The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability”

“The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection.”

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca

Original article written by Dr. Joseph Mercola and Alix Mayer
on Mercola 9 January 2022

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @globalresearch_crg.

***

The reason our children are being targeted by COVID mandates is because vaccine makers want to get the shots onto the childhood vaccination schedule.

Once a vaccine is added to the childhood schedule, the vaccine maker is shielded from financial liability for injuries, unless the manufacturer knows about vaccine safety issues and withholds that information

Products must satisfy four criteria in order to get emergency use authorization:

    1. There must be an emergency;
    2. a vaccine must be at least 30% to 50% effective;
    3. the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product;
    4. and there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). Unless all four criteria are met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained

According to a U.S. federal court decision, the Pfizer shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are not interchangeable

Comirnaty is not fully approved and licensed. It’s only “ready for approval.” Comirnaty is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not yet available in the United States. They’re waiting for it to be added to the childhood vaccination schedule, to get the liability shield

*


In this interview, Alix Mayer explains why our children are being so aggressively targeted for the COVID-19 injection even though they’re not at risk of serious SARS-CoV-2 infection, and clarifies the status of Comirnaty.

Mayer, board president of Children’s Health Defense — California Chapter, is herself vaccine injured; not from the COVID jab, but from a series of vaccines she received 20 years ago. (Incidentally, Mayer grew up in the Oscar Mayer family in the 5th generation descended from the original Oscar Mayer, a German immigrant who started as a butcher boy. Despite Mayer’s vaccine injury, her family does not share her views on vaccine safety issues.)

Mayer graduated from Duke University with a BA and from Northwestern University with an MBA in finance and management strategy. She worked for Apple in the mid-1990s. When she was 29, Apple promoted her to acting manager of worldwide customer research.

In preparation for a family trip to Bali, her doctor recommended getting six vaccines: hepatitis A vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, diphtheria, tetanus, polio and oral typhoid, which she did. Eventually, 13 years later, she finally realized it was these shots that triggered her health problems.

“They gave me brain damage and total disability,” she says. “I spent three years in my early 30s being 80% housebound, and I really I didn’t know if I was ever going to get better.

I went through a whole bunch of diagnoses: lupus, chronic fatigue syndrome, Lyme disease. Ultimately, none of those made sense and none of the treatments made me any better, until we put the pieces together and figured out that I was actually vaccine injured.

It’s literally just a cause and effect. If you look back at my history and lay out my vaccine schedule, you can see that my health declined two weeks after I got the vaccines.

I had encephalitis and encephalopathy … digestive issues, hypersomnia — sleeping 16 hours a day — flu-like symptoms, a 24/7 migraine, joint pain. I really had no life at all in my early 30s until I went on a gluten-free diet. That started my health recovery.

I then became an award-winning medical journalist with a bunch of different blogs, and then a health consultant. In 2018, I retired from all that and joined Children’s Health Defense.”

The COVID Jab Tragedy

While many vaccines have a questionable safety profile, especially when combined, data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) suggest there’s never been a vaccine as dangerous as the experimental mRNA gene transfer injections for COVID.

What’s more, while lack of transparency and accountability has been a chronic problem within the vaccine industry, the obvious hazards associated with vaccines are really being highlighted by the COVID jabs.

Many now know of someone who has been injured by the COVID jab, and most were injured so shortly after the shot that it’s hard to deny a correlation. The staggering number of injuries reported among adults who have received the COVID shot in turn highlights the insanity of rolling it out to young children.

According to Mayer, the reason they’re trying to mandate the COVID shot for children is to evade liability for injuries, because once a vaccine is on the childhood vaccination schedule, vaccine makers have immunity against lawsuits for injuries.

Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability

The COVID shots currently have legal immunity against liability because they’re still under emergency use authorization (EUA). If you think BioNTech’s Comirnaty has been fully licensed, you’d be mistaken. Mayer explains:

“I put together a slide deck about Emergency Use Authorization (which you can see in the video interview above) because there is so much confusion over this and what’s really going on. Once you understand the genesis of EUA and the standards they have to meet in order to keep these products on the market, then you understand the behaviors [we’re now seeing].

They’re falling all over themselves to protect the EUAs for these products and also introduce other very confusing kinds of approval to get away with stuff. So, let me just start to clarify it right now.

This presentation is all about these three strangleholds that the vaccine makers and our government are never going to let go of … These are the things they’re guarding with their lives.

First of all, they need to guard the emergency … so they cannot have any early treatments. Those cannot exist. They’re also going for full liability protection, and children will be used as pawns to get them full liability protection.

Vaccine makers love EUA products because they have this huge liability shield. If you’re injured by an EUA vaccine, you can’t sue the manufacturer, you can’t sue the person who gave it to you, you can’t sue the institution where you got the shot.

You have to go through something called the CICP, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, where they’ll only cover unpaid medical expenses, and probably only for pharmaceuticals and lost wages.

Now, if you’re vaccine injured, let me tell you right now, you are not going to be using pharmaceuticals because they do not work for vaccine injury. They will make you sicker. You’ll be on two dozen pharmaceuticals before you know it and you’re going to be sick from those. They do not work. The only thing that’s going to get you better if you’re vaccine injured is natural treatments …

That’s the kind of treatment you’re going to need, and that’s not even covered, even if you were to get compensation. Everybody I know with chronic illness, whether it’s a child or an adult who has chronic fatigue syndrome, vaccine injury, Lyme disease, they’re paying $50,000 out of pocket per year.

If you can’t work and you have to pay for your treatment out of pocket, I don’t know how you ever get by. People suffer like crazy, they lose homes, they go into bankruptcy.”

Since its inception, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which pays for injuries caused by vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule, has paid out about one-third of claims. It’s a long, arduous process that oftentimes takes years and in the end rarely provides adequate compensation.

“If you do end up getting compensation … they don’t pay it out in one lump sum, they pay it out year by year, and they pretty much hope that whoever is injured is actually going to die of their injuries before they get compensated.

That’s been said to me a bunch of times by people who’ve been through this horrible process. Now, the CICP has only compensated 3% of claims. And so far, there have been no approvals for [compensation] for COVID shot injuries,” Mayer says. [Editor’s note: The first COVID case was recently determined “eligible” for compensation, but the case has not yet been adjudicated.1]

Stages of Liability: EUA

In her slide show, Mayer reviews each of the stages of product liability, and whether the mRNA shots can be mandated. As mentioned, vaccine makers have no liability as long as their product is under EUA, as the product is investigational.

“Investigational is a synonym for experimental,” Mayer says. “And the word experimental ties it directly into the Nuremberg Code, which says that we cannot be experimented on [without consent]. We always have the right to accept or refuse a medical treatment.

[The Nuremberg Code] is not a law, but it’s a code under which the whole world is supposed to be operating by. And it is actually codified into some local and federal laws as well … So, what everybody needs to know is that coercion and duress are considered de facto mandates and illegal. De facto means that it’s basically the same as an outright mandate.

It’s illegal medical segregation, medical apartheid [because that is a form of coercion or duress.] So, if you go to a restaurant and they demand your vaccine passport, only let you eat outside, and they might not let you use the bathroom, that’s medical segregation.

That is illegal and I do not support businesses that do that and you shouldn’t either. Any access privileges that are different between the vaccinated and unvaccinated are illegal, and any visual indication of vaccine status like a sticker or a bracelet … that’s also illegal because that creates segregation and medical apartheid, [since they are all forms of coercion or duress.]”

Importantly, mass violation of the law does not make something legal.

“If we all drove 100 miles an hour on Interstate 80, would we watch the speed limit signs suddenly changed to 100 miles per hour? No, it’s not going to happen. Mass violation of the law has never made anything legal. And just because schools and businesses and our government are mandating these shots, it doesn’t make it legal. It’s all illegal …

Now, they know full well that it’s illegal to mandate these [COVID shots]. President Biden knows it’s illegal. But what they’re counting on is that the court cases overturning their illegal mandates will take a while, and in that interim, people are going to be scared enough to get the shots. And unfortunately, it’s worked.”

Stages of Liability: Full Licensure and Childhood Scheduling

The next stage is full licensure (FDA approval). Once a product is fully licensed, the company becomes liable for injuries. At that point, the product can be legally mandated. Of course, knowing how dangerous the COVID shots are, no manufacturer wants to be financially liable for injuries. They’d be sued out of business.

This is the holy grail if you’re a manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule. ~ Alix Mayer

To get immunity against liability again, the vaccine manufacturers need to get their product onto the childhood vaccination schedule. This will also allow government to mandate the shots. As noted by Mayer:

“This is the holy grail if you’re a vaccine manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put it on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule.”

DOJ Redefines Medical ‘Consequence’

In Doe v. Rumsfeld,2 the court held that service members could refuse an EUA product without punitive consequences such as dishonorable discharge or other punishments. Therefore, there were no consequences to refusing an EUA product, other than the natural consequence of possibly getting the disease.

However, in July 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice attempted to redefine the term “consequences” just for the COVID shot, to suggest that punitive consequences, like job loss or being separated from your working or learning location, are legal when a person refuses an EUA vaccine.

“But this type of consequence, a punitive consequence, has never been adjudicated,” Mayer says. “That’s not in any law. This is just an opinion from the DOJ. And it absolutely means nothing, except it came from our DOJ, so people give it a lot of authority.

They also stated twice — and this is so hard to understand because it’s just beyond reason — that the right to accept or refuse an EUA product is ‘purely informational.’

Literally, you can read that you could die by taking it, but it’s purely informational. You cannot act on it. That’s what the DOJ says. Again, it’s not adjudicated, so it doesn’t mean anything. It’s an opinion. It holds no legal weight at all. So, as we said before, these mandates are starting to be overturned.”

Four Standards for EUA

There are four standards that must be fulfilled for an EUA. If any of these criteria are not met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained. First, the secretary of Health and Human Services has to declare and maintain a state of emergency. If the emergency were to go away, all EUA products would have to come off the market. And that doesn’t just mean vaccines. It also includes the PCR tests and even surgical masks.

The second standard is evidence of effectiveness. Historically, vaccines had to show a 70% or greater effectiveness, as measured by a fourfold increase in antibody levels, in order to qualify. For an EUA vaccine, the efficacy threshold is only 30% to 50%. In another departure from prior vaccine approvals, the COVID vaccine clinical trials relied on the RT-PCR test, not antibodies, to demonstrate effectiveness in the small “challenge phase” of the trials.

Now, you probably heard that the Pfizer shot was 95% effective when it first rolled out, but that was relative risk reduction, not absolute risk reduction. Confounding these two parameters is a common strategy used to make a product sound far better than it actually is. The absolute risk reduction for Pfizer’s shot was just 0.84%.3

For example, if a study divided people into two groups of 1,000 and two people in the group who didn’t get a fictional vaccine got infected, while only one in the vaccinated group got infected, the relative risk reduction would be reported as 100%. In terms of absolute risk reduction, the fictional vaccine only prevented 1 in 1,000 from getting the infection — a very poor absolute risk reduction.

The take-home message here is that even though the minimal threshold for effectiveness is ludicrously low, in terms of absolute risk reduction, these shots still don’t measure up. Within six months, even the relative risk reduction bottoms out at zero. What’s more, there’s evidence that the clinical trials were manipulated as well.

“I remember an analysis very early in lockdowns [that showed] if you added back all the probable cases of COVID to the clinical trial [data], the effectiveness went from 90% to between 19% and 29%,”4 Mayer says.

The third standard is that the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. In the case of COVID shots, there’s overwhelming evidence showing they do more harm than good.

The fourth and last standard that must be met is there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). “This is why hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were quashed,” Mayer says. This is also another reason Comirnaty is not treated as a fully approved product in the U.S., because if it were, then all the other COVID shots that are under EUA would have to be removed from the market.

“This is a four-legged stool,” Mayer says. “If any one of these legs goes away, you have to take your EUA products off the market … by law. I put [state of] emergency and [treatment] alternatives in red, because those are two of the things that they have a stranglehold on; those are things they are guarding like crazy.

This means that every variant that comes out, they have to make it sound super scary to keep the emergency going. So, the variants serve a purpose. You have to think about these variants in the context of this crime, where they have to keep the emergency going to keep their products on the market.

You would think this emergency would stop maybe when we get to herd immunity, maybe if we get 90% vaccination uptake, maybe COVID is just going to go away, like smallpox did in the early 1900s [even though] only 5% of people were vaccinated. [But it won’t] go away [until] the shots get full approval and the manufacturers get a full liability shield.”

Comirnaty’s Quasi Approval

With regard to Comirnaty, is it or is it not fully approved and licensed? The answer is more complex than a simple yes or no. Mayer explains:

“Comirnaty’s quasi approval is just for BioNTech. It doesn’t have to do with Pfizer, and this is why I’m doing this presentation because I’m going to explain what’s going on with that.

This is the race to get liability protection. Remember, that’s the other stranglehold that they want. They really want to get this liability protection. Once the COVID shots are fully approved, the manufacturer has full liability.

There’s all this confusion about Comirnaty. Was it fully approved? Is it on the market? Is it interchangeable with the Pfizer shot? And does it make the COVID shot mandate legal? It’s all the same answer. No, no, no, no.

The FDA issued an intentionally confusing biological license application approval for Comirnaty. It was an unprecedented approval to both license the Comirnaty shot, saying it’s ‘interchangeable’ with the Pfizer shot. But they also said it’s ‘legally distinct.’

In that same approval, they retain the vaccine’s liability shield by designating it EUA as well. They want it to be fully approved, but they want the liability protection, so they did this BS dual approval.

So, [Comirnaty] is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not available in the United States. It’s available in the U.K., New Zealand and other places, but it is not available in the United States because they’re really scared of liability.

Now, are you ready for this one? The BLA actually states that Comirnaty is only ‘ready for approval.’5 It doesn’t say it’s approved anywhere in the document. And they buried this language in a pediatric section to confuse people even more.

Here’s what they said; ‘We’re deferring submission of your pediatric studies for ages younger than 16. For this application, because this product is ready for approval for use in individuals 16 years of age and older, as pediatric studies for younger ages have not been completed.’

Why did they do this? Sixteen is a very important number. You would think the age break would be 18. That’s a very typical age break for everything else that we do in this country. Why 16?

The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection. That’s why this is ready to be approved for 16 and up, not 18 and up.”

Comirnaty Is Not Fully Licensed

This confusion is clearly intentional. On the one hand, the FDA claims Comirnaty is interchangeable with the Pfizer shot, yet it’s also legally distinct. Courts have had to weigh in on the matter, and a federal judge recently rejected the DoD claim that the two shots are interchangeable. They’re not interchangeable. That means Comirnaty vaccine is still EUA. It doesn’t have full approval and it’s not on the market.

“Military members involved in lawsuits are challenging the military’s COVID vaccine mandate. They filed an amended complaint seeking a new injunction after the judge last month rejected the assertion that the Pfizer COVID shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are interchangeable. So, we’re still hammering on this legally, but a court has ruled that they’re not interchangeable.

[Editor’s note: This information is accurate at the time of the interview, but legal challenges are ongoing and courts may issue new rulings. December 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court announced6 it has slated January 7, 2022, to hear arguments challenging Biden’s vaccine and testing mandates.]

So, how do we know that Comirnaty is not being treated as fully approved? First, the approval states you have the right to accept or refuse the product. That means it’s an EUA. Second, it’s not available in the U.S. because Comirnaty doesn’t have liability protection. Third, if it were available, it’s an alternative [treatment] and all other EUA shots would have to come off the market.

No. 4, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) would have to recommend it for ages 16 to 18 and the CDC would have added it to the children’s recommended schedule. That’s how we know it’s not fully approved and on the market.

Here is the label for Comirnaty. It says it’s emergency use authorization. It doesn’t say it’s fully approved, because it’s not. But look at the safety information they are recognizing: Myocarditis and pericarditis have occurred in some people who’ve received the vaccine, more commonly in males under 40 years of age than among females and older males.

So, this is saying that young men are getting heart inflammation. And what we know from all the anecdotal reports is 300 athletes have died or collapsed on the field, and children in schools have died of heart attacks. That’s what’s going on here.

And the reason they have to declare this is because they know it. They know it’s happening. And the only way they can be sued is if they know there’s a problem with their vaccine and they don’t declare it. So, they declare it here, in very mild language as if it’s not that big of a deal, but it’s a very big deal. Young people are dying [from the shots] who have a 99.9973% chance of recovering from COVID …

The holy grail is to get the shot on the CDC recommended schedule for children, because then it gets full liability protection according to the 1986 Act. This is why they’re going after our children when they have a 99.9973% recovery rate …

Every medical intervention is a risk benefit equation, and it doesn’t calculate for kids at all. They should never be getting COVID shots. The shots don’t prevent transmission. They don’t prevent cases. They don’t prevent hospitalization or death.”

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Notes

1 Reuters October 19, 2021

2 Biotech Law December 22, 2003

3 Maryannedemasi.com November 11, 2021

4 The BMJ Opinion

5 FDA BioNTech BLA Approval

6 USA Today December 22, 2021

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS:

How egregious that the big pharmaceutical companies are trying to use children as a liability shield to protect their criminal organization. Even worse, however, are the governments/politicians and health officials/institutions that are letting them. No amount of “contracts” should ever protect criminal activity, which is what we’re seeing right now in what is quite possibly the largest racketeering scandal in the history of humankind.

(And in my opinion, this isn’t even covering the ACTUAL REAL reason that they want to vaccinate children so much. This is only the watered-down, “scientific”, realistic version…)

Any documents/legal dealings (keyword here: LEGAL – although, what does that matter when corrupt enterprises are able to re-define terms according to their purpose?) and NDA’s should automatically become null and void if there is fraudulent activity happening.

However, when those “in charge” are allowed to investigate themselves, they, of course, end up finding no wrong-doing. And when there are multiple conflicts of interest, all for the purpose of financial bribery and protecting each other, there needs to be effective systems in place to address this obvious malfeasance.

It would seem, the “law” (and even us, everyday/ordinary people) literally needs to take matters into its own hands, and stop catering to enforcing illegal mandates and nonsensical “policies”. When will they go after the REAL criminals, instead of innocent civilians who are simply trying to defend not only their rights and freedoms, but everyone else’s as well? Including law enforcement?

We all need to pick our side in history. Let’s hope we’re picking the right one.

History is Repeating Itself: Fauci Was Accused of Genocide Almost 30 Years Ago

“The Greatest Lie Ever Told” …until now.

The very one and the same, Dr. Fauci, our coronavirus “expert”, has been accused of perpetuating a lie to the public surrounding infectious diseases not only currently (literally RIGHT NOW), but was also accused of practically the same thing almost 30 years ago.

The malpractice of using false PCR tests… raising alarm bells on a new “dangerous virus” – that was embellished for the sake of proposing a cure/not cure to the public, and resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths.

Sound familiar?

What began as a supposed epidemic of an AIDS outbreak back in the 1980’s to the 1990’s, Fauci has been called out by numerous sources for elaborating/manufacturing this lie.

One well-known figure who has spoken openly about Fauci’s fraudulent activities is Dr. Kary Mullis, who had no bones about picking a debate with the supposed expert.

I have cited this excerpt before, but it so relevant and significant, that I feel it necessary to add here again for reference:

PCR Inventory Kary Mullis on “Dr” Fauci:

He should not be in the position like he’s in.

Those guys have got an agenda. Which is not, what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to – and they smugly – like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”

“You can’t expect the sheep, to really respect the best and the brightest. They don’t know the difference, really. I mean, I like humans, don’t get me wrong, but, basically, there is a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn’t a really good scientist. I mean, that’s a problem, that’s a main problem, actually with science, I’d say in this century, because scientists being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don’t understand it.”

President of the University of South Carolina asked Fauci if he’d come down there and debate me on stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody who was, from the other side, to come down there and balance my – because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that’s going to tell me the other side. But Fauci didn’t want to do it…

In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.

The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.

But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done.

“I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.”

He pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.”

(Kary Mullis)
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus

As Celia Farber, the interviewer, mentions: “One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears.”

Robert Willner: Calls out Fauci by name for being a FRAUD

Another noted doctor, who wrote the book “Deadly Deception”, dealing with the so-called AIDS epidemic and the huge corruption/collusion to mislead the public, which you can read here:

Deadly Deception by Robert Willner

“THERE IS NO EPIDEMIC”

“YOU ARE THE VICTIM OF A MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR FRAUD”

“An incredible story of the arrogance, ignorance, corruption, and deception of establishment medicine, the pharmaceutical industry and agencies of the U.S. Government. A factual account, completely documented, of the most horrendous and deadly scientific fraud in history.”

had this to say about the Director of the NIH and current head of the coronavirus taskforce, and the insidious deceitful agendas committed at the time during the AIDS scandal:

The below quotes are several excerpts with the corresponding timestamps of Robert Willner’s perspective of Fauci and the pandemic fraud of the century at that time – (in which we now have “conveniently” Fauci again spearheading the current fraud of this century. NOT A COINCIDENCE.)

Robert Willner exposing the truth

@4:00: “But I am against lying to our young people. I am against causing death and destruction through that lie. I am against telling a lie to the young people so that they can continue in other behaviors which are truly causing AIDS.

Now you’ve got to ask yourself, the reason that I’m here today. And it’s been suggested that I’m here to sell a book. Called Deadly Deception. There’s only two ways that you can get the truth to people. By your own words out of your own mouth, and by putting them on paper. And that’s the reason for the book.

We’re talking about probably the most horrible scandal and scam ever perpetrated, not only in the name of science, but in humanity and in all history.

Hitler would ENVY the job being done by the NIH

@5:00: “Today is December 7th. And I was uh… 12 years old when the attack on Pearl Harbor came. And I remember WW2 very well. And it’s a very significant day today. Because I see an incredible parallel between what is going on in the so-called AIDS epidemic, and what happened in the years preceding and resulting in WW2.

The great lie of Hitler. It’s amazing. I think he would envy the job being done by members of the National Institutes of Health. And even the media. Especially in this country.

I charge the media with part of the responsibility; and a very significant one, in a current holocaust. That can end up being worse than the one that occurred during WW2.”

Media “proving” a deadly virus / but not scientists

@6:04: “When it was first announced that Dr. Robert Gallo had found the virus that probably caused AIDS, that announcement was made with Margaret Heckler in 1984 to the press and to the media, without one single scientific document appearing in any journal in the United States.

And as we know now, without any proof whatsoever, that the virus caused any disease.

The media picked up on it. For the sake of a story. And soon the virus that probably caused AIDS, was now the virus that caused AIDS. It was proven in the press. And nowhere else.

Now it’s interesting. A lot of questions are asked of me whenever I appear before the cameras, and do what some people have called “the stunt”, to sell books. – I’m from the planet Earth. I honestly believe that these people are from the planet Uranus. How anyone could suggest that I would stick myself with a virus that is supposedly deadly? For the purpose of selling a book; that’s complete insanity.”

Fauci guilty of genocide / killer drug

@7:24: “And I will put the lies of the individuals of the NIH, particularly Gallo and Fauci and [William] Haseltine and [Max] Essex, and the rest of these scoundrels, of the worst order. Criminals guilty of genocide, without a doubt. I invite them to take me to court! I wish Burroughs Wellcome would take me to court. Because they have been putting out a killer drug knowingly!

Dissenting expert opinions that go against the narrative

@8:03: “Now I’m not alone in what I’m doing here today. How does the press escape such obvious truths? Why would the finest virologist in the world, the most noted virologist, member of our National Academy of Sciences, Peter Duesberg, why would he put his entire career on the line? What did he have to gain? He’s already lost his laboratory. And his funding. They can’t take away his professorship because he’s tenured.

Why would a Charles A. Thomas, professor of Merit of Harvard say the same thing? Why would Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize in Virology last year, why would he stick his neck out? What did he have to gain? These are the questions reporters should be asking.

Deadly drugs causing acquired immunity deficiency

@9:32: “We have known what causes acquired immunity deficiency diseases for at least 70 years. It’s in the medical textbooks. It’s there for you to read.

Number one cause on the face of this Earth, is malnutrition and starvation. That’s Africa. Look to the headlines of the October 3rd issue of the London Times, Sunday Times last year [1993]. And inside headlines that screamed across 2 pages “The Plague That Never Was”.

@10:20: “There is no epidemic! It doesn’t exist!”

@10:54:Number two, is drugs. And don’t just think of street drugs. Because the number one cause of AIDS today is actually TWO medical drugs! AZT. A drug that was discovered in the 60’s as a chemotherapeutic drug for cancer. And was shelved because it was too toxic to treat cancer. A drug worse than cancer. Is being used to treat people who are immuno-suppressed.”

[Number three cause of AIDS], is radiation. Whether they worry about Chernobyl and Nagasaki and Hiroshima.”

Number four, is chemotherapy.

The most toxic chemo therapeutic drug of all times, AZT, is what they’re now using to treat AIDS.

Corruption of pharma drugs and sabotaged tests

@12:40: “But did anybody here bother to look at the insert, the paper that comes with the drug?

It’s a DNA terminator! It means it is a terminator! Just like the movie. It terminates life! You terminate DNA, you terminate life.”

“And they talk about side effects in the insert. When are you going to learn there is no such thing as a side effect in medicine? It’s an unwanted DIRECT effect! And you know what one of the unwanted direct effects of AZT is? Lymphoma! Cancer! One of the diseases of AIDS, as they call it.

Oh! Another so-called side effect? Which is really an unwanted direct effect? Pancytopenia. You need a definition? Pancytopenia.
Pan, “all”. Cyto, “cells”. Penia, “loss of”. Loss of all your cells. That’s AIDS. That is the definition of AIDS.

So AZT, by definition, by their own drug insert, causes AIDS. And NOBODY survives AZT. That will eventually lead to your death. And they’ve cut the dosage way down! Because it was killing them too fast. It’s like giving somebody a large dose of strychnine and they die within 5 minutes. And so the next person you give them a few drops of it and they last four or five days and you say, “Strychnine’s a wonderful drug. This person last 5 times longer.” This is the kind of thing they present to the world.”

NIH and CDC complicit in perpetrating mass fraud cover-up

@14:35:It is a scandal and a scam beyond belief. The virologists who are responsible for this, what do they have to gain? Now, I don’t know what Duesberg had to gain, or Charles A. Thomas, or Kary Mullis; he already got his Nobel Prize. Why does he come out and say? And he’s the one who found the test. The PCR reaction. And he said that there is no body of evidence that supports that the virus causes any disease whatsoever.

But what about the individuals who have perpetrated this lie? They are all multi-millionaires.

What do we have to say about the National Institutes of Health when a private laboratory, independent laboratory, found AZT to be 1,000 times more toxic than the laboratory of the NIH? We can understand a 5% error in the laboratory, even a 10% error – but a 10,000% error? Or a 100,000% error? That’s fraud.

And as I understand it, the word has gone out, and there is even documents and letters to prove it. That the CDC, the same organization that let blacks go untreated with syphilis, well-documented, just to see what would happen with the disease. The same organization who had to admit that they can’t give in on the AIDS thing, now, because nobody would ever be able to trust the government.”

“Science” and politicians – one in the same…

@16:17: “But “science” is acting no differently than politicians do. And now we have disease by politics.”

Premeditated patents and HIGHLY inaccurate tests

@16:25: “Isn’t it strange, that the same day or the day after, Robert Gallo filed for a test for HIV after it was announced? This sounds like premeditation. You mean he just happened to have this test available? And so the same day or the following day he files for a patent? He had a test. He was simply looking for some kind of a disease he wanted to apply it to.

And that test… 30,000 Russians who tested positive for HIV were then tested with another test that’s supposedly far more accurate to confirm the positivity. And 66 out of 30,000 proved to be positive. That means that the test HIV is 99.997% inaccurate. You want to take a test that’s 3 thousandths of a percent right? And you’re going to rely on that? But that’s what they’re doing to people out there. They’re taking a test that is not only invalid, it’s TOTALLY misleading!”

How Fauci believes an “epidemic” virus gets around

@18:09: “And of course, Fauci said, that you need, or when he was answering what I did, in Cleveland, a week ago, he said, “Well, he’s going to have to stick himself 300 times, to transmit the virus.” Where are you people in the press? 300 times?! To transmit a virus? You cannot have an epidemic under those circumstances!”

Fauci and Gallo engaging in name-calling instead of facing scientific queries

@20:21: “And if you hear an argument amongst politicians, and one calls the other names and doesn’t answer the specific charges, scientifically, who’s the liar?

Fauci and Gallo, instead of answering the scientific conflicts, and contradictions, that Dr. Duesberg so brilliantly pointed out, instead of answering them, they call him a homophobe. Can you imagine? I’ve been called a homophobe too.”

Viruses are apparently prejudice too…

@21:01: I wonder, I come here with a message of hope, to not only the gays, but to the blacks, and the hispanics, and the all the other outcasts of society, which strangely enough are the only groups that have been connected with the so-called AIDS. Because you see, if you belong to one of those groups, you got AIDS. But if you don’t belong to one of those groups, you get the respectable diagnosis of ‘you have tuberculosis’, ‘you have lymphoma’, ‘you have leukemia’, ‘you have kaposi sarcoma’, ‘pneumocystis pneumonia’, 30+ diseases!”

Suppressed from the media – just a propaganda machine

@22:33: “So every time I’ve stuck myself with a needle, I get calls from major television shows, by excited young people who want to tell the truth. Then I get a call three days later, telling me that it’s been nixed at a higher level.

That’s no surprise. After all, who am I fighting? Two drug industries. One, supposedly legitimate, and the other, illegitimate. And they do an awful lot of advertising. The supposedly legitimate ones. All those things out there that they sell for your colds and for everything else that’s a pharmaceutical industry, and they also put out prescription drugs, most of them. And they pull the purse strings. And so we have, a better propaganda machine in the United States, than Hitler had in his time.

Fauci and Gallo, along with their cohorts, getting paid to murder

@23:46: “The liars and killers, like Fauci, and Gallo, and Haseltine and Essex and Flossie Wong-Staal, and Margaret Fischl, these people are getting by with the lie and getting paid immense sums of money for it, and praise from the rest of the world. While they murder.”

The government/health agencies want to give us a vaccine – even if we’re immune to a virus

@32:03: “They [government/health agencies] just spent another 20 billion dollars in only 10 years time. And they’re asking for more. [after spending billions of dollars failing to find a cancer virus] And now they want to give us a vaccine! See? Oh, well they make money with that. They not only have a test for HIV, which by the way, is not for the virus, it’s for immunity. Like I say, “It’s the first disease in the history of medicine where you’re immune to it you’re going to die from it.”

But now, they want to give us a vaccine.”

Why would some scientists risk their reputation to speak against the narrative? – Maybe because they’re HONEST

@33:34: “And yet, you want to condemn me and say that I’m out for publicity? Well what is it that Peter Duesberg is out for? He held the reputation, and still amongst honest scientists as being the foremost virologist in the world. What is Kary Mullis out for? He just won the Nobel Prize. Why does he want to put at risk that incredibly marvelous reputation of being a Nobel Prize winner? Why would he put that at risk, unless maybe there’s still some honest scientists around. 

Now what about the rest of them out there?”

The lie is being perpetuated, by those who keep silent

@34:12: “You know, I often ask myself the question, if my children were still in school, and I had house payments to make, and I had to put them through school, etc., would I be doing what I’m doing today? I don’t think I’ve ever answered the question because I’m… I’m kind of afraid of what I might answer if I was going to answer honestly.

And he who is without sin shouldn’t be casting any stones. So I won’t cast the stones at the thousands and thousands and thousands of virologists out there who are going along with this scam. Because you see, they would be out of jobs if they dared criticize Margaret Heckler, or the heads of the NIH. They’d be out of jobs and they’d have families that they have to support. And futures that would be down the drain. You don’t cross the establishment. And so the lie is being perpetuated, by the silence.

And even Gallo, would say to the press in answer to the question, what does he have to say about Duesberg’s challenges? And he says, “Well, if we’re wrong, why do so many people believe us?” I mean, I can just see Hitler and his stormtroopers saying to the press, “If we’re wrong, why does everybody do what we tell them to do?”

The choice we all have to make

@36:46: “If enough of the honest ones would stand up and take that chance, if you all stand together, you make a statement. And you can do that in your press associations. Even though the people who own the newspapers and the television shows are afraid of losing their sponsors, you can at least keep your dignity. 

That’s the choice you have to make.”

We all make mistakes – but we can still be decent and compassionate to each other

@38:03: “There’s no dishonor in being gay and admitting that you’ve been on drugs. The decent human beings in this world will give you the support and help you. Like we help drug addicts of all followings, so to speak.

Those that will turn against you have turned against you anyway. Because of what you feel and what you are. And there are even some religious groups who have turned against the gays, and said it was God’s vengeance. How can you believe in a loving God and believe that that God would cause such a terrible disease amongst humans?

No, this is a man caused disease. But we all make mistakes in life. And that shouldn’t stop the compassion and the love and the understanding of decent human beings.”

The ‘greatest lie ever told’ by “health criminals”

@42:15: [while injecting himself with the blood of an AIDS positive gentleman] “I say to my friends, Fauci, and Gottlieb, and Galpin, and Gallo and all the rest of those criminals, that this is for the sake of humanity, and no other reason.”

“And this is in the hopes that it’ll save the lives of millions of individuals who will die because of the greatest lie ever told.”

“It’s real easy to create an epidemic.”

@47:51: “It’s real easy, it’s real simple, to create an epidemic. You simply take a bunch of diseases and put them under one heading, and then claim that one virus is responsible for it.”

The TRUTH will destroy the credibility of the NIH, CDC, FDA, etc.

@49:43: “It wasn’t suitable for a scoundrel, like Robert Gallo in the 1940’s – he wasn’t old enough, or maybe he was born just about that time, for somebody to come along and to pull off a scam of this magnitude.

And now they’re caught up in a maelstrom. Now if the truth gets out, yes, it will deal a blow to the credibility of the NIH, and the CDC, and the FDA, and the AMA, and my God it is sorely needed! That blow is necessary! To clean up the act.”

CDC: “You have AIDS even if you have not tested for HIV”

@01:04:04: “The CDC that let syphilitics untreated, when they had drugs that could have treated – just to observe, the same CDC has already admitted that between 40 and 60% of the cases listed in AIDS were not even tested for HIV. And not that it makes any difference because the test is meaningless.”

“A person can have HIV without developing AIDS, but it is not possible to have AIDS without first having HIV.”

HIV vs. AIDS: What is the difference?

Malfeasance/lies of the health industries. Men and women responsible belong in jail.

@01:06:41: “The lie is so compounded and so idiotic and so unbelievable that you literally have to fight your way out of the maze of these lies! They are all unadulterated lies! And the men responsible for them, and women, belong in jail.”

How does disease fester? And can we prevent it?

@01:12:34: “In the United States, in 1919, 18 million people died of the flu. My question is, why didn’t the other 92 million die? The answer to that, and every reporter owes it to their readers, is very simple. The bugs do not cause the disease, unless there’s a suitable terrain. And so the answer to all disease, is not to take a shotgun and blow a human being apart. But to simply prevent the disease to begin with, by living at peace and in harmony, not only with your fellow human beings but with every organism on this planet.”

Now for a quick comparative rundown between the AIDS epidemic around 30 years ago, and the covid situation we have now:

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana

Or, those who don’t learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.

We are LITERALLY, right now, in the middle of history repeating itself. And if we don’t become aware and alert to these heinous agendas, a repeat of the Holocaust may be looming on the horizon.

We can stop it by banding together, realizing that we are being lied to on a MASSIVE SCALE, and refuse to participate in this system. It takes courage and integrity, but as so many HONEST doctors and scientists, inventors, activists, virologists, even former ceo’s/founders of the vaccine companies (Michael Yeadon, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Reiner Fuellmich, Pierre Kory, Carrie Madej, Sherri Tenpenny, Dolores Cahill, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Sucharit Bhakdi, Andrew Wakefield, Simone Gold, Andrew Kaufman, Charles Hoffe, etc., etc., etc.) are in the forefront and risking their reputation to warn us that this coronavirus/vaccine agenda is not what it seems, and is a dangerous affront to humanity. They, just like Peter Duesberg, Charles A. Thomas, Robert Willner, Kary Mullis – all of these brave people came out into the public light to expose this corruption – which, unironically, also involved Anthony Fauci.

There ARE honest people getting the truth out. And their sincere efforts and dedication is appreciated beyond measure. But we NEED to listen. Or we will continue to be victims of this planned genocide that has been long in the making.