The Other Virus: Learned Helplessness

Compliance leading to our downfall.

What is a culture of compliance, and ever-shifting rules, doing to us?

MAY 17, 2021|12:01 AM

PETER VAN BUREN

Why would any American allow the government to deny him a final goodbye to the person who raised him? Why would anyone allow grandma to die untouched in a hospital room without fighting back? In the post-vaccination era, why don’t people remove their masks? Learned helplessness, employed as a control tool.

Learned helplessness is well documented. It takes place when an individual believes he continuously faces a negative, uncontrollable situation and stops trying to improve his circumstances, even when he has the ability to do so. Discovering the loss of control elicits a passive reaction to a harmful situation. Psychologists call this a maladaptive response, characterized by avoidance of challenges and the collapse of problem-solving when obstacles arise. You give up trying to fight back

An example may help: You must keep up with ever-changing mask and other hygiene theater rules, many of which make no sense (mask in the gym, but not the pool; mask when going to the restaurant toilet but not at your table; NYC hotels are closed while Vegas casinos are open; Disney California closed while Disney Florida was open) and comply.

You could push back, but you have been made afraid at a core level (forget about yourself rascal, you’re going to kill grandma if you don’t do what we say) and so you just give in. Once upon a time we were told a vaccine would end it all, yet the restrictions remain largely in place. You’re left believing nothing will fix this. Helpless to resist, you comply, “out of an abundance of caution.”

American psychologists Martin Seligman and Steven Maier created the term “learned helplessness” in 1967. They were studying animal behavior by delivering electric shocks to dogs (it was a simpler time). Dogs who learned they couldn’t escape the shock simply stopped trying, even after the scientists removed a barrier and the dog could have jumped away.

Learned helplessness has three main features: a passive response to trauma, disbelief that trauma can be controlled, and stress.

Example: You are being stalked by a killer disease which often has no outward symptoms. There is nothing you can do but hide inside and buy things from Amazon. The government failed to stop the virus initially, failed to warn you, failed to supply ventilators and PPE gear, and failed to produce a vaccine quickly enough. You may die. You may kill your family members along the way. You have lost your job by government decree and are forced to survive on unemployment and the odd stimulus check—manufactured dependence. It is all very real: WebMD saw a 251 percent increase in searches for anxiety this April.

Americans, with their cult-like devotion to victimhood, are primed for learned helplessness. Your problems are because you’re a POC, or fat, or on some spectrum. You are not responsible, can’t fix something so systemic, and best do what you are told.

The way out is to allow people to make decisions and choices on their own. This therapy is used with victims of learned helplessness such as hostages. During their confinement all the important decisions of their life, and most of the minor ones, were made by their captors. Upon release, many hostages fear things as simple as a meal choice and need to be coaxed out of helplessness one micro-choice at a time.

Example: You cannot choose where to stand, so follow the marks on the floor. Ignore the research saying three feet apart is as useful or useless as six feet apart. Don’t think about why the rules are the same inside a narrow hallway and outsidein the fresh air but don’t apply at all on airplanes.

Kin to learned helplessness are enforcers. Suddenly your waitress transitions from someone serving you into someone ordering you to wear a mask, sit alone, eat outside, etc. Flight attendants morph from delivering drinks to holding the power to have security haul you to jail for unmasking when not actively eating. Companies once run by entrepreneurs are today controlled by the harassment-stalking undead from HR. We’ve become a republic of hall monitors. And there it is. The wrong people are in charge.

One of the better examples of learned helplessness is One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, a great book made into an impressive movie starring a lean Jack Nicholson. Nurse Ratched cows a group of mentally ill men into complete learned helplessness, encouraging them to rat each other out for small offenses, and to follow her every order no matter how absurd. The kicker comes near the end when we learn all of the men (except Nicholson) are free to leave the hospital at any time. They just…can’t.

It is amazing how fast people stepped into the Nurse Ratched role. Within moments of COVID’s arrival in the national conscience, officials like California’s Gavin Newsom, and New York’s Andrew Cuomo and Bill De Blasio raced to assume fat emergency powers. They spent not one moment assessing the impact of their decisions to lock down against the effects of the lock down. They ignored information questioning the value of lock down. 

They turned topsy-turvy the idea that in a free society the burden of proof is on those who would restrict freedom and not on those who resist such restrictions.

They were aided in manufacturing learned helplessness by the most sophisticated propaganda operation ever created. Already engorged with the coin of three years of fake news, the legacy media saw the value of a new crisis in working toward their two real goals: making as much money as possible garnering clicks, and defeating Donald Trump. Previous shows—Russiagate, with a hat tip to 9/11 when Americans demanded fewer freedoms to feel safer—illustrated the way. On a 24/7 basis Americans were injected with the message: You are helpless and Donald “COVID” Trump will kill you; your only hope is to comply fully with the people at CNN who are administering the electric shocks.

Truth is useless to propagandists, actually a threat. 

Look at what turned out to be false (in addition to Russiagate): We never ran out of ventilators or PPE or nurses or ICU beds or morgues. Masks are not needed outdoors. We did in fact develop a vaccine, several for that matter, in less than a year. Almost everyone who died was elderly or had serious comorbidities (a distinct class) but we salivated over “new case numbers” as the primary metric anyway because they went up so much faster. When people questioned the real-world view against the media portrayal, they were told about “asymptomatic COVID” or shunned as hoaxers. Everyone makes mistakes. But just as with Russiagate, all the media mistakes swung one way.

It worked. Condo boards boarded up their gyms. Restaurants forced diners to eat outside in the rain. Entire industries, such as tourism and hospitality, disappeared overnight. New groups were shoved into poverty and unemployment. Children were denied education, criminals released from jails. People were told not to hug their loved ones or celebrate birthdays or attend church. We were told to fear our neighbors as potential carriers.

Every time dissenting information popped up—Florida opening its beaches for Spring Break, for example—the media rushed in to declare everyone was going to die. Texas was declared dead, South Dakota was declared dead, and Americans believed it all even when reports of survivors started drifting out of Disney World.

Americans are not comfortable accepting that their lives being manipulated at this level, the way for example many Russians assume it to be so. We tend to dismiss such things as conspiracy theories and make an Oliver Stone joke. 

But ask yourself how many of the temporary security and surveillance measures enacted after 9/11 are still controlling our lives almost 20 years later. Is the terror threat still so real the FBI needs to monitor our social media in bulk? Was it ever?

Nothing here is to say vaccines don’t work, or are themselves dangerous. That’s another debate. 

This is about the politics of mass control. Add up the “doesn’t really make sense but we do it anyway” COVID rules and try to make sense of them. Why would otherwise smart leaders implement such rules, for example in New York’s case, purposely impoverishing a city or seeking to defund the police in the midst of triple digit rises in crime? Every time your answer is, “it just doesn’t make sense,” consider a scenario beyond coincidence where it would make sense, however out there that might be. It might be the most important thing you can do.

Then look out the window. Remember “15 days to flatten the curve?” With no voting or debate, a system based on a medical procedure capable of controlling our travel, which businesses we can visit, which hotels we can stay in, what jobswe can hold, what education we can access, at which point it is no more “voluntary” than breathing, was put into place. We no longer need to ask what is going to happen. 

Remember the real question is always why.

Peter Van Buren is the author of We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi PeopleHooper’s War: A Novel of WWII Japan, and Ghosts of Tom Joad: A Story of the 99 Perc

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Which One Are You?: A Follower? Or a Leader? | The Answer May Shock You

No pun intended.

During these uncertain times, especially amidst the corona/vaccine agendas, it has become increasingly clear that there are, sadly, a great percentage of conformed followers than there are questioning leaders.

I’d like to highlight the following social experiments to demonstrate this. Now unless these experiments were staged, because I can’t rule that out, but I am going under the assumption that it has not, and that these are legitimate.

Similar experiments like these have been conducted in the past as well, with varying results. However, just from these modern time experiments, it is worrying the lengths that conformity will go to in order to just be one of the pack, and not be considered an “outlier”. We can see it in abundance today, that humanity hasn’t changed much in their line of thinking. If anything, we have become even more docile, even more compliant, even more unquestioning of even the most inane decisions as long as it comes from a position of “authority”.

The below experiments show the need that people have to follow the group, even if it doesn’t make sense, and/or even if it’s wrong. While the first couple of experiments shown do not involve the welfare of others, the third example most certainly does, and the results are terrifying.

Do you know where you’d stand? Are you being completely honest with yourself? Take a deep, long look at what’s going on in the world; how desperate some people are to fit in, to not be considered a “conspiracy theorist”, or a “right-wing nut” that doesn’t agree with the “majority of the population”… or a dumb imbecile that doesn’t even listen to experts/authority…

Would you be okay going against the grain even though EVERYONE ELSE around you is following a certain narrative?

EXPERIMENT 1. Social Conformity

This first experiment shows a lady who, though there is no reason for doing so, other than everybody else was doing it, conforms to a practice of standing up when a buzzer goes off, then sitting back down after a second or two. There is LITERALLY no reason to do this, but slowly but surely, even those who were not hired actors who initiated this social conditioning from the start, became conformed to following the original test subject.

What would you have done?

It’s easy to say that we wouldn’t participate without being in the same situation as them, but would we, or wouldn’t we? Can we admit when we may just well follow along with the pack for the sake of not being ostracized or be the odd one out? Or would we be strong enough in our own resolution to not follow along with silly mandates, even though everyone else around is?

Experiment 2. Herd Mentality

The below video shows a modern day example of the Asch experiment in progress. The Asch experiment wanted to see how many people would be influenced in giving the wrong answer, simply because everyone else gave the wrong answer. In this line up, 10 people are given the task of choosing which line matches the singular line shown on a separate stand. The first 9 people are all in on the scam to choose the wrong answer, leaving the 10th person, the actual test subject, to decide their answer. Will they trust their instinct and choose the right answer, even if they’re the ONLY ONE to choose it?

Or will they follow along with the crowd?

Herd mentality and peer pressure are very real social dilemmas that affect people in our day to day lives. While some people did not conform to the rest of the group, indicating that there are some willing to follow their intuition and not follow the crowd, even at the risk of ostracization or looking silly, we also can’t overlook the fact that some people may already know about the Asch experiment, and realize that it is a social test; thus skewering the results.

As it is, being different and the only one to choose a different answer, can seem isolating; but if one has confidence in themselves, and doesn’t care what other people think, especially when they’re sure the other people are wrong, can we see real leadership – and perhaps make us second guess our initial reaction/response.

Now, while the first two examples had nothing to do with anything serious, what if the matter literally comes to life and death? What if we are coerced, say… by an authority figure, to carrying out an act that does significant harm to another human being?

Think people will be any less obedient/conforming?

Take a look at the Milgram experiment, which was conducted in the 1960’s to test people’s obedience to authority figures.

Experiment 3. “Listen to the Authorities”

This video is highly disturbing, because it shows the lengths that people will go to simply in the name of listening to an authority figure; even if they’re against it, even if they want nothing more to do with a particular action, if they are commanded by someone in a presumed position of authority, they will continue to commit life-threatening harm on another being.

Source: youtube | Brian Burak | Milgrim Experiment [Milgram]

The gentleman who has the unfortunate task of “punishing” the learner is clearly distraught over the commands to keep inflicting shocks to the other participant. However, at the continued prompting of the experimenter, ends up going all the way to the end of the shock board – even after the learner ceases to respond.

It’s important to note that he is not FORCED to keep pressing the switch. He could refuse – in fact, does so on numerous occasions, yet at the insisting prods of the experimenter, concedes, albeit begrudgingly, and continues to press the switches.

It’s clear that he cares about the other person at the end of the shocks, yet because this authority figure tells him to continue – to inflict terrible pain even to the point of no response – he finishes the task until the experimenter tells him to stop.

The following short interview between the gentleman and the experimenter(s) happens next:

Experimenter: “How do you feel, by the way?”

Subject: “I feel all right, but I don’t like what’s happened to that fellow in there. He’s been hollering – we had to keep giving him shocks – I didn’t like that one bit. I mean, he wanted to get out, and you just kept going, kept throwing 450 volts. I didn’t like that. He wouldn’t even look in on that gentleman.”

Experimenter 2: “But who’s actually pushing the switch?”

Subject: “I was. But he kept insisting. I told him no, but he said it got to keep going. I told him it’s time we stopped when we got up to 195, 210 volts.”

Experimenter 2: “But why didn’t you just stop?”

Subject: “He wouldn’t let me! I wanted to stop.”

Think the test would have been any different if a cute, little puppy was involved? …Well, you’d be wrong.

In an incredibly inhumane experiment, the same experiment was conducted, but this time using a puppy, with real shocks. I obviously DO NOT CONDONE the following test, but wanted to mention it here for further reference to people’s compliance to authority figures:

(And I usually don’t condone cussing on this site, but in some cases it’s warranted and drives the point home rather succinctly)

Charles Sheridan and Richard King took this experiment one step further, but asked subjects to shock a puppy for every incorrect action it made. Unlike Milgram’s experiment, this shock was real. Exactly 20 out of 26 subjects went to the highest voltage.

Almost 80 percent. Think about that when you’re walking around the mall: Eight out of ten of those people you see would torture the shit out of a puppy if a dude in a lab coat asked them to.

Words at the end of the above video from Stanley Milgram that should be immortalized:

“The results, as I observe them in the laboratory, are disturbing. They raised the possibility that human nature cannot be counted on to insulate men from brutality and inhumane treatment at the direction of malevolent authority.

A substantial proportion of people do what they are told to do irrespective of the content of the act and without limitations of conscience. So long as they perceive that the command comes from a legitimate authority.

If in this study, an anonymous experimenter could successfully command adults to subdue a 50 year old man and force on him painful electric shocks against his protests, one can only wonder what government, with its vastly greater authority and prestige, can command of its subjects.

I believe we are all under a social experiment of some kind, by design. The corrupt world leaders are sitting back, watching people follow in line of the most ridiculous and dangerous mandates; laughing at how many actually follow and enforce these rules, while at the same time seeing just how far they can go before people start realizing that it is all a farce.

Then when you consider exactly how much of an influence that social media presents on our life, and the excessive amount of bots programmed to give the users the illusion that a vast amount of the population thinks a certain way, including collusions with the mainstream media – one can see how easily the public could be swayed into a “groupthink” mentality.

So how far can humanity be pushed to following a narrative, a guideline, a rule, if seemingly “everybody” else does it too, and especially when those in a “position of authority” command it?

This is the question that is being asked. And chillingly, a large portion of people would rather follow the herd mentality, than be a brave individual that goes against the status quo. Even if one’s own moral conscience is on the line.

I think it’s high time for all of us, as an individual, to really take a step back and gauge our own actions (and inactions, for that matter). Can we develop our own fortitude, our own strong constitution, to do what’s right – even if “the majority” or “authority figures” demand we do otherwise? What is “right”, for that matter? 

Our moral compass is being tampered with. We need to fine-tune it, and get back on track. Regardless of peer pressure or authoritative control. And we need to be brave enough to stand apart from the herd, and help lead the pack away from this destructive nature.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Crystal Clear Learning

NOT ON THE BEEB: Dr. T | Mask, Swabs, ‘Vaccine’, Magnetism & Genocide [Full Transcript]

Dr. T proposes a hypothesis that involves hydrogel and EMF.

In order to help share crucial information across the world, I have taken it upon myself to transcribe pertinent videos in order to help these people’s voices to be heard. Please feel free to use this for further resource, translation help, etc. I recognize that some people prefer to read rather than watch videos, and/or if someone has a hard time hearing this information, then it is typed out for reading and search capabilities.

Thank you to Dr. T and Not On The Beeb for this information. Your efforts in alerting people to this egregious vaccine agenda is much needed and much appreciated in these times. Especially since there is so much collusion by corrupt industries to keep these alternative opinions/discussions/investigations suppressed from the public.

Full transcript below. All words are shared by Dr. T unless otherwise stated.

[some embellishments/highlights added for emphasis and crucial information]

Dr. T : “I’m sharing the following hypothesis urgently of how the covid-19 experimental injections may be harming and killing in the hope that it may be able to help in some way to help stop this attempted mass genocide.

I do not believe this is an accident. And I will explain why.

I am a UK medical doctor. My hypothesis is that these experimental mRNA covid-19 injections contain a magnetized nanoparticle attached to the mRNA which crosses the blood brain barrier and is then attracted to the brain. Particularly mid-line structures. I further hypothesize that two things aid this passage of the magnetized mRNA to the brain. Local temperature effects from EMF radiation and from an artificial network, such as from hydrogel. I will now explain why I am proposing this hypothesis.

Since April/May 2021, thousands of reports around the world have emerged in people who have been injected with the pfizer/biontech or moderna covid-19 experimental injections, who are now finding this specific area where they were injected in their arm has become magnetic. There are a number of emerging patterns which need to be urgently investigated. They are all emerging patterns and all, some or none of them may be of significance.

It appears that people have had 2 injections have a higher tendency towards stronger magnetism than those who have had one. The effect seems to be extremely localized and strongest at some point in the first few weeks to a month. But this may not be the case. The effect is magnetic rather than metallic, as the neodymium magnets can be seen to flip over if the wrong pole is against the skin, and stick when the correct pole is against the skin. Some patients can feel that pull within their body when the magnet is sticking. Some individuals, more common in those who have had two injections are magnetic enough that metal objects will stick to their arms and stay there.

I have seen this personally, and my understanding is that there are cases of objects as large as cutlery sticking to some patients. Body type seem to vary in how easy it is to pick up this magnetism in the skin. It appears stronger so far in perhaps more muscular or slim people, and those where their arms have a bit more fat or adipose tissue it’s weaker. But again, these are all small numbers. A possible correlation also came up to do with previous flu vaccinations, particularly in the same year.

It is relevant, at this point, to note that there has been widespread discrediting of this magnetism from mainstream news sources from the BBC to Reuters.”

BBC clip: “These are viral videos showing people sticking magnets onto their arms where they claim they’ve had the covid vaccine. Some people say there must be something magnetic in the vaccines.”

Jack Goodman: “None of the covid vaccines contain metals that could possibly be magnetic.”

Eric Palm: “There’s really no physical reason – the vaccine needles are extremely small, a fraction of a millimeter in size, so even if you injected an extremely magnetic particle, it would be so small in size, that there wouldn’t be enough force on it to actually keep a magnet stuck to your skin.”

Jack Goodman: “But we can be sure, there’s absolutely nothing in any of the covid vaccines that could make magnets stick.”

Separate clip of a gentleman calling out Snopes: “For Snopes, for fact check UK – [points to a magnet sticking to a lady’s arm who is sitting next to him], you got it wrong, guys. You got it 100% wrong. I verified this.”

Dr. T : “The people effected by this phenomenon being fact-checked and called fakes. Indeed, just me speaking to you now will be enough to make me get called one of those too.

It is also of note that the listed ingredients do not include any metals or magnetic particles. However, this magnetic nanotechnology does exist, and extensive studies in animals and cells in vitro have taken place over the last 5, or even 15 years.

Also, information at the time of writing, which is in the public domain, shows that the Pfizer/Biontech and Moderna both used an S2 spike protein during the manufacture, from a company called ACROBiosystems. And they also show a diagram of their mRNA with a magnetized nanoparticle on one end that was used in the development of the Pfizer vaccine. So it appears from this information that by some means, some magnetic property may have been transferred into the body during the process of the mRNA injections. Possible cancer therapy using magnetic nanoparticles highlighted a possible issue in the past with free radicals.

I hypothesized this magnetized mRNA is crossing the blood brain barrier and causing harm there for a number of reasons. Firstly, reviewing the passive databases from the yellow card system, [Eudravigilance] and Vaers, with respect to covid-19 experimental vaccines, a number of side effects are extremely common. One example is Bells Palsy. This is where there is paralysis of the facial nerve and that causes weakness and drooping on one side of the face.

At the time of reading this, in the UK alone, on the yellow card system, there are 597 cases of Bells Palsy and also 387 cases where they was labeled ‘facial paralysis’. These are just the ones reported. Most passive systems only report 1-10% of the actual number of side effects.

It is of note that many other side effects have been reported after the vaccines, include cranial nerves that emerge from the deep mid-line structures of the brain. In particular, the brain stem. So from our main cerebral cortex brain here, and our spinal cord coming up, the bit that it meets in the middle is called the brain stem. And from here, all 12 of the cranial nerves emerge.

The 1st cranial nerve, the olfactory, damage to this affects sense of smell.
Cranial nerve 2, optic, damage to this affects vision.
Cranial 3, oculomotor, damage to this affects the eyelids, pupils and the lens, i.e. focusing part of the eye.
Cranial nerve 4, the trochlear, damage to this affects looking down and towards the nose.
Cranial nerve 5, the trigeminal, damage to this affects touch, pain and temperament sensation on the face, as well as chewing.
Cranial nerve 6, abducens, damage to this affects eye movements.
Cranial nerve 7, as mentioned, the facial nerve, damage to this affects facial expression, lip movements, taste towards the tip of the tongue, as well as tear and saliva secretion.
Cranial nerve 8, vestibulocochlear, damage to this affects hearing and balance.
Cranial nerve 9, glossopharyngeal, damage to this affects taste at the back of the tongue, the gag reflex, swallowing, and some aspects of speech.
Cranial nerve 10, the vagus nerve, damage to this affects the muscles inside the organs, such as the heart, lungs and intestines. And I’ll come on to this a bit more in a minute.
Cranial nerve 11, spinal accessory, damage to this affects the movement of two large muscles of the neck, the trapezius and the sternocledomastoid.
Cranial nerve 12, the hypoglossal, damage to this affects speech, movements of the tongue, and swallowing.

The 6th, 7th, 9th, 10th and 12th cranial nerves arise within very close proximity in the brain stem. Which sits between the top of the spinal cord and the main brain, as mentioned.

I would like to highlight a bit more detail about the vagus nerve, the 10th nerve. As it has such far reaching complex functions. Damage can cause emotional disturbances, including anxiety and depression, difficulty with breathing and swallowing, changes in heart rate and blood pressure, including leading to fainting and syncope. Damage can also effect digestion, with delayed ability to digest food, vomitting, nausea, heartburn, and weight loss or weight gain. Pins and needles may be felt at the extremities, such as the fingers and toes.

This leads me on to my hypothesis, that low-level radiation from EMF may be directing where this damage takes place. Although the significance of the small temperature increases that take place inside the brain with the use of mobile phones, and other mobile devices, has been debated, there is agreement that there is a very small increase in temperature that takes place within the brain with the use of mobile devices.

Many factors will affect how significant this exposure is, from how thick the skull is, to how much development is happening in the brain. So children, and the elderly may be at more risk. The effects of EMF are not just limited to heat. There are animal and cell studies looking at changes of ion channels, demyelination, and autophagy 2. EMF radiation has been listed as a possible carcinogen since 2011, by the IARC, which is the WHO’s international Agency for Research into Cancer.

When mobile devices are connected to the ears, either remotely using bluetooth or via electrical cables, this radiation is going straight from one ear to the other and the meeting point of this between these two ears, or the external auditory meatus, is actually part of that brain stem. The part that is exactly in the middle is the pons. And from the pons part of the brain stem, that is where the 7th cranial nerve, the facial nerve, comes from.

Could it be that this nerve and the other cranial nerves are being damaged at its origin by EMF interacting with magnetic nanoparticles? This is my hypothesis. This is not me stating this is fact. But I must put this hypothesis out there.

Of further concern is that there is emerging evidence that covid-19 swabs, both PCR and lateral flow swabs, may be contaminated, possibly with hydrogel. If this is the case, then when these swabs are shoved far into someone’s nasal pharynx, enough to cause superficial trauma in many cases, that this hydrogel may also be attracted towards these magnetic and electrical fields. The body’s own magnetic sensing gland, the pineal gland, is also deep within the brain. And it could be that the combination of hydrogel, EMF radiation, and magnetized mRNA is a deadly trio that leads to deep brain structures being destroyed. The properties of magnetic hydrogel is also being investigated and has been for some time. This is not new technology.

These are only hypotheses but they are extremely worrying ones. With the further push through of the covid-19 vaccination program worldwide, including now on the children, who are at such slight risk of Sars-CoV-2 itself, compared to adults, how can we allow any further injections to take place without this issue being fully investigated? These are now the children, too!

Sars-CoV-2 has been artifically made, it appears, from the strongest arguments made scientifically. This makes it a bio-weapon. However it got into circulation. Accidentally or deliberately. Still something that is man-made and causes harm is a bioweapon. How can we then trust that an international pharmaceutical industry that has been involved in whatever way with the creation of a bioweapon, to then propose the cure?

We must not be blinded because we can’t imagine that people could want to harm others. A very small number of people do. And an even larger number of people allow and facilitate that harm taking place. Because they cannot face the possibility that others could cause harm and they too become the harmers.

Please consider this hypothesis, and these series of hypotheses.”

[END TRANSCRIPT]

This is not the first doctor, by far, who has proposed such a theory. Carrie Madej has been an outspoken opponent of these vaccines and discusses the dangers of hyrdogel and the capabilities that the new technology can wreak on humanity. Pair that up (no pun intended) with the enormous 5G rollout, Gates and DARPA’s involvement in track and tracing, implantable chips, these highly promoted and suspicious vaccines AND covid test swabs/masks… not to mention the heinous efforts of a worldwide depopulation agenda – etc., etc., etc. – it’s actually quite amazing that people CAN’T see this as a possibility. To me and logically minded individuals, this is the only conclusion one can come to.

This Hydrogel Biosensor Implant Scheme Would Only Work if the NWO Controllers Gain Access to Everyone’s Bloodstream

From the NWO point of view, for this scheme to succeed on a worldwide scale, they would need to gain access to every person’s bloodstream, which they could do if mandatory vaccination laws continue to be rolled out, as is already happening or being talked about in many nations, states and regions around the world. Massachusetts just passed a law mandating flu shot vaccines for schoolchildren; the Australian PM is talking about mandatory vaccination; however on the other side, states like South Dakota have introduced bills to ban mandatory vaccinations for schools. This will be the real battleground in the months ahead as Operation Warp Speed and other schemes are pushed to the hilt, with a desperate NWO trying to continue the charade of a pandemic in time for them to roll out their rushed and untested COVID vaccine – a new type of RNA vaccine with the capability to modify your genetics (RNA and DNA), and most likely the capability to implant you with a nanotech hydrogel biosensor. With Gates one of the funders of this technology, it shows his excuses are very weak when he says that he’s not trying to microchip humanity.

Source: Hydrogel Biosensor: Implantable Nanotech to be Used in COVID Vaccines?

As it is, when people continue to turn a blind eye to all of these facts/possibilities, just because they don’t want to face the truth, it puts us ALL in jeopardy.

We need to raise our awareness, raise our critical thinking, and admit when things have finally gotten out of hand and STAND UP and say “ENOUGH”. I believe most people are good, but so easily misled. Let’s tap back into our moral compass/compassion, and protect humanity and the planet, instead of allowing these dangerous globalists to take over.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image/screenshot taken from notonthebeeb.co.uk

Get an Earful

Are “COVID Variants” Named After 5G Towers/Networks? | Delta, Kappa, Lambda, Mu… - The theories of "COVID" and 5G being connected rages on.
Are These Findings the Death Blow for Vaccine Passports? - "COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus"
Egregious Medical Tyranny Holds Patient Hostage in a Hospital and Refuses Her Preferred Medical Treatment – Patient DIES Under Their Protocol - Veronica Wolski was denied specific treatment - AND denied the freedom to leave the hospital.
More LIES and CONtradictions About COVID and the Vaccines | How Does Anyone Still Believe the Narrative? - We have been lied to numerous times by top officials. When will the rest of the world wake up?
W.H.O. / Governments Working in Collusion with Big Pharma? | A Necessary Look Back at the Swine Flu Pandemic - STEPPING BACK IN TIME: Another attempt to vaccinate the whole world.
Jerm Warfare Interview with Dr. Zelenko: “These “vaccines”, which I call ‘poison death shots’ “ - "The only reason you'd vaccinate your child is if you believe in child sacrifice."
Scandal Behind the FDA “Fake Approval” of Pfizer Jab - Corruption and collusions behind the Pfizer/FDA "vaccine" efforts.