Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible

While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise – our own minds pose even more important concerns.

In my previous post, which described a supposedly 900 year old prophetic warning for what is to come, I mentioned that I was going to focus on a specific section from that list for this article.

I believe it’s incredibly crucial to address (as well as many of the verses that were in the alleged prophecies – even if it’s revealed to be a forgery, since many of the topics are indeed imperatively important – especially when it pertains to children), and since this particular topic has become the forefront of where our society is heading, wanted to bring awareness to it so that we can make the most prepared, informed decisions for what’s best for us and for our loved ones.

Now, while every fiber in my being wants to shake you by the shoulders and yell, “DON’T PARTAKE IN THIS!!!!”, I obviously cannot dictate what you choose to do with your life. But I will offer up some information and warnings of what this event may be leading into.

So without further adieu, the topic I will be covering today is:

24. When the Year Thousand that comes after Year Thousand begins
Men will know how to make mirages live
The senses will be deceived and they will believe they are touching that which is not
They will follow paths which are seen only by the eyes
And in this way dreams will be able to come alive.

But man will no longer know how to separate
That which is from that which is not
He will be lost inside false labyrinths
Those who will know how to make the mirages live
Will take advantage of the naive man by deceiving him
And a lot of men will become grovelling dogs.

Many of us have likely already heard of Mark Zuckerberg’s newest venture “Metaverse” – which is to, on one hand, replace Facebook – and perhaps attempt to re-establish his reputation after Facebook’s many legal complications – and on the other hand give the users an incredible new experience where people can play games, learn, socialize, etc. in an immersive virtual wonderworld built upon anyone’s limitless imagination, basically.

Of course, this is the “official” version. And yes, while it sounds fabulous and looks amazing, this is exactly the kind of trap that’s set to engage us in a perpetual state of false livelihoods and pointless dreams in which we abandon our natural life and sole(soul) purpose for the escape and frivolous existence of a technological world where nothing is real and nothing of true substance can be found.

Mind Games

The assault on our minds is an ever-growing pursuit by the “global elitists”. Now whether they can attain that through psychological manipulation/mass formation psychosis (the current trending topic), nanoparticles that seep through the skin and up to our neurological functions, direct gene-therapy injections through a “vaccine”, other forms of drugs/medication, implantable microchips, some form of MK-Ultra mind control, entertainment – TV, movies, music, games, etc. (“entertain” literally means to “to keep up, maintain, to keep (someone) in a certain frame of mind,“…) – the fact remains that this is an on-going effort that they have initiated through several means and constant pretenses, mostly using medical/biological/mental health developments as a reason.

While the verses mentioned above certainly do allude to the fact that it may have nothing to do with invading our mind – more that we will be tricked/deceived into believing images are real, a further section (#26) of the prophecies had this to say (after mentioning a very devastating warning of child sex abuse, slavery and trafficking):

But even the one being protected by his family
Will be in danger of having a dead mind
He will live inside games and mirages
Which will guide him because there will be no more educators
No-one will have taught him to hope and how to act.

It certainly does seem to reek of the Metaverse agenda. But add to that the statement that the child succumbs to this lifestyle/mentality because he will not be taught how to behave and respond, and that it will be the games/mirages that will inevitably guide him.

This is INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT. It must be said that not only are adults also finding themselves in the trap of being allured by these technological advances (I could have been one of them since I used to find the idea of Star Trek’s Holodeck an amazing prospect and once loved it if it could be true), but parents are also allowing their children to get deeply involved in these types of systems.

Besides the fact that it’s EXCEEDINGLY DANGEROUS for children to be engaged in such online interactions, and certainly in a virtual world where they will be fully immersed and surrounded by a multitude of other users whose motives may or may not be completely innocent – is the frightening prospect of what’s possible through this holographic dreamscape.

Some women have already stated that they were sexually harassed and stalked and generally felt uncomfortable in this virtual world – which was at the time filled with more men and kids – even though access is supposedly limited to those 18 years old and up.

Woman claims she was virtually ‘groped’ in Meta’s VR metaverse

Then there are the further advancements and accompaniments that are sure to follow along to bring the users even more “reality” to the virtual reality. There have already been developments that sell full/partial body gear (jackets, suits, gloves, etc.) to let the player/user feel practically every aspect of the digital world around them.

One can only wonder what kinds of problems this will arise through physical bullying, more sexual abuse/harassment (again… I cannot stress this enough, please keep your children away from this kind of tech…) or even the severity of the game’s mechanics in conjunction with the body suit – gunshots/punches/falling from a high place/etc. While I’m sure there will be safeguards in place to prevent actual bodily harm, one can never be sure that the A.I. and/or gear won’t malfunction and actually cause grievances to the body and even to the mind.

Of course, this would only apply to those who choose to get the body gear. Or will it? Our minds are incredibly powerful tools. I remember distinctly playing a Mario game when I was little, and while playing as the flying Mario, there were instances where I could actually sense my own body floating/flying. This was without being fully immersed in a virtual world and without any body gear on. Simply by staring at a TV set and playing as the character.

Now, some may claim that they know the difference between real life and augmented reality, virtual reality, holograms, etc., etc., and they will be responsible enough to limit their exposure. So would never be “trapped” in any kind of mirage/vision. Although I could imagine some people will not be responsible with this technology and will, quite literally, live their lives through this virtual world.

And certainly there will be many who won’t ever cross the line to harass/abuse others, and will keep their children away from this technology.

Some, like myself, aren’t even interested in it and will never participate in this endeavor.

But what if you had no choice?

In section 4. Holographic images to trick/deceive of the post WHAT TO LOOK OUT FOR: New Toxic Vaccine, Massive Deception, “Great Reset”, Destroying Humanity…, I provided a few videos for the readers to consider how technologically advanced we are (and again, keep in mind, this is just the technology that they allowed us to see at the time…).

I believe, that through the use of satellites, drones, nanoparticles filling the sky, and the 5G towers being installed everywhere, along with other advanced technology that are kept hidden from lay peoples’ eyes, this will indeed trick people into seeing “mirages”, images that aren’t really there, but that we will fully believe are there – and, more frighteningly, will seem so real to us, that we will be able to touch and feel these images.

This will be so extensive, that everyone throughout the world may be able to see these images. We will not be given a choice to don virtual reality headsets – the digital world will be brought to us, whether we like it or not.

Another possibility could be through the use of old-fashioned holographic images, re-fashioned into an incredible collaboration that involves current technologies to bring us a new way of looking and interacting with things – real or visualized.

The following, for example, is a demonstration of what’s possible using a combination of different technologies (ultrasound/ultrasonic waves and frequencies, mirrors/holograms, sensor arrays, etc.) to create haptic feedback that not only works on real objects, but works on “cloned” objects as well. This video was created over 6 years ago and is just using a prototype… so imagine what could be accomplished since then and using a much bigger device…

Source: youtube | ShinodaLab | Haptoclone (web archive version) (2015)

But what if there’s another way to induce mirages/images, that has nothing to do with holographic tech?

Hypnotic illusions… literally

While the topic of hypnosis is regarded with a high dose of ridicule and skepticism by many people, there are on-going studies conducted by even the most “prestigious” of institutions whose researchers are positive that hypnotism is a real phenomenon to take seriously.

Professor of Psychology Stephen M. Kosslyn – “who has specialized in mental imagery and the connection between vision and the brain at Harvard since 1977, teamed up with Stanford University’s David Spiegel, a major figure in hypnosis research, five years ago at a conference for mind-body interaction. Kosslyn had no previous association with the field, but with the help of a MacArthur Foundation grant, Spiegel and Kosslyn took on the challenge of proving hypnosis’ legitimacy.”

Harvard Professor Demonstrates Hypnosis Is Real (2002)

“Now that we know which brain regions are involved, we may be able to use this knowledge to alter someone’s capacity to be hypnotized or the effectiveness of hypnosis for problems like pain control,” said the study’s senior author, David Spiegel, MD, professor and associate chair of psychiatry and behavioral sciences.”

“Hypnosis is the oldest Western form of psychotherapy, but it’s been tarred with the brush of dangling watches and purple capes,” said Spiegel, who holds the Jack, Samuel and Lulu Willson Professorship in Medicine. “In fact, it’s a very powerful means of changing the way we use our minds to control perception and our bodies.”

“We’re certainly interested in the idea that you can change people’s ability to be hypnotized by stimulating specific areas of the brain,” said Spiegel.”

Study identifies brain areas altered during hypnotic trances (2016)

However, the one thing that is crucially missing is what our brain is capable of doing through suggestion only. Hence, the very real dangers of what hypnotism may achieve if we are not aware of it, and if we’re not building up our own thoughts and resistance to it.

While there have been many accounts of beneficial outcomes of hypnotism/hypnotherapy to help someone through addiction problems, repressed memories, addressing certain phobias, etc. – we must realize the other side of the coin that it can potentially be used to harm/deceive as well.

The following link, for example, highlights 10 Criminal Hypnotists – their crimes boiling down to thievery, and sexual assault.

And yes, while this is egregiously awful, what if the power of suggestion is so strong that hypnotists can compel us to see each other as enemies? What if we see our own family members as brutal bandits wielding guns/knives? What if they can convince us that we’re being invaded by a hostile alien horde – using a combination of haptic holographic images, the power of suggestion, mass formation psychosis, 5G frequencies/waves, and real aircraft/Directed Energy Weapons mixed in to cause actual damage and chaos?

Imagine how many people will succumb to this illusion/reality. With the combination of all of these techniques and technologies, it will seem very, very real.

And with the amount of people willingly being put under hypnosis, and even events that cater to this experience on a mass-scale, such as the very interesting (ominous…) Swedish Festival, scheduled for this year (2022):

“At gala screenings for three films at this year’s festival — Apichatpong Weerasethakul’s Memoria starring Tilda Swinton, Shirin Neshat’s Land of Dreams with Matt Dillion and Isabella Rossellini and Christian Tafdrup’s psychological thriller Speak No Evil — a hypnotist will perform a mass hypnosis on the audience, “transforming the audience’s state of mind in accordance with the mood and theme of the film,” organizers said Tuesday.”

“According to Goteborg artistic director Jonas Holmberg, the experiment is meant to “raise questions about submission, transgression and control,”

Sweden’s Goteborg Festival to Experiment With Mass Hypnosis

one has to wonder, how many of us could have been put under the spell of hypnosis without our consent or awareness of it?

The many victims of criminal hypnotists were not aware that they were being put under a subjugation of control merely by someone else’s manipulation and suggestions. Would we be able to say, for sure, that we were never under a hypnotic trance?

Could different beats – binaural beats – for instance, reach to us in our subconcious mind and implant certain suggestions/images/memories/emotions without us realizing it?

Could a movie, commercial ads, etc. subliminally trigger something within us at a designated time, by a certain sound, a specific word, a specific image…

If we were in the audience of a “stage hypnotist” – just for the “entertainment” of it, – or, as the Swedish Festival admits – the experiment of it, could we be sure that we were not accidentally on-purpose put under to serve a specific motive at a later date?

Although many of the events and considerations proposed in this post my sound too incredulous to take seriously, there are enough testimonies, accounts, evidence, scientific research and literature, etc. that lends credibility to these theories.

We have to realize, if our own minds can play tricks on us, what could a group of highly intelligent and extremely funded organizations do to take advantage of this neural scientific frontier?

And to leave one last context, which is what technically led me to researching this topic, along with Serge Monast exposing the Blue Beam Project, I offer another portion of the young prophet Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov’s words that suddenly don’t seem too far off the mark… and shows incredibly eerie parallels to Serge Monast’s testimony (if they’re not implicitly coincided… Vyacheslav died in 1993, Serge Monast exposed the Blue Beam Project in 1994)

@2:19:25: “What did Slavochka say about the antichrist? He said, “Mommy when he comes, he will proclaim himself to be “god”.” Ultimately, he will proclaim himself “god”. People will be under extremely powerful hypnosis. Everyone will recognize his own messiah in him.

When Christians look at him, they will see Jesus Christ, Buddhists will see Buddha, Muslims will see Mohammed. Buddhists, – even though Slavochka said that this religion is from satan, – will think that something isn’t right here because Buddha did not intend to return. Buddha is not supposed to come, therefore, Buddhists will doubt. They will feel that there is something wrong.

Slavochka said, “Mommy, he is surrounded by so many demons and they don’t even hide, but people will look at them and see angels instead.” And satan himself, Slavochka said, smells so badly, he stinks, but people will not smell his stench. Everyone will see his own “god” in him.

He will seem handsome to people. Slavochka said, “Mommy, he has such a white face as if it was powdered with flour and his eyes are so red. He is leering at me. He is so frightful.”

Slavochka said that he will have extremely powerful hypnosis. People will be coming from everywhere and gathering around him. All of a sudden, they will be so eager to look at him.

He said to me, “Mommy, even you will want to see him. It will take so much effort for you not to go there. You will struggle with your desire to go there and admire this “beauty”. But you will resist this temptation. And those who will go to see him will perish.”

@2:29:14: “Slavochka said that the antichrist will show a real fire coming down from the sky. He will be moving around at a tremendous speed, therefore, he will be here and there. People will be saying, “Look, here is the Christ. Look, there the Christ is!” Moving at incredible speed, he will be everywhere almost at once.

He will indeed say to a mountain, “Stand up and move!” The hypnosis will be so powerful that people will come forward, touch the mountain, pat it and try to push it. They will feel that this is a stone mountain and it will seem real to them. But the mountain will not be there. It will be a deception.”

Russian Angel Youth Vyacheslav Film 2 Part 3 (English Subtitles) – 360p

“Men will know how to make mirages live
The senses will be deceived and they will believe they are touching that which is not”

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by ChiemSeherin from Pixabay

Roger Waters (of Pink Floyd) Calls Mark Zuckerberg / Instagram: “Insidious Movement”

Hero standing up against the establishment.

From a widely shared Twitter post made on June 11th 2021 by La Jornada, we can see Roger Waters at a “Free Julian Assange” event, THE PEOPLES FORUM, raising donations to bring awareness to his unfair imprisonment. In the background of the video, we can see the saying, “Journalism is not a crime – war crimes are.”

[NOTE: I did attempt to visit the site that is posted on the banner “standwithassangenewyork.org” but nothing shows up. There is, however, a twitter page similar to this name: StandWithAssangeNY | @AssanageNY]

Fittingly, Roger Waters took this opportunity to showcase his disdain for the monopolistic efforts of big tech to gain even more control over the population than they already have.

In the video below, Roger Waters reveals a request from Mark Zuckerberg / Instagram asking permission to use Pink Floyd’s song “Another Brick in the Wall 2” for their Instagram movie. Waters’ response to Zuckerberg is astounding, since he is one of a small few speaking out against social media censorship.

Roger Waters calling out Zuckerberg and Facebook/Instagram as a corrupt industry and refusing to be a part of their system:

“This is something that I actually put in my folder when I came out here today. You have no idea what it is. Nobody does. Because it arrived on the internet to me this morning. It’s a request for the rights to use my song “Another Brick in the Wall 2” in the making of a film to promote instagram. So it’s a missive… it’s a missive from Mark Zuckerberg to me, right? It arrived this morning. With an offer of a huge, huge amount of money. And the answer is: “F*ck you! No f*cking way!”

And I, I only mention that because this is an insidious, it’s the insidious movement of them to take over absolutely everything. You know? So those of us who do have any power, and I do have a little bit, in terms of the control of the publishing of my songs, I do anyway – So I will not be a party to this bullsh*t, Zuckerberg.

Roger Waters reading from the missive: “We want to thank you for considering this project. We feel that the core sentiment of this song is still so prevalent and necessary today, which speaks to how timeless a work [it is]” – it’s true.

And yet, they want to, they want to subjourn it; they want to use it, to make facebook and instagram even bigger and more powerful than it already is, so that it can continue to censor all of us in this room! And prevent this story about Julian Assange getting out to the general public, so the general public can go, “What?! What?” No! No more. Nada mas.”

“Zuckerberg features in my new rock and roll show. I’ve got him sitting – no, I shouldn’t tell you. But, but he does. But you think, how does this little prick, who started off saying, She’s pretty. We’ll give her a four out of five. She’s ugly, we’ll give her a one.”

How the f*ck did he get any power in anything? And yet, here he is, one of the most powerful idiots in the world.”

This is amazing. This is what the world needs more of, instead of people who are easily bought off and paid for, and who constantly bow their heads and do whatever the establishment tells them to do.

Roger Waters is a shining example of someone who stands up and defends the people, instead of falling in line and following the narrative. Even after being offered a substantial amount of money, Waters tells them, “not a chance”.

This is dignity, people. This is integrity. He is speaking out not only for himself, but for the rest of us; standing up against this tyrannical control and censorship. How many people have been deleted, banned, censored, simply for not following the main narrative? And how ironic, when the lyrics Zuckerberg and the big tech giants wants to use is, in part: “We don’t need no thought control.”

The nerve, right? A huge, totalitarian dictatorship, monitoring certain narratives across the platform, labeling numerous posts as “misinformation” and “this post is disputed”, and “due to what we deem as hate speech (which is anything that we don’t like), your account has been banned” has the audacity to want to use a song that was created to fight back against “thought control”.

It pretty much sums up what facebook, instagram, twitter and other huge tech platforms are all about. Their purpose to organize a large, oppressive “group think” to control the thoughts of others and anyone who dissents from their agenda gets ostracized, shunned, banned, etc.

Thankfully, there are still people who resist this corruption, even at the cost of further monetary gain and fame. Thank you so much to Roger Waters, for being the voice of reason and shutting down this huge oligarch’s attempts at abusing this song and exploiting its meaning. This is the action of a role model. Not the corrupted individuals who are trying to indoctrinate and condition the minds of the population.

One Final Note:

On the matter of Mr. Julian Assange, it’s also fascinating how instead of hailing whistleblowers exposing crimes as heroes, they are instead investigated and accused of crimes themselves, for obtaining materials “illegally” or for breaking NDAs.

Of course, where is the outrage for the ACTUAL CRIMINALS being exposed for their crimes? Why do the efforts of the media aim to smear the whistleblower instead of reporting on the atrocities being committed? And why should NDAs protect criminals or criminal activity? If a crime is being committed, that should make the NDA null and void. It would seem as if the NDA is there solely to protect any kind of criminal activity that may be perpetrated. A crime is still a crime, NDA or not. Any NDA issued that results in protecting illegal activity should be overthrown and cancelled.

It’s fascinating when telling the truth and exposing crimes is considered an even bigger crime than the crime itself. Perhaps it all boils down to who was initially committing the crime to begin with…

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

VIDEO: NANO-MAN (deep nasal swab tech, radiation, injection tech, Borg assimilation) - A collection of topics that covers the transhumanism agenda and how the COVID vaccines/tests may be one of the catalysts.
The Great Deception… Great Reset? Global Currency Reset? New Age Awakening? | All One in the Same? - Many are looking forward to the NESARA/GESARA reformation act. But is it really for the benefit of humanity? Or a tempting deception?
The 5G Roll Out: EMF Radiation, Devastating Health Impacts, Social and Economic Implications. Crimes Against Humanity? - What are the real effects of 5G radiation? & "Why is 5G Important for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?"
Is This Post Legitimately Detailing a Global Government Plan Using COVID as the Catalyst? | If So, It May be Related to a Previous Genocide Experiment - "THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government."
The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability” - "The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection."
Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
Sofia Smallstorm Warned of DNA Genetic Altering and the Transhumanist Agenda Back in 2011 - "- self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself."

Two Whistleblowers from Facebook Expose Worldwide Effort to Censor Vaccine Concerns

Project Veritas releases new leaked information.

Ever wonder why certain posts you share on facebook, instagram, youtube, etc. never get much attention? Or perhaps get deleted altogether?

With the rollout of these covid “vaccines”, the tech industries have been hard at work aiming to discredit and/or ban ANYONE who has announced a certain form of “hesitancy” or flat out refusal to be a part of the vaccine bandwagon.

And even if certain individuals DID take the vaccine, and only wanted to share their testimony on the side effects, or perhaps a statement of what happened to their friend or family member, Facebook has initiated a global ranking and employee driven effort to tag specific posts that cross a certain threshold of “vaccine hesitancy”.

Even if the data that is being shared is TRUE, and come from verifiable health/medical papers and documents, if the data veers more towards an unflattering light of the vaccines, it is being targeted and consequently censored from these huge tech platforms. Which obviously deters the truth about the covid vaccines from getting out.

Yesterday, May 24, 2021, Project Veritas uploaded a video and a post highlighting two Facebook employees that have come out against this egregious abuse of private companies’ being able to dictate what information is allowed to be seen and what should be hidden in order to support certain agendas. The aim to target the “vaccine hesitant” is just one of them.

Here is James O’Keefe discussing the leak with Fox’s Sean Hannity:

Sean Hannity: “Now let’s turn to a brand new investigative report from Project Veritas just uncovering an algorithm that reportedly could be used to target facebook’s political enemies. Now, Fox news, we’re just seeing this for the first time, but as always, we let you decide. Listen, to this.”

Whistleblower #1: “Facebook uses classifiers in their algorithms to determine certain content, to be what they call “vaccine hesitant”, or they call it “vaccine hesitancy”. And without the user’s knowledge, they assign a score to these comments that’s called the VH score, the “vaccine hesitancy” score. And then based on that score will demote or leave the comment alone depending on the content within the comment. And that narrative being, get the vaccine… the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out… as an enemy of society.

They want to build a community where everybody complies, not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life. The policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it.”

Sean Hannity: “Here now, is the founder and CEO, Project Veritas, James O’Keefe. Okay, there’s a lot of significance to this, and, facebook has responded. I’ll let you tell the story.”

James O’Keefe: “Thanks, Sean. We’ve had two whistleblowers within facebook, come to us and leak us these documents regarding “vaccine hesitancy”.

What does that mean? Essentially facebook has beta tested this, these algorithms, 1.5 percent of their almost 3 billion users are getting a tiered ranking system, something called “vaccine hesitancy” – tier 1 and tier 2. Tier 1 is alarmist and critical remarks about covid and the vaccine, and tier 2 is something called “indirect vaccine discouragement”.

Now what’s remarkable about these private documents that facebook has not wanted you to see, until tonight, is that tier 2 says that even if the facts are true, that you will be targeted and demoted. Your comments will be targeted and demoted, Sean. “Vaccine hesitancy” score tiering system at facebook – these whistleblowers have given Project Veritas these documents and spoken to us in the shadows. It’s a 20 minute long video online, the documents are on our website.

And Sean, after we publish this report, we reached out to facebook, they’ve actually given us a comment – I’m going to read it to you, it says, quote, facebook has responded to Project Veritas for the first time, quote, “We proactively announce this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.” So as, in response to us publishing this, they’re claiming to now make this public but we just checked, and they haven’t yet made most of these documents public, Sean.”

Sean: “Okay, do I, knowing your ammo, is there more to come in the days to come?”

James: “Yes, there’s more to come. What’s remarkable about it, is that this has been private, they don’t want you to know that they’re doing this, and this is the town square, as you all know. We’re trying to retake our town square. Governor deSantis just signed a bill in Florida; I’m in Florida today, I was with him when he did that.

But they’re (facebook) tiering users without them knowing that they’re doing it. They’re demoting your comments, deboosting you on facebook without you knowing that they’re doing that.

And they’re obviously terrified of this report because they’re actually responding to Project Veritas – before they would attack us, or ignore us. And they have this system, you can see the documents online. They clearly have a ranking system, a tiered system, Sean. The author of this report we’ve named him, Amit Bahl, is an employee at facebook, we have the document showing that he authored the report and the chain of command from him to Mark Zuckerberg.

So there’s more to come, another one tomorrow. Two whistleblowers, on the record with Project Veritas, current facebook insiders, leaking us these documents. We consider them brave heroes and we hope that there’s a legion of more insiders that follow their lead, coming public to projectveritastips@protonmail.com with this information.”

Sean: “James O’Keefe, thank you for sharing with us, we appreciate it, we’re going to follow closely.”

Here is the Project Veritas video that was uploaded yesterday featuring one of the whistleblowers who came forward to reveal facebook’s tiering system plan:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

“I have to do something.”

“When it comes time to standing up for a world, I want my children to live in, I don’t want to leave them a world to where they don’t have these liberties.”

“People aren’t allowed to have voice and yet, facebook touts itself with promoting people’s opportunity to have voice.”

“They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it.”

“If I lose my job, it’s like, what do I do? But that’s less of a concern to me.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “We have just obtained multiple leaked documents from inside facebook, this time detailing a plan to curb, quote, “vaccine hesitancy” on a global scale. It was so concerning it brought us not one, but two whistleblowers from inside facebook who are ready to speak out on what this means for free speech and public discourse on their own platform.”

Interview with first whistleblower starts @1:00:

Whistleblower #1 (Data Center Technician):

Whistleblower #1: “Facebook uses classifiers in their algorithms to determine certain content, to be what they call “vaccine hesitant”, or they call it “vaccine hesitancy”. And without the user’s knowledge, they assign a score to these comments that’s called the VH score, the “vaccine hesitancy” score. And then based on that score will demote or leave the comment alone depending on the content within the comment.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Our first facebook insider is a data center technician who leaked us multiple internal documents detailing an algorithm test being run on 1.5 percent of facebook and instagram’s nearly 3.8 billion users worldwide.

The goal? To quote, “Drastically reduce user exposure to vaccine hesitancy (VH) in comments”.

Whistleblower #1: “And it’s the same thing. You’ll see a lot of this difference in their public policy verses the private policy where the public policy is very vague. It’s very ambiguous. It’s designed to be questioned because it’s designed to be able to easily defend. But then if look at the private policy, it’s much, much more clear, much more specific. I think that they’re trying to make it seem like they’re not doing as much or that they’re just kind of like generalizing it, like, “Oh, well we just have some robot that just tags your post. And then, you know, we look at it.” but I think they don’t want people to know, “Oh no, we actually have something that we made specifically for vaccine hesitancy.”

So there’s a main document along with all the, all the attachments and stuff that goes with it. So basically when they write this algorithm that goes through facebook content, and it looks for certain keywords that are related to vaccination, or, you know, not getting a vaccine and stuff like that. And it gives it a score. And the VH score means vaccine hesitancy, which is defined as being hesitant to get a vaccine, but not just like, “Well, I don’t know.” It’s even, “Well, I saw a study that said that someone died that got the vaccine.” That’s vaccine hesitancy.”

James O’Keefe: “So this is a beta test. This is all a beta test.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right, right.”

James: “And how big is this beta test?”

Whistleblower #1: “They refer to the test size as 1.5%. I’m not exactly sure which pool that pulls from, but I think it’s comments on authoritative health pages.”

James: “You seem to think that they’ve already ruled this out. Why do we believe they’ve already ruled this out?”

Whistleblower #1: “In one slideshow that they have, they call it their weekly progress tracker. They actually lay all this out in a chart and you can see it, you can look at the slides, they go by date. So we’ve got here – Covid-19 Vaccine Safety and Efficacy “Global”, “Currently Global” 13 languages, facebook plus instagram. All C-19 Vaccine [Global], “Currently Global” 66 languages. And the very first thing that brought me to the conclusion that they’re wanting to do this globally is they were developing it in like, you know, as many languages as they can get their hands on.”

James: “So this is like a product launch, almost?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. Yeah, in their last quarterly report, they reported 2.79 billion people on Earth use some kind of facebook app.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Who’s behind this new algorithm policy? Well, one thing is for sure, the authors of this experiment Joo Ho Yeo, Nick Gibian, Hendrick Townley, Amit Bahl, and Matt Gilles are not low-level employees. In fact, one of the internal documents Project Veritas obtained was a facebook flow chart that showed they’re only a few clicks away from Mark Zuckerberg, himself.”

James: “Who makes these decisions?”

Whistleblower #1: “These are teams at facebook and they call themselves, they work with what they call B2V “Barriers to Vaccination”. So that’s one of their core terms – is Barriers to Vaccination. And then the people on these teams, they call them Health Integrity Teams. So there’s a Health Integrity Team for messenger, there’s a Health Integrity Team for every system that facebook has.”

James: “An integrity team?”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “Is it came about after March 2020 – covid?”

Whistleblower #1: “No.”

James: “This is something that’s existed?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. Yes.”

James: “So, the Health Integrity Teams, and Barrier to Vaccination Teams at facebook.”

Whistleblower #1: “So this here, Amit Bahl, he is a Research Scientist for the Core Data Science Team at facebook. He also works in Health Integrity. Everyone who works on this project works in Health Integrity. Hendrick Townley, this is the experiment launch post, as you can see, this is on April 16th. This is 2021. That why there’s no year there. Cause it’s this year. And Hendrick Townley is one of the Software Engineers that worked on this. There were – I think it was him and two other software engineers. And then Amit Bahl wrote the actual classifier itself. I don’t – I’m sure he had like a team of developers, but he is considered the one who wrote it. Amit Bahl, and then as you go up, it’s like his boss, boss’s boss. Boss’s boss’s boss.”

James: “So Amit Bahl works for Udi Weinsberg, who works for Nicolas Stier – do I have that correct?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “And that person works for Danny Ferrante, and that person works for Javier Olivan, and Javier Olivan reports directly to Mark Zuckerberg.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “So this is a chain that goes all the way down to Amit Bahl.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “This kind of censorship sounds similar to shadowbanning – when users are unaware their posts can’t be seen. A term one of our own investigations coined when exposing twitter, just a few years ago. But this time, we’re exposing facebook and instagram’s methods to quash an entire side of a conversation. Arguably, one of the most pressing issues of the day.”

James: “According to these documents, facebook tiers users, 0 to 5, and a score of 0 to 1. Can you talk a little bit about this tier system?”

Whistleblower #1: “Oh yeah. So basically this is what they’re using to structure how, how they’re going to judge this content on, on a scale to how vaccine hesitant it actually is, or if it’s explicitly discouraging. In my opinion, the main reason why they built this as was for the human, what they call “raters” so that they can use this as a reference when they, so if the algorithm can’t make a decision on a certain post, it’ll send it to a human rater and then the human rater looks at it and they will make a decision on whether or not it’s vaccine hesitant or not.”

James: “So we have tier 2 – Indirect Discouragement. What happens when you are a tier 2?”

Whistleblower #1: “So basically your comment is going to be suppressed. As to the scale of that suppression, it’s hard to say, we would have to look at it like a case by case basis. But what they’re saying is it’s going to get, they call it a position change – on some of these comments, you can see, it’ll say position change: seven. And I’m not sure whether the seven refers to like a 7% or if it’s just like seven positions down in the comment chains.”

James: “So it’s suppressed?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “But we don’t know the extent of this suppression?”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “And we’ve heard “shadowban”, we’ve heard “deboost”, I have not heard “position change”.

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Facebook has not been shy about combating “vaccine hesitancy” as reported in their own press release stated May 11 of this year. However, what they say publicly in their own policy doesn’t scratch the surface of what is written in these internal leaked documents. By the facebook whistleblower.”

James: “If I read this correctly, facebook is saying it doesn’t matter if the story is true, so long as it doesn’t cause people to hesitate getting the vaccine? What’s your read on this?”

Whistleblower #1: ” ‘The Borderline Vaccine Framework – Shocking Stories: Potentially, or actually true events or facts that can raise safety concerns.’ “

James: “That post was done by a user. And they’ve taken a screenshot and observed it for the tier system.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right. Yeah.”

James: “What about this gives them alarm?”

Whistleblower #1: ” ‘How is this not scary?’ That would be considered indirect discouragement.”

James: “Indirect discouragement. Which would be considered tier 2.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “So this is an example of indirect discouragement of the vaccine.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah. Questioning the vaccine, questioning anything involving the vaccine.”

James: “And this was then demoted.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah.”

James: “So this is another example of tier 2 indirect discouragement – why don’t you tell us why this would be indirect discouragement, according to facebook.”

Whistleblower #1: “So this would be considered “vaccine hesitant” because they don’t want people to see someone had a bad effect. They’re not saying, “Don’t get the vaccine,” but they’re saying, “Look at all this negative stuff that happened after I got the vaccine.”

James: “Okay, they’re reporting facts, but truth doesn’t matter.”

Whistleblower #1: “No, because it doesn’t match the narrative. So, and the narrative being: Get the vaccine, the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out… as an enemy of society.

So the VAERS is a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It looks like they’re measuring the comments where they’re mentioning, you know, that the patient died.”

James: “So is VAERS a CDC supported program?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes, I think so. Really they support all of this because you know, they released the standards, the CDC themselves. And that’s really one of, one of the primary things that facebook is basing their policy off of is, well, if you looked at their public policy, it would be according to the authoritative health pages.”

James: “So they are open about the fact that they essentially coordinate with the CDC, here.”

Whistleblower #1: “Of course.”

James: “From the internal document, ‘Content pointing to the Vaccine Adverse Effects [Events] Reporting System data that suggest extreme risks without providing full context’ – full context… What do they mean by that?”

Whistleblower #1: “I think so, like in the previous comments, like she said, “Oh, during this study 653 people died” and then they don’t put the rest of the study in there. It’s like, okay, so you want me to write like a 10-page comment? What’s full context? Another ambiguous term. If they saw a study from someone they didn’t like, would they say, “Well, that’s not the full context because ABCDEFG.”

James: “Ultimately it seems like any facts that escape a particular narrative are omitted, demoted, deboosted, banned…”

Whistleblower #1: “Absolutely. Yes.”

James: “Considered dangerous to society.”

Whistleblower #1: “Suppressed in any way possible.”

James: “Where do you think this is headed? Does it get worse from here?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “How so?”

Whistleblower #1: “I think people accept it and they see people like twitter, facebook, google, and stuff like that, they see that this is accepted by the public and then they go, that’s like a green light to be like, “Oh, well we can go ahead and do this more.” So not only are we going to start doing vaccines stuff, we’re going to spread it to everything. So we’re going to start saying, “Oh if you make a post that could put somebody in danger or it could compromise someone’s safety,” whatever that means, “then we’re going to go ahead and look at that and assign that a score of some unknown classifier.” Who knows what it could be. They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it. And when you’re scrolling on your phone, I think they’re afraid of what people would conclude.”

James: “Tell me they don’t think about the underlying value.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah. Or what could, what it could turn into: the slippery slope.”

James: “They’re not even thinking about that.”

Whistleblower #1: “Nope.”

James: “And do you think there’s a lot of people inside facebook that agree with you or some percentage? What would you estimate that number of people to be?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. I would say at least 25%.”

James: “So you’re telling me, that 25% of the people there, agree that what they’re doing with this vaccine hesitancy coding and algorithms, is morally wrong?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. That would not surprise me at all. The policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it. What would happen if this was scaled larger and scaled to twitter and the internet as a whole is way worse than anything that could happen from me getting fired from my job. To me, that, it far outweighs that. Because it’s about more than me. It’s about really everyone in the world.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “It’s clear this facebook insider is not alone in his concerns of facebook’s new policy that would promote discourse on vaccines in general. As a matter of fact, the next insider you’re about to meet, felt so compelled to come forward, he goes so far as to compare the new policy to an abusive relationship.”

Interviewer with second whistleblower starts @11:58:

Whistleblower #2 (Data Center Engineer):

James: “What do you do at facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “I’m a data center engineer.

I’d say that in a sense it’s prohibiting people from being able to have an open dialogue about issues that affect their personal security. Some of these things, the questions, the comments that are being presented, you know, are from people that have concerns about their personal health or their personal security being affected. It’s kind of like having a relationship with somebody that’s controlling and abusive in a sense like an abusive partner, not allowing their spouse to speak out about the things that are going on in their marriage or their relationship and limiting their voice. It’s very damaging from that sense. You know, if you think about this logically, it just, you know, it’s very incriminating in my opinion.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Just months ago, the same insider leaked us a tape of Mark Zuckerberg privately speaking to his team last July, showcasing his own vaccine hesitancy when talking about covid.”

Inside clip of Mark Zuckerberg on July 16, 2020: “I just want to make sure that I share some caution on this because we just don’t know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people’s DNA and RNA.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Today, his own words would violate their new public policy.”

James: “You were the source who brought us the Mark Zuckerberg vaccine footage from July 2020, is that correct?”

Whistleblower #2: “That’s correct.”

James: “Zuckerberg seemed to change his mind – evolve on the issue of vaccine, and the facebook policy itself would have prevented Zuckerberg from saying what it is he had said just a few months ago. Pretty crazy!

What prompted you to give that footage to Project Veritas?”

Whistleblower #2: “Well, based on my own knowledge and research of, you know, the adverse effects and the potential side effects of vaccines of any medication really. So I think it’s important for people to be understanding of the – of those facts. We’re able to have these conversations at work with our, with our coworkers about our medical decisions. And we do. We have them, you know, frequently.

Why is it okay for us to have these conversations at work as adults and not have somebody step in and say, “Hey, you need to stop talking about that and you shouldn’t talk about that. You’re not allowed to talk about – that’s ‘fact-checked’. That’s false.”

Occasionally people do, in the conversation, but, but we’re allowed to have open dialogue. And, and here – “

James: “You’re saying that you can have these conversations at the water cooler and office – “

Whistleblower #2: “Absolutely. Even in the midst of the office.”

James: “In the midst of the office?”

Whistleblower #2: “Yes.”

James: “At facebook, the location, facebook, but you’re not allowed to go onto facebook and write this stuff.”

Whistleblower #2: “No.”

James: “That’s ironic.”

Whistleblower #2: “It is very ironic.”

James: “What is your message to Mr. CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who is certainly watching this video?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would ask, you said that you support freedom of expression. My question to you is, why, in a sense, you don’t support freedom of expression in the most basic sense, that’s available to all people everywhere: which is to exist as God created them – without any interference or intrusion by any corporation or government to exist as they are? And why push a narrative that it’s not okay for people to go ahead and exist to express themselves as God’s creation, without taking a vaccine? Why is there this push to suppress that ideology?”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “This insider’s biggest concern is facebook building a quote, “community of compliance”, unquote. And feels the topic may go beyond the authority of Zuckerberg himself.”

Whistleblower #2: “It’s the platform that they want to build. It’s the community that they want to build. They want to build a community where everybody complies, not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life, which regarding their own body, their own health.”

James: “And based upon your position, and what you’ve seen, and your role at facebook, why do they want people to comply? Why is that the culture at facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “For the promotion of a society that is focused on medical progress in a sense or medical, you know, medical experimentation.”

James: “What is facebook doing to promote covid vaccines to its billions of users?”

Whistleblower #2: “Specifically encouraging people to post, you know, to take on the profile frame for showing that they’ve been vaccinated and to promote in a sense, solidarity amongst other people that have taken the vaccine and encourage users to also go and get the vaccine. It’s interesting that they would, you know, encourage one side, but not allow the other side to speak of, you know, why they wouldn’t be making the decision to get a vaccine. There’s no solidarity, there’s no opportunity to be united around that. It’s just basically: Get the vaccine or feel left out.

You know, people aren’t allowed to have voice and yet, you know, facebook touts itself with promoting people’s opportunity to have voice. And, you know, as stated before, you know, have a voice about the most important decisions anyone has to face in their life is pretty important and it’s shocking and disturbing really to see people that are willing to go to the lengths of limiting those discussions around the world, you know, for things that, that concern people’s own personal security.

I almost feel like there’s, there’s outside sources pressuring Mark, or could be, I’m not saying that’s a fact, but you know, it does make me concerned. And, and you look at the video with Fauci and, you know, Mark discussing it, Mark doesn’t seem too pleased with you know, the fact that he had to bring it up. It’s almost like he was, you know, he had to mention it.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “These two brave insiders know, that they risk it all standing against facebook – one of the most powerful institutions of the day. Yet, they are still putting it all on the line in order to preserve our liberties.”

Whistleblower #2: “I think that’s also the main reason why people don’t want to come out with it, because what if I, you know, I have, I had two kids, I have my wife and if I lose my job, it’s like, what do I do? But that’s less of a concern to me.”

James: “And the people who may do what you did, next, but they’re not sure if they should do it, what’s your message to those people?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would say, go ahead and do it. And I – and then just think about what I said. There’s a lot of blowback to telling the truth. And that’s true, as far as human history is concerned. And yeah, you are going to receive blowback, but just weigh, weigh it out.

Can you live with yourself for the rest of your life if you work at facebook and you knew about this? Especially if it came out later and you’re like, “Man, I saw that so many times. I could have said something and I didn’t.” How are you going to feel about that? That’s my thing. My morality. I have to show somebody this because at least, even if nothing were to come of this, and for some reason everything was scrapped, I would still think that it, that it was worth it. Cause I’m like, well, at least I tried, I tried to show somebody this.”

James: “It’s almost like you’re saying that your desire to follow your conscience outweighs any potential risk there might be to you. Doing this.”

Whistleblower #2: “Yes. Yes.”

James: “What is your message to those people? That are watching this who agree with you inside facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would say that you’re not alone. The biggest thing with social media, that we’ve seen throughout the years is that ranking people’s comments, their posts, even, even like news media, there’s this view that tries to make you think that you’re alone in this and that you’re not the majority. And even people that say that they agree with internally, they deal with struggles. Internally, they question things. It’s just that they’re not able to overcome that, that cognitive dissonance that sits in and they resort to what is safe. It’s easier to comply with things than it is to come forward and say, “This is wrong.” Or to really awaken to understanding that the way you’re being treated or the way other people are being treated is wrong.

And so that’s challenging, but know that you’re not alone. And that if you do come forward and you do speak up that you can live peacefully, knowing that you did the right thing, no matter what. And that’s encouraging, not just to other people, but it’s also encouraging to yourself. It’s an – and it won’t make you feel as alone anymore.”

James: “That’s very profound, I think.”

Whistleblower #2: “I’m a father. So, you know, obviously like I fear for my family, for my children’s safety. And, but I also understand that I have to, as I told, you know, my wife, I have to do something. You know, when it comes time to standing up for a world I want my children to live in, I don’t want to leave them a world to where they don’t have these liberties, these personal securities to where they can willingly make their own medical decisions between them, their doctor, and, those that are closest to them. That’s not something I can live in. That’s not something I could do. And it came down to the point where I had to make a decision to do what was right.”

After Project Veritas received the leaked documents, a team member from PV reached out to facebook for a response. Mario Balaban contacted a spokesperson to address a couple of questions about the “vaccine hesitancy” policy.

Rather than answering the questions, a facebook spokesperson responded with this line, “We proactively announced this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.”

As of this moment, there is no indication that they have updated their policies regarding this information, and they did not respond back when Project Veritas requested a follow-up to answer the questions directed to them from the original email.

For more information and images of the documents that were leaked from the insiders, please visit Project Veritas’s website at:

Thank you to James O’Keefe and the Project Veritas team for going to such incredible lengths to get the Truth out to the public. Your hard work and dedication to these efforts are sincerely appreciated!

And a HUGE thank you to the brave individuals who have spoken out against these oppressive establishments and who are helping to expose the corruption within. Your honesty and integrity is greatly needed in these uncertain times.

Thank you!

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image (slight alterations have been added – original artist created the “f” used in the image and not the addition of words) by kropekk_pl from Pixabay

Get an Earful

VIDEO: NANO-MAN (deep nasal swab tech, radiation, injection tech, Borg assimilation) - A collection of topics that covers the transhumanism agenda and how the COVID vaccines/tests may be one of the catalysts.
The Great Deception… Great Reset? Global Currency Reset? New Age Awakening? | All One in the Same? - Many are looking forward to the NESARA/GESARA reformation act. But is it really for the benefit of humanity? Or a tempting deception?
The 5G Roll Out: EMF Radiation, Devastating Health Impacts, Social and Economic Implications. Crimes Against Humanity? - What are the real effects of 5G radiation? & "Why is 5G Important for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?"
Is This Post Legitimately Detailing a Global Government Plan Using COVID as the Catalyst? | If So, It May be Related to a Previous Genocide Experiment - "THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government."
The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability” - "The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection."
Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
Sofia Smallstorm Warned of DNA Genetic Altering and the Transhumanist Agenda Back in 2011 - "- self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself."