200,000 Unvaccinated Military Members Denied Temporary Restraining Order as Commanders Threaten Those Who Refuse COVID-19 Vaccines

Egregious abuse of power of those in “authoritative” positions.

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca
Written by Brian Shilhavy / Health Impact News (September 7, 2021)

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

 

Several military members told Health Impact News today that their commanders are coercing members of their unit to get the COVID-19 shot TODAY (September 7, 2021) or face the consequences of disobeying a direct order.

One member stated that when they went by the local pharmacy in a drug store, there were many military members lined up to get the shots today, fearful of the consequences if they don’t.

And this is in spite of the fact that military officials are saying publicly that service members still have 2 to 3 months to comply, according to Military.com.

Sailors and Marines Have 90 Days to Get Vaccinated or Face Punishment

2 Sep 2021
Military.com | By Konstantin Toropin

Sailors and Marines now have 90 days to get vaccinated against COVID-19 or risk disobeying a lawful order, a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the maritime branches’ top leaders said in a series ofmessagesreleased Tuesday and Wednesday.

Airmen Have Less than Two Months to Get Fully Vaccinated

7 Sep 2021
Military.com | By Stephen Losey

The Department of the Air Force has set a tight two-month deadline for active-duty troops to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Those who don’t get the shot in time could be punished under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Airmen and Space Force Guardians must be fully vaccinated – including a two-week period after a final shot – by Nov. 2, the Air Force said in a press release Friday. Air National Guardsmen and reservists have until Dec. 2.

Apparently the military commanders are following their own schedule, regardless of what is being stated publicly by the various branches.

Lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives have now proposed legislation that would prevent the military from issuing dishonorable discharges for service members who refuse the COVID-19 vaccine.

Lawmakers Try to Ban Dishonorable Discharges for Troops Who Refuse Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccines

2 Sep 2021
Military.com | By Travis Tritten

House lawmakers have backed legislation prohibiting dishonorable discharges for troops who refuse the COVID-19 vaccine, as the Navy gave its sailors 90 days to get the shot this week and the Army and Air Force were poised Thursday to enforce their own timetables.

Legislation sponsored by Rep. Mark Green, R-Tenn., an Army veteran, requires only honorable discharges for anyone who is separated from the military over refusing to be vaccinated. It was added to the fiscal 2022 defense authorization bill, passed by the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday.

“No American who raises their hand to serve our Nation should be punished for making a highly personal medical decision,” Green said in a statement after the committee vote.

However, service members are telling Health Impact News that this is what some of them are being threatened with, dishonorable discharge, while others have said they have been threatened with demotions and being barred from reenlisting.

Judicial System Again Fails to Protect Constitutional Rights of Citizens by Denying 200,000 Unvaccinated Military a Temporary Restraining Order

On August 17, 2021, two military members filed a lawsuit in federal court in the State of Colorado, claiming that they represented 200,000 service members who were not vaccinated for COVID-19, but that they had previously contracted COVID-19 and recovered, and that therefore there was no need to be vaccinated against COVID-19, as they had “natural immunity.”

On August 24, 2021, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin issued a Memorandum for “SENIOR PENTAGON LEADERSHIP COMMANDERS OF THE COMBATANT COMMANDS DEFENSE AGENCY AND DOD FIELD ACTIVITY DIRECTORS” which stated:

I therefore direct the Secretaries of the Military Departments to immediately begin full vaccination of all members of the armed Forces under DoD authority on active duty or in the Ready Reserve, including the National Guard, who are not fully vaccinated against COVID-19. (Source.)

So on August 31, 2021, Todd Callender, counsel for the military Plaintiffs, filed a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to stop this directive from being enforced, which was heard by Judge Raymond P. Moore, who then denied the TRO on September 1, 2021.

The Plaintiffs had expert testimony from an affidavit by Dr. Peter McCullough, stating that “people who have the naturally created antibodies resulting from contracting and recovering from the Virus” should not be vaccinated because “it will do more harm than good.”

Judge Moore rejected his testimony and the evidence provided by the plaintiffs, because it was contrary to what the CDC states.

But Plaintiffs ignore all contrary opinion evidence, including obviously relevant guidance from the Centers for Disease  Control and Prevention (“CDC”) recommending vaccination regardless of whether a person has already had COVID-19 because research has not yet shown people are protected once they recover from the virus.

See Frequently Asked Questions about COVID-19 Vaccination, CDC Website, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html (last visited Sept. 1, 2021).

The Court is not compelled to view Plaintiffs’ evidence in a vacuum or an echo chamber. As a result, the evidence cited by Plaintiffs coupled with their unsubstantiated insistence on their own natural immunity is insufficient to establish a clear and unequivocal right to a TRO under the circumstances of this case. (Read full opinion here.)

Again, to expect relief from COVID-19 vaccine mandates from the judiciary is just not reasonable. The system is rigged. They will quote the CDC, Anthony Fauci, and a whole host of other corrupt government agencies and leaders to deny facts and keep the COVID-19 narrative going that benefits the Pharmaceutical industry and their Wall Street Billionaires and Bankers.

The judiciary works for these Wall Street Billionaires and Bankers, not for the public.

Mass non-compliance is what is needed now, and while there are signs that those in law enforcement and other government agencies are now forming groups to resist (See: Police, Firefighters In LA Form Group To Resist Vaccine Mandates, for example), where are the military commanders who take seriously the oath they took to protect this country and their citizens??

One of the military members that Health Impact News corresponded with today wrote:

As much as I value my uniform, my time in service and fighting back against such obvious abuses of power I’m coming more and more to the realization that this is the new world order, so to speak.

These vaccines aren’t going away no matter how long or how bitterly we fight this in the courts.

It’s time to tell the system to go **** itself and start figuring out how to best take care of ourselves and our families outside of the system.

Our military leadership has no concern for our wellbeing and they have made it clear that they will punish those who can’t see things from their perspective.

I signed up to defend the Constitution and freedom and now my military leadership is intent on violating both. I’m no longer interested in serving my country in this capacity. It’s time to leave while I can still walk to the door.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image: Pfc. Shaniah Edwards, Medical Detachment, prepares to administer the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine to soldiers and airmen at the Joint Force Headquarters, February 12, 2021. (U.S. Army National Guard photo by Sgt. Leona C. Hendrickson – Source.)

Reiner Fuellmich Clarifies Nuremberg Misunderstandings

Trials not underway… yet.

I’d like to address an incredibly important topic that has grown into a life of its own – in my belief, because of the severity of the events going on around us, and the hope that these egregious crimes that are being committed will see justice. The goal for those of us who are awake to these heinous agendas is that the criminals responsible for perpetrating these terrible crimes against humanity will be held accountable for their actions.

Now to say that these criminals deserve to be hanged, the death penalty, etc., I won’t delve into or give my opinion. This post is to try and clarify why the issue of the Nuremberg Code, and in the same vein, talk of a second Nuremberg Trial, has been such a huge talking point lately.

It is a notion I have mentioned on this site, not in order to spread false information, but because of the trajectory that these events seemed to be heading. And/or what many people have spoken about in regards to how essential this matter is, and why there are so many people referencing this topic as if it is already happening.

When we take into account some of the various quotes we’ve heard from multiple doctors/scientists, etc., like Michael Yeadon, Reiner Fuellmich, Vernon Coleman… for example, it may lead those, especially those of us who are eager to see something like this happen, to jump the gun and hear what we really want to hear, instead of what is actually happening.

Source: odysee | @PlanetLockdown | Michael Yeadon | Full Interview | Planet Lockdown

Michael Yeadon @53:35: “So, you will notice, if you ask some friends who have been vaccinated, ask them, were they informed, in writing, that these are experimental medicines that have not yet been approved? If you weren’t, you were administered an experimental agent without your consent.

That is contrary to the Nuremberg code. Code put in place after World War II, recognizing the foul, human experiments performed by Nazi doctors. The Nazi doctors, by the way, were pretty much all hanged. For their crimes, against humanity. And I’m sorry to say, that NHS doctors who are administering these agents to people who are not at risk from the virus, and they’re not telling them that they’re experimental, are also breaching the Nuremberg code and I believe they’re doing it knowingly. And I think there should be a Nuremberg 2. And I think those physicians should be tried on those charges and appropriate sentences handed down. So if you’re one of those physicians, I hope to be around to see you in the court.”

Reiner Fuellmich: “There cannot be any doubt, whatsoever, at least not for me, after having interviewed so many experts from all different fields of science. Um… doctors, virologists, epidemiologists, economists, lawyers, psychologists, psychiatrists – There cannot be any doubt whatsoever that what has been happening here for a year now, is, and I – when I first said this, some people kind of rolled their eyes and said, “Hey, nobody’s going to ever agree with you”, but this is the worst – these are the worst crimes against humanity EVER, ever committed.

@3:49: “ – we have the evidence. I’m – this is, I know there’s some people out there who may not quite work with actual evidence. Well, it’s different with us. Because we have been speaking to all of these scientists and other people. Over a hundred in the meantime. It’s happening globally, but in the end, it may very well turn out that we’re going to have to have a special court because, maybe, there’s a lot pointing in that direction, maybe the national courts will not really be able to deal with this. Because this is such a – this is on such a magnitude, it’s so, it’s so big that it is very possible that we’re gonna eventually need to have something like Nuremberg 2.

Dr. Vernon Coleman @6:07: “Now, let me tell you something else, and this should strike terror into every doctor, nurse or boy scout currently involved in giving, or promoting, these vaccines. The Nuremberg Code on medical experimentation, written in 1947, for reasons which I hope I don’t have to explain, even to David Lammy, stated that explicit voluntary consent from patients is required for human experimentation. That means that patients MUST be told they’re taking part in a trial and they must be warned of all the possible adverse events. That’s what informed consent means.

How many doctors and nurses jabbing people with this stuff are telling patients that it’s a trial? How many are giving people the information they need to make a valued judgement? I would guess, somewhere close to none. So legally, all those people giving vaccinations are war criminals. I’ll repeat that. Legally, all those people giving vaccinations are war criminals. War criminals never think they’re war criminals, of course. In the end of WW2, the Nazi’s mostly claimed that they were doing important work just obeying orders. Doing what they were told. None of that cuts the mustard, as they say, just doing what you’re told, doesn’t stop you being a war criminal.”

Source: lbry.tv | Truth For Freedom | World Doctors Alliance calls for Covid Nuremberg Trials

Dr. Mikael Nordfors @4:04: “My name is Mikael Nordfors. I’m a medical doctor, author, musician and political reformist from Sweden, and I have started an organization called People’s Court, and our aim is to support everyone standing up against tyranny, and a medical tyranny now we’re getting all over the world so that people don’t have to be afraid, we’ll help them to get new work, get some money, support, collect money to support all the people standing up.

And we will arrange a new Nuremberg Trial, hopefully a Nuremberg to litigate against all the criminals behind this hoax.”

With so many doctors/scientists discussing the covid scam, and referencing the Nuremberg Codes/Trials, the topic inevitably grew into a huge amalgamation of an event that is widely spread as currently being underway, or at least, should be.

Many websites, my own included, have mentioned the Nuremberg Trials and the team that Reiner Fuellmich is leading, and to clarify any misunderstandings, Reiner Fuellmich himself has addressed this information, in order to straighten the facts. While yes, he himself has mentioned that eventually a Nuremberg 2 should be the goal, it has not been confirmed to have a tribunal as of yet, and he is not the one leading this specific task at this time. He is, however, working on a Corona Committee, and exposing the factions regarding this narrative and the falsehoods that have been perpetrated on the public.

Source: odysee | Awakening The People | The Trueman Show interviews Reiner Fuellmich

Jorn Luka @1:00:09: “We see a lot of news articles, well, not on the mainstream media, obviously, but in the more alternative media is they’re all writing about what you’re doing, and they’re all writing also about like, they call it themselves a Nuremberg… trial?

I think it’s good to talk about that for a bit as well because the thing is, the messages that I get from a lot of people is they see you as like, ‘Yeah, Reiner Fuellmich will save us’, and I think – to some extent, your work is super good and I think it awakens a lot of people and hopefully even in a justice system you will accomplish a lot of good stuff. But, as you told me before the interview, like, not like a thing like a Nuremberg trial, for example. And it’s just a bit, um, hope for the alternative media to write it down like that, right?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “Yeah, but there are a lot of false stories out there. Um, for example, the story about me and a thousand other attorneys filing and already having begun our work on a Nuremberg 2.0 trial, that’s false. I mean, I have been telling, this is my opinion, that eventually we may very well end up in a situation in which we will have to have an international corona court. Sort of like Nuremberg 2.0. But we haven’t even come close to that yet.

We’re going to need – first of all, we’re going to need a place where this can happen. Where are you going to have this? It’s probably going to have to be some extraterritorial place. Some kingdom. Some obscure kingdom. We don’t know. We need judges, as well.

Another story is that, Dolores – Professor Dolores Cahill of Dublin University, and Bobby Kennedy and I have filed a class action complaint in Canada. That’s not true. I do cooperate closely with my friend Bobby Kennedy, and I do cooperate with Dolores Cahill, and many others, but we haven’t filed any cases together. Uh, the class action that’s been filed is the one by Michael Swinwood, and he will file another one. The one that we spoke about. The children’s class action. There’s efforts underway of something similar happening in the United States. That’s true. But what’s been reported about my and my colleagues being able to walk over water, that’s not really true. We’re doing our best. We will – “

Jorn Luka: “Except you’re still doing great, great great work, though.”

Reiner Fuellmich:We will win, in the end. Because, there’s no other way. We have to win. And we’re the ones who are going to call the shots.

Those… one of the psychologists, one of the professors of psychology who we interviewed, he said that in order for a democracy to work, you need people with moral competence. Moral competence requires two things. One, the ability to ask questions, rather than to blindly follow orders; and the ability to discuss other opinions, rather than to kill the other person or call them a nazi or right-wing, simply because he has a different opinion. And he says that only 80% of the people have this moral competence. However, you can learn it. If you are taught what this is about.

Uh, but at this point, it’s only 20% of the people who have this moral competence, and that happens to be the group of people who are questioning the corona measures and who are working together, in a very effective way, I think, to stop all of this.

Now if you consider that only .000 something percent of the population is trying to cause very serious harm to the rest of the population, because they’re afraid of us. That is at the core of this. They’re afraid of us. They’re afraid that the, that we’re going to find out about them. If you take that into consideration, then the 20% on our side, is A LOT.

Now you’re going to ask, “What about the other 80%?” They don’t really play a role. Because they’re always going to follow the leader. They’re always going to follow orders. We’re the ones who are questioning things. We’re the ones who are ready and willing to discuss stuff with the other side – not the other side, but with the other 80%. And that’s why we’re the ones who are going to call the shots.”

Dr. Fuellmich has also made a telegram post regarding this issue, stating:

False reports have been circulating for months that the German Corona Investigative Committee or Dr. Reiner Fuellmich would initiate a Nuremberg 2.0 with the help of hundreds of lawyers and doctors.

It is appreciated that Reiner Fuellmich can clarify this topic. While I hope that the original misinformation did not come from a place of misdirection or malicious intent, but rather from a place of misunderstanding and/or optimistic misinterpretation, I cannot dismiss the possibility that this was initiated as a means of discrediting Fuellmich and their intents. Obviously I hope this is not the case, but as always, I recommend doing one’s own research and looking at multiple sources to seek out the truth of the matter. As it is, with Dr. Fuellmich speaking up and clarifying this widespread rumor, it has at least laid this speculation to rest. 

With so much proof and evidence, however, that this covid/vaccine agenda is indeed the largest crime against humanity ever perpetrated, it is no misunderstanding that many people are looking forward to a second Nuremberg Trial, and that those responsible will be brought to justice. Hopefully sooner rather than later.

In the meantime, dig deep into these vaccine agendas, and the ACTUAL GOALS of the government and the “wealthy philanthropists” that made these vaccines possible. As well as how a “surprise outbreak” was guaranteed to happen during Trump’s presidency to begin with. …I’m not sure how one can consider a surprise outbreak 3 years in advance if it is a SURPRISE, instead of planned, but what do I know. 😛

While some may try and defend Anthony Fauci by surmising that he undoubtedly meant that every 2-3 years or so a “surprise outbreak” ends up happening and surely he was just trying to “prepare” us all for the next one, I’d have to counter back by the following testimonies of Robert Willner and Kary Mullis, both of whom called Anthony Fauci out for the HIV/AIDS “pandemic” almost 30 years ago.

History is Repeating Itself: Fauci Was Accused of Genocide Almost 30 Years Ago

Yes, if the “surprise outbreak” was planned, it is because Fauci is engaged in yet another scheme to depopulate, and/or sterilize/experiment on the population and push these dangerous vaccines on to the public. And it goes even deeper and darker than this, ladies and gentleman. Anthony Fauci is just one of the players.

Crimes against humanity, indeed. And most certainly deserving of a worldwide tribunal to expose and arrest the individuals/organizations involved. Will anything come from these trials/tribunals? Well, I have faith, and in the words of Jorn Luka and Reiner Fuellmich:

Jorn Luka: “The truth will prevail, right?”

Reiner Fuellmich: “It always does. In the end, it always does.”

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Daniel Bone from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Egregious Medical Tyranny Holds Patient Hostage in a Hospital and Refuses Her Preferred Medical Treatment – Patient DIES Under Their Protocol - Veronica Wolski was denied specific treatment - AND denied the freedom to leave the hospital.
More LIES and CONtradictions About COVID and the Vaccines | How Does Anyone Still Believe the Narrative? - We have been lied to numerous times by top officials. When will the rest of the world wake up?
W.H.O. / Governments Working in Collusion with Big Pharma? | A Necessary Look Back at the Swine Flu Pandemic - STEPPING BACK IN TIME: Another attempt to vaccinate the whole world.
Jerm Warfare Interview with Dr. Zelenko: “These “vaccines”, which I call ‘poison death shots’ “ - "The only reason you'd vaccinate your child is if you believe in child sacrifice."
Scandal Behind the FDA “Fake Approval” of Pfizer Jab - Corruption and collusions behind the Pfizer/FDA "vaccine" efforts.
Our Grave Concerns About the Handling of the COVID Pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK - Open letter from several healthcare professions to the UK government/administrators.

The Hypocrisy of “Authority Figures”: Starring Nancy Pelosi

Are government officials above the law?

“RULES FOR THEE, BUT NOT FOR ME”

It’s amazing the hypocrisy that some of those in authoritative positions delve into. They give the orders, but don’t follow it themselves. They state one thing, but flip their opinion on the same subject when it suits them. To be sure, Nancy Pelosi is not the only one, and surely not the last, sadly, but being the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives and surrounded by much controversy, puts her in the spotlight. And with so many civilians caught up in the middle of it, it was only fair to shed some justifiable material on this topic.

This post does not come from a place of hate or disdain. Merely an objective view of misconduct from those in a leading position.

Praises, then Condemns – (2011 / 2021)

Thank goodness for the enduring quality of internet content that preserves our most important and heartfelt memories, right? (Other than all the ones that big tech has decided to delete, for one reason or another…)

Let’s take Pelosi’s tweet ~10 years ago making this statement:

This tweet came after 100,000 people stormed the Wisconsin State Capitol as an effort to fight for union’s rights. At the time, Nancy Pelosi was all for it.

Then we have how Nancy Pelosi addressed the destruction of several long-important monuments destroyed by mob groups in July 2020:

Interviewer: “Shouldn’t that be done by a commission or the city council, not a mob in the middle of the night throwing it into a harbor?

Nancy Pelosi: (dismissively shrugging the question off) “People will do what they do.

Then, fast forward to actions done on her very own property:

YouTuber Arrested for Livestreaming Himself Defecating in Driveway of Nancy Pelosi’s Mansion — Says It Was a ‘Peaceful Protest’
Report: Nancy Pelosi’s California Home Vandalized with Pig’s Head, Fake Blood

And now, this year (2021) after the capitol riots (of which her and her team were allegedly in charge of security… and who, ironically, are accused of actually letting the rioters in) her stance on “democracy in action” is vastly different:

Interesting that during this case, “democracy in action” is now called an “assault”, out of many terms Nancy Pelosi has used. And yes, one can counter this argument with the tragedy that did erupt out of the Jan 6. riots as opposed to the 2011 riots, but again, one has to ask, was this set up from the beginning just to spin a sordid view on the Trump protestors? After all, as word has gotten around (and video proof), it seems as the security detail simply opened the doors and allowed the rioters to enter the building.

And as most of us (should) know, it wouldn’t be the first time that outside agencies (such as Antifa, perhaps?) has been hired to disrupt what was supposed to be a peaceful protest. False flags and hired guns (to put it frankly) are becoming more and more known thanks to investigative research and more video surveillance/coverage.

Inciting Violence – (2020 / 2021)

And speaking of “inciting violence” and/or condemning/supporting it, we have the below comment from Pelosi made in August of 2020:

“We take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. And sadly, the domestic enemies to our voting system and honoring our Constitution are right at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with their allies in the Congress of the United States. But again, let’s just get out there and mobilize, organize, and not let the President deter anybody from voting.”

The above quote, if one were to choose to in such context, could imply that Nancy Pelosi was inciting violence. Calling out these “domestic enemies” and even providing the address for her constituents to take action. After all, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc. has deleted/banned/censored for less than this while continuously decrying that it was only for the “benefit of the users”.

Now, we can take a look at Donald Trump’s speech and the violence that he was, apparently, encouraging:

Now it is up to Congress to confront this egregious assault on our democracy.

You will have an illegitimate president, that’s what you’ll have. And we can’t let that happen.

‘Yes, it does because the constitution says you have to protect our country and you have to protect our constitution and you can’t vote on fraud,’ and fraud breaks up everything, doesn’t it? When you catch somebody in a fraud, you’re allowed to go by very different rules.

Honestly, I could go on and on with this, because truthfully, you can take any statement, put a spin on it, and claim that you thought it was an attempt at someone trying to “incite violence”.

To be honest, this video is terrifying and could be misconstrued as someone threatening Tubby… (if we are to follow the vague procedures and guidelines of big tech/media/authority leaders who make up the rules as they go along).

Nancy Pelosi: “Refusing to accept reality” – (2017 / 2020)

Back in 2017, Nancy Pelosi and a huge number of her colleagues contested the results of the 2016 election. Claiming that there “was no question” that it was stolen.

However, now that 2020 has arrived, and their newly elect leader, Joe Biden, is at the helm (supposedly…), any question of election results being manufactured is ridiculous and couldn’t possibly happen. At least, according to the very same people that complained about it to begin with in 2016 and refused to believe Donald Trump was elected fairly.

In November (2020), the House Speaker slammed Republicans for their response to the election results.

“They’re engaged in an absurd circus right now, refusing to accept reality,” Pelosi said.

“Stop the circus and get to work on what really matters to the American people — their health and their economic security.”

Chuck Schumer echoed Pelosi’s sentiments, urging Republicans to “stop their shenanigans.”

SHORT MEMORY? Nancy Pelosi accused of hypocrisy after her tweet claiming 2016 election was ‘HIJACKED’ resurfaces

Regardless of who cheated when, or even if both parties did, (or none, for that matter), the amount of hypocrisy on this point is outrageous. One can’t whine and complain for 4 years that their election was stolen, but then refuse that it can even happen in the next one. That’s basically saying that they were lying for 4 years and knew that the previous election was won fairly this whole time. (As long as we can believe that this election was won fairly…)

Keeping up the Image (just the wrong one) – (2020)

When the coronavirus first started making its rounds, it, indeed, caused massive confusion and chaos with seemingly no one being on the same page. To add to that confusion, we have the very political leaders who were relaying these rules and guidelines, not following it themselves. Creating a double-standard and making the public worldwide wonder why those in specific positions were allowed to do the very thing they announced was not allowed.

Nancy Pelosi was called out on this after being caught at a hair salon (which was allegedly shutdown and only opened to take care of her, personally – since there was an outdoor mandate only) and walking around without a mask covering her mouth even though there was a mask mandate in that city during the time, in which “the average citizen” could be fined for not following the policy.

There is a lot of debate and “she-said / she-said” (if these gender-terms are still allowed… which we will sort of address in the next section) between Nancy Pelosi and the hair salon owner, Erica Kious. But seeing as how Erica herself stated, “It was a slap in the face that she went in, you know, that she feels that she can just go and get her stuff done while no one else can go in, and I can’t work,” Kious said. “We’re supposed to look up to this woman, right?“.

And when you add into that the other numerous accounts of government officials that are defying these mandates that THEY THEMSELVES ordered (whether at the behest of other higher mandates or not…) and this emotional and heartbreaking plea from Angela Marsden (one of many) that echoes Erica Kious’ sentiments, it would not be a stretch to “presume” who may be at fault here.

Identity Crisis – (2021)

And here we have the latest in controversies and contradictions that Nancy Pelosi has been involved in. Honestly, it’s incredible that she’s in the position she’s in while engaging in the duplicitous behavior and actions she’s been behind. Even if not from a malignant stand point, the fact that those in governing positions are entitled to defying the very orders they’re mandating, yet expecting everybody else to fall in line is unethical and untrustworthy. (And then they wonder why they’re not trusted.)

On Jan 1, 2021, a press release was announced detailing a few of the new House rules that were proposed and unveiled to be voted on. Among these rules was this statement:

It promotes inclusion and diversity. That includes changes that would: establish the Select Committee on Economic Disparity and Fairness in Growth; require standing committees to include in their oversight plans a discussion of how committee work over the forthcoming Congress will address issues of inequities on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, age, or national origin; honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships in the House rules to be gender neutral; make permanent the Office of Diversity and Inclusion to facilitate a diverse workforce that is reflective of our Members and the districts they represent; and survey the diversity of witness panels at committee hearings to ensure we are hearing from diverse groups of experts as we craft legislation.

To further clarify:
In clause 8(c)(3) of rule XXIII, strike ‘‘father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half sister, grandson, or granddaughter’’ and insert ‘‘parent, child, sibling, parent’s sibling, first cousin, sibling’s child, spouse, parent-in-law, child-in-law, sibling-in-law, stepparent, stepchild, stepsibling, half-sibling, or grandchild’

In the wise words of Rep. Kevin McCarthy: “This is stupid.
Then he smartly followed up with “Signed, – A father, son, and brother

It’s funny, because he wasn’t the only one throwing some shade on this confusing proposal:

This happened just a few days after the proposal:

I stand before you as a wife, a mother, a grandmother, a daughter. A daughter whose father served in this congress.” – Nancy Pelosi

So let me get this straight…

Just a few days after Nancy Pelosi proposed to remove all gender specific pronouns from Congress (even if, as some “fact-checkers” claim, it was from just one document – whatever the heck that means, and allegedly wouldn’t have to be followed in speeches and such – because, you know, only government officials are allowed to bend the rules for themselves but that everyone else has to follow… do I have that right?) Nancy Pelosi herself still mentioned, in her own speech – (because she’s allowed to do that, of course) – FIVE different pronouns that are recommended to be changed to gender neutral (due to “equality”), in a matter of less than TEN SECONDS?

Does she even believe the own rules she’s trying to set forth? Is she for gender-equality, or not? Is she willing to admit that this is a silly proposal and she, quite obviously, prides herself on identifying as a “wife, a mother, a grandmother, and a daughter”?

I guess I just don’t understand the ever-changing rules and unfair guidelines that certain government officials impose on others but don’t have to follow themselves.

Unfortunately, the unfair treatment of others by those in a higher authority has been an ongoing conflict, and the injustices that we are subjected to are only exacerbated by the laws placed in order to protect those very same people. The corruption of this system needs to be addressed.

This is just one person in a sea of many. And again, this post is not meant to condemn, harass, or ridicule any individual, but just to point out the hypocrisy and biased dichotomy between authority figures and everyone else.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

Egregious Medical Tyranny Holds Patient Hostage in a Hospital and Refuses Her Preferred Medical Treatment – Patient DIES Under Their Protocol - Veronica Wolski was denied specific treatment - AND denied the freedom to leave the hospital.
More LIES and CONtradictions About COVID and the Vaccines | How Does Anyone Still Believe the Narrative? - We have been lied to numerous times by top officials. When will the rest of the world wake up?
W.H.O. / Governments Working in Collusion with Big Pharma? | A Necessary Look Back at the Swine Flu Pandemic - STEPPING BACK IN TIME: Another attempt to vaccinate the whole world.
Jerm Warfare Interview with Dr. Zelenko: “These “vaccines”, which I call ‘poison death shots’ “ - "The only reason you'd vaccinate your child is if you believe in child sacrifice."
Scandal Behind the FDA “Fake Approval” of Pfizer Jab - Corruption and collusions behind the Pfizer/FDA "vaccine" efforts.
Our Grave Concerns About the Handling of the COVID Pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK - Open letter from several healthcare professions to the UK government/administrators.