The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability”

“The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection.”

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca

Original article written by Dr. Joseph Mercola and Alix Mayer
on Mercola 9 January 2022

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @globalresearch_crg.

***

The reason our children are being targeted by COVID mandates is because vaccine makers want to get the shots onto the childhood vaccination schedule.

Once a vaccine is added to the childhood schedule, the vaccine maker is shielded from financial liability for injuries, unless the manufacturer knows about vaccine safety issues and withholds that information

Products must satisfy four criteria in order to get emergency use authorization:

    1. There must be an emergency;
    2. a vaccine must be at least 30% to 50% effective;
    3. the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product;
    4. and there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). Unless all four criteria are met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained

According to a U.S. federal court decision, the Pfizer shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are not interchangeable

Comirnaty is not fully approved and licensed. It’s only “ready for approval.” Comirnaty is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not yet available in the United States. They’re waiting for it to be added to the childhood vaccination schedule, to get the liability shield

*


In this interview, Alix Mayer explains why our children are being so aggressively targeted for the COVID-19 injection even though they’re not at risk of serious SARS-CoV-2 infection, and clarifies the status of Comirnaty.

Mayer, board president of Children’s Health Defense — California Chapter, is herself vaccine injured; not from the COVID jab, but from a series of vaccines she received 20 years ago. (Incidentally, Mayer grew up in the Oscar Mayer family in the 5th generation descended from the original Oscar Mayer, a German immigrant who started as a butcher boy. Despite Mayer’s vaccine injury, her family does not share her views on vaccine safety issues.)

Mayer graduated from Duke University with a BA and from Northwestern University with an MBA in finance and management strategy. She worked for Apple in the mid-1990s. When she was 29, Apple promoted her to acting manager of worldwide customer research.

In preparation for a family trip to Bali, her doctor recommended getting six vaccines: hepatitis A vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, diphtheria, tetanus, polio and oral typhoid, which she did. Eventually, 13 years later, she finally realized it was these shots that triggered her health problems.

“They gave me brain damage and total disability,” she says. “I spent three years in my early 30s being 80% housebound, and I really I didn’t know if I was ever going to get better.

I went through a whole bunch of diagnoses: lupus, chronic fatigue syndrome, Lyme disease. Ultimately, none of those made sense and none of the treatments made me any better, until we put the pieces together and figured out that I was actually vaccine injured.

It’s literally just a cause and effect. If you look back at my history and lay out my vaccine schedule, you can see that my health declined two weeks after I got the vaccines.

I had encephalitis and encephalopathy … digestive issues, hypersomnia — sleeping 16 hours a day — flu-like symptoms, a 24/7 migraine, joint pain. I really had no life at all in my early 30s until I went on a gluten-free diet. That started my health recovery.

I then became an award-winning medical journalist with a bunch of different blogs, and then a health consultant. In 2018, I retired from all that and joined Children’s Health Defense.”

The COVID Jab Tragedy

While many vaccines have a questionable safety profile, especially when combined, data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) suggest there’s never been a vaccine as dangerous as the experimental mRNA gene transfer injections for COVID.

What’s more, while lack of transparency and accountability has been a chronic problem within the vaccine industry, the obvious hazards associated with vaccines are really being highlighted by the COVID jabs.

Many now know of someone who has been injured by the COVID jab, and most were injured so shortly after the shot that it’s hard to deny a correlation. The staggering number of injuries reported among adults who have received the COVID shot in turn highlights the insanity of rolling it out to young children.

According to Mayer, the reason they’re trying to mandate the COVID shot for children is to evade liability for injuries, because once a vaccine is on the childhood vaccination schedule, vaccine makers have immunity against lawsuits for injuries.

Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability

The COVID shots currently have legal immunity against liability because they’re still under emergency use authorization (EUA). If you think BioNTech’s Comirnaty has been fully licensed, you’d be mistaken. Mayer explains:

“I put together a slide deck about Emergency Use Authorization (which you can see in the video interview above) because there is so much confusion over this and what’s really going on. Once you understand the genesis of EUA and the standards they have to meet in order to keep these products on the market, then you understand the behaviors [we’re now seeing].

They’re falling all over themselves to protect the EUAs for these products and also introduce other very confusing kinds of approval to get away with stuff. So, let me just start to clarify it right now.

This presentation is all about these three strangleholds that the vaccine makers and our government are never going to let go of … These are the things they’re guarding with their lives.

First of all, they need to guard the emergency … so they cannot have any early treatments. Those cannot exist. They’re also going for full liability protection, and children will be used as pawns to get them full liability protection.

Vaccine makers love EUA products because they have this huge liability shield. If you’re injured by an EUA vaccine, you can’t sue the manufacturer, you can’t sue the person who gave it to you, you can’t sue the institution where you got the shot.

You have to go through something called the CICP, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, where they’ll only cover unpaid medical expenses, and probably only for pharmaceuticals and lost wages.

Now, if you’re vaccine injured, let me tell you right now, you are not going to be using pharmaceuticals because they do not work for vaccine injury. They will make you sicker. You’ll be on two dozen pharmaceuticals before you know it and you’re going to be sick from those. They do not work. The only thing that’s going to get you better if you’re vaccine injured is natural treatments …

That’s the kind of treatment you’re going to need, and that’s not even covered, even if you were to get compensation. Everybody I know with chronic illness, whether it’s a child or an adult who has chronic fatigue syndrome, vaccine injury, Lyme disease, they’re paying $50,000 out of pocket per year.

If you can’t work and you have to pay for your treatment out of pocket, I don’t know how you ever get by. People suffer like crazy, they lose homes, they go into bankruptcy.”

Since its inception, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which pays for injuries caused by vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule, has paid out about one-third of claims. It’s a long, arduous process that oftentimes takes years and in the end rarely provides adequate compensation.

“If you do end up getting compensation … they don’t pay it out in one lump sum, they pay it out year by year, and they pretty much hope that whoever is injured is actually going to die of their injuries before they get compensated.

That’s been said to me a bunch of times by people who’ve been through this horrible process. Now, the CICP has only compensated 3% of claims. And so far, there have been no approvals for [compensation] for COVID shot injuries,” Mayer says. [Editor’s note: The first COVID case was recently determined “eligible” for compensation, but the case has not yet been adjudicated.1]

Stages of Liability: EUA

In her slide show, Mayer reviews each of the stages of product liability, and whether the mRNA shots can be mandated. As mentioned, vaccine makers have no liability as long as their product is under EUA, as the product is investigational.

“Investigational is a synonym for experimental,” Mayer says. “And the word experimental ties it directly into the Nuremberg Code, which says that we cannot be experimented on [without consent]. We always have the right to accept or refuse a medical treatment.

[The Nuremberg Code] is not a law, but it’s a code under which the whole world is supposed to be operating by. And it is actually codified into some local and federal laws as well … So, what everybody needs to know is that coercion and duress are considered de facto mandates and illegal. De facto means that it’s basically the same as an outright mandate.

It’s illegal medical segregation, medical apartheid [because that is a form of coercion or duress.] So, if you go to a restaurant and they demand your vaccine passport, only let you eat outside, and they might not let you use the bathroom, that’s medical segregation.

That is illegal and I do not support businesses that do that and you shouldn’t either. Any access privileges that are different between the vaccinated and unvaccinated are illegal, and any visual indication of vaccine status like a sticker or a bracelet … that’s also illegal because that creates segregation and medical apartheid, [since they are all forms of coercion or duress.]”

Importantly, mass violation of the law does not make something legal.

“If we all drove 100 miles an hour on Interstate 80, would we watch the speed limit signs suddenly changed to 100 miles per hour? No, it’s not going to happen. Mass violation of the law has never made anything legal. And just because schools and businesses and our government are mandating these shots, it doesn’t make it legal. It’s all illegal …

Now, they know full well that it’s illegal to mandate these [COVID shots]. President Biden knows it’s illegal. But what they’re counting on is that the court cases overturning their illegal mandates will take a while, and in that interim, people are going to be scared enough to get the shots. And unfortunately, it’s worked.”

Stages of Liability: Full Licensure and Childhood Scheduling

The next stage is full licensure (FDA approval). Once a product is fully licensed, the company becomes liable for injuries. At that point, the product can be legally mandated. Of course, knowing how dangerous the COVID shots are, no manufacturer wants to be financially liable for injuries. They’d be sued out of business.

This is the holy grail if you’re a manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule. ~ Alix Mayer

To get immunity against liability again, the vaccine manufacturers need to get their product onto the childhood vaccination schedule. This will also allow government to mandate the shots. As noted by Mayer:

“This is the holy grail if you’re a vaccine manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put it on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule.”

DOJ Redefines Medical ‘Consequence’

In Doe v. Rumsfeld,2 the court held that service members could refuse an EUA product without punitive consequences such as dishonorable discharge or other punishments. Therefore, there were no consequences to refusing an EUA product, other than the natural consequence of possibly getting the disease.

However, in July 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice attempted to redefine the term “consequences” just for the COVID shot, to suggest that punitive consequences, like job loss or being separated from your working or learning location, are legal when a person refuses an EUA vaccine.

“But this type of consequence, a punitive consequence, has never been adjudicated,” Mayer says. “That’s not in any law. This is just an opinion from the DOJ. And it absolutely means nothing, except it came from our DOJ, so people give it a lot of authority.

They also stated twice — and this is so hard to understand because it’s just beyond reason — that the right to accept or refuse an EUA product is ‘purely informational.’

Literally, you can read that you could die by taking it, but it’s purely informational. You cannot act on it. That’s what the DOJ says. Again, it’s not adjudicated, so it doesn’t mean anything. It’s an opinion. It holds no legal weight at all. So, as we said before, these mandates are starting to be overturned.”

Four Standards for EUA

There are four standards that must be fulfilled for an EUA. If any of these criteria are not met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained. First, the secretary of Health and Human Services has to declare and maintain a state of emergency. If the emergency were to go away, all EUA products would have to come off the market. And that doesn’t just mean vaccines. It also includes the PCR tests and even surgical masks.

The second standard is evidence of effectiveness. Historically, vaccines had to show a 70% or greater effectiveness, as measured by a fourfold increase in antibody levels, in order to qualify. For an EUA vaccine, the efficacy threshold is only 30% to 50%. In another departure from prior vaccine approvals, the COVID vaccine clinical trials relied on the RT-PCR test, not antibodies, to demonstrate effectiveness in the small “challenge phase” of the trials.

Now, you probably heard that the Pfizer shot was 95% effective when it first rolled out, but that was relative risk reduction, not absolute risk reduction. Confounding these two parameters is a common strategy used to make a product sound far better than it actually is. The absolute risk reduction for Pfizer’s shot was just 0.84%.3

For example, if a study divided people into two groups of 1,000 and two people in the group who didn’t get a fictional vaccine got infected, while only one in the vaccinated group got infected, the relative risk reduction would be reported as 100%. In terms of absolute risk reduction, the fictional vaccine only prevented 1 in 1,000 from getting the infection — a very poor absolute risk reduction.

The take-home message here is that even though the minimal threshold for effectiveness is ludicrously low, in terms of absolute risk reduction, these shots still don’t measure up. Within six months, even the relative risk reduction bottoms out at zero. What’s more, there’s evidence that the clinical trials were manipulated as well.

“I remember an analysis very early in lockdowns [that showed] if you added back all the probable cases of COVID to the clinical trial [data], the effectiveness went from 90% to between 19% and 29%,”4 Mayer says.

The third standard is that the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. In the case of COVID shots, there’s overwhelming evidence showing they do more harm than good.

The fourth and last standard that must be met is there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). “This is why hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were quashed,” Mayer says. This is also another reason Comirnaty is not treated as a fully approved product in the U.S., because if it were, then all the other COVID shots that are under EUA would have to be removed from the market.

“This is a four-legged stool,” Mayer says. “If any one of these legs goes away, you have to take your EUA products off the market … by law. I put [state of] emergency and [treatment] alternatives in red, because those are two of the things that they have a stranglehold on; those are things they are guarding like crazy.

This means that every variant that comes out, they have to make it sound super scary to keep the emergency going. So, the variants serve a purpose. You have to think about these variants in the context of this crime, where they have to keep the emergency going to keep their products on the market.

You would think this emergency would stop maybe when we get to herd immunity, maybe if we get 90% vaccination uptake, maybe COVID is just going to go away, like smallpox did in the early 1900s [even though] only 5% of people were vaccinated. [But it won’t] go away [until] the shots get full approval and the manufacturers get a full liability shield.”

Comirnaty’s Quasi Approval

With regard to Comirnaty, is it or is it not fully approved and licensed? The answer is more complex than a simple yes or no. Mayer explains:

“Comirnaty’s quasi approval is just for BioNTech. It doesn’t have to do with Pfizer, and this is why I’m doing this presentation because I’m going to explain what’s going on with that.

This is the race to get liability protection. Remember, that’s the other stranglehold that they want. They really want to get this liability protection. Once the COVID shots are fully approved, the manufacturer has full liability.

There’s all this confusion about Comirnaty. Was it fully approved? Is it on the market? Is it interchangeable with the Pfizer shot? And does it make the COVID shot mandate legal? It’s all the same answer. No, no, no, no.

The FDA issued an intentionally confusing biological license application approval for Comirnaty. It was an unprecedented approval to both license the Comirnaty shot, saying it’s ‘interchangeable’ with the Pfizer shot. But they also said it’s ‘legally distinct.’

In that same approval, they retain the vaccine’s liability shield by designating it EUA as well. They want it to be fully approved, but they want the liability protection, so they did this BS dual approval.

So, [Comirnaty] is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not available in the United States. It’s available in the U.K., New Zealand and other places, but it is not available in the United States because they’re really scared of liability.

Now, are you ready for this one? The BLA actually states that Comirnaty is only ‘ready for approval.’5 It doesn’t say it’s approved anywhere in the document. And they buried this language in a pediatric section to confuse people even more.

Here’s what they said; ‘We’re deferring submission of your pediatric studies for ages younger than 16. For this application, because this product is ready for approval for use in individuals 16 years of age and older, as pediatric studies for younger ages have not been completed.’

Why did they do this? Sixteen is a very important number. You would think the age break would be 18. That’s a very typical age break for everything else that we do in this country. Why 16?

The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection. That’s why this is ready to be approved for 16 and up, not 18 and up.”

Comirnaty Is Not Fully Licensed

This confusion is clearly intentional. On the one hand, the FDA claims Comirnaty is interchangeable with the Pfizer shot, yet it’s also legally distinct. Courts have had to weigh in on the matter, and a federal judge recently rejected the DoD claim that the two shots are interchangeable. They’re not interchangeable. That means Comirnaty vaccine is still EUA. It doesn’t have full approval and it’s not on the market.

“Military members involved in lawsuits are challenging the military’s COVID vaccine mandate. They filed an amended complaint seeking a new injunction after the judge last month rejected the assertion that the Pfizer COVID shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are interchangeable. So, we’re still hammering on this legally, but a court has ruled that they’re not interchangeable.

[Editor’s note: This information is accurate at the time of the interview, but legal challenges are ongoing and courts may issue new rulings. December 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court announced6 it has slated January 7, 2022, to hear arguments challenging Biden’s vaccine and testing mandates.]

So, how do we know that Comirnaty is not being treated as fully approved? First, the approval states you have the right to accept or refuse the product. That means it’s an EUA. Second, it’s not available in the U.S. because Comirnaty doesn’t have liability protection. Third, if it were available, it’s an alternative [treatment] and all other EUA shots would have to come off the market.

No. 4, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) would have to recommend it for ages 16 to 18 and the CDC would have added it to the children’s recommended schedule. That’s how we know it’s not fully approved and on the market.

Here is the label for Comirnaty. It says it’s emergency use authorization. It doesn’t say it’s fully approved, because it’s not. But look at the safety information they are recognizing: Myocarditis and pericarditis have occurred in some people who’ve received the vaccine, more commonly in males under 40 years of age than among females and older males.

So, this is saying that young men are getting heart inflammation. And what we know from all the anecdotal reports is 300 athletes have died or collapsed on the field, and children in schools have died of heart attacks. That’s what’s going on here.

And the reason they have to declare this is because they know it. They know it’s happening. And the only way they can be sued is if they know there’s a problem with their vaccine and they don’t declare it. So, they declare it here, in very mild language as if it’s not that big of a deal, but it’s a very big deal. Young people are dying [from the shots] who have a 99.9973% chance of recovering from COVID …

The holy grail is to get the shot on the CDC recommended schedule for children, because then it gets full liability protection according to the 1986 Act. This is why they’re going after our children when they have a 99.9973% recovery rate …

Every medical intervention is a risk benefit equation, and it doesn’t calculate for kids at all. They should never be getting COVID shots. The shots don’t prevent transmission. They don’t prevent cases. They don’t prevent hospitalization or death.”

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Notes

1 Reuters October 19, 2021

2 Biotech Law December 22, 2003

3 Maryannedemasi.com November 11, 2021

4 The BMJ Opinion

5 FDA BioNTech BLA Approval

6 USA Today December 22, 2021

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS:

How egregious that the big pharmaceutical companies are trying to use children as a liability shield to protect their criminal organization. Even worse, however, are the governments/politicians and health officials/institutions that are letting them. No amount of “contracts” should ever protect criminal activity, which is what we’re seeing right now in what is quite possibly the largest racketeering scandal in the history of humankind.

(And in my opinion, this isn’t even covering the ACTUAL REAL reason that they want to vaccinate children so much. This is only the watered-down, “scientific”, realistic version…)

Any documents/legal dealings (keyword here: LEGAL – although, what does that matter when corrupt enterprises are able to re-define terms according to their purpose?) and NDA’s should automatically become null and void if there is fraudulent activity happening.

However, when those “in charge” are allowed to investigate themselves, they, of course, end up finding no wrong-doing. And when there are multiple conflicts of interest, all for the purpose of financial bribery and protecting each other, there needs to be effective systems in place to address this obvious malfeasance.

It would seem, the “law” (and even us, everyday/ordinary people) literally needs to take matters into its own hands, and stop catering to enforcing illegal mandates and nonsensical “policies”. When will they go after the REAL criminals, instead of innocent civilians who are simply trying to defend not only their rights and freedoms, but everyone else’s as well? Including law enforcement?

We all need to pick our side in history. Let’s hope we’re picking the right one.

Doctors/Whistleblower: LARGE Amounts of Graphene Oxide Found in Certain COVID Vaccines

Proof with patents/documents and lab results shows that graphene oxide is in the vaccine.

Researching this subject of course brings up several “fact-checking” websites set on debunking this claim; however, as educated individuals have found out, these fact-checking websites serve one main purpose – and that is to perpetuate only one side of the narrative, even if they’re WRONG.

So instead of me attempting to fact-check the fact-checkers or debunk the doctors/scientists – which I know I can’t do since I am not adept in their fields, my sole purpose in this post is to point out what these doctors/scientists ARE saying and let people decide for themselves what may be the truth.

Of course, the truth is the truth and nothing can change that, but with so much misinformation and misleading content running rampant in today’s world, it’s crucial to scrutinize all of the information and discern the truth from the lies.

The following quotes/transcripts offered here allege to have found a substantially dangerous amount of graphene oxide in several different vaccines. And some speculation as to why these same companies are insisting that just one shot, two shots, booster shots, etc., may not be enough.

(…Again, I’m not a scientist. But what would multiple doses of large graphene oxide amounts do in the human body, especially if it is administered several times per year?… Another haunting question, why have there been graphene oxide found in masks and test swabs as well?)

Graphene Oxide in Jabs, Masks and Swabs

La Quinta Columna discovers large amount of graphene oxide in the vaccination

The following excerpts (timestamps were added for the time of the subtitles) were taken from orwell.city / La Quinta Columna: ‘98% to 99% of the vaccination vial is graphene oxide’ Please visit their site for a full transcript and video of the interview.

Ricardo Delgado @3:43: “Graphene is toxic, it is a chemical, a toxic chemical agent. Introduced in the organism in large quantities, it causes thrombi. It causes blood clots. We have all the scientific articles to back it up. It causes post inflammatory syndrome, it causes alteration of the immune system. And when the redox balance is broken, in the sense that there is less of the body’s own reserve glutathione than an introduced toxicant such as graphene oxide, it generates a collapse of the immune system and a cytokine storm. In other words, something very similar to the fashionable disease, isn’t it?”

José Javier Esparza: “The entire COVID disease. And then you, who already suspected what all this was about, got a vial of vaccination and took it to the Public University of Almeria.”

Ricardo Delgado @5:51: ” – because remember that the marketing of face masks was stopped precisely because they carried graphene particles, both a run of 500 thousand in Madrid, in La Rioja, in Castilla-La Mancha, etc., in a large part of the world and in Canada. You all know that masks with nanotechnology, such as those of Decathlon, and with the graphene symbol, are still being marketed. So, what we have to ask ourselves is: if the masks were removed because they caused or could cause pulmonary affections by introducing the graphene toxicant, how is it possible for it to be introduced into the vial? Moreover, in a considerable amount.

What we have found there, according to what the university that has done this study says, is that the main component is precisely graphene oxide and in a very small amount of something else, but above all it is graphene oxide. And given that all the people who are inoculated with the Pfizer vaccine, which was the one we sent for analysis, as well as Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson&Johnson, Janssen, Sinovac, and all types of vaccines acquire magnetic properties, we suspect with many indications that they all contain more or less doses of graphene, of graphene oxide.”

Ricardo Delgado @7:36: “It seems that the body has a certain capacity to naturally eliminate graphene oxide through certain immunological mechanisms. Once inside the body it acts as if it were a biological agent as such, as if it were precisely SARS-CoV-2. precursor of glutathione. So that is why, we probably suspect, they are trying to introduce a second and a third dose. Now intranasally. They are already talking about new intranasal vaccines with graphene oxide nanoparticles. Both for influenza and COVID-19, because in aerosols it is much more potent.”

Ricardo Delgado @11:53: “98% to 99% of the vial is precisely graphene oxide, that is, the main component of the vaccine is graphene oxide.”

Former Pfizer employee CONFIRMS La Quinta Columna’s findings of graphene oxide in the vaccines

(Some excerpts with corresponding timestamps and embellishment added for emphasis):

Stew Peters: “Well we have gone back and forth with fact-checkers – some independent researchers who have attempted to debunk the findings of Spanish researchers called La Quinta Columna, originally broken here on the Stew Peters Show by Dr. Jane Ruby. That video revealing that graphene oxide, a toxic substance – a poison!, was found in the Pfizer vaccines. Those researchers later found that the same applied to Moderna and AstraZeneca, is now being tested as a result of our reporting. The truth is here.

USA Today and Lead Stories, all funded by the cabal, were all over me, all over Dr. Jane Ruby, and out and out calling us liars for reporting those findings to the world in a video that has now soared over well I think about a million views on Rumble.

We have sought the input of many medical experts, world-renowned doctors, Dr. Jane Ruby, Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Judy Mikovitz, Dr. David Martin, they have all confirmed that report. But despite all of that confirmation, the assaults on our truth continue.”

Karen Kingston @1:50: “Well, thank you for giving me a platform to share my findings and to spread the truth. And you’re right, it is extremely difficult to find this information and link it together.

I do have a unique set of skills, this is what I do in the industry; I analyze intellectual property, the legal landscape, for both physicians, pharma and consumers, and then I’m also a scientific writer and do the clinical analysis as well. So you can’t expect everyone to have that skill set to find this information, and the truth is I’m – you know, the whole do your own research was born out of the reality that the mainstream media has been lying to us and big tech and social media have been blocking the truth. And that’s why people have had to do their own research. And that’s – that violates our first amendment.”

Stew Peters @2:38: “So, just lay it out there. Is graphene oxide in these shots?

Karen Kingston:100% it is, and it’s irrefutable. And I’ll walk you through it.

So, what’s really important to know is that all of the mRNA vaccines contain what’s called a PEGylated lipid nanoparticle. And that’s what we’re going to go through. So if you take a look at the Moderna patent, it says, right there, that this contains lipid nanoparticle formulation. And as you go through the patent, which I’ll show you, they specifically talk about various ingredients and various PEGylated formulations that have alpha-numeric codes. And then you can also find them in the filings with the FDA with the IND [investigational new drug] and phase 3 trials for both Moderna and Pfizer. And you can also find them, you know, across the pond with the UK filings. I hope that’s making sense so far.

So here’s the important thing about the patent. I read the patent; it’s 193 pages plus attachments. And I read the patent to look for graphene oxide. It is not listed in the patent because it is a trade secret. So remember Bill Gates saying that there was a trade secret? Trade secrets are not, you know, privy to the public, so they cannot be in the patent. So graphene oxide is not listed in the patent, and it lists everything BUT that. But I’m still going to show you evidence that these contain graphene oxide and the patent in China that shows they contain graphene oxide.

Stew Peters: “So let me just ask you, why would they put every other ingredient on the patent, with the exception of the standalone, graphene oxide? Why would they not put that on there?”

Karen Kingston:I would say the number one reason is because it’s poisonous to humans and well-known that it’s poisonous to humans.

Karen Kingston @4:58:They’re just seeing, you know, how much they can put into people before they die, I think, honestly.

Stew Peters: “So this is a dose finding study? Basically a live dose finding study, and those that are dying or multiple sclerosis, Guillan-Barre, these tremors, the magnetism, all these things – “

Karen Kingston:Well remember, we’re supposed to get boosters every 6 months. So we’re gonna get graphene oxide boosters every 6 months, to see how much we can build up in the system. We’ll go through this, because when you see the nations that are being injected, we’re the guinea pigs, you know, and so once they perfect this technology, I think there’s a second plan. I actually am not super comfortable talking about this stuff, because I don’t like to, you know, opinions on things, you know, and hypothesize, so I’d rather just stick to the data, if that’s okay.”

Karen Kingston @9:15: And so if you want to know what is graphene, you know, what they explain here on SINOPEG, is, it is the ‘core-shell structure polyethylene glycol functionalized graphene for energy-storage polymer dielectrics: combined mechanical and dielectric performances’.

So what that means is that graphene is a conductor – it can be a conductor of electricity. If it has a positive charge, and this is in all the – some of the studies from the NIH and Moderna and stuff, if graphene gets a positive charge, it annihilates anything that it comes in contact with. Right now they’re not charged. They’re neutralized. You know, well like, how does a positive charge get into the cell? That’s that other lipid. That ionizable lipid that gives it the positive charge for cell penetration. But these currently are not – they’re neutral, they have a neutral field. But if they are, if there’s an electrical magnetic field that activates a positive charge, potentially there’ll be damage and potentially death, depending on where these nanoparticles ended up in people’s bodies and how much of them did.”

Karen Kingston @11:47: ” – there’s a company called Shanghai Nanotech, and they filed a patent, and you can – for graphene oxide for the use in COVID-19 excipients, and this is a meeting of them at their headquarters and that looks like, I think his name is Tal Zaks, the chief technology officer for Moderna, and if you go to the World Health Organization website, there is a page where they talk about how the global world needs to work together on these COVID-19 vaccines. It’s from some time last year. And you’ll see the usual suspects there. You’ll see like Peter Daszak and the names from Moderna and several names from the NIH and NIAID, so… there is a large group of billionaires and millionaires, many many times over that have coordinated for the development and execution of these products.” 

Dr. Andreas Kalcker’s team finds graphene oxide in the vaccines

There is also further confirmation of Ricardo Delgado’s findings from Dr. Andreas Kalcker’s team, showing similar research results and investigations of graphene oxide in the vaccines.

The following excerpts (timestamps were added for the time of the subtitles) were taken from orwell.city / Andreas Kalcker’s team confirms evidence of graphene oxide in ‘vaccines’ Please visit their site for a full transcript and video of the interview.

Dr. Isignares @00:12: “For example, there is an issue that concerns us a lot because we had already detected certain things in the vaccines. And that’s that these vaccines contain graphene oxide. It’s been verified by electronic microscopy by someone from our team. The question is: why is there graphene?”

Dr. Andreas Kalcker: “To make it crystal clear. What varies is the biological composition of the vaccines. What doesn’t change in any of them, and that’s in all of them, are the crystals that are present in different amounts. They’re present in all the vials. There is both the magnetite, which has a Chinese patent, by the way. It’s patented. You can see… It’s not magnetite. It’s graphene.

Dr. Andreas Kalcker @1:51: “What happens then? The body needs its electromolecular capabilities to work. The heart beats because there’s a magnetic field that creates, subsequently, the electricity for pumping and everything else. And, therefore, what graphene is doing is that it’s completely altering our electromagnetic field. Something that has never happened before. And, let’s say, what we’re seeing is something ‘in vivo’ with some dramatic effects.

To understand more, we have also been watching a lot of videos of people who are dying after being vaccinated. There’re others where you see people spasming. These spasms have, for example, very specific frequencies, and they are, basically the same in all kinds of spasms. These spasms, clearly indicate that there is a disruption of the human electromagnetic fields.”

Research and studies proving that graphene oxide is being attempted to use in vaccines

It’s almost humorous that all of these fact-checking websites are refusing to acknowledge that there might be large amounts of graphene oxide in these vaccines, although the doctors/scientists above have allegedly found evidence that it does, and there are also some published studies that might suggest that graphene oxide will be used in vaccines as well. (please let me know if any of the links are no longer working)

An article on pubmed published the following research in 2016:
Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity

“Our work not only presents a novel, highly effective GO-based vaccine nano-adjuvant, but also highlights the critical roles of surface chemistry for the rational design of nano-adjuvants.”

Another article on pubmed published this research in 2018:
Effects of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles on the Immune System Biomarkers Produced by RAW 264.7 and Human Whole Blood Cell Cultures

“These applications include batteries, super capacitors, drug delivery and biosensing. However, few studies have investigated the effects of these nanoparticles on the immune system.”


The current study shows that GONPs modulate immune system biomarkers and that these may pose a health risk to individuals exposed to this type of nanoparticle.”

And yet another article from pubmed published in 2020:
Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant

“Our work describes the surface modification of graphene oxide and for the first time summarizes that functionalized graphene oxide serves as a vaccine carrier and shows significant adjuvant activity in activating cellular and humoral immunity. In the future, it is expected to be introduced into vaccine research to improve the efficacy of vaccines.”

“Keywords: Adjuvant delivery; Antigen delivery; Functionalized-GO; Immune adjuvant; Vaccine adjuvant; Vaccine nano-carrier.”

There is also this study showing how graphene oxide can inhibit certain responses, such as anxiety, fear, etc. (which, just theorizing, may perhaps take away someone’s natural instinct to perceive danger or threats…) when injected into certain parts of the brain. (Which also begs the question… what happens when this material gets injected into other parts of the brain…)

Soothing the symptoms of anxiety with graphene oxide

Of course the title of the link downplays the implications that this graphene oxide can cause – which seems to be a manipulative tactic that people employ to try and convince others of the benefits of a potentially dangerous substance and/or decision. And while on the surface drugs and medicines may have advantageous effects, we can’t overlook the possibility that others may use the same drugs and medicines/procedures/gene therapy, etc. and twist it to fit their own purposes.

From the same link:

“Serge Picaud, Deputy Leader of the Graphene Flagship’s Biomedical Technologies Work Package, comments: “This work provides another great demonstration of the therapeutic potential of graphene, used either alone or included in a medical device.”

Now I propose a theory of my own: In the near future, the same fact-checking writers/articles that were “debunking” all of the ‘graphene oxide in vaccines research’ will state something to the effect of: “Even though there is graphene oxide in the vaccines, there’s no reason for alarm” and/or “The graphene oxide material found in vaccines are not large enough to cause harm”, etc., etc., until the headlines change once again to state, “Why too much graphene oxide in your system is detrimental to your health” and “Further booster shots will not contain graphene oxide due to its dangers”.

Only time will tell…

Thank you to the Stew Peters Show and all those exposing this egregious corruption.
And a special thank you to Orwell City for translating and transcribing the videos with Ricardo Delgado and Andreas Kalcker & team.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by seagul from Pixabay

Get an Earful

VIDEO: NANO-MAN (deep nasal swab tech, radiation, injection tech, Borg assimilation) - A collection of topics that covers the transhumanism agenda and how the COVID vaccines/tests may be one of the catalysts.
The Great Deception… Great Reset? Global Currency Reset? New Age Awakening? | All One in the Same? - Many are looking forward to the NESARA/GESARA reformation act. But is it really for the benefit of humanity? Or a tempting deception?
The 5G Roll Out: EMF Radiation, Devastating Health Impacts, Social and Economic Implications. Crimes Against Humanity? - What are the real effects of 5G radiation? & "Why is 5G Important for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?"
Is This Post Legitimately Detailing a Global Government Plan Using COVID as the Catalyst? | If So, It May be Related to a Previous Genocide Experiment - "THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government."
The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability” - "The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection."
Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
Sofia Smallstorm Warned of DNA Genetic Altering and the Transhumanist Agenda Back in 2011 - "- self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself."

Vernon Coleman Speech at the London Worldwide Freedom Rally | July 24, 2021

Dr. Vernon Coleman exposing COVID/vaccine corruption.

I’ve always appreciated the wise words of Vernon Coleman, and his dedication in bringing light to all of the corruption within the government and the medical industry, so I wanted to bring attention to his speech that he made on July 24, 2021 at the London Worldwide Freedom Rally.

All of the speakers were amazing, and I just wish I were able to transcribe all of them. There is, at the moment, the transcription available at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gT0UF6M1EUM but be aware that it is from youtube and may be taken off of their platform. The transcription also may be incorrect in some areas, so please keep that in mind.

With that being said, the below transcription of Vernon Coleman’s speech is an attempt at correcting the errors and allowing for a more accurate representation of the speech. (Although it still may not be 100% accurate. If you notice any missing words or mistranslations, please let me know and I will fix it.)

Thank you to all of the speakers at the Freedom Rallies, and the platforms that are covering these events. As well as the groups involved for planning this incredibly important rally.

(All text in the box below (besides the headers) are by Vernon Coleman)

Thought it was going to be a BBC microphone. They never let me near one of those.

I told you you weren’t alone!

I heard, by the way, the BBC and the Guardian have got their story for tomorrow: ‘There are nearly a hundred people in Trafalgar Square today.’

Really?

Lying media and the government

@1:36: The BBC and all mainstream media have been lying, lying, lying – with the government, of course, all through the last 18 months. The BBC of course, linked up with its financial partner, Bill Gates. Bill Gates, by the way, I’ve read the other day, his company in Ireland made 220 billion pounds profit last year. Do you how much tax they pay?

Nothing!

That’s what they now call a “philanthropist”. Or maybe they spell psychopath like philanthropist.

The lies really began in March, last year. The first video I made when I said that the vaccine was going to be mandatory was in March 2020. And during that video I said that I thought that the figures they plucked, plucked the feathers [of the code], the mathematical model; it’s mathematical modeling as far as they use for making it up. They have said that we were all going to die – million and tens of millions of people were going to die. And they completely forgot that the flu usually, and can, kill up to 650,000 people a year. But they said that this thing, which was the coronavirus, was going to kill loads and loads, millions of people.

COVID is just the flu rebranded

@3:12: The day after I made that video, the government was told, the government in the UK was told that the coronavirus was the cause, causes COVID-19. It’s no more dangerous than the flu! That’s what the government was told. It’s the flu. It’s just a flu rebranded. It’s a well-marketed version of the flu. And the government knew that in March 2020. It’s actually tucked away on my website. If you go to my website you should find the links because they haven’t seen fit to take it off yet. They probably will now.

Lockdowns will kill MILLIONS

@3:52: Anyway, they lied from then on, they lied incessantly. They lied and said we have to have lockdowns, even though – the lockdowns are caused/created by the CIA as a way of punishing people. The lockdowns will kill, I said for the last year, the lockdowns would kill 150 to 200 thousand people. That was a wild underestimate. The lockdowns are going to kill MILLIONS, because the number of people waiting for urgent tests and healthcare is now over 5 million; and heading, so the government admits, to 12 or 13 million.

The death rate this winter is going to be enormous! But it’s going to have nothing to do with a manufactured fake COVID-19 scare. It’s all going to be because people have been locked down, because the flu is going to come back because pathogenic priming is going to kill people who had the vaccine. It’s going to kill… it’s going to kill all sorts of people who haven’t been had their heart problems properly tested. It’s going to treat the millions who haven’t had their symptoms properly tested because their GP is cowering under their desk.

It’s going to kill a massive number of people, and they’re going to blame it all on COVID-19 and they’re going to say we need more lockdowns.

Deliberate, callous genocide – to reduce world population

@5:24: Now that’s not stupidity. That’s deliberate, callous genocide. They killed, they murdered!, thousands of people in old people’s homes, and they knew EXACTLY what they were doing. If I knew what they were doing, I’m sure they did. It was obvious! Last year, that they were deliberately murdering old people in care homes. Because this is all a game, in their eyes, to reduce the world population. That’s… everything goes the same way.

Social distancing/masks – made up ploy

@6:00: And then there’s the social distancing. Social distancing was always a joke. Because a cough or a sneeze can travel 25 feet! So if they were going to do social distancing to stop people getting infections, they should have made the distance 25 feet. But you couldn’t even try to run the country with 25 feet. So they made it 6 feet. Or 2 meters, which is 6 foot 6 inches. It’s all just made up.

And now the masks. You’ve got to wear a mask. I could’ve put my due with about a hundred scientific papers proving conclusively that masks do more harm than good. But does anybody care? No! Fauci, Fauci said “Don’t wear a mask. It’s just virtue signaling.” Whitty said, “Don’t wear a mask.” And then the World Health Organization, Bill Gates’ little pet medical toy, decided that everybody should wear a mask, so they all changed their minds.

Masks are causing more harm than good

@7:04: And millions of people are wearing masks for people who don’t like to use a plastic bag because it’s bad, and they’re all wearing masks, much of which is a bit of plastic, and then they’re throwing them away or the birds are getting trapped. But the masks are doing a MASSIVE amount of harm. People who wear masks will be demented in 10 years time – I’m not kidding, that’s not rhetoric, that’s a fact!

Because the masks cause hypoxia, low-oxygen levels, and they cause hypercapnia, which is a high CO2 level, and your brain then starts to deteriorate. The masks are also causing bacterial pneumonia. There’s a worldwide epidemic of bacterial pneumonia. People pick up their masks off the floor, they pick up their masks and out of their pockets and they put them on and they’re transmitting all sorts of horrid diseases.

As I said, the truth is that masks do more harm than good. If you’re looking for some evidence, there’s a free book on my website; just get it down and show it to people who wear masks. They’re killing themselves.

The future, I reckon, they’re losing about one percent a year. And the kids at school who wear masks will be the stupid kids in a few years time. And the parents who let their kids wear masks should be locked up for child abuse.

What else have they done?

Testing experimental “vaccines” on 7 billion people

@8:39: Masks, social distances, oh! And there’s those little jabby things. They want everybody to have an experimental jab. Now normally when you do an experiment, you do an experiment on a few hundred brave souls, maybe a couple of thousand, sometimes less. Drug companies are very cautious about the number of people because they don’t want to kill too many people all at once.

Except for this one. They’re giving it to 7 billion! As a test. It’s an experimental vaccine for Heaven’s sakes. But still we can trust Dr. Whitty, who used to work with Bill Gates, who comes up everywhere you look, and Patrick Vallance who used to work for GSK when they did some of the most horrendous things in history. And drug companies have already paid out billions of dollars in America alone for doing fraudulent things. But that’s okay. We must now say that the drug companies are wonderful.

No they’re not! Drug companies are evil! Pablo Escobar was a more decent man than the people running our drug companies. I’d rather have Pablo Escobar as the minister of health than any of the bozos we have!

Doctors are not allowed to question the vaccine on BBC – EVEN IF THEY’RE RIGHT

@10:03: The whole disaster has got worse and worse without people seeming to care. The BBC bans anyone from its airways who disagrees with vaccines in any respect. The BBC policy, and I’ll tell you this straight, the BBC policy is that they will not allow a doctor or anybody else to be quoted or to talk on any of their programs if they question vaccination at all. And the BBC actually says, “Even if they’re right, we won’t have them on.”

They’ll have Dolly Parton on. They have the queen quoted all over the place. They’ll have some idiot pop singer, but they won’t have doctors talking about vaccines. I’m sorry, I know it’s a horrid word. Injections. They won’t allow them to talk because it’s considered dangerous and we might actually damage the scam.

Bill Gates – destroying the planet and working to control the food industry

@11:03: I’ve got some figures here which you should know. By the way, before I look at that, I must tell you, you know Bill Gates is spraying all this calcium carbonate in the stratosphere. Because just by coincidence Mr. Gates is involved with some companies who make laboratory food. So if the farmers all stop being able to farm, Mr. Gates will make even more money and pay even less tax than nothing.

Makes you want to cry, doesn’t it? Makes you want to scream.

Explanation for why SOME surgeons wear masks

@11:39: By the way, as far as masks are concerned, just remember, people always say, “Oh, well surgeons wear them in hospital, don’t they?” Well, actually, the surgeons work in a controlled environment, they wear sterile masks, they change them every two hours, and a lot of surgeons don’t wear masks these days because it’s been proven that they don’t do any good. It’s just the idiots who wear masks because they’re told they should, and by the time they’ve worn them for a year they’re too demented to be able to read anything that tells them the truth!

It all culminates to “mandatory vaccines” – and more deaths

@12:18: Let’s get back to the jabs, the injections. Because they’re the way that they want to move forward. It was always obvious they wanted to have mandatory vaccines.

March 2020, I did a video in which I said, “They will want to introduce mandatory vaccinations”, because it was clear that was the only possible reason for what they were doing. That was the plan all along, to take total control. It’s all about power and money.

Let me give you some latest figures. These were last night, downloaded last night; see if I can read them.

“The United States government’s vaccine adverse reporting system reports that 11,405 people have been killed, have died, after having the COVID-19 jab.” 11,000 in America. And before anybody from the media says, ‘oh, he’s making that up’, those are the American government figures, not mine! That’s the American government that says that.

Possible bribery by Bill Gates to the MHRA

@13:26: In the UK, the MHRA, let me tell you this, the MHRA, which is supposed to be the government department that looks after drugs, the MHRA received 980,000 pounds. Guess where they got it from.

Bill Gates. Bill Gates gives the MHRA 980,000 quid. I’m not quite sure what happened to the other 20 grand, but he gives them 980,000 quid. And then he says, ‘oh, by the way, I’ve got some vaccines coming out. Do you think you could, nudge nudge?‘ If he was a car dealer, it wouldn’t be allowed, but because it’s just the government in our lives, they get away with it.

Tragic deaths and horrific side effects from the COVID vaccine

@14:11: Anyway, in the UK, the MHRA says that so far in the UK, after people have taken – been given the COVID-19 vaccines, 1,470 people have died, and there have been 59,307 severe adverse reactions. So far. And it hasn’t started yet! Believe me. Once the pathogenic priming gets going in the Autumn, people will start dropping like flies, and we have no idea. I tell you, that flag has as much of an idea of what’s going to happen in five years time as anyone in the government or anyone with anything to do with the COVID vaccines.

The UK, in the UK, the MHRA reports that in addition to the 1,470 people who sadly died after having their vaccine jab, 340 went blind, there were 349 miscarriages – ‘oh that’s all right! You’re pregnant! Of course you can have the jab. It’ll be perfectly safe. It’s only 349 miscarriages so far.’ There have been 3,237 strokes, 21,000 people have sought psychiatric help, and 37,000 has got respiratory disorders.

Devi Sridhar: lying directly on BBC, announcing that the vaccine is 100% safe for children

@15:40: In the UK, the BBC gave airtime to a woman called Devi Sridhar, who is one of the advisors or the advisor to Sturgeon, up in Scotland, and Sridhar said on BBC that the vaccine, she called it vaccine, is 100% safe for children! She lied! The BBC allowed this woman to lie to the people to take an injection. Which will – no one knows what it will do. She also said it only produced some mild reactions. Some mild reactions could be treated. You know, a little bit of redness on your arm, a little bit of soreness, maybe a bit of a headache. That’s what she said. And she said no children had died.

What a pity, Sturgeon doesn’t have an advisor who can read! What a pity, the BBC allows this woman on the airways to tell children, <i>’oh, it’s all right. It’s a lovely little vaccine. The queen says it won’t hurt so it’s got to be all right.'</i>

Children, in America, a one-year old died two days after a vaccination, 3 thirteen year olds died very shortly after being vaccinated, a 12 year old was so ill he asked to die, a 16 year old had a stroke. How many children of 16 have a stroke?

Devi Sridhar, called that name somewhere because that woman – the BBC and that woman have done more harm than [shipment or Shipman?] to children, or will do, in my view, in this country.

Whatever you do, please, last year, over a million people stop paying the BBC license fee. Don’t pay the BBC! That’s one million, hundred and fifty quid, that’s 150 million, that’s nearly Gary Lineker’s salary, the bloody crisp salesman.

COVID and flu injections at the same time (another experiment)

@18:09: Picking up these vaccines, every quarter, and then it will be every month, and then it will be every time you have a vaccine, it’ll be an mRNA vaccine because they’re currently testing an mRNA flu vaccine. That was entirely predictable. The mRNA, through vaccine, they’ll give you in that arm, and in that arm you’ll have the COVID-19, I’m not kidding you, that’s the plan for the autumn. A COVID-19 jab and a flu jab at the same time. Guess how many people have been tested having two jabs at the same time? If your guess is not, then you’re right.

Nobody knows what’s going on. This is an experiment. And an experiment means that you don’t know what’s happening. And I’m fed up with being harassed.

Why is it not harassment when the government keeps telling me to have a vaccine? I don’t know how many texts, I don’t know how many letters and phone calls… That’s harassment.

COVID vaccine does not stop you from getting or spreading COVID

@19:12: And by the way, the vaccine, people, why I am fed up with reading people saying, ‘oh, the vaccine will stop you from getting COVID, the vaccine will stop you spreading COVID’. The vaccine, the jab, the injection, the toxic material, the napalm, whatever you want to call it, doesn’t do those things. Read the NHS booklet. And it does actually admit that.

So why are they giving this jab to people? Well we all know the answer to that. It has nothing to do with this year’s flu. Which will be coming back, in the autumn. And they’ll blame that. And they’ll blame that on those of us who have been wise enough not to be jabbed.

There are more horrible figures. Public Health Scotland, I haven’t got this, isn’t an official figure, but Public Health Scotland has revealed that 5,522 died, the European Medicine Agency 18,928 died, and so it goes on.

Call to stand up for our rights and freedom | “You’re not alone.”

@20:21: We have to do whatever we can. We have to fight. We have to spread leaflets, spread videos, talk to people. Convince people. Tell people the facts. Tell people the truth. Because we have to win this war. We have to win this war because there is no option to winning this war.

Gareth said he would rather die than let them win. I agree. I would rather die than have this jab. I will not have the vaccine jab. It doesn’t do what they say it’s going to do. But it does kill people! But I can prove it kills people because the figures are there. But you won’t have heard it on mainstream media because I’m banned from all mainstream media. The only time the BBC will mention my name is to say something rude. Anyway, I better stop.

Just remember, you’re not alone, when you get home. More and more people are waking up, and once they wake up they won’t go back to sleep.

Distrust the government, avoid mass media, and fight the laws!

True Character

There is also this rather enlightening exposé on who Vernon Coleman is, even a few decades ago, showing the testament of who he is as a person and the care and integrity he has shown throughout the years.

Vernon Coleman: “If you’ve got – if you’re pregnant, of if you’ve got venereal disease or you’ve got asthma, or you’re depressed, or you’re suffering from anxiety, I think all these things and a lot of other things, are problems which people would very much like to keep between themselves and their doctor.”

Vernon Coleman: “If you’re suffering from depression, for example, and you’re working for a large company, you may find that your future role in that company is diminished, because the bosses may feel that you’re not suitable for promotion.

So a simple word on a sick note can ruin a man’s career.”

Vernon Coleman: “I think at the moment I’m still bending it. I’m prepared to break it, but I’m still bending it at the moment.”

Interviewer: “Wouldn’t it be simpler for you to just bow to the rules?”

Vernon Coleman: “Well there are a lot of simpler ways of dealing with it, of course. I could just simply be slightly dishonest and write ‘flu’ on all the sick notes. Um… but it seems like a slightly easy way out.”

Interviewer: “Now you say you’re prepared to break the rules. This could cost you a 1,000 pound fine or even more. So how far are you prepared to go?”

Vernon Coleman: “Yes, well I suppose eventually they could, they could stop me practicing within the health service. But I feel this is so important that it’s a basic principle of medical practice, that a confidentiality between patients and doctor is of vital importance. And the rules and regulations of the DHS must come second to that. And if the rules say that I can’t maintain confidentiality then the rules will have to go. Or I’ll have to go.”

Again, a sincere thank you to Vernon Coleman and the many others who were speaking at this rally and others across the world. Your voice and efforts are greatly appreciated and deeply needed in these uncertain times. Many blessings as well to the many people who are waking up to these agendas and standing up against it. And I pray that others who are a part of these narratives will turn against it and choose the right path.

Thank you for reading, and please feel free to share this transcript with others.