BOMBSHELL: Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds [Full Transcript]

” – it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it’s a way for them to know who’s vaccinated because their blood will glow.”

As well as offering informational articles on this website, I also provide written transcripts for those who prefer to read texts to these incredibly important interviews and insights.

The video below is of a Pfizer employee who exposed emails detailing the secretive nature of keeping news about aborted fetal cells being used in the vaccines/vaccine development away from public knowledge. She also reveals the SM-102 lipid that is used for vaccines is actually referred to as “luciferase” – these ingredients which are, of course, being hushed about in the mainstream media and which may be part of the “trade secrets” that Bill Gates does not disclose is in the vaccines.

Are the reasons for patent protection only? Or because they know that it would cause an uproar in the communities if the population realized that aborted fetal cell lines were used in the vaccines and/or the testing of it, and that “luciferase” is a real enzyme being used in this process as well? If it was about our health and for altruistic purposes, and “free”, then what would be the problem in dispensing the FULL ingredient list for the whole world to know and be able to reproduce for their own countries?

The answers become obvious for those with eyes to see and ears to hear. And when one realizes the corrupt nature of these companies and organizations, the fact that these vaccines are not for our health becomes clearer and clearer.

Thank you to Melissa Strickler for bringing this to our attention. The full transcript of the interview between her and Jim Hale from LifeSite News is below. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Jim Hale: “Hello LifeSite friends. Jim Hale with you. And we have today a very important woman for you to meet. In fact, this may be one of the most important developments that we have seen in the last year and a half, throughout the COVID ordeal, and the vaccine battles; all the misinformation that we’ve heard from big pharma, from the government, from the media.

Well, a young lady in Kansas has stepped forward. She was a Pfizer employee for ten years. And recently she went to Project Veritas exposing some of the emails that came right from Pfizer executives and Pfizer employees who were talking about how to talk to the public about the Pfizer vaccine, which is derived from aborted fetal stem cells. And we have her with us right now; her name is Melissa Strickler.

Melissa, thank you so much for joining us today, here on LifeSite. You are a very courageous young woman and I – I just wanted to ask you about that, Melissa. What was it that compelled you to want to come forward?”

Melissa Strickler: “Well, honestly, I mean, I stumbled across the information by accident, but I would rather say a miracle. ‘Cause I’m not computer smart. And when I found the information I thought, you know, the Lord wanted me to show it to my family to convince them not to get it and things like that. Then I found out by presenting them with this, they had been lying to me and already got it. Well, maybe not lying, but not telling me.

And so then I was like, well why did I find this information? Then what am I supposed to do? And I told a couple of friends who had previously worked at Pfizer what I found and they referred me to Project Veritas. And I prayed about it, quite a bit, to decide what to do, and it’s like God just kept giving me the right verses. Kind of pointing me down the path of what to do and Project Veritas reached out to me almost instantly after getting a hold of them, which I took as a sign to go with them.

And they also had a whistleblower shortly before me named Jody who – she whistleblew against her hospital and she said she fears God and not man. You know, what they can do to us. And so I was like, if I feel that way, why aren’t I doing anything about it? And I just – it’s important information for the world to know, especially because so many people were getting denied their religious exemptions under false things.

Jim Hale: “Right. And that’s what this is all about, Melissa. Because, what – what Pfizer’s messaging has been, it is, is being very evasive about the truth about this vaccine being derived from, you know, aborted babies. Is what’s going on here, right?”

Melissa Strickler: “Well they’re just simply being deceitful. I mean, they could end the “conspiracy theories”, they could correct the fact-checkers on social media and they remain silent because they know if they do say, ‘yeah, we did use fetal cell lines in the development of this’, they KNOW that they’re not able to deny the religious exemptions. And so I think that’s what it’s about.

I don’t – I mean, it’s wrong to, in my opinion, to benefit from an abortion. Just my opinion; I don’t think God would want us, you know, doing those things. But it’s even more than that. I mean, it goes so deeper than that as to public deceit and they’re trying to get it to children. It’s just… ridiculous.”

Jim Hale: “Well, let’s, let’s, let’s talk about some of these emails that you exposed. Starting with Vanessa Gelman, who is the Pfizer Senior Director of Worldwide Research. And this is what she had to say:

“From the perspective of corporate affairs, we want to avoid having the information on fetal cells floating out there… The risk of communicating this right now outweighs any potential benefit we could see, particularly with general members of the public who may take this information and use it in ways we may not want out there.”

Wow.

What was your reaction when you saw this?”

Melissa Strickler: “Well these were the first things I had stumbled upon in the database, and it made me sick to my stomach because I’m like, “If they’re going to lie about something like this, what else?” Because I had been in contact with the company, you know, asking questions – ’cause I’d hear a “conspiracy theory” and I’d email them and they’d shut it down.

I never asked about the fetal cell lines just because, I don’t know, it never stumbled across my lap to ask that, I guess. But I did ask about other things, and I knew they were being deceitful in their answers and that just kind of led me down the rabbit hole of, why?

Jim Hale: “Yes, and then Gelman went on to say in another email, “We’ve been trying as much as possible to not mention the fetal cell lines…”

And let’s talk about this gentleman, Philip Dormitzer, Pfizer Chief Scientific Officer. Now these, these aren’t a bunch of underlings we’re talking about. These are important people at Pfizer here. And he talks about, tell us first of all, he mentions, HEK293T – what does that mean, Melissa?”

Melissa Strickler: “Well it’s actually like one of the things, if the public knew, they definitely would care. They’re human embryonic kidney cells. So in the 70’s there was an aborted fetus from an unknown origin, and they noticed that its cells are never stop replicating, unlike normal cells, which, you know, die. 

And so they just saw – their claim is they saw a cost-benefit that, why keep, you know, having to get these fetuses and all of these things, when we can use these immortal cell lines that never die. And what they use them for is to see how the vaccine or what they’re working on will affect our cells. Some things do include those cells; I’m not a hundred percent sure if they’re in this final vaccine or not. But how can we trust them if they say they aren’t? So, they’re basically cancerous cells from an aborted fetus that they use to test.

Jim Hale: “That, that’s fascinating. It’s so helpful to learn this, ’cause there’s so much confusion out there. 

Melissa, what, what was your job at Pfizer? And how long did you work there?”

Melissa Strickler: “So, I started working there when it was called Hospira, a little over 9 – over 9 years ago; it’s not quite been 10 years. But I started working there as a pack assistant and I was on the production line where we’d just get the product, label it, ship – pack it, and send it out. MQ started – MQ is a Manufacturing Quality. They’re the ones who see the whole process of the manufacturing process and they noticed, you know, I had an eye for finding things and I didn’t make a lot of mistakes. Things like that. And so they offered me a job as a promotion, considered out there. And so I took it.

Loved the job. I love it, I had the best boss, he’s a God fearing man, he was great. I had some, actually I do believe because of that position is why I became a Christian, because I worked with Christians who ultimately helped, you know, plant seeds.

So, but what our job was, was we have to know everyone’s job in the plant on papers. So we get like electronic training documents we have to read and sign off on, and sometimes we have to do physical training to make sure we know the task. But we see the entire operation from fill, to light testing, to packaging.

And I, specifically, my job is to like, really make sure protocols are being followed, to make sure paperwork’s all in order, and my favorite part of the job is inspecting the product. Which is when you’re just checking for defects, looking to see if there’s little bits of metal, or glass, or cracks, or any sterilization issues that could cause harm to the customer. So I’m the final inspection of the product, sometimes. You know. Things like that.”

Jim Hale: “Right. So, you were a trusted employee of Pfizer, so, you know, when you saw this email from Dormitzer, I just want to read this, where he talks about the HEK293T cells, and he says, the use for IVE assay. What does that mean?”

Melissa Strickler: “I think it means ‘in vitro’. There’s like ‘in vivo’ and ‘in vitro’. In vitro is like in a human sample, and in vivo is like a test tube.”

[ EDITOR’S NOTE FOR CLARIFICATION ]: The difference between in vivo/in vitro:

“The term in vivo refers to a type of experiment that is carried out within a whole, living organism, such as a plant or animal.. In vivo means “within the living” in Latin, which aptly fits its modern definition.. Overview. In vivo refers to a specific type of experimentation that involves living animals.”

“In vitro is pretty much the exact opposite. Instead of complex, living organisms, in vitro experiments refer to techniques that use biological components such as cells or biological molecules and are carried out outside of a living organism, whether that be in a test tube, culture dish, or so on.”

biologydictionary.net

Jim Hale: “Right. And this is very important, what he goes on to say here. Especially for Catholics. He says, “they’re ultimately derived from an aborted fetus”. So there you go, right there. Okay. That, that’s – “

Melissa Strickler: “But they say, “Oh! But they’ve replicated so many times that it’s like not the same thing.”

Jim Hale: “Right, right. That, you know, yeah, so somehow there’s enough distance that you shouldn’t have to worry about it. But, and he says, “On the other hand, the Vatican doctrinal committee has confirmed that they consider it acceptable for pro-life believers to be immunized.”

And what’s stunning about this, Melissa, is that it shows you how much they understand about, you know, what the push-back on this is going to be. So they have their talking points all squared away to deal with, with Catholics, and you know, by extension other Christians as well. So, you know, if the Vatican says it’s okay, then, then we’re good with this, and all we have to do is polish our message.”

Melissa Strickler: “Yeah, but is the Vatican saying it’s okay because they’re not getting the facts? Like are they okay because they don’t understand? And even though I’m not Catholic, I understand that Catholics follow the pope. They, they follow what they deem, you know, like – but Christians don’t answer to the pope. And I think that’s where their disconnect is, in the, in these emails, is they think because the pope says that it’s okay, that all religious people should be okay with it.”

Jim Hale: “Well, right. And we had one judge in New York trying to say, “Well, look, sorry. You don’t get to this religious exemption because pope Francis says it’s okay.” So that, that’s all part of their attempt to just whitewash the whole thing, for sure. Thankfully though, the federal judge in New York has issued a preliminary injunction that upholds the religious exemption for medical records in the state of New York. So that is a major battle won.”

Melissa Strickler: “That’s great, but I still, like – it still concerns me. Like one of my friends just text me yesterday that hers is getting denied. You know? Like – and that’s in Kansas! That’s in the Bible belt.”

Jim Hale: “Yeah. Well, well, Melissa, that’s why what you have done is so vital. This is just so important that you have exposed Pfizer’s real agenda, here. And I want to ask you a little bit more about that, Melissa. Just, you know, you said you had plenty of Christian friends, many of those who helped lead you to Christ. So I take it you’ve had a conversion, somewhat recently in your life?”

Melissa Strickler: “I was born again on January 19th, 2019 at 6:44p.m.”

Jim Hale: “I love it! That, that is just wonderful. And you’re recently married, too?”

Melissa Strickler: “Yes. I just got married. Um, my legal name, like I haven’t gotten to change all my documents yet. My legal name is Melissa [MacIntey(sp?)] now, but Melissa Strickler is my maiden name and it’s still in the process of getting changed. So…”

Jim Hale: “Well Melissa, I know that you’ve put your name out there, and I want to encourage all of those who are watching this interview right now to go on to the link that we’re going to put below on the Project Veritas page, just to see those initial interviews you did with James O’Keefe.

And I also want to let our viewers know that we are going to step up now to try to help you, Melissa, because you got a phone call, that was really creepy! I gotta say. That, that’s on the Project Veritas website and we’re going to, we’re going to go ahead and play that right now, just so our viewers can hear the call you got from the – this man in security from Pfizer. Let’s listen to that right now:”

Clip insert:

“My name is K.J. Wigglesworth. I’m from the corporate office Pfizer security in New York City. I’d like to pass a message on to you from Ian MacKellar, who’s the VP and site leader at the McPherson plant for Pfizer vaccines.

We’ve been advised to let you know that you are not, under any circumstances, to return to work. Your termination is being processed at the current time. If you have any questions, contact Mr. MacKellar at the McPherson plant and I’m sure that he will explain the reasons why.”

Jim Hale: “Melissa, when did you get that phone call?”

Melissa Strickler: “I got it on this past Saturday. Forgive me, I don’t know the days. They’ve all kind of blurred together.”

Jim Hale: “And have you heard anything else after that?”

Melissa Strickler: “I did get a letter – um, some people were thinking that maybe I was scammed and it wasn’t a real call from my job. I knew it was, but, just to lay that to rest, I did get a confirmation letter in the mail letting me know that my job protection ends on the 19th of this month from my leave.”

Jim Hale: “So you’ve been terminated?”

Melissa Strickler: “Basically. I mean they haven’t fired me. I’m sure I’m still going to get pay checks for about two weeks, um, but… yeah, as soon as they can, they don’t want me coming back there.”

Jim Hale: “Yeah, well, 2 weeks of paychecks for 10 years of work is not all that great. So that’s where I was mentioning – I know you weren’t that familiar with LifeSite, before we got in touch with you, but I want to just say, Melissa, that you and your husband are now part of the LifeSite family. Because I would say 95% of all the people who are watching this right now are Christians. And they really want to help right now.

When they see people like you, and they see David, you know, grabbing his slingshot to go after Goliath, and that – that’s what Pfizer really is right now. I mean, the power companies like Pfizer has right now, is unprecedented really in human history. They’re outside the law.”

Melissa Strickler: “They’re trying to act like a government of their own. And I don’t like it.”

Jim Hale: “They – absolutely. So, thank you SO much for what you have done. And, as I said, you’re part of the LifeSite family now. You’re about to find out what LifeSite News is all about, because we are starting up a life funder for you. And we want to put that address on the screen right now, so we can help you. You know, you get another paycheck or two from Pfizer but that’s where we come in, Melissa. So we want to encourage all those out there who really want to do something, to contribute as little or as much as you can to help Melissa now, who is out of a job, newly married – “

Melissa Strickler: “I’ll probably never get to work for a company that has anything to hide, ever again.”

Jim Hale: “Well that’s right, and we also know, Melissa, that this is a spiritual battle. You have taken up your cross, and you’re going to be attacked. They are going to come after you with everything they can to try to discredit you, to try to say you’re a religious wacko and all that kind of stuff. But, but you know what? We love it when they call us religious wackos and right-wing fringe people – “

Melissa Strickler: “What an honor to suffer as Christ. Christ was laughed out of his hometown. I mean, what an honor, right?”

Jim Hale: “Amen to that. You know, it really, it’s an honor when they try to smear us in that way. And I think it’s also important to point out, Melissa, that you’re not like an “anti-vax” person, obviously.”

Melissa Strickler: “I really wasn’t. But you know, I’ve been saying to a lot of my friends that, you know, I’m not really political. I have, you know, my preferences, but I’m not one way or another but I’ve been saying for like the last year that if anything good came from Donald Trump, it was that people started paying attention to politics. And if anything good comes out of this COVID vaccine, it’s that people started looking into what’s going into their bodies.”

Jim Hale: “Well, and that’s, that’s what this is all about. Never before in the history of mankind have we been in a situation where we have not just the government, the federal government, but now we have corporate America, the whole education system, all the “elites” in the world are telling us, forcing us, saying that, you know, if you want to feed your family you have to inject something into your body. And thanks to you we know now, for a fact, that Pfizer has been concealing the truth about their vaccine, that is now “FDA approved”, unbelievably. The fastest approval process.

Melissa Strickler: “All that means is it’s approved to be given to people, it does not mean the FDA said it’s safe.”

Jim Hale: “Well, right. We know – we just interviewed Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccines, and he, he described the approval process for the Pfizer vaccine as being totally corrupt.”

Melissa Strickler: “It’s misleading and it’s just another thing. It’s just another thing. And then of course instead of people questioning things, they don’t want to cause a mess, and so they just do it. Do what they’re told. They, they get misled and it’s really sad, because I can tell you, there’s far more about this vaccine that people need to know. And it should be coming out, more and more. This is a slow leak. But it will eventually flood Pfizer.”

Jim Hale: “Well, tell us more about that. What else do you think we need to know, Melissa?”

Melissa Strickler: “The vaccine glows. At least Pfizer’s does. And the only components that I know that can do that are SM-102, which is called luciferase, and graphene oxide. And they claim both of those aren’t in there.”

Jim Hale: “Wow, so when you say it glows, tell us what you mean when you say it glows.”

Melissa Strickler: “Well, it looks like someone took a blue glow stick, cracked it open and poured it in the vial. But it only glows if there’s light, and if it’s around a dark surrounding. Like a dark background, or a dark table.

I have pictures of those – “

Jim Hale: “So you’re saying that this, that graphene is, is in the Pfizer vaccine?”

Melissa Strickler: “I would believe luciferase has a little bit more weight, that I think is in there. The graphene oxide I also have reason to believe is in there, but I can’t prove that one as well.”

Jim Hale: “Explain this ‘luciferase’, because, of course we’re talking about Lucifer, here.”

Melissa Strickler: “Well, what it is, is it’s a glowing chemical; it’s found in lightning bugs, plants and fish. It’s a kind of an organic matter, and it’s – it glows. And depending on the certain type of chemical compound it is, it’ll either glow a green, like a lightning bug, or it can glow blue. In this case the vaccine is blue when it glows. But when it’s in front of a white background, it’s clear.

It’s, it’s very odd, considering I’ve looked at hundreds of thousands of units and never once have seen anything do that. Or not even close. Usually it looks like water.”

Jim Hale: “Melissa, what, what are you saying here?”

Melissa Strickler: “I am saying, like, I thought all this stuff was “conspiracy theories”. And then I watched a doctor say that they use codes, in their, their stuff. You know? And I took notes of those codes, and I found out SM-102 is luciferase and when I messaged them, my company, I emailed them and I said, “Hey, is luciferase in the vaccine?” And they responded with, the vaccine is – err – “the luciferase is in the testing of the vaccine, but won’t be included in the final vaccine”.

But the way I see this, is this whole thing is experimental. We haven’t even seen the comirnaty – I don’t even know how to say it – we have not even seen those labels getting put on the vials on that plant yet. So as far as I know, everyone is still receiving that emergency use authorization, and it’s experimental – it is a test – it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it’s a way for them to know who’s vaccinated because their blood will glow. Their cells.

Jim Hale: “Wow. And, this is absolutely stunning. I have never heard this before, Melissa. And how dangerous is this?”

Melissa Strickler: “It is toxic to people, in certain doses. Yeah. I don’t know a whole lot about that, but I do know it is toxic in certain doses.”

Jim Hale: “What do you know about, we know that there’s a lot more vaccine injuries and vaccine deaths then the CDC is putting out there, what do you know about the higher ups at Pfizer and how they are dealing with that reality?”

Melissa Strickler: “I haven’t really heard a whole lot. Um, one thing I’ll say, like, I’ve never met Albert Bourla, who’s the CEO. I’ve emailed him a couple times, but I’ve never actually spoken directly to him because when I get answers, after emailing Albert Bourla, they’re from, you know, Pfizer answer services or whatever.

But the people like in those emails, I had never heard of. I did verify they were employees, you know, things like that, but other than that I didn’t know that – how high up they were until Project Veritas did their research. Which threw me for a rollercoaster, cause I had no idea that it went up that high.

I will say, like, Pfizer, I kind of call them the abusive rich husband. You know? They give you excellent benefits, excellent pay, and the jobs are fairly easier, and temperature-controlled building. You, you know, you don’t have to buy fancy clothes, you change into scrubs there, you know, it’s a good job. It’s just, you know, they don’t exactly treat you the best in the sense of they don’t all seem to value all their employees equally. We get a lot of virtue-signaling emails, I would say weekly. They named Albert Bourla a “father of the year”. You know? Things like that.

And I just, this whole – since the pandemic began – like I had no problems almost all up until the pandemic began. And even then I was still excited to be helping contribute with this process. And so were a lot of my coworkers. We were all excited. And then when the process actually came to our plant, a lot of people experienced vaccine regret, and a lot of people refused to get it. In fact, I would say over half of the employees were willing to walk out over this, and Pfizer knows that.”

Jim Hale: “Melissa, this is really bombshell information, here. Just describing the culture at Pfizer. I mean, this sounds like pure evil. This, I mean – “

Melissa Strickler: “We’ve known it – yeah, we’ve known it for about a year and a half and I just kept praying. I was like, “Lord, you know that I can’t quit. You’re going to have to have me fired. Like, why am I here? I don’t want to be helping this.” You know? And one day I was praying, and I was wanting to walk out. I was like, I can’t handle it any more and I just got the impression I needed to wait. And two weeks later I found all this. So…”

Jim Hale: “But you know what? You have spoken the truth; the truth shall set you free. So you, you are free now. You have – ”

Melissa Strickler: “I’ve got nothing to hide.”

Jim Hale: “Well thank you for that. You are a, a courageous young lady and, you know, I want to ask all of our viewers right now to pray for you. Pray for you, and your husband, may God continue to grant you courage and sustain you through all of this, because I know after this interview we just did today, they’re really going to be coming after you, Melissa.”

Melissa Strickler:Well I also did an interview with Candace Owens that just aired last night, where I go into a lot of detail with the FDA and the glowing. You’ll have to subscribe to dailywire to view that right now, but I think they are wanting to get it on youtube. So once that’s available…”

Jim Hale: “Well, we’re obviously, we’re not going to be able to put this interview on youtube, but it’s going to be on rumble, it’s going to be on banned, it’s going to be on gab, it’s going to be on telegram, it’s going to be everywhere that we can get this out. Because, honestly, Melissa, this is one of the most important – this is some of the most important information, I think, that has been revealed yet.”

Melissa Strickler: “There – it’s endless. Endless deceit. Endless. I don’t think they’ve been honest about a single thing about this vaccine other than it’s experimental. And it’s an mRNA. Which they also don’t mention that that’s CRISPR technology.

Jim Hale: “And you know what? It’s deadly. It’s deadly! Melissa. I just interviewed a man from McAllen, Texas. What a sweet man. He was a single father of one son. This 15 year old boy took the Pfizer vaccine, 4 days later he collapsed and died. Myocarditis. It was, it was – “

Melissa Strickler:But you’ll be fact-checked as false and misleading information cause you’re a danger to the society. Pfizer could put an end to all of that. They could. They could speak up, issue a statement and say, hey, like, these people aren’t conspiracy theorists. But they don’t. Because they don’t want people to know.

Jim Hale: “Well, that, that’s one question I have, Melissa, is that when is the American public going to start listening? To take – you know, their blinders off? It’s almost as if people have been hypnotized. They’ve gone out, they’ve gotten their shots, they’ve gotten their boosters, and they are willfully ignorant, right now. If they are not listening to what you are saying, you know, may God have pity and mercy on us all. Because now we know. Now we know the truth.”

Melissa Strickler: “They’re exchanging the truth for a lie, for comfort. You know? People want to hold on to their lives so bad, they’re going to lose them no matter what.”

Jim Hale: “Well, it’s like Alexander [S] Easton says, “they have the will to disbelieve the horrible”. And I think George Orwell said, you know, he called it ‘the desire not to know, when you live in a totalitarian regime’. You know. It’s like a weird psychology that happens. And you know, I just pray that people like you are helping to awaken us all from this terrible slumber.”

Melissa Strickler: “Awake, oh sleeper. Rise from the dead. Cause it’s, it’s a big deal. Like, it breaks my heart, cause they may be Jesus loving people, but they don’t know their Bibles. Because if they did, they would be very well aware of what’s happening right now. History always repeats itself.

People are sitting there – I’m the generation who still learned about the holocaust and everything. And I remember being horrified thinking, how did we ever let that happen to a religious group of people who did nothing? You know? Well, I think now we’re finding out who would’ve whistleblown on Anne Frank and who would’ve whistleblown on the Nazis. You know? I think we’re kind of finding that out.”

Jim Hale: “That’s such a good point, Melissa. We are living through pages of history right now. Just like you said. When we all look back and we judge the German people and we say, you know, how in the world did they buy all that propaganda… these were intelligent people. Well, you know, we’re going to be judged too. This generation is going to be judged for one of the greatest scams in the history –

Melissa Strickler:Worldwide! People keep forgetting, they’re like, oh this has happened. Stuff like plagues have happened before and I’m like, yes, but we haven’t had mass deception on a global scale, mass abortion on a global scale, mass everything on a global scale, literally trying to get this to kids.

And if anybody knows anything about Genesis 6, God really cares about the human genes. The human genome. That we’re made in the image of God, and this vaccine uses CRISPR/Cas9 technology, which edits your DNA and edits your genes. And that’s something else that they’re not very upfront about it. [Jim Hale: “Tell us more about that.”]

Well it says, you know, God sent the flood cause of the wickedness of man, but it goes up if you say, you know, it was the nephilim, in the land, those days, is why God brought the flood. And they were… mixed races; they, they altered their human image of God and it says Noah was perfect in his genetics. Essentially is what it says, and he loved God and that to me is my biggest red flag. Like I don’t want to mess with any of my DNA if I have a say in it. You know? And even in Revelation – “

Jim Hale: “So this vaccine does alter our DNA?”

Melissa Strickler: “Yeah. It does! And they were so open about that, just 3 years ago. But then as soon as it’s in a vaccine they’re like, “Oh no. It doesn’t do that.” But they boasted all about it for years until it was in a vaccine.”

Jim Hale: “Well, Melissa Strickler, this has been the most mind-blowing interview I think I have ever done. And I hope you will come back to talk more about not only your ordeal, but just to try to educate us more; tell us more – Is there anything else you feel like that, that you need to tell us right now?”

Melissa Strickler: “Yes. While the use of the fetal cell lines is wrong, I believe, there’s so much more on the Bible that’s against all of this; even if fetal cell lines don’t corrupt, like to serve your Holy Spirit and your conscience, there’s still Revelation 18, where it says the whole world was deceived by sorcery, witchcraft and magic spells, and the root of that word, the root word in the Greek is ‘pharmakeia’. And it’s where we get our word ‘pharmacy’. And if that doesn’t raise a red flag for every Bible loving person out there, I don’t know what will. Honestly. Because we’ve been so convinced things are one way, and then I’ve done just this deep study in the fact that Revelation mentions pharmaceuticals being involved is very alarming to me.”

Jim Hale: “Melissa, Melissa Strickler… Well, you know what? You know what else Revelation mentions, Melissa? Is that Jesus wins, right?”

Melissa Strickler: “Yes He does. Even if it’s not now, in this life, He will ultimately. And that doesn’t – He wins.”

Jim Hale:Amen.

Well, may God protect you, may God continue to, you know, the Holy Spirit just, you know, fill you with strength and grace and courage to keep doing what you’re doing, Melissa. We can’t thank you enough, on just behalf of our viewers, our LifeSite staff, and everyone that is watching this interview right now, thank you so much, and please be assured that we will be praying for you. I’m getting ready to go to mass in just a few minutes here, and I’m going to be praying for you and your husband before the alter.”

Melissa Strickler: “Thank you so much. I need that so much right now. Please pray that, you know, God is with me, because I need Him. I need Him in this. And sometimes it feels a little dry on my end. So… “

Jim Hale: “Right. Melissa Strickler, thank you. God bless you, sister.”

Melissa Strickler: “Thank you.”

Proof that ‘luciferase’ is being used for vaccines:

“The combination of cutting-edge techniques in molecular biology, animal research and imaging technologies, provides researchers the unique opportunity to use this tool for influenza research, including the study of virus-host interactions and dynamics of viral infections. Importantly, the feasibility to genetically alter the viral genome to express two foreign genes from different viral segments opens up opportunities to use this approach for: (i) the development of novel IAV vaccines, (ii) the generation of recombinant IAVs that can be used as vaccine vectors for the treatment of other human pathogen infections.”

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31475986/ ] “A Luciferase-fluorescent Reporter Influenza Virus for Live Imaging and Quantification of Viral Infection”

FURTHER proof that ‘luciferase’ is being used in vaccines:

And while Melissa Strickler alleges that Pfizer, specifically, uses the SM-102 lipid nanoparticle, here is an admission from an “infectious disease expert” discussing the same lipid in the Moderna vaccine:

Question: Does the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine contain SM-102? Is it true that SM-102 is not approved for use in humans?

Answer from infectious diseases expert James Lawler, MD: Yes, the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine does contain SM-102.”

[ https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/sm-102-moderna-vaccine ] “You asked, we answered: Is it safe for SM-102 to be in the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine?”

While the same article goes on to say that “it’s safe” – at this point, with all of the deception, lies and manipulation techniques that these establishments have pulled in order to get everyone vaccinated, it is getting clearer and clearer that we cannot trust these mainstream health/medical organizations.

Note from Expanding Awareness Relations:

I honestly cannot say this enough, thank you SO much to EVERYONE speaking out against this nefarious agenda. A HUGE thank you to Melissa Strickler, LifeSite and the others who are courageously standing up against the establishment and warning others about the dangers of what’s going on. Your integrity and bravery are incredibly appreciated.

Stay strong, resist the mark/vaccine. (Not sure if they’re one and the same, but DO NOT take any chances! DO NOT take the “world passport”, the vaccine, and/or the “mark”. Stay human. Do not get genetically modified.)

God bless.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”

Two Whistleblowers from Facebook Expose Worldwide Effort to Censor Vaccine Concerns

Project Veritas releases new leaked information.

Ever wonder why certain posts you share on facebook, instagram, youtube, etc. never get much attention? Or perhaps get deleted altogether?

With the rollout of these covid “vaccines”, the tech industries have been hard at work aiming to discredit and/or ban ANYONE who has announced a certain form of “hesitancy” or flat out refusal to be a part of the vaccine bandwagon.

And even if certain individuals DID take the vaccine, and only wanted to share their testimony on the side effects, or perhaps a statement of what happened to their friend or family member, Facebook has initiated a global ranking and employee driven effort to tag specific posts that cross a certain threshold of “vaccine hesitancy”.

Even if the data that is being shared is TRUE, and come from verifiable health/medical papers and documents, if the data veers more towards an unflattering light of the vaccines, it is being targeted and consequently censored from these huge tech platforms. Which obviously deters the truth about the covid vaccines from getting out.

Yesterday, May 24, 2021, Project Veritas uploaded a video and a post highlighting two Facebook employees that have come out against this egregious abuse of private companies’ being able to dictate what information is allowed to be seen and what should be hidden in order to support certain agendas. The aim to target the “vaccine hesitant” is just one of them.

Here is James O’Keefe discussing the leak with Fox’s Sean Hannity:

Sean Hannity: “Now let’s turn to a brand new investigative report from Project Veritas just uncovering an algorithm that reportedly could be used to target facebook’s political enemies. Now, Fox news, we’re just seeing this for the first time, but as always, we let you decide. Listen, to this.”

Whistleblower #1: “Facebook uses classifiers in their algorithms to determine certain content, to be what they call “vaccine hesitant”, or they call it “vaccine hesitancy”. And without the user’s knowledge, they assign a score to these comments that’s called the VH score, the “vaccine hesitancy” score. And then based on that score will demote or leave the comment alone depending on the content within the comment. And that narrative being, get the vaccine… the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out… as an enemy of society.

They want to build a community where everybody complies, not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life. The policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it.”

Sean Hannity: “Here now, is the founder and CEO, Project Veritas, James O’Keefe. Okay, there’s a lot of significance to this, and, facebook has responded. I’ll let you tell the story.”

James O’Keefe: “Thanks, Sean. We’ve had two whistleblowers within facebook, come to us and leak us these documents regarding “vaccine hesitancy”.

What does that mean? Essentially facebook has beta tested this, these algorithms, 1.5 percent of their almost 3 billion users are getting a tiered ranking system, something called “vaccine hesitancy” – tier 1 and tier 2. Tier 1 is alarmist and critical remarks about covid and the vaccine, and tier 2 is something called “indirect vaccine discouragement”.

Now what’s remarkable about these private documents that facebook has not wanted you to see, until tonight, is that tier 2 says that even if the facts are true, that you will be targeted and demoted. Your comments will be targeted and demoted, Sean. “Vaccine hesitancy” score tiering system at facebook – these whistleblowers have given Project Veritas these documents and spoken to us in the shadows. It’s a 20 minute long video online, the documents are on our website.

And Sean, after we publish this report, we reached out to facebook, they’ve actually given us a comment – I’m going to read it to you, it says, quote, facebook has responded to Project Veritas for the first time, quote, “We proactively announce this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.” So as, in response to us publishing this, they’re claiming to now make this public but we just checked, and they haven’t yet made most of these documents public, Sean.”

Sean: “Okay, do I, knowing your ammo, is there more to come in the days to come?”

James: “Yes, there’s more to come. What’s remarkable about it, is that this has been private, they don’t want you to know that they’re doing this, and this is the town square, as you all know. We’re trying to retake our town square. Governor deSantis just signed a bill in Florida; I’m in Florida today, I was with him when he did that.

But they’re (facebook) tiering users without them knowing that they’re doing it. They’re demoting your comments, deboosting you on facebook without you knowing that they’re doing that.

And they’re obviously terrified of this report because they’re actually responding to Project Veritas – before they would attack us, or ignore us. And they have this system, you can see the documents online. They clearly have a ranking system, a tiered system, Sean. The author of this report we’ve named him, Amit Bahl, is an employee at facebook, we have the document showing that he authored the report and the chain of command from him to Mark Zuckerberg.

So there’s more to come, another one tomorrow. Two whistleblowers, on the record with Project Veritas, current facebook insiders, leaking us these documents. We consider them brave heroes and we hope that there’s a legion of more insiders that follow their lead, coming public to projectveritastips@protonmail.com with this information.”

Sean: “James O’Keefe, thank you for sharing with us, we appreciate it, we’re going to follow closely.”

Here is the Project Veritas video that was uploaded yesterday featuring one of the whistleblowers who came forward to reveal facebook’s tiering system plan:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

“I have to do something.”

“When it comes time to standing up for a world, I want my children to live in, I don’t want to leave them a world to where they don’t have these liberties.”

“People aren’t allowed to have voice and yet, facebook touts itself with promoting people’s opportunity to have voice.”

“They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it.”

“If I lose my job, it’s like, what do I do? But that’s less of a concern to me.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “We have just obtained multiple leaked documents from inside facebook, this time detailing a plan to curb, quote, “vaccine hesitancy” on a global scale. It was so concerning it brought us not one, but two whistleblowers from inside facebook who are ready to speak out on what this means for free speech and public discourse on their own platform.”

Interview with first whistleblower starts @1:00:

Whistleblower #1 (Data Center Technician):

Whistleblower #1: “Facebook uses classifiers in their algorithms to determine certain content, to be what they call “vaccine hesitant”, or they call it “vaccine hesitancy”. And without the user’s knowledge, they assign a score to these comments that’s called the VH score, the “vaccine hesitancy” score. And then based on that score will demote or leave the comment alone depending on the content within the comment.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Our first facebook insider is a data center technician who leaked us multiple internal documents detailing an algorithm test being run on 1.5 percent of facebook and instagram’s nearly 3.8 billion users worldwide.

The goal? To quote, “Drastically reduce user exposure to vaccine hesitancy (VH) in comments”.

Whistleblower #1: “And it’s the same thing. You’ll see a lot of this difference in their public policy verses the private policy where the public policy is very vague. It’s very ambiguous. It’s designed to be questioned because it’s designed to be able to easily defend. But then if look at the private policy, it’s much, much more clear, much more specific. I think that they’re trying to make it seem like they’re not doing as much or that they’re just kind of like generalizing it, like, “Oh, well we just have some robot that just tags your post. And then, you know, we look at it.” but I think they don’t want people to know, “Oh no, we actually have something that we made specifically for vaccine hesitancy.”

So there’s a main document along with all the, all the attachments and stuff that goes with it. So basically when they write this algorithm that goes through facebook content, and it looks for certain keywords that are related to vaccination, or, you know, not getting a vaccine and stuff like that. And it gives it a score. And the VH score means vaccine hesitancy, which is defined as being hesitant to get a vaccine, but not just like, “Well, I don’t know.” It’s even, “Well, I saw a study that said that someone died that got the vaccine.” That’s vaccine hesitancy.”

James O’Keefe: “So this is a beta test. This is all a beta test.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right, right.”

James: “And how big is this beta test?”

Whistleblower #1: “They refer to the test size as 1.5%. I’m not exactly sure which pool that pulls from, but I think it’s comments on authoritative health pages.”

James: “You seem to think that they’ve already ruled this out. Why do we believe they’ve already ruled this out?”

Whistleblower #1: “In one slideshow that they have, they call it their weekly progress tracker. They actually lay all this out in a chart and you can see it, you can look at the slides, they go by date. So we’ve got here – Covid-19 Vaccine Safety and Efficacy “Global”, “Currently Global” 13 languages, facebook plus instagram. All C-19 Vaccine [Global], “Currently Global” 66 languages. And the very first thing that brought me to the conclusion that they’re wanting to do this globally is they were developing it in like, you know, as many languages as they can get their hands on.”

James: “So this is like a product launch, almost?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. Yeah, in their last quarterly report, they reported 2.79 billion people on Earth use some kind of facebook app.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Who’s behind this new algorithm policy? Well, one thing is for sure, the authors of this experiment Joo Ho Yeo, Nick Gibian, Hendrick Townley, Amit Bahl, and Matt Gilles are not low-level employees. In fact, one of the internal documents Project Veritas obtained was a facebook flow chart that showed they’re only a few clicks away from Mark Zuckerberg, himself.”

James: “Who makes these decisions?”

Whistleblower #1: “These are teams at facebook and they call themselves, they work with what they call B2V “Barriers to Vaccination”. So that’s one of their core terms – is Barriers to Vaccination. And then the people on these teams, they call them Health Integrity Teams. So there’s a Health Integrity Team for messenger, there’s a Health Integrity Team for every system that facebook has.”

James: “An integrity team?”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “Is it came about after March 2020 – covid?”

Whistleblower #1: “No.”

James: “This is something that’s existed?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. Yes.”

James: “So, the Health Integrity Teams, and Barrier to Vaccination Teams at facebook.”

Whistleblower #1: “So this here, Amit Bahl, he is a Research Scientist for the Core Data Science Team at facebook. He also works in Health Integrity. Everyone who works on this project works in Health Integrity. Hendrick Townley, this is the experiment launch post, as you can see, this is on April 16th. This is 2021. That why there’s no year there. Cause it’s this year. And Hendrick Townley is one of the Software Engineers that worked on this. There were – I think it was him and two other software engineers. And then Amit Bahl wrote the actual classifier itself. I don’t – I’m sure he had like a team of developers, but he is considered the one who wrote it. Amit Bahl, and then as you go up, it’s like his boss, boss’s boss. Boss’s boss’s boss.”

James: “So Amit Bahl works for Udi Weinsberg, who works for Nicolas Stier – do I have that correct?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “And that person works for Danny Ferrante, and that person works for Javier Olivan, and Javier Olivan reports directly to Mark Zuckerberg.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “So this is a chain that goes all the way down to Amit Bahl.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “This kind of censorship sounds similar to shadowbanning – when users are unaware their posts can’t be seen. A term one of our own investigations coined when exposing twitter, just a few years ago. But this time, we’re exposing facebook and instagram’s methods to quash an entire side of a conversation. Arguably, one of the most pressing issues of the day.”

James: “According to these documents, facebook tiers users, 0 to 5, and a score of 0 to 1. Can you talk a little bit about this tier system?”

Whistleblower #1: “Oh yeah. So basically this is what they’re using to structure how, how they’re going to judge this content on, on a scale to how vaccine hesitant it actually is, or if it’s explicitly discouraging. In my opinion, the main reason why they built this as was for the human, what they call “raters” so that they can use this as a reference when they, so if the algorithm can’t make a decision on a certain post, it’ll send it to a human rater and then the human rater looks at it and they will make a decision on whether or not it’s vaccine hesitant or not.”

James: “So we have tier 2 – Indirect Discouragement. What happens when you are a tier 2?”

Whistleblower #1: “So basically your comment is going to be suppressed. As to the scale of that suppression, it’s hard to say, we would have to look at it like a case by case basis. But what they’re saying is it’s going to get, they call it a position change – on some of these comments, you can see, it’ll say position change: seven. And I’m not sure whether the seven refers to like a 7% or if it’s just like seven positions down in the comment chains.”

James: “So it’s suppressed?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “But we don’t know the extent of this suppression?”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “And we’ve heard “shadowban”, we’ve heard “deboost”, I have not heard “position change”.

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Facebook has not been shy about combating “vaccine hesitancy” as reported in their own press release stated May 11 of this year. However, what they say publicly in their own policy doesn’t scratch the surface of what is written in these internal leaked documents. By the facebook whistleblower.”

James: “If I read this correctly, facebook is saying it doesn’t matter if the story is true, so long as it doesn’t cause people to hesitate getting the vaccine? What’s your read on this?”

Whistleblower #1: ” ‘The Borderline Vaccine Framework – Shocking Stories: Potentially, or actually true events or facts that can raise safety concerns.’ “

James: “That post was done by a user. And they’ve taken a screenshot and observed it for the tier system.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right. Yeah.”

James: “What about this gives them alarm?”

Whistleblower #1: ” ‘How is this not scary?’ That would be considered indirect discouragement.”

James: “Indirect discouragement. Which would be considered tier 2.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “So this is an example of indirect discouragement of the vaccine.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah. Questioning the vaccine, questioning anything involving the vaccine.”

James: “And this was then demoted.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah.”

James: “So this is another example of tier 2 indirect discouragement – why don’t you tell us why this would be indirect discouragement, according to facebook.”

Whistleblower #1: “So this would be considered “vaccine hesitant” because they don’t want people to see someone had a bad effect. They’re not saying, “Don’t get the vaccine,” but they’re saying, “Look at all this negative stuff that happened after I got the vaccine.”

James: “Okay, they’re reporting facts, but truth doesn’t matter.”

Whistleblower #1: “No, because it doesn’t match the narrative. So, and the narrative being: Get the vaccine, the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out… as an enemy of society.

So the VAERS is a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It looks like they’re measuring the comments where they’re mentioning, you know, that the patient died.”

James: “So is VAERS a CDC supported program?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes, I think so. Really they support all of this because you know, they released the standards, the CDC themselves. And that’s really one of, one of the primary things that facebook is basing their policy off of is, well, if you looked at their public policy, it would be according to the authoritative health pages.”

James: “So they are open about the fact that they essentially coordinate with the CDC, here.”

Whistleblower #1: “Of course.”

James: “From the internal document, ‘Content pointing to the Vaccine Adverse Effects [Events] Reporting System data that suggest extreme risks without providing full context’ – full context… What do they mean by that?”

Whistleblower #1: “I think so, like in the previous comments, like she said, “Oh, during this study 653 people died” and then they don’t put the rest of the study in there. It’s like, okay, so you want me to write like a 10-page comment? What’s full context? Another ambiguous term. If they saw a study from someone they didn’t like, would they say, “Well, that’s not the full context because ABCDEFG.”

James: “Ultimately it seems like any facts that escape a particular narrative are omitted, demoted, deboosted, banned…”

Whistleblower #1: “Absolutely. Yes.”

James: “Considered dangerous to society.”

Whistleblower #1: “Suppressed in any way possible.”

James: “Where do you think this is headed? Does it get worse from here?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “How so?”

Whistleblower #1: “I think people accept it and they see people like twitter, facebook, google, and stuff like that, they see that this is accepted by the public and then they go, that’s like a green light to be like, “Oh, well we can go ahead and do this more.” So not only are we going to start doing vaccines stuff, we’re going to spread it to everything. So we’re going to start saying, “Oh if you make a post that could put somebody in danger or it could compromise someone’s safety,” whatever that means, “then we’re going to go ahead and look at that and assign that a score of some unknown classifier.” Who knows what it could be. They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it. And when you’re scrolling on your phone, I think they’re afraid of what people would conclude.”

James: “Tell me they don’t think about the underlying value.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah. Or what could, what it could turn into: the slippery slope.”

James: “They’re not even thinking about that.”

Whistleblower #1: “Nope.”

James: “And do you think there’s a lot of people inside facebook that agree with you or some percentage? What would you estimate that number of people to be?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. I would say at least 25%.”

James: “So you’re telling me, that 25% of the people there, agree that what they’re doing with this vaccine hesitancy coding and algorithms, is morally wrong?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. That would not surprise me at all. The policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it. What would happen if this was scaled larger and scaled to twitter and the internet as a whole is way worse than anything that could happen from me getting fired from my job. To me, that, it far outweighs that. Because it’s about more than me. It’s about really everyone in the world.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “It’s clear this facebook insider is not alone in his concerns of facebook’s new policy that would promote discourse on vaccines in general. As a matter of fact, the next insider you’re about to meet, felt so compelled to come forward, he goes so far as to compare the new policy to an abusive relationship.”

Interviewer with second whistleblower starts @11:58:

Whistleblower #2 (Data Center Engineer):

James: “What do you do at facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “I’m a data center engineer.

I’d say that in a sense it’s prohibiting people from being able to have an open dialogue about issues that affect their personal security. Some of these things, the questions, the comments that are being presented, you know, are from people that have concerns about their personal health or their personal security being affected. It’s kind of like having a relationship with somebody that’s controlling and abusive in a sense like an abusive partner, not allowing their spouse to speak out about the things that are going on in their marriage or their relationship and limiting their voice. It’s very damaging from that sense. You know, if you think about this logically, it just, you know, it’s very incriminating in my opinion.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Just months ago, the same insider leaked us a tape of Mark Zuckerberg privately speaking to his team last July, showcasing his own vaccine hesitancy when talking about covid.”

Inside clip of Mark Zuckerberg on July 16, 2020: “I just want to make sure that I share some caution on this because we just don’t know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people’s DNA and RNA.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Today, his own words would violate their new public policy.”

James: “You were the source who brought us the Mark Zuckerberg vaccine footage from July 2020, is that correct?”

Whistleblower #2: “That’s correct.”

James: “Zuckerberg seemed to change his mind – evolve on the issue of vaccine, and the facebook policy itself would have prevented Zuckerberg from saying what it is he had said just a few months ago. Pretty crazy!

What prompted you to give that footage to Project Veritas?”

Whistleblower #2: “Well, based on my own knowledge and research of, you know, the adverse effects and the potential side effects of vaccines of any medication really. So I think it’s important for people to be understanding of the – of those facts. We’re able to have these conversations at work with our, with our coworkers about our medical decisions. And we do. We have them, you know, frequently.

Why is it okay for us to have these conversations at work as adults and not have somebody step in and say, “Hey, you need to stop talking about that and you shouldn’t talk about that. You’re not allowed to talk about – that’s ‘fact-checked’. That’s false.”

Occasionally people do, in the conversation, but, but we’re allowed to have open dialogue. And, and here – “

James: “You’re saying that you can have these conversations at the water cooler and office – “

Whistleblower #2: “Absolutely. Even in the midst of the office.”

James: “In the midst of the office?”

Whistleblower #2: “Yes.”

James: “At facebook, the location, facebook, but you’re not allowed to go onto facebook and write this stuff.”

Whistleblower #2: “No.”

James: “That’s ironic.”

Whistleblower #2: “It is very ironic.”

James: “What is your message to Mr. CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who is certainly watching this video?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would ask, you said that you support freedom of expression. My question to you is, why, in a sense, you don’t support freedom of expression in the most basic sense, that’s available to all people everywhere: which is to exist as God created them – without any interference or intrusion by any corporation or government to exist as they are? And why push a narrative that it’s not okay for people to go ahead and exist to express themselves as God’s creation, without taking a vaccine? Why is there this push to suppress that ideology?”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “This insider’s biggest concern is facebook building a quote, “community of compliance”, unquote. And feels the topic may go beyond the authority of Zuckerberg himself.”

Whistleblower #2: “It’s the platform that they want to build. It’s the community that they want to build. They want to build a community where everybody complies, not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life, which regarding their own body, their own health.”

James: “And based upon your position, and what you’ve seen, and your role at facebook, why do they want people to comply? Why is that the culture at facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “For the promotion of a society that is focused on medical progress in a sense or medical, you know, medical experimentation.”

James: “What is facebook doing to promote covid vaccines to its billions of users?”

Whistleblower #2: “Specifically encouraging people to post, you know, to take on the profile frame for showing that they’ve been vaccinated and to promote in a sense, solidarity amongst other people that have taken the vaccine and encourage users to also go and get the vaccine. It’s interesting that they would, you know, encourage one side, but not allow the other side to speak of, you know, why they wouldn’t be making the decision to get a vaccine. There’s no solidarity, there’s no opportunity to be united around that. It’s just basically: Get the vaccine or feel left out.

You know, people aren’t allowed to have voice and yet, you know, facebook touts itself with promoting people’s opportunity to have voice. And, you know, as stated before, you know, have a voice about the most important decisions anyone has to face in their life is pretty important and it’s shocking and disturbing really to see people that are willing to go to the lengths of limiting those discussions around the world, you know, for things that, that concern people’s own personal security.

I almost feel like there’s, there’s outside sources pressuring Mark, or could be, I’m not saying that’s a fact, but you know, it does make me concerned. And, and you look at the video with Fauci and, you know, Mark discussing it, Mark doesn’t seem too pleased with you know, the fact that he had to bring it up. It’s almost like he was, you know, he had to mention it.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “These two brave insiders know, that they risk it all standing against facebook – one of the most powerful institutions of the day. Yet, they are still putting it all on the line in order to preserve our liberties.”

Whistleblower #2: “I think that’s also the main reason why people don’t want to come out with it, because what if I, you know, I have, I had two kids, I have my wife and if I lose my job, it’s like, what do I do? But that’s less of a concern to me.”

James: “And the people who may do what you did, next, but they’re not sure if they should do it, what’s your message to those people?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would say, go ahead and do it. And I – and then just think about what I said. There’s a lot of blowback to telling the truth. And that’s true, as far as human history is concerned. And yeah, you are going to receive blowback, but just weigh, weigh it out.

Can you live with yourself for the rest of your life if you work at facebook and you knew about this? Especially if it came out later and you’re like, “Man, I saw that so many times. I could have said something and I didn’t.” How are you going to feel about that? That’s my thing. My morality. I have to show somebody this because at least, even if nothing were to come of this, and for some reason everything was scrapped, I would still think that it, that it was worth it. Cause I’m like, well, at least I tried, I tried to show somebody this.”

James: “It’s almost like you’re saying that your desire to follow your conscience outweighs any potential risk there might be to you. Doing this.”

Whistleblower #2: “Yes. Yes.”

James: “What is your message to those people? That are watching this who agree with you inside facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would say that you’re not alone. The biggest thing with social media, that we’ve seen throughout the years is that ranking people’s comments, their posts, even, even like news media, there’s this view that tries to make you think that you’re alone in this and that you’re not the majority. And even people that say that they agree with internally, they deal with struggles. Internally, they question things. It’s just that they’re not able to overcome that, that cognitive dissonance that sits in and they resort to what is safe. It’s easier to comply with things than it is to come forward and say, “This is wrong.” Or to really awaken to understanding that the way you’re being treated or the way other people are being treated is wrong.

And so that’s challenging, but know that you’re not alone. And that if you do come forward and you do speak up that you can live peacefully, knowing that you did the right thing, no matter what. And that’s encouraging, not just to other people, but it’s also encouraging to yourself. It’s an – and it won’t make you feel as alone anymore.”

James: “That’s very profound, I think.”

Whistleblower #2: “I’m a father. So, you know, obviously like I fear for my family, for my children’s safety. And, but I also understand that I have to, as I told, you know, my wife, I have to do something. You know, when it comes time to standing up for a world I want my children to live in, I don’t want to leave them a world to where they don’t have these liberties, these personal securities to where they can willingly make their own medical decisions between them, their doctor, and, those that are closest to them. That’s not something I can live in. That’s not something I could do. And it came down to the point where I had to make a decision to do what was right.”

After Project Veritas received the leaked documents, a team member from PV reached out to facebook for a response. Mario Balaban contacted a spokesperson to address a couple of questions about the “vaccine hesitancy” policy.

Rather than answering the questions, a facebook spokesperson responded with this line, “We proactively announced this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.”

As of this moment, there is no indication that they have updated their policies regarding this information, and they did not respond back when Project Veritas requested a follow-up to answer the questions directed to them from the original email.

For more information and images of the documents that were leaked from the insiders, please visit Project Veritas’s website at:

Thank you to James O’Keefe and the Project Veritas team for going to such incredible lengths to get the Truth out to the public. Your hard work and dedication to these efforts are sincerely appreciated!

And a HUGE thank you to the brave individuals who have spoken out against these oppressive establishments and who are helping to expose the corruption within. Your honesty and integrity is greatly needed in these uncertain times.

Thank you!

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image (slight alterations have been added – original artist created the “f” used in the image and not the addition of words) by kropekk_pl from Pixabay

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”