Pfizer-BioNTech/COMIRNATY Vaccine Is Still Under “STUDY” Runs to be Completed at Different Intervals Between 2022-2026

” – known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis”

In addition to the many debates and conflicts surrounding the “approval” of the Pfizer/BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine, there is interesting information to glean from the documents involved surrounding this controversy.

The below documents, some from the FDA’s own website, sheds further light into what seems to be a product still in its experimental/study phase. Some of the revelations are chilling, and doesn’t quite give the reassurance that an “approved” drug of this magnitude is more beneficial to us than what it is purported to be saving us from.

Screenshot of the FDA NEWS RELEASE: FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine
taken on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine ]
Content current as of August 23, 2021

Selected quotes in gray text boxes are from the above document:

“Specifically, in the FDA’s review for approval, the agency analyzed effectiveness data from approximately 20,000 vaccine and 20,000 placebo recipients ages 16 and older who did not have evidence of the COVID-19 virus infection within a week of receiving the second dose. The safety of Comirnaty was evaluated in approximately 22,000 people who received the vaccine and 22,000 people who received a placebo 16 years of age and older.

Based on results from the clinical trial, the vaccine was 91% effective in preventing COVID-19 disease.

More than half of the clinical trial participants were followed for safety outcomes for at least four months after the second dose. Overall, approximately 12,000 recipients have been followed for at least 6 months.

The most commonly reported side effects by those clinical trial participants who received Comirnaty were pain, redness and swelling at the injection site, fatigue, headache, muscle or joint pain, chills, and fever. The vaccine is effective in preventing COVID-19 and potentially serious outcomes including hospitalization and death.”

There are a couple of notes to take away from this document. In the above quote, it doesn’t quite specify how long the clinical trial lasted. Only that more than half of the clinical trial participants were followed for safety outcomes for 4 months after the second dose. It also states that 12,000 of the recipients were followed for at least 6 months.

Both of these numbers (4 and 6) are incredibly low quantities when taking into account pregnant women who are at the beginning of their pregnancy. The length of the clinical trial does not take into account the full 9 months needed to determine a healthy pregnancy, nor does it allow for any time to safely assess the development of the baby once born.

The data in this document also does not include differences between those of the placebo group compared to that of the “vaccine” group. In addition, if we are to only take the 12,000 participants into account, which from the wording of the document seems to allude that these are the recipients of the vaccine, that would still leave 10,000 participants unaccounted for. Just from the amount of vaccine recipients (22,000), this is 45% of their study that the data does not reflect. If we are to include the 22,000 of the participants who received the placebo, the data that was not tracked would rise to 72%.

There is also the challenge of how they determined that the vaccine actually prevented COVID. Were these recipients exposed to someone with COVID or were deliberately inoculated with the disease to see if they would get infected? Many people, myself included, have gone on for more than a year without developing COVID, or at least “COVID symptoms”. Since this data only involved a 4-6 month trial period, how many of us (vaccinated, placebo, or otherwise) can say that we have not contracted COVID during this time-frame either? Is this implying that unless you’re vaccinated, you will most likely get COVID every 4-6 months?

Another consideration to take into account are the many testimonies from well-respected and renowned doctors/scientists/virologists who are adamant in their assessment that these vaccines are unnecessary and instead further harms the immune system rather than help it.

In the same regard, those who are unvaccinated will obviously then not contract any of the possible side effects that are listed in this document as well as the many adverse events that are reported to VAERS. Which leaves one to wonder if the benefits really outweigh the risks of the COVID vaccines.

There is also the slight alteration on a different page of the FDA website that gives further clarification as to the efficacy of the COVID vaccines – which does not reflect that of what many people are influenced to believe:

Under the heading:

Q: What safety information did FDA evaluate to authorize the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for emergency use and approve Comirnaty?

Screenshot of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
taken on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions ]
Content Current as of August 23, 2021

UPDATE on September 6, 2021: Since the FDA website decided to remove this particular section from their FAQ (as of 9/1/2021), here is a screenshot taken from the web archive showing its existence:

“While the vaccine may not prevent infection, symptoms or transmission of the virus from person to person – “

This seems to be the heart of the matter, and although it continues with, “it is effective in preventing hospitalization and death.” it is in direct conflict with what we were led to believe this whole time. Most of the mainstream media, big tech platforms, health agencies, etc. have insisted that vaccines are needed to stop transmission of the virus and to protect those around us. However, this one simple statement defies everything that people were coerced into believing.

And with the last part of the sentence concluding that it prevents hospitalization and death, which even that is debatable when looking at the scope of the situation, it leaves one to wonder why this would not be an option for people to decide to take that risk on their own account. When comparing data of young individuals as well and their extremely low risk of hospitalization and death in the COVID setting, there ARE acknowledged threats when they are injected with the vaccine.

“Additionally, the FDA conducted a rigorous evaluation of the post-authorization safety surveillance data pertaining to myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and has determined that the data demonstrate increased risks, particularly within the seven days following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age compared to females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had resolution of symptoms. However, some individuals required intensive care support. Information is not yet available about potential long-term health outcomes. The Comirnaty Prescribing Information includes a warning about these risks.”

The FDA is also acknowledging that there are higher risks involved with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and myocarditis and pericarditis, especially in males aged 12-17, and up to age 40.

“Information is not yet available about potential long-term health outcomes.”

“In addition, the FDA is requiring the company to conduct postmarketing studies to further assess the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with Comirnaty. These studies will include an evaluation of long-term outcomes among individuals who develop myocarditis following vaccination with Comirnaty. In addition, although not FDA requirements, the company has committed to additional post-marketing safety studies, including conducting a pregnancy registry study to evaluate pregnancy and infant outcomes after receipt of Comirnaty during pregnancy.”

The document is also stating that the possibility of myocarditis and pericarditis is an accepted issue and will continue to be monitored after the marketing of the Comirnaty vaccine.

And in a rather blunt admission, FDA states on their own website that Comirnaty is not required to evaluate pregnancy and infant outcomes after receipt of Comirnaty during pregnancy. This would explain why the initial trial run was only monitored for 4-6 months. An outline in the BLA (Biologics License Approval) also states that Comirnaty will conduct studies on this group as we see in a later section.

BLA documents state Comirnaty vaccine studies to be conducted for the next several years

Screenshot taken from from the FDA BLA Approval on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
Document dated August 23, 2021

Text below is page 5 of the FDA BLA Approval document

Your deferred pediatric studies required under section 505B(a) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) are required postmarketing studies. The status of
these postmarketing studies must be reported according to 21 CFR 601.28 and section
505B(a)(4)(C) of the FDCA. In addition, section 506B of the FDCA and 21 CFR 601.70
require you to report annually on the status of any postmarketing commitments or
required studies or clinical trials.

Label your annual report as an “Annual Status Report of Postmarketing Study
Requirement/Commitments”
and submit it to the FDA each year within 60 calendar
days of the anniversary date of this letter until all Requirements and Commitments
subject to the reporting requirements under section 506B of the FDCA are released or
fulfilled. These required studies are listed below:

1. Deferred pediatric Study C4591001 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in children 12 years through 15 years of age.

Final Protocol Submission: October 7, 2020

Study Completion: May 31, 2023

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2023

2. Deferred pediatric Study C4591007 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in infants and children 6 months to <12 years of age.

Final Protocol Submission: February 8, 2021

Study Completion: November 30, 2023

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024

3. Deferred pediatric Study C4591023 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in infants <6 months of age.

Final Protocol Submission: January 31, 2022

Study Completion: July 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2024

Submit the protocols to your IND 19736, with a cross-reference letter to this BLA STN
BL 125742 explaining that these protocols were submitted to the IND. Please refer to
the PMR sequential number for each study/clinical trial and the submission number as
shown in this letter.

Submit final study reports to this BLA STN BL 125742. In order for your PREA PMRs to
be considered fulfilled, you must submit and receive approval of an efficacy or a labeling supplement. For administrative purposes, all submissions related to these required
pediatric postmarketing studies must be clearly designated as:

• Required Pediatric Assessment(s)

As the document states, the completion study of Comirnaty postmarketing (after approval) is not due until May 31, 2023 / Novermber 20, 2023 / July 31, 2024 respective of older to lower age groups. There is also another important acronym to consider, which is the IND, which stands for Investigational New Drug.

With this knowledge in hand, it’s important to note that the clinical trial run was monitored for 4-6 months after the second dose on around 55% of the recipients, while the actual “approved” drug still in its investigational/study stages is set to be monitored for 2-3 years. This is a sizeable difference in the amount of time to determine safety and efficacy, especially when considering the many events already reported to VAERS. And according to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions page from the FDA website:

Screenshot taken from the FDA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions ]
Content current as of August 23, 2021

Q: Are vaccine providers required to report side effects?
A: Providers administering Comirnaty or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine must report to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and to Pfizer the following information associated with the vaccine of which they become aware:
  • Vaccine administration errors whether or not associated with an adverse event
  • Serious adverse events (irrespective of attribution to vaccination)
  • Cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome
  • Cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death

Acknowledged myocarditis and pericarditis issues being studied on children

” – known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis”

Screenshot taken from from the FDA BLA Approval on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
Document dated August 23, 2021

Text in the gray box below are from pages 6-8 of the FDA BLA Approval documents
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]

We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events
reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known
serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of
subclinical myocarditis.

Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under
section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks.

Therefore, based on appropriate scientific data, we have determined that you are
required to conduct the following studies:

4. Study C4591009, entitled “A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of
the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in the United States,” to evaluate
the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of
COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: August 31, 2021

Monitoring Report Submission: October 31, 2022

Interim Report Submission: October 31, 2023

Study Completion: June 30, 2025

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2025

5. Study C4591021, entitled “Post Conditional Approval Active Surveillance Study
Among Individuals in Europe Receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine,” to evaluate the occurrence of myocarditis
and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: August 11, 2021

Progress Report Submission: September 30, 2021

Interim Report 1 Submission: March 31, 2022

Interim Report 2 Submission: September 30, 2022

Interim Report 3 Submission: March 31, 2023

Interim Report 4 Submission: September 30, 2023

Interim Report 5 Submission: March 31, 2024

Study Completion: March 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024

6. Study C4591021 substudy to describe the natural history of myocarditis and
pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: January 31, 2022

Study Completion: March 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024

7. Study C4591036, a prospective cohort study with at least 5 years of follow-up for
potential long-term sequelae of myocarditis after vaccination (in collaboration
with Pediatric Heart Network).

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021

Study Completion: December 31, 2026

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2027

8. Study C4591007 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical
myocarditis following administration of the second dose of COMIRNATY in a
subset of participants 5 through 15 years of age.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this assessment according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: September 30, 2021

Study Completion: November 30, 2023

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024

9. Study C4591031 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical
myocarditis following administration of a third dose of COMIRNATY in a subset of
participants 16 to 30 years of age.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021

Study Completion: June 30, 2022

Final Report Submission: December 31, 2022

It is interesting that the timing to be considered for approval of these vaccines was only a 4-6 month timeframe, however, known dangers/risks, identified as “serious”, are still allowed to be approved and to be studied for 2+ years.

The document also recognizes that myocarditis and pericarditis is enough of a concern to happen after administration of the Comirnaty vaccine, since it mentions several studies just for this specific adverse event, and to continue to assess these reports.

In addition to all of the substudies to be conducted, there is a study to be initiated on a select group of participants to administer a third dose of the Comirnaty vaccine.

All of this information leads credence to the fact that even though the Comirnaty vaccine has “officially been approved” by the FDA, it is still in the investigational stages and being experimented upon on the public. And it goes without saying, but if myocarditis and pericarditis (on top of other reported side effects) are serious risks especially in children (“The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age.”), then for this known risk to be offered to infants/toddlers defies any ethically moral boundaries and is in direct violations of the Nuremberg Code.

The next section also provides further evidence that there have been NO studies in the safety/efficacy of the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine on pregnant women.

Pregnancy/Births were not studied during the initial Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty trial runs

Another snippet from the FDA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions website page, states the following:

Screenshot taken from the FDA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions ]
Content current as of August 23, 2021

Q: Can pregnant or breastfeeding women receive the Comirnaty or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine?

A: While there have been no specific studies in these groups, there is no contraindication to receipt of the vaccine for pregnant or breastfeeding women. Pregnant or breastfeeding women should discuss potential benefits and risks of vaccination with their healthcare provider.

The acknowledgement above seems to indicate that the FDA and Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty company have side-stepped this particular group in their vaccine studies, and have left it up to the healthcare provider to determine whether or not to administer this vaccine to pregnant women or women who are breastfeeding. This alone should be enough of a statement that there is no sufficient/professional data to analyze if the Comirnaty is safe during pregnancies/breastfeeding stages.

And if one were to consider the VAERS reporting system, in which the Pfizer-BioNTech company is required to report to, there have been numerous conditions of miscarriages/stillbirths/complications during pregnancy after administration of the COVID vaccine. While it is difficult to determine if these complications were a direct result of the vaccine, it is up to the scientific/healthcare community to investigate these cases in a thorough, unbiased and uninfluenced manner.

Another extremely alarming section of the FDA BLA Approval documents shows the following trial to be monitored in pregnant women:

Screenshot taken from from the FDA BLA Approval on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
Document dated August 23, 2021

Text in the gray box below are from pages 9-10 of the FDA BLA Approval documents
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
POSTMARKETING COMMITMENTS SUBJECT TO REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
UNDER SECTION 506B

We acknowledge your written commitments as described in your letter of August 21, 2021 as outlined below:

10. Study C4591022, entitled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Exposure during
Pregnancy: A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of Pregnancy and
Infant Outcomes in the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists
(OTIS)/MotherToBaby Pregnancy Registry.”

Final Protocol Submission: July 1, 2021

Study Completion: June 30, 2025

Final Report Submission: December 31, 2025

There are a couple of key takeaways in this section that are of incredible importance. One major term to focus on is the word “NON-INTERVENTIONAL“.

According to What is a Non Interventional Study?, “In general, a non interventional study (NIS) (also called a non interventional trial) is where a patient takes regular medicine, prescribed according to the label. In an NIS, the researcher sets out to exert as little influence as possible on the patient’s condition while studying a medicine’s “…effectiveness, safety and tolerability under real life conditions” (Mishra & Vora, 2010).”

The article also reiterates multiple times that “non-interventional” studies are observational studies – the researchers are not to interfere with the dosages in any way but to prescribe them exactly as listed on the label. It also seems to imply that even if severe side effects show up, they are to still carry through with the “medicinal product” in that patient as prescribed. Another insinuation that one can make is that in order to not interfere with the study, it is not recommended to prescribe treatments that may help alleviate potential side effects. The term “tolerability” is implying to keep the patient going through the side effects in order to continue to study the long-term effects of the investigational new drug.

However, with the inclusion of “real life conditions”, it doesn’t indicate whether the patient can seek out physicians to investigate what is causing the side effects in their system and engage in therapeutic treatments to alleviate these effects. If a study is to be conducted in real life conditions, then it is to be expected that patients will seek treatments on their own while the researcher is only required to observe the patient to see how the alternative treatments interact with the drug/symptoms.

The same article goes on to state that the UK/EU have different definitions of what “non-interventional” means. “Aronson (2004) states… “the term ‘non-interventional’ in the Directive doesn’t mean non-interventional (i.e. non-interference) at all; it refers to an intervention with a licensed medicinal product.”

There is controversy and conflicts in this statement as another article, Interventional or Non-Interventional? Analyzing the Differences Between Clinical Studies Using Medicines in the European Union points out:

“Although defined in DIR 2001/20/EC, non-interventional studies are outside its scope. Due to the lack of harmonized regulation, some studies designed to be non‑interventional may be considered clinical trials by EU authorities. The two blinded studies described in Table 4 (see PDF) were considered clinical trials in the EU for planning on collection of data to support the marketing authorization application of experimental IMPs, despite no IMP being given and normal clinical practice being kept during the study period. Sponsors are thus advised to consult with authorities when planning studies under these conditions and/or whenever the objectives or design may raise questions.”

Further in the article, it states the following, which again, is not reassuring considering the policies/guidelines/mandates that authorities have been engaging in in order to mandate these investigational new drugs (COVID vaccines) onto the public:

“There is no centralized submission procedure for non-interventional studies with the exception of non-interventional PASSs, imposed as an obligation by an EU competent authority.{9} Because non-interventional studies do not have harmonized legislation, some Member States require submissions to regulatory authorities, while others do not. It is therefore important that sponsors are familiar with the regulatory framework of target EU Member States, and that they consult with local competent authorities and ethics committees (ECs) when justified.”

It’s sad to have to point this out, but the quote does specify “competent” authorities. And even the inclusion of “ethics committees” is not comforting seeing as how one of the leading figures in ethics study is Christine Grady, Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, and wife of Anthony Fauci – Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Chief Medical Advisor to the president, and who is also a large spokesperson for the experimental injections.

The other takeaway from section 10 of the FDA BLA documents is the term “TERATOLOGY“.

Definition of teratology
: the study of malformations or serious deviations from the normal type in developing organisms
merriam-webster/teratology

Teratology, branch of the biological sciences dealing with the causes, development, description, and classification of congenital malformations in plants and animals and with the experimental production, in some instances, of these malformations. Congenital malformations arise from interruption in the early development of the organism. Malformations in human infants, for example, may occur because the infant’s genotype contains mutant genes or includes an abnormal number of chromosomes; they also may occur if early in pregnancy the mother has had German measles (rubella), has taken some injurious drug, or has been exposed to an injurious dosage of radiation. Experimental studies suggest similar types of factors can cause malformations in animals and plants.”
britannica/teratology

Now when you combine the terms “non-interventional” and “teratology” together, it is suggesting that the ongoing studies (that were not conducted to begin with even in a clinical trial setting, as per the FDA’s own response) on pregnant women with Comirnaty and on the developing baby, will be monitored with as little intervention as possible and is mostly to be observed for malformations/genetic defects/miscarriages/etc.

In other words, safety and efficacy were never studied in this particular group, and neither was it studied in infants. It has also not been studied for long-term analysis, as the 4-6 month trial runs proves. The current “approval” it is undergoing now is an authorized experiment on the human population that is posing incredibly unnecessary risks when considering the many effective treatments that are already available to combat respiratory illnesses. And the insistent assertiveness to push this “investigational new drug” onto babies/children who are at extremely low risk for this illness is a disastrous decision from those in an “authoritative” position and should be investigated for malfeasance and misconduct.

This is also not the first time that government agencies/health industries/etc. have conducted experiments on the public.

The Tuskegee/Syphilis experiment was initiated onto a selection of African American men between 1932-1972. The study was only stopped (allegedly) after a publication was released on Associated Press in 1972 about the immorally unethical experiments being conducted on this group:

“Of about 600 Alabama black men who originally took part in the study, 200 or so were allowed to suffer the disease and its side effects without treatment, even after penicillin was discovered as a cure for syphilis. Treatment then probably could have saved or helped many of the experiment participants, PHS officials say.”AP WAS THERE: Black men untreated in Tuskegee Syphilis Study

This study seems to echo the sentiments we see going on with the coronavirus situation, in which only one type of drug is being promoted (the COVID vaccines) while suppression of other treatments that have been proven to work (such as Ivermectin) has been denounced by the very same government/health/medical fields that have conducted these experimental studies.

A study that involved the CDC/FDA’s approval, this time on Black and Latino babies, was conducted in the early 1990’s and involved the measles vaccine:

“1990: CDC Inoculated Black and Latino Babies with an Unlicensed Measles Vaccine
A covert clinical trial by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Kaiser Permanente inoculated Black and Latino babies with an experimental measles vaccine without informing parents the vaccine was experimental. More than 1500 six-month old black and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles are given the deadly “experimental” measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States; a vaccine that had been tested in African and Mexican babies resulting in high death rates. The parents were never informed and they never gave their consent. The CDC harmed babies, violated federal law, and trampled on parental rights with impunity.”
1990 FDA Issued a Waiver From Consent; Covert CDC Experimental Vaccine Test on Black / Latino Babies

It’s interesting that the measles vaccine experiment identifies Kaiser Permanente specifically, because as we see in another section of the FDA BLA Approval for Comirnaty, it seems as if Kaiser Permanente makes another appearance in the role of human experimentation:

Text in the gray box below is from page 10 of the FDA BLA Approval documents
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]

13. Study C4591014, entitled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 BNT162b2 Vaccine
Effectiveness Study – Kaiser Permanente Southern California.”

Final Protocol Submission: March 22, 2021

Study Completion: December 31, 2022

Final Report Submission: June 30, 2023

It would seem that the approval by the FDA of these IND drugs (Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine) is a way for the government/health agencies to skirt away from liability by stating that since the vaccines are no longer “experimental” by their definition, and that they are FDA “approved”, it is no longer required to gain informed consent of these drugs. In addition, as to the technicality of their terms and protocols, there are a multitude of ways to interpret their “informed consent” rules, which officials can then bend or define in any way that best reflects the use of their study/drug.

[ https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/informed-consent#exceptions ]

Also keeping in mind how long it was determined before the “health agencies” granted approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine – (4-6 months) – it would be conclusive to state that the vaccines have NOT sufficiently been studied in young children or pregnant women (or even the rest of the age groups because of the short amount of time the clinical trial study was conducted in), and the subsequent approval of this vaccine is to continue this research on the population who is exceedingly being pressured into taking this investigational new drug.

There is also the matter of the many adverse events that have been reported since the inoculation of these injections, that have largely gone unheeded within the health/medical institutions that are endorsing this drug. Other than the widely acknowledged myocarditis and pericarditis, most common in young males, which is still being studied and allowed to persist onto the public.

So again, taking into account the collusion of the government/health/medical/research fields to conduct experiments on the public, it would be necessary to reflect upon these agencies for additional breaches upon human rights, consent, and ethical behavior.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Ahmad Ardity from Pixabay

FLASHBACK: In 2018, CDC Epidemiologist Timothy Cunningham Was Found Dead After Allegedly Claiming That the Flu Vaccine Was Causing Outbreaks

Are we sure the CDC is on our side?

As with anything built around intrigue and suspicion, “conspiracy theories” are bound to crop up.

Such is the case with the tragic disappearance, then death, of Dr. Timothy Cunningham, a CDC epidemiologist based in Georgia.

Because there is so much misinformation and conflicting agendas between multiple different sources, depending on one’s political/ethic leanings, it is difficult to piece together FACTS from these questionable circumstances.

So I am not attempting to debunk or fact-check these claims – just to reiterate that these are the claims that were made from these sources, and offer these pieces of information for the readers to consider.

In these times of deceit, especially when looking for honest answers about vaccine efficacy, I felt it prudent to revisit this case and the suspicious details that surround it.

The “FACTS”:

I put FACTS in quotes because I am merely repeating what multiple sources agree upon that actually happened during Timothy Cunningham’s disappearance and these are what has been more or less confirmed by the various different media: (although we must ask ourselves, can we even trust the media to begin with?)

– “Timothy Jerrell Cunningham was a Harvard-educated doctor with the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention. As an epidemiologist, he was a team leader in the US Public Health Service Commissioned Corps and was named in 2017 as part of the Atlanta Business Chronicle’s 40 Under 40 list.”wikipedia/Timothy J. Cunningham

-Timothy Cunningham was last seen on February 12, 2018, reported missing on February 14, 2018, and was found dead late Tuesday, April 3, 2018.

“Initial reports from a medical examiner’s autopsy revealed that Cunningham’s cause of death was drowning. Timothy Cunningham’s body was found along the Chattahoochee River, in an area that was inaccessible through walking”Timothy Cunningham Cause of Death: How Did the Missing CDC Employee Die?

– Law enforcement did not find evidence of foul play and ruled it as a suicide by drowning. “Chief Medical Examiner Jan Gorniak said he committed suicide by drowning.”Cause of death released for CDC scientist Timothy Cunningham

– Timothy Cunningham’s belongings, most notably his house keys and wallet, were found inside his LOCKED home.

– Timothy Cunningham’s parents revealed to detectives that he sent them a “series of worrying text messages and a phone call from him the night of February 11, the day before he went missing.”Timothy Cunningham Cause of Death: How Did the Missing CDC Employee Die?

“His neighbor, Viviana Tory, said that Cunningham told her husband to have her erase his cell phone number from her contacts list.”Timothy Cunningham: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Conflicting details of the case

A couple of things about this story I found rather odd and don’t line up, are these conflicting statements involving the officials’ interviews with CDC members, as well as the lead investigator and their assessment of Cunningham’s death.

The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention is discounting information that police released regarding missing employee Timothy Cunningham as erroneous.

In a statement from the government agency, officials said that information in the news that claimed Cunningham had been passed over for a promotion was untrue.

Those details were actually released by the Atlanta Police Department during a press conference on their ongoing attempts to find Cunningham, who went missing on Feb. 12 after leaving work and supposedly returning home. But the truth, according to the CDC, is the exact opposite.

On Feb. 27, Atlanta Police said on the day he went missing, Cunningham had a meeting.

“That meeting was to explain a promotion that he did not receive to branch manager. He had been informed the previous Monday that he was not getting the promotion but the explanation occurred on the morning of the twelfth,” the officer said.

The news CDC statement reads:

“In fact, he received an early promotion/exceptional proficiency promotion to Commander effective July 1, 2017, in recognition of his exemplary performance in the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS).”

11Alive reached out to Atlanta Police about the CDC’s statements and the agency is standing behind the information they released.

“Our information came directly from the CDC. Any further questions about Dr. Cunningham’s employment, or this statement issued by the CDC today, would need to be answered by the CDC,” the statement read.”

Source: Officials release conflicting details about missing CDC scientist

And during this reveal, it makes me wonder if some of the information got crossed, and the promotion that Dr. Cunningham allegedly got passed up for was for a different field altogether – although may still be involved with the CDC in a different branch. There are alleged documents that Dr. Cunningham actually resigned from a position called the RDF3 [Rapid Deployment Force 3] as an Infection Control Officer on February 7th. – Missing CDC scientist file: A ‘highly driven’ man struggling with personal, professional issues

And within the same link, states that he got passed over for a promotion on Feb 8th: “Thursday, Feb. 8 | Cunningham’s superiors tell him he did not get the promotion he was up for.”

Notice it says Cunningham’s “superiors” – but yet doesn’t state if those were specifically CDC superiors, or superiors of a different branch within the government agencies.

Then we have these rather strange conflicting statements:

“He [Major Michael O’Connor] added that they had interviewed friends, family, employees, and tracked his last movements, and could find nothing indicating foul play.”

“His parents, Tia and Terrell Cunningham, did say that they had received a series of worrying text messages and a phone call from him the night of February 11, the day before he went missing. They said they shared the details with detectives”

Source: Timothy Cunningham Cause of Death: How Did the Missing CDC Employee Die?

Hm… call me crazy, but if someone’s family divulged that their loved one, who recently went missing, sent a “series of worrying text messages” the DAY BEFORE THEY WENT MISSING (and who subsequently was found dead almost a month later), I most certainly wouldn’t rule out “foul play” at the drop of a hat… 

Regardless if the theories of Timothy Cunningham’s involvement with the CDC may have led to his death is true or not, the above conflicting statement alone is a red flag and should signal to anyone that there is a chance of foul play being involved – and shouldn’t even be a question coming from an experienced police unit.

And while we can’t expect these investigators to be miracle workers, there should still be a level of decorum and motivation/ambition when leading a missing person’s case and efforts to find cause of death, especially when so many events in this circumstance don’t add up.

Yet, we have this official statement about this case:

“Barring some new information coming forward – and obviously we’re checking, you know, we’ll check video, we’ll check places he might have got access to the river – but barring new information coming forward we may never be able to tell you how he got into the river,” O’Connor said.Timothy Cunningham: Why we may never know the whole story of CDC scientist’s disappearance

“On May 21, 2018, officials ruled his death a suicide. Toxicology tests showed nothing significant, there were no signs of trauma, and it was still not known how he ended up in the river. The investigation is now closed, Atlanta police have said.”Timothy Cunningham: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Uh huh. That definitely sounds like the determination of the Atlanta Police Department’s Homicide and Missing Person’s Unit to solve a case instead of attempting to cover it up. Which, by the way, I’m not saying conclusively is the agenda, but with other’s speculations and their own connections that maybe, just maybe, Cunningham’s involvement with his role at the CDC and the material he was exposed to did have something to do with his death is worth taking a look into.

Which brings me to:

The Theories:

There are a wide plethora of different theories, sources, assessments, attempts at piecing together this puzzle, etc. that can inevitably leave one running around in circles. As there is no absolute confirmation that these different possibilities are rooted in facts, the issue remains open to conjecture and supposition. And while many are sure that there is something sinister and underhanded going on in relation to Dr. Cunningham’s death and what he may have uncovered, we can’t overlook the possibility that he did indeed take his own life amidst a sea of misunderstandings and dreadful coincidences.

Of course, I have my own opinions, but opinions they will remain since I don’t know FOR SURE the reality of what happened.

With that being said, here are some of the speculations for further deliberation:

– An article by yournewswire alleged to have been contacted by Dr. Cunningham who provided the following statements in January under anonymity at the time:

“Some of the patients I’ve administered the flu shot to this year have died,” the doctor said in January, adding “I don’t care who you are, this scares the crap out of me.”
“We have seen people dying across the country of the flu, and one thing nearly all of them have in common is they got the flu shot,”CDC Doctor: ‘Disastrous’ Flu Shot Is Causing Deadly Flu Outbreak

– When it was revealed that Dr. Cunningham went missing in February, yournewswire sent out the following notice:

“In January, Dr. Cunningham shared his opinion that this year’s flu shot was behind the deadly outbreak of the flu, while warning that if his name was attached to the widely-circulated quotes, he would lose his job – or suffer an even worse fate.
Understanding the dangers involved in speaking out about vaccines in the current climate, we granted him anonymity in the article. However Dr. Cunningham told us we should go public should anything happen to him.”
CDC Doctor, Who Claimed Flu Shot Caused Outbreak, Missing Feared Dead

– While the following excerpt doesn’t specify the sources, it offers further details on what Dr. Cunningham may have been working on that led to this conspiracy:

“According to exclusive sources, he was startled with findings over the years regarding how flu vaccines amplify the side effects of viral infections rather than inoculate patients effectively.

In December of 2017, Cunningham was assigned to what was at the time a new project unofficially known as “Shogun.” According to our exclusive sources, testing and manipulation of the SARS strand were being used against a new drug that could eliminate a virus to infect your cells.”PURGED ARTICLE| Where is Timothy Cunningham’s Whistleblower Report on Coronavirus?

The same article proposes that Cunningham discovered an agenda that sought to weaponize SARS; while scientists from Japan found an all encompassing cure – which obviously went against the purpose that pharmaceutical agencies were aiming for:

“Cunningham discovered that specific individuals in the U.S. were working on information they received from the Chinese regarding weaponizing SARS – with high specificity in virulence targeting particular genetic code and enzyme packets for transcription. In essence, the new virus would mimic that of HIV. A “smart” virus that could replicate all ligands of target cells not to be detected by innate immune cells and therefore “lie in waiting.”

“His knowledge? Japan created an all-encompassed cure, and pharmaceutical companies were seeking ways around it.”PURGED ARTICLE| Where is Timothy Cunningham’s Whistleblower Report on Coronavirus?

– Now if all of that wasn’t enough, there were also theories that Dr. Cunningham stumbled upon a plot that may have been aimed at African Americans specifically:

“The Harvard educated scientist had worked on tackling the Ebola and Zika outbreaks before his death. He is also believed to have been researching the effects of the FLU vaccine, on Black people.”Scientist Researching Effects Of FLU VACCINE On Black People At The CDC . . Ends Up DEAD IN RIVER!!!

– Granted, the above excerpt is taken from an African American News Network site, however, studies that Dr. Cunningham himself participated in lends credence to their assessment:

“Finally, of great concern is that blacks in their 20s, 30s, and 40s are dying of diseases such as heart disease and diabetes. Which are typically seen in whites at older ages. This phenomenon has been described as weathering, meaning that the black population may be exposed to socioeconomic influences such as poverty and other environmental factors that can result in illness and death and earlier age than whites.”Transcript for Vital Signs African American Health | Press Briefing Transcript

“Compared with whites, blacks in age groups <65 years had higher levels of some self-reported risk factors and chronic diseases and mortality from cardiovascular diseases and cancer, diseases that are most common among persons aged ≥65 years.” Vital Signs: Racial Disparities in Age-Specific Mortality Among Blacks or African Americans – United States, 1999-2015

Please let me know if any of the links no longer work so I can update them with replacements.

So not only are there implications that Timothy Cunningham found a link between flu vaccines and unnecessary harm/death resulting in them, but he may also have made a connection between the increased illnesses in younger African Americans that may have been contributed by a failing health system – either unintentional, or very deliberate.

Side Note:

While I can’t vouch for the legitimacy of any website, I wanted to highlight the yournewswire website that initially ran the CDC whistleblower story to begin with. There have been many articles refuting their credibility, but what is true, at least according to Snopes (which, if it’s coming from Snopes to begin with, then extra caution should be applied…), stated the following:

“It is true the 2017-2018 flu season has been the worst one in years, and this season’s flu vaccine has been less effective than in the recent years. So not only is this year’s flu strain (H3N2) more rampant, but the main weapon against its spread isn’t holding it at bay.”

Source: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-cdc-flu-shot-causing-outbreak/

Hm… this incidence sounds strangely familiar and fairly recent… almost as if it’s going on RIGHT NOW.

Additional research shows that the efficacy of the flu vaccines for the 2017-2018 season was only 36%… according to the CDC. CDC: Flu vaccine 36% effective, highest for young children

Meanwhile, loaded with this CDC link, Snopes (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cdc-doctor-flu-shot-dead/) felt it prudent to point out how “YourNewsWire.com made several false statements in their article including that the flu vaccine is only 10 percent effective (it’s not — it’s 36% effective according to health officials)”,

yet failed to mention that the yournewswire website was simply stating what CBS news informed their readers: This year’s flu vaccine may only be 10% effective, experts warn. Which, you know, makes it NOT a false statement, and reflects the intellectual dishonesty that Snopes is known for.

But I digress. The point is, there are multiple sides to every story, but only ONE TRUTH.

Continuing on, I want to mention one last separate study that may or may not have connections with what Dr. Cunningham was presumed to have found.

CDC Deliberate Coverup of MMR Vaccines Linked to Increased Autism in African American Males

Although this event happened a few years before Dr. Cunningham’s death, it only adds fuel to the fire in regards to his involvement with the CDC, and his studies into epidemiology – and the presumed connections that vaccines may have had detrimental effects on people’s immune system; in addition to perhaps a very purposeful agenda to coverup inhumane testing on the public by inoculating them with so-called vaccines.

There has been such controversy surrounding Brian Hooker/William Thompson blowing the whistle on the CDC’s attempts to erase correlations between the MMR vaccine and the increased rate of autism in African American males, yet these efforts have still slid by the wayside and it seems as if no one has been held accountable for this egregious malfeasance and misconduct by the very group who is supposed to be protecting us from these “dangerous viruses” and inoculations that pose greater risk than the disease itself.

CDC Whistleblower Scientist Given Huge Bonus and Asked to Rewrite Fraudulent Vaccine-Autism Study

In fact, the CDC apparently blocked (I don’t know how that’s possible, to be honest – but due to technical legalities and “classified information”, NDA’s, blah blah blah, corrupt establishments can just hide behind a legal team and not address their own crimes – plus possible collusions with the legal system itself…) William Thompson’s capability to testify in court for a specific vaccine-related case. … Although he was granted whistleblower immunity, he has yet to be subpoenaed to testify.

CDC Blocks Testimony by Vaccine Whistleblower in Medical Malpractice Case

But it’s certainly not due to the fact that they have anything to hide, right? And it’s certainly not because they were engaging in awful, illegal human experimentation or anything like that. No, no. I’m sure the reason is because they simply don’t want confidential information out that they are secretly undercover heroes who are saving the whole world and must keep this secret purpose hidden, otherwise the REAL bad guys would know who to attack. I mean, what other possible reason would there be to “not allow” someone to testify?

“Dr. William Thompson’s deposition testimony would not substantially promote the objectives of CDC or HHS.”CDC Blocks Testimony by Vaccine Whistleblower in Medical Malpractice Case

lol No kidding. The whole point of the testimony is to expose the CDC FOR THEIR OBJECTIVES, which would obviously not reflect what they want to continue fooling the rest of the world into believing that they’re working towards.

So all in all, am I proposing that Dr. Timothy Cunningham’s death could be related to William Thompson’s exposé of CDC’s concealment/destruction of evidence, with Cunningham’s own efforts at finding links between rising illnesses within the African American community – on top of the suspicious deaths/autism cases in some of the vaccine-inoculated individuals?

I’m saying that there is enough “circumstantial evidence” to warrant further investigation and research before dismissing it altogether. And keeping a closer eye on the CDC while we’re at it.

Source: odysee | Free From Censorship | Vaxxed – Documentary

DISCLAIMER: I mean no disrespect bringing up the tragic death of Dr. Timothy Cunningham, and only aim to bring possible injustices to light and spread awareness that the narratives we’re being told may not be the truth and may be intentionally hiding a corrupt agenda; and silencing those that may have been trying to expose it.

My heart goes out to Timothy Cunningham’s family and friends. If he was trying to expose corruption, then I hope and pray his wishes gets granted. And if you have any further information or clarification as to the events that happened, please feel free to contact me so I can add it and/or correct it.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Get an Earful

BOMBSHELL: Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds [Full Transcript] - " - it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it's a way for them to know who's vaccinated because their blood will glow."
Studies PROVE That Live Parasites and Parasite Proteins Are Being Used/Tested in Vaccines | Are Parasites the Cause of ALL Illnesses? - At least 650,000 - 800,000 CHILDREN have been injected with a malaria vaccine to test its efficacy.
Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates - Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.
The War on COVID-19: Man’s Final Conquest of Nature. The Great Reset Requires “Merging Humans with the Machine” - "Man's conquest of nature, if the dreams of some scientific planners are realized, means the rule of a few hundreds of men over billions upon billions of men."
Taking a Look Back at the 2012 Olympics London Closing Ceremony: Does it Hold Secrets to What’s Going on in the World? - The world has been blind-sided for centuries, while underhanded organizations operate behind the curtain.
VMAT2 “God Gene” Has Been Studied Extensively Throughout the Years – And is Being Used in CRISPR Studies/Vaccines - According to studies, scientists can manipulate and "tightly experimentally tune" our level of spirituality.

Scam of the Medical Industry and a Depopulation Agenda Revealed at the ITNJ

Robert O. Young’s Testimony at the International Tribunal of Natural Justice

I always hear from others, especially those who DON’T WANT TO HEAR DIFFERENTLY, if something sinister and nefarious were going on in the world, especially one that includes a worldwide effort to dictate the actions (and the populations) of everyone else, wouldn’t SOMEONE be talking about it?

So I’ve been making posts that reveal that more and more people HAVE talked about this, and to be honest, I’m having a hard time catching up. There are SO many people talking out against this agenda, and the reason why it’s not heard about?

Because “they” largely keep it out of the press. It is literally being suppressed. And no wonder, with these “powers that shouldn’t be” owning the media, owning big tech, owning big pharma, owning the government agencies, owning the health industries, owning the entertainment business, owning the education system… These “elites” have already infiltrated most aspects of our lives.

So. Of. Course. We’re. Not. Going. To. Hear. About. Corruption.

Unless we’re actively looking for it.

And don’t get me wrong. I don’t want to believe all of this is happening either. But once you open this door, even just a tiny little crack, the flood of information comes pouring through. And then it’s up to common sense, common decency, and common courage (all of which, sadly, aren’t so common anymore…) to keep the door open and expose it for the depravity it is.

The below testimony is from Dr. Robert O. Young, who reveals how he and other doctors of his position are treated when they go against the health/medical establishment, and the corruption of multiple agencies accused of perpetuating, quote/unquote, “new viruses” on the public all for the sake of fear-mongering, and driving people to turn to drugs and vaccines to “cure/treat” them. In reality, the true purpose is so much worse.

It is, in no other better terms, the BIGGEST SCAM on humanity.

Some excerpts with timestamps below [embellishment has been added for emphasis]. All quotes by Robert Young unless otherwise stated:

Sacha Stone: “Our next witness is Dr. Robert O. Young, who has graciously come to be here today from California in the United States.

Dr. Robert Young is widely recognized as one of the top researchers and clinical scientists in the world. He has developed his life to researching the true causes of diseases, subsequently developing something known as the new biology, to help people around the world reverse any sickness, any ailment, any disease. And to begin to rebalance their lives to reclaim their health and their wellness.

Mr. Young is a controversial character, in as much as he appears to be. One of the most targeted individuals on Earth, amongst the 7.5 odd billion souls that inhabit the surface of the Earth. Mr. Robert Young is probably one of the top dozen targeted individuals by the global corporatocracy, the global pharmaceutical enterprise, that element of the global pharmaceutical enterprise, which appears, I say advisedly, appears to have been weaponized against humanity. And it is the very reason why we are here today, and this week. Unapologetically.

Dr. Robert Young, you are very welcome to this tribunal. Thank you for coming.”

Silencing dissenting opinions… not just from censorship

Robert O. Young @3:50:There are powers to be that want to put impediments in the way, to slow you down. And if you don’t slow down, then they notch it up a few. And they gave me a warning in 1996, where I was charged with two counts. Those went away because there was no evidence that they could prosecute me on. And yet, not wikipedia, I call it wackipedia, uses that as a bullet, because I learned that what the opposite side is trying to achieve is headlines. And the headlines is what they use through the media to destroy you.

I didn’t really get the picture, even after being on major network shows. Constantly on Fox news, having been on Oprah Winfrey, having a good relationship with Dr. Oz, who told me I was on the top 10 list – he was number 7; I was number 8. As you know he had to testify in front of Congress about his actions as he deviates away from conventional medicine to more alternative medicine thought. You notice that his program trains changed dramatically.

So… yes. I was on that top 10 list, as Sacha referred to. I wasn’t sure what that all meant, but as I saw my friends and colleagues being taken out one by one, through assassination, I realized that potentially I had my life at risk and I also realized, which I’m very very sensitive, because I love my family, I love my children, I love my grandchildren, that if they can’t get you, then they take out those who they love. And in January, one of those people was taken out, and he was a colleague and a friend. He’s no longer with us.”

Dr. Young wouldn’t approve of hospital protocols

@14:05: “I asked Dr. Jonathan, should I return back to medical school, and he said, “You wouldn’t survive it.” And I said, “Why?” He said, “Because you would get to the emergency room and start doing things that were totally off the protocol. You would not survive it, nor would you approve of what’s going on.” It wasn’t a matter of education or being able to comprehend, it was a matter of… “there would be a very difficult thing for you to be in that environment.”

“Over time, acquired two bachelors, three masters, and three doctorates. One being in nutrition. One being in biochemistry, which I’m still trying to help people understand, which is called pathological blood coagulation. People still read it and scratch their head. But it’s something that I really cherish and I’m happy to provide the court with this dissertation, pathological blood coagulation, because it answers a very very important question: “Why does the blood coagulate inside the blood vessel?” No one’s ever been able to figure that out. Well it took me many many years to figure it out and to write schematics on how that process happens. And a lot of the work that I’ve been doing over the last 30 – or 35 years, is a result of this.”

Malfeasance/bribery/coercion in the medical industry

@21:57: [referring to a former client who was treated from metastatic breast cancer by Robert O. Young] “she subsequently left the ranch and she went home and eventually she, for some reason, decided to move from what she believed in and was passionate about, that literally saved her life, and become a witness for the district attorney.

And it was one of the ones which was shocking because never did I ask for anything in return. There was no financial consideration. In fact I was paying her to be there, she wasn’t paying me to be there on the ranch. So there was no – my attorney at that time, says this is a perfect example of no good deed goes unpunished.

And during the trial she did testify against me. And… you know, as I looked into her eyes, I noticed that something had seriously changed. I still, today, am shocked when I even talk about it. I later learned that the district attorney, not so much from her, but from others, are offered financial consideration for testifying against me. I have an affidavit in my possession that one of those who worked for me and worked for me for close to 17 years was offered close to a hundred thousand dollars to testify against me.”

@26:15: “This woman which is just shocking and what was not presented at the case, it was not allowed to come in, were the PET scans from the oncologist showing the remission of her cancer. She was diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, three months after being on my program. Three months after, PET scans were taken, showing that there was no cancer anywhere in her body.”

 

@27:56:If however, someone like myself comes along with a new idea, that contradicts the credo that has been recited for years and passed on to others, and in fact, even threatened to overturn it, which my science does, then all passions are raised against this threat, and no method is left unturned to suppress it. People resist it in every way possible, pretending not to have heard of it. Speaking disparagingly of it. As if it were not even worth the effort of looking into the matter. And so a new truth can have a long wait before finally being accepted.”

No virus has ever been isolated

@30:31: “Once you understand the new biology, the new chemistry, the new physics, it literally underwrites everything you understand and even how wonderful and courageous Dale’s work is. Once he puts the other component, when he understands that the biggest fraud against this humanity, our humanity, is the fact that viruses have never been isolated! None!

There is no measle virus, and once you understand the basic chemistry and biology of the fraud that they’ve perpetuated on the human race and each year, if you ever thought about this, why is there a new virus every year? With a new name? With a similar types of symptomologies? This all started with the third reich, and Dr. Enders, and the so-called viruses. I write about this in one of my books. A Second Thoughts About Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV AIDS Hypothesis. And I’m not alone.

Those who have been brave enough, who stood up, even Peter Duesberg, at Berkeley University, a friend of mine, who wrote the book, Inventing AIDS Virus, lost all of his funding at the University. When the Nobel Prize winner for discovering the so-called HIV virus gets exiled to Beijing because he’s changing his mind about the existence of a virus. This is how bad things are.

What actually causes sickness?

@34:10: [while under house arrest] “But I didn’t stop working. I was not allowed to post to facebook. But I was still allowed to publish. And so I published a lot of the things that I’m talking about now even though it goes clear back to the 90’s. I began publishing in 2015 and 2016. And more recently, I shared this slide with the New Earth’s conference that 95% of all sickness and diseases are caused by what you eat, what you drink, what you breathe, and what you think. And I added additional thought in there. What you believe.

Your beliefs become biology. Only 5% of all sickness and disease is caused by genetics. And yet that 5% of genetics is only triggered based upon what you eat, what you drink, what you think, and what you believe. So you have to manage your thoughts. You have to manage your beliefs. Because they do change the biochemistry of the body.

Therefore, 100% of all sickness and disease is caused by what you eat, what you drink, what you breathe, what you think and what you believe.”

@37:38: “The unfortunate thing, many doctors do not understand this simple principle: germs do not cause disease. Period. We have been sold a bill of goods. We have been deceived.”

“We are putting you out of business. We are shutting you down.”

@46:03: “The trustee, of Martin Luther King, said to me, “Dr. Young, you have to be very careful. You are the Martin Luther King of the 21st century. Your message is so powerful, it destroys complete industries.”

When I was in China, when I lectured at Jinhua University, after my lecture, I was pulled aside again, he said, “Dr. Young, your science is incredible. But I want to say this, you are not Western medicine, you’re not Eastern medicine, you’re something totally different. You need to be very careful.”

At that time, being proud and youthful in my thinking, not having experienced the strong hand of the government, not having been charged 3 times: 1996, 1999, and then 2013. Having… maybe a little bit of egotistical thinking, ‘how can they ever get me?’

You can make up a lot of stuff. And uh, that’s what happened on July 23rd 2013. They came in; when I asked them what was their purpose? They had investigators, said, “We are putting you out of business.” “We are shutting you down.”

Why would you need drugs if natural treatment/diet can cure you?

@54:51: “And I want to stop this madness. I want to stop the so-called “good-doers”, who think they’re doing right, are doing evil. You can see it, in their eyes. You can feel it, in their voice.

Their only gratification is, they got their headline off of me. They published it on “wackipedia”, who – and google, who promotes disinformation, of what the truth really is. No one’s going to publish my pleomorphic documents. Because that would cause a lot of upset in the medical community. Well. It would also cause a lot of upset in big pharma. Why would you need drugs?

Mass chemical poisoning – to wipe out the “deplorables”

@57:00: “I would like to provide two papers that are published, The Possible Cause of Polio, Post-polio, CNS, PVIPD, Legionnaires, AIDS and the Cancer Epidemic – and the reason I did a hyphen? Because I know these aren’t viruses. It’s mass chemical poisoning.

People in New Zealand, that are doing this, aren’t doing it to kill the rats. The people that are doing this in India, are not doing it to kill the rats. The people that are doing this in New York, are not doing this to kill the rats. They are doing it to kill humanity; and wipe out the scourge of billions of people of those who they considered, you know, the “deplorables”. Quote, unquote, you know, Hillary Clinton.”

Dangerous substances in vaccines that we are injecting into children

@58:07: “So you asked the question of Dale, about vaccinations. This is what a child in the first years of life receives in micrograms and milligrams, etc.:

Screenshot taken from the video.

“This is what we are injecting into our newborn babies. As I said earlier, not in this format, the only thing you prove by vaccinating your children, is that if they live through it, is you just poisoned them and they survived it. There is no such thing as providing immunity or antibodies against these so-called assaults, when it’s not about the matter, it’s about the environment around the matter.”

“Viral existence has NEVER been scientifically demonstrated”

@1:01:26: “Viral existence has NEVER been scientifically demonstrated, it’s never even been proven, all viruses from HIV, EBV, CMV, Hepatitis C, West Nile Virus, Ebola, Measles, Zika, polio, the list goes on and on.

[shows slide] This is how you centrifuge for determining or demonstrating the existence of virus. This is what they talk about that they do.

Now here’s the fraud. They don’t do it! And if they do it, they don’t find a virus!”

Renaming the same “virus/illness” to perpetuate “cures/vaccines”

@1:03:48: “So you see polio incidence and pesticide production, as it rises up, and as it drops down – so we’re going to be seeing more incidence of paralysis – what they do, “We can’t have polio, we already cured that. So we’re going to put another name on it.”

That’s what they do in the cancer business. That’s what they’ve done in HIV. HIV would just quietly go away and there’ll be a new name for AIDS, auto-acquired immune deficiency.”

@1:04:21: “Poliomyelitis Incidence Timeline: from 1912 to 1970, why is Polio on the rise? Because DDT somewhere in the world is being used and they’re importing that food into the U.S. market. And if it’s not DDT, it’s Roundup. Glycophosphates. And they were so convinced that it was helpful, they actually sprayed it on everyone. Even children during school; they were sprayed.

So here we see the polio incidence and DDT production from 1940 to 70, in millions of pounds, and what happened as that came off? Has nothing to do with the efficacy of vaccines.

I want you to understand my position on this. See, once you understand that there’s no virus, what’s the point? What are you inoculating for? So what they did, they said, “Well wait a minute. Polio can’t come back. We have a cure. So let’s call it a… something else. Acute flaccid paralysis. Because we can’t have polio.”

Tragic deaths of multiple holistic/naturopathic doctors

Sacha Stone: @1:24:39: “Underpinning the imperative of this commission of inquiry, is the recent apparent murders, assassinations, of multiple natural practitioners and advocates of natural cures.”

“You also reminded us, incredibly succinctly, that we have made very little, if any, progress since the medieval times, as it relates to how the greatest souls amongst us – healing, treating, curing, redeeming, saving humanity from itself are witch hunted, as heretics, burned at the stake.”

Depopulation agenda by biological/chemical warfare

Sacha Stone: @1:32:14: “Where does any synthetic molecule serve the living?”

Robert Young: “They don’t. I mean, none.”

Sacha Stone: “And, am I right in suggesting that a medicine, by definition, is something which contains synthetic molecules. Something that is registered, patented, put in the market as a medicine?”

Robert Young: “Absolutely.”

Sacha Stone: “So, what I’m learning from you, Dr. Young, is that a quadrillion dollar enterprise is at work amongst us, decimating, culling, the human family…”

Robert Young: “Intentionally.”

Sacha Stone: “Intentionally. Using synthetic molecules, which by design are our cancer aids – “

Robert Young: “Yes, for the purpose of sterilization and population control. There’s too many people on the planet, we need to get rid of, in the words of Bill Gates, at least 3 billion people, need to die. So we’ll just start off in Africa, we’ll start doing our research there, and we’ll eliminate most of the Africans, because they’re deplorable. They’re worthless. They’re not part of this “world economy”. So they have their rights taken away, and they’re suppressed and they’re experimented.”

Sacha Stone: “And the multilateral agencies and the health and regulatory, so-called, authorities and agencies appear in the main to have become weaponized. And appear, I again use the word ‘appear’ advisedly, we’re not casting judgements here, we’re taking depositions listening to expert testimonies, appear to be weaponized, and appear to be working in collusion against the living men and women of the soil. Is that a fair statement?”

Robert Young: “It is. It’s not a bacterial war, it’s a systemic poisoning war. And they’re using chemical warfare against all of us.”

Sacha Stone: “Have you in your years defined anything close to the atoms seed of who and what they are? We know about the agencies, we understand the acronyms, but have you come close at all to identifying who and what they are?”

Robert Young: “I haven’t met these Luciferian people. Wherever they may be. They hide because they fear the light, of which I represent.”

Culling of at least a third of the population – using VACCINES – starting with Africa

Sir John Walsh of Brannagh ITNJ Chief Justice: “This is not a question. You said that you’d heard that there was basically a plan to eliminate a third of the population. A colleague – population of the world, and that Africa was the main target because the people there are worthless… I just want to say, that a colleague of mine, and I make it clear when I say ‘colleague’ – someone I know professionally who is very highly placed – he’s not a friend, he’s just someone I know who went to the conference at Davos just recently, and the people who go to Davos are the architects and controllers of money and the politics of the world, and he came back and he said to me, that it is a definite systematic plan, because they have worked out they need to get rid of at least a third of the people on the Earth. And I said to him, “Does that include me?” And he said, “No, it doesn’t include you, because you’re of European stock.”

Robert Young: “Yeah, well, these are not my words. These are Bill Gates’ words. Just google Bill Gates and depopulation and sterilization, and you’ll hear out of his own mouth the plan. And then if that’s not enough for you, then listen to Henry Kissinger, and his words, where he talks about how this is a win-win situation and the mandation and mandating vaccines is part of the plan for depopulation

“Never lose hope. You’re gonna win.”

Bishop Riah Abu el Assal ITNJ Commissioner @1:37:17: “I have much in common with you. I’ve been blacklisted for almost a quarter of a century. They try to plant weapons in our home. I was accused that I subsidized terroristic and subversive activity – different activities in Israel and the West Bank. And then I ended up invited by the different parties witnessing the Nobel Peace Prize given to Chairman Arafat, Prime Minister Lavigne, and later President Pence. I was there in Mosul. Never lose hope. You’re gonna win.”

For further reading of Dr. Robert O. Young and his views, please visit:
Dr. Robert O. Young | Your Ultimate Guide for Healthy Living

So many people are speaking out against this agenda. Good, honest people risking their livelihood, their reputation, their safety… for our sake.

Are we going to continue to turn a blind eye and deaf ear to them? Or finally open ourselves up to accepting the truth and commending these brave people for standing up against these corrupt institutions and take action? Stop consenting, bring these injustices to light, and hold the groups responsible accountable for these egregious crimes.

This takes an effort on everyone’s part. The media. The politicians. The health industry. The education system. The entertainment business. Big tech. Law enforcement. The government… There ARE honest people within all of these establishments. As corrupt as some of these institutions are. Perhaps people are unwittingly going along with the plan because they see no other choice.  YOU ARE THE CHOICE! When more and more people stand up and refuse this system, it crumbles and fails. Be a part of the fight FOR humanity. Not against it.