of the Temple of Set) is a very recognizable name involved in the US military/pentagon and engaged in the MK-ultra mind control experiments, as well as satanic practices, with a notable connection to Anton LaVey. (Satanic Subversion of the U.S. Military / The Satanic Subversion Of The United States Military)

Jack Parsons is another popular name (founder of NASA) who had extensive ties to the occult and a fascination with Aleister Crowley. (The Occult Rocket Scientist Who Conjured Spirits with L. Ron Hubbard)

Yet, there are still people who refuse to believe that something untoward may be happening right within our government organizations. Claiming that just because someone believes in “satan” or “lucifer”, doesn’t mean they’re engaging in wicked, evil acts. Even when there are witness testimonies describing their horrible encounters with these types of cult.

Svali (raised in a corrupt cult society)

A thorough exposé into the life of an alleged Illuminati member can be found here: Svali Speaks

In it, she details how she grew up in a cult – how they are raised, how she was trained to raise others, the tragic situations that are perpetuated in the “family” in order to essentially brainwash the members into blindly following orders and remaining loyal to their cause.

It is a horrific look into how children are treated in this organization, creating dissociative identity disorders that the higher members of the cult can control and call on through certain predetermined methods.

Here are some key excerpts from a detailed e-mail correspondence, purportedly between Svali and H.J. Springer (editor of centrexnews) in 2000:

2000

(all quotes by Svali)
“The Illuminati is a group that practices a form of faith known as “enlightenment”. It is Luciferian, and they teach their followers that their roots go back to the ancient mystery religions of Babylon, Egypt, and Celtic druidism. They have taken what they consider the “best” of each, the foundational practices, and joined them together into a strongly occult discipline. Many groups at the local level worship ancient deities such as “El”, “Baal”, and “Ashtarte”, as well as “Isis and Osiris” and “Set”.”

“The national council [consists of] influential bankers with old money such as: The Rockefellers, the Mellon family, the Carnegie family, the Rothschild family, etc.”

(after a ritualistic child sacrifice): “Afterwards, the man in scarlet, he had a huge golden ring on his hand. He came over to the center of the room. He had each of the people that were swearing that day go forward and kneel before him and kiss his ring, and [I had to ] swear my allegiance to the New Order, to the New World Order for all … until my death.”

“The Freemasons and the Illuminati are hand in glove. I don’t care if this steps on any toes, it’s a fact. The Masonic temple at Alexandria, Virginia (the city itself was named after Alexandria, Egypt, and is a hotbed of Illuminati activity) is a centre in the Washington, DC area for Illuminati scholarship and teaching.”

“Are all Masons Illuminati? No, especially at the lower levels, I believe they know nothing of the practices that occur in the middle of the night in the larger temples.”

“Many of the administrators and directors at the FBI are also Illuminists. The CIA helped bring over German scientists after WWII. Many of these were also Illuminati leaders in their own country, and they were welcomed with open arms by the U.S. group. They also funnelled all information they were learning to the Illuminati. The scientists that ran MK-Ultra and other governmental mind control programs were Illuminists brought over from Nazi Germany.”

“Remember those studies that stated that “TV violence doesn’t affect children’s behaviour” years ago? Guess who funded them? They are a bunch of bullcrud. What a person watches DOES influence them, and this is well known by the behaviourists in the group. In fact, they know that TV is a tool that they purposely use to influence “the masses”. It cannot create a total personality change in the average citizen, but it can desensitize us increasingly to violence, pornography and the occult, and influence the perceptions of young children.”

“The evidence is there, but in my opinion, the average person does not want to know, and even when confronted with it, will look the other way. The Franklin case is a point. How much evidence has come out? Or the MK-ULTRA documents that have been declassified, shown as real, and people ignore it.”

” The Illuminists don’t care who prints this stuff or if they are “exposed”, because they are counting on the majority not believing it, having done a pretty good job with a media blitz campaign. Seen any articles in Newsweek or Time that addresses this other than as a laughable conspiracy theory? Guess who owns Time-Warner?

I have heard them laughing about this very thing in leadership meetings five years ago, and I doubt their attitude has changed much since then.”

For a full account, please visit: Exclusive Interview with Ex-Illuminati Bloodline Programmer/Trainer Svali

There is also the interview Svali did with Investigative Journal Greg Szymanski in 2006 that you could listen to below.

RELATED:  CIA Mind Control Experiments | Declassified Documents Reveal Sex Abuse, More

The Vatican is also HUGELY implicated in initiating these satanic rituals. Greg Szymanski, the same man who interviewed Svali in 2006, published this article highlighting the suspicious activity and some high profile individuals involved with the Vatican rituals: Satanic Black Masses at the Vatican

Now, while there are other whistleblowers and former members that have spoken out against this indoctrination/corrupt society, I want to mention a specific gentleman who was not necessarily born into a cult, but was introduced to one when he was an influential banker at the time, before he left this system after a harrowing encounter.

4. Ronald Bernard’s testimony: The attack on children

Ronald Bernard was a former criminal dealer who was introduced into the dark underworld by some colleagues who thought he was ready to be inducted into their satanic rituals. Little did they know, this would instead be the breaking point for Ronald, and allowed him to tap into the light he had within himself in order to leave this corrupted establishment, and pursue a life dedicated to spreading awareness and creating peaceful unity.

Below are a couple of videos with some excerpts of Ronald’s testimony, expressing the horrific reality of black mass and the egregious agenda of targeting our children to be raised in a corrupt society.

Ronald Bernard: “To put it carefully, most of these people followed a not very mainstream religion. So you have Catholics, Protestants, all sort of religions.

These people, most of them, were Luciferians.

And then you can say, religion is a fairy tale. God doesn’t exist. None of that is real. Well, for these people it is truth and reality, and they served something immaterial, what they called Lucifer.

And I also was in contact with those circles, only I laughed at it because to me they were just clients.

So I went to places called Churches of Satan.”

Interviewee: “So now we are talking about Satanism?”

Ronald: “Yes. So I visited these churches, just as a visitor, dropped by, and then they were doing their (un)Holy Mass with naked women and liquor and stuff, and it just amused me.

I didn’t believe in any of this stuff, and was far from convinced if any of this was real.”

Interviewee: “It was just a spectacle to you…”

Ronald: “Yes, in my opinion the darkness and evil is within the people themselves. I didn’t make the connection yet.

So I was a guest in those circles and it amused me greatly to see all those naked women and the other things. It was the good life.

But then at some point, I was invited, which is why I’m telling you all this, to participate in sacrifices, abroad.

(long pause)

That was the breaking point.

Children.”

Interviewee: “You were asked to do that…?”

Ronald: “Yes, and I couldn’t do that.”

Interviewee: “Would you like to stop for a moment, by the way?”

Ronald: “No. And then I started to slowly break down.

I lived through quite a lot as a child myself and this really touched me deeply.

Everything changed.

But that is the world I found myself in.”

(all quotes by Ronald Bernard)

“Because if we need to throw it all out there, because people stay where they are, that is the problem! The good people.

It is not the bad people, there are only a few, bad people do their thing, but it is the good people, worldwide, who do nothing. For a very long time, and I am a little angry with them.

Because when I was in my youth, between 15-20, via family, first line, I heard stories from nurses who were sent to India for a mission for development assistance over there.

Those people… I am trying to control myself.

Those people, were burnout after four or five years, completely traumatized, nurses, back in the Netherlands. No one was allowed to know.

But what was this all about? Children, again. Every time – children!

Organ trafficking.

We just think it is normal for a baby to be saved, but where do these organs come from?

And those children are still alive the moment they remove their organs. Those nurses could not cope with it anymore. India.

I am not sure if this is still going on right now. World, stand up! Go, find out!

Organ trafficking! Children! No one is talking about that. No one is taking action.

Those satanists – f*ck them! That is just a pathetic tiny little group. Organ trafficking worldwide. The god Mammon.

And I can testify – start with damaging little children from early on, and your world becomes even sicker.”

Source: Ronald Bernard – About child organ harvesting – Dutch with subs

5. Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Mr. Ronald Bernard makes numerous references to these Protocols, stating that most of these dark agendas we see going on in our world today can be found in this book.

According to the link he provided us, where you can read the whole English translation: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, this book was “first published in the year 1897 by Philip Stepanov for private circulation among his intimate friends.”

The introduction from this file also states the following, “The Jewish journals, of course, say that they are a forgery, leaving it to be understood that Professor Nilus, who embodied them in a work of his own, had concocted them for his own purposes.

Mr. Henry Ford, in an interview published in the New York WORLD, February 17th, 1921, put the case for Nilus tersely and convincingly thus:

“The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT NOW.”

I am not going to attempt to verify who is wholly responsible for these protocols. Whether they are a “forgery” or a “psyop”, a legitimate code, or what have you.

But I will highlight some of the more impertinent parts of this publication (again, written back in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s), that is extremely unsettling when comparing it to today’s current affairs.

1897

(all quotes from the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion)

Economic Wars / DESTRUCTIVE EDUCATION: “2. The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers, specialists bred and reared from early childhood to rule the affairs of the whole world.”

5. In the hands of the States of to-day there is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the Press. The part played by the Press is to keep pointing out requirements supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the complaints of the people, to express and to create discontent. It is in the Press that the triumph of freedom of speech finds its incarnation. But the GOYIM States have not known how to make use of this force; and it has fallen into our hands. Through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade; thanks to the Press we have got the GOLD in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather it out of the oceans of blood and tears. But it has paid us, though we have sacrificed many of our people. Each victim on our side is worth in the sight of God a thousand GOYIM.”

Materialism Replaces Religion / WE SHALL DESTROY GOD: “3. But even freedom might be harmless and have its place in the State economy without injury to the well-being of the peoples if it rested upon the foundation of faith in God, upon the brotherhood of humanity…

With such a faith as this a people might be governed by a wardship of parishes, and would walk contentedly and humbly under the guiding hand of its spiritual pastor submitting to the dispositions of God upon earth. This is the reason why IT IS INDISPENSABLE FOR US TO UNDERMINE ALL FAITH, TO TEAR OUT OF THE MIND OF THE “GOYIM” THE VERY PRINCIPLE OF GOD-HEAD AND THE SPIRIT, AND TO PUT IN ITS PLACE ARITHMETICAL CALCULATIONS AND MATERIAL NEEDS.”

Control of the Press / WE CONTROL THE PRESS: “4. NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.”

Distractions / WE DECEIVE WORKERS: “In order that the masses themselves may not guess what they are about WE FURTHER DISTRACT THEM WITH AMUSEMENTS, GAMES, PASTIMES, PASSIONS, PEOPLE’S PALACES …. SOON WE SHALL BEGIN THROUGH THE PRESS TO PROPOSE COMPETITIONS IN ART, IN SPORT IN ALL KINDS: these interests will finally distract their minds from questions in which we should find ourselves compelled to oppose them. Growing more and more unaccustomed to reflect and form any opinions of their own, people will begin to talk in the same tone as we because we alone shall be offering them new directions for thought …”

Ruthless Suppression / GENTILES ARE CATTLE: 9. Death is the inevitable end for all. It is better to bring that end nearer to those who hinder our affairs than to ourselves, to the founders of this affair. WE EXECUTE MASONS IN SUCH WISE THAT NONE SAVE THE BROTHERHOOD CAN EVER HAVE A SUSPICION OF IT, NOT EVEN THE VICTIMS THEMSELVES OF OUR DEATH SENTENCE, THEY ALL DIE WHEN REQUIRED AS IF FROM A NORMAL KIND OF ILLNESS

I want to bring up another interesting ideology that these “learned elders” possess, and it is the following:

Ruthless Suppression  GENTILES ARE CATTLE:11. In this difference in capacity for thought between the GOYIM and ourselves may be clearly discerned the seal of our position as the Chosen People and of our higher quality of humanness, in contradistinction to the brute mind of the GOYIM. Their eyes are open, but see nothing before them and do not invent (unless perhaps, material things). From this it is plain that nature herself has destined us to guide and rule the world.”

Now, what’s fascinating to me, is the stark contrast in their belief structure, that they consider themselves “higher quality of humanness” and that nature “destined us to guide and rule the world”, yet even by their own admission have committed so many atrocities not only against “goyim”, but others of their kind (“chosen people”) as well.

And their insistence that their authority to rule and control should not be contested and one of their main roles in humanity is to strip away other people’s freedom – and their strange idolatry to gold, which in their mind, gives them the right to control the world:

Power of Gold:2. IN OUR HANDS IS THE GREATEST POWER OF OUR DAY – GOLD: IN TWO DAYS WE CAN PROCURE FROM OUR STOREHOUSES ANY QUANTITY WE MAY PLEASE.

3. Surely there is no need to seek further proof that our rule is predestined by God? Surely we shall not fail with such wealth to prove that all that evil which for so many centuries we have had to commit has served at the end of ends the cause of true wellbeing – the bringing of everything into order?

Then compare that with WHO/WHAT they’re trying to stamp out (Christianity, Christ, spirituality), and it posits a disturbing picture that the “God” they serve, is not the same one that believers in Jesus Christ know as the Supreme Creator.

Their idolatry for gold, their self-righteous belief that in order to serve the greater good (good for whom?) they must engage in sacrifices and no-holds barred killing of those they deem necessary, even if it’s their own people; their goal to spread as much chaos, division and violence as they possibly can in an attempt to control the masses – their indoctrination of not only their own children, but the pressure to exert their own beliefs onto other people as well – yet they still call the goyim the brutes?

And what separates these protocols from, say, the Bible, for instance?

Well, just as a small example:

Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Out of 62 pages (not including forwards/introductions, etc.) of rather large text:

Love is mentioned all of 2 times.

Since I have room, here are the contexts of which it is mentioned:

“2. As the majority of conspirators act out of love for the game…”

“12. That the people may know and love their king, it is indispensable for him to converse in the market-places with his people. This ensures the necessary clinching of the two forces which are now divided one from another by us by the terror.”

Power is mentioned a whopping 70 times. In 62 pages.

Bible

Out of ~1,000-2,000 pages (depending on size of font and translation):

Love is mentioned 310 times.

Conversely, the protocols would have had to mention the word “love” 9-10 times to match with the scripture. Of course, love is not their goal…

To think of it this way, “love” is mentioned 4-5 TIMES MORE in the Bible. And that’s using the most pages of 2,000. If it was 1,000, then the protocols would have had to mention the word love ~19 times.

Power, on the other hand, is mentioned 272 times in the Bible.

To put that into further perspective, the Bible would have had to mention “power” 2,258 times to match what was in the protocols. Out of 2,000 pages.

An even smaller, but perhaps more impactful, example…

Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

To paraphrase: “Kill those who stand in our way.”

Bible:

Jesus Christ: “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another.”John 13:34

Hm… I think I can see a difference.

6. Jacques Attali: From cannibalism, to genetically modifying, implanting chips, to buying and selling children

1981

(all quotes by Jacques Attali)

On cannibalism: ” – we start from cannibalism and return to it. In short, we can interpret the whole of industrial history as a machine for translating the founding cannibalism, the first relationship to evil, where men eat men, into industrial cannibalism, where men become commodities that eat commodities.”

On genetically modifying/creating clones/hybrids: “In other words, with genetic engineering we could gradually create the conditions for humanity to assume itself freely, but collectively, or else create the conditions for a new commodity, genetic this time, which would be made up of copies of humans sold to humans, chimeras or hybrids used as slaves, robots, means of work…”

On implants: “It is planned to develop small implants in the body that can release hormones and active substances in target organs.”

On buying and selling children: “This idea corresponds entirely to an economic evolution in the sense that the woman or the couple will become part of the division of labour and general production. Thus it will be possible to buy children in the same way as one buys “peanuts” or a television set.”

“The only way to resolve this contradiction is to imagine that society could buy children from a family that would be paid in return. I am not thinking of family allowances, which are weak incentives. A family would agree to have many children if the state guaranteed them substantial progressive allowances on the one hand and full responsibility for the material life of each child on the other. In this scheme, the child would become a kind of bargaining chip in the relationship between the individual and the community.”

Source: The 1981 Michel Salomon – Jacques Attali interview

1981

(these quotes are making its way around the internet of Attali stating that “they” want to euthanize the “useless and old”. Although there ARE implications of this from Attali’s writing/interviews, I could not provide a verifiable source for these specific quotes, so please keep this in mind.)

Jacques Attali: “In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as it exceeds 60-65 years man lives longer than he produces and costs society dearly, then the weak and then the useless who do nothing for society because there will be more and more of them, and especially the stupid ones.

Euthanasia targeting these groups; euthanasia will have to be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. We cannot of course execute people or set up camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe it is for their own good.

Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to come to an abrupt halt rather than gradually deteriorating. We won’t be able to run intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!

We will find something or cause it, a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the fat, it doesn’t matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and the stupid will believe it and ask to be treated.

We will have taken care to have planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.

The selection of idiots will thus be done on its own: they will go to the slaughterhouse on their own.”

Source: Globalist Banker Predicted Scamdemic & Genocide of The Useless

2011

(all quotes by Jacques Attali)

On creating new species/human hybrids and nanotechnology: “Further still, we will create new species, chimeras, capable of operating in difficult environments, radioactive for example, or replace men in battle. And even supreme transgression, to equip animals with a brain similar to the human brain. A little later, the meeting of computing science, genomics, nanotechnology and neurosciences will allow man to create other species, ultra-human, super-human.”

On justifying science experiments and getting rid of God: “Let us not hope to put a stop to it. Unless some unlikely world police, makes a shrine of the genome, a place will always be found to conduct these experiments, inexpensive, justifying them by the promise of curing rare diseases or extending human life expectancy. And even if the West resists it, emerging countries, from Argentina to China, via Brazil and tomorrow Nigeria and Indonesia, will welcome desperate researchers. After getting rid of God, man will have gotten rid of himself.”

Source: https://www.attali.com/en/society/human-more-than-human/ (June 12, 2011)

For additional reading that touches upon other topics that Attali has “predicted” that is currently happening, please visit:

“You are Damaged and Only We Can Repair You”
Illuminati Insider foretold Migrants, Surveillance, Mechanical Procreation

There’s actually more that I wanted to add, including Serge Monast / Blue Beam Project, Aldous Huxley, the Committee of 300, Georgia Guidestones, etc., but this post is getting quite long-winded enough already. I may end up doing a part 2 on this topic.

One thing that I did not realize would be a common factor in ALL of these “conspiracy theories” that are (and have been for a long time) carried out during our timeline, is the mention of God, spirituality, the soul… That was honestly not my intention and it was not something I actively sought to include.

My initial spur to create this post was to show how a scheme to depopulate and control the world either by injecting everyone with a virus/disease/illness/vaccine and/or through wars, mass chaos, corruption, etc. was already planned for a VERY LONG time.

Some may not be aware, simply because they are wrapped up in their own life (wake up, eat, work, tv, maybe socialize, sleep, repeat) and so this whole topic is lost on them. Especially when we’re indoctrinated as little children to trusting teachers, trusting preachers, trusting the government, trusting the news, trusting doctors, trusting law enforcement, trusting day care workers… I could go on and on.

Then there is the matter of what we are taught in schools. Yes education is important, but is it really necessary to engage in advanced math/algebra when basic math will suffice in most arenas of our life – unless you are set to pursue a career directly involving this subject? Not to mention the completely incorrect things we were taught in schools – such as how Thanksgiving tradition started, George Washington’s history, Christopher Columbus discovering America – and again, I could go on and on. Now they are changing our education system to include even more atrocious and harmful systemic doctrines.

Instead, a crucial subject matter should be to teach our children “critical thinking” and how to formulate our own thoughts and data gathering to come to educated conclusions. Since our world has been inundated with “fake news” and “misinformation” everywhere we turn, especially coming from an establishment whose sole purpose originally was to give us REAL, accurate news – and who most of us were ingrained to trust in, it is essential that people are able to look beyond this manipulation tactic, and finally think for themselves.

It is also necessary to teach children (and the whole world) about our spirituality and the importance of compassion and morality, so that these agendas to create chaos and division and horrific science experiments won’t work.

As it is, since our societal foundation has been built out of lies upon lies, AND fear – which is another huge topic, it is extremely hard for people to break out of this system and realize that a lot of the world governments DO NOT have our best interest in mind. Despite what they teach in schools and show on media. Even if the original purpose of the government was to protect their country, it is no longer the case in some areas. They have been infiltrated and controlled by immoral organizations, and it’s prudent that we wake up to this fact and start making changes to address this.

When we can realize that there is a hidden/dark goal to invade and disrupt all aspects of our lives in order to dominate and control free thinking and freedom itself, even our very own spirituality and consciousness, maybe we can finally step out of this implemented system and start better serving our fellow beings.

One last quote, very important and VERY relevant in today’s lost and confused world:
1917

“It is not a bad thing to know these things, which are ingredients of reality. They must be seriously considered. And one is guided to develop something of a nose for reality when one takes up anthroposophy, whilst the materialistic education people have today, with innumerable channels opening into it from the Press, is designed to point not to the realities but to something which is cloaked in all kinds of slogans. And if someone does wake up, as Delaisi did, and writes about how things really are, how many people get to know about it? How many people will listen? They cannot listen, for it is buried by — well, by a life that again is ruled by the Press.”

Source: Rudolf Steiner (1917) Fall of the Spirits of Darkness | Fall/Darkness: Lecture 14: Into the Future

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Andrea Spallanzani from Pixabay

Research on Demand

“America’s Pastor” Billy Graham Exposed - Exposing Graham's ties to freemasonry and their agendas.
The Super-Capitalists’ Depopulation Agenda - Please share and spread awareness.
Vaccination Deaths/Frontline Workers Testimonies & VAERS Reports - Vaccination Deaths / Side Effects / Adverse Reactions
Down the Rabbit Hole: “Conspiracy Theories” Playing Out in Real Time - Scandalous plots? Yes. They have been planned for a long time...
Revealing Some Controversial Themes About the “Sound of Freedom” Movie, Starring Jim Caviezel - Jim Caviezel portrays Tim Ballard. But is everything on the up and up?
What is the Transubstantiation of the Eucharist? - Is it a form of cannibalism?
Is the Dome/Firmament Over Earth Real? - Is there a barrier between us, and "space" as we know it?

Genesis 2: Adam and Eve

Earnest Examination

To start, I’ve realized that I have never read the Bible front to back, and so would like to remedy that. On some of my posts, I quote from the Bible, which I feel is a little insincere if I’m not going to study the whole Bible. So this is my chance to get closer to the Word and really understand the book that I occasionally quote from. 

Originally, I was going to start with the New Testament as a friend has advised me to do, since when I started on the Old Testament I kept getting hung up on what I saw at the time were contradictions, and baseless wickedness and corruption. It repelled me from the Bible. She mentioned that that is exactly why Jesus Christ came. To do away with the “old” ways and bring about a new, better way of living. Which is to love and care about one another. The reason the Old Testament is so important is so that we know the conditions of how the world used to be, before Jesus Christ arrived to show us a more peaceful and loving way to be. 

Now that I feel I may have a better understanding of this, I am compelled to start from “The Beginning“, both literally and figuratively. After having attempted Matthew 3, I realize that I am constantly having the urge to go back through the Bible to check references and names, etc. Since my desire is to take this one step at a time and build upon the knowledge based upon the timeline laid out before us in the Bible, I have decided to revisit the time I tried to read the Bible front to back, and see if my old views still stand. 

Make no mistake, I will still have questions and ponderings about why God decided to do the things He’s done (and of course more questions on top of that), but I have learned not to condemn or judge such actions since I do feel some things are beyond our understandings and it is not my place to judge. I will try my best to look at it from an unbiased and simply curious, thoughtful mind. 

To lay it out in a way that I can manage, I have highlighted the texts of verses that I either don’t understand or have a comment or question about in yellow. And the comments I’ve left beneath it will be of a smaller font and using brown text.

I would love it if you’d join me in this journey and if you have any insights and/or knowledge of these chapters/verses etc., please feel free to share with me and the other readers. Any chance to get a clearer understanding of the Bible and Jesus Christ would be welcomed with open arms.

All verses used are from biblestudytools.com (NIV) Genesis 2
1 Thus the heavens and the earth were completed in all their vast array.
2 By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work.
3 Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating that he had done.

I find it interesting that in the Christianity beliefs, this Holy Day is Sunday (which some scholars attribute to being from a pagan tradition – as in worshipping the sun). Yet in other religions, they observe the day as being on Saturday (also has its roots in paganism – the worship of Saturn) and even on Friday. When one chooses to attempt to look into these details about what day the true holy day is, it is met with a ton of references to pagan practices and mythology as well. Some hypothesize that the Bible is merely a retelling of ancient myths (Sumerian, Greek, Roman, Egyptian, etc.) with some alterations/additions.
To dig deep into the similarities and differences between all of these religious cultures would send you down a rabbit hole and, at least for me, leave me with more questions than answers. The only thing I can say for myself is to have faith and keep a good heart and to keep a relationship with God. I think as long as people are doing their best, God knows what’s in our hearts, and He is loving and forgiving. He knows that there is a lot of misleading and misinformation going on, but the key is to not give up and to keep searching and praying and work on our soul development. (at least in my beliefs)

Adam and Eve

4 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the LORD God made the earth and the heavens.
5 Now no shrub had yet appeared on the earth and no plant had yet sprung up, for the LORD God had not sent rain on the earth and there was no one to work the ground,
6 but streams came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground.
7 Then the LORD God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.

There are also interesting myths and re-tellings of the creation of man. It ranges from anywhere between the Blackfoot (Old Man) legend – which states that the first people were a woman and her son, created out of clay, to Norse mythology – the first man (Ask(r)) and woman (Embla) were created from tree trunks, and of course to the account that we have in the Christian doctrine, that man was first created out of the dust of the ground (or also clay) and that wo-man came from the “womb” of Adam, to many more different accounts. Some of which allege that we were born out of literal blood, sweat and tears from various beings.
8 Now the LORD God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden; and there he put the man he had formed.
It’s interesting that the debate over where Eden could possibly be, even with all the hints and directions from the Bible, is one where so many people disagree upon. As we can see in versus 10-14, we are given the specific names of the four rivers that were sprouted from the river in Eden. Now, this is not taking into account that throughout history, there has possibly been (and this is just me speculating and theorizing…) a very specific agenda in order to rename these rivers in order to throw people off as to the real location of where Eden is. Not only that, but there are also historically proven documentation that lends credence to different empires’ goals to try and change or even eliminate the Christian doctrine altogether. (I propose that this is still happening in today’s time, but I won’t get into that on this particular post.)
Supposing that nothing was changed and everything was legitimately named the same as it always was (very unlikely), then determining the location of Eden would be quite easy, I would assume. As it is, and with some speculating that the biblical flood wiped out and/or covered this location, one could surmise that this was God’s doing in order to protect this location from suspicious individuals, or one could come to the conclusion that the location was and has been known by a select few, and they are still guarding the secrets for either their own benefit, and/or to deprive others from finding it in order to discredit the Bible. Or a handful of other interesting theories.
Researchers are still looking for the location, and I have to send out a warning again to not just blindly believe what we are being told. I have mentioned in my last post (Blue Beam Project) that there is a possible agenda to “unearth” (literally) various “proof” that will undermine the words of the Bible. So please be discerning with any and all material set forth by scholars, experts, scientists, researchers, etc., etc. 

9 The LORD God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground—trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food. In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
From this verse I’ve come to the conclusion that both the tree of life and the tree of knowledge were practically right next to each other. Do we get a physical description of each tree? Other than that they were “pleasing to the eye”? I guess I’ll just have to keep reading to find out. I am not sure at this point. Although I do know that God specifically tells Adam not to eat from the tree of knowledge, but he does so willingly. So even if the trees were identical, Adam and Eve knew the difference anyway from knowingly taking it from the serpent.
10 A river watering the garden flowed from Eden; from there it was separated into four headwaters.
I could be way off base, but maybe this verse is alluding to these separated “headwaters” as being much larger than I originally anticipated. Perhaps it’s not the size of the rivers as we know it today, but much, much larger and covering a huge expanse that escapes most of us simply determining these bodies of waters as small rivers. And if the flood was as destructive as we are led to believe, perhaps the old rivers were also covered up by the floodwaters, making them even larger than we realized. I’m sure others have already come to this hypothesis, but it’s the first time I actually thought about it in detail as being a possibility.
11 The name of the first is the Pishon; it winds through the entire land of Havilah, where there is gold.
12 (The gold of that land is good; aromatic resin and onyx are also there.)
13 The name of the second river is the Gihon; it winds through the entire land of Cush.
14 The name of the third river is the Tigris; it runs along the east side of Ashur. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.

These are all oddly specific verses that definitely seem to be giving the reader a greater understanding of where this Garden is, so why is it still a mystery today unless it was specifically designed to be so? Am I speculating that the location of this Garden has already been known and suppressed by those in the know? Why, yes. Yes I am. I have other theories, of course, that I’m not sure the readers are quite ready for yet, so I will just keep encouraging people to please look into these things themselves and keep an open mind and heart. Again, whatever you find, even if you have doubts, I truly believe that if you trust and faith in doing what’s right and good, then you are on the right path.
15 The LORD God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it.

God formed Adam from the dust of the Earth and then made the Garden of Eden, separate from where Adam was at the time, and then He put Adam into the Garden.
This begs the question, at least for me, how big was the Garden of Eden? How big was the space in which Adam occupied outside of the Garden? What timeframe from when God created Adam did God then decide to create this apparent paradise for Adam to live in?

16 And the LORD God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden;
17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”

There is a lot I can say here about God’s omniscience and humankind’s free will, but I will wait until later verses before I expand upon all of that. I also want to mention that some people have alluded to this “eat from the tree” as being a metaphor for simply choosing the “right path” vs. choosing the “wrong path”. It’s just fascinating to me that God presents all these wonderful, glorious trees – and then specifically two important trees right in the middle of the Garden, and gives Adam (and Eve) a choice. Again, I’m not going to get into free will vs. predetermination just yet, but it’s a guarantee that I will.
18 The LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.”
19 Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name.

I want to mention an interesting correlation between some people’s beliefs of a golem being created out of clay and coming to life. The Judeo-Christian belief that God Himself created the first golem out of clay, being Adam, of course. And some gnostic texts (that are widely excluded from the Bible) even reference Jesus Christ as a young boy, who created sparrows, for instance, out of clay and brought them to life. You can also read about the legend of Rabbi Löew, who, allegedly in 1580, created a golem in order “to spy on the Jews’ foes and shield them from persecution.”
20 So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds in the sky and all the wild animals. But for Adam no suitable helper was found.
21 So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs and then closed up the place with flesh.
22 Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.

So before God made woman, He made all different types of animals and land and sea creatures to accompany the man, and when He saw that this was not sufficient enough, is when He made woman. My thought is, God himself wanted to create mankind in His own image – would He not expect man to want a companion of the same?
23 The man said, “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called ‘woman,’ for she was taken out of man.”
24 That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.

I’m going to say this flat out, this verse confuses me. There was no “father” and “mother” as far as Adam and Eve is concerned, so why would this allude to being the reason why a mean leaves his parents? There were no such thing as children, no such thing as parents, no such thing as “family” whereas the first two human beings are concerned.
And if I’m going to be semantic about it, since Adam (man) was created first, and then woman from man, wouldn’t it make more sense for this verse to indicate that it is the woman who leaves her father and mother to be united with man? Woman, at least according to the Bible, is created for the sole purpose of being man’s companion. Not the other way around. I’m not saying I agree with this. Just that the context we’re presented with in these verses seem to allude to this. Do I just have this significantly backwards? Am I not understanding this correctly? Please someone point me in the right direction if this is grievously off course.

25 Adam and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.

I think most of us are aware of in today’s society, the idea of nakedness is automatically conditioned within us to be associated with sex and/or the vulnerable state of being exposed. No longer are the thoughts simply pure and innocent, but by their eating of the tree of knowledge, somehow, this sense of naivete and virtue is lost and now they see the impurity and the embarrassment of exposing their body.

I want to reiterate that some of my thoughts and theories may be way off base, and I also research some other things on the side as well to try and get a broader understanding of what I’m reading, so please bear with me, or, even better, if you have insights that bring more light to these verses, please let me know.

I enjoy bouncing off theories and theology off of each other and love to hear other people’s perspectives on things. Thank you for reading and I look forward to hearing from you!

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Genesis 1: The Beginning

Earnest Examination

To start, I’ve realized that I have never read the Bible front to back, and so would like to remedy that. On some of my posts, I quote from the Bible, which I feel is a little insincere if I’m not going to study the whole Bible. So this is my chance to get closer to the Word and really understand the book that I occasionally quote from.
 
Originally, I was going to start with the New Testament as a friend has advised me to do, since when I started on the Old Testament I kept getting hung up on what I saw at the time were contradictions, and baseless wickedness and corruption. It repelled me from the Bible. She mentioned that that is exactly why Jesus Christ came. To do away with the “old” ways and bring about a new, better way of living. Which is to love and care about one another. The reason the Old Testament is so important is so that we know the conditions of how the world used to be, before Jesus Christ arrived to show us a more peaceful and loving way to be.
 
Now that I feel I may have a better understanding of this, I am compelled to start from “The Beginning“, both literally and figuratively. After having attempted Matthew 3, I realize that I am constantly having the urge to go back through the Bible to check references and names, etc. Since my desire is to take this one step at a time and build upon the knowledge based upon the timeline laid out before us in the Bible, I have decided to revisit the time I tried to read the Bible front to back, and see if my old views still stand.
 
Make no mistake, I will still have questions and ponderings about why God decided to do the things He’s done (and of course more questions on top of that), but I have learned not to condemn or judge such actions since I do feel some things are beyond our understandings and it is not my place to judge. I will try my best to look at it from an unbiased and simply curious, thoughtful mind.
 

To lay it out in a way that I can manage, I have highlighted the texts of verses that I either don’t understand or have a comment or question about in yellow. And the comments I’ve left beneath it will be of a smaller font and using brown text.

I would love it if you’d join me in this journey and if you have any insights and/or knowledge of these chapters/verses etc., please feel free to share with me and the other readers. Any chance to get a clearer understanding of the Bible and Jesus Christ would be welcomed with open arms.

All verses used are from biblestudytools.com (NIV) Genesis 1

The Beginning

1 In the beginning God created the heavens (I noticed this is plural – upon investigating realized that the Bible describes 3 different heavens, but on this particular verse, it seems to imply that it is used to describe “sky”, not “The Heaven” in which the angels/God/Heavenly hosts reside in. Which begs the questions, did God create The Heavens as well, or is it a construct that we as physical beings can’t quite comprehend?) and the earth.
2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.

In my mind, this is obviously alluding to the sun. However, when reading a few more verses beneath this one, verse 16, it clearly seems to depict the makings of the sun and the moon (the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night) on the fourth day, so my obvious conclusion is incorrect. So what was this “light”?
4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness.
Now here we can see the deliberate separation of the light from the darkness. It reminds me of the allegory of the candle that I read somewhere. I can’t remember where, but if I come across it I will give credit to where it’s due. But it mentions that you can put light into a dark room, such as using a candle, lamp, light bulb, etc., but you can’t put darkness into a room that’s already lit. It was meant to signify the spiritual side of things. I might have heard this allegory from a near death experience, where I believe someone mentioned that when they were initially heading towards hell or the darkness, they could see a pinpoint of light that was coming towards him and it radiated through the darkness and reached him. Then he mentioned that it was impossible for the darkness to be allowed into the light because the light would just completely engulf it. Darkness simply can’t exist in the light. So if one’s heart or soul is completely dark and cold, there’s no way it could get to Heaven. But as long as there’s light within, you can shine even in the darkness and go to Heaven.
I liked this rendition and it has stuck with me ever since I read it.
Now with this verse, it doesn’t seem to have spiritual connotations, but it makes sense physically and scientifically when thinking about the candle story. If there was light, there wouldn’t be darkness. So God made the means to separate the two.

5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.
So since God has not made the sun yet, I can only surmise that this light was, as of yet, an un-contained amount of energy that simply obeyed God’s will.
6 And God said, “Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water.”
7 So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so.

8 God called the vault “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.
Okay, I’m just going to say it. I am very confused. Here is another reason why I was so reluctant to read the Bible, because there are so many different versions, so many different translations, and even with the slightest change could end up with a completely different result or meaning.
Take these verses, for instance. I remember reading that it wasn’t a “vault”, but a “firmament”; which, okay, very slight difference and of no real significance. They mean the same thing, right? I am okay with that. However, in verse 8, I remember it specifically saying “heaven” and not “sky”. And yes, we’ve already covered that there are 3 different types of “heavens”, so that doesn’t quite phase me either. What does absolutely confuse me, though, is that when looking at the KJV, the verse is this: “And God called the firmament Heaven.”
This is a huge difference to me because not only is the word “Heaven” capitalized, but it is also singular. Then, when looking at the very first verse of the KJV, it states this, “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” In this sentence, “heaven” is not plural or capitalized. Then, to make matters even worse, when looking at a 1980’s NKJV book that was passed down from my family, the first verse is a lower case “heavens”, yet verse 8 writes “Heaven”. What am I to make with all these differences? To me, they aren’t just slight, insignificant differences. They are large ones that can give a completely new meaning depending on how one looks at it.
For that matter, how do we know which translation is the most correct? Other than actually learning Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic and studying the very first original documentations of the Bible, not to mention the other languages that could benefit from these ancient writings?
(I will leave this particular rant here, because I am sure there’s more to come.)
Getting back to the separation of water from water, I have gathered that to mean the clouds/sky/”heaven”, from the waters of the Earth.

9 And God said, “Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear.” And it was so.
10 God called the dry ground “land,” and the gathered waters he called “seas.” And God saw that it was good.
11 Then God said, “Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds.” And it was so.
12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
13 And there was evening, and there was morning—the third day.

14 And God said, “Let there be lights in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times, and days and years,
15 and let them be lights in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth.” And it was so.
16 God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars.

So here we see the creations of the sun, moon and stars, perhaps the constellations as well, but does this include the other planets? The other galaxies? After all, the motion of the planets have helped people determine special days and times, along with solar and lunar cycles, so I would surmise that these were created as well. The Bible also alludes to some significance in regards to the planetary alignments and of course the “morning star”, which has been considered as Venus on numerous occasions.
17 God set them in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth,
18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good.
19 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fourth day.

20 And God said, “Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the vault of the sky.”
21 So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living thing with which the water teems and that moves about in it, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
22 God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth.”
23 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fifth day.
24 And God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind.” And it was so.

25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
I want to mention, these verses as well as verse 21 mentions “kind(s)” numerous times. Enough times to make it quite significant. Why would these verses be so specific in this regard? Perhaps it’s because these verses attempt to drive home the importance of not interbreeding these species and instead let natural reproduction occur. As we know in today’s time (and, to be honest, who knows how long it’s been going on for) the practice of interbreeding and hybridization has been on the increase and there are many attempts at cross-breeding and dna-altering, genetic manipulation, etc., etc. going on. Quite so that it’s actually pretty terrifying. I think these verses were specifically referring to let each kind be it’s kind, and to interfere with that could lead to unexpected consequences.
26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
This is a very interesting verse to me.
For one, who was God speaking to?
“Let us”
(Who else? Who’s “us”?)
“in our image”
“in our likeness”
This would imply that there are others that are of God’s image as well. Not just God Himself, or humankind, apparently, but other beings. Are these the angels? Separate Heavenly host members? A kind of “counsel”, if you will? Surely He did not mean “other gods”, correct?
Secondly, who actually wrote Genesis? Many Bible scholars attribute Genesis to being written by Moses, perhaps under divine revelation. But this has not been confirmed. Only speculated and theorized upon. So no one really knows for sure.

27 So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.
I won’t quite get into this verse just yet, since I know the particular issue I want to raise stems from Genesis 6, but wanted to point out the dichotomy between the male/female human being. Angels themselves, at least biblically, are more often than not considered to be of a masculine form.
28 God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”
This verse makes me sad because it sets up the world to be a blissful utopia in which humankind and animalkind can live side by side in peace and harmony, yet before even the first human child is to be born (Cain), that perfect world has been tainted. Even though at that time animals were still peaceful, the fact that from the very beginning, “we” lived in sin, makes my heart sad.
29 Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.
30 And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that move along the ground—everything that has the breath of life in it—I give every green plant for food.” And it was so.

This verse and the one above it implies that at this time there were no carnivorous beings. Yes, humans had dominion over the animals, but there is nothing to implicate that they were given to us for food. But verse 29 specifically mentions that all plants and fruits are given to us for food. And then in verse 30, all green plants are given to animals to eat. There is no mention that animals or humans are to eat one another.
31 God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning—the sixth day.
“God saw all that he had made, and it was very good.” – I have to repeat that line because as most of us know, the drama that enfolds on the following pages shows us the dark turn that the world gets thrusted in due to certain specific decisions of God’s creations. Now, while I love God’s creations, and it is due to the actions of a small handful of characters that pivots us into a world of chaos, I must still admit that my understanding of His sovereign plan is out of my reach. Thankfully, I have the faith and trust in the Lord to see me through, and I am, as always, searching for the Truth.

That concludes the first chapter of Genesis, and I am interested to see what my reaction will be when I finally get to the chapter that initially made me give up on the Old Testament. (I didn’t even finish Genesis originally…)

But now that I have a more patient outlook and understanding of what I’m reading, I feel more encouraged and determined to gain further insights and knowledge into the Holy Bible.

And again, if you have further revelations/knowledge about this chapter, please feel free to share. I enjoy bouncing off theories and theology off of each other. Thank you for reading and I look forward to hearing from you!

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Earnest Examination

Genesis 16: Hagar and Ishmael - Earnest Examination
Genesis 14: Abram Rescues Lot - Earnest Examination
Genesis 13: Abram Inherits Canaan - Earnest Examination
Genesis 12: The Call of Abram - Earnest Examination
Genesis 11: The Tower of Babel - Earnest Examination
Genesis 10: The Table of Nations - Earnest Examination
Genesis 8: Noah’s Deliverance - Earnest Examination
Genesis 7: The Flood Begins - Earnest Examination