FLASHBACK | COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci

A look into Anthony Fauci’s involvement into medical/health corruption.

In light of recent revelations, with the now admission from Fauci himself, that the coronavirus may have originated (been created) in the Wuhan lab instead of occurring naturally, and that it would be worth it to take a closer look –

(although last year every mainstream news media and “fact-checker” on the planet was insisting that this assertion was “debunked” and a “baseless conspiracy theory”)

– not to mention the gain of function controversy and the $600,000 funding (at least) that Fauci sent to the Wuhan Institute specifically for bat-to-human transmission viruses – and Fauci’s OWN admission in May 2020 that “The best evidence shows the virus behind the pandemic was not made in a lab in China”,

I felt it would be prudent to bring up the following article as a flashback to the corruption that Fauci and his cohorts have been engaged in with other viruses that have haunted humankind.

Before I get into that, I also want to highlight this particular section as another opportunity to present how many times the lead talking head of directing the coronavirus response has flip-flopped on his OPINION (NOT FACT) – on what should be founded on scientific basis and actual research, not just based on assumptions, “leanings”, and “indications”:

“If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats, and what’s out there now it’s very, very strongly leaning toward this [virus] could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated—the way the mutations have naturally evolved,” he responded.

“A number of very qualified evolutionary biologists have said that everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that it evolved in nature and then jumped species,” Fauci added.

In May 2021, PolitiFact’s Kate Sanders asked Fauci if he was “still confident” that COVID-19 developed in nature.

“No, actually … I am not convinced about that,” Dr. Fauci said. “I think we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we continue to find out to the best of our ability what happened.”

“Certainly, the people who investigated it say it likely was the emergence from an animal reservoir that then infected individuals,” he continued, “but it could have been something else, and we need to find that out. So, you know, that’s the reason why I said I’m perfectly in favor of any investigation that looks into the origin of the virus.”

– Source: Dr. Fauci Keeps Changing His Wuhan Lab Funding Story, Jay Battacharya Tells Laura Ingraham

Uh huh… And why has his sudden inclination to actually investigate the origins of the coronavirus instead of dismissing it as most likely from a natural biological transmission now such a huge agenda for Mr. Fauci? After A WHOLE YEAR of repeated insinuations that it was naturally occurring?

It couldn’t possibly have anything to do with Rand Paul’s testimony that he has proof that the gain-of-function research for this SPECIFIC virus came under the direction of Fauci and his institution, right? Exposing the relationship that Dr. Shi Zhengli (who perhaps unwittingly made mention of her collaboration) has with the NIH institution, thanking Fauci personally for funding the research at the end of her paper?

VIDEO: Rand Paul Says Fauci ‘Absolutely’ Committed Perjury When Denying Wuhan Gain-of-Function Research

Methinks the WHO is obviously complicit in this whole ordeal as well…

“A joint report into the origins of COVID by the World Health Organization (WHO) and China has found it is “extremely unlikely” that the virus escaped from a lab, according to a draft version seen by AP News.”
‘Extremely Unlikely’ COVID Came From Lab Draft WHO Report Says, As Ex-CDC Head Touts Claim

I don’t know if I have to mention it, but Mr. Fauci is not the only one who should be under the radar… We already know about Bill and Melinda Gates’ involvement in all of this as well, but what about Mrs. Fauci? What does she do, again?

“Christine Grady is an American nurse, bioethicist, and a senior investigator. She currently serves as the Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. She also serves as Head of the Department’s Section on Human Subjects Research.”
Christine Grady Wiki Bio

“Head of the Department’s Section on Human Subjects Research

…Hmm… make of that what you will.

FLASHBACK: The original article was first published on April 05, 2020.

The following information has been reblogged from rielpolitick.com
(original post can be found at journal-neo.org | The Remarkable Doctor A. Fauci)

COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci

Source – journal-neo.org

“…Fauci, Birx and Redfield, all incestuously complicit in the HIV/AIDS frauds and malpractice, today hold the future of not only American public health, but also of the entire world economy in their hands. Not a good situation. As their work on the proved HIV=IDS fraud shows, the coronavirus tests do not at all prove presence of a deadly virus in any patient. If this is so, it is perhaps the greatest criminal fraud in medical history”

The Remarkable Doctor A. Fauci – By F. William Engdahl

Dramatic political and social decisions are being made across the United States and around the world on what emergency quarantine measures and other steps must be taken. In many cases the radical and severe measures, such as shutting down the world economy, are being justified by COVID-19 case projections of morbidity into the future. If there is one person who is the face of the current strategy of dealing with the coronavirus in Washington it is the Director of the US National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the NIH, Dr. Tony Fauci. What major media conveniently leave out in discussing Fauci’s role is his highly controversial and conflicted history since he first joined NIAID in 1984 during the beginnings of the AIDS panic. His role then sheds valuable light on his remarkable and highly controversial actions today.

Tony Fauci, a leading member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, is being promoted by major US media such as CNN, MSNBC or the New York Times as the great expert on all related to the Covid19 outbreak. He had dismissed the President’s efforts to promote a known malaria medication as treatment for severe corona patients as “anecdotal,” even though seven years before he backed the same drug. He has publicly taken projections from an institute created in Washington State by the Gates Foundation, the same foundation that virtually owns the WHO and owns major stakes in the leading vaccine makers, to claim that up to 200,000 Americans could die from COVID19. Fauci stated that COVID19 is “probably about 10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu,” which would mean 300-600,000 coronavirus deaths this year, at the same time in a respected medical journal he compared Covid-19 as similar to seasonal flu in morbidity. When questioned how long the shutdown of much of the US economy must last, Fauci replied only when there is zero new covid19 positive tested cases, something impossible given the defective testing. He has also backed direct human tests of novel vaccines with no prior animal tests, including with radical non-tested mRNA gene-edited vaccines.

Fauci has more influence over US national policy on the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic than anyone, including the President.

Much of media treats him with awe as an unimpeachable scientist, one of the world’s finest. A closer look at Anthony Fauci’s career gives a starkly different picture, a very alarming one in fact.

America’s AIDS Czar

Tony Fauci has held the top post at the NIAID in Washington for an astonishing 36 years. Today he is well past retirement age at 79, and holds the funds to determine which drug companies or university researchers will get precious government funds or not from NIAID’s annual $5 billion budget.

Let’s go back to 1984 when Fauci was named head of NIAID during the Reagan era. That year an AIDS researcher, Robert Gallo, working under Fauci, held a press conference to announce that he had “discovered” the AIDS virus. He said it was HIV– human immunodeficiency virus. The shocking announcement which went around the world, was in complete disregard of scientific procedures of prior peer-reviewed published scientific evidence, including the required electron microscope analyses. It was a case of “science by press conference” as a critical scientist, Prof. Peter H. Duesberg described it. Duesberg was an award-winning researcher at Berkeley who isolated the first cancer gene through his work on retroviruses in 1970, and mapped the genetic structure of these viruses.

For Gallo and Fauci, that was unimportant as millions in research funds flowed into NIAID to research the new virus, HIV. Fauci and Gallo claimed that AIDS was highly contagious, also by sexual transmission, especially among homosexual men. Notably, before the Gallo claim to have found the HIV AIDS virus, NIAID had been doing research on the role of drugs, poppers or nitrites, proven immune-suppressants, in the deaths of the earliest AIDS patients. That was quickly dropped in favor of researching a “cure” for AIDS. Media was told that AIDS was the “public health threat of the Century.” Gallo went on to make millions on his patented blood test for HIV, despite the fact that the test was often giving false positives and did not test directly for the alleged virus but for active antibodies, something immunology practice said was not valid, as antibodies merely suggested a past infection response and not necessarily presence of AHIV. At this time in the 1980’S Fauci was responsible for AIDS research at NIAID, a post he still holds.

False Tests?

The issue of HIV/AIDS tests is central. While a frightened world was clamoring for a test, Gallo and Fauci promoted their deeply flawed tests of antibodies. In 2006 Gallo claimed, “HIV tests were highly accurate from the time they were developed in 1984 and have become much more accurate over time…” Highly accurate in 1984 but more accurate than highly over time? Gallo added in response to criticism, “A PCR test for the presence of the virus itself can accurately determine a child’s HIV status.”

In a sharp rebuttal of the Gallo claims, claims endorsed by Fauci and the NIAID as well as CDC, Roberto A. Giraldo, MD and Etienne de Harven, MD, the scientist who produced the first electron micrograph of a retrovirus, pointed out that both the ELISA and Western blot, and a genetic test, the PCR or ‘Viral Load’ test,” the two major tests used to determine if one has AIDS, are invalid. “None of these tests detect the HIV virus itself, nor do they detect HIV particles.” They add that there are “more than 70 different documented conditions that can cause the antibody tests to react positive without an HIV infection.” Among the false positive cases are influenza, the common cold, leprosy or the existence of pregnancy. The same tests are used today to determine SARS-CoV-2-positive.

They concluded, “The fact that after 25 years of intense research HIV has been neither isolated nor purified in terms of classical virology indicates to us that the infectious view of AIDS as a contagious viral disease is based on an apparently non-existent microbe!”

Giraldo and de Harven declared, “The alleged existence of HIV was asserted from the study of proteins, reverse transcriptase activity (RT), and RNA fragments that were found in culture supernatants, not from the direct analysis of purified viral particles.” The CDC requires a positive antibody test for HIV to determine AIDS in the USA. Yet in Africa since 1985 the WHO requires no HIV test or any other laboratory test. Merely the patient’s symptoms that can include weight loss, chronic diarrhea, prolonged fever, persistent cough and such, symptoms endemic to chronic poverty, malnutrition and lack of sanitation.

Yet this fraud has shaped the career of Tony Fauci for more than 35 years. Fauci as head of NIAID has taken millions from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as well as the Clinton Foundation along with tens of billions from US taxpayers for this bogus research. Suspiciously, the 2006 article by Giraldo and de Harven was suddenly retracted by the journal in 2019 just before the coronavirus Wuhan outbreak.

Despite the fact that he knew the established rules of virology, Fauci, as head of NIAID, recommended the Burroughs Wellcome chemotherapy drug, AZT as a “preventive drug” for HIV diagnosed patients even without symptoms! Burroughs Wellcome gave NIAID the study that was deliberately biased for AZT. Fauci even backed AZT for pregnant women despite the grave risk to the fetus.

One mark of pregnancy in all women is a higher level of antigens as the natural immune system fights any infection to protect the fetus. AZT or Retrovir, a failed leukemia drug, has been proven to be a highly toxic drug. It was approved for AIDS testing in a record 5 days by Fauci and the US Government in 1987. Today despite more than thirty years funded research and billions of dollars, no effective vaccine for HIV/AIDS exists.

Fauci and Gilead

According to people who have studied the role of Tony Fauci as head of NIAID, his focus has been what is called scientific reductivism, described as “a 19 Century-style, single-germ theory for a complex web of factors that collapsed the immune systems of a subset of gay men in the early 1980s.” He has refused to explore the documentation that a variety of lethal drugs and other toxins such as nitrites could play a role. As a result he has wasted tens of billions of taxpayer dollars since 1984 on dead end experiments.

One of his most nefarious was his collaboration with Gilead Sciences.

Not satisfied with having developed a false positive test for AIDS and having gained FDA fast-track approval for AZT to treat HIV-positive patients with serious illness symptoms, Fauci decided to collaborate with Gilead (as in the Biblical “balm of Gilead”) on what came to be called PrEP experiments.

Fauci in 2007 began to finance clinical trials of the AZT drugs in HIV “negatives,” on the theory the chemotherapy would “protect” them from becoming “positive.” That is, testing toxic HIV drugs on otherwise healthy persons to “insure” they never got AIDS. If it sounds mad, it was. Gilead supplied the drug, Truvada, to NIAID between 2007-2012 for Phase III human tests on HIV negative subjects. Four tests of at least 2,000 and up to 5,000 test subjects each, were done. The project was called “pre-exposure prophylaxis” or “PrEP.” Healthy subjects were given doses of chemotherapy drug Truvada on the thesis it could prevent them from one day getting HIV-positive. CDC, in its May 2014 recommendation urged physicians to prescribe Truvada for negatives in the so-called “risk groups,” an official government imprimatur for an extremely profitable drug.

The FDA ignored two of the four Truvada tests that had failed and been halted. Despite that and owing to data manipulation by Fauci’s NIAID and Gilead, the FDA approved the dangerous Truvada for PrEP. Today Gilead lists the side effects of Truvada: Kidney problems, including kidney failure; worsening Hepatitis B; too much lactic acid in your blood (lactic acidosis), which can lead to death; severe liver problems, which can lead to death; bone problems. They state that Truvada “can help reduce the risk of getting HIV-1 through sex, when taken every day and used together with safer sex practices.”

The Fauci-Gilead scam of promoting Truvada for healthy people to “reduce risk” of HIV is a marker for the level of medical malpractice and in some cases evident criminal abuse of human health that the current White House coronavirus guru, A. Fauci, represents.

Fauci and COVID-19

In October, 2019 Fauci and his NIAID got $100 million from the Gates Foundation to develop “gene-based” therapies for HIV and sickle cell disease. That means Fauci still to the time of the first claims of novel coronavirus in Wuhan China, Fauci was still promoting a 35-year fraud around HIV. Fauci is also part of the Gates Foundation cabal. In 2012 Fauci was named one of the five Leadership Council of the Gates Foundation-created Global Vaccine Action Plan.

This is highly relevant to his role today as the Trump Administration coronavirus “pope.” Has his NIAID or any other laboratory in the world rigorously, with electron microscopy, isolated and purified samples of patients tested SARS-CoV-2 positive for Covid-19? Or are the virus proofs as faulty as Fauci and the AIDS clique have made for HIV?

In addition NIAID is working with Gilead to conduct Phase II human trials on Gilead’s drug, remdesivir, as a potential treatment for hospitalized adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

A coincidence?

Relevant also is the fact that all top scientific advisers to the US President’s Task Force on COVID-19 are tied since decades to the bogus and destructive HIV/AIDS research and propagation of false theories. Alongside Tony Fauci of NIAID stands Deborah L. Birx, M.D., Obama appointee as US Global AIDS Coordinator who worked under Tony Fauci at NIAID from 1983-1986.

Robert Redfield is the current Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, center of the recent coronavirus testing scandal. Redfield cofounded with the discredited Robert Gallo, former Fauci colleague in the AIDS scandals of the early 1980’s at NIH, the Institute of Human Virology based at University of Maryland. Redfield and Birx also coauthored numerous scientific articles on purported HIV vaccines, none of which have been effective.

Fauci, Birx and Redfield, all incestuously complicit in the HIV/AIDS frauds and malpractice, today hold the future of not only American public health, but also of the entire world economy in their hands. Not a good situation. As their work on the proved HIV=IDS fraud shows, the coronavirus tests do not at all prove presence of a deadly virus in any patient. If this is so, it is perhaps the greatest criminal fraud in medical history.

_____________________

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”

https://journal-neo.org/2020/04/15/the-remarkable-doctor-a-fauci/

ONE LAST NOTE FROM E.A.R. (excerpt below taken from the post “Anthony Fauci Caught ‘Lying’ – Several Times”)

An interesting piece from 1994 on Kary Mullis and his views on a couple of questionable individuals:

In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.

The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.

But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done.

“I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.”

He pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.”

(Kary Mullis)
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus

It seems as if this self-described “ass” actually has a heart of gold and was trying to expose possible corruption as early as the 1990’s.

As Celia Farber, the interviewer, mentions: “One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears.

Sadly Kary Mullis passed away on August 17, 2019, allegedly from pneumonia. Just weeks away from when Event 201 took place in October 2019, and a few more weeks from when an actual “surprise outbreak” erupted, allegedly as early as November 2019. And just a couple of months after that, we have the PCR tests that Mr. Kary Mullis himself invented and was against using for viral detection, being used (and abused) for viral detection en masse – at the behest of the “expert scientists”.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

Vernon Coleman Speech at the London Worldwide Freedom Rally | July 24, 2021 - Dr. Vernon Coleman exposing COVID/vaccine corruption.
Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths - America's Frontline Doctors addressing the fraudulent use of the EUA for COVID vaccines.
Might COVID Injections Reduce Lifespan? - "Yeadon, Montagnier, Zelenko and others are raising concerns about global genocide."
Scam of the Medical Industry and a Depopulation Agenda Revealed at the ITNJ - Robert O. Young's Testimony at the International Tribunal of Natural Justice
COVID Presenting Same Exact Symptoms as… THE COMMON COLD - We have been lied to on a MASSIVE SCALE; all to enforce the vaccine on us.
NOT ON THE BEEB: Dr. T | Mask, Swabs, ‘Vaccine’, Magnetism & Genocide [Full Transcript] - Dr. T proposes a hypothesis that involves hydrogel and EMF.

Anthony Fauci Caught ‘Lying’ – Several Times

Science doesn’t lie. But people sure do.

What is “science”?

SCIENCE:
 
1. a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws.
2. systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.
3. any of the branches of natural or physical science.
4. systematized knowledge in general.
5. knowledge, as of facts or principles; knowledge gained by systematic study.
6. a particular branch of knowledge.
7. any skill or technique that reflects a precise application of facts or principles.

Science is a set of facts and principles gained from knowledge and study into the experience and observation of the physical/material world.

FACTS. TRUTHS. PRINCIPLES.

I know I’m not the only one questioning why “science” seems to be changing at the whim of a small few. And who do we have at the helm of it all? Especially during these very confusing/controversial covid times?

Anthony Fauci, NIH, WHO, FDA and the CDC. (All “gold-standard, leading experts” that ironically are shifting, changing, removing what “science” has defined throughout all these years.)

Even his very own statements about science should shed some light on what science is supposed to be: “He added, “So, when they see someone up in the White House, which has an air of authority to it, who’s talking about science, that there are some people who just don’t believe that — and that’s unfortunate because, you know, science is truth. … If you go by the evidence and by the data, you’re speaking the truth.”
Anthony Fauci lied about masks; now he complains that people ‘distrust authority’

Yes. “If you go by the evidence and by the data, you’re speaking the truth.” – not if you’re making it up and changing it as you go along because it suits a particular agenda.

Let’s see how many times Mr. Dr. Expert Anthony Fauci and the co-horts of this agenda were caught lying or “changing” goalposts/rules and even the very definition of what herd immunity means (keep in mind, this is just a very small sample out of many) :

Wearing a mask:

1. Feb. 17 (2020): Fauci told USA Today that wearing a mask is for the infected to protect others. “Now, in the United States, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to wear a mask.
The Fauci Timeline — Sorting Fact From Fiction

2. March 2020: “When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences — people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face,” said Fauci at that time.
FLASHBACK: Dr. Fauci claims masks don’t provide COVID protection, only help people ‘feel…better’

3. In June 2020, Fauci admitted that he and other public health officials had downplayed the benefit of masks — with some even advising against wearing them — because of a fear of equipment shortages for front-line health care workers.
Dr. Anthony Fauci Admits Shifting Goalposts on ‘Herd Immunity’

4. September 2020: “At that point, which is now months and months ago, I have been on the airways, on the radio, on TV, begging people to wear masks. And I keep talking in the context of wear a mask, keep physical distance, avoid crowds, wash your hands and do things more outdoors versus indoors.”

Fauci says Trump took his stance on masks ‘out of context’ during debate

5. By October (2020), Dr. Fauci had completely reversed course on mask-wearing, saying that it may be time to impose a nationwide mask-wearing mandate, something he termed “universal mask-wearing.”

“Well, if people are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandating it,” Fauci told CNN’s Erin Burnett Oct. 23.
FLASHBACK: Dr. Fauci claims masks don’t provide COVID protection, only help people ‘feel…better’

From a personal opinion: I want to point out how adamant Anthony Fauci is about flouting wearing a mask, yet here, he is not wearing one throughout his entire speech. Doesn’t he realize how far his droplets are landing? Not to mention that at the 19 minute mark we see press secretary Jen Psaki take the stand, without wiping down the potentially dangerous, deadly virus that Anthony Fauci could have been dispensing all over the podium.

Including that is the fact that Jen Psaki then takes her face masks (because, “double the protection”…) off as well, and flips it mouth-side down on the very podium that expert Anthony Fauci was just speaking at and spreading his germs. At the very end of the video, Jen is seen putting the mask back on, after letting it sit and fester on top of the stand that Dr. Fauci was just speaking over.

What has our common sense been reduced to?

Herd immunity:

6. Earlier on in the pandemic, Fauci had said the United States would need 60 to 70 percent of people to be vaccinated in order to reach herd immunity, according to the Times.
REPORT: Fauci Admits He Lied Because ‘Country Wasn’t Ready’ To Hear The Truth

7. Dr Fauci’s estimate for reaching herd immunity has been steadily inching up, @nytimes’ Donald McNeil Jr reports. Fauci told us at last week’s @CNBC #HealthyReturns that it may be 75-85%. https://t.co/j18nUYZ3cV pic.twitter.com/hIKewMAFim

— Meg Tirrell (@megtirrell) December 24, 2020
REPORT: Fauci Admits He Lied Because ‘Country Wasn’t Ready’ To Hear The Truth

8. “When polls said only about half of all Americans would take a vaccine, I was saying herd immunity would take 70 to 75 percent,” Fauci told the Times. “Then, when newer surveys said 60 percent or more would take it, I thought, ʻI can nudge this up a bit,’ so I went to 80, 85.”

“We need to have some humility here,” he added. “We really don’t know what the real number is. I think the real range is somewhere between 70 to 90 percent. But, I’m not going to say 90 percent.”
Fauci doubles down after being confronted over startling admission that he deceived the public about herd immunity

We even have the WHO, who is constantly changing / “updating” their definition for what herd immunity means depending on the alleged “new” results and information that they determine from their studies.

Another change, once again, on December 21, 2020:

Yet another "update" explaining their change in definition.

Very suspect, Anthony Fauci and WHO. Very suspect.

And perhaps because of this exposure, they felt the need to “clarify”, this time taking into account not only the vaccines that they heap enormous praise and focus on, but this time alluding to the Samaritan goodness of their hearts that they do not feel as if herd immunity should be achieved by exposing people to the virus. But instead by using the vaccine. (Because they care so much.)

The question then is, who is going to protect us from the vaccine if/when it turns out (since new information comes out all the time…) that the vaccine was not as “safe and effective” as they once thought? Their inclusion that “WHO will continue to update these answers as new information becomes available.” leaves the door wide open to skirt away from any responsibility of the side effects of the vaccine due to not enough foresight because of the ever-evolving nature of this new virus and the vaccine that has yet to be studied thoroughly for long-term safety and effectiveness.

The argument then possibly becomes that their sincere effort to “save humanity” from this deadly pandemic overrides the vaccine effectiveness because of the huge demand to save the population (let’s not get into the depopulation agenda of Bill Gates – in which he and Anthony Fauci are close friends – and others… although, by all means, please research this to gain more information) and that they honestly, truly, genuinely sought to cure us all from this virus. The tragic outcome of the vaccine that they “earnestly” thought was for the benefit of the people would be unprecedented and the blame would then go to, again, the changing nature of the virus and/or our immune response system not adhering well to their honest-to-goodness efforts.

Sorry, but, I’m not buying it.

Asymptomatic vs. Symptomatic

9. January 2020: “But the one thing historically that people need to realize is that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory viruses of any type asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there is a rare symptomatic transmission that may transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.
Here Is a Video of Fauci Explaining in January 2020 That Asymptomatic Transmission Is NEVER the Driver of Outbreaks

10. June 2020: Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove: “We’re constantly looking at this data, and we’re trying to get more information from countries to truly answer this question,” she added. “It still appears to be rare that an asymptomatic individual actually transmits onward.”

Anthony Fauci: “We know from epidemiological studies they can transmit to someone who is uninfected even when they’re without symptoms,” Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told ABC’s “Good Morning America” on Wednesday. “So to make a statement to say that’s a rare event was not correct.”
Fauci says asymptomatic coronavirus transmission is possible following WHO confusion

11. September 2020: “I can tell you right now that we should be testing more and we should be testing asymptomatic people,” Fauci told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes on Thursday night. “Take that to the bank and trust me on it.”
CDC reverses course on testing asymptomatic people for Covid-19, again

The PCR / covid tests:

12. Yet a PCR test instruction document from the CDC that had been revised five times as of July 13, 2020, specified testing and interpretation of the test using a Ct of 40. On September 28, 2020, a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases from Jaafar et al. had asserted, based on patient labs and clinical data involving nearly 4,000 patients, that a Ct of 30 was appropriate for making public policy. An update to the CDC instructions for PCR testing from December 1, 2020, still uses a Ct of 40.
The WHO Finally Updates Its COVID-19 Testing Policy… One Hour After Biden’s Inauguration

13. Anthony Fauci (July 16, 2020): “…If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…it’s just dead nucleoids, period.”
Fauci Himself Admits Covid PCR Test at Over 35 Cycles Is Deceitful, Worse Than Useless

14. Article published on September 30, 2020: The reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test used to identify those people infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus uses a nasal swab to collect RNA from deep within the nasal cavity of the individual being tested. The RNA is reverse transcribed into DNA and amplified through 40 or more cycles, or until virus is detected. The result is reported as a simple “yes” or “no” answer to the question of whether someone is infected.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials state they do not specify the cycle threshold ranges used to determine who is positive, and that commercial manufacturers and laboratories set their own threshold ranges.

Any test with a cycle threshold (CT) above 35 is too sensitive, says Juliet Morrison, PhD, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 [cycles] could represent a positive.” A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35, she added. Dr. Mina said he would set the figure at 30, or even less.

Coronavirus Cases Plummet When PCR Tests Are Adjusted

Yikes. There is so much wrong with these examples. Who is in charge, again? The labs/manufacturers can set their own threshold? Yet officials wouldn’t recommend anything higher than 35? Or even 30? Even Anthony Fauci, who finally wasn’t lying about the amount of cycles? Yet at what threshold were all of these tests being done to crank out all of these false positives that are, again, just now being addressed and changed? The FDA recommended threshold of 40 or as many as it takes “until virus is detected“?

Then pair that up with what Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test had to say:
“I don’t think you can misuse PCR. [It is] the results; the interpretation of it. If they can find this virus in you at all – and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”
Dr. Fauci admits the PCR test for coronavirus is all but useless as it is administered in the US

15. Dr. David Samadi (January 21, 2021): The World Health Organization has now released guidance to laboratories around the world to reduce the cycle count in PCR tests to get a more accurate representation of COVID cases.

The current cycle was much too high and resulting in any particle being declared a positive case.

The WHO notice concluded by suggesting that “most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.”
World Health Organization updates PCR test guidelines

So apparently all this time they weren’t assessing all of the other necessary relative data needed to confirm a positive case, and instead ran as many cycles as they possibly could to detect the virus – against the numerous prompts of the medical community who said all along that this was a huge oversight – meanwhile suspiciously cranking out positive numbers for the media to drool over. And as some people have pointed out, all of these new changes are “coincidentally” just in time to greet the new president as an illusion of control and miraculously reduced numbers of positive coronavirus cases. (Or it’s due to the fantastic work of the rushed vaccine – or both.)

Hydroxychloroquine

16. The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.

So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump street? He didn’t even launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9 (2020), by which time 33,000 people had died.

Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 — nobody needed to die

17. August 12, 2020: Since the start of the pandemic, hundreds of doctors have successfully used hydroxychloroquine to treat patients symptomatic of COVID-19 infections. In frustration at the media negativity about this safe, effective medicine American doctors have sent an open letter to Dr Fauci raising their concerns.
Doctors Send Open Letter to Fauci About HCQ COVID Cure

Other doubts from multiple outlets about the supposed “expert” decisions of those in charge:

Up until COVID hit in 2020, neither WHO nor the CDC had ever considered a single positive PCR test sufficient for diagnosing viral infection.

TOTAL COINCIDENCE ALERT: C19 Diagnostic Criteria Tightened by WHO on Biden Inauguration Day!

Sen. Marco Rubio just called out Anthony Fauci in a penned piece posted on Fox News as a lying liar who arrogantly used his position as the nation’s top infectious disease bureaucrat to lie to the American people “in order to manipulate their behavior.”

“[P]lacing blind faith in unelected celebrity scientists,” Rubio warned, “has its limits, and we must not be afraid to call them out when they’re caught overstepping their legitimate authority.”

Anthony Fauci’s ‘lying’ is hardly surprising

Also, the nation’s testing data has been called into question, as this week the CDC and 11 states were forced to admit that they were mixing testing results in a way that might make the data less useful in assessing the rate of the disease’s spread.

If it isn’t the nation’s mood, nor the science, could it be… politics?

Did Anthony Fauci Get Out-Foxed? Why His Reversal On Reopening Is So Troubling

Mea culpa: I spent a lot of time on these here digital pages defending Dr. Anthony Fauci. Brother, was I wrong. Fauci is a stone-cold liar. And if he’s not a stone-cold liar, his only defense is that he is a fraud. Either way, shame on him … and me.

Nolte: Dr. Fauci Is Either a Liar or a Fraud

Why all the changing rules contradicting those of other scientists/doctors?

One would think if an expert in his field had any real experience and knowledge about viruses, transmission, etc., that their “rules” would not keep changing based on the “popular view” or pressure to conform to what politics demands. With the “leadership” blaming all of the changes on this new virus/pandemic and that they have to adjust their position based on new findings/studies about it, it makes one wonder why their (the leading expert’s) initial view was so out of touch compared with the MANY other doctors/scientists who were saying all along that masks don’t work, lockdowns don’t work, we don’t need a vaccine because HCQ works and ivermectin, etc., etc., etc.

So again I ask you… what makes the NIH, CDC, WHO experts so much more knowledgeable about this ‘virus’, if they have been wrong countless times and only changing their views (they claim: “based on new findings”) if all of the scientists and doctors they were trying to silence this whole time due to “misinformation” and “false news” were RIGHT ALL ALONG?

What makes these few “leading experts”, who have been proven wrong time and time again, and who has changed their mind, time and time again, so much more authoritative and knowledgeable about this coronavirus situation than the numerous other doctors and scientists who have been right from the very beginning? The very same scientists and doctors who have been gaslighted and ridiculed, censored and banned, doxxed and attacked for sticking to their values and scientific findings that these other so-called “leading experts” are just now admitting are correct?

Why aren’t Fauci and the rest of the government alphabet crew (NIH, WHO, CDC, FDA, etc.) labeled as “misinformation” and “false news” when they were peddling all of their uncertain information to begin with; yet the actual scientific facts and findings of the medical community were called into question? Should the media who helped propagate these incorrect assessments be held liable as well?

How many people could have been saved if the world leaders (far be it for me to imply that some (most?) are in on a huge conspiratorial agenda…) would have listened to the multiple doctors and scientists/researchers advice instead of those at the head of these (quite possibly corrupt) funded agencies?

Has Anthony Fauci been lying this whole time (blaming citing ‘new information’) and just changing the goal posts to suit some other purpose?

PCR Inventory Kary Mullis on “Dr” Fauci:

He should not be in the position like he’s in.

Those guys have got an agenda. Which is not, what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to – and they smugly – like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”

“You can’t expect the sheep, to really respect the best and the brightest. They don’t know the difference, really. I mean, I like humans, don’t get me wrong, but, basically, there is a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn’t a really good scientist. I mean, that’s a problem, that’s a main problem, actually with science, I’d say in this century, because scientists being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don’t understand it.”

President of the University of South Carolina asked Fauci if he’d come down there and debate me on stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody who was, from the other side, to come down there and balance my – because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that’s going to tell me the other side. But Fauci didn’t want to do it…

An interesting piece from 1994 on Kary Mullis and his views on a couple of questionable individuals:

In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.

The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.

But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done.

“I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.”

He pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.”

(Kary Mullis)
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus

It seems as if this self-described “ass” actually has a heart of gold and was trying to expose possible corruption as early as the 1990’s.

As Celia Farber, the interviewer, mentions: “One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears.

Sadly Kary Mullis passed away on August 17, 2019, allegedly from pneumonia. Just weeks away from when Event 201 took place in October 2019, and a few more weeks from when an actual “surprise outbreak” erupted, allegedly as early as November 2019. And just a couple of months after that, we have the PCR tests that Mr. Kary Mullis himself invented and was against using for viral detection, being used (and abused) for viral detection en masse – at the behest of the “expert scientists”.

Science doesn’t lie. But people sure do.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Peggy und Marco Lachmann-Anke from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Vernon Coleman Speech at the London Worldwide Freedom Rally | July 24, 2021 - Dr. Vernon Coleman exposing COVID/vaccine corruption.
Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths - America's Frontline Doctors addressing the fraudulent use of the EUA for COVID vaccines.
Might COVID Injections Reduce Lifespan? - "Yeadon, Montagnier, Zelenko and others are raising concerns about global genocide."
Scam of the Medical Industry and a Depopulation Agenda Revealed at the ITNJ - Robert O. Young's Testimony at the International Tribunal of Natural Justice
COVID Presenting Same Exact Symptoms as… THE COMMON COLD - We have been lied to on a MASSIVE SCALE; all to enforce the vaccine on us.
NOT ON THE BEEB: Dr. T | Mask, Swabs, ‘Vaccine’, Magnetism & Genocide [Full Transcript] - Dr. T proposes a hypothesis that involves hydrogel and EMF.

The Story of Zoe Alexander: X Factor Exposed

The horrible deception and manipulation of an X Factor hopeful.

On this website, I honor Truth and Integrity as shown by these articles:

When News Media Lies
How Do We Find the Truth?
Why is Having Integrity so Hard?

and so when I see an obvious case of deception and injustice, I have to call it out. And one of my key goals is to work on spreading awareness on many different subjects; and since this topic was recently brought to my attention and it is one in which I used to partake in, I had to address it.

Now, my history and perhaps that of others, may be able to relate. I used to watch X-Factor, American Idol, American’s Got Talent, etc., etc. It bemused me to see all the auditions and, in my younger days, I am ashamed to admit, I joined the judges in scoffing and ridiculing the wild and/or awkward contestants with their off-key singing and strange behavior. It was entertaining, to say the least, which was the point.

But behind this obvious spectacle, it was lost on myself and others, that these were real people with real feelings who had heartfelt hopes and dreams and their own individual personality.

Now, I can simply attribute this to myself being “young and stupid” and not knowing any better. But, you know, that’s a cop out, if I may say so. After all, my Mom taught me to be nice to others. (Or she tried to, I should say.) I was also bullied as a child. So much so that in turn I became a bully myself. Again, not proud of it at all, but such is life when people go through certain emotional trauma. But I should have been understanding and more compassionate while viewing these t.v. shows. Most of them are real people putting their heart on the line. I say “most” because I have a suspicion that they hired actors as well to bring more entertainment value to their program.

And thankfully, after my negative and bitter stage, I began to feel the emotions of other people and realized that everyone is special and important and that all of us deserve to be treated with love and respect. This is actually both a curse and a blessing, because even the slightest thing can trigger me and my heart feels it, and instantly I’ll want to cry. I never used to be this way, but with some divine help and natural maturing, it’s opened my eyes to seeing people as precious and we should treat everyone right.

Blast to the Past

That brings me to Zoe Alexander’s case and many others (and a harsh look at myself with how I used to be…)

I remember over a year ago, I felt compelled to go down the nostalgia trail and re-watch some of these auditions. I used to love watching them. I would tune in for every episode but was mostly interested in the initial auditioning process.

Imagine my surprise when after watching a few, I realized I didn’t enjoy it as much. In fact, I was feeling more and more uncomfortable and disturbed that these judges (most of them, anyway), were downright cruel and dismissive. Especially if the participant didn’t fit their “ideal image”.

Again, I used to LOVE watching these episodes. Now, I felt a deep cringe inside of me; not because of the awkwardness of the people auditioning, but because my heart went out for them that they were being treated this way. The people that I used to snicker and laugh at, I now felt a huge compulsion to hug and let them know that they’re beautiful and who cares what these “judges” think.

(Of course, that was the whole point of the auditioning process, supposedly – to be judged. But what many didn’t know at the time is how staged this whole ordeal was.)

What used to be a guilty pleasure of mine now washed over me in shame. At the time, I didn’t realize how cruel my actions of laughing at these potential contestants through the screen actually was.

Enter in Zoe Alexander

Zoe Alexander on the X-Factor UK

Zoe Alexander from The X Factor UK

When I first saw this young performer, I thought she looked great, happy, and sweet. Yes, her apparent obsession with Pink was a little strange, and there was an interesting nod to her parents that they were also tribute artists (of course, at the time, we didn’t realize that this was all a setup to make her and her family look like star-wannabe’s), but her performance was fun and I thought she did really well.

Then we come to the judges who are “allegedly” confused about this contestant’s desire to want to stray from Pink, yet still choose to do a Pink song. Out of the kindness of their heart’s, of course (#sarcasm), they allow her to try a different song.

Unfortunately, this wasn’t enough to sway the judges and they lamented that if only she would have strayed away from the Pink impersonation, she might have had a chance.

The look on Zoe’s face was devastating. The realization that she had been had can be seen by anyone re-watching this scene and knowing the “real” story. But to those who were tricked and manipulated (i.e. – the whole t.v. viewing audience) into believing a certain narrative, their takeaway of these events was simply that Zoe had her chance, and she blew it – then went into a full blown temper tantrum.

When Zoe yelled out that they made her do a Pink song, the judges and audience can be heard displaying their shock at her audacity to accuse them of such, especially since this never occurred during the audition. The judges kept reiterating how they never said anything like that, and it was her choice to sing it and that they even gave her a second chance.

The t.v. audience was left with an edited mess; painting Zoe as an ungrateful, deluded, angry character that was perhaps one of the most violent contestants they’ve ever had – that a lot of us fell for.

After seeing this audition, my opinion of this sweet, happy demeanor of this young lady changed to that of bewilderment and “Woah… that sure escalated quickly.”

Since I knew, even at that time, that editing was certainly a possibility, I wasn’t too quick to jump on the wagon that Zoe was delusional and her anger was misplaced. But I was taken aback that my initial opinion of her was so wrong. Still, something nagged in the back of my mind that something wasn’t quite right. The words that they told her to sing a Pink song kept reverberating inside and I thought, “She wouldn’t have said that without a good reason.” And sure, they could have edited that bit out of the show, but the pure disbelief and confoundment on her face told me a different story.

I even attempted to do a little research then and there about it, but since it was still so new and fresh, the only things I found about it were all deprecating articles and videos about a lady who went on a rage-filled tantrum on the show.

Videos by Zoe Alexander Sheds New Light

Zoe Alexander XFactor The Truth
Zoe Alexander Part 2 XFactor The Truth

In this exposé that came out on July 19, 2020 and August 18, 2020, Zoe reveals how the producers of the show encouraged her to choose a Pink song even though it was her desire to get away from the Pink persona and do different artists to display a different range of her abilities and her search to be herself.

The producers, however, made it clear to her that she would not be advancing unless she did Pink. In her original email to them, she wrote the 5 songs that they asked her to submit, which was all her own decision. After receiving word back from them asking her to put Pink instead, she finally caved and listened to their “advice”.

From here, the sordid tale takes off into a twisted, confusing, heartbreaking ordeal that ended with Zoe Alexander suffering from an emotional breakdown on The X Factor. To say that the producers were deliberately trying to manufacture this emotional outburst is an understatement.

As Zoe relates, one of the producers even urged the cameraman to keep his camera on her, even as the cameraman visibly felt uncomfortable doing so, knowing how devastatingly upset Zoe Alexander was after realizing she was used this whole time. Once the producers felt that they had enough footage, they had no more need of her and finally left her alone.

This is absolutely heartbreaking that they would simply use and abuse someone in this highly emotional state. Just getting up in front of four judges is enough to unsettle nerves, much less getting up in front of four stern judges and an entire audience, and knowing that it could be aired on national t.v. What she thought was an honest and uplifting chance at her start to stardom, ended up being an awful set up from the very beginning.

I can’t even begin to imagine the hurt and disbelief she was in, as well as her family. To see one’s child subjected to this terrible harassment must have been excruciating.

“Investigation” Ensues

Even before these videos came out, I had heard about Zoe Alexander’s story around the internet. Of course, there will be people demanding “actual proof”, which, yes, we should do, but did anyone “demand proof” that Zoe Alexander really did choose her own songs? Why is it always left to the “little people” to be demanded to show proof of any wrong doing or to clear their name? Why do we not demand this of the big industries themselves?

After all, if these big corporations are as squeaky clean as some people surmise, then it should be no problem for them to provide proof in full, unedited versions of all of the tapes of Zoe Alexander and her family, much less that of the countless other victims candidates that went on the show to prove their innocence in the defamation of character and emotional trauma that they are accused of inflicting upon numerous people.

And yes, perhaps all these huge companies will have legal documents and signed forms that protect them from certain liabilities and such, and then we have the lovely government agencies whose purpose, in part, is: “We also help to make sure people don’t get scammed and are protected from bad practices. This is particularly important for vulnerable or older people.” such as is from the Ofcom regulator that investigated Zoe Alexander’s claims and found nothing untowards on the X Factor’s end.

…Oh. Don’t forget to read the red part I circled on the bottom of the page. It seems like it would be a pertinent part in why Ofcom wouldn’t see any suspicious activity from a company that is, perhaps, funding them…

Ofcom website showing its regulations.
“We are independent, and funded by fees paid to us by the companies we regulate.”ofcom.org.uk

Sure seems like that would give them an incentive to not penalize a company that provides their paycheck. But perhaps my assumptions are unfounded and merely ridiculous speculation. After all, if someone was paying you exorbitant amounts of money, of course you wouldn’t mind them going out of business based on claims that you could easily refute simply by saying so. And it’s not like these companies are in cahoots or anything… The government working with the media? Surely you jest.

<<< Operation Mockingbird >>>

Sure this may simply be baseless accusations… On the other hand, it’s equally as likely, if not more so, that there’s a ring of truth to this theory (or a full out chorus of bells ringing and angels singing, “Hallelujah, someone’s finally got it!”)

There’s also an interesting correlation between what Zoe Alexander relates with her visit from the dailymail editor. It’s a very startling account, and a huge eye-opener into the “journalism” that’s going on. Remember, this event happened in 2012.

After Zoe’s meltdown on the X Factor, her family had a visit from the dailymail editor.

In Zoe’s words about what the editor allegedly said, which should raise alarm bells to everyone: “It doesn’t matter what you said; it’s only what we say you said. And it doesn’t matter what you do; it only matters what we say you do.”

It reminds me of this interesting tidbit, courtesy of Mika Brzezinski / MSNBC:

“The dangerous edges here are that he’s (Donald Trump) trying to undermine the media, trying to make up his own facts, and it could be that while unemployment and the economy worsens he could have undermined the messaging so much that he could actually control, uh, exactly what the people think, and that is, that is our job.”Mika Brzezinksi – (youtube.com)

UPDATE: Another youtube account deleted. Here is the original video that can now be found on the web archive (unless that gets deleted as well…)

I don’t think enough people know about these underhanded tactics from the media and government to control what the people think. It ranges from anything about politics, to world wide economics, to the entertainment industry… to anything and everything in between.

And why would the media want to portray certain people in a bad light? Is it simply for views and entertainment? Money? Advertisements? Is the whole world just one gigantic soap opera and we’re the unwitting performers?

Seems like a huge conspiracy, but don’t forget, a lot of the alleged false flags and conspiracy theories involving these shady practices have been confirmed. MK Ultra is no longer a theory. It is found to be true. The fact that the CIA works with the media is proven. Many whistleblowers have spoken out to bring awareness to this egregious agenda to control what the population think. And with their stranglehold over the media, we are subjected to information that they want us to “know”, and we are blinded from their suppression of things that they don’t want us to know.

The fact that these industries can get away with shamelessly bashing someone’s identity and persona for as frivolous a reason as entertainment and ratings that turn into money should heed as a wake-up call to us all to step off of these platforms and not participate in their viewership or consumerism. When we can show them that we won’t tolerate bullying and abuse and emotional exploitation on others, and that we won’t tolerate being indoctrinated and herded into a certain propaganda mindset, when we make the conscious decision to turn the program off, these “businesses” will no longer have their audience and they will lose their destructive hold on us.

It should also alert us to the fact that we cannot believe everything we see or hear on t.v., social media, news, radio, etc., etc. We need to be aware that not everything is as it seems and we need to work on developing our critical thinking skills and discernment. Don’t fall into the manipulation system that tptsb (“the powers that shouldn’t be”) have set up for us.

Growing Support for Zoe

I hope that Zoe Alexander and others like her that have suffered through this emotional and psychological trauma know just how much people really do care about them and, at least speaking for myself, am deeply regretful about believing the portrayal that this industry has painted them. I’m glad that I was able to grow out of this stage and learn some truths about the wool that was pulled over viewer’s eyes.

Thankfully, I’m not the only one, as there are others that are now coming to see the light.

Youtube page of X Factor with contestant Zoe Alexander
Screenshot taken from The X Factor UK (youtube.com) – Zoe Alexander’s Audition

It’s interesting to note that this particular X Factor Youtube video of Zoe Alexander has the comments turned off, from the X Factor UK’s own channel. And over 160,000 dislikes. Almost twice the amount as that of the likes. It’s almost as if people are starting to realize the truth of how this show wrongly depicted Zoe Alexander and set her up to be a patsy for people’s amusement… Of course, with the comments turned off, we can’t really tell on this page… only come to the most logical conclusion.

However, as this other channel has the same audition (and might be deleted in due time), I have decided to screenshot some of the more recent comments that were made merely hours ago:

Zoe Alexander on the X Factor
Zoe Alexander X Factor audition on youtube
Screenshots taken from Steve P (youtube.com) – Zoe Alexander X Factor UK Audition
Some other supportive and enlightened comments from this video I’ve decided to highlight here:
IM LITERALLY CRYING I USED TO THINK SHES CRAZY TOO BUT AFTER SOMEONE EXPLAINED THE TRUTH IN TIKTOK NOW I FEEL BAD 😭
 
luvme ツ
I remember when I first watched this episode long ago it made me think she was aggressive for no reason, but now that the truth is all out i genuinely feel bad for Zoe. Shes been set up as a laughing stock. Justice for Zoe!!
 
McDanes kaiser Abad
can literally see in her eyes when she realized she was being played 💔 nobody deserves that f this show
 
Tony Gonzales
she WANTED to find herself but they literally told her to sing a pink song. She was so wrongly set up and it makes me feel horrible for her 🙁 .
 
This makes so much more sense now. I feel awful for judging her all those years ago, her reaction is completely understandable. I’ve lost so much respect for the show

A lot of this sudden support and popularity can be traced back to this tiktok user: @thatsmypurseidontknowyou

It’s amazing the amount of support and encouraging words that Zoe is getting now, and this is exactly as it should be. We should all be taking care of each other and showing our love and support, no matter what the circumstance. Even if Zoe had no justifiable reason for doing what she did (although we now know how wrongly she was used and her hurt and humiliation is completely understandable), the fact that everyone needs love and compassion instead of scorn and derision should be impressed upon us; and if we see someone lashing out, let us pray for them and hold them in our hearts and wish them the best, that their hurt and anger can be healed.

We should also pray that those involved in these schemes may come around and realize the errors of their ways, and change their hearts to caring about people and no longer taking part in these manipulative, corrupted agendas.

Bless you all, and thank you for reading.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

Vernon Coleman Speech at the London Worldwide Freedom Rally | July 24, 2021 - Dr. Vernon Coleman exposing COVID/vaccine corruption.
Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths - America's Frontline Doctors addressing the fraudulent use of the EUA for COVID vaccines.
Might COVID Injections Reduce Lifespan? - "Yeadon, Montagnier, Zelenko and others are raising concerns about global genocide."
Scam of the Medical Industry and a Depopulation Agenda Revealed at the ITNJ - Robert O. Young's Testimony at the International Tribunal of Natural Justice
COVID Presenting Same Exact Symptoms as… THE COMMON COLD - We have been lied to on a MASSIVE SCALE; all to enforce the vaccine on us.
NOT ON THE BEEB: Dr. T | Mask, Swabs, ‘Vaccine’, Magnetism & Genocide [Full Transcript] - Dr. T proposes a hypothesis that involves hydrogel and EMF.