Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT)

Dr. Pierre Kory: “And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”

On January 24, 2022, Senator Ron Johnson held a panel discussion with several highly acknowledged doctors and medical experts, as well as testimonial accounts from witnesses, describing the medical tyranny and corruption that has been unleashed since “COVID-19” hit. The conference was ~5 hours long, and as Senator Ron Johnson put it, “we didn’t even scratch the surface of what we need to discuss”, because there is just so much data and information to be exposed.

In the highlight video below, some of the key points have been addressed, and have been transcribed including timestamps for easier search and maneuverability.

While there will likely be some disagreements to some of the assertions that have been stated (some question the legitimacy of COVID, for one, since it has been speculated that it is a rebranding of the flu and marketed to be deadlier in order to push the vaccines, and whether we’re even in a “pandemic” – or ever was, etc.) the number one thing that most of the members of this panel have concluded upon, is that the measures and protocols put in place by the government and health agencies, namely the CDC, NIH and FDA, have either failed miserably, and/or was implemented on purpose for ulterior reasons – and the “COVID vaccines” are not only unnecessary, but are also causing an unprecedented amount of injuries and death.

Many thanks to the speakers at this event, and to Senator Ron Johnson for giving them a platform to discuss the suspicious nature of what has been happening due to this COVID/vaccine narrative.

The video below has been transcribed in full. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

To watch the full version, please go here.

Source: rumble | Senator Ron Johnson | COVID-19: A Second Opinion (Shorter Highlight Video)

Senator Ron Johnson: “All I can ask, is the viewers to share this. Tell your friends. I know this is long. This is, this is a 5 hour long panel. And we didn’t even scratch the surface of what we need to discuss! This shouldn’t be necessary. As our information grew, as we became better and better educated; less ignorant about… the coronavirus, COVID, the COVID vaccines – This, this should’ve been made public every step along the way.

But it wasn’t.

So again, I’m just asking the viewing public to have an open mind, respect these individuals who have paid a significant price. Professionally, reputationally.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @00:53: “How many of you in this room, recognizing there are doctors, there are PhDs, there are attorneys, media experts, other scientists, public citizens… how many of you personally have witnessed censorship, intimidation, or professional reprisal, and damage as a result of your advocacy for patients?”

[several members raise their hand]

“I want this to be recorded. That is 80% of this room have experienced something negative in their life in trying to promote and help compassionately something positive for patients suffering with a potentially fatal illness.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @01:35: “I’d like to start really quick with a story. So, a high risk individual approaches me: 50 years old, obese, Type 1 diabetic, calls me, “I have COVID.” This is about a year ago. “What do I do? Help. Help. I’m going to the ER. My oxygen’s 86. I have excruciating pain in my lungs.” So I said, “You’re going to the pharmacy; don’t go to the ER.”

I called in some early treatment medications, are the drugs which shall not be named. Said individual calls me a couple of hours later and says, “You know that excruciating 9 out of 10 lung pain, and it’s now a 2 out of 10 six hours later.” Well I know the mechanisms of the medication I prescribed. A few hours later in the next morning he calls me, he says, “You know that oxygen saturation of 86? It’s now a 98%.” I said, “Isn’t that fantastic? Early treatment works.”

That individual’s my brother. I am my brother’s keeper.”

__________

Dr. Harvey Risch @02:32: “This warning says, “FDA cautions against the use of hydroxychloroquine in out-patients outside of the hospital setting.” But then, in the justification, it says, “We base this on information to treat hospitalized patients.”

Hospital disease, as we’ll hear, and as we know, from two years of dealing with COVID, it’s a completely different illness, treated with different drugs, different medications, in the hospital. Outpatient disease is flu-like. Hospital disease is a [undetermined] pneumonia.

And so the fact that the FDA would base recommendations and warnings on hospital disease, which is a totally different disease than outpatient disease, is a fraud. This website is still there today, and constitutes an outright fraud.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @03:20: “Again, I’ll point out, there is so much we don’t know. I would’ve liked to seen a much larger dose of modesty coming out of our federal health officials, and the Legacy Media, and big tech, when it came to – we would be so much better off, if there was robust debate and discussion.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @03:42: I have to say, I’m going to call it out, and I’m known for this, I call it like I see it, I’m calling attention to the corruption. If you look at these innumerable failed policies, there’s only one way to understand them. They are literally written by pharmaceutical companies. Almost every single policy serves the interest of the pharmaceutical company.

However, if you look outside the United States and look around the world, there have been numerous successes. As one of the world experts on Ivermectin, let me just talk about some programs which used Ivermectin. My colleagues here, as Dr. Risch just pointed out, there are a number of compounds that we’ve identified that are effective in early treatment. Almost all of them are repurposed or generic.

But let me just say a few words about Ivermectin and what it’s doing around the world. Not in the United States. In the United States it’s a “horse de-wormer”, it’s “horse-paste”, and only the illiterate, ignorant and/or unvaccinated use it.”

“That medication has been shown to literally solve the pandemic in numerous regions around the world.”

__________

Dr. Richard Urso @04:50: “And as time went on, they were told, in no uncertain terms, if you use these drugs, you probably will be fired. And nobody had to tell them; they’re smart people, you don’t have to draw a map.”

“- is why is an ophthalmologist treating? Because patients were languishing at home. And I’ve treated over 1600 patients because patients were languishing at home with no treatment for inflammation, with no treatment for respiratory distress, with no treatment for blood clotting. It’s absolutely absurd, and I wasn’t going to let it happen. And I think as you see in this room, all of us feel the same.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @05:27: “Are African-Americans, are they denied early treatment in the community?”

Dr. Christina Parks:“Well yes they are. My dad just died. Right? He died Friday. Couldn’t get a test. Couldn’t get monoclonal antibodies. We treated him at home, unfortunately we had an oxygen machine that didn’t work. So he – blood saturation went down to the point where he was incoherent. We called EMS; they said your problem is your oxygen machine doesn’t work. They put oxygen on him, he went to 98% saturation.

We moved him to the hospital, he recovered all of his cognitive functions, he was doing quite well. But he was no longer getting medications that reduces inflammation. He was no longer getting medications that block the histamine response. He was no longer getting the medications that he needed. And he was no longer getting, you know, lung steroids, and he just declined, and declined, and declined. Until he passed away, on Friday, and I say he passed away from lack of appropriate care.”

__________

Dr. Mary Bowden @06:28: “So in the last 6 months, I’ve really evolved into a early treatment advocate. I’ve used a combination of medications and up until recently I was using monoclonal antibodies, and sadly we can’t get those anymore. But, you know, I just hear so many stories. At first it was, you know, “my PCP won’t see me”. So they came to see me, and ENT. I became the PCP. Now it’s people are terrified to go to the hospital. So I’ve become the emergency room. And I’m giving high dose IV steroids, I’m giving, you know, 25 grams of IV, vitamin C, but I am keeping people out of the hospital, and I’ve kept over 2,000 people out of the hospital. And if you look at current statistics, 20 of those people should be dead. And they’re not. So…”

“And the turning point for me, when I really got angry, was a patient that his wife reached out to me, he’s trapped in the ICU. Father of 6, sheriff’s deputy, refused to give anything but, you know, these hospitals give them low dose steroids, they give them 6 milligrams of dexamethasone, you know, 3 times a day. A lot of these hospitals won’t even give breathing treatments; it’s ridiculous. They won’t give them the vitamins! I mean – and so, basically she called me in desperation, and I testified, she sued the hospital to try to get her husband the medications he needed.

I testified; we won. The hospital refused to grant me privileges. Even though I have a spotless record. And I was furious. That’s when it all changed for me and I became… I became thrust into the public because of Methodist Hospital. But, it’s just, you know, we – I’ve seen a lot, and I’m angry, and I’m exhausted. I mean, I’ve one hospital I can send patients to that I feel safe to.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @08:17: “Some of those heart wrenching stories I’m hearing, where a loved one’s in the hospital, and their… the family’s begging the hospital to do more. To try and save the person’s life. And they’re just being told, “Nah, your loved one – there’s not much hope, you know. Get ready for the worst.” and they just won’t do anything.”

__________

Dr. Paul Marik @08:37: “So the question is, why? Why have cheap, safe and effective drugs being ignored for the treatment of COVID-19, which could have saved maybe 500,000 lives? And I think Dr. Kory has told us exactly why.”

__________

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty @08:57: “I want to talk about medical ethics. Because I’m concerned that many of our pandemic policies have ignored foundational principles of medical ethics.”

“We effectively abandoned patients that were suffering from other conditions and had other medical needs. The disastrous fruits of this myopia include an unprecedented 40% increase in all cause mortality among working age adults, 18-64, over the last year. Most of which, 2/3 to 3/4 , depending on the state, was not related to COVID. Actuaries tells us that a 10% rise in all cause mortality is a once in 200 year disaster. This was a 40% rise.”

__________

Dr. Robert Malone @09:48: “In my opinion, we should not have politicized the public health response to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. This is a bipartisan issue, and the physicians represented here are truly a bipartisan group. I’m not, although I’ve been characterized as a right-wing proud boy, I’ve previously supported, um, both President Obama and President Biden’s campaigns. But, the course of events have forced me to rethink a lot of my positions, and I think that’s the case with many of my peers.”

“If I may quote, in May of 1995, Nelson Mandela said, “There can be no keener revelation of a society’s soul, than the way in which it treats its children.” In my opinion, our public policies in managing this, have had a particularly strong adverse effect on our children, and vaccine mandates for our children are completely unjustified at this point.”

__________

Dr. David Wiseman @10:52: “So my friend told me a week ago, he said, “Watch this new movie. It’s called Don’t Look Up.” And I told him, “Listen, I don’t need to look at this movie. I’ve been in this movie for the last 2 years.”

__________

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya @11:03: “We have better treatments, and we should be investing in research to continue to improve our treatments and strategies to make sure that we have treatments available everywhere, where someone vulnerable especially gets sick.”

“If you put these strategies together, our society can continue to function in a much more healthy way than we have functioned these past 2 years. While at the same time, working to protect older people, the strategies we followed, basically by ignoring the possibility of early treatment, by not focusing our efforts on the protection of vulnerable populations, and worst of all, these restrictions on human behavior, on human connection, have wreaked enormous damage. And it’s far past time that we stop those policies and instead followed an alternate plan.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @11:56: “So Dr. Bhattacharya was joined by colleagues from Harvard and from Oxford. And put together the Great Barrington Declaration, I’m pretty sure they published that in, I think it was October 2020. We’ve since seen emails between Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci, head of NIH and NIAID, basically with a concerned effort to destroy, reputationally destroy, Dr. Bhattacharya and his co-authors.

Now, let’s ask the listening audience, does that sound like a crazy individual? Sounds to me like a highly qualified, very reasonable person, as we have in this – we’ve assembled in this room.”

__________

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty @12:40: “One worry, that public health officials have mentioned is, well, if we acknowledge that natural immunity is a reality, which, of course it is, and it’s been – it’s epidemiology and immunology 101, they’re worried that people will go out and deliberately get COVID rather than getting the vaccine.

But of course, the issue around acknowledging natural immunity is, what about the people who already have had COVID? That’s what we’re talking about here. Right? And we can give people advice on, you know, avoiding infection and so forth. But ignoring all the folks that have already recovered from COVID is not a good public health policy.”

“Acknowledging natural immunity, would lead to the next very basic question: how many people have it? And the fact that 2 years into the pandemic, we still do not know exactly how many Americans have had COVID… is aston- it’s an astonishing failure of the public health to do basic epidemiological research. The two most basic facts that every medical student learns first, about every new illness that they learn about, are incidence and prevalence. How many new cases, and how many total cases over a given period of time?”

“One very important fact about natural immunity, is that there has not been a single reported case of someone getting reinfected and subsequently transmitting the virus to others. Which we know is not the case for vaccines. Vaccines don’t offer, against COVID, that kind of sterilizing immunity.

So we FOIA’d the CDC, please show us any evidence of someone with natural immunity getting reinfected and transmitting the virus to others. They couldn’t come up with any data. We actually put that in our lawsuit. The university’s experts could not come up with a single counter example.

That’s a very dangerous thing to say. Right? Because almost nothing in medicine and science is a 100%. You can always find outliers. But natural immunity – people with natural immunity are the safest people to be around. You are not going to get COVID from somebody who’s already had COVID.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @14:45: “So, we are seeing actually the vaccinated carry a high volume of virus, because they don’t have the secretory IgA. So this false construct from our federal agencies that “this is a pandemic, and the unvaccinated are spreading”, is a pathophysiological lie. The vaccinated are carrying high volumes in their nose, their tears, their mouth, the virus. Because the vaccine does not neutralize in that location of the body where the virus comes in.

So this is very important. This is why mandates are absolutely now moot, irrelevant, and out the window and need to go away worldwide like most of the world has done already. This is the funny uncle. This is not SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19. This is, COVID-22 meh.”

__________

Dr. Richard Urso @15:40: “Zero randomized control trials that show masks stop the spread of respiratory disease. And that’s including N95. And for everyone, N stands for ‘non-oil resistant’, 95 stands for 95% of airborne particles of which all viruses fit through.

So I usually tell people that, you know, wearing N95 also has not been shown in randomized control trials to be effective. But more importantly, that the capsule on these viruses aren’t oil capsule. And I tell people, it’s like peeing in the pool, it goes right through. It doesn’t stick to water, water molecules, it’s an oil capsule virus.

At the end of the day, the data is what it is, there’s zero, repeat, zero randomized control trials at all, showing that masks stop the spread of upper respiratory disease.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @16:25: “So you’ve treated, through Telemedicine [Dr. Ben Marble:Yes.”] 150,000 COVID patients? [Dr. Ben Marble:“Yes, sir.”] With your team?”

Dr. Ben Marble: “Yes, with the team. We have a team of volunteer free doctors, that donate their time to help treat these patients that come to us. They go to myfreedoctor.com, and they answer our questionnaires, we deliver the early treatment protocols to them as early as we can, and we have a 99.99% survival rate. So I believe myfreedoctor.com, the volunteer free doctor team, we have settled the science on this, early treatment works, period.”

__________

Dr. Harpal Mangat @17:02: “For the key answer is to find a doctor who is gonna treat you. And then that doctor’s gonna be cognizant that a lot of its scripts will not be prescribed. Like I have patients in Virginia, I treat them. I have to figure out where I can get the relevant drugs. And that often means independent pharmacists.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @17:23: “But these are crimes. You know what is going on in this country right now? Is that the CDC, has been captured by the pharmaceutical industry. They sent out a memo in August of 2021. They sent out a similar memo back in the spring of 2020, telling the nations’ physicians and pharmacists not to use generic medicines. We are now in the state, in this country, where it – Senator Johnson asked the question, how can we get the average US citizen to treat, or get treated?

We have pharmacists across the land who are refusing – refusing, to fill these. Because they’ve been manipulated and brain-washed into thinking that it – that the FDA hasn’t approved the use, as if that matters. Off-label prescriptions and prescribing has been going on for decades. It’s encouraged, when there are no effective treatments. Yet I have to, when I’m trying to treat my patients, and Dr. Marble can attest to this, we have pharmacists who refuse to fill some of the safest and the low cost medicines known in the history of medicine.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @18:32: “All of the different drugs that there have been some research on… and what’s interesting about this chart is that Dr. Kory circled the ones that are recommended by our health agencies. They all range from seven hundred bucks, up to 3200. All the ones that are not recommended are, the ones that are, you know, a couple of bucks. Uh, go figure.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @18:56: “I’ve lost a third of my business because insurance contracts have pulled away from me for unprofessional conduct for using these “dangerous” drugs, Ivermectin, for the which my patients have had no adverse reactions. I’ve treated 500,000 patients, or diagnosed 500,000 patients diagnostically in my career. I’ve not had one single complaint against me. I have 4 complaints against licenses in 4 different states for saving lives. So the adverse reaction from these drugs is being attacked for being a good doctor. That’s the bad adverse reaction. And I know many of my colleagues on this panel as well.” [audience applauds]

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @19:29: “And I can tell you 201, the patients that I’ve lost, is because we’ve gotten a late start on early treatment. I’ve recently published a paper with Fazio and colleagues from Italy, we have shown the golden window to treat COVID-19 is the first 72 hours. And the patients that I have lost, and they’ve been very few, but if people listen to this out here, they will recognize that it’s a late start at treatment that is, in a sense, the failure of early treatment. If we start early, we have uniformed successes. I’ve reviewed hundreds and hundreds of reports of hospitalized patients. And of those who’ve died of COVID-19. And in those reports, the clear observation is, that determinants of hospitalization and death are the lack of early treatment.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @20:17: “I am completely agnostic when it comes to whatever drug will end this pandemic. Vaccine, whatever, I don’t care. I want this pandemic over, I want people to live.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @20:27: “We also had the wrong bodies leading the vaccine program. Remember, the FDA’s supposed to be the safety watchdog. The National Institutes of Health is the government research body and the CDC is the outbreak investigation body. Right now, the CDC and the FDA are the named sponsors of a vaccine program.

If America can learn anything, we should never have the FDA and CDC be a sponsor of a public program in administering a product. [audience applauds] It has been a giant and colossal mistake. We should have had a separate body, a government body be the sponsor of the vaccine program. The vaccine manufacturers can supply the products, and then we needed the separate data safety monitoring board, clinical event committee and human ethics committee there in oversight. And if this would have happened based on the emergence of unexplained deaths, I am testifying today that the program would have been shutdown in February, because of excess mortality.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @21:26: “They will attack you, they will threaten you, they will put you in a state of fear and say, “You can only do what we say, but don’t save a life.” And by the way, the vaccines are expired because Omicron is here. And now they still want to mandate them. So they threaten us, and threaten us, and threaten us, and we’re hunted for caring and being compassionate and empathetic and wanting to help humanity.”

__________

Kyle Warner @21:50: “Is it, you know, logical to think that if you’ve been harmed by the first dose, then you shouldn’t get a second dose? And if you get the second dose and you’re harmed, would a booster potentially do more harm and, if you were on the 7th booster, would that potentially cause more harm down the road?”

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: “Of course. You don’t have to be a physician to know the answer to that question. A 4 year old, knows the answer to that question.”

Dr. Richard Urso: “Yeah, and I just want to partner off of what Dr. McCullough said. I don’t think people realize that all these people who had COVID were excluded from the trials. All of them. So we’re going to take our 5-11 year olds, that there’s 28 million, that means 14 – it was about half and half, it’s probably more 60% have had COVID already. So let’s say 12 million have had – have not had COVID. So if those 12 million had the vaccine, and it was a perfect vaccine, it’s 0.1 per hundred thousand, you might save 12 [million] children.

What’s going to happen to the 16 children – 16 million children who haven’t… who’ve already had the virus, who already have immunity, and we’re going to subject them to something that wasn’t even tested in that group? It’s literally absurd. And that’s the thing I would say, Senator, is that it’s – we’re not here about civil liberties and mandates. We’re here to save lives. And this group of people should be excluded, absolutely.

There’s an Achilles Heel to the program of natural immunity. Natural immunity denial should not be happening. It should be a major focus of what we’re trying to do here. Because you’re going to harm, I don’t know how many children by force vaccinating 16 million children. It’s absurd.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @23:22: “In listening to my colleagues, call out all of the inanities, the insanities, the absurdities. Okay? These departures of our policies from what we know are to be scientific truths. These things like denial of natural immunity. We have to understand why. To sit here and point fingers, ‘they’re doing this wrong, and that wrong’

WHY are they doing this? There could be multiple reasons. The simplest and most easily understandable and proveable is, every vaccine, every – these, you know, these novel patented high-cost drugs, is profits. They are putting profits ahead of patients. You know, we can call attention to all of these policies; they are non-scientific. They are failing at having scientific support, yet they’ve been carrying out and they’re being distributed across the country. And doctors, and states, and health departments are willingly accepting these without question, without critical thinking.

And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!” [audience applauds]

__________

Dr. Christina Parks @24:25: “Why are they vaccinating our children? Because once it’s on the vaccine, um, once it’s on the childhood schedule, they are no longer liable for injury. So they’re going to get off that EUA, put it right on the childhood vaccine schedule, and then have no liability going forward.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @24:42: “So I’m going to tell you – read you a quick little news story out of Vietnam. Just got this today.

A 9th grader, in the northern province of Phu Tho, died Tuesday after getting her second Pfizer vaccine dose, the local medical center said Thursday. The girl had gotten her first Pfizer dose on December 3rd 2021. After which she experienced dizziness and had difficulty breathing. She was taken to a medical center for treatment and later recovered.

She had her second dose last Monday. Her mother told healthcare workers about the girl’s side effects following her first shot, but they asked her to get the second shot anyway. Again, this is a… 9th grader. Doesn’t have much risk from COVID. Has a reaction to the first dose, but let’s give her the second dose anyway.

2o minutes following the second shot, the girl experienced tightness in her chest, dizziness, difficulty breathing and seizures. She received emergency treatment on the spot before being transferred to a district medical center. On arrival, she began to vomit blood, fell into a coma, and her heart stopped. Her family received news that she died Tuesday morning.

Now, I guess this isn’t evidence that a death might be related to the vaccine. But it certainly would concern me more than it’s concerned Dr. [Anthony] Fauci, Dr. [Rochelle] Walenksy, Dr. [Francis] Collins, Dr. [Janet] Woodcock, Dr. [Peter] Marks – I know one of your favorites, Brianne [Dressen].

Um, this is reality. This is reality that’s being ignored by our federal health officials, by the Legacy Media,”

__________

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty @26:27: “But every patient is a new textbook, every patient is a unique human being that has unique factors that only we and the patient really understand, with sufficient depth to make difficult medical judgments. And this is the first time in my career – I think the other clinical physicians in the room would agree, where I’ve worried about, is somebody going to be looking over my shoulder asking me why I’ve prescribed fluvoxamine for this indication rather than that indication? I prescribe it for depression, no problem. ‘Are you giving this to treat COVID?’ Why should it matter to you? So it -”

Senator Ron Johnson: “So you’re saying – this is the first time in your – [Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: “The last 2 years.”] Is that true?”

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: “The last 2 years. Now, there’s – there are things that hospital administrators do that have annoyed physicians for years. But the kind of hamstringing of physicians, in terms of doing what we believe to be the right and best and good for this vulnerable patient in front of me right now, that is my only responsibility, as a physician, this patient who has placed their trust in me as their physician, to do what is best for them, and not be, not be acting as the agent of a social program. Or a state program. Or any other interest, that could compromise -”

__________

Dr. Paul Marik @27:54: “So I can tell you what happened to me. So I was using our protocol to treat critically ill patients in the ICU with a whole host of repurposed drugs. I then – this is a memo, this is a memo sent to the entire healthcare system, but they targeted me personally. And what did this memo say? This said I can use Remdesivir, and then I will quote, it was an added section,

Do not endorse section which includes medications that may cause harm and efficacy is not supported in peer-reviewed published RCTs. These medications will not be verified or dispensed for the prevention or treatment of COVID. This list includes: Ivermectin, bicalutamide, etoposide, fluvoxamine, dutasteride, and finasteride.”

And then, just to stick it to me, they added ‘ascorbic acid’ [vitamin C]. [audience laughs] The healthcare system was effectively preventing me treating my patients according to my best clinical judgment.

And then how did this progress? I objected. So the first week I was in the ICU, I didn’t know what to do. What was I to do? My hands were tied. As a clinician for the first time in my entire career I could not be a doctor. I could not treat patients the way I had to be to treat patients. I had 7 COVID patients. Including a 31 year old woman. I was not allowed to treat these people. I had to stand by idly, I had to stand by idly, watching these people die.

I then tried to sue the system and you know what they did? They did something called peer-sham review. It is a disgusting and evil concept. They then accused me of 7 most outrageous crimes that I had committed. And that I was such a severe threat to the safety of patients, they immediately suspended my hospital privileges because I possessed – I posed such an outright threat to these patients. Ignoring the fact that under my care, the mortality was 50% those of my colleagues.

I then went on through the sham-peer review, I went to a kangaroo court, where they continued this, and the end result was I lost my hospital privilege and was reported to the national practitioner data bank. So here I was standing up for patients’ rights, and this hospital – this evil hospital, ended my medical career. So that’s what they do. It’s an outright outrage; it’s evil to the core.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @31:05: “You can use safe, effective, off-label drugs for other conditions outside COVID?”

Dr. Paul Marik: “Absolutely. If this was pneomococcal pneumonia, this wouldn’t be an issue. This is specifically for COVID.”

__________

Jennifer Bridges @31:18: “So I’m still a nurse, but I was fired from Houston Methodist. I’m the one you might have seen all over the news. We were the first one mandated with a COVID shot. So I blew it up on the national media. We have a huge state and federal lawsuit because we didn’t want to be guinea pigs. We saw for ourselves, in the hospital, people coming in with adverse reactions after getting the Pfizer shot.

And the crazy thing is, let me tell you a couple of things about Methodist Hospital down in Houston, Texas. When they first started with COVID, I did that COVID unit on and off the whole time till they fired me in June, right? They started the first two months with hydroxychloroquine. They actually used it in the hospital, then they cut it back real quick, switched it to Remdesivir, and all these other expensive drugs. And we’re like, why? And we would ask these doctors; no one could give us a reason. They just said, “Well the hospital policy changed.” But they didn’t know why.

And you know most of those doctors in that hospital would not even go in those COVID rooms. There was maybe 2 that would. They would stand outside, make us dress up head to toe and go in with an ipad. So the only form of communication those doctors would have at Houston Methodist with the COVID patients was through an ipad. So literally we go in there, they’d be talking to them, never assess the lungs, never look at them, nothing. Go to discharge them; I would come back out and be like, “No. Have you listened to them? They can’t breathe.” Like the wheezing’s horrible – they had no clue.”

__________

Brienne Dressen @32:48: “For 80% of us, are misdiagnosed with anxiety initially; and then months down the road we get appropriate diagnosis, and that’s when we are able to find doctors that are actually willing to go against the directive. Because like these physicians were discussing, their licenses have been threatened. And because their licenses have been threatened, we cannot get medical care. They are afraid to treat us. We have had patients who are severely injured and are dying, who cannot get in the door to get seen by physicians, because physicians are afraid of the word “COVID vaccine”.

So instead, what they’re doing is they’ve made us like Kyle Warner and myself, and our membership of over 12,000 COVID vaccine injured, we are ground-zero to take care of the COVID vaccine injured. When we have highly qualified practitioners, across the globe, that have been silenced and threatened, if they even so much as see us for what’s going on.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @33:37: “There is the father of a boy here in this room who’s died of myocarditis. …One death is too many. One! One! We have 21,000 cases of myocarditis, and climbing, in the United States that the CDC has verified. One was too many.

Under no circumstances, under any circumstances, should a young person ever receive one of these vaccines, let alone ever be pressured to receive a vaccine, let alone ever be mandated to take a vaccine. This is crystal clear. The FDA agrees; there can be no controversy over this.”

“We are seeing unprecedented numbers of athletes dying on the field in Europe. Unprecedented. Of these cardiac arrests, half of them don’t come back. We now have a report out of the heart group in the UK where actuarial mortality for those under age 15, mortality in the UK, is higher than expected.”

__________

Dr. Robert Malone @34:58: “And I am concerned about our children. I am concerned about all of those effects. Brain, heart, blood coagulation, reproductive system, immunologic system, and furthermore, they’re not at risk for this virus. Why are we doing this? And mandating these vaccines for children just breaks my heart.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @35:25: “This is, this is what we get, when I investigate. [holds up two completely redacted sheets of paper – audience laughs and groans] I mean this isn’t, to do with this. But this is after a couple of years trying to get information out of another agency, and we finally get the information, and it’s all redacted.

This is, this is how the administrate – the, you know, the federal government, the agency is complying with congressional oversight.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @35:47: “This dose that was tested in a major trial, and which made corticosteroids the standard of care worldwide, and I’ll also want to, I also want to give praise to Senator Johnson. You know, Senator Johnson invited me to give testimony in the Senate, in May of 2020. And I remember my first conversation with him when he reached out. He was so, he was so, um… enthusiastic about hearing about the work that Dr. Marik and myself were doing, that we were putting out protocols and we’re trying to treat this disease.

You know, and he said he couldn’t understand why the system wasn’t reacting; why the entire system wasn’t reacting the way we were. And I remember he told me – he goes, I want the doctors to take their gloves off. And they’re not.”

They were sitting idly by the bedside, institutions were paralyzed, waiting for randomized control trials to be done. And then finally a randomized control – so at that time, I testified, to the world, that corticosteroids were critical in the treatment of this disease. Nothing happened. Until a trial came out 8 weeks later and proved the life saving properties of corticosteroids. But that dose that was tested was ridiculous. It was the lowest dose, and the dose that’s being used, helps the few and fails the many.”

__________

Dr. Richard Urso @36:58: “I want to personally thank you. Um, in the past, medical schools and conferences would, like this, would take place. We’d debate on how to treat these kinds of diseases, and, you know, I – it’s kind of strange that we – this meeting has to take place in the U.S. Senate. Um, you know, given the current state of affairs, that’s where we are. But, in the past, we would think that somehow the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, we would have basically maybe a message board, exchange ideas.

And I really want to reach out and say thank you for what you’ve done. To Dr. McCullough and Dr. Risch, who initially set all of this up. You know, the extreme censorship and attacks have led us to come to this place. And so I wanted just to thank you, for what you’ve done. You’ve really pushed this all forward, you know, as a – you know, you’ve been yourself become a researcher and a scientist over this last 2 years. So thank you very much.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @37:57: “Uh, these are highly qualified individuals. They speak from experience. We’ve got to fix this problem. We can’t let this continue, we can’t let it happen in the future. So again, thank all of you for coming. Thank you for being doctors, for being nurses, for being aca-magicians, for being medical researchers, and thank all of you for viewing this. Share this with your friends.

God bless you all.” [audience applauds]

Once again, a huge thank you to everyone who participated in this panel. Your thoughts and efforts at exposing this corruption is a perfect example of bravery and integrity in the face of adversity – especially since it is going against what these depraved institutions are trying to implement as the new status quo.

Thank you so much for your heroism, compassion and steadfastness at bringing awareness to these topics.

And a sincere thank you to the readers/viewers who are staying informed and sharing these important information with others; and the many who have refused to comply with these outrageous policies/mandates.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by fernando zhiminaicela from Pixabay

Revolver Exclusive: The Big Pharma “Shell Game” Tricking Our Military Into Mandatory Vaccinations

Commander Jay Furman alerting of deception and malfeasance within the government and pharmaceutical companies.

Reposted from Revolver and Commander Jay Furman
Original article written on September 25, 2021 (reprinted with permission)

Last month, Revolver exclusively published a paper by Navy CDR J.H. Furman, warning that the mandatory COVID-19 vaccination of the entire Navy could constitute a national security threat.

Now, Furman has produced another paper, describing what he calls a “shell game” by which other U.S. government agencies, and several pharmaceutical companies are tricking the Navy into embracing mandatory vaccination, at great risk to the United States.

 

His paper is reproduced below.

The views and opinions expressed in this paper do not in any way represent the United States Navy or the Department of Defense.

 

CDR Jay Furman, USN

At the turning point of the Spanish American War, a single American officer volunteered to hand carry a critical message through impossible enemy lines to a fateful ally named General Garcia, forever changing the course of that war and our country. Today, one million COVID-19 non-vaccinated brave military messengers would deliver a, no less, existential dispatch: the U.S. Military is being misled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Center for Disease Control (CDC), and the Pfizer and BioNTech drug companies, resulting in the current mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies. While some media outlets reflexively cheer on the deadly shell game, is our military leadership prematurely mandating a vaccine that their personnel cannot, or should not, legally receive? Could that decision prove to be more detrimental to military readiness than the disease itself, thereby posing a greater threat to U.S. national security?

 

On August 23, 2021, news broke that Pfizer had obtained an FDA license for its COVD-19 vaccine. The contrived FDA announcement:

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine [BioNTech’s COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA, not Pfizer]. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine [Pfizer’s non-FDA licensed vaccine], and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee) [only available in markets outside U.S.], for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older (emphasis added).

 

The agency charged with the public’s health in pharmaceutical matters issued two related official letters confounding the announcement, above. Reconciling those letters and the ensuing policy is tedious, leaving the truth one-layer too deep for most media outlets. Unfortunately, the resulting confusion appears more goal than incidental. Bottom-line, the FDA did not license a COVID-19 vaccine physically available to consumers in the U.S.

In their first letter, the FDA issued the only COVID-19 vaccination license for COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA (Comirnaty) owned by German company BioNTech (not Pfizer). It is not produced for a U.S.-licensed label anywhere in the FDA’s jurisdiction. In their second letter, the FDA re-issued the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (not a FDA license). The letter officially designates Comirnaty as the licensed name for COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA. This EUA explicitly states that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine “[…] has not been approved or licensed by the FDA, but has been authorized by emergency use [EUA] by the FDA […]” (emphasis added). It goes on to assert that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) formulations are the same and thereby can be clinically substitutable. The FDA notes the abundant supply of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and the non-availability of Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) in the U.S. market. They then explicitly re-affirm that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is, in fact, experimental and only covered by the EUA, not FDA licensed.

 

FDA License Letter:

 

EUA Re-issue Letter Excerpts:

Confused yet? The CDC did not help matters, either. On Monday, August 31, 2021, their Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) released an inaccurate statement. The committee’s public announcement unanimously endorsed the FDA license for the “Pfizer-BioNTech licensed vaccine.” They misstated the vaccine name and license holder, never mentioning the actual owner of the FDA license, BioNTech, conflating legal ownership of Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) as Pfizer’s. They neglected to mention it is not available in the U.S. and therefore not possible for consumers here to receive. Those inaccuracies further aided the public misperception that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is FDA licensed. Concurrently, two high-level career FDA officials resigned at the time of the CDC ACIP board announcement, citing frustration with overreach into FDA affairs by other parts of the Executive Branch.

 

The Pfizer company issued a “forward-looking” press release, that was also easily misinterpreted. Perhaps they were hoping the mundane went unnoticed, as the pharmaceutical giant intermingled complex terms and concepts: Pfizer, BioNTech, Comirnaty, COVID-19, mRNA, EUA, authorized, approved, licensed, manufacturer, legal owner, national markets, and etc. The corporate relationship between Pfizer and BioNTech is no less convoluted. The joint venture and vaccine names, also similar, only add to the confusion. All of which potentially prevented a clear understanding of important legal and regulatory nuances, and allowed a fearful U.S. public to believe an available vaccine was now regulatorily licensed for their safety and legal recourse, when in reality, it was not. In brief:

  • BioNTech is the marketing arm of the two company enterprise in the U.S., Europe, and UK.
  • Pfizer produced Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) for BioNTech, while both submitted supporting material for the license.
    BioNTech, alone, received an FDA license for Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA).
  • Both Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) were covered, in-part, by the re-issued EUA.
  • Both Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA may be available in other countries. Yet, Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is not available anywhere under FDA jurisdiction.
  • If and when this occurs, Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) will be “[…] manufactured, filled, labeled, and packaged at Pfizer.”
  • Both Pfizer produced vaccines are, at times, marketed as Comirnaty outside the U.S. While only COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is officially recognized as Comirnaty in this country.

Recent U.S. military vaccine mandates look to be a direct result of the manufactured confusion. August 24, 2021 DoD guidance stated that the Department “[…] will only use COVID-19 vaccines that receive full licensure from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) […]” (emphasis added). A fully FDA licensed COVID-19 vaccine is not available to U.S. service members. They are simply not able to legally comply with the DoD mandate.

By administrative and regulatory law, it appears that all public and private institutions are not allowed to mandate EUA medical products. In 21 U.S. Code 360bb-3-Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies for unapproved products (b)(2)(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), it says that recipients have “[…] the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” In the FDA’s own policy guidelines it is written that recipients “[…] have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product […].” Under U.S. Code 335(i)(4) and related regulations, “the informed consent process typically requires human subjects to agree to the receipt… upon a disclosure that the product in question is not yet FDA approved and that the receipt of such product is voluntary.” Informed consent is required to administer EUA vaccines with few exceptions.

 

The newly mandated Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is legally defined as an EUA and therefore cannot be mandated in the military unless informed consent is waived by a presidential waiver and, according to U.S. Code Section 1107a of Title 10 and DoDI 6200.02, only after meeting specific criteria. Two of these criteria apparently preclude its issuance in this case: 1) “[…] specified military operation presents a substantial risk that military personnel may be subject to a chemical, biological, nuclear, or other exposure likely to produce death or serious or life-threatening injury or illness […]” and; 2) “[…] no available satisfactory alternative therapeutic or preventive treatment in relation to the intended use of the investigational new drug.” In the first, a waiver of informed consent is limited to the support of a specific military operation. For the second, monoclonal antibody therapy is an FDA-authorized alternative COVID-19 treatment.

It does not matter that the FDA stated in their re-issued EUA, their website, or Fact Sheet that the vaccines are similarly formulated and can be clinically interchangeable. The simple fact is that the administration of an EUA vaccine, by law, requires informed consent. It is therefore illegal to mandate any of the three U.S. available COVID-19 vaccines that are not officially licensed. As the Department did not receive an informed consent waiver from the President to mandate the Pfizer-BioNTech CV-19 Vaccine, and the FDA licensed Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is not yet available in the U.S., it remains uncertain how the military can continue to incorrectly mandate COVID-19 vaccination.

Consequently, the Services’ mandatory vaccination orders are impossible to lawfully execute according to Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 90. U.S. military officers take an oath to the Constitution, and not to those appointed over them in the event orders are unlawful (enlisted service members swear allegiance to both). An officer may find themselves duty bound to refuse an unlawfully mandated vaccination in support and defense of the law of the land, on the behalf of their troops.

 

Meanwhile in other countries, Pfizer has not provided any COVID-19 vaccines without explicit (and extreme) indemnity contracts in place. They are requiring not only protection from all future product harm civil lawsuits, but also protection from Pfizer’s “[…] fraud, gross negligence, mismanagement, failure to follow good manufacturing processes… or malice […].” The company is requiring some countries to fund foreign bank accounts, take out insurance, and put up sovereign assets such as their Embassies or military bases, according to global health law lecturer Mark Eccleston-Turner of the University of England and statnews.com.

The aforementioned regulatory charade may be a U.S. version of Pfizer’s COVID-19 global indemnity project. Unfortunately, the company has a history of misbranding “with the intent to defraud or mislead.” In a landmark DOJ case they were found guilty of a felony, and fined $2.3 billion (the largest such fine ever) for fraudulent marketing. Interestingly, the FDA receives almost half of its current funding from industry in the form of “regulatory fees,” a clear conflict of interest which should be strongly questioned.

If the vaccine is actually safe and effective, then why all this confusion? Why did they only license “Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA),” exclusively available outside of this country? Why did they not license the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” the only label available in the U.S. Why does Pfizer not just import the approved label? Why are they so keen on some form of almost total indemnity everywhere their vaccines are available? Why are we told they are interchangeable, but their license and EUA are legally not? If what is in the vial is the same, then why the legal labyrinth? And what exactly was the cross-agency overreach into FDA licensing processes and why is there no formal Congressional inquiry?

 

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) is asking questions. He recently wrote a letter to the FDA requesting “why they did not grant full licensure for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that is already in use and available in the U.S., and how the agency will ensure that those being vaccinated under mandates will receive the FDA-approved version […].” Those concerned about our nation’s defense should consider asking their Congressmen and Senators to do the same.

The complex web of words, business structures, international legal agreements, and unforthright regulation may not collectively protect U.S. citizens. Rather, they enable a slight-of-hand scheme that increases global market-share, reduces expenses, and lowers potential legal exposure. All the while, this product (with no long-term studies and declining efficacy) is pushed on the consumer—at all costs—regardless of the potential harm. If the confusion were removed as it should be, informed citizens, their elected officials, and public servants would not stand for this carnival-like side show.

Nine months into the vaccination campaign, available evidence to-date does not look good for existing U.S. vaccines. The original “wild” version of SAR-CoV-2 is virtually dead and the increasingly immune variants dominate. Delta is highly contagious, but much less dangerous to the general population. The largest real-world analysis study, examining 700,000 records in Israel’s official health database, found that the COVID-19 vaccinated are 13 times more likely to be infected and 27 times more likely to demonstrate serious symptoms than those with recovered natural immunity. The Combined Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which tracks post-vaccination events for possible patterns, has through August recorded more than 600,000 events, including 81,000 serious or life-threatening events and about 13,000 deaths.

In contrast, as of 12 August, the COVID-19 mortality rate in the military was .001%, or 29 deaths in the almost 2.2 million-strong and exceptionally healthy U.S. service member population. Recent studies, meanwhile, indicate that teen boys and young men (the military’s dominant demographic) are more likely to suffer heart problems from vaccination than they are to be hospitalized from COVID-19 itself. It is not difficult at all to imagine that in a force as young and healthy as the military, universal vaccination could cause more harm than the disease itself.

We all, citizen, elected official and military, want to protect the Force, but the extent of national harm that could result from doing so in this way, with wrong or incomplete information, is staggering to contemplate. Industry, regulators, and media must be immediately cross-examined. We literally only get one shot at this, as these vaccines are irreversible experimental gene therapies. I have previously suggested a Department-wide safety pause to conduct further study, so as to not prematurely commit the entire U.S. fighting force to one permanent experimental group. Given all of the cross-agency confusion, Congressional inquiry may be necessary. A bipartisan body could better investigate the misperceptions informing national security decisions.

Until more is reliably known, DoD can still maintain a control group with almost half of the 2.2 million uniformed population still deciding not to vaccinate. We could easily commence prevention and treatment therapies like I-MASK+ currently used in nations around the world with great efficacy.

It would be a national calamity to “rush to failure” en masse with the entire U.S. troop strength, using vaccines that may be more harmful than the disease itself to this specific population entrusted with our nation’s defense. The pervasive misperception that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is FDA licensed, thereby justifying mandatory vaccination policy, is a logical syllogism based on a false premise and, therefore, invalid. The FDA, CDC, Pfizer, BioNTech and the media must reveal what is under all of the “shells” for the sake of this Republic.

Many U.S. military service members are carrying these messages to Garcia in the strongest terms possible, by tendering resignations. I am aware of many seasoned officers and enlisted who have done so, or done the effective equivalent (early retirement or non-reenlistment). This mandatory vaccination decision may, in the end, squander billions in training and readiness. The sudden loss of even a fraction of the one million non-vaccinated force could expose critical capabilities at scale. The talent capable of separating, at this time, have completed all service obligations, are fully trained and highly experienced, constituting the best of our warfighter expertise and lethality. Many others are declining to visit the military recruiter’s office for the first time. The already difficult task of recruiting for our all-volunteer force may become nearly impossible with a mandatory vaccination policy.

The most tragic are those already in the Service who have a remaining obligation (contracts or enlistments) and cannot choose to leave for risk of legal or financial ruin. Continue down this path, and our military will almost certainly suffer a heretofore-unseen morale deficit, further reducing overall fighting capability. If we run off or demoralize fully half of our armed force, then the defense of this nation will be significantly crippled.

And for what? To protect 0.001% of those in service? We would wreck our military, just after wrecking our economy, at the worst possible time, when U.S. soft power and perceived hard power are arguably at their lowest levels in half a century. This unnecessary vaccine mandate comes at a moment when strategic competitors are demonstrably more capable, more aggressive, and more able to project their will against U.S. interests than ever before.

If the mandatory COVID-19 vaccine policy is truly a military readiness initiative, then the reality is it will cause a far graver impact to our national defense posture than this disease. America’s foes do not care the reason why our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guard or Guardians are not on duty to prevent attack. Mandatory vaccination’s enterprise-level damage to recruiting, retention, and trust and confidence within the ranks could make us all more vulnerable than COVID-19 ever could alone. It has been said that this great nation can only be conquered from within. If the military self-inflicts a strategic sized wound (by persecuting half the troops), then it is possible we could gift this nation’s enemies our own mortal blow.

To review, the FDA licensed vaccine is not available to consumers in the U.S. and even DoD cannot mandate any emergency vaccine without a specifically conditional, presidential waiver of a service member’s informed consent. To do otherwise is unlawful. The way I see it, service members have three choices: 1) choose to receive the EUA shot; 2) submit a religious and/or medical waiver, or; 3) refuse the EUA shot, as only a fully licensed vaccine labeled Comirnaty, not available at your U.S. clinic, can be mandated at present.

As we do best, service members are helping service members. More information can be found at COVID-19 educational information hub: thecontrolgroup.us

Commander Furman is a career United States naval officer, naval aviator and foreign area officer with extensive experience advising senior military, diplomatic and international organization’s leadership. The Commander has spent years serving throughout Africa, Asia, Europe and the Middle East at sea, ashore and airborne. He holds a Master of Arts in Security Studies from the Naval Postgraduate School.

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS:
Thank you to Commander J.H. Furman and The Revolver for bringing these incredibly important issues to our attention. The amount of deception and manipulation that these “medical/health agencies”, government/politicians and pharmaceutical companies have employed to vaccinate everyone cannot in common sense terms be deemed as a beneficial goal and/or for health reasons. There is something else at work here.

Thank you again to Commander J.H. Furman and everyone else speaking up during these perilous times. Your bravery and integrity in coming forward is greatly appreciated and much needed to bring this awareness to the population.

God bless.

Egregious Medical Tyranny Holds Patient Hostage in a Hospital and Refuses Her Preferred Medical Treatment – Patient DIES Under Their Protocol

Veronica Wolski was denied specific treatment – AND denied the freedom to leave the hospital.

A tragic unfolding of events has occurred surrounding Veronica Wolski, a freedom activist who has largely expressed her views against masks, vaccines and vaccine mandates.

After falling ill and being sent to the AMITA Health Resurrection Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois, Veronica Wolski was denied her choice in care and was also denied being released of her own free will to a medical team that was already lined up to take care of her illness and her wishes. She passed away on Sunday, September 13, 2021 – allegedly from pneumonia; after weeks of being denied release and denied her preferred treatment of Ivermectin.

The Resurrection Medical Center not only imposed a medical tyranny and abuse of power in withholding preferred medical treatment, but also exercised an egregious amount of authoritative control by preventing the patient from denying their protocol. This is basically like saying if you had cancer, out of all of the available treatments you have at your disposal, but you get admitted to a certain hospital, they are “allowed” to do only their protocol treatment on you, regardless if that is what you want or not. And not letting you leave and instead making you undergo their experiment procedure.

This outrageous misconduct and malfeasance was nothing less than keeping her a prisoner and demanding that she use their protocol, or else.

And as we can see, being forced to use their protocol ended up in a harrowing and heartbreaking ordeal, not only for Veronica Wolski and her loved ones, but also for the individuals vouching for her rights and freedom.

The below videos show two advocates who were trying to stand up to the medical tyranny that undoubtedly led to the death of Veronica Wolski.

Thank you to the Stew Peters Show and Dr. Lee Vliet and Attorney Nancy Ross for bringing this to our attention. Who knows how many others were subjected to this abuse, and ended up dying alone in the hospital while the establishment enforced their unsafe and disturbing “treatment” on unwilling patients.

Killed by Tyranny – Veronica Wolski’s Doctor Speaks Out

Transcript provided below. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis:

Stew Peters: “Well, Americans are witnessing the unthinkable in our hospitals and our healthcare systems around the country as patients seem to be held hostage by doctors driven by a political machine, rather than the upholding of an oath.

Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet MD is president and CEO of the Public Charity Truth for Health Foundation, which can be found at truthforhealth.org and an independent practicing physician actively treating COVID patients and providing educational programs for patients. Community health groups and health professionals.

Dr. Vliet was assisting in the efforts to save the life of Veronica Wolski in Chicago who passed away without ever being provided the treatment she or her advocates were requesting. And Dr. Vliet joins us now.

Thank you so much for being here, we really appreciate it.”

Dr. Lee Vliet: “Thank you, Stew. I’m honored to be able to help in getting the horror out to the public of what happened to Veronica Wolski, in Resurrection Hospital in Chicago last weekend.

Our team was requested by the attorneys to be involved, beginning on Wednesday afternoon. On Thursday afternoon we had a medical care team with critical care, ICU doctor, independent critical care nurses, nurses on the ground willing to coordinate her medical care in the setting, delivery capability for high flow oxygen, IV fluids, medications. Everything she was being denied in the hospital, our team had ready by Friday.

And at every turn, I was personally involved in helping the patient’s power of attorney. Our team was involved and our attorneys were also involved trying to help the patient’s power of attorney, whom you’ll meet later, who was a warrior for Veronica, help her get the patient released from the prison of this hospital, which it had become.

Veronica, I heard, I was conferenced in on a conversation that took place, I heard it, Veronica was asking to be released today. And she was denied, she was pressured into intubation, she refused it; I heard her myself and she asked for the treatment that her power of attorney was fighting heroically. I heard the doctors deny it.

Every single step that the patient requested, that the power of attorney requested, was violated in her legal rights to request treatment. She was denied release even though the power of attorney made it clear she was being released home to hospice, and the patient knew she might die at home, she asked to die in freedom. Not as a prisoner.

And, quite frankly, I heard the doctor brow-beating the patient’s power of attorney on Sunday afternoon saying, “Well, we can’t get hospice here. And that’s not our process, and that’s not what we do.” And I happen to know medically for a fact that what she was telling the power of attorney was not factually correct.

Therefore, in my opinion medically, they willfully denied treatment to this patient. And then the power of attorney learned that afternoon when she finally got into the hospital to see her, that standing outside her door, that they had taken away the IV fluids. And medically, we all know that if you deprive a patient of IV fluids who’s already dehydrated, which her laboratory data showed, then they’re going to go down quickly, no matter how high flow the oxygen is. You can’t deliver it if there’s inadequate fluid volume in the blood stream.

And they had not treated a rising white count bacterial pneumonia – I mean they – the oversight and the negligence medically, was staggering. I have never in my career seen anything as egregious as what our team, our whole team, was witness to from Thursday through Sunday in this situation. And ironically, we were also brought in on other hospital situations in other states, in the same time frame. The same talking points were being used with the patients; the same denial of the patient’s power of attorney access to the patient.

In fact, at one hospital, in Arizona, the patient’s power of attorney was escorted out of the hospital in handcuffs! This medical tyranny has got to stop, and Truth for Health Foundation is fighting that battle. We have a medical censorship defense fund to help doctors like Dr. McCullough and others who have been sued for speaking out. We will defend patients and their families, and their rights to have their power of attorney request honored. And, we know, our team was guiding the resources on the ground in Illinois to set up an entire mobile unit to take care of this patient. And she was denied leaving the hospital under bogus descriptions from the team there.

Stew Peters: “This – this is horrific; what you’re describing. And I – I’m sorry but, with TV and radio, I’ve got part breaks that I’m coming up against right now. Truthforhealth.org is your website. I encourage everybody to go visit that.

Dr. Vliet, thank you so much for being here – I gotta go. Uh, we really appreciate you coming forward and I hope to have you back soon. Thank you so much. God bless you.”

Dr. Lee Vliet: “Thank you.”

EXCLUSIVE! Veronica Wolski’s Power of Attorney Speaks Out After Tyrannical Killing

Transcript provided below. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis:

Stew Peters: “Well, an extremely emotional week in Chicago left us saying goodbye to Veronica Wolski; best known for her signage over the Kennedy Expressway on the People’s Bridge. 

Wolski became the center of controversy when she was denied the medical treatment being requested by her power of attorney, Nancy Ross, who joins us now.

Nancy, I know that it’s been a really emotional couple of weeks, specifically the last 24 hours, so I want to thank you for coming here to talk with us today. We know that you didn’t have to do that.”

POA Nancy Ross: “Thank you, Stew, very much. And thank you to your audience and all those really around the world who have been fighting for Veronica. Veronica always said, “Never be silent.” You know, “Never quit. Never give up.” And she fought to the very end. 

She had a prescription for Ivermectin at home. She’d been requesting to the hospital if she could bring that. My understanding is that was denied.

But I’ll back up. First she became sick, she thought she had a sinus infection, she tested positive for COVID, went home, and two days later had shortness of breath. And went into the hospital. Very quickly she was put on high levels of oxygen, was my understanding. And they began Remdesivir.

She called me, she told me she didn’t want the medicine: “I don’t want this. I want them out.” I have multiple texts from her saying, “Get me out of here.” / “Get me home.” / “Bring me oxygen.” / “Get medical transport. Take me out.”

I didn’t know what was going on. I tried to contact family and friends, and was assured that they were following frontline protocols, and that she would be getting some of the treatment she really wanted. It was all very confusing, very disturbing.

I finally told her, “I’m coming to Chicago. And I’ll help however I can.” She asked me then to be her POA so we can arrange to have after care for her to get her out and to get her after care. And there were so many roadblocks, over the next 10 days. It was, um, it was very difficult.

And um, security escorted me out of the building multiple times. After I’d been invited in. After day 2 they told me I was no longer allowed in the hospital, period. I asked what policy I violated, what had I done wrong? I was there to advocate for her. We sent a demand letter to the hospital with 17 different demands, and we were really trying to work with them. But it was clear that Veronica was being denied some treatments; even some food and nutrition that we had to beg for, over many many days.

Stew Peters: “It seems like she was denied… every human right that we’re inherently promised as Americans. Why – did they ever give you an answer on why you were not allowed to be there advocating for her?

Nancy Ross: “They told me after the 2nd day, that Veronica’s of sound mind. Everyone always assured me; and she is a warrior, as everyone knows, for truth and justice and freedom. She knows – she knows her rights. She was advising them on what, you know, she thought could work best for her, and pleading with them. They said she can speak for herself. That I didn’t need to be there and that further conversations would be with her.

Now I understand, you know, my rights at the time were to help her. I’d called for a patient conference for multiple days. Finally after 4 days, I walked in and they had maybe 8 representatives from the hospital system there to speak with me. And some of our, just even basic concerns just were not, were not met.

And we had private duty nurses who were available to go in and just be caretakers; just to sit with her in isolation. You know, as you know, many COVID patients, you know, they are, they’re isolated. And after 10 days, and certainly after 20 days, we felt like it’s time for her to stop being secluded. And at minimum, she needed loved ones, family, friends, and nurses who could at least just care for her. And be with her. Hold her hand, and try to advocate for her. But that was denied as well.”

Stew Peters: “I just can’t wrap my head around any of this. It – it’s – this is happening in America.

And if the justification for removing you was that Veronica Wolski could speak for herself, then why was it that her demands, her requests that she was speaking for herself, were not honored? And fell on deaf ears? And she didn’t – she was denied the right to try. She was denied the ability to make freedom choices after her own health!

I mean – I don’t, I don’t understand how they can get away – this is criminal! This is absolutely criminal. By every sense of the word.”

Nancy Ross: “On day 2, when I was there, so she would’ve been in the hospital at that point, I believe well over a week, I was able to meet with a very kind infectious disease doctor overseeing her care. And he agreed to prescribe the Ivermectin. Again, even though she had a prescription at home from a different doctor, he agreed to prescribe it in the hospital.

We were, thrilled. We thought we had an – a real advocate there.

And then hours later he was overruled by the AMITA system, who said they are following NIH protocols. And an ethics committee met; we demanded an ethics committee conference. They met without us. We didn’t have a chance to present what we believe was some solid case study.

There also had been a court ruling, in nearby Elmhurst, where a hospital was ordered to give a patient their Ivermectin. My understanding is, that patient came out of a coma after 20 days and is home now playing with her grandkids. Veronica knew this. And she knew that there was hope, and that was denied. She also wanted to be transferred; she wanted to come home on hospice. They told her, oxygen needs were so high she couldn’t leave the hospital. But we felt we had found medical transport to meet her oxygen needs; we had a team ready to care for her. And it seems it was blocked at every turn.”

Stew Peters: “Forgive my ignorance on this, but isn’t there such a thing as AMA – “against medical advice” – that a patient is always afforded the right to just leave? To walk out? I mean, they’re not in jail. She’s not being held in custody. She hasn’t been charged with a crime. And certainly nurses and doctors are not law enforcement. But it seems that they have this unilateral, unchecked authority over patients once they come in and are determined to be “COVID” patients.”

Nancy Ross: “Right. We were told she wouldn’t have oxygen – or may not have oxygen to walk out. I said, “Well, we would have it.” And, by the end, they said, no – no medical transport company, no one will take her, because her – she was so unstable at that point. The needs were so dire.”

Stew Peters: “But you had somebody that would take her. Correct?”

Nancy Ross: “We had, we had an ambulance that said they had the needs that she required. And they said they needed authorization from the hospital, to release her. And we also had a nurse practitioner who was prescribing medications to her, ready on the outside, and many doctors, lawyers. I was blessed to have, just a really incredible team around me. Because I’m – I’m not a medical expert. I’m her friend; I’ve been friends with her for, for some time, and she, you know, she asked for help. I just – I’ve never – I’m just speechless. I’m so sorry.”

Stew Peters: “So you had a hospice – you had an ambulance, rather, that was prepared and ready to take her; you had a practitioner that was prescribing the medications that Veronica Wolski was requesting. All that needed to happen was for authorization from the hospital for her to be released to that equipped ambulance – who said that they were capable of caring for her, and that authorization never came.”

Nancy Ross: “It did not. They said, “We just don’t release her to anybody. We need to know who’s the name of this hospice company? Who is it? Who is it?”

And I did not give the name. I said, “I need to know the proper procedures at the hospital. Who do I talk to for her release?” And, the end of the conversation, it was, “They’re not in till Monday morning at 9.” I said, “She may not make it, till Monday.” And she didn’t. Um, I just have so many questions.”

Stew Peters: “And when you get answers to those questions, would you please come back? Because – [Nancy Ross: “Absolutely.”] – millions of people have the same questions, and demand answers, on – “

Nancy Ross: “They do. If I could help at all, Stew, some – we have very kind people have reached out and said, you know, maybe this will work. You know, initially, when they inform you of the risk of certain medication, like Ivermectin, which, by the way, is issued to other patients at AMITA, for other conditions. It’s just not… um, it’s just not part of their protocol for COVID. It’s not banned. It’s just not part of their protocol. Okay? So when they present you with the risk, you say, “I now have informed consent, thank you very much, I demand to try this. I demand this medication.” Then give them a window. Maybe just 48 hours.

If you want to try budesonide, just 48 hours, to open up my lungs so I can breathe. Waive responsibility to the hospital for that medication, if you have to. You know, not everyone can get lawyers and doctors involved when you’re fighting for your life. But go through those steps. I mean, if you have to go to court. And then I was told you can fire your attending physician. Tell them you want to fire your attending physician in the ICU and have that person replaced immediately, until you can find someone who will listen to you.

Now, this isn’t “wild west” medications we’re talking about. These are, you know, these are some basic things that have shown – have proven results, is my understanding, to help heal COVID patients. And heal them much more quickly than a ventilator.”

Stew Peters: “Yeah. So proven that they have earned a Nobel Prize for saving human life. [Nancy Ross: “Exactly. Exactly.”] Uh, and they are FDA approved. Unlike the Remdesivir, that is part of the NIH protocol, which we think we know why that is happening as well. Horrific.

Really appreciate your courage and for you, as emotional as it must be pulling yourself together in order to come here and answer some of these basic questions. And we hope to hear more from you as you get answers to the many questions that you no doubt have.”

Nancy Ross: “Thank you Stew. And God bless all those who are fighting and all those families who are affected. We’re praying for you and Veronica did not die in vain.”

Stew Peters: “God bless you, Nancy. And no, she did not. Her voice will be heard. Thank you so much.”

I want to expand a little bit on Nancy Ross’s recommendations when in a hospital for an illness; specifically for “COVID”. Their protocols are in place by a deliberate design. From the very same corrupt government/medical/health agencies overseeing the vaccination efforts. As was the struggle that Veronica Wolski and her advocates went through, although there was a doctor who was willing to prescribe the Ivermectin medication, he was ultimately overruled by the health administrators.

This is the bottom line that needs to be addressed when seeking medical care. Veronica was also demanding to use Ivermectin, but it fell on deaf ears. Perhaps a better alternative would be to steer clear of all government funded/public hospitals and seek independent/private physicians with an honest reputation instead if possible; who will actually honor their patient’s wishes. And/or investigate online physicians who will fill out prescriptions and search for pharmacies that will fill them. I would suggest doing this sooner rather than later, so you or your loved one can better be prepared in case of a sudden illness.

Lastly, those who have advocated for the use of Remdesivir and ventilators, you have blood on your hands. There is no better description for the pain and damage you have caused. From the NIH/CDC/FDA/government officials who have approved this protocol (many of who I surmise know exactly what they are doing), to the influencers and social media peddlers/fact-checkers, to the physicians and attendants who have initiated it. 

Anyone who has died using this “treatment” is under the blame of the healthcare system and the government. Likewise, anyone who has suffered ill effects and/or deaths from the incredibly coerced COVID injections have the same groups responsible, along with the pharmaceutical companies.

If you are a doctor, nurse, healthcare worker/administrator, etc. who is just now learning (or have known) about the egregious and heartbreaking tyranny that has led to numerous complications and deaths of hundreds, if not hundreds of thousands of lives due to the illogical and deplorable “rules and guidelines” of these – for lack of a better (yet still politically correct) description – corrupt industries, this is your chance to do the right thing, and refuse to participate.

My heart goes out to these ladies who had to watch as the person they were trying to advocate for fell under the grips of the medical tyrannical authorities who basically imprisoned the patient within their walls and murdered her with their unsafe/dangerous protocols.

My heart also goes out to anyone who has lost loved ones amidst these strange, unethical circumstances. I urge anyone who works within these medical fields to fully contemplate on your choices, and put your life in these people’s shoes. What if the person being held against their will in the hospital was your mother, your father, your child, grandparent, husband, wife…? What if you were held against your own will and denied medical treatment that could have saved your life? Suffering alone and isolated, away from your friends and family, and at the mercy of people “just following orders”?

Is your job worth it? Worth tarnishing your own soul and compassion for fellow human beings that you would be willing to watch them die in the hospital bed? Or will you finally rise up and be brave and realize you don’t want any involvement of these heinous crimes?

Thank you so much to everyone who is speaking out against these malpractices and unbelievably cruel dictatorships. Your bravery and integrity in coming forward shines a light on the steps that we need to take in order to preserve our rights, lives and freedom.

God bless.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by KoalaParkLaundromat from Pixabay