The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability”

“The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection.”

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca

Original article written by Dr. Joseph Mercola and Alix Mayer
on Mercola 9 January 2022

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @globalresearch_crg.

***

The reason our children are being targeted by COVID mandates is because vaccine makers want to get the shots onto the childhood vaccination schedule.

Once a vaccine is added to the childhood schedule, the vaccine maker is shielded from financial liability for injuries, unless the manufacturer knows about vaccine safety issues and withholds that information

Products must satisfy four criteria in order to get emergency use authorization:

    1. There must be an emergency;
    2. a vaccine must be at least 30% to 50% effective;
    3. the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product;
    4. and there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). Unless all four criteria are met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained

According to a U.S. federal court decision, the Pfizer shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are not interchangeable

Comirnaty is not fully approved and licensed. It’s only “ready for approval.” Comirnaty is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not yet available in the United States. They’re waiting for it to be added to the childhood vaccination schedule, to get the liability shield

*


In this interview, Alix Mayer explains why our children are being so aggressively targeted for the COVID-19 injection even though they’re not at risk of serious SARS-CoV-2 infection, and clarifies the status of Comirnaty.

Mayer, board president of Children’s Health Defense — California Chapter, is herself vaccine injured; not from the COVID jab, but from a series of vaccines she received 20 years ago. (Incidentally, Mayer grew up in the Oscar Mayer family in the 5th generation descended from the original Oscar Mayer, a German immigrant who started as a butcher boy. Despite Mayer’s vaccine injury, her family does not share her views on vaccine safety issues.)

Mayer graduated from Duke University with a BA and from Northwestern University with an MBA in finance and management strategy. She worked for Apple in the mid-1990s. When she was 29, Apple promoted her to acting manager of worldwide customer research.

In preparation for a family trip to Bali, her doctor recommended getting six vaccines: hepatitis A vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, diphtheria, tetanus, polio and oral typhoid, which she did. Eventually, 13 years later, she finally realized it was these shots that triggered her health problems.

“They gave me brain damage and total disability,” she says. “I spent three years in my early 30s being 80% housebound, and I really I didn’t know if I was ever going to get better.

I went through a whole bunch of diagnoses: lupus, chronic fatigue syndrome, Lyme disease. Ultimately, none of those made sense and none of the treatments made me any better, until we put the pieces together and figured out that I was actually vaccine injured.

It’s literally just a cause and effect. If you look back at my history and lay out my vaccine schedule, you can see that my health declined two weeks after I got the vaccines.

I had encephalitis and encephalopathy … digestive issues, hypersomnia — sleeping 16 hours a day — flu-like symptoms, a 24/7 migraine, joint pain. I really had no life at all in my early 30s until I went on a gluten-free diet. That started my health recovery.

I then became an award-winning medical journalist with a bunch of different blogs, and then a health consultant. In 2018, I retired from all that and joined Children’s Health Defense.”

The COVID Jab Tragedy

While many vaccines have a questionable safety profile, especially when combined, data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) suggest there’s never been a vaccine as dangerous as the experimental mRNA gene transfer injections for COVID.

What’s more, while lack of transparency and accountability has been a chronic problem within the vaccine industry, the obvious hazards associated with vaccines are really being highlighted by the COVID jabs.

Many now know of someone who has been injured by the COVID jab, and most were injured so shortly after the shot that it’s hard to deny a correlation. The staggering number of injuries reported among adults who have received the COVID shot in turn highlights the insanity of rolling it out to young children.

According to Mayer, the reason they’re trying to mandate the COVID shot for children is to evade liability for injuries, because once a vaccine is on the childhood vaccination schedule, vaccine makers have immunity against lawsuits for injuries.

Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability

The COVID shots currently have legal immunity against liability because they’re still under emergency use authorization (EUA). If you think BioNTech’s Comirnaty has been fully licensed, you’d be mistaken. Mayer explains:

“I put together a slide deck about Emergency Use Authorization (which you can see in the video interview above) because there is so much confusion over this and what’s really going on. Once you understand the genesis of EUA and the standards they have to meet in order to keep these products on the market, then you understand the behaviors [we’re now seeing].

They’re falling all over themselves to protect the EUAs for these products and also introduce other very confusing kinds of approval to get away with stuff. So, let me just start to clarify it right now.

This presentation is all about these three strangleholds that the vaccine makers and our government are never going to let go of … These are the things they’re guarding with their lives.

First of all, they need to guard the emergency … so they cannot have any early treatments. Those cannot exist. They’re also going for full liability protection, and children will be used as pawns to get them full liability protection.

Vaccine makers love EUA products because they have this huge liability shield. If you’re injured by an EUA vaccine, you can’t sue the manufacturer, you can’t sue the person who gave it to you, you can’t sue the institution where you got the shot.

You have to go through something called the CICP, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, where they’ll only cover unpaid medical expenses, and probably only for pharmaceuticals and lost wages.

Now, if you’re vaccine injured, let me tell you right now, you are not going to be using pharmaceuticals because they do not work for vaccine injury. They will make you sicker. You’ll be on two dozen pharmaceuticals before you know it and you’re going to be sick from those. They do not work. The only thing that’s going to get you better if you’re vaccine injured is natural treatments …

That’s the kind of treatment you’re going to need, and that’s not even covered, even if you were to get compensation. Everybody I know with chronic illness, whether it’s a child or an adult who has chronic fatigue syndrome, vaccine injury, Lyme disease, they’re paying $50,000 out of pocket per year.

If you can’t work and you have to pay for your treatment out of pocket, I don’t know how you ever get by. People suffer like crazy, they lose homes, they go into bankruptcy.”

Since its inception, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which pays for injuries caused by vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule, has paid out about one-third of claims. It’s a long, arduous process that oftentimes takes years and in the end rarely provides adequate compensation.

“If you do end up getting compensation … they don’t pay it out in one lump sum, they pay it out year by year, and they pretty much hope that whoever is injured is actually going to die of their injuries before they get compensated.

That’s been said to me a bunch of times by people who’ve been through this horrible process. Now, the CICP has only compensated 3% of claims. And so far, there have been no approvals for [compensation] for COVID shot injuries,” Mayer says. [Editor’s note: The first COVID case was recently determined “eligible” for compensation, but the case has not yet been adjudicated.1]

Stages of Liability: EUA

In her slide show, Mayer reviews each of the stages of product liability, and whether the mRNA shots can be mandated. As mentioned, vaccine makers have no liability as long as their product is under EUA, as the product is investigational.

“Investigational is a synonym for experimental,” Mayer says. “And the word experimental ties it directly into the Nuremberg Code, which says that we cannot be experimented on [without consent]. We always have the right to accept or refuse a medical treatment.

[The Nuremberg Code] is not a law, but it’s a code under which the whole world is supposed to be operating by. And it is actually codified into some local and federal laws as well … So, what everybody needs to know is that coercion and duress are considered de facto mandates and illegal. De facto means that it’s basically the same as an outright mandate.

It’s illegal medical segregation, medical apartheid [because that is a form of coercion or duress.] So, if you go to a restaurant and they demand your vaccine passport, only let you eat outside, and they might not let you use the bathroom, that’s medical segregation.

That is illegal and I do not support businesses that do that and you shouldn’t either. Any access privileges that are different between the vaccinated and unvaccinated are illegal, and any visual indication of vaccine status like a sticker or a bracelet … that’s also illegal because that creates segregation and medical apartheid, [since they are all forms of coercion or duress.]”

Importantly, mass violation of the law does not make something legal.

“If we all drove 100 miles an hour on Interstate 80, would we watch the speed limit signs suddenly changed to 100 miles per hour? No, it’s not going to happen. Mass violation of the law has never made anything legal. And just because schools and businesses and our government are mandating these shots, it doesn’t make it legal. It’s all illegal …

Now, they know full well that it’s illegal to mandate these [COVID shots]. President Biden knows it’s illegal. But what they’re counting on is that the court cases overturning their illegal mandates will take a while, and in that interim, people are going to be scared enough to get the shots. And unfortunately, it’s worked.”

Stages of Liability: Full Licensure and Childhood Scheduling

The next stage is full licensure (FDA approval). Once a product is fully licensed, the company becomes liable for injuries. At that point, the product can be legally mandated. Of course, knowing how dangerous the COVID shots are, no manufacturer wants to be financially liable for injuries. They’d be sued out of business.

This is the holy grail if you’re a manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule. ~ Alix Mayer

To get immunity against liability again, the vaccine manufacturers need to get their product onto the childhood vaccination schedule. This will also allow government to mandate the shots. As noted by Mayer:

“This is the holy grail if you’re a vaccine manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put it on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule.”

DOJ Redefines Medical ‘Consequence’

In Doe v. Rumsfeld,2 the court held that service members could refuse an EUA product without punitive consequences such as dishonorable discharge or other punishments. Therefore, there were no consequences to refusing an EUA product, other than the natural consequence of possibly getting the disease.

However, in July 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice attempted to redefine the term “consequences” just for the COVID shot, to suggest that punitive consequences, like job loss or being separated from your working or learning location, are legal when a person refuses an EUA vaccine.

“But this type of consequence, a punitive consequence, has never been adjudicated,” Mayer says. “That’s not in any law. This is just an opinion from the DOJ. And it absolutely means nothing, except it came from our DOJ, so people give it a lot of authority.

They also stated twice — and this is so hard to understand because it’s just beyond reason — that the right to accept or refuse an EUA product is ‘purely informational.’

Literally, you can read that you could die by taking it, but it’s purely informational. You cannot act on it. That’s what the DOJ says. Again, it’s not adjudicated, so it doesn’t mean anything. It’s an opinion. It holds no legal weight at all. So, as we said before, these mandates are starting to be overturned.”

Four Standards for EUA

There are four standards that must be fulfilled for an EUA. If any of these criteria are not met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained. First, the secretary of Health and Human Services has to declare and maintain a state of emergency. If the emergency were to go away, all EUA products would have to come off the market. And that doesn’t just mean vaccines. It also includes the PCR tests and even surgical masks.

The second standard is evidence of effectiveness. Historically, vaccines had to show a 70% or greater effectiveness, as measured by a fourfold increase in antibody levels, in order to qualify. For an EUA vaccine, the efficacy threshold is only 30% to 50%. In another departure from prior vaccine approvals, the COVID vaccine clinical trials relied on the RT-PCR test, not antibodies, to demonstrate effectiveness in the small “challenge phase” of the trials.

Now, you probably heard that the Pfizer shot was 95% effective when it first rolled out, but that was relative risk reduction, not absolute risk reduction. Confounding these two parameters is a common strategy used to make a product sound far better than it actually is. The absolute risk reduction for Pfizer’s shot was just 0.84%.3

For example, if a study divided people into two groups of 1,000 and two people in the group who didn’t get a fictional vaccine got infected, while only one in the vaccinated group got infected, the relative risk reduction would be reported as 100%. In terms of absolute risk reduction, the fictional vaccine only prevented 1 in 1,000 from getting the infection — a very poor absolute risk reduction.

The take-home message here is that even though the minimal threshold for effectiveness is ludicrously low, in terms of absolute risk reduction, these shots still don’t measure up. Within six months, even the relative risk reduction bottoms out at zero. What’s more, there’s evidence that the clinical trials were manipulated as well.

“I remember an analysis very early in lockdowns [that showed] if you added back all the probable cases of COVID to the clinical trial [data], the effectiveness went from 90% to between 19% and 29%,”4 Mayer says.

The third standard is that the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. In the case of COVID shots, there’s overwhelming evidence showing they do more harm than good.

The fourth and last standard that must be met is there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). “This is why hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were quashed,” Mayer says. This is also another reason Comirnaty is not treated as a fully approved product in the U.S., because if it were, then all the other COVID shots that are under EUA would have to be removed from the market.

“This is a four-legged stool,” Mayer says. “If any one of these legs goes away, you have to take your EUA products off the market … by law. I put [state of] emergency and [treatment] alternatives in red, because those are two of the things that they have a stranglehold on; those are things they are guarding like crazy.

This means that every variant that comes out, they have to make it sound super scary to keep the emergency going. So, the variants serve a purpose. You have to think about these variants in the context of this crime, where they have to keep the emergency going to keep their products on the market.

You would think this emergency would stop maybe when we get to herd immunity, maybe if we get 90% vaccination uptake, maybe COVID is just going to go away, like smallpox did in the early 1900s [even though] only 5% of people were vaccinated. [But it won’t] go away [until] the shots get full approval and the manufacturers get a full liability shield.”

Comirnaty’s Quasi Approval

With regard to Comirnaty, is it or is it not fully approved and licensed? The answer is more complex than a simple yes or no. Mayer explains:

“Comirnaty’s quasi approval is just for BioNTech. It doesn’t have to do with Pfizer, and this is why I’m doing this presentation because I’m going to explain what’s going on with that.

This is the race to get liability protection. Remember, that’s the other stranglehold that they want. They really want to get this liability protection. Once the COVID shots are fully approved, the manufacturer has full liability.

There’s all this confusion about Comirnaty. Was it fully approved? Is it on the market? Is it interchangeable with the Pfizer shot? And does it make the COVID shot mandate legal? It’s all the same answer. No, no, no, no.

The FDA issued an intentionally confusing biological license application approval for Comirnaty. It was an unprecedented approval to both license the Comirnaty shot, saying it’s ‘interchangeable’ with the Pfizer shot. But they also said it’s ‘legally distinct.’

In that same approval, they retain the vaccine’s liability shield by designating it EUA as well. They want it to be fully approved, but they want the liability protection, so they did this BS dual approval.

So, [Comirnaty] is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not available in the United States. It’s available in the U.K., New Zealand and other places, but it is not available in the United States because they’re really scared of liability.

Now, are you ready for this one? The BLA actually states that Comirnaty is only ‘ready for approval.’5 It doesn’t say it’s approved anywhere in the document. And they buried this language in a pediatric section to confuse people even more.

Here’s what they said; ‘We’re deferring submission of your pediatric studies for ages younger than 16. For this application, because this product is ready for approval for use in individuals 16 years of age and older, as pediatric studies for younger ages have not been completed.’

Why did they do this? Sixteen is a very important number. You would think the age break would be 18. That’s a very typical age break for everything else that we do in this country. Why 16?

The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection. That’s why this is ready to be approved for 16 and up, not 18 and up.”

Comirnaty Is Not Fully Licensed

This confusion is clearly intentional. On the one hand, the FDA claims Comirnaty is interchangeable with the Pfizer shot, yet it’s also legally distinct. Courts have had to weigh in on the matter, and a federal judge recently rejected the DoD claim that the two shots are interchangeable. They’re not interchangeable. That means Comirnaty vaccine is still EUA. It doesn’t have full approval and it’s not on the market.

“Military members involved in lawsuits are challenging the military’s COVID vaccine mandate. They filed an amended complaint seeking a new injunction after the judge last month rejected the assertion that the Pfizer COVID shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are interchangeable. So, we’re still hammering on this legally, but a court has ruled that they’re not interchangeable.

[Editor’s note: This information is accurate at the time of the interview, but legal challenges are ongoing and courts may issue new rulings. December 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court announced6 it has slated January 7, 2022, to hear arguments challenging Biden’s vaccine and testing mandates.]

So, how do we know that Comirnaty is not being treated as fully approved? First, the approval states you have the right to accept or refuse the product. That means it’s an EUA. Second, it’s not available in the U.S. because Comirnaty doesn’t have liability protection. Third, if it were available, it’s an alternative [treatment] and all other EUA shots would have to come off the market.

No. 4, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) would have to recommend it for ages 16 to 18 and the CDC would have added it to the children’s recommended schedule. That’s how we know it’s not fully approved and on the market.

Here is the label for Comirnaty. It says it’s emergency use authorization. It doesn’t say it’s fully approved, because it’s not. But look at the safety information they are recognizing: Myocarditis and pericarditis have occurred in some people who’ve received the vaccine, more commonly in males under 40 years of age than among females and older males.

So, this is saying that young men are getting heart inflammation. And what we know from all the anecdotal reports is 300 athletes have died or collapsed on the field, and children in schools have died of heart attacks. That’s what’s going on here.

And the reason they have to declare this is because they know it. They know it’s happening. And the only way they can be sued is if they know there’s a problem with their vaccine and they don’t declare it. So, they declare it here, in very mild language as if it’s not that big of a deal, but it’s a very big deal. Young people are dying [from the shots] who have a 99.9973% chance of recovering from COVID …

The holy grail is to get the shot on the CDC recommended schedule for children, because then it gets full liability protection according to the 1986 Act. This is why they’re going after our children when they have a 99.9973% recovery rate …

Every medical intervention is a risk benefit equation, and it doesn’t calculate for kids at all. They should never be getting COVID shots. The shots don’t prevent transmission. They don’t prevent cases. They don’t prevent hospitalization or death.”

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Notes

1 Reuters October 19, 2021

2 Biotech Law December 22, 2003

3 Maryannedemasi.com November 11, 2021

4 The BMJ Opinion

5 FDA BioNTech BLA Approval

6 USA Today December 22, 2021

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS:

How egregious that the big pharmaceutical companies are trying to use children as a liability shield to protect their criminal organization. Even worse, however, are the governments/politicians and health officials/institutions that are letting them. No amount of “contracts” should ever protect criminal activity, which is what we’re seeing right now in what is quite possibly the largest racketeering scandal in the history of humankind.

(And in my opinion, this isn’t even covering the ACTUAL REAL reason that they want to vaccinate children so much. This is only the watered-down, “scientific”, realistic version…)

Any documents/legal dealings (keyword here: LEGAL – although, what does that matter when corrupt enterprises are able to re-define terms according to their purpose?) and NDA’s should automatically become null and void if there is fraudulent activity happening.

However, when those “in charge” are allowed to investigate themselves, they, of course, end up finding no wrong-doing. And when there are multiple conflicts of interest, all for the purpose of financial bribery and protecting each other, there needs to be effective systems in place to address this obvious malfeasance.

It would seem, the “law” (and even us, everyday/ordinary people) literally needs to take matters into its own hands, and stop catering to enforcing illegal mandates and nonsensical “policies”. When will they go after the REAL criminals, instead of innocent civilians who are simply trying to defend not only their rights and freedoms, but everyone else’s as well? Including law enforcement?

We all need to pick our side in history. Let’s hope we’re picking the right one.

FLASHBACK: In 2018, CDC Epidemiologist Timothy Cunningham Was Found Dead After Allegedly Claiming That the Flu Vaccine Was Causing Outbreaks

Are we sure the CDC is on our side?

As with anything built around intrigue and suspicion, “conspiracy theories” are bound to crop up.

Such is the case with the tragic disappearance, then death, of Dr. Timothy Cunningham, a CDC epidemiologist based in Georgia.

Because there is so much misinformation and conflicting agendas between multiple different sources, depending on one’s political/ethic leanings, it is difficult to piece together FACTS from these questionable circumstances.

So I am not attempting to debunk or fact-check these claims – just to reiterate that these are the claims that were made from these sources, and offer these pieces of information for the readers to consider.

In these times of deceit, especially when looking for honest answers about vaccine efficacy, I felt it prudent to revisit this case and the suspicious details that surround it.

The “FACTS”:

I put FACTS in quotes because I am merely repeating what multiple sources agree upon that actually happened during Timothy Cunningham’s disappearance and these are what has been more or less confirmed by the various different media: (although we must ask ourselves, can we even trust the media to begin with?)

– “Timothy Jerrell Cunningham was a Harvard-educated doctor with the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention. As an epidemiologist, he was a team leader in the US Public Health Service Commissioned Corps and was named in 2017 as part of the Atlanta Business Chronicle’s 40 Under 40 list.”wikipedia/Timothy J. Cunningham

-Timothy Cunningham was last seen on February 12, 2018, reported missing on February 14, 2018, and was found dead late Tuesday, April 3, 2018.

“Initial reports from a medical examiner’s autopsy revealed that Cunningham’s cause of death was drowning. Timothy Cunningham’s body was found along the Chattahoochee River, in an area that was inaccessible through walking”Timothy Cunningham Cause of Death: How Did the Missing CDC Employee Die?

– Law enforcement did not find evidence of foul play and ruled it as a suicide by drowning. “Chief Medical Examiner Jan Gorniak said he committed suicide by drowning.”Cause of death released for CDC scientist Timothy Cunningham

– Timothy Cunningham’s belongings, most notably his house keys and wallet, were found inside his LOCKED home.

– Timothy Cunningham’s parents revealed to detectives that he sent them a “series of worrying text messages and a phone call from him the night of February 11, the day before he went missing.”Timothy Cunningham Cause of Death: How Did the Missing CDC Employee Die?

“His neighbor, Viviana Tory, said that Cunningham told her husband to have her erase his cell phone number from her contacts list.”Timothy Cunningham: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Conflicting details of the case

A couple of things about this story I found rather odd and don’t line up, are these conflicting statements involving the officials’ interviews with CDC members, as well as the lead investigator and their assessment of Cunningham’s death.

The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention is discounting information that police released regarding missing employee Timothy Cunningham as erroneous.

In a statement from the government agency, officials said that information in the news that claimed Cunningham had been passed over for a promotion was untrue.

Those details were actually released by the Atlanta Police Department during a press conference on their ongoing attempts to find Cunningham, who went missing on Feb. 12 after leaving work and supposedly returning home. But the truth, according to the CDC, is the exact opposite.

On Feb. 27, Atlanta Police said on the day he went missing, Cunningham had a meeting.

“That meeting was to explain a promotion that he did not receive to branch manager. He had been informed the previous Monday that he was not getting the promotion but the explanation occurred on the morning of the twelfth,” the officer said.

The news CDC statement reads:

“In fact, he received an early promotion/exceptional proficiency promotion to Commander effective July 1, 2017, in recognition of his exemplary performance in the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS).”

11Alive reached out to Atlanta Police about the CDC’s statements and the agency is standing behind the information they released.

“Our information came directly from the CDC. Any further questions about Dr. Cunningham’s employment, or this statement issued by the CDC today, would need to be answered by the CDC,” the statement read.”

Source: Officials release conflicting details about missing CDC scientist

And during this reveal, it makes me wonder if some of the information got crossed, and the promotion that Dr. Cunningham allegedly got passed up for was for a different field altogether – although may still be involved with the CDC in a different branch. There are alleged documents that Dr. Cunningham actually resigned from a position called the RDF3 [Rapid Deployment Force 3] as an Infection Control Officer on February 7th. – Missing CDC scientist file: A ‘highly driven’ man struggling with personal, professional issues

And within the same link, states that he got passed over for a promotion on Feb 8th: “Thursday, Feb. 8 | Cunningham’s superiors tell him he did not get the promotion he was up for.”

Notice it says Cunningham’s “superiors” – but yet doesn’t state if those were specifically CDC superiors, or superiors of a different branch within the government agencies.

Then we have these rather strange conflicting statements:

“He [Major Michael O’Connor] added that they had interviewed friends, family, employees, and tracked his last movements, and could find nothing indicating foul play.”

“His parents, Tia and Terrell Cunningham, did say that they had received a series of worrying text messages and a phone call from him the night of February 11, the day before he went missing. They said they shared the details with detectives”

Source: Timothy Cunningham Cause of Death: How Did the Missing CDC Employee Die?

Hm… call me crazy, but if someone’s family divulged that their loved one, who recently went missing, sent a “series of worrying text messages” the DAY BEFORE THEY WENT MISSING (and who subsequently was found dead almost a month later), I most certainly wouldn’t rule out “foul play” at the drop of a hat… 

Regardless if the theories of Timothy Cunningham’s involvement with the CDC may have led to his death is true or not, the above conflicting statement alone is a red flag and should signal to anyone that there is a chance of foul play being involved – and shouldn’t even be a question coming from an experienced police unit.

And while we can’t expect these investigators to be miracle workers, there should still be a level of decorum and motivation/ambition when leading a missing person’s case and efforts to find cause of death, especially when so many events in this circumstance don’t add up.

Yet, we have this official statement about this case:

“Barring some new information coming forward – and obviously we’re checking, you know, we’ll check video, we’ll check places he might have got access to the river – but barring new information coming forward we may never be able to tell you how he got into the river,” O’Connor said.Timothy Cunningham: Why we may never know the whole story of CDC scientist’s disappearance

“On May 21, 2018, officials ruled his death a suicide. Toxicology tests showed nothing significant, there were no signs of trauma, and it was still not known how he ended up in the river. The investigation is now closed, Atlanta police have said.”Timothy Cunningham: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Uh huh. That definitely sounds like the determination of the Atlanta Police Department’s Homicide and Missing Person’s Unit to solve a case instead of attempting to cover it up. Which, by the way, I’m not saying conclusively is the agenda, but with other’s speculations and their own connections that maybe, just maybe, Cunningham’s involvement with his role at the CDC and the material he was exposed to did have something to do with his death is worth taking a look into.

Which brings me to:

The Theories:

There are a wide plethora of different theories, sources, assessments, attempts at piecing together this puzzle, etc. that can inevitably leave one running around in circles. As there is no absolute confirmation that these different possibilities are rooted in facts, the issue remains open to conjecture and supposition. And while many are sure that there is something sinister and underhanded going on in relation to Dr. Cunningham’s death and what he may have uncovered, we can’t overlook the possibility that he did indeed take his own life amidst a sea of misunderstandings and dreadful coincidences.

Of course, I have my own opinions, but opinions they will remain since I don’t know FOR SURE the reality of what happened.

With that being said, here are some of the speculations for further deliberation:

– An article by yournewswire alleged to have been contacted by Dr. Cunningham who provided the following statements in January under anonymity at the time:

“Some of the patients I’ve administered the flu shot to this year have died,” the doctor said in January, adding “I don’t care who you are, this scares the crap out of me.”
“We have seen people dying across the country of the flu, and one thing nearly all of them have in common is they got the flu shot,”CDC Doctor: ‘Disastrous’ Flu Shot Is Causing Deadly Flu Outbreak

– When it was revealed that Dr. Cunningham went missing in February, yournewswire sent out the following notice:

“In January, Dr. Cunningham shared his opinion that this year’s flu shot was behind the deadly outbreak of the flu, while warning that if his name was attached to the widely-circulated quotes, he would lose his job – or suffer an even worse fate.
Understanding the dangers involved in speaking out about vaccines in the current climate, we granted him anonymity in the article. However Dr. Cunningham told us we should go public should anything happen to him.”
CDC Doctor, Who Claimed Flu Shot Caused Outbreak, Missing Feared Dead

– While the following excerpt doesn’t specify the sources, it offers further details on what Dr. Cunningham may have been working on that led to this conspiracy:

“According to exclusive sources, he was startled with findings over the years regarding how flu vaccines amplify the side effects of viral infections rather than inoculate patients effectively.

In December of 2017, Cunningham was assigned to what was at the time a new project unofficially known as “Shogun.” According to our exclusive sources, testing and manipulation of the SARS strand were being used against a new drug that could eliminate a virus to infect your cells.”PURGED ARTICLE| Where is Timothy Cunningham’s Whistleblower Report on Coronavirus?

The same article proposes that Cunningham discovered an agenda that sought to weaponize SARS; while scientists from Japan found an all encompassing cure – which obviously went against the purpose that pharmaceutical agencies were aiming for:

“Cunningham discovered that specific individuals in the U.S. were working on information they received from the Chinese regarding weaponizing SARS – with high specificity in virulence targeting particular genetic code and enzyme packets for transcription. In essence, the new virus would mimic that of HIV. A “smart” virus that could replicate all ligands of target cells not to be detected by innate immune cells and therefore “lie in waiting.”

“His knowledge? Japan created an all-encompassed cure, and pharmaceutical companies were seeking ways around it.”PURGED ARTICLE| Where is Timothy Cunningham’s Whistleblower Report on Coronavirus?

– Now if all of that wasn’t enough, there were also theories that Dr. Cunningham stumbled upon a plot that may have been aimed at African Americans specifically:

“The Harvard educated scientist had worked on tackling the Ebola and Zika outbreaks before his death. He is also believed to have been researching the effects of the FLU vaccine, on Black people.”Scientist Researching Effects Of FLU VACCINE On Black People At The CDC . . Ends Up DEAD IN RIVER!!!

– Granted, the above excerpt is taken from an African American News Network site, however, studies that Dr. Cunningham himself participated in lends credence to their assessment:

“Finally, of great concern is that blacks in their 20s, 30s, and 40s are dying of diseases such as heart disease and diabetes. Which are typically seen in whites at older ages. This phenomenon has been described as weathering, meaning that the black population may be exposed to socioeconomic influences such as poverty and other environmental factors that can result in illness and death and earlier age than whites.”Transcript for Vital Signs African American Health | Press Briefing Transcript

“Compared with whites, blacks in age groups <65 years had higher levels of some self-reported risk factors and chronic diseases and mortality from cardiovascular diseases and cancer, diseases that are most common among persons aged ≥65 years.” Vital Signs: Racial Disparities in Age-Specific Mortality Among Blacks or African Americans – United States, 1999-2015

Please let me know if any of the links no longer work so I can update them with replacements.

So not only are there implications that Timothy Cunningham found a link between flu vaccines and unnecessary harm/death resulting in them, but he may also have made a connection between the increased illnesses in younger African Americans that may have been contributed by a failing health system – either unintentional, or very deliberate.

Side Note:

While I can’t vouch for the legitimacy of any website, I wanted to highlight the yournewswire website that initially ran the CDC whistleblower story to begin with. There have been many articles refuting their credibility, but what is true, at least according to Snopes (which, if it’s coming from Snopes to begin with, then extra caution should be applied…), stated the following:

“It is true the 2017-2018 flu season has been the worst one in years, and this season’s flu vaccine has been less effective than in the recent years. So not only is this year’s flu strain (H3N2) more rampant, but the main weapon against its spread isn’t holding it at bay.”

Source: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-cdc-flu-shot-causing-outbreak/

Hm… this incidence sounds strangely familiar and fairly recent… almost as if it’s going on RIGHT NOW.

Additional research shows that the efficacy of the flu vaccines for the 2017-2018 season was only 36%… according to the CDC. CDC: Flu vaccine 36% effective, highest for young children

Meanwhile, loaded with this CDC link, Snopes (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cdc-doctor-flu-shot-dead/) felt it prudent to point out how “YourNewsWire.com made several false statements in their article including that the flu vaccine is only 10 percent effective (it’s not — it’s 36% effective according to health officials)”,

yet failed to mention that the yournewswire website was simply stating what CBS news informed their readers: This year’s flu vaccine may only be 10% effective, experts warn. Which, you know, makes it NOT a false statement, and reflects the intellectual dishonesty that Snopes is known for.

But I digress. The point is, there are multiple sides to every story, but only ONE TRUTH.

Continuing on, I want to mention one last separate study that may or may not have connections with what Dr. Cunningham was presumed to have found.

CDC Deliberate Coverup of MMR Vaccines Linked to Increased Autism in African American Males

Although this event happened a few years before Dr. Cunningham’s death, it only adds fuel to the fire in regards to his involvement with the CDC, and his studies into epidemiology – and the presumed connections that vaccines may have had detrimental effects on people’s immune system; in addition to perhaps a very purposeful agenda to coverup inhumane testing on the public by inoculating them with so-called vaccines.

There has been such controversy surrounding Brian Hooker/William Thompson blowing the whistle on the CDC’s attempts to erase correlations between the MMR vaccine and the increased rate of autism in African American males, yet these efforts have still slid by the wayside and it seems as if no one has been held accountable for this egregious malfeasance and misconduct by the very group who is supposed to be protecting us from these “dangerous viruses” and inoculations that pose greater risk than the disease itself.

CDC Whistleblower Scientist Given Huge Bonus and Asked to Rewrite Fraudulent Vaccine-Autism Study

In fact, the CDC apparently blocked (I don’t know how that’s possible, to be honest – but due to technical legalities and “classified information”, NDA’s, blah blah blah, corrupt establishments can just hide behind a legal team and not address their own crimes – plus possible collusions with the legal system itself…) William Thompson’s capability to testify in court for a specific vaccine-related case. … Although he was granted whistleblower immunity, he has yet to be subpoenaed to testify.

CDC Blocks Testimony by Vaccine Whistleblower in Medical Malpractice Case

But it’s certainly not due to the fact that they have anything to hide, right? And it’s certainly not because they were engaging in awful, illegal human experimentation or anything like that. No, no. I’m sure the reason is because they simply don’t want confidential information out that they are secretly undercover heroes who are saving the whole world and must keep this secret purpose hidden, otherwise the REAL bad guys would know who to attack. I mean, what other possible reason would there be to “not allow” someone to testify?

“Dr. William Thompson’s deposition testimony would not substantially promote the objectives of CDC or HHS.”CDC Blocks Testimony by Vaccine Whistleblower in Medical Malpractice Case

lol No kidding. The whole point of the testimony is to expose the CDC FOR THEIR OBJECTIVES, which would obviously not reflect what they want to continue fooling the rest of the world into believing that they’re working towards.

So all in all, am I proposing that Dr. Timothy Cunningham’s death could be related to William Thompson’s exposé of CDC’s concealment/destruction of evidence, with Cunningham’s own efforts at finding links between rising illnesses within the African American community – on top of the suspicious deaths/autism cases in some of the vaccine-inoculated individuals?

I’m saying that there is enough “circumstantial evidence” to warrant further investigation and research before dismissing it altogether. And keeping a closer eye on the CDC while we’re at it.

Source: odysee | Free From Censorship | Vaxxed – Documentary

DISCLAIMER: I mean no disrespect bringing up the tragic death of Dr. Timothy Cunningham, and only aim to bring possible injustices to light and spread awareness that the narratives we’re being told may not be the truth and may be intentionally hiding a corrupt agenda; and silencing those that may have been trying to expose it.

My heart goes out to Timothy Cunningham’s family and friends. If he was trying to expose corruption, then I hope and pray his wishes gets granted. And if you have any further information or clarification as to the events that happened, please feel free to contact me so I can add it and/or correct it.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Get an Earful

VIDEO: NANO-MAN (deep nasal swab tech, radiation, injection tech, Borg assimilation) - A collection of topics that covers the transhumanism agenda and how the COVID vaccines/tests may be one of the catalysts.
The Great Deception… Great Reset? Global Currency Reset? New Age Awakening? | All One in the Same? - Many are looking forward to the NESARA/GESARA reformation act. But is it really for the benefit of humanity? Or a tempting deception?
The 5G Roll Out: EMF Radiation, Devastating Health Impacts, Social and Economic Implications. Crimes Against Humanity? - What are the real effects of 5G radiation? & "Why is 5G Important for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?"
Is This Post Legitimately Detailing a Global Government Plan Using COVID as the Catalyst? | If So, It May be Related to a Previous Genocide Experiment - "THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government."
The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability” - "The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection."
Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
Sofia Smallstorm Warned of DNA Genetic Altering and the Transhumanist Agenda Back in 2011 - "- self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself."