More LIES and CONtradictions About COVID and the Vaccines | How Does Anyone Still Believe the Narrative?

We have been lied to numerous times by top officials. When will the rest of the world wake up?

A video that has gone viral in the last few days exposes medical “authorities” proposing underhanded tactics and straight up lies and fear-mongering attempts in order to push vaccines onto more of the public.

There have been many attempts at deceiving the public regarding the COVID/vaccine narrative, or just flat-out conflicting information that doesn’t make any sense when actually thinking about the statements.

The below sections take a look at just a small few of them, starting with the video mentioned above:

1. Novant Health administrator suggesting to deliberately scare/manipulate people into getting the vaccine:

Some embellishment is added for emphasis. Some words were undetermined due to unclear audio:

Carolyn Fisher: ” – the dashboard on how it’s set up myself, as far as how we get information out to the community on meaningful numbers – we set on a weekly basis. So that’s on our website, and we’ve been sharing that through social channels as well. Particularly those graphics that show the number of patients and how’s the percentage of them that are unvaccinated – percentage of unvaccinated people in the ICU, and the percentage of deaths. And the numbers. So those are numbers that we put out as far as, we don’t get into details of floor – Those other numbers are certainly out there.”

Mary Kathryn Rudyk: “I guess my feeling at this point in time is, maybe we need to be completely, a little bit more scary for the public. Then there’s another […], that I completely agree, there are many people still hospitalized that we’re considering post-COVID. But we’re not counting in those numbers. So how do we include those post-COVID people, in the numbers of patients we have in the hospital?”

Carolyn Fisher: “So is that all the people who have been in a hospital since the beginning of COVID?”

Mary Kathryn Rudyk: “Well, or those that are still in, and that’s something that I can take to someone else. But, I think those are important numbers, of patients that are still in the hospital, that are off the COVID floor, but still occupying the hospital for a variety of reasons.”

Shelbourn Stevens: “Carolyn, we call those – I’m sorry – we’re calling those “recovered” now; if you look at the […] dashboard, they’re listed as “recovered”. But I do think it – from our standpoint, we would still consider them a COVID patient, cause they’re still healing.”

Mary Kathryn Rudyk: “Yep. So I think that that needs to be highlighted as well. Because once they’re off isolation and drop from the COVID numbers, that’s exactly right.”

Shelbourn Stevens: “Carolyn, we can talk offline, and how we run that up, to marketing.”

Mary Kathryn Rudyk: “Right. So I was going to say that I think we have to be more blunt, we have to be more forceful, we have to say something coming out, ‘You know, you don’t get vaccinated, you know you’re going to die.’ I mean, let’s just, let’s just be really blunt to these people.”

There’s a lot to unravel in this brief discussion, but it all boils down to this: Mary Kathryn Rudyk suggests inundating the public with FEAR that COVID is such a deadly disease and that if you don’t get vaccinated, ‘you’re going to die’; yet in the very same discussion, acknowledges that there are many people who have recovered from COVID and are sometimes referred to as “post-COVID”.

Then if one wants to further expand upon this discussion, alleging that Rudyk is announcing this to also try and benefit the healthcare workers so that they are not overwhelmed with COVID-infected (or COVID-recovered) patients, I would have to bring up the point that there have been prophylactic treatments available to help prevent one from going to the hospital, yet these treatments are being SUPPRESSED from the public and denounced all around the healthcare industry and mainstream media/social media platforms.

If it’s about our health, then why are approved, well-known, beneficial, effective treatments being taken away from public use and ridiculed, and even in some cases, outlawed?

Maybe it’s because… it’s not about our health?

2. American Medical Association trains their healthcare members to label “hospitalization rates” as “deaths”

Another health organization that has been caught directly trying to lie and manipulate the public has been exposed by what they are training their associates to say in order to either sugar-coat certain terminology, or by outright blatant fear-mongering attempts in order to produce the results they want. (i.e. more and more people getting vaccinated)

At first, I couldn’t believe this was really real, until I checked it out for myself; and indeed, it is all stated there, right on the pdf of their website.

This information was first brought to my attention through the Stew Peters Show with Dr. Bryan Ardis. The video describing some of the incredibly outrageous deceptive tactics the AMA teaches members of its organization can be watched below:

A couple of screenshots are provided, with a link from the web archive:

Screenshot taken on September 14, 2021 from
[ https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2021-02/covid-19-vaccine-guide-english.pdf / pg. 9]
Web Archive version: COVID-19 Vaccine Guide

Instead of “Operation warp speed” – say “Standard process”
Instead of “Government” – say “Public health agencies”
Instead of “Hospitilization rates” – say “Deaths”

There is also the eerie, cult-like mentality that the AMA endorses their members to propagate on social media platforms and during interviews. A small portion of that has been captured in the below screenshot:

Screenshot taken on September 14, 2021 from
[ https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2021-02/covid-19-vaccine-guide-english.pdf / pg. 2]
Web Archive version: COVID-19 Vaccine Guide

– “I will get vaccinated as soon as it is available, as will my family. #TrustScience #COVID19”

– “I trust the scientific process and the rigorous peer review for the coronavirus vaccines. #TrustScience #COVID19”

– “I trust a vaccine endorsed by scientists, career public health professionals, my doctor, and the mainstream medical community. #TrustScience”

The egregious step to label “hospitalization rates” as “deaths” aside, which is insane as it is, I couldn’t help but get chills when reading the indoctrination-like proclamations of the social template content.

That is exactly what these industries and agencies want: blind trust to those in “authoritative” positions.

3. Israeli Health Minister caught on hot-mic: “there is no medical or epidemiological justification for the COVID passport, it is only intended to pressure the unvaccinated to vaccinate.”

I don’t expect the tweet to last long (perhaps I’ll be proven wrong), so I have provided a screenshot of the snippet in question:

Source: twitter | @disclose.tv

I can’t personally verify the translation since I don’t speak the language, but the following excerpts come from the following source: Caught on hot mic, Israeli health minister says ‘green pass’ not based on epidemiology

“Imposing “green pass” rules on certain venues is needed only to pressure members of the public to get vaccinated, and not for medical reasons, Israeli Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz said on Sunday, ahead of the weekly Cabinet meeting.

Horowitz was caught on a hot mic telling this to Interior Minister Ayelet Shaked, who was also unaware that the conversation was being taped and would be broadcast on Channel 12 News.

In response to Shaked’s suggestion that the “green pass” could be removed as a requirement for outdoor seating at restaurants, Horowitz said: “For swimming pools, too, not just in restaurants.”

“Epidemiologically, it’s true,” said Horowitz, adding, “The thing is, I’m telling you, our problem is people who don’t get vaccinated. We need [to influence] them a bit; otherwise, we won’t get out of this [pandemic situation].”

Here is another resource for further consideration:

Source: twitter | @EdladYaniv

Text translated using: Hebrew to English translation

“And now the unbelievable video is that it is exactly the opposite of what The Minister of Health told The High Court:

Health Minister Nitzan Horwitz explains to Sarah Ayelet Shaked that in some places the green giver is not necessary and is only to pressure Israelis to get vaccinated.

And this is exactly the opposite of what the Health Minister told The Begach “that the green tag is net health considerations.”

And this is Chairman Meretz.”

More lies, more influencing, more pressure, more threats, more deception.

When will the world wake up?

4. Vaccines and vaccine passports are only valid for 6 months. After that – you need more vaccines.

Again highlighting Israeli’s Health Minister, Dr. Horowitz, who has admitted that the vaccines are not about one’s health, is implementing the following protocols for their country – another under-handed tactic that is being used to trick the public into more unnecessary vaccines.

“Israel’s vaccine passport QR-code system, Green Pass, will now expire six months after the second injection is received, making a third, and possibly fourth, booster shot effectively mandatory to continue participation in Israel’s mainstream society.

On Aug. 29, Israeli health officials announced at a press conference that effective Oct. 1, fully vaccinated Green Pass validation status would expire six months after the second dose is received, according to news website Arutz Sheva.”

Additionally, citizens returning from overseas travel who have accepted a third injection will be required to quarantine for only 24 hours after arrival. Those who only have two doses are no longer considered fully vaccinated and will be sequestered for 7 days.

On Aug. 24, Haaretz reported Health Minister Nitan Horowitz as saying in comments given on Channel 13 Television, “This is simply because, in terms of its effectiveness, the vaccine is valid only for a period of five or six months.”

“After about half a year, you have to get a third dose. Otherwise, the vaccine loses its power.”

– Source: Israel Vaccine Passport Now Expires After Six Months, Boosters Required

So according to Israeli’s Health Minister, the vaccine is only beneficial for up to 6 months. After that, you will have to get another. And then, after those 6 months are up, then what? Another? And then another? And another? 2 per year COVID shots, in addition to the yearly flu shot? Do I have that correct?

(And do I need to mention Pfizer’s new venture in supplying – out of the goodness of their hearts, I’m sure – a two-pill-a-day regiment to combat COVID symptoms? Of course it’s about our health and not lining their pockets to make them richer. Of course. Because it’s not like we already have a cheap alternative at treating our symptoms that is curiously being continuously suppressed in the news all to steer our focus on their new, more costly product. That would just be ridiculous…)

5. FDA’s own admission: “While the vaccine may not prevent infection, symptoms or transmission of the virus from person to person – “

The FDA has been caught red-handed removing this particular portion from their Frequently Asked Questions webpage.

On August 31, 2021, I took a screenshot of the following information from the FDA’s own website, under the question:

Q: What safety information did FDA evaluate to authorize the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for emergency use and approve Comirnaty?

Here was their response, as of August 23, 2021:

As you can see, I had to retrieve this information from the wayback machine because strangely enough, on September 1st, 2021 – the very next day after I was able to screenshot this data, the FDA removed this portion from their site.

[https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions] – (content as of September 14, 2021 shows the latest current update as September 1, 2021]

What could have occurred, within 7 days of their “current content”, to decide to remove this very telling statement? Did new data suggesting that the vaccines do prevent infections, symptoms and transmissions suddenly come out within that very brief time period? Or, more likely, they realized that this statement does not reflect the worldwide pressure to get everyone vaccinated?

Speaking of, even the “president” of the United States is conflicted on if the vaccines work or not.

6. Joe Biden: “The bottom line – we’re going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated coworkers.”

“My job as president is to protect all Americans.

So tonight I’m announcing that the Department of Labor is developing an emergency rule to require all employers with 100 or more employees, that together employ over 80 million workers, to ensure their workforces are fully vaccinated or show a negative test at least once a week.

Some of the biggest companies are already requiring this: United Airlines, Disney, Tyson’s Foods – and even Fox News.

The bottom line – we’re going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated coworkers.”

Source: twitter | @POTUS

Um… isn’t the whole point of getting the vaccine to protect oneself from the “virus”, and in the same vein, the unvaccinated? Why does the vaccinated need protection from the unvaccinated? They are supposedly already protected BECAUSE of the vaccine.

At least, that’s what we were always told from the CDC, FDA, government officials, medical/health authorities, etc. At least, until they decided to flip-flop on their assessment and change their definitions. And at least until new “variants” popped out. … And until they misled the public by removing pertinent information from their own websites. And until… well, you get the point. (maybe)

Then we have Joe Biden’s VP also chiming in with her two cents:

“By vaccinating the unvaccinated, increasing our testing and masking, and protecting the vaccinated, we can end this pandemic. That’s exactly what we are committed to doing.”

Source: twitter | @KamalaHarris

The actual bottom line, they are basically admitting that the vaccine doesn’t work. They’ve already admitted they don’t know how long the vaccines last. Dr. Horowitz mentions no longer than 5-6 months. But for all we know, the vaccines “last” 3 days, if they even work at all. How long have you, personally, gone without COVID (or even the flu/common cold) before and after the vaccine? (If you chose to get one?)

After over 20 months, I’ve gotten sick one time that only lasted 4 days, and even then my symptoms were extremely mild. No flu, no runny nose, just a slight sore throat that went away after 4 days. Meanwhile, I’ve had friends get sick shortly RIGHT AFTER the injection. But, you know, they would’ve been considered “unvaccinated” at that point still…

Which brings me to:

7. “Unvaccinated are filling the hospitals!”

Really…? Hm… well, when you consider who they (CDC/FDA/health agencies) consider as “unvaccinated”, it’s no wonder.

Did you know, anyone who is not considered “fully vaccinated” – meaning, 14 days after their second dose, if it’s a two-dose regiment, or 14 days after a single dose if it’s a single-dose only regiment, is considered either a “partially vaccinated” or an “unvaccinated” person, depending on the honesty of the hospitals to report them?

Trust the Science? CDC Counts People Who Died Within 14 Days of Jab as “Unvaccinated”

To put that more clearly, if you get the second vaccine, and get “COVID” (sick/heart attack/myocarditis/blood clots/flu/etc.) 13 days after the shot, YOU CAN STILL BE CONSIDERED AN UNVACCINATED INDIVIDUAL.

Which goes without saying, but if you are experiencing side effects or illnesses a day or two after the first vaccine – they consider you an unvaccinated person. To think of it a different way, by the time you get the first Pfizer shot (and if you’re diligent in getting the second shot 3 weeks from the first), it will take you 35 days before they consider you a fully vaccinated person. For Moderna, that would be 42 days, again assuming you were diligent in getting your second shot right on time.

So if you get sick at any time during this time period and have to be admitted, the hospitals are allowed to write you up as an unvaccinated/partially vaccinated person.

Another interesting thing to consider, if you did get injected, the hospitals do not have to test you unless you present SEVERE symptoms of “COVID”. So this, obviously, is left up to the specific hospital to determine what is “severe” to them. If you have the flu, tossing and turning, throwing up, shivering, crying in pain, etc. – “Well, it’s not severe enough. It’s obviously not COVID. We don’t have to test them.”

Think this might have something to do with the COVID numbers showing more favorably to the vaccinated cases?

Not to mention that even if the vaccinated individual does get tested, the PCR tests were recommended to use a lower set of cycles for them. …Hm, I’m sure that wouldn’t have anything to do with returning a negative result; thus again, making it seem like the vaccines are working.

But I’m sure the hospital system isn’t that corrupt, right? There’s no way they’d be involved in such deliberate manipulation and misconduct, right? Even though these are all protocols that come from the CDC and other government health agencies…? Surely they just care about our well-being even though there have been studies that prove that in the majority of people natural immunity is by-far superior than shady, no long-term data vaccines, right?

Covid-19 natural immunity compared to vaccine-induced immunity: The definitive summary

“They can’t be lying. They wouldn’t do that. They were just mistaken, is all. They’re following the science. It’s science – science changes, you know. No, no, I’m sure that the government and health/pharma industries that are making a lot of money right now due to side effects from… well, not from the vaccines, obviously – it has to be from something else – I’m sure that they care about us far more than my idiot family members who I’ve lived with for all my life and who have raised me and bought me presents and clothed and fed me.

I mean, just look at everything the government and health agencies and other large corporations has offered me for injecting myself with an experimental vaccine! Beer, donuts, McDonald’s, sports and concert tickets, pizza, marijuana, cash – You all are silly if you don’t think the government wants what’s best for us.

‘Lying’…. pfft.”

So… yeah… I’m just going to direct you back up to number 1, again.

I realize how I may sound on this post. It’s not my intention to sound condescending, and I apologize if that’s how I come off. But in certain times, like what’s going on around us today, if it sounds harsh, maybe it needs to be.

When looking at the situation around us, I find it hard to comprehend that there are still people that believe the official narrative even after everything that’s been presented to us. It almost feels as if the events going on around us are deliberately conceived and obviously created to induce as much unbelievable situations to see how people will respond to it. Perhaps like a test to see how much the governments can get away with and still have people believe them. Sadly, a large group have had the wool pulled over their eyes, and simply go along with the establishment without even thinking about it.

Actually, now that I think about it, maybe this really is their goal. It not only helps them along with their corrupt endeavors, whatever that should be, but it also is a means to employ as many people who still believe their narrative to help them achieve it.

What do you think? Are you thinking? Do you know people who are just following along, without a second thought? Or even worse, indulging in a self-righteous attitude that they’re right and everyone else who doesn’t simply follow this narrative is wrong? Ignoring all of the obvious signs that this is just an agenda set to vaccinate everyone, leading up to controlling every aspect of our lives?

This is happening. The government and health officials continue lying because people still fall for it. If you’re reading this, chances are you already know about the deception and lies that we’re being told to continue forcing this unnecessary vaccine on all of us. I’d say it’s very rare for a person who has already bought into the narrative to read a post exposing the corporations on their lies and manipulation. And if that person does read a post similar to this one, will they contemplate on the information within, or automatically dismiss it as a crazy “conspiracy theory”?

There are truths out there for you. But you need to be willing to accept it.

"It's easier to fool people, than to convince them they have been fooled."
- quote often attributed to Mark Twain

I love you all. Even the ones who haven’t woken up to the scam or who simply don’t believe it. And I know it’s weird to say, but I even love the ones perpetrating the scam. They need it the most. There is something twisted and broken within them, and I literally pray for their soul. I hope in the near future, all of us will realize the actions we’re doing to others, and rise up and grow in truth and compassion, instead of remaining in this state of division.

God bless.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by mohamed Hassan from Pixabay [slightly modified]

Get an Earful

Are “COVID Variants” Named After 5G Towers/Networks? | Delta, Kappa, Lambda, Mu… - The theories of "COVID" and 5G being connected rages on.
Are These Findings the Death Blow for Vaccine Passports? - "COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus"
Egregious Medical Tyranny Holds Patient Hostage in a Hospital and Refuses Her Preferred Medical Treatment – Patient DIES Under Their Protocol - Veronica Wolski was denied specific treatment - AND denied the freedom to leave the hospital.
More LIES and CONtradictions About COVID and the Vaccines | How Does Anyone Still Believe the Narrative? - We have been lied to numerous times by top officials. When will the rest of the world wake up?
W.H.O. / Governments Working in Collusion with Big Pharma? | A Necessary Look Back at the Swine Flu Pandemic - STEPPING BACK IN TIME: Another attempt to vaccinate the whole world.
Jerm Warfare Interview with Dr. Zelenko: “These “vaccines”, which I call ‘poison death shots’ “ - "The only reason you'd vaccinate your child is if you believe in child sacrifice."
Scandal Behind the FDA “Fake Approval” of Pfizer Jab - Corruption and collusions behind the Pfizer/FDA "vaccine" efforts.

Jerm Warfare Interview with Dr. Zelenko: “These “vaccines”, which I call ‘poison death shots’ “

“The only reason you’d vaccinate your child is if you believe in child sacrifice.”

Dr. Zelenko, the doctor who created a treatment protocol for COVID, sits down with Jerm Warfare to discuss COVID, the dangers of the vaccines, and the worldwide suppression and agendas that are occurring around us.

The below video of the interview has been transcribed in full, with some embellishment added for emphasis.

Intro message from Dr. Zelenko: “Hi, my name is Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, I’m the original owner of the Zelenko protocol, which is a pre-hospital treatment for COVID-19.

What I believe is going on: that the enemies of humanity have weaponized fear and anxiety in order to effectuate a change in your life to mold society into the direction that they believe to be correct. And that involves taking away our freedom, and anxiety is a tool to which they enslave us.

So I’m here just to give you a simple message: that COVID-19 is highly treatable. There are treatment approaches as well as prevention – preventive, prophylactic approaches, and there’s no need to be afraid. There’s plenty of information available and even over the counter options without prescriptions that can save your life. You really don’t have any reason to be afraid once you have the right information. The information will set your mind and your soul free. And you don’t have to live with paralyzing anxiety.”

Jerm Warfare @1:54: “My name is Jerm. This is Jerm Warfare, the battle of ideas. That was the face and the voice of Dr. Vladimir Zelenko who is joining me right now on the other side.

It’s a great pleasure, Dr. Zelenko. Thank you for being here.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Thank you so much for having me.”

Jerm Warfare: “You posted a video saying that your cancer has returned.”

” – worst global crime in the history of humanity.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @2:18: “Yeah, I have a very rare – actually the rarest form of cancer there is. And there’s around 10 cases a year in the world. Always found at autopsy. And I was diagnosed with it three and half years ago during an emergency surgery, where they thought that I had a blood clot and turned out to be a tumor that killed my right lung in the pulmonary artery. I had that resected and I went through very difficult chemo which I had to design myself, cause there was no treatment available.

And that was good for two years, and then it came back last summer. Had another open heart surgery and had my heart valves replaced because of the tumor. And then just last week I found out it came back again, again in the pulmonary artery. And so now we’re putting together a plan to deal with this, but the game is not over. I’m very hopeful and optimistic about the future. Both mine and that of the world.

I really believe that my heart is still beating because of the prayers and the positive energy of so many decent people around the world. It’s what happened last time. I had millions of people praying. And so statistically, naturally I shouldn’t really be talking to you. I should be under the ground. And yet God has spared me for now, and I ended up, just a few years after having this type of cancer diagnosed, being the tip of the spear of the worst global crime in the history of humanity. And so part of the reason I was spared is becoming… revealed to me, I would say. But God’s ways are very mysterious, so.”

Jerm Warfare: “If you get through, which I’m hoping you will, you can call it the Zelenko Miracle.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Well, listen, it’s already a miracle, every second of my life. And your life is a miracle. And those are things that we don’t necessarily focus on or appreciate, until our lives are threatened.

See the address between life and death is something very familiar to me. And so when someone lives in that state of being, you realize that: I want to say Happy Birthday to you. And not because – I don’t really think it’s your biological birthday, but what it is, is that every second of existence is a recreation; creation ex nihilo, something from nothing. God is making us in the present tense. And so since we’re being made every nano-second, that implies a few things. That He knows about us, He cares about us, He wants us to be. And if He wants us to be then you’re never alone. If you’re never alone there’s no room for anxiety.”

Government’s protocol: ‘Send them home and give them tylenol’
Meanwhile, patients were getting sicker and eventually put on ventilators – in which 80% DIED.

Jerm Warfare @5:08: “This – let’s go back 18 months or so. Life was somewhat normal, and then suddenly this weird thing happened.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “So I didn’t choose COVID, it chose me. What I mean by that is that I was practicing family medicine in upstate New York, in a small community of 35,000 people that live within a square mile. Very high population density. And when COVID arrived, it spread to everyone. Immediately. And I found my practice, my little practice of – we used to see 50 patients a day – inundated with over 250 patients. And there was no treatment at that time.

The government was telling us, “Send people home. Give them tylenol. When they get sicker, send them to the hospital. They’ll end up on a respirator.” And 80% were dying… on the ventilator. So that didn’t seem like a good idea to me. So, just like 3 years before, I had to develop my own cancer treatment, because nothing existed. I figured, well, why not innovate and find something to help my patients. These are people that I care about; these are people that I’ve cared about for 2 decades.

And so, I actually prayed; at 2 o’clock in the morning. I couldn’t sleep – You know, when people look at you and say, “Doctor, please help us.” And they – and you care about them, and then you have nothing to offer them. It’s a terrible feeling.

It’s, it’s – so, I just was studying what other countries have been doing. And something made sense to me. That in South Korea they were using hydroxychloroquine and zinc. And France, in Marseille, France, they were using hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin. And I understood the mechanism of action of these drugs and I said, you know, why don’t we just combine the three of them, modify the dosing and see what happens? Why not? This is battlefield medicine. You know? This is World War 3, the whole world is fighting the same virus, there’s no studies, there’s nothing that I could rely upon. So what do you do? You innovate.

They say necessity is the mother of all innovation. I had a necessity. I had to take care of my patients. I’m an outpatient doctor. Meaning pre-hospital doctor. My job is to keep people out of the hospital. That’s what I’ve always done, 20 years, in every other aspect of medicine. So why would I allow my patients to go home and just get sicker? It didn’t make sense.”

Dr. Zelenko develops a treatment protocol for COVID

@7:38: “So, since I understood the virology, I understood that this virus is an RNA virus that uses certain pathway for viral replication, and I found out that zinc inhibits that process, so zinc was the bullet. And I said, okay. But there was a problem with zinc. It didn’t get into the cell. Due to biochemical reasons. And so it was having like a bullet without a gun. So I needed a gun.

And it turned out that hydroxychloroquine is a zinc delivery system. So zinc ionophore; it lets zinc go from outside the cell to inside the cell. And by doing that we were able to inhibit the RNA dependent RNA polymerase; it’s just an enzyme, but all the COVID strains were using to… to use to make copies of themselves. And I shut down viral replication. So in other words, zinc was able to get to the right place at the right time, and stop the virus from making copies of itself. So that was the mechanism of action.

It was theoretical, but I deployed it. I also didn’t treat everyone. I treated the high-risk patients. And the way I found out who was high-risk, I just called the ICU near me, and I asked the doctor there, who is dying? And they said to me, “well, the old people and the people with chronic illnesses.” I said, “How about the younger people?” They said, “We’re not seeing them in ICU.” So right away I knew that this virus doesn’t kill equally.

So, I didn’t have any resources. Half my staff was sick, the outpatient service was like ‘blood-draw’, and radiology were closed. The hospitals were at near capacity. So I was like walking through my office; it was like a bomb went off. A mass casualty event – people all over. And so I had to triage. I had to make decisions; who to, who would get my attention. And who was low-risk enough that I can send them home. So I basically sent home everyone who wasn’t dying and it was young. And left the older patients; all those that had chronic medical problems.”

Treatment needs to be started IMMEDIATELY – against government “recommendations”

@9:46: “And I started treating them immediately. I didn’t wait for the results of tests. The tests took a week to get back. If I would wait a week, by the time the test result came back, the patient was dead. So instead of – I did the test, but I wouldn’t wait to treat – I used my head and said, “well, you know, the whole community has COVID, there’s no flu, they have all the symptoms, they’ve been exposed, this person has COVID.” Until proven otherwise. And I would treat them immediately. Within the first few days of the onset of symptoms.

From the moment I did that, people stopped going to the hospital and dying. So initially I didn’t believe it. I thought it was a fluke or – I couldn’t believe – But after 50 patients or so, I realized that I… stumbled across, or God gave a gift, of something that is a potential answer to a global problem that has no treatment.”

“Look, COVID is two diseases. There’s the viral infection phase, which is… lasts around 5 days/6 days. And then the immune reaction, your body’s immune system goes on overdrive and it’s the body’s immune reaction that kills the person. It destroys the lungs and causes blood clots. But the immune reaction does not start until a week – 6-7 days into the illness. So the key is to destroy the virus before then, so that the immune reaction, so the monster doesn’t wake up. We have a latent monster inside us – the immune system, in this particular case, and it’s ready to destroy the person. And it takes around a week to wake up. So if we could treat this infection within the first few days, it never wakes up. No problem. Patients get better.”

Media and NIH against the use of hydroxychloroquine – not interested in the treatment of COVID

Jerm Warfare @11:35: “Now, the elephant in the room is the amount of negative press, as you are well aware, surrounding hydroxychloroquine. I mean, Donald Trump, he spoke very highly of it. And funnily enough he took your treatment, didn’t he? As well as a bunch of people in the White House.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Yeah, I ended up treating most of them. What happened was that I made a video addressed to the president, telling – I felt like a front line soldier that found an important enemy map. I needed to get it to the five-star general immediately. Didn’t have time to go through the chain of command.

So I made a video and it was addressed to the president, and the next day his chief of staff, Mark Meadows, calls me on my cell phone. I’m not making – I wouldn’t believe it unless it happened to me. But that’s what happened. And then I told him what I was doing; they were interested. Two days later the commissioner of the FDA is calling me on my cell phone, in Wuhan.

@12:32: And then the – because no one knew what to do. Don’t you understand that at that time, I wasn’t saying that my treatment is the best treatment. I was saying it’s the only treatment! So, so people were looking for solutions. And so then he referred me to the NIH, which was a deadend. They weren’t interested.

And then Rudy Giuliani called me. And I ended up doing a podcast with Rudy; became my good friend. And millions of people saw it. And from that podcast my life has never been the same again. Um, so that’s how people got to know me. And I’ve ended up advising governments and hospital systems and thousands of other physicians.

Um, so I also sent a letter to the president after a few hundred patients summarizing my experience and making my recommendations. And I didn’t know if the president got it or not. Until there was a news conference where President Trump announces to the world that he’s taking hydroxychloroquine. And he says, “Yeah, I got a letter from a, your upstate New York doctor.” And he was telling me this and this and this. I couldn’t believe it. – [Jerm Warfare: “How did you feel?”] – it’s the president of the United States. So, that was pretty cool. And so, that’s how I got involved.

“COVID-19 is an artificially made bioweapon”

@13:50: But, to understand the essence of the problem, we need to understand the essence of the problem. And everything else will make sense. So if I would’ve told you 18 months ago that COVID-19 is an artificially made bioweapon, I would immediately be labeled a conspiracy theorist. [Jerm Warfare: “Yes.”] Now, even the liberal media admits that this is an artificially made bioweapon. It’s a conspiracy, it’s just not a theory. It’s a conspiracy to commit mass murder and genocide.

And to tell you to what degree of resolution we know things – so for example, I can tell you like this, in 1999, that the Ralph Baric, Baric, in the University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill, modified a surface protein on a bat coronavirus, and made it be able to infect human beings. And he has a patent number associated with that modification.

And then it became, this type of research became illegal in America. It was outsourced by Fauci and the NIH, to Wuhan! And then in 2005 or so, they were able to augment the lethality of this virus, so that it, it can destroy human lungs and cause blood clots. And we know the patent number is associated with those changes.

So no one’s denying that this is an artificially made bioweapon. So, okay. So now you have to understand why is there such opposition to the treatment of it in the pre-hospital setting. Cause what is the real desire goal of this bioweapon. It’s not to kill everyone. It’s to scare everyone. And if you studied psychological warfare, which I have, if you use fear – prolonged fear – and isolation: lockdown, what you do is you psychologically destroy the person. Most people will be compensated.

And then you dangle a false promise: the vaccine, and because you’re living in such chronic pain, and fear, you will gravitate – not intellectually – towards something that, anything, that will alleviate that emotional pain that you’re in. Now, that explains why people get so belligerent if you challenge them. Because if you challenge someone’s narrative, that they bought into, what you’re really doing is bringing them back into that anxiety state, and they, it causes so much pain they can’t stand it. So you can’t reason with them. It’s not a – it’s a super rational transformation of – it’s a way of enslaving people.

Denying the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin – because THEY WORK

@16:31: Now, the problem with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, for example, is that they work! And since they work, what that means is that it could reduce the amount of anxiety and fear in the world, which is contrary to the whole point of the bioweapon. It’s a weapon against the bioweapon.

So, you have to ask yourself, why was this released? Why was this bioweapon made? Why is there such a effort – sorry – why is there such a global coordinated attempt to maintain global fear? And there’s an answer.

Um, in 2015 – by the way, I have a disclaimer. I want no one to believe me. Please do not believe anything that I’m saying. But, you can take that information that I am giving you, and I’m giving you very specific information, and go do your due diligence. Do your research. Don’t make the same mistake that you did with the governments, with me. Don’t buy into my narrative. But at least listen. And then, go and look into it, do your research, your due diligence, your – use your brain. And then come to a conclusion. And whatever that conclusion is, it’s yours. But the point is, hear the other side.

Bill Gates and the eugenics agenda

@17:51: So anyway, so with that disclaimer, I’m going to say that in 2015, you can google, ‘Bill Gates, Ted lecture’. So this sociopath – [Jerm Warfare: “I saw it. I saw it.”] So this sociopath calls for the reduction of the world population, because of global warming. Okay. So first of all, what kind of human being, uh, feels entitled to decide how many people should live on the planet or not? So that’s someone who doesn’t believe in the divine nature of humanity. That’s someone believes that in eugenics, or survival of the fittest, or the godless version of our lives.

But anyway, I have a good joke for you, by the way.

A child goes to his mother and says, “Where did we come from?” So the mother says, “Well, we’re made in the image of God.” And then the child goes to the father and says, “Where did we come from?” And the father says, “We evolved from monkeys.” So the child’s confused. So he goes back to the mother and looks for an explanation. So the mother says, “That’s not a contradiction. That’s my side of the family, and that’s his side of the family.” [Jerm Warfare laughs]

So Bill Gates belongs on that, group of people, belong to the monkey side of humanity. Whereas most humanity belongs to the – the wind made in the image of God department. Now, since they think they’re the biggest monkey, they think they’re on top of the food chain. That they can do whatever they want with us.

So here – I’m going to ask you a question. The same sociopath – I’m picking on him, but he’s just representative of a mentality – in last year said that 7 billion people need to vaccinated. So one simple question. Why would I take a vaccine, supported and funded by someone – for my health, a vaccine for my health – supported by someone who wants to reduce the world population? [Jerm Warfare: “It makes no sense.”]

Risk versus benefit analysis: medical necessity / efficacy / safety

@19:57: Okay, so, if I evaluate any treatment, any vaccine, anything I do to someone, I do a risk versus benefit analysis. If what I’m going to do may be risky, but does the benefit outweigh the risk? Otherwise, why would I do it? So, to understand if something is beneficial, you need to assess three things.

Whether you need it: medical necessity. You know a surgeon who operates on everyone is not a surgeon. He’s a butcher. He’s not using medical judgement. Just because someone came to your office doesn’t mean you have to cut him. There has to be a need for it, a reason for it. And the real surgeons know when not to cut. A real doctor knows when not to do something. So necessity.

Does it work? Efficacy. That’ll be useful, right? If I’m going to do something to someone, it better work.

And is it safe?

Though, if you analyze these vaccines from that perspective, and I can do that for you, I don’t know how much time we have, but – [Jerm Warfare: “No, please. I’ve got all the time.”] All right, so let’s look at medical necessity.

Without a vaccine: healthy children have a 99.998% survival rate /
“For every one child that dies from COVID-19 naturally, a hundred will die from the vaccine.”

@21:05: 18 and under, healthy children, have a 99.998% survival rate, according to the CDC, with no treatment from COVID. Why would I immunize a group, a demographic, that has a near 100% chance of recovery with NO treatment, with an experimental substance of questionable efficacy and known danger? The answer is I wouldn’t. Unless, I believe in child sacrifice. Doctor, Dr. Michael – “

Jerm Warfare: “Yeah. Exactly right. But – sorry, sorry, sorry – doctor, the media keeps pushing out a different story. So the questions is, who do you believe?”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Well, you can look at the CDC and see the survival rate of COVID-19. Um, as a matter of fact, I mean I can look at the day outside right now and say it’s night. That doesn’t mean it’s true. So the media is a tool of the fear. Maintaining the fear. So, getting back to my point, which was that – yeah, the young demographic has a 100% survival, essentially, so why would I do something that would threaten that demographic?

If you look at Dr. Michael Yeadon, who was the head of Pfizer, vice president of Pfizer[Jerm Warfare: “Yeah, he was on my podcast also.”] So, you know what he says? The guy is a world expert on vaccine development. And he did his statistical analysis, and he said the following, and he said this to me directly, because I’m friends with him and I called him up, and he said “For every one child that dies from COVID-19 naturally, a hundred will die from the vaccine.” 

Jerm Warfare: “That is not something I want to hear, doc.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Well it’s not about what you want to hear or don’t want to hear, it’s about the truth. I don’t want to hear it either but it’s not going to help the children that are going to be sacrificed. 

Let me ask you a question. What’s the difference if I take a child, let’s say a five year old, and cut its throat, or throw this child off a cliff, or into a volcano or whatever, or inject them with something that they don’t need because they’re going to get better anyway, and it has a 100 to 1 kill ratio? [Jerm Warfare: “Yeah, no… this, um – “]

Without a vaccine: healthy 18-45 year olds have a 99.95% survival rate /
WITH TREATMENT (not vaccine), it’s near 100% survival rate

@23:26: So, okay, I’m gonna finish. Now, if we look at 18 to 45, many healthy adults, so the survival benefit there is according to the CDC, is 99.95%. With treatment, it’s near a 100%. So the same question. Why would I vaccinate a demographic of healthy adults, with something that, against the virus, that they’re gonna get better from, and with something that may kill them? It just doesn’t make sense.

And just yesterday, it was published, multiple studies, that proved what we all knew anyway, that natural immunity is multiple – many many times better than vaccine induced immunity. Which means, anyone who had COVID already and has antibodies have superior antibodies. So why would I inject in them a liquid that makes inferior antibodies and puts them at risk? There’s no medical – just – there’s no medical necessity there.

Okay. Now let’s get to the problematic group. The high risk group, 45 and over, or those that have medical problems, have a death rate, globally, of 7.5%. That’s unacceptable. That is… a huge number of dead people. However, if you treat them, properly, all the data, all the clinical trials or the peer reviewed studies, they’re dozens of them that have corroborated my initial observations. Which I had published in a peer-reviewed international journal, that if you treat people properly, you reduce the death rate and hospitalization rate by 85%.

So, just to explain what that actually means, at a 600,000 dead Americans, we could’ve prevented 510,000 from going to the hospital. So I can reduce that death rate from 7.5% to around 1%. So now comes a good question. If we have something that with treatment, has a 1% death rate, in a sub – in a small demographic of high risk patients, perhaps it’s better to vaccinate than let them get sick. We have to – we have – it’s a good idea – thought. It’s a question. I’m not denying it.
 

By the way, if there were good, effective and safe COVID-19 vaccines, I would recommend them. I’m not against the vaccines, I’m against being stupid. And, so let’s look if these vaccines have – if they work!

Booster shots suggested even though the initial vaccines
DON’T WORK

@26:07: The three most vaccinated countries in the world: Israel, Gibraltar, and in the Indian Ocean there’s an island nation called Seychelles, they all have more than 80% vaccination rates. All the countries are experiencing massive outbreaks of delta variant.

The CDC director, I think her name – Walensky or whatever he name is, said two days ago that it seems according to the Israeli data, anyone who was vaccinated early, has a higher risk to end up in the hospital, in the ICU, and therefore you should take another shot. [Jerm Warfare: “Why?”]

I’ll tell you why in a minute. But, so, so it doesn’t work. Apparently.

And now let’s look at the safety concerns, which is really – could keep us busy for the next hour. Let’s divide safety concerns over time. Because they vary over time. So there’s the first time period would be, let’s say from the moment of injection to 3 months. It’ll be the acute period. Then there’s the subacute period from 3 months to 3 years. And then there’s the long-term, more than 3 years. And I want to break it up in this way because it’s important to understand the mechanisms of action.

The – I’m sorry, my kids are calling me. Um, from the moment of injection until 3 months, people are dying from blood clots. And we know exactly why. The Salk Institute from San Diego published a paper, a landmark paper a few months ago explaining the mechanism. From the moment you’re injected, your entire body becomes a spike factory. Producing a viral spike protein.”

Jerm Warfare: “Sorry, before you go on, can you just explain what that means? Cause we keep hearing about that.”

The “vaccine”/”poison death shots” cause dangerous spike proteins to produce in our body – leading to blood clots

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @28:16: “Well, um, how do vaccines work? How – usually I would give you a piece of a virus, let’s say the flu virus. So, I’ll take a piece of it, not the whole living thing, although sometimes we do use living tenuated viruses, but in most cases – or polio – that’s a better example. I take a dead polio virus and I inject it into you. Your immune system recognizes that it doesn’t belong there. It mounts an immune response generating antibodies and now if you ever come into contact with real polio, all your soldiers are ready to pounce, and destroy it and you don’t get sick.

That’s how a normal, traditional vaccine would work. These quote/unquote vaccines, which I call ‘poison death shots’, they’re completely different. They don’t inject a piece of virus. At all. They inject a code, a formula, that converts your body into a factory that produces part of the virus. And a very specific part of the virus.

See the virus, coronavirus, is basically a ball with thorns. And it has these little spikes. Let’s call it the male organ. And in order to be able to get into the cell, it needs to attach to the receptor on the cell, which is the female organ. So the spike itself goes and finds its mate, and that allows the virus then to get into the cell. So, the spike is what actually gets the virus inside the cell.

So what we’re doing is giving you a code in the form of mRNA, which is the code. Your body’s cellular metabolism, your body’s own processes, are hijacked to manufacture all these little spikes. Not the whole virus, by the way. Just these little spikes. Trillions, hundreds of trillions of them, and it turns out that they migrate and end up in your blood vessels. Lining the endothelium, which is the inner skin. The inner lining of the blood vessel.

And it’s supposed to be smooth, obviously. Cause you have high rate of flow of blood cells, you don’t want them – [Jerm Warfare: “Yes, I understand.”] – you don’t want them to bump into stuff and break. In fact, all of a sudden you just coated lined wallpaper, inner lining of every vessel in your body with thorns. Little spikes. [Jerm Warfare: “Okay, yes.”] And then the blood cells get damaged. And when they get damaged, they leak stuff. That sets off a reaction in the body to cause blood clots.

So, the main cause of death in the first 3 months is blood clots in the form of heart attacks and strokes, or anywhere else. It could be kidneys, lungs, could be in your mesentery, your gut. So that’s what we’ve seen. And 40% of the deaths are happening within the first 3 days of injection.

How many people have to die from the COVID vaccines before we finally say, ENOUGH?

@31:45: Now, what’s the threshold of death? When do we say, you know, it’s too risky? It’s too much? In 1976 we had the swine flu vaccine. Um, it killed 26 people. The entire vaccine program was canceled.

According to the United States government already, this is according to the government, there’s 13,000 dead. According to the whistleblower, from the CDC, that wrote an affidavit, the number’s 45,000.

That’s not enough? I’m telling you, in 2009 there was a study on the system used for reporting. Called VAERS. That only 1% of events are actually reported. Now, I can make an argument, that maybe rashes are reported much less than death. Agreed. I’m not gonna deny that.

So what is the number? No one really took the time to figure it out. But, okay, it’s not 1%. So I’ll be very generous to VAERS. I’ll give ’em a 20% reporting rate. And that’s being generous. So what that means is that the number of deaths being reported, you have to multiply it by a factor of 5. [Jerm Warfare: “So over 200,000.] I think so.

And there are two other problems with this system. Which is that known reports are being scrubbed off the server. We have evidence of this. We have screenshots of reports that were there a few months ago that no longer exist. We can’t get ’em. And also I have colleagues that are trying to file reports. They lost patients, and the system won’t let them. It’s rejecting their reports, on technicalities.

So, there’s an obvious – and Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin is actually doing an investigation to see to what degree their suppression and obstruction and flow of true side effect information. So, that’s a lot of death already.

Issues of myocarditis and miscarriages – and no long-term assessment of the COVID vaccines

@33:55: The other problem is inflammation of the hearts. Called myocarditis. It damages the hearts it seems of young men. And the other problem is miscarriages in the first trimester in women that have been vaccinated is a much increased rate of losing their babies.

So that’s pretty bad. Remember, this is something that doesn’t work and you don’t need it. And then, let’s go to the longer term consequences. Well, it’s clear that the number of autoimmune diseases and cancers is going up. And there’s enough data concern/smoke, to require further inquiries to see if these mRNA vaccines are actually causing it. Remember, it went from laboratory to human use in less than a year. When on average it takes 10 years to vet a vaccine. So it’s not like we have long-term studies. So you need to know what’s going to be in a few years.

So there’s a concern already of autoimmune diseases and cancer – so that’s going to effect lifespan, and there’s also a real concern – there’s a leaked study from Pfizer that wasn’t supposed to get out. But someone leaked it from Japan. Where it showed the, when you inject it here [Dr. Zelenko points to his arm] where the vaccine actually ends up. And the largest amount ends up in the ovaries. So the question is, what is the long-term consequences on fertility? That has not been vet – that has not been ruled out. That has not been checked or assessed.

” – this vaccine program is the biggest threat to humanity in the history of humanity.”

@35:32: Okay. Now, but that’s – everything I just said is nothing compared to what I’m about to tell you. Between 3 months and 3 years, is a period where the world experts, the top minds in medicine and science, are SCREAMING, “Stop! You’re going to cause a genocide.”

So, for example. Remember, don’t believe me. Dr. Luc Montagnier, he happened to win the Nobel Prize – [Jerm Warfare: “For HIV.”] – for finding HIV. Yes. Pretty big boy. I wouldn’t say he’s the… he said like this. He’s never seen anything like this, and this vaccine program is the biggest threat to humanity in the history of humanity.

Okay. Then, Dr. Dolores Cahill, a top […] from Ireland, came out saying that within 2 years, she believes 90% of the people who got vaccinated will be dead.

Now, – [Jerm Warfare: “Wait! Two years?] – Yeah. So maybe she’s wrong. Maybe it’s 3 years. Or 4 years. And maybe it’s not 90%, what if it’s 5%? Not enough? So she’s raising a concern – hold on, and then Dr. Robert Malone invented the mRNA vaccine technology. It’s telling people, “Don’t take it. It’s too dangerous. The government is lying to you.”

And the, Dr. Michael Yeadon that I mentioned is saying the same exact thing.

Immune system, activated by the vaccine/virus, is attacking our own body –
Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE)

@37:15: What is the concern? And why are people going nuts about this? So, here’s the reason. In the 1960’s, an RSV vaccine was made, given to children, it killed children. No one understood why until they figured out that the children developed antibodies to RSV. And then when they were exposed to RSV, there was a – the immune system blew up and it was the immune system that killed the child. [Jerm Warfare: “What? The immune system?”]

It’s the child’s immune system that killed the child. It was an overreaction. That’s called antibody dependent enhancement. It’s not from the actual vaccine. What happens – listen again. They got the vaccine, they developed antibodies. Now you have these supposedly protective antibodies, then the RSV virus came, touched – came into contact with these antibodies and there was an explosion in unhealthy immune reaction.

Not every part of your immune system is good for you. You heard of autoimmune diseases? Lupus? Rheumatoid arthritis? That’s your body’s immune system attacking your body. That’s unhealthy. So it’s not always that your immune system is good for you.

So, in this particular case, the antibodies that were produced by the vaccine triggered a reaction, once coming into contact with the virus that killed the children.

So in 1970’s, there was something called the dengue fever virus vaccine, same thing happened. They would give it to people/adults; they died. It was the same exact mechanism of death called antibody dependent enhancement.

In all the attempts to make coronavirus vaccines, in the animal models, all of them manifested this reaction. And killed a large percentage of the animals that – in other words, the animals were vaccinated: mice, ferrets, and they produce antibodies, and then they’re purposefully infected with the virus that they’re immunized against. They’re challenged, to see if it works. And a large percentage of these animals died. Again, it’s called antibody dependent enhancement.

So here’s the question. Wouldn’t it be a good idea to rule that out by human beings, before you deploy a vaccine to 7 billion people?”

Jerm Warfare: “It sounds like an absolutely terrible idea. So, why – “

Leading experts warn of the many side effects of the vaccines –
and world suppression of the truth

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @40:13: “That’s exactly what happened. Said – there’s 2 billion people already in the United States, there’s been a deployment of a substance that has the potential to kill the organism that it was given to. And that potential has not been excluded. And there’s a historical precedent for these things to happen. And it’s being done to people that don’t need the vaccine. And it doesn’t even work.

So, I’m going to make it very simple. Um, this vaccine is being deployed not for medical reasons. At all.

So I already told you, look, the causes, blood clots, inflammation of hearts, miscarriages, increased rates of cancer potentially, increased rates of autoimmune diseases, potential infertility, and the potential of this autoimmune death process, that it’s not me saying it! I am nobody. There are world experts in the fields; you mean, the guy who invented the vaccine – that’s not enough for you? Or the guy who ran Pfizer? Or the guy who won the Nobel Prize for finding HIV? That’s not enough?

These people – so what would be the normal rational thing to do? Would be, well, take a step back, let’s test these more to see if they’re safe. Forget about – you don’t need it, but still. So, do you see what’s going on here?

There is the suppression of life-saving medications, there’s the suppression of knowledge of life-saving treatments. Anyone who dares to say against the accepted narrative that the media is pumping, is deplatformed. It could be the world expert who made the mRNA vaccine who says something against the policy of the government is immediately deplatformed from every social media site. Why is that? And then, the actual side effects of these vaccines are being artificially suppressed, so that we don’t know the truth. And no one really needs this vaccine. Because I explained to you – though… what’s going on here?”

Jerm Warfare: “I mean, Dr. Lee Merritt has said very much the same thing.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Yep, and Dr. Peter McCullough.

A need to reflect on our own values and freedom into the future

Jerm Warfare @42:47: “Yes. He also says the same thing. So, how – how do you, how do you respond, doc? What do you do, in a situation now when you’re hearing about the mandatory vaccines that are coming? And by the way, it’s not just in the United States. Our own government is now talking about making these vaccines mandatory.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Define mandatory. In other words, they’re going to come down and hold you down, and put a needle in your arm?”

Jerm Warfare: “I don’t think that – to that degree, but I think you won’t be able to get employment, you won’t be able to go into shops, etc., etc.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “I wouldn’t worry about it; I’ll tell you why. Because there’ll be so many dead people, rotting corpses in the streets, that the worse it’ll get, it will look like a kindergarten, and you’ll have plenty of job openings.”

Jerm Warfare: [laughs] “I’ve never heard that. That is such a dark joke, but it’s so true.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Look, I am not ready to sacrifice having a future for a few conveniences in the present. [Jerm Warfare: “Sure.”] I’d rather sacrifice the present, so that I have a future. And people have really messed up values. “All right. I can’t fly in a plane, so I’ll take the vaccine.” or, you know, “I’ll lose my job.” or, “I won’t be able to go to school.” And I look at these people and I say, well, you are making decisions on – that will potentially affect your lifespan and you’re doing it so willingly and blind – why? And so people are so gullible; it’s so easy to manipulate humanity.”

We’re in a life and death situation: not with the virus, but with the vaccine

Jerm Warfare @44:36: “Is it, is it literally a life and death kind of scenario? In your view.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Absolutely, yes. We’re at World War 3. And you know, if the Germans were bombing over your head, you wouldn’t be asking that question. But the bombs that are being sent at us are invisible. And sugar-coated. And, I mean, there’s already hundreds of thousands of deaths from the vaccine. How much more death do you need to see before you say enough?”

Jerm Warfare: “Well they’ll say – they’ll respond and say yes, but it’s not because of the vaccine. It’s because of other things.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Well they can say whatever they want. It’s just not consistent with truth. Not consistent with the data. And we know that COVID-19 is exceptionally treated.

It’s true that if there’s a fire and I don’t put it out, it’s going to burn the house down. So you’ve set a lot of fires, artificially. You go around and you set fires around the neighborhood and then you tell people, don’t put it out. Then the neighborhood burns down. Okay? That’s true. But doesn’t mean you have to put gasoline on the fire either. So, my answer to you is, don’t worry about the virus. Be prepared to deal with it. They’re over the counter options. And you’ll be fine. And don’t buy into the false – “

Assessing the difference between DNA and mRNA vaccines –
and the issues with “shedding”

Jerm Warfare @45:54: “Emma has got a question. She wants to know what your thoughts on the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. Because as far as I’m aware it’s not mRNA.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Yeah, it’s worse. It’s a DNA vaccine. In other words, the way it works is, mRNA is limited to the cytoplasm of a cell. To the – let’s call it your living room. It gets into your living room and it uses your television and it makes copies using the equipment that’s in your living room. And those proteins that are made are what are potentially killing you.

The Johnson and Johnson is a DNA vaccine. And that gets into your bed where you are, lying there, in your pajamas, and goes right into your core, into your essence, and makes – messes with your DNA, and then becomes mRNA and – in other words, it’s deeper penetrating. It’s much worse. It’s like having someone – difference of this: someone in your living room and someone in your bed. Johnson and Johnson gets into – into you, real deep.

Now in Texas they have a flag, ‘don’t tread on me’. So I made a meme, ‘don’t shed on me.’ But uh, I don’t like shedding, but it’s not really a major problem for most people. Because what shedding is, is in the first 3 months after you get vaccinated, you’re actually shedding the spikes. And it comes through your breath, droplets, it comes through your skin, comes through other bodily fluids.

Now most people, it may mess up their periods, it may make you feel not so well, but it’s not an enough of a dose to cause real problems. Except in 2 categories of people. Someone who has a blood-clotting predisposition. There are conditions where people are more prone to blood clots. That could trigger blood clots. Because that’s what the main concern is, in the first few months.

And then, miscarriages. It seems to cause miscarriages in, you know, pregnant women. So, if – or women that want to get pregnant; it messes with their ability to get pregnant. So, but it’s a short-lived problem. So it’s not – it’s a problem, but it’s not a problem worth over emphasizing, because there’s much bigger problems.”

Jerm Warfare: “She says, yeah, especially around pregnant women.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “Yeah, so that – that’s a good question. Um, you don’t know who’s vaccinated, and again, if it’s more than 3 months they’re no longer radioactive. You know? But you don’t really know when and what – so, that becomes a hard question. So… pregnant women have to be a little bit more isolated, in my opinion, if they want to protect their pregnancies. But the majority of people should not isolate themselves because of shedding.

Inspiration and advice: ‘Stay away from bad, do good, and live’

@49:04: Whenever I need inspiration, I look back into bigger minds than me. And in the Psalms of David, King David writes the following, a very good prescription: ‘stay away from bad, do good, and live’. So that’s the prescription. So let’s break that up.

‘Stay away from bad’. Do not give into the fear, do not isolate yourself. Do not take a poison death shot. And if you did already, don’t do it again. Don’t harm yourself. Do no harm. Don’t destroy yourself psychologically, emotionally, and physically.

‘Do good’ means, that if you’re in the high risk category group, meaning anyone over the age of 45, or anyone with medical problems, or in my opinion anyone who got the vaccine, you should take prophylactics; it’s preventive therapy. And preventive therapy doesn’t mean to take another shot and make more bombs. Preventive therapy means that to prevent the detonation of those bombs that already exist by using antiviral drugs – um, and you can find them on my website: vladimirzelenkomd.com.

I have protocols with dosing and everything for prescription and for over the counter options. So people could have them in their hands. But they – and the idea is to protect yourself in advance so that you, if you do come into contact with the detonator, another virus, you don’t die. And if you do get sick, God forbid, you have to start treating day one. In other words, you don’t want the monster to wake up. And then you’ll live.”

Spirituality and the sanctity of life –
Godliness vs. godlessness

Jerm Warfare @51:03: “It seems like this is way more than a medical war that grew in. It seems like it’s a psychological war, isn’t it? Religious war, spiritual war, I don’t know what, but it’s certainly more – “

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “It’s a war against God. There are two systems of thought, that can’t co-exist anymore. There’s a system that is based on God centered consciousness. Which means like this, just follow the logic. If God makes you, that means your life, your life has sanctity. If your life has sanctity, that means you have human rights. If you have human rights, then it’s not in the realm of another human being to decide how long you should live and how many of us should be on the planet. That’s God’s department.

There’s another system, which is completely godless. It’s based on Darwin’s theories and Galton who developed eugenics. You know they were – he was a nephew of Charles Darwin. And their system is the survival of the fittest system. In other words, they believe that there’s a hierarchy of humanity, to be based on genetics or other factors, and it’s the strongest, on top of the food chain, that will dictate what happens to everyone else.

Now, this sounds like a fairy tale except that it killed 200,000,000 people 80 years ago. Because invariably it deteriorates into 3 categories of human beings. The super-human, the human and the sub-human. So the Nazis, the Aryans, believed that they were descendants of Aryan gods. And therefore felt entitled that they could enslave and murder anyone they wanted, and wage global war.

And the humans were the Anglo-Saxons, the Europeans that were meant to be enslaved and serve the super-humans. And the sub-humans that I belong to, the Jews, the slobs, the gypsies, handicapped, and political people that oppose them politically, they’re the sub-humans that needed to be thrown into gas chambers and then the ovens and vaporized into dust.

So, and this is not a fairytale. This is history. Recent history. So that mentality did not go away. That mentality went dormant for a bit, and now it’s woken up, but it’s not anti-semitic, actually. What it is, is something else.

On top of the super-human is these, what they perceive themselves as evolved higher level of consciousness people that think that they know better for what the rest of us need, and therefore can make policies that will control how many of us live, and how long we live. In reality, these are not evolved people. These are devolved pagans. These are sociopaths, these are wannabe deities, these are just the biblical historical replay of maniacs that are denying the existence of God and believe in their own immortality.

People who are dictating the rest of the world keep themselves hidden

@54:17: And what – so let’s – who are they? Um, honestly speaking, 70% of all corporate wealth in the world is owned by 150 people. So I would suspect it’s some – some people in that group. And because they control media, politics, academia, and one of their policies – what do they want?

The real people who are doing this are too smart to be in the news. It’s not Fauci, it’s not even Soros or Gates, or Schwab. Because the people that are really doing it are really really smart. And they hide themselves like layers of proxies, to do their bidding. And ‘why would I sacrifice myself – I’m too smart for that’.

But if you look at the World Economic Forum, which is a good example of despotic thinking – tyrannical thinking – and they crafted a 2030 UN plan. It’s already being implemented. And, you know, Hitler wrote Mein Kampf, and wrote it many years before he took control. He laid out his plans. These people are not even hiding their agenda. So what is their agenda? Go look at the 2030 World Economic Forum plan, and you’ll see – [Jerm Warfare: “You’ll own nothing.”] – and you’ll be happy, yeah.

What kind of sociopath, what kind of human being feels that they can decide whether you own property or not? Possessions or not? What else do they say? Um, you won’t eat meat except on special occasions. [Jerm Warfare: “And insects, also.”] All right. I didn’t hear that one. They – you won’t use fossil fuels. America will no longer be a super-power. A few European countries will run the world. There’ll be a billion refugees. So, what you have are – this guy, Schwab, said in 2016, it’s on an interview in French, that within 10 years, by 2026, everyone will have a digital tag and identifier in them.

Jerm Warfare: [jokes] “You are really ruining my Friday evening, doc.”

Test on humanity – on our decisions

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko @56:58: “You know, that’s good. Because reality – you need a reality check. And the next people that are willing to stand their ground and sacrifice even their own lives so that humanity’s – the soul of humanity is… remains. Because that’s, it’s an attack on the core of what is means to be a human being. And the core of our souls, and the core of our relationship with Creator.

And ultimately I think there’s a divine test, here. Which is, no one’s making you take this. You’re choosing to do it. There’s no such thing ‘you were forced’. Because, you could be pressured, you could be coerced, but you still have the ability to say ‘no’.

And if you put your trust – if I was God, I would be asking this following question: “I know you’re scared and the world is crazy. But who are you going to put your trust in? Me, who makes you? You’re going to ask me to fill the… your anxiety space? Are you going to ask me for protection? Because I’ll do it. Or are you going to go around to false gods, despotic governments, sociopathic oligarchs, and the golden calf of this vaccine? Because if you are going to do that, then let them protect you. Let’s see how that’s going to work out for you.”

Reflecting on the future – God conscious living vs. immorality

Jerm Warfare @58:20: “In front of you, doc, there is a crystal ball. What do you see?”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “I see a glorious future. I see a… we’re in the cusp of a redemptive process. Where there’s going to be – people are going to self select into… God conscious living, versus idolatry.

And then I believe what the prophets say. Not me. That the spirit of inequity will be removed from the Earth. God will take out His big broom, clean out the garbage, and then the world will be filled with the knowledge and glory of God.

I think, I think that God has had enough of people who, for example, if these despots had their way, a 30 year old man who thinks he’s a woman would be sharing a bathroom with my 4 year old daughter. [Jerm Warfare: “It’s unreal.”]

So this type of erosion – you know, in the Bible it says that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed. The Talmud asks why. So one suggestion is because of immorality. The answer’s no. The whole world was immoral. What was so special about them that they were singled out? You know what the answer is? That they codified it into law. It became the law of the land. Immorality became codified as the norm.

[Jerm Warfare: “That’s what’s happening now.”] You think? What do you think I”m telling you this? So I think that we’re in a glorious journey that there’s going to be a transformation. It’s going to be bumpy. Be some turbulence. But at the end, the world will be cleaned up, just like the flood. And we’ll be left with, with people that want to live a God centered moral life.

I’m not afraid of dying. It’s not my department. You know? How I’m going to die, how long I’m going to live, no one knows. And it’s ultimately in God’s hands and He could do whatever He wants.

What I’m afraid of is living. In other words, am I living to my fullest potential? When I have to stand before the King of Kings, and give an accounting – he’s not going to ask me why I wasn’t like you. He’s going to ask me, “Why weren’t you like you could’ve been?” Me. Zev Zelenko. “Why didn’t you reach the potential that I had for you?”

And, so, I want to use my thoughts, of check and control, my speech, and my actions of check and control, and my time. I want to use that in a way that makes the world cleaner and better and healthier, and more Godly, and beautiful. I think that’s a worthy, worthy of my time and efforts. And that’s what I focus on, and that’s what I try to do. And that’s why I’m talking to you.

Jerm Warfare: “I’ve been waiting for 30 minutes to say what I’m about to say, but you are making medicine great again.

Thank you so much for your time. It’s been a great pleasure.”

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: “God bless you. Thank you.” 

Jerm Warfare: “You too. Thank you, man.

My name is Jerm, this is Jerm Warfare, the battle of ideas.”

Thank you so much to Jerm Warfare and Dr. Vladimir Zelenko for this interview. Your efforts to spread awareness and the truth is extremely important especially in these suppressed times, where going against the narrative is ridiculed and censored.

And a special thank you to Dr. Zelenko and other doctors/healthcare providers who made the decision to help treat the people who needed it. Your compassion and integrity speaks volumes of your character and is the role model that people need to get through these uncertain times.

Lastly, a huge thank you to everyone for reading and spreading these messages. God bless.

Featured image by HeungSoon from Pixabay

Our Grave Concerns About the Handling of the COVID Pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK

Open letter from several healthcare professions to the UK government/administrators.

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

Mr Boris Johnson, Prime Minister

Ms Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister for Scotland

Mr Mark Drakeford, First Minister for Wales

Mr Paul Givan, First Minister for Northern Ireland

Mr Sajid Javid, Health Secretary

Dr Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer

Dr Patrick Vallance, Chief Scientific Officer

 

22 August 2021

Dear Sirs and Madam,

Our grave concerns about the handling of the COVID pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK.

We write as concerned doctors, nurses, and other allied healthcare professionals with no vested interest in doing so. To the contrary, we face personal risk in relation to our employment for doing so and / or the risk of being personally “smeared” by those who inevitably will not like us speaking out.

We are taking the step of writing this public letter because it has become apparent to us that:

  • The  Government (by which we mean the UK government and three devolved governments/administrations and associated government advisors and agencies such as the CMOs, CSA, SAGE, MHRA, JCVI, Public Health services, Ofcom etc, hereinafter “you” or the “Government”) have based the handling of the COVID pandemic on flawed assumptions.
  • These have been pointed out to you by numerous individuals and organisations.
  • You have failed to engage in dialogue and show no signs of doing so. You have removed from people fundamental rights and altered the fabric of society with little debate in Parliament. No minister responsible for policy has ever appeared in a proper debate with anyone with opposing views on any mainstream media channel.
  • Despite being aware of alternative medical and scientific viewpoints you have failed to ensure an open and full discussion of the pros and cons of alternative ways of managing the pandemic.
  • The pandemic response policies implemented have caused massive, permanent and unnecessary harm to our nation, and must never be repeated.
  • Only by revealing the complete lack of widespread approval among healthcare professionals of your policies will a wider debate be demanded by the public.

In relation to the above, we wish to draw attention to the following points. Supporting references can be provided upon request.

  1. No attempt to measure the harms of lockdown policies

The evidence of disastrous effects of lockdowns on the physical and mental health of the population is there for all to see. The harms are massive, widespread, and long lasting. In particular, the psychological impact on a generation of developing children could be lifelong.

It is for this reason that lockdown policies were never part of any pandemic preparedness plans prior to 2020. In fact, they were expressly not recommended in WHO documents, even for severe respiratory viral pathogens and for that matter neither were border closures, face coverings, and testing of asymptomatic individuals. There has been such an inexplicable absence of consideration of the harms caused by lockdown policy it is difficult to avoid the suspicion that this is willful avoidance.

The introduction of such policies was never accompanied by any sort of risk/benefit analysis. As bad as that is, it is even worse that after the event when plenty of data became available by which the harms could be measured, only perfunctory attention to this aspect of pandemic planning has been afforded. Eminent professionals have repeatedly called for discourse on these health impacts in press-conferences but have been universally ignored.

What is so odd, is that the policies being pursued before mid-March 2020 (self-isolation of the ill and protection of the vulnerable, while otherwise society continued close to normality) were balanced, sensible and reflected the approach established by consensus prior to 2020. No cogent reason was given then for the abrupt change of direction from mid-March 2020 and strikingly none has been put forward at any time since.

  1. Institutional nature of COVID

It was actually clear early on from Italian data that COVID (the disease – as opposed to SARS-Cov-2 infection or exposure) was largely a disease of institutions. Care home residents comprised around half of all deaths, despite making up less than 1% of the population. Hospital infections are the major driver of transmission rates as was the case for both SARS1 and MERS. Transmission was associated with hospital contact in up to 40% of cases in the first wave in Spring 2020 and in 64% in winter 2020/2021.

Severe illness among healthy people below 70 years old did occur (as seen with flu pandemics) but was extremely rare.

Despite this, no early, aggressive and targeted measures were taken to protect care homes; to the contrary, patients were discharged without testing to homes where staff had inadequate PPE, training and information. Many unnecessary deaths were caused as a result.

Preparations for this coming winter, including ensuring sufficient capacity and preventative measures such as ventilation solutions, have not been prioritised.

  1. The exaggerated nature of the threat

Policy appears to have been directed at systematic exaggeration of the number of deaths which can be attributed to COVID. Testing was designed to find every possible ‘case’ rather than focusing on clinically diagnosed infections and the resulting exaggerated case numbers fed through to the death data with large numbers of people dying ‘with COVID’ and not ‘of COVID’ where the disease was the underlying cause of death.

The policy of publishing a daily death figure meant the figure was based entirely on the PCR test result with no input from treating clinicians. By including all deaths within a time period after a positive test, incidental deaths, with but not due to COVID, were not excluded thereby exaggerating the nature of the threat.

Moreover, in headlines reporting the number of deaths, a categorisation by age was not included. The average age of a COVID-labelled death is 81 for men and 84 for women, higher than the average life expectancy when these people were born. This is a highly relevant fact in assessing the societal impact of the pandemic. Death in old age is a natural phenomenon. It cannot be said that a disease primarily affecting the elderly is the same as one which affects all ages, and yet the government’s messaging appears designed to make the public think that everyone is at equal risk.

Doctors were asked to complete death certificates in the knowledge that the deceased’s death had already been recorded as a COVID death by the Government. Since it would be virtually impossible to find evidence categorically ruling out COVID as a contributory factor to death, once recorded as a “COVID death” by the government, it was inevitable that it would be included as a cause on the death certificate. Diagnosing the cause of death is always difficult and the reduction in post mortems will have inevitably resulted in increased inaccuracy. The fact that deaths due to non-COVID causes actually moved into a substantial deficit (compared to average) as COVID-labelled deaths rose (and this was reversed as COVID-labelled deaths fell) is striking evidence of over-attribution of deaths to COVID.

The overall all-cause mortality rate from 2015-2019 was unusually low and yet these figures have been used to compare to 2020 and 2021 mortality figures which has made the increased mortality appear unprecedented. Comparisons with data from earlier years would have demonstrated that the 2020 mortality rate was exceeded in every year prior to 2003 and is unexceptional as a result.

Even now COVID cases and deaths continue to be added to the existing total without proper rigour such that overall totals grow ever larger and exaggerate the threat. No effort has been made to count totals in each winter season separately which is standard practice for every other disease.

You have continued to adopt high-frequency advertising through publishing and broadcast media outlets to add to the impact of “fear messaging”. The cost of this has not been widely published, but government procurement websites reveal it to be immense – hundreds of millions of pounds.

The media and government rhetoric is now moving onto the idea that “Long Covid” is going to cause major morbidity in all age groups including children, without having a discussion of the normality of postviral fatigue which lasts upwards of 6 months. This adds to the public fear of the disease, encouraging vaccination amongst those who are highly unlikely to suffer any adverse effects from COVID.

  1. Active suppression of discussion of early treatment using protocols being successfully deployed elsewhere.

The harm caused by COVID and our response to it should have meant that advances in prophylaxis and therapeutics for COVID were embraced. However, evidence on successful treatments has been ignored or even actively suppressed. For example, a study in Oxford published in February 2021 demonstrated that inhaled Budesonide could reduce hospitalisations by 90% in low risk patients and a publication in April 2021 showed that recovery was faster for high risk patients too. However, this important intervention has not been promoted.

Dr. Tess Lawrie, of the Evidence Based Medical Consultancy in Bath, presented a thorough analysis of the prophylactic and therapeutic benefits of Ivermectin to the government in January 2021. More than 24 randomised trials with 3,400 people have demonstrated a 79-91% reduction in infections and a 27-81% reduction in deaths with Ivermectin.

Many doctors are understandably cautious about possible over-interpretation of the available data for the drugs mentioned above and other treatments, although it is to be noted that no such caution seems to have been applied in relation to the treatment of data around the government’s interventions (eg the effectiveness of lockdowns or masks) when used in support of the government’s agenda.

Whatever one’s view on the merits of these repurposed drugs, it is totally unacceptable that doctors who have attempted to merely open discussion about the potential benefits of early treatments for COVID have been heavily and inexplicably censored. Knowing that early treatments which could reduce the risk of requiring hospitalisation might be available would alter the entire view held by many professionals and lay people alike about the threat posed by COVID, and therefore the risk / benefit ratio for vaccination, especially in younger groups.

  1. Inappropriate and unethical use of behavioural science to generate unwarranted fear.

Propagation of a deliberate fear narrative (confirmed through publicly accessible government documentation) has been disproportionate, harmful and counterproductive. We request that it should cease forthwith.

To give just one example, the government’s face covering policies seem to have been driven by behavioural psychology advice in relation to generating a level of fear necessary for compliance with other policies. Those policies do not appear to have been driven by reason of infection control, because there is no robust evidence showing that wearing a face covering (particularly cloth or standard surgical masks) is effective against transmission of airborne respiratory pathogens such as SARS-Cov-2. Several high profile institutions and individuals are aware of this and have advocated against face coverings during this pandemic only inexplicably to reverse their advice on the basis of no scientific justification of which we are aware. On the other hand there is plenty of evidence suggesting that mask wearing can cause multiple harms, both physical and mental. This has been particularly distressing for the nation’s school children who have been encouraged by government policy and their schools to wear masks for long periods at school.

Finally, the use of face coverings is highly symbolic and thus counterproductive in making people feel safe. Prolonged wearing risks becoming an ingrained safety behaviour, actually preventing people from getting back to normal because they erroneously attribute their safety to the act of mask wearing rather than to the remote risk, for the vast majority of healthy people under 70 years old, of catching the virus and becoming seriously unwell with COVID.

  1. Misunderstanding of the ubiquitous nature of mutations of newly emergent viruses.

The mutation of any novel virus into newer strains – especially when under selection pressure from abnormal restrictions on mixing and vaccination – is normal, unavoidable and not something to be concerned about. Hundreds of thousands of mutations of the original Wuhan strain have already been identified. Chasing down every new emergent variant is counterproductive, harmful and totally unnecessary and there is no convincing evidence that any newly identified variant is any more deadly than the original strain.

Mutant strains appear simultaneously in different countries (by way of ‘convergent evolution’) and the closing of national borders in attempts to prevent variants travelling from one country to another serves no significant infection control purpose and should be abandoned.

  1. Misunderstanding of asymptomatic spread and its use to promote public compliance with restrictions.

It is well-established that asymptomatic spread has never been a major driver of a respiratory disease pandemic and we object to your constant messaging implying this, which should cease forthwith. Never before have we perverted the centuries-old practice of isolating the ill by instead isolating the healthy. Repeated mandates to healthy, asymptomatic people to self-isolate, especially school children, serves no useful purpose and has only contributed to the widespread harms of such policies. In the vast majority of cases healthy people are healthy and cannot transmit the virus and only sick people with symptoms should be isolated.

The government’s claim that one in three people could have the virus has been shown to be mutually inconsistent with the ONS data on prevalence of disease in society, and the sole effect of this messaging appears to have been to generate fear and promote compliance with government restrictions. The government’s messaging to ‘act as if you have the virus’ has also been unnecessarily fear-inducing given that healthy people are extremely unlikely to transmit the virus to others.

The PCR test, widely used to determine the existence of ‘cases’, is now indisputably acknowledged to be unable reliably to detect infectiousness. The test cannot discriminate between those in whom the presence of fragments of genetic material partially matching the virus is either incidental (perhaps because of past infection), or is representative of active infection, or is indicative of infectiousness. Yet, it has been used almost universally without qualification or clinical diagnosis to justify lockdown policies and to quarantine millions of people needlessly at enormous cost to health and well-being and to the country’s economy.

Countries that have removed community restrictions have seen no negative consequences which can be attributed to the easing. Empirical data from many countries demonstrates that the rise and fall in infections is seasonal and not due to restrictions or face coverings. The reason for reduced impact of each successive wave is that: (1) most people have some level of immunity either through prior immunity or immunity acquired through exposure; (2) as is usual with emergent new viruses, mutation of the virus towards strains causing milder disease appears to have occurred. Vaccination may also contribute to this although its durability and level of protection against variants is unclear. 

The government appears to be talking of “learning to live with COVID” while apparently practicing by stealth a “zero COVID” strategy which is futile and ultimately net-harmful.

  1. Mass testing of healthy children

Repeated testing of children to find asymptomatic cases who are unlikely to spread virus, and treating them like some sort of biohazard is harmful, serves no public health purpose and must stop.

During Easter term, an amount equivalent to the cost of building one District General Hospital was spent weekly on testing schoolchildren to find a few thousand positive ‘cases’, none of which was serious as far as we are aware.

Lockdowns are in fact a far greater contributor to child health problems, with record levels of mental illness and soaring levels of non-COVID infections being seen, which some experts consider to be a result of distancing resulting in deconditioning of the immune system.

  1. Vaccination of the entire adult population should never have been a prerequisite for ending restrictions.

Based merely on early “promising” vaccine data, it is clear that the Government decided in summer 2020 to pursue a policy of viral suppression within the entire population until vaccination was available (which was initially stated to be for the vulnerable only, then later changed – without proper debate or rigorous analysis – to the entire adult population).

This decision was taken despite massive harms consequent to continued lockdowns which were either known to you or ought to have been ascertained so as to be considered in the decision making process.

Moreover, a number of principles of good medical practice and previously unimpeachable ethical standards have been breached in relation to the vaccination campaign, meaning that in most cases, whether the consent obtained can be truly regarded as “fully informed” must be in serious doubt:

  • The use of coercion supported by an unprecedented media campaign to persuade the public to be vaccinated, including threats of discrimination, either supported by the law or encouraged socially, for example in co-operation with social media platforms and dating apps.
  • The omission of information permitting individuals to make a fully informed choice, especially in relation to the experimental nature of the vaccine agents, extremely low background COVID risk for most people, known occurrence of short-term side-effects and unknown long-term effects.

Finally, we note that the Government is seriously considering the possibility that these vaccines – which have no associated long-term safety data – could be administered to children on the basis that this might provide some degree of protection to adults. We find that notion an appalling and unethical inversion of the long-accepted duty falling on adults to protect children.

  1. Over-reliance on modeling while ignoring real-world data

Throughout the pandemic, decisions seem to have been taken utilising unvalidated models produced by groups who have what can only be described as a woeful track record, massively overestimating the impact of several previous pandemics.

The decision-making teams appear to have very little clinical input and, as far as is ascertainable, no clinical immunology expertise.

Moreover, the assumptions underlying the modeling have never been adjusted to take into account real-world observations in the UK and other countries.

It is an astonishing admission that, when asked whether collateral harms had been considered by SAGE, the answer given was that it was not in their remit – they were simply asked to minimise COVID impact. That might be forgivable if some other advisory group was constantly studying the harms side of the ledger, yet this seems not to have been the case.

Conclusions

The UK’s approach to COVID has palpably failed. In the apparent desire to protect one vulnerable group – the elderly – the implemented policies have caused widespread collateral and disproportionate harm to many other vulnerable groups, especially children. Moreover your policies have failed in any event to prevent the UK from notching up one of the highest reported death rates from COVID in the world.

Now, despite very high vaccination rates and the currently very low COVID death and hospitalisation rates, policy continues to be aimed at maintaining a population handicapped by extreme fear with restrictions on everyday life prolonging and deepening the policy-derived harms. To give just one example, NHS waiting lists now stand at 5.1m officially, with – according to the previous Health Secretary – a likely further 7m who will require treatment not yet presented. This is unacceptable and must be addressed urgently.

In short, there needs to be a sea change within the Government which must now pay proper attention to those esteemed experts outside its inner circle who are sounding these alarms. As those involved with healthcare, we are committed to our oath to “first do no harm”, and we can no longer stand by in silence observing policies which have imposed a series of supposed “cures” which are in fact far worse than the disease they are supposed to address.

The signatories of this letter call on you, in Government, without further delay to widen the debate over policy, consult openly with groups of scientists, doctors, psychologists and others who share crucial, scientifically-valid and evidence-based alternative views and to do everything in your power to return the country as rapidly as possible to normality with the minimum of further damage to society.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Jonathan Engler, MB ChB LLB (Hons) DipPharmMed

Professor John A Fairclough, BM BS B Med Sci FRCS FFSEM,  Consultant Surgeon, ran vaccination program for a Polio Outbreak, Past President BOSTA, for Orthopaedic Surgeons, Faculty member FFSEM

Mr Tony Hinton, MB ChB, FRCS, FRCS(Oto), Consultant Surgeon

Dr Renee Hoenderkamp, BSc (Hons) MBBS MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr Ros Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician

Mr Malcolm Loudon, MB ChB MD FRCSEd FRCS (Gen Surg) MIHM VR

Dr Geoffrey Maidment, MBBS, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician

Dr Alan Mordue, MB ChB, FFPH (ret), Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine

Mr Colin Natali, BSc(Hons), MBBS FRCS FRCS(Orth), Consultant Spine Surgeon

Dr Helen Westwood, MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner

Click here for the complete list of signatories and if you wish to add your name to the letter.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image: Prime Minister Boris Johnson during a press conference on 16 March, with Chief Medical Officer Prof Chris Witty and Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance. Picture by Andrew Parsons