As some of my dear readers may be aware of, I have been covering an interesting figure of the 1990’s in a few of my posts by the name of Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov.
His history is fraught with mystery and intrigue, since it is claimed that he came to this world in order to warn this current generation that we will be the one to see the rise of the antichrist.
Now, I will just add this caveat: I cannot be entirely sure that this is a true account. Of course, I don’t think any of us can. There have been a lot of speculation and guesses as to who, what, where, when and how THE antichrist will make his appearance. And there are many who don’t follow the biblical testaments or believe in any religious/philosophical heralding of an impeding apocalypse, so don’t wonder about this at all and/or think it is only a conspiracy-theory-doomsday-delusion.
However, I am a believer in Jesus Christ and do believe that there are biblical warnings that point to what we should be on the lookout for. And because of this reason, I have been researching several different subjects, and Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov is one that just happened to catch my eye. And whether his is a true account or not, the topics that have been allegedly covered by this young individual – retold through his mother – resonates with me and I find a lot of truth within the subjects that he has mentioned.
For instance, the topic that I’m covering today is something that I have wondered about and struggled with in my pursuit of the truth and the reality of life and death; even before I came across this young prophet and his point of view. Which is incredibly deep coming from such a young child (he passed away at the age of 10). While this article is not about him personally, it is about a topic that he has broached, and because I have contemplated on this matter as well, wanted to delve deeper into the truth of this subject.
The Quest for Immortality (or even an extended life)
In my musings, I have wondered whether the notion of transfusions/transplants goes against what God intended. I know this might be an incredibly sensitive topic, but if we are pursuing the truth, then we must address difficult questions with a genuine and sincere approach, instead of aversion and antagonism. It is not my intention to offend anyone or pass judgement. Only to discuss this matter from a perspective that may not have been considered before.
With that being said, are we fully aware of the implications that may arise when pursuing this route when trying to save ourselves or a loved one?
Where are the organ donations coming from?…
The horrors of black market organ harvesting cannot be ignored, nor can the unscrupulous actions of the medical industry when faced with the possibility of a patient who is willing to pay ungodly amounts of money in order to save their own life, or one of their loved ones.
While some could never believe that such atrocities exist, the sad reality is that the love of money (and of one’s life) can push someone to make unethical decisions. Even if an organ transplant patient or blood transfusion recipient has no idea of the sinister back alley handed dealings, this secret, behind the scenes business may still be taking place.
“How was forced organ harvesting uncovered? The story starts with a whistleblower, a woman with a pseudonym Annie, who made a public statement in March 2006 that her ex-husband had been harvesting corneas of Falun Gong practitioners from 2003 to 2005 in Sujiatun hospital in Shenyang City in Liaoning Province in China. Other doctors in the hospital had been harvesting other organs. The Falun Gong were killed through organ extraction. Their bodies, after organ extraction, were cremated.”
As if this wasn’t horrific enough, the implications that the “cabal” may be behind some of the organ harvesting/trafficking may be in play as well.
In a harrowing interview, Stew Peters gives a child-trafficking victim a platform to speak on the tragic and devastating encounters she’s had within the corrupt “elite’s” cult and what she’s learned. It is a very heartbreaking and disturbing account – certainly not for the faint of heart. (I can’t watch this video without crying.)
A short testimony about the organ/body-harvesting trade:
Ally Carter @23:38: “- this is not about a sexual experience, this is not about just cash; this is about something else and it’s deeper than that. Because this is decades of tactics, this is decades of issues, these are decades of problems. Satanic ritual abuse exists, um, human sex-trafficking exists, organ-harvesting exists all over the place. The black market exists.
Um, humans, babies, children, 4 year olds/6 year olds, having their bodies sliced open and used as human suitcases over the border. I have been trafficked over the border.
Those babies are moved as if they’re still alive. They put clothes on them, they sit them up, and they use them until their bodies cannot be used anymore.
This is not just about sex. Because after your body is used for sex, your organs are used for organ harvesting and selling on the black market, which goes to your hospitals; you wonder why a heart costs so much. You wonder why a liver or kidney costs so much.”
And while she claims to have evidence of the abuse that she’s had to endure – by the hands of some of the most prominent figures in our world today, no less – she doesn’t specify if she has the proof for the organ-harvesting claims.
However, this most certainly should not detract from the reality that this is a very real criminal enterprise.
In 2012, Patrick McMahon, Air Force combat veteran and nurse practitioner, made waves when he accused The New York Organ Donor Network for pressuring the doctors to prematurely declare patients “brain dead” in order to meet a quote, “and even hired “coaches” to train staffers how to be more persuasive” in convincing next-of-kin to sign their deceased love one over as an organ donor.
In one chilling allegation, Patrick McMahon submitted the following as an example of their gross misconduct:
“In September 2011, a 19-year-old man injured in a car wreck was admitted to Nassau University Medical Center. He was still trying to breathe and showed signs of brain activity, the suit charged.
But doctors declared him brain dead under pressure from donor-network officials, including Director Michael Goldstein, who allegedly said during a conference call: “This kid is dead, you got that?” the suit charged.” – Organs taken from patients that doctors were pressured to declare brain dead: suit
An update to this lawsuit in 2017 had The New York Donor Network deny Mr. Patrick McMahon’s allegations, but also refused to release the documents of the patients in question, even after the judge court ordered them to do so; the New York Donor Network even going so far as to appeal this request through the Manhattan Supreme Court.
In another shocking Stew Peters exposé, a nurse claims to have found the connection between the deadly push of Remdesivir and the seemingly strategic planning of their patient’s deaths:
“I am an RN working in case management at _______ Hospital in California, and I know why the hospitals are killing their own patients.” Upon receiving this nurse’s horrific findings, The Stew Peters Show was able to get this whistleblower nurse to come on the show and answer the tough questions about the connection she found between the use of deadly Remdesivir, Vancomycin, and organ donors.
In the email, the whistleblower stated: “There is a link between the hospital deaths and organ harvesting in the state of California…Every patient’s license is in their medical records, and they can tell if they are organ donors or not.” – Whistleblower: Hospitals Killing For Organs, “This is Absolutely Evil And A Crime Against Humanity!”
Are organs being harvested from LIVE people?
To add on to the controversial aspect of this medical intervention, is the huge debate surrounding the vitality of the organs and how long someone must stay alive – either naturally or through mechanical means – in order to keep their organs viable for distribution.
The medical condition of the person at the time of death can determine what organs and tissues can be donated and what cannot be. Organs need to be removed as soon as the person is declared brain-dead. Without the necessary oxygen supply, the organs stop functioning right.
The approximate amount of time between recovering the tissues/organs and transplanting them is:
- Lung – 4 to 6 hours
- Heart – 4 hours
- Liver – 24 hours
- Pancreas – 24 hours
- Kidney – 72 hours
- Cornea – 14 days
- Bones – 5 years
- Skin – 5 year
- Heart Valves – 10 years
This is why creating a tissue bank (heart valves, skin, bones etc.) is possible but creating an organ bank is not. In case of organ transplantation, the process has to be very quick in order to save a life.
Keeping a brain-dead person on ventilator support helps as the organs continue receiving oxygen, providing a window of time for doctors to conduct organ transplantation.
According to the above website, the heart and lungs are only viable within a 4 hour time frame. I assume this to mean that by the time the donor is “deceased”, the organs must immediately be transplanted to the intended recipient within the designated time. Otherwise it is too late and the organs (and therefore the payment) is no longer an option.
So by these conditions, the body must technically still be alive during the extraction of the organs, and the definition on what “brain dead” and “not legally alive” means is hotly contested in areas of not only ethical considerations, but scientific data as well.
For instance, there are reports of near-death experiencers being declared “brain dead“, “clinically dead”, “dead dead” (being in the morgue for 3 days…), yet still coming back from that brink with a story to tell. If their body was announced as technically dead, for all intents and purposes, then how is it at all possible for their “consciousness” to return to their body and having the lucidity return to them?
(DISCLAIMER: Please take these claims with a grain of salt. Always use discernment as most of these are anecdotal accounts and cannot be proven or provided with evidence.)
And how does this bode for the several thousands and thousands of people who have been declared “brain dead”, all in order for doctors/nurses/black market organ workers… to rush in to cut open their bodies (while still technically alive) and start harvesting for organs and tissue? And with that in mind, what would happen if a person who is declared “brain dead” suddenly regains their consciousness WHILE HAVING THEIR ORGANS REMOVED?
In some nerve-wrecking and heartbreaking reports, the following accounts demonstrates that this may, in fact, be possible:
– “April 2012 – Doctors declared british teen Stephen Thorpe “brain dead,” telling the father that the boy would never recover from a serious car accident. Despite pressure from the doctors, the father would not consent to allow the boy’s organs to be donated. With the help of other doctors, five weeks later Thorpe left the hospital, having almost completely recovered.”
– “July 2013 – A New York woman who was pronounced ‘brain dead’ by doctors unexpectedly awoke just as her organs were about to be removed for transplant.”
– “2014 U.S. man wakes up in morgue in body bag: An American man wasn’t pronounced “brain” dead, but dead dead. Hospital workers in Lexington, Mississippi zippered him into a sack and shipped to the morgue where he freaked out the workers preparing to embalm him by kicking his way out of his body bag. When Walter Williams actually did die, his nephew told a TV reporter, “I think he’s gone this time.” Shesh. If a nurse, a doctor, a coroner, and other hospital staff could get “dead” so very wrong…”
– 2014 – “Swedish man hears doctors urging the harvesting of his organs: Doctors in Sweden discussed organ donation within earshot of Jimi Fritze as he lay in hospital after a stroke. To the doctor’s shocking surprise, Fritze could hear every word they said. However, he couldn’t object because he couldn’t move. He had suffered a stroke, and after the doctors looked at a scan of his brain, they gave his family bad news, and claimed that “there was no hope,” Fritze said.”
– March 2018 – Thirteen-year-old Trenton McKinley of Alabama recovered and is doing well after doctors pronounced him “brain dead” and “his organs were matched to five children who needed them”, never mind the fact that he needed them himself.
There is also the aborted fetuses trade, which includes corrupt organizations such as the NIH and Planned Parenthood; both of which have been exposed for what I, and many others, consider crimes against humanity:
“David Daleiden, founder and president of The Center for Medical Progress, states, “The NIH grant application for just one of Pitt’s numerous experiments with aborted infants reads like an episode of American Horror Story. Infants in the womb, some old enough to be viable, are being aborted alive and killed for organ harvesting, in order to bring in millions of dollars in taxpayer funding for Pitt and the Planned Parenthood abortion business it supports.” – Aborted Infants’ Continued Blood Flow Advertised in Racist University of Pittsburgh Grant Application to NIH
With these serious ethical concerns and implications, we have to really reflect on whether it is worth it to potentially be taking another person’s life to save our own, even if we are not fully cognizant of this fact. While I’m sure many of us are assured that the organ donor does not feel or suffer any of the procedures, unless we are actually under the knife, there is no way to know for sure. And the guilt that one may feel knowing that the person could have died while still having a chance to recover would undoubtedly weigh on some consciences.
Blood donors (again, from who…?)
Now, while not only considering organ donations to save or extend our life, we have to also address the practice of blood transfusions as well.
Again, the possibility of underhanded dealings in the black market and criminal enterprises needs to be mentioned.
As many may be familiar with, Silicon Valley is largely composed of a technocratic, transhumanist industry who is helping to usher us all in the “great reset”, biotech age; whether we like it or not.
In an endeavor that I have mentioned a few times before, because I am haunted by the stark coldness and unfeeling ramifications that it would most likely entail, is a statement from the Newsweek article titled, “Can Blood from Young People Slow Aging? Silicon Valley Has Bet Billions It Will“:
“One chilling missive came from a man who offered to provide all the blood Wyss-Coray might need for such an experiment—he claimed he could obtain it from human children of any age.”
In my opinion, this admission should be investigated to the fullest degree. I fail to see how this is even possible, unless one has a huge bank of blood already from “human children of any age”… or whether they can procure this amount through whatever means they have available to them – which again, raises severe alarm bells.
Either way, it is a grisly and sinister agenda. And the purpose for what this “young blood” will be used for, to keep the older generations alive and feeling young, is something right out of a dystopian playbook.
As Nir Barzilai puts it, “You have no idea how many people are interested to investing money in longevity,” said Nir Barzilai, the founding director of the Institute for Aging Research at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, and the founder of a company aimed at mitochondrial health. “There are billions of dollars.”
What’s in it for me?
Now that I’m finished talking about the ethical considerations (for now), it’s time to tackle why the recipient may not be getting off scott-free either. (Besides the medical bill, of course.)
Since the recipient will be under the knife and therefore have no idea what, exactly, is being transplanted/transfused into their body, and since many of us know how complicit some health/medical institutions really are, we have to wonder – not only how healthy the organ/blood being donated is, but also if the recipient is not subjected to an experiment as well.
Some, like David Bennett, consented to giving a very risky trial run to have a pig heart implanted in him. Not just any pig heart. A genetically modified one.
“In a medical first, doctors transplanted a pig heart into a patient in a last-ditch effort to save his life and a Maryland hospital said Monday that he’s doing well three days after the highly experimental surgery.
While it’s too soon to know if the operation really will work, it marks a step in the decades-long quest to one day use animal organs for life-saving transplants. Doctors at the University of Maryland Medical Center say the transplant showed that a heart from a genetically modified animal can function in the human body without immediate rejection.
The patient, David Bennett, 57, knew there was no guarantee the experiment would work but he was dying, ineligible for a human heart transplant and had no other option, his son told The Associated Press.”
Again, the desperation to cling so tightly to one’s own life may compel them to make decisions they may later on regret. Turning yourself into a genetically modified organism might trend highly on that list. David Bennett had this to say on his decision:
“It was either die or do this transplant. I want to live. I know it’s a shot in the dark, but it’s my last choice,” Bennett said a day before the surgery, according to a statement provided by the University of Maryland School of Medicine.”
This procedure has effectively, in a sense, created a human-animal hybrid. A genetically modified human hybrid.
That was David’s choice.
But what if you had no choice?
Far be it for me to assume that organ/blood recipients have not been getting all their donated organs/blood transfusions in a kosher manner… Already, there are attempts at not only implanting genetically modified animal parts in human being, but there are also endeavors to implant synthetic organisms/organs into us as well.
While history dictates that the government and mad scientists have taken certain liberties with their citizen’s bodies and lives, we have to wonder if there are even more clandestine operations hidden in the background that we are not aware of.
Now, even if these speculations are not true, what IS true is that there is a highly dangerous, suspicious “vaccine” containing mRNA and which have admissions that it does, indeed, modify our cells.
“Ultimately, the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cellular gene therapy. I always like to say, if we had surveyed 2 years ago, in the public, would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy, and inject it into your body, we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate.
I think this pandemic has also opened many people’s eyes to innovation in the way that was maybe not possible before.”
So with that in mind, how would vaccinated individual’s organs and blood be, not only in the short term, but in the long term as well? There has already been a sudden increase in blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, myocardial infarctions, neurological symptoms, miscarriages/stillbirths, cancers, etc., etc., etc. reported by Thomas Renz/DoD due to the vaccine intake.
Now imagine getting an organ/blood transfusion from a vaccinated individual with these conditions? And do we have a say in whose organs/blood we get in order to save ours or a loved one’s life? And even if they assure us that it is completely healthy and safe, are we really going to take the word of the same organizations who have assured us that brain dead individuals have no chance of recovery, only to have that same person wake up in the morgue?
This is all without even considering that the vaccines may, in fact, be injecting us with nanochip technology, hydrogels, graphene oxide, etc. in attempts at connecting us to a control-power grid. And as mentioned earlier, synthetic organ creations seem to be the next step in evolution for these “biomedical” technocrats, working on 3d printing organs like the heart, out of, again, their wonder material: hydrogel.
So now we have to consider whether we are okay with being a potentially genetically modified, human-animal hybrid, with synthetic (and possibly deadly) materials inside of us. In order to sustain/extend our life. Rather than “Godspeed” to the Lord.
This is, of course, not to say you would not want to find relief for yourself or a loved one who is suffering, but the serious subject matter of changing our natural, human born genetics with that of unnatural/man-made substances and mutation with animal DNA should be highly examined.
For those with (and without…) Biblical inclinations, there are specific verses that addresses this:
“But God gives it a body as he has chosen, and to each kind of seed its own body. For not all flesh is the same, but there is one kind for humans, another for animals, another for birds, and another for fish.” – 1 Corinthians 15:38-39
“Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.” – Romans 1:22
“So God looked upon the earth, and indeed it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth.” – Genesis 6:12
What’s in the blood?
So, now we get to, what was the initial reason why I decided to approach this topic to begin with?
Again, because of the testimony of Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov. In his life, he refused to get a blood transfusion because, as he claimed it, the sins of the blood could be transferred to the recipient.
It may seem like an outlandish claim.
However, there are some scientific literature to back this up, as eerie as it sounds.
“blood carries a person’s DNA, the signature that is supposed to be unique to their body.”
“Scientific American explains that when donor blood is mixed into the body with a transfusion, that person’s DNA will be present in your body for some days”
“That publication notes studies have shown that highly sensitive equipment can pick up donor DNA from blood transfusions up to a week after the procedure, but with particularly large transfusions, donor white blood cells were present for up to a year and a half afterward.”
And in this 2017 study, the conclusion these scientists/doctors came to is that they are considering having physicians receive informed consent from the recipient before agreeing to the transfusion because of this possible personality change:
“In conclusion, our results showed that the majority of the subjects could conceive that RBC transfusion might transmit some of the donor’s traits. Furthermore, three subjects out of seven indicated that they had perceived changes in behaviors or values after their own RBC transfusion. Better understanding the frequency and importance of these perceived changes is important as physicians might have to include such information while getting informed consent for transfusion.”
Organ transplants are no different, and have been documented for decades, according to the following pubmed article:
“Personality changes following heart transplantation, which have been reported for decades, include accounts of recipients acquiring the personality characteristics of their donor.”
“Four categories of personality changes are discussed in this article: (1) changes in preferences, (2) alterations in emotions/temperament, (3) modifications of identity, and (4) memories from the donor’s life. The acquisition of donor personality characteristics by recipients following heart transplantation is hypothesized to occur via the transfer of cellular memory, and four types of cellular memory are presented: (1) epigenetic memory, (2) DNA memory, (3) RNA memory, and (4) protein memory.”
Implications for the future of heart transplantation are explored including the importance of reexamining our current definition of death, studying how the transfer of memories might affect the integration of a donated heart, determining whether memories can be transferred via the transplantation of other organs, and investigating which types of information can be transferred via heart transplantation. Further research is recommended.”
In another startling account, a recipient of a liver transplant was documented as having not only a complete change in blood type, but she acquired the immune system of her donor as well…
In a recent case of possible cell memory, Australian girl Demi-Lee Brennan’s blood group was changed after receiving a liver transplant from her donor, reports the AFP. Nine months after the initial transplant, doctors discovered that Brennan had changed blood types and she acquired the immune system of the donor due to the stem cells of her new liver transferring over to her bone marrow. “In effect she had had a bone marrow transplant. The majority of her immune system had also switched over to that of the donor,” Michael Stormon, a hepatologist who treated Brennan at the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, reported to the AFP.
It amazes me that this foresight came from a 10 year-old child, who chose to end his life, rather than receive a potential change in personality and genetic make up.
And we have to wonder, what is the risk when it comes to this incredibly sensitive topic? What if our little one was sick, dying of leukemia? I can’t imagine how heartbreaking that would be, yet people go through these types of sorrow everyday. And on one hand I understand their heartfelt desperation at keeping their loved one alive, but again, at what cost?
Again, this is not to presume, or cast judgement, only to bring this topic to light in a different perspective. Perhaps we’re clinging on to life so hard, that we forget and/or ignore that this is only a temporary life/death. Even doctors/scientists/skeptics are having to come around to the mystery of the consciousness, and that there is more to this life than meets the eye.
“If you try to hang on to your life, you will lose it. But if you give up your life for my sake and for the sake of the Good News, you will save it.” – Mark 8:35
Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.
Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.