The Elephant in the Room: A Taboo Subject That Few People Want to Address | What is REALLY Going on in Our World?

Taking a glimpse outside of the small, mainstream box.

As I was writing my last post, something occurred to me; like an epiphany that hit me like a freaking freight truck.

WE ARE NOT ADDRESSING WHAT’S REALLY GOING ON HERE.

Let me explain.

While the group at Senator Ron Johnson’s conference panel was comprised of several highly intelligent and knowledgeable doctors, scientists, researchers, etc. discussing the egregious medical corruption and inane measures and protocols and the ridiculousness of vaccine mandates, even though the data and testimonies shows that it DOES NOT WORK, the panel was inevitably still left questioning why this is still being enforced.

The main assertion that arose, at least from the 38 minute highlight video, was that it was all about increasing profits, for the hospitals and the pharmaceutical companies.

To be fair, perhaps this is true for some individuals. Those invested in stocks, in underhanded dealings, being bribed (and/or threatened) to encourage vaccine uptake, etc.

But that still does not address the issue of why do they want this vaccine in us so badly? This is the KEY issue here.

While Senator Johnson and the doctors and medical experts have been debating and discussing the COVID/pandemic narrative – and that early treatment works, etc., etc., they were not mentioning the intent behind this deadly vaccine push, aside from a profit-driven agenda.

Now, I will tell you why. At least based on my understanding and my unabashed views at telling what I see like I see it, no matter how “crazy” it may sound.

WE ARE IN A SPIRITUAL BATTLE.

Plain and simple. Once we can wrap our minds around this seemingly implausible and outrageous concept, this is the only thing that makes sense in the grand scheme of things.

Many may already be aware of the “FUNVAX” video, allegedly created in 2005, which exposed a governmental/DoD plot to inject people with a vaccine in order to diminish/turn off their spirituality/religiosity aspect:

“It would be quite useful to eliminate some of the fanatical, um… religious nuts in the world. And I think that, that, um, maybe a vaccine would be the way to do that.

“Well, so, so the present plan, and the test that we’ve done so far have used respiratory viruses such as flu, or rhinoviruses, and we believe that that’s a satisfactory way to get the exposure of the largest part of the population. Most of us, of course, have been exposed to both of those viruses and we’re, we’re quite confident that this will be a very successful approach.”

“- the name of this project is FunVax, which is the vaccine for religious fundamentalism.

There are also the admissions from Rudolf Steiner in the 1900’s that this will be attempted on humanity beginning as early as birth – perhaps even in the womb, if possible. And as the FUNVAX video shows, removing spiritual/religious ideologies is clearly a goal that “they” are working towards.

“The time will come — and it may not be far off — when quite different tendencies will come up at a congress like the one held in 1912 and people will say: It is pathological for people to even think in terms of spirit and soul. ‘Sound’ people will speak of nothing but the body. It will be considered a sign of illness for anyone to arrive at the idea of any such thing as a spirit or a soul. People who think like that will be considered to be sick and — you can be quite sure of it — a medicine will be found for this. At Constantinople the spirit was made non-existent. The soul will be made non-existent with the aid of a drug. Taking a ‘sound point of view’, people will invent a vaccine to influence the organism as early as possible, preferably as soon as it is born, so that this human body never even gets the idea that there is a soul and a spirit.

The two philosophies of life will be in complete opposition. One movement will need to reflect how concepts and ideas may be developed to meet the reality of soul and spirit. The others, the heirs of modern materialism, will look for the vaccine to make the body ‘healthy’, that is, makes its constitution such that this body no longer talks of such rubbish as soul and spirit, but takes a ‘sound’ view of the forces which live in engines and in chemistry and let planets and suns arise from nebulae in the cosmos. Materialistic physicians will be asked to drive the souls out of humanity.

Rudolf Steiner: LECTURE 5 | Changes in Humanity’s Spiritual Make-up

With the human soul withdrawing more and more from the body, the body is increasingly in danger of being filled with something else. And if human beings are not prepared to take up impulses which can only come from spiritual knowledge, the body will be filled with demonic powers. Humanity is facing a destiny where the body may be filled with ahrimanic demonic powers. So we have to add to what I said yesterday about future development: there will be people in future who are Tom, Dick and Harry in ordinary life, which is something determined by social circumstances, but their bodies will be empty to such an extent that a powerful ahrimanic spirit can live in them. One will be meeting ahrimanic demons. Human beings will not be what they appear to be.

Rudolf Steiner: LECTURE 5 | Changes in Humanity’s Spiritual Make-up

“I have pointed out that while human bodies will develop in such a way that certain spiritualities can find room in them, the materialistic bent, which will spread more and more under the guidance of the spirits of darkness, will work against this and combat it by physical means. I have told you that the spirits of darkness are going to inspire their human hosts, in whom they will be dwelling, to find a vaccine that will drive all inclination towards spirituality out of people’s souls when they are still very young, and this will happen in a roundabout way through the living body. Today, bodies are vaccinated against one thing and another; in future, children will be vaccinated with a substance which it will certainly be possible to produce, and this will make them immune, so that they do not develop foolish inclinations connected with spiritual life — ‘foolish’ here, of course, in the eyes of materialists.”

“The whole trend goes in a direction where a way will finally be found to vaccinate bodies so that these bodies will not allow the inclination towards spiritual ideas to develop and all their lives people will believe only in the physical world they perceive with the senses. Out of impulses which the medical profession gained from presumption — oh, I beg your pardon, from the consumption they themselves suffered — people are now vaccinated against consumption, and in the same way they will be vaccinated against any inclination towards spirituality.

Rudolf Steiner: LECTURE 13 | The Fallen Spirits’ Influence in the World

So these are not just assumptions and musings of a “madman”. He was completely correct in his assertion that this will be a goal of those in the upcoming future – being NOW in our current time frame.

And what so few of us are willing to admit, even to ourselves, is that there very well may be LITERAL demons and evil spirits dictating humanity.

“The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons.”1 Timothy 4:1

“When an impure spirit comes out of a person, it goes through arid places seeking rest and does not find it.  Then it says, ‘I will return to the house I left.’ When it arrives, it finds the house unoccupied, swept clean and put in order. Then it goes and takes with it seven other spirits more wicked than itself, and they go in and live there. And the final condition of that person is worse than the first. That is how it will be with this wicked generation.”Matthew 12:43-45

“No, but the sacrifices of pagans are offered to demons, not to God, and I do not want you to be participants with demons. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons too; you cannot have a part in both the Lord’s table and the table of demons.” – 1 Corinthians 10:20-21

“For Jesus had commanded the impure spirit to come out of the man. Many times it had seized him, and though he was chained hand and foot and kept under guard, he had broken his chains and had been driven by the demon into solitary places.

Jesus asked him, “What is your name?”

“Legion,” he replied, because many demons had gone into him.”Luke 8:29-30

“Some Jews who went around driving out evil spirits tried to invoke the name of the Lord Jesus over those who were demon-possessed. They would say, “In the name of the Jesus whom Paul preaches, I command you to come out.” Seven sons of Sceva, a Jewish chief priest, were doing this. One day the evil spirit answered them, “Jesus I know, and Paul I know about, but who are you?” Then the man who had the evil spirit jumped on them and overpowered them all. He gave them such a beating that they ran out of the house naked and bleeding.” – Acts 19:13-16

“Just then a man in their synagogue who was possessed by an impure spirit cried out, “What do you want with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Have you come to destroy us? I know who you are—the Holy One of God!”

“Be quiet!” said Jesus sternly. “Come out of him!” The impure spirit shook the man violently and came out of him with a shriek.

The people were all so amazed that they asked each other, “What is this? A new teaching—and with authority! He even gives orders to impure spirits and they obey him.”Mark 1:23-27

“They are demonic spirits that perform signs, and they go out to the kings of the whole world, to gather them for the battle on the great day of God Almighty.” – Revelation 16:14

If you are a Christian (and even if you’re not…) you need to pay extremely close attention to these words. They are not just metaphors and figurative speech. If you believe in the Bible and God/Jesus Christ, then you must believe that there are hidden, dark forces at work in this world.

For those who don’t believe, there is a saying that ‘just because you don’t believe in it, it doesn’t mean that it’s not there’.

This is what’s going on here.

The sooner people actually come to terms with this, the sooner we can continue to raise awareness and prepare people to protect themselves and their loved ones.

This is what it has all been boiling down to, and what we’ve been warned about throughout the Bible these last couple of millenia. Do not be tempted into sins, do not entertain demons, love and forgive one another, and build ourselves up in faith and devotion to Jesus Christ.

“Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.Ephesians 6:10-12

Now, another interesting statement that Rudolf Steiner made that I wanted to point out, pertains to what form these ahrimanic (evil forces) can take:

“If you were to go back to very early times in evolution, you would find a battle similar to the one I have just described. As already mentioned, these battles have recurred over and over again, but always on different issues. In the distant past, the crowd of ahrimanic spirits were also cast down from the spiritual worlds into the earthly realm when they had lost such a battle. You see, they would return to the attack again and again. After one of these battles, for example, the crowd of ahrimanic spirits populated the earth with the earthly life-forms which the medical profession now calls bacilli. Everything which has the power to act as a bacillus, everything in which bacilli are involved, is the result of crowds of ahrimanic spirits being cast down from heaven to earth at a time when the dragon had been overcome. In the same way the ahrimanic, mephistophelean way of thinking has spread since the late 1870s as the result of such a victory. Thus we are able to say that tubercular and bacillary diseases come from a similar source as the materialism which has taken hold of human minds.”

Rudolf Steiner: LECTURE 9 | The Battle between Michael and ‘The Dragon’

This is particularly intriguing because it sort of falls in line with what many of the medical/health/pharmaceutical companies are largely about: infectious and bacterial diseases. Fascinating that this is being connected to fallen spirits of the Heavens.

“Some individuals develop an irresistible hankering for intellectual materialism which arises from being in league with the fallen Ahriman. They gradually come to love the impulses which Ahriman raises in their souls and, indeed, consider them to be a particularly noble and sublime way of thinking. Once again, it is necessary to be fully and clearly aware of these things. Unless they are in our conscious awareness and we have clear insight, we cannot make head or tail of events.

There always is the danger of people continuing in materialism, in the materialistic, ahrimanic way of thinking, and carrying this on into ages when, according to the plan of things, it should have been overcome. The people who do not turn away from the ahrimanic, materialistic way of thinking and want to keep it, would then be in league with everything which has come about through similar victories won over the dragon by Michael. They therefore would not unite with spiritual progress in human evolution but with material progress. And a time would come in the sixth post-Atlantean age when the only thing to please them would be to live in something which will have been brought about by bacilli, those microscopically small enemies of humanity.

Rudolf Steiner: LECTURE 9 | The Battle between Michael and ‘The Dragon’

While there are some conclusions and assessments of Steiner that I take issue with, I wanted to highlight his perspective on this particular spiritual interference, if you will, and that it is rooted in microscopically small entities invading their host… like a parasite, for example.

There are also many biblical references that connect illnesses with demons… interestingly enough, and as Jesus Christ is healing illnesses and ailments, it also sends out demonic entities – perhaps alluding that some of these sicknesses and demonic possession are one in the same.

Another mention of these ahrimanic beings, and the reason that I believe there is so much chaos and confusion about what’s going on in the world:

“The first thing we must know is that, seeing that these powers have come down to earth, we must live with them; they exist and we cannot close our eyes to them, for they will be more powerful than ever if we do this. This is indeed the point: The ahrimanic powers which have taken hold of the human intellect become extremely powerful if we do not want to know them or learn about them.

The ideal of many people is to study science and then apply the laws of science to the social sphere. They only want to consider anything which is ‘real’, meaning anything which can be perceived by the senses, and never give a thought to the things of the spirit. If this ideal were to be achieved by a large section of humanity the ahrimanic powers would have gained their purpose, for people would then not know they existed.”

Rudolf Steiner: LECTURE 10 | The Influence of the Backward Angels

There will always be those who say that humans are “evil” in their own right, and don’t need demonic entities fueling the hate and rage and fear. But perhaps it is this oblivious blindness (and/or stubbornness) that is preventing people from knowing the truth of our world, and that we are indeed being overrun by malevolent spiritual beings, because people are largely remaining willfully ignorant to their existence.

However, as many of us are aware of, there are indeed groups/societies that not only believe in these beings, but worship them as well. And this is another issue that people do not want to address, because to do so would also heavily upset their upbringing and worldly construct.

And while many will go around yelling about “proof”, that is the whole purpose of the ahrimanic beings using “science” as their shield – it protects them because they are of a spiritual nature, instead of a physical one.

(Although, in all honesty, it is my belief that there is indeed proof of demonic beings, but this has not been disclosed to the public. Either because those “in control” do not want to cause wide spread fear/chaos (at least not yet…), or it is deliberately being kept secret to continue the illusion that demons don’t exist so they can continue to wreak havoc on humanity.)

So bottom line, while I appreciate the many doctors and nurses and medical experts coming forward to discuss the insanities and ridiculous guidelines that have been imposed on the health and medical communities, and their attempts at raising awareness of the dangerousness of these COVID vaccines, a part of me has to wonder if it is all just a red herring, whether they realize it or not, to detract our attention away from what’s really going on.

And the continued advocacy of vaccines by many doctors has left a bitter taste in my mouth, especially when one starts to realize that many (if not all) diseases may have been created by man (and fallen beings?) to begin with – all to continue, perhaps, to push a “cure” onto humanity. And yes, a “cure”, but for what? HIV? Cancer? Heart attacks? Blood clots? An innoculation to cure the very disease that was given to you to begin with?

No. Of course not. That is just pretense. It is actually the “cure” that Rudolf Steiner and the DoD officials/scientists presented so that we no longer believe in “fantastic” notions of spirituality or souls, consciousness, connection to the Source, etc. But instead to keep our sights on the physical, the material, to worship the advancements in technology and demon-made man-made objects. And perhaps also to expel our own soul/spirituality from our body, like Steiner has been lecturing, in order to make room for other, less welcome hosts…

But until well-respected and sincere doctors, scientists, medical experts – even everyday ordinary citizens – can let go of the harmful stigma that discussing demons and spirits in a very serious manner is seen as a “crazy” and “inane” thing to do, then we will be stuck looking cluelessly at one another and continuing to wonder why, even after all the evidence is presented, that vaccines are still being widely enforced; and continuing to question exactly why the “global technocrats” are trying to trap and surveil the whole entire world and why evil seems to have a grasp on the world.

It’s biblical, people.

And the Mark of the Beast is a very real endeavor by these “spirits of darkness” (false light). And while people will say that the vaccine is not the mark of the beast, if it does indeed contain nanochips/routers/sensors/hydrogel/graphene oxide, DNA changing gene-therapies, etc. – for the purpose of mind control and/or to shut off one’s spirituality – then those who have taken it may be controlled/compelled to getting the actual mark/seal. So in a sense, even if the vaccine is not the mark itself, by having the substances in the body, it may end up driving the person to getting the mark.

Again, this kind of talk is highly shunned in the medical/scientific community. And it’s exactly this reason that is doing humanity a huge disservice. A costly one.

So if we’re humble and wise – not just “book knowledge” or college degree smart, then we will look beyond the “scholarly materialists”, and realize that it is their inclinations that are likely leading the way to the “great falling away” / the “great apostasy”.

“Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin [lawlessness] is revealed”2 Thessalonians 2:3

“The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.”2 Thessalonians 2:9-12

“But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people.

They are the kind who worm their way into homes and gain control over gullible women, who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires, always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth.”2 Timothy 3:1-7

“At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other, and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.”Matthew 24:10-14

A Call to Persevere

“But, dear friends, remember what the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ foretold. They said to you, “In the last times there will be scoffers who will follow their own ungodly desires.” These are the people who divide you, who follow mere natural instincts and do not have the Spirit.

But you, dear friends, by building yourselves up in your most holy faith and praying in the Holy Spirit, keep yourselves in God’s love as you wait for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ to bring you to eternal life.”Jude 1:17-21

By continuing to set our sights on “scientific”, “logical”, “rational” explanations, we are ignoring the elephant in the room. And that’s exactly what these demonic “powers that shouldn’t be” want.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Patter Hill from Pixabay

Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT)

Dr. Pierre Kory: “And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”

On January 24, 2022, Senator Ron Johnson held a panel discussion with several highly acknowledged doctors and medical experts, as well as testimonial accounts from witnesses, describing the medical tyranny and corruption that has been unleashed since “COVID-19” hit. The conference was ~5 hours long, and as Senator Ron Johnson put it, “we didn’t even scratch the surface of what we need to discuss”, because there is just so much data and information to be exposed.

In the highlight video below, some of the key points have been addressed, and have been transcribed including timestamps for easier search and maneuverability.

While there will likely be some disagreements to some of the assertions that have been stated (some question the legitimacy of COVID, for one, since it has been speculated that it is a rebranding of the flu and marketed to be deadlier in order to push the vaccines, and whether we’re even in a “pandemic” – or ever was, etc.) the number one thing that most of the members of this panel have concluded upon, is that the measures and protocols put in place by the government and health agencies, namely the CDC, NIH and FDA, have either failed miserably, and/or was implemented on purpose for ulterior reasons – and the “COVID vaccines” are not only unnecessary, but are also causing an unprecedented amount of injuries and death.

Many thanks to the speakers at this event, and to Senator Ron Johnson for giving them a platform to discuss the suspicious nature of what has been happening due to this COVID/vaccine narrative.

The video below has been transcribed in full. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

To watch the full version, please go here.

Source: rumble | Senator Ron Johnson | COVID-19: A Second Opinion (Shorter Highlight Video)

Senator Ron Johnson: “All I can ask, is the viewers to share this. Tell your friends. I know this is long. This is, this is a 5 hour long panel. And we didn’t even scratch the surface of what we need to discuss! This shouldn’t be necessary. As our information grew, as we became better and better educated; less ignorant about… the coronavirus, COVID, the COVID vaccines – This, this should’ve been made public every step along the way.

But it wasn’t.

So again, I’m just asking the viewing public to have an open mind, respect these individuals who have paid a significant price. Professionally, reputationally.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @00:53: “How many of you in this room, recognizing there are doctors, there are PhDs, there are attorneys, media experts, other scientists, public citizens… how many of you personally have witnessed censorship, intimidation, or professional reprisal, and damage as a result of your advocacy for patients?”

[several members raise their hand]

“I want this to be recorded. That is 80% of this room have experienced something negative in their life in trying to promote and help compassionately something positive for patients suffering with a potentially fatal illness.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @01:35: “I’d like to start really quick with a story. So, a high risk individual approaches me: 50 years old, obese, Type 1 diabetic, calls me, “I have COVID.” This is about a year ago. “What do I do? Help. Help. I’m going to the ER. My oxygen’s 86. I have excruciating pain in my lungs.” So I said, “You’re going to the pharmacy; don’t go to the ER.”

I called in some early treatment medications, are the drugs which shall not be named. Said individual calls me a couple of hours later and says, “You know that excruciating 9 out of 10 lung pain, and it’s now a 2 out of 10 six hours later.” Well I know the mechanisms of the medication I prescribed. A few hours later in the next morning he calls me, he says, “You know that oxygen saturation of 86? It’s now a 98%.” I said, “Isn’t that fantastic? Early treatment works.”

That individual’s my brother. I am my brother’s keeper.”

__________

Dr. Harvey Risch @02:32: “This warning says, “FDA cautions against the use of hydroxychloroquine in out-patients outside of the hospital setting.” But then, in the justification, it says, “We base this on information to treat hospitalized patients.”

Hospital disease, as we’ll hear, and as we know, from two years of dealing with COVID, it’s a completely different illness, treated with different drugs, different medications, in the hospital. Outpatient disease is flu-like. Hospital disease is a [undetermined] pneumonia.

And so the fact that the FDA would base recommendations and warnings on hospital disease, which is a totally different disease than outpatient disease, is a fraud. This website is still there today, and constitutes an outright fraud.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @03:20: “Again, I’ll point out, there is so much we don’t know. I would’ve liked to seen a much larger dose of modesty coming out of our federal health officials, and the Legacy Media, and big tech, when it came to – we would be so much better off, if there was robust debate and discussion.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @03:42: I have to say, I’m going to call it out, and I’m known for this, I call it like I see it, I’m calling attention to the corruption. If you look at these innumerable failed policies, there’s only one way to understand them. They are literally written by pharmaceutical companies. Almost every single policy serves the interest of the pharmaceutical company.

However, if you look outside the United States and look around the world, there have been numerous successes. As one of the world experts on Ivermectin, let me just talk about some programs which used Ivermectin. My colleagues here, as Dr. Risch just pointed out, there are a number of compounds that we’ve identified that are effective in early treatment. Almost all of them are repurposed or generic.

But let me just say a few words about Ivermectin and what it’s doing around the world. Not in the United States. In the United States it’s a “horse de-wormer”, it’s “horse-paste”, and only the illiterate, ignorant and/or unvaccinated use it.”

“That medication has been shown to literally solve the pandemic in numerous regions around the world.”

__________

Dr. Richard Urso @04:50: “And as time went on, they were told, in no uncertain terms, if you use these drugs, you probably will be fired. And nobody had to tell them; they’re smart people, you don’t have to draw a map.”

“- is why is an ophthalmologist treating? Because patients were languishing at home. And I’ve treated over 1600 patients because patients were languishing at home with no treatment for inflammation, with no treatment for respiratory distress, with no treatment for blood clotting. It’s absolutely absurd, and I wasn’t going to let it happen. And I think as you see in this room, all of us feel the same.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @05:27: “Are African-Americans, are they denied early treatment in the community?”

Dr. Christina Parks:“Well yes they are. My dad just died. Right? He died Friday. Couldn’t get a test. Couldn’t get monoclonal antibodies. We treated him at home, unfortunately we had an oxygen machine that didn’t work. So he – blood saturation went down to the point where he was incoherent. We called EMS; they said your problem is your oxygen machine doesn’t work. They put oxygen on him, he went to 98% saturation.

We moved him to the hospital, he recovered all of his cognitive functions, he was doing quite well. But he was no longer getting medications that reduces inflammation. He was no longer getting medications that block the histamine response. He was no longer getting the medications that he needed. And he was no longer getting, you know, lung steroids, and he just declined, and declined, and declined. Until he passed away, on Friday, and I say he passed away from lack of appropriate care.”

__________

Dr. Mary Bowden @06:28: “So in the last 6 months, I’ve really evolved into a early treatment advocate. I’ve used a combination of medications and up until recently I was using monoclonal antibodies, and sadly we can’t get those anymore. But, you know, I just hear so many stories. At first it was, you know, “my PCP won’t see me”. So they came to see me, and ENT. I became the PCP. Now it’s people are terrified to go to the hospital. So I’ve become the emergency room. And I’m giving high dose IV steroids, I’m giving, you know, 25 grams of IV, vitamin C, but I am keeping people out of the hospital, and I’ve kept over 2,000 people out of the hospital. And if you look at current statistics, 20 of those people should be dead. And they’re not. So…”

“And the turning point for me, when I really got angry, was a patient that his wife reached out to me, he’s trapped in the ICU. Father of 6, sheriff’s deputy, refused to give anything but, you know, these hospitals give them low dose steroids, they give them 6 milligrams of dexamethasone, you know, 3 times a day. A lot of these hospitals won’t even give breathing treatments; it’s ridiculous. They won’t give them the vitamins! I mean – and so, basically she called me in desperation, and I testified, she sued the hospital to try to get her husband the medications he needed.

I testified; we won. The hospital refused to grant me privileges. Even though I have a spotless record. And I was furious. That’s when it all changed for me and I became… I became thrust into the public because of Methodist Hospital. But, it’s just, you know, we – I’ve seen a lot, and I’m angry, and I’m exhausted. I mean, I’ve one hospital I can send patients to that I feel safe to.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @08:17: “Some of those heart wrenching stories I’m hearing, where a loved one’s in the hospital, and their… the family’s begging the hospital to do more. To try and save the person’s life. And they’re just being told, “Nah, your loved one – there’s not much hope, you know. Get ready for the worst.” and they just won’t do anything.”

__________

Dr. Paul Marik @08:37: “So the question is, why? Why have cheap, safe and effective drugs being ignored for the treatment of COVID-19, which could have saved maybe 500,000 lives? And I think Dr. Kory has told us exactly why.”

__________

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty @08:57: “I want to talk about medical ethics. Because I’m concerned that many of our pandemic policies have ignored foundational principles of medical ethics.”

“We effectively abandoned patients that were suffering from other conditions and had other medical needs. The disastrous fruits of this myopia include an unprecedented 40% increase in all cause mortality among working age adults, 18-64, over the last year. Most of which, 2/3 to 3/4 , depending on the state, was not related to COVID. Actuaries tells us that a 10% rise in all cause mortality is a once in 200 year disaster. This was a 40% rise.”

__________

Dr. Robert Malone @09:48: “In my opinion, we should not have politicized the public health response to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. This is a bipartisan issue, and the physicians represented here are truly a bipartisan group. I’m not, although I’ve been characterized as a right-wing proud boy, I’ve previously supported, um, both President Obama and President Biden’s campaigns. But, the course of events have forced me to rethink a lot of my positions, and I think that’s the case with many of my peers.”

“If I may quote, in May of 1995, Nelson Mandela said, “There can be no keener revelation of a society’s soul, than the way in which it treats its children.” In my opinion, our public policies in managing this, have had a particularly strong adverse effect on our children, and vaccine mandates for our children are completely unjustified at this point.”

__________

Dr. David Wiseman @10:52: “So my friend told me a week ago, he said, “Watch this new movie. It’s called Don’t Look Up.” And I told him, “Listen, I don’t need to look at this movie. I’ve been in this movie for the last 2 years.”

__________

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya @11:03: “We have better treatments, and we should be investing in research to continue to improve our treatments and strategies to make sure that we have treatments available everywhere, where someone vulnerable especially gets sick.”

“If you put these strategies together, our society can continue to function in a much more healthy way than we have functioned these past 2 years. While at the same time, working to protect older people, the strategies we followed, basically by ignoring the possibility of early treatment, by not focusing our efforts on the protection of vulnerable populations, and worst of all, these restrictions on human behavior, on human connection, have wreaked enormous damage. And it’s far past time that we stop those policies and instead followed an alternate plan.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @11:56: “So Dr. Bhattacharya was joined by colleagues from Harvard and from Oxford. And put together the Great Barrington Declaration, I’m pretty sure they published that in, I think it was October 2020. We’ve since seen emails between Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci, head of NIH and NIAID, basically with a concerned effort to destroy, reputationally destroy, Dr. Bhattacharya and his co-authors.

Now, let’s ask the listening audience, does that sound like a crazy individual? Sounds to me like a highly qualified, very reasonable person, as we have in this – we’ve assembled in this room.”

__________

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty @12:40: “One worry, that public health officials have mentioned is, well, if we acknowledge that natural immunity is a reality, which, of course it is, and it’s been – it’s epidemiology and immunology 101, they’re worried that people will go out and deliberately get COVID rather than getting the vaccine.

But of course, the issue around acknowledging natural immunity is, what about the people who already have had COVID? That’s what we’re talking about here. Right? And we can give people advice on, you know, avoiding infection and so forth. But ignoring all the folks that have already recovered from COVID is not a good public health policy.”

“Acknowledging natural immunity, would lead to the next very basic question: how many people have it? And the fact that 2 years into the pandemic, we still do not know exactly how many Americans have had COVID… is aston- it’s an astonishing failure of the public health to do basic epidemiological research. The two most basic facts that every medical student learns first, about every new illness that they learn about, are incidence and prevalence. How many new cases, and how many total cases over a given period of time?”

“One very important fact about natural immunity, is that there has not been a single reported case of someone getting reinfected and subsequently transmitting the virus to others. Which we know is not the case for vaccines. Vaccines don’t offer, against COVID, that kind of sterilizing immunity.

So we FOIA’d the CDC, please show us any evidence of someone with natural immunity getting reinfected and transmitting the virus to others. They couldn’t come up with any data. We actually put that in our lawsuit. The university’s experts could not come up with a single counter example.

That’s a very dangerous thing to say. Right? Because almost nothing in medicine and science is a 100%. You can always find outliers. But natural immunity – people with natural immunity are the safest people to be around. You are not going to get COVID from somebody who’s already had COVID.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @14:45: “So, we are seeing actually the vaccinated carry a high volume of virus, because they don’t have the secretory IgA. So this false construct from our federal agencies that “this is a pandemic, and the unvaccinated are spreading”, is a pathophysiological lie. The vaccinated are carrying high volumes in their nose, their tears, their mouth, the virus. Because the vaccine does not neutralize in that location of the body where the virus comes in.

So this is very important. This is why mandates are absolutely now moot, irrelevant, and out the window and need to go away worldwide like most of the world has done already. This is the funny uncle. This is not SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19. This is, COVID-22 meh.”

__________

Dr. Richard Urso @15:40: “Zero randomized control trials that show masks stop the spread of respiratory disease. And that’s including N95. And for everyone, N stands for ‘non-oil resistant’, 95 stands for 95% of airborne particles of which all viruses fit through.

So I usually tell people that, you know, wearing N95 also has not been shown in randomized control trials to be effective. But more importantly, that the capsule on these viruses aren’t oil capsule. And I tell people, it’s like peeing in the pool, it goes right through. It doesn’t stick to water, water molecules, it’s an oil capsule virus.

At the end of the day, the data is what it is, there’s zero, repeat, zero randomized control trials at all, showing that masks stop the spread of upper respiratory disease.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @16:25: “So you’ve treated, through Telemedicine [Dr. Ben Marble:Yes.”] 150,000 COVID patients? [Dr. Ben Marble:“Yes, sir.”] With your team?”

Dr. Ben Marble: “Yes, with the team. We have a team of volunteer free doctors, that donate their time to help treat these patients that come to us. They go to myfreedoctor.com, and they answer our questionnaires, we deliver the early treatment protocols to them as early as we can, and we have a 99.99% survival rate. So I believe myfreedoctor.com, the volunteer free doctor team, we have settled the science on this, early treatment works, period.”

__________

Dr. Harpal Mangat @17:02: “For the key answer is to find a doctor who is gonna treat you. And then that doctor’s gonna be cognizant that a lot of its scripts will not be prescribed. Like I have patients in Virginia, I treat them. I have to figure out where I can get the relevant drugs. And that often means independent pharmacists.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @17:23: “But these are crimes. You know what is going on in this country right now? Is that the CDC, has been captured by the pharmaceutical industry. They sent out a memo in August of 2021. They sent out a similar memo back in the spring of 2020, telling the nations’ physicians and pharmacists not to use generic medicines. We are now in the state, in this country, where it – Senator Johnson asked the question, how can we get the average US citizen to treat, or get treated?

We have pharmacists across the land who are refusing – refusing, to fill these. Because they’ve been manipulated and brain-washed into thinking that it – that the FDA hasn’t approved the use, as if that matters. Off-label prescriptions and prescribing has been going on for decades. It’s encouraged, when there are no effective treatments. Yet I have to, when I’m trying to treat my patients, and Dr. Marble can attest to this, we have pharmacists who refuse to fill some of the safest and the low cost medicines known in the history of medicine.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @18:32: “All of the different drugs that there have been some research on… and what’s interesting about this chart is that Dr. Kory circled the ones that are recommended by our health agencies. They all range from seven hundred bucks, up to 3200. All the ones that are not recommended are, the ones that are, you know, a couple of bucks. Uh, go figure.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @18:56: “I’ve lost a third of my business because insurance contracts have pulled away from me for unprofessional conduct for using these “dangerous” drugs, Ivermectin, for the which my patients have had no adverse reactions. I’ve treated 500,000 patients, or diagnosed 500,000 patients diagnostically in my career. I’ve not had one single complaint against me. I have 4 complaints against licenses in 4 different states for saving lives. So the adverse reaction from these drugs is being attacked for being a good doctor. That’s the bad adverse reaction. And I know many of my colleagues on this panel as well.” [audience applauds]

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @19:29: “And I can tell you 201, the patients that I’ve lost, is because we’ve gotten a late start on early treatment. I’ve recently published a paper with Fazio and colleagues from Italy, we have shown the golden window to treat COVID-19 is the first 72 hours. And the patients that I have lost, and they’ve been very few, but if people listen to this out here, they will recognize that it’s a late start at treatment that is, in a sense, the failure of early treatment. If we start early, we have uniformed successes. I’ve reviewed hundreds and hundreds of reports of hospitalized patients. And of those who’ve died of COVID-19. And in those reports, the clear observation is, that determinants of hospitalization and death are the lack of early treatment.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @20:17: “I am completely agnostic when it comes to whatever drug will end this pandemic. Vaccine, whatever, I don’t care. I want this pandemic over, I want people to live.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @20:27: “We also had the wrong bodies leading the vaccine program. Remember, the FDA’s supposed to be the safety watchdog. The National Institutes of Health is the government research body and the CDC is the outbreak investigation body. Right now, the CDC and the FDA are the named sponsors of a vaccine program.

If America can learn anything, we should never have the FDA and CDC be a sponsor of a public program in administering a product. [audience applauds] It has been a giant and colossal mistake. We should have had a separate body, a government body be the sponsor of the vaccine program. The vaccine manufacturers can supply the products, and then we needed the separate data safety monitoring board, clinical event committee and human ethics committee there in oversight. And if this would have happened based on the emergence of unexplained deaths, I am testifying today that the program would have been shutdown in February, because of excess mortality.”

__________

Dr. Ryan Cole @21:26: “They will attack you, they will threaten you, they will put you in a state of fear and say, “You can only do what we say, but don’t save a life.” And by the way, the vaccines are expired because Omicron is here. And now they still want to mandate them. So they threaten us, and threaten us, and threaten us, and we’re hunted for caring and being compassionate and empathetic and wanting to help humanity.”

__________

Kyle Warner @21:50: “Is it, you know, logical to think that if you’ve been harmed by the first dose, then you shouldn’t get a second dose? And if you get the second dose and you’re harmed, would a booster potentially do more harm and, if you were on the 7th booster, would that potentially cause more harm down the road?”

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: “Of course. You don’t have to be a physician to know the answer to that question. A 4 year old, knows the answer to that question.”

Dr. Richard Urso: “Yeah, and I just want to partner off of what Dr. McCullough said. I don’t think people realize that all these people who had COVID were excluded from the trials. All of them. So we’re going to take our 5-11 year olds, that there’s 28 million, that means 14 – it was about half and half, it’s probably more 60% have had COVID already. So let’s say 12 million have had – have not had COVID. So if those 12 million had the vaccine, and it was a perfect vaccine, it’s 0.1 per hundred thousand, you might save 12 [million] children.

What’s going to happen to the 16 children – 16 million children who haven’t… who’ve already had the virus, who already have immunity, and we’re going to subject them to something that wasn’t even tested in that group? It’s literally absurd. And that’s the thing I would say, Senator, is that it’s – we’re not here about civil liberties and mandates. We’re here to save lives. And this group of people should be excluded, absolutely.

There’s an Achilles Heel to the program of natural immunity. Natural immunity denial should not be happening. It should be a major focus of what we’re trying to do here. Because you’re going to harm, I don’t know how many children by force vaccinating 16 million children. It’s absurd.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @23:22: “In listening to my colleagues, call out all of the inanities, the insanities, the absurdities. Okay? These departures of our policies from what we know are to be scientific truths. These things like denial of natural immunity. We have to understand why. To sit here and point fingers, ‘they’re doing this wrong, and that wrong’

WHY are they doing this? There could be multiple reasons. The simplest and most easily understandable and proveable is, every vaccine, every – these, you know, these novel patented high-cost drugs, is profits. They are putting profits ahead of patients. You know, we can call attention to all of these policies; they are non-scientific. They are failing at having scientific support, yet they’ve been carrying out and they’re being distributed across the country. And doctors, and states, and health departments are willingly accepting these without question, without critical thinking.

And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!” [audience applauds]

__________

Dr. Christina Parks @24:25: “Why are they vaccinating our children? Because once it’s on the vaccine, um, once it’s on the childhood schedule, they are no longer liable for injury. So they’re going to get off that EUA, put it right on the childhood vaccine schedule, and then have no liability going forward.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @24:42: “So I’m going to tell you – read you a quick little news story out of Vietnam. Just got this today.

A 9th grader, in the northern province of Phu Tho, died Tuesday after getting her second Pfizer vaccine dose, the local medical center said Thursday. The girl had gotten her first Pfizer dose on December 3rd 2021. After which she experienced dizziness and had difficulty breathing. She was taken to a medical center for treatment and later recovered.

She had her second dose last Monday. Her mother told healthcare workers about the girl’s side effects following her first shot, but they asked her to get the second shot anyway. Again, this is a… 9th grader. Doesn’t have much risk from COVID. Has a reaction to the first dose, but let’s give her the second dose anyway.

2o minutes following the second shot, the girl experienced tightness in her chest, dizziness, difficulty breathing and seizures. She received emergency treatment on the spot before being transferred to a district medical center. On arrival, she began to vomit blood, fell into a coma, and her heart stopped. Her family received news that she died Tuesday morning.

Now, I guess this isn’t evidence that a death might be related to the vaccine. But it certainly would concern me more than it’s concerned Dr. [Anthony] Fauci, Dr. [Rochelle] Walenksy, Dr. [Francis] Collins, Dr. [Janet] Woodcock, Dr. [Peter] Marks – I know one of your favorites, Brianne [Dressen].

Um, this is reality. This is reality that’s being ignored by our federal health officials, by the Legacy Media,”

__________

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty @26:27: “But every patient is a new textbook, every patient is a unique human being that has unique factors that only we and the patient really understand, with sufficient depth to make difficult medical judgments. And this is the first time in my career – I think the other clinical physicians in the room would agree, where I’ve worried about, is somebody going to be looking over my shoulder asking me why I’ve prescribed fluvoxamine for this indication rather than that indication? I prescribe it for depression, no problem. ‘Are you giving this to treat COVID?’ Why should it matter to you? So it -”

Senator Ron Johnson: “So you’re saying – this is the first time in your – [Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: “The last 2 years.”] Is that true?”

Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: “The last 2 years. Now, there’s – there are things that hospital administrators do that have annoyed physicians for years. But the kind of hamstringing of physicians, in terms of doing what we believe to be the right and best and good for this vulnerable patient in front of me right now, that is my only responsibility, as a physician, this patient who has placed their trust in me as their physician, to do what is best for them, and not be, not be acting as the agent of a social program. Or a state program. Or any other interest, that could compromise -”

__________

Dr. Paul Marik @27:54: “So I can tell you what happened to me. So I was using our protocol to treat critically ill patients in the ICU with a whole host of repurposed drugs. I then – this is a memo, this is a memo sent to the entire healthcare system, but they targeted me personally. And what did this memo say? This said I can use Remdesivir, and then I will quote, it was an added section,

Do not endorse section which includes medications that may cause harm and efficacy is not supported in peer-reviewed published RCTs. These medications will not be verified or dispensed for the prevention or treatment of COVID. This list includes: Ivermectin, bicalutamide, etoposide, fluvoxamine, dutasteride, and finasteride.”

And then, just to stick it to me, they added ‘ascorbic acid’ [vitamin C]. [audience laughs] The healthcare system was effectively preventing me treating my patients according to my best clinical judgment.

And then how did this progress? I objected. So the first week I was in the ICU, I didn’t know what to do. What was I to do? My hands were tied. As a clinician for the first time in my entire career I could not be a doctor. I could not treat patients the way I had to be to treat patients. I had 7 COVID patients. Including a 31 year old woman. I was not allowed to treat these people. I had to stand by idly, I had to stand by idly, watching these people die.

I then tried to sue the system and you know what they did? They did something called peer-sham review. It is a disgusting and evil concept. They then accused me of 7 most outrageous crimes that I had committed. And that I was such a severe threat to the safety of patients, they immediately suspended my hospital privileges because I possessed – I posed such an outright threat to these patients. Ignoring the fact that under my care, the mortality was 50% those of my colleagues.

I then went on through the sham-peer review, I went to a kangaroo court, where they continued this, and the end result was I lost my hospital privilege and was reported to the national practitioner data bank. So here I was standing up for patients’ rights, and this hospital – this evil hospital, ended my medical career. So that’s what they do. It’s an outright outrage; it’s evil to the core.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @31:05: “You can use safe, effective, off-label drugs for other conditions outside COVID?”

Dr. Paul Marik: “Absolutely. If this was pneomococcal pneumonia, this wouldn’t be an issue. This is specifically for COVID.”

__________

Jennifer Bridges @31:18: “So I’m still a nurse, but I was fired from Houston Methodist. I’m the one you might have seen all over the news. We were the first one mandated with a COVID shot. So I blew it up on the national media. We have a huge state and federal lawsuit because we didn’t want to be guinea pigs. We saw for ourselves, in the hospital, people coming in with adverse reactions after getting the Pfizer shot.

And the crazy thing is, let me tell you a couple of things about Methodist Hospital down in Houston, Texas. When they first started with COVID, I did that COVID unit on and off the whole time till they fired me in June, right? They started the first two months with hydroxychloroquine. They actually used it in the hospital, then they cut it back real quick, switched it to Remdesivir, and all these other expensive drugs. And we’re like, why? And we would ask these doctors; no one could give us a reason. They just said, “Well the hospital policy changed.” But they didn’t know why.

And you know most of those doctors in that hospital would not even go in those COVID rooms. There was maybe 2 that would. They would stand outside, make us dress up head to toe and go in with an ipad. So the only form of communication those doctors would have at Houston Methodist with the COVID patients was through an ipad. So literally we go in there, they’d be talking to them, never assess the lungs, never look at them, nothing. Go to discharge them; I would come back out and be like, “No. Have you listened to them? They can’t breathe.” Like the wheezing’s horrible – they had no clue.”

__________

Brienne Dressen @32:48: “For 80% of us, are misdiagnosed with anxiety initially; and then months down the road we get appropriate diagnosis, and that’s when we are able to find doctors that are actually willing to go against the directive. Because like these physicians were discussing, their licenses have been threatened. And because their licenses have been threatened, we cannot get medical care. They are afraid to treat us. We have had patients who are severely injured and are dying, who cannot get in the door to get seen by physicians, because physicians are afraid of the word “COVID vaccine”.

So instead, what they’re doing is they’ve made us like Kyle Warner and myself, and our membership of over 12,000 COVID vaccine injured, we are ground-zero to take care of the COVID vaccine injured. When we have highly qualified practitioners, across the globe, that have been silenced and threatened, if they even so much as see us for what’s going on.”

__________

Dr. Peter McCullough @33:37: “There is the father of a boy here in this room who’s died of myocarditis. …One death is too many. One! One! We have 21,000 cases of myocarditis, and climbing, in the United States that the CDC has verified. One was too many.

Under no circumstances, under any circumstances, should a young person ever receive one of these vaccines, let alone ever be pressured to receive a vaccine, let alone ever be mandated to take a vaccine. This is crystal clear. The FDA agrees; there can be no controversy over this.”

“We are seeing unprecedented numbers of athletes dying on the field in Europe. Unprecedented. Of these cardiac arrests, half of them don’t come back. We now have a report out of the heart group in the UK where actuarial mortality for those under age 15, mortality in the UK, is higher than expected.”

__________

Dr. Robert Malone @34:58: “And I am concerned about our children. I am concerned about all of those effects. Brain, heart, blood coagulation, reproductive system, immunologic system, and furthermore, they’re not at risk for this virus. Why are we doing this? And mandating these vaccines for children just breaks my heart.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @35:25: “This is, this is what we get, when I investigate. [holds up two completely redacted sheets of paper – audience laughs and groans] I mean this isn’t, to do with this. But this is after a couple of years trying to get information out of another agency, and we finally get the information, and it’s all redacted.

This is, this is how the administrate – the, you know, the federal government, the agency is complying with congressional oversight.”

__________

Dr. Pierre Kory @35:47: “This dose that was tested in a major trial, and which made corticosteroids the standard of care worldwide, and I’ll also want to, I also want to give praise to Senator Johnson. You know, Senator Johnson invited me to give testimony in the Senate, in May of 2020. And I remember my first conversation with him when he reached out. He was so, he was so, um… enthusiastic about hearing about the work that Dr. Marik and myself were doing, that we were putting out protocols and we’re trying to treat this disease.

You know, and he said he couldn’t understand why the system wasn’t reacting; why the entire system wasn’t reacting the way we were. And I remember he told me – he goes, I want the doctors to take their gloves off. And they’re not.”

They were sitting idly by the bedside, institutions were paralyzed, waiting for randomized control trials to be done. And then finally a randomized control – so at that time, I testified, to the world, that corticosteroids were critical in the treatment of this disease. Nothing happened. Until a trial came out 8 weeks later and proved the life saving properties of corticosteroids. But that dose that was tested was ridiculous. It was the lowest dose, and the dose that’s being used, helps the few and fails the many.”

__________

Dr. Richard Urso @36:58: “I want to personally thank you. Um, in the past, medical schools and conferences would, like this, would take place. We’d debate on how to treat these kinds of diseases, and, you know, I – it’s kind of strange that we – this meeting has to take place in the U.S. Senate. Um, you know, given the current state of affairs, that’s where we are. But, in the past, we would think that somehow the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, we would have basically maybe a message board, exchange ideas.

And I really want to reach out and say thank you for what you’ve done. To Dr. McCullough and Dr. Risch, who initially set all of this up. You know, the extreme censorship and attacks have led us to come to this place. And so I wanted just to thank you, for what you’ve done. You’ve really pushed this all forward, you know, as a – you know, you’ve been yourself become a researcher and a scientist over this last 2 years. So thank you very much.”

__________

Senator Ron Johnson @37:57: “Uh, these are highly qualified individuals. They speak from experience. We’ve got to fix this problem. We can’t let this continue, we can’t let it happen in the future. So again, thank all of you for coming. Thank you for being doctors, for being nurses, for being aca-magicians, for being medical researchers, and thank all of you for viewing this. Share this with your friends.

God bless you all.” [audience applauds]

Once again, a huge thank you to everyone who participated in this panel. Your thoughts and efforts at exposing this corruption is a perfect example of bravery and integrity in the face of adversity – especially since it is going against what these depraved institutions are trying to implement as the new status quo.

Thank you so much for your heroism, compassion and steadfastness at bringing awareness to these topics.

And a sincere thank you to the readers/viewers who are staying informed and sharing these important information with others; and the many who have refused to comply with these outrageous policies/mandates.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by fernando zhiminaicela from Pixabay

An Essential Question We All Must Ask Ourselves: How Far Will We Go to Save Our Own Life?

How much is our life worth? Or our child? Where is the limit?

As some of my dear readers may be aware of, I have been covering an interesting figure of the 1990’s in a few of my posts by the name of Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov.

His history is fraught with mystery and intrigue, since it is claimed that he came to this world in order to warn this current generation that we will be the one to see the rise of the antichrist.

Now, I will just add this caveat: I cannot be entirely sure that this is a true account. Of course, I don’t think any of us can. There have been a lot of speculation and guesses as to who, what, where, when and how THE antichrist will make his appearance. And there are many who don’t follow the biblical testaments or believe in any religious/philosophical heralding of an impeding apocalypse, so don’t wonder about this at all and/or think it is only a conspiracy-theory-doomsday-delusion.

However, I am a believer in Jesus Christ and do believe that there are biblical warnings that point to what we should be on the lookout for. And because of this reason, I have been researching several different subjects, and Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov is one that just happened to catch my eye. And whether his is a true account or not, the topics that have been allegedly covered by this young individual – retold through his mother – resonates with me and I find a lot of truth within the subjects that he has mentioned.

For instance, the topic that I’m covering today is something that I have wondered about and struggled with in my pursuit of the truth and the reality of life and death; even before I came across this young prophet and his point of view. Which is incredibly deep coming from such a young child (he passed away at the age of 10). While this article is not about him personally, it is about a topic that he has broached, and because I have contemplated on this matter as well, wanted to delve deeper into the truth of this subject.

The Quest for Immortality (or even an extended life)

In my musings, I have wondered whether the notion of transfusions/transplants goes against what God intended. I know this might be an incredibly sensitive topic, but if we are pursuing the truth, then we must address difficult questions with a genuine and sincere approach, instead of aversion and antagonism. It is not my intention to offend anyone or pass judgement. Only to discuss this matter from a perspective that may not have been considered before.

With that being said, are we fully aware of the implications that may arise when pursuing this route when trying to save ourselves or a loved one?

Where are the organ donations coming from?…

The horrors of black market organ harvesting cannot be ignored, nor can the unscrupulous actions of the medical industry when faced with the possibility of a patient who is willing to pay ungodly amounts of money in order to save their own life, or one of their loved ones.

While some could never believe that such atrocities exist, the sad reality is that the love of money (and of one’s life) can push someone to make unethical decisions. Even if an organ transplant patient or blood transfusion recipient has no idea of the sinister back alley handed dealings, this secret, behind the scenes business may still be taking place.

“How was forced organ harvesting uncovered? The story starts with a whistleblower, a woman with a pseudonym Annie, who made a public statement in March 2006 that her ex-husband had been harvesting corneas of Falun Gong practitioners from 2003 to 2005 in Sujiatun hospital in Shenyang City in Liaoning Province in China. Other doctors in the hospital had been harvesting other organs. The Falun Gong were killed through organ extraction. Their bodies, after organ extraction, were cremated.”

How Was Forced Organ Harvesting Uncovered

As if this wasn’t horrific enough, the implications that the “cabal” may be behind some of the organ harvesting/trafficking may be in play as well.

In a harrowing interview, Stew Peters gives a child-trafficking victim a platform to speak on the tragic and devastating encounters she’s had within the corrupt “elite’s” cult and what she’s learned. It is a very heartbreaking and disturbing account – certainly not for the faint of heart. (I can’t watch this video without crying.)

A short testimony about the organ/body-harvesting trade:

Ally Carter @23:38: “- this is not about a sexual experience, this is not about just cash; this is about something else and it’s deeper than that. Because this is decades of tactics, this is decades of issues, these are decades of problems. Satanic ritual abuse exists, um, human sex-trafficking exists, organ-harvesting exists all over the place. The black market exists.

Um, humans, babies, children, 4 year olds/6 year olds, having their bodies sliced open and used as human suitcases over the border. I have been trafficked over the border.

Those babies are moved as if they’re still alive. They put clothes on them, they sit them up, and they use them until their bodies cannot be used anymore.

This is not just about sex. Because after your body is used for sex, your organs are used for organ harvesting and selling on the black market, which goes to your hospitals; you wonder why a heart costs so much. You wonder why a liver or kidney costs so much.”

Source: VICTIM: “BIDEN & OBAMA RAPED ME”: POWERFUL ELITES, CELEBS, DEMONIC SEX ABUSE RING

And while she claims to have evidence of the abuse that she’s had to endure – by the hands of some of the most prominent figures in our world today, no less – she doesn’t specify if she has the proof for the organ-harvesting claims.

However, this most certainly should not detract from the reality that this is a very real criminal enterprise.

In 2012, Patrick McMahon, Air Force combat veteran and nurse practitioner, made waves when he accused The New York Organ Donor Network for pressuring the doctors to prematurely declare patients “brain dead” in order to meet a quote, “and even hired “coaches” to train staffers how to be more persuasive” in convincing next-of-kin to sign their deceased love one over as an organ donor.

In one chilling allegation, Patrick McMahon submitted the following as an example of their gross misconduct:

“In September 2011, a 19-year-old man injured in a car wreck was admitted to Nassau University Medical Center. He was still trying to breathe and showed signs of brain activity, the suit charged.

But doctors declared him brain dead under pressure from donor-network officials, including Director Michael Goldstein, who allegedly said during a conference call: “This kid is dead, you got that?” the suit charged.” Organs taken from patients that doctors were pressured to declare brain dead: suit

An update to this lawsuit in 2017 had The New York Donor Network deny Mr. Patrick McMahon’s allegations, but also refused to release the documents of the patients in question, even after the judge court ordered them to do so; the New York Donor Network even going so far as to appeal this request through the Manhattan Supreme Court.

In another shocking Stew Peters exposé, a nurse claims to have found the connection between the deadly push of Remdesivir and the seemingly strategic planning of their patient’s deaths:

“I am an RN working in case management at _______ Hospital in California, and I know why the hospitals are killing their own patients.” Upon receiving this nurse’s horrific findings, The Stew Peters Show was able to get this whistleblower nurse to come on the show and answer the tough questions about the connection she found between the use of deadly Remdesivir, Vancomycin, and organ donors.

In the email, the whistleblower stated: “There is a link between the hospital deaths and organ harvesting in the state of California…Every patient’s license is in their medical records, and they can tell if they are organ donors or not.”Whistleblower: Hospitals Killing For Organs, “This is Absolutely Evil And A Crime Against Humanity!”

Are organs being harvested from LIVE people?

To add on to the controversial aspect of this medical intervention, is the huge debate surrounding the vitality of the organs and how long someone must stay alive – either naturally or through mechanical means – in order to keep their organs viable for distribution.

The medical condition of the person at the time of death can determine what organs and tissues can be donated and what cannot be. Organs need to be removed as soon as the person is declared brain-dead. Without the necessary oxygen supply, the organs stop functioning right.

The approximate amount of time between recovering the tissues/organs and transplanting them is:

    • Lung – 4 to 6 hours
    • Heart – 4 hours
    • Liver – 24 hours
    • Pancreas – 24 hours
    • Kidney – 72 hours
    • Cornea – 14 days
    • Bones – 5 years
    • Skin – 5 year
    • Heart Valves – 10 years

This is why creating a tissue bank (heart valves, skin, bones etc.) is possible but creating an organ bank is not. In case of organ transplantation, the process has to be very quick in order to save a life.

Keeping a brain-dead person on ventilator support helps as the organs continue receiving oxygen, providing a window of time for doctors to conduct organ transplantation.

Source: Time in which organs need to be donated after death

According to the above website, the heart and lungs are only viable within a 4 hour time frame. I assume this to mean that by the time the donor is “deceased”, the organs must immediately be transplanted to the intended recipient within the designated time. Otherwise it is too late and the organs (and therefore the payment) is no longer an option.

So by these conditions, the body must technically still be alive during the extraction of the organs, and the definition on what “brain dead” and “not legally alive” means is hotly contested in areas of not only ethical considerations, but scientific data as well.

For instance, there are reports of near-death experiencers being declared “brain dead“, “clinically dead”, “dead dead” (being in the morgue for 3 days…), yet still coming back from that brink with a story to tell. If their body was announced as technically dead, for all intents and purposes, then how is it at all possible for their “consciousness” to return to their body and having the lucidity return to them?

(DISCLAIMER: Please take these claims with a grain of salt. Always use discernment as most of these are anecdotal accounts and cannot be proven or provided with evidence.)

And how does this bode for the several thousands and thousands of people who have been declared “brain dead”, all in order for doctors/nurses/black market organ workers… to rush in to cut open their bodies (while still technically alive) and start harvesting for organs and tissue? And with that in mind, what would happen if a person who is declared “brain dead” suddenly regains their consciousness WHILE HAVING THEIR ORGANS REMOVED?

In some nerve-wrecking and heartbreaking reports, the following accounts demonstrates that this may, in fact, be possible:

– “April 2012 – Doctors declared british teen Stephen Thorpe “brain dead,” telling the father that the boy would never recover from a serious car accident. Despite pressure from the doctors, the father would not consent to allow the boy’s organs to be donated. With the help of other doctors, five weeks later Thorpe left the hospital, having almost completely recovered.”

– “July 2013 – A New York woman who was pronounced ‘brain dead’ by doctors unexpectedly awoke just as her organs were about to be removed for transplant.”

– “2014 U.S. man wakes up in morgue in body bag: An American man wasn’t pronounced “brain” dead, but dead dead. Hospital workers in Lexington, Mississippi zippered him into a sack and shipped to the morgue where he freaked out the workers preparing to embalm him by kicking his way out of his body bag. When Walter Williams actually did die, his nephew told a TV reporter, “I think he’s gone this time.” Shesh. If a nurse, a doctor, a coroner, and other hospital staff could get “dead” so very wrong…”

– 2014 – “Swedish man hears doctors urging the harvesting of his organs: Doctors in Sweden discussed organ donation within earshot of Jimi Fritze as he lay in hospital after a stroke. To the doctor’s shocking surprise, Fritze could hear every word they said. However, he couldn’t object because he couldn’t move. He had suffered a stroke, and after the doctors looked at a scan of his brain, they gave his family bad news, and claimed that “there was no hope,” Fritze said.”

– March 2018 – Thirteen-year-old Trenton McKinley of Alabama recovered and is doing well after doctors pronounced him “brain dead” and “his organs were matched to five children who needed them”, never mind the fact that he needed them himself.

There is also the aborted fetuses trade, which includes corrupt organizations such as the NIH and Planned Parenthood; both of which have been exposed for what I, and many others, consider crimes against humanity:

“David Daleiden, founder and president of The Center for Medical Progress, states, “The NIH grant application for just one of Pitt’s numerous experiments with aborted infants reads like an episode of American Horror Story. Infants in the womb, some old enough to be viable, are being aborted alive and killed for organ harvesting, in order to bring in millions of dollars in taxpayer funding for Pitt and the Planned Parenthood abortion business it supports.”Aborted Infants’ Continued Blood Flow Advertised in Racist University of Pittsburgh Grant Application to NIH

With these serious ethical concerns and implications, we have to really reflect on whether it is worth it to potentially be taking another person’s life to save our own, even if we are not fully cognizant of this fact. While I’m sure many of us are assured that the organ donor does not feel or suffer any of the procedures, unless we are actually under the knife, there is no way to know for sure. And the guilt that one may feel knowing that the person could have died while still having a chance to recover would undoubtedly weigh on some consciences.

Blood donors (again, from who…?)

Now, while not only considering organ donations to save or extend our life, we have to also address the practice of blood transfusions as well.

Again, the possibility of underhanded dealings in the black market and criminal enterprises needs to be mentioned.

As many may be familiar with, Silicon Valley is largely composed of a technocratic, transhumanist industry who is helping to usher us all in the “great reset”, biotech age; whether we like it or not.

In an endeavor that I have mentioned a few times before, because I am haunted by the stark coldness and unfeeling ramifications that it would most likely entail, is a statement from the Newsweek article titled, “Can Blood from Young People Slow Aging? Silicon Valley Has Bet Billions It Will“:

“One chilling missive came from a man who offered to provide all the blood Wyss-Coray might need for such an experiment—he claimed he could obtain it from human children of any age.”

In my opinion, this admission should be investigated to the fullest degree. I fail to see how this is even possible, unless one has a huge bank of blood already from “human children of any age”… or whether they can procure this amount through whatever means they have available to them – which again, raises severe alarm bells.

Either way, it is a grisly and sinister agenda. And the purpose for what this “young blood” will be used for, to keep the older generations alive and feeling young, is something right out of a dystopian playbook.

As Nir Barzilai puts it, “You have no idea how many people are interested to investing money in longevity,” said Nir Barzilai, the founding director of the Institute for Aging Research at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, and the founder of a company aimed at mitochondrial health. “There are billions of dollars.”

What’s in it for me?

Now that I’m finished talking about the ethical considerations (for now), it’s time to tackle why the recipient may not be getting off scott-free either. (Besides the medical bill, of course.)

Since the recipient will be under the knife and therefore have no idea what, exactly, is being transplanted/transfused into their body, and since many of us know how complicit some health/medical institutions really are, we have to wonder – not only how healthy the organ/blood being donated is, but also if the recipient is not subjected to an experiment as well.

Some, like David Bennett, consented to giving a very risky trial run to have a pig heart implanted in him. Not just any pig heart. A genetically modified one.

“In a medical first, doctors transplanted a pig heart into a patient in a last-ditch effort to save his life and a Maryland hospital said Monday that he’s doing well three days after the highly experimental surgery.

While it’s too soon to know if the operation really will work, it marks a step in the decades-long quest to one day use animal organs for life-saving transplants. Doctors at the University of Maryland Medical Center say the transplant showed that a heart from a genetically modified animal can function in the human body without immediate rejection.

The patient, David Bennett, 57, knew there was no guarantee the experiment would work but he was dying, ineligible for a human heart transplant and had no other option, his son told The Associated Press.”

Doctors transplant a genetically modified pig heart into a human for the 1st time

Again, the desperation to cling so tightly to one’s own life may compel them to make decisions they may later on regret. Turning yourself into a genetically modified organism might trend highly on that list. David Bennett had this to say on his decision:

“It was either die or do this transplant. I want to live. I know it’s a shot in the dark, but it’s my last choice,” Bennett said a day before the surgery, according to a statement provided by the University of Maryland School of Medicine.”

Doctors transplant a genetically modified pig heart into a human for the 1st time

This procedure has effectively, in a sense, created a human-animal hybrid. A genetically modified human hybrid.

That was David’s choice.

But what if you had no choice?

Far be it for me to assume that organ/blood recipients have not been getting all their donated organs/blood transfusions in a kosher manner… Already, there are attempts at not only implanting genetically modified animal parts in human being, but there are also endeavors to implant synthetic organisms/organs into us as well.

While history dictates that the government and mad scientists have taken certain liberties with their citizen’s bodies and lives, we have to wonder if there are even more clandestine operations hidden in the background that we are not aware of.

Now, even if these speculations are not true, what IS true is that there is a highly dangerous, suspicious “vaccine” containing mRNA and which have admissions that it does, indeed, modify our cells.

“Ultimately, the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cellular gene therapy. I always like to say, if we had surveyed 2 years ago, in the public, would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy, and inject it into your body, we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate.

I think this pandemic has also opened many people’s eyes to innovation in the way that was maybe not possible before.”

CEO of Big Pharma Bayer “mRNA vaccines are an example of cellular gene therapy”

So with that in mind, how would vaccinated individual’s organs and blood be, not only in the short term, but in the long term as well? There has already been a sudden increase in blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, myocardial  infarctions, neurological symptoms, miscarriages/stillbirths, cancers, etc., etc., etc. reported by Thomas Renz/DoD due to the vaccine intake.

Now imagine getting an organ/blood transfusion from a vaccinated individual with these conditions? And do we have a say in whose organs/blood we get in order to save ours or a loved one’s life? And even if they assure us that it is completely healthy and safe, are we really going to take the word of the same organizations who have assured us that brain dead individuals have no chance of recovery, only to have that same person wake up in the morgue?

This is all without even considering that the vaccines may, in fact, be injecting us with nanochip technology, hydrogels, graphene oxide, etc. in attempts at connecting us to a control-power grid. And as mentioned earlier, synthetic organ creations seem to be the next step in evolution for these “biomedical” technocrats, working on 3d printing organs like the heart, out of, again, their wonder material: hydrogel.

So now we have to consider whether we are okay with being a potentially genetically modified, human-animal hybrid, with synthetic (and possibly deadly) materials inside of us. In order to sustain/extend our life. Rather than “Godspeed” to the Lord.

This is, of course, not to say you would not want to find relief for yourself or a loved one who is suffering, but the serious subject matter of changing our natural, human born genetics with that of unnatural/man-made substances and mutation with animal DNA should be highly examined.

For those with (and without…) Biblical inclinations, there are specific verses that addresses this:

“But God gives it a body as he has chosen, and to each kind of seed its own body. For not all flesh is the same, but there is one kind for humans, another for animals, another for birds, and another for fish.”1 Corinthians 15:38-39

“Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.”Romans 1:22

“So God looked upon the earth, and indeed it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth.”Genesis 6:12

What’s in the blood?

So, now we get to, what was the initial reason why I decided to approach this topic to begin with?

Again, because of the testimony of Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov. In his life, he refused to get a blood transfusion because, as he claimed it, the sins of the blood could be transferred to the recipient.

It may seem like an outlandish claim.

However, there are some scientific literature to back this up, as eerie as it sounds.

blood carries a person’s DNA, the signature that is supposed to be unique to their body.”

Scientific American explains that when donor blood is mixed into the body with a transfusion, that person’s DNA will be present in your body for some days”

“That publication notes studies have shown that highly sensitive equipment can pick up donor DNA from blood transfusions up to a week after the procedure, but with particularly large transfusions, donor white blood cells were present for up to a year and a half afterward.”

Source: How Does A Blood Transfusion Change Your Body And DNA?

And in this 2017 study, the conclusion these scientists/doctors came to is that they are considering having physicians receive informed consent from the recipient before agreeing to the transfusion because of this possible personality change:

“In conclusion, our results showed that the majority of the subjects could conceive that RBC transfusion might transmit some of the donor’s traits. Furthermore, three subjects out of seven indicated that they had perceived changes in behaviors or values after their own RBC transfusion. Better understanding the frequency and importance of these perceived changes is important as physicians might have to include such information while getting informed consent for transfusion.”

Source: Perceived changes in behavior and values after a red blood cell transfusion

Organ transplants are no different, and have been documented for decades, according to the following pubmed article:

“Personality changes following heart transplantation, which have been reported for decades, include accounts of recipients acquiring the personality characteristics of their donor.”

“Four categories of personality changes are discussed in this article: (1) changes in preferences, (2) alterations in emotions/temperament, (3) modifications of identity, and (4) memories from the donor’s life. The acquisition of donor personality characteristics by recipients following heart transplantation is hypothesized to occur via the transfer of cellular memory, and four types of cellular memory are presented: (1) epigenetic memory, (2) DNA memory, (3) RNA memory, and (4) protein memory.”

Implications for the future of heart transplantation are explored including the importance of reexamining our current definition of death, studying how the transfer of memories might affect the integration of a donated heart, determining whether memories can be transferred via the transplantation of other organs, and investigating which types of information can be transferred via heart transplantation. Further research is recommended.”

Source: Personality changes following heart transplantation: The role of cellular memory

In another startling account, a recipient of a liver transplant was documented as having not only a complete change in blood type, but she acquired the immune system of her donor as well…

In a recent case of possible cell memory, Australian girl Demi-Lee Brennan’s blood group was changed after receiving a liver transplant from her donor, reports the AFP. Nine months after the initial transplant, doctors discovered that Brennan had changed blood types and she acquired the immune system of the donor due to the stem cells of her new liver transferring over to her bone marrow. “In effect she had had a bone marrow transplant. The majority of her immune system had also switched over to that of the donor,” Michael Stormon, a hepatologist who treated Brennan at the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, reported to the AFP.

Source: Can An Organ Transplant Change A Recipient’s Personality? Cell Memory Theory Affirms ‘Yes’

It amazes me that this foresight came from a 10 year-old child, who chose to end his life, rather than receive a potential change in personality and genetic make up.

And we have to wonder, what is the risk when it comes to this incredibly sensitive topic? What if our little one was sick, dying of leukemia? I can’t imagine how heartbreaking that would be, yet people go through these types of sorrow everyday. And on one hand I understand their heartfelt desperation at keeping their loved one alive, but again, at what cost?

Again, this is not to presume, or cast judgement, only to bring this topic to light in a different perspective. Perhaps we’re clinging on to life so hard, that we forget and/or ignore that this is only a temporary life/death. Even doctors/scientists/skeptics are having to come around to the mystery of the consciousness, and that there is more to this life than meets the eye.

“If you try to hang on to your life, you will lose it. But if you give up your life for my sake and for the sake of the Good News, you will save it.” – Mark 8:35

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay