Craig Venter of the NIH and Human Genome: Creating Synthetic Life | ” – trying to design what we want biology to do”

Agenda of the Human Genome Project: ” – for manufacturing and operating a complete human being.”

Playing God in Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Synthetic Biology and the Meaning of Life
– [ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837218/ ]

Thanks to a pingback post by the following site: There Is No Pandemic, it led me to a very interesting video featuring a Mr. Craig Venter, delving into an incredibly topical subject – even though the video was made in 2010.

Don’t think synthetic life-forms are possible in vaccines? Or that there’s even an agenda to do this?

Craig Venter, genetic researcher for the NIH and the Human Genome Project, would tell you otherwise…

“operating system”

“all the characteristics of the first species disappear”

“new species emerges from this software”

“making the flu vaccine each year by using these new synthetic techniques”

Click image for archived video. Original source can be found here: [ https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/may/20/craig-venter-synthetic-life-form ]
“Craig Venter creates synthetic life form”
Full transcript. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Craig Venter: “Well this has been about a 15 year process. It started back in 1995, when we sequenced the first two genomes in history. Including the smallest genome, that of mycoplasma genitalium. And we set out a goal to try and understand what the smallest genome you can have as an operating system, to try and understand the basic components of life. It’s taken us through this long journey. Much longer than we ever anticipated. But that’s what happens when you enter into areas that nobody’s ever been before.

So at first we had to learn how to write the genetic code to synthesize pieces. Because the largest piece that ever has been synthesized other than our work has been only 30,000 letters. The first chromosome we were trying to make was over 500,000. And the one that we ultimately made and report in this paper is over 1,000,000 letters of genetic code. And we start with 4 bottles of chemicals, and the computer code in the computer, the digital code in the computer from DNA sequence. So, just learning how to do the synthesis was mastering a lot of chemistry that has never been done before. And we learned sequentially over the years how to build larger and larger molecules.

In 2003 we reported making a 5,000 letter bacterial virus, 5X174, and how to error correct the pieces. So, we start with pieces of DNA coming off DNA synthesizers; they’re only about 50-80 letters long. That’s pretty much the limit of what you can make with a chemical synthesizer. So everything we make from that has to be putting these little pieces together. Much like having a box of legos and having to assemble them back in the right order to get what you started with. So it’s been progressive over this entire time period. We thought we would have this almost 3 years ago. But we kept running into very significant biological roadblocks.”

Interviewer: “All right. And what do you ultimately hope to do with a method like this?

Craig Venter: “Well, this is an important step, we think, both scientifically and philosophically. It certainly changed my views of definitions of life and how life works. It’s pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in the cell, and the cell instantly starts reading that new software, starts making a whole different set of proteins. And within a short while, all the characteristics of the first species disappear. And a new species emerges from this software that controls that cell going forward.

When we look at life forms we see them as sort of fixed entities. But this shows, in fact how dynamic they are. That they change from second to second. And that life is basically a result of an information process, a software process. Our genetic code is our software. And our cells are dynamically constantly reading that genetic code, making new proteins, the proteins make the other cellular components, and that’s what we see. But it’s hard to imagine how dynamic it is until we found, simply by replacing the software, it started making a whole new cell, whatever is defined by that software. So that’s, that’s a pretty important change in how we approach and think about life.

Also this is now the first time where we’ve started with information in the computer, built that software molecule, now over a million letters of genetic code, put that into a recipient cell, and have this process start where that information converted that cell into a new species. So this becomes a very powerful tool for trying to design what we want biology to do.

As leaders of competing genome projects, Francis Collins, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, and J. Craig Venter, president of Celera Genomics, were recognized, correctly, as the two most important players in the worldwide effort to spell out the 3 billion “letters” of the human genome–the biochemical recipe, encoded in our DNA, for manufacturing and operating a complete human being.

[ https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,998842,00.html ]

We have a wide range of applications, so at the biotech company that funded the synthetic genomics that Ham Smith and I started a few years back, we have a major deal with ExxonMobil to try and use algae to capture carbon dioxide and make new hydrocarbons that can go into the Exxon refineries. To try and replace taking the oil out of the ground.

There’s no natural algaes that we know that can do this at the scale it’s needed. So we’re going to have to use our synthetic genomic techniques to either heavily modify existing algaes or develop whole new ones from scratch that have all the parameters that we want. These same tools, these same processes can be used for making chemicals, for making food substances, we hope for cleaning up water.

But perhaps the most important immediate application is we’re already working at the Venter Institute and working with Novartis to try and make new vaccines very quickly; we think we can shorten the process by 99% for making the flu vaccine each year by using these new synthetic techniques. But I think it’s going to be one of those situations I tell audiences I talk to that ‘we’re entering a new era we’re limited mostly by our imaginations’.”

Interviewer: “Could you ever use a method like this with a higher organism? Something more complex than bacteria?

Craig Venter: “Well, it’s certainly not in the immediate future. Bacteria have much more simplified genetic systems. They don’t have the same complex regulation that higher organisms have. But there are a number of single cell eukaryotes.

So we’re eukaryotes because we have a nucleus, I think one of the key things we mastered with our studies, particularly since 2003, and we reported the latest results a few months ago in Science at the end of last year, is we can move chromosomes across the branches of life. So we can move from bacteria into eukaryotes, we use yeast for all these processes. We can take the chromosomes out of yeast and move them back into bacteria to create new life forms.

So a next step would be try to make a simplified eukaryote. Yeast is very key for bio-manufacturing, for ethanol production, etc. And if we can have even a more efficient yeast cell, and at the same time, try and understand all its components, I think we’ll be able to make synthetic eukaryotes. Higher animals, multi-cellular systems are, I think, projects for the much more distant future.”

Interviewer: “Actually I have a couple more questions. Just about how we distinguish between any sort of synthetically – organisms with synthetic genomes versus the natural ones? One question I guess would be about containment.”

[Interview cuts out a section]

Craig Venter: ” – we were when we first started down this process, what could be an artifact that could fool us into thinking we had created synthetic life, when in fact it was just a contaminate of the native chromosome? And, where would even a single molecule of native chromosome could fool us into thinking we had created a new cell?

So early on we started designing a process of putting watermarks in the genetic code. We did this in the first chromosome we reported two years ago, basically all of us that helped build the genetic code signed the DNA, coded our names into the chromosome.

With this genome we’ve gone a little bit further; we’ve put 4 major watermarks in. We’ve developed a new code for writing English language, other languages, with punctuation and numbers into the genetic code. In the first watermark we actually have this code that needs to be decoded for people to read the rest. We even have a website built into the genetic code that if people solve it they can let us know that they’ve been able to read it.

“- and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”Revelation 13:17

All the authors of this study over the… certainly the last decade, our names are all encoded in this first genome. And we have three quotations built in there of adding a little philosophy to the genetic code at the same time. Which I think the chance of finding any of these in a naturally occurring genome is about as close to zero as you can get. So we can absolutely prove from the genetic changes, that we’ve been built in to the design of the chromosomes that it’s unquestionably the synthetic DNA that we made, not some natural contaminant.

A containment, that’s a really critical issue, and it’s one of the most important issues to us, and one of the number one questions I get asked in all my litera- all my lectures around the globe. And when we look at molecular biology for the last several decades, we all use e. coli in the laboratory, that genes from multiple species have been put in it over the years – probably tens of millions of experiments. And there’s not been a single accident. And the reason for that is that e. coli has a chemical dependency for growing in the laboratory.

So these are things we can start to build in to the design of synthetic genomes, we can build in suicide genes so they can’t escape. And so we can use artificial amino acids. There’s a number of approaches that we’re developing and other labs are developing to guarantee absolute containment.

And this first proof of principle, we’ve largely copied the mycoides genome, because as a control, if we couldn’t boot up something that was already known, we could never get to the design phase. We deleted 14 genes from this genome, and made all these other genetic modifications. This cell only grows on extremely rich [media(sp?)] on the laboratory.

The only other place it goes, the mycoides genome is a minor goat pathogen that causes mastitis in goats. We think we’ve eliminated the genes associated with that, but it will not grow outside of the laboratory unless it’s deliberately injected or sprayed into a goat. So, we don’t work with goats, so we think we have pretty good containment systems in the lab.

There’s selectable markers that’s dependent on a specific antibiotic. So these are early attempts, I think. These containment approaches would get far more sophisticated with the next versions of what we and others do.”

Interviewer: “All right. Well, are there any final points you’d like to make before we close?”

Craig Venter: “Well, this is the first synthetic cell that’s been made and we call it synthetic because the cell is totally derived from a synthetic chromosome made from 4 bottles of chemicals on a chemical synthesizer. Starting with information in the computer.

Before we did these experiments starting back in the late 90’s, we asked for a complete bioethical review, knowing we were going into uncharted territory, trying to create new species. The review group at the University of Pennsylvania published the results in Science in 1999. Since then there’s been lots of different review processes around the world. The Sloan Foundation funded my institute, the Venter Institute, along with MIT, and a Washington think tank, to look at the security issues concerning this. That report was published and can be downloaded from JCVI.org.

There’s been ongoing discussions in the U.S. government, in the E.U., the National Academy of Sciences has done reports on this. So I think this is the first incidence in science where the extensive bioethical review took place before the experiments were done. And it’s part of an ongoing process that we’ve been driving, trying to make sure that the science proceeds in an ethical fashion, that we’re being thoughtful about what we do, and looking forward to the implications to the future.”

End of transcript.

So here is undeniable proof, that the folks at the NIH and Human Genome Project have been trying to synthesize organisms for the sole purpose of creating new species/life forms, and using these techniques for vaccines, AND states that these synthetic substances WILL CHANGE DNA.

It all ties back to the NIH and the HUMAN GENOME PROJECT. The theory that the COVID vaccines are an attempt at a worldwide genome experiment project is becoming clearer every single day, backed up with all of the data that has come forward, backed up with all of the studies pointing to this very agenda, backed up with countless interviews, positions and documentations of the likes of Anthony Fauci, Christine Grady, Bill Gates, Craig Venter, Eric Lander, Klaus Schwab, Francis Collins, their institutes and cohorts GAVI, WEF, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIH, Human Genome Project, World Health Organization, United Nations, MIT, Harvard, etc., etc., etc.

“Venter and colleagues published their paper about creating a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome in the journal Science in May 2010.

“Some of you are asking, why do this? It’s great basic science, but there are some more compelling reasons,” he said, noting that synthetic DNA can be used to develop genomics-based vaccines.

“The National Institutes of Health has funded my institute to create synthetic pieces of every known flu virus, so anytime we need a new vaccine, we can just take these pieces off the shelf, and go through the assembly and have flu vaccine stocks in a very short time,” he said. “In the next year or two, you might get the first synthetic DNA vaccines.”

Web archive version: Synthetic life forms can produce vaccines, gobble up CO2 and more, says expert

Although the below excerpt specifies “intranasal”, there are also endeavors of injectable live attenuated vaccines as well:

“The company’s breakthrough Synthetic Attenuated Virus Engineering (SAVE) platform utilizes a computer algorithm to recode the genomes of viruses and construct live-attenuated vaccines to prevent viral infections or treat solid tumors.”

Web archive version: Codagenix and Serum Institute of India Announce Commencement of First-in-Human Trial of COVI-VAC, A Single Dose, Intranasal Live Attenuated Vaccine for COVID-19

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16778323/ ] “Genetically modified live attenuated parasites as vaccines for leishmaniasis” (2006)

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28620583/ ] “Engineering of Genetically Arrested Parasites (GAPs) For a Precision Malaria Vaccine” (2017)

[ https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/investigational-malaria-vaccine-gives-strong-lasting-protection ] “Investigational Malaria Vaccine Gives Strong, Lasting Protection” (2021)“The vaccine combines live parasites with either of two widely used antimalarial drugs—an approach termed chemoprophylaxis vaccination.”

Now, with all of that being said, and with this outright admission by Craig Venter about their agenda, I have to bring up one of Richard Fleming’s latest criticism of ALL the doctors that have claimed to find what seems to be graphene oxide, nanobots, and/or parasitic-like organisms in the vaccines.

Firstly, this should have been approached in a more scientific approach to researching the vaccine’s contents.

While the other doctors are investigating these vaccines and are questioning its contents, even inviting other scientists and researchers to help them identify what these substances are, Dr. Fleming is undermining their research and dismissing their conclusions. Even implying, at one point, the mention of “credentials” as to whether or not to take one seriously.

Secondly… isn’t that precisely why we’re in the mess we’re in right now? Because SO many people decided to trust the likes of Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins? Does it matter how many so-called credentials one has to determine their sincerity and integrity or even professionalism? Doesn’t look like it to me. As long as a researcher is honest and looking for the truth, I will take their word over an overpaid “expert” any day. Especially ones who conduct inhumane, atrocious experiments on other living beings.

Then, of course, when addressing anything in a scientific approach, and certainly before reaching concrete conclusions and dismissing any other research (like the fraudulent Lancet paper did, for example…) one must consider ALL variables. Take the following for consideration:

how many vials total did Richard Fleming test?

were they from the same batch, or all different batches? Different brands, or all the same brand?

were all these vials from the same country? – it is becoming more and more apparent that different countries are getting different doses/batches

at what magnification did Fleming conduct his tests compared to all of the other doctors/scientists?

are we considering that some batches/doses will contain certain substances while others consist of saline solutions only – as what has already been theorized?

if different countries are getting different batches, there is a chance that there will be different substances for each country – to perhaps test a wider set of material/organisms and/or to target certain people’s DNA/ethnicity/etc.?

what is the “garbage” and “debris” that Fleming is referencing? “Garbage” has to be something. Was there an attempt to identify these compositions? Or just label them all with the term “debris” and “garbage”?

Fleming also mentions the term “crystalline” on more than one occasion… does he realize that there are indeed nanocrystal-graphene hybrid material that has been synthesized? Does he know every possible thing that can be synthesized or genetically modified using either Venter’s DNA genetic modification technique or the CRISPR technology?

“Nanocrystal-graphene have been proposed as a new kind of promising hybrid for a wide range of application areas including catalysts, electronics, sensors, biomedicine, and energy storage, etc. Although a variety of methods have been developed for the preparation of hybrids, a facile and general synthetic approach is still highly required.”

“A rich library of highly crystalline nanocrystals, with types including noble metal, metal oxide, magnetic material and semiconductor were successfully grown on chemically converted graphene (CCG), which is simultaneously reduced from GO during the synthesis.”

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22699842/ ] “Generalized syntheses of nanocrystal-graphene hybrids in high-boiling-point organic solvents”

Is Mr. Fleming aware of all the technological and biological advancements and agendas in the arena of nanotechnology in combination with virus-based particles?

“Genetically modified viruses offer a general route for the production of materials with complex nanoscale detail, for use either directly or as templates. It appears likely that modified viruses will feature prominently in the nanotechnology of the immediate future. The possible commercial exploitation of virus-templated materials includes nanowires, high surface area materials for battery electrodes, detectors, catalytic material, light harvesting devices, quantum dots, and tunable photonic devices.”

[ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9783527671403.hlc094 ] “7 Virus Particle-Based Liquid Crystals”

Will Mr. Fleming attempt to identify these so-called “garbage” and “debris” and conduct further studies with a higher magnification, or continue to shoot down other’s legitimate attempts at trying to figure out exactly what these particles are? Notice he never tries to identify what ANYTHING in the vaccine is, other than mentioning “lipid nanoparticles”. Only giving his opinion of what it’s not.

And with all of the evidence showing that genetically modified organisms is not only highly probable but also incredibly likely, considering the NIH’s many, many, MANY horrific experiments and crimes against humanity (and animal life), and Craig Venter’s ventures, not to mention Bill Gates’ very own admission and extensive funding in this matter, I am ultimately left questioning Fleming’s motives.

Bill Gates: “You know, is there something to worry about with medicines, that is might – some of them might have side effects? Do we need safety testing? I mean and we’re taking things that are… you know, genetically modified organisms and we’re injecting them in little kids arms. We just shoot them right into the vein.”

Bottom line: yes, these vaccines are extremely dangerous. And if the ones in control of pushing these worldwide vaccines are also in control of the Human Genome Project and attempts at re-writing our DNA, our best bet would be to avoid these at all costs and address these as the crimes they are.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay

BOMBSHELL: Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds [Full Transcript]

” – it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it’s a way for them to know who’s vaccinated because their blood will glow.”

As well as offering informational articles on this website, I also provide written transcripts for those who prefer to read texts to these incredibly important interviews and insights.

The video below is of a Pfizer employee who exposed emails detailing the secretive nature of keeping news about aborted fetal cells being used in the vaccines/vaccine development away from public knowledge. She also reveals the SM-102 lipid that is used for vaccines is actually referred to as “luciferase” – these ingredients which are, of course, being hushed about in the mainstream media and which may be part of the “trade secrets” that Bill Gates does not disclose is in the vaccines.

Are the reasons for patent protection only? Or because they know that it would cause an uproar in the communities if the population realized that aborted fetal cell lines were used in the vaccines and/or the testing of it, and that “luciferase” is a real enzyme being used in this process as well? If it was about our health and for altruistic purposes, and “free”, then what would be the problem in dispensing the FULL ingredient list for the whole world to know and be able to reproduce for their own countries?

The answers become obvious for those with eyes to see and ears to hear. And when one realizes the corrupt nature of these companies and organizations, the fact that these vaccines are not for our health becomes clearer and clearer.

Thank you to Melissa Strickler for bringing this to our attention. The full transcript of the interview between her and Jim Hale from LifeSite News is below. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Jim Hale: “Hello LifeSite friends. Jim Hale with you. And we have today a very important woman for you to meet. In fact, this may be one of the most important developments that we have seen in the last year and a half, throughout the COVID ordeal, and the vaccine battles; all the misinformation that we’ve heard from big pharma, from the government, from the media.

Well, a young lady in Kansas has stepped forward. She was a Pfizer employee for ten years. And recently she went to Project Veritas exposing some of the emails that came right from Pfizer executives and Pfizer employees who were talking about how to talk to the public about the Pfizer vaccine, which is derived from aborted fetal stem cells. And we have her with us right now; her name is Melissa Strickler.

Melissa, thank you so much for joining us today, here on LifeSite. You are a very courageous young woman and I – I just wanted to ask you about that, Melissa. What was it that compelled you to want to come forward?”

Melissa Strickler: “Well, honestly, I mean, I stumbled across the information by accident, but I would rather say a miracle. ‘Cause I’m not computer smart. And when I found the information I thought, you know, the Lord wanted me to show it to my family to convince them not to get it and things like that. Then I found out by presenting them with this, they had been lying to me and already got it. Well, maybe not lying, but not telling me.

And so then I was like, well why did I find this information? Then what am I supposed to do? And I told a couple of friends who had previously worked at Pfizer what I found and they referred me to Project Veritas. And I prayed about it, quite a bit, to decide what to do, and it’s like God just kept giving me the right verses. Kind of pointing me down the path of what to do and Project Veritas reached out to me almost instantly after getting a hold of them, which I took as a sign to go with them.

And they also had a whistleblower shortly before me named Jody who – she whistleblew against her hospital and she said she fears God and not man. You know, what they can do to us. And so I was like, if I feel that way, why aren’t I doing anything about it? And I just – it’s important information for the world to know, especially because so many people were getting denied their religious exemptions under false things.

Jim Hale: “Right. And that’s what this is all about, Melissa. Because, what – what Pfizer’s messaging has been, it is, is being very evasive about the truth about this vaccine being derived from, you know, aborted babies. Is what’s going on here, right?”

Melissa Strickler: “Well they’re just simply being deceitful. I mean, they could end the “conspiracy theories”, they could correct the fact-checkers on social media and they remain silent because they know if they do say, ‘yeah, we did use fetal cell lines in the development of this’, they KNOW that they’re not able to deny the religious exemptions. And so I think that’s what it’s about.

I don’t – I mean, it’s wrong to, in my opinion, to benefit from an abortion. Just my opinion; I don’t think God would want us, you know, doing those things. But it’s even more than that. I mean, it goes so deeper than that as to public deceit and they’re trying to get it to children. It’s just… ridiculous.”

Jim Hale: “Well, let’s, let’s, let’s talk about some of these emails that you exposed. Starting with Vanessa Gelman, who is the Pfizer Senior Director of Worldwide Research. And this is what she had to say:

“From the perspective of corporate affairs, we want to avoid having the information on fetal cells floating out there… The risk of communicating this right now outweighs any potential benefit we could see, particularly with general members of the public who may take this information and use it in ways we may not want out there.”

Wow.

What was your reaction when you saw this?”

Melissa Strickler: “Well these were the first things I had stumbled upon in the database, and it made me sick to my stomach because I’m like, “If they’re going to lie about something like this, what else?” Because I had been in contact with the company, you know, asking questions – ’cause I’d hear a “conspiracy theory” and I’d email them and they’d shut it down.

I never asked about the fetal cell lines just because, I don’t know, it never stumbled across my lap to ask that, I guess. But I did ask about other things, and I knew they were being deceitful in their answers and that just kind of led me down the rabbit hole of, why?

Jim Hale: “Yes, and then Gelman went on to say in another email, “We’ve been trying as much as possible to not mention the fetal cell lines…”

And let’s talk about this gentleman, Philip Dormitzer, Pfizer Chief Scientific Officer. Now these, these aren’t a bunch of underlings we’re talking about. These are important people at Pfizer here. And he talks about, tell us first of all, he mentions, HEK293T – what does that mean, Melissa?”

Melissa Strickler: “Well it’s actually like one of the things, if the public knew, they definitely would care. They’re human embryonic kidney cells. So in the 70’s there was an aborted fetus from an unknown origin, and they noticed that its cells are never stop replicating, unlike normal cells, which, you know, die. 

And so they just saw – their claim is they saw a cost-benefit that, why keep, you know, having to get these fetuses and all of these things, when we can use these immortal cell lines that never die. And what they use them for is to see how the vaccine or what they’re working on will affect our cells. Some things do include those cells; I’m not a hundred percent sure if they’re in this final vaccine or not. But how can we trust them if they say they aren’t? So, they’re basically cancerous cells from an aborted fetus that they use to test.

Jim Hale: “That, that’s fascinating. It’s so helpful to learn this, ’cause there’s so much confusion out there. 

Melissa, what, what was your job at Pfizer? And how long did you work there?”

Melissa Strickler: “So, I started working there when it was called Hospira, a little over 9 – over 9 years ago; it’s not quite been 10 years. But I started working there as a pack assistant and I was on the production line where we’d just get the product, label it, ship – pack it, and send it out. MQ started – MQ is a Manufacturing Quality. They’re the ones who see the whole process of the manufacturing process and they noticed, you know, I had an eye for finding things and I didn’t make a lot of mistakes. Things like that. And so they offered me a job as a promotion, considered out there. And so I took it.

Loved the job. I love it, I had the best boss, he’s a God fearing man, he was great. I had some, actually I do believe because of that position is why I became a Christian, because I worked with Christians who ultimately helped, you know, plant seeds.

So, but what our job was, was we have to know everyone’s job in the plant on papers. So we get like electronic training documents we have to read and sign off on, and sometimes we have to do physical training to make sure we know the task. But we see the entire operation from fill, to light testing, to packaging.

And I, specifically, my job is to like, really make sure protocols are being followed, to make sure paperwork’s all in order, and my favorite part of the job is inspecting the product. Which is when you’re just checking for defects, looking to see if there’s little bits of metal, or glass, or cracks, or any sterilization issues that could cause harm to the customer. So I’m the final inspection of the product, sometimes. You know. Things like that.”

Jim Hale: “Right. So, you were a trusted employee of Pfizer, so, you know, when you saw this email from Dormitzer, I just want to read this, where he talks about the HEK293T cells, and he says, the use for IVE assay. What does that mean?”

Melissa Strickler: “I think it means ‘in vitro’. There’s like ‘in vivo’ and ‘in vitro’. In vitro is like in a human sample, and in vivo is like a test tube.”

[ EDITOR’S NOTE FOR CLARIFICATION ]: The difference between in vivo/in vitro:

“The term in vivo refers to a type of experiment that is carried out within a whole, living organism, such as a plant or animal.. In vivo means “within the living” in Latin, which aptly fits its modern definition.. Overview. In vivo refers to a specific type of experimentation that involves living animals.”

“In vitro is pretty much the exact opposite. Instead of complex, living organisms, in vitro experiments refer to techniques that use biological components such as cells or biological molecules and are carried out outside of a living organism, whether that be in a test tube, culture dish, or so on.”

biologydictionary.net

Jim Hale: “Right. And this is very important, what he goes on to say here. Especially for Catholics. He says, “they’re ultimately derived from an aborted fetus”. So there you go, right there. Okay. That, that’s – “

Melissa Strickler: “But they say, “Oh! But they’ve replicated so many times that it’s like not the same thing.”

Jim Hale: “Right, right. That, you know, yeah, so somehow there’s enough distance that you shouldn’t have to worry about it. But, and he says, “On the other hand, the Vatican doctrinal committee has confirmed that they consider it acceptable for pro-life believers to be immunized.”

And what’s stunning about this, Melissa, is that it shows you how much they understand about, you know, what the push-back on this is going to be. So they have their talking points all squared away to deal with, with Catholics, and you know, by extension other Christians as well. So, you know, if the Vatican says it’s okay, then, then we’re good with this, and all we have to do is polish our message.”

Melissa Strickler: “Yeah, but is the Vatican saying it’s okay because they’re not getting the facts? Like are they okay because they don’t understand? And even though I’m not Catholic, I understand that Catholics follow the pope. They, they follow what they deem, you know, like – but Christians don’t answer to the pope. And I think that’s where their disconnect is, in the, in these emails, is they think because the pope says that it’s okay, that all religious people should be okay with it.”

Jim Hale: “Well, right. And we had one judge in New York trying to say, “Well, look, sorry. You don’t get to this religious exemption because pope Francis says it’s okay.” So that, that’s all part of their attempt to just whitewash the whole thing, for sure. Thankfully though, the federal judge in New York has issued a preliminary injunction that upholds the religious exemption for medical records in the state of New York. So that is a major battle won.”

Melissa Strickler: “That’s great, but I still, like – it still concerns me. Like one of my friends just text me yesterday that hers is getting denied. You know? Like – and that’s in Kansas! That’s in the Bible belt.”

Jim Hale: “Yeah. Well, well, Melissa, that’s why what you have done is so vital. This is just so important that you have exposed Pfizer’s real agenda, here. And I want to ask you a little bit more about that, Melissa. Just, you know, you said you had plenty of Christian friends, many of those who helped lead you to Christ. So I take it you’ve had a conversion, somewhat recently in your life?”

Melissa Strickler: “I was born again on January 19th, 2019 at 6:44p.m.”

Jim Hale: “I love it! That, that is just wonderful. And you’re recently married, too?”

Melissa Strickler: “Yes. I just got married. Um, my legal name, like I haven’t gotten to change all my documents yet. My legal name is Melissa [MacIntey(sp?)] now, but Melissa Strickler is my maiden name and it’s still in the process of getting changed. So…”

Jim Hale: “Well Melissa, I know that you’ve put your name out there, and I want to encourage all of those who are watching this interview right now to go on to the link that we’re going to put below on the Project Veritas page, just to see those initial interviews you did with James O’Keefe.

And I also want to let our viewers know that we are going to step up now to try to help you, Melissa, because you got a phone call, that was really creepy! I gotta say. That, that’s on the Project Veritas website and we’re going to, we’re going to go ahead and play that right now, just so our viewers can hear the call you got from the – this man in security from Pfizer. Let’s listen to that right now:”

Clip insert:

“My name is K.J. Wigglesworth. I’m from the corporate office Pfizer security in New York City. I’d like to pass a message on to you from Ian MacKellar, who’s the VP and site leader at the McPherson plant for Pfizer vaccines.

We’ve been advised to let you know that you are not, under any circumstances, to return to work. Your termination is being processed at the current time. If you have any questions, contact Mr. MacKellar at the McPherson plant and I’m sure that he will explain the reasons why.”

Jim Hale: “Melissa, when did you get that phone call?”

Melissa Strickler: “I got it on this past Saturday. Forgive me, I don’t know the days. They’ve all kind of blurred together.”

Jim Hale: “And have you heard anything else after that?”

Melissa Strickler: “I did get a letter – um, some people were thinking that maybe I was scammed and it wasn’t a real call from my job. I knew it was, but, just to lay that to rest, I did get a confirmation letter in the mail letting me know that my job protection ends on the 19th of this month from my leave.”

Jim Hale: “So you’ve been terminated?”

Melissa Strickler: “Basically. I mean they haven’t fired me. I’m sure I’m still going to get pay checks for about two weeks, um, but… yeah, as soon as they can, they don’t want me coming back there.”

Jim Hale: “Yeah, well, 2 weeks of paychecks for 10 years of work is not all that great. So that’s where I was mentioning – I know you weren’t that familiar with LifeSite, before we got in touch with you, but I want to just say, Melissa, that you and your husband are now part of the LifeSite family. Because I would say 95% of all the people who are watching this right now are Christians. And they really want to help right now.

When they see people like you, and they see David, you know, grabbing his slingshot to go after Goliath, and that – that’s what Pfizer really is right now. I mean, the power companies like Pfizer has right now, is unprecedented really in human history. They’re outside the law.”

Melissa Strickler: “They’re trying to act like a government of their own. And I don’t like it.”

Jim Hale: “They – absolutely. So, thank you SO much for what you have done. And, as I said, you’re part of the LifeSite family now. You’re about to find out what LifeSite News is all about, because we are starting up a life funder for you. And we want to put that address on the screen right now, so we can help you. You know, you get another paycheck or two from Pfizer but that’s where we come in, Melissa. So we want to encourage all those out there who really want to do something, to contribute as little or as much as you can to help Melissa now, who is out of a job, newly married – “

Melissa Strickler: “I’ll probably never get to work for a company that has anything to hide, ever again.”

Jim Hale: “Well that’s right, and we also know, Melissa, that this is a spiritual battle. You have taken up your cross, and you’re going to be attacked. They are going to come after you with everything they can to try to discredit you, to try to say you’re a religious wacko and all that kind of stuff. But, but you know what? We love it when they call us religious wackos and right-wing fringe people – “

Melissa Strickler: “What an honor to suffer as Christ. Christ was laughed out of his hometown. I mean, what an honor, right?”

Jim Hale: “Amen to that. You know, it really, it’s an honor when they try to smear us in that way. And I think it’s also important to point out, Melissa, that you’re not like an “anti-vax” person, obviously.”

Melissa Strickler: “I really wasn’t. But you know, I’ve been saying to a lot of my friends that, you know, I’m not really political. I have, you know, my preferences, but I’m not one way or another but I’ve been saying for like the last year that if anything good came from Donald Trump, it was that people started paying attention to politics. And if anything good comes out of this COVID vaccine, it’s that people started looking into what’s going into their bodies.”

Jim Hale: “Well, and that’s, that’s what this is all about. Never before in the history of mankind have we been in a situation where we have not just the government, the federal government, but now we have corporate America, the whole education system, all the “elites” in the world are telling us, forcing us, saying that, you know, if you want to feed your family you have to inject something into your body. And thanks to you we know now, for a fact, that Pfizer has been concealing the truth about their vaccine, that is now “FDA approved”, unbelievably. The fastest approval process.

Melissa Strickler: “All that means is it’s approved to be given to people, it does not mean the FDA said it’s safe.”

Jim Hale: “Well, right. We know – we just interviewed Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccines, and he, he described the approval process for the Pfizer vaccine as being totally corrupt.”

Melissa Strickler: “It’s misleading and it’s just another thing. It’s just another thing. And then of course instead of people questioning things, they don’t want to cause a mess, and so they just do it. Do what they’re told. They, they get misled and it’s really sad, because I can tell you, there’s far more about this vaccine that people need to know. And it should be coming out, more and more. This is a slow leak. But it will eventually flood Pfizer.”

Jim Hale: “Well, tell us more about that. What else do you think we need to know, Melissa?”

Melissa Strickler: “The vaccine glows. At least Pfizer’s does. And the only components that I know that can do that are SM-102, which is called luciferase, and graphene oxide. And they claim both of those aren’t in there.”

Jim Hale: “Wow, so when you say it glows, tell us what you mean when you say it glows.”

Melissa Strickler: “Well, it looks like someone took a blue glow stick, cracked it open and poured it in the vial. But it only glows if there’s light, and if it’s around a dark surrounding. Like a dark background, or a dark table.

I have pictures of those – “

Jim Hale: “So you’re saying that this, that graphene is, is in the Pfizer vaccine?”

Melissa Strickler: “I would believe luciferase has a little bit more weight, that I think is in there. The graphene oxide I also have reason to believe is in there, but I can’t prove that one as well.”

Jim Hale: “Explain this ‘luciferase’, because, of course we’re talking about Lucifer, here.”

Melissa Strickler: “Well, what it is, is it’s a glowing chemical; it’s found in lightning bugs, plants and fish. It’s a kind of an organic matter, and it’s – it glows. And depending on the certain type of chemical compound it is, it’ll either glow a green, like a lightning bug, or it can glow blue. In this case the vaccine is blue when it glows. But when it’s in front of a white background, it’s clear.

It’s, it’s very odd, considering I’ve looked at hundreds of thousands of units and never once have seen anything do that. Or not even close. Usually it looks like water.”

Jim Hale: “Melissa, what, what are you saying here?”

Melissa Strickler: “I am saying, like, I thought all this stuff was “conspiracy theories”. And then I watched a doctor say that they use codes, in their, their stuff. You know? And I took notes of those codes, and I found out SM-102 is luciferase and when I messaged them, my company, I emailed them and I said, “Hey, is luciferase in the vaccine?” And they responded with, the vaccine is – err – “the luciferase is in the testing of the vaccine, but won’t be included in the final vaccine”.

But the way I see this, is this whole thing is experimental. We haven’t even seen the comirnaty – I don’t even know how to say it – we have not even seen those labels getting put on the vials on that plant yet. So as far as I know, everyone is still receiving that emergency use authorization, and it’s experimental – it is a test – it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it’s a way for them to know who’s vaccinated because their blood will glow. Their cells.

Jim Hale: “Wow. And, this is absolutely stunning. I have never heard this before, Melissa. And how dangerous is this?”

Melissa Strickler: “It is toxic to people, in certain doses. Yeah. I don’t know a whole lot about that, but I do know it is toxic in certain doses.”

Jim Hale: “What do you know about, we know that there’s a lot more vaccine injuries and vaccine deaths then the CDC is putting out there, what do you know about the higher ups at Pfizer and how they are dealing with that reality?”

Melissa Strickler: “I haven’t really heard a whole lot. Um, one thing I’ll say, like, I’ve never met Albert Bourla, who’s the CEO. I’ve emailed him a couple times, but I’ve never actually spoken directly to him because when I get answers, after emailing Albert Bourla, they’re from, you know, Pfizer answer services or whatever.

But the people like in those emails, I had never heard of. I did verify they were employees, you know, things like that, but other than that I didn’t know that – how high up they were until Project Veritas did their research. Which threw me for a rollercoaster, cause I had no idea that it went up that high.

I will say, like, Pfizer, I kind of call them the abusive rich husband. You know? They give you excellent benefits, excellent pay, and the jobs are fairly easier, and temperature-controlled building. You, you know, you don’t have to buy fancy clothes, you change into scrubs there, you know, it’s a good job. It’s just, you know, they don’t exactly treat you the best in the sense of they don’t all seem to value all their employees equally. We get a lot of virtue-signaling emails, I would say weekly. They named Albert Bourla a “father of the year”. You know? Things like that.

And I just, this whole – since the pandemic began – like I had no problems almost all up until the pandemic began. And even then I was still excited to be helping contribute with this process. And so were a lot of my coworkers. We were all excited. And then when the process actually came to our plant, a lot of people experienced vaccine regret, and a lot of people refused to get it. In fact, I would say over half of the employees were willing to walk out over this, and Pfizer knows that.”

Jim Hale: “Melissa, this is really bombshell information, here. Just describing the culture at Pfizer. I mean, this sounds like pure evil. This, I mean – “

Melissa Strickler: “We’ve known it – yeah, we’ve known it for about a year and a half and I just kept praying. I was like, “Lord, you know that I can’t quit. You’re going to have to have me fired. Like, why am I here? I don’t want to be helping this.” You know? And one day I was praying, and I was wanting to walk out. I was like, I can’t handle it any more and I just got the impression I needed to wait. And two weeks later I found all this. So…”

Jim Hale: “But you know what? You have spoken the truth; the truth shall set you free. So you, you are free now. You have – ”

Melissa Strickler: “I’ve got nothing to hide.”

Jim Hale: “Well thank you for that. You are a, a courageous young lady and, you know, I want to ask all of our viewers right now to pray for you. Pray for you, and your husband, may God continue to grant you courage and sustain you through all of this, because I know after this interview we just did today, they’re really going to be coming after you, Melissa.”

Melissa Strickler:Well I also did an interview with Candace Owens that just aired last night, where I go into a lot of detail with the FDA and the glowing. You’ll have to subscribe to dailywire to view that right now, but I think they are wanting to get it on youtube. So once that’s available…”

Jim Hale: “Well, we’re obviously, we’re not going to be able to put this interview on youtube, but it’s going to be on rumble, it’s going to be on banned, it’s going to be on gab, it’s going to be on telegram, it’s going to be everywhere that we can get this out. Because, honestly, Melissa, this is one of the most important – this is some of the most important information, I think, that has been revealed yet.”

Melissa Strickler: “There – it’s endless. Endless deceit. Endless. I don’t think they’ve been honest about a single thing about this vaccine other than it’s experimental. And it’s an mRNA. Which they also don’t mention that that’s CRISPR technology.

Jim Hale: “And you know what? It’s deadly. It’s deadly! Melissa. I just interviewed a man from McAllen, Texas. What a sweet man. He was a single father of one son. This 15 year old boy took the Pfizer vaccine, 4 days later he collapsed and died. Myocarditis. It was, it was – “

Melissa Strickler:But you’ll be fact-checked as false and misleading information cause you’re a danger to the society. Pfizer could put an end to all of that. They could. They could speak up, issue a statement and say, hey, like, these people aren’t conspiracy theorists. But they don’t. Because they don’t want people to know.

Jim Hale: “Well, that, that’s one question I have, Melissa, is that when is the American public going to start listening? To take – you know, their blinders off? It’s almost as if people have been hypnotized. They’ve gone out, they’ve gotten their shots, they’ve gotten their boosters, and they are willfully ignorant, right now. If they are not listening to what you are saying, you know, may God have pity and mercy on us all. Because now we know. Now we know the truth.”

Melissa Strickler: “They’re exchanging the truth for a lie, for comfort. You know? People want to hold on to their lives so bad, they’re going to lose them no matter what.”

Jim Hale: “Well, it’s like Alexander [S] Easton says, “they have the will to disbelieve the horrible”. And I think George Orwell said, you know, he called it ‘the desire not to know, when you live in a totalitarian regime’. You know. It’s like a weird psychology that happens. And you know, I just pray that people like you are helping to awaken us all from this terrible slumber.”

Melissa Strickler: “Awake, oh sleeper. Rise from the dead. Cause it’s, it’s a big deal. Like, it breaks my heart, cause they may be Jesus loving people, but they don’t know their Bibles. Because if they did, they would be very well aware of what’s happening right now. History always repeats itself.

People are sitting there – I’m the generation who still learned about the holocaust and everything. And I remember being horrified thinking, how did we ever let that happen to a religious group of people who did nothing? You know? Well, I think now we’re finding out who would’ve whistleblown on Anne Frank and who would’ve whistleblown on the Nazis. You know? I think we’re kind of finding that out.”

Jim Hale: “That’s such a good point, Melissa. We are living through pages of history right now. Just like you said. When we all look back and we judge the German people and we say, you know, how in the world did they buy all that propaganda… these were intelligent people. Well, you know, we’re going to be judged too. This generation is going to be judged for one of the greatest scams in the history –

Melissa Strickler:Worldwide! People keep forgetting, they’re like, oh this has happened. Stuff like plagues have happened before and I’m like, yes, but we haven’t had mass deception on a global scale, mass abortion on a global scale, mass everything on a global scale, literally trying to get this to kids.

And if anybody knows anything about Genesis 6, God really cares about the human genes. The human genome. That we’re made in the image of God, and this vaccine uses CRISPR/Cas9 technology, which edits your DNA and edits your genes. And that’s something else that they’re not very upfront about it. [Jim Hale: “Tell us more about that.”]

Well it says, you know, God sent the flood cause of the wickedness of man, but it goes up if you say, you know, it was the nephilim, in the land, those days, is why God brought the flood. And they were… mixed races; they, they altered their human image of God and it says Noah was perfect in his genetics. Essentially is what it says, and he loved God and that to me is my biggest red flag. Like I don’t want to mess with any of my DNA if I have a say in it. You know? And even in Revelation – “

Jim Hale: “So this vaccine does alter our DNA?”

Melissa Strickler: “Yeah. It does! And they were so open about that, just 3 years ago. But then as soon as it’s in a vaccine they’re like, “Oh no. It doesn’t do that.” But they boasted all about it for years until it was in a vaccine.”

Jim Hale: “Well, Melissa Strickler, this has been the most mind-blowing interview I think I have ever done. And I hope you will come back to talk more about not only your ordeal, but just to try to educate us more; tell us more – Is there anything else you feel like that, that you need to tell us right now?”

Melissa Strickler: “Yes. While the use of the fetal cell lines is wrong, I believe, there’s so much more on the Bible that’s against all of this; even if fetal cell lines don’t corrupt, like to serve your Holy Spirit and your conscience, there’s still Revelation 18, where it says the whole world was deceived by sorcery, witchcraft and magic spells, and the root of that word, the root word in the Greek is ‘pharmakeia’. And it’s where we get our word ‘pharmacy’. And if that doesn’t raise a red flag for every Bible loving person out there, I don’t know what will. Honestly. Because we’ve been so convinced things are one way, and then I’ve done just this deep study in the fact that Revelation mentions pharmaceuticals being involved is very alarming to me.”

Jim Hale: “Melissa, Melissa Strickler… Well, you know what? You know what else Revelation mentions, Melissa? Is that Jesus wins, right?”

Melissa Strickler: “Yes He does. Even if it’s not now, in this life, He will ultimately. And that doesn’t – He wins.”

Jim Hale:Amen.

Well, may God protect you, may God continue to, you know, the Holy Spirit just, you know, fill you with strength and grace and courage to keep doing what you’re doing, Melissa. We can’t thank you enough, on just behalf of our viewers, our LifeSite staff, and everyone that is watching this interview right now, thank you so much, and please be assured that we will be praying for you. I’m getting ready to go to mass in just a few minutes here, and I’m going to be praying for you and your husband before the alter.”

Melissa Strickler: “Thank you so much. I need that so much right now. Please pray that, you know, God is with me, because I need Him. I need Him in this. And sometimes it feels a little dry on my end. So… “

Jim Hale: “Right. Melissa Strickler, thank you. God bless you, sister.”

Melissa Strickler: “Thank you.”

Proof that ‘luciferase’ is being used for vaccines:

“The combination of cutting-edge techniques in molecular biology, animal research and imaging technologies, provides researchers the unique opportunity to use this tool for influenza research, including the study of virus-host interactions and dynamics of viral infections. Importantly, the feasibility to genetically alter the viral genome to express two foreign genes from different viral segments opens up opportunities to use this approach for: (i) the development of novel IAV vaccines, (ii) the generation of recombinant IAVs that can be used as vaccine vectors for the treatment of other human pathogen infections.”

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31475986/ ] “A Luciferase-fluorescent Reporter Influenza Virus for Live Imaging and Quantification of Viral Infection”

FURTHER proof that ‘luciferase’ is being used in vaccines:

And while Melissa Strickler alleges that Pfizer, specifically, uses the SM-102 lipid nanoparticle, here is an admission from an “infectious disease expert” discussing the same lipid in the Moderna vaccine:

Question: Does the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine contain SM-102? Is it true that SM-102 is not approved for use in humans?

Answer from infectious diseases expert James Lawler, MD: Yes, the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine does contain SM-102.”

[ https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/sm-102-moderna-vaccine ] “You asked, we answered: Is it safe for SM-102 to be in the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine?”

While the same article goes on to say that “it’s safe” – at this point, with all of the deception, lies and manipulation techniques that these establishments have pulled in order to get everyone vaccinated, it is getting clearer and clearer that we cannot trust these mainstream health/medical organizations.

Note from Expanding Awareness Relations:

I honestly cannot say this enough, thank you SO much to EVERYONE speaking out against this nefarious agenda. A HUGE thank you to Melissa Strickler, LifeSite and the others who are courageously standing up against the establishment and warning others about the dangers of what’s going on. Your integrity and bravery are incredibly appreciated.

Stay strong, resist the mark/vaccine. (Not sure if they’re one and the same, but DO NOT take any chances! DO NOT take the “world passport”, the vaccine, and/or the “mark”. Stay human. Do not get genetically modified.)

God bless.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Get an Earful

VIDEO: NANO-MAN (deep nasal swab tech, radiation, injection tech, Borg assimilation) - A collection of topics that covers the transhumanism agenda and how the COVID vaccines/tests may be one of the catalysts.
The Great Deception… Great Reset? Global Currency Reset? New Age Awakening? | All One in the Same? - Many are looking forward to the NESARA/GESARA reformation act. But is it really for the benefit of humanity? Or a tempting deception?
The 5G Roll Out: EMF Radiation, Devastating Health Impacts, Social and Economic Implications. Crimes Against Humanity? - What are the real effects of 5G radiation? & "Why is 5G Important for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?"
Is This Post Legitimately Detailing a Global Government Plan Using COVID as the Catalyst? | If So, It May be Related to a Previous Genocide Experiment - "THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government."
The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability” - "The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection."
Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
Sofia Smallstorm Warned of DNA Genetic Altering and the Transhumanist Agenda Back in 2011 - "- self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself."

Down the Rabbit Hole: “Conspiracy Theories” Playing Out in Real Time

Scandalous plots? Yes. They have been planned for a long time…

It amazes me, that even with all the resources we have today, and all of the brave people coming forward or even offering information anonymously in order to expose dark corruptions going on in our world, some people will still not realize this and instead refuse to believe any such conspiracy could be possible. There are even doctors and scientists that state, point blank, what they are aiming for. And people will STILL NOT BELIEVE that it is happening.

Their arguments usually contain some form of the following, if not all of them:

“But why would they do this? It doesn’t make sense.”

“I find it hard to believe that a world-wide conspiracy for a “new world order” is possible. Too many people would have to be involved. Somebody would say something.” (That’s exactly what some people are doing, but people are still not believing them…)

“That’s just a crazy conspiracy theory. You crazy conspiracy theorist.”

“Bill Gates is wonderful. He’s spending billions of dollars to help us. I can’t believe you think he’s some evil villain.” (Not to say that I think he’s an evil villain… *cough*)

“There’s no way they have a diabolical plan to inject people with harmful substances. You watch too much tv.”

I’m sure you get the gist of it.

Yes, trying to wake people up is a difficult endeavor. Us critical thinkers can point out the obvious, but it’s up to them to actually LOOK at what is presented, and come to an epiphany that, “Wow, they may be right after all.” Instead of plugging their ears and closing their eyes, saying, “La la la! I can’t hear you!”

Therefore, I am going to present some actual footage and forms that show that what is going on around us RIGHT NOW has been already planned by immoral agencies for decades/centuries/millenia.

Keep in mind, this is just a small sample out of all of the testimonies and admissions that have been exposed. While some may be anecdotal in nature, it cannot be lost on us that some of these testimonies and reveals were made many years ago, and as we can see in our current timeline, these agendas are being played out as stated.

(Also be aware, due to the nature of our reality, some of these propositions may be somewhat unorthodox depending on one’s belief structure… which is another topic that needs to be seriously looked into without automatically caving into a dismissive attitude. While it may be hard to believe, especially for those who are more inclined to believing only in a physical/materialistic world, the implications that this physical construct is most certainly not our true being is the core of the struggles we’re enduring today.)

This post contains disturbing material.

Jump to:

1. Rudolf Steiner predicted (in 1917) worldwide vaccines to damage/alter our personality/spirituality

1917

(All quotes by Rudolf Steiner. Some embellishment added for emphasis)

“The time will come — and it may not be far off — when quite different tendencies will come up at a congress like the one held in 1912 and people will say: It is pathological for people to even think in terms of spirit and soul. ‘Sound’ people will speak of nothing but the body. It will be considered a sign of illness for anyone to arrive at the idea of any such thing as a spirit or a soul. People who think like that will be considered to be sick and — you can be quite sure of it — a medicine will be found for this. At Constantinople the spirit was made non-existent. The soul will be made non-existent with the aid of a drug. Taking a ‘sound point of view’, people will invent a vaccine to influence the organism as early as possible, preferably as soon as it is born, so that this human body never even gets the idea that there is a soul and a spirit.”

“…the heirs of modern materialism, will look for the vaccine to make the body ‘healthy’, that is, makes its constitution such that this body no longer talks of such rubbish as soul and spirit…”

“Materialistic physicians will be asked to drive the souls out of humanity.”

Source: Fall of the Spirits of Darkness | Fall/Darkness: Lecture 5: Changes in Humanity’s Spiritual Make-up

1917

Rudolf Steiner: “I have told you that the spirits of darkness are going to inspire their human hosts, in whom they will be dwelling, to find a vaccine that will drive all inclination towards spirituality out of people’s souls when they are still very young, and this will happen in a roundabout way through the living body. Today, bodies are vaccinated against one thing and another; in future, children will be vaccinated with a substance which it will certainly be possible to produce, and this will make them immune, so that they do not develop foolish inclinations connected with spiritual life — ‘foolish’ here, of course, in the eyes of materialists.”

Source: Fall of the Spirits of Darkness | Fall/Darkness: Lecture 13: The Fallen Spirits’ Influence in the World

You can read the entire lecture, which delves in deeper into the subject of spirituality, human evolution and our morality, and even the hidden influences that coerce us into specific decision making, here.

The above quotes mention specifically the advent of a vaccine to drive out any inclinations of spirituality and souls from human beings. Very strange that a materialistic physician would even entertain the idea if they did not believe in this aspect to begin with. Of course, if they believe that it is only a false belief and not a real essence, then I’m sure scientists really could attempt to address this “problem” by attacking the brain, perhaps, maybe even by genetically modifying our dna, let’s say, and/or performing surgery on the “disillusioned believer”.

How could they do this? Maybe through a worldwide effort to inject everyone with a vaccine that targets this phenomena – just as a far out theory? (I mean, it’s not like there’s an agenda to vaccinate the whole world in today’s time, right?)

Which brings me to the released footage from 2005, allegedly from the Pentagon describing this very process.

2. Meeting (from 2005) announcing vaccine/respiratory illness to suppress spirituality/religious inclinations (FunVax / VMAT2 / God gene)

Transcript from the above video (again, embellishment added for emphasis):

2005

FunVax scientist: “On the left over here, we have individuals who are religious fundamentalists, religious fanatics. And this is the expression of rt-pcr, real-time pcr expression of the VMAT2 gene.

Over here we have individuals, so – so let me complete –  so over here we have individuals who are not particularly fundamentalists, not particularly religious, and you can see there’s a much reduced expression of this particular gene – that the VMAT2 gene.

Another evidence that, that supports our hypothesis for the development of this approach. -“

Audience attendee: “What you’re suggesting here is by, by spreading this virus we’re going to eliminate individuals from donning on a bomb vest and going into a market, blowing up the market.”

FunVax scientist: “So our hypothesis is that these are fanatical people, that they have over expression of the VMAT2 gene and that by vaccinating them against this, will eliminate this behavior.

So we have some, some very, very remarkable data in this next slide. Here we have two brain scans, these are fMRIs – these are two different individuals with different levels of expression of the VMAT2.

On top is an individual who’s a religious fanatic, and individual, and we’ve repeated this numerous times that, that has high levels of VMAT2. Now, um, this individual down here who had low levels of the VMAT2 gene, this individual would self-describe as, as not particularly religious. In each case, these individuals were read a religious text – this individual light – lit up the right middle frontal gyrus, shown here, and that’s a part of the brain that’s associated with theory of mind. It’s a part of the brain that has to do with intense and in beliefs and desires.

In contrast, in mark contrast, here’s an individual who would not particularly self-describe as, as religious, and when they’re read a religious text, what you see is that this part of the brain called the anterior insula lights up. This is a part of the brain that’s associated with disgust or displeasure on hearing something.”

Audience attendee: “Do you suggesting, like, take a CT scan with me when I’m evaluating people to determine whether I put a bullet in their head?”

FunVax scientist: “So, so um the data that I’m presenting here, uh, supports the concept that we’re proposing, uh, and I think that we would not propose to do CT scans or fMRIs on individuals out in the hinterlands of Afghanistan.

The virus would immunize against this VMAT2 gene and that would have the effect that you see here which is, it’s essentially to turn a fanatic into a, a normal person. And we think that will have major effects in the Middle East.”

Audience attendee: “How would you suggest that this is going to be dispersed? Aerosol? Or…?”

FunVax scientist: “Well, so, so the present plan, and the test that we’ve done so far have used respiratory viruses such as flu, or rhinoviruses, and we believe that that’s a satisfactory way to get the exposure of the largest part of the population. Most of us, of course, have been exposed to both of those viruses and we’re, we’re quite confident that this will be a very successful approach.”

Audience attendee: “This is fascinating. What’s the name of this proposal?”

FunVax scientiest: “Yes, so, so the name of this project is FunVax, which is the vaccine for religious fundamentalism.

Audience attendee: “And you have a proposal already?”

FunVax Scientist: “The proposal has just been submitted and I think that the data that I have shown you today would, would support the, the development of this project and we think it has great promise.”

Footage from a proposed FunVax Documentary initiated by Ryan Harper that I don’t believe has been fully created yet… for one reason or another:

Source: youtube | FunVaxDoc | Is FunVax Possible? Dean Hamer and FunVax Scientist Discuss

(If any of the links on this site no longer work or exist, please let me know. Citing sources is very important and since certain sites go through purges, I’d like to be informed if this goes down so I can rectify it if I can. Thanks!)

Transcript: (embellishment added)

Narrator: “So let’s get back to reality for a minute. Is a vaccine against religious fundamentalism even possible?”

Same FunVax scientist from leaked 2005 footage: “So somebody asked me to design a vaccine for religious fundamentalism or fanaticism, uh, basically what I would do is to try to better understand why people are fanatical. Why do they have extreme behavior? Uh, it’s pretty clear these days that, that all behavior results from, uh, activity of our own brains. And so there must be pathways that are important in generating this kind of behavior.”

Dean Hamer (worked as director of the Gene Structure and Regulation Unit and as an independent research at the NIH): “So if indeed spirituality is this series of chemical reactions in the brain, and if it can be enhanced by certain types of drug, then, naturally it follows that it can be inhibited as well. ‘Cause for every activator there must be an inhibitor. And so I can easily imagine under the right circumstances, the right stimuli, or the right drugs, and the right inhibitors, might have some effect on a person’s spirituality.

At least in the short run. Whether or not that would have a long term effect, or people would undergo homeostasis and alter, uh, is an open question. We really don’t know the answer to that.”

FunVax scientist: “It would be quite useful to eliminate some of the fanatical, um… religious nuts in the world. And I think that, that, um, maybe a vaccine would be the way to do that. It’s difficult to know how successful it would be, but it’s certainly an interesting idea. From the point of view of a, uh, medical professional, um, the question of spreading a virus that is – has not been approved by regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, is a major issue.

For additional investigation and information into this VMAT2 / vaccine proposal, please visit:

FUNVAX – Revisited
Interview With Joey Lambardi About The Fundamentalism Vaccine (FunVax)
Geneticist claims to have found ‘God gene’ in humans

Dean Hamer “The GOD Gene: How Faith is Hardwired into Our Genes” (published in 2004)

TIME magazine “THE GOD GENE” (October 25, 2004 edition)

Proof is right in front of your eyes. Now whether you choose to believe “fact-checking” and “debunking” websites, that are EMPLOYED/FINANCIALLY SUPPORTED by the very same organizations that are under question, or whether you decide to give the honest journalists/researchers/concerned citizens trying to expose the corruption a try (and keep an open mind) remains up to you.

“You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink.”

“You can lead a person to the facts, but you can’t make him believe it.”

3. Who is a “religious fanatic”? Sounds like it could be a cult to me…

Now that brings me to, how do you label a “religious fundmentalist”? Whose right is it to determine who is a “religious nut” – a label graciously attributed by a scientist whom we’re all supposed to trust because we’re always told to “trust the science” and “trust the experts”, and who also believes it would be, and again I quote, “quite useful to eliminate some (of them)”?

What if I were to label this scientist and Dean Hamer, and all other researchers/scientists who aim to discover everything there is to know about humanity, life and the world, and who would go to such great lengths that upset the moral, ethical boundaries that no one should ever cross all in the “name of science”, as a “science fundamentalist”, who are just as damaging, if not EVEN MORE SO, than these religious fanatics?

Can we honestly say that scientists/inventors have not done horrific crimes “all in the name of science”? (That was a rhetorical question.)

Now besides just mentioning scientists and religious fanatics, I also have to bring up other cult-like organizations.

Michael Aquino (founder of the Temple of Set) is a very recognizable name involved in the US military/pentagon and engaged in the MK-ultra mind control experiments, as well as satanic practices, with a notable connection to Anton LaVey. (Satanic Subversion of the U.S. Military / The Satanic Subversion Of The United States Military)

Jack Parsons is another popular name (founder of NASA) who had extensive ties to the occult and a fascination with Aleister Crowley. (The Occult Rocket Scientist Who Conjured Spirits with L. Ron Hubbard)

Yet, there are still people who refuse to believe that something untoward may be happening right within our government organizations. Claiming that just because someone believes in “satan” or “lucifer”, doesn’t mean they’re engaging in wicked, evil acts. Even when there are witness testimonies describing their horrible encounters with these types of cult.

Svali (raised in a corrupt cult society)

A thorough exposé into the life of an alleged Illuminati member can be found here: Svali Speaks

In it, she details how she grew up in a cult – how they are raised, how she was trained to raise others, the tragic situations that are perpetuated in the “family” in order to essentially brainwash the members into blindly following orders and remaining loyal to their cause.

It is a horrific look into how children are treated in this organization, creating dissociative identity disorders that the higher members of the cult can control and call on through certain predetermined methods.

Here are some key excerpts from a detailed e-mail correspondence, purportedly between Svali and H.J. Springer (editor of centrexnews) in 2000:

2000

(all quotes by Svali)
“The Illuminati is a group that practices a form of faith known as “enlightenment”. It is Luciferian, and they teach their followers that their roots go back to the ancient mystery religions of Babylon, Egypt, and Celtic druidism. They have taken what they consider the “best” of each, the foundational practices, and joined them together into a strongly occult discipline. Many groups at the local level worship ancient deities such as “El”, “Baal”, and “Ashtarte”, as well as “Isis and Osiris” and “Set”.”

“The national council [consists of] influential bankers with old money such as: The Rockefellers, the Mellon family, the Carnegie family, the Rothschild family, etc.”

(after a ritualistic child sacrifice): “Afterwards, the man in scarlet, he had a huge golden ring on his hand. He came over to the center of the room. He had each of the people that were swearing that day go forward and kneel before him and kiss his ring, and [I had to ] swear my allegiance to the New Order, to the New World Order for all … until my death.”

“The Freemasons and the Illuminati are hand in glove. I don’t care if this steps on any toes, it’s a fact. The Masonic temple at Alexandria, Virginia (the city itself was named after Alexandria, Egypt, and is a hotbed of Illuminati activity) is a centre in the Washington, DC area for Illuminati scholarship and teaching.”

“Are all Masons Illuminati? No, especially at the lower levels, I believe they know nothing of the practices that occur in the middle of the night in the larger temples.”

“Many of the administrators and directors at the FBI are also Illuminists. The CIA helped bring over German scientists after WWII. Many of these were also Illuminati leaders in their own country, and they were welcomed with open arms by the U.S. group. They also funnelled all information they were learning to the Illuminati. The scientists that ran MK-Ultra and other governmental mind control programs were Illuminists brought over from Nazi Germany.”

“Remember those studies that stated that “TV violence doesn’t affect children’s behaviour” years ago? Guess who funded them? They are a bunch of bullcrud. What a person watches DOES influence them, and this is well known by the behaviourists in the group. In fact, they know that TV is a tool that they purposely use to influence “the masses”. It cannot create a total personality change in the average citizen, but it can desensitize us increasingly to violence, pornography and the occult, and influence the perceptions of young children.”

“The evidence is there, but in my opinion, the average person does not want to know, and even when confronted with it, will look the other way. The Franklin case is a point. How much evidence has come out? Or the MK-ULTRA documents that have been declassified, shown as real, and people ignore it.”

” The Illuminists don’t care who prints this stuff or if they are “exposed”, because they are counting on the majority not believing it, having done a pretty good job with a media blitz campaign. Seen any articles in Newsweek or Time that addresses this other than as a laughable conspiracy theory? Guess who owns Time-Warner?

I have heard them laughing about this very thing in leadership meetings five years ago, and I doubt their attitude has changed much since then.”

For a full account, please visit: Exclusive Interview with Ex-Illuminati Bloodline Programmer/Trainer Svali

There is also the interview Svali did with Investigative Journal Greg Szymanski in 2006 that you could listen to below.

RELATED:  CIA Mind Control Experiments | Declassified Documents Reveal Sex Abuse, More

The Vatican is also HUGELY implicated in initiating these satanic rituals. Greg Szymanski, the same man who interviewed Svali in 2006, published this article highlighting the suspicious activity and some high profile individuals involved with the Vatican rituals: Satanic Black Masses at the Vatican

Now, while there are other whistleblowers and former members that have spoken out against this indoctrination/corrupt society, I want to mention a specific gentleman who was not necessarily born into a cult, but was introduced to one when he was an influential criminal broker (updated: labeled as a banker but was not – he was a self-professed criminal entrepreneur) at the time, before he left this system after a harrowing encounter.

4. Ronald Bernard’s testimony: The attack on children

Ronald Bernard was a former criminal dealer who was introduced into the dark underworld by some colleagues who thought he was ready to be inducted into their satanic rituals. Little did they know, this would instead be the breaking point for Ronald, and allowed him to tap into the light he had within himself in order to leave this corrupted establishment, and pursue a life dedicated to spreading awareness and creating peaceful unity.

Below are a couple of videos with some excerpts of Ronald’s testimony, expressing the horrific reality of black mass and the egregious agenda of targeting our children to be raised in a corrupt society.

Ronald Bernard: “To put it carefully, most of these people followed a not very mainstream religion. So you have Catholics, Protestants, all sort of religions.

These people, most of them, were Luciferians.

And then you can say, religion is a fairy tale. God doesn’t exist. None of that is real. Well, for these people it is truth and reality, and they served something immaterial, what they called Lucifer.

And I also was in contact with those circles, only I laughed at it because to me they were just clients.

So I went to places called Churches of Satan.”

Interviewee: “So now we are talking about Satanism?”

Ronald: “Yes. So I visited these churches, just as a visitor, dropped by, and then they were doing their (un)Holy Mass with naked women and liquor and stuff, and it just amused me.

I didn’t believe in any of this stuff, and was far from convinced if any of this was real.”

Interviewee: “It was just a spectacle to you…”

Ronald: “Yes, in my opinion the darkness and evil is within the people themselves. I didn’t make the connection yet.

So I was a guest in those circles and it amused me greatly to see all those naked women and the other things. It was the good life.

But then at some point, I was invited, which is why I’m telling you all this, to participate in sacrifices, abroad.

(long pause)

That was the breaking point.

Children.”

Interviewee: “You were asked to do that…?”

Ronald: “Yes, and I couldn’t do that.”

Interviewee: “Would you like to stop for a moment, by the way?”

Ronald: “No. And then I started to slowly break down.

I lived through quite a lot as a child myself and this really touched me deeply.

Everything changed.

But that is the world I found myself in.”

(all quotes by Ronald Bernard)

“Because if we need to throw it all out there, because people stay where they are, that is the problem! The good people.

It is not the bad people, there are only a few, bad people do their thing, but it is the good people, worldwide, who do nothing. For a very long time, and I am a little angry with them.

Because when I was in my youth, between 15-20, via family, first line, I heard stories from nurses who were sent to India for a mission for development assistance over there.

Those people… I am trying to control myself.

Those people, were burnout after four or five years, completely traumatized, nurses, back in the Netherlands. No one was allowed to know.

But what was this all about? Children, again. Every time – children!

Organ trafficking.

We just think it is normal for a baby to be saved, but where do these organs come from?

And those children are still alive the moment they remove their organs. Those nurses could not cope with it anymore. India.

I am not sure if this is still going on right now. World, stand up! Go, find out!

Organ trafficking! Children! No one is talking about that. No one is taking action.

Those satanists – f*ck them! That is just a pathetic tiny little group. Organ trafficking worldwide. The god Mammon.

And I can testify – start with damaging little children from early on, and your world becomes even sicker.”

Source: Ronald Bernard – About child organ harvesting – Dutch with subs

5. Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Mr. Ronald Bernard makes numerous references to these Protocols, stating that most of these dark agendas we see going on in our world today can be found in this book.

According to the link he provided us, where you can read the whole English translation: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, this book was “first published in the year 1897 by Philip Stepanov for private circulation among his intimate friends.”

The introduction from this file also states the following, “The Jewish journals, of course, say that they are a forgery, leaving it to be understood that Professor Nilus, who embodied them in a work of his own, had concocted them for his own purposes.

Mr. Henry Ford, in an interview published in the New York WORLD, February 17th, 1921, put the case for Nilus tersely and convincingly thus:

“The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT NOW.”

I am not going to attempt to verify who is wholly responsible for these protocols. Whether they are a “forgery” or a “psyop”, a legitimate code, or what have you.

But I will highlight some of the more impertinent parts of this publication (again, written back in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s), that is extremely unsettling when comparing it to today’s current affairs.

1897

(all quotes from the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion)

Economic Wars / DESTRUCTIVE EDUCATION: “2. The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers, specialists bred and reared from early childhood to rule the affairs of the whole world.”

5. In the hands of the States of to-day there is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the Press. The part played by the Press is to keep pointing out requirements supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the complaints of the people, to express and to create discontent. It is in the Press that the triumph of freedom of speech finds its incarnation. But the GOYIM States have not known how to make use of this force; and it has fallen into our hands. Through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade; thanks to the Press we have got the GOLD in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather it out of the oceans of blood and tears. But it has paid us, though we have sacrificed many of our people. Each victim on our side is worth in the sight of God a thousand GOYIM.”

Materialism Replaces Religion / WE SHALL DESTROY GOD: “3. But even freedom might be harmless and have its place in the State economy without injury to the well-being of the peoples if it rested upon the foundation of faith in God, upon the brotherhood of humanity…

With such a faith as this a people might be governed by a wardship of parishes, and would walk contentedly and humbly under the guiding hand of its spiritual pastor submitting to the dispositions of God upon earth. This is the reason why IT IS INDISPENSABLE FOR US TO UNDERMINE ALL FAITH, TO TEAR OUT OF THE MIND OF THE “GOYIM” THE VERY PRINCIPLE OF GOD-HEAD AND THE SPIRIT, AND TO PUT IN ITS PLACE ARITHMETICAL CALCULATIONS AND MATERIAL NEEDS.”

Control of the Press / WE CONTROL THE PRESS: “4. NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.”

Distractions / WE DECEIVE WORKERS: “In order that the masses themselves may not guess what they are about WE FURTHER DISTRACT THEM WITH AMUSEMENTS, GAMES, PASTIMES, PASSIONS, PEOPLE’S PALACES …. SOON WE SHALL BEGIN THROUGH THE PRESS TO PROPOSE COMPETITIONS IN ART, IN SPORT IN ALL KINDS: these interests will finally distract their minds from questions in which we should find ourselves compelled to oppose them. Growing more and more unaccustomed to reflect and form any opinions of their own, people will begin to talk in the same tone as we because we alone shall be offering them new directions for thought …”

Ruthless Suppression / GENTILES ARE CATTLE: 9. Death is the inevitable end for all. It is better to bring that end nearer to those who hinder our affairs than to ourselves, to the founders of this affair. WE EXECUTE MASONS IN SUCH WISE THAT NONE SAVE THE BROTHERHOOD CAN EVER HAVE A SUSPICION OF IT, NOT EVEN THE VICTIMS THEMSELVES OF OUR DEATH SENTENCE, THEY ALL DIE WHEN REQUIRED AS IF FROM A NORMAL KIND OF ILLNESS

I want to bring up another interesting ideology that these “learned elders” possess, and it is the following:

Ruthless Suppression  GENTILES ARE CATTLE:11. In this difference in capacity for thought between the GOYIM and ourselves may be clearly discerned the seal of our position as the Chosen People and of our higher quality of humanness, in contradistinction to the brute mind of the GOYIM. Their eyes are open, but see nothing before them and do not invent (unless perhaps, material things). From this it is plain that nature herself has destined us to guide and rule the world.”

Now, what’s fascinating to me, is the stark contrast in their belief structure, that they consider themselves “higher quality of humanness” and that nature “destined us to guide and rule the world”, yet even by their own admission have committed so many atrocities not only against “goyim”, but others of their kind (“chosen people”) as well.

And their insistence that their authority to rule and control should not be contested and one of their main roles in humanity is to strip away other people’s freedom – and their strange idolatry to gold, which in their mind, gives them the right to control the world:

Power of Gold:2. IN OUR HANDS IS THE GREATEST POWER OF OUR DAY – GOLD: IN TWO DAYS WE CAN PROCURE FROM OUR STOREHOUSES ANY QUANTITY WE MAY PLEASE.

3. Surely there is no need to seek further proof that our rule is predestined by God? Surely we shall not fail with such wealth to prove that all that evil which for so many centuries we have had to commit has served at the end of ends the cause of true wellbeing – the bringing of everything into order?

Then compare that with WHO/WHAT they’re trying to stamp out (Christianity, Christ, spirituality), and it posits a disturbing picture that the “God” they serve, is not the same one that believers in Jesus Christ know as the Supreme Creator.

Their idolatry for gold, their self-righteous belief that in order to serve the greater good (good for whom?) they must engage in sacrifices and no-holds barred killing of those they deem necessary, even if it’s their own people; their goal to spread as much chaos, division and violence as they possibly can in an attempt to control the masses – their indoctrination of not only their own children, but the pressure to exert their own beliefs onto other people as well – yet they still call the goyim the brutes?

And what separates these protocols from, say, the Bible, for instance?

Well, just as a small example:

Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Out of 62 pages (not including forwards/introductions, etc.) of rather large text:

Love is mentioned all of 2 times.

Since I have room, here are the contexts of which it is mentioned:

“2. As the majority of conspirators act out of love for the game…”

“12. That the people may know and love their king, it is indispensable for him to converse in the market-places with his people. This ensures the necessary clinching of the two forces which are now divided one from another by us by the terror.”

Power is mentioned a whopping 70 times. In 62 pages.

Bible

Out of ~1,000-2,000 pages (depending on size of font and translation):

Love is mentioned 310 times.

Conversely, the protocols would have had to mention the word “love” 9-10 times to match with the scripture. Of course, love is not their goal…

To think of it this way, “love” is mentioned 4-5 TIMES MORE in the Bible. And that’s using the most pages of 2,000. If it was 1,000, then the protocols would have had to mention the word love ~19 times.

Power, on the other hand, is mentioned 272 times in the Bible.

To put that into further perspective, the Bible would have had to mention “power” 2,258 times to match what was in the protocols. Out of 2,000 pages.

An even smaller, but perhaps more impactful, example…

Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

To paraphrase: “Kill those who stand in our way.”

Bible:

Jesus Christ: “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another.”John 13:34

Hm… I think I can see a difference.

6. Jacques Attali: From cannibalism, to genetically modifying, implanting chips, to buying and selling children

1981

(all quotes by Jacques Attali)

On cannibalism: ” – we start from cannibalism and return to it. In short, we can interpret the whole of industrial history as a machine for translating the founding cannibalism, the first relationship to evil, where men eat men, into industrial cannibalism, where men become commodities that eat commodities.”

On genetically modifying/creating clones/hybrids: “In other words, with genetic engineering we could gradually create the conditions for humanity to assume itself freely, but collectively, or else create the conditions for a new commodity, genetic this time, which would be made up of copies of humans sold to humans, chimeras or hybrids used as slaves, robots, means of work…”

On implants: “It is planned to develop small implants in the body that can release hormones and active substances in target organs.”

On buying and selling children: “This idea corresponds entirely to an economic evolution in the sense that the woman or the couple will become part of the division of labour and general production. Thus it will be possible to buy children in the same way as one buys “peanuts” or a television set.”

“The only way to resolve this contradiction is to imagine that society could buy children from a family that would be paid in return. I am not thinking of family allowances, which are weak incentives. A family would agree to have many children if the state guaranteed them substantial progressive allowances on the one hand and full responsibility for the material life of each child on the other. In this scheme, the child would become a kind of bargaining chip in the relationship between the individual and the community.”

Source: The 1981 Michel Salomon – Jacques Attali interview

1981

(these quotes are making its way around the internet of Attali stating that “they” want to euthanize the “useless and old”. Although there ARE implications of this from Attali’s writing/interviews, I could not provide a verifiable source for these specific quotes, so please keep this in mind.)

Jacques Attali: “In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as it exceeds 60-65 years man lives longer than he produces and costs society dearly, then the weak and then the useless who do nothing for society because there will be more and more of them, and especially the stupid ones.

Euthanasia targeting these groups; euthanasia will have to be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. We cannot of course execute people or set up camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe it is for their own good.

Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to come to an abrupt halt rather than gradually deteriorating. We won’t be able to run intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!

We will find something or cause it, a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the fat, it doesn’t matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and the stupid will believe it and ask to be treated.

We will have taken care to have planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.

The selection of idiots will thus be done on its own: they will go to the slaughterhouse on their own.”

Source: Globalist Banker Predicted Scamdemic & Genocide of The Useless

2011

(all quotes by Jacques Attali)

On creating new species/human hybrids and nanotechnology: “Further still, we will create new species, chimeras, capable of operating in difficult environments, radioactive for example, or replace men in battle. And even supreme transgression, to equip animals with a brain similar to the human brain. A little later, the meeting of computing science, genomics, nanotechnology and neurosciences will allow man to create other species, ultra-human, super-human.”

On justifying science experiments and getting rid of God: “Let us not hope to put a stop to it. Unless some unlikely world police, makes a shrine of the genome, a place will always be found to conduct these experiments, inexpensive, justifying them by the promise of curing rare diseases or extending human life expectancy. And even if the West resists it, emerging countries, from Argentina to China, via Brazil and tomorrow Nigeria and Indonesia, will welcome desperate researchers. After getting rid of God, man will have gotten rid of himself.”

Source: https://www.attali.com/en/society/human-more-than-human/ (June 12, 2011)

For additional reading that touches upon other topics that Attali has “predicted” that is currently happening, please visit:

“You are Damaged and Only We Can Repair You”
Illuminati Insider foretold Migrants, Surveillance, Mechanical Procreation

There’s actually more that I wanted to add, including Serge Monast / Blue Beam Project, Aldous Huxley, the Committee of 300, Georgia Guidestones, etc., but this post is getting quite long-winded enough already. I may end up doing a part 2 on this topic.

One thing that I did not realize would be a common factor in ALL of these “conspiracy theories” that are (and have been for a long time) carried out during our timeline, is the mention of God, spirituality, the soul… That was honestly not my intention and it was not something I actively sought to include.

My initial spur to create this post was to show how a scheme to depopulate and control the world either by injecting everyone with a virus/disease/illness/vaccine and/or through wars, mass chaos, corruption, etc. was already planned for a VERY LONG time.

Some may not be aware, simply because they are wrapped up in their own life (wake up, eat, work, tv, maybe socialize, sleep, repeat) and so this whole topic is lost on them. Especially when we’re indoctrinated as little children to trusting teachers, trusting preachers, trusting the government, trusting the news, trusting doctors, trusting law enforcement, trusting day care workers… I could go on and on.

Then there is the matter of what we are taught in schools. Yes education is important, but is it really necessary to engage in advanced math/algebra when basic math will suffice in most arenas of our life – unless you are set to pursue a career directly involving this subject? Not to mention the completely incorrect things we were taught in schools – such as how Thanksgiving tradition started, George Washington’s history, Christopher Columbus discovering America – and again, I could go on and on. Now they are changing our education system to include even more atrocious and harmful systemic doctrines.

Instead, a crucial subject matter should be to teach our children “critical thinking” and how to formulate our own thoughts and data gathering to come to educated conclusions. Since our world has been inundated with “fake news” and “misinformation” everywhere we turn, especially coming from an establishment whose sole purpose originally was to give us REAL, accurate news – and who most of us were ingrained to trust in, it is essential that people are able to look beyond this manipulation tactic, and finally think for themselves.

It is also necessary to teach children (and the whole world) about our spirituality and the importance of compassion and morality, so that these agendas to create chaos and division and horrific science experiments won’t work.

As it is, since our societal foundation has been built out of lies upon lies, AND fear – which is another huge topic, it is extremely hard for people to break out of this system and realize that a lot of the world governments DO NOT have our best interest in mind. Despite what they teach in schools and show on media. Even if the original purpose of the government was to protect their country, it is no longer the case in some areas. They have been infiltrated and controlled by immoral organizations, and it’s prudent that we wake up to this fact and start making changes to address this.

When we can realize that there is a hidden/dark goal to invade and disrupt all aspects of our lives in order to dominate and control free thinking and freedom itself, even our very own spirituality and consciousness, maybe we can finally step out of this implemented system and start better serving our fellow beings.

One last quote, very important and VERY relevant in today’s lost and confused world:
1917

“It is not a bad thing to know these things, which are ingredients of reality. They must be seriously considered. And one is guided to develop something of a nose for reality when one takes up anthroposophy, whilst the materialistic education people have today, with innumerable channels opening into it from the Press, is designed to point not to the realities but to something which is cloaked in all kinds of slogans. And if someone does wake up, as Delaisi did, and writes about how things really are, how many people get to know about it? How many people will listen? They cannot listen, for it is buried by — well, by a life that again is ruled by the Press.”

Source: Rudolf Steiner (1917) Fall of the Spirits of Darkness | Fall/Darkness: Lecture 14: Into the Future

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Andrea Spallanzani from Pixabay

Research on Demand

Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
A Poison to “Destroy Bodies and Rot Souls”? | Is This a 900 Year Old Prophecy Predicting the Future? - Even if we are warned of the future, will we believe it? And even if we did, can we stop/change it?
The Tragedy at Astroworld: Travis Scott, Demonic Imagery, and Seemingly Coordinated Events – Was This Planned? - As more information comes out, one has to wonder: are the police complicit? Or just covering up for a failed response?
Taking a Look Back at the 2012 Olympics London Closing Ceremony: Does it Hold Secrets to What’s Going on in the World? - The world has been blind-sided for centuries, while underhanded organizations operate behind the curtain.
Are the Vaccines Affecting Our Spirituality? | There May be More to it Than We Think - Father Savvas Agioritis shares testimonies of spiritual decline after taking the vaccines.
Research Into the Jews / Talmud | Pt. 1 - A (long) look into another's religion.
Important Messages About Humanity/Civilizations from a High-Ranking Shaman | Credo Mutwa - Incredible information from a respected Spiritual Leader.
Another Fake Vaccination – This Time with Chris Tucker? - More deception when it comes to the covid vaccine.
“America’s Pastor” Billy Graham Exposed - Exposing Graham's ties to freemasonry and their agendas.